►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council August 3, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
the
city
of
bellevue
virtual,
regular
city
council
meeting
for
monday
august
3rd
2020.
city
clerk,
are
you
ready
for
the
roll
call?
Yes.
C
B
B
A
Okay,
all
right,
so,
let's
see
we
have
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
Now
we're
gonna
have
to
amend
the
agenda
because
council
member
barksdale
requested
that
the
city
manager
provide
us
an
update
on
the
status
of
our
review
of
public
safety
practices.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
amend
the
agenda.
C
A
A
B
B
B
It
has
been
10
years
since
the
city
of
bellevue
identified
the
need
and
scale
for
a
comprehensive
aquatics
facility.
It
has
been
50
years
since
the
last
public
aquatic
center
was
built.
Bellevue's
population
is
nearly
two
and
a
half
times
what
it
was
in
1970
and
the
daily
population
grows
in
the
city
by
one
and
a
half
times
with
the
economic
impact
of
covid19
unfolding.
Our
challenges
are
great.
The
health
and
wellness
of
our
community
and
workforce
are
essential
to
rebuilding
our
economy.
B
Public
aquatic
centers
that
allow
access
for
everyone
all
ages,
abilities
backgrounds,
invest
in
our
future.
This
great
need
will
outlast
the
current
pandemic.
We
must
use
this
time
to
be
ready
for
when
our
economy
improves
the
city
and
regional
aquatic
studies
give
you
the
full
picture
to
understand
what
going
big
means
and
what
right-sized
regional
aquatic
center
entails.
B
Splash
forward
in
conjunction
with
the
isaac,
sports
group
has
conducted
a
feasibility
study,
analysis
and
report
on
aquatic
programs
and
provides
a
recommended
right-sized
aquatic
center
for
bellevue.
We
have
regularly
shared
our
findings
and
analysis
with
the
city
park
staff
and
the
arc
study
team,
as
we
collaborated
reviewed
and
compared
the
findings
of
the
city
study.
B
While
there
are
many
areas
of
agreement,
our
report
identifies
variances
and
where
further
analysis
is
needed,
our
goal
is
to
provide
the
added
detail
and
analysis
that
can
be
used
by
the
city,
potential
partners
and
stakeholders.
In
the
next
phase
we
have
listened
to
aquatic
stakeholders,
needs
hopes
and
dreams.
We
have
gathered
comparative
operational
data
from
local
and
national
facilities.
B
B
Next
steps
include
exploring
regional
support
and
partnerships
that
put
bellevue's
needs
first,
as
well
as
exploring
ways
that
splash
forward
can
continue
to
support
the
city's
efforts
with
our
collective
aquatics
reports.
We
now
have
the
framework
to
fully
engage
private
partners
and
refine
design
concepts.
The
remaining
contingency
funds
for
the
city
feasibility
study
and
the
king
county
aquatics
grants
program
to
be
considered
in
supporting
the
next
phase.
We
believe
that
private
partnerships
are
in
developing
the
full
range
of
sources,
for
funds
are
essential
steps
to
being
shovel
ready.
B
The
next
speaker
is
sandy
carlick,
and
the
communication
reads
as
follows:
my
name
is
sandy
carlick.
I
began
working
with
clients
at
the
bellevue
aquatic
center
nine
years
ago.
Then
in
2015
I
started
my
own
company
nurturing
water
therapies,
focusing
primarily
on
adaptive
swim.
Lessons
for
kids
with
special
needs
swimming
is
an
essential
life
skill
for
kids
on
the
autism
spectrum.
Children
with
autism
are
at
an
extremely
high
risk
of
drowning
compared
to
other
children.
B
B
Dr
lee,
a
professor
of
epidemiology
at
columbia,
university's
mailman
school
of
public
health
in
new
york
city
states
that
swimming
ability
for
kids
with
autism
is
an
imperative
survival.
Skill
children
diagnosed
with
autism,
usually
between
ages,
2
and
3,
need
swimming
lessons
as
soon
as
possible,
even
before
they
start
any
behavioral
therapy
speech
therapy
or
occupational
therapy.
B
Very
often,
kids,
with
auditory
sensitivities
find
that
being
immersed
in
water
mutes
sounds
and
provides
a
break.
The
temperature
and
consistent
pressure
of
the
water
against
the
skin
can
also
serve
as
a
source
of
constant,
easily
discernible
and
calming
sensation
that
is
extremely
comforting
to
the
nervous
system.
B
As
you
envision
a
new
public
aquatic
center
for
bellevue,
I
strongly
urge
you
to
keep
the
bellevue
aquatic
center
and
invest
in
it
as
a
warm
water
therapy
and
learn
to
swim
facility.
The
opportunity
to
have
two
warm
water
pools
in
bellevue,
one
at
the
bellevue
aquatic
center
and
one
at
a
new
aquatic
center
would
be
critical
to
meeting
the
current
and
future
demand
in
bellevue
for
warm
water
programming,
currently
with
very
limited
pools
available
in
washington
state.
The
demand
today
for
warm
water,
therapeutic
exercise
and
therapy
providers
is
quite
long.
B
B
Converting
today's
blue
lagoon
pool
into
a
warmer
program
pool
would
be
extremely
beneficial
to
be
able
to
provide
children
with
special
needs,
a
space
better
suited
for
them,
including
basic
water,
safety,
learn
to
swim
classes,
one-on-one
sessions
and
special
olympics
programs.
Having
a
true
program
pool
that
is
separate
from
both
the
warm
water
springs
therapy
pool
and
a
competitive
lap
pool
is
critical
for
this
population.
B
In
2020,
the
cdc
reported
that
approximately
one
in
54
children
in
the
us
is
diagnosed
with
an
autism
spectrum
disorder
according
to
2016
data
that
doesn't
account
for
the
large
number
of
children
with
anxiety,
physical,
sensory
communication
or
behavior
challenges
that
we
work
with
each
day
since
starting
my
business
five
years
ago.
The
number
of
special
needs,
kids
and
adults
I
serve
has
grown
tremendously
and
I
maintain
a
waiting
list
of
up
to
three
months
again.
The
email
goes
on
for
another
couple
of
paragraphs
and
is
located
in
the
counsel
at
inbox.
B
The
next
communication
is
from
james
rivard,
managing
principal
of
srm
development.
Dear
counsel,
this
letter
concerns
and
supports
srm's
2020
bellevue
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
proposal
affecting
property
owned
by
srm
adjacent
the
bellevue
way,
southeast
and
south
main
street.
This
property,
located
at
a
highly
visible
trafficked
and
increasingly
integral
intersection,
can
become
bellevue's
signature.
Southern
gateway
into
downtown
bellevue
srm
is
excited
to
work
with
the
city
to
transform
this
critical
intersection
by
providing
a
mixed-use
development
that
furthers
both
the
downtown
belgium
and
city
center.
B
South
goals,
with
your
support
srm,
can
bring
bellevue
much
needed
centrally
located
housing
and
quality
commercial
space,
all
supported
by
a
range
of
public
transportation
options.
Our
comprehensive
all
the
requirements
set
forth
in
the
bellevue
municipal
code,
and
we
ask
that
you
support
our
bellevue
community
and
likewise.
B
The
proposal
is
needed
to
allow
the
production
of
additional
housing
units
and
to
allow
for
coordinated
development
of
an
important
gateway
corner
location,
as
the
srm
property
only
recently
came
under
common
ownership,
with
the
parcel
to
the
north
at
the
corner
of
bellevue
way,
southeast
and
main
street.
The
uniform
zoning
designation
requested
in
the
proposal
would
allow
future
redevelopment
of
the
srm
property
to
advance
the
goals
stated
in
the
bellevue
comprehensive
plan
and
specifically
within
the
city
center
south
and
larger
downtown,
sub-areas
benefits
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
B
A
small
strip
mall
srm
envisions
a
dynamic
gateway
into
downtown
bellevue,
providing
ground-level
commercial
and
much-needed
residential
accommodations
tailored
for
the
city
center
south
of
sub
area
was
an
aesthetic
authentic,
too,
and
reflective
of
the
local
neighborhood,
as
the
srm
has
brought
several
properties
along
this
gateway
under
common
ownership,
the
city
has
a
unique
opportunity
to
have
a
gateway,
crafted
with
a
singular
vision
and
compatibility,
in
addition
to
being
consistent
with
the
downtown
bellevue
sub
area
and
city
center
south
goals.
The
proposal
provides
a
growing
bell
view
with
necessary
housing
via
a
mixed
use
development.
B
Indeed,
the
bellevue
comprehensive
plan
describes
city
center
south
as
an
emerging
mixed
use,
neighborhood
and
as
such
srm's
planned
development
would
help
enhance
the
mix
of
commercial
and
residential
units
that
have
come
to
define
the
local
neighborhood
again.
The
email
goes
on
for
a
couple
of
paragraphs.
It
is
located
in
the
council
ad
inbox.
B
B
Since
our
move,
we
have
made
the
newport
hills
neighborhood
our
home,
my
three
young
sons
attend
newport
heights
elementary
school
and
with
tremendous
support
from
the
school.
Their
transition
was
smooth
and
we
were
able
to
access
additional
resources
for
our
youngest,
who
is
on
the
autism
spectrum
having
access
to
an
aquatic
center
for
children
to
have
a
safe
environment,
to
learn
basic
water
safety,
swim.
B
There
is
a
great
need
for
providing
access
to
learn
to
swim
and
aquatics
programming
for
our
low
income
and
underserved
children
and
families
within
our
community.
We
know
this
community
better
than
most
and
know
firsthand
the
incredible
role
a
community
center
focused
on
health
and
wellness
plays
in
the
lives
of
those
we
serve.
B
B
Since
2014,
the
club
has
held
an
annual
eight-week,
swim
and
water
safety
program
at
semina,
through
a
grant
provided
by
the
michael
phelps
foundation,
serving
children
first
through
eighth
grade,
primarily
serving
low-income
youth
who
have
never
had
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
swim.
Lessons.
Many
of
the
participants
did
not
own
a
swimsuit
the
club.
Then
purchases
suits
for
youth
to
participate.
B
So
far,
240
youth
have
participated
in
the
program
with
90
percent
being
low
income.
Youth
at
the
beginning
of
covet,
19
bgcb
moved
quickly
to
meet
the
growing
needs
of
our
community,
closing
the
gaps
in
accessible
youth
care
and
academic
support.
While
schools
closed,
especially
for
children
of
essential
workers
and
those
most
vulnerable.
B
In
our
effort
to
combat
food
insecurity,
the
club
served
three
meals
a
day
serving
over
33
000
meals
from
march
through
june.
Bgcb
will
never
miss
an
opportunity
to
support
our
families.
We
are
confident
a
community
aquatic
center
can
bring
the
services
that
we
provide
and
ties
directly
with
the
larger
vision
of
our
founder,
joan,
crock,
envisioned
and
girls.
Clubs
of
bellevue
is
a
proven
partner
with
the
city
of
bellevue
operating.
B
B
B
Escalating
tensions
with
a
military
type
show
of
force
is
not
a
way
to
encourage
peaceful
protests,
and
I
don't
want
my
tax
dollars
to
be
used
to
that
end.
We
need
instead
to
reduce
police
budgets
and
redirect
funding
by
investing
in
black
community-led
education,
health
and
safety
programs,
examples
of
programs
to
invest
in
our
youth
and
our
schools
and
youth
homelessness
services,
solutions
to
the
opioid
crisis
and
non-police
responders
for
crisis
such
as
mental
health
response
teams
and
community
violence
prevention
programs.
B
The
final
communication
this
evening
is
written
by
larry
martin
good
evening
council.
I'm
writing
on
behalf
of
the
family
that
owns
the
safeguard
self
storage
property.
To
ask
you
to
include
their
proposal
in
the
2020
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
work
program,
as
recommended
unanimously
by
the
planning
commission.
B
B
Much
has
changed
since
the
land
use,
designation
and
zoning
of
the
site
were
last
considered
in
1988.,
the
cost
of
housing
has
increased
tremendously.
Public
awareness
of
the
environmental
impact
of
low-density
auto-oriented,
suburban
neighborhood
housing
have
increased
employment
near
the
site,
has
continued
to
grow.
These
factors
have
led
to
market
demand
for
multi-family
housing,
mixed
with
retail
and
other
neighborhoods
supportive
uses.
We
ask
that
you
help
meet
the
need
for
more
housing,
located
close
to
employment
and
services
by
advancing
the
safeguard
proposal
for
further
consideration
by
the
planning
commission,
and
that
ends
written
communications.
A
Okay,
thank
you
city
clerk.
Now
we're
on
to
the
report
of
the
city
manager,
mr
miyake.
E
E
D
D
D
D
E
Sorry,
sorry,
my
dog
was
barking
so
yeah.
This
is
the
item
that
was
just
added
on
to
the
agenda
for
this
evening
under
the
managed
report
and
its
status
of
the
council's
commitment
to
review
public
safety
practice
along
with
conducting
community
forums,
and
I
wanted
to
say,
as
we
head
into
the
august
recess,
I
wanted
to
provide
the
council
with
a
quick
update
on
the
community
engagement
process,
which
was
directed
by
the
council
on
public
safety
practices,
including
the
police
use
of
force
policies.
E
E
So
to
date,
the
staff
have
been
focused
on
two
key
areas:
to
fulfill
the
council's
pledge
to
look
at
police
practices,
which
again
include
the
use
of
force
policies.
These
are
conversations
with
the
community
stakeholders
and
to
identify
a
third
party
to
specifically
review
our
police
use
of
force
policies
in
terms
of
the
community
stakeholders.
I
know
council
members
as
well
staff
have
been
hearing
from
stakeholders
to
help
inform
the
public
safety
review
and
community
engagement
project
process,
and
these
are
con.
E
We
have
a
apparently
successful
consultant
which
has
been
and
we're
working
with
them
through
the
contracting
process
to
try
to
get
them
on
board
in
august,
once
we
receive
feedback
from
our
stakeholders
on
a
community
engagement
as
well
as
complete.
Our
conversations
without
the
outside
use
of
force.
Consultants
will
then
have
a
proposed
process
for
council
consideration
and
feedback.
