►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - July 26, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
To
the
bellevue
city
council
meeting
for
july,
26
2021,
it's
a
beautiful
evening
tonight
we
have
a
lot
of
material
to
go
over,
so
I'm
hoping
we
can
after
we
honor
police,
chief
violet.
I
hope
we
can
keep
our
comments
down
to
three
minutes
max
at
a
time
clerk.
Could
you
do
the
roll
call?
Please?
Yes,
mayor
robinson.
C
D
E
A
F
You
mayor,
whereas
steve
milette
has
provided
vital
service
to
the
city
of
bellevue
for
six
years,
serving
as
chief
of
police
since
2015
and
whereas
chief
millet
implemented
the
tomorrow's
program
shortly
after
arriving
in
bellevue,
which
created
seven
advisory
councils
to
the
chief
which
represented
communities
based
on
race,
ethnicity,
religion
and
sexual
orientation.
F
The
chief
also
created
a
new
employee
wellness
program,
assigning
a
sergeant
to
oversee
the
unit,
giving
staff
access
to
critical
health
and
financial
information,
and
whereas
chief
milette
also
helped
navigate
the
police
department
and
the
city
of
bellevue's
engagement
in
the
social
justice
movement
over
the
past
year.
The
programs
referenced
above
allowed
for
open
dialogue
and
swift
participation
in
these
critical
issues.
F
Now,
therefore,
on
behalf
of
mayor
lynn,
robinson
and
on
behalf
of
the
bellevue
city
council,
do
hereby
this
26th
day
of
july
in
the
year
2021
hereby
command
stephen
l
mylett
for
his
professionalism,
dedication
and
service
to
the
community
and
the
bellevue
police
department.
We
wish
him
the
best
in
his
future
endeavors
and
that's
signed
mayor
lynn,
robinson.
C
C
C
Most
of
us
would,
quite
frankly,
run
away
from
and
see
things
on
a
daily
basis
that
most
people
would
rather
not
think
about,
let
alone
have
to
deal
with,
and
the
chief
is
no
different
chief
millet.
Thank
you
for
serving
the
city
of
bellevue
and
its
residents
with
dedication,
commitment
and
honor
over
these
last
six
years,
and
what
are
six
years
it's
been
for
you
and
your
department.
C
You
know
some
of
those
highlights
as
councilmember
robertson
just
mentioned
in
the
accommodation,
but
some
of
the
things
that
will
always
stand
out
for
me
was
your
community-based
policing
approach,
your
outreach
to
minorities
in
our
city,
assuring
immigrants
that
this
department
would
never
ask
a
victim
witness
or
suspect
for
their
immigration
status.
C
You
know
developing
a
department,
more
diverse
and
engaged
with
this
with
the
community
that
it
serves
restoring
the
bike
patrol
reorganizing
the
department
into
geographic
sectors
forming
those
different
advisory
councils,
such
as
for
african
americans,
muslim
latino,
lgbtqi
asia,
pacific
islander
and
south
asian,
as
well.
Knowing
and
caring
about
every
officer
in
this
department
who
put
on
a
uniform
and
pushing
back
loudly
against
racism
stemming
from
the
pandemic
against
our
asian
residents,
letting
them
know
loud
and
clear
that
that
was
not
going
to
be
tolerated
in
our
city.
C
You've
been
a
steady
hand
at
the
wheel
for
this
department
during
sometimes
some
very
challenging
times,
and
I
couldn't
wish
you
a
better
transition
to
to
akron
and
I'm
sure
you
weren't
able
to
accomplish
everything
you
set
your
mind
to
when
you
first
took
this
job
and
I'm
sure
there's
there's
still
a
long
to
do
list
that
intern
chief
shirley
will
probably
be
looking
at
and
talking
to
you
over
the
next
couple
of
months.
C
About
but
you
know,
but
I
think
by
every
measure
you
have
left
this
department
in
a
much
better
place
than
when
you
found
it,
and
you
know
the
city
of
akron
is
lucky
to
have
you
and
I'm
sure
that
your
tenure
there
will
be
as
successful.
It
has
been
here
in
bellevue,
so
my
best
wishes
to
you
to
your
family
in
your
new
adventure
in
ohio.
E
Hi
chief
hi
councilman
yeah.
Well,
I'm
very
disappointed.
You
short
term
and,
as
you
probably
know,
everybody
knows
public
safety.
You
know
for
the
city
of
bellevue
for
me
before
the
council
is
the
number
one
priority.
The
most
important
people
look
at
police
department
of
public
safety
as
the
responsibility
of
a
government,
because
we
cannot
depend
on
individual
military
protections.
You
have
a
bunch
of
militia
and
so
it's
essential,
no
question
and
we've
been
very
fortunate
in
bellevue.
You
know
over
my
50
some
years
living
here.
E
We
are
under
such
a
wonderful
wonderful
department
with
great
people,
and
so,
as
I
you
know,
we
look
for
new
person,
new
chief.
We
have
done
so.
You
know
a
few
times,
not
that
many
it's
a
major
responsibility.
We
always
look
for
the
best,
and
indeed
you
know.
We
were
very
fortunate
that
we
found
you
so
you
ui
police
officers,
police
chief,
that's
most
important.
When
you
have
somebody
new
from
the
outside,
you
know.
Usually
it
takes
time
to
adjust
and
people
don't
know
you
know
you
and
the
new
chief.
E
It
takes
a
long
time
of
period
of
adjustment,
but
you
came
on
and
it's
a
just
work
writing
smoothly,
because
you
have
demonstrated
your
experience
and
background
just
fetching.
You
know
like
a
handsome
glove
and
I
think
it's
proven
to
be
the
case,
and
I
think
you
have
the
respect
of
your
fellow
officers
there's
nothing
that
can
replace
that
and
obviously
you
have
respect
of
the
management
and
you
have
our
respect.
E
You
know
we
are
elected
by
the
people
and
hopefully
you
know
we
know
where
they
come
from
and
we
believe
that
you
have
equal
respect
and
you've
done
a
great
job.
You've
filmed
you
know
during
your
tenure,
you
have
established
a
number
of
new
programs,
you
know,
such
as
the
community
outreach
and
having
representatives
from
various
diverse
community
groups.
As
the
deputy
mayor
mentioned,
and
you
know,
the
biggest
challenge
we
face
now
is
really
how
to
include
how
to
communicate
how
to
bring
people
in
to
most
important.
E
You
know,
part
of
our
city
and
the
most
important
part
again
is
safety,
public
safety
and
especially
for
immigrant
population.
They
traditionally
look
at
police
officers
as
well
the
enforcer
you
know
they
scare
about
you
and
they
stay
away
from
you,
but
we
have
continued
and
you
have
having
this.
You
know
the
ethnic
minority
council
on
board
and
that
really
had
sort
of
walked.
The
talk
you
bring
people
into
the
police
department,
establish
communication
and
second,
you
have
increased
higher,
diverse
police
officers.
E
Absolutely
and
it's
not
easy
because
it's
against
the
community,
but
traditionally
don't
look
at
law
enforcement
as
something
that
is
very
friendly,
and
you
know
so.
You
have
absolutely
improved
the
makeup,
and
so
we
are
very
sorry,
especially
the
last
year
we
have.
We
have
gone
through
such
a
tremendous
stress
on
our
law
enforcement
offices
and
you
have
kept
up.
E
We
have
been
very
sensitive
and
we
have
proven
we
had
a
one
one
night
challenge,
but
you
know,
since
then
we
had
what
wonderful,
peaceful
you
know
for
the
city
of
bellevue,
so
it's
proven
proven
your
leadership
proven
what
you
have
done
to
the
department
and
I
think,
with
what
you
have
set
up.
It
actually
points
out
to
another
improvement.
It's
the.
I
would
call
the
community
policing,
you
know,
I
think
you
definitely
emphasize
that
and
that's
the
direction
I
when
I
was
in
the
council
almost
30
years
ago.
E
Will
you
talk
about
that?
That's
really.
The
very
basic
fundamental
policing
is
community
policing,
it's
beat
officers
you're
part
of
a
community
making
communities
safe
right
and
helping
the
community
know
that
you
are
there
to
protect
them
when
you
are
needed.
So
I
thank
you
for
starting
up
playing
that
foundation
and
I
wish
you
the
best
and
we
are
we're
sorry
to
see.
You
go
obviously
no
question
about
it,
but
I
we
realized
that.
However,
it's
a
lot
more
important
also
to
be
with
the
family.
E
That's
the
priority
and
you
are
also
demonstrated
you
are
set
a
good
example,
show
your
wisdom
and
your
priorities.
So
we
understand
appreciate
it.
The
best
of
everything,
that's
a
lot
with
your
family,
and
I
hope
you
do
find
time
to
visit
us
because
we're
still
the
best
region
best
city
in
the
country.
So
I'm
sure
you
come
to
us.
I
You
know
chief,
it's
it's
been
a
fascinating
relationship
and
partnership.
You
came
in
when
I
was
married
and
right
away.
Well,
two
things.
I
really
remember
from
that
time
period:
one
is
going
with
you
to
the
mosque
in
bellevue
and
talking
to
people
there
on
a
saturday
and
ended
up
having
lunch
with
them,
and
you
talked
about
recruitment.
You
talked
about
yourself.
I
I
You
know
from
the
posture,
but
I
mean
that
was
just
so
amazing
that
you
related
so
much
to
everybody
and
to
people
and
not
not
just
that
community
but
others
as
well,
and
you
know,
we've
gone
to
several,
went
to
several
meetings
and
dinners
and
things
at
the
mosque
in
other
places,
and
you
brought
other
officers
with
you
and
I
think
that
was
a
real
positive
start
and
a
start
on
bellevue
really
going
forward
in
our
identity
of
making
our
bellevue
welcomes
the
world.
Our
diversity,
strength
actually
means
something.
I
Thank
you,
and
I
won't
forget
that
the
other.
Well,
I
won't
forget
the
night
of
the
fire
and
being
called
at
six
o'clock
in
the
morning
to
come
down
to
the
starbucks
and
across
the
street,
and
you
were
there
and
the
fbi
was
there
and
the
police
were
there
and
everybody
we
went
over
and
you
really
made
a
tremendous
tremendous
impact
on
that
again
in
the
whole
community,
not
just
the
muslim
community
but
the
whole
community,
about
your
commitment
and
how
you
actually
carry
out
the
job
I
mean
you
know.
I
I
appreciate
all
of
the
and
didn't
leave
as
much
to
say,
but
the
people
who
have
talked
you
know
council
members
beforehand
really
laid
out.
I
You
know
the
whole
piece
of
what
you've
done
and
it's
just
amazing,
but
I
just
want
to
add
to
that
because
I
worked
with
you
on
a
very
you
know:
good
personal
level
and
and
official
level
as
well,
and
I
just
haven't
seen
anybody
in
your
job
and
and
this
type
of
thing
carry
it
the
way
you
do
and
then
to
come
through
and
help
us
get
through
this
after
the
george.
I
Why
can't,
I
think
lord?
I
always
have
trouble
names,
george
george,
lloyd
event
and
kneeling
with
the
with
the
black
lives
matter,
people
working
with
the
community
working
with
the
store
owners
working
with
others,
everybody
to
make
that
again,
you
brought
it
together
and
made
it
really
work,
and
that
says
a
lot
for
you.
You
know
it's
just
amazing
and
I'm
personally
I'm
very
pleased
that
you're
going
where
you
think
you
need
to
be
at
this
point,
and
we
all
have
to
do
that
at
times.
F
F
You
know
in
the
world
and
leading
a
police
force
is
right
up
there
with
one
of
the
more
difficult
jobs
and
one
of
the
more
important
jobs.
We
have
it's
one
of
the
most
important
positions
for
the
city
of
bellevue.
As
councilmember
lee
said,
public
safety
is
critical
to
having
a
wonderful
livable
community
and
during
your
tenure
you
have
strengthened
the
department.
You've
strengthened
them
from
within
you've
strengthened
their
reputation
from
without
not
just
in
bellevue
but
across
the
region.
F
I
have
people
that
comment
on
what
a
great
police
chief
we
have
and
how
wonderful
you
you've
made
the
city
look.
You
also
have
strengthened
the
relationships
with
our
community
and
you
strengthen
the
leadership
and
connections
internally
at
city
hall,
with
between
the
police
department
and
the
other
departments,
including
the
council.
F
So
you
know,
as
as
someone
said,
you
left
the
department
stronger
than
you
found
it,
you've
really
enhanced
and
elevated
the
department
and
the
city's
reputation,
and
so
I
I
can't
thank
you
enough
for
all
the
I
know
what
it's
not
a
40-hour
week-
job,
it's
probably
not
even
an
80-hour
week
job,
but
all
the
extra
time
care
and
consideration
that
you've
given
to
this
position
and
to
the
to
the
men
and
women
of
the
department
and
to
the
people
of
this
city.
So
I'm
I'm
just
so
grateful
for
your
service.
F
I'm
sorry
to
see
you
go,
but
of
course
I
wish
you
the
best
of
luck
for
you
and
your
family.
I
know
you're
going
to
be
successful.
I
hope
you
find
ohio
to
be
a
wonderful
place
to
live
and
a
good
department
to
lead
and
yeah.
We,
we
don't
be
a
stranger
and
we
will
be
watching
for
you
to
continue
doing
great
things
which
I'm
sure
will
get.
Maybe
even
get
picked
up
in
the
papers
here.
So
I'm
really.
A
A
You've
been
a
guiding
force
and
a
source
of
strength
for
me
and
many
others.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
always
being
present
and
available
for
continually
growing
in
this
evolving
role
that
you've
had
and
for
just
doing
an
excellent
job.
I
appreciate
you
I'm
going
to
miss
you
very
much
and
I
wish
you
well
thank.
G
Oh
okay,
thank
you
mayor.
I'm
sorry
about
that
steve!
Thank
you.
So
much
you
know
leading
in
law
enforcement
now
is
so
so
hard
and
I
so
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
chose
bellevue
six
years
ago
to
be
our
police
chief.
You
know
when
I
think
about
you.
I
think
about
the
fact
that
you
were
there
for
the
community
and
leading
by
example
for
the
department
about
what
leadership
looks
like
I
still
remember
the
first
time
we
met,
you
talked
about
the
guardian
view
of
policing
versus
in
the
past.
G
For
me,
though,
the
parts
I
will
remember
the
most
is
what
council
member
stokes
talked
about
of
being
in
the
the
mosque
fire
and
the
500
people
all
squished
into
some
amish
high
school,
and
it
really
does
highlight
the
fact
that
you
are
there
when
the
community
needs
you
and
our
police
officers
are
there
as
well.
G
The
fentanyl
one
at
bellevue
high
school
when
communities
are
so
concerned
about
an
issue
that
continues
to
happen
in
our
community,
and
you
could
have
just
sent
your
officers.
You
were
there
personally
and
that
to
me
is
very,
very
meaningful
and
it's
part
of
leadership.
So
I
will
just
tell
you
that
I
I
wish
you
well.
G
So
thank
you
chief
for
all
your
efforts
and
we
will
miss
you
very
much
and
wish
you
well
don't
be
a
stranger.
Thank
you.
D
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
chief,
thank
you,
as
everyone
else
has
said,
for
your
service
and
leadership
really
appreciate
how
you
engaged
in
the
community
and
made
sure
that
community
policing
was
met.
Everyone
in
the
community
and
what
I'll
remember
most
are
conversations
around
race
and
policing
and
really
appreciate
not
just
your
openness
but
also,
I
think
you
know
I
would
say,
inviting
that
conversation
and
that
curiosity
that
you
had
so
I
really
appreciated
that.
D
I
mean
it
meant
a
lot,
so
I
know
karen
you'll
carry
that
forward
into
akron
and
and
it'll
be
welcome
with
open
arms.
So
I
just
want
to
say:
congratulations
thank.
A
J
So
thank
you
mayor
and
many
nice
things
have
been
said
about
uc,
which
you
know,
I'm
sure
all
of
us
agree
with,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
on
behalf
of
the
city's
executive
leadership
team.
We
want
to
thank
you
for
your
tremendous
contributions
to
not
only
the
team
but
also
to
the
city.
You
know
from
a
city-wide
perspective,
we
are
grateful,
for
you
know:
steve's,
unwavering
support
of
the
organization's
one
city
culture
and
for
embracing
the
city's
core
values
of
stewardship,
commitment
to
employees,
innovation,
integrity
and
exceptional
public
service.
J
H
H
I'm
very
humbled
by
all
of
your
all
of
your
kind
words.
This
is
this.
Is
I'm
conflicted?
I
really
am
because
I
really
think
that
bellevue
is
a
very,
very
special
place
and
it
has
been
my
true
privilege
and
honor,
and
the
highlight
of
my
career
getting
to
work
here
in
this
city
in
this
community,
with
some
phenomenal
people
mayor
you
and
the
council
and
the
councils
before
you
have
shown
me
nothing
but
support.
H
You
have
been
open
to
ideas
and
and
given
me
just
so
much
leeway
to
lead-
and
I
cannot
thank
you
all
enough
for
that
when
I've
ever
asked
for
anything,
this
council
has
said.
Yes,
you've
said
yes
to
public
safety.
You
said
yes
to
the
men
and
women
of
the
of
this
police
department.
You
said
yes
to
the
community
that
we're
going
to
provide
the
best
services
possible
across
the
board
across
the
entire
city,
but
certainly
in
policing,
and
that
was
I.
I
can't
tell
you
how
how
much.
H
H
I'm
gonna
miss
your
leadership.
I'm
gonna
miss
your
friendship,
I'm
gonna
miss
I'm
gonna
miss
so
much
and
you-
and
I
will
have
a
private
conversation
about
this-
that
I
won't
talk
about
here,
but
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
on
the
leadership
team.
H
H
I
am
so
honored
to
serve
along
each
and
every
one
of
you
and
I
thank
you
for
all
the
support
that
you've.
Given
me
personally,
the
bellevue
community.
H
H
H
You
listen
to
the
community,
you
care
about
this
community
and
you
love
this
community
and
I
know
you
all
do
you've
made
my
job
easy
and
mary
you've
given
in
counsel
you've.
Given
me
a
lot
of
compliments-
and
I
thank
you
for
all
of
them,
but
I
promise
you
if
I
have
success
here,
is
because
of
people
that
I
get
to
work
with
each
and
every
day.
H
I
I
I
leave
here
conflicted
because
I
love
it
here.
I
look
forward
to
the
challenges
that
akron
provides
and-
and
I
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
community
in
city,
but
I
leave
a
part
of
my
heart
here.
I
do
and-
and
I
thank
you
all
thank
you.
A
A
G
A
B
B
L
Thank
you
so
much
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
city,
council,
members
and
city
manager,
miyaki.
Thank
you
for
giving
me
an
opportunity
to
speak
this
evening.
My
name
is
paul
and
I
live
in
bellevue
and
I'm
a
member
of
the
people
for
climate
action.
The
bellevue
chapter
pca
is
our
acronym.
It's
an
all-volunteer
organization
and
our
mission
is
to
support
cities
like
bellevue
that
have
committed
to
greenhouse
gas
or
ghg
emissions
50
by
the
year
2030..
L
The
three
of
us
that
are
here
speaking
this
evening
wish
to
commend
the
council
for
encouraging
city
staff
to
take
on
more
climate
action
work.
We
are
also
here
in
support
of
the
staff
that
has
been
working
so
hard
since
the
environmental
stewardship
plan
was
adopted
in
december
of
last
year.
L
L
Some
of
our
members
have
contributed
time
to
research
and
compile
what
climate
actions
are
being
taken
by
other
cities
across
the
country,
and
we
thought
you
might
find
these
comparisons
interesting
charmaine.
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
to
put
it
in
perspective.
Let's
first
look
at
the
history
of
bellevue's
community-wide
ghg
emissions.
That's
found
right
on
the
city
website
for
the
nine
years
before
the
pandemic,
our
community
emissions
were
essentially
flat,
as
you
can
see
in
the
chart.
L
That
was
good
in
the
sense
that
emissions
weren't
increasing
but
hasn't
resulted
in
a
downward
trajectory
toward
the
2030
target,
which
is
illustrated
by
the
red
dotted
lines.
To
show
you
that
such
a
trajectory
is
possible.
Here's
a
similar
chart
from
berkeley
california,
a
city
about
the
same
size
as
bellevue.
L
L
Now,
given
this
is
a
simplistic
slide,
the
next
people
for
climate
action
speaker,
you
will
hear
from
barbara
braun-
will
provide
more
detail
for
not
only
this
side
of
berkeley
but
other
u.s
cities
similar
in
size
to
bellevue.
B
M
Okay,
so
please
go
to
the
next
slide,
just
one
second
here
good
evening,
city
leaders,
my
name
is
barbara
braun
and
I'm
a
resident
of
bellevue
and
speaking
on
behalf
of
ppa
pca,
is
so
excited
that
the
council
consensus
is
moving
toward
taking
much
bolder
action
on
sustainability
to
get
an
idea
of
the
investment
level
that
might
be
appropriate
for
bellevue.
M
We
thought
it
would
be
helpful
to
share
information
from
other
cities
who
are
currently
making
progress
much
faster
than
bellevue
pca,
looked
at
five
similar
sized
cities
and
looked
at
what
they
are
spending
in
2021
on
sustainability.
As
shown
on
this
slide,
the
blue
is
the
city
level
and
the
green
is
the
sustainability
level.
M
Budget
size
varies
across
these
cities
from
boulder
at
341
million
to
bellevue
at
850
million
on
a
per
capita
basis.
Spending
varies
from
a
low
of
3254
in
boulder
to
a
high
of
68.95
per
resident
in
santa
monica.
Bellevue
is
on
the
high
end.
