►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council November 16, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
E
A
A
C
Certainly
mayor
the
commendation
reads
as
follows:
whereas
jerry
weber,
president
of
bellevue
college,
for
three
years
from
august
2017
to
march
of
this
year,
passed
away
at
the
age
of
70
on
november
11th,
whereas
bellevue
college
is
a
key
city
destination,
the
third
largest
institution
of
higher
education
and
the
largest
community
college
in
the
state,
with
over
30
thousand
students
enrolled
annually,
whereas
dr
webber
brought
valuable
experience
to
bellevue
college,
having
led
two
illinois
schools,
the
college
of
lake
county
and
tonka
key
community
college
before
coming
here,
whereas
at
bellevue
college,
dr
weber,
embraced
the
school's
dedication
to
equity,
sustainability
and
diversity,
supported
faculty
and
staff
and
helped
students
reach
their
academic
and
life
goals.
C
Whereas
sustainability
was
an
abiding
passion
for
dr
webber
and
after
he
left
bellevue
college,
he
co-founded
the
seed
center,
an
online
resource
for
community
colleges
attempting
to
build
and
improve
their
green
economy,
education
and
workforce
training
programs.
Now,
therefore,
I
lynne
robinson
represent
lynn
robinson
mayor
of
the
city
of
bellevue
washington,
on
behalf
of
its
city
council.
Do
hereby
commend
dr
jerry
weber
for
providing
strong
leadership
and
an
important
time
to
bellevue
college.
One
of
the
city's
essential
institutions
signed
lynn,
robinson
mayor
city
of
bellevue.
A
A
G
G
I
speak
tonight
briefly
as
I've
written
a
link
to
your
statement
which
the
clerk
assures
me
as
a
part
of
your
meeting
packet
for
tonight.
I
will
not
repeat
what
I've
written
there
I
speak
tonight
because
I
think
it
is
important
to
give
great
credit.
Where
is
due
to
the
work
of
the
staff
and
the
anticipated
support
of
that
work
by
the
council
tonight
on
environmental
stewardship
plan,
I've
written
and
spoken
to
the
council
over
the
years
about
the
urgency
of
folsom
action
to
meet
the
existential
threat
of
global
warming.
G
G
It
will
encourage
and
guide
other
communities
as
well.
My
main
reading,
my
main
remaining
concern
is
the
necessity
of
frequent
monitoring
and
review
of
the
progress
of
the
city
toward
meeting
its
goals
by
crucial
deadlines.
Slippage
of
these
deadlines,
which
are
generous
in
terms
of
the
crisis
facing
us,
would
be
unthinkable.
G
G
H
H
After
contacting
jennifer
robinson,
she
directed
me
to
contact
jennifer
ewing,
ms
ewing
counseled
me
that
the
bellevue
people
for
climate
action
would
be
a
good
fit.
I
joined
the
pca
group
over
a
year
ago
and
began
my
education
on
the
challenges
facing
bellevue.
Regarding
the
climate
crisis,
I
also
joined
the
climate
action
planning
committee,
the
citizens
group
representing
various
cities
in
king
county.
H
The
cap
group
is
comprised
of
people
that
care
about
our
environment
and
includes
a
developer,
a
college
professor
engineers,
a
former
city
council
member,
a
former
city
planner,
a
green
building,
a
construction
management
consultant
software
engineer,
school
teacher
and
a
technical
writer.
The
goal
was
to
document
a
common
set
of
actionable
and
concrete
steps.
The
cities
can
take
that
was
accomplished
and
is
available.
H
We
all
hear
the
threat
of
devastating
effects.
Climate
change
is
having
in
our
natural
world
the
collapse
of
fisheries,
the
devastating
wildfires
across
the
west,
among
other
undocumented
impacts.
The
intergovernmental
panel
on
climate
change
is
reporting.
We
have
10
years
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
50,
where
natural
systems
will
overtake
humanity's
ability
to
address
the
threat.
H
When
I
joined
the
bellevue
pca
in
cap
group,
I,
like
you
believe
that
climate
change
is
a
threat
and,
over
the
course
of
the
last
year
I
went
from
believing
in
the
risk
to
understanding
the
many
facets
of
the
risk
to
helping
document
actionable
steps
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
That
learning
curve
is
very
steep.
H
This
group
met
twice
a
week
for
months,
researching
and
documenting
real
approaches
in
use
today
around
the
country
and
world
in
reducing
emissions.
I
respectfully
ask
the
bellevue
city
council
to
take
leading-edge
actions
in
the
esp
deployment
and
leverage
off
those
in
the
community
that
have
studied
actions.
Bellevue
can
take
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
I
Hello
again,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
my
name
is
court.
Olson.
F
I
I
Well,
a
large
large
majority
of
the
population
today
is
concerned
about
the
climate.
Most
folks
have
just
begun
to
understand
and
we
might
solve
the
crisis
today.
Even
very
smart
and
highly
respected
people
have
very
little
understanding
of
the
underlying
greenhouse
gas
emissions
problem
or
of
the
effective
solutions.
I
This
is
largely
because
the
essential
information
is
inconveniently
located
in
many
different
places,
and
also
because
it
takes
a
fair
amount
of
analysis
to
convert
that
information
into
an
effective,
comprehensive
plan.
It's
certainly
not
because
people
are
stupid
in
part
because
of
my
career
in
the
building
industry.
I've
had
an
early
jump
start
on
studying
solutions
to
the
climate
crisis.
I
Today
I
wish
to
thank
the
city
for
the
recent
environmental
stewardship
plan
work.
It
is
encouraging
that
said.
The
city's
work
on
the
climate
crisis
is
far
from
done.
Continued
analysis
and
improvements
to
this
plan
are
going
to
be
needed
to
reach
the
city's
target
of
50
percent
greenhouse
gas
reduction
by
2030..
I
I'm
happy
to
tell
you
that
several
of
us
and
the
people
for
climate
action
organization
have
the
knowledge
and
background
that
could
help
the
city
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
more
robustly
than
we
see
written
in
the
current
plan.
To
that
end,
I
highly
recommend
that
the
city
establish
an
advisory
task
force
focused
on
the
2030
target
of
a
50
greenhouse
gas
emissions
reduction.
I
I
J
B
K
Great
thank
you.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
here
this
evening.
I
believe
last
week
was
the
meeting
to
give
comments
regarding
bicycle
pedestrian
infrastructure.
K
However,
they're
not
complete
and
they're
not
yet
connected
it.
Is
these
unprotected
gaps
like
the
east
rail
to
108
that
cause
bad
bicycle
versus
car
interactions,
and
when
that
happens,
the
cyclist
usually
loses
most
forward-looking
cities
and
communities
around
the
country
and
around
the
world
are
learning
to
embrace
the
bicycle
as
a
tool
and
as
an
essential
part
of
the
multimodal
transportation
planning
necessary
to
make
vibrant
and
livable
cities.
K
K
B
B
B
It
doesn't
look
like
we
are
able
to
hear
from
miss
hummer.
The
final
speaker
this
evening
was
david
hoffman,
who
was
going
to
speak
in
support
of
the
esi
plan,
and
we've
already
had
three
speakers
in
support
of
that.
For
this
evening,
however,
mr
hoffman
has
emailed
the
council
with
his
comments.
A
Just
wonder
if
she
might
be
struggling
with
the
thing
on
my
computer
that
I
miss
when
I
mute
myself
at
the
top
with
f4.
B
B
A
Can
she
email
her
comments
to
us
for
tonight.
A
B
L
Yes,
mayor,
thank
you
good
night,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members.
I
have
two
items
I'd
like
to
share
with
you
this
evening.
The
first
one
is,
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
a
good
news
story
on
the
great
work
of
our
transportation
department.
L
We
were
recently
informed
that
the
city
would
be
receiving
an
award
for
best
city
project
from
the
washington
state
department
of
transportation
for
our
120th
avenue
northeast
stage.
3
project
joining
us
this
evening
is
andrew
singalonkas.
Our
transportation
department
director
deprived
us
some
brief
details
about
the
project
and
the
award
andrew.
M
Well,
thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki
and
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newan
house
and
the
city
council,
and
we
do
have
some
good
news
to
share
with
you.
The
city
of
bellevue
will
be
receiving
an
excellent
award
from
the
washington
state
department
of
transportation.
M
N
M
Please
this
is
an
annual
award.
The
evaluation
criteria
include
safety
enhancement,
practical
solutions,
multimodal
integration,
innovation,
effective
project
management,
community
engagement.
M
Sorry
about
that
public
satisfaction
and
timeliness
next
slide,
please
the
120th
quarter,
improvements
connect
one
of
I-405
via
via
northeast
fourth
street
to
spring
boulevard
and
runs
along
sound
transit's
east
lake
right,
rail
transit
extension
next
side
slide.
Please,
the
project
supports
growth
and
development
for
the
new
spring
district
and
overall
bell
red
transformation.
M
Next
slide,
improvements
included,
widening
a
two-lane
road
to
five
lanes
with
continuous
five-foot
bike,
wide
bike
lanes
and
eight
foot
wide
sidewalks
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
The
project
provided
new
water
sewer
and
storm
water
facilities
for
training,
retaining
walls
and
the
undergrounding
of
electrical
utilities.
M
In
a
bridge
over
the
light
rail
alignment,
120th
ave,
northeast
stage,
3
project
was
completed
on
time
and
under
budget
with
the
help
of
city
departments
such
as
transportation,
community
development
utilities
parks
and
development
services,
and
we
also
partnered
with
transit,
washdot
and
private
developers
in
the
area.
Next
slide,
please,
the
project
was
key
to
opening
development
in
the
spring
district
and
tod
areas.
M
It
also
provided
access
to
the
light
rail
stations
in
the
south
transit,
sound
transit
operations
and
maintenance
facility
east
the
project
facilitated
hundreds
of
housing
units,
retail
and
thousands
of
new
jobs.
Next
up
slide,
please.
M
Here
are
some
before
and
after
pictures
looking
north
next
slide,
and
here
are
some
before
and
after
pictures
looking
south
next
slide,
the
project
was
23.7
million,
which
included
both
federal
grants
and
sound
transit
funding,
and,
as
you
can
see,
a
majority
of
the
project
funding
was
from
outside
sources.
M
The
final
expenditure
is
a
prop
approximately
20
million
a
savings
about
3.7
million
and
we're
grateful
for
all
of
our
partners
to
make
this
made.
This
project
happen
next
slide.
M
So
what's
next,
the
formal
awards
ceremony
with
washdot
fhwa
and
the
city
staff
is
scheduled
for
december
1st
from
3
30
p.m,
to
4
30
p.m.
I
don't
have
the
details
about
the
ceremony,
but
I
I
will
be
certain
to
let
you
know
about
it
when
I
find
out
and
with
that.
Thank
you.
L
L
On
sunday
afternoon,
governor
inslee
announced
a
new
coveted
health
restrictions
which
began
to
take
effect
tonight
and
last
for
approximately
four
weeks
until
december.
14Th,
the
emergency
rollback
of
activities
comes
as
our
state
faces,
a
record
spike
in
cases
resulting
in
hospitalizations
being
up
by
roughly
70
percent.
L
These
restrictions
include
indoor
gatherings
with
people
outside
the
household
will
be
prohibited
unless
they
quarantine
for
roughly
for
14
days.
Restaurants
and
bars
can
only
operate
outdoor,
dining
and
carryout
or
delivery.
Retail
and
personal
services
are
restricted
to
25
capacity
and
indoor
services
are
closed
at
gyms
museum,
zoos
and
movie
theaters.
L
In
response
to
the
mayor
to
the
governor's
news
release
on
this
morning,
the
city
of
bellevue
posted
this
information
in
more
detail.
In
addition,
provided
other
helpful
links
on
our
website
at
bellevue.gov,
our
economic
development
group
also
sent
reminders
to
businesses
on
the
existing
support
available
to
them
to
businesses.
In
this
time
of
coped
and
as
we
move
forward,
the
city
will
continue
to
keep
the
public
informed
of
the
latest
news
and
updates
via
the
city's
website
and
social
media
and
mayor.
That
concludes
my
manager's
report.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
know
these
are
proposed
guidelines
for
the
next
four
weeks.
I
really
hope
that
it
only
takes
four
weeks
to
get
out
of
the
situation
that
we're
in,
but
I
did
hear
good
news
that
the
state
is
really
anticipating
that
in
the
spring
we
should
be
resuming
all
our
normal
activities
by
at
least
by
the
spring.
So
looking
forward
to
that,
I
know
we
all
are.
Thank
you,
mr
miyake.
M
N
A
L
Sure
thank
you
mayor
and
council
members
public.
The
public
hearing
is
on
ordinance
number
6530,
which
imposed
an
interim
official
control,
towing
time
limitations
or
certain
active,
temporary
use
permits
and
suspends
the
restrictions
for
application
of
certain
successive
temporary
use
permits
this
all
in
response
to
the
impact
of
kovid
on
the
construction
industry.
L
By
way
background
on
october
12th,
the
council
adopted
ordinance
6530
on
imposing
the
interim
official
control
and
per
state
law.
A
public
hearing
must
be
held
within
60
days
of
its
adoption
of
the
ordinance
in
order
for
the
interim
official
control
to
remain
in
effect
joining
us
this
evening.
For
a
brief
staff
report
are
liz
stead,
our
land
use
director
and
tristan
tana's,
consulting
attorney
both
from
our
development
services
department.
With
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
both
liz
and
frisna.
O
O
Can
you
all
see
that
yes,
great?
Thank
you.
As
mr
miyaki
noted,
we
are
here
to
present
a
brief
staff
report
on
the
interim
official
control
related
to
temporary
use
permits.
This
is
ordinance
number
6530
prior
to
council
holding
the
public
hearing
for
this
interim
official
control.
O
The
direction
that
we
need
from
council
is
to
hold
that
public
hearing
our
agenda.
For
this
evening.
We
will
be
explaining
briefly
the
process
for
the
interim
official
control,
talk
about
the
objectives
and
the
expected
outcomes
of
this
ordinance
and
then
recall
the
components
of
the
interim
official
control
measures
and
permit
decision
criteria
related
to
that
temporary
use
permits
and
conclude
with
asking
council
to
hold
the
public
hearing.
O
So
the
process
for
interim
official
control
council
adopted
this
ordinance
6530
on
october
12th.
O
This
plan
is,
would
modify
and
put
in
place
certain
measures
based
on
county
by
county
data.
O
As
noted
earlier,
there
has
been
a
rollback
to
additional
restrictions
starting
at
midnight
tonight,
and
the
practical
outcome
is
that
businesses
and
services
must
continue
to
or
further
limit
their
activities
and
follow,
distancing
and
other
requirements
in
bellevue.
We
are
seeing
that
these
businesses
and
services
utilize
temporary
use
permits
to
expand
their
areas
to
add
capacity
while
following
distancing
requirements,
as
I'm
sure
you
all
have
seen.
Restaurants
are
using
outdoor
spaces
and
parking
lots
to
accommodate
outdoor
park
at
their
dining
retail
stores
are
placing
merchandise
and
accommodating
shopping
and
outdoor
spaces.
O
O
These
providers
are
needing
this
interim
official
control
so
that
they
are
assured
they
can
operate
in
this
manner,
certainly
before
investing
and
mobilizing
these
temporary
measures.
So
the
interim
official
control
has
quickly
mitigated
the
continuing
impacts
of
kovit
and
the
limitations
that
have
been
placed
by
washington's
reopening
plan.
O
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
now
to
liz
ted.
Our
land
use
director
to
go
through
the
next
several
slides
liz.
P
Yeah
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members,
thank
you
for
having
us
this
evening,
just
a
few
quick
reminders
about
the
ordinance
that
we've
discussed
previously.
This
does
actually
give
us
the
ability
to
toll
the
time
on
the
ordinance.
So
we
do
not
have
a
time
limitation
on
these
temporary
use
permits.
As
long
as
safe
start,
washington
is
in
place,
so
permit
holders
will
still
have
the
full
duration
of
their
permits.
P
Once
the
governor
lifts
the
safe
start
washington,
so
we
would
start
counting
on
the
first
day
after
the
completion
of
all
the
phases
of
safe,
start
washington
and
any
permit
holders
would
have
another
90
days
to
go
ahead
and
tie
up
any
loose
ends
and
as
they
move
back
into
their
regular
business
processes.
Next
slide,
please.
P
P
Not
move
okay,
there
we
go
so
one
sorry
about
the
technical
difficulties
here.
One
of
the
other
wonderful
things
about
this
ordinance
that
was
passed
is
that
we
can
also
now
not
have
a
concern
about
a
successive
application
in
the
land
use
code.
P
The
permit
decision
criteria
that
we
looked
at
in
this
was
when
we
have
a
temporary
use.
Permit.
We
look
at
protecting
the
public
health
safety
welfare.
Avoiding
injury
to
adjacent
properties
example
of
that
is.
The
fire
review
team
looks
closely
at
all
the
tents
and
the
heating
elements
and
how
those
are
working
together
to
make
sure
that
people
are
safe.
We
also
look
at
whether
the
proposed
temporary
use
is
compatible
in
intensity
and
appearance
with
the
existing
land
uses
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
P
P
P
We
are
continuing
to
communicate
with
existing
permit
holders
and
potential
applicants,
and
we
have
implemented
some
streamlining
for
reapplication
and
revision
process
for
those
people
that
are
slightly
changing
an
existing
permit
that
they
already
hold
or
that
somehow
fell
out
and
need
to
come
back
into
the
system.
We've
got
a
streamlined
process
for
them,
so
the
direction
we
need
from
council
tonight
is
to
hold
the
public
hearing
on
ordinance
6530.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
this
is
an
ordinance
that
the
council
has
already
adopted.
So
as
part
of
the
procedure,
we
need
to
do
this
public
hearing.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing.
B
Q
Q
I
should
go
back
and
introduce
myself.
My
name
is
patrick
bannon,
I'm
president
of
the
bellevue
downtown
association,
and
to
reflect
our
appreciation
for
the
leadership.
The
city
continues
to
show
in
supporting
the
small
business
community
and
doing
whatever
the
jurisdiction
can
to
come
around
those
businesses
and
provide
flexibility,
responsiveness,
solutions,
oriented
approach
to
doing
everything
they
can
to
help
those
businesses.
Q
So
we
will
continue
to
do
everything
we
can
to
make
that
happen
in
partnership
with
the
city.
I
want
to
just
commend
the
city
staff
as
well
for
their
flexibility
and
solutions
approach
to
the
covid
crisis.
It's
it's
been
remarkable.
We've
learned
so
much
working
together
as
a
team
and
and
trying
to
solve
for
for
business
needs.
Q
I
think
we're
all
listening,
even
more
than
we
did
before
so
again
want
to
reflect
my
my
personal
appreciation,
as
well
as
that
of
the
bdas
for
the
council's
leadership
and
the
city's
overall
leadership
in
confronting
the
epidemic
and
supporting
small
business
again
support
this.
This
ordinance
thanks
again.
B
L
A
L
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
We
have
three
items
under
the
study
session
this
evening
and
the
first
one
is
the
planning
commission's
final
review
recommendations
and
the
criteria
to
set
forth
in
the
languages
code
to
make
recommendations
on
the
2020
annual
comprehensive
plan,
amendment
work
plan
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
city
conducts
its
annual
amendment
process
over
the
course
of
the
year.
L
L
This
was
last
in
front
of
council
on
july
20th,
where
the
city
council
initiated
the
c1,
affordable
housing
amendment
into
final
review,
then
again
on
august
3rd,
where
the
council
directed
the
four
privately
initiated
amendments
into
the
2020
annual
work
program
with
threshold
review
on
joining
us
this
evening
is
I'm
matt
cummins
director
of
the
community
development
department
and
joining
him
is
emil.
King
planning
assistant
director,
tara
johnson,
comprehensive
planning
manager
all
from
the
community
development
department
and
also
joining
us,
is
radical.
L
R
Good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
members
of
council
tonight,
we
are
presenting
a
series
of
recommendations
to
amend
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
This
plan
is
very
important
to
bellevue,
as
it
sets
forth
the
vision,
goals
and
policies
and
a
series
of
land
use
maps
that
guide
development
and
property
zoning
designations
across
the
city.
R
Careful
consideration
of
these
annual
amendments
is
a
hallmark
of
the
planning
we
seek
to
undertake
in
bellevue.
The
common
theme
of
these
amendments
is
housing.
The
four
site-specific
amendments
each
include
consideration
for
additional
housing
capacity
to
varying
degrees,
each
with
unique
circumstances
that
you'll
hear
more
about
tonight.
R
In
addition,
the
city-initiated
amendment
for
c-1
policies
pertaining
to
increased,
affordable
housing
is
an
important
precursor
to
future
technical
work
and
community
engagement.
That
staff
will
undertake
at
this
point
I'll
turn
things
over
to
tara,
johnson,
the
city's,
comprehensive
planning
manager
and
staff
liaison
to
the
planning
commission.
S
Good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
new
in
house
city
manager,
miyaki
staff
present
this
evening
and
members
of
the
public
give
me
a
second.
While
I
pull
up
tonight's
presentation.