E
When
you
return
from
your
break
in
early
september,
so
we
look
forward
to
these
discussions
throughout
the
month
with
some
of
the
community
members
and
look
forward
to
bring
this
back
to
the
council
with
a
proposed
process
in
a
very
early
september.
A
G
A
E
Sure
mayor,
thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
The
public
hearing
in
front
of
you
gives
the
public
the
opportunity
to
comment
on
the
release
of
a
multiple
sewer
easements
following
the
public
hearing
council
will
be
asked
to
take
action
on
the
proposed
resolution
to
release
these
easements.
E
These
are
very
similar
to
easements
that
you
have
front
have
been
in
front
of
you
before,
along
with
the
public
hearing
process.
So
joining
us
this
evening
is
aaron
mcdaniel,
a
real
property
manager
in
finance
and
asset
management
department.
To
give
you
a
quick
staff
report
before
you
open
up
the
public
hearing
ira.
H
All
right,
thank
you
and
good
evening,
mayor
council
members.
Our
staff
report
tonight
is
regarding
a
request
to
release
three
sewer
easements
and
a
portion
of
a
fourth
sewer
easement,
which
are
located
at
7009
and
7011
ripley
lane
southeast
next
slide.
Please,
the
easements
are
located
on
the
property
shown
here
in
purple,
which
is
in
unincorporated
king
county,
near
the
city
limits
of
renton.
It's
actually
a
renton
address
right
along
lake
washington
next
slide.
H
For
example,
the
easement
that
is
running
east
to
west
in
red
here
was
drawn
as
lying
underneath
their
house,
but
the
facilities
that
the
easement
was
intended
to
cover
are
located
several
feet
to
the
south
on
the
next
property
at
7011
ripley
lane.
These
circumstances
resulted
from
what
appears
to
be
a
decades
old
surveying
issue
where
the
homes
and
the
fences
were
all
built
several
feet
across
their
respective
property
lines.
H
All
the
parties
continue
to
operate
as
if
the
easements
were
located
where
the
sewers
sewer
facilities
were
located.
So
our
intention
now
is
to
correct
and
clarify
the
city's
easements.
We've
worked
with
both
property
owners
and
they
have
signed
new
easements
that
are
shown
here
in
green
and
they've,
been
surveyed
by
the
city
to
make
sure
that
they
match
the
location
of
the
sewer
facilities.
H
A
Okay,
thank
you,
and
we
can.
We
can
ask
questions
after
as
well,
but
I
guess
I'll
just
go
through
and
see
if
anybody
has
questions.
Councilmember
barksdale.
A
A
B
Mayor
there
are
no
speakers
signed
up
for
the
public
hearing
this
evening
and
therefore
I
would
like
to
ask:
is
there
anyone
connected
to
this
meeting
that
would
like
to
make
comment?
Who
was
unable
to
pre-register
to
speak?
If
you
are
connected
with
a
computer,
please
use
the
raise
hand
function.
If
you
are
connected
with
a
telephone,
please
use
star
nine
and
I
will
pause
for
raised
hands.
A
D
A
E
Er
sure
the
study
session
item
in
front
of
you
tonight
is
on
the
2020
aquatic
center
feasibility
study,
update
and
just
by
way,
background
council
approved
as
part
of
the
2019-2020
budget,
the
execution
and
completion
of
an
aquatic
center
feasibility
study.
Tonight
staff
will
be
presenting
the
council
with
the
results
of
the
study
and
after
the
presentation
we
are
seeking
any
direction
the
council
might
want
to
fight
staff
for
afterwards.
E
So
with
that
joining
us
this
evening,
michael
shiashaki,
the
director
of
our
parks
and
community
services
department,
as
well
as
his
staff,
came
cougar
project
manager,
and
I
believe
we
have
some
additional
guests
with
us.
This
night,
susan
popolardo,
the
board
president
of
splash,
as
well
as
emily
wheeler
on
listening
in
as
part
of
the
principal
of
arc.
Architects
consultant
both
are
not
part
of
the
presentation,
but
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
their
their
presence
here.
So
with
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
michael.
M
M
M
M
First,
I
will
briefly
cover
how
we've
arrived
at,
where
we
are
today.
Much
of
the
investment
in
pools
in
our
region
goes
back
to
the
1960s
and
the
king
county
forward.
Thrust
bond
16
pools
were
built
across
the
region
as
a
part
of
forward
thrust,
including
bellevue's
old
pool
of
the
pools
that
are
still
operating.
The
remaining
ones
are
approaching
the
end
of
their
typical
lifespans.
M
So
then,
fast
forwarding
to
2006
a
local
nonprofit
organization
called
splash,
which
stands
for
swimming
pools
for
leisure,
active
sports
and
health
was
established
to
promote
aquatics
on
the
east
side.
M
So
in
2008
and
2009,
the
city
council
funded
a
study
and
provided
direction
to
look
at
the
feasibility
of
a
new
aquatic
center
in
the
city
and
that
work
was
completed
in
2009.
M
Then
in
2017
there
was
a
new
regional
interest
and
this
included
the
the
formation
of
splash
forward,
and
this
group
once
again
was
advocating
for
aquatics
needs
on
the
east
side.
And
you
know
this
group
has
really
been
so
instrumental
in
moving
the
conversation
forward
and
they've
really
been
a
great
partner
on
this
effort.
M
So
then
in
2018
king
county
initiated
a
regional
aquatics
report
that
included
bellevue
redmond
kirkland
and
the
county
and
the
city
council
at
that
time,
authorized
a
memorandum
of
understanding
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
a
regional
approach
to
developing
aquatics
aquatics
facilities.
On
the
east
side,
the
study
concluded
that
there
were
major
needs
for
aquatics
facilities
on
the
east
side,
the
need
for
collaboration
and
coordination
of
a
regional
solution
and
suggested
the
need
for
one
regional
pool
or
center
and
two
to
three
smaller
community
or
neighborhood
pools
or
centers.
M
Then,
in
2019,
as
directed
by
the
city
council
staff,
initiated
an
update
to
the
aquatics
feasibility
study.
In
april
of
that
year,
staff
came
to
the
city
council
to
seek
your
support
on
the
overall
work
plan
and
scope
of
the
study
and
per
the
feedback
to
staff
from
the
council.
That
evening
it's
now
referred
to
as
the
go
big
or
go
home
discussion.
M
Then,
in
october
of
last
year,
staff
came
back,
and
this
was
about
at
the
70
percent
completion
stage
of
the
study
and
offered
kind
of
a
preliminary
review
of
the
three
options
that
were
under
study
and
that
kind
of
that
brings
us
up
to
today
and
the
final
feasibility
study
update
and
with
that
I
will
pass
the
mic
to
ken
cragar
for
the
next
portion
of
the
presentation.
N
Next
slide,
please
and
next
slide,
and
thank
you
very
much
and
good
evening.
So,
while
odell
poole
has
served
more
than
three
and
a
half
million
participants
in
programs
and
services,
it's
no
longer
able
to
fully
meet
our
current
or
future
demand
for
community
aquatic
needs.
In
the
city
of
over
140
000
residents,
bellevue
school
district
meets
are
often
held
outside
of
the
city
limits,
and
many
practices
are
held
in
private
swim
clubs.
N
N
So
this
feasibility
update
is
meant
to
assist
the
city
in
understanding
the
factors
that
an
undertaking
of
this
size
and
scope
will
take.
Its
purpose
is
to
lay
the
foundation
to
assist
the
council
in
reaching
a
decision
how
bellevue
can
participate
in
meeting
the
increasing
aquatic
needs
of
our
community.
N
N
In
order
to
ground
this
study,
we
have
developed
three
program
options
to
be
able
to
compare
and
evaluate
the
opportunities
these
were
based
on
the
previous
build
your
own
solution.
In
the
last
presentation,
we
presented
the
council
in
each
option,
costs
are
in
today's
dollars
and
are
structured
in
a
way
that
the
city
both
builds
and
operates
the
state-of-the-art
facility.
N
It
contains
a
standard,
50
meter,
competition
pool
with
one
end
being
the
deep
water
area
for
diving
and
other
water
uses
programming
will
occur
in
the
six
lane
program,
pool
and
there's
a
separate
leisure
and
recreational
pool
in
this
option.
All
the
wellness
and
therapy
programs
will
remain
at
odell
next
slide.
Please.
N
As
a
result,
we're
looking
at
a
94
000
square
foot
facility
with
construction
costs
in
the
range
of
70
million
dollars,
while
this
option
would
greatly
increase
the
city's
ability
in
meeting
current
and
future
needs,
our
cost
recovery
model
is
suggesting
an
approximate
72
percent
in
comparison
that
current
oil
facility
operates
at
an
astonishing
59
percent,
given
its
age
and
size
next
slide.
Please.
N
For
our
option,
two
we
developed
it
to
hold
conference
and
district
meets,
so
this
one
has
the
main
competition
pool
now
being
stretched
to
66
meters,
which
allows
both
the
50
meter,
lane
configuration
and
diving
or
artistic
swimming
to
occur.
At
the
same
time,
we've
also
increased
the
capacity
and
size
of
both
the
program
pool
and
the
legion
recreation
pool
to
serve
more
opportunities
to
the
community.
N
With
this
option,
we've
increased
the
building
size
to
approximately
121
000
square
feet
and
construction
costs
for
almost
90
million
dollars.
Think
about
the
average
size
of
a
typical
costco
building.
That's
what
we're
looking
at
sitting
at
a
yearly
operating
cost
of
nearly
1
million
dollars.
The
cost
recovery
crisis
to
above
80
percent,
due
to
both
the
increased
programming
capacity
and
by
transitioning
costs
from
odols
maintenance
into
the
new
center
next
slide.
N
N
N
Next
slide,
please,
while
option
three
is
the
largest
facility
at
162
000
square
feet.
The
center
has
the
greatest
amount
of
flexibility
and
increased
options
for
both
aquatic
and
dry
side
amenities,
capital
construction
costs
are
in
the
110
million
range
and
due
to
the
increased
capacity,
the
coast
recovery
remains
high.
At
a
77
percent
mark.
N
N
N
A
typical
15
to
20
minute
drivable
service
area
is
not
uncommon
for
a
significant
aquatic
facility
and
with
the
significant
identified
aquatic
needs
in
the
region.
A
center
of
this
scope
will
draw
interest
beyond
bellevue
and
include
sammamish
issaquah,
renton,
kirkland
and
redmond,
just
to
name
a
few.
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
bring
the
final
aquatics
feasibility
study
back
to
you.
This
groundwork
helps
pave
the
way
for
future
success
in
building
and
operating
a
new
aquatic
center
in
bellevue.
At
the
point,
the
project
moves
forward.
This
study
will
provide
the
foundational
jumping
off
point
for
future
planning
and
design
of
such
a
facility.
M
J
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
presentation.
I've
been
long
awaiting
this
report,
so
we
I
also
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we're
still
at
the
point
where
the
features
of
options,
one
two
and
three
are
plug
and
play.
If
you
will,
if
we
want
a
little
bit
of
this
and
a
little
bit
of
that,
it's
we're
still
well
early
enough
in
the
process
to
define
that
is
that
correct.
J
Okay,
great
so,
as
everyone
knows,
I
am
a
huge
supporter
of
this
idea
when
we
started
this
feasibility
study
to
today.
Things
have
changed
quite
a
lot
with
covet
and
the
impact
on
governmental
budgets.
However,
I
would
still
like
to
keep
moving
forward.
J
I'm
not
saying
we're
ready
to
pull
the
trigger
and
fund
it
100
today,
but
I
do
want
to
keep
the
momentum,
because
when
I
first
joined
the
council
in
2009,
we
had
just
had
the
first
splash
feasibility
study
and
then
that
recession
got
pretty
bad
and
it
ended
up
stuck
on
a
shelf,
and
I
don't
want
that
to
happen
to
this
swimming
and
water
availability
is
far
too
important,
with
drowning
being
the
number
one
cause
of
death
of
children
under
five
and
number
two
accidental
cause
of
death
for
children.
Five
to
fourteen.
J
This
is
a
huge
issue
and
the
learn
to
swim,
swim
lesson
two
year.
Wait
at
bellevue
aquatic
center
is
just
not
good
for
our
region.
It
is
a
life,
health
and
public
health
issue
really
with
us
being
between
two
lakes.
Learning
to
swim
is
really
a
matter
of
life
and
death,
as
well
as
also
servicing
our
youth,
our
special
needs
population
and
all
of
the
adults
from
you
know,
18
to
102..
J
Everyone
can
swim
and
it's
a
great
activity
and
one
that
I
really
think
a
world-class
city
like
bellevue
should
provide.
So
with
that
said,
I
wanted
to
recommend
that
we
or
obviously
I'm
speaking
first.
So
what
I
think
we
should
do
is
give
direction
to
staff
tonight
to
continue
to
down
the
site
selection
process.
J
So
this
question
is
for
either
ken
or
michael
is.
If
we
give
direction
tonight
to
continue
down
the
path
as
I've
laid
out
continue
on
site
selection
bring
back
a
budget
proposal,
for
you
know,
funding,
structure,
concept
or
design
study,
because
I
want
to
keep
this
moving
forward,
while
our
economy,
normalizes
and
hopefully
rebounds,
and
if
there's
federal
and
state
grant
money
out
there.
I'd
like
us
to
be
at
a
place
where
we
can
really
go
after
that
is.
Is
that
the
right
direction,
as
far
as
where
we
are
today.
M
I
would
say
those
are
the
kind
of
the
logical
next
steps
we
do
need
to
kind
of
hone
down
the
list
of
potential
sites
and
once
again
talk
talk
with
bellevue
college
again
so
yeah,
I
think
those
I
I
think
your
ideas
would
forward
this
and
keep
the
momentum
going.
J
Great,
thank
you.
I'm
whenev
everyone's
had
a
chance
to
talk.
I'd
love
the
opportunity
to
make
that
motion,
and
this
feels
like
a
different
meeting
than
the
go
bigger
go
home
moment,
but
we
don't
want
to
lose
that
because
I
think
we're
all
very
excited
and
then
I'll
just
make
one
final
comment
and
that's
that
the
plug
and
play
I
really
like
option
three,
but
if
we
wanted
to
scale
it
down
a
little
bit,
the
splash
forward
preferred
alternative.
