►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - June 21, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
There
are
three
pre-registered
speakers
and
before
I
start
calling
names
I'll
just
notify
the
public
that
oral
communications
as
a
reminder
is
for
a
period
of
no
more
than
30
minutes,
and
speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
for
three
minutes.
Each
and
three
people
are
allowed
to
speak
to
either
side
of
a
one
particular
topic,
and
with
that
I
will
call
our
first
speaker,
who
is
karen
morris.
D
D
As
you
know,
I
have
followed
and
studied
the
issue
of
the
impact
of
homeless
uses
on
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
surrounding
cities
for
many
years.
There
is
a
lot
of
naivete
around
this
issue
and
refusal
to
be
proactive
and
head
off
problems
until
they
are
impossible
to
ignore
and
extremely
difficult
to
deal
with.
Seattle
and
other
regional
cities
are
instructive.
Examples
of
this
bellevue
aims
to
be
more
pragmatic,
proactive
and
head
off
problems
and
forward
thinking
about
how
we
handle
things,
but
on
this
issue
we
are
being
pulled
towards
making
the
same
mistakes
others
have.
D
If
we
do,
it
is
the
surrounding
residents
who
will
suffer,
not
pushing
those
methods
that
haven't
provided
public
safety
elsewhere.
Many
believe
that
sites
in
bellevue
will
be
serving
mainly
eastside
homeless,
but
that
is
not
true.
All
such
housing
programs
are
administered
by
entities
such
as
plymouth,
housing,
etc,
and
there
are
participants
in
king
county's,
coordinated
entry
for
all
system
which
evaluates
and
determines
who
receives
housing
in
king
county.
D
When
facilities
open
up
anywhere
in
the
county,
they
will
most
likely
be
immediately
filled
up
with
the
homeless,
overrunning
services
in
seattle
and
elsewhere
in
king
county.
They
will
likely
end
up
with
very
few
spots
left
for
our
local
homeless
and
since
no
one
is
time
limited
in
the
permanent
housing
spots
will
not
open
up
very
frequently
either,
and
if
you
want
to
know
the
impact
this
will
have
on
both
bellevue
residents
and
the
residents
and
staff
of
these
places.
D
You
only
need
to
look
at
the
history
of
incidents
in
seattle
at
these
places
which
I
have.
I
am
also
concerned
that
council
members
who
should
be
objectively
evaluating
and
listening
to
their
own
citizens
are
serving
as
public
advocates
for
one
political
and
activist
viewpoint.
Here
I
refer
to
open
attempts
on
a
local
political
site
to
drum
up,
support
and
comment
to
drown
out
the
voices
of
other
citizens
with
a
different
opinion.
D
I
support
any
and
all
methods
and
amendments
to
mitigate
the
possible
public
safety
and
quality
of
life
issues
that
will
arise
here
as
they
have
in
seattle,
portland
and
elsewhere.
I
personally
don't
think
the
proposed
amendments
on
tonight's
agenda
go
far
enough
and
they
represent
a
compromise
already.
D
Please
don't
defeat
them
or
water
them
down
even
more,
and
they
need
to
be
required,
not
suggested
in
my
long
experience
they
will
never
happen,
otherwise
they
often
don't
even
happen
when
they're
required
without
diligent
enforcement.
Thank
you
for
your
attention
and
I
hope
you
will
do
the
right
thing
here.
D
Thank
you.
Just
as
an
example,
the
person
who
threw
the
elderly
lady
down
the
light
rail
stairs
in
seattle
numerous
times
and
then
went
and
stabbed
somebody
has
committed
crimes
in
bellevue
and
is
well
known
to
the
bellevue
police.
So
if
you
think
what
happens
there
can
happen
here,
you're
wrong.
E
Good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newinghouse,
council
members,
I'm
betsy
hummer,
my
address
is
on
file
and
it
is
very
different
to
be
back
in
person.
It's
very
nice.
It's
wonderful!
I
am
here
to
urge
you
to
adopt
the
amendments
proposed
by
council
member
robertson
to
the
permanent
support
of
housing.
The
vulnerable
population
that
makes
up
people
experiencing
homelessness
deserve
the
same
accountability
from
providers
that
other
vulnerable
populations,
such
as
children,
see
seniors
and
those
with
disabilities
receive.
E
So
the
participants
have
a
guarantee
that
they
will
receive
care,
they
have
been
promised
and
they
will
have
recourse
if
not
adhered
to.
These
are
simply
the
same.
Successful
requirements
that
you
also
carefully
crafted
for
the
homeless
services
uses
land
use
code
with
input
from
the
entire
community.
B
E
B
Okay,
thank
you
for
clarifying
the
final
pre-registered
speaker
on
the
list
is
alex
zimmerman.
F
The
microphone
working
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much,
the
hive,
my
dirty
damn
nazi
fascist
map
bandita
in
psychopath,
my
name
alex
zimmerman,
and
I
want
to
speak
about
something.
What
is
very
interesting?
What
is
happening
right
now?
Yeah.
First.
Thank
you
very
much
to
give
us
speak
three
minutes,
it's
very
unique
because
nobody
give
us-
and
I
give
you
example
right
now-
what's
happened
today
in
country
and
when
it
chair
council,
banduckin
country
council,
by
baidu,
but
by
duchy.
You
know
what
it
means
she's
before
you.
F
She
only
three
people
speak
and
she
cut
from
two
minutes
to
one
minute
and
she's
doing
this
systematically
many
times,
I'm
totally
confused.
Maybe
she
have
a
covet
before
you
know
what
is
mean
sitting
home
in
heaven.
What,
as
I
call
heaven
yeah
for
two
years
more
than
two
years,
maybe
she'll
have
a
mental
problem
right
now,
maybe
she's
a
psychopath,
because
I
don't
understand
how
one
or
two
minutes
can
change
everything
she
not
care
about
this.
So
we
have
new
aristocrats
right
now.
F
You
know
what
is
mean,
what
is
leaving
heaven
yeah,
he
will
live
in
heaven.
Thank
you
very
much.
Seattle
happened
right
now
with
you
because
last
friday,
mayor
of
seattle,
obviously
you
know
what
is
mean
talk
so
console
very
stupid.
It's
in
seattle
times
officially,
so
we
have
a
big
problem
right
now
with
democrats.
We
need
to
clean
this
freaking
idiot
totally
because
it's
don't
have
sense
for
many
years
right
now.
I
want
to
speak
about
amazon
mafia.
F
You
know
what
is
me
and
what
this
one
bring
to
you
beloved
25
000
people
guys
in
97.
I
speak
here
when
microsoft
come
and
I
talk
who's
this
freaking
idiot
who,
in
small
city
like
bellevue,
open
a
factory
with
fifty
thousand
people,
they
say,
destroy
bella.
You
totally
have.
I
know
bellevue
for
thirty
five
years
live
almost
25..
It's
not
a
point
guys
situation
right
now,
very
simple.
F
They're
boring
like
a
slave,
because
many
come
from
jungle,
but
it's
okay,
no
problem
about
this,
but
you
never
stop
in
amazon.
We
have
right
now
traffic.
What
is
crazy
months
ago
from
bellevue
mall,
you
know
what
is
mean
to
factory.
I
drive
for
45
minutes
guys
you
make
right
now
from
bella
view
worst
scenario
of
what
is
this
in
new
york,
this
very
expensive
place
manhattan
guys.
You
make
idiotic
situation
in
you
quiet
for
30
years.
I
never
hear
from
you,
so
somebody
told
you
this
mafia
need
be.
Stop
stand
up.
America.
B
Thank
you,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
If
there
is
anyone
joining
us
here
in
council
chambers
who
would
like
to
make
comment
to
the
council,
please
raise
your
hand
also
at
home.
If
you
use
star
nine
and
use
the
raise
hand
function,
please
to
indicate
you
would
like
to
speak.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
part
of
me
accommodating
me
as
well.
I
was
was
late
to
signing
up,
so
my
name
is
chad,
vakulen
and
I
am
represented
the
east
side,
affordable
housing
coalition
today
and
the
coalition
is
a
group
comprised
of
over
34
organizations
that
represent
housing
providers
and
direct
service
providers.
G
Faith
leaders,
community
members,
folks
that
are,
are
really
going
to
be
impacted
and
are
pretty
big
stakeholders
with
this
luca
and
we'll
also
be
working
directly
with
the
impacted
community,
who
will
be
subsequently
living
in
this
type
of
housing
and
to
I
really
want
to
like
structure
this
conversation
through
an
equitable
lens,
because
we
know
that
the
people
that
are
most
impacted
by
housing
is
insecurity
and
homelessness
are
members
from
you
know
different
communities
from
that
represent
like
lgbt
btq
plus
community
communities
of
color
people
with
disabilities,
seniors
veterans-
and
I
really
want
to
ground
this
conversation
and
that,
because
those
are
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
at
the
end
of
day,
most
impacted
by
your
decisions.
G
So
I
really
would
like
to
applaud
the
planning
commission
for
their
diligence
in
in
the
work
that
they've
done.
This
far,
and
especially
through
the
robust
community
engagement
work
that
they've
done,
and
we
know
for
the
city
of
bellevue
to
achieve
its
housing
goals
and
meet
the
needs
that
our
community
members
face.
It's
it's
really
imperative
that
all
types
of
housing
are
really
easily
accessible,
and
the
coalition
strongly
supports
the
allowance
of
permanent
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use.
G
Districts
where
residential
dwellings
or
hotels
are
allowed,
as
well
as
the
allowance
of
emergency
housing
and
shelters
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
are
allowed,
and
while
this
luca
intends
to
expand
access
to
housing
stability,
we
are
a
little
bit
concerned
that
adding
additional
barriers
to
accessing
of
this
housing.
G
It
hinders
the
goal
it
may
run
counter
to
the
intent
of
state
law,
which
kind
of
press
started.
This
whole
kind
of
conversation
with
the
luca
thus
far.
So
we
do
want
to
thank
you
for
your
ongoing
work
to
ensure
that
bellevue
can
provide
the
full
range
of
housing
options
to
residents
experiencing
homelessness
in
housing
stability,
and
we
are
definitely
looking
forward
to
partner
into
further
dialogue
on
how
an
effectively
structured
luca
can
improve
bellevue's,
comprehensive
approach
to
the
ongoing
housing
crisis
and
while
also
at
the
same
time,
reaching
compliance
with
state
law.
H
Good
evening,
council
members,
I
have
one
item
under
the
city
manager's
report
this
evening,
and
that
is
a
brief
report
from
the
bellevue
parks
department,
as
well
as
the
bellevue
downtown
association
about
the
upcoming
family.
Fourth
celebration
and
joining
us
this
evening
is
jared
gilmore,
who
is
a
supervisor
in
our
parks
and
community
services
department,
as
well
as
mike
aguilera,
vice
president
of
events
and
operations
from
the
bellevue
downtown
association.
With
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
them
for
a
brief
report.
I
Hi
sorry,
my
name
is
jarrah
gilmore
and
I
was
recently
hired
as
the
program
manager
for
the
northwest
arts
center
and
lead
planner
of
the
bellevue
fourth
of
july
event,
which
is
happening
in
just
13
days
and
myself
and
mike
here
are
here
to
invite
you
to
attend
this
event.
We're
very
excited
to
bring
it
back
in
its
full
fashion
this
year,
and
we
have
a
few
pictures
to
encourage
you
with
some
colorful
photos,
as
mike
here,
introduces
himself
and
explains
the
event
in
a
few
more
details.
J
J
J
We
turned
and
pivoted
and
made
a
fireworks
display
happen
late
in
the
game,
thanks
to
a
number
of
folks
jumping
in
very
quick.