At
57.39
per
resident
city
budgets
are
dependent
on
the
basket
of
services
provided.
So
this
is
not
an
apples-to-apples
comparison
or
a
commentary
on
bellevue's
efficiency.
M
Each
of
these
cities
has
a
dedicated
sustainability
department,
while
these
departments
invest
in
a
variety
of
programs.
It's
helpful
to
get
a
big
picture
view
by
looking
at
the
size
of
their
budget.
Today,
bellevue
is
spending
about
683
thousand
dollars
on
the
esi
plus
one-time
grants
by
comparison.
M
M
Bellevue
is
spending
if
you
go
to
actually
two
slides
ahead,
but
bellevue
is
spending
0.08
percent
of
its
budget
on
sustainability.
M
M
Each
of
these
cities
has
a
sizable
sustainability
staff,
ranging
from
7
to
18
employees.
These
include
technical
staff
with
expertise
in
reducing
emissions
in
buildings
and
transportation.
Currently,
bellevue
has
a
staff
of
two
working
at
the
program
level
and
no
resident
technical
experts.
By
the
way
we
love
what
jennifer
and
anna
are
doing.
So
we
just
want
more.
Each
of
these
cities
has
elevated
sustainable
sustainability
to
the
sen
to
send
tv
central
to
their
city
charters
and
strategies.
M
N
O
O
We're
good
hello,
mayor,
robertson
and
council
members
and
city
manager
miyake.
My
name
is
court
olson
and
I'm
a
long
time
resident
of
bellevue.
As
you
probably
know,
I'm
here
to
wrap
up
remarks
from
the
people
for
climate
action,
bellevue
group
and
last
week
we
were
encouraged
by
comments
that
we
heard
from
several
of
you
who
wish
to
see
more
rapid
advances
of
the
environmental
stewardship
plan.
Thanks
for
making
those
observations
tonight
we'll
offer
recommendations
for
the
future.
But
first,
let's
look
back
next
slide.
O
Please
actually,
two
down
there,
you
go
in
the
six
months
since
the
environmental
stewardship
plan
was
adopted
in
december,
we've
seen
how
a
rather
slow
start.
Also,
several
actions
scheduled
for
2021
have
now
been
delayed
to
2022..
O
However,
we
don't
think
existing
staff
is
the
problem.
Both
jennifer
ewing
and
anna
hugger
up
have
had
ongoing
duties
for
several
years.
We
believe
that
they've
just
not
had
time
to
rapidly
advance
the
december
plan,
so
we
are
urging
this
city
to
appropriate
more
funds.
This
fall
to
hire
three
more
new
environmental
stewardship
staff,
as
barbara
braun
has
just
showed
you
other
cities.
Our
size
are
with
robust
climate
action
plans,
have
seven
to
18
staff
devoted
to
sustainability
work.
O
O
Accordingly,
bellevue
needs
to
catch
up
with
other
leading
cities.
Based
on
our
research.
We
feel
that
bellevue's
esi
program
should
have
at
least
a
three
million
dollar
annual
budget
and
have
eight
full-time
staff
next
slide.
Please
we
recommend
another
three
people
doing
the
roles
that
are
shown
in
this
slide.
One
of
the
most
important
ones,
we
think,
is
an
educational
outreach
effort
to
convince
people
what
needs
to
be
happening
in
bellevue,
as
you
start
to
implement
new
actions.
O
Next
slide,
please
this
fall
when
the
current
budget
is
reviewed,
we
ask
that
at
least
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
be
carved
out
to
hire
three
new
environmental
stewardship
staff
in
the
early
2022
year
slide.
Please
then,
in
the
fall
of
next
year
in
the
fall
of
2022,
when
you're
doing
a
new
two-year
budget
to
boost
the
esi
staff
level
up
to
a
number
of
eight
in
2023,
we
would
like
you
to
consider
a
three
million
dollar
annual
budget
that
would
really
help
the
whole
program
advance
as
it
should.
G
Thank
you,
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
new
in-house
and
council
member
as
a
13-year
bellevue
resident
today
I
am
voicing
support
for
initiative,
21554,
I'm
sorry
25-544
or
programmed
around
impact
mitigation
for
permanent
supportive
housing.
I
have
participated
in
cfh's
advisory
group
since
january
2020
and
currently
serve
on
the
cfh
good
neighbor
agreement
advisory
committee.
G
I
am
proud
to
represent
my
neighborhood
in
both
groups.
The
thoughtful
and
respectful
discussions
over
the
last
18
months
have
resulted
in
improvements
and
adjustments
to
csh
plan
eastgate
operations.
I
believe
the
culmination
of
our
collective
effort
will
advance
cfa's.
Success
at
this
stage
benefit
their
clients
and
minimize
the
impact
to
the
community.
G
However,
concerns
have
been
raised
about
the
close
proximity
of
the
east,
a
permanent,
supportive
housing
to
cfh
and
negatively
impacting
cfh
if
not
operated.
Well,
the
city
should
consider
setting
standards
for
supportive
housing
operators
similar
to
those
that
shelter
operations
must
abide
by.
These
expectations
are
not
meant
to
deter
permanent
support
accounting
but
ensure
the
health
and
safety
of
the
clients
they
serve,
and
the
community
at
large
as
an
example,
last
november's
fatal
stabbing
of
a
caseworker
at
employment's
supportive
housing
project.
G
Why
must
one
operator
be
held
to
higher
standards
than
another?
I
recognize
the
need
for
permanent
supportive
housing
in
bellevue,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
the
operators
of
these
publicly
funded
projects
are
ready
and
capable
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
clients,
while
minimizing
the
impact
of
the
nearby
community.
G
Please
create
a
set
of
basic
standards
for
these
operators,
similar
to
cfh.
Failure
to
acknowledge
this
gap
may
undermine
the
success
of
cfh
and
the
permanent
supported
housing
operations
and
the
good
world
built
within
the
community.
I
urge
you
to
support
initiative
21-544.
Thank
you
for
your
service.
P
P
While
I
may
not
agree
with
how
we
came
to
be
here,
these
are
all
needed
services
that
have
the
possibility
of
serving
our
community.
Well,
I
see
it
as
the
possibility,
as
I've
been
expressing
concern
for
the
last
couple
years
that,
while
the
luca
adds
certain
requirements
for
oversight
such
as
addressing
concerns
for
safety,
program
standards,
security
and,
most
importantly,
to
me-
transparency
that
are
addressed
for
the
shelter.
P
P
The
lack
of
mitigation
for
permanent
supportive
housing
leaves
the
city
of
bellevue
and,
more
specifically,
the
residents
of
the
surrounding
areas
of
eastgate,
woodridge,
factoria
and
more
and
more
extremely
vulnerable
to
the
potential.
After
effects
of
this
oversight,
and
now
with
king
county's
purchase
of
the
silver
cloud
inn
in
redmond
slash
north
bellevue,
there
will
be
many
more
residents
affected.
P
P
Q
You
your
time
begins
now.
Okay,
karen
morris
address
on
file,
I'm
here
speaking
for
hillary
neighbors,
about
a
long
pattern
of
treatment
by
three
groups:
tent
city,
four
sharewheel
temple
beneath
torah
and
at
times
cob
staff.
This
15-year
pattern,
regrettably,
is
promises,
made
promises
broken
over
that
time.
We
have
documented
many
examples
of
this
and
could
provide
them
again
if
needed.
Q
Now
I
speak
to
a
new
example
and
propose
action
to
demonstrate
some
mitigation
of
that
pattern
and
of
the
fact
that
this
neighborhood
has
borne
the
majority
impact
of
these
camps
here
in
bellevue
before
this
sixth
day
of
tc4
at
tbt.
Among
concerns,
I
ask
if
the
time
limit
of
the
permit
would
be
adhered
to.
I
base
this
concern
on
numerous
extensions
of
stay
and
contraventions
of
the
ordinance
in
sammamish
right
before
coming
here
in
email
from
tbt,
I
was
told
temple
beneath
plans
on
complying
with
all
code
requirements.
Q
This
includes
the
length
of
stay
requirement,
a
cob
staff
member
also
verbally
stated
that
the
city
would
be
enforcing
code
requirements,
including
length
of
stay.
I
expressed
hope
that,
with
their
greatly
reduced
numbers
and
special
funding
available
for
emergency
housing
at
the
time,
it
might
be
possible
for
the
city
to
find
them
housing
indoors
before
end
of
stay.
Q
Q
I
spoke
with
cob's
homeless
outreach
coordinator
and
discovered
that
the
city
has
done
no
outreach
to
this
group,
but
has
placed
people
into
the
camp.
This
should
change.
I
also
heard
her
speak
about
mistrust
in
the
homeless
population
and
needing
to
do
lots
of
rapport
building,
mainly
by
doing
what
you
say
you
are
going
to
do.
I
suggest
cob
at
all
need
to
extend
that
courtesy
to
our
neighborhood,
also
where
mistrust
was
built
from
past
experience
of
numerous
promises
not
kept.
Q
This
permit
was
the
first
extended
permit
under
the
new
ordinance.
It
allows
two
90-day
stays
in
a
three-year
period.
Normally,
there
is
an
18-month
gap
between
stays
now,
since
we
have
two
90-day
stays
with
no
gap.
These
two
should
be
both
allowed
stays
under
that
permit
and
there
should
not
be
another
stay
or
permit
at
this
location
for
36
months.
B
Thank
you
miss
morris.
Then
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
speaker
list.
For
this
evening.
We
do
still
have
a
few
minutes
remaining
in
oral
communications.
If
there's
anyone
connected
to
this
call,
who
would
like
to
speak
to
the
council
this
evening,
please
use
the
raised
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
you're
connected
with
a
phone.
B
A
A
J
There,
I
am,
can
you
hear
me
now
sorry,
a
little
bit
of
a
technical
glitch
on
my
side?
Apologize
to
all
just
think
I
just
wanted
to
mention
under
the
city
manager's
report
is
a
management
breed.
D
J
It
relates
to
the
bellevue
conflict
resolution,
center's
eviction,
resolution
program
that
will
be
teed
up
later
this
year.
It's
just
meant
for
a
written
management
brief
and
not
intended
for
presentation
this
evening.
A
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you!
So
if
there's
any
comments
or
questions
on
that,
please
feel
free
to
email,
city
manager
or
the
staff
included
on
that
all
right.
We're
going
to
take
a
quick
break.
It's
almost
seven
o'clock,
so
we'll
come
back
at
7
10.
A
F
Thank
you
and
I
have
a
slide
that
I
worked
with
staff
to
prepare
so
that
we
can
have
them
in
a
really
usable
manner.
So,
as
we
were,
have
been
working
with
the
1590
money
which
we
adopted
last
year
and
as
the
legislatures
passed
new
code
on
supportive
housing
and
as
we've
started,
to
make
awards
under
the
1590
money
or
under
arch
awards
for
supportive
housing
and
as
we
adopted
an
interim
official
control
a
few
weeks
ago,
which
is
set
for
public
hearing
next
week.
F
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
about
supportive
housing.
Actually,
I'm
not
ready
for
the
slide
right
now,
because
thank
you.
I'd
like
to
actually
talk
for
a
few
minutes.
First
and
then
I'll
put
it
up
so
and
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
it
about
how
we
can
make
supportive
housing
work
really
well
for
bellevue.
F
We
when
we
adopted
the
1590
money.
We
did
that
because
we
thought
that
bellevue
could
do
a
better
job
at
managing
that
money
to
provide
housing
and
supportive
services
for
the
people
of
this
city,
and
I'm
going
to
tell
a
little
bit
of
a
personal
story.
I
don't
do
it
often,
but
I
think
I
really
care
about
this
issue,
and
my
interest
in
this
issue
are
this
is
or
is
informed
by
this
I
have
a
brother
who
is
a
paranoid
schizophrenic
who
has
been
homeless
since
the
80s.
F
F
It
didn't
matter
what
his
family,
my
family,
did
to
try
to
help
him,
because
we
are
not
social
workers.
We
are
not
nurses,
we
are
not
psychiatrists
or
psychologists,
and
it
was
only
about
eight
years
ago
that
he,
through
the
help
of
a
social
worker,
got
into
a
supportive
housing
type
situation
and
that
support
of
housing
was
an
excellent
facility
that
was
clean
had
outdoor
areas.
One
of
the
reasons
he
never
wanted
to
live
in
an
apartment
was
because
he
wanted
to
be
outside
it
had
beautiful
outdoor
areas.
F
It
was
clean,
it
had
great
programs
where
he
had
people
that
would
help
him
make
sure
he
took
his
medication
and
help
him
with
his
health
issues
and
support
of
the
other
people
there
and
my
brother.
I
was
spent
this
last
weekend
at
a
memorial
service
for
my
brother
because
he
died
earlier
this
year.
We
couldn't
celebrate
dudakovit,
we
finally
did
but,
but
he
didn't
die
alone
outside
unknown
to
anyone.
F
He
did
not
have
addiction,
he
did
not
have
aggression,
but
he
needed
help,
and
I
look
at
some
of
the
folks
that
we
are
trying
to
help
with
supportive
housing,
and
I
know
that
they
need
support
if
there's
not
support
in
the
support
of
housing.
It's
just
housing
and
we
nest
won't
necessarily
help
people.
It's
really
it's
just
a
different
geography
from
the
street.
It
doesn't
actually
help
people
get
better
and
deal
with
their
problems.
F
Tonight
we
had
a
disability
proclamation
and
we
talked
about
disability,
equity,
hope
and
freedom
to
me.
A
lot
of
these
folks
who
not
everyone
who
needs
supportive
housing,
has
a
severe
mental
illness.
Not
everyone
who
needs
supportive
housing
has
addiction
problems
or
criminal
problems,
but
many
of
the
people
that
are
hard
to
house
fall
into
that
category
and
they
need
help
because
it's
a
type
of
disability
and
if
we
don't
provide
the
help,
there's
not
going
to
be
any
movement
where
they
can
be
under
a
roof
and
and
in
their
right
mind.
F
So
many
of
the
things
that
are
on
the
work
plan
proposal
are
things
that
will
make
sure
that
the
people
who
need
these
services
have
the
best
chance,
because
I
think
bellevue.
I
voted
to
support
taking
the
1590
money,
because
I
really
do
think
bellevue
can
do
it
better,
and
so
most
of
these
items
are
with
regard
to
the
funding.
When
we
are
funding
these
projects.
F
I
think
we
need
to
do
it
in
such
a
way
as
to
make
the
projects
really
successful,
and
it's
it's
it's
90
about
or
even
100
about
making
sure
that
the
people
who
are
living
in
those
projects
have
the
services
they
need.
So
they
can
get
better
and
be
productive
and
have
and
create
those
relationship
ties
there's
some
of
it.
That's
outreach
because
you
want
to
make
sure
that
when
you're
having
a
facility
in
a
neighborhood,
the
neighbors
know
what's
going
on
that
they
can
embrace
the
project
that
they
know
what
to
do.
F
F
If
we
can
put
the
slide
up
so-
and
I
would-
and
I
would
point
out
that
that
right
now
the
city
is
in
the
process
of
doing
rfp
work
for
grant
money
for
the
1590
money,
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
the
interim
official
control
work
for
the
support
of
housing
land
use.
So
to
me
this
is
exactly
the
right
time.
F
We
don't
have
any
pending
supportive
housing
projects
in
for
funding,
so
this
won't
delay
anything,
and
so
I
think
that
now
will
we
have
a
little
gap
while
we're
gathering
rfp
is
the
time
to
really
look
at
our
standards
so
that
when
we
start
getting
applications,
whether
it's
under
the
land
use
or
under
grant
funding,
we
have
the
systems
in
place
to
make
these
projects
succeed.
F
The
bellevue
way
as
we
as
it
were
so
on
the
slide,
are
all
of
the
things
that
we're
considering.
I
had
asked
about
whether
we
should
consider
adding
some
of
these
things.
I
didn't
say:
let's
have
the
council
vote
and
do
these
things.
F
We
need
to
consider
them
as
part
of
the
work
that's
being
done
with
regard
to
the
rfp
for
the
1590
money
and
looking
at
the
grant
agreements,
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
it
as
part
of
the
work
under
the
interim
official
control
and
working
towards
permanent
regulations
for
supportive
housing.
So
if
you
look
at
c
now,
I
would
point
out
there's
two
c2s,
because
one
is
already
included
in
the
work
plan
and
one
is
not.
The
first
thing
was
a
preference
for
bellevue
residents
that
is
already
included
in
the
work
plan.
F
The
making
sure
that
the
inside
of
a
facility
is
has
good
maintenance
and
is
habitable
for
the
residents.
That
is
not
in
the
work
plan,
making
sure
that
the
exterior
property
has
standards
and
maintenance
is
in
the
land
use
code
work
plan
requirement
for
certain
on-site
supportive
services,
I'm
not
quite
sure
exactly
what
is
needed.
But
I
think
we
need
to
consider
that
so
that
again,
the
supportive
housing
actually
has
some
support
and
the
requirement
for
ratio
of
staff
to
caregivers
to
residents.
F
That
kind
of
goes
with
this
determining
what
supportive
services
are
required,
a
requirement
for
a
safety
and
security
plan.
That's
for
the
residents
to
make
sure
that
everyone
stays
safe
and
for
the
staff
and
just
in
general.
I
plymouth
did
something
like
this
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
they're
going
to
be
really
successful
and
then
neighborhood
outreach
and
relationship
building,
and
I'm
not
talking
about
the
type
of
committee
that
we
have
for
the
shelters.
F
I'm
talking
about
letting
people
know
what's
going
on
letting
people
know
how
they
can
contact
the
facility,
letting
them
know
how
they
can
help
and
volunteer
and
be
supportive
and
build,
and
because
it's
about
building
neighborhoods,
we
talk
about
building
neighborhoods
all
the
time.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
included
in
neighborhood
building,
but
I
noted
some
exceptions
might
be
appropriate.
F
For
example,
if
there's
a
domestic
violence
shelter,
that's
one
that
we
don't
want
people
to
know
where
it
is
so
we
wouldn't
want
to
announce
where
it
is
and
do
outreach
saying:
hey,
there's
a
shelter
for
domestic
violence
victims.
No,
we
wouldn't
want
to
do
that.
So
these
are
all
things.
If
council
votes
to
include
these
in
the
work
plan,
these
would
just
be
folded
in.
It
would
definitely
require
a
little
more
staff
time
because
it's
the
eight
hour
rule.
F
That's
why
I'm
here,
but
they
could
be
folded
in
with
the
work,
that's
ongoing
and
they
could
be
timely
included
in
the
work,
that's
ongoing,
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
these
are
really
really
successful
projects.
F
So
I
will
stop
talking
now,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
and
I
hope
that
I
will
have
council's
support,
because
I
know
that
you
share
the
the
desire,
as
I
do
for
us
to
help
the
people
like
that,
need
it
and
to
make
sure
supportive
housing
is
actually
supportive
housing,
because
without
the
support,
it's
just
warehousing.
F
So
I
hope
that
you
will.
You
will
support
my
request
for
this
eight
hour
rule
exception
and
have
these
things
put
into
the
work
plan.
A
So
the
question
on
the
table
is
if
we
want
to
support
the
request
to
allow
staff
to
extend
beyond
eight
hours
to
bring
back
recommendations
for
the
council,
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
something
council
member
robertson,
we're
like,
at
the
top
a
amount
of
funds,
allocated
the
fact
that
it's
already
included
in
the
work
or
in
the
work
plan
for
the
funding
agreement.
Does
that
mean
that
you
also
want
to
see
that
in
the
land
use
code,
or
is
that
not
no?
Where.
F
These
would
go
or
actually
they
wouldn't
go
anywhere
until
council
says
they
would
where
they
might
be
in
the
work
plan.
Those
are
things
actually
I
don't
even
know.
If
a
and
b
I
wrote,
I
think,
staff
wrote
those
or
maybe
I
did,
but
they
were
how
much
I'm
gonna.
Maybe
I
did
write
them.
It's
I've
been
working
on
this
issue
for
so
many
months,
but
those
are
things
that
they're
already
doing
as
part
of
the
1590
money
as
part
of
the
arch
money
is
part
you
know
et
cetera.
So
the
question.
A
F
A
That's
all
right,
so
so
council,
if
you
look
at
this
graph
and
you
see
c,
I
I
dash
one
and
then
you
see
the
next
one's
already
included
that
but
the
next
one
after
that
c
I
I
I
and
then
I
fee,
b
and
bi.
Those
are
the
ones
that
are
under
discussion
tonight.
A
So
I'm
going
to
limit
the
comments
and
questions
to
those
five
that
have
been
proposed
and
we
can
have
discussion
here
and
then
we
will
take
each
of
those
and
vote
on
whether
we
want
to
advance
those
or
not,
because
I
think
it's
possible
that
there
may
be
support
for
some,
but
not
others
after
our
comments
and
our
questions
have
been
answered,
so
is
there
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
if
you
have
a
comments
or
question,
I
can
see
you,
then
I
will
call
on
you.
A
I
see
council
member
stokes
and
I
see
council
members
on
and
I
see
councilmember
lee
so
go
ahead.
Councilmember
stokes.
I
Okay,
thank
you
mirror
and
thank
you.
Councilmember.
I
This
is
this
is
really
important,
and
I
am
glad
that
this
has
been
brought
forward.
One
of
the
things
when
you
think
there
are
two
parts
to
this
one
is
I
wish
this
had
been
and
I
think
we
need
to
reframe
it.
I
I
think
the
title
is
put
on.
This
is
awful
impact
mitigation
for
what
for
these
people,
because
they're
they
need
mitigating
and
their
activities
need
mitigate.
I
It's
not
it's
not
consistent
what
you
talked
about
with
your
with
your
brother,
so
I
I
would
we've
got
to
change
the
whole
look
at
this
thing.