I
think,
makes
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
J
It
gives
us
everything
we
want
and
need
at
a
little
bit
scaled
down
price
and
scale
so
I'll
just
put
a
pin
in
it
there
and
let
the
next
person
speak.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
G
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
report.
I
think
it's
really
important
to
understand
all
of
these
nuances
and
parts
and
pieces.
You
know
it's
undeniable,
that
we
have
a
demand
that
exceeds
the
availability
for
our
aquatic
services
and
that
the
aquatic
center
and
moving
forward
would
serve
this
really
important
aquatic
need
in
bellevue
and
the
broader
community.
G
My
questions,
because
we
are
now
in
covid,
have
to
do
with
really
understanding
how
this
fits
in
with
our
budget
and
the
financing
options.
So
you
mentioned
that
the
bellevue
school
district
was
committed
on
already
on
board
and
also
talked
about
some
of
the
other
cities
like
redmond
and
kirkland.
G
N
From
discussions
that
we've
held,
they
are
definitely
interested
in
participating
in
a
regional.
They
realize
that
there's
a
regional
need
how
it's
divided
or
developed
as
far
as
one
big,
complex
and
smaller
satellite
aquatic
centers.
That
still
needs
to
be
worked
out,
but
they
do
have
an
interest
and
have
expressed
an
interest,
and
this
is
pre-covered
discussions
about
pursuing
this
as
an
approach
and.
A
G
Go
ahead
and
are
they
looking
at
them
bringing
money
to
the
table?
I
saw
that
there
was
a
comment
about
the
king
county
aquatic
program,
funds
of
5
million.
That's
a
potential,
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
how
to
put
this
in
perspective
with
the
other
budget
needs
that
we're
going
to
have
you
know
earlier,
we
had
heard
that
we
were
talking
about
25
percent
of
our
capital
budget
going
to
the
general
fund,
because
we
had
concerns.
M
There
there
is
funding
remaining
in
the
project
budget
that
we
can
do
a
staff
driven
process
work
with
the
public
as
we
try
to
hone
down
those
options.
So
there
is,
there
is
money
remaining
in
the
budget
that
would
allow
that
work
to
move
forward.
A
C
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
mayor,
first
of
all,
michael
and
ken,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
great
presentation
and
getting
us
up
to
speed
on
all
the
hard
work
that
you've
put
into
this
study
to
date
completely
agree
with
councilmember
robertson
and
that
you
know
really
hate
to
lose
any
momentum.
Here.
We
put
so
much
effort
into
this
process
thus
far
and
have
some
just
great
potential
partnerships,
as
well
as
the
important
partnership
we
have
with
splash
ford.
C
We
might
not
have
that
if
this
gets
delayed
again
for
10
plus
years,
because
we
put
it
on
a
shelf-
and
you
know
bellevue
absolutely-
is
that
world-class
city
that
deserves
a
world
world-class
aquatic
center.
Certainly,
I
think,
michael.
I
really
like
your
suggestion
of
of
a
staff
driven
analysis
given
where
we
are
with
with
covid,
with
the
pandemic,
with
the
budget
crunch
that
that
we're
in
versus
putting
a
lot
of
additional
dollars.
Looking
at
the
the
site
analysis.
C
However,
in
your
estimation,
right
now
are
all
four
of
those,
and
you
might
not
be
able
to
answer
that
at
this
point
yet,
but
are
all
four
still
possibilities,
or
should
we
look
at
even
cutting
that
list
down
before
we
even
have
that
staff
driven
process
of
site
analysis.
M
Well,
you
know,
I
think
we
really
one
of
the
first
steps
is
to
check
back
with
our
colleagues
at
bellevue
college
to
see
if
they're,
if
they're
interested
in
continuing
to
partner
or
not
the
other
two
sites,
one
at
mary,
moore
and
one
at
airfield
park.
You
know
we
probably
control
our
destiny.
A
little
bit
more
there.
Okay,
I'm
told
on
the
lincoln
center
site
that
just
due
to
the
constraints
of
the
size
that
it,
it
probably
is
the
most
well,
it
is
the
ones
that
remain
it's.
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
would
I
would
agree
and
then
on
those
potential
partners,
is
the
appetite
still
there
for
all
those
potential
partners
that
that
you
listed
off.
I
mean
that
might
require
some
additional
work,
but
I'm
just
curious
prior
to
this
presentation
tonight.
As
far
as
you
know,
is
there
appetite
still
as
strong
as
before.
N
I
would
say
that
everybody
is
still
interested
to
what
extent
with
pre-covid,
nike
or
19.
Now
I
don't
know
how
strong,
but
I
do
know
that
splash
ford
has
been
reaching
out
to
a
lot
of
potential
partners
and
there
are
a
lot
of
people
out
there
that
are
very
interested
in
still
helping
out
and
pursuing
this
as
a
goal.
K
I
thought
she
did
it
all
right,
I'm
still
at
the,
as
I
said
before
last
time,
go
big
or
go
home
either
two
or
three,
and
I
appreciate
councilmember
robertson's
robertson's.
You
know,
review
and
and
survey
on
this
and
chen
I've
been
talking
about
this
for
a
long
time.
I
was
engaged
with
this
from
the
school
district
on
this
and
with
the
original
splash,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
that
happened
along
the
way
is
that
it
just
lost
momentum.
K
K
Looking
at
these
and
getting
the
community
involved
and
yes,
I
think
it
is
a
regional
facility,
it's
centered
in
bellevue,
but
it's
a
regional
facility
and
I
think
we
will
have
regional
cooperation
and
involvement
in
this,
and
there
are
some
other
regional
things
going
on
one
group
talking
to
bothell
about
something
along
these
lines.
So
I
I
think
we
should
continue.
Probably
I
would
just
take
you
know
lincoln
center
out,
I
mean
first
place.
You
have
to
have
it
somewhere
where
people
can
get
to
it.
K
So
it's
convenient
and
that's
just
too
crammed
in,
and
I
think
it's
just.
It
was
a
nice
idea,
but
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
work
which
actually
cuts
down
some
of
the
work
we
would
have
to
do
in
looking
at
the
sites
I
mean
marymore
is
technically
not
in
bellevue,
but
it's
close
enough
I'd
like
to
see
it
a
little
closer
to
to
I-90
frankly,
but
I
think
we
should
go
forward.
K
I
I
appreciate
the
response
and
I
think
staff
will
do
it
in
a
very
cost,
effective
manner
and
one
of
the
things
we
have
to
keep
in
mind.
This
is
just
not
not
about
the
competitive
aspect
of
this.
This
is
about.
This
is
really
about
health.
This
is
about
the
community
and
and
very
great
assets
that
can
come
to
the
community,
including
you
know,
tax
resources,
but
income,
but
keep
that
in
mind.
K
This
is
this
is
something
for
the
well-being
and
the
of
and
of
the
whole
city
and
the
region,
and
it
should
be
in
bellevue.
Bellevue
should
have
one.
There
are
a
lot
of
cities
around
this
country
that
have
really
great
facilities
and
are
not
as
great
as
city
as
bellevue.
We
can
do
it,
so
I
think
the
right
move
is
to
go
along
really
look
at
this
very
carefully
and
particularly
talk
with
talk
with
gary
locke,
about
moving
things
with
the
bellevue
college
and
getting
some
other
people
involved.
K
Who
can
take
the
story
and
really
make
this
something
that
will
help
actually
help
us
get
out
of
the
the
doldrums
of
covet,
so
I'm
I'm
really
excited
about
it,
and
I
I
appreciate
going
forward
we're
not
talking
about
real
money
right
now.
That's
down
the
road,
but
again,
I
think
this
is
one
of
those
moments
where
it
really
is
accurate.
We
either
go
big
or
we
go
home.
L
Thank
you.
Well,
thanks
to
the
staff
for
bringing
this
report
to
us,
did
a
good
job,
a
lot
of
information
there
and
well.
Third
time
is
the
charm.
I
remember
when
I
first
got
the
console.
28
years
ago
we
were
talking
about
aquatic
center.
We
have
a
chris
heaton,
that's
her
name.
She
is
a
council
member
who
was
very
very
supportive.
L
I
mean
you
know
passionate
about
this
topic,
but,
as
you
see
the
history,
yeah
the
economy
and
so
on,
it
was
the
real
couple
of
times,
but
this
is
the
third
time,
and
I
think
that
we
are
looking
at
a
in
fact
indeed
truly
a
regional
facility,
but
it
requires
spell
view
leadership.
L
L
It
is
a
very
good
point
and
I
think
they
are
willing
and
that
they
have
committed
and
that's
the
reason
why
I
believe
that
I
always
agree
with
councilman
robertson.
We
don't
want
to
lose
momentum,
but,
however,
we
are
facing
a
covert
19..
This
is
something
nobody
anticipated
as
we
talked
before
you
know
last
time
it
was
not.
They
stopped
the
momentum
because
of
the
economy
and,
unfortunately,
we're
facing
the
same
thing.
L
However,
the
difference
that
we
have
a
great
great
study,
good
staff
staff
and
great
partners-
and
I
just
mentioned
splash
forward-
is
a
great
partner
and
there
are
other
regional
partnerships
that
we
also
need
to
be
talking
to
and
looking
at
I
think
again,
the
latest
report
indicated
there's
a
lot
of
good
conversation.
A
lot
of
work.
That's
been
done,
so
I
think
we
are
in
a
good
place.
So
my
thought
is
that
we
don't
need
to
lose
momentum.
L
If
we,
the
city
council,
I
think
we're
ready
to
say
what,
because
of
the
study
we
just
received,
we
know
what
kind
of
facility
we
want.
I
think
we
made
we
need
to
make
that
decision
it's
between
two
or
three
and
two
or
three.
It's
not
that
much
different,
but
I
think
councilman
robertson
mentioned
she
prefers
three.
Maybe
some
other
people
prefer
two,
but
we
don't
really
know
what
it
is,
because
it
depends
on
the
site.
We
don't
know
what
the
site
is.
You
know
we
just
looked
at
it.
L
L
Momentum
doesn't
mean
that
we
have
to
stop
okay,
so
I
feel
that
with
the
partnership
with
splash
forward
and
they're
willing
to
go
out
there,
they're
willing
to
help
us
to
raise
money
if
it's
necessary
to
talk
our
partners
to
other
folks,
and
some
of
them
doesn't
really
need
too
much
money
because
staff
is
already
doing
it.
We
have
ongoing
relationship
with
the
partners
and
us
can
continue
to
to
just
to
look
forward.
So
my
thought
is
the
city
council.
L
If
we
can
make
some
decisions
today
or
soon,
we
have
to
have
a
public
hearing.
Obviously,
but
we
can
say
we
want
to
go
forward
and
this
is
our
choices
between
two
or
three
or
something
in
between,
and
then
let's
go
forward
and
find
money
where
there
may
be.
I
don't
think
the
city
council
at
this
moment
the
city
can
say
that
quickly.
Well,
we
have
money
to
spend
because
when
we
know
people
under
discover
19,
are
they
very
this
desperate
yeah?
L
L
A
Okay,
you'll
get
another
chance
to
talk.
Councilmember
barksdale.
I
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
and
thanks
to
staff
for
bringing
this
to
the
to
us
and
really
great
job
on
the
presentation
just
to
build
on
first
on
a
couple
comments
that
have
already
been
made
by
other
council
members
good
to
hear
that
the
funding
is
already
accounted
for
in
the
project
budget.
I
I
would
building
on
a
council
member
lee's
statement
have
difficulty
with
putting
public
or
city
financing
toward
a
project
when
we
do
have
people
who
are
struggling
to
pay,
rent
and
and
are
experiencing
food
insecurity.
So
the
more
that
we
could
put
that
priority
on
finding
funds
outside
of
city
funding.
That
would
be
great
in
terms
of
equity.
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
or
just
really
just
in
general,
how
have
you
accounted
for
equity?
I
N
The
city
does
have
a
program
in
place
for
providing
including
the
aquatics
programming
to
low-income
people
in
need,
and
I'm
sure
we
would
continue
that.
We're
looking
at
a
whole
range
of
options
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
people
from
all
ages
abilities
can
and
will
be
able
to
successfully
use
the
center.
I
Okay-
I
just
I
just
want
to-
I
guess,
say
I
agree
with
making
sure
that
it's
equitable
in
terms
of
age
and
ability.
I
just
want
to
also
encourage
us
to
focus
on
providing
access
to
low-income,
youth
and
families
and
also,
as
we
think,
about
a
site
location,
also
take
equity
into
consideration
and
make
sure
that
it's
a
location
that
is
equitably
accessible
to
that
same
population
of
low-income
youth
and
families.
Thank
you.
M
A
Well,
thank
you,
I
feel,
like
you
know,
we
we
talk
about
perhaps
pushing
this
out
for
more
of
a
community
process.
It
feels
like
we've
been
going
on
with
a
community
process
for
12
years,
and
I
just
I
feel
like
this
is
a
benefit
to
the
to
the
community.
It's
a
community
asset
and
if
it's,
if
it's
serving
everybody
in
the
community,
I'm
anxious
to
to
move
this
forward,
and
I
would
really
love
to
see
staff
narrow
down
the
choices
without
spending
additional
money.
A
You
know
if
we
were
to
try
to
sight
it
there
there's
a
ton
of
remediation
that
has
to
go
on
because
of
the
fact
that
that
that
was
a
dump
for
a
while
and
so
there's
there's
a
lot
of
remediation,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
I
I
think
that
I
hear
the
council
say
you
know,
option
two
or
three
that
we're
and
and
council
can
specify
that
when
we
come
down
to
our
final
comments
here,
but
that's
what
I'm
hearing
and
it
sounds
like
lincoln
center
is
out.
A
My
guess
is
airfield
park
is
out,
but
of
course
you
you
should
verify
that
for
me,
and
so
maybe
we're
down
to
bellevue
college
and
marymore
and
bellevue
college.
We
now
need
to
have
a
conversation
and
see
if
there's
still
a
partner
with
us
or
not,
and
actually
that
brings
up
a
question.
It
seemed
like
option.
Three
was
more
for
the
bellevue
college
site.
N
N
Ken
go
ahead
I'll,
say
on
the
option:
three:
a
lot
of
the
dry
side.