We
were
basically
the
only
only
show
in
town,
so
we
had
large
crowds
capacity
issues
and
we
we
made
it
work
in
kudos
to
transportation
and
police
for
for
making
it
work.
We
think
it's
not
going
to
be
as
bad
this
year.
All
those
other
events
are
coming
back,
seafair,
everett
tacoma.
J
I
know
kirkland
and
google
are
doing
a
drone
show
this
year,
so
we're
going
to
keep
our
eyes
on
that
to
see
how
that
goes,
but
thanks
to
the
bellevue
collection,
again
for
being
a
host
for
the
fireworks
launch
zone
as
well
as
complementary
public
parking
at
all
of
their
properties.
We're
really
trying
to
message
out:
it's
not
just
bellevue
square,
if
you're
willing
to
walk
or
transport
yourself,
another
block
or
two
you're,
going
to
save
a
lot
of
time
upon
exit.
J
We
are
again
with
last
year
in
mind,
shifting
and
trying
to
allow
for
more
public
viewing
area.
So
we
are
down
sizing
our
main
stage
and
we're
going
to
put
a
entertainment
plaza
down
near
the
pond.
So
we're
going
to
open
up
that
whole
footprint,
the
family,
fun
zone,
that's
usually
been
in
the
southeast
corner,
has
been
shrunk
and
it's
going
to
be
more
on
the
east
corridor
there.
J
So
again,
more
public
viewing
spots
for
folks
to
to
to
settle
in
la
start
time,
for
the
event
is
5
p.m,
and
that
is
also
when
public
parking
is
available
at
the
bellevue
collection
properties.
We've
got
highland
middle
school
coming
in
with
their
choir
to
do
the
national
anthem
and
the
bellevue
youth
symphony.
Orchestra
is
back
for
live
performance
in
that
entertainment,
plaza
so
really
a
great
way
to
showcase
all
the
wonderful
things
going
on
in
the
community
and
look
forward
to
having
you
all
on
site.
So
thank
you.
A
K
That's
correct
mayor,
I'm
very
pleased
to
propose
the
appointment
at
erica
inomoto
to
the
arts
commission
she's
from
honolulu
she
has
been
was
in
seattle
and
been
in
bellevue
she's,
a
program
manager
with
microsoft.
K
She's
worked
for
several
renowned
arts
institutions,
both
in
hawaii
and
here
and
she's,
currently
serving
with
bam
as
own
member
and
she's
has
just
a
great
outlook
on
a
role
of
parks
and
community
service
and
and
culture
community
services,
as
well
in
the
city
and
she'll,
be
an
excellent
member
of
the
commission
really
pleased
to
have
have
her
to
recommend.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
welcome
erica.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent.
Calendar
move.
A
H
Absolutely
mayor
the
first
topic
on
your
agenda
this
evening
are
the
land
use
code,
amendments
to
the
to
establish
regulations
for
permanent
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
emergency
sheltering
required
as
a
result
of
the
amendments
in
state
law
which
occurred
back
in
2021
the
topic.
This
topic
was
last
in
front
of
council
at
your
may
23rd
study
session,
where
the
planning
commission
recommended
a
number
of
land
use
code.
H
Amendments
to
the
council
at
that
meeting
council
requested
additional
information
as
well
as
since
then
there's
been
a
number
of
amendments
that
have
come
forward
to
the
planning
commission
recommendation
tonight.
Staff
are
seeking
direction
on
a
landing
code
amendment
to
bring
forward
for
adoption
at
a
future
meeting
joining
us
this
evening
is
lested
interim
co-director
trisnatanus,
consulting
attorney
and
nick
whipple
code
and
policy
planning
manager
all
from
the
development
services
department.
With
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
you.
Liz.
L
Thank
you,
city
manager
and
good
evening
council
members,
amir
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
members,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
tonight
we're
looking
forward
to
being
back
from
our
previous
first
study
session
on
the
permanent
supportive
housing
amendments
and
emergency
code.
This
is
around
allowing
and
regulating
permanent
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing
and
non-transient
emergency
housing.
L
A
Okay,
so
it
shouldn't
take
long
what
let's
just
pause
for
a
minute
and
yeah
and
it's
up
for
the
community
so.
A
L
Are
we
ready,
yeah?
Okay,
thank
you
and
glad
you
can
all
see
our
presentation
now
that
will
make
it
just
a
little
bit
easier
in,
what's
already
a
tough
topic
so
moving
forward,
I
did
want
to
go
through
what
the
direction
is.
We
are
looking
for
direction
from
council
to
bring
the
luca
ordinance
back
for
final
action
at
a
future
meeting.
L
Staff
is
also
going
to
provide
responses
to
questions
that
were
asked
by
council
on
our
last
first
study
session,
which
was
may
23rd,
and
we
will
also
provide
more
info
about
the
outreach
and
engagement
that
has
occurred
on
this
topic
and
then,
lastly,
we'll
discuss
the
next
steps.
Moving
forward
to
process
this
luca
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
pass
this
over
to
tris
nutanis,
our
consulting
attorney,
who
will
go
through
the
rest
of
our
the
next
portion
of
the
slide
deck.
M
Great
thank
you
liz
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house,
council
members.
I
realize
that
this
is
somewhat
repeat
information.
What
we
did
want
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
information
about
the
genesis
of
the
luca
the
state
legislature
did
pass
house
bill
1220
and
it
added
an
rcw
rcw,
35a
21430,
which
requires
cities
to
allow
permanent,
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
residential
and
hotel
uses
are
allowed,
as
well
as
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelters,
where
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
are
allowed.
M
M
As
miss
ted
mentioned,
we
do
want
to
talk
about
the
policy
tools
that
are
available
to
council.
The
first
is
the
land
use
code.
This
is,
of
course,
the
subject
of
tonight's
meeting
and
we
are
looking
to
amend
this
land
use
code
to
establish
regulations,
board
of
housing,
transactional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter,
and
the
land
use
code
will
contain
the
regulations
for
these
uses,
as
well
as
the
requirements
for
citing
the
uses
and
the
development
standards
for
these
uses
for
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelters.
M
M
The
guide
would
also
provide
an
overview
of
city
resources
that
can
help
with
this
engagement,
and
these
practices
can
really
be
tailored
to
the
specific
project
that
is
being
contemplated.
The
third
policy
tool
is
council
decisions
relative
to
funding
agreements.
The
city
does
provide
funding
to
support
development
of
housing
in
these
agreements.
Council
can
decide
on
what
agreements
and
covenants
should
be
in
place
for
the,
including
income
restrictions,
submission
of
certain
documents,
such
as
budgets
and
schedules,
conditions
to
acquire
the
property,
as
well
as
to
repair
or
rehabilitate
that
property
and
other
items.
M
All
of
these
would,
of
course,
be
specific
to
the
project
that
is
being
funded,
so
all
three
of
these
policy
tools
may
be
considered
at
the
same
time
and
in
parallel,
so
I
know
there's
a
bit
of
some
nice
confusion
as
to
which
decisions
are
influencing
what
the
slide.
This
slide
shows
those
meetings
that
correspond
to
the
land
use
code,
amendment
that
is
being
processed
in
front
of
you
now
from
the
ioc.
M
The
first
ioc
adoption
on
july
12th
of
last
year,
the
public
hearing
on
august
2nd
and
then
the
planning
commission
processing
of
the
luca
which
started
at
the
first
meeting
on
september,
8th
until
april
27th
when
they
made
the
recommendation
decision
and
council
began.
Considering
this
luca,
of
course
on
may
23rd,
and
this
is
the
second
study
session.
M
M
It
says
january
24th,
but
it's
actually
november
22nd
staff
returned
and
recommended
that
any
on-site
services
requirements
be
part
of
funding
agreements
and
so
that
they
can
really
be
tailored
to
the
projects
at
hand,
and
the
city
should
work
on
neighborhood
outreach
and
engagement
as
a
best
practices
guide.
M
So
going
to
the
next
slide
slide
8
funding
agreement
context
in
the
funding
agreements.
Context
council
also
has
the
opportunity
to
make
policy
decisions
to
fund
projects,
and
these
are
some
examples
of
these
projects.
The
illahi
apartments,
plymouth,
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
the
cfh
eastgate
was
decided
on
on
july
12th
of
last
year
and
then
for
lifewire
and
hope
starts
here
or
hsh
projects
on
january
24th.
N
Great
thank
you
and
good
evening
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
council.
So,
as
tristan
mentioned,
the
land
use
code-
that's
before
you
this
evening
is
recommended
by
the
planning
commission
and
there
are
really
two
uses
that
are
addressed
through
this
luca
and
the
first
being
supportive
housing.
So
one
of
the
primary
organizers
of
the
the
uses
described
in
state
law
and
addressed
in
this
land
use
code.
Amendment
relate
to
the
duration
of
stay,
so
the
uses
where
the
length
of
stay
is
30
days
or
longer.
N
N
One
of
the
requirements
added
to
the
luca
related
to
supportive
housing
as
a
requirement
for
on-site
kitchens.
This
requirement
is
flexible
in
nature
and
that
it
does
allow
for
different
arrangements
to
occur,
whether
that
be
a
kitchen
in
the
unit
or
a
common
kitchen
in
the
building.
The
purpose
there,
of
course,
is
to
ensure
that
residents
do
have
access
to
a
meal
prep
area
or
are
able
to
have
meals
on
site
since
supportive
housing
is
housing,
and
there
are
also
two
design
controls
in
the
recommended.
Luca.
N
This
is
consistent
with
other
sections
of
our
code,
where
we
have
home
occupations,
for
example
in
neighborhoods,
just
to
avoid
redevelopment
of
a
single-family
home
in
a
way
that
would
put
like
a
major
lobby
or
something
you
know
in
the
front,
something
that
would
make
it
look
slightly
different
than
a
typical
single-family
residence
and
there's
also
a
requirement
in
the
single-family
land
use
district
that
on-site
services
are
provided
for
residents.
Only.
This
is
to
limit
the
activity
of
people
not
residing
in
the
area
coming
to
the
single-family
home
for
services.
N
N
So
the
registration
would
require
a
safety
and
security
plan,
a
code
of
conduct
and
a
standard
operating
procedure
plan.
There
is
also
a
mailed
notice.
That's
sent
within
a
500
foot
radius
of
that
supportive
housing
location
again.
This
registration
would
only
apply
to
those
locations
that
have
supportive
services
that
are
greater
than
25
of
the
floor
area
of
that
location
and
then
moving
on
to
the
next
slide
slide.
10
homeless
service
uses.
N
N
The
way
that
the
planning
commission
sorted
the
uses
again
was
by
the
length
of
stay,
and
so
where
the
length
of
stay
is
less
than
30
days.
They've
been
that
use
has
been
categorized
as
a
homeless
service
use.
So
of
the
the
uses
addressed
by
state
law,
the
draft
or
the
recommended
luca
has
categorized
transient.
Emergency
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelter
as
a
homeless,
service
use
and
homeless
service
uses
have
now.
N
The
definition
has
been
expanded
or
the
section
rather
has
been
expanded
to
include
transient
emergency
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelter
as
allowed
uses
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed,
and
but
there
is
no
change
to
the
the
permitting
process
or
the
path
to
allow
for
those
uses.
So
the
cop
or
conditional
use
permit
process
is
still
in
place,
as
well
as
the
requirements
in
land
use
code,
section
20.20.455,
which
relate
to
homeless
services
uses.
So
those
have
not
been
changed.
N
So
moving
on
to
slide
11,
so
to
respond
to
some
of
the
questions
that
we
had
heard
at
the
may,
23rd
city
council
study
session,
the
first
question
being
asking
why
a
conditional
use
permit
for
transient
emergency
housing
is
required.