B
B
T
S
Technology,
thank
you
so
as
part
of
our
presentation
this
evening
we
have
with
us,
as
staff
has
already
introduced
our
chair
of
the
planning
commission,
radika
mulgavkar
who's
going
to
be
providing
the
council
and
the
public
with
an
overview
of
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
on
all
the
comprehensive
plan,
amendments
that
were
considered
as
part
of
this
year's
work
program.
S
Also
present
this
evening
we
have
senior
planner,
nicholas
matz
and
janet
lewin,
both
of
whom
oversaw
their
respective
portions
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
amendment
process
and
so
should
any
questions
arise
from
city
council
we'll
be
directing
questions
should
it
should
it
apply
to
their
applications,
and
they
can
provide
additional
analysis
and
information
to
the
council
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
charmaine.
Thank
you.
S
So
purpose
of
tonight's
evening
is,
first
of
all
to
provide
an
overview
to
the
council
of
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
on
all
five
comprehensive
plan
amendments
and
then
for
a
city
council
to
provide
direction
to
staff.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
thank
you.
So
I
apologize
in
advance
for
the
amount
of
text
on
this
slide,
but
I
did
we
did
want
to
highlight
for
you
on
the
final
review
decision
criteria
that
both
staff
and
the
planning
commission
use.
When
we're
evaluating
each
of
the
comprehensive
plan
amendments
each
of
the
applications
we
review
them
to
ensure
that
they
comply
with
each
of
these
specific
criteria.
S
We
also
go
through
public
hearings
with
the
planning
commission,
as
well
as
a
courtesy
public
hearing
with
applications
that
fall
under
the
purview
of
the
east,
bellevue
community
council,
following
planning
commissions,
public
hearing
and
then
issuing
a
formal
recommendation
on
each
of
the
applications.
We
bring.
This
back
to
city
council
for
your
review
and
consideration
and
then
back
for
final
action.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
thank
you
so
just
to
highlight
the
four
applications.
As
we've
said
previously,
we
received
we
received
four
applications
which
we
brought
to
city
council
in
august
city
council,
went
through
the
threshold
review
criteria
and
initiated
all
these
applications
into
the
final
review
process.
S
S
I
also
would
like
to
highlight
there
are
three
applications
that
fall
under
the
purview
of
the
east
bellevue
community
council,
which
were
the
subject
of
our.
I
believe
it
was
october,
6th,
hearing,
courtesy
hearing
with
them.
They
were
the
northeast,
8th
street
partners,
application
the
glendale
country
club,
northeast
application
and
then,
of
course,
the
affordable
housing
c1
strategy,
we'll
be
reviewing
each
of
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
on
all
five
applications
shortly.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
thank
you.
The
this
is
a
map
that
graphically
depicts
the
location
of
each
of
the
four
private
amendments
and
their
site-specific
amendments.
The
c1
strategy,
of
course,
is
a
policy
amendment,
so
it
applies
city-wide
based
on
specific
criteria
which
we'll
be
talking
about
as
part
of
this
presentation
as
well.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
thank
you,
and
now
I'm
going
to
hand
things
over
to
our
planning.
Commission
chair
who's,
gonna
walk
through
the
planning
commission
recommendations
on
the
four
privately
initiated
amendments,
and
then
we'll
start
talking
about
the
c1
strategy.
Following
that.
J
All
right,
thank
you,
tara
and
thank
you
to
all
of
the
staff
in
who
have
been
working
with
the
planning.
Commission.
They've
done
a
great
job
throughout
the
year,
especially
in
light
of
everything
with
kobit
and
thank
you,
council
members,
and
for
having
me
and
hello
public.
J
The
planning
commission
recommends
by
a
six
zero
vote,
that
the
city
council
adopt
the
hundred
bellevue
way
southeast
amendment
to
amend
the
map
from
a
split
downtown
mix
used
downtown,
mu
and
office
to
a
single
downtown
mu
on
a
.87
acre
site.
The
commission
found
that
the
application
satisfies
all
the
land
use
code
decision
criteria
for
the
final
review
of
a
comprehensive
plan.
J
Should
I
kara
should
I
have
questions
now
or
at
the
end,
we'll
do
it
at
the
end.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
next
slide
please.
So
this
is
the
safeguard,
say
self
storage.
Again,
the
planning
commission
recommends
by
a
six
zero
vote,
that
the
city
council
adopt
the
safeguard
self
storage
amendment
to
amend
the
map
from
an
office
to
a
community
business
on
five
parcels,
totaling
6.4
acres.
J
The
planning
commission
recommends
again
by
a
six
zero
vote
that
the
city
council
adopt
the
northeast
eighth
street
partners,
amendment
to
amend
the
map
from
office,
zero
office,
multifamily
high
on
two
parcels
on
a
nearly
one
acre
site.
The
commission
found
that
the
application
satisfies
all
land
use
code
decision
criteria
for
final
review
of
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment,
notably
that
it
seeks
to
maintain
the
vitality
and
character
of
a
bellevue
neighborhood,
while
appropriating
appropriately
addressing
local
business.
J
The
local
business
location
next
slide.
Please
this.
This,
the
glendale
country
club
actually
had
the
most
amount
of
discussion
aside
from
the
affordable
housing
strategy
within
the
planning
commission
and
in
the
end,
the
planning
commission
recommends
by
a
4-2
vote
that
the
city
council
adopt
the
glendale
country
northeast
amendment
to
amend
the
map
from
a
single
family
low
to
multi-family
medium
on
a
3.3
acre
portion
of
the
currently
undivided
glendale
country
club
property.
J
So
the
little
triangle
the
commission
found
that
the
application
satisfies
all
land
use
decision
criteria
for
final
review
of
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment
and
we
to
give
a
little
more
detail.
Since
this
wasn't
a
a
six
zero
vote.
The
commissioners
decide
discuss
the
glendale
country
club
northeast
amendment
at
length,
as
I
noted,
and
the
rationale
for
staff's
recommendation
to
not
approac
adopt
the
proposed
amendment.
J
Most
of
the
planning
commission
ultimately
concluded
that
the
proposal
was
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
in
that
it
was
not
made
in
isolation
to
the
surrounding
area
and
thus
could
fit
within
the
neighborhood,
which
is
criterion
b1.
J
It
addressed
the
interests
and
changes
changed
needs
of
the
entire
city
regarding
the
evolving
community
role
of
the
golf
course
over
the
duration
of
its
60-year
plus
history
criterion
b2,
it
could
be
suitably
developed
under
a
multi-family
designation
even
with
regard
to
the
critical
areas,
designation,
criterion,
b4
and
could
achieve
a
public
benefit.
That
was
not
based
solely
on
financial
incentive,
but
in
fact
did
demonstrate
a
community-wide
environmental
benefit
which
is
criterion
b5
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
tara,
to
continue.
S
Thank
you,
chairman
gafkar.
Now
I
just
would
like
to
highlight
some
of
the
pertinent
relevant
highlights
of
action
c1
and
the
c1
affordable
housing
strategy
which,
as
we
said
previously,
council,
launched
this
effort
on
july
20th.
S
S
However,
following
that
staff
will
be
doing
a
great
deal
of
work,
technical
analysis
relating
to
land
use
code
provisions
that
speak
to
specific
density
incentives
for
both
single-family
and
multi-family
properties,
I'll
talk
shortly
about
the
types
of
properties
that
this
would
this
would
impact,
but
essentially,
once
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment,
one
city
council
takes
action
on
the
comprehensive
plan,
amendments
and
the
specific
policies
that
would
reside
in
the
housing
element.
Following
that,
we'll
start
the
luca
process
which
will
come
before
both
the
planning,
commission
and
city
council.
S
S
Our
intent
is
we're
taking
a
look
at
that
similar
section
of
the
existing
incentive
and
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
appropriate
metric
is.
All
that
will
all
that
kind
of
density,
analysis
and
technical
analysis
will
occur
as
part
of
the
land
use
code
amendment
process.
So
that's
not
something
that's
occurred
up
to
now.
S
Our
intent
is
to
apply
to
not
have
the
supply
within
our
growth
corridors
like
bellred,
downtown
and
eastgate,
and
the
reasoning
for
that
is
primarily
because
those
areas
already
have
existing,
affordable
housing
incentives
in
place
that
have
been
used,
and
so
our
intent
is
to
really
focus
in
on
the
types
of
properties,
religious,
faith-owned
properties
that
qualify
and,
in
addition,
under
house
bill
1377,
which
was
passed
earlier,
which
was
passed
last
year
and
is
now
enacted
into
state
law.
S
I
would
also
like
to
highlight
that-
and
we
talked
about
this
as
well
at
the
july
20th
council-
meeting-
that
staff
brought
forward
section
c1
as
part
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
part
of
one
of
the
21
actions
and
staff
did
bring
forward
a
proposed
amendment
or
amendments
to
the
code
to
fulfill
some
of
the
intent
under
the
strategy
in
2018.
S
There
was
extensive
council
discussion
at
that
time
and
and
council
direction
was
to
defer
this
conversation,
because
there
was
anticipation
that
this
bill
was
being
discussed
through
the
legislative
process,
and
so
council
direction
was
to
to
wait
till
that
occurred,
and
so
that
has
occurred.
S
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
thank
you.
I
did
want
to
touch
on
the
types
of
properties
that
would
be
impacted
by
both
the
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
policies
proposed
policies
and
recommended
policies
by
the
planning
commission,
as
well
as
potentially
the
land
use
code
provisions
which
will
be
coming
for
you
before
you
next
year.
S
The
types
of
properties
that
fall
under
this
these
categories
and
that
have
been
referenced
as
well
under
house
bill,
1377
and
state
law,
include
public
surplus
property,
nonprofit
housing
and
faith-owned
property
all
located
in
multi-family
and
mixed-use
zones
under
single-family
zones.
We're
looking
primarily
at
faith-owned
property
and
religious
property
owned
by
religious
organizations,
does
not
include
property
that
comes
under
the
ownership
of
our
parks
and
community
services
or
properties
owned
by
public
utilities
and
then,
as
we
mentioned
before.
S
It
of
course,
excludes
the
growth
corridor
areas
downtown
bellerin
and
eastgate,
since
they
already
have
incentives
in
place.
I
we
would
also
like
to
clarify.
I
think
this
was
a
issue,
a
question
that
came
up
at
our
july
20th
briefing
or
discussion
with
city
council
when
city
council
provided
direction
to
start
work
on
this.
On
this
effort,
there
was
a
question
regarding
whether
properties
that
currently
are
not
under
these
specific
types
of
ownerships.
S
S
Staff
has
done
a
fair
amount
of
outreach
and
conversation
with
with
constituents
with
affected
property
owners,
folks,
that
are
that
own
religious,
religious
property
churches
and
other
religious
institutions
and
the
feedback
that
we've
received
is
not
all
of
them
have
the
ability
or
available
land
based
on
the
types
of
types
of
services
that
they
that
they
offer
to
take
advantage
of
the
density
bonus.
But
we
do
know
there
are
a
few,
and
so
staff
anticipates
that
it's
just
a
few
of
these
types
of
properties
that
would
develop.
S
Also,
something
additional
to
note
is
several
of
the
religious
institutions
and
organizations
that
are
currently
existing
have
been
in
existence
with
the
same
zoning
since
the
60s
and
70s.
So
this
provides
an
opportunity
if
they
do
have
available
land
for
them
to
provide
these
additional
services
and
affordable
housing
on
their
property
if
it
if
it
suits
their
purposes,
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please.
S
That
would
provide
bonus
incentives,
additional
bonus
incentives
from
the
existing
15
percent
and
those
would
apply
both
multi-family
and
single-family
zones
within
the
city
for
affordable
housing
and
again
they
would
have
only
applied
to
those
eligible
types
of
eligible
qualifying
properties
that
we
just
talked
about
we're.
Also
inc
proposing
and
planning.
Commission
has
also
recommended
a
policy
in
support
of
creating
a
demonstration
program.
S
Staff
has
been
approached
by
a
number
of
different
groups,
non-profit
and
different
organizations
that
have
expressed
an
interest
in
developing,
affordable
housing
and
so
we're
adding
some
policy
language
that
could
enable
a
creation
of
a
demonstration
program
that
would
apply
just
in
multi-family
zones
within
the
city.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
following
council
action
on
c1,
along
with
all,
of
course,
all
the
other
privately
initiated
amendments.
S
Next
steps
really
specifically
relating
to
c1
is
for
staff
to
start
working
on
some
of
the
provisions
relating
to
the
demonstration
ordinance,
and
so
that's
something
again
that
will
that
would
come
back
before
city
council
and
then.
In
addition,
we
anticipate
early
in
2021
to
start
working
on
the
land
use
code,
amendments
that
would
add
specific
requirements
and
thresholds
to
density
bonus
incentives
that
would
apply
in
both
single-family
and
multi-family
zones.
S
If
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide.
Thank
you,
and
now
I'm
going
to
pass
things
on
to
chairman
gafkar,
again
who's
going
to
walk
the
council
through
and
through
some
of
the
discussion
that
occurred
as
part
of
the
planning
commission
deliberations.
S
J
J
Additionally,
there
were
members
of
the
public
that
felt
like
there
hadn't
been
enough
time
for
public
comment
and
they
made
that
point
during
our
commission
meeting.
So
the
outcome
is
even
though
we
voted
on
it.
Part
of
it
was
the
pressure
of
knowing
that
it
couldn't
come
back
until
next
year
and
I
think
commissioners
felt
a
little
bit
like
they
hadn't
gotten
enough
opportunity
to
really
understand
such
a
complicated,
important
subject
for
the
city,
but
that's
not
to
say
they
weren't
in
support
of
it.
J
The
planning
commission
desires
to
see
the
city
council
direct
that
current
and
appropriate
data
on
income
levels
and
specific
site
impacts
to
infrastructure,
including
transportation,
the
environment,
school
districts
and
other
services
be
provided
to
the
commission
during
the
study
and
review
of
the
c1
luca,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
back
to
you.
Tara,
thank.
S
You
chairman,
gafkar
charmaine,
thank
you,
so
I
just
would
like
to
briefly
touch
on
the
community
engagement
component
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
process,
as
you
know,
due
to
covid,
we
really
had
to
pivot
to
an
online
environment,
but
we
are
here
now
at
the
end
of
the
and
nearly
the
end
of
the
year
and
have
been
able
to
move
forward
with
both
threshold
and
final
review
in
this
online
environment.
S
So
planning
commission
held
public
hearings
relating
to
threshold
review.
We
started
that
process
in
february.
S
Unfortunately,
planning
commission
couldn't
meet
for
a
little
bit
so
following
that
they
were
able
to
hold
a
public
hearing
in
july,
and
then
city
council
launched
the
c1
strategy
in
july
and
then
also
established
the
rest
of
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
work
program,
which
includes
the
private
amendments.
In
august,
then
we
staff
worked
with
the
planning
commission
on
the
final
review
process
through
study
sessions.
S
We
also,
as
we've
indicated
previously,
held
a
courtesy
public
hearing
with
ebcc
for
three
of
the
applications
and
then,
following
that,
we
had
a
planning
commission
public
hearing
on
the
final
review
process
in
october
late
october
and
then
we're
bringing
forward
the
planning
commission.
We
brought
forward
the
planning
commission
recommendations
as
as
we've
as
we
work
through
each
of
the
amendments
and
anticipating
action
by
city
council
by
the
end
of
the
year.
S
S
The
first
three
applications,
100
bellevue
way,
southeast
safeguard
and
northeast
8th
street
partners.
The
majority
of
the
applications,
majority
of
public
comments,
sorry
came
from
applicants
and
letters
of
support
for
for
the
applications
with
the
glendale
country
club
property.
We
had
seven
people
speak
at
the
hearing.
S
We
received
a
total
of
four
comments
and
again
letters
in
support
of
the
of
the
proposed
amendment
with
regards
to
the
affordable
housing
c1
strategy.
We
had
a
total
of
seven
people
testify
at
the
public
hearing
three
had
concerns
about
similar
to
the
planning
commission
discussion,
three
voice,
concerns
relating
to
the
length
of
time
and
and
felt
that
additional
review
was
needed
prior
to
the
proposed
policies
moving
forward.
S
In
terms
of
the
number
of
comments,
we
received
substantive
comments
in
writing
over
email
electronically,
relating
to
the
c1
strategy.
I
believe
the
majority
about
100
were
in
support
of
the
application.
S
Some
had
specific
comments
relating
to
additional
analysis
that
they
thought
should
staff
should
incorporate
as
part
of
this
process
and
specific
ideas,
and
what
that
on
what
the
density
should
look
like
density
increases
should
look
like,
and
then
we
had
one
application
on
one
letter
of
comment
again
similar
to
the
planning
commission's
discussion,
indicating
that
we
needed
additional
recommended
additional
time
be
taken
to
really
analyze
some
of
the
impacts
of
the
neighborhoods
and
traffic
traffic
issues
that
could
that
could
occur
as
a
result
of
these
density
increases.
S
A
Thank
you,
tara
and
thank
you
chairman
golf
car.
Thank
you
for
working
so
hard
on
pretty
meaty
material
here.
You
and
the
commission
did
really
good
work
and
we
thank
you
so
much
if
you
is
it
possible
for
you
to
stick
around
in
case.
The
council
has
questions
as
we
start
our
discussion.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I'm
going
to
call
on
people
in
this
order
and
I'm
going
to
ask
you
to
keep
your
comments
and
questions
to
three
minutes.
Knowing
that
we'll
go
back
around
and
we'll
go
back
around
as
many
times
as
necessary,
but
we'll
start
with
council
member
barksdale,
then
council,
members,
zahn
robertson,
lee
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
member
stokes
and
then
me
so
starting
with
council
member
barksdale,
as
liaison
to
the
planning
commission.
F
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I'm
also
want
to
thank
and
the
rest
of
the
commission
for
the
robust
and
healthy
discussion
that
they
had.
It
was
encouraging
to
see
all
the
engagement
and
care
that
was
going
into
consideration
of
these
applications
for
preliminary
and
final
review,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
intelligence
and
the
analysis
and
supporting
of
the
commission,
and
I
just
want
to
know
and
I'll
reserve
any
additional
comments
for
later
for
the
next
round.
U
I
too
really
want
to
express
my
appreciation
to
to
the
planning,
commission
and
the
staff
and
and
all
of
the
comments
that
we
got
on
these
cpas.
I
too
support
the
recommendations
to
move
forward
with
these.
You
know,
and
I
what
I
really
appreciate
is
the
thoughtful
review
and
really
looking
at
right
for
the
c1,
where
it
should
not
be
because
we
already
have
some
policies
in
downtown
bel,
red
and
east
gate,
tod
and
the
demonstration
program.
U
That
may
also
be
willing
to
develop
for
affordable
housing,
so
that
would
be
one
of
my
my
questions
related
to
that,
but
otherwise
excited
that
we
are
moving
on
this,
even
though
I
can
appreciate
that
rushing
is
always
a
challenge
and
so
appreciate
just
the
hard
work
of
getting
us
to
this
point.
Thank
you.
V
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
to
the
planning,
commission
and
staff.
The
the
interesting
thing
about
this
set
of
comprehensive
plan
amendments
is
it's
all
about
housing
and
that's
a
really
good
news
piece,
because
we
need
more
housing
in
bellevue.
We
need
more
housing
at
all
levels,
but
particularly
that
missing
middle,
and
I
think
that
all
of
these
comp
plan
amendments
will
help
with
both
affordable
housing
and
with
the
missing
middle.
So
before
I
weigh
in
I'd
just
like
to
say,
I
support
all
of
the
amendments.
V
I
will
vote
be
voting
yes
when
they
come
forward
for
action,
and
I
also
really
appreciate
and
do
support.
The
planning
commissions
asks
for
additional
data
and
details
that
they're
going
to
grapple
with
on
the
land
use
code
for
the
c1,
and
so
my
comments
now
are
about
going
to
be
about
c1
and
how
that's
going
to
move
through
after
council
passes
these
comp
plan
amendments
and
the
land
use
code.
Work
begins.
V
First,
I
think
that
it's
really
important
that
that
everyone,
the
public
planning
commission
council,
understands
exactly
what
hb
1377
is.
We
didn't
get
an
explanation
of
that
tonight.
It's
a
session
law
from
the
2019
session,
but
I
think
that
it's
really
important
that
the
policymakers
understand
what
that
law
says
and
what
that
law
does
and
how
that's
going
to
impact
the
changes
that
we
need
to
make
on
our
land
use
code.
So
it'd
be
great
if
part
of
the
planning
commission
work
for
the
land.
V
Use
code
includes
a
very
clear
explanation
to
them
and
to
the
public
about
what
that
is.
I'd
also
like
to
see
that
come
forward
to
council,
so
that
we
understand
what
it
is.
Second,
I
think
that
the
planning
commission's
comments
about
the
suitable
land
is
very
well
taken
and
wanting
to
see
the
impacts
on
with
regard
to
schools,
environment,
transportation
and
neighborhood,
as
well
as
the
income
levels.
V
One
of
the
things
that
was
a
message
that
I
heard
loud
and
clear
from
the
tag
or
from
some
members
of
the
tag
is
that
dispersion
of
affordable
housing
within
projects
and
within
the
city
is
really
important.