Portions
of
that
were
really
what
the
bellevue
college
was
looking
at.
We
were
trying
to
bookmark
from
that.
You
know
that
plug
and
play
option
we
had
before
of
giving
the
book
ins
to
the
programs,
and
so
we
could
see
how
much
flexibility
and
how
much
impact
different
pool
options
of
different
sizes
really
matters
and
makes
the
difference
into
the
feasibility.
A
Narrowed
down
the
site,
selection
and
the
options
without
spending
a
lot
of
money,
and
then
we
could
talk
about
what
the
next
steps
would
be.
So
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
go
around
again,
starting
with
council
robertson
and
let
her
go
and
we'll
go
in
in
order
of
robertson's
on
you
and
how
stokes
lee
barksdale
and
then
me,
council,
member
robertson,.
J
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
would
like
a
chance
to
make
a
motion
to
give
direction,
but
since
we're
going
around
again,
I
won't
do
it
now
until
everyone's
spoken.
J
I
think
it's
a
good
conversation,
so
I'll
just
give
a
overview
of
where
I
am
on
the
actual
project,
and
that
is,
as
I
said,
either
option
three
or
the
splash
preferred
option
which
scales
down
some
of
the
amenities-
and
I
agree
with
mayor
robinson
that
if
it's
not
on
the
campus
of
bellevue
college,
we
may
not
need
as
much
dry
side
amenities
and
whatnot
but-
and
I
also
do
support
site
selection
moving
forward
as
well
as,
if
there's
other
sites
that
are
in
bellevue,
that
we
would
work
for
this.
J
Those
should
be
brought
to
us,
but
I
do
think
we
can
take
lincoln
center
off
it's
just
too
small,
but
I
wouldn't
dismiss
airfield
park.
I
think
airfield
park.
If
we
can't
go
to
bellevue
college,
is
the
best
location
number
one?
It's
the
largest
number
two,
it's
actually
in
bellevue
number
three.
We
don't
actually
have
to
buy
it.
The
marymore
park-
one
we
own,
but
we
would
have
to
buy
it
because
it's
utility
property
and
so
we'd
have
to
pay
fair
market
value
for
it.
J
So
the
idea
of
not
having
to
have
an
outlay
of
cash
for
property
is
completely
undermined
with
the
barrymore
park,
but
but
we
need
to
do
more
work
on
all
of
this
question
for
staff
the
airfield
park
remediation
for
the
landfill.
I
know
we've
done
some
of
it,
no
matter
what
happens
with
that
piece
of
property,
whether
it's
developed
as
an
aquatic
center
or
if
it's
developed
as
another
park
like
the
what's
under
the
master
plan,
it
has
to
be
remediated
right.
M
You
know
and
some
of
that
remediation
goes
on
today.
I
think
the
part
that
needs
to
be
full
more
fully
investigated
is
actually
putting
a
building
on
a
portion
of
the
landfill
or
not,
or
you
know
what
other
methods
there
might
be
to
construct
a
building
out
there.
I
think
that's
the
piece
that
hasn't
been
fully
looked
at.
J
Oh
okay,
well
good!
Well,
hopefully
we
can
look
at
that,
because
it
seems
to
me
that
bellevue
college
was
this
council's
number
one
choice
when
we
talked
about
this
before,
but
I'm
really
not
interested
in
building
a
regional
aquatic
center
that
is
not
inside
bellevue
city
limits.
I
would
be
pretty
interested
in
a
regional
approach
where
we
had
satellite
centers
in
other
cities
and
a
regional
one
here,
but
I'm
just
not
really
interested
in
building
an
aquatic
center.
That's
not
in
bellevue
as
the
main
cornerstone.
J
Personally,
I
don't
think
it
would
serve
as
many
needs
it
has
to
be
between
520
and
I-90
in
order
to
serve
service
the
most
people.
Anyway,
I
will
let
other
people
speak
but
and,
like
I
said,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
for
the
next
steps
after
we've
all
gone
around
again.
Thank
you.
A
G
Yes,
thank
you.
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
we
still
have
project
budget
to
do
the
site
assessment,
some
more,
and
I
agree
that
we
need
to
keep
the
momentum
going,
I'm
so
blessed
that
we
have
splash
forward
as
our
key
partner
and
that
their
study
and
the
cities
is
in
alignment.
So
those,
I
think
are
always
really
good
things.
G
G
What
I
didn't
hear
any
discussion
about
is
making
sure
that,
as
we
look
at
the
cost
that
we
are
making
sure
that
environmental
stewardship
elements
are
going
to
be
part
of
this
facility,
because
we
don't
build
a
lot
of
new
facilities
in
bellevue,
and
so
when
we
do.
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
it
from
our
environmental
stewardship
as
well
for
new
buildings.
M
G
Okay,
well
so
we
do
have
the
roms
on
capital
cost
and
so
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
accounting
for
that
element
within
even
the
rough
order
of
magnitude.
Thank
you.
C
You
mayor
yeah
I'll
just
echo
a
lot
of
what's
been
said
already,
but
yeah,
I
think,
taking
lincoln
center
off
the
table
at
this
point
makes
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I'm
very
interested
in
moving
forward
with
number
two
and
with
number
three
options.
I
think
we
should
keep
both
of
those
on
the
table.
I
mean
option.
One
is,
is
an
option,
but
you
know,
as
councilmember
stoke
says
you
know
and
as
michael
just
pointed
out,
it's
so
early
in
this
process.
C
Still
you
know
I
would
hate
to
just
go
with
the
you
know
the
the
you
know
that
first
option,
because
we
didn't
think
we
could
do
two
or
three.
So
I
certainly
would
like
to
keep
those
two
options
open,
because
I
do
think
it's
important
if
we're
going
to
do
this
and
we
have
the
momentum
to
do
it
and
we're
not
putting
any
money
towards
it
right
now,
we're
still
in
this
study
and
site
selection
process.
C
I
just
think
it's
way
too
early
to
you
know,
take
the
the
the
bigger
options
off
off
the
table
so
and
really
like
the
approach
really
like
as
a
staff
driven.
I
appreciate
council
member
lee's
comments
about
you
know
the
the
time
that
we're
in
right
now,
I
think,
that's
really
important
and
for
the
public
to
understand
that
you
know
very
little
dollars
will
go
towards
us
other
than
the
dollars
that
have
already
been
put
towards
this
study
previously.
C
But
this
will
be
staff
driven
and
no
outside
resources
will
be
needed
to
continue
to
drive
this
process
and
and
again
I
it's
been
mentioned
numerous
times,
but
we
are
so
lucky
to
have
splash
ford
as
a
partner
in
this
you
know,
I
think,
a
lot.
C
Be
quite
envious
to
have
a
partner
like
splash
ford
that
can
do
so
much
of
the
heavy
lifting
and
the
due
diligence
and
work
hand
in
hand
with
our
with
our
city
staff.
So
really
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
that
they're
doing,
and
you
know-
and
I
appreciate
council
member
robertson
keeping
this
going
as
well.
So
I'm
ready
to
move
forward
on
that
motion
when
it
becomes
available
and
thank
you.
K
Well,
I
think
it's
pretty
much
been
said.
I
I
think
we
have
to
keep
in
mind
that
we're
yes,
we're
aware
of
the
cost
and
money
and
all
things
at
this
time.
But
again
this
is
the
goal.
K
Is
we're
going
to
get
out
of
this
cova
thing
we're
going
to
go
forward
and
we
need
to
be
ready
for
this
to
go
forward,
because
this
is
a
big
piece
that
can
help
us
actually
from
for
a
city
standpoint
at
a
a
personal
standpoint
or
a
citizen
standpoint
have
something
that
will
will
show
great
movement,
and
it's,
and
also
it's
like
a
lot
of
other
projects.
We've
had
downtown
park
was
one
of
those
that
could
have
been
yeah
and
it
was.
K
They
went
big,
the
city
hall,
the
city
hall,
could
been
yeah,
you
know
and
there's
a
lot
of
fight
on
that.
We've
had
numbers
of
those
things
and
we
have
a
history
in
bellevue
and
a
lot
of
big
areas
of
of
going
big
and
saying
we're
bellevue.
We
can
do
something
that
really
has
benefits
and
I
think
the
two
modified
with
three.
I
think
it's
great
to
keep
those
two
in
there
and
one
is
one
in
there
and
I
agree,
I'm
glad
has
some
agreement
on
mary
moore
is
just
too
far.
K
You
talk
about
equity
and
all
and
people
in
in
bellevue
having
access
to
it.
That's
that's
not
in
bellevue,
so
I
think
we
just
should
take
that
off
and
I
I
do
think
the
airfield
park-
and
you
know
we
several
of
us
were
involved
in
that
whole
conversation
on
and
getting
that
done.
We
can.
K
We
can
get
over
those
issues
because
whatever
we
do
there,
we
have
to
deal
with
the
the
garbage
dump
so
to
speak
so,
and
I
do
think
we
should
really
pursue
a
bellevue
college
as
much
as
possible
and
if
there's
some
other
spot
comes
up,
you
know
we
can
always
be
flexible.
I
don't
think
we're
taking
a
vote.
That
says
we
do
a
b
c
and
we
stick
with
that.
We're
saying
these
are
concepts
the
big
pieces
and
we
want
to
go
forward
on
that.
K
Fortunately,
we
have
staff,
that's
done
a
great
job
on
this
and
and
splash
forward
working
with
us,
and
we
have
all
of
the
elements
and
the
the
pieces
there.
Let's
take
that,
let's
work
on
this
now
and
when
we
get
through
this
copic
deal,
let's
be
ready
to
go,
that's
that's
where
we're
going
to
come
into
this
and
it
benefits
the
the
public
and
it
will
benefit
and
I'm
glad
when
councilmember
barksdale
specifically
brought
this
up.
K
This
is
going
to
be
something
that
is
for
all
of
bellevue
and
it
has
great
health
and
well-being
and
aspects
to
it
as
well
and
frankly,
I'd
like
to
see
the
kids
in
high
school
not
have
to
go
to
the
woodridge
25-yard
little
pool
at
seven
o'clock
in
the
morning
when
it's
it's
cold
and
freezing
and
have
to
practice.
So
you
know
there
are
all
these
factors
it's
time
to
do
it.
This
is
something
that's
that's
way
too
late,
but
actually
we're
going
to
do
it
better
than
ever
would
have
been
done.
L
Thank
you,
mrs
mayor.
I
agree
100,
we
don't
need
to
lose
our
momentum,
we
don't
want
to
and
but
covert
19
you
know
is
something.
L
That's
happened,
that's
reality,
but
the
key
is
that
we
can
be
nimble
and
we
are
especially
with
the
pond
that
we
have
in
splash
forward
and
in
the
many
partners
we're
talking
about.
We
just
talk
about
the
regional
approach,
king
county,
other
cities,
jurisdictions,
business
partners
and
communities.
These
are
all
things
that
we
can
have
to
help
us
to
move
this
forward.
L
Feasibility,
yes,
yes,
and
you
know,
even
though
it's
a
small
amount,
you
know,
I
don't
think
it
would
actually
make
a
difference
if
we
do
all
the
right
things
having
the
good
partners
such
as
splash
forward-
and
I
was
talking
to
susan
povolato
and
she
was
very
very
as
enthusiastic,
very
excited
about.
You
know
what
the
private
sector
partnership
can
actually
help
in
moving
forward.
You
know
the
things
that
the
thing
that
I
heard
from
the
council
is
many
things
we
can
do
internally.
L
We
can
direct
the
staff
to
work
with
splash
forward
and
other
partners
to
develop
a
strategy
to
pursue
the
things
that
we
want
them
to
do.
Look
at
options.
I
think
the
council
have
to
give
the
staff
a
clear
direction
of
option.
We
want
we
want-
and
I
think
I
hear
two
or
three
so
you
know
that's
something
that
can
change
a
little
bit.
It's
not
that
much
different.
You
work
with
what
we
want
to
do
and
work
and
look
for
the
site
sites
is
a
big
big
challenge.
L
L
So
I
believe
that
if
we
can
have
the
staff
working
with
economic
development
or
city
staff
and
design
and
work
with
the
the
option
that
we
think
will
work
the
best
and
then
look
at
different
sites
whatever
they
may
be.
We
have
no
idea.
You
mentioned
a
few.
We
drop
up
a
few.
There
will
be
others
that
come
up
maybe
and
then
some
some
you
have
to
talk
to
them
in
order
to
make
it
for
real
and
then
the
design
will
fit
into
the
site
into
the
function.
L
Then
we
got
something
to
come
up
with.
So
all
these
things
are
necessary.
Eventually,
if
you
want
to
have
the
stun
so
right
now,
it's
basically
a
commitment
by
the
council
that,
yes,
we
want
to
do
it.
This
is
what
we
want
for
the
community
and
then
let's
have
the
staff
working
with
the
partners,
including
you
know,
splash
forward
to
make
those
things
happen
and
even
with
the
twenty
thousand
dollars.
I
believe
that
you
know
at
this
time
of
crisis.
L
You
know
I
would
rather
have
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
pay
somebody's
rent
and
feed
somebody's
family.
That
would
be
a
great
gesture.
We've
been
doing
that
already.
We
just
funded
a
million
dollars,
another
500
000
later
on
to
help
the
people
the
families
in
need.
So
this
is
a
tremendous
gesture,
not
just
gesture.
It's
real
real
money.
They
can
feed
people
can
house
people,
because,
I
believe,
with
the
partnership
I'm
talking
about
with
with
the
splash
forward
and
others
we
can
make
up
for
all
that's
necessary
to
keep
the
momentum
going
thanks.
A
Okay,
councilmember
barksdale.
I
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I
guess.
The
only
thing
I
have
left
here
is
just
I
do
support
the
my
idea
would
be
the
bellevue
college
site,
but
if
there
is
a
better
site
again,
the
criteria
for
me
is
is
also
equity,
so
make
sure
that
it's
making
sure
that
it's
accessible,
you
know
when
it
come
when
this
comes
back
the
next
time.
I
would
like
to
see
more
about
equity
in
this
in
this
in
the
plans
here,
and
I
guess
the
only
other
thing
is.