So,
as
mentioned
just
in
that
last
slide.
Transient
emergency
housing
has
been
categorized
as
a
homeless
service
use
based
on
the
duration
of
stay
and
there
have
been
no
changes
to
the
homeless
service
use
requirements.
N
N
And
so
those
are
categorized
as
kind
of
the
least
intense
uses
and
then
homeless
service
uses
are
more
intense
and
those
have
the
full
conditional
use
permit
requirement
with
them
and
then
non-exempt
supportive
housing
are
those
projects
or
locations
that
do
provide
supportive
services
that
are
more
than
25
percent
of
the
floor
area.
And
so
a
registration
requirement
would
be
applicable
to
those
that
subset
of
supportive
housing
locations.
N
So
with
the
next
question
about,
can
a
lease
agreement
satisfy
the
code
of
conduct,
so
a
code
of
conduct
is
again
required
for
those
non-exempt
supportive
housing
locations.
We
did
have
a
chance.
Both
cfh
and
plymouth,
were
able
to
provide
some
draft
lease
agreements.
So
we
could
take
a
look
at
those
and
understand,
what's
typically
included
within
those.
N
There
was
also
dialogue
between
service
providers
and
supportive
housing
operators,
as
well
as
staff
and
human
services
that
are
familiar
with
these
housing
types.
So
we
did
discuss
the
land
use
code,
amendment
and
some
of
the
requirements
associated
with
that,
and
then
the
city
also
had
an
online
presence.
N
So
on
to
slide
15
the
luca
process
and
schedule,
so
this
was
the
process
that
was
taken
for
this
luca
leading
up
to
tonight,
which
is
council's
again
second
study
session
on
this
luca.
The
planning
commission
did
have
a
thoughtful
discussion
on
this
luca
over
five
study
sessions
and
a
public
hearing
as
well.
N
There
were
three
study
sessions
that
led
up
to
the
april
27th
public
hearing
or
I'm
sorry,
three
study
sessions
that
led
up
to
the
february
9th
public
hearing,
and
then
there
were
two
study
sessions
held
after
the
public
hearing
before
recommending
the
the
lucca
to
the
city
council
on
may,
23rd
may
23rd.
The
city
council
reviewed
the
planning
commission
recommendation
and
we
are
back
tonight
seeking
council
direction
and
then
just
as
a
reminder,
the
interim
official
control
is
set
to
expire
on
july
12th.
N
We
also
wanted
to
note
that
there
will
be
opportunity
for
future
policy
conversations
that
are
separate
from
this
luca
relating
to
supportive
housing
best
practices,
as
ms
tennis
mentioned,
that
work
is
wrapping
up
and
is
expected
to
be
headed
back
to
council
and
then
also
when
there
are
funding
agreements
for
individual
projects.
So
those
future
meeting
opportunities
are
for
further
conversations
to
inform
direction
for
best
practices,
as
well
as
opportunities
to
inform
funding
agreements
with
individual
projects.
N
So,
just
to
end
the
slide
or
the
presentation
with
the
direction
we
are
seeking
direction
tonight
for
council
to
direct
staff
to
bring
back
the
luca
ordinance
for
final
action
at
a
future
meeting
with
that,
we'll
turn
it
to
you.
Mayor.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
presentation,
so
I
think
we'll
start
off
by
making
a
motion
deputy
mayor.
If
you
could
do
that.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
will
open
the
floor
up
for
discussion
and
questions.
I
know
that
we
have
two
potential
amendments
here,
so
I'd
like
to
take
one
at
a
time
if
there
are
any
other
amendments,
we'll
we'll
entertain
those
as
well,
but
go
start
with
council
member
robertson
and
let
you
propose
you're
a
mentor.
You
want
me
to
walk
through
that.
Instead
of.
O
Asking
questions
right
now:
I'll,
walk
through
it
and
I'll
ask
questions
as
needed.
To
make
my
point,
I
guess
later
so,
okay,
so
I
know
that
you
have
some
pocket
slides,
which
I
just
saw
that
should
walk
the
council
through
the
differences
between
mine,
but
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
launch
in
you're
welcome
to
put
those
up.
We
have
them
here
on
our
on
our
pages.
O
So,
as
you
all
know,
we've
been
we've
been
at
this
topic
a
long
time
we
did
the
homeless
citing
luca.
We
are
now
doing
the
permanent
support
of
housing,
luca
and
the
esshb
1220,
which
does
require
all
cities
to
allow
these
kinds
of
uses
in
hotel,
motel
and
and
the
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
every
zone
where
residential
is
allowed
does
give
is
not
a
blanket.
O
O
Any
such
requirements
on
occupancy
spacing
and
intensity
of
use
may
not
prevent
the
sighting
of
a
sufficient
number
of
permanent
supportive
housing.
Transitional
housing,
indoor,
emergency
housing
or
indoor
emergency
shelters
necessary
to
accommodate
each
code.
City's
projected
need
for
such
housing
and
shelters
under
the
gma,
so
we
have
definitely
been
allowing
these.
I
think
that
it's
a
good
thing
to
be
complying
with
state
law,
but
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
be
thoughtful
about
using
the
authority
that
we're
given
under
state
law
to
make
sure
that
these
are
regulated
correctly.
O
So
to
that
end,
I
worked
with
staff.
I
really
liked
the
redmond
code
they're
ahead
of
us
in
the
schedule,
and
I
really
and
they're
an
east
side
city.
They
share
a
border
and
they
have
a
council
much
like
ours
and-
and
I
really
liked
their
code.
So
I
worked
with
staff
to
create
the
redlining
now
just
to
orient
you
to
attachment
g.
The
purple
red
lines
are
the
planning
commission
red
lines.
O
The
red
text
is
where
I
made
changes
so
walking
you
through
there's
six
kind
of
general
topical
changes.
The
first
is
to
make
the
single
family
uses
consistent
with
the
standards
for
adult
family
homes
in
bellevue
staff
initially
recommended
limiting
to.
I
think
eight
bedrooms
for
single-family
zones
and
planning
commission
took
that
out.
O
The
standards
for
adult
family
homes
in
bellevue
allows
eight
residents
plus
staff,
so
in
order
to
make
sure
that
this
is
right,
size
for
single-family
homes
without
telling
them
how
many
people
to
put
in
bedrooms,
I
thought
the
easiest
thing
to
do
in
bellevue
is
to
make
these
single-family
uses
consistent
with
adult
family
homes,
because
this
kind
of
is
like
that
supportive
housing
requires
requires
staff
and
services
in
order
to
keep
people
healthy,
housed
and
doing
well.
So
it's
very
much
like
an
adult
family
home.
So
that's
the
first
thematic
change.
O
Second,
with
regard
to
the
security
plan,
outreach
and
code
of
conduct
and
standard
operating
procedures,
these
were
already
required
by
the
planning
commission
draft.
What
this
does
is
this
provides
details
as
to
what
they
are.
So
if
you
look
at
the
look
at
the
draft
and
attachment
g,
it
specifically
will
say
security
plan,
but
then
it
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
detail
about
what
that
is,
or
code
of
conduct.
There's
no
real
standards
of
what
the
code
of
conduct
is
requires
standard
operating
procedures.
The
one
thing
that's
a
little
different
is
the
operating
agreement.
O
Again,
this
is
directly
and
all
these
details
are
directly
lifted
out
of
the
redmond
code.
So
why
remake
it
when
you
don't
have
to
so
that
just
kind
of
puts
meat
on
the
bone
and
gives
better
direction
for
what
those
are
and
what
they
mean?
O
I
removed
exceptions
from
general
performance
standards
like
density.
They
had
some
footnotes
in
the
land
use
tables
that
would
have
allowed
permanent
supportive
housing
to
be
denser
than
is
allowed
for
other
housing
in
the
underlying
zone.
I
thought
that
they
should
be
subject
to
the
same
general
standards,
so
I
we
took
those
footnotes
out
finally
for
zones
where
large
permanent,
supportive
housing
facilities
may
be
located.
It
limits
the
number
of
residents
to
100,
just
like
our
housing
uses
unless
additional
mitigation
is
provided,
and
this
again
is
straight
from
the
redmond
code.
O
So
these
standards
have
been
already
adopted
without
a
lot
of
issues
in
redmond.
I
think
they're
balanced
and
consistent
with
the
local
authority
granted
under
state
law
and
are
much
less
stringent
than
what
many
other
cities
have
been
drafting.
I
think
they're
going
to
make
this
allowing
permanent
support
of
housing
everywhere
is
kind
of
a
bit
of
an
experiment,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
make
the
experiment
more
successful
and
predictable,
and
not
just
for
the
neighbors
who
might
be
worried
about
these
going
in,
but
for
the
people
living
in
these
facilities.
O
We
heard
from
cfh
about
how
they
were
a
little
nervous
about
the
about
the
process
of
sighting
the
shelter
and
it
turned
out
really
well,
because
the
people
around
there
are
very
they've
gotten
volunteers.
People
are
accepting
they're
excited
about
it.
I
think
it's
going
to
work
work
much
better,
so
I
think
it's
going
to
create
better
connectivity
and
really
better
protection
for
the
residents
to
make
sure
that
they
have
support
services
on
site,
etc,
etc.
O
So
I
believe
that
the
draft,
as
amended
in
attachment
to
g,
does
strike
the
right
balance,
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
support
the
changes
as
the
best
balance
for
compromise
if
we
find
out
in
a
year
or
two's
time
that
these
these
standards
do
not
allow
what's
the
language
from
the
statute,
they
do
not
allow
sufficient
number
of
permanent
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
bellevue,
which
I
highly
doubt
we
can.
O
We
can
change
them,
but
in
the
meantime,
I
think
that
these
are
going
to
allow
way
more
than
we
will
ever
need
to
serve
the
people
who
need
these
services
who
live
or
are
connected
to
the
city
of
bellevue.
I
would
also
point
out
that
the
operating
agreement
does
prioritize
people
who
either
are
homeless
in
bellevue
or
who
have
ties
to
bellevue,
and
that's
something.
I've
heard
this
council
say
many
times
is
a
priority,
so
I
really
tried
to
create
a
compromise
that
I
thought
the
council
could
get
behind.
That
would
make
this
better.
O
Also
for
those
of
you
that
weren't
all
the
planning
commission
meetings-
and
I
was
only
at
the
once
since
january-
we
received
literally
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
pages
of
comments
from
the
public
either
objecting
to
this
all
together,
which
of
course,
is
something
we
cannot
do.
Nor
would
we
want
to
but
asking
for
more
more
standards
so
that
everyone
can
feel
really
good
about
these
types
of
facilities.
O
We
have
some
great
providers
who
may
go
through
all
these
processes
anyway,
whether
they're
in
the
code
or
not,
but
that
doesn't
mean
we're
not
going
to
have
a
provider
that
really
needs
the
standards
in
the
code
in
order
to
encourage
or
or
mandate
that
they
actually
do
provide
the
service
and
the
standards
that
are
best
for
the
residents,
both
in
the
facility
and
nearby.
So
I
also
think
I
would
just
add.
Finally,
the
operating
agreement,
I
think,
will
not
only
make
them
better
neighbors
and
better
providers
to
the
people
in
the
facilities.
O
I
think
they're
going
to
create
a
really
great
cooperation
and
collaboration
between
the
city
and
the
providers,
because
between
the
police
and
the
providers
between
the
city,
homeless,
outreach
department
and
the
providers,
so
I
think
it's
going
to
really
work
a
lot
better.
If
we
make
the
changes
that
are
in
attachment,
g
can.
A
You
propose
your
a
motion.