We
don't
want
to
have
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
all
low,
low,
low
income
together,
because
there
can
be
a
you
know.
Stigma
to
that,
and
also
people
may
not
feel
as
comfortable
there
having
a
variety
of
income
levels
from
market
rate
to
very
low
within
a
single
project
can
be
really
helpful.
V
To
that
end,
I
think
it
might
be
helpful
to
have
the
it
for
all
the
members
of
the
tag
that
are
still
around
and
available
to
come
and
do
a
session
with
the
planning
commission
on
the
land
use
code,
because
I
think
that
the
planning
commission
would
really
benefit
from
hearing
those
ex
experts
opined
but
also
being
able
to
ask
questions.
I
was
so
grateful
to
the
members
of
the
technical
advisory
group
who
helped
put
together
the
affordable
housing
strategy
for
us,
and
I
think
that
their
expertise
would
still
be
a
great
benefit.
V
So
that's
my
weighing
in
on
the
land
use
code
for
c1,
I'm
going
to
vote
when
these
come
forward
for
action,
I'm
going
to
vote
yes
on
all
of
them
and
thank
the
planning
commission
for
their
thoughtful
comments.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you
madame,
since
we're
only
taking
three
minutes,
I
want
to
just
highlight
a
couple
of
things,
and
hopefully
we
have
second
round
number
one.
I
want
to
thank
the
commission.
They
are
wonderful
to
be
so
diligent
to
look
at,
and
I
like
to
know
that
the
amendment
that
had
two
dissensions,
what
are
some
of
the
reasons
and
discussion
for
the
ascent
for
the
dissension
second
in
for
the
ce1,
is
one
I
have
some
concern
about
when
we
last
heard
it.
D
You
know
we
all
support,
affordable
housing,
no
question
about
that.
We
need
more
land,
we
need
more
encouragement,
we
know,
need
more
housing,
whatever
opportunity
we
have,
we
need
to
do
it,
and
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
utilize
space,
like
the
churches
that
you
know
have
space
that
they
can
be
turned
into
a
foot
of
housing
that
we
see
it
as
a
model
and
it
works
very
well.
We
encourage
it.
The
only
concern
I
had
when
I
raised
the
question,
then,
is
you
know
we
don't?
D
I
don't
want
to
have
to
see
any
in
unintended
consequences,
because
the
question
has
been
raised
by
the
commissioner
is
the
neighborhood
and
also
councilman,
robertson
and
transportation.
What's
impact
the
neighborhoods?
Currently
we
the
study,
we
made
the
analysis
we
made
a
bit
of
the
church,
property,
religious,
owned
properties.
D
It
doesn't
have
any
negative
impact
because
we
all
understood
it,
but
if
we
provide
a
opportunity
for
people
to
go
into
a
single
family's
own
place,
and
so
we
I
intend
to
establish
the
church
here
and
in
fact
they
do,
but
after
in
a
very
short
period
of
time,
they
decided
well
we'll
turn
that
into
an
affordable
housing.
D
You
know
that
would
be,
I
think,
an
intended
consequence
that
would
have
an
impact
you
know
to
the
community.
Whatever
that
may
be,
we
don't
know,
and
I
don't
make
any
prejudgment
as
to
what
they
should
be,
what
they
shouldn't
be,
but
it's
an
impact,
and
I
think
that
it's
a
concern
that
I
have.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do,
it's
specific
you
know
right
now.
We
know
we
think
that
we're
specific.
But
what?
If
an
area
an
example?
D
D
You
know
land
use
and
then
we
have
impact
we
have
not
anticipated,
and
how
do
we
handle
that?
So
I
just
want
to
have
some
certainty,
some
conditions
and
I
talked
to
the
staff.
I
think
the
stuff
understand
that,
but
I
have
not
heard
back
from
them,
but
I
sense
that
they
they
figured
that
well,
it
is
a
concern.
I
don't
have
heard
an
answer
that
how
do
we
prevent
an
intended?
D
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
yeah.
I
appreciate
council
member
lee's
comment
there
always
looking
at
the
details,
so
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
really
appreciate
staff
with
thorough,
janet
and
nicholas.
Thank
you
so
much
great
presentation
and
thank
you,
char
or
sorry,
chair,
mulgovkar
for
being
here
tonight
absolutely
support
this
moving
this
forward
and
all
the
amendments
as
part
of
it.
As
councilmember
robertson
said,
we
need
more
housing
period.
I
think
this
is
going
to
move
us
in
that
right
direction.
C
I'm
also
supportive
of
the
commission's
request
for
more
time
and
more
data.
I
hope
the
the
time
was
more
due
to
covet
and
having
to
shift
to
online,
and
we
were
in
that
odd
period
there
for
for
a
little
a
little
while,
where
we
couldn't
have
meetings-
and
I
know
that
affected
the
commission
as
well-
so
certainly
hope
that
we
can
avoid
that
movement
moving
forward
but
happy
to
move
this
forward.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilmember
stokes,.
E
There
we
go.
No,
it's
been
a
great
conversation,
really
appreciate
the
staff's
presentation
on
this
and
the
outlining
the
details
and
the
hard
work
by
the
planning
commission
and
some
of
the
comments.
I'm
glad
to
hear
everybody
is
positive
about
this.
It.
E
It
really
is
a
big
step
in
implementing
what
we
started
back
two
years
ago
now,
with
the
affordable
housing
task
force
and
one
of
the
benefits
of
coming
a
little
earlier
or
later
not
benefits
later
is
I
appreciate
very
much
councilman
robertson's
suggestion
on
the
tag
I
was
gonna
and
have
been
working
on
on
that
same
thing,
and
I
I
think
the
number
of
the
tag
group
are
interested
in
coming
and
talking
with
us
and
talking
with
the
planning
commission.
E
So
I
would
recommend
we
it's
not
a
formal
reinstitution
of
that,
but
invite
them
to
lend
their
knowledge
and
their
scope
and
and
understanding
of
the
whole
process
to
this
particular
effort
and
looking
at
this,
the-
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
that
the
planning
commission
did
and
I
think
what
we're
looking
at
those
it
was
interesting.
You
had
101
comments,
so
there
wasn't
a
dearth
of
people
interested
in
looking
at
this,
and
you
know
very
very
few
real
questions
about
the
process.
E
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
we're
looking
at
this
was
a
intended
short
look
at
it
from
a
policy
level
to
help
the
council
move
this
forward.
What
a
lot
of
things
they're
talking
about,
I
think,
is
very
important,
but
it's
really
in
the
implementation
part,
which
is
a
lot
of
the
work
that
commissions
and
boards
do
so
it's
not
all
just
and
and
to
end
up
with
a
full-blown.
E
What
are
all
the
details?
What
are
all
the
pieces
this
and
that
that
goes
into
it
would
take
a
lot
of
time
and
sometime.
We
get
bogged
down
in
details
at
the
wrong
times,
and
I
think
this
was
a
was
actually
a
very
good
move
and
I'm
glad
they
voted
for
six
to
zero,
which
shows
strong
support
for
it
and
the
concerns
they
brought
up
were
legitimate
and
they'll
be
addressed
at
the
right
time.
So
I'm
not
I'm
not
worried
about
that
at
all.
I
think
we're
in
good
shape.
On
that
part.
E
I
have
concerns
about
because
some
of
the
conversation
about
bringing
affordable
housing
into
neighborhoods
and
single-family
neighborhoods,
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
they're
affordable.
There
are
housing,
multi-family
housing
all
over
the
city
in
neighborhoods,
and
you
know
this
is
something
that's
changing
and
we're
working
on
that
and
it
is
a
concern.
But
I
think
we
that
that's
not
a
real
big
issue,
and
I
know
that
unkind,
constant
consequences
would
happen.
E
But
if
somebody
has
a
formula
for
always
avoiding
those,
I
think
you
could
make
a
million
dollars.
So
it's
good
to
raise
the
issue,
but
I
I
hope
we
don't
get
bogged
down
with
some
of
the
negativity
of
we
don't
want
it
in
our
neighborhood
type
thing.
I
think
we
can
work
with
this
and
it's
a
very
good
plan.
It
would
work
well
with
the
community
and
work
well
in
really
addressing
all
people
who
live
and
work
and
and
and
in
bellevue.
E
So
I
think
it's
a
great
advancement
in
what
we're
doing,
and
I
think
there
are
other
advancements
in
the
strategy
that
we
need
to
work
on
in
the
future
and
that's
the
way
things
go.
You
always
improve,
so
I'm
hardly
in
favor
of
this
and
look
forward
to
moving
this
along
and
then
actually
coming
back
working
with
the
commission
on
the
implementation
pieces.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
I'll,
go
ahead
with
my
questions
and
comments
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
you
councilmember
barksdale.
So
I
really
appreciate
this
coming
forward
as
quickly
as
it
has.
I
know
that
church
property
situation
was
in
front
of
the
council
about
three
years
ago
and
we
were
asked
to
vote
on
it
that
night,
with
what
we
felt
was
not
enough
preparation
or
so
to
have
the
planning
commission
go
through
it
as
they
are
and
bring
it
back.
Tonight
is
very
much
appreciated.
A
Three
years
has
been
a
long
time
and,
in
addition
to
covet
a
lot
of
those
church
properties
are
just
barely
hanging
in
there,
and
you
know
this
is
this-
is
in
lieu
of
seeing
a
lot
of
sales
to
private
developers.
This
gives
us
a
chance
to
get
more
affordable
housing
in
get
a
variety
of
affordable,
affordable
housing
for
a
variety
of
different
populations.
So
I'm
really
appreciative
of
this
opportunity.
A
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
The
case
study
thing.
I
I
feel,
like
we've,
already
seen
examples
of
everything
that
a
church
property
can
offer
we've
seen
andrew's
glenn
we've
seen
30
bellevue.
I
know
there's
an
interesting
duplex
for
seniors,
I
think
on
sixth
street,
between
148th
and
145th,
or
something
like
that
anyway,
emily
you
probably
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
But
what?
What
are
we
trying
to
accomplish?
With
these
case
studies.
S
So
I
think
the
intent
is
to
really
evaluate
first
off
the
feedback
that
initial
feedback
that
we've
received
as
a
result
of
some
of
the
outreach
that's
occurred,
you
know
what
we've
some
of
the
feedback
that
we've
heard
from
religious
institutions
is
that
the
density
bonus
may
not
be
adequate
enough
for
what
some
of
the
pro
some
of
the
projects
that
that
are
being
considered
both
by
nonprofits
we've
also
had
some
conversations
with
organizations
like
microsoft,
who
are
interested
in
doing
affordable
housing,
and
I
think
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
really
in
terms
of
density
they're.
S
Trying
to
essentially
what
would
result
in
is
some
significant
upsells,
which
isn't
the
intent
of
the
density
incentive
density
incentives
that
we're
proposing,
and
in
fact
we
have
the
dash
property
which
council
is
aware
of
that
is
actually
they've
actually
come
in
and
submitted
for
a
comprehensive
plan
amendment
as
part
of
our
2021
cycle.
S
So
that
will
be
coming
forward
to
both
the
planning,
commission
and
council
and
due
course,
so
essentially,
projects
like
that
which
are
wanting
to
really
accommodate
a
really
significant
amount
of
not
extensively
significant
but
more
than
the
density
bonus,
would
allow
for.
N
S
S
The
proposed
language
within
the
policy
that
that
we've
been
we
that
we've
included
to
the
planning
commission
and
then
planning
commission
has
recommended
to
council.
At
this
point.
A
So
I
guess
I'm
still
not
understanding
the
benefit
of
a
case
study
since
I
feel
like
we've
already
done:
church
property,
rezoning
and
development
in
multi-family
zones
or
we've
created
multi-family
zones.
So
how
would
a
case
study
be
different
than
what
we've
seen
with
andrew's
glenn?
What
we've
seen
with
30
bellevue
and
any
other
church
property
development
that
we've
already
done.
N
S
Would
not
necessarily
apply
to
religious
organizations,
so
would
be,
it
could
be
a
non-profit.
It
could
be
another
type
of
developer
that
comes
in
and
wants
to
propose
propose
some
sort
of
project
that
we
have.
We
haven't
really
thought
of,
so
it
provides
an
opportunity
for
us
to
really
see
what
if
we
have
barriers
within
the
code,
why
aren't
we
seeing
more
affordable
housing
being
developed
in
bellevue?
S
What
you
know,
essentially,
what
are
our
barriers?
How
can
we
overcome
them?
What
are
things
can
we
can
we
see
a
project?
That's
innovative
in
some
way
that
we
haven't
considered
before
whether
it's
a
combination
of
some
unique
services
that
they're
able
to
provide
there's
several
great
examples
of
that
that
have
been
done
around
the
area.
So
that's
essentially.
A
Necessarily
the
church
properties,
but
it
is
still
the
c1
which
is
surplus
property.
So
I
just
don't
want
to
put
anything
in
here
that
slows
the
process
down
any
further
than
it's
already
been
slowed
down.
So
can
we
move
forward
on
church
property
rezoning
without
doing
a
case
study?
First?
A
S
Those
are
all
parallel
paths,
so
the
demonstration
ordinance
would
be
one.
We
are
also
considering
as
part
of
our
2021
work
program,
cpa
policy
amendments
looking
at
maybe
there's
a
certain
grouping
of
select
properties
that
are
located
on
arterial,
that
that
may
that
could
be
granted
or
we
would
move
forward
with
proposing
up
zones
or
a
different
zoning
designation
that
could
accommodate
some
additional,
affordable
housing
and
then
you'd
also
have
the
density
provisions,
density
incentive
provisions
within
the
code.
So,
okay,
multiple
avenues
to
achieving.
A
You
so
I
have
two
more
questions.
One
is:
what
is
the
impact
of
the
amendment
that
the
planning
commission
is
proposing.
J
Or
well
yeah
I'd
be
I,
for
I
don't
think
it's
a
really
an
impact.
It's
more
that
we
just
wanted
to
be
clear
of
the
areas
that
we
thought
we
needed
more
information
about,
so
we
and
we
wanted
to
message
that
to
council
as
well,
that
these
are
areas
where
the
where
the
planning
commission
felt
like
they
didn't
have
enough
information
to
make
good
decisions
under
a
luca
like
they
felt
good
about
overall
policy,
but
wanted
better
detail.
J
And
there
was
a
lot
of
concern
that
particularly
around
the
income
data,
that
it
was
old
data
and
wasn't
you
know
we
needed
to
freshen
that
up
and
things
like
that,
and
so
that
was
the
intent.
A
W
Ahead
yeah.
Thank
you
mayor.
Many
of
the
comments
that
were
made
by
the
planning
commission
are
really
revolve
around
what
will
be
luca
work.
So
how
will
this
work?
Where
will
it
work?
What
are
the
impacts
of
the
decisions
and
the
metrics
and
how
do
they
apply
in
and
around
neighborhoods,
and
that's
the
exact
nature
of
the
work
the
planning
commission
will
take
up
next
year,
the
policies
as
drafted
tonight.
A
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
explanation
and
then
the
last
thing
is
you
kind
of
alluded
to
this.
You
know
looking
outside
of
the
c1
proposal
here,
the
rezones
just
all
of
these
rezones
don't
necessarily
bring
us
affordable
housing.
We
have
an
opportunity
for
it,
but
it's
not
required
in
any
of
these
rezones
and
I,
of
course,
would
love
to
see
it
included,
affordable
housing
included
in
all
of
these
new
developments.
A
Making,
I
think,
sorry,
tara,
I
think
mack
kind
of
alluded
to
this
this
morning
so
mac.
Maybe
you
can
tackle
this
one.
W
Sure
mayor
I
mean
there
are
a
couple
of
paths
that
may
end
up
in
affordable
housing
at
the
projects,
so
assuming
that
developers
move
forward
after
they
receive
you
know
if
they
receive
the
comp
plan
amendment
and
then
corresponding
up
zone,
there
is
not
a
requirement,
I
think,
as
council
knows,
to
have
to
provide
affordable
housing.
You
know
in
projects
the
city
uses
its
incentive
system
to
try
to
incent
projects
into
that
affordability.
W
Now
one
of
the
things
that
has
come
up
is
in
the
multi-family
districts,
where
we
use
a
density
per
acre
standard.
There
is
not
an
incentive
based
into
that
system.
Currently,
the
incentives
are
general
there's
a
small
density
bonus,
but
it's
not
the
same
as
in
say
the
bell
red,
where
you
get
an
far
bonus.
That
is
fairly
significant.
W
So
we're
looking
at
all
of
that,
as
we
move
forward
for
other
ways
to
implement
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
but
did
just
want
to
draw
a
council's
attention
that
the
the
bonus
system
is
different
when
you
think
about
a
multi-family
district
just
generally
out
in
the
city
versus
the
growth
corridor.
That
has
very
deliberate
incentive
systems
in
place.
W
Yeah,
yes,
that
well
again
that'll
contingent
on
council
action,
but
we
will
be
bringing
back
recommendations
way
in
advance
of
any
potential
developer
wanting
to
take
advantage
of
them.
So
sometime
in
the
first
quarter
of
next
year
is
likely
when
you'll
see
the
mffte
work.
F
A
V
Thank
you
yeah,
so
I
wanted
to
ask
mac.
Thank
you
mayor
for
all
your
questions.
I,
the
mfte.
The
council
gave
direction
to
bring
that
back
to
expand
it
citywide
quite
some
time
ago,
maybe
even
pre-covered.
So
will
we
have
that
ready,
teed
up
for
action
first
quarter
of
next
year,
mack.
W
Yes,
councilmember
robertson,
the
the
mfte
we
will
be
bringing
back
the
results
we
went
out
and
did
a
number
of
stakeholder
outreach
to
see
where
people
were
seeing
the
necessary
tweaks
and
there
were
multiple
components
of
that,
and
so
you'll
have
a
chance
to
discuss
and
work
through
those
things
and
then
give
final
direction
for
how
you'd
like
it
adopted.
V
So
maybe
two
meetings
three
at
the
most
on
that
before
final
adoption:
okay,
okay,
great,
because
I've
been
waiting
for
that
to
come
back
for
a
while.
The
other
thing
I
would
point
out,
which
I
think
council
members
on
raised
is
that
as
these
once
this
land
use
code,
change
has
for
c1
adopting
c1
is
in
effect,
if
we
have
the
properties
that
want
to
take
advantage
of
it.
V
There's
the
city
always
has
the
opportunity
to
partner
with
them
using
the
0.1
percent
sales
tax,
where
we
can,
for
example,
buy
down
greater
affordability
for
some
units
on
a
permanent
basis,
in
addition
to
also
creating
the
land
use
code
for
them
to
do
that
so,
and
we
could
also
use
the
mfte
tool
as
well
as
that
tool
with
the
four
other
comp
plan
amendments
with
housing
that
are
on
that
we're
talking
about
earlier
with
this
agenda
item
tonight.
V
I
think
that
there
is
lots
of
opportunity,
and
I
hope
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
talk
with
developers
to
make
sure
that
every
developer
is
aware
when
fte
is
available
and
as
well
as
when
we
come
up
with
the
plan
for
the
0.1
that
we
could
use
that
to
take
opportunities
to
make
sure
we
have
affordable
housing,
particularly
in
the
transit
corridors,
which
I
believe,
all
four
of
the
properties
on
tonight's
agenda
are
so
yeah.
I'm
ready
to
move
forward
on
this
when
it
comes
back.
I
think
this
has
been
a
great
discussion.
U
Yeah
I've
appreciated
my
colleagues
comments
as
well.
The
one
that
I
did
have
is
when
I
think
about
affordable
housing
is
both
rentals
as
well
as
home
ownership.
So
will
this
affordable
housing
c1
also
encompass
both
rental
units
as
well
as
affordable
home
ownership,
because
I
do
think
that
that's
the
other
part
that
we
are
missing
is
actually
housing
that's
affordable
for
purchase,
so
that
we
can
actually
folks
can
actually
generate
wealth
as
part
of
the
home
ownership.
A
E
Since
the
the
question
of
the
one
percent,
0.01
percent
sales
taxes
come
up
and
different
uses,
I
think
this
before
we
start
launching
into
other
things
on
it.
I'd
like
to
get
a
good
legal
analysis
of
exactly
what
we
can
or
can't
do
with
that,
so
that
we
we
don't,
because
you
know
it's
a
great
opportunity.
I
think
we
just
need
to
narrow
it
down
or
understand
before
we
kind
of
think
well.
E
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
lee.
Thank
you.
D
Now,
I'm
in
complete
support
of
affordable
housing
and
the
method,
the
plan
of
using
face-based
properties.
You
know,
for
that
purpose,
no
question
about
it,
because
it's
a
great
opportunity.
My
only
concern
again
is
the
an
intended
consequence.
You
know
we
have
land
use
code.
The
zoning
codes
that's
in
place
for
very
good
reasons,
because
the
people
who
live
in
certain
areas
they
need
to
know
what
they
they
they
their
preferences
are
and
that
hasn't
been
changed
that
hasn't
been
going
through
the
process.
You
know
the
staff's
outreach
they
have.
D
They
talked
to
all
the
property
owners.