I
Mitigating
the
impact
on
the
lower
income,
youth
and
families
in
our
community,
I
mean
we
don't
know
when
cope
when
we'll
be
out
of
covet
and
when
that.
Furthermore,
when
that
impact
will
when
when
people
in
our
community
will
be
relieved
of
that
impact
of
cobit,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that.
Thank
you.
I
I
I
can
clarify,
I
mean
if
I
know
there
was
talk
about
having
a
budget
proposal
and
so
just
like
and
right
now
what
I've
seen.
What
I'm
saying
is,
like
you
know,
some
dependence,
pretty
high
increase
dependence
on
like
public
financing,
and
so
just
would
like
to
see
a
proposal
that
doesn't
rely
us
heavily
on
that.
Just
given
the
impact
of
coping
on
the
community
right
now,.
I
A
I
A
Think
that
what
I'm
hearing
and
is
that
option
two
and
three
or
the
splash
preferred
option
are
seem
to
be
rising
to
the
top
and
then
the
locations
being
airfield
or
bellevue
college,
and
I
think
the
considerations
need
to
be
the
equitable
access
environmental
concerns,
stewardship
concerns
and
the
partnership
potential.
A
So
I
would
be
all
for
staff.
You
know
narrowing
down
those
ideas
into
a
recommendation
that
considers
the
equity
and
the
other
things
I
mentioned,
I'm
fine
with
them
using
the
balance
of
the
20
000,
that's
left
over
if
they
need
to,
but
if
they
don't
need
to
that,
that'd
be
great.
We
can
hang
on
to
that.
One
thing:
I'm
going
to
say
that
I
didn't
say
before
is
in
terms
of
the
therapy
pool
potential.
A
I
am
all
for
sole
proprietors
providing
therapy
and
not
relying
necessarily
just
on
a
medical
partnership
with
a
large
hospital
organization.
I
don't
mind
having
that
partnership,
but
I
hope
that
if
we
did
something
like
that,
we'd
still
provide
the
opportunity
for
sole
proprietors
to
come
in
and
do
what
they
do.
So
that
would
be
important
to
me
so
council,
member
robertson.
Do
you
want
to
try
to
make
a
motion
absolutely.
J
Will
before
I
do,
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
one
of
councilmember
barksdale's
comments
and
let
him
know
that,
as
far
as
the
helping
people
learn
to
swim
and
who
may
not
have
the
funds
to
pay
for
that
and
other
programming
there.
I've
actually
personally
been
talking
with
usa
swimming
foundation
and
they
provide
grants
to
government
or
other
pools
for
exactly
that
thing,
and
so
that's
something
that's
way
down
the
road.
But
it's
something
that
I've
certainly
been
thinking
about.
J
I'm
trying
to
get
usa
swimming
foundation
to
make
their
first
capital
grant
I'll
keep
you
so
far.
No
no
go,
but
you
know
there's
definitely
operation
grants
but
anyway.
So
let
me
make
the
motion.
I
move
that
we
direct
staff
to
continue
forward
on
the
aquatics
project
process,
including
site
selection,
using
the
remaining
portion
of
the
budget
for
this
project
as
needed,
and
also
to
bring
forward
in
this
year's
budget
consideration
a
budget
proposal
for
concept
and
design
studies
and
funding
structures
for
our
consideration
as
part
of
the
budget.
C
J
Oh
sorry,
yes,
and
also
narrowing
down
the
location
to
drop
the
will
wilberton
or
lincoln
center
project,
and
I
I
heard
a
mix
about
mary
moore
mayor.
You
seem
to
want
that
in
there.
I
don't.
I
I.
J
Okay,
so
and
narrowing
it
narrowing
it
down
to
bellevue
college
or
airfield
park
or
other
properties
that
we
may
not
have
discussed
in
the
past.
If
one
becomes
available.
K
L
Want
some
yeah,
so
thank
you.
I
I
like
what
you
just
added
and
other
locations
as
well.
We
we!
We
don't
have
this
magic,
that
these
are
just
the
locations
that
will
be
available
if.
L
L
It's
very
clear:
it
wasn't
first,
it's
added
yeah
and
I
I.
I
also
feel
that
this
point,
whatever
the
budget,
I
want
to
make
a
statement
that
the
staff
should
not
be
considering
the
country's
giving
you
that
money.
Then
you
go
spend
it.
I
wish
is
only
when
you
really
need
it.
L
I
feel
that
you
know
if
you
don't,
I
will
have
you
know
in
case.
If
you
don't
actually
I
was
going
to
propose.
We
want
to
spend
that
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
help
the
human
service
needs.
You
know
in
this
covert
nighting
situation,
but
I
don't
think
you
know.
That's
that's
the
only
reservation
I
have.
A
Well,
I
believe
that
was
also
covered
in
the
motion
and
I
think
it's
a
fair
request
that
if
they
don't
use
that
money,
that
the
city
manager
consider
other
social
human
service
application
of
that
excess
funding.
But
I
have
a
question:
councilmember
robertson:
did
you
put
in
the
considerations
for
equitable
access,
environmental
stewardship
and
partnership
potential
in
your
motion.
J
A
Excuse
me:
I've
got
two
people
talking
here.
Councilmember
stokes,
you
just
want
to
take
a
vote
right
now.
Is
that
what
you're
asking.
L
J
I
believe
that
was
in
there
council
member
lee,
I
said,
funding
concept
and
design
studies
in
the
budget
proposal
to
come
back
with
all
of
those
yeah,
so
staff.
Would
that
include
what
council
member
lee
is
asking
for.
A
G
A
I
So,
just
echoing,
before
just
what's
been
talked
about
in
terms
of
the
funding
structure
and
make
and
seeing
partnerships
carry
most
of
that,
given
the
covet
impacts.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
A
E
Mayor
council
members
and
for
the
discussion
on
the
pool,
the
spirited
conversation
there
so
in
front
of
these
this
evening
is
consideration
of
a
motion
to
approve
the
2020
annual
work
program,
as
recommended
by
the
planning
commission
joining
us
this
evening
is
tara
johnson,
our
planning
manager
and
nicholas
matt
senior
planner
of
our
community
development
department.
E
Who
is
the
commission
chair
and
and
more
so,
who
is,
was
the
alcohol
chair
and
the
commission
member
this
evening?
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
you,
tara.
P
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki
good
evening,
mia,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
members,
staff
and
members
of
the
public
that
are
in
attendance
tonight
we're
bringing
forward
as
part
of
this
agenda
item
four
proposed
privately
initiated
comprehensive
plan
amendments
which
are
to
be
considered
under
threshold
review
for
this
year's
work
program.
P
Along
with
myself
this
evening.
We
also
have
some
other
staff
members
and
then
also
our
planning
commission,
a
couple
of
our
planning
commission
members
with
us.
This
evening
we
have
senior
planner,
nicholas
metz,
who
manages
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
process,
as
well
as
our
outgoing
chair
of
the
planning
commission
and,
more
so,
and
our
new
chair,
commissioner,
radhika
mulgavkur,
will
be
covering
and
both
of
them
will
be
covering
portions
of
the
presentation
relating
to
the
discussions
and
deliberations
of
the
planning
commission
has
had
relating
to
these
comprehensive
plan.
Amendments
next
slide,
please
charming.
P
Tonight
tonight
we
have
two
specific
asks
of
the
council.
First
off.
We
would
like
the
council
to
review
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
and
discussion
on
the
threshold
review
relating
to
the
four
privately
initiated,
comprehensive
plan
amendments
and
then,
secondly,
we'd
like
the
council
to
provide
direction
on
which
amendments
are
to
be
included
in
this
year's
work
program.
P
As
you
may
recall,
at
your
july,
20th
meeting
council
has
already
initiated
the
c1
strategy,
comprehensive
plan
policy
amendment
and
now
I'm
going
to
hand
over
the
presentation
to
nicholas
who's
going
to
walk
you
through
the
details
of
the
proposed
amendments.
Q
Q
I
haven't
figured
out
a
way
to
take
the
threshold
review
criteria
and
show
them
in
another
version,
but
the
purpose
of
reviewing
them
for
you
tonight-
and
these
are
just
summary
statements
regarding
each
of
these
decision
criteria-
is
to
reacquaint
you
and
our
communities
with
the
work
that
the
planning
commission,
that
the
staff,
the
planning
commission
and
the
council
does
in
order
to
reach
decisions
about
recommending
applications
for
the
work
program.
Q
Q
Again
briefly,
the
the
the
topic
proposed
by
the
amendment
is
appropriately
addressed
through
the
comprehensive
plan
itself
that
the
application
for
is
in
compliance
with
the
three-year
limit
rule
that
you
modified
last
year
for
this
year's
use
that
the
application
does
not
raise
policy
issues
that
are
outside
the
limited
framework
of
the
annual
plan.
Q
Similarly
situated
properties
in
like
circumstances
near
the
application
that
the
application
proposed
is
consistent
with
current
general
plan
policies
and
that
state
law,
court
or
an
administrative
decision
requires
it
and,
as
you
all
know,
could
we
have
the
next
slide?
Please
just
a
brief
note:
tara
has
made
mention
of
the
four
applications
before
you
this
year,
I'm
going
to
briefly
touch
on
them
before
I
turn
it
over
to
the
planning.
Commissioners.
Just
wanted
to
note.
Q
There
was
a
fifth,
the
capella
property
redesignation
and
at
57
550th
in
bridal
trails,
as
shown
there
on
the
map
140th
on
the
east
city
of
kirkland
on
the
north.
This
is
a
privately
initiated
map
amendment
that
was
totaling
roughly
30
acres.
The
applicant
withdrew
it
before
consideration
by
the
planning
commission,
stating
reasons
related
to
the
kovic
19
epidemic
next
slide,
please.
Q
These
are
the
four
applications
that
are
before
you
tonight.
As
tara
noted
there,
the
there
would
be
another
plan,
amendment
you've
already
initiated
into
the
work
program.
The
c1
plan
amendment
an
interesting
issue,
because
all
four
of
these
applications
share
a
reaction
to
providing
more
retail
market
housing
within
the
community
in
bellevue,
all
four
of
them
coming
from
sites
that
are
not
currently
residentially
enabled
to
seek
new
new
market
rate
housing
through
these
various
mechanisms,
the
four
of
them
are
we'll
just
touch
on
them
very
briefly
from
the
top
left.
Q
The
glendale
country
club
northeast
plan
amendment,
which
is
a
proposal
moment
from
single-family
load
to
multi-family
medium
on
a
3.3
acre
portion
of
the
glendale
country
club.
The
site
is
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
east
belgium.
Community
council
in
the
upper
right
is
the
safeguard
self
storage
property
in
crossroads
proposed
a
man
map
amendment
from
office
to
community
business
on
five
parcels,
totaling
a
little
over
six
acres.
Q
This
is
at
just
north
of
crosswords
park,
the
south,
the
one
in
the
southeast,
the
northeast
8th
street
partners.
Application
is
also
on
8th
street
right
up
the
right
up
the
hill
from
glendale.
It's
a
proposed
map
amendment
from
office
to
multi-family
high
on
two
parcels
on
a
site
of
nearly
one
acre
and
then
the
final
application
before
you
is
the
hundred
bellevue
way
southeast
site,
which
is
south
of
the
former
jack-in-the-box
at
main
and
bellevue
way.
Southeast.
Q
That
proposal
on
just
under
an
acre
is
a
proposed
map,
amendment
from
a
split
designation
between
downtown
mu
and
office
to
a
single
downtown
mu
designation
on
the
site.
With
that,
I
will
turn
it
over.
I
will
ask
I
believe,
commission
chair
mugab
card
to
take
over
and
begin
the
planning
commission's
presentation
of
their
recommendations.
A
I
wanna
I
wanna
welcome
chair
and
we'll
go
forward
to
our
meeting
tonight,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
former
chair
anne
moreso
for
her
all
her
dedication
to
the
planning,
commission
and
the
city
and
the
work
that
she
has
done.
We
really
appreciate
it
and
we're
happy
to
have
you
here.
You
here
tonight
as
well.
R
Thank
you
mayor
robinson.
It
has
been
a
true
pleasure
and
honor
serving
the
planning
commission
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
members
of
the
council
xiaomi.
Would
you
take
us
the
next
slide?
Please.
R
R
R
R
R
The
commission
vote
on
the
safeguard
self
storage
was
unanimous
as
well,
and
we
recommend
approving
this
proposed
amendment,
because
the
application
satisfies
all
land
use
code
decision
criteria
for
threshold
review
of
a
privately
initiated
comp
plan.
Amendment
again,
this
point
highlights
of
the
more
important
findings.
R
This
has
historically
been
an
ongoing
community
focus
as
well.
The
proposed
amendment
addresses
significantly
change
conditions
affecting
the
subject
property
in
the
surrounding
area,
because
the
question
is
whether
this
site
has
been
subject
to
the
same
level
of
planned
amendment
scrutiny
as
other
land
use
in
addressing
the
crossroads
area
role.
R
The
evolving
role
of
crossroads
parks
next
slide
special
maine,
and
with
that
I
will
pass
it
on
to
our
new
chair
of
the
planning
commission,
ciao
mukafkar.
S
S
The
commission's
review
and
unanimous
vote
on
the
application
reflects
a
thorough
study
of
the
post-proposed
amendment
and
of
note
is
that
the
pro
proposed
amendment
addresses
significantly
changed
conditions
resulting
from
the
unanticipated
consequence
of
adopted
policy
when
higher
density.
Multi-Family
development
emerged
as
a
major
residential
land
use
pattern
in
the
areas
west
and
east
of
the
site
along
northeast
8th
street,
so
very
similar
to
what
we're
seeing
on
the
slide.
Just
prior
to
this
and
again
along
northeast
8th,
we
expect
to
see
increased
transit
focus.
S
S
However,
if
selected
for
the
annual
work
program,
the
commission
will
continue
to
study
potentially
isolating
the
proposed
multi-family
housing
site
from
the
gendale
country
club
golf
course
not
itself,
and
this
portion
it
should
be
noted
as
not
being
used
for
recreational
golf
purposes.
Nor
does
the
country
club
intend
to
ever
use
it
like
that
without
a
land
use
nexus
with
that,
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
nicholas
and
let
him
tell
you
about
how
we
engage
with
the
community.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
chairman,
golf
cart.