O
C
A
Okay,
so
now
I'm
going
to
open
the
floor
to
discussion
and
questions
about
this
particular
amendment
by
councilmember
robertson,
so
councilman
rezan,
you
want
to
start
us
off.
P
Sure
mayor,
I
wasn't
quite
prepared
to
be
the
first
one
to
comment,
but
I
can
what
I
was
trying
to
understand.
As
I
look
at
these
is
that
I
know
the
planning
commission
spent
a
lot
of
time
studying
and
looking
and
finding
a
balance
for
what
we
were
trying
to
do
and
getting
comments.
P
L
Thank
you
councilmember
when
we
think
about
it.
There
are
some
of
these
that,
certainly,
you
could
say
would
add
more
time
would
add
more
process.
So,
potentially
there
is
more
time
and
cost
to
the
process
such
as
a
conditional
use
permit
or
some
of
the
requirements.
There
also
would
be
some
impacts
to
city
staff.
Some
of
those
impacts
would
be
requirements
for
the
police
department
to
be
involved
in
health
and
our
human
services
group.
L
On
the
balance,
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
specific.
We
have
not
done
a
deep
dive
analysis
to
determine
how
it
would
truly
impact
the
provision
of
housing.
We
can
certainly
see
some
of
the
potential
cost
impacts
and
we
can
certainly
see
some
of
the
impacts
to
city
staff,
but
beyond
that
we
do
not
have
the
specifics.
That
would,
I
know,
be
helpful
for
your
analysis,
but
we
have
not
done
that
at
this
point.
P
And
then
my
my
other
question
is
we
spoke
back
in
november
about
looking
at
developing
this
best
practices
guide
that
you
mentioned.
Staff
are
currently
working
on
how
many
of
these
different
provisions
that
are
here
about
community
engagement
and
whatnot
is
actually
part
of
this
best
practices
guide
that
we
had
talked
about
developing.
L
L
Those
are
in
the
best
practices
guide
and
are
still
being
developed
and
we're
taking
these
conversations
into
account
as
well
as
we
work
toward
finalizing
that
they
do
have
the
ability
to
scale
those
with
the
best
practices
guide,
scale,
the
best
practice
to
the
type
of
project
and
the
size
and
intensity
that
we're
looking
at.
So
we
will
be
continuing
to
work
on
that
after
these
meetings,
as
they
inform
them.
P
I
wanted
to
understand
so
one
of
the
things
we
had
talked
about
is
putting
certain
things
in
the
funding
agreements
and
if
I
look
at
this
list,
they
look
very
familiar
to
me.
So
what
percentage
of
these
types
of
housing
do?
We
expect
not
to
have
any
funding
at
all
from
the
city,
so
they
would
not
be
part
of
the
they
would
not
have
a
funding
agreement
that
they
would
be
subject
to
for
funding
coming
from
the
city.
L
I
do
not
have
a
specific
sense
treasure
neck,
I'm
not
sure
if
you
have
any
of
that
research.
I
do
know
that
we
have
a
lot
of
the
larger
ones.
We
are
funding
partners,
as
evidenced
by
the
illahi
and
the
plymouth
projects,
but
I
do
not
have
a
percentage.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
I'm
going
to
apologize
in
advance,
my
laptop
is
kind
of
noisy
councilman
amazon.
Had
the
question
similar
questions
that
I
had
about
the
impact
I
just
was
curious
if
you
could
paint
a
picture
of
who
sorry
paint
a
picture
of
the
types
of
residents
that
were
we're
talking
about
here.
That
would
take
advantage
of
these
services.
L
It's
a
it's
a
really
varied
population.
You
have
some
people
who
may
be
coming
out
of
domestic
violence
situations
and
are
looking
for
a
safe
place
to
land
all
the
way
to
somebody
who
has
substance,
abuse
issues
and
is
in
recovery
and
is
working
on
that.
So
there's
such
a
wide
range.
You
know,
I
know
that
plymouth
housing
serves
a
certain
population
and
then
we
look
at
mary's
place
that
generally
serves
women
with
children
and
families.
So
we
do
have
a
quite
a
variety.
We
also
have
in
this
permanent
support
of
housing.
O
It
applies
to,
it
primarily
applies
to
the
over
it's
the
over
30
days.
I
don't
think
it
makes
any
change
to
the
ones
that
are
under
30
days
and
it
doesn't.
I
wanted
to
correct
something.
I
don't
think
it,
I'm
not
adding
a
cup
for
anything.
I
don't
believe
yeah,
because
I
said
that
it
was
it's
just
some
permanent
support,
housing,
transitional
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelter
more
than
30
days.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
don't
have
my
notes
now,
but
I
I
really
wanted
to
understand
sort
of
the
reason
I
asked
that
question
is
to
understand
the
impact
potential
impact,
but
I
know
we
don't
have
the
the
data
to
say,
but
we
do
have
the
experience
of
cfh
in
terms
of,
as
you
mentioned
the
additional
time
in
terms
of
process
and
cost.
L
I
can
speak
anecdotally,
as
I
was
involved
in
the
in
the
permitting
process.
The
homeless
services
permit
process
is
much
more
intensive.
I
believe,
than
what
councilman
robertson
is
is
suggesting
in
her
amendments,
but
in
that
case
there
is
a
conditional
use
permit
requirement,
and
there
is
also
a
requirement
for
a
good
neighbor
advisory
committee,
which
did
add
quite
a
bit
of
time
to
the
processing
of
that
permit.
L
L
So
some
of
those
costs
are
really
just
fact,
based
and
dependent
on
each
project
and
the
scale
of
the
project
itself,
so
it
would
be.
I
can't
really
assume
one
size
fits
all
that
those
are
some
of
the
areas.
The
other
area
that
is
impact
is
in
staff
city
staff
time.
I
know
our
time
in
terms
of
supporting
the
good
neighbor
committee
was
quite
extensive
and
we
did
have
a
lot
of
staff
time
from
many
different
departments,
including
fire
and
police
and
others
associated
with
that
project.
Q
Thank
you
and
the
reason
I
even
though
this
doesn't
add
a
cup
just
really
take
a
note
of
how,
when
we
add
sort
of
restrictions
that
can
impact
the
project,
and
just
if
I
remember
correctly,
the
like
the
code
of
conduct
and
security
plan
and
so
forth
might
already
be
covered
by
other
plans,
like
the
police
already
have
a
plan
for
how
they're
gonna
engage
and
the
leases,
as
you
mentioned
before,
I
think
I'll
end
there.
Anyone
that's
all
I
have
for
now.
Thank
you.
C
C
As
everyone
probably
saw,
we
heard
from
a
lot
of
residents
a
lot
of
community
leaders,
those
community
leaders
that
probably
represent
more
than
just
themselves
for
those
people
that
are
at
work
or
couldn't
get
to
a
computer
or
what
have
you
they
were
able
to
weigh
in,
and
I
think
that's
really
important
for
us
to
take
that
consideration
seriously.
So
you
know,
and
and
for
me
the
message
from
residents
was
very
clear
strike
a
balance.
C
You
know.
Yes,
we
we
want
to
have
common
sense
requirements
while
providing
a
path
to
permanent,
supportive
housing
for
bellevue
residents
that
may
be
experiencing
homelessness.
I
think
that's
an
important
distinction.
The
member
robertson
brought
up
it's
something
that
we
use
at
the
human
services
commission
when
we're
looking
at
the
human
services
fund.
Usually
the
first
question
is:
is
this
going
to
help
bellevue
residents,
so
I
think
there
should
be
certainly
leaning
towards
first
and
foremost
helping
those
that
are
experiencing
homelessness
from
bellevue.
C
Of
course,
there
are
others
and
we
should
help
them
as
well,
but
we
should
focus
on
that.
So
you
know
I
think,
for
me,
the
you
know
this
brings
up.
C
You
know
the
conversations
we
had
back
in
2017
and
2018
with
with
with
the
shelter,
but,
as
you
rightly
pointed
out
liz
you
know
this
is
nowhere
as
near
as
I
don't
think
as
challenging
some
of
these
requirements
as
the
the
shelter,
but
the
shelter
was,
you
know
a
unique
service
and
and
and
and
building
and
and
different
residents
that
would
be,
would
be
living
in
there
so
and
we
really
need
to
have
a
certain
level
of
accountability,
and
I
think
that
number
of
speakers
tonight
had
had
mentioned
that
and
that's
why.
C
I
really
think
we
need
to
have
some
real
teeth
to
this,
or
else
just
hoping
that
some
of
these
operators
and
providers
are
going
to
follow.
Our
requirements
may
not
happen
and
I'm
really
trying
to
be
thoughtful.
In
terms
of
being
proactive
and
not
thinking
about
the
providers
that
are
providing
amazing
services
in
our
city
right
today,
but
there's
you
know,
certainly
a
possibility
that
you
know
there's
other
providers
that
are
not
as
accountable
as
a
cfh
or
a
life
wire
or
a
sofia
way.
C
These
are
great
providers
and
we
are
so
lucky
to
have
them
in
our
in
our
community.
But
what
does
that
look
like
going
forward
with
without
those
providers
in
our
city?
So
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
you
know.
I've
been
thinking
about
and
and
also
just
about
how
important
it
is
to
go
through
that
process,
because,
as
the
mayor
thing
brought
up
last
time,
this
is
in
front
of
us.
You
know
we.
We
had
quite
a
few
residents
that
were
against
that
eastgate
campus.
C
Once
we
decided
to
include
them
once
we
heard
them
that
really
came
together
and
we
actually
had
residents
do
a
complete
180
in
terms
of
they
were
serving
on
cfh
board.
They
were
serving
on
staff.
They
were
volunteering
for
that
organization
because
they
were
heard
and
they
wanted
to
be
part
of
the
solution
and
they
want
people
to
feel
welcome
in
our
city.
They
just
wanted
their
considerations
and
concerns
to
be
taking
into
account,
which
we
did,
and
you
know
I.
C
I
think
that
that
is
now
going
to
be
a
successful
project
and
it's
because
we
stopped
and
listened
to
the
residents.
I
hope
all
of
my
colleagues
will
will
do
that,
but
I
certainly
support
councilman
robertson's
amendments
as
is,
and
would
like
to
see
that
be
put
into
the
code.
Thank
you.
R
Right
off
the
bat,
I
support
the
council
member
robertson's
proposed
amendments.
I
talked
to
her
extensively
and
I
also
have
heard
and
seen
a
lot
of
email
from
the
residents
we're
doing
this
to
serve.
We
heard
today,
you
know
in
the
public
speaking
we
primary
goal
is
to
serve
bellevue
and
its
residents
and,
of
course
you
know,
this
is
a
regional
problem
and
regional
issue
and
we
want
to
be
able
to
help
as
much
as
we
can.
But
it
really
depends
on.
R
You
know
our
scope,
our
ability
our
own
priority,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
things
on
our
table
on
our
plate.
So
we
need
to
take
care
of
ourselves
in
a
very
important
issue,
very
urgent,
because
it's
taking
care
of
bellevue's
residents
who
are
in
an
unfortunate
position,
as
I
mentioned
way
back
even
30
years
ago,
when
arch
is
taking
care
of
a
woman
that
times
situation
that
they
can
help
family
break
up
situations
that
they
have
families
to
take
care
of.
R
So
we
do
those
and
now
situation
obviously
change
and
have
and
have
increased
significantly,
and
we
realize
that
that's
why
we
are
coming
with
this
process
to
take
care
of
that,
and
I
think
it's
very
important
we
do
so,
and
you
know,
as
I
mentioned
my
deputy
mayor
mentioned,
you
know
we
have
done
a
good
job,
I
believe
in
the
homeless,
shelter
working
with
the
congregation
for
homeless
and
working
with
what
have
we
come
up
with
on
eastgate
and
the
public
were
very
much
concerned
about
it,
and
so
we
went
through
a
lot
of
due
diligence
and
we
didn't
take
the
shortcut
we
didn't
say
that
was
easier.