We,
you
know,
I
think,
eventually
it
might
change
if
our
housing
is
become
critical
enough.
You
know,
maybe
people
already
changed,
but
we
haven't
gone
through
that
process.
So
I'm
just
concerned
that
if
we
do
this,
we
open
up
a
chain
land
use
patent
so
that
any
property,
including
single-family
homes.
If
they
have
been
a
religious
facility,
they
can
suddenly
become
a
whatever
that
might
be.
D
We
don't
know
you
know,
but
it
will
be
for
the
purpose
of
other
house
encouraging
all
types
of
housing
to
go
in
there
and
that
that's
a
consequence.
We
need
to
have
the
public
to
step
in
to
say.
I
think,
that's
why
I
hear
that
the
planning
commission
has
some
concerns.
You
know
what
is
the
data?
What's
the
process,
how
was
the
outreach?
What
is
the
land
use?
Consideration
have
all
be
talking
about.
I
think
this
is
a
concern
that
we
all
appreciate
it.
D
If
we
recognize
that
we
need
to
make
some
provisions
to
be
specific
that
well,
this
can
not
happen
if
it
happens,
it
has
to
happen
within
a
proper
legal
context
and
we
need
to
change
the
land
use.
If
people
supports
it,
it
will
happen.
If
it
doesn't
it
doesn't.
We
cannot
just
say
that.
Well,
this
is
a
loophole.
That's
there
and
if
you
get
in
there
it
becomes
a
religious
faith-based
facility.
Then
suddenly
you
become
a
multi-family,
affordable
housing
with
a
lot
of
incentives.
You
know
which
provides
a
economic
incentive
for
people
who
can
go.
D
Do
it
that
doesn't
make
sense.
You
know
that's
another
fight,
so
I
would
not.
I
support
the
idea
of
this
faith-based
property
use
and
conversion
as
this
no
question
about
it,
I
would
fully
support
it
just
like
the
council
does,
but
I
would
want
to
have
a
precaution,
a
some
kind
of
condition
to
say
that
it
has
to
stop.
I
mean
so
that
people
are
not
going
to
consider
what
this
is
the
council
decisions
like
that?
That's
that's
an
intended
consequence.
D
We
realize
that
we
need
to
do
something
about
it,
not
just
close
our
eyes
and
just
hope
that
in
the
future
something
will
happen
then
the
public
will
be
unhappy
about
it.
So
that's
my
position
on
that.
So
I
will
I
can
support
it.
If
we
have
the
staff
to
come
up
with
the
provision,
somehow
we
can
prevent
that
from
happening
until
we
got
this
proper
land
use
process
with
planning
commission
go
through
it
and
we
understand
what
it
is.
The
consequences
we
may
live
with.
D
The
second
question
I
raised
earlier
is,
I
still
like
to
know
what
are
the
two
distinctions
about
the
the
other
amendment.
Just
for
information,
I
will
go
along
with
it,
but
if
they
have
something
that
touched
me
that
say
you
know
I
want
to
listen
more
then
I
might
act
differently,
but
I
would
like
to
know
that
if.
N
D
Have
time
to
have
the
chairperson,
you
know
say
why
the
two
persons
dissented
from
the
decision
the
commission
made.
Thank
you,
mr
benver.
B
J
So
the
two
dissenting
votes
and
staff,
I
would
ask
for
you
to
also
jump
in,
were
commissioner
davidos
and
vice
chairman
coochin.
J
I
believe
that
commissioner
davidos
from
the
very
beginning
felt
like
this
property
was
not
an
appropriate
shouldn't,
have
just
come
through
the
process
and
was
did
not
feel
like
it
met
even
threshold
review,
so
he
also
felt
like
he
didn't
meet
the
next
level
of
review
and
then
count
vice
chairman
cuccin
essentially
agreed
with
the
analysis
provided
by
staff
who
had
recommended
that
we
not
move
that
forward
and
then
the
staff
I
kind
of
will
let
you
speak
to
your
rationale
for
that,
but
then
the
rest
of
the
commission.
J
S
So
included
in
staff's
recommendation
to
the
planning
commission,
we
went
through
the
comprehensive
plan
criteria.
This
is
specific
to
the
glendale
country
club
northeast
application.
S
That
was
the
only
that
was
the
only
application
that
staff
recommended
did
not
meet
some
of
the.
So
we
went
through
each
of
the
decision
criteria
accompanied
the
plan
decision
criteria
and
the
code,
and
so
we
felt
that
one
of
the
primary
issues
is,
it
did
not
establish
a
clear
nexus
between
our
land
use,
comprehensive
land,
use,
element,
comprehensive
plan
policies
and
then
also
our
environmental
element
policies
and
then
parts
and
open
space.
S
So
we
evaluated
that
so
essentially
we
found
that
it
did
not
meet
all
of
the
comprehensive
plan
policies
and
then
the
second
criteria
relates
to
does
the
amendment
address
interests
and
changing
needs
of
the
entire
city,
and
we
evaluated
based
on
that
and
we
found
that
the
amendment
would
not
enhance
the
livability
of
the
community.
S
Then
the
third
criteria
talks
through
does
does
the
application
address
significantly
change
conditions
since
the
last
time
the
comprehensive
plan
map
was
amended
or
text
was
amended
and
we
felt
that
it
actually
did
meet
that
criteria
and
then
the
other,
the
other
criteria
is.
Are
we
able
to
determine
if
the
property
could
be
suitably
developed
under
potential?
The
zoning
classification
that
they're
hoping
to
achieve
the
site
is
constrained
with
critical
areas.
So
at
this
point
it's
conjecture
whether
you
know
how
much
of
density
they
could
really
achieve
they
there.
S
The
applicants
have
indicated
that
it
is
that
it
is
feasible
to
redevelop
but
staff
evaluated
it
based
on
feedback
from
development
services
and
the
transportation
department
and
the
utilities
department.
A
So
tara
you're
talking
about
staffs,
I
think
we
were
asking
about
the
two
planning
commissioners
and.
S
So
essentially,
the
the
two
dissenting
planning
commissioners
concurred
with
some
of
the
issues
raised
by
staff.
Okay.
That
was
the
reason
for
me
going
through
through
all
of
that,
thank
you
and
then
I
I
defer
to
I'll
I'll
have
nicholas
matt's,
also
weigh
in
if
I've
missed
anything.
S
I
think
the
last
criteria
relates
to
a
public
benefit,
and
then
our
analysis
was
that
it
it
focuses
the
application
justification
focus
more
on
a
financial
perspective
rather
than
an
environmental
or
land
use
perspective
and
nicholas
did
I
miss
anything
anything
you'd
like
to
add
in
me.
A
Thanks,
okay,
great
so
I'm
going
to
let
councilmember
barksdale
finish
our
discussion
here.
F
Yeah
thanks
man-
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
try
and
say
I
appreciate
the
colleagues
comments
and
just
wanted
to
say
that
looking
forward
to
the
next
step
in
the
process
where
we
will
discuss
with
the
planning
commission,
we'll
discuss
those
details
that
council
member
lee
rays
and
other
council
members
have
raised
and
that
the
public
engagement
outreach
will
be
a
part
of
that
going
forward
as
well.
So
this
isn't
the.
A
End
of
that
yeah,
I
appreciate
that
okay,
deputy
mayor,
are
you
ready
to
make
a
motion?
Certainly.
A
C
L
A
C
A
D
D
I
would
like
to
make
have
the
staff
to
make
a
provision
of
some
time
set
some
specific
requ
specifics
tied
to
the
use
of
this
provision
this
this
this?
Yes,
this
this
way
to
convert
religious,
faith-based
properties
into
affordable
housing,
tied
to
some
specific
parameter,
which
will
be
used
when
implementation
actually
takes
place.
A
D
A
Bye,
we
appreciate
it
good,
okay,
moving
on
to
our
budget
update,
we're
moving
right
along
with
this
budget
process
here,
and
I
appreciate
it
so,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
this
one.
L
L
Tonight
we
are,
we
are
seeking
the
council
direction
and
prepare
ordinances
to
counsel
for
council
consideration
and
adoption
for
the
basic
life
support
transport
fees
as
part
of
the
adoption,
the
overall
adoption
process,
and
when
we
finalize
the
budget
joining
us
this
evening
on
our
chief
hagan
with
the
fire
department
as
well
as
tony
caller,
director
of
finance
and
asset
management.
Tony
is
also
going
to
give
us
an
assessment
of
where
we
are
relative
to
the
budget
process
and
as
well
as
how
do
we
move
forward?
L
X
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
As
always,
it's
pleasant
to
be
back
here
with
you
this
evening.
This
is
again,
as
mr
miyagi
said,
an
update
on
fire
inspection
fees
and
basic
life.
Support
transport
fees
and
I'll
also
give
a
piece
on
from
now.
Until
the
end
of
when
we
adopt
the
budget
next
slide.
Please
tonight
we
are
seeking
feedback
on
the
update
on
fire
inspection
fees
and
specific
direction
to
prepare
fee
ordinances
to
bring
back
on
with
the
with
the
adoption
package.
X
The
basic
life
support
fee
next
slide.
Please
our
agenda
this
evening
is
we'll.
Do
a
brief
piece
on
the
calendar
review
the
budget,
the
final
meetings
as
we
head
towards
a
budget
adoption
I'll
once
again,
recap
the
many
actions
it
will
take
for
final
adoption
and
then
I'll
turn
the
presentation
over
to
chief
hagan,
who
will
speak
about
the
fire
inspection
fee
and
the
basic
life
support
transport
fee
next
slide.
Please.
So
we've
seen
this
a
few
times
before
I'm
going
to
hit
it
pretty
quickly.
X
X
So
from
a
detailed
perspective,
this
is
where
we've
been.
The
city
manager
presented
his
preliminary
budget
on
october
19th
development
services
fees
were
presented
on
october
26th.
At
that
time,
council
did
give
direction
to
bring
back
those
fee
ordinances.
With
the
budget
package
on
november
2nd,
the
human
services
commission
was
here
and
also
presented
their
rates
on
the
cbdg
funding.
Again,
council
gave
direction
to
bring
back
those
ordinances
on
with
the
adoption
package
on
november.
9Th
utility
rates
was
here
and
again
received
direction
to
proceed
forward
with
adoption
there.
X
Tonight
we
have
the
fire
inspection
fees
and
the
basic
life
support
transport
piece
on
november
23rd
we
will
have
the
public
hearing
and
then
the
area
in
blue
will
be
looking
for
council
feedback
and
potential
direction
for
adoption,
the
23rd
as
well,
which
will
take
us
either
to
december
7th
or
december
14th
for
budget
adoption
based
on
council
direction.
X
So
taking
a
moment
and
taking
a
step
back
to
get
from
here
to
the
budget
process
november
23rd
again
we
have
our
public
hearing
that
will
be
held
first
piece
of
the
meeting
after
the
public
hearing.
We
do
have
study
session
time.
Staff
is
requesting
that
council
members
provide
any
proposed
adjustments
to
the
budget
on
the
november
23rd
package.
So
in
order
to
do
that,
both
myself
or
any
other
staff
member
is
available
to
help
any
council
member
who
would
be
interested
in
bringing
forth
a
proposed
adjustment
proposed
adjustment.
X
We
will
need
to
bring
forward
balanced
adjustments.
So
if
you
do
have
an
adjustment
that
you
would
like
to
make
we'll
need
to
make
sure
it's
a
balanced
adjustment
that
has
revenues
and
offsets
or
whatever
else
might
be,
with
the
idea
that
you
have
to
bring
forward
again,
I'm
available
as
well
as
city
manager,
miyaki
and
any
other
staff
member,
depending
on
the
number
of
adjustments
that
come
forward
and
the
context
of
those
adjustments.
X
X
There
are
a
series
of
adoptions
of
actions
that
will
be
needed
to
adopt
the
budget
this
year.
You
can
see
the
list
in
front
of
you
tonight,
we'll
be
focusing
on
the
basic
life
support
fee
ordinance.
You
will
notice
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide,
because
staff
is
not
proposing
an
adjustment
to
the
fire
inspection
fee.
That
ordinance
will
not
need
to
come
before
you
for
adoption.
X
Y
Thank
you
tony
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse,
members
of
council
and
city
manager
miyake.
I
have
two
pieces
of
business
before
you
this
evening.
I'd
like
to
provide
you
with
an
update
on
our
fire
inspection
fee
and
then
propose
to
you
an
increase
in
our
bls
or
basic
life
support
transport
fee
regarding
the
fire
inspection
fee
to
jog
your
memory.
This
was
all
this
was
authorized
in
december
of
2018
and
implemented
january
1st
of
this
year.
Y
Rather,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
getting
in
sync
with
the
regular
biennial
budget
process,
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention
that
you
gave
us
four
financial
objectives
when
we
started
this
one,
that
we
remain
regionally
competitive,
that
we
have
fees
that
are
predictable
and
understandable,
that
we
support
our
city-wide
cost
recovery
objectives
and
that
we
offer
a
fair
price
for
the
services
provided
and
then,
furthermore,
that
we
maintain
a
nexus
between
the
level
of
effort
we're
putting
into
conducting
these
inspections
and
the
fees
that
we
collect
from
the
members
of
the
community.
Y
Y
As
of
a
couple
days
ago,
we're
70
percent
complete
for
the
year
and
until
the
most
recent
covet
directions
from
the
governor,
we
felt
pretty
good
about
about
getting
all
them
done
this
year.
We'll
try
our
best
regarding
the
current
of
fee
schedule.
Y
As
a
reminder,
our
fire
inspection
fee
is
a
sum
of
three
things:
a
base
rate
of
180
dollars,
the
square
footage
which
rates
on
a
number
from
zero
to
nine,
so
the
size
of
the
inspection
and
then
its
classification
or
its
degree
of
difficulty.
So
the
fee
equals
the
base
rate
times
the
square
footage
times
the
occupancy
factor-
and
I
spent
some
time
with
travis
ripley,
our
our
acting
fire
marshal
to
get
a
so
I
could
share
with
you
a
flavor
for
kind
of
what
this
means.
Y
Our
lowest
invoice
was
actually
for
36
dollars
to
the
owner
of
a
small
condominium,
and
our
largest
invoice
was
for
over
7
500
for
the
safeway
distribution
plan,
the
fastest
inspection
we
did
this
year
was
30
minutes
in
duration
and
the
longest
one
took
several
days
to
complete,
including
code
research,
on-site
time
and
then
the
paperwork.
Afterwards.
Y
I'd
also
like
to
point
out
that
we
have
different
frequencies
for
our
inspections,
our
hazardous
occupancies.
We
do
twice
a
year,
multi-family
buildings.
Without
sprinkler
system
protection,
we
do
annually
buildings
that
have
restaurants
without
sprinklers.
We
do
annually
and
everything
else
in
our
system.
We
do
every
other
year
next
slide.
Please.
Y
Well
again,
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
we
we
really
appreciate
you
know
the
two
extra
inspectors
we
got
a
couple
years
ago.
We
have
been
very
diligent
in
trying
to
achieve
the
objectives
you
set
for
us,
we're
on
track
for
full
cost
recovery,
and
we
are
very
cognizant
of
demonstrating
that
nexus
between
level
of
effort
and
the
fee.
We're
charging,
as
we've
talked
about
in
so
many
different
areas.
This
year
has
been
challenging
with
with
covet
19..
Y
We
have
encountered
some
businesses
that
have
yet
to
reopen.
Some
of
our
business
owners
have
been
a
little
wary
about
having
us
on
site
to
do
inspections,
and
I
I
credit
our
prevention
staff
with
coming
up
with
a
pretty
innovative
idea,
which
is
doing
inspections
via
facetime.
Y
Let's
say
every
six
months
and
those
restaurants
in
some
cases
have
been
not
opened
or
only
opened
sporadically,
so
we've
been
able
to
actually
relax
the
timeline
on
which
we
make
those
inspections,
because
their
hood
vents
just
haven't
been
seeing
a
lot
of
action.
So
what
I'm
saying
is
that
we've
been
flexible?
Y
We
figured
out
how
to
do
remote,
fire
drills.
Excuse
me
virtual
fire
drills
and
maintain
that
flexibility
next
slide.
Please
a
couple
meetings
ago,
you
directed
us
to
take
a
look
and
say:
is
there
a
way
that
we
could
have
affordable
housing
units
not
have
to
deal
with
the
fire
inspection
fee?
And
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
that
and
we're
embarking
on
a
holistic
review
of
affordable
housing,
exemptions
and
fees,
and
that
work
will
be
taken
up
in
the
first
quarter
of
2021.
Y
So,
instead
of
asking
your
direct
answering
your
direct
question,
we're
going
to
bring
that
answer
to
you
in
a
more
comprehensive
manner
in
a
few
short
months
next
slide.
Please
I'd
like
to
draw
your
attention
now
to
our
second
subject,
which
is
our
bls
transport
fee
and
I'd
just
like
to
highlight
for
you
the
difference
between
bls
and
basic
life,
support
and
als,
which
is
advanced
life
support.
So
this
evening,
we're
talking
about
transports
that
bellevue
firefighters
perform
on
our
aid
cars
at
the
emt
level.
Y
Y
Y
After
we
would
raise
our
fee,
we
would
still
be
below
the
middle
of
the
pack,
the
most
expensive
fee
to
transport
and
deputy
mayor
newinghouse.
I
have
to
apologize
to.
I
got
this
wrong
this
morning.
The
high
cost
is
valley,
regional
verfa
and
they
charge
1700
and
the
low
fee
is
king
county
district.
50,
which
is
skycomish
they
charge
575..
Y
So
again,
we
would
propose
that
we
raise
our
fee
from
638
to
750,
which
still
puts
us
just
below
the
middle
of
the
pack
and
offers.
I
feel
a
really
great
value
for
the
service
that
our
community
gets.
Y
No
individual
needing
transport
to
a
hospital
is
denied
that
transport
based
on
age,
sex,
race
or
financial
situation
next
slide,
please
any
bellevue
resident
that
we
transport
we
bill
what
their
insurance
pays
and
we
rate
we
waive
any
residual
fee.
Any
bellevue
resident
without
insurance
can
apply
for
financial
assistance
through
us
and
have
that
amount
waived.
This
does
happen
on
a
routine
basis.
It's
happened
two
times
in
the
last
three
years
and
we
were
able
to
accommodate
both
people
that
came
to
us
and
said
they
had
really
a
legitimate
trouble
paying
that
bill.
Y
We
maintain
a
small
fund
to
be
able
to
help
out
in
those
situations,
and
any
person
who
is
transported
by
us
who
is
not
a
resident
can
also
apply
for
financial
assistance
and
have
the
entire
amount
waived
if
they
qualify.
This
does
happen,
occasionally
very
rarely,
we've
been
able
to
accommodate
the
very
few
instances
where
this
has
happened.
Next
slide.
Please.
Y
A
Thank
you,
chief
hagan,
okay.
So
I'm
going
to
call
on
council
members
in
the
following
order:
council
member
robertson,
followed
by
council
member
stokes,
lee
barksdale,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
council,
members
on
and
myself
so,
starting
with
council
member
robertson.
V
Thank
you,
mayor
chief,
I
appreciate
the
presentation.
I
am
so
pleased
that
you
really
looked
at
making
sure
that
the
inspection
fee
is
tied
to
effort
so
that
it
really
is
a
cost
recovery
and
that
there's
a
nexus
there.
I
think
that
that's
really
important
and
as
well
as
the
basic
life
support
fee.
V
I
think
that
that
being
in
the
middle
of
the
pack
is
great,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
that
I
wanted
to
follow
up
from
something
that
I
put
outside
this
topic
area,
but
in
the
fire
department
budget
that
I
would
let
my
colleagues
know
is
now
in
the
memory
bank
books
number
26
to
29.
I
had
some
fire
fire
department
budget
questions,
so
the
question
is
specifically
with
regard
to
the
training
administration
fte
cut,
that
is
in
this
current
budget.
V
Y
Thank
you
councilmember
robertson
for
that
question.
I
I
do
know
that
we
have
had
that
position
continuously
in
the
bellevue
fire
department
for
25
years.
Okay,.
V
Y
Thank
you.
The
admin
position
down
at
the
bellevue
joint
training
center
is
really
valuable
to
the
uniform
staff
that
are
down
there.
That
position
provides
administrative
support
to
really
all
activities
that
happen
at
the
training
center.
Y
That
includes
a
very
high
level
of
activity
when
we
have
new
higher
training
called
recruit
training
incumbent
training,
which
is
keeping
the
skills
sharp
for
our
existing
firefighters,
who
routinely
are
down
there
performing
individual
skills
and
also
multi-company
operations,
and
then,
as
you
know,
we're
also
the
host
for
regional
training
in
our
zone,
we're
in
a
multi-department
training
consortium
so
that
position
to
directly
answer
your
question.
That
position
handles
correspondence.
Y
Calendaring
scheduling
the
use
of
the
facility
tracking
all
this
training
on
an
individual
and
company
basis
on
multiple
computer
programs
and
really
provides
indirect
to
support
to
the
battalion
training
commander
and
the
officers
that
are
down
there
using
the
facility
in
an
administrative
capacity.
Okay,.