This
is
not
how
to
keep
these
bad
people
away
from
the
rest
of
the
community
and
some
of
the
comments
today
tonight
and
some
seen
in
in
facebook
or
oh,
my
gosh.
We've
got
to
keep
these
people
away,
they're
freaking
out
with
the
silver
cloud.
That's
just
a
small
small
number
of
people.
I
A
lot
of
people
are
very
supportive,
so
I'm
I'm
really
trying
to
see
what
is
valuable
with
this.
How
can
we
get
to
the?
Why
do
we
need
this
or
if
we
do
need
it?
Let's
do
it,
but
we've
got
to
change
this
because
when
you
look
from
the
outside,
it's
like
one
more
time,
bellevue
is
trying
to
make
it
hard
to
put
people
where
they
need
to
be
taken.
I
Care
of,
I
hope
that
your
brother
was
never
looked
at,
as
people
are
looking
at
the
homeless,
people
that
were
hoping
to
put
in
permanent
supportive
housing
we've
got
to
change
that.
Bellevue
still
has
the
reputation
of
being
kind
of
a
oh.
We
don't
want
to
deal
with
those
people,
and
we,
you
know
we
sent
six
years.
It
just
was,
you
know,
pointed
out
tonight,
with
one
of
the
speakers
they've
been
working
six
years
to
mitigate
and
to
try
to
keep
these
people
in
place
so
now's
the
time
with
some
good
ideas.
I
We
can
just
keep
those
people
out
of
our
area
and,
if
you're
concerned
about
safety
you're
a
lot
safer
being
around
these
places
than
you
are
in
your
neighborhoods,
unfortunately,
or
walking
downtown
or
being
you
know,
in
the
middle
of
downtown
or
other
places,
and
it's
just
we've
got
to
get
our
limbs
away
from
this.
Looking
at
these
people
as
less
than
people
and
needing
help
in
a
different
way,
we
need
to
be
purposeful,
helpful
and,
like
with
your
brother,
be
helped
in
a
very
loving
helpful.
I
Also,
very
you
know,
caring
like
a
parent
in
a
sense
or
like
a
friend
more
like
a
friend,
and
not
that
these
are
people
who
are
less
and
we
gotta
keep
them
in
control.
I
I
Should
we
have
some
staff
take
some
time
to
look
at
this
and
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
take
a
lot,
but
if
we're
looking
at
best
practices
and
how
can
when
working
with
developers
to
make
sure
that
they
look
at
these
things,
they
have
a
program,
not
not
a
strict.
You
know,
abcd,
you
have
to
check
all
these
things
off,
but
a
good
program.
G
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
Well,
first
of
all,
my
condolences,
councilmember
robertson,
on
your
on
your
brother.
I
can
only
imagine
what
that
must
have
been
like
growing
up
and
and
throughout
the
years
you
know
I
would
say
I
agree
with
the
premise
that
we
need
to
focus
on
what
is
needed
for
supportive
housing
to
be
the
most
successful
in
bellevue.
G
I
think
we
all
want
that
where
I
think
about,
though,
is
which
conditions
are
going
to
be
the
most
conducive
for
a
program
to
be
as
successful
as
possible,
and
then
how
do
we
make
sure
that
our
funding
actually
reflects
that?
Because
otherwise
these
are
going
to
seem
like
unfunded
mandates
that
we
don't
like,
and
I
know
that
I
was
not
able
to
be
at
the
the
meeting
last
week
where
we
voted
on
the
1590
money.
G
That
is
a
different
view
than
what
we're
doing
here,
which
seems
to
be
a
similar
to
mfte,
where
we
put
rules
in
place
that
we
thought
was
the
best
and
then
the
community,
the
developers
came
back
and
said.
Actually
these
things
don't
work
for
us,
and
we've
had
to
revamp
the
whole
thing
in
order
to
create
a
program
that
the
developers
would
build,
affordable
housing,
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
careful.
G
A
So,
council,
members
on
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
this
is
a
really
good
opportunity
for
us
to
ask
staff
questions
about
the
things
we
wonder.
So
if
you
want
to
try
to
get
an
answer
staff,
I
know
they
can't
answer
everything
right
now.
But
if
you
want
to
phrase
any
of
this
in
the
form
of
a
question
of
concerns,
you
might
have
that
you
want
to
get
information
on.
This
is
a
really
good
time
to
do
that.
G
G
A
So,
let's,
let's
continue
on
with
questions
and
comments
and
we'll
let
staff
weigh
in
is
that
okay
mac
or
did
you
want
to
weigh
in
now.
A
Let's,
let's
do
it
all
at
the
end,
if
you
don't
mind
and
so
we're
on
to
council
member
lee.
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I
want
to
compliment
councilman
robertson
for
taking
the
time
to
come
up
with
a
number.
S
E
Ideas,
especially,
I
suppose
you
know
in
her
case
of
her
brother
she's-
probably
very
sensitive
to
this,
and
but
what
I'm
looking
at
is
you
know
from
a
overall
bigger
picture.
I
think
the
key
word
is
we
want
this
to
be
successful.
E
I
think
we
all
agree
we'll
be
struggling
this
working
on
this
after
we
struggled
for
a
number
of
years
and
we
all
decided
we're
going
to
have
to
stand.
We
want
it
and,
however,
we
want
to
do
it
in
the
right
way
and
that's
why
we've
been
struggling
on
this,
but
it's
coming
together,
we're
very,
very,
very
impressed
with
what
we've
got
and
I
think,
a
couple
weeks
ago
last
week
we
showed
that
we
decided,
let's
vote
for
it
and
go
ahead
and
move,
but
the
one
key
word
is
support,
support
the
support
of
housing.
E
E
Will
make
this
a
successful
program
and
we
need
professionals
to
answer
these
questions.
We
need
people
who
have
done
it
like
cleveland's,
housing
and
housing
and
others,
and
you
know
congregation
formulas
and
other
professionals
and
we
want
to
bring
them
together
to
do
it.
So
I'm
not
sure
you
know,
even
though
I
appreciate
what
country
members
roberts
has
done
come
up
with
a
list,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
is
the
exact
list
or
more
or
less
that.
E
That's
the
reason
why
we
want
to
stop
the
looking
you
that's
why
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
city
city
council
members,
you
know,
bring
the
questions
to
the
table
and
we
all
appreciate
you
know
to
do
this.
It
takes
money
right
because
that's
why
we
appreciate
50
90
money.
They
give
us
another
opportunity
to
make
this
happen
without
money.
We
can
do
it.
We
cannot
do
it
successfully.
E
We
cannot
do
it
without
delay,
you
know,
but
do
do
it
without
delay,
doesn't
mean
it's
not
going
to
be
right.
We
got
to
do
it
right,
otherwise,
it's
not
going
to
work
out
because
it's
we
have
to
work
to
satisfy
to
me.
Like
people
mentioned
repeatedly,
it's
got
to
be
a
successful
project
and
it
comes
with
janus
mentioned.
It's
got
to
be
a
successful
project.
E
You
know
because
it
needs
continuing
support.
We
put
some
money
now,
59
doesn't
last
forever.
It's
not
automatic,
eventually
to
make
it
successful
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
stakeholders
wherever
in
the
future.
The
city
has
to
continue
to
provide
money
and
to
keep
open
minded.
What
you
get
have
have
communities
to
support.
We
have
to
know:
what's
the
best
the
professionals
recommend
to
come
up
with
and
this
community.
E
You
know,
I
hope,
they're
on
board.
I
think
they
are
because
we
just
heard
in
the
earlier
communication
from
the
public
they
they.
You
know
we
we
are
behind
this,
but
we
need
to
be
make
sure
that
the
stakeholders,
the
projects
successful
so
in
the
future.
We
can
continue
to
provide
the
money
to
support
this
budget
to
make
sure
it's
successful.
E
As
a
result,
there
may
be
other
considerations.
I
know
we
just
have
a
list
here
today
and
there
are
professionals
we
hope
the
staff
will
help
us.
That's
all
we
like
to
this.
We
rely
on
the
staff,
we
have
good
staff.
You
know
we
can
come
up
with
maybe
other
ideas.
Some
of
these
may
not
work,
but
I
don't
claim
to
be
professionals.
Oh,
I
think
this
works.
I
think
that
doesn't
work.
You
know
I
may
have
some
opinions
on
some
things.
E
Maybe
we
can
study
based
on
the
staff
work
based
on
other
best
practices
based
on
the
professionals,
so
this
is
works.
This
includes
and
that's
the
reason
why
we
have
to
work
with.
Like
you
know,
council
members,
I
mentioned
again
the
multifamily
tax
exam.
We
work
with
stakeholders,
we
work
with
developers
same
thing.
We
have
to
work
with
professionals
right
we
work
with
people,
the
clients
we
have
to
find
out
what
professionals
feel
that
we
are
have
the
best
program
best
way
to
do
this,
so
maybe
other
considerations
that
need
to
be
added.
E
So
I'm
not
going
to
say
this
is
the
list.
This
is
the
final
word.
No,
I
don't
know
that.
I
rely
on
the
staff
doing
the
good
work.
They've
done
to
come
up
with
other
professionals
to
come
up
with
fast
with
god,
and
I
agree
we
should
not
delay
it.
We
should
know
you
know,
so
I
think
the
timing
comes
when
robertson
mentioned
it's
good.
We
don't
have
something
right
on
now,
we're
going
to
do
it.
E
If
we
do,
we
should
do
whatever
we
can,
but
we
still
need
to
make
sure
we
provide
the
opportunity
to
look
at
the
best
we
got
and
what
the
professionals
stakeholders.
The
other
considerations
we
can
include,
and
we
can
do
something.
You
know
we
can
reserve
something
and
we
can
add
them
when
we
need
to,
and
then
we
can
make
this
a
real
success.
This
is,
I
believe,
the
way
to
do
it.
Otherwise,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Council
members.
D
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
first,
thank
you,
jennifer
councilmember
robertson,
for
putting
this
together,
taking
the
time
to
put
this
together
and
condolences
you
and
your
family
for
your
brothers.
D
I
I
do
want
to
say
I
I
think
the
biggest
challenge.
For
me
I
mean
I
think
councilmember
stokes
really
spoke
to
the
the
concern
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
we're
centering
the
vulnerable
population
in
our
community,
who
are
experiencing
chronic
homelessness
and
need
the
supportive
services
and-
and
you
know,
we're
taking
a
lot
of
steps
to
make
sure
that
we
provide
affordable
housing
and
lower
the
barriers
to
providing
affordable
housing
housing.
D
And
so
I
wonder,
and
I
know
we've
talked
about
developer
flexibility
in
the
past
and
and
to
as
a
way
to
lower
the
barrier,
and
I
feel
like
we're
kind
of
going
in
the
opposite
direction
here
and
I
guess
a
question
for
staff
and
I
guess
sort
of
a
comment
really
that
I
think
I
think
these
developers
have
already
shown
that
they're
incentivized
to
do
what's
needed
in
order
for
the
program
to
be
successful
and
for
the
residents
in
their
properties
to
you
know,
be
well
accepted
into
the
community,
which
is
important
for
their
success.
D
So
I
wonder
if
there's
maybe
a
way
to
do
this
informally
like
through
sort
of
putting
best
practices
or
got
you
know
in
in
a
pamphlet
that
they
can
reference
so
that
it's
more
of
a
they
still
get
the
awareness
and
understanding
of
like
here's.
What
we've
seen
happen
in
the
past
and
what
we
think
can
be
successful
without
really
without
so
I'm
saying
more
secured
instead
of
the
stick.
In
this
case,
I
think.
A
Okay,
good,
I'm
just
writing
this
down
smith,
deputy
mayor.
Thank
you.
C
Mayor
yeah
a
lot
of
good
comments,
and
I
appreciate
everyone's
perspective
and
I
just
kind
of
want
to
re-center
this
conversation
just
a
little
bit,
because
I
think,
let's
not
get
away
that.
I
think
from
the
fact
that
we
all
want
this
supportive
housing
in
in
in
bellevue.
We
might
have
some
different
ideas
about
the
operations
or
some
of
these
initiatives
that
councilman
robertson
put
forward
today.
But
let's
not
forget
that.
C
I
think
we're
united
here
as
seven
strong
that
we
want
to
see
this
happen
and
I
think
that's
the
key
consideration
and
I
I
did
not
hear
you
know
from
councilman
robertson,
making
anyone
less
less
than
I
I
heard
compassion.
I
heard
about
best
in
class
services,
supportive
services
making
sure
they're
getting
the
care
that
they
need
by
making
sure
there's
a
requirement
there
that
we
have
the
the
number
of
staff.
In
order
to
do
that,
and
I-
and
I
also
just
hear
you
know-
centering
our
residences
as
well.
C
You
know
this
is
a.
This
is
a
consideration
that
we
need.
We
need
to
think
about.
I
mean
look
at
how
many
people
we
heard
from
this
evening
who-
and
I
know
some
of
them
personally-
that
were
skeptical
about
the
eastgate
campus.
These
folks
are
on
the
g
act.
Now
these
folks
are
trying
to
make
this
the
most
successful
possible
solution
for
bellevue.
I
think
that's
a
win.
These
are
the
same
people
that
have
expertise
in
this
area
and
we
should
take
advantage
of
that,
and
we
should
listen
to
that.
C
I
I
almost
say
this
is
tantamount
to
what
we
heard
from
the
people
for
climate
action.
We
have
experts
in
our
community.
We
need
to
listen
to
them.
We
need
to
embrace
them.
We
should
make
them
a
part
of
this
conversation,
and
I
think
all
we're
looking
at
tonight
is
allowing
staff
to
do
some
research
on
our
behalf,
and
I
absolutely
agree
with
the
comment
about
reaching
out
to
providers
and
operators
getting
their
perspective
on
this,
because
the
last
thing
I
think
any
of
us
want
to
do-
is
to
slow
this
down.
C
Nor
do
we
want
to
hurt
anyone
that
needs
to
get
into
permanent
support
of
housing
now,
and
I
do
not
want
plymouth
to
back
out
of
you
know
establishing
you
know
supportive
housing
in
in
bellevue.
I
want
them
to
be
successful.
We
all
want
them
to
be
successful,
so
my
my
perspective
is:
let
staff
do
the
work.
Let's
get
some
of
that
analysis
done.
Let's
see
where
we're
at.
C
I
think,
let's
make
sure
we
we
take
in
consideration
all
the
good
information
that
we
can
get
from
these,
these
different
agencies
and
providers
and
then
as
well
as
our
residents.
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
component
of
that
as
well
in
terms
of
what
we've
heard
tonight.
So
I
look
forward
to
that
conversation.
I
look
forward
to
what
mac
and
his
and
his
great
team
come
back
with
and
some
of
their
recommendations
and
what
their
analysis
shows,
and
I
think
we
take
it
from
there.
C
So
councilman
robertson
really
appreciate
you
bringing
this
forward,
as
everyone's
expressed
in
our
sincerest
condolences
for
for
your
brother
can
only
imagine
how
difficult
of
a
situation
that
was,
but
I
appreciate
you
bringing
this
forward
for
the
for
the
conversation
that
we're
having
this
evening.
A
Thank
you,
so
I'm
gonna
give
my
thoughts
on
this
and
then
try
to
summarize
what
I've
heard.
I
you
know
in
in
listening
to
everybody,
there's
a
lot
of
use
of
the
word
success
and
I'll.
Tell
you
as
somebody
as
a
physical
therapist.
Who's
worked
with
many
different
abled
people.
Success
has
its
own
definition
for
every
individual.
A
I
used
to
volunteer
my
physical
therapy
skills
at
the
pike
place,
markets,
homeless,
medical
clinic
and
so
I've.
You
know
I've
spent
time
with
many
individuals
who
have
struggled
and
I've
seen
just
some
of
the
impossibilities
of
their
situations,
and
I
know
for
a
fact:
you
cannot
improve
your
situation
if
you
do
not
have
stable
housing.
So,
as
deputy
mayor
said,
I
think
we're
all
on
board
with
that
and
so
tonight
we're
talking
about.
You
know
how.
How
do
we
best
do
that?
A
How
do
we
serve
the
residents
of
the
supportive
housing
while
serving
our
entire
community,
and
I
do
question
if
this
is
equitable
or
if
it
creates
new
barriers?
So
I'd
like
staff
to
kind
of
look
into
that
a
little
bit?
I
wonder
if
it
will
slow
down
the
creation
of
other
permanent,
supportive
housing
development
when
I
think
of
the
people
that
these
types
of
housing
serve.
A
I
think
about
my
friends
who
have
adult
children
with
disabilities,
who
will
never
be
able
to
live
independently
and
they're
either
going
to
live
with
their
parents
for
the
rest
of
their
lives
or
they're,
going
to
have
a
situation
where
they
can
live
in
in
a
a
unit
that
has
support
for
them,
and
we
just
don't
have
that
in
bellevue
right
now.
So
it's
not
just
about
homeless
individuals,
it's
about
people
who
are
unable
to
live
independently
and
and
so
I'm
very
interested
in
creating
more
opportunities.
A
So,
and
so
my
question
is,
you
know,
do
we
have
the
staff
and
or
the
budget
to
look
into
these
questions
and
to
look
into
this
request
of
councilmember
robertson
and
I'm
wondering
what
staff
recommends
or
if
we
should
have
stakeholders
involved
as
well
to
create
best
practices
on
this?
So
this
is
where
I
personally
would
like
staff
to
weigh
in
tonight
and
councilmember
robertson.
Unless
you
have
something
else,
you
want
to
say
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
staff.
A
Well,
can
we
do
you
want
to
okay,
go
ahead,
councilmember
stokes
I'll,
give
everybody,
I
guess
a
chance
to
speak
again.
Okay,
I
was
just.
F
Gonna
say
I
didn't
even
notice
the
title
on
the
memo.
I
didn't
write
that
title
on
the
memo
and
you're
right.
F
It
does
send
the
wrong
message
and
is
not
at
all
a
capture
of
what
I
intended
to
achieve
here
so,
and
I
would
point
out
that
most
of
these
things
are
not
land
use
code
things
most
of
these
things
are
carrots
that
would
be
put
into
a
funding
agreement
and
if
they
cost
more
money
and
bellevue
wants
them,
then
bellevue's
going
to
need
to
help
fund
them,
and
that
would
be
my
expectation
is
that,
if
we're
going
to
require
a
certain
amount
of
support,
primarily
this
would
be
an
operations
agreement.
F
T
F
That's
how
I
see
it-
and
I
would
also
add
I
I
mayor-
I
didn't
say
it,
but
I
agree.
It's
kids
who
or
adult
children
who
can't
live
apart,
often
can
be
in
this
kind
of
situation.
In
that
case,
the
safety
and
security
plan
would
be.
If
people
are
in
wheelchairs,
how
are
they
going
to
get
them
out
in
a
fire?
How
are
they
going
to
make
sure
the
residents
don't
you
know,
are
safe
with
each
other,
safe
from
the
general
public,
etc?
F
It's
not
just
about
othering,
it's
about
inclusivity
and
making
sure
that
the
folks
who
are
in
these
are
cared
for
with
love,
intention
and
adequate,
not
just
adequate,
but
excellent
levels
of
services,
because
that's
what
everyone
deserves
so
I'll
just
leave
it
there.
I
I
I
like
the
idea
of
having
staff
just
come
back
and
present
it
to
us
best
practices
is
kind
of
what
I
was
trying
to
get
to.
I
didn't
coin
it
though
council
member
stokes
did
so
thank
you
for
that.
That
is
really
where
I
am
so
thanks.
Okay,.
A
Mayor
no
councilmember
stokes
raised
his
hand
next
and
I'm
going
to
go
around
and
give
everybody
an
equal
chance
to
speak
again.
Go
ahead.
Councilmember
stokes.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
just
a
couple
of
things
and
I
really
appreciate
councilman
robertson,
what
you're
saying
on
this,
and
I
think
that-
and
I
think
this
is
what
I
was
aiming
at-
let's,
let's
get
this
on
a
lens
of
moving
forward
and
doing
this
in
a
positive
way,
because
we
really
care
for
these
people
and
we
want
to
do
the
best,
and
this
is
part
it's
not
get
away
from
the
well.
You
know
we
got
to
control
these
people
or
make
sure
they
don't
do
bad
things.
Let's
work
on.
I
How
do
we
go
forward
on
it
and
I
think
we'll
have
great
success,
I'd
like
if
we
can
turn
this
around
in
in
people's
minds
that
this
is
something
that
we
really
have
to
do,
and
we
can
do
it
well
because
we're
both
you
and
I
think,
that's
where
we're
we're
going.
So
I
really
appreciate
that.
The
second
is
on
the
timing.
I
mean,
I
guess,
the
sooner
the
better
it's
just
I
just
want
to
know
you
know.
Can
staff
can
work
this
in?
I
don't.
I
I
don't
see
it
as
really
a
huge
problem
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
get
it
into
a
citizen
advisor
committee
and
go
back
and
forth,
and
next
thing
you
know
it's
three
years
past
and
we're
still
working
on
it.
I
think
this
is
something
staff
can
come
up
with
best
practices.
Standards
talk
to
us
about
it,
and
then
we
can.
We
can
get
something
in
shape.
That's
not
you
know,
put
in
stone,
but
is
is
a
good
step
forward,
so
I'm
I'm
I'm
feeling
very
good
about
it.
Thank
you.
G
Yes
mayor,
I
was
hoping
that
staff
was
going
to
answer
the
three
questions
that
I
had
in
the
first
round.
In
addition
to
that,
as
I've
listened
to
my
colleagues,
what
I've
also
thought
about
is
that
it
is
about
do
these
pieces
that
we
absolutely
all
agree
are
important
elements
these
and
many
others
to
the
success.