Chairman.
Can
I
have
the
next
slide
please
so
briefly,
and
something
that
we
always
like
to
inform
council
members
about
is
our
the
results
of
our
continuous
and
ongoing
community
engagement
throughout
the
conference
and
plan
amendment
process,
both
formally
and
informally.
Q
Briefly,
noting
here
the
number
of
comments
that
we
received
up
to
the
threshold
review
public
hearing
date
and,
of
course,
the
numbers
speaking
at
the
hearings
themselves,
the
it's
an
unusually
short
year,
but
we
have
not
had
people
concerned
that
they
don't
have
access
to
information
or
access
to
the
means
by
which
we
are
conducting
the
plan.
Amendment
review
the
comments
are
generally
either
in
favor
or
asking
for
information
in
regards
to
the
applications.
Q
You'll
note
the
particular
numbers
on
the
glendale
country
club.
There
were
a
number
of
those
comments
sent
in
mostly
in
favor
18
of
them.
In
favor,
there
were
10
that
were
asking
for
information.
We
had
10
people
also
speak
in
favor
at
the
hearing
itself.
P
Thank
you
nicholas
so,
as
we
said
at
the
at
the
outset
of
the
presentation
tonight,
we're
we're
here
before
the
city
council
to
review
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
and
they
provided
you
with
the
with
an
overview
of
their
discussions
and
following
that,
we're
asking
the
council
for
official
direction
on
the
work
program
for
this
year
and
relating
to
the
four
comprehensive
plan
privately
initiated
amendments
in
terms
of
our
community
engagement
approach.
P
As
you
know,
due
to
our
covet
situation
and
not
being
able
to
have
community
meetings
and
public
meetings
in
person,
we've
had
to
modify
and
adapt
our
approaches
with
community,
both
with
community
engagement,
also
allowing
the
public
to
get
involved
as
part
of
the
public
hearing
process
and
study
sessions.
P
In
addition,
other
amendments
that
are
initiated
by
council,
similar
to
the
c1
strategy
that
you
that
you
talked
about
at
your
july
20th
meeting,
would
also
be
incorporated
into
the
work
program
and
completed
prior
to
the
end
of
the
year.
Timeline
consistent
with
state
statute,
so
schedule
a
little
overview
of
the
schedule
for
the
remainder
of
the
year.
We
have
tentative
study
sessions
penciled
in
with
a
planning
commission
for
september.
P
That
concludes
our
presentation
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
You
have.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
That's
a
good
presentation.
It's
it's
so
great
to
see
the
planning
commission
functioning
so
solidly
on
on
tricky
things
like
this.
I
really
appreciate
the
work
they've
done.
We
are
going
to
go
through
in
this
order.
Councilmember
barksdale
lee
stokes,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
members
on
robertson
and
then
me
so
councilmember
barksdale.
I
Great
thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
also
say
thank
you
to
ann,
I'm
grateful
for
your
leadership
and
the
way
that
you
foster
discussion
and
inclusion
on
the
commission
as
chair,
and
also
want
to
welcome
radica
into
your
new
role.
This
chair
and
I've
had
the
opportunity
to
serve
with
each
of
you
and
others
on
the
planning
commission
and
look
forward
to
what's
to
come.
I
L
Thank
you
good
work
staff
and
also
appreciate
the
commissioners
working
and
volunteering
and
your
great
service
to
the
community,
and
I
do
just
have
one
question
when
you
were
discussing
glendale
golf
course,
golf
club,
you
mentioned
it's
changing
from
single
family
to
multi-family
medium
or
I
thought
it's
written
as
multi-family.
L
Q
L
Okay,
but
it's
still
compatible
with
the
surrounding
properties,.
Q
K
K
C
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
here.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation,
staff
and
and
for
the
planning
commissioners,
very
thoughtful,
very
thorough,
clearly
meets
all
the
requirements
and
happy
to
keep
moving
this
forward
and
look
forward
to
the
planning
commission's
recommendations.
So
thank
you.
G
Oh
there's
the
mute
on
you.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
the
thorough
discussion
on
the
topics
and
welcome
radica
to
the
chair
of
the
transportation
or
the
planning
commission.
G
Q
Certainly,
council
members
on
the
under
the
rules
that
we
adopted
last
year
once
an
application
has
been
submitted
and
and
considered
complete.
The
three-year
rule
starts
up,
so
the
three-year
rule
would
apply
to
the
30-acre
portion
of
the
the
capella
property
designation.
That
came
in.
G
J
Yes,
it's
good
to
see
a
couple
of
planning
commissioners
faces,
even
if
we
don't
see
you
in
person,
I
know
you
guys
have
probably
been
missing
the
work
and
I'm
glad
to
see
you
guys
back
at
it.
So
I
am.
I
am
fine
to
accept
the
planning
commission
recommendation
on
threshold
review
for
all
four
parcels.
I
would
like
to
ask
a
couple
questions
or
make
some
comments
on
things
that
I
other
that
I
think
that
we
should
think
about
as
we
move
into
final
review.
J
So
the
first
question
I
had
is
on
the
100
bellevue
waypiece.
I
had
thought
that
we
had
finished
cleaning
up
all
of
the
downtown
boundary
split
zones,
but
apparently
we
haven't,
because
this
is
one
of
them
and
I
inquired
with
staff
if
there
were
any
others
like.
Is
this
the
last
one
we're
finally
going
to
be
done?
Apparently
there's
one
other,
but
it
was
just
developed
and
so
staff
didn't
think
that
we
should
scope
that
final
split
zone
parcel
in
because
it's
not
apt
to
redevelop
anytime
soon
emil.
J
T
This
is
email,
king
you're,
right
that
over
the
years
we've
handled
a
lot
of
the
split
zone
parcels
on
the
on
the
south
edge
of
downtown.
This
appears
to
be
one
of
two
remaining
parcels.
T
The
the
only
other
remaining
one
is
to
the
east
of
this
parcel
separated
by
a
number
of
hundreds
of
feet,
and
it
was
recently
developed
by
alamo
manhattan
as
apartment
and
as
an
apartment,
building
complex
under
the
split
zoning,
so
there'd
be
no
real
net
effect
of
changing
the
the
split
zone
to
all
downtown
zoning.
J
Thank
you
for
that
clarification.
Like
I
said
I
thought
we
were
done
with
all
this
glad
to
see
one
of
the
final
ones
get
in
front
of
us.
The
thing
I'm
the
thing
I
would
like
to
have
the
planning
commission
consider,
or
at
least
opine
upon
with
regard
to
this
parcel,
is
this
moves
the
downtown
boundary,
at
least
on
this
parcel
further
south
than
at
any
other
point,
and
it
puts
two
parcels
which
are
adjacent
to
it
to
the
east,
which
is
office
and
professional
office,
also
north
above
this
southern
this.
J
What
would
be
the
new
southern
boundary
line?
I
would
like
you
know
we
really
kind
of
promised
the
neighborhoods
around
downtown
that
the
downtown
boundary
would
be
the
downtown
boundary.
However,
I
was
willing
to
fix
these
split
zone
parcels,
because
that
makes
all
the
sense
in
the
world.
J
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
set
a
precedent
to
keep
creeping
the
downtown
boundary
where
there
aren't
split
zones
and
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
the
planning
commission
has
the
ability
to
apply
on
how
this
will
not
set
a
precedent
and
create
a
new
change
of
circumstance.
For
those
properties
that
are
immediately
eased
so
and
then
on
the
on
the
same
question
on
the
office
to
community
business,
sureguard
or
safeguard
storage-
there's
no
cb
near
here.
J
So
how
does
that
create
or
not
create
a
precedent
so
that
leading
to
an
unlocking
and
up
zones
all
around
there?
I
don't
really
want
to
see
cascading
up
zones
all
around
the
city,
except
in
our
growth
corridors,
and
that
comment
is
particularly
relevant
on
the
northeast
eighth,
which
is
surrounded
on
three
sides
by
multi-family,
medium
and
only
across
the
street
is
multi-family
high.
J
How
do
we
not
cr,
you
know,
create
a
multi-fit.
You
know
if
this
goes
to
multi-family
high.
How
do
we
not
create
a
a
precedent
that
would
then
upzone
that
whole
area
multi-family
medium,
is
a
bit
of
a
transition
next
to
the
single
family?
Medium,
that's
surrounding
the
multi-family
medium,
which
is
on
three
sides
of
that
that
property,
northeast
eighth
partners,
property
and
same
question
really
for
the
glenn
glendale.
J
It's
touches
multi-family
medium,
but
it
touches
single
family
medium
on
more
of
its
frontage.
So
how
do
we
make
sure
that
if
that
is
changed,
that
we
don't
create
a
cascade
of
converting
all
that
single
family
to
multi-family?
Now,
if
we
do
it
in
the
next
major
comp
plan
update
and
that's
what
the
public
wants?
That's
one
thing,
but
I
don't
I
hate
to
see
things
that
seem
right,
then
create
a
precedent
for
a
cascade
of
additional
up
zones
across
the
city
so
and
then.
J
Finally,
I'm
hoping
that
the
transportation
commission
or
staff
can
work
up
when
this
comes
back
to
us
after
final
review.
What
the
transportation
impacts
would
be
of
these
changes
of
zoning.
So,
for
example,
if
the
traffic
general
numbers
from
the
guide
that
we
use
says
that
single
family
low
is
on
five
acres
is
ten
trips
a
day
and
multifamily
medium?
Is
you
know,
55
trips
a
day?
I
just
would
like
to
see
that
numbers,
because
I
think
we
need
to
be
aware.
Yes,
we
definitely
need
more
housing
in
the
city.
J
We
need
more
affordable
housing
and
we
need
more
market
housing.
But
we
need
to
be
careful
where
we
put
it
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
unduly
burden
the
traffic
infrastructure,
which
is
already
in
pre-covered
times
very
heavily
burdened,
so
I'd
like
that
numbers
worked
up
by
staff
for
final
review,
but
other
than
that.
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
the
analysis
from
final
review
and
and
ready
to
vote
to
grant
threshold
review
for
these
four
parcels.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
so
I'm
going
to
take
my
turn
here
and
council.
Remember:
roberts
robertson.
I
can't
even
say
your
name
robertson.
You,
you
just
nailed
my
concerns
exactly
so.
I
have
the
same
concerns
about
setting
precedence,
although
I
want
to
say
I'm
very
supportive
of
the
recommendations
here.
So
I
I
like
the
way
this
is
going
and
I
just
think
that
it's
important
that
whatever
development
is
created
that
it's
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
as
well.
A
So
if
you're
using
the
surrounding
neighborhood
to
do
these
up
zones,
then
we
should
make
sure
that
the
development
itself
is
consistent.
The
concern
that
I
have-
and
I
think
we
can
work
with
this-
is
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
taking
every
opportunity
we
have
to
create
affordable
housing.
So
if
we're
creating
more
opportunity
for
development,
I
would
like
to
think
that
we
can
get
some
affordable,
housing
or
fee
in
lieu
out
of
that,
if
that's
possible.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
this
needs
to
be
part
of
the
amendment,
or
this
just
can
be
my
direction
or
if
we
need
to
maybe
go
around
the
table
and
see
if
people
agree,
but
I
I
would
really
like
to
have
the
staff
and
the
planning
commission
look
at
our
affordable
housing
strategy
and
look
at
the
policies
and
see
if
we
can
put
that
part
some
of
that
those
requirements
into
the
up
zoning
that
there
are
there
is
some,
if
you're
going
to
build
some
housing
that
there
is
some
affordable
housing
there.
A
So
at
least
to
look
and
look
at
how
that
might
happen,
what
they
might
recommend
to
get
some
affordable
housing
out
of
the
developments
of
housing.
So
do
you
think
staff?
Do
you
think
that
you
need
a
vote
on
this
or,
I
guess
well,
we
do
need
to
to
adopt
the
the
work,
but
in
terms
of
what
what
the
council
members
have
asked,
the
planning
commission
to
consider
does
that
need
to
be
part
of
what
we're
voting
on.
Or
can
you
take
those
as
comments.
P
Mayor
robinson,
we
can
take
those
as
comments
similar
to
some
of
the
other
issues
policy
issues
that
have
been
raised
by
other
council
members.
We
would
we
would
incorporate
that
analysis
as
part
of
the
final
review,
but
it
would
be
helpful
for
staff
and
the
planning
commission
to
get
direction
on
the
policy
analysis
that
that
council
is
wanting
us
to
to
to
to
look
at
in
detail.
A
So
I'm
gonna
go
down
the
line
again
and
see
if
there's
any
more
comments.
Councilmember
barksdale.
I
No
further
comments.
Thank
you.
K
Only
that
I
do
support
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
aspect
and
I
would
think
that
actually,
our
affordable
housing
code
in
place
would
be
hopefully
applicable
or,
if
not,
we
need
to
look
at
that.
So
I
appreciate
that
addition
additional
aspect,
but
I
approve
the
recommendations
as
put
forward.
C
Yes
appreciate
the
comments
and
support
the
inclusion
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy
into
this
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
no
further
comments.
A
G
G
Would
traffic
be
considered
additional
review
as
part
of
this
work
that
the
planning
commission
is
doing
so?
My
question
is:
if
we
hadn't
asked
the
question
we
wouldn't
be
doing
looking
at
those
elements.
P
I
believe
we
council
members
on,
we
would
typically
be
looking
at
at
compliance
with
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
policies
and
the
comprehensive
plan.
Okay,.
J
You
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion,
because
I
think
that
we're
all
in
agreement
I'll
move
to
adopt
the
2020
annual
comprehensive
plan
amendment
work
program,
as
recommended
by
the
planning
commission
through
their
resolution,
as
well
as
to
to
ensure
that
the
final
review
analysis
includes
a
review
of
transportation,
impacts.
The
precedent
setting
nature
of
each
of
the
amendments
and
a
look
at
how
we
can
use
the
amendments
to
implement
our
affordable
housing
strategy.
J
C
A
E
Thank
you
mayor
robinson
and
council
members.
Ornet
6522
authorizes
a
grant
agreement
with
king
county
to
accept
221
thousand
nine
hundred
nine
dollars
in
cares
act
funding
the
ordinance
also
amends
the
2019-2020
budget
to
authorize
expenditure
of
these
funds.