V
Thank
you,
that's
really
helpful
and
the
cut
saves
the
department
or
the
city,
eighty
thousand
dollars
right
and
I
I
thought
it
was
really
interesting
that
the
increase
in
the
basic
life
support
fees
raises
eighty
thousand
dollars.
So
I
thought
there
was
a
little
symmetry
there.
So
if
we
wanted
to
restore
that
cut,
would
using
an
another
increase
to
the
basic
life
support
fee
be
one
way
that
we
can
do
that.
V
Sure
so
that's
an
80
000
cut
and
the
current
increase
for
the
basic
life
support
transport
is
80
000,
which
of
course,
is
appropriated
elsewhere
per
the
draft
budget.
I'd
like
to
I
guess,
I'd
like
to
this
is
probably
a
tony
question.
If
we
wanted
to
add
a
little
bit
more
to
the
basic
life
support
fee
from
the
recommended
amount
to
a
little
bit
higher
since
we're
still
relatively
in
the
middle
of
the
pack.
V
V
I
didn't
call
you
in
advance
to
let
you
know
I
was
going
to
ask,
but
it'd
be
good
to
have
that
information
added
to
the
memory
bank
so
because
because,
especially
as
we
are
going
to
be
adding
a
lot
new
of
firefighters
for
station
10
in
the
years
to
come,
I
think
that
this
position
is
going
to
be
pretty
important
and
if,
if
we,
if
we're
it's
in
the
budget,
to
cut
right
now,
there's
no
plan
at
this
point
to
restore
that
cut.
V
So,
okay,
so
if
we
cut
that,
I
I
know
that
from
the
last
time
we
did
some
cuts
to
our
departments.
It
took
probably
five
to
six
years
to
restore
those
cuts,
which
is
a
long
time
and
doesn't
true
up
really
well
with
the
opening
of
station
10
for
that
position.
So
I'm
going
to
want
to
talk
about
this
more
in
probably
next
week
and
internally
with
staff.
V
But
I
wanted
to
ask
those
questions
on
the
record,
so
my
colleagues
could
hear
the
answers
and
also
to
highlight
it
that
it's
in
the
memory
in
the
new
memory
bank
in
our
council
packet,
so
but
otherwise,
I'm
I
you
know
I
may
want
to
recommend
that
we
add
a
little
bit
more
to
the
basic
life
support
fee
to
cover
this
cut,
but
otherwise
I'm
supportive
of
the
bls
fee
which
hasn't
been
raised
in
six
years,
especially
because
we
do
give
you
know,
cuts
or
not
cuts
to
it.
V
But
we
do
forgive
it
for
people
that
can't
afford
it.
It's
generally
insurance
covering
it.
We
had
a
hospital
ride
in
my
family
last
year,
not
in
bellevue,
and
it
was
a
lot
more
than
this.
Let
me
tell
you
so
anyway,
thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
also
supportive
of
the
fire
fees.
I
really
appreciate
it,
and
I
appreciate
you
coming
back
holistically
on
the
affordable
housing
package
of
how
we
can
support
that
and
work
next
year.
So
thanks.
Y
Y
E
Yeah,
I
too
appreciate
very
much
your
presentation
and
all
the
work
you've
done
and
your,
I
think,
really
innovative.
Taking
a
look
at
these
things
and
the
way
you
approach
it
from
a
very
comprehensive
view
is
is
very
much
appreciated.
E
Good
results,
it's
tough
in
these
times
with
budget
and
everything
else
and
you're
doing
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
with
in
the
clovid.
E
Bubble
here
and
I
think,
fits
great
too.
I
appreciate
what
councilmember
robertson
just
said
on
two
grounds:
one
and
it's
not
exactly
related
to
this
in
a
sense
but
on
the
basic
life
support.
I
guess
that's
a
a
thing
to
look
at.
E
I
would
agree
to
take
a
look
at
that
if
you
can
not
too
much
more,
but
that's
a
possibility
on
the
position
that
she
was
talking
about,
that
I
was
kind
of
surprised
because
he
sounded
like
you
were
very
much
in
favor
and
what
what
a
great
the
work
that
was
being
done
by
the
person
there
this
position,
but
because
of
other
factors,
you
know
you
had
to
make
some
cuts.
E
But
if
you're
at
all
looking
at
coming
having
this
again,
it
sounds
like
a
position
that
is
very,
very
helpful
and
and
again
going
back
to.
I
know
from
wasn't
there,
but
in
terms
of
talking
to
people
about
the
problems
of
recovering
from
the
recession,
it's
very
difficult.
When
you
cut
a
position
and-
and
you
lose
somebody
who
has
been
there
a
long
time
or
you
lose
a
lot
of
knowledge
and
then
you
have
to
come
back
and
put
it
in
place
again,
it's
difficult.
So
I
would
also
appreciate
looking
at
this.
E
If
this
is
a
position
that
is
as
helpful
as
you
have,
I
don't
say
if
it
is,
it
sounds
like
a
very
positive
and
useful
position
and
if
you
would
really
like
to
have
that
going
forward,
let's
do
take
a
look
at
where
we
could
how
we
could
do
that
to
save
that
position
and
not
be
in
a
position
later
on
of
taking
a
lot
of
time
and
having
to
retrain
people
and-
and
you
know,
disrupting
the
program.
E
So
I
would
and
it's
it's
a
lot
of
money
in
one
ways,
but
it's
not
and
for
the
benefit.
I
would
certainly
appreciate
you
know,
hearing
your
responses
to
the
questions
that
councilman
robertson
raised.
Otherwise
I
think
it's
just
gratin
thanks
very
much.
D
D
I
highly
regard
you
know
as
the
very
well
respected,
and
you
know
the
the
the
the
people
that
we
depend
on
and
you
the
value
fire
department
has
always
come
through
with
the
highest
level
of
integrity
and
and
camaraderie,
and
you
know
family
environment
where
everybody
performs
and
but
so
I
share
the
same
feeling
as
you
know,
others
that
we
don't
want
to
lose
sight
of,
losing
somebody
or
something
that
is
a
key
to
your
performance
in
terms
of
function
to
meet
those.
You
know,
expectations
lightly.
D
You
know,
but
of
course
same
time
you
know
I
don't
want
to
micromanage
your
decision
you
make.
You
are
the
one:
that's
in
the
position
of
making
choices
and
life
is
making
choices,
and
so,
but
I
just
want
to
assure
you
that
you
know
you
have
my
support
and
I
hope
the
kinds
of
support
when
you
have
made
you
have
to
make
choices,
but
not
to
compromise
yourself
or
department,
because
those
things
life
and
welfare
cannot
be
compromised.
D
So
I
hope
you
understand
that,
and
you
know
you
have
practical
resources
and
support,
and
but
it's
up
to
you
to
make
your
you
know
decisions
and
choices
of
what's
the
best
way
to
manage
your
department.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
support
your
proposal
and
always-
and
so
you
know,
I
always
support
the
decision
you
make
and
just
make
sure
that
you
understand
where
I'm
coming
from.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
lee
councilmember
barksdale.
Thank.
F
You
and
thanks
chief
for
for
the
great
presentation
and
all
the
work
that
you
all
are
doing,
and
I
just
have
one
question:
it's
gonna
come
related
to
tech.
Have
you
all
considered
an
app
to
support
the
support
fire
inspections,
remote
or
virtual
currencies.
Y
T
We
we've
implemented,
it's
called
streamline
and
it's
the
program
that
actually
tracks
the
for
us
the
entire
program
and
helps
it.
It's
definitely
streamlined
a
lot
of
paperwork
and
and
process
for
us
and
and
I'm
sure
that
we'll
continue
to
look
at
technology.
You
know,
as
we
kind
of
embark
on
these
tough
times
of
cobit
and
such
to,
to
manage
getting
into
these
places
and
doing
our
job.
F
Great
thank
you
and
I
support
the
exploring
ways
to
fund
the
admin
role
through
basic
life,
support
fees.
Somebody
just
got
to
doing
this
and,
if
they're
not
doing
it,
somebody's
absorbing
that
work
right.
So
thank
you.
C
Thank
you,
mayor
chief
hagin,
thanks
for
being
here
tonight,
wonderful
presentation
and
if
you
haven't
heard
recently,
thank
you
again
to
you
and
your
entire
department
for
the
great
work
that
they're
doing
during
covent
tremendous
tremendous
effort
during
very
trying
times.
So
yes
happy
to
move
this
forward
and
supportive
of
both
the
fees
and
and
and
the
bls,
and
thank
you
for
the
correction
there
from
the
from
this
morning.
That's
even
more
than
what
you
originally
thought
that
that
number
was
and
that's
quite
expensive.
C
That
is
tremendously
good
value
for
for
for
that
service,
and
I
wholeheartedly
support
council
member
robertson's
idea
if
that's
a
way
that
we
can
fund
and
maintain
what
I
feel
is
a
very
important
position
with
the
bellevue
fire
department
that
training
administrator
to
maintain
the
high
quality
of
training
and
for
for
for
our
department
is
so
crucial,
and
I
would
absolutely
support
that,
if
that's
able
to
do
so
thanks
for
taking
that
homework
assignment
and
finding
out
exactly
what
that
number
needs
to
be
at,
but
anyway
that
we
can
maintain
that
position.
C
I
certainly
would
be
in
favor
of
especially
since
you
know
it
made
it
through
the
last
time
we
had
a
budget
crunch
right
during
the
the
recession
of
a
109
or
yeah
09
10..
So
clearly,
there's
a
need
to
maintain
this
and
it's
been
a
position
within
the
department
for
quite
some
times.
It
would
appear
so
look
forward
to
seeing
what
you
bring
back
to
us,
but
thanks
again
for
everything
you
do
and
for
being
here
this
evening,.
U
Yes,
I
too
appreciate
chief
all
of
the
efforts
of
the
fire
department
and
your
leadership,
especially
with
the
virtual
inspections,
because
I
know
that
l
and
I
and
building
inspectors
have
been
doing
virtual.
So
I
appreciate
that
we're
following
suit
to
keep
everybody
safe,
including
our
firefighters,
so
appreciate
that
very
much.
I
also
support
finding
ways
to
retain
the
training
administrator,
because
to
me
that's
one
of
the
the
really
important
things
to
keep
our
our
staff
as
safe
as
possible.
Is
that
we're
offering
them
state-of-the-art
training
and
making
sure
that
that
happens?
U
The
holistic
view
of
the
affordable
housing
fee
exemptions,
I
think,
is
a
really
good
way
to
look
at
that,
because
I
think
it
creates
a
centralized
tracking
as
well
as
really
transparency
and
accountability
to
what
we're
doing
related
to
affordable
housing.
So
thank
you
for
that.
I
did
have
one
question
and
that
is,
as
I
think,
about
kovid
and
people
that
are
teleworking
versus
being
in
the
office.
Are
we
finding
that
there
are
different
that
were
our
call?
Volumes
are
changing
or
increasing?
So
that's.
U
Actually,
one
of
my
questions
is
as
people
as
there
might
be
more
people
at
home.
Are
we
finding
that
that
there's
more
fire
calls
because
they're
there's
some
fire
risk
and
yeah,
so
just
wanted
to
understand
a
bit
more
about
that
in
terms
of
as
you're
budgeting
for
the
future?
What
you're,
seeing
in
terms
of
changing
patterns.
Y
We
have
seen
an
overall
decrease
in
call
volume
of
about
21
percent
this
year,
but
we're
also
finding
a
really
interesting
fact
and
that's
that
we're
having
way
more
serious
and
significant
medical
calls,
for
example,
serious
heart
attacks
and
strokes,
coupled
with
this
decrease
in
overall
volume,
the
number
of
actual
fires
we're
having
is
remaining
fairly
constant,
so
we're
not
rolling
out
the
door
as
much.
But
when
we
do
roll
out,
we
tend
to
be
rolling
out
for
more
serious
types
of
alarms,
both
on
the
medical
and
the
fire
side.
Y
Y
Those
are
on
the
rise
and
that
might
lead
us
to
assume
that
perhaps
people
are
still
a
little
bit
wary
of
of
going
to
a
hospital
for
treatment,
which
is
something
we're
really
trying
to
focus
on
the
messaging
that
hospitals
are
safe,
they're
ready
for
you
and
if
you,
if
you
have
chest
pain,
if
you're
not
feeling
well,
please
call
us
and
we'll
come
take
care
of
you.
It's
it's
nothing
to
fear
so
interesting
statistics
this
year.
Thank
you.
U
Y
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
hold
off
on
giving
you
an
exact
number
because
I'd
have
to
check,
but
I
know
they.
I
know
their
utilization
is
certainly
not
less
than
it
was
the
previous
year
and
the
bellevue
cares
program
was
one
of
only
a
couple
of
providers
that
was
actually
out
helping
people
in
need
throughout
the
entire
experience
of
covid
that
we've
had
in
2020.
So
it's
still
a
highly
utilized
feature
in
our
community
and
if
you
would
allow
me,
I
will
get
back
to
you
with
some
more
specific
numbers
about
about
cares.
Referrals.
U
That
would
be
great
because
I
think
it's
a
very
important
program
and
then
mayor
is
this
the
time
to
ask
any
questions
of
tony
about
the
process
of
the
the
budget
piece
and
specifically
the
memory
bank
and
how
things
get
on
there.
A
A
Thank
you,
then
we
can
answer
tony.
You
can
answer
councilmember
zahn's
question
there.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
this
presentation
and
chief
hagan.
You
just
gave
a
really
good
description
of
why
we
don't
want
our
hospitals
crowded
with
coven
patients.
If
we
can
help
it,
because
more
people
die
from
non-coveted
illnesses
covid
when
our
hospitals
are
completely
full
and
people
can't
get
in
or
don't
go
in,
for
a
heart
attack
and
and
things
that
would
be
easy
to
fix
if
they
were
receiving
the
care
they
needed.
A
So
thank
you
for
explaining
the
the
need
for
people
to
get
the
care
that
they
need.
A
I,
I
really
am
concerned
about
downtown
being
our
fastest
growing
neighborhood
and
the
fact
that
the
population
is
growing
so
quickly
and
delaying
the
fire
station,
10
and
and
staffing
and
things-
and
I
I
have
concerns
about
that-
I'm
very
interested
in
the
answer
to
jennifer
councilmember
robertson's
questions.
So
I'll
look
forward
to
that,
but
my
question
would
be
if
you
do
get
transported
to
the
hospital
and
you
don't
have
insurance
that
covers
that,
and
you
cannot
afford
to
pay
that
what
happens.
Y
What
actually
happens
is
our
our
ems
staff
has
somebody
who
discreetly
takes
that
information
and
evaluates
the
request,
basically
to
avoid
avoid
the
bill,
and
we
have
a.
We
have
a
sum
of
money
set
aside
that
we
use
to
cover
those
very
rare
instances.
So
you
know
we
like
to
get
the
message
out
there
that
nobody
should
be
afraid
of
calling
9-1-1
for
fear
of
a
bill.
Y
We
we
take
people
to
the
hospital.
We
we
treat
their
need,
we
get
them
where
they
need
to
go.
We
turn
away
absolutely
nobody.
So
again,
if
you're
a
bellevue
resident
and
you
are
insured,
we
we
we
bill
what
your
insurance
pays
and
we
waive
the
rest,
and
then
we
have
this
fund.
That
would
help
individuals
in
the
situation
that
you
mentioned.
Y
So
if
people
are
sick
or
injured,
they
need
they
needed
treatment
and
a
trip
to
the
hospital
our
firefighters
treat
them,
they
load
them
up,
they
take
them
where
they
need
to
go,
and
we
sorted
it
out
later.
In
the
few
instances
where
we've
had
requests
for
assistance
or
complete
waiving
of
the
bill,
we
do
what
we
have
to
do
to
take
care
of
it.
A
And
I
know
from
personal
experience:
your
crew
is
really
good
at
talking
to
family
members
who
maybe
do
not
need
to
have
the
transport
and
giving
them
the
option
to
drive
themselves
the
patient
themselves,
the
family
members.
So
I
appreciate
that
so
tony.
Can
you
do
a
little
recap
here
and
help
me
craft
direction
for
for
your
staff.
X
Certainly,
mayor
I'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
I'll
also
try
to
answer
councilmember
zone's
question
at
the
same
time.
So
what
I've
heard
this
evening
is
that
staff
will
come
back
with
a
increase
to
the
basic
life
support
fee
that
would
accommodate
the
80
000
of
the
admin
person.
X
So
we'll
come
back
with
that
it'll
be
part
of
your
memory
bank
and
so
we'd
be
looking
for
direction
on
your
basic
life
support
fee
after
you
get
that
information
which
probably
wouldn't
that
be
till
next
week,
so
we
won't
be
looking
for
for
direction
on
that
until
next
week,
so
we'll
bring
that
back
in
the
memory
bank.
I
also
heard
a
few
of
the
questions
that
need
to
get
put
in
the
memory
bank.
X
Specifically
around
bellevue
cares
in
the
referral
program
and
council
members
on
how
items
have
gotten
in
the
memory
bank
are
primarily
those
that
I've
either
heard
from
directly
from
a
council
meeting,
or
it
was
emailed
to
me
if
you
have
questions
or
if
any
other
council
member
has
questions
that
have
been
asked,
that
we
have
either
overlooked
or
misunderstood
or
didn't
get
in
the
memory
bank.
I
would
be
happy
to
talk
to
anyone
and
ensure
that
they
get
in
this
week,
so
I
would
be
happy
to
make
those
phone
calls.
X
So
if
you
are
interested
in
that,
I'd
be
pleased
to
do
that,
for
you.
So
does
that
answer
everybody's
questions
and
then
next
week
is
also
on
the
23rd,
we'll
be
looking
for
any
adjustments
you
may
have
to
the
budget
after
the
public
hearing
so
that
we
can
start
preparing
for
budget
adoption
either
7th
or
the
14th,
depending
on
council
direction.
A
Let
me
just
finish
what
I
was
gonna
say
and
then
we'll
do
that.
So
I
think
we
have
consensus
on
the
adjustment
of
the
of
the
inspection
fee
and
then
we're
gonna
want
to
get
that
more
information.
I
think
before
we
give
further
direction.
Is
that
what
you're
in
that
works,
with
your
schedule,
of
course?
Okay?
So
I
heard
council,
member
lee
and
council
members
on
so
council
member
leah
heard
you
first
go
ahead.
D
Thank
you
very
much
tony.
When
would
you
think
that
you
can
get
back
to
us
with
your
memory
bank
that
you
receive
from
us.
X
So
we
are
publishing
with
each
packet,
so
we
received
a
list
of
questions
today
from
at
least
one
council
member
we'll
be
having
those
as
many
as
we
can
answer
in
the
memory
bank
by
thursday,
in
order
for
council
to
start
to
be
able
to
provide
us
direction
on
the
23rd.
We
need
to
get
answers
into
this
week's
memory
bank,
so
I
would
need
your
questions
no
later
than
probably
tomorrow
afternoon.
If
you
have
questions.
U
Yes,
I
think
mine
was
a
procedural
question,
because
I
know
that
we've
talked
several
times
about
some
questions
that
I
have,
and
so
I
think.
Procedurally
perhaps
I
miss
the
the
process
where
emails
are
in
memory,
banks
and
phone
calls
or
not.
So
I
don't
see
any
of
our
discussions
in
the
memory
bank,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
clear
about
procedure
so
that
the
conversations
that
we
might
be
having
and
questions
I'm
asking
are
clearly
documented.
X
F
X
X
Certainly,
I
think
it
would
be
most
helpful
if
we
had
a
clear
understanding
of
what
your
request
is,
so
we
can
ensure
that
it's
been
costed
correctly
if
there
is
a
cost
attached
to
it,
depending
on
what
you're
looking
at.
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful
for
us
to
be
able
to
do.
It's
also
important
that
we
find
an
offsetting
if
you're,
looking
for
an
increase
in
cost,
what
the
offsetting
either
reduction
is
or
revenue
increases
in
order
to
pay
for
it.
X
A
Okay,
so
we've
heard
from
everybody
you
have
direction,
so
we
will
hear
back
from
you
next
week.
Maybe
yes,
you
will
okay
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
we're
gonna,
take
a
break
it's
about
8
35.
So
let's
come
back
at
8.
45.
I'll,
see
you
here.
It's.
A
L
Sure
this
is
the
third
and
final
study
session
item
this
evening
in
front
of
the
council
and
it's
the
review,
the
recommendation,
the
recommended
environmental
stewardship
plan
this
evening
and
tonight's
staff
will
present
the
recommended
plan
to
the
council.
The
draft
plan
was
released
for
public
comment
on
september.
24Th
staff
will
also
speak
to
the
comments
received
and
how
the
recommended
plan
addresses
many
of
the
public's
feedback
we
receive.
L
This
topic
was
last
before
again
the
council
on
september
14th
for
an
update
and
discussion
with
the
k4c
joint
commitments
and
tonight
staff
is
requesting
some
direction
with
regard
to
adopting
of
the
recommended
stewardship
plan
to
occur
at
a
future
meeting
so
joining
us
this
evening.