G
Where
does
it
actually
go
because
one
of
the
things
we
also
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
end
up
in
is
that
by
putting
these
into
land
use
or
funding
agreements
that
we're
actually
going
to
slow
everything
down
versus
having
it
at
the
right
time,
because
we've
certainly
seen
with
with
actually
cfh
that
we've
actually
had
to
put
in
more
money
for
funding,
because
adding
these
pieces
in
have
actually
lengthened
their
time.
G
The
work
would
have
been
done
anyway,
but
the
timing
actually
created
issues
that
cost
a
lot
of
money
and
time.
So
I
believe
that
I
had
three
questions
that
was
in
the
first
round
is
now
the
time
that
I'm
gonna
get
a
response.
A
A
E
Well,
if
you
say
less,
I
would
then
take
less
time.
I
have
been
thinking
about
this
for
a
while,
you
know
and
as
definitely
I
think,
that's
exactly
what
the
council
wants.
You
know
we
talk
about
that.
We
want
to
move
this
forward.
There's
no
question
about
it.
One
thing
I
just
want
to
add,
you
know
is
the
list,
that's
included.
I
think
I
made
a
point.
There
may
be
other
things,
others
that
can
help
the
success
of
this
project.
E
We
know
experts
just
because
it's
listed
here,
they
never
happen
to
put
it
and
we
may
or
may
not
disagree
with
it,
but
the
staff
is
the
expert
we
depend
on
and
we
trust
them.
So
I
really
like
to
have
the
staff
have
an
open
mind,
look
at
it
and
if
we
need
resources,
we
want
it
to
happen.
We
have
to
consider
if
we
got
to
put
money
where
mouth
is.
A
I
think
thank
you
councilmember
lee,
and
I
think
I've
heard
that,
with
requests
of
staff
and
stakeholders
to
create
best
pac
practices,
anybody
else
want
to
weigh
in
councilmember
barksdale.
D
Just
just
really
quick,
two
questions,
one
curious
about
the
implications
on
cost
and
schedule
for
the
operations
agreement,
or
so
I
think,
council
members.
I
brought
that
up
too,
but
just
wanted
to
get
clarification
on
that
and
then
the
second
one
on
the
best
practices.
What
are
the
alternatives
and
what
would
having
sort
of
an
informal
sort
of
pamphlet
when
I
say
best
practices,
I
mean
like
not
codified,
but
like
here's,
some
information
about
what
might
work,
how
staff
sees
that
as
an
alternative
or
an
option.
A
Okay,
great
deputy
mayor,
did
you
have
any
other
comments?
Questions
not.
C
This
time,
where
I
wait
till
after
staff,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
mack
hope
you
took
notes.
R
Thank
you,
yeah
mayor,
I
was
feverishly
writing
down.
Hopefully
I
I
got
everybody's
questions.
R
If
I
missed
one,
please
absolutely
just
let
me
know
there
are
the
questions,
kind
of
fall
down
into
a
couple
of
categories,
kind
of
questions,
about
some
of
the
individual
items
and
and
what
they
are
and
how
they'd
be
built
into
an
analysis,
phase
and
and
building
that
into
a
work
plan,
and
then
some
of
them
get
into
like
just
just
now
here,
implications
on
schedule
and
best
practices
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
I'll
try
to
hit
them
in
that
order,
not
necessarily
just
in
terms
of
you
know
who
asked
two
questions
and
three
questions
and
one
question
so
forth.
R
So
the
first
couple
questions
that
were
brought
up
relate
to
how
the
the
things
you
see
on
that
spreadsheet
came
to
be
and
whether
or
not
that
lit
list
is
an
exhaustive
list
around
best
practices
excuse.
R
Helpful
that
might
be
helpful
just
for
a
few
moments.
This
list
was
generated
by
council
member
robertson.
R
In
the
amount
of
time
we
had
and
worked
with
council
member
robertson,
we
were
trying
to
help
her
understand
what's
already
in
the
work
plan,
so
that
if
the
council
wanted
to,
we
could
add
these
items
so
as
a
separate
additional
item,
if
you'd
like
us
to
look
into,
were
there
other
best
practices
that
some
of
the
permanent
supportive
housing
providers
may
recommend
the
council
take
a
look
at.
We
could
certainly
add
that
as
a
an
additional
kind
of
catch-all
to
the
work
plan,
and
so
as
a
result,
there
was
another
question
there
about.
R
R
For
some
or
any
of
these
things,
it
could
be
appropriate
for
some,
it
could
be
appropriate
for
none
there's
a
lot
of
analysis
that
would
actually
go
into
that,
whether
or
not
they
should
all
exist
in
the
funding
agreements
themselves
and
what
a
standard
set
of
conditions
around
operating
may
look
like.
So
one
of
the
goals,
I
think
I
I've
heard
also
expressed,
is
a
desire
to
see
how
any
such
set
of
regulations
would
impact
the
ability
to
deliver
and
cite
permanent,
supportive
housing
in
the
city.
R
We
would
certainly
be
looking
at
that
as
part
of
the
analysis,
to
bring
back
to
you
all
about
standard
sets
of
conditions
versus
project
specific
conditions
and
how
that
affects
timing
costs
and
the
ability
to
deliver
these
actual.
R
Then
there
was
a
question
and
sort
of
reiterated
in
slightly
different
terms
around.
Can
this
be
done,
informally,
and
certainly
in
any
scenario,
we
can
work
on
if
it's
a
desire
of
the
council
information-
and
we
do
that
frequently
about
different
different
things
that
occur
in
the
community
and
when
we're
happy
to
do
so
and
work
with
our
housing
staff
about
what
that
might
look.
R
Like
I
think
the
question
before
the
council
tonight
is,
would
you
like
us
to
do
evaluation
and
analysis
of
these
things
and
anything
else
you
may
want
to
add
to
the
list
for
potential
implementation
as
a
more
formal
set
of
approval
conditions
as
compared
to
an
informal
set
of
information
for
would-be
operators
of
permanent
supportive
housing.
R
So
the
answer
to
that
question
is
yes,
it
could
be
done
informally.
I
think
the
council's
having
a
discussion
about.
Do
you
want
to
think
about
something
more
formal
questions
came
up
around
how
equitable
or
does
this
add
new
barriers.
We
would
certainly
want
to
do
that
analysis
and
bring
it
back
for
you
and
talk
about.
R
Should
these
types
of
conditions
be
put
in
funding
agreements
or
be
made
a
portion
of
land
use
code,
whether
or
not
that
would
in
fact
add
new
barriers
and
how
it
would
relate
to
actually
citing
and
getting
permanent
supportive
housing
built
in
the
city.
So
we
would
bring
that
back
to
you
and
then
probably
the
there
was
a
couple
of
questions
generally
around.
R
Do
we
have
staff
and
budget
and
what
this
all
looks
like
and
the
answer
is,
we
do
have
housing
staff
and
we
do
have
city
planners,
and
we
do
a
bunch
of
things
around
these
various
topical
areas.
This
isn't
built
into
the
work
plan
at
the
current
time,
which
is
why
we're
kind
of
bringing
this
to
you
as
an
eight-hour
rule
exception.
R
R
Other
than
there's
a
lot
of
staff
time
between
the
development
services
group,
the
planning
group
and
a
certain
amount
of
legal
analysis
that
will
need
to
go
into
creating
the
recommendations
for
you
all
around
pros
and
cons
of
each
of
these
things
and
the
vehicle
meaning
where,
if
you
wanted
to
implement
such
a
concept,
would
be
the
best
place
to
do
it.
So
what
we
would
do
there
would
be
an
opportunity
cost.
R
So
where
do
we
go
from
here?
That's
ultimately
a
question
for
the
council
and
we're
happy
to
help
in
any
way
we
can.
If
you
want
to
move
forward-
and
I
think
I
got
everybody's
questions-
I
think
we'll
we'll
stop.
There.
A
Well,
I
will
say
that
in
summarizing
what
you
just
said,
there's
a
fork
in
the
road
where
we
look
at.
Do
we
ask
you
to
analyze
these
recommendations
as
put
forth
by
council
member
robertson,
or
do
we
ask
you
to
have
an
open
mind
and
look
at
this
and
also
anything
else
that
would
be
a
recommended
best
practice
either
by
staff
or
stakeholders.
A
So
that's
one
fork.
The
second
fork
would
be
do.
Would
you
recommend
that
it
be
a
recommended
best
practice
or
is
it
codified
and
if
we
codify
it
where?
Where
would
we
do
that,
and
so
those
to
me
are
kind
of
two
key
questions
in
terms
of
what
our
recommendation
will
be
for
you
tonight,
I
feel
like
we
can
vote
on
the
first
one,
I'm
not
sure
if
we're
ready
to
vote
on
the
second
one.
A
But
can
I
just
get
comment
on
my
proposal
for
staff
if
we're
going
to
ask
them
to
look
at
anything
that
we
look
at
the
recommendation,
as
well
as
any
other
recommended
best
practices
by
staff
or
stakeholders,
so
councilmember
robertson,
I'll,
let
you
start
thank.
F
F
I
think
we
won't
know
that
until
we
know
what
the
best
practices
are
and
what
and
whether
those
are
going
to
create
any
challenges
to
getting
these
projects
off
the
ground.
So
I
need
I
need
staff's
analysis.
I
think
everyone
else
does
whether
so
we
can
decide
how
to
best
implement
these,
but
let's
first
figure
out
what
the
best
practices
are
and
then
we'll
figure
out
how
to
implement
them.
A
So
let's
say
that
that's
is
what
is
going
to
be
on
the
table.
Tonight
is
if
we
want
to
advance
staff's
analysis
of
the
recommendations
and
any
additions
to
bring
back
or
not
or
you
know
if
you
have
a
modification,
but
I
I
think
you
know
from
what
I've
heard
from
everybody.
This
seems
to
be
the
pivot
point
here.
So
if,
if
there's
a
motion,
I
think
councilman
rosanne,
you
have
a
question
or
a
comment.
A
G
Know
I
I
do
have
a
a
comment,
slash
question.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
items
on
our
work
plan
and
I
guess
what
I'm
really
trying
to
understand
is,
if
we
vote
to
add
this,
where
does
that?
Where
is
that
going
to
fall
because
we're
also
talking
about
east
main
and
the
potential
of
going
higher
with
height
for
affordable
housing
when
we
were
at
the
retreat?
We
also
talked
about
staff
looking
at
consideration
of
a
safe
parking
program.
G
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
well
as
moving
with
wilberton
and
and
bell
red,
so
I
just
want
to
understand
if
we
vote
yes
to
include
this,
where
what's
actually
going
to
get
pushed
to
be
later
in
the
priority
or
how
that's
going
to
work,
because
we
do
have
a
lot
of
things
that
we
want.
Staff
to
work
on
and
certainly
affordable
housing
is
a
huge
part
of
that,
as
well
as
the
the
strategies
we
already
have
to
address
homelessness.
I
Well,
I
guess
one
question
is,
or
my
understanding
of
the
landscape
is
that
this
is
not
something
we
would
rush
to
apply
in
the
next
three
months
or
even
probably,
hopefully,
we'll
have
more
coming
in,
but
we've
already
we're
not.
This
is
not
dealing
with
plymouth.
We
got
that
set
up
and
everything's
going.
This
is
for
the
future
and
I
think
we
want
it
done
well,
we
don't
want
it
rushed
because
there's
no
rush.
I
At
the
same
time,
we
do
have
a
lot
of
other
things
that
are
going
forward
too,
and
we
all
you
know
we
keep
talking
about.
We
want
bell
red
to
go.
We
want
wilverton
to
go.
We
want
this
to
go
we're
putting
more
on
staff,
but-
and
I
think
if
we
need
to
find
some
additional
funding
for
that,
we
should
do
that.
I
But
I
don't,
let's
don't
put
a
real
tight
timeline
on
this,
but
make
a
commitment,
that's
that
staff
can
handle
and
it
may
take
a
lot
less
time
than
than
we
think
in
a
sense
to
come
up
with
this
there's,
probably
somebody
around
this
country
who
actually
has
something
like
this.
I
So
I
think-
and
I
think
we
need
to
give
staff
the
option
to
and
and
max
auction
to
look
at
this
and
how
do
we
fit
this
in
with
everything
else,
because
we
need
this
done
well,
but
it's
not
something
we
need
tomorrow.
A
So,
based
on
what
I'm
hearing
mac,
do
you
think
it
would
be
possible,
under
eight
hours
to
come
back
with
what
it
would
take
for
you
to
give
best
practice
recommendations
to
us
and
have
the
discussion
about
where
they
fall,
whether
it's
a
budgetary
or
an
operational
or
a
land
use
thing?
Do
you
think
you
could
kind
of
map
out
what
it
would
the
impact
would
be
if
we
voted
for
that?
Could
you
do
that
on
before
underneath
an
eight-hour
rule.
R
So
I
think,
there's
maybe
two
two
components
of
that
question
mayor
just
on
the
first
part,
coming
back
with
recommendations
on
kind
of
where
these
things
would
fit,
I'm
certain
we
could
not
do
that
in
fact,
I'm
certain
to
be
much
more
than
eight
hours.
R
R
That's
right,
and
I
I
don't
have
a
firm
answer
on
that
there
there
would
be
a
a
number
of
departments
that
would
be
impacted.
R
The
likely
impact
would
be
to
one
of
the
other
housing
programs
or
one
of
the
planning
initiatives,
which
is
usually
in
the
form
of
a
delay
in
the
case
of
analysis
as
compared
to
you
know
something
more
drastic,
certainly
not
something
on
the
scale
of
east
main,
but
we
would
need
to
pull
one
of
the
project
managers
and
have
them
focus
in
on
this.
R
A
Could
you
come
back
to
us
next
week
and
tell
us
where
this
would
fall
in
the
queue
that
we
have
already
if
we
were
to
move
forward
with
this
based
on?
You
know,
council
member
stokes
thoughts
that
maybe
we're
not
in
a
huge
hurry
to
supplant
other
goals,
but
if
it's
something
we
want
to
work
on
in
the
future,
where
would
that
fit
in
the
queue?
R
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
say
qualified.
Yes,
I
believe
that
you
know
we
can
sit
down
as
staff
in
the
next
week
and
get
a
now
that
we
have
a
better
sense
of
potentially
the
scope.
The
council
will
want
to
look
at
and
see
what
the
overall
timing
impacts
could
be.
A
A
A
So
what
do
you
think
about
putting
off
the
vote
tonight
to
next
week
when
we
get
a
little
more
information
on
where
this
would
fit
in
our
work
plan?
Councilmember
robertson,
do
you
feel
comfortable
with
that.
F
Well,
I'd
love
to
have
council
initiate
the
work
with
the
schedule
and
impacts
to
come
back
next
week
so
that
we
can
adjust
how
fast
it's
going
to
be
done,
because
I
think
I
think,
at
the
time
is
kind
of
now
to
do
it,
because
the
interim
official
control
and
support
of
housing
is
is
going
and
we're
about
to
hit
rfps
for
these
types
of
projects.
F
But
so
I
mean
obviously
it's
a
council
decision.
We
can
vote
next
week,
but
I
think
if
we
give
direction
that
we
want
to
do
it
and
then
they
come
back
and
we
can
then
say
we
don't
want
to
do
it
or
we
want
to
scale
it
down.
We
want
to
slow
it
down.
F
That
might
be
a
little
bit
more
clarity
for
staff.
G
On
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
really
clear
about
what
we're
voting
on
so
we're
voting
on
having
staff
do
this
work,
but
they're
going
to
come
back
next
week
with
the
timing
implication
instead
of
what
you
recommended,
which
is
wait
until
next
week,
when
we
understand
what
would
get
displaced
is
that
right?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
about
what
we're
voting
on
right
now.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
pretty
much
sums
it
up
and
I'll
tell
you
I'm
more
comfortable
with
having
staff
come
back
next
week.
To
be
honest
with
you,
it's
not
that
I
don't
support
this
work,
this
recommendation,
but
I
want
to
know
exactly
what
I'm
voting
for
and
the
impact
it
has
on
our
work
plan.
So
since
it's
a
new
initiative.
F
I
just
hate
to
spend
too
much
time
next
week
on
it
other
than
to
get
a
report
from
staff
and
why
don't
we
bring
it
back
next
week
with
staff
providing
a
high
flyover
and
and
maybe
staff
can
craft
a
motion,
because
I
did
that
completely
on
the
fly
and
on
on
initiating
the
work
plan,
including
best
practices.
F
A
Okay,
can
we
get
a
head
nod
for
that
or
we
can
do
a
vote
if
we
need
to,
but
I
think
you'd
have
a
competition
just
council
member
lee,
I
can't
see
your
head
moving.
Are
you
nodding?
Okay?
So
sorry,
okay,
very
good!
All
right!
Thank
you.
Councilmember
robertson,
appreciate
that
the
discussion,
okay,
we
are
on,
I
believe,
we're
on
to
the
consent
calendar.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar?
I.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
I
I
any
opposed
okay
that
passes
so
now
we
have
a
public
hearing.
Mr
miyake,
could
you
please
introduce
that.
J
As
you
mentioned,
the
matter
of
front
of
you
this
evening
is
the
public
hearing
on
the
landis
code,
amendment
for
the
east
main
station
area
and
just
by
way
of
background
study
session
on
june
28th
council
was
introduced
to
the
proposed
land
use
code
amendment
to
create
the
languages
code
for
the
east
main
station
area
area,
and
at
that
meeting
the
council
director's
staff
to
prepare
and
schedule
the
land
use
code,
amendment
for
public
hearing
and
identify
topics.
That
council
would
like
additional
information
on
at
a
future
study
at
future
study
sessions.
J
So,
following
the
public
hearing,
a
council
will
have
the
opportunity
to
identify
any
additional
topics
they'd
like
to
discuss
at
future
study
sessions
joining
us
this
evening.
For
a
brief
staff
report
are
mike
brennan,
the
director
tristan
tannis,
consulting
attorney
nick
whipple
senior
planner,
all
from
the
development
services
department
mike.
U
Yes,
there
you
go.
Excuse
me,
let
me
get
my
video
going
here
apologize
for
the
technical
glitch
there.
We
go
so
good
evening,
deputy
our
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members.
We
are
here,
as
mr
martinyaki
said,
for
the
public
hearing
for
the
east
maine
land
use
code
amendment
that
draft
was
published
earlier
this
year
and
we
have
already
had
a
number
of
conversations
with
stakeholders
and
a
study
session
with
council
in
june.
Tonight.
U
As
council
will
recall
in
the
meeting
on
june
28th,
you
did
provide
us
a
direction
on
some
of
the
topic
areas
based
on
some
of
the
stakeholder
feedback
that
you
would
like
to
discuss
further,
and
we
will
be
preparing
that
information
when
we
return
to
council
for
study
sessions
starting
in
september
following
the
council
break
next
slide,
please
so
the
agenda
for
this
evening.
The
agenda
next
slide.
U
Please
the
agenda
for
this
evening
would
be
just
a
brief
context,
setting
for
the
east
maine
and
how
it
fits
into
some
of
the
more
comprehensive
planning
initiatives
have
been
going
on
over
the
last
number
of
years
related
to
the
light
rail
project
in
the
city
a
bit
about
the
the
land
use
code,
timeline
kind
of
where
we've
been
where
we
are,
and
then
the
next
steps,
an
overview
of
the
land,
ease
code,
amendment
topics
and
then
finally,
just
an
overview
of
the
public
engagement.
U
U
Light
rail
system,
as
council
will
remember
back
in
2013
the
the
decision
on
the
alignment
for
the
light
rail
or
the
east
link
project
was
decided
by
the
council
and
the
sound
transit
board,
and
that
was
a
very
important
decision
that
really
just
defined
where,
within
the
city
light,
rail
services
would
be
provided
and
the
specific
locations
of
the
stations
that
would
provide
access
to
the
community
in
2015.
The
spring
district
began
construction
around
the
light
rail
station.
U
The
spring
district
120th
street
station
really
an
important
step
implementing
the
bel
red
plan,
which
was
really
an
replanting
of
the
entire
bellred
corridor
in
alignment
with
the
discussions
that
were
going
on
in
defining
the
light
rail
alignment
following
the
beginning
of
that
construction,
which
was
really
a
first
move
toward
the
construction
of
transit,
oriented
development.
Around
light
rail
stations,
the
east
main
cac
was
launched
in
2016
and
really
did
some
great
work.
Defining
the
future
recommendations
for
the
transformation
of
the
properties
around
the
east
main
station
on
main
and
112th
avenue.
U
I
think,
of
the
downtown
horizon
or
skyline,
with
towers
now
up
to
600
feet,
adding
additional
incentives
to
create
more
public,
open
space
and
really
rethinking
some
of
the
the
uses
and
pedestrian
orientation
at
grade
in
the
downtown
area,
and
we
are
now
seeing
projects
that
are
well
under
construction.
Taking
advantage
of
those
changes
that
were
made
in
that
code,
update
for
downtown
livability
in
late
2019,
east
main
cpa
was
adopted.
U
Amendments
to
the
comprehensive
plan
that
really
carried
forward
the
work
of
the
cac
and
the
continued
deliberations
of
the
council
for
shaping
this
part
of
the
city.
The
east
main
planning
area
that
ca,
the
cpa,
update,
really
defined
the
the
future
vision
for
the
east
main
area.
Following
the
2019
adoption
of
the
cpa,
we
began
work
on
the
land
use
code
amendment
and,
in
late
2020,
published
the
complete
draft
of
land
use
code
for
east
maine.
That
document.
U
We
are
here
this
evening
to
take
the
important
next
step
and
that
is
really
to
hear
from
the
community
on
their
interests,
their
suggestions,
their
preferences
for
the
east
main
area
in
response
to
what
has
been
proposed
in
the
language
code
draft
and
then
following
that,
as
I
mentioned,
we'll
be
returning
back
to
council
with
additional
study
discussions
on
the
topic
areas.