R
We
didn't
take
the
position
of
cost
less
money,
no
because
it's
important,
we
want
to
do
it
right
and
the
problem
we
have
in
the
region
is.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
working
on
this,
throwing
money
at
things
doing
it
haphazardly
and
it
ends
up
that
we
create
more
problem
than
we
actually
try
to
solve.
So
I
think
we've
done
a
good
job
and
I
believe
that
it's
important
that
we,
you
know,
agree
that
we
have
to
look
at
best
practices
and
we
still
have
some
more
to
come.
R
You
know
in
making
doing
outreach.
It's
important
and
outreach
means
that
letting
people
in
on
so
that
they
see
transparency.
Also,
it
means
that
the
providers
today
we've
got
providers,
good
providers,
homeless,
shelter
has
good
providers
and
we
have
worked
with
them
very
successfully,
but
we
don't
know
what
the
future
looks
like.
So
we
need
to
be
sure
that
we
have
safeguards
for
the
future.
R
So
I
believe
in
you
know,
in
funding
agreement,
that's
very
important,
because
that
provides
us,
the
flexibility
and
the
opportunity
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do,
you
know
it's
going
to
be
the
way
that
it's
appropriate
in
a
good
and
rightful
bellevue.
So
I
also
believe
in
that
cost
is
important.
I
appreciate
what
c,
which
cfh
mentioned
you
know.
If
we
go
through
a
process,
will
cost
more
money.
However,
it's
important.
We
want
to
make
sure
it's
right,
so
we
don't
want
to
do
it,
as
you
know,
for
experience
expediency.
R
Well,
let's
save
money,
so
let's
shortcut
show
change
something.
We
cannot
do
that.
The
most
important
piece
of
it
is
to
hear
from
the
public.
Now
we
heard
them,
we
make
sure
we
have
agreements,
we
have
good
providers,
but
two
years
five
years,
ten
years
from
now
you
know
we
don't
know.
So
we
need
to
have
a
opportunity
to
have.
You
know
fun
agreements,
it's
important
and,
as
you
mentioned,
we're
gonna
have
best
practices.
So
when
we
get
best
practices,
we
learn
more.
R
When
we
learn
more,
we
want
to
build
into
our
agreement
this
good
best
practices,
if
it's
appropriate
for
the
city
of
bellevue.
So
that's
important.
We
have
that
flexibility,
that
we
have
the
ability
to
make
sure
that
the
public
will
be
heard
and
they
are
being
heard
now
they
will
be
heard
in
the
future
and
we
make
sure
that
we
incorporate
what
is
right
for
bellevue
and
for
its
residents.
R
R
Apply
support
as
a
member
robertson's
amendment.
Thank
you.
K
E
K
K
We've
been
working
on
this
since
2017-18.
We
were
working
on
the
temporary
shelter
in
one
location
for
a
long
time
and
huge
battles
about
that
back
and
forth.
It
didn't
get
done,
it's
taken,
seven,
eight
nine
years
and
it's
still
not
completed
it's
going
forward
now,
and
the
thing
we've
learned
from
that
is
that
we've,
a
lot
of
people
have
gone
without
adequate
housing
in
that
time
period.
We
don't
have
the
time
to
come
back
and
when
you
take
the
proposal
or
as
presented
made,
it
sound
like
they're
just
a
few
tweaks
here.
K
These
things
do
it.
But
when
you
look
at
attachment
g
on
page
10,
I
mean
that's,
that's
that'll
take
a
lot
of
time
and
it's
very
detailed,
and
it
is
a
way
to
keep
to
confine
this
or
to
make
it
so
that
it's
impossible
to
do
this,
because
when
you
listen
to
some
to
a
lot
of
people
in
the
community-
and
you
know
everybody
has
their
opinion,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
have
weighed
in
who
are
very
supportive
of
this
proposal.
K
As
as
the
planning
commission
and
staff
have
have
presented,
we
talked
a
lot
about
cfh
and
sophia's
way.
Mary's
place
sofia's
way
in
and
mary's
place
are
actually
putting
this
in
place
now
and
this
they
did
work
with
the
community,
and
this
will
happen
with
the
proposal
as
as
from
the
commission.
K
K
I
looked
at
redmond's
and
redmond
is
way
behind
us
on
this
behind
us
a
lot
of
these
things
in
this
area,
and
I
just
it
just
as
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
a
lot
and
obviously
the
community
has
been
out
of
communications
to
say
that
we
need
to
now
start
having
a
lot
of
communication
with
the
community
is
just
a
repetitive
thing.
It's
a
thing
to
delay
and
to
undermine
our
effort
to
get
people
who
need
help.
K
Citizens
or
people
who
are
just
visiting
here
or
from
you
know,
from
redmond
or
kirkland
or
but
who
need
help
and
kim,
and
we
we
have
the
com
you're,
always
complaining
and
worried
about
homeless
people
being
out
there.
The
solution
is
not
to
put
them
in
jail
or
treat
them
like
they're,
not
worth
anything
it's
to
work
with
them
and
get
them
in
housing
and
now
not
five.
Ten
years
from
now,
which,
if
who
knows
what
will
happen
in
the
future,
we
put
this
in
place.
K
There'll
be
arguments
about
this
forever
and
I
think
we're
going
to
miss
a
grand
opportunity
to
really
do
something.
Great
and
frankly,
there's
a
lot
of
support
from
this
from
people
who
want
who
look
at
bellevue
and
want
to
make
bellevue
even
greater
than
it
is.
There
are
people
in
the
in
the
in
the
private
industry.
K
There
are
people
in
the
community
who
know
that
doing
this
right
and
getting
it
in
place
and
get
people
off
the
streets
get
people
give
them
help
is
what
we
need
to
deal
with
it
and
not
act
like
seattle
or
some
other
places,
and
the
other
factor
is
that
you
know
there's
some
talk
about
about
cfh
again,
and
there
were
some
comments
and
some
of
them
some
here,
acting
as
if
cha's
cfh
is
supporting
the
amendments.
K
David
dowling
wrote
us
a
letter.
I
talked
to
him
about
this
before
I'm
after
the
letter.
I'm
surprised
to
get
it,
but
because
another
former
council
member
wrote
a
letter
saying
that
he's
worked
with
dave
and
dave
is
all
supportive
for
this
and
acted
as
the
cfhs
and
he
said,
and
he
wrote,
and
he
said
I
do
not.
I
agree
with
it
with
the
with
the
planning
commission
and
with
the
staff's
recommendation.
K
K
I
think
we
have
something
we
that
is,
that
is
a
compromise
with
a
lot
of
people
and
all
of
a
sudden.
It's
this
idea
that
somewhere
or
other
and
some
of
the
council
members
are
saying.
Well,
you
know
it's
okay,
if
it
costs
us
a
lot
more
money.
If
it
takes
us
10
years
to
get
to
it,
that's
the
better
way
to
go.
No,
that's
not
right!
You
can't
just
that
is
not
the
bellevue
way.
K
Maybe
it
is
sometimes,
but
frankly,
we
have
a
very,
very
good
package
here.
We
have
an
understanding.
We
have
a
good
staff,
we
have
a
planning
commission,
we
have
individuals
in
the
community
plymouth.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
who
know
how
to
do
this.
There's
a
lot
of
detail
in
the
plan
already
that
that
holds
them
accountable.
K
This
is
just
to
me
playing
games
with
this
and
we're
playing
games
with
people's
lives
and
we're
not
playing
games
with
people's
lives
in
the
in
the
housing.
The
regular
you
know,
people
who
live
in
housing
now,
because
that
is
something
that
this
will
actually
have
a
very
positive
effect
on
of
helping
and
getting
people
off.
K
K
You
know,
let's,
let's
write
up
another
thing
with
this
and
the
other
thing
is,
I
just
don't
want
to
have
to
deal
with
the
state
when
the
state
comes
down
and
says:
well,
you
know
can't
you
read,
so
we
need
to
do
this
now.
There
is
plenty
of
everybody's
working
together.
Staff
is
on
top
of
this.
The
planning
commission,
council
members
can
work
on
this
people
in
the
community.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
in
the
community
again
mary's
place
sophie
away,
talent,
congregation
the
homeless,
the
other
providers.
K
You
know
there
are
three,
I
think,
two
or
three.
Actually
a
home
housing
like
this
already
existing
in
bellevue
has
for
some
time.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
Well,
I'm
going
to
say
that
I
really
appreciate
council
member
robertson's
work
on
this
and
the
points
that
you
bring
up
are
very
thoughtful
and
I
agree
that
a
lot
of
these
things
should
be
in
the
best
practices
guide
or
and
or
in
a
funding
agreement,
but
I
don't
believe
they
belong
in
a
land
use
code
amendment
and
I
too
respect
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
without
any
changes.
A
O
Right
right,
right
right
so
and
I
had
a
question
for
charmaine
and
I
emailed
that
she
didn't
see
it.
So
if
the
amendment
does
not
pass,
is
it
in
order
for
me
to
bring
separate
amendments
for
components
of
this
either
tonight
or
when
this
comes
back.
B
So
that
would
be
considered
a
reconsideration.
The
question
would
be:
is
this
final
direction
from
council.
B
O
O
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
yeah
and
then
I
had
a
question.
Actually
I
can
wait
till
we
take
a
vote
and
then
I'll
ask
the
question
about
the
planning
commission.
I
would
just
want
to
compare.
I
had
a
question
for
staff
about
comparing
the
two
on
one
point:
can
I
answer?
M
There
wouldn't
be
any
prohibition
in
the
land
use
code
for
that
use.
That
would
be
still
consistent,
assuming
that
they,
you
know
their
on-site
services,
for
instance,
aren't
being
used
by
outside
residents
and
such,
but
I
believe
there
would
be
consideration
for
building
codes
and
fire
codes
and
other
codes
right.
O
I
mean
you
can't
stack
people
like
cords
of
wood,
nor
would
you
ever
want
to,
but
if
the
house
is
big
enough
to
have
well,
we
don't
even
have
a
residential
occupancy
limit.
So
if
there
was
eight
bedrooms,
they
wanted
to
put
three
persons
per
bedroom
and
put
24
people
in
a
single
family
home
four
on
a
block.
They
could
do
that.
M
As
drafted,
it
is
consistent
with
it.
There
is
the
provision
that
nick
whipple
talked
about
too
in
terms
of
maintaining
the
residential
character
of
the
homes
so
assuming
they
they
do.
That.
O
That's
right!
Okay,
so
that
that's
just
an
example
of
why
we
need
spacing
occupancy,
particularly
in
the
single
family
zone.
So
I
see
how
the
vote's
going
to
go,
but
we
go
ahead
and
take
it.
I
will
be
bringing
back
targeted
amendments
to
discuss
issues
like
I
just
raised.
If
this
does
not
pass
tonight.
A
R
Very
much
I
heard
the
meta
mayor's
concern
about
not
wanting
to
delay
this
process
and
I
want
to
ask
the
staff:
what
kind
of
delay
will
we
have?
We
want
to
move
forward
fast.
If
we
approve
the
amendment,
I
mean
you
can
just
do
it
right,
so
I
just
want
to
know.
Maybe
there's
a
delay,
what
what
kind
of
delay
we're
looking
at
10
years
six
months,
one
month
I
don't
know
so
let's
have
some
real
information
and
okay.
So
that's
my
question
for
the
staff.