L
Again,
our
is
our
community
development
staff,
matt
cummins,
the
director
emilio
king,
jennifer
ewing,
as
well,
who
is,
will
do
the
bulk
of
the
presentation
this
evening,
as
well
as
anna
mcmahon
who's,
an
additional
guest
from
our
resource
conservation
program
manager
for
the
finance
and
asset
management
department.
So
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
community
development
staff
to
kick
this
off.
W
W
A
W
A
I
apologize
council
member
stokes
has
dropped
off
our
meeting
we'd
like
to
just
halt
here
for
one
second
and
see
if
we
can
get
him
back
on.
So
it's
not
just
a
matter
of
coming
back,
he's
actually
disconnected
so
can
we
hold
on
for
just
a
second
here?
I
know
charmaine's
working
on.
Q
N
L
I
think
we
should
go
ahead
and
begin
the
presentation,
given
the
hour
mare.
Okay,
you
could
always
you
know,
follow
back
up
with
council
member
stokes.
W
Thank
you
mayor.
So,
in
finishing
up
my
introductory
comments,
we
do
think
this
strikes
a
balance
between
all
the
competing
interests
and
thinking
about
how
to
advance
the
overall
environmental
goals
of
the
city.
The
various
components
of
the
plan
that
touch
or
affect
commissions
and
boards
within
the
city
have
been
presented
to
those
commissions
and
feedback
has
been
taken
and
incorporated.
W
The
same
is
true
internally
across
the
leadership
team
and
and
other
departments,
and
so
the
totality
of
all
of
that
is
what
you
see
in
the
draft
plan.
That's
been
out
for
public
comment.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
off
to
ms
ewing
to
walk
through
the
draft
plan
tonight
and
then
myself
and
assistant
director
emil,
king
and
our
staff
are
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
Z
Great
thank
you
mack
and
senior
manager,
miyaki
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
members
of
the
council.
I'm
excited
to
be
presenting
the
draft
plan
or
recommended
plan
to
you
this
evening.
I
want
to
make
sure
you're
able
to
see.
Can
you
see
that
powerpoint
right
now
get
that
done?
Okay,
all
right!
So,
as
mac
mentioned,
we
will
be
requesting
direction.
Regarding
the
adoption
of
the
plan
at
a
future
meeting.
Z
The
purpose
of
the
meeting
tonight
is
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
our.
You
know.
Most
recent
outreach
process,
a
recap
of
the
direction
received
to
date
and
then
really
dive
into
more
of
the
details
of
the
plan
and
talk
through
some
of
the
highlights
of
the
different
actions
in
the
in
the
various
focus
areas
and
then
request
direction
from
council.
B
Z
Okay,
great
thanks,
so
to
recap:
the
direction
we
have
received
to
date.
We've
had
a
number
of
touch
points
with
council,
most
recently
just
about
two
months
ago
in
september,
and
then
prior
to
that
last
november,
we
were
supposed
to
present
to
council
in
the
spring,
but
that
was
delayed
due
to
coved.
But
we've
heard
from
council
really
a
desire
to
build
on
our
work
to
date,
to
really
be
bold
and
leading
edge,
if
possible.
Z
Z
We've,
as
mac
mentioned,
we've
had
three
rounds
of
outreach
public
outreach,
also
throughout
the
process.
You
know
doing
similar
engagement
internally,
because
this
plan
really
touches
on
the
work
of
a
number
of
different
departments.
Z
You
know
starting
focusing
outreach
more
at
a
high
level
on
our
goals
and
targets.
Then,
earlier
this
year
the
outreach
was
focused
more
on
specific
actions
for
the
plan.
Z
Talking
to
you
know
our
community
to
various
focus
groups
with
members
of
the
business
community
and
other
environmental
nonprofits
and
other
stakeholders
and
again
going
to
all
the
boards
in
commissions
and
then,
most
recently,
we
released
the
draft
plan
on
september
24th
and
did
another
round
of
public
outreach
and
engagement.
You
know
really
focused
on
the
draft
plan
with
an
online
town
hall
and
a
really
brief
survey
on
engaging
bellevue.com
where
we
received
about
a
hundred
responses,
plus,
you
know
a
number
of
emails
that
came
through
to
counsel.
Z
So
what
we've
heard
from
this
outreach?
You
know
we're
trying
to
summarize
comments
from
you
know:
100
plus
people,
although
you
know
we
heard
from
a
mix
of
residents-
and
you
know
various
business
and
other
stakeholders
from
the
community
from
our
residents.
A
lot
of
what
we
heard
was
you
know
a
desire
to
continue
to
try
to
strengthen
the
plan,
in
particular
the
energy
section.
Z
We've
heard
you
know,
similarly
to
what
we
hear
during
the
open
comment,
desires
to
review
and
possibly
update
the
plan
annually
to
have
some
sort
of
citizen
advisory
body
to
you,
know
oversee
or
provide
input
into
the
implementation
of
the
plan,
and
then
we've
heard
you
know
desire
for
for
really
more
leading
ed
action,
leading-edge
actions
and
timelines
for
the
actions
in
the
plan
and
that
sort
of
thing
from
some
of
our
stakeholder
groups.
Z
We
presented
just
last
week
to
the
bellevue
chamber
policy
group
and
we
anticipate
we'll
likely
receive
a
letter
from
them,
but
they
it
was
late
last
week
so
that
hasn't
come
in
yet
one
of
the
the
main
questions
they
had
was
around.
You
know
the
impact
of
the
plan
on
housing,
affordability
and
then
you
know
we
we've
heard
from
pse,
and
you
know
they
kind
of
outlined
a
number
of
the
areas
where
the
city
already
works
closely
with
pse
on
you
know
various
energy
efficiency
projects,
electric
vehicle
charging,
renewable
energy.
Z
So
you
know
overall
wanting
to
continue
a
lot
of
that
collaborative
working
relationship.
We
have
and
then
pse
offered
some
comments,
kind
of
more
broadly
around
their
position
around
building
electrification,
that
being
kind
of
something
they're
hearing
from
and
talked
about
in
in
other
cities
in
their
in
their
service
territory.
Z
So
shifting
gears
to
talk
about
the
actions
in
each
focus
area,
I
just
I've
included
a
slide
to
kind
of
recap:
the
goals
and
targets
just
sort
of
for
some
context
and
I'll
also
speak
to
how
we're
addressing
the
feedback
as
I,
as
I
talk
through
the
different
actions
in
the
plan,
so
starting
with
a
climate
change
focus
area
and
the
goal
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
80
by
2050
and
50
by
2030.
Z
This
focus
area
is
is
very
interconnected
to
the
other
aspects
of
the
plan,
in
particular
the
the
energy
and
mobility
and
land
use
sections.
So
a
number
of
those
strategies
will
also
support
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions
for
the
actions
we
have
in
the
climate
focus
area.
We
have
a
number
of
different
actions
in
there
related
to
better
understanding,
some
of
our
possible
vulnerabilities
to
the
changing
climate
and
how
that
might
impact
some
of
our
long-term
planning
around
our
stormwater
systems.
Z
That
sort
of
thing
also
wanting
to
get
some
better
data
on
the
air
quality
in
bellevue,
in
particular
some
of
the
neighborhoods.
You
know
adjacent
to
our
freeways
and
understand
you
know,
what's
happening
there
and
then
really
take
into
account
any
sort
of
mitigation
strategies,
as
we
do
look
to
have
more
development
in
neighborhoods
such
as
east
main
and
wilberton,
and
bell
red
close
to
freeways.
Z
How
can
we
ensure
you
know
good
air
quality
in
in
those
developments
close
to
the
freeway,
and
then
you
know,
of
course,
continuing
our
our
collaborative
work
with
the
k4c,
it's
kind
of
mostly
a
coincidence,
but
you
know
a
couple
of
our
other
east
side.
Cities
are
completing
their
climate
or
sustainability
plans
around
now.
Z
So
I
think,
there's
a
number
of
areas
where
we
might
be
able
to
actually
work
together
during
the
implementation,
along
with
continuing
to
work
with
the
county
and
then
with
the
state
legislative
interests,
a
number
of
the
to
achieve
our
goals
in
the
plan.
There's
you
know
that
will
require
a
mix
of
both
city
actions
and
some
actions
at
the
state
level.
Z
So
the
city's
legislative
interests
already
include
a
number
of
different
environmental
related
statements
of
policy,
and
so
you
know
there's
a
couple
of
areas
where
some
policy
language
could
be
added
as
part
of
the
legislative
agenda
process.
Z
You
know
this,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
was
kind
of
one
of
the
areas
where
we
heard
some
interest
from
our
residents
in
trying
to
strengthen
the
plan.
You
know
this.
This
is
kind
of
one
focus
area
where
there's
actions
happening
at
both.
Z
You
know
the
state
level
and
also
you
know
trying
to
think
through
what
makes
sense
for
for
bellevue
to
take
on,
in
particular
in
light
of
the
the
state
clean
buildings
act
which
was
passed
last
year,
and
that
has
some
requirements
for
large
commercial
buildings
to
analyze
their
energy
use
and
report
on
that
and
then
actually
make
improvements
to
their
buildings
if
they're
not
meeting
certain
energy
performance
thresholds.
Z
So
that's
one
strategy
where
we're
looking
to
provide
technical
assistance
to
buildings
in
bellevue
monitor
how
that
program
rolls
out
and
also
the
state
will
be
offering
some
early
adopter
incentives.
Z
So
we
really
want
to
see
bellevue
buildings
that
have
to
comply
with
the
program
or
you
know,
can
also
don't
actually
have
to
comply,
but
can
also
take
advantage
of
those
incentives.
We
want
to
really
support
those
buildings
in
in
achieving
that,
then
also
looking
at
what
might
some
options
be,
for
you
know
more
medium-sized
buildings
in
bellevue
and
also
tracking
how
that
state
bill
or
state
legislation
is
implemented.
Z
We're
you
know
in
terms
of
energy
use,
you
know
we're
looking
at
how
we
can
both
conserve
energy
and
increase
renewable
energy
for
conserving
energy.
Looking
at
you
know
both
commercial
and
multi-family
buildings,
and
then
also
you
know,
single-family
buildings.
So
there
are
already
a
number
of
different
home
energy
retrofit
programs
that
the
city
offers
through
you
know
our
weatherization
funding
pse
offers
a
number
of
programs.
I
think
we
really
want
to
understand
where
there
might
be
some
gaps
there.
Z
You
know
in
particular,
maybe
for
lower
moderate
income
residents,
who
maybe
don't
quite
qualify
for
the
home
weatherization,
but
maybe
aren't
you
know
able
to
take
advantage
of.
You
know
some
of
the
pse
incentives
trying
to
to
you
know,
fill
some
of
those
holes
that
we
think
might
exist
and
then,
finally,
to
look
at
our
incentives
around
green
building
and
how
we
might
further
incentivize
new
construction
to
go
beyond
the
code.
Z
For
materials,
management
and
waste,
we
have
the
goal
to
have
zero
waste
by
2050
a
couple
of
the
the
strategies
here
for
achieving
this.
You
know
in
particular,
we
have
some
room
for
improvement
with
recycling
in
our
commercial
and
multi-family
buildings,
and
you
know,
as
we
have
more
development
in
bellevue.
You
know.
Of
course
that's
gonna,
you
know
primarily
be
new.
Z
New
residents
will
mostly
be
in
multi-family
buildings
and
and,
of
course,
we'll
have
a
lot
of
job
growth
as
well.
We
really
want
to
make
sure
those
new
buildings
have
the
space
they
need
to
allow,
for.
Z
You
know
three
different
waste
streams,
that
sort
of
thing
and
then
also
you
know
there
is
some
state
legislation
around
banning
plastic
bags,
but
we've
heard
a
lot
of
interest
in
looking
at
how
we
could
potentially
phase
out
styrofoam
and
other
single-use
plastics,
and
then,
of
course,
you
know,
we
have
a
pretty
robust
outreach
and
education
program
through
our
utilities
department
and
are
looking
to.
You
know
continue
a
lot
of
that
work
and
you
know
always
kind
of
fine-tune
and
and
they're
always
looking
for.
Z
Z
So
in
terms
of
our
tree
canopy,
you
know
the
the
big
strategies
here
are
really
looking
to
update
our
tree
codes
to
try
to
minimize
tree
losses
or
when
trees
do
need
to
be
removed.
That
we
are,
you
know
sufficiently
mitigating
for
that
and
then
to
achieve
the
40
tree
canopy
goal.
We
are,
you
know,
we're
estimating
that
we
would
need
to
plant
about
75
000
trees,
so
it's
about
2
500
trees
a
year
over
the
next
30
years.
Z
So
you
know
we
already
do
plant
a
couple
thousand
trees
a
year
roughly,
so
this
would
really
be
kind
of
building
and
scaling
up
some
of
those
efforts
and
really
kind
of
creating
some
new
efforts,
not
only
planting
on
city
property,
but
really
where
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
is
on
private
property.
Z
So
looking
at
opportunities
for
like
a
tree
giveaway
program,
partnering
with
other
community
organizations
to
try
to
increase
tree
planting,
you
know
on
residential
property,
school
property
and
also
you
know,
to
the
extent
possible
on
on
city
property
and
then
there's
a
couple,
big
related
planning
efforts
underway
or
soon
to
be
underway.
The
utilities
department
is
working
on
a
watershed
management
plan
where
they
have
had
staff.
Z
So
we'll
see
we
more
kind
of
coming
out
of
that
around
strategies
to
preserve
and
enhance
the
health
of
our
streams
and
then,
similarly,
with
the
parks
and
open
space
plan
which
is
due
to
be
updated,
I
think
in
2022
you
know:
that's
really
well
we'll
see
the
the
really
in-depth
planning
around
how
what
the
strategy
will
look
like
to
achieve
the
walkable
access
to
park,
schools
on
the
mobility
and
land
use
side.
We
have
a
number
of
different
goals
and
targets
related
to
commute
trips.
Z
Z
Z
Z
Now,
there's
a
lot
of
different
private
companies
doing
this
so
really
looking
at
how
we
can
support
a
lot
of
the
efforts
that
are
out
there
through
pse,
through
electrify
america,
et
cetera
to
you
know,
try
to
get
some
of
these
ev
charging
stations
in
bellevue,
and
then
you
know,
I
think,
we've
obviously
seen
a
lot
of
changes
to
commuting
patterns
due
to
covid,
and
you
know,
there's
we
don't
know
exactly
what
the
postcovid
world
is
going
to
look
like
in
terms
of
transportation.
Z
So
you
know
continuing
our
transport
transportation,
demand
management,
programs,
of
course,
and
then
also
really
understanding
and
continuing
to
monitor
commuting
patterns,
as
we,
you
know,
emerge
out
of
the
pandemic.
Z
Z
We've
already
made
some
pretty
significant
strides
towards
the
renewable
energy
goal
by
signing
up
for
pse's
green
direct
program,
installing
solar
on
two
city
facilities
at
the
crossroads
community
center
and
bellevue
service
center,
and
so
that
you
know
the
plan
goes
into
much
more
detail.
But
you
know
some
of
the
the
key
highlights
here
on
our
city
operations.
Side
are
really
looking
at
how
we
can
continue
to
squeeze
some
more
energy
efficiency
out
of
our
city
facilities
and
then
also,
you
know,
really
continuing
to
work
on
electrifying,
our
city
fleet.
Z
You
know
focusing
more
on
our
light
duty
vehicles
initially
and
then
also
really
looking
at
how
we
can
continue
to
institutionalize
environmental
stewardship.
In
our
operations,
which
you
know,
we
we've
already
been
doing
quite
a
bit
of
work
to
that
end,
but
just
kind
of
continuing
that
and
identifying
more
training
opportunities
and
that
sort
of
thing
as
they
come
up.
Z
We
have
heard
an
interest
from
residents
in
reporting
on
our
progress
annually,
and
you
know
we
have
had
an
environmental
stewardship
dashboard
for
a
number
of
years.
We've
just
recently
refreshed
that,
and
you
know
have
had
it
we've,
given
it
a
bit
of
a
makeover.
So
it's
just
a
little
bit
more
user-friendly,
but
also,
you
know
have
made
sure
the
the
data
and
all
the
metrics
in
here
match
with
what's
in
the
plan,
and
so
this
will
really
be
our
vehicle
going
forward
for
reporting
on
progress.
Z
In
addition
to
you
know,
reports
to
council
and
engagement
with
the
community,
but
yeah
we
we
are
really
interested
in
tracking
and
monitoring
data.
Recognizing,
though
you
know
this
year
is
definitely
going
to
be.
An
anomaly
next
year
might
also
be
a
bit
of
an
anomaly,
so
I
I
think
you
know
we
certainly
are
interested
in
the
data,
but
it
will
be
a
little
difficult
in
some
ways
to
kind
of
compare
things
to
2019
as
we
go
forward.
So
it'll
it'll
be
interesting
to
monitor
that.
Z
So
you
know
that
that
really
concludes
the
the
presentation.
Obviously
that
was
kind
of
a
quick
overview,
but
wanted
to
try
to
talk
through
some
of
the
highlights
in
the
plan
in
terms
of
the
actions
for
the
various
focus
areas-
and
you
know
at
this
point
wanting
to
reiterate
our
requests
for
direction
regarding
the
adoption
of
the
plan
at
a
future
meeting.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much,
so
I'm
going
to
call
on
everybody
in
this
order,
starting
with
council
members
on
then
councilmember
barksdale,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
member
robertson,
councilmember,
stokes,
council,
member
lee
and
then
myself
so
we'll
start
with
councilmember
zion.
Yes,.
U
U
92
of
our
greenhouse
gas
comes
from
those
two
areas,
so
I
think
that
we
are
poised
to
move
this
forward
and
I
really
do
believe
that
government
leads
the
way
we
both
own
assets,
that
can
be
more
sustainable
as
well
as
are
part
of
helping
the
community
and
all
the
stakeholders
get
us
moving
in
the
right
direction.
U
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
have
been
looking
at
bold
with
those
leading
edge
actions,
but
I
will
say
that
what
I
saw
was
70
of
our
community
is
pushing
for
leading
edge,
and
I
do
think
that,
although
I
agree
that
we
have
a
2050
goal,
the
2030
is
really
the
key
goal
that
we
need
to
be
focused
on.
So
I'd
like
to
for
us
to.
U
You
know
figure
out
how
to
have
more
specific
timelines
so
that
we
are
able
to
look
at
phases
by
year,
and
I'd
also
like
to
look
at
just
like
the
economic
development
plan
coming
back
quarterly,
so
that
that
reporting
is
really
visible.
Transparent
will
hold
ourselves
accountable
for
taking
actions
and
making
sure
that
the
plan
is
really
dynamic
so
that
we're
able
to
take
advantage
of
those
things
that
other
cities
are
already
doing.
U
You
know
my
sense
is
that
we
don't
need
to
reinvent
the
wheel,
because
a
lot
of
those
strategies
and
actions
are
already
available
and
in
fact
I
want
to
give
a
particular
shout
out
to
the
people
for
climate
action
and
the
portfolio
of
actions
that
they've
emailed
to
us,
which
a
number
of
them
are
in
our
plan
already,
which
is
amazing
and
I'd
like
to
request
how
we
actually
pull
more
of
those
actions
directly
into
the
plan
that
we
have
so
that
we
can
get
going,
and
especially
in
the
existing
buildings
area,
where
we
don't
have
the
that
states
clean
building
for
new
buildings.
U
U
U
I'm
wondering
if
by
having
these
quarterly
check-ins
and
continuing
to
work
with
groups
like
the
pca,
that
that's
the
way
to
move
this
forward.
And
while
I
appreciate
the
idea
of
having
a
citizen
advisory,
I
think
that
this
work
is
so
dynamic
and
there's
so
many
people
that
we
want
to
engage
with
that.
I
would
just.
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
really
considering
very
carefully
whether
we
want
to
create
another
commission
versus
finding
a
way
to
pull
in
some
of
these
actions
that
they
sent
us
in
their
strategy.
F
All
right,
thank
you
mayor,
so
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
jennifer
for
all
the
work
that
you
put
in
and
factoring
in
the
community's
input
as
well.
I
do
think
also
similar
to
what
was
mentioned
by
council
members
on
having
the
quarterly
updates
would
be
important
as
a
kpi
person,
a
couple
questions.
So
in
the
comp
plan
we
we
have
sort
of
the
overall,
then
we
have
neighborhood
plans,
neighborhood
area
plans.
F
Have
we
thought
about
sort
of
monitoring
by
neighborhood
and
tailoring
some
of
the
actions
by
a
neighborhood.
So
then
you
know
I
like
the
way
that
it's
factored
in
ways
that
the
community
can
get
engaged
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
there's
a
way
for
different
neighborhoods
to
say,
hey,
look.
This
is
something
these
are
actions
that
I
can
take,
and
then
you
know,
given
their
current
situation
and
the
different
neighborhood
can
take
a
different
set
of
actions
and
so
forth,
and
then
my
last
question
is:
how
are
we
integrating
it
with
other
programs?
F
So,
for
example,
when
we
do
the
virtual,
when
we
do
the
neighborhood
walks,
pre-covet
or
virtual
neighborhood
walks
afterward?
How
are
we
bringing
in
our
environmental
sustainability
plan
and
actions
to
help
educate
and
inspire
people
to
participate.