The
council
would
like
to
discuss
further
before
you
make
your
final
decision
on
the
final
code.
U
V
Thanks
mike
next
slide,
please
charmaine
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council,
following
up
on
mike's
description
of
the
broader
context,
the
city
context
and
timeline.
This
slide
focuses
on
the
east
main
luca
timeline.
So,
prior
to
tonight,
we
started
in
earnest
in
council
for
council's
direction
and
council's
processing
of
this
luca
last
year,
following
briefings.
In
may,
we've
had
two
study
sessions
and
at
that
point
in
july,
council
directed
staff
to
finish
drafting
the
code,
including
the
economic
analysis
that
would
inform
the
draft
code.
V
V
So
throughout
the
work
in
preparing
the
economic
analysis
as
well
as
the
complete
draft
code.
As
mike
mentioned,
we
have
been
working
with
our
stakeholders
and
after
the
drafts
were
produced,
we
did
share
that
with
our
stakeholders
also,
and
we
continued
working
with
our
stakeholders
throughout
the
beginning
of
this
year
and
on
june
28th.
As
you
know,
we
presented
this
this
draft
code
to
council
and
the
council
also
saw
a
list
of
requests
from
stakeholders
in
that
study
session.
V
It
is
also
council's
decision
as
to
what
changes
to
the
draft
code
council
wants
to.
Ultimately
direct
to
staff
and
staff
does
plan
to
bring
forward
any
implication
the
time
and
process,
so
that
council
has
that
information
when
it
makes
when
they
make
that
ration
to
us.
V
The
next
slide,
please
I'm
giving
a
quick
recap
now
to
the
role
of
the
various
documents
in
the
process.
The
progression
of
this
process
is
from
a
high
level
in
the
comprehensive
plan
down
to
the
specific
design
details
in
development,
application
and
review.
The
first
process
item
is
the
comprehensive
plan.
It
sets
the
vision
and
policy
priorities.
V
These
priorities
are
high
level
and
broad
and
at
the
same
time,
the
comprehensive
plan
is
intentionally
flexible
so
that
there
is
room
for
the
land
use
code
to
maneuver
and
be
responsive
to
that
to
the
high
level
priorities
and
that's.
The
second
item
is
the
land
use
code
and
that's
where
we
are
tonight
and
throughout
this
process,
the
land
use
code
includes
requirements,
standards
and
design
guidelines
that
will
govern
the
review
and
approval
of
any
development
application
within
the
east
main
area.
V
The
city
or
development
services
would
certainly
review
this
development
application
for
compliance
with
the
code
and
just
again,
noting
that
we
are
here
now
in
the
process
of
drafting
the
land
use
code
that
will
apply
to
east
maine,
and
this
are
the
standards,
requirements
and
design
guidelines
next
slide,
please
just
a
quick
recap
on
the
division
that
was
part
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
V
Amendment
for
east
maine
and
the
vision
is
that
in
2035,
east
main
is
a
vibrant,
livable
and
memorable
transit
oriented
development
neighborhood,
where
there
are
housing
choices,
offices,
hotels
and
other
commercial
uses
that
it
would
sit
comfortably
between
downtown
and
the
low
density,
single
family,
neighborhood
to
the
west
of
112.,
having
small
walkable
blocks
and
connected
pathways.
So
people
can
move
easily
between
the
light
rail
station
and
places
in
and
around
the
station
area.
V
As
noted
earlier,
this
vision
is
what
council
adopted
through
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
for
east
maine
in
2019
next
slide.
Please,
with
that,
I'm
now
going
to
turn
the
presentation
to
nick
to
provide
more
detail
on
the
draft
code
and
the
requests
that
have
been
submitted,
as
well
as
the
ongoing
public
engagement.
Nick.
W
Thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
members
of
the
council.
So,
as
trisnow
noted,
I
will
begin
talking
about
just
the
various
land
use,
components
that
are
included
or
the
land
use
code,
components
that
are
included
with
this
luca
staff
has
broken
these
components
up
into
three
topic
areas
so
we'll
be
discussing
urban
form,
housing
and
then
just
touching
briefly
on
code
structure.
W
W
The
height
transition
is
the
same
policy
approach
taken
city-wide
as
denser
areas
of
the
city
about
land-use
districts,
that
are
of
a
lower
density
and
some
examples.
We've
got
the
photo
on
the
right
here.
That's
called
the
suryon
main
project,
that's
a
project
that
was
developed
or
is
under
construction
right
now
on
main
street
and
108th
avenue
northeast.
It
does
above
the
down
hertz
in
the
downtown
and
abuts
the
surrey
downs
neighborhood.
W
So
we
see
a
lower
height
there
to
transition
to
the
surrey
downs
neighborhood
to
the
south
and
then
the
second
photo
is
a
past
project,
application
for
the
sheraton
site.
That's
the
property
just
north
of
main
street
under
the
downtown
olb
zoning
and
then
for
maximum
density
or
far,
and
the
density
would
be
a
5
far
under
the
draft
land
use
code,
which
is
the
same
as
the
downtown,
albeit
south
district
in
the
north.
W
The
luca
also
provides
for
walkable
blocks.
It
implements
a
1300
foot
perimeter
block
length
requirement
the
same
block
length
requirements
apply
in
bell
red
another
area
in
the
city
where
new
walkable
blocks
have
been
created,
it
does
provide
the
land
use
code.
Draft.
Does
provide
for
exceptions
along
114th
avenue,
southeast
and
near
sturdivant
creek,
where
smaller
blocks
are
infeasible
and
just
as
a
reminder,
the
blocks
that
can
be
framed
by
open
space.
W
They
can
be
framed
by
potential
streets
which
are
similar
to
some
of
the
mid-block
connections
in
downtown
or
bike
connections
or
a
vehicular
street.
So
those
are
the
options
to
create
those
walkable
blocks.
W
W
It's
the
same
that
can
be
built
in
the
downtown
albe
south
land
use
district
north
of
main
street.
The
the
floor
plate
sizes
in
downtown
albe
south
are
the
largest
floor
plates
that
are
allowed
in
downtown
and
they
are
larger
than
the
floor
plates
that
are
also
allowed
in
bell
red
just
to
provide
that
increased
flexibility
for
developers
next
slide.
Please.
W
W
That
would
be
the
north
extent
and
then
the
other
area,
where
we've
got
ex
proposed
through
connection,
is
just
north
of
the
bellevue
athletic
club
at
our
pre-located
street.
So
this
pedestrian
bike
connection
is
an
additional
connection
that
we
would
land
somewhere
between.
Those
two
points
you
could
think
of
it,
as
maybe
somewhere
between
the
hilton
hotel
and
the
red
lion
hotel
and
one
required
pre-located
street
is
also
included
with
the
east
main
land
use
code.
W
The
luca
includes
elements
for
that
really
empathize
the
emphasize
the
pedestrian
experience
so
elements
such
as
ground
floor
uses,
seating
weather
protection,
artistic
elements
all
ensure
an
enriched
experience
for
the
pedestrian
on
the
ground
plane.
The
provisions
related
to
pedestrian
emphasis
are
very
similar
to
the
requirements
expected
of
downtown
development
with
flexibility.
W
W
The
luca
also
has
a
requirement
in
the
draft
for
a
minimum
30
percent
of
the
total
project
gross
square
feet
to
be
residential
use
and
the
luca
prioritizes
affordable
housing
through
the
incentive
program,
so
where
additional
height
and
floor
area
is
offered
in
exchange
for
affordable
housing
at
an
80
percent.
Ami,
the
luco
requires
that
the
affordable
housing
be
built
on-site,
so
on-site
performance
for
those
areas
so
that
the
affordable
housing
is
built
in
that
transit-rich,
east
main
tod
and
then.
W
Lastly,
for
the
code
structure,
the
luca
was
developed
to
be
consistent
with
the
city-wide
code
framework
and
process,
including
permit
review
processes
how
the
public
is
made
aware
of
a
future
development,
the
tod
etc.
Next
slide
please.
W
So
there
are
a
number
of
topics
that
council
is
interested
in
discussing
further
per
the
june
28
study
session.
The
topics
relate
to
the
list
of
requested
items
provided
that
by
the
property
owner
stakeholders
within
the
tod,
so
we
do
plan
to
bring
back
these
topics
beginning
in
september
for
council
discussion.
W
Some
of
those
topics
include
building
heights
step,
backs
block
size,
exceptions,
the
minimum
housing
requirements,
ami
levels
for
units
based
on
tenancy,
a
fee
in
lieu
model
as
compared
to
on-site
performance
for
affordable
housing
and
then
just
how
non-conforming
uses
are
treated
and
how
we
may
want
to
implement
development
agreements
as
a
tool
in
this
land
use
code.
Amendment
next
slide,
please
and
lastly,
we'll
just
touch
on
the
public
engagement.
So
this
is
a
process
for
legislative
decisions,
so
process
for
requirements,
including
notice
of
application.
W
The
cpa,
determination
and
the
notice
of
public
hearing
were
followed
throughout
the
luca
process.
As
trisna
noted,
we
have
engaged
with
property
owners
within
the
east
main
tod.
This
has
included
wake
properties,
the
bellevue
athletic
club
and
j
j
bellevue.
As
an
example,
the
surrey,
downs,
neighborhood
and
bell
crest
neighborhood
were
also
engaged
in
the
process.
W
They
have
been
tracking
various
issues,
some
related
to
building
height
transportation
impacts
and
are
are
in
support
of
having
uses
generally
in
support
of
having
uses
that
are
for
the
neighborhood
and
serve
that
community,
and
then
we've
also
fielded
questions
from
the
business
community
and
organizations,
including
the
bda
about
this
land
use
code
amendment
and
lastly,
we
have
a
web
page
for
the
east
main
tod,
so
people
are
able
to
track
the
progress
of
this
land
use
code
amendment.
U
Thanks
nick
and
so
at
this
point,
we
are
essentially
that
wraps
up
our
staff
report,
handing
it
back
to
the
council
to
open
the
public
hearing
unless
you
have
some
questions
about
the
presentation,
materials
and
then
following
the
public
hearing.
If
the
council
has
additional
topics
that
you
would
like
us
to
come,
add
to
the
list
for
future
discussion
and
deliberation
with
the
council,
as
I
mentioned
starting
in
september,
please,
please
let
us
know,
and
we
will
absolutely
add
those
to
the
list
mayor.
Thank.
A
X
B
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
We
have
a
number
of
folks
signed
up
this
evening.
There
are
14
on
the
pre-registered
list
and
before
I
start
calling
names,
I
would
like
to
mention
that
there
were
three
written
comments
that
were
submitted
to
the
council
and
have
been
included
in
your
desk
packet
for
this
evening.
Y
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
We
sent
counsel
our
seven
key
requests
on
the
draft
land
use
code
on
june
25th.
We
included
a
table
listing
each
of
our
requests,
the
reasons
for
each
request
and
indicating
the
policy
support
from
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
council
guiding
principles
under
each
one.
Y
One
of
our
requests
is
to
have
lower
heights
next
to
1
12,
put
taller
heights
next
to
the
freeway
and
main,
without
penalizing
the
achievable
density
on
the
site.
In
essence,
we
have
not
been
requesting
more
density
but
have
simply
requested
to
shift
density
from
112th
towards
the
freeway
and
main
street.
Y
Y
Under
our
proposal,
we
could
deliver
housing
in
shorter
buildings
in
the
near
term
and
not
incur
a
significant
density
penalty
across
from
the
light
rail
for
doing
so.
All
of
our
requests
center
around
the
ability
to
develop
a
thoughtful
vibrant
mixed-use
place.
If
we
cram
density
into
the
area
without
laying
out
the
buildings
to
ensure
there
is
proper,
sunlight,
air
and
ambiance,
then
the
businesses
inside
are
more
likely
to
fail
and
people
will
not
want
to
live
there.
Y
Y
T
T
T
T
T
In
addition,
block
length
and
perimeter
restrictions
make
convenient
parking
behind
retailers
difficult
such
convenient
parking
is
needed
for
retailers,
success
and
just
for
your
information,
we
will
incur
many
development
costs
that
many
other
sites
may
not
incur.
They
include
creating
streets
and
installing
utilities
to
go
to
each
building
that
are
generally
already
available
on
smaller
sites.
T
We
know
we
will
have
to
incur
these
costs.
The
only
reason
to
mention
these
items
is
for
you
to
know
that
we
will
have
these
costs
that
many
other
sites
may
not.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
support
to
the
staff
and
to
the
council
for
all
the
hard
work
you
have
all
done.
We
appreciate
it
very
much
and
thank
you
very
much.
Bye.
AA
Hello,
my
name
is
david
slight:
I'm
a
resident
of
surrey,
dance,
227,
110th,
avenue,
southeast
mayor
robertson,
deputy
mayor
council.
Thank
you
for
allowing
some
public
input.
I
should
also
make
you
aware
I'm
the
secretary
of
the
surrey
downs
community
club,
but
these
comments
of
my
own
community
club
has
a
charter
to
inform
our
residents
and
not
necessarily
to
speak
for
them,
and
I
hope
many
of
them
will
speak
for
themselves.
This
evening.
AA
Having
worked,
and
many
thanks
to
the
planning
department,
who've
done
a
great
job
of
sharing
information
and
educating
local
residents,
but
we
still
do
not
see
clear
hard
guidelines
in
the
planning
information
in
the
land
use
code,
amendments
that
ensure
that
these
lower
heights,
whatever
the
design
that's
submitted,
comes
in
that
the
lower
heights
along
112th
create
the
kind
of
environment
that
you're
looking
for.
We
just
need
to
make
sure
those
huge
towers
are
by
the
405
are
not
across
the
tracks
from
our
single
family
residents.
AA
AB
You
very
much
hello
council
members,
jack
mccullough,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
weak
properties.
It's
nice
to
be
in
front
of
you
talking
about
east
main
again,
we've
been
at
this
for
a
long
time
and
happily
we're
here
kind
of
in
the
red
zone,
time
to
make
final
and
good
decisions
on
the
critical
issues
in
front
of
us
on
the
zoning.
AB
What
I
wanted
to
talk
about
briefly
tonight
was
just
the
issue
of
development
agreements
and
what
is
appropriate
and
perhaps
not
for
inclusion
in
a
development
agreement,
as
staff
indicated
development
agreement,
I'll
call
it
a
da
is
a
useful
tool
and
it
needs
to
be
part
of
the
east
main
toolbox.
AB
But
we
have
to
be,
I
think,
thoughtful
about
what
we
move
or
push
off
into
the
d.a
bucket
and
what
we
make
decisions
about
today.
The
da
provides
flexibility,
but
we
also
need
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
adequate
certainty
in
the
code
in
front
of
us.
You've
heard
all
of
the
speakers
actually
preceding
me
to
talk
about
the
importance
of
lower
heights
along
112th
and
higher
heights
on
the
eastern
side
of
the
planning
area
close
to
405..
AB
We've
obviously
had
long
conversations
with
the
city
about
this,
and
it's
been
pointed
out
to
us
that
cipa
might
be
a
problem
that
the
lack
of
clear
sepa
review
this
issue
could
prevent
the
inclusion
of
this
that
perhaps
these
this
height
modification
ought
to
be
deferred
to
a
time
when
a
development
agreement
could
be
adopted.
AB
AB
Actually
more
height
on
the
eastern
side
of
of
the
planning
area
leads
to
fewer
impacts
on
the
residents
to
the
west
across
112th,
which
is
what
those
residents
are
looking
for.
A
sepa
addendum
is
something
that
can
be
accomplished
in
the
next
couple
months
and
we've
already
provided
a
lot
of
the
information
that
can
make
that
happen.
AB
So
our
strong
recommendation
to
the
council
is
that
we
take
the
opportunity,
while
we're
deliberating
on
the
final
portions
of
this,
to
actually
do
that
sepa
addendum
and
make
a
good
decision
about
height
and
while
we're
doing
that,
I'd
suggest
in
a
couple
other
areas.
We
look
at
the
same
thing
non-conformities.
AB
AB
This
creates
a
problem
because,
because
it
may
suggest
that
changes
need
to
be
made
to
the
hilton
site,
just
in
order
to
develop
a
separate
area
of
the
property
met,
some
of
the
council
members
will
remember
12
years
ago.
This
is
an
issue
we
actually
spent
a
fair
amount
of
time
with
in
the
belred
rezone
and
we
developed
specific
guidance
in
the
bell
red
code
to
deal
with
non-conformities.
AB
Similarly,
in
the
case
of
the
pre-located
street,
we
want
to
make
sure
it
doesn't
impact
sturdivant
creek.
I
think
these
are
all
issues
that
we
have
an
opportunity
to
resolve
now
in
front
of
us
and
we
suggest
in
the
time
we
have
this
fall
that
we
get
that
work
done.
Thank
you
very
much.
Council
members.
AC
My
name
is
patrick
bannon,
I'm
president
of
the
bellevue
downtown
association
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
members
of
the
council,
mr
city
manager,
on
behalf
of
the
bda.
I
just
wanted
to
do
a
quick
check
in
on
our
own
progress,
as
this
is
a
topic
of
high
interest
for
our
membership.
AC
Our
work
on
east
main
will
continue
through
august
and
september,
led
by
our
land,
use
and
livability
committee,
and
we
greatly
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
hear
and
incorporate
this
feedback
tonight
from
stakeholders
from
council
from
and
from
the
community
so
taking
together.
These
viewpoints
advance
the
dialogue
and
help
with
our
efforts
to
communicate
a
position
and
a
set
of
recommendations
prior
to
council
action,
and
we
support
completing
the
luca
on
schedule.
This
fall
to
date.
AC
We
can
agree
on
the
enormous
potential
for
east
maine's
transition
to
a
vibrant,
walkable,
neighborhood,
well
served
by
high
capacity,
transit
and
other
modes.
East
main
is
unique
for
bellevue
its
adjacencies
to
downtown
zoning,
major
arterials
light
rail
I-405
and
the
single-family
neighborhoods
all
present
strengths
and
complexities.
AC
As
noted
above,
the
bda's
committee
process
will
continue
through
september,
working
toward
a
bda
recommendation
prior
to
council
approval
on
the
luca
thanks
again
for
your
careful
study
and
ongoing
leadership
behind
this
major
planning
issue
and
a
major
opportunity
for
our
city's
future.
Thank
you.
B
Mr
brennan,
we
do
not
have
a
good
connection
with
you.
Can
you
I'm
gonna,
try
to
mute
you
and
then
unmute
again.
B
Z
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
robertson
and
members
of
the
council.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
council
and
on
behalf
of
the
bellevue
cub.
We
wish
to
commend
the
council
and
the
city
staff
in
their
efforts
as
quickly
as
possible,
to
bring
to
conclusion
the
resolution
a
suitable
code
to
support
the
vision
and
success
of
the
tod.
Z
Z
To
accomplish
this,
we
will
need
the
effective
use
of
our
remaining
property
that
must
be
supported
by
market-driven
options,
the
creative
property
that
enhances
the
value
for
belonging
to
this
community
and
supports
the
broad
vision
of
eastlink,
and
we
have
mentioned
many
of
these
things
previously
and
we,
I
don't
feel
a
need
at
this
time
to
go
over
those,
but
I
think
members
of
the
council
and
the
staff
have
heard
our
special
needs
in
order
for
our
development
and
those
of
the
commercial
area
to
be
successful.
Z
This
district
needs
to
be
competitive
with
other
alternatives
and
which
mr
wig
has
mentioned.
The
east
main
lan
code
needs
to
be
fair
and
allow
this
to
be
successful.
Unfortunately,
the
cloak
the
code
is
punitive
and
provides
more
restrictions
to
the
downtown
or
the
bell
red
codes,
and
mr
wig
gave
him
examples
of
this,
such
as
the
gap
between
the
base
and
max
far
as
five
times
higher
in
east
maine
than
in
the
adjacent
zones
to
the
north.
Z
We
encourage
that
the
disparities
in
these
areas
be
ironed
out
at
this
time,
so
that
this
whole
tod
area
becomes
an
area
that
must
be
welcoming
livable
and
iconic.
So
I
want
to
thank
the
council
and
the
staff
for
all
of
these
considerations
and
we
hope
to
work
closely
with
everyone
in
concluding
this
most
successfully.
Thank
you.
B
S
Wonderful
well
good
evening,
mayor
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
alex
brennan,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
future
wise
future
wise
works
throughout
the
state
on
issues
of
environmental
sustainability,
affordable
housing
and
healthy,
equitable
communities,
and
we
do
that
through
the
lens
of
our
state
growth
management
act.
I'm
excited
to
be
working
in
bellevue,
alongside
local,
non-profit,
affordable
housing
and
service
providers,
resident
advocates
and
the
local
business
community
to
advance
affordable
housing
through
the
newly
forming
east
side,
housing
roundtable,
which
you
will
be
hearing
more
about
in
the
near
future.
S
This
is
the
moment
of
great
opportunity
for
bellevue.
East
link
is
opening
in
just
a
few
years,
and
while
offices
from
manhattan
to
houston
sit
vacant
in
the
aftermath
of
the
pandemic
in
bellevue
demand
is
booming.
Bellevue
has
a
real
opportunity
to
accommodate
that
demand
and
provide
public
benefit
by
offering
added
development
capacity
near
light.
Rail
stations
in
exchange
for
affordable
housing.
S
I
hope
that
you
will
fully
explore
how
to
best
take
advantage
of
this
height
for
affordable
housing
strategy,
while
being
mindful
of
transitions
to
adjacent
neighborhoods.