L
R
F
L
There
certainly
would
be
additional
time
involved
in
some
of
the
review
of
the
submittal
requirements
that
are
that
were
proposed
in
councilmember
robertson's
proposals,
but
without
a
actual
code
or
or
application,
it's
hard
to
determine
what
sort
of
timing
delay
that
could
you
know
evoke.
I
certainly
don't
think
it
would
be
10
years
so
yeah.
R
M
R
R
S
All
I
was
going
to
say
is,
I
think,
the
like
the
time
it
takes
us
to
look
at
it
may
depend
upon
the
scope
of
of
the
amendments
that
we're
asked
to
look
at.
So
you
know
if,
if
council
member
robertson
had
sounded
like
some
targeted
amendments,
that
would
certainly
shorten
the
time.
C
Yeah
in
some
ways
I
wish
you
know
we
were
to
have
some
additional
documents
ready
and
approved,
such
as
the
best
practices
guide.
Before
getting
to
this
point,
how
I
mean
that's
the
way
it
should
work,
I
think,
and
it
would
make
this
conversation
a
little
a
little
bit
easier
as
well.
You
know
and-
and
I
appreciate
council
member
stokes's
passion
for
for
this,
and
but
at
the
same
time
I
don't
think
you
know.
No
one
here
is
trying
to
delay.
C
No
one
here
wants
to
put
people
into
jail,
no
one's
playing
games.
We
all
care
about
those
that
are
unhoused
in
our
community.
I
want
to
make
that
very
clear,
including
councilman
robertson,
brought
this
forward
now.
I
want
to
bring
up
specifically
two
two
items,
but
one
has
most
of
my
interest
because
I
hear
all
the
time
living
in
east
bellevue,
okay,
living
in
lake
hills,
okay,
time
and
time
again,
and
it
may
not
be
always
accurate,
but
lake
hills,
east
gate,
factoria.
C
Not
that
bellevue
is,
you
know
greatly
affordable,
but
if
you
were
to
purchase
property
in
bellevue
most
likely,
where
would
you
go?
Eastgate
lake
hills,
factoria-
and
there
is
a
real
chance
here-
that
all
of
these
would
be
clustered
very
very
closely
together
right
beside
the
eastgate
campus
in
eastgate
as
well.
C
We
have
to
look
at
this
again
being
proactive
and
if
we
truly
are
a
united
city,
we
should
have
this
dispersed
across
the
city
and
not
clustered
in
one
area.
This
seems
like
very
common
sense
to
me.
Residents
already
feel
in
east
bellevue
that
they
are
the
dumping
ground
for
any
project
that
downtown
doesn't
want
or
another
ritzy
neighborhood
doesn't
want.
It
goes
to
east
bellevue.
I
don't
think
that's
always
the
case,
but
you
have
to
take
in
consideration
already.
C
Now
we're
going
to
start
adding
additional
homes
right
near
that
and
we've
got
the
eastgate
campus.
My
point
is:
is
that
that
could
cause
some
issues
at
some
time.
Potentially.
I
think
we
need
to
take
that
in
consideration.
So
I
really
do
appreciate
council
members
robertson,
one
amendment
she
does
bring
it
back
to
have
at
least
I
believe
it's
half
mile
separation
between
different-
and
I
think
it's
only
fair.
C
You
know
I
think
and
and
equitable,
and
I
think
all
residents
want
to
be
a
part
of
this
solution,
and
I
don't
think
one
community,
or
one
neighborhood,
I
should
say-
should
have
the
vast
majority
of
all
of
them
right
in
that
in
that
place
or
in
that
specific
neighborhood.
I
also
like
to
see
brought
back
as
a
separate
amendment.
The
bellevue
police
department
reviewed
the
the
safety
plan.
C
I
do
not
think
that
would
take
a
lot
of
time
and
I
think
that
would
help
ensure
for
residents
and
neighbors
that
all
precautions
are
being
thought
out
are
in
place.
I
think
that
would
give
a
lot
of
residents
just
some
sense
of
security
that
they
have
taken
a
look
at
it.
So
I'd
like
to
see
that
come
back
as
well.
But
again
I
appreciate
councilman
robertson,
bringing
this
forward.
P
Councilman
rezan,
yes,
thank
you
mayor.
You
know.
I
appreciate
listening
to
my
colleagues,
speak
about
this
topic
and
making
sure
we
get
this
right.
What
I
kept
thinking
about
is
the
speaker
that
came
as
part
of
the
east
side,
affordable
housing
coalition
and
so
here's
what
I
was
thinking
about.
If
there
was
a
cul-de-sac
that
had
a
home
for
lgbtq
youth
and
then
several
houses
down
there
was
one
for
veterans.
Would
we
say
that
that
was
unacceptable
and
I'm
also
thinking
about
as
we
look
at
broadly
housing?
P
Is
that
what
the
provision
was?
I'm
not
sure
that
that's
really
what
we're
trying
to
say
to
the
community
at
large
in
bellevue.
So
thank
you.
A
So
I'll
just
say
that
I
live
downtown
just
to
sympathize
with
you
and
I've
got
some
arch
units
in
our
building
and
we
have
section
8
senior
housing
around
the
corner
and
a
another
big
complex
down
the
street
and
the
beauty
of
it
is
that
they're
all
great
buildings,
they're,
all
well
maintained
and
the
people
are
part
of
you-
know
an
integral
and
important
part
of
the
community.
So
I
I
prefer
the
variety
that
we
have
and
I
think
it
is
really
all
over
our
city.
A
We
just
don't
know
it
because
they're
they
don't
stand
out
as
affordable.
Any
other
comments
or
questions
go
ahead.
Q
Q
And
then
my
my
only
concern
with
redmond
code
is
I
I
don't
know
that
it's
been
implemented.
So
we
don't
know
the
impact
of
those
changes
on
being
able
to
actually
carry
out
permanent,
supportive
housing
needs
or
address
the
permanent,
supportive
housing
needs.
Q
So
maybe,
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
understand
the
implications
of
those
decisions,
maybe
by
talking
to
the
if
we
haven't
already
providers-
and
I
and
I
still
am
interested-
and
I
think
council
members
on
brought
this
up
in
the
impact
to
the
actual
people
that
would
that
we're
trying
to
serve
with
these
changes.
A
A
Can
you
do
a
hand
if
you
said
I
raise
your
hand
for
what
for
support
for
I
for
the
amendment?
Okay,
three
and
raise
your
hand
if
you
said
nay,
okay,
so
three
to
four,
it
does
not
pass,
but
that
is
not
the
end
of
your
ideas
because
we'll
see
them
back
individually
and
look
forward
to
hearing
your
discussion
about,
but
also
the
staffs
discussion
with
it.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward.
A
A
Going
to
resume
our
discussion,
so
we
still
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
accept
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
and
I
believe
we
have
another
amendment
that
councilman
barksdale
would
like
to
make.
Q
All
right,
thank
you
mayor,
so
this
is
related
to
emergency
housing
and
specifically
the
idea
of
splitting
the
emergency
housing
into
transient
and
non-transient.
I
I'll
I'll
start
off
just
asking
a
couple
of
questions
of
staff.
If
I
might
or
may
is
that
okay,
or
should
I
just
when.
Q
So
a
move
that
we.
Q
Remove
the
distinction
between
transient
and
non-transient
emergency
housing,
which
would
move
it
out
of
the
homeless
services
uses
and
just
be
emergency
housing.
L
A
I
can
go
ahead
and
so
can
you
restate
your
motion.
Councilmember
barksdale.
Q
That
we
remove
the
distinction,
so
basically
keep
the
current,
which
is
it's
just
emergency
housing,
not
a
distinction
between
transient
and
non-transient
emergency
housing,
which
means
it
would
no
longer
be
in
the
home.
Transient.
Emergency
housing
would
not
exist
in
the
homeless.
Services
uses.
Q
So
the
main
the
main
ideas
here
is
a
the
the
need
for
the
cup,
but
also
because
emergency
housing,
as
I
understand
it,
and
staff,
please
clarify
if
I
get
this
wrong,
but
one
of
the
main
intentions
of
of
it
is
to
provide
housing
for
people
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness
or
people
who
are
immediately.
Q
Who
who
just
experienced
homelessness
and
one
of
the
things
that
we've
talked
about,
is
homelessness
prevention
and
rapid,
rehousing,
and
I
think,
there's
again
just
talking
about
the
barriers
and
the
impact
of
putting
those
barriers
in
place.
We've
heard
about
the
impact
of
the
cup
on
cfh.
Q
We've
also
talked
about
the
impact
of
cu
having
a
cup
on
private
development
when
we
talked
about
east
maine,
and
so
I
think
it's
going
to
make
it
more
difficult
for
us
to
build
the
housing
that
we
need.
That
would
support
even
the
goals
of
rapid,
rehousing
or
homelessness
prevention.
Q
L
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
there
is
not
that
distinction.
I
did
ask
staff
earlier
today.
If
there
was,
we
do
not
know
of
any
at
this
time.
We've
not
done
a
a
holistic
review,
so,
but
nothing
that
I'm
aware
of
at
this
time.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
second
councilmember
stokes.
Let's
start
with
you
any
comments
or
questions
on
this
amendment
that
council
member
barksdale
just
made.
R
R
L
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
start
in,
and
I
would
welcome
any
auditions
from
my
colleagues
the
shelter
the
emergency
shelter
is
generally
relegated
to
stays
that
are
approximately
one
day
24
hours
in
length,
so
it
may
be
that
somebody
comes
back
to
the
shelter
so
think
of
the
eastside
men's
shelter
that
we
just
permitted
for
congregation
for
the
homeless.
L
The
people
may
come
in,
they
may
stay
for
the
night.
They
may
stay
for
a
portion
of
the
morning
and
then
they
leave
they
may
or
may
not
come
back
that
night,
there's
no
real
permanence
to
that
relationship.
It
is
very
transient
in
nature
the
as
the
code
is
written
now,
the
transient
emergency
housing
is
for
those
people
that
are
going
to
stay
in
locations
less
than
30
days.
So
somewhere
between
24
hours
and
30
days.
It's
still
not
a
permanent
lease
arrangement.
L
You
may
come
in.
You
need
a
maybe
you've
lost
your
home
for
some
reason
and
you
need
a
couple
of
weeks
bridge
between
your
home
and
your
next
location.
So
it's
a
short-term
stay.
It's
not
meant
to
be
anything
longer
than
30
days
after
30
days.
We
start
to
call
that
in
this
in
the
code
the
planning
commission
proposed.
We
would
call
that
transient
housing,
so
the
I'm
sorry,
not
transient
housing.
We
would
call
it
emergency
housing.
Transient
is
the
24
hours
to
30
days.
A
M
Yeah,
so
there
are
really
four
housing
types
that
we're
talking
about
here
right
so
forth.
We
have
supportive
housing,
permanent,
supportive
housing.
We
have
transitional
housing,
we
have
emergency
housing
and
we
have
indoor
emergency
shelter
for
the
emergency
housing
that
council
member
barksdale
is
proposing.
We
have
actually
separated
those
out
between
transient,
so
less
than
30
days
and
non-transient
30
days
or
more
the
transient
one.
M
R
R
Do
you
have
something
that
you
can
damage
show
that
it's
working
somewhere?
So
I
think
staff
has
had
time.
I
have
an
understanding
or
we
can
wait
until
we
have
more
conversation
on
this.
Otherwise
I
would
not
be
able
to
say
hey
or
nay,
I
mean
you
have
problem
figuring
it
out.
I
have
a
problem.
I
think
the
public
would
have
problems,
so
I
would
like
to
be
more.
You
know,
diligent,
to
understand
what
it
means
an
impact.
It
is
so
I
I
came.