Tonight
staff
is
seeking
council
adoption
of
this
or
nitsa
and
joining
us.
This
evening
is
jessica,
nader,
our
chief
economic
development
officer,
as
well
as
philly
marsh
economic
development
manager,
both
from
the
community
development
department.
With
that
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
jesse
for
a
very
brief
on
staff
report,.
U
As
the
city
manager
mentioned
tonight's
council
is
tonight,
council
is
receiving
presentations
on
two
well
two
items
of
karzak
related
funding.
This
presentation
for
myself
and
philly
is
related
only
to
the
pass-through
funds
in
229
221
thousand
dollars
provided
by
king
county.
We
are
requesting
adoption
of
the
ordinance
and
philly
will
give
you
more
details
on
the
specific
staff
recommendations
with
that
I'll
pass
it
over.
V
At
the
end
of
june,
the
city
of
bellevue
was
notified
of
the
opportunity
to
receive
just
shy
of
222
thousand
dollars
from
king
county
in
a
federal
cares,
act
funded
grant
program.
This
king
county
grant
program
is
intended
to
help
alleviate
the
adverse
economic
impact
of
the
coveted
pandemic,
and
funding
may
be
used
for
pass-through
grants
to
small
businesses,
reimbursing
the
cost
of
business
interruption,
city,
internal
operational
expenditures
or
city
direct
expenditures
for
small
businesses.
V
Next
slide,
please.
After
evaluating
the
wide
variety
of
needs
and
requests
within
the
business
community
staff
recommends.
The
majority
of
this
funding
be
used
for
direct
business
grants.
This
business
bellevue
business
relief
grant
program
will
be
intended
for
businesses
who
have
experienced
a
loss
of
income
due
to
coven
19
that
has
not
previously
been
reimbursed
by
any
other
funding
source
like
some
of
our
neighboring
cities.
V
Additionally,
we
recommend
the
remainder
of
this
grant.
Funding
be
used
to
provide
internal
operational
support
for
business
assistance
and
relief
efforts,
such
as
the
technical
assistance
we
are
providing
to
business
impact
northwest
who
will
assist
businesses
in
applying
for
the
small
business
support
grant
translation
of
materials,
as
well
as
additional
staff
time
to
continue
our
responsiveness
to
business
assistance,
requests,
resources
and
support
with
that.
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
jesse.
U
Thank
you,
philly
next
slide,
charmaine
council.
We
do
recognize
that
there
continues
to
be
a
large
need
in
our
local
business
community.
The
recommended
allocation
provides
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
provide
meaningful
support
via
the
cash
grants
and
to
continue
the
high
level
of
technical
assistance
that
makes
bellevue
a
welcoming
place
for
businesses
of
all
sizes
and
all
backgrounds.
U
There
are
approximately
4
000
small
businesses
in
bellevue
that
could
potentially
qualify
for
these
grants,
meaning
we'll
be
able
to
service
the
need
of
less
than
one
percent
of
our
small
businesses,
but
the
37
that
do
receive
the
grants
will
find
a
substantial
impact
and
benefit
from
them.
So
with
that,
we
recommend
the
council
adopt
ordinance
6522
to
accept
the
king
county
relief
funds
and
requests
that
the
council
approve
our
recommended,
recommended
expenditures
for
the
grants
and
covert
related
operations.
U
We
are
happy
to
answer
the
council's
questions.
Okay,.
A
L
Comments
or
questions
I
just
unread
it
myself,
yeah,
I'm
very
happy
that
we
have
the
opportunity
and
this
king
county
is
passing
on
federal
government's
case
act
to
us.
L
Okay,
so
I
appreciate
helping
people
who
are
even
five
thousand
dollars,
so
it's
a
lottery
system
which
is
good,
even
though
it's
one
percent,
but
it's
still
help.
The
question
is:
how
do
we
make
sure
that
you
know
everybody
especially
underrepresented?
L
L
Who
has
you
know
those
communities
that
we
want
to
help
so
all
right,
the
details
in
the
the
devil
is
in
detail.
I
hope
the
intent
is
good.
I
I
I
support
it
and
I
will
have
to
happily
go
for
it,
but
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
staff
pays
attention
and
I'd
like
to
know.
After
that's
always
done.
You
know
who
are
the
small
businesses
that
got
the
grant
this
37
of
them
and
who
you
know
are
the
people
who
may
have
applied
put
their
name
in
the
lottery
that'd
be
good.
G
Yes,
thank
you.
You
know,
I
think
this
is
so
so
important,
so
I
appreciate
the
ability,
with
the
the
coved
grants,
to
be
able
to
offer
these
opportunities.
G
This
is
the
first
time
that
we've
been
able
to
offer
any
kind
of
small
business
grant
from
the
city
itself,
and
I
just
think
about
how
devastating
it
must
be.
To
start
a
business
grow,
a
business,
try
to
sustain
a
business
and
then
be
shut
down
due
to
covid.
G
My
question
is:
is
it
possible
for
us
to
find
the
thirty
to
seven
thousand
dollars
within
the
city
budget
so
that
all
of
the
money
is
available
as
five
thousand
dollar
grant?
So
we
can?
Even
if
that
means
only
you
know,
x,
number
or
seven
more
businesses
actually
get
the
five
thousand
dollar
grant.
I
think
that
might
still
be
really
important,
so
I'd
like
to
understand
that.
A
E
Sir,
yes,
we
could
take
a
look
at
it.
Would
it
would
result
in
some
kind
of
reduction
in
service
somewhere
else
in
the
in
the
city
budget?
There
will
definitely
be
a
trade-off,
and
so
it
wouldn't
be
like
we
could
do
it
without
any
other
impact
somewhere
else
in
the
city
budget.
E
At
a
cost
to
the
city
to
the
city,
business,
in
terms
of
you
know
how
we
conduct
our
business
yes,
so
there
definitely
would
be
a
trade-off
and
we
could.
We
could
come
back
with
that
if
you'd
like.
G
J
Sorry
I
I
forgot,
I
had
to
mute
again.
I
wish
charmaine
could
just
control
it
all.
She
probably
does
too
anyway.
So
no
I'm
happy
to
see
this.
This
is
great
glad
to
see
some
money
to
go
to
our
small
businesses,
really
appreciate
the
partnership
with
king
county
of
distributing
this
money
to
us.
It's
really
important
to
all
of
us
that
our
businesses
not
only
succeed
and
continue
to
operate
through
covid,
but
that
they
thrive
in
the
post-covered
world.
J
J
This
is
like
the
airplane,
where
it
says
you
know
when
the
plane's
going
down
put
your
oxygen
mask
on
first,
so
you
can
help
your
children
around
you,
not
that
businesses
or
children,
but
if
the
city,
if
we
aren't
able
to
provide
the
services
that
go
to
everyone,
we
are
you
know,
then
the
whole
city
will
suffer
so
as
much
as
I
want
to
do
as
much
as
we
can
for
individuals
and
businesses.
J
If
the
city
ends
up
not
being
able
to
provide
public
safety-
or
you
know,
if
we
have
to
cut
police
officers,
officers
cut
paramedics,
you
know
cut
people
who
keep
our
utility
lines
in
in
service.
J
I
think
that
that
would
hurt
our
city
on
a
much
larger
scale,
and
so
I
am
very
supportive
of
us
making
sure
that
we
cover
our
operational
costs,
because
if
we
don't,
I
mean
we
won't
be
able
to
do
more
human
services
grants
later
I
mean
we
have
to
take
care
of
our
our
our
costs
of
doing
business
so
anyway
other
than
that
I'm
supportive,
I'm
ready
to
move
to
adopt
once
everyone's
have
their
turn.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilmember.
A
K
Well,
I
agree
with
both
the
comments
that
are
made.
I
think
that's.
This
is
a
kind
of
a
hobson's
choice
in
the
way
that
we
we've
been
forced
to.
I.
K
I
do
also
realize
that
one
of
the
things
that
the
federal
money
is
designated
for
is
to
help
cities
back
up
cities
where
they
are,
you
know,
running
a
deficit
as
well
and
and
somehow
earlier
you
have
to
pay
to
have
services
provided-
and
this
is
what
this
is
for
and
again
it's
also
correct
that
this
would
come
from
someplace
else
and
I'm
not
sure
what
the
trade-off
would
be,
and
I
think
we
I
think
we
should
just
leave
this
to
to
the
staff
to
the
city
city
manager,
to
manage
this,
and
you
know,
37
000
would
come
from
someplace
else
and
probably
all
code
be
related
in
various
ways.
K
I
All
right,
thank
you.
So
first
yeah
I
mean
just
echoing
the
appreciation
for
receiving
these
funds
from
kane
county
and
glad
that
we're
able
to
support
our
small
businesses
and
small
for
very
small
businesses
at
that.
So
I
guess
my
only
concern
is
around
with
the
lottery
system
making
sure
that
the
businesses
with
the
most
need-
and
I
know
that
we
have
the
low
eligibility
requirements
which
I
appreciate,
because
then
it
reduces
overhead
for
the
businesses
to
apply
for
funding.
I
But
it
also
creates
a
potential
situation
where
the
the
smaller
businesses
with
the
most
need,
maybe
don't
get
the
grants
that
they
need.
But-
and
I
don't
have
a
perfect
solution,
but
maybe
we
could
inform
that
prioritization
of
funding
by
industries
most
impacted
in
the
city
or
in
the
region
so,
and
I
think
that
may
be,
like
entertainment,
food
and
services,
but
happy
to
defer
to
staff
on
that.
Thank
you.
U
V
Sure
yeah,
so
the
looking
at
some
of
the
other
cities
and
their
choice
to
upfront
do
a
lottery
system
based
on
the
fact
that
all
businesses
are
in
need,
and
it
also
greatly
decreases
the
burden
on
staff
in
the
evaluation
and
making
sure
that
those
businesses
meet
the
criteria.
I
C
Thank
you
mayor,
first
of
all,
jesse
and
philly,
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
and
and
thank
you,
king
county,
for
these
additional
funds
to
get
to
our
small
businesses
that
are
in
such
dire
need.
For
some
support
I
mean
five
thousand
dollars
might
seem
like
a
lot,
but
it
could
be
the
difference
between
them
surviving
another
month
or
or
or
not.
So
I
do
appreciate
councilmember
marksdale's
suggestion
on
those
industries
most
impacted.
C
As
you
know,
the
great
work
that
you
know,
jesse
and
team
have
done
on
on
our
economic
development
strategy
and
and
identifying
those
the
those
industries
that
are
most
impacted
right.
Q
C
You
know
be
at
the
hotels,
accommodation,
restaurants,
you
know
the
the
those
are
the
ones
that
are
suffering
the
most,
I'm
sure
others
are
as
well,
but
certainly
if
you
just
look
at
the
unemployment
numbers,
you
know
those
industries
certainly
have
become
even
more
so
under
the
strain
of
the
pandemic.
C
So
if
there
is
a
way
to
insert
that
part
into
the
process,
I
think
that
that's
great,
but
I
have
every
confidence
that
staff
will
be
able
to
make
sure
to
get
this
money
to
to
those
companies
and
small
businesses
that
most
need
it.
C
So,
and
I,
and
I
think,
council
member
lee
is
absolutely
correct
in
terms
of
not
just
highlighting
for
him
who
these
37
companies
that
will
be
receiving
the
5
000,
but
we
should
highlight
them
in
as
many
ways
as
possible
so
that
the
community
can
support
them.
Because
again,
this
five
thousand
dollars
is
not
going
to
be
something
that's
going
to.
You
know
enable
them
to
survive
the
rest
of
the
pandemic.
They
need
community
support
from
our
residents.
C
A
Thank
you.
So
you
know
I.
I
appreciate
council
member
john's
idea,
but
having
listened
participated
in
the
state
of
the
city
and
and
learned
all
that
our
economic
development
team
have
been
doing
for
small
business.
A
You
know
the
the
money
that
we're
using
right
now
to
to
provide
those
services
are
so
essential
and
I
don't
want
to.
I
don't
want
to
lose
the
ability
to
do
that.
I
also
appreciate
the
the
the
emphasis
on
equitable
disbursement
of
this
these
funds
and
it
sounds
like
you've
researched
how
other
cities
have
done
it,
and
I
know
that
issaquah
did
a
really
good
job
and
I
think
they
use
this
the
same
system.
They
they
had
good
results.
A
So
I'm
I'm
just
grateful
that
the
county
is
providing
the
funding
that
we
need
to
to
help
our
small
businesses,
and
I
think
we
all
need
to
lobby
the
federal
government
for
some
more
funding
because
we're
not
through
this
yet
and
it's
a
it's
a
month-to-month
challenge
for
these
small
businesses
and
if
we
want
bellevue
to
stay
bellevue,
then
we
need
to
keep
our
our
businesses
here.
So
I
just
really
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
support
this.
So
do
we
have
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance,
6522.
A
E
E
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
ordinance,
65-23
does
four
things
it
one.
It
authorizes
an
interagency
agreement
with
the
state
to
accept
four
million
359
thousand
dollars.
In
cares.
Funding
for
city
costs
incurred
due
to
covid.
E
E
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
good
news
story
in
terms
of
receiving
money
from
the
federal
government
through
the
state
joining
us
this
evening
is
nathan,
mccoma
deputy
city
manager
on
the
manager's
office,
as
well
as
tony
as
far
as
assistant
director
of
our
parks
and
community
services
department,
to
provide
a
brief
staff
report
to
the
council
nathan.
E
F
F
F
F
F
As
the
council's
aware,
the
federal
government
passed
the
cares
act
and
it
provides
for
reimbursement
of
costs
associated
with
public
safety
and
public
health
efforts
of
the
4.3
million.
In
cares,
funding
coming
to
the
city
of
bellevue
from
the
state
of
washington,
the
city
of
bellevue
has
already
expanded
in
excess
of
3.8
million
on
the
operational
response
to
covid
as
examples
of
those
operational
expenses.
F
When
I
say
these,
I
think
you're
readily
intuitively
understand
how
significant
they
are
so
obviously
payroll
for
direct
response,
especially
for
that
of
our
paramedics,
emergency
medical
technicians
and
police
and
then
followed
by
all
of
our
other
city
personnel.