As
you
finalize,
your
plans
for
this
area,
providing
housing
for
all
incomes
near
jobs
and
transit
centers
will
help
create
a
walkable
livable,
sustainable
future
for
bellevue
and
the
entire
east
side.
Thank
you.
B
Barely
if
you
could
speak
up,
your
time
will
begin
now.
Okay,.
AD
Hello,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
my
name
is
paul
weller,
we
own
a
house
located
at
248,
111th
avenue,
southeast
in
surrey,
downs
neighborhood
for
reference.
If
we
walked
out
my
back
door
onto
my
back
deck,
my
view
has
a
picture-perfect
frame
of
the
east
main
tod,
my
property
and
my
view
will
be
one
of
the
most
significantly
affected
insta
free
downs.
AD
It
also
states
that
it
is
envisioned
to
comfortably
span
the
changing
character
from
downtown
to
the
low
density
residential
neighborhood
west
of
112th
avenue
southeast.
This
is
considerate,
but
I
want
to
make
this
very
clear.
Single-Family
zones
do
not
need
protection,
and
single-family
zones
should
not
be
considered
in
making
significant
land
use
changes
to
a
transit-oriented
development
site.
AD
We
will
we
really
have
one
chance
to
make
this
right
and
we
should
not
be,
can
not
provide
consideration
to
single-family
zones
for
height
transition
density,
traffic
demands
and
land
uses
when
making
these
significant
zone.
Zoning
changes
that
not
don't
just
affect
us,
but
our
whole
region
and
our
environment.
AD
Giving
too
much
consideration
to
single-family
zones
will
create
unintended
consequences
and
will
not
provide
the
desired
outcome
that
we
need
for
a
transit-oriented
development
site,
for
example,
if
the
height
of
the
whole
site
is
capped
at
250,
with
a
step
down
transition,
height
of
50
feet
close
to
112
and
a
density
far
of
five,
then
then
the
developer
would
not
have
the
flexibility
to
move
structures.
The
city
should
not
put
in
place
restrictions
that
would
require
the
developer
to
choose
between
two
desired
outcomes.
AD
The
developer
should
be
provided
the
flexibility
in
the
land
use
code
to
allow
for
the
necessary
height
to
achieve
both
desired
objectives.
Another
example
of
an
unintended
consequence
is
requiring
the
fire
density
and
a
30
minimum
residential
housing
density,
rather
than
requiring
the
housing
density.
The
city
should
place
in
incentives
which
should
strongly
encourage
housing
rather
than
require
it.
Let's
use
the
carrot,
rather
than
the
stick
in
the
situation.
Thank
you
for
your
inspiration.
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
If
not
here,
then
where
getting
the
right
getting,
this
right
requires
all
of
us
to
continue
working
together
with
focus
and
urgency,
along
with
strong
leadership
from
the
bellevue
chamber.
We
are
proud
to
be
part
of
a
growing
coalition
called
the
east
side,
housing
roundtable,
a
group
of
private
sector
and
non-profit
organizations
that
are
focused
solely
on
increasing
affordable
housing
in
bellevue.
AE
AE
AF
Great
thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
members
of
the
council,
joe
fain
president
and
ceo
of
the
bellevue
chamber,
really
appreciate
the
amount
of
time
and
energy
that
has
been
spent
not
just
on
this
issue,
but
on
all
of
the
issues
pertaining
to
development
and
in
particular,
affordable
housing
that
this
council
has
prioritized
over
the
last
several
months.
AF
AF
We
at
the
chamber
are
working
hard
to
review
some
of
the
economic
analysis
that
the
city
has
done
to
partner
with
staff,
to
vet
different
options
for
the
for
incentivizing
additional
development
of
housing
and
we'll
be
bringing
forward
more
information
about
that.
As
we
continue
our
work
and
as
we
continue
our
work
through
the
housing
round
table.
AF
One
thing
that
I
wanted
to
leave
you
with
in
with
regards
to
housing.
Is
it's
a
interesting?
It's
an
interesting
conundrum
in
that
there
are
really
three
elements
of
of
housing
that
are
policy
decisions,
and
the
first
is:
is
it
the
jobs,
housing
imbalance?
AF
That
is
the
is
the
issue,
or
is
it
just
the
sheer
number
of
unit
count?
That
is
the
issue
or
is
it
affordability?
That's
the
issue
for
a
development
like
this.
Thus
far,
it
seems
like
those
second
factors.
AF
B
K
Great
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
comment
this
evening.
My
name
is
jacqueline
gruber
and
I'm
here
today
representing
vulcan
and
I'm
a
participating
member
of
the
eastside
housing
roundtable
vulcan
is
an
office
and
multi-family
helper.
We
currently
have
2
million
square
feet
of
office
development
in
bellevue's
downtown
and
are
excited
excited
to
be
permitting
for
two
additional
multi-family
buildings.
We
continue
to
look
for
more
multi-family
sites.
The
co-barriers
in
bellevue
can
sometimes
make
multi-family
housing
challenging.
K
Ultimately,
we
need
both
office
development
and
residential
development
in
order
to
achieve
the
jobs
to
housing
balance
necessary
for
a
healthy
city.
This
is
why
we
are
commenting
tonight.
We
applaud
the
city
council's
recent
changes
to
the
mfte
ordinance
to
help
incentivize
residential
development
in
multi-family
areas.
This
was
an
important
and
forward-looking
first
step.
The
city
should
implement
additional
code
changes
to
encourage
housing
development
in
order
to
meet
existing
and
future
demand.
East
maine
is
a
great
opportunity
to
bring
more
housing
to
bellevue.
K
If
done
correctly,
the
vision
for
this
area
is
transit,
oriented
development,
where
residents
are
a
short
light
rail
ride
from
our
region's
major
employers.
To
achieve
this
vision,
the
code
must
carefully
be
crafted
to
avoid
overly
prescriptive
design
standards
which
sacrifice
potential
housing
floor
area
for
aesthetics
code
barriers
that
are
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
Like
specific
road
locations,
housing,
minimums
setbacks
and
floor
plate
limits
should
not
be
implemented
to
maximize
housing
production.
K
The
incentive
zoning
program
should
focus
on
granting
higher
bonus
heights
and
bonus
far
with
a
formula
that
supports
on-site
construction
of
affordable
housing
at
80
ami.
We
must
do
the
math
necessary
to
make
sure
that
the
incentive
structure
will
function
and
should
consider
options
like
payments
in
lieu.
K
B
AG
AG
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house,
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
jared
axelrod
and
I
lead
local
public
policy
with
amazon
here
to
speak
in
support
of
the
land
use
code.
Amendment
for
east
main
station
area,
as
you
heard
me
share
at
previous
meetings.
Amazon
believes
that
all
people
should
have
access
to
housing
that
they
can
afford,
and
we
will
continue
to
work
with
governments
like
the
bellevue
city
council,
to
implement
more
effective
housing
policies
to
help
deliver
on
this
mission.
The
land
use
code.
AG
The
benefits
of
this
land
use
code
change
are
especially
significant
due
to
its
proximity
to
the
soon-to-open
east
main
station,
as
you
saw
in
our
announcement
with
our
partnership
with
sound
transit
back
in
june,
amazon
strongly
believes
in
the
values
and
benefits
of
transit-oriented
development,
which
has
a
range
of
benefits,
including
greater
economic
activity,
reduced
traffic
congestion
and
a
more
resilient
labor
force.
I
want
to
offer
a
few
items
for
your
consideration
this
evening.
AG
First,
allowing
more
height,
especially
closer
to
405
and
along
114th
avenue
southeast
in
exchange
for
more
affordable
housing
is
a
solid
policy.
This
can
help
the
city
meet
its
affordable
housing
goals
and
ensure
proper
transitions
to
the
nearby
neighborhoods
all
while
maximizing
the
number
of
units
on
site.
AG
Second
policy
should
strongly
incentivize
on-site
performance
to
create
vibrant
walkable
transit
oriented
zones,
new
light
rail
stations
do
not
open
every
day
and
do
not
open
in
every
neighborhood
in
our
region.
Suffice
to
say
there
is
only
one
shot
to
get
this
right.
The
policies
must
build
enticing
incentive
structures
that
work
to
best
maximize
on-site
performance.
AG
However,
if
appropriate
and
absolutely
necessary,
in-lieu
fees
should
also
be
on
the
table
so
that
we
can
continue
to
grow
the
supply
of
affordable
housing
in
bellevue.
It's
important
that
land
use
code
changes
like
this
or
for
other
neighborhoods.
The
city
will
soon
consider
continue
to
explore
the
full
range
of
location,
appropriate
tools
that
work
best
to
produce
housing
at
all
income
levels.
Last.
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
council
for
your
work.
Continued
work
over
several
months
and
years
on
this
matter.
AG
As
you
all
know,
this
has
been
a
long
time
in
the
process
and
we
appreciate
your
continued
commitment
to
transit,
oriented
development
and
affordable
housing
in
bellevue.
We,
along
with
several
of
the
other
partners
who
you've
heard
this
evening,
are
happy
to
work
with
you
and
your
staff
over
the
next
several
weeks
and
months
to
finalize
this
land
use
code.
Amendment
thanks
for
your
consideration.
B
AH
B
AI
Yes,
I
can
hear
you.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
thank
you.
Your
time
begins
now
good
evening
may
robinson
and
council
members.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
for
the
record.
I
am
patience:
malaba
director
of
government
relations
and
policy
at
the
housing
development
consortium
of
seattle,
king
county.
We
are
a
membership
association
with
rep,
which
represents
nonprofit
organizations,
public
partners
and
private
businesses
who
are
working
to
develop,
affordable
housing
across
our
king
county
region.
AI
Ensuring
that
enough,
affordable
homes
are
built
in
bellevue,
will
always
have
positive
implications
for
social
equity
and
for
the
local
economy,
strength
when
workers
can
walk
or
take
transit
to
work,
we
all
benefit,
we
all
benefit
from
better
air
quality
and
less
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
These
are
outcomes
that
we
all
want.
AI
B
A
Okay,
we've
been
going
for
a
long
time
without
a
break
here,
and
I
I
hate
to
break
mid,
but
that
we
could
go
on
for
a
while
here.
So
I'm
gonna
ask
that
we
take
a
break
until
9,
15
and
resume
discussion
of
this.
A
We're
talking
about
further
direction
on
this,
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussions
and
we've
given
recommendations
to
staff
and
now
after
hearing
the
public
comment,
staff
is
looking
for
further
direction.
I
wonder
mike,
I
think
you
had
a
chart
at
things
that
we've
already
direction
we've
already
given
you
is
it
possible
to
put
that
back
up.
U
That
was
operator
error.
Sorry
about
that.
So
the.
If
you
bring
the
powerpoint
back
up,
we
can
take
you
to
the
slide
that
kind
of
identifies
the
high
level
items
that
were
included
in
the
council
direction
at
the
june
28th
meeting.
U
So
I
don't
know
if
trisnator
showman
was
bringing
that
up
charmaine.
Thank
you
and
continue
down
we'll
get
to
that
side.
U
There
we
go
so
these
this
represents
the
topics
kind
of
the
major
topic
areas
that
were
representing
the
items
requested
by
stakeholders
for
changes
and
other
suggestions
made
by
the
council
for
further
deliberation
or
consideration.
A
A
So
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
the
gallery
view.
So
I
can
see
everybody
and
I
see
deputy
mayor
and
I
see
councilmember
robertson.
So,
let's
start
with
you
and
I
see
councilmember
lee
and
councilmember
barksdale,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
okay
hold
on
sorry
hold
on
for
just
sex,
see.
If
I
can
do
this,
this
is
like.
A
Okay,
so
I've
got
deputy
mayor,
councilmember,
robertson,
councilmember,
lee
councilmember,
barksdale,
council
members
on
so
far,
and
so
we'll
start
with
deputy
mayor.
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
just
wanted
to
say
mike
and
team
great
presentation
tonight,
thanks
for
the
the
overview
and
to
get
us
grounded
in
this
once
again
on
on
east
main,
and
I
really
want
to
thank
all
the
participants
this
this
evening
for
weighing
on
this
as
well.
C
We
heard
a
lot
of
great
comments
and
I
know
personally
for
me
there
was
a
couple
of
items
there
that
I
wanted
to
to
highlight
mike
and
there's
about,
I
think
five
or
six
items
here
that
I
would
request
to
be
added,
but
they
might
already
be
included
in
one
of
those
topic
areas,
so
there
might
be
some
overlap
there,
so
I'll
go
through
them
quickly
and
you
can
tell
them
that
they're
already
included
or
not
or
if
it
would
be
something
that
might
be
interested
in
adding.
C
So
I
believe
one
of
the
stakeholders
mentioned
site
plan
is
that
included
already.
If
not,
that
seems
like
something
that
should
come
back
before
us
in
september.
I
think
we
heard
over
and
over
again
about
keeping
the
height
near
405..
I
think
we
heard
that
from
both
the
residents
of
surrey
downs
as
well
as
some
stakeholders
here,
so
I
think
that's
something
that
clearly
there's
an
appetite
for
that.
You
know
those
higher
heights
near
405.
C
also
curious
about
the.
I
believe
it
was
seven
requests,
and
I
think
this
came
directly
from
one
of
the
stakeholders,
perhaps
wig
properties.
That
asked
us
to
take
a
look
at
and
ensure
that
those
were
included
in
the
future
study
session
topics
and
then
three
more
one
is
the
and
it
I
didn't
hear
a
lot
of
it
about
tonight,
but
it
came
up
once
before,
and
that's
about
the
amenity
incentive
system
and
the
requirements
being
placed
on
the
east
main
property
owners
different
when
compared
to
downtown
and
bell
red.
C
I
think
that
might
be
interesting
to
take
a
look
at,
especially
as
the
council
gave
direction
boy
a
while
back
to
look
at
using
downtown
as
kind
of
that
that
that
base
luca
code
and
then
moving
forward
from
that.
So
if
there
is
a
big
discrepancy,
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
to
know
why
or
why
it's
different.
C
C
If
I
have
that
right,
so
it's
so
it's
a
different
base,
far
for
residential
and
for
residential
and
non
non-residential.
I'm
just
curious
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
Oh
and
then.
Lastly,
it's
the
pre-located
street,
which
I
believe
we
heard
a
little
bit
about
tonight
and
again
curious
how
that
works
with
the
downtown
code,
because
my
understanding
is
that
in
the
downtown
code
the
property
owners
get
bonus,
points
or
far
bonus
points
if
they
create
a
pedestrian
corridor.
C
U
So
a
number
of
those
weren't
already
included
in
the
list.
If
you'll
recall,
there
was
a
table
at
the
june
28th
study
session
of
the
items
identified
by
the
wigs
that
you
mentioned
were
included
in
that
table,
so
those
would
be
brought
forward
the
site
plan
question
mr
wigg
was
commenting
about
the
importance
of
being
able
to
lay
out
a
a
good
site
plan.
U
It
was
critical
to
the
success
success
of
a
project
and
there
are
so
many
elements
that
really
drive
the
ability
to
lay
the
property
out
and
a
number
of
those
are
addressed
in
the
some
of
the
decisions
they've
already
made
with
regard
to
the
block
sizes,
the
etc.
U
So
we'll
try
to
tee
up
on
that
topic
area,
those
things
that
influence
the
site,
planner
the
ability
to
lay
out
the
pro
the
property
building
locations
and
the
things
that
drive
that
again,
there
are
many
things
that
have
an
influence,
including
floor
plate,
size
max
right,
so
that
one
was
a
little
that
might
be
a
little
tricky,
but
we'll
we'll
try
to
do
something
with
that
to
really
work
through.
You
know
what
is
the
flexibility?
U
That's
provided
in
where
are
the
boundaries
of
that
flexibility
with
it
with
respect
to
the
site
plan,
as
far
as
the
the
others
looking
at
some
of
the
comparisons
to
the
downtown
that
wasn't
included
in
any
of
the
previous
requests,
so
that's
an
analysis
that
we
would
need
to
set
up
and
bring
back
for
you.
So
we
can
certainly
put
that
on
the
list
as
well.
If
you
want
to
do
comparisons
to
downtown
and
bell
red
for
base,
far
against
the
max,
far
etc.
U
There
are
a
number
of
different
drivers
in
those
areas
of
the
city
that
are
different
than
east
main
and
every
area
has
got
a
kind
of
a
unique
set
of
circumstances
and
we'll
try
to
describe
those
as
well.
So
we
can.
We
can
absolutely
add
those
to
the
list
of
topics
that
we
can
bring
back
for
additional
discussion
and
description.
F
Great
I'll
try
to
be
brief,
since
we
have
two
more
agenda
items
tonight.
So
I
mike
question
are
any
of
the
comments
that
we
received
tonight
with
regard
to
revisions
not
included
in
the
land
use
code
topic
areas
that
council
will
address.
U
That's
a
challenging
question,
so
I'm
trying
to
recall
all
the
comments.
So
I'm
scanning
my
notes,
I
think
I
didn't
hear
anything
that
was
dramatically
outside
of
what
we've
already
got
on
the
list:
lots
of
discussion
about
housing,
the
balance
of
housing,
incentivizing
housing
and
affordable
housing
heights
and
pushing
the
maximum
heights
up
along
the
freeway
or
the
east
side
of
the
property.
So
all
of
those
are
in
line
with
some
of
the
topic
areas
that
we've
already
have
on
the
list
to
bring
back
for
council
discussion.
F
Okay-
and
I
would
encourage
all
the
people
who
commented
to
feel
free
to
send
in
your
comments
and
writing
to
the
council,
so
we
can
track
them
because
we're
going
to
be
studying
this
for
a
while.
Second
are
any
of
the
seven
items
that
are
on
the
wigs
june.
U
So
I
believe
we-
I
don't
have
a
letter
in
front
of
me
if
I'm
just
trying
to
it
from
memory,
but
I
believe
we've
captured
all
of
those
requests
in
that
table
that
I
refer
to
that
have
the
the
yellow
and
the
green
boxes
from
the
june
28th
meeting.
So
they
answer
your
questions.
Yes,
I
believe
we
captured
all
of
their
their
items
right.
F
Great
you're
telling
me
everything
I
want
to
hear
third
on
the
amenities.
This
is
one
thing
I
think
we
need
do
you
need
to
add
to
the
extent
it's
not
already
included.
I
would
definitely
like
to
see
a
broader
look
at
the
amenity
system,
adding
more
amenities.
The
one
I'm
most
particularly
interested
in
making
a
high
point
amenity
is
the
pedestrian
over
crossing
bridge.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
a
very,
very
important
connection
and
it's
expensive
and
it's
going
to
make
the
light
rail
work
better.
F
It's
going
to
make
this
development
work
better.
It's
going
to
give
people
access
to
downtown
et
cetera,
so
that
is
one
that
I
definitely
want
to
see
us
put
in
the
amenity
system.
So
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
the
amenity
list-
and
the
amenity
list
is
on
here,
but
is
that
either?
Can
you
either
add
it
or
tell
me
it's
already
included.
U
Deputy
mayor
newton
house
also
suggested
a
closer
look
at
the
amenity
incentive
system
and
some
comparisons.
So
yes,
it's
on
the
list.
F
I
would
like
to
see
us
do
whatever
we
need
to
do
under
cipa,
whether
it's,
whether
a
look
by
the
staff
results
in
a
dns
or
whether
it
requires
an
addendum,
but
it
sounds
and
we'll
listen
to
the
rest
of
the
council,
of
course,
but
based
on
the
overwhelming
comments
we
had
tonight
and
a
definite
interest
on
the
part
of
council
looking
at
higher
heights
and
shifting
heights,
if
staff
feels
like
we
need
to
revisit
sita,
let's
do
it
now,
because
we
should
be
able
to
do
that
addendum
in
90
to
120
days
if
an
addendum
is
needed.
F
So
I
don't
know
what
direction
you
need
from
council
to
do
that.
I
just
don't
want
to
get
to
november
and
have
to
start
that
process
then.
So
you
can
maybe
weigh
in
on
that
and
tell
us
what
you
need
to
kick
that
off
right.
U
So
the
this
is
a
comment
that
was
made
during
the
last
study
session
about
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
are
pushing
forward
some
of
the
conversations
and
decisions
that
could
trigger
a
need
to
look
at
the
cpa,
analysis
or
the
comp
plan
policies
again
and
do
that
as
early
as
possible.
So
we
are
absolutely
working
to
do
that.
I
I
think,
as
far
as
the
the
sipa
analysis
is
concerned,
I
think
the
height
clearly
is
one
item
that
that
could
require
us
to
take
another.
Look
at
that.
U
But
again
we
need
to
figure
out
where
the
council
is
going
to
land
before
we
bring
the
consultant
back
in,
if
that's
necessary,
to
actually
do
the
analysis
etc
to
support
that
work.
So
I
guess
at
this
point
on
that
question.
It
doesn't
require
any
direction
from
the
council.
That
would
be
a
staff
initiated
analysis
and
decision
for
the
cpap.
U
But
the
the
direction
was
clear
during
the
study
session
in
june
that
let's
initiate
that,
as
at
the
earliest
possible
point
to
minimize
any
extension
of
the
time
it
would
take
to
process
this
code.
F
Okay,
so
just
as
a
quick
follow-up
and
then
I'll,
let
someone
else
talk.
I
I've
heard
council,
member
or
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
myself
will
say
we
want
to
look
at
a
higher
hype
than
is
currently
under
the
sepa.
I
I
hope
that,
as
my
colleagues
talk
tonight,
if
council
is
interested
in
looking
at
that,
you
will
share
that
tonight
before
we
go
on
break
so
that
staff
can
decide
while
we're
on
break.
If
that's
something
they
need
to
do
so,
thanks.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
call
in
this
order:
councilmember
lee
councilman
bart
sales
on
and
stokes
so
councilmember
lee.