M
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
just
want
to
mention
that
the
planning
commission
did
get
this
suggestion
from
some
of
the
public
commenters
to
include
emergency
housing
as
its
own
kind
of
category.
Without
splitting
them
up,
they
did
consider
that
we
had
at
the
time
we
explained
that
this.
The
way
we
split
them
up
is
because
we
have
that
in
our
land
use
code
framework
for
other
residential
uses.
A
Okay,
deputy
mayor
those.
N
C
Okay,
thank
you.
It's
it's
an
interesting
idea
like
council
member
lee,
you
know
I
would
I
would
need
to
to
to
know
more.
I
need
to
know
the
the
the
the
impact,
what
that
means
for
the
overall
code
impact
to
residents
and
and
and
and
the
neighborhood
so
for
for.
For
me
I
would
say
no
at
this
point,
but
I
would
welcome
council
member
barksdale
to
bring
it
back
as
a
separate
amendment,
along
with
councilmember
robertson,
for
consideration
at
that
time.
P
So
what
I
was
trying
to
understand
is:
if
we
were
to
pursue
this,
then
it
would
have
the
the
process
about
registration
and
public
notice.
That
is
part
of
the
supportive
housing.
Is
that
right.
L
P
Okay,
and
do
we
have
a
sense
for
what
the
likely
requests
are
for
emergency
housing
between
transient
and
non-transient.
So
I
guess
again,
kind
of
understanding
the
impact
and.
P
And
and
then
I
guess
my
last
question
is
if
it
was
left
the
way
it's
currently
written,
a
cup
requirement
means
that
you
go
through
the
process
and
you
will
be
approved
or
you
go
through
the
process
and
you
may
be
rejected.
What
does
that
mean.
L
In
any
conditional
use
permit,
there
is
some,
you
know
some
possibility
that
the
permit
would
be
denied
it
is
made.
A
recommendation
is
made
by
the
director
of
development
services
to
the
hearing
examiner,
who
would
then
make
that
decision
on
the
conditional
use
permit.
So
there
would
always
be
some
risk
in
any
conditional
use.
Permit.
Okay,.
L
It
would
require
it
does
require
a
lot
of
process,
so
certainly
that
can
be
seen
as
a
barrier,
but
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
process
associated
with
the
homeless
services
use
path.
L
As
the
planning
commission
defined
it
because
of
its
transit
transitory
nature,
they
did
actually
look
at
it
as
a
homeless
service
use
versus
the
permanent
supportive
housing
classification,
which
they
did
look
at
more
as
housing.
So
in
the
current
draft
it
is,
it
is
a
separate
separated
out
when
it
is
the
transient
nature.
O
So
yeah,
I
was
just
looking
at
the
definition
and
it's
really
hard
for
me
to
that's
why
I
always
draft
my
things
up
and
print
them
in
the
packets,
so
that
people
can
have
a
fair
chance
to
actually
understand
the
amendments.
So
I'm
not
really
understanding
the
impacts
of
this,
and
I
would
have
to
see
it
in
the
context
of
the
code
to
understand
it.
That
said,
I
was
looking
at
the
bell
view
code
on
homeless
services
and
it
defines
an
overnight
shelter
as
a
facility.
O
That's
constructed
for
the
primary
purpose
of
providing
shelter
for
people
experiencing
homelessness
in
general
or
for
specific
populations
of
people
experiencing
homelessness.
Support
services
may
or
may
not
be
provided.
How
is
that
different
than
the
definition
for
transient
emergency
housing
is
that
in
the
code.
O
For
individuals
or
families
who
are
homeless
or
at
imminent
risk
of
becoming
homeless,
that
is
intended
to
address
the
basic.
That's
the
definition
right
out
of
the
rcw.
I
recognize
that
it
it
so
it's
a
slight
difference,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
it's
much
of
a
difference.
So
not
understanding
this
and
thinking
that.
O
Thinking
how
the
planning
commission
had
the
chance
they
chewed
on
this
issue
a
lot
and
they
ultimately
came
down
to
siding
with
staff
on
considering
the
transient
emergency
housing
really
akin
to
a
homeless
use
and
when
the
planning,
commission
and
the
staff
are
in
agreement
on
something
like
that
and
they've
chewed
on
it.
A
lot
and
really
the
only
folks
advocating
for
something
different
are
the
people
who
are
the
providers
and
not
necessarily
the
clients
or
the
neighborhoods
or
anything
else.
O
A
You
know
a
shelter
is
not
an
ideal
situation
and
it
it's
better
than
sleeping
outside
in
the
rain,
and
you
have
opportunities
for
services.
But
it's
not
your
own
room.
It's
not
your
own
place,
you
don't
have
a
door
and
you
really
have
to
get
along
with
all
the
people
there
with
you,
and
you
know,
everybody
in
this
room
has
trouble
getting
along
with
certain
people
and
it's
just
not
you
know
it's
it's
it's
group
housing
and
it's
tough.
A
So
I'm
inclined
to
say
no
to
this
amendment
myself,
but
I
really
do
want
to
support
the
people
who
are
outside
getting
into
stable
housing.
As
best
we
can,
I
think,
that's
more
through
more
supportive
housing,
but
it
would
be
great
to
see
pros
and
cons
on
this.
It
would
be
great
to
see
the
answers
to
the
questions.
A
Q
P
I
I'm
just
wondering
when
you
bring
it
back
whether
there
is
a
gradation
of
of
requirement.
Is
there
something
else
other
than
a
cup
that
for
this
type
of
emergency
housing
transient?
A
I
think
we
can
vote
on
that
direction
and
with
knowing
that
we
will
have
a
long
discussion
during
that
decision-making
process
to
consider
councilmember
robertson's
new,
singular
amendments
and
councilmember
barksdale's
amendment.
A
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
call
for
the
vote,
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed.
K
A
A
H
Thank
you,
mayor
council
members,
the
the
second
and
last
topic
on
your
study
sessions
agenda
this
evening
is
the
proposed
land
use
code,
amendment
to
remove
references
to
the
east
bellevue
community
council
from
the
land
use
code
and
to
provide
regulatory
citywide
by
adopting
previously
disapproved
ordinances
within
the
east,
bellevue
community
council
jurisdiction
area
and
just
by
way
of
background,
this
proposed
land
use
code.
Amendment
responds
to
recently
enacted
state
legislation,
sunsetting
the
east
bellevue
community
council
and
other
community
councils
in
the
state
of
washington
by
way
of
house
bill
1769.
H
So
tonight,
staff
is
seeking
direction
to
enter
a
finding
of
necessity
for
council
to
process
this
digest
code
amendment
and
to
direct
staff
to
schedule.
The
public
hearing
so
joining
us
this
evening
are
is
liz
there
too.
Oh
okay,
I
guess
it's
not
it's!
It's!
It's
tris
natanna's
consulting
attorney
as
well
as
nick
whipple
on
code
and
policy
planning
manager
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
for
presentation.
M
M
Thank
you
for
having
us
here
to
introduce
and
present
this
east
bellevue
community
council,
ebcc
sunset
land
use,
code,
amendment
or
luca
sorry
getting
distracted.
M
Okay
for
our
agenda
on
this
item,
we'll
start
by
providing
some
background
information,
including
an
explanation
of
this.
The
state
regs
that
we're
responding
to.
We
will
go
through
the
objectives
of
this
leukaem
and
then
explain
the
components
of
the
luca
we'll,
also
describe
the
required
process
and
our
plan
for
next
steps,
and
then
we'll
recap
the
direction
that
we're
looking
for.
M
Its
creation
was
the
condition
of
the
area's
annexation
into
bellevue
into
the
city.
The
ebcc
is
one
of
two
remaining
community
councils
in
the
state
and
the
other
one
is
houghton
in
kirkland,
so
the
abcc
is
made
up
of
five
residents
of
the
east
bellevue
area,
it's
empowered
by
the
community
municipal
corporation
statute
or
chat
chapter
3514
of
the
rcw.
M
The
ebcc
has
approval
and
disapproval
authority
over
certain
land
use
actions
within
the
area,
and
it
also
may
act
in
an
advisory
capacity
on
other
land
use
issues
that
directly
or
indirectly
affect
this
jurisdictional
area
so
slide.
Five.
In
this
past
legislative
session,
the
state
legislature
passed
and
the
governor
signed
the
law
house
bill
1769.
M
It
amended
that
community
municipal
corporation
statute
to
sunset
community
councils
in
the
state
this
sunset
will
occur
on
july,
8th,
at
which
point
the
community
councils,
including
the
abcc,
will
no
longer
exist
currently
because
the
ebcc's
authority
to
approve
or
disapprove
zoning
ordinances
and
other
land
use
controls
over
the
past
five
decades
or
so.
There
are
inconsistencies
in
regulations
that
apply
to
the
evcc
area
versus
those
that
apply
citywide.
M
This
means
that
the
land
use
code
has
regulations
that
apply
only
to
the
abcc
area
and
there
are
regulations
that
apply
citywide
that
don't
apply
to
the
abcc
area.
With
the
sunset
of
the
ebcc
upcoming.
This
luca
is
proposed
to
apply
consistent
regulations
throughout
to
achieve
clarity,
predictability
and
equity
citywide.
M
We
are
asking
council
to
retain
processing
of
this
luca
through
finding
of
necessity
and
because
council
has
already
made
policy
decisions
for
all
of
the
components
that
we
are
going
to
go
through
here
in
this
luca.
N
The
allowance
for
different
bonuses
related
to
height
in
those
land
use
districts,
so
that
would
now
be
available
in
the
ebcc.
However,
this
change
would
not
have
an
effect,
as
there
are
no
light
industry
districts
in
the
east,
bellevue
community
council
for
homeless
service
uses.
This
use
is
regulated
in
the
ebcc
as
transient
lodging.
So
this
change
would
extend
the
city's
homeless
service,
uses,
process
and
requirements
to
the
ebcc,
and
then
there
are
a
number
of
review
procedures
that
would
be
changed
by
this
land
use
code
amendment.
N
So
the
ebcc
has
review
approval
or
notification
process
steps
for
the
different
permits
that
are
listed
here
so
conditional
use
permits
preliminary
plats
final
plats,
planned
unit
developments
or
puds
and
home
occupation
permits.
So
the
amendment
would
remove
the
ebcc's
role
in
those
permit
processes
and
the
city-wide
review
and
appeal
procedures
for
those
application.
Types
would
then
apply
within
that
jurisdictional
boundary
and
moving
on
to
our
some
substantive
amendments.
So
in
the
land
use
code
there
is
a
allowance
for
r
7.5
within
our
single
family
land
use
districts
in
the
east
bellevue
community
council.
N
That
district
does
not
exist
or
it's
not
acknowledged.
So
a
rezone
to
r
7.5
would
not
be
possible.
So
this
room.
This
amendment
would
allow
for
the
r
7.5
to
become
available
in
the
east
bellevue
community
council.
However,
there
would
be
no
immediate
effect.
It
would
just
provide
an
opportunity
for
someone
to
petition
for
that
rezone
at
a
future
time
and
then
for
the
land
use
tables.
N
There
are
a
a
number
of
specific
provisions
that
apply
within
the
ebcc
as
it
relates
to
the
list
here,
and
so
those
would
now
be
more
consistent
with
the
the
city
allowance
for
those
and
then
for
residential
minimum
parking.
This
is
something
the
council
recently
had
provided
a
decision
on
and
in
the
east
bellevue
community
council,
the
the
radius
where
you
could
take
advantage
of
reduced
minimum
parking
was
set
at
one
half
mile,
whereas
a
city-wide
it
was
set
at
or
excuse
me,
the
reverse
there
so
city-wide.
N
The
allowance
is
one-half
mile
radius
from
a
frequent
transit
area.