F
O
O
As
we
examine
the
need
our
recommendations
also
factor
in
several
principles,
we
will
be
factoring
in
speed
the
fact
that
the
city
must
expend
these
dollars
by
october,
the
31st
fairness.
How
do
we
ensure
agencies
throughout
the
community
have
an
opportunity
to
receive
dollars
to
administer
these
services
local?
While
there
are
providers
throughout
the
king
county
region,
our
residents
and
families
in
crisis
need
to
be
able
to
access
resources
in
close
proximity
without
the
added
burden
of
traveling
to
access
them
in
an
expanded
resource
pool.
O
There
is
a
continued
need
to
ensure
that
a
broad
number
of
agencies
receive
funding
so
that
community
demand
does
not
over
tax
the
work
capacity
of
a
limited
number
of
agencies,
and
so
that
residents
can
access
help
from
agencies
they
identify
with
and
perceive
to
be
understanding
of
their
cultural
needs.
Next
slide,
please,
specifically
in
relation
to
food
scarcity
on
this
slide
in
front
of
you
are
examples
of
food
provision
by
agencies
throughout
the
community
and,
as
you
can
see,
vast
numbers
of
meals
and
food
boxes
or
bags
have
been
dispersed
by
these
providers.
O
Yet
these
are
only
a
small
number
of
the
providers
responding
to
the
need
for
food
in
the
community.
Despite
this,
significant
community
response
providers
and
residents
alike
are
both
identifying
food
scarcity
as
a
primary
challenge
in
the
community,
which
is
only
increasing
families,
are
being
forced
to
decide
where
to
allocate
limited
dollars,
rent
food,
medical
bills,
etc.
O
O
There
are
families
who
are
experiencing
poverty
for
the
first
time
and
are
learning
how
to
access
assistance,
in
addition
to
families
who
were
already
living
paycheck
to
paycheck
and
are
now
faced
with
the
possibility
of
multiple
months
of
back
rent.
The
significant
demand
is
also
taxing
the
workload
capacity
of
the
agencies
currently
funded
by
the
city
of
bellevue,
creating
a
need
for
new
and
additional
agencies
to
receive
funding
to
administer
this
assistance
to
the
community.
In
addition,
there
continues
to
be
the
need
for
agencies
to
receive
funding
who
maintain
an
expertise
on
serving
specific
populations.
O
O
Staff
propose
utilizing
currently
contracted
agencies
to
distribute
the
food
assistance
and
propose
agencies
that
the
city
is
not
currently
funding.
For
this
purpose
to
provide
emergency
financial
assistance,
we
are
requesting
the
council's
authorization
for
the
budget
for
these
services.
After
adoption
of
the
ordinance
staff
will
engage
the
following
process
to
determine
recipients
for
food
scarcity.
The
staff
will
make
recommendations
based
on
ongoing
data
gathering
where
to
allocate
dollars
amongst
currently
contracted
agencies,
to
engage
additional
agencies
for
emergency
financial
assistance
to
residents.
O
The
city
would
issue
an
rfp
in
addition
to
the
standard
press
release,
staff
would
proactively
reach
out
to
agencies
in
the
community
that
provide
this
service,
but
that
are
not
currently
receiving.
Funds
from
the
city
of
bellevue
staff
would
also
reach
out
to
those
in
the
community
involved,
with
advocacy
for
traditionally
underserved
populations
to
gain
their
insight
on
additional
agencies
to
contact
staff
would
continue
to
provide
assistance
to
any
agency
applying
for
funding,
as
is
done
with
all
of
our
funding.
O
Applications
at
the
close
of
the
rfp
staff
would
then
conduct
a
review
of
the
applications.
The
staff
recommendation
for
food
assistance
providers
and
emergency
financial
assistance
providers
would
be
presented
to
the
human
service
commission
for
endorsement
before
administering
contracts,
and
we
would
be
able
to
accomplish
this
by
the
end
of
august
next
slide,
please.
A
C
Thank
you,
mayor
boy,
another
great
presentation,
another
feel-good
story
for
sure
these
additional
funds
here
will
go
a
very
long
way,
and
you
know
you
said
the
the
the
right
term
that
I
was
looking
for
and
that's
speed.
I
think
be
it
or
the
prior
ordinance
for
this
ordinance.
I
think
the
speed
in
which
we
can
get
these
funds
you
know
to
to
those
operators
and
then
to
the
community
you
know
and
to
serve
the
needs
of
either
the
food
in
security
or
or
or
safe
housing
is
so
critical
right
now.
C
So
I
really
thank
you
for
the
speed
that
you're
in
which
you're
doing
this.
Obviously
there
are
different
federal
regulations
and
paperwork
that
we
need
to
follow,
certainly,
but
the
quicker
that
we
can
get
this
money
into
the
community
and
address
these
issues
is
really
paramount
for
us-
and
I
know
you
understand
that,
but
again,
I'm
just
underlining,
underscoring
or
appreciating
the
fact
that
you
are
moving
with
such
speed.
C
Can
you
one
question
I
did
have
and
I'm
obviously
fully
in
support
of
this
and
ready
to
move
the
motion
forward,
but
the
the
the
the
ongoing
dialogue
that
you're
having
with
some
of
the
operators
and
non-profits
about
the
biggest
need,
has
that
changed
at
all
are?
Are
we
still
getting
the
same
data
in
terms
of
the
greatest
need,
in
this
case
the
the
food
scarcity
and
the
safe
housing,
or
are
we
hearing
from
from
from
different
folks
as
well?
C
O
Yes,
thank
you
for
your
question
deputy
mayor.
So,
as
you
might
recall,
the
council
has
heard
presentations
two
previous
times
on
the
opportunity
to
allocate
funding
towards
human
services
in
the
midst
of
the
pandemic,
and
the
first
was
a
response
to
provide
450
000
additional
dollars
to
emergency
financial
assistance
and
in
the
very
beginning
that
was
clearly
the
primary
need
being
represented
in
the
community
and
what
we
were
hearing
from
both
providers
and
residents
alike.
O
And
then,
in
the
recent
presentation
on
cdbg
funding,
we
were
hearing
some
expanded
needs
in
the
community.
So
while
emergency
financial
assistance
remained
a
need,
so
did
the
need
for
subsidized
child
care
for
legal
assistance,
legal
advocacy
and
shelter
funding,
and
so,
when
we
are
listening
again,
a
new
presenting
need
is
around
food
scarcity.
That
was,
that
was
not
a
need
that
we
were
hearing.
That
providers
were
not
able
to
respond
to.
A
Okay,
council
members
on.
G
Yes,
thank
you
I'm.
This
is
good
news
that
we
have
the
4.3
million
of
cares
funding
from
the
state
to
support,
because
I
would
say
that
what
I've
been
hearing
throughout
the
summer
is
that,
while
they're
in
some
regards
there
is
food
available,
the
access
to
the
food
has
been
very
much
a
concern.
G
So
there
are
funding
gaps
and
I
would
say
that
I'm
excited
that
we
did
on
april
6th,
have
the
450
000
may
18th
to
have
200
000
for
rental
assistance,
but
it's
been
two
and
a
half
months.
So
I
think
that
speed
is
very
important
because
folks,
that
can't
pay
their
rent.
It's
already
august.
Third,
so
to
the
degree
that
we
can
look
at
the
500
000
funding
split
the
way
it
is
and
look
for
ways
that
we
can
provide
more
funding.
G
I
think
that
our
community
is
struggling
in
both
rental
assistance,
as
well
as
food
and
the
other
areas
like
child
care,
legal
advocacy
and
mental
and
behavioral
health.
So
I
understand
that
we
may
not
have
any
additional
funding
right
now.
I
I
would
continue
to
stress
the
importance
of
finding
ways
to
assist
the
community.
G
O
We
definitely
are
helping
to
amplify
the
message
of
the
need
in
the
community,
and
so
we
are
working
with
agencies
to
better
understand
that,
and
that
is
across
the
entire
spectrum.
So
we
are
participating
in
a
number
of
regional
conversations.
Those
around
shelters,
also
food
scarcity,
with
the
nourishing
networks,
conversation
and
trying
to
better
understand
the
need
represented
by
our
providers
and,
following
their
lead
on
how
we
can
amplify
that
message
out
to
the
community,
so
that
both
private
individuals
and
businesses
can
engage
once
they
become
aware
of
the
need.
G
Yeah
and
then
with
the
food,
I
think,
to
the
degree
that
maybe
we
can
create
partnerships
so
that
businesses
that
our
restaurants
can
have
business
and
feed
people
in
the
community,
as
well
like
the
food
truck
voucher
program,
would
be
amazing.
J
I'm
really
pleased
with
this.
I
think
it's
I'm
really
proud
of
the
ethic
at
this
city
and
the
city
council
for
continually
moving
really
quickly
to
the
initial
grants,
then
then
making
sure
that
our
cpg
money
was
used
well
for
the
things
that
are
most
needed
and
equitably
and
again
tonight
same
thing.
So
I'm
supportive
of
this
ordinance
I'm
supportive
of
the
way
that
the
money
is
outlined
to
be
spent.
J
If
people
aren't
eating
and
they
don't
have
a
roof
over
their
head,
all
is
not
well
in
their
world,
and
so
we
need
to
help
them,
and
this
cares
act
money.
The
amount
that
we
have
to
share
is
going
to
do
a
lot
of
good,
and
hopefully
the
economy
will
rebound
quicker
so
that
people
can
start
being
back
at
work
and
living
their
best
life
thanks.
I
Thank
you
and
thanks
to
staff
again
for
the
good
news
and
appreciative
as
well
for
the
funding
from
the
state.
So
I
I
agree
I
mean
this
is
this
is
a
good
story
and
I
I'm
looking
forward
to
getting
the
money
into
the
community's
hands
so
that
they
can
have
food
and
can
hear
their
rent.
I
guess
just
echoing
I
like
the
idea
of
seeing
that
there
is
any
matching
opportunity,
matching
opportunities
or
other
ways
as
we
continue
to
look
for
funding.
L
Thank
you.
This
is
indeed
great
great
stories.
One
thing
that
I
just
want
to
remind
us
all:
you
know
this
case
act
money.
Ultimately,
we
need
to
thank
our
presidents,
the
people
that
we
serve
and
the
people
in
our
community.
This
is
all
money
from
federal
government,
but
out
it
all
came
from
us,
don't
forget
we
pay
for
them.
They
got
the
money
and
if
we
haven't
paid
we're
gonna
owe
them
to
pay
it
back.
So,
but
it's
a
great
great
thing
we
are,
we
have
the
ability
opportunity.
L
I
want
to
thank
the
community
who
are
able
to
help
in
this
great
great.
You
know
way
to
help
the
people
who
are
in
need.
The
only
one
thing
I
want
to
say
is
that
we
talk
about.
You
know
food
brand
what's
important
and
we
have
been
doing
that
through
our
human
services
needs,
and
this
is
our
additional.
So
this
gives
an
opportunity
to
reach
out
even
more.
L
L
The
non-traditional,
non-profit
agencies
that
have
not
that
can
serve
those
who
have
not
been
represented.
Normally,
I
think
it's
important.
They
open
up
a
door
open
up
opportunity
for
them
to
also
be
involved,
participate
to
be
helped
or
to
help
us
eventually,
that's
the
whole
goal
of
helping
people
is,
ultimately
they
will
be
able
to
help
everybody
elsewhere.
L
I
think
this
is
the
ultimate
goal,
so
I
really
appreciate
the
opportunity
we
have
because
we're
able
to
you
know
have
the
money
come
to
us
and
whether
you
know
saying
we're
doing
all
this
good
stuff,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
keep
in
mind
whatever
program
we
do
so
the
organizations
I
think
that
was
I
was
told-
and
I
mentioned
about
salvation
army
jubilee-
reach
they've
all
been
doing
great
things.
L
You
know
the
people
who
are
in
line
for
food,
150,
200
people
every
day
you
know
lining
up
for
food,
and
so
it's
just
amazing.
So
that's
all
I
have
to
say,
and
I
think
this
is
another
great
story-
great
opportunity
that
we're
trying
to
help
and
the
sk
the
thing
that
scares
me
is,
I
don't
know
how
long
this
might
keep
going.
You
know,
so
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
careful
really
thinking,
even
though
we're
happy
to
spend
money
now
we're
able
to.
L
K
Yes,
so
I
I
again
as
everybody
else
thanks
the
staff
and
it's
just
amazing
work
and-
and-
and
I
know
this
is
just
the
point
in
time-
you
notice
what's
going
to
happen
in
the
future,
but
the
fact
matter
is
we're
getting
this
done
and
getting
it
done
at
a
at
a
time
that
apparently
the
community
needs
it.
K
So
that's
that's
good
and
I
think
the
the
comments
about
us
being
doing
this
quickly
are
very
important
and
I
think
one
thing
I
want
to
leave
in
all
this.
I
think
it
applies
to
what
we're
doing.
It
reminds
me
of
an
old
kind
of
nursery
rhyme
that
I
always
liked
and
that's
maybe
it
has
something
to
do
with
the
way
I
approach
things
now.
A
So
I
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
I
I
do
think
that
speed
needs
to
be
one
of
the
top
criteria
for
for
dispersing
these
funds,
because
these
are,
as
you
know,
month-to-month
needs
that
become
just
critical
at
the
end
of
each
and
beginning
of
each
month
as
rent
becomes
due.
So
anything
we
can
do
to
expedite
the
process.
I
would
really
love
to
see,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
the
good
work
you're
doing,
and
I
just
hope.
Next
month
we
have
some
more
money
to
disperse
somehow
some
way.
C
K
L
A
The
opposed
okay,
that's
great!
Thank
you.
Okay,
now
we're
going
to
move
into
an
executive
session,
we're
going
to
recess
for
a
property
disposition
for
approximately
50
minutes,
15
minutes,
and
then
the
council
meeting
will
be
adjourned,
but
this
is
the
end
of
our
publicly
viewed
meeting
right
now.
So
council
members,
you
will
get
on
another
link
for
the
executive
session.
I
believe
that's
in
an
email
that
you
received
just
recently,
so
I
will
see
you.