E
Thank
you
wait
a
minute.
I'm
really
excited
to
hear
all
the
support
that
we
heard
from
the
community,
especially
people
who
are
really
you
know
affected
directly
by
housing,
to
provide
for
the
added
you
know,
people
who
will
be
working
coming
to
work
for
the
city
so
very
gratified.
E
Second,
I
heard
that
you
know
in
a
way
the
wix
properties
proposal
as
they
presented
to
us
back
in
june.
They
bought
us
seven
points.
It
seems
to
me
that,
as
I
heard
from
the
staff-
and
you
already
are
including
those
right-
so
I
don't
think
we're
missing
anything,
and
so,
but
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
somebody
heard
from
the
testimony
that
we're
looking
at
something
iconic
and
I
think,
that's
very
important.
E
E
I
I
think
that
you
know
variety
of
the
development
really
present
us
that
multimodal
connection
to
the
light
rail
and
into
the
neighborhood
and
eventually
to
wilburton.
I
believe
that
this
is
really
and,
of
course,
this
I
think,
that's
her
transformer
robertson
mentioned.
You
know
we
could
also
make
connection
to
downtown.
E
You
know
conveniently
with
ways
like
sky
bridge
or
corridor
or
various
other
ways.
You
know
even
maybe
underground
tunnels,
so
I
think
there's
a
variety
of
things
we
can
make
the
connection,
so
I
support
it
and
I
hope
staff
can
confirm
that
those
items
that
will
presented
included
by
wix
poverty
will
be
discussed.
U
Yes,
councilman
will
be
those
those
items
will
confirm
that,
but
I'm
I'm
pretty
certain
that
they're
already.
Thank
you.
E
Just
to
be
clarified,
you
know
the
urban
farm
is
really
the
thing
that
stand
up
for
me
and
I
think
that's
where
we
talk
about
before
with
the
staff
we
have
some
real
strong,
you
know
I
I
don't
want
to
use
contention,
but
the
difference
in
urban
farms.
I
want
to
really
clarify
that.
I
personally
support
the
they
suggested
a
height
increase.
If
you
know
we're
talking
about,
if
we
can
make
it
iconic
make
it
workable,
accomplish
your
goals,
I
I
support
it.
Thank
you
mike.
D
All
right,
thank
you
mayor,
so
thank
you
to
staff
and
for
the
public
and
to
the
public
for
their
comments
mike.
D
My
interest
was
also
in
the
amenity
incentive
system
amid
the
incentive
system,
but
I
had
a
couple
of
new
things
that
I
wanted
to
include
in
that
one
is
mom
and
pop
shops
and
how
we
can
incentivize
those,
especially
given
supporting
commercial
services
as
part
of
the
vision,
but
also
just
given
the
need
for
affordable
commercial
spaces
and
then,
secondly,
other
amenities
that
promote
sense
of
belonging
and
engagement
among
people
who
are
who
either
live,
work
or
play
in
that
space,
which
I
think
helps
support
the
informal
gathering,
spaces
and
unique
character
and
in
terms
of
considering
the
shifting
the
height
closer
to
the
highway.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
council
members
on.
G
G
So
I
guess
here's
a
couple
of
things.
One
is,
I
agree
with
councilmember
bartsdale
that
to
the
degree
we
can
look
at
affordable,
retail
as
an
amenity
and
then
that
we
can
incentivize
would
be
really
important
to
me
and
then
my
question
would
be
on
the
height.
G
You
know
what
height
would
pencil
out
so
that
we
can
actually
build
more
housing
and
increase
height
along
405,
and
specifically,
what
I
heard
the
wigs
talk
about
is
that,
based
on
what
they
could
charge
for
rent,
it
may
be
that
it
won't
be
affordable
if
we
are
not
able
to
provide
more
height.
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
a
bit
more
about
how
much
height
are
we
talking
about,
I
believe
in
our
packet
wig
one.
G
G
So
are
we
actually
going
to
evaluate
and
analyze
up
to
400
feet
as
part
of
the
sipa
review,
because
I
I
would
like
to
think
that,
if
we're
going
to
pursue
sipa
and
looking
at
an
amendment
that
we
don't
end
up
going
to
that
well
too
many
times
that
we
really
do
try
to
look
at
what
is
the
height
that
we
are
looking
for
in
order
to
incent
the
the
housing
piece.
G
A
Any
can
we
move
on
mike.
Did
you
want
to
make
any
comment.
U
Yeah,
I
think
brief
comment
here:
response
to
council
members
on
it's
coming
about
height,
so
that
the
question
about
height
and
and
the
balance
between
adding
the
ability
to
maximize
the
density
and
development
and
what
you
get
for
that
it's
the
public
benefit
side
is,
is
a
is
the
equation
really
and
that's
what
you've
heard
a
number
of
the
commenters
talking
about
to
to
try
to
make
sure
that
what
happens
here
does
kind
of
maximize
the
ability
to
accomplish
the
public
benefit
which
is
in
this
case
we're
talking
about
the
affordable
housing
public
benefit.
U
A
Great
councilmember
stokes.
I
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
really
great
discussions
tonight
I
think
the
actually.
I
was
very
glad
to
hear
almost
everybody
saying
what
I've
said.
I
think
in
the
last
two
times
we've
had
this
is,
I
think,
we're
looking
at
well
one
we
need
to
have
affordable
housing
there.
I
I
don't
know
why
we're
even
talking
about
fee
and
lou,
because
that
will
let
me
no
affordable
housing
at
a
tod
site,
and
I
just
can't
see
us
doing
that,
but
clearly,
as
I
said
before,
I'm
very
willing
to
go
higher
if
we
get
affordable
housing,
and
that
is
a
prime
directive
and
everybody
almost
everybody
coming
talk
to
us
said
that
I
do
think
we
need
to
look
at
a
couple
of
things.
I
One
is
I'd
like
I'd
like
more
first
discussion
of
what
does
it
really
mean
that
we
can't
pencil
out
if
we
don't
get
a
certain
height
and
why
I
mean
I'd
like
to
know
I
mean
it's
that's
easy
to
say.
I'd
like
to
have
us
understand
that
from
several
sources
I
mean,
if
I
were
doing
a
development.
I'd
probably
say
the
same
thing,
and
it's
probably
true,
but
I
just
would
like
to
have
some
confirmation
of
that,
so
we're
talking
about
realities.
I
The
second
factor
is
that
we
all
have
to
keep
in
mind
is
this
is
a
game-changing
decision
for
bellevue
the
question
of
and
the
question
that
the
deputy
mayor
raised
about
a
downtown.
Well,
you
know
we
could
just
not
have
the
wedding
cake
anymore.
We
could
have
a
fl,
you
know
a
a.
What
do
you
call
it
a
a
level
cake,
I
mean
we
could
be
like
some
cities
that
don't
really
have
any
guidance
or
that
don't
have
zones.
I
We
have
zones
and
there
are
reasons
for
them
so,
but
we
can
make
adjustments.
So
it's
it's
we're
at
a
point
where
we
we're
looking
at
the
way
we've
done
it.
This
way,
the
way
it's
been
successful,
we
have
the
zones
and
are
we
going
to
do
something
different,
we're
crossing
the
zone,
we're
crossing
the
freeway?
I
So
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
the
reality
that
if
we,
whatever
we
do
here,
we're
going
to
have
the
same
request
coming
across
the
freeway
on
both
sides.
Up
there
we're
going
to
have
it
in
other
places,
why
not
in
part
of
bill
red?
So
I
think
that's
that's
just
the
reality
is
that
if
we
we
can't
go
with
one
developer
on
something,
because
it's
really
special
and
not
look
at
others.
So
this
is
a
big
decision
and
I'm
not
afraid
to
make
it,
but
I
think
I
want.
I
The
public
benefits
not
just
building
a
nice
building
for
for
us
public
addre.
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
other
factors,
so
I
think
we're
on
a
good
path,
and
I've
said
it
before
I'm
willing
to
go
high
for
affordable,
real,
affordable
housing,
and
I
don't
consider
a
hundred
percent
for
a
condo.
I
It
doesn't
sound
a
good
message
about
what
affordable
housing
is
when
we
have
real
need
for
workforce
housing
and
that
type
of
thing.
So
those
are
things
I'd
like
to
look
at
I
you
know,
I
don't
really
know
why
we
would
we
want
to
well.
I
guess
we
can
discuss
fianlu,
but
I
just
don't
see
that
as
an
option
for
this
site,
because
this
is
a
tod
site
and
we
have
we
have
plans,
we
have,
you
know
the
code
and
everything
for
a
reason,
and
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
these
other
conversations.
I
I
I
It
could
be
a
reality,
I'm
ready
to
go
forward
and
I
think
we're
looking
at
the
right
things,
but
let's
do
them
as
in
a
good
good
fashion,
and
do
it
not
not
taking
forever
and
changing
every
time.
We
have
a
conversation.
Well,
we
have
to
go
back
and
re-talk
something
else.
So,
let's
get
our
ducks
in
a
row.
Let's
look
at
this
real
hard
and
be
be
willing
to
make
some
bold
changes,
but
for
a
the
return
to
the
public.
That
is
that
would
would
pay
for
that
essentially.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
you
know
I
I
want
to
say
to
staff
how
much
I
appreciate
the
different
attention
we
give
to
the
different
parts
of
bellevue,
the
bell
red,
the
downtown,
the
east
main.
I
mean
wilburton
eastgate.
We
have
a
large
planning
process
and
we
have
a
visioning
process
for
all
those
areas.
That
is
unique
and
I
think
that
this
piece
of
property
is
very
unique.
We've
already
discussed
about
it,
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
what
I
said
three
years
ago.
A
A
But
I
don't
know
if
I'm
saying
anything
new
that
you
haven't
heard
before
in
direction,
but
I
think
I've
been
pretty
consistent
with
that.
So
do
you
feel
like
you've
gotten
the
direction
that
you
need
mike
tonight.
U
Yes,
I
I
appreciate
the
extra
explanation
and
suggestions.
I
think
we've
got
a
pretty
comprehensive
list.
We
will
organize
that
in
a
way
that
makes
logical
sense.
I
think
clearly,
housing
will
probably
be
at
the
front
end
of
the
discussion
with
the
council,
because
what
falls
after
that
is
how
do
we
make
sure
that
it
can
be
accomplished
within
the
development
area,
both
from
a
physical
and
an
economic
standpoint?
So
I
think
we've
got
pretty
strong
and
clear
direction
from
the
council,
so
I
appreciate
that.
A
Great
okay,
we
have
two.
We
have
two
study
session
items
and
I
well.
We
have
three
but
two,
two
discussion
ones,
and
I
want
you
to
look
at
I'm
going
to
ask
council
to
look
at
the
recommended
motion
here
and
if
you
agree
with
that,
let's
just
vote
on
it
and
if
you
don't
or
you
want
to
change
it
or
let's
go
ahead
and
have
that
discussion.
A
X
We
are
fine
with
your
direction
ma'am
mayor.
If
council
is
good
to
go
without
the
presentation,
we're
fine.
If,
whichever
direction
you'd
like
to
go
mayor,
we
are,
we
are
supportive.
A
A
J
X
I
will
do
that.
I
just
it
just
unclosed
for
me,
so
I'm
going
to
continue
to
speak
as
it
comes
up
and
I
will
share
as
soon
as
we
get
there
this
evening.
We
are
seeking
direction
to
bring
back
we're
discussing
arpa
and
we
are
seeking
direction
to
bring
back
on
consent
next
week
and
here's
the
presentation
I
apologize
for
losing
it.
I
hit
the
wrong
button,
that's
what
happens
when
we
get
ourselves
moving
too
fast
here,
I
believe,
share
screen.
M
X
All
right,
we
are
seeking
direction
this
evening
to
bring
back
on
consent,
appropriate
legislation,
including
budget
amendments
and
authorization
to
contract
for
up
to
eight
million
of
the
arpa
funding.
X
X
X
The
interim
guidance
is
very
clear:
it
must
be
spent
on
respond
and
responding
to
the
covet
19
pandemic,
whether
it's
to
the
public
health
emergency
or
its
negative
economic
impacts,
providing
premium
paid
essential
worker
there's
clauses
that
allow
us
to
recoup
some
of
the
reduction
loss
that
we
lost
through
covet
19,
and
it
also
allows
for
investments
in
water
sewer
and
broadband.
It's
important
to
note
that
the
money
must
be
incurred
or
contracted
by
december
31
24
and
must
be
spent
by
december.
X
31St
2026
in
front
of
you
tonight
is
a
proposal
for
us
to
meet
our
most
critical,
immediate
needs
in
the
community,
focusing
on
housing
and
workforce
stability,
I'll
turn
it
over
tony
as
far
as
and
jessie
kanato.
In
just
a
minute.
I
reckon
before
recommendation
before
you
asks
that
we
appropriate
up
to
8
million
of
the
20
million
dollar
arpa
funding,
leaving
and
holding
on
to
in
advance
the
remaining
12
million
dollars
to
a
later
date.
We
all
know
with
covid
gosh
every
time
we
turn
around,
there's
something
new
and
unexpected.
X
AJ
Our
recommendation
for
prioritizing
housing
stability
assistance
is
informed
by
the
data
that
is
gathered
by
our
human
services
team
on
current
community
needs.
While
the
pandemic
has
continued
to
cause
need
in
a
variety
of
areas,
the
data
demonstrated
that
needs
related
to
housing.
Stability
were
the
most
urgent.
AJ
The
city
has
been
responsive
to
the
need
for
eviction
prevention
funds
throughout
the
pandemic,
in
quarters,
2,
3
and
4
of
2020,
the
city
dedicated
a
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
via
the
human
services
fund
to
eviction
prevention,
also
from
a
variety
of
pandemic
funding
sources,
including
council,
contingency
funds,
cdbg
cv
dollars
and
cares
dollars.
The
city
dedicated
one
million
four
hundred
and
fifty
seven
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
one
dollars
towards
eviction
prevention
and
for
2021.
AJ
Nonetheless,
the
need
is
still
stark
and
is
unmet
by
other
funding
sources
by
prioritizing
assistance
for
those
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
To
achieve
housing,
stability
residents
will
be
better
situated
to
receive
other
assistance
and
make
progress
when
an
individual
has
a
safe,
stable
home,
they
are
better
able
to
achieve
food
security,
make
progress
with
mental
and
physical
health
goals
and
access
child
care
or
education
for
their
children.
AJ
AJ
While
the
county
is
currently
operating
a
rent
assistance
program,
it
remains
our
recommendation
to
prioritize
city
dollars
for
this
purpose.
For
a
number
of
reasons,
recent
data
gathered
by
city
staff
has
indicated
that
only
approximately
three
to
four
percent
of
the
county
dollars
are
actually
reaching
bellevue
residents.
As
the
data
has
shown
on
the
previous
slide,
we
have
a
significant
number
of
bellevue
residents
in
urgent
need
now
to
prevent
them
from
becoming
homeless.
AJ
In
addition,
the
county
is
operating
a
lottery
system
which
requires
that
residents
apply
without
knowing
if
they
will
receive
assistance
at
times,
leaving
them
in
limbo
and
still
needing
to
apply
to
other
agencies.
In
addition,
the
county
program
has
a
prescribed
limit
on
how
much
back
rent
can
be
paid
for
a
resident.
AJ
We
are
still
working
out
the
details
of
a
proposed
program
with
legal
review,
but
we
are
recommending
the
payment
of
100
of
back
rent
to
march
20
march
3rd
of
2020
and
three
months
of
forward
rent
for
residents
who
have
been
impacted
by
the
pandemic
for
those
residents
who
may
be
currently
homeless.
We
are
also
recommending
the
payment
of
100
of
back
rent
to
march
third,
twenty
twenty
and
then
payment
for
the
moving
costs
to
their
next
home.
AJ
The
goal
is
to
move
the
bellevue
residents
supported
by
this
program
to
full
housing
stability.
While
it
is
difficult
to
estimate
the
number
of
households
that
could
be
supported
by
this
funding
due
to
the
variability
in
how
much
is
owed
in
back
rent,
we
would
estimate
approximately
a
thousand
households
may
be
served
throughout
the
pandemic.
At
the
urging
of
the
council,
commission
and
staff
effort,
our
human
services
team
has
done
an
excellent
job
of
increasing
outreach
to
providers
throughout
the
multiple
rfps
for
coveted
funding.
N
Mayor
deputy
mayor
members
of
council,
as
we
thought
about
the
most
pressing
and
immediate
needs
from
the
economic
development
perspective,
we've
been
doing
a
lot
of
research
to
help
inform
our
recommendations.
Tonight,
we've
been
working
with
our
east
side
neighbors
and
our
regional
partners
around
the
workforce,
and
we
have
discovered
that
there
are
about
3,
300,
unemployed,
job-seeking,
bell
viewers.
At
this
time.
Our
unemployment
rate
continues
to
be
about
twice
as
high
as
it
was
pre
pandemic.
It
has.
N
It
has
improved
from
where
it
was
about
this
time
last
year
and
you'll
hear
more
about
that
during
the
next
economic
development
update.
But
there
are.
N
This
is
still
a
significant
increase
over
our
usual
unemployment
numbers
here
in
the
city
of
bellevue
a
couple
of
months
ago,
we
also
took
on
a
consultant,
in
partnership
with
our
east
side,
neighbors
from
renton
to
bothell,
to
do
a
study
and
analysis
on
the
state
of
back,
do
commercial
rents
in
the
region,
and
what
we
discovered
is
that
there's
about
25
of
our
local
property
owners,
who
are
saying
that
their
commercial
tenants
are
still
requesting
assistance
with
paying
the
rent
or
making
making
arrangements
to
pay
for
back
due
grant
those
most
impacted.
N
Next
slide,
please,
based
on
that,
we've
come
up
with
two
recommendations
for
the
council,
the
first
being
half
a
million
dollars
for
a
workforce
program.
This
would
be
a
three-year
pilot
done
in
loose
cooperation
with
our
neighboring
cities
on
the
east
side
and
really
focused
on
providing
a
navigation
program
to
help
our
residents
access,
the
existing
ecosystem
of
service
providers
and
other
resources
to
help
them
get
the
training
and
other
assistance
that
they
need
to
re-enter
the
workforce
or
upskill.
N
So,
over
the
three-year
span
of
the
program,
we
expect
to
be
able
to
serve
about
2100,
total
residents
and
helped
20
businesses
create
new
internship
programs
in
partnership
with
some
of
our
external
partners.
Like
the
bellevue
chamber,
we
do
believe
that
this
will
help
provide
equitable
outcomes
to
the
recovery,
particularly
as
those
individuals
in
the
sector's
most
impacted
are
more
likely
to
be
on
in
lower
income
scale
and
more
likely
to
see
their
jobs
impacted
through
automation
or
elimination,
as
the
recovery
continues
next
slide.
N
Please,
the
other
program
we're
recommending
tonight
is
half
a
million
dollars
in
small
business
rent
relief.
This
is
intended
to
help
prevent
further
closure
of
small
businesses,
as
particularly
those
in
the
aforementioned
sectors,
personal
services,
health
and
wellness
and
the
creative
economy.
N
This
program
would
serve
to
create
about
55
grants
for
local
small
businesses
and
help
pay
any
back
their
back
due
rent.
We
expect
the
average
award
would
be
about
nine
thousand
dollars
per
business,
and
this
would
help
to
ensure
that
those
small,
locally
owned
businesses
will
continue,
continue
to
be
functional
and
provide
services
for
the
city
of
the
bellevue
residents,
as
well
as
to
help
preserve
their
ability
to
keep
bell
viewers
employed.
N
So
that
will
preserve
the
number
of
jobs
at
local,
small
businesses
and
together
the
workforce
program,
and
the
small
business
program
will
provide
the
most
critical
cert.
The
critical
needs
at
this
time
for
our
small
business
community.
X
A
G
Yes,
oh,
I
actually
have
two
questions.
One
is
on
the
the
rental
assistance.
Are
we
going
to
also
do
outreach
to
the
small
mom-and-pop
landlords
as
well,
so
that,
since
it
looks
like
we
might
have
2
000
renters
that
are
going
to
need
assistance
and
we're
going
to
be
helping
half?
G
Can
we
make
sure
that
the
small
mom
and
pop
landlords
are
are
part
of
that,
and
then
my
second
question
for
jesse
is
on
the
commercial
tenant
you
said:
25
are
experiencing
the
the
gap
of
of
being
able
to
pay
rent
where
the
500k
only
helps
55
businesses.
Can
you
give
me
a
sense
for
what
that
25
number
looks
like,
because
what
I
I
just
like
to
understand
how
many
businesses
we're
helping
and
if
it
doesn't
help
that
many?
G
AJ
Thank
you,
council
members
on
I'll,
take
the
one
on
the
household
rental
assistance
and
then
I'll
pass
it
over
to
jesse
for
the
other
question,
so
our
program
would
invite
residents
to
apply
for
this
assistance.
It
would
not
be
a
landlord
assistance
program,
so
our
outreach
would
be
to
the
tenants
and
residents
that
outreach
would
primarily
occur
through
the
large
network
of
providers.
We've
now
formed
throughout
the
community
that
do
have
relationships
with
diverse
members
of
our
community
individuals.
We
may
not
have
been
reaching
as
adequately
before.
AJ
At
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
We
only
had
contracts
with
five
providers
for
rent
assistance
and
we,
through
pandemic
funding,
have
had
contracts
with
14
which
really
expands
our
outreach
into
the
community.
We
would
also
share
the
information
with
all
of
our
contracted
providers
about
this
opportunity.
So,
even
if
they
are
not
a
rental
assistance
provider,
they
would
have
a
relationship
with
our
residents
in
other
ways,
in
hopes
of
reaching
the
most
possible.