R
Jennifer,
I
can
go
ahead
and
answer
this
one
on
the
on
the
neighborhood
area
planning,
so
our
data
walks
are
actually
starting
tomorrow
night.
We
have
one
on
tuesday
night
and
one
on
thursday
night
and
a
number
of
the
the
action
and
goal
elements
that
jennifer
described
are
actually
in
our
data
that
we're
talking
with
the
community
about.
So
we
do
see
a
key
interface
between
the
neighborhood
area
planning
and
this
environmental
stewardship
work.
R
As
far
as
some
of
the
the
metrics,
I
think
we
would
want
to
look
a
bit
deeper
to
see
if
we
can
gather
that
information
at
the
neighborhood
level
and
talk
to
them
at
about
it.
We
do
have
things
like
the
tree
canopy
by
neighborhood,
so
that
is
one
example
that
we
do
have
the
information
and
we
can
have
a
good
discussion
as
well
as
the
the
park
and
open
space
access.
R
So
I
think
we
can
look
at
the
full
breadth
of
metrics
that
jennifer
has
in
in
her
report
and
looking
at
see
how
they
fit
into
the
great
neighborhoods
work
that
we're
doing
also.
A
Okay,
all
right
did
you
get
all
your
questions
answered
council
member.
F
I
believe
so
so
it
sounds
like
the
integration
with
the
neighborhood
area
plan
and
the
virtual
like
there
was
a
broader
sort
of
question
around
the
neighborhood
just
integration
with
other
programs
like
when
we
do
neighborhood
walk
so
there's
the
breakdown
which
you
address
but
then
sort
of.
Generally
speaking,
integration
with
other
programs.
R
Yeah,
I
think
the
integration
with
the
other
neighborhood
programs
that
that
can
be
something
that
we
use
our
current
outreach
that
we're
doing
right
now
through
great
neighborhoods
and
nep,
and
other
projects
that
are
at
that
neighborhood
level.
I
think,
as
we
get
to
kind
of
meet
and
know
more
people
out
in
the
community,
with
these
new
efforts,
we
can
try
and
pull
the
pieces
together
of
all
the
programs
that
are
out
there
and
see
where
we
can
get
some
some
synergies
moving
forward.
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
thanks
matt,
camille
and
jennifer.
A
great
presentation-
and
you
know
you
guys-
should
be
congratulating
this
incredible
plan
in
a
lot
of
ways.
You
know
it's
thorough,
it's
specific,
it's
widespread
in
terms
of
its
impact,
so
very
excited
in
terms
of
where
this
is
at.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
the
to
the
work
to
date
and
really
appreciate
the
robust
outreach,
both
within
the
walls
of
city
hall,
but
as
well
as
outside,
really
important
and
love
that
the
city
is
leading
by
example.
C
You
know
just
so
much
to
point
to
there
and
I
appreciate
that
update
jennifer
within
the
within
the
presentation
tonight.
So
a
couple
of
questions
here,
the
performance
dashboard
right
now.
How
often
would
that
be
updated
jennifer?
Would
that
coincide,
for
example
with?
If
would
we
be
able
to
do
that
on
a
quarterly
basis,
as
it
was
suggested
earlier,
or
would
that
be
done
on?
You
know
every
six
months,
12
months
basis?
C
Z
Yeah,
typically,
we
update
those
metrics
on
an
annual
basis
and
on
a
mcmand,
and
I
work
work
together
on
that.
A
lot
of
the
data
is
not
really
available
more
frequently
than
annually
so
and
actually
there's
a
lot
of
cities
that
don't
necessarily
report
on
this
data
annually
that
don't
actually
do
their
greenhouse
gas
emissions
inventory
annually.
Z
I
think
even
seattle
doesn't
do
theirs
annually,
so
I
it
would
be
nice
to
do
it
more
frequently
than
that,
but
I
think
annually,
as
you
know,
I
would
definitely
say,
is
more
on
the
you
know
real
best
practice,
end
of
the
spectrum,
yeah
gotcha.
C
Thank
you.
So
I
don't
know
how
much
of
this
was
in
the
discussion
or
the
outreach,
but
the
plan
doesn't
seem
to
have
any
any,
I
wouldn't
say,
focus
per
se,
but
was
there
a
discussion
about
public-private
partnerships
taking
advantage
of
all
the
incredible
technology
companies
that
we
have
here
in
bellevue,
the
amazons,
the
microsoft
t-mobile
et
cetera?
That
I
think,
would
want
to
be
partners
with
us
on
something
like
this.
Z
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
I
think
we,
you
know
there
was
certain,
certainly
interest
in
from
a
lot
of
our
large
employers
in
in
supporting
this
work.
You
know
one
of
the
areas
where
I
think
we
need
to
explore
what
that
could.
Look
like
more
is
you
know
this
idea
of
like
a
sustainable
district
or
eco
district?
I
think
that's.
You
know
in
general
an
example
of
a
public-private
partnership,
but
those
are
often
you
know
the
city
might
help
facilitate,
but
that's
really
kind
of
driven
more
by
the
private
sector.
Z
So
I
think
something
like
that
could
be
an
opportunity.
I
I
think
you
know,
we've
heard
a
lot
of
interest
in
you
know
helping
us
achieve
our
tree,
canopy
goal.
You
know
so
our
employers
wanting
to
get
involved
in
that.
So
I
think
yeah
there.
There
are
probably
some
more
opportunities
we
could
explore
there
around
the
public-private
partnership
approach.
C
Okay,
well,
I
would
suggest
that
we
put
that
into
the
plan
that
we
continue
to
explore
that
on
an
ongoing
basis
or
when
we
see
an
opportunity
to
to
partner.
I
think
that'd
be
a
great
opportunity
to
do
that
and
then
just.
Lastly,
before
I
yield
my
time,
you
know.
Originally,
I
thought
that
perhaps
you
know
going
down
the
the
commission
route
might
make
some
sense,
but
I
think
for
for
for
this
specifically,
I
really
think
that
a
you
know
a
technical
advisory
group.
C
You
know
for
all
the
reasons
stated
earlier
in
this
conversation,
this
meeting
with
the
you
know,
with
the
the
the
need
to
take
advantage
of
the
expertise
that
we
might
have
in
our
our
in
our
community.
Already.
You
know,
I
think
there
there
might
be
some
value
in
that
you
know
be
it
the
folks
from
the
people
for
climate
action
or
other
experts
within
the
area
within
our
region,
if
we
can
take
advantage
of
their
expertise
to
help
this
move
along,
especially
when
it
comes
to
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
C
V
So
wow
this
has
been
a
long
time
coming.
I'm
really
excited
to
see
this
us
getting
so
close
to
the
end
of
getting
this
adopted,
and
then
we
can
start
implementation,
and
I
know
that
the
public's
been
clamoring
for
this
for
a
long
time.
I
think
that
implementation
is
going
to
be
really
important,
three
components
of
it
to
making
sure
that
we
get
community
buy-in
and
if
you
have
buy-in,
then
you
get
community
to
adopt.
V
V
The
next
is
going
to
be
incentivizing
that
if
we
help
our
businesses,
for
example
the
single-use
plastics
during
my
briefing
with
staff,
I
talked
about
how
taco
time
had
converted
all
the
way
to
completely
compostable
so
looking
at
how
they
did
that
and
if
we
need
to,
if
it
costs
more,
I
mean
it's
going
to
come
down
in
price
to
convert
as
more
people.
Do
it
but
figuring
out.
V
Maybe
we
could
give
a
you
know,
b,
o
tax
incentive
for
ones
that
you
know
for
companies
that
do
take
out
that
can
convert
that
way.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
really
important
to
get
people
to
adopt
it,
make
it
so
that
it
doesn't
cost
them
money
and
they
can
feel
good
about
it
and
the
third
is
going
to
be
providing
technical
to
support
and
advice
to
different
groups
and
businesses
to
help
them
implement
a
lot
of
these
things.
V
I
love
the
idea
of
a
eco
district
and
I
had
the
thought
that
we
could
get
some
of
our
neighborhoods
if
they
had
and
councilmember
barksdale
talks
about
neighborhood
area
getting
neighborhoods
to
maybe
replace
some
of
their
landscaping
with
rain
gardens,
it
could
be
an
idea
that
they
could
use
the
nep
funds,
for
we
could
have
competitions
on
how
green
can
you
make
your
neighborhood
planting
trees?
Things
like
that.
I
think
that
that
would
all
be
really
great
positive
work
that
will
move
the
ball
and
make
our
whole
community
get
excited
about
this.
V
So,
finally,
I
I
I
also
support
a
tag.
I
think
deputy
mayor
had
a
good
idea
with
that,
and
I
think
that
should
be
something
that
we
bring
into
being
when
we're
ready
to
update
the
esi
next
time
so
not
right
away,
but
or
if
we
see
a
need
in
the
interim,
with
the
quarterly
updates
which,
by
the
way,
I
also
support,
I
think,
councilmembers
on
suggested
those.
I
think
things
that
we
measure
are
things
that
we
value
and
we've
started
doing
quarterly
updates
on
affordable
housing.
V
We
started
doing
them
on
economic
development.
I
think
that
having
one
for
the
esi
would
also
be
a
really
good
idea,
but
having
a
technical
advisory
group
that
comes
together
when
we
really
need
need
additional
drilling
down
work
beyond
just
what
the
staff
is
doing,
I
think
would
be
great.
I
mean
you
look
at
all
the
work
the
technical
advisory
group
did
on
our
affordable
housing
strategy.
V
We
can
have
some
bellevue
is
filled
with
intelligent
engaged
and
knowledgeable
experts
who
would
love
to
give
their
time
to
help
the
city
be
even
better.
So
I
I
really
strongly
support
that
as
well.
All
overall
great
work
from
the
staff
great
work
from
the
public,
engaging
with
us
and
great
work
from
the
council.
We've
had
a
lot
of
meetings
on
this
and
there's
been
some
great
conversations
and
I'm
ready
to
move
it
forward.
Thanks.
X
E
Okay,
this
is
kind
of
weird
this
way.
Yeah.
I
echo
those
comments
and
I
agree.
A
technical
advisory
committee
or
group
would
be
the
way
to
go,
and
I
I
think
we
should
look
at
that
fairly
quickly,
because
I
think
there
are
things
we
need
to
move
along
a
little
quicker
than
we're
doing,
and
this
would
be
a
help
on
that
one
of
the
things-
and
I
echo
a
lot
of
these
comments.
I
think
it's
a
great
plan.
We
have
all
this
stuff
in
place
and
it's
good
it's
it's
very.
E
What
we're
seeing
tonight
is
very
slim
on
actual
information
about
the
implementation
of
what's
happening.
All
that
it's
just
you
know
it's
a
broad
plan
and
that's
good.
What
concerns
me
is
that
you
look
at
this
and-
and
somebody
reads
this,
and
they
say
we
want
to
get
to
40
percent
tree
canopy
in
2050,
that's
30
years
from
now
it.
E
E
I
think
the
urgency
of
of
the
of
the
the
whole
work
that
our
goal
we're
going
for,
and
I
know
it
takes
a
lot
of
time,
but
when
you
start
looking
at
those
individual
a
lot
of
the
achievements,
we're
looking
for
they're,
not
real
big
in
some
ways,
particularly
over
that
time
period,
I
I
think
things
will
overwhelm
us
if
we're
not
really
doing
being
more
aggressive
on
this,
because
there
are
places
and
things
are
happening
that
are
going
to
change
things,
and
we
need
to
be
more
prepared
for
that.
E
I'm
not
sure
what
that
means,
but
I'm
just
I
guess,
I'm
a
little
frustrated
that
we
have
a.
It
sounds
like
a
really
good
plan,
but
it's
such
a
time
period
and
it's
hard
to
get
people
motivated.
If
you
say
well,
we've
got
some
time
to
work
on
this.
That's
that's
my
concern.
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
great
stuff
in
it,
but
we
can't
just
say
hey.
This
is
great:
let's
do
it.
E
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
actually
delivering
on
what
we're
promising
and
if
we're
going
to
do
that,
we
have
to
have
more
interim
goals.
We
have
to
have
a
plan
and
look
at
what
are
we
actually
going
to
achieve,
and
how
can
we
do
that?
How
can
be
aggressive-
and
I
think
that's
what
people
in
the
community
are
looking
at
this
and
saying
it's
a
good
plan,
but
is
it
really
going
to?
E
Are
we
still
going
to
be
planning
and
working
on
this
when
something
really
catastrophic
happens,
because
we
didn't
have
action,
so
I
I
would
just
like
a
better
a
look
at
being
more
aggressive
on
this
and
building
it
into
all
the
things
we
do
in
in
the
city,
not
just
having
this
segregated
off
to
the
side,
and
I
think
we're
doing
a
lot
of
that,
but
I'm
just
encouraging
us
to
do
even
more
integrated
into
this.
E
I
do
have
well
and
I,
as
I
said,
I
think
the
tag
thing
is
or
something
like
that
is
good
good
to
work
on
it
in
the
future,
but
I
I'm
very
encouraged
by
by
the
whole
direction
by
the
way
it's
been
set
up
and
everything
I'm
just
concerned
that
we're
it's
a
kind
of
a
planning
to
do
something
sometime
and
we
need
to
have
more
direction.
I
want
to
know
what
are
we
going
to
do
in
the
next
five
years?
What
are
we
going
to
do
in
10
years?
What?
E
So
that's
that's
my
and
I
don't
want
to
sound
real
negative
on
it,
but
I
this
is.
This
is
an
urgency
and
we're
we're
seen
to
be
approaching
it
from
kind
of
an
academic
context,
and
I
think
we
we
have
the
skills
we
have
the
people.
We
have
the
resources,
we
know
there's
so
much
information
out
there.
We
can
be
really
cutting
edge,
be
much
more
aggressive
on
this
and
actually
achieve
something,
and
I'm
concerned
that
we're
going
to
end
up
in
20
years
from
now
and
saying
whoops
we're
not
there
yet.
D
Yeah
staff
has
done
a
great
job
in
coming
up
with
this
plan
and
so
took
us
to
the
point
that
we
are
discussing
this.
However,
I
have
mixed
feelings
when
I
you
know
think
about
this.
Look
at
this
and
listen
to
our
discussion.
You
know
I'm
glad.
You
know
that
we
have
a
wonderful
vision,
wonderful
plan
and
but
same
time
you
know
I
I
can't
even
say
I'm
elated,
that
you
know
we're
spending
the
time.
D
Looking
at
this
and
having
a
a
a
plan
to
tackle
this,
you
know,
we've
heard
a
lot
of
input
from
the
public.
I
mean
over
the
last
number
of
years
and
it's
more
and
more
young
people
even
including,
are
coming
up
and
they
realize
the
importance
of
environment
because
we're
getting
more
and
more
people
we're
getting
more
and
more
economic
progress,
we're
getting
more
and
more
things
that
you
know
it's
going
to
destroy
the
earth
if
we
do
not
pay
attention
to
not
take
care
of
our
environment.
D
So
we
come
up
with
these
these
ideas
and
plans.
So
I
I
feel
that
there
are
two
things
we
need
to
do.
One
is
people
are
asking
for
leading
edge
solutions.
Absolutely
you
know
we
are
in
a
technology
place
we're
in
the
technology
period,
technology
revolution,
but
you
know
it's
something
that
we
have
no
control
over
it's
something
way
out
in
the
distance.
It's
it's
difficult
to
plan.
You
know
we're
looking
at
20,
40,
20
50.,
and
so
you
know
I
agree
with
the
council
member.
D
Need
to
look
at
near-term
goals,
20
30
goals,
things
that
we
can
do
things
that
we
have
control
over
things,
that
we
can
lead
by
example.
What
the
city
can
do
at
the
same
time,
working
toward
the
leading
ad
solutions,
no
question
about
it,
but
in
the
meantime
we've
got
to
let
people
know
what
we're
doing.
Making
progress
and
people
build
confidence
that
we
we
mean
it
we're
serious
about
it.
D
So
I
think
the
things
that
the
council
members
are
mentioned,
what
the
city
can
do
without
grain
building
without
constructions
without
the
thing
with
the
things
we
do
with
things
under
control
like
getting
into
electric
vehicles,
changing
our
fleet
you're,
doing
all
the
things
and
we
we
talk
about
utility
department.
You
know
watershed
management,
wow,
we
control
water.
We
control
a
lot
of
things
that
you
know
it's
environmental.
D
As
a
result,
we
have.
We
have
environmental
services.
Commission,
you
know
it
should
be
more
than
just
looking
at
setting
rates.
No,
it's
something
that
we
should
be
looking
at.
How
do
we
address
environmental
issues?
Specifically
the
water?
The
utility
department
has
the
most
to
do
with
it
because
they
control
waste
reduction,
garbage
collection,
water
usage
and
wastewater
treatment.
All
these
things
are
under
our
our
control,
so
don't
need
to
go
look
forward
to
gee.
Let's
find
somebody
else
who
can
do
this.
I
agree.
Partnership.
D
Private
private
product
is
important,
especially
when
we
talk
about
technology
leading
edge
solutions.
We
got
to
work
with
them,
but
that's
not
a,
but
we
need
to
know
where
we
can
make
make
a
con
show
the
people,
the
public
who's
asking
us
to
do
something
we
haven't
got
anything
to
show.
So
I
really
support
that.
We
need
to
do
the
things
that
we
can
be
by
examples,
starting
with
our
departments,
the
things
that
we
can
under
control
that
things
we
can
talk
to
our
citizens
about
we've
got
great
public,
the
public's
willing
to
support
it.
D
If
we
talk
to
them,
give
them
the
opportunity
to
say
you
know
we
can
do
this
and
what
you
suggest
and
then
you
come
up
with
solutions.
So
I
think
we
do
this
if
we
don't
just
keep
talking
planning
getting
commissions
together
yesterday,
what
plan
do
we
have?
Let's
do
more,
you
know
we're
looking
five
miles
in
the
distance
50
years
away,
but
we
have
things
right
in
front
of
our
nose
that
we
can
do
okay.
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
lee,
thanks,
okay,
so
we're
running
short
on
time.
Here,
I'm
going
to
try
to
say
what
I
was
going
to
say
for
myself
and
then
I'm
going
to
sum
up
a
little
bit
and
then
give
people
a
chance
to
talk
again.
There's
so
much.
I
want
to
say
about
this.
This
is
one
of
my
favorite
topics.
A
I
will
say
that
in
the
next
time
we
do
one
of
these.
You
know
that
you
come
right
out
and
you
talk
about
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
a
certain
time,
and
you
tell
us
how
you
were
going
to
do
it,
but
those
aren't
really
how
you
need
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
I
mean
those
you
could
not
do
any
of
those
things
and
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
or
you
could
do
all
those
things
and
not
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
A
So
I'd
like
to
have
a
little
more
actionable
statements
on
how
exactly
we
plan
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
next
time
and
that's,
I
think,
on
page
10
just
that
little
intro
there.
I
think
the
thing
that
I
hear
most
consistently
from
the
public
is
the
tree
canopy
and
you
do
address
it.
You
talk
about
our
goals
and
we
talk
about
you
know
looking
at
our
our
tree
preservation
codes,
I
get
probably
more
emails
about
that
than
any
other
thing
to
do
with
tree
canopy.
A
A
Let's
see
so
I
think
oh,
oh,
the.
The
other
thing
that
I
would
like
to
add
in
there
is,
I
think,
probably
the
well
my
goal
right
now.
I
think
only
10
of
the
people
who
work
downtown
live
down,
live
in
bellevue
and
my
goal
is
to
increase
that
number
to
50
that
at
least
50
percent
of
the
people
who
work
in
bellevue
live
in
bellevue
because
you
just
imagine
all
the
commute
time
and
and
greenhouse
gas
emissions
with
travel.
A
That
you're
going
to
get
rid
of
with
that-
and
I
love
the
concept
of
the
15-minute
city
so
embracing
that
concept.
I'd
like
to
see
that
represented
in
this
document
a
little
bit
next
time,
but
what
I'm
hearing
from
my
colleagues
is
they'd
like
to
see
more
frequent
updates,
and
I
don't
know
you
seem
to
think
jennifer.
A
I
think
that
maybe
two
times
a
year
would
be
the
most
you
could
do,
but
if
you-
but
I
hear
a
desire
for
quarterly
updates
so
anyway,
I
think
we'd
like
to
hear
more
about
our
progress.
A
I
like
the
idea
of
integrating
the
eis
program
with
our
neighborhood
programs
and
teaching
things
like
councilmember
robertson,
said
with
the
rain,
gardens
and
and
other
things
like
that,
and
I
I
think
that
that
and
fostering
public-private
partnerships
are
two
things
I
would
add
into
this
document
today
and
the
pr
private
public
partnership
examples
could
be
the
establishment
of
eco
districts
working
on
tree
canopy
and
even
green
development
with
our
zero
emission.
What
are
those
our
green
building
development?
A
So
I
think
the
rei
now
facebook
building
is
a
great
example
of
a
pretty
green
building.
That's
was
very
popular
for
the
next
buyer
because
of
that
I,
like
the
idea
of
creating
a
tag,
and
I
would
like
to
myself.