N
And
council
members
on
regarding
the
question
on
the
rental
release
for
small
businesses,
so
the
25
refers
to
the
number
of
property
owners
or
landlords
that
are
reporting
that
their
tenants
are
requesting,
assistance
or
accommodation
with
the
rent.
It
was
difficult,
even
through
signific,
significant
work
by
our
consultants
and
our
neighbors
and
partners.
N
It
was
difficult
for
us
to
ascertain
the
exact
number
of
small
businesses
that
are
in
arrears
at
the
moment,
but
we
do
know
that
there
are
about
7
000,
total
small
businesses
in
the
city
of
bellevue,
so
the
55
grants
is
a
smaller
portion,
but
it
is
a
significant
portion
of
those
small
businesses
in
those
three
highly
impacted
sectors,
those
that
are
needing
the
service.
The
most.
E
A
A
E
A
D
A
Okay,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one,
mr
miyaki,
would
you
like
to
introduce.
J
You
know
again,
given
our
mayor,
I'm
gonna
just
turn
it
right
over
to
the
team
and
hand
it
over
to
mac
to
kind
of
teach
this
up
for
the
council.
R
City
manager,
miyaki,
mayor
council,
we're
back
this
evening
with
the
next
installment
of
the
1590
work
program
discussion
I
mean
you
all
may
recall
that
we've
had
two
separate
discussions
relating
to
1590
and
how
we
may
go
about
spending
the
money
that
we
are
now
collecting
relating
to
the
one
tenth
of
one
percent
sales
tax
we've
been
discussing
most
recently
human
services
and
what
a
process
might
look
like
to
distribute
human
services
or
said
another
way,
non-capital
construction
dollars
and
what
that
might
look
like
and
the
council
gave
direction
and
we
issued
an
rfp
for
those
human
services.
R
And
then
the
council,
you
know,
has
been
working
on
making
those
awards
now
we're
turning
our
attention
to
the
creation
of
affordable
housing
units
themselves
and
the
capital
construction
components
of
the
hb
1590
work
program.
So
we're
here
this
evening
tonight.
If
we
can
flip
to
the
next
slide.
R
The
specific
request
this
evening
is
for
council
to
give
direction
so
that
we
can
begin
to
initiate
an
rfp
and
we're
going
to
be
walking
through
the
components
of
what
that
rfp
may
look
like,
and
that
specifically
relates
to
priorities
and
the
types
of
criteria
that
we
would
put
into
the
rfp
in
the
interest
of
time.
We're
going
to
go
through
this
relatively
quickly,
but
the
high
level
components
council
will
recall.
R
You
adopted
a
policy
statement
early
on
in
this
identifying
which
policies
that
you'd
already
adopted
to
give
guidance
for
where
you
may
want
to
spend
the
money
and
a
significant
component
that
you
also
discussed,
was
a
component
for
lack
of
a
better
term
local
control
and
how
the
city
council
would
like
to
make
decisions
around
spending
the
1590
monies.
So
what
we've
tried
to
do
is
build
a
process
for
you
all.
R
That
would
involve
a
funding
round
where
we
would
put
out
an
application
and
take
in
submittals
around
those
highest
need
priorities
on
an
annual
basis
and
that
process
would
line
up
with
other
funding
rounds
for
affordable
and
very
low
income
housing,
particularly
tax
credits,
state
monies.
The
arch
trust
fund
round
and
so
forth.
R
So
what
we
plan
to
do
this
evening
is
walk
you
through
how
that
process
might
work
we'll
just
cover
the
high
level,
because
it
was
all
in
your
packet
around
the
criteria
and
the
priorities
and
then
loop
back
to
the
direction
we're
hoping
to
get
from
council.
R
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
talked
about
some
of
this
we'll
go
to
the
next
slide.
I
want
to
just
put
this
up.
We
have
shown
this
slide
at
each
presentation.
R
The
most
important
component
is
that
there's
a
provision
in
house
bill,
1590
that
says
at
least
60
percent
of
the
funding-
has
to
be
spent
on
producing
the
types
of
housing
that
we're
talking
about
here,
for
individuals
at
or
below,
60
ami
and
then
very
specific
populations
and
we've
gone
through
that
at
each
each
meeting.
The
only
caveat
that
I'll
note
here
is
there
has
been
an
amendment
to
house
bill
1590
that
changed
a
few
of
the
definitions
and
we've.
Given
you
an
update
on
that
and
is
in
your
packet.
R
So
if
we
jump
to
the
next
slide,
I'm
going
to
hand
it
off
to
miss
olson
who
will
walk
you
through
the
the
work
program
and
then
lindsey
masters
will
help
you
with
how
our
application
process
is
going
to
work
and
some
of
the
work
that
art
staff
will
be
helping
out
city
staff.
Doing
as
we
bring
recommendations
to
you
all
on
the
capital.
Part
of
this.
AK
Great
thank
you
for
that
mack
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
I'll
be
brief.
This
work
plan
overview
just
really
speaks
to
the
work.
That's
happened
over
the
last
several
council
studies
sessions
and
the
stakeholder
engagement.
That's
gotten
us
to
this
point
with
the
human
services
rfp
and
then
with
this
capital.
Rfp,
so
you'll
see
on
that
slide.
We're
looking
for
direction
on
process
criteria,
priorities
to
begin
to
initiate
that
rfp.
So
I
will
turn
it
over
to
lindsay
masters
at
arch
to
give
a
presentation
on
that
process.
AL
Great,
thank
you
liesel,
I'm
happy
to
be
here,
so
I'm
going
to
briefly
walk
through
some
of
the
key
components
in
our
process
for
administering
these
important
new
funds,
some
of
which
you'll
be
familiar
with
from
your
your
ongoing
role,
approving
city
funds
through
our
trust
fund
process
each
year.
So,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
gives
you
a
deep
dive
and
I'll
walk
you
step
by
step
through
each
element
in
the
process.
AL
The
overall
approach
to
this
process
is
that
we
are
trying
to
complement
and
to
leverage
our
existing
trust
fund
application
round,
while
making
some
really
key
modifications
that
give
you
bellevue
the
opportunity
to
establish
your
own
local
priorities,
criteria
and
direction
for
the
funding,
so
we'll
come
back
to
those
later
in
the
presentation.
AL
So
where
we
are
at
is
now
in
the
step,
one
where
the
council
is
going
to
provide
some
direction
on
those
overall
priorities
criteria
they'll
be
incorporated
into
an
rfp
that
would
be
released
as
soon
as
we
can
get
it
out
early
in
august.
If
possible.
AL
We
would
then
be
coinciding
with
our
active
funding
round,
which
was
announced
earlier
in
june,
and
utilizing
the
same
set
of
application
forms
that
are
well
known
to
affordable
housing
developers
around
the
state,
as
well
as
a
set
of
additional
supplemental
questions.
That
would
help
us
to
provide
some
more
detailed
analysis
on
how
the
proposals
fit
in
with
your
priorities
from
there
arch
would
be
conducting
a
very
similar
review
and
analysis
that
we
do
for
all
of
the
funding
applications.
AL
We
already
receive,
looking
at
things
like
financial
feasibility,
the
capacity
organizations
and
preparing
that
sort
of
staff
report
for
discussion
by
an
inter-departmental
staff
team,
and
the
idea
here
is
that
we'll
be
timing
this
again
to
coincide
with
our
ongoing
funding
ground
so
that
we
can
share
information
from
that
process
and
and
with
the
goal
to
align
our
analysis
and
our
and
our
recommendations.
At
the
end
of
the
day.
AL
The
other
kind
of
key
component
in
this
interdepartmental
staff
team
is
that
we're
really
trying
to
create
a
more
robust
set
of
coordination
within
the
city,
particularly
as
we
look
ahead
towards
integrating
those
processes
for
allocating
service
dollars.
That
may
have
other
ongoing
implications
and
operational
considerations
with
the
upfront
capital
recommendations
so
really
trying
to
to
beef
that
up
and
so
we'd
be
bringing
in
representatives
from
not
only
community
development
but
also
parks
and
community
services.
AL
Homelessness,
outreach
coordinator,
potentially
development
services
as
well.
So
that's
a
really
important
distinction
from
the
arches
process,
which
again
relies
on
an
appointed
citizen
advisory
board
of
other
experts,
housing
and
our
own
executive
board
to
finalize
those
recommendations.
So
we
would
perform
that
as
a
staff
team
for
the
review
of
the
department
director.
We
would
approve
that
and
send
it
for
your
consideration
again
in
that
same
time,
frame
that
we
also
delivering
through
a
set
of
recommendations
for
the
trust
fund.
That
happens.
AL
The
next
steps,
five
from
five
to
six
and
seven,
would
look
very
similar
to
what
you
are
used
to
the
functions
arch
has
provided
for
for
many
years
and
actually
helping
to
develop
and
execute
contracts,
administer
all
the
expenditures
and
perform
that
ongoing
monitoring
of
the
projects.
We
would
also
be
feeding
data
and
information
to
the
city
to
help
inform
your
ongoing
reporting
on
the
program.
AL
AL
But
we
also
really
felt
it
was
important
again
to
give
you
an
explicit
point
to
establish
your
set
of
local
priorities
and
you
want
to
prioritize
with
funding.
That's
what
we're
doing
tonight
and
again
you
get
to
leverage
everything
we've
already
established
over
the
last
three
decades
funding
projects
through
the
trust
fund
program.
So
we
have
staff
with
affordable
housing
expertise.
AL
You
have
all
the
monitoring
and
contracting
systems
set
up,
so
it's
just
a
matter
of
kind
of
making
sure
those
scale
to
the
funding
and
then,
in
addition,
we
are
really
again
adding
that
in
more
integrated,
robust
coordination
between
staff,
with
various
expertise
within
the
city
on
homelessness
and
human
services
and
planning,
so
the
next
couple
slides
are
going
to
walk
through
the
criteria.
AL
I
think,
with
with
that,
you
can
move
on
to
your
part
lisa
in
wrapping
up
what
the
summary
of
of
what
we
discussed
so
far.
The
criteria.
AK
Great
thanks
for
that
lindsay
so
as
as
it's
been
mentioned,
as
staff
work
to
continue
to
build
this
long-term
process
to
allocate
both
capital
and
services
funding,
we
know
that
there
are
high
priority
housing
needs
that
are
happening
in
bellevue
right
now
and
so
similar
to
the
human
services.
Rfp
we're
looking
to
issue
this
capital
funding
rfp
in
order
to
quickly
get
funding
out
into
the
community,
because
we
know
that
there
are
projects
in
the
pipeline.
AK
So
we're
looking
again
like
lindsay,
spoke
to
to
use
the
arch
process
with
bellevue
specific
modifications
to
meet
those
local
needs
in
order
to
provide
funding
for
the
capital
costs
of
constructing
or
acquiring
affordable
housing.
AK
AK
The
following
funding
priorities
on
the
screen
are
what
are
recommended
for
the
capital
rfp.
The
first
one
is
addressing
and
preventing
homelessness
and
housing
instability.
We
believe
this
funding
can
really
help
support
those
different
needs
that
individuals
and
households
may
require
to
obtain
and
maintain
their
stable
housing.
AK
The
second
priority
is
addressing
individuals
and
households
who
are
earning
the
zero
to
30
percent
ami
level
because,
as
we
just
showed,
that's
where
really
the
greatest
housing
need
is
and
where
existing
sources
of
funding
are
insufficient
to
meet
the
need.
The
third
funding
priority
is
really
focusing
on
our
underserved
and
vulnerable
residents.
AK
So
the
next
slide
just
shows
in
a
little
more
detail
the
anticipated
rfp
schedule
so
to
coincide
with
arch's
fall
funding
round.
We
would
issue
the
rfp
in
early
to
mid
august
with
applications
due
at
the
end
of
september,
staff
would
work
on
a
recommendation
through
the
inter
departmental
staff
review
team
that
lindsay
mentioned
with
the
funding
recommendation
coming
to
council
in
that
first
quarter
of
2022.
R
Yeah
thanks
liesel
as
as
we're
wrapping
up
here,
we
can
go
ahead
and
flip
to
the
next
slide.
The
request
from
council
tonight
is
to
think
about
and
if
you're
comfortable,
with
the
criteria
as
we've
laid
them
out
there
and
the
priorities
based
on
all
your
discussions
to
date
and
the
stuff
that
we
put
in
your
packet
to
give
us
direction
to
initiate
the
rfp
along
those
lines.
We
know
there
are
still
some
ongoing
discussions.
R
You
just
had
a
discussion
much
earlier
tonight
about
what
a
potential
set
of
conditions
may
look
like
you
know
those
are
discussions,
the
condition
or
the
award
itself
wouldn't
happen
for
at
least
six
months,
probably
depending
on
how
the
submittal
we
could
get
the
quickly
get
the
rfp
out
on
the
street
and
then
get
submittals
in
and
then
evaluate
them
and
bring
them
back
to
council.
So
the
timing
should
line
up,
even
if
you,
whatever
you
decide
next
week
relative
to
those
other
things
you
were
talking
about
earlier.
R
Our
request
tonight
is
to
try
to
get
the
rfp
put
together
and
out
on
the
street
to
catch
as
wide
a
net
as
we
could
at.
R
A
Well,
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
speeding
through
these
last
two
presentations
after
waiting
so
long
for
your
chance
to
present.
I
can
only
imagine
how
hard
that
is
great
presentation,
so
the
direction
we're
trying
to
give
staff
is
whether
or
not
to
initiate
the
rfp
and
also
if
we
were
to
do
that,
what
kind
of
priorities
and
criteria
should
they
incorporate
into
the
rfp.
E
You,
madam
mayor
hi,
just
some
questions.
You
know
we
we
do.
We
have
anything
that
considers
include
mental
health
and
especially
for
young
people,
because
the
disruption
they've
had
you
know
in
this
pandemic
and
and
also
you
know,
address
diverse
population.
E
R
R
Right
and
so
as
we
talk
about
this,
the
the
request
this
evening
is
to
look
solely
at
the
construction
or
capital
side
of
the
funding
stream,
the
mental
health
components
and
or
human
service
components,
or,
let's
just
say,
general
service
is
handled
right
now,
through
our
human
services
group
and
through
the
human
services
commission
and
you've
gotten
a
presentation
on
that.
In
the
last
couple
weeks,
we
have
significantly
more
demand
than
we
currently
have
money
allotted
for
that.
R
A
Okay,
council
members
on.
G
Yes,
actually,
this
is
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
You
know
last
week
what
we
saw
with
the
mental
health
was
that
we
we
got
our
proposals
for
3.3
million,
but
only
1.6
was
available
for
capital,
we're
talking
about
six
million
dollars
when
we
first
voted
this
in.
We
talked
about
the
fact
that
well,
first
of
all,
I
agree
with
the
priority.
I
agree
with
the
process
and
I
agree
with
the
criteria.
G
So
let's
start
there,
but
I
would
add
that
when,
when
I
voted
for
this,
when
we
voted
for
this,
we
talked
about
the
fact
that
we
have
a
unique
opportunity
to
bond
against
future
revenues
so
that
if
we
actually
got
proposals
for
well
over
six
million
dollars,
I
really
recommend
to
my
colleagues
that
we
don't
wait
until
the
next
year
for
a
funding
cycle,
because
you
know
real
estate
is
only
getting
more
expensive,
and
so
we
need
to
be
moving
with
more
urgency.
G
R
So,
council,
members
on
on
the
question
of
issuing
debt,
which
is
an
option
for
the
city,
we
can
issue
debt
for
up
to
half
of
the
revenue
stream.
What
we
are
proposing
to
do
is
build
a
debt
issuance
question
into
the
2022
work
program.
R
So
an
idea
around
early
wins
and
looking
at
the
1590
funding
stream
for
right
now
was
the
preferred
option
to
recommend
to
you
for
lots
of
reasons
and
we're
hearing
a
tremendous
need
to
be
able
to
access
the
money
right
now
and
it's
probably
it's
a
several
month
process
to
to
be
able
to
cue
up
the
machine
to
issue
debt.
So
the
actual
departments
involved,
my
department
in
community
development
and
tony
calls
department,
along
with
some
legal
analysis,
to
be
able
to
issue
that
debt.
So
we've
already
got
it
queued
up
for
the
work
plan.
R
I
think
the
question
you're
asking
is
in
terms
of
timing.
If
we
see
a
dramatic
need
or
desire
to
access
the
money
now,
that's
actually
a
pretty
important
question
to
whether
or
not
we
want
to
look
hard
at
a
debt
issuance
so
would
probably
be
in
a
better
question
that
or
better
place
to
answer
your
question
once
we
see
what
comes
in
from
the
rfp
solicitation,
and
if
we
get
that
kind
of
demand,
we
probably
will
want
to
talk
to
you
all
about
what
a
dead
insurance
may
look
like.
R
G
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
extend
the
meeting
to
10
45
no
moved?
Second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
C
A
Any
opposed
okay,
councilmember
stokes.
I
I
think
it's
fine.
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
you've
gone
into,
it's
very
thoughtful,
it's
you
know
it's
it's
complex
and,
and
we
don't
have
the
we
could
use
a
lot
more
money,
but
I
think
you've
done
an
excellent
job
of
putting
it
together
and
and
also
I'm
I'm
ready
to
have
it
brought
back
to
vote
on.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
else?
Okay,
I
see
councilmember
robertson.
I
saw
a
thumbs
up
from
councilmember
barksdale
and
I
see
a
thumbs
up
from
deputy
mayor,
so
councilmember
robertson
go
ahead.
F
Thanks
no,
I
wanted
to
come
back
and
vote
on
it.
I
just
on
the
rfp
criteria.
I
saw
I
wanted
to
emphasize
two
things
that
I
really
particularly
liked
and
ask
about
something
I
think
is
missing,
and
that
is
the
city-wide
approach,
the
geographic
distribution
of
housing
opportunities
across
bellevue.
I
think
that's
really
great.
I
talk
a
lot
about
dispersion.
There's
two
kinds
of
dispersions
though-
and
this
is
only
one-
the
other
type
of
dispersion-
is
having
the
affordable
units
mixed
in
with
different
income
rates.
F
So
I
think
that
we
should
be
definitely
contacting
people
who
are
building
towers
today
and
letting
them
know
that
they
can
apply
to
have
some
grant
funding
to
turn
some
of
their
units
into
permanent,
affordable
housing.
I
think
that
that
would
be
a
great
opportunity.
We
could
really
leverage
it,
and
that
goes
with
the
partnerships.
F
I
think
partnerships
where
we
can
have
work
with
people
who
are
doing
you
know
fee
developers
we're
going
to
get
a
lot
more
bang
for
our
buck
and
create
a
lot
more
units
much
more
quickly.
If
we
do
that,
so
I'd
love
to
have
a
mac
or
whomever's
response
to
that.
If
that
is
something
that
we
will
be
able
to
focus
on
as
we
get
responses
to
the
rfp
and
otherwise
I'm
so
tired
it
being
on
zoom
this
long,
I'm
ready
to
vote.
But
I
want
to
hear
from
mack
first
yeah.
R
Thank
you,
councilmember
robertson.
Yes,
we've
been
testing
that
in
the
marketplace
about
mixed
income
buildings
and
what
it
might
take
to
go
from
80
ami,
which
is
very
typical
workforce,
affordable
housing,
type
of
unit
or
subsidy
down
to
60
or
down
to
30..
R
What
we
intend
to
do
is
build
that
in
to
say
that
that's
absolutely
possible
and
that
please
submit
if
you're
in
that
category
and
then
try
to
reach
the
right
people,
because
I
think,
as
everyone
on
the
council
knows,
there's
certain
developers
that
that
that's
just
not
their
business
model
and
they
may
not
be
interested,
but
for
those
that
are,
they
need
to
know
that
they
can
access
this
money
and
then,
of
course,
there's
a
you
know
a
cost
to
that
as
well,
and
we
can
help
you
all
with
once
we
get
the
submittals.
R
A
Yeah
and-
and
you
just
brought
up
exactly
what
I
wanted
to
bring
up
as
well,
so
thank
you
and
I'll
just
take
it
a
little
further
lindsay.
I
want
to
ask
you
what
percentage
of
zero
to
30
percent
ami
earners
require
supportive
housing.
AL
A
Okay,
so
I
I
would
really
like
to
include
in
what
councilmember
robertson
is
suggesting
that
we
look
at
ways
to
mix
in
unsupported
housing
needs
of
zero
to
30
into
all,
so
that
we
have
a
full
spectrum
of
is
mixed
into
these
developments
if
possible.
I
know
that's
hard,
but
we've
got
money
that
we've
never
had
before
and
we've
I've
always
heard
developers
say
if
the
city
could
contribute
something
to
us,
we
could
do,
we
could
lower
the
rents,
and
so
this
is
an
opportunity.
I
think,
to
do
that.
A
So
I'd
love
to
look
at
the
potential
of
buying
down
rents
in
that
range
along.
You
know
with
at
least
80
percent.
Ami
is
not
market
rate.
I
don't
know
what's
possible,
but
I'm
really
not
interested
in
building
buildings.
Lots
of
buildings
of
this
range
and
other
buildings
of
this
range.
I
think
you
know,
bellevue's,
been
very
successful
in
mixing
affordabilities
and
I'd
really
like
to
encourage
us
to
continue
to
do
so.
A
So
that
would
be
my
goal
any
any
more
questions
or
comments.
A
And
all
the
all
those
in
favor
say
I
I
opposed
all
right
great.
I
want
to
thank
the
entire
council
for
working
so
hard
tonight
and
staff,
and
mr
miyake
I
mean
this
has
been
a
very
substantive
night
and
I
know
it's
been
tough
for
everybody
and
everybody's,
given
it
their
all.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
very
much
and
wish
you
a
good
night
meeting
adjourned.