I
would
like
to
start
working
on
that
right
away
and
it
sounds
like
there's
support
from
the
entire
council
for
that.
A
So
maybe
we
can
integrate
the
idea
of
that
into
this
document
and
what
the
role
of
a
tag
would
be,
and
then
I
totally
agree
with
speeding
up
these
goals
and
creating
short-term
goals.
We
call
them
enabling
goals
in
my
field.
How
do
we
get
to
those
goals
and
how
do
we
measure
our
progress
along
the
way,
so
that
might
be
for
the
next
document
next
time
we
do
this
and
maybe
with
the
help
of
a
new
tag,
but
this
is
great.
A
This
is
really
a
good
start,
and
it's
you
know
once
you
get
past
what
I
considered
kind
of
a
weak
statement
on
page
10.
It
is
such
a
robust
document
and
I'm
really
pleased
with
the
commitment
to
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
doing
the
things
we
need
to
be
doing
and
and
and
kind
of,
the
promise
for
for
being
better
as
a
city
and
as
a
community.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
this.
I'm
gonna
go
around
the
table
again
and
give
everybody
a
chance
to
comment.
A
U
Yeah
great,
you
know,
I'm
so
excited
about
all
of
us
being
all
into
this,
and
I
think
that
where
I'd
like
just
to
eventually
get
to
is
where
we
have
this
culture
of
sustainability
and
it
grounds
us
in
all
the
decisions
that
we
make
throughout
the
city.
So
it's
not
just
any
one
specific
department
we're
all
in
this
together
and
the
urgency.
U
I
appreciate
that
because
I
think
that
when
we
look
at
our
plan,
let's
figure
out
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
in
year,
one
and
year
two,
instead
of
a
here's,
what
we're
going
to
try
to
get
to
by
2030
and-
and
I
think
we
also
need
to
be
really
careful
about
the
equity
piece
of
making
sure
that,
if
we're
talking
about
the
ability
to
do
weatherproofing
or
whatnot,
that
that
there's
access
and
equity
to
the
kind
of
things
that
we
can
do,
I
love
the
idea
of
the
b
o
tax
incentive.
U
I'm
wondering
if,
for
residential
that
there's
things
we
can
do
with
some
kind
of
a
low
or
no
interest
loan
for
people
to
be
able
to
do
some
of
the
the
energy
type
of
improvements
that
they
can
make.
You
know,
I
guess
the
the
other
one
is
just.
How
do
we
really
make
this
fun
so
that
it
is
about
each
of
our
actions
and
actually
I
did
have
one
more
the
the
pca.
You
know
when
I
look
in
there.
U
U
It
sure
seems
to
me
they've
done
the
research
and
the
deep
work
already
and
provided
this
really
amazing
document
can't
we
do
more
with
incorporating
some
of
those
concepts
and,
as
we
then
move
forward,
we
can
figure
out
which
one
of
those
fits
into
year,
one
two
or
three
or
or
broader,
and
who
are
some
partners
to
do
this
work?
Because
what
we
haven't
talked
about
tonight
is
the
fact
that
we're
part
of
k4c-
and,
as
you
mentioned
several
other
cities
on
the
east
side,
are
in
the
middle
of
working
on
their
own
esp.
U
So
I
think
that
we
should
look
at
how
we
actually
leverage
that
broader
coalition
and
alliance.
Just
because
you
know,
if
we've
got
someone
living
in
bellevue,
they
could
literally
be
right
across
the
street
from
kirkland
and
redmond.
So
it
sure
seems
to
me
there's
an
opportunity
there
that
we
need.
We
also
want
to
leverage
about
working
with
our
other
cities
as
well
as
the
county,
so
those.
A
Z
Yeah
we
we
have
gone
through
a
process
to
kind
of
do
a
sort
of
crosswalk
of
you
know.
What's
in
the
plan
versus
what's
in
their
spreadsheet,
and
there
definitely
is
quite
a
bit
of
overlap,
you
know,
and
we
we
went
through
a
pretty
similar
exercise
to
that
working
with
our
consultant
team.
Z
Z
Maybe
since
the
beginning
or
so
of
this
year,
as
they've
been
putting
it
together,
yeah
we
could
think
of
it
make
sense
to
to
reference
it
in
the
plan
or
you
know,
I
think
we're
certainly
aware
of
it,
and
you
know
I
think
it's
a
good
resource.
We,
you
know,
there's
there's
quite
a
few
other
toolkits
out
there,
that
you
know
we've
also
looked
at
and
and
other
resources
in
addition
to
that,
one
so
yeah
we
and
we
actually
kind
of
in
our
sort
of
internal
sharepoint
site.
U
Perhaps
somewhere
in
within
this
document,
we
could
have
just
maybe
reference
materials
and
and
include
some
of
those
pieces
in
that
would
be
fine
and
then
my
other
one
was
related
to,
as
we
think
about
tags
or
other
ideas
of
how
we
collaborate
and
build
that
alliance
and
coalition.
U
Having
a
note
in
there
about
how
we
might
collaborate
more
with
k4c
or
other
east
side
cities
that
are
already
doing
their
esp
as
well.
So
those
are
my
two
requests.
R
I
think
council
members,
I
think
taking
the
reference
approach,
is
the
right
tact
at
this
point.
We
have
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
looking
through
all
of
those
other
actions
and
what
you
have
before
you
is
the
staff
recommended
plan
based
on
on
all
of
our
analysis
of
other
things
out
there.
R
A
R
I
think
I
think,
as
maybe
as
part
of
the
public
engagement
section,
we
can
talk
about
other
things
that
did
come
up
during
the
during
the
process
and
in
reference
to
those
documents
I
wouldn't
necessarily
want
to.
You
know,
try
and
have
this.
This
is
already
150
page
document.
If
we
were,
I
would
recommend
not
expanding
it
beyond
what
it
is
right
now.
U
I
find
if
it
if
you
include
a
note
by
reference
so
that
we
could
go
look
if
we
wanted
to.
Thank
you,
deputy.
C
Thank
you,
mayor,
jennifer
it'd,
be
great
if
you
could
do
just
a
little
bit
of
research
on
the
reporting
structure.
Just
getting
back
to
that
issue
for
a
second
here,
it
sounds
like
there's
some
interest
in
quarterly
reports
by.
I
think
I
heard
you
say
earlier
that
annual
reports
are
kind
of
best
practice.
C
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
that,
because
certainly
you
know
the
data
is
important,
but
if
we're
only
getting
a
partial
picture,
if
it's
quarterly,
then
perhaps
we
can't
take
the
action
that
we
need
to
take,
but
if
we
can
get
great
data
quarterly
fantastic,
I
absolutely
think
we
should
do
it
and
I
think
everybody
on
the
council
would
support
that,
but
I
just
want
to
ensure
that
we're
getting
good
data
regardless
or
else
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
make
the
right
decisions
to
keep
moving
the
ball
forward
as
clearly
you've
heard
tonight.
A
Z
Refer
you
all
right,
okay,
go
ahead,
yeah!
I
just
wanted,
because
I
think
I
may
have
caused
a
little
confusion
there.
So
we
you
know
from
a
data
standpoint.
Z
You
know
we
can
look
and
see
if
there's
some
data
that
could
be
updated
more
frequently
than
once
a
year,
but
I
think
with
the
the
council
check-ins
whether
they're
you
know
twice
a
year
quarterly
or
whatever
I
I
think
those
would
be.
You
know
the
data
would
be
part
of
it,
but
I
think
there's
also
just
a
fair
amount
of
progress
to
report
on
just
more
in
terms
of
the
actions
in
the
plan.
Z
So
I
I
think
the
the
data
and
the
metrics
are
certainly
a
component,
but
there's
also
a
lot
there
for
on
both
the
community
and
city
operations
side.
So,
even
if
we
may
not
have
new
data,
you
know
quarterly.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
material
and
I
think
in
the
past
you
know
we've
often
been
a
little
pressed
for
time.
Z
You
know
with
trying
to
get
through
the
the
update.
So
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
clarify
that
you
know,
although
we
may
not
have
fresh
data
every
quarter,
I
think
there's
still
you
know
other
progress
and
information
that
that
could
certainly
be
shared.
A
I'm
gonna
ask
that
we
may
have
someone
make
a
motion
to
extend
the
meeting
by
five
minutes.
B
C
No
did
you
have
something
else
go
ahead
more.
Thank
you.
Jennifer
also
be
great
again.
You
have
to
answer
this
right
now,
but
great.
When
you
come
back
to
us
on
this
because
on
the
energy
section
to
me,
it
felt
a
little
bit
like
sp.
Well,
let
me
back
up
on
the
climate
change
piece.
So
it'd
be
great.
C
If
we
can
get
some
more
action
items
associated
with
that
or
looking
at
different
technologies
that
can
lower
emissions
like
carbon
capture,
other
things
like
that
or
even
waste
energy,
which
was
something
that
we've
talked
about
here
before,
but
anything
else
we
can
do
to
help
businesses
lower
their
environmental
impact
as
well.
I
think
that'd
be
something
that
would
be
of
interest
to
everyone
here
and
then
also
on
this
and
then
going
to
the
energy
section.
I
was
going
to
talk
about
there's.
It
seems
to
be
really
focused
strongly
on
solar.
C
I
don't
know
if
you
looked
at
any
other
types
of
energy
sources
other
than
solar
and
if
so,
to
what
extent
again
it's
getting
late
tonight,
you
can
come
back
to
us
on
that,
but
certainly
there
are
other
sources
to
to
look
at
there
and
then
would
really-
and
this
is
something
near
and
dear-
to
councilmember,
lee's,
heart
and
certainly
he's
mentioned
a
little
bit
here,
but
I'd
love
to
have
a
stronger
transportation
technology
piece
to
this
as
as
well,
yes,
we
do
talk
a
little
bit
about
aces
here,
self-driving
and
autonomous,
but
the
transportation
technologies
is
so
important
and
it
plays
a
critical
piece
of
our
overall
environment
and
health
environment
and
emissions.
C
So
we'd
love
to
see
a
stronger
piece
of
that
as
well
in
this.
So
but
again,
I
don't
want
you
going
away
tonight
thinking
that
this
is
not
a
great
plan,
because
it
is
but
again
clearly
we're
passionate.
We
have
a
lot
to
add
and
a
lot
of
questions
but
great
work
again.
Thank
you.
A
Again,
when
we're
talking,
let's
try
to
differentiate
between
what
we
want
to
have
changed
on
this
plan
versus
what
we
want
to
have
change
the
next
time
around,
because
we
don't
want
to
have
them
have
to
start
everything
over
again.
So
maybe
in
an
email
jared,
you
could
explain
to
jennifer
what
your
hopes
are
with
that
yeah,
okay,
councilmember
lee.
D
Thank
you,
anime.
We
have
a
lot
of
great
ideas
and
this
is
a
great
plan.
I
compliment
jennifer
you
and
again,
and
so
we
I
you
know
my
concern
is
we
need
actions,
we
need
actions.
D
You
know
action
has
to
be
things
that
we
can
do.
You
know
even
asking
the
the
environmental
service
jennifer
ewing,
to
do
all
the
things
we're
asking
to
do.
You
know
she,
I
don't
I
don't.
I
don't
see
how
she
can
get
all
accomplished
just
coming
out
with
dealing
with
what
we
have
suggested.
D
So
my
thinking
is
that
we
we
a
number
of
departments
that
already
directly
connected
with
the
ideas
with
the
plans
that
has
been
articulated
and
the
ones
that
we
don't
have.
Well.
You
know
we
worry
about
it
in
the
long
run,
but
in
this,
in
the
short
term,
we
have
utilities
development
mentioned.
We
have
transportation
department
which
appreciate
w
male
stress
very
emphatically.
D
They
are
going
to
be
helping
the
work
to
take
actions,
develop
those
ideas
and
plan
into
actions.
They
can
do
it
and
same
thing
with
green
building.
Why
not?
We
can
do
a
changing
fleet,
we
can
do
it.
Each
department
has
its
own,
you
know
if
we
talk,
we
give
them
the
idea
to
do
it.
That's
one,
that's
what
we
can
do
actions
and
it's
there
before.
Second,
you
know
I
like
the
idea
of
having
more
community
that
can
help
us
absolutely,
but
again
it's
just
additional
ideas
and
things
we
have
to
do
extra.
D
We
already
have
a
utility
environmental
service
commission,
and
I
know
that
I
don't
I
heard
people
say:
well,
that's
not
the
main
charge,
but
they
are
a
group
of
people,
individuals
that
already
they're
interested
willing.
I
like
the
community
that
can
discuss
environmental
issues
and
they're
very
interested,
and
I
think
that's
legitimate
it's
already
there.
They
can.
You
can
use
that
based
on
that
and
incorporate
technology
people
like
tag
people
like
pca,
whatever
you
know
they
can
be
part
of
the
community
organization.
D
Commission
we
already
established
it's
there.
We'd
have
to
reinvent
the
wheel.
We
don't
have
to
create
anything
it's
there.
So
I
believe
that
we,
if
we
just
make
sure
we
do
things
practically
that
can
be
done
and
make
it
happen.
People
will
be
much
much
happier,
they
don't
have
to
say.
Well,
let's
do
another,
let's
do
another
this
and
that's
another
planning.
No,
we
don't
need
to
do
that.
Let's
show
some
progress.
I
like
the
idea,
don't
have
to
be
20
30
it's.
What
can
we
do
in
one
year?
D
D
A
E
Yeah
I'll
be
real,
quick.
I
just
reiterate
what
I
said
earlier
like.
I
think
this
is
something
I
think
we
need
to
work
more
directly
on
this
great
plan
and
everything
else.
I
want
to
move
past
the
planning
stage
I
do
have
to
say
I
have
a
the
idea
of
turning
the
taking
the
environmental
services
commission,
which
is
misnamed
and
making
it
giving
it
a
challenge.
A
charge
in
this
is
a
little
several
dicey
for
several
reasons,
one
of
which
you
really
don't
want
to
have
a
utilities
department.
E
There's
some
there's
some
issues
there
in
terms
of
their
work
and
the
environmental
work
and
how
it
comes
together,
they're,
not
an
environmental
agency.
They
have
they
affect
the
environment,
but
you
want,
as
in
you
I
mean
it.
I
just
don't
think
that's
the
best
thing
to
do.
In
fact,
it
would
would
cause
some
real
concerns
about
the
objectivity
and
all
that
I
just
put
that
on
the
table,
and
I
think
it
puts
them
in
an
awkward
position
really.
E
So
I
don't
know
why
we
named
it
environmental
services
because
that's
not
basically
what
they
do,
but
I
that
I
understand
the
reason
on
that
or
thinking,
but
I
just
have
a
concern,
but
what
I'm
really
interested
in
is
what
we've
been
talking
about
is
I
we
need
to.
We
need
to
work
on
implementation.
We
need
to
work
on.
How
does
this
fit
in
with
our
policy?
E
E
I
know
this
is
the
plan,
but
the
plan
has
to
be
built
on
and
and
we
can't
it
has
credence
if
you
can
say
well,
we
had
plans
before,
and
this
is
what
we've
accomplished
and
now
this
is
where
we're
going
to
go
forward.
This
is
a
plan
that
isn't
really
it's
going
forward,
but
it's
just
hard
to
look
at
and
say
so.
E
How
is
this
going
to
actually
accomplish
anything
and
I'd
like
to
see
more
detail
and
at
least
understanding
and
coming
back
and
saying
we're
doing
x,
y
and
z,
and
this
is
how
we're
going
to
reduce
this
and
come
back
to
us
and
ask
us
for
action.
Ask
us
for
something:
that's
more
aggressive
on
the
tree
camp
again!
50
year,
you
know
50
years
we'll
have
40
reduction.
E
A
Okay,
council
member
robertson.
V
Thank
you.
I
agree.
I'm
ready
to
go,
let's
adopt
this
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
comments
tonight
that
have
been
very
valuable,
but
I
hope
that
there
are
comments
that
are
meant
to
help
give
staff
input
on
the
implementation
of
this
plan
and
they're,
not
comments,
saying:
let's
change
the
plan
and
go
back
and
rework
it
because
we've
been
on
this
a
long
time.
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
adopt
it,
so
we
can
get
to
the
implementation
phase.
V
I
think
the
quarterly
meetings
or
quarterly
updates,
which
we've
all
support,
I
think,
are
really
great,
because
then
we
can
give
input
on
prioritizing
or
how
we're
going
to
implement,
and
I
hope
that
that
staff
will
bookmark
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
councils
made
for
implementation
as
well
as
comments
from
the
public
for
the
same
purpose.
I
also
it
seems
like
we
have
a
lot
of
support
for
tag.
V
I
agree
that
the
environmental
services
commission
they're
busy
doing
our
utility
work,
capital,
budget
etc,
but
I
think
a
tag
either
towards
when
council
gives
more
input
on
implementation
to
maybe
vet
some
of
that
or
towards
the
next
update,
or
maybe
both,
I
think,
would
be
really
appropriate.
V
But
I'm
ready
to
you
know
finish
council
comments
tonight,
give
direction
to
staff
to
bring
this
back
for
passage
and
try
to
get
out
at
1005..
So
with
that,
thank
you.
Everyone.
A
So
just
a
minute
councilmember
lee,
so
I'm
not
really
hearing
everybody
say
what
you
just
said:
councilmember
robertson,
I'm
hearing
some
people
want
to
have
it
come
back
and
look
at
it
again
with
a
few
changes
and
I'm
hearing
you
say
that
you
like
it
just
as
it
is
and
you'd
like
to
see
changes
made
as
we
begin
implementation
of
this
plan,
yeah.
V
No,
I
wasn't
getting
to
say
that
I
that's
what
I
I
hear
everyone
saying
they
support
a
majority
say
they
support
a
tag.
Majority
want
quarterly.
My
my
my
recommendation
to
my
colleagues
is:
let's
pass
this
and
then
the
interests
that
we
have
they
can
they're
implementation
items
really.
I
don't
think
that
we
should
be
word
spending
this
down
to
the
end.
I
don't
know.
V
Right
well,
my
my
recommendation
is:
if
we're
going
to
have
some
changes,
let's
have
them
be
in
motion
language
print
it
in
the
packet
when
this
is
ready
to
adopt,
because
I
don't
think
we
need
to
keep
nibbling
at
the
plan.
Let's
get
the
plan
passed
to
implement
it.
That
was
my
point
it
it
wasn't
that
I
didn't
hear
anyone
saying
they
wanted
changes.
I
was
just
saying:
I
think
that
those
can
be
implementation,
but
if
we're
going
to
make
changes,
let's
make
them
and
pass
it
at
the
next
meeting.
Thank
you.
A
So,
council,
member
lee,
what
would
you
like
to
say
thank.
D
D
You
might
make
a
motion
to
include
that,
but
somebody
has
referenced
the
appropriateness
of
the
environmental
services
commission.
I
want
to
referring
to
what
jennifer
said
utility
commission.
They
have
time
they
have
capacity
to
do
more.
You
know
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
The
commissioners
themselves
are
very
interested,
and
many
of
them
have
the
interest,
expertise
and
commitment
to
look
into
environmental
stewardship.
A
L
Thank
you
mayor.
I
was
actually
going
to
look
to
mac
who's
unmuted
now
to
kind
of
sum
up
what
we've
heard
in
terms
of
what
we're
planning
to
bring
back,
I
mean
there's
a
lot
set
this
evening.
Yeah
definitely
heard
some
themes.
L
W
So,
thank
you,
city
manager,
miaki
yeah.
I
agree
with
your
comments
there.
I
think
the
lion's
share
of
what
what
I
heard
tonight-
and
I
think
we
would
encourage
staff
heard-
is
more
in
the
implementation
realm
and
thinking
about
you
know
what
are
the
first
actions
that
we
try
to
work
on
in
terms
of
the
work
itself
mayor.
I
also
agree
with
your
comments.
There
were
a
few
substantive
things
that
were
thrown
out
there
about.
W
So
if
the
council
were
to
concur
that
the
two
items
that
you
just
brought
up
mayor
were
the
two
things
you'd
like
to
see
and
put
in
the
plan
being
specifically
some
policy
around
public
private
venture
opportunities
and
being
nimble
to
take
advantage
of
those
when
and
if
they
come
up
and
the
second
one
being
making
sure
there's
coordination
between
the
esi
work
and
the
neighborhood
planning
work
or
any
other.
You
know
work
within
the
planning
initiatives,
that's
appropriate.
I
think
we
could
draft
that
policy.
A
Okay,
that's
great,
and
I
do
I
do
like
council
members,
on's
idea
about
kind
of
incorporating
this
into
every
department
in
the
city.
It's
kind
of
it's
the
same
with
affordable
housing.
It
affects
economic
development,
it
affects
so
many
other
things.
So
with
that
lens
on
it,
I
feel
good
with
that
direction
that
you
just
described
there
and
I'm
wondering
if
I
could
get
some
head
nods
from
everybody
to
see
how
you
feel
about
it
as
well.
A
Absolutely
all
right,
okay!
Well,
that's
great!
We
do
not
need
to
take
a
vote
on
that
because
I
think
you'll
bring
it
back
to
us
and
we
can
reboot
them
right.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
I
think
we're
just
under
the
wire
here.
The
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.