You
could
take
advantage
of
reduced
parking,
however,
within
the
east
bellevue
community
council
that
was
set
at
one
quarter
mile.
So
this
amendment
would
change
that
to
a
half
mile,
consistent
with
the
city-wide
requirement
and
then
for
regulations
for
trailers,
boats
and
large
recreational
vehicles.
N
There
are
a
different
set
of
rules
that
apply
within
the
east
belvedere
community
council,
as
it
relates
to
this
use,
and
the
screening
requirements
and
parking
requirements,
for
example,
are
different
than
those
that
apply
city-wide.
So
this
luca
would
make
those
requirements
consistent,
city-wide,
citywide.
N
The
other
difference
is
the
use
of
rvs,
so
within
the
ebcc
through
a
temporary
use,
permit
rvs
may
be
permitted
on
private
property
as
a
temporary
dwelling
for
up
to
one
year,
whereas
city
regulations
limit
the
use
of
an
rv
as
a
dwelling
through
a
temporary
use
permit
up
to
30
days,
so
there
would
be
a
difference
there.
This
change
does
not
apply,
however,
to
temporary
use
permits
that
have
been
issued
prior
to
the
effective
date
of
this.
N
So
for
the
review
process,
this
is
a
process
for
city
council,
legislative
action,
so
the
process
for
requirements
apply
which
include
the
notice
of
application,
as
well
as
the
notice
of
public
hearing
tonight
is
the
the
first
study
session
for
this
land
use
code.
Amendment
the
east,
bellevue
community
council,
sunset
date,
as
mentioned
earlier,
is
on
july
8th.
N
There
would
be
a
public
hearing,
if
directed
by
council
soon
after
that,
sometime
in
july,
with
adoption
or
action
that
can
be
taken
the
same
night
or
we
can
reserve
a
separate
night
to
take
final
action
and
so
for
next
steps.
The
luca
application
was
noticed
in
the
weekly
permit
bulletin
on
june
9th
we
will
be
launching
a
project
web
page
as
well,
which
will
include
the
strike
draft.
N
So
with
that,
we
are
seeking
direction
again
for
for
council
to
direct
staff
to
enter
or
sorry
for
council
to
enter
finding
a
necessity
to
process
this
luca
and
then
direct
scaf
staff
to
schedule
the
public
hearing
with
that,
we'll
turn
it
back
to
you,
mayor,
okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
put
the
motion
on
the
table.
C
C
All
the
council
members
for
all
their
in
some
cases,
many
many
years
of
service
to
to
the
ebcc,
and
even
I
believe,
chejo
lei
has
a
distinction
of
probably
serving
the
shortest
term
of
six
months,
but
all
of
you,
betsy
hummer,
is
in
the
audience
tonight.
C
He
probably
had
every
hat
on
as
as
as
a
council
member,
but
as
well
as
hassan
den
ajaya
ron,
epstein
and
steve
kasner
all
gave
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
and
commitment
to
to
that
community
council,
and
I
think
it's
important
to
to
recognize
that,
even
though
it
is
being
dissolved,
everybody's
invited
to
the
very
last
ebcc
meeting
on
thursday,
the
23rd
here
at
city
hall,
if
you
would
like
to
attend
and
thank
the
council
members
for
their
service
in
regards
to
this
motion,
pretty
straight
forward
from
from
my
perspective,
you
know,
I
think
it's
prudent
to
get
consistent
with
the
definitions
with
with
the
code
to
align
this
with
the
rest
of
the
city.
C
So
I
am
at
this
point
happy
to
to
move
this
forward.
Thank
you.
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions
go
ahead,
councilmember
robertson,
so.
O
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
and
I
wanted
to
make
a
couple
of
general
comments
about
the
ebcc,
which
I
can
wait
till
left
the
vote.
Whatever
your
pleasure
mayor,
but
questions
are
yes,
I
support
moving
this
forward,
but
the
two
questions
on
the
process.
First,
if
the
council
wants
to-
because
this
seems
like
a
rather
it's
just
a
kind
of
a
technical
amendment
to
make
us
one
city
again,
could
we
take
action
and
would
staff
tee
it
up
to
take
action
after
the
public
hearing?
O
Second
on
the
r7.
Thank
you.
I'd
appreciate
that
on
the
r
7.5
on
the
rezone,
should
that
be
something
that
the
planning
commission
considers
doing
to
make
the
city
more
uniform
as
part
of
the
major
comp
plan
update.
M
Yes,
the
r
7.5
is
just
not
available
in
the
ebcc
there's
an
asterisk
on
that
land
use
designation
to
say
that
it's
not
effective
within
the
abc
ebcc
area.
So
someone,
let's
say
that
they
wanted
to
rezone
their
property
to
that
land
use
district.
They
could
not
right
now,
so
this
luca
would
make
that
designation
available.
O
If
the
council
passes
the
proposed
ordinance
that
we
hold
a
public
hearing
on,
could
then
counsel
direct
planning
commission
to
take
up
the
consideration
on
whether
certain
parcels
or
areas
within
the
evcc
area
should
have
a
comp
plan
designation.
That
would
allow
7.5,
that's
something
that
could
happen
as
part
of
the
major
compound
update.
M
I
believe
so,
potentially
I
think
community
development
staff
would
probably
be
better
suited
to
answer
that
question
for
you,
because
yeah.
O
The
night
of
the
public
hearing,
or
yes,
of
course
or
after,
if
this
goes
beyond
that,
all
right
and
mayor,
do
you
should
I
make
my
comments
now?
O
I
just
I
wanted
to
join
my
voice
to
david
mayor
newman
houses
abcc's
been
around
a
long
time,
I'm
slightly
older
than
it
just
a
little.
So
I
think
we
know
it's
been
there
for
a
while,
and
you
know
it's
funny,
because
before
I
long
before
I
lived
in
bellevue
or
was
a
planning
commissioner
or
council
member,
I
was
an
attorney
who
represented
ebcc
for
a
time
in
the
1990s
yeah
and
the
other
community
council.
O
We,
I
think
we
had
all
three
of
the
active
ones
at
the
time
in
my
law
firm
in
the
90s,
and
so
I
knew
a
lot
of
the
old
guard
from
the
ebcc
ken
seal
and
I'm
blanking
on
his
name,
but
some
of
the
guys
that
have
been
around
for
a
long
time
and
they
were
just
class
acts.
So
it's
it's!
It's
been,
the
ebcc
has
been
around.
O
You
know.
53
years,
they've
been
a
part
of
the
community
and
part
of
the
conversation
for
a
long
time,
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
leaders
that
have
served
on
the
east,
bellevue
community
council
and
to
a
person.
Every
single
ebcc
council
member,
I've
ever
known,
were
active,
engaged
champions
of
their
neighborhood
to
a
person
and
although
it's
time
to
sunset,
the
community
council,
I
don't-
and
I
agree
that
it's
time
to
sense
that
make
us
one
one
city.
O
I
don't
want
to
dismiss
the
historical
importance
of
the
ebcc
as
liaisons
and
advocates
for
neighborhoods
in
bellevue
and
betsy
hummer,
former
two-term,
chair
of
the
ebc
season.
In
the
audience.
O
I
also
wanted
to
give
a
nod
to
you
betsy,
because
when
you
came
on
as
chair,
you
worked
really
really
hard
to
try
to
get
ebcc
working
better
and
having
better
relations
with
the
city,
making
them
more
connected
to
the
commissions
to
the
council
to
the
staff,
and
I
think
that
that
was
really
a
positive
direction.
And
I
have
no
doubt
that
you
and
all
the
colleagues
that
you
have
on
the
evcc
are
going
to
continue
to
be
engaged
and
strong
advocates.
O
For
neighborhoods,
your
neighborhood
and
all
neighborhoods
in
bellevue,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you,
I
want
to
thank
your
colleagues.
Please
share
with
your
colleagues
the
gratitude
that
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
I
and
I'm
sure
the
rest
of
the
council
share
for
your
longtime
service
and
commitment
to
the
people
of
bellevue.
Thanks.
A
I'm
going
to
speak
and
then
I'll
have
council,
member
lee
speak
and
then
council,
member
stokes.
Yes,
I
too
want
to
thank
you
very
much,
betsy
you're
here
and
your
fellow
east
w
community
council
people
for
all
your
dedication
to
your
community
and
your
work
with
the
city.
A
I
cut
my
teeth
on
the
lake
hills
issues
with
the
boarding
houses,
as
I
was
getting
on
the
council,
and
I
really
appreciated
working
with
the
community
and
the
city
council
to
make
sure
that
you,
your
needs
were
heard
and
there
was
a
response,
although
we
had
to
reverse
it.
But
you
know
that
was
a
great
process
to
learn
on
and
I
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
same
avenue
is
there.
You
have
council
members
here
who
will
listen
to
your
community.
A
You
have
a
loud
voice
and
I
encourage
you
to
keep
talking
and
and
keep
communicating
with
us.
So
thank
you
for
everything
that
you've
done
and
I
I
will
be
supporting
this
motion
council
member
lee,
followed
by
councilmember
stokes.
Thank.
R
You
very
much
I
want
to
join
my
fellow
council
members
to
thank
the
all
the
members
of
the
beloved
community
council
over
all
the
years
since
1969.
That's
a
long
time
ago.
That's
one
year
after
I
moved
to
bellevue.
So
it's
long
enough
and
they
have
always
been
really
truly
representing
the
neighborhoods
and
the
people
who
are
on
that.
You
know,
council
are
always
definitely
dedicated,
I
mean
they
spend
their
time
and
they
are
at
council
meetings
the
community
meetings.
It's
not
just
a
few
people
get
together
just
plot
against
somebody
else.
R
They
really
have
the
interest
you
know
of
this
of
the
east
bellevue.
You
know
lake
hills,
especially
actually
it
was
one
of
the
oldest
community
right.
Most
homes
are
started
developing
in
that
area
and
in
fact,
indeed,
they
represent
not
just
the
lake
hills,
but
they
have
the
overall
interest
of
the
city
in
mind
as
well,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
the
way
it
has
happened
that
they
represented
at
the
that
time.
The
best
interests
you
know
of
the
city
as
a
whole
city
has
changed.
R
City
has
grown
so
has
lake
hills,
so
the
people
have,
but
it's
always
maintained
that
the
commitment,
neighborhood
grassroot
interest
and
we
hear
a
lot
of
things
happening
there.
We
have
used
to
be
boys
and
girls
club.
We
have
the
samantha
club,
we
have.
You
know
a
lot
of
things
going
on
and
so
they've
gone
through
many
different
challenges
and
everywhere
everywhere
in
the
city
that
something
happens.
That
has
not
happened
before.
R
Like
you
know,
eastbound
community
council
lake
hills
area
gets
it
first,
you
know,
so
I
think
it's
really
important
and
we
see
development
going
on.
You
know
the
first
one.
Now
it's
the
way
it
is,
and
it's
still
you
know
in
transition.
So
thank
you
all
and
I
can't
say
all
the
names
everybody
they
all
know
who
they
are
and
they've
come
they've
gone.
You
know,
like
jennifer,
mentioned
a
number
of
names,
and
so
thank
you
and
please
convey
to
them
our
sincere
thanks
and
appreciation.
Thank
you.
K
Yeah
I
want
to
join
in
and
thank
you
very
much
for
all
the
time
and
and
service,
and
I
think
it's
you
know
things
happen
in
time
and
all-
and
it
was
time
for
this,
and
I
appreciate
that
you
were
particularly
betsy
were
not
you
know
it
wasn't.
K
You
worked
with
us
on
on
the
inevitable
innocence
and
you
know,
and
and
that
happens-
and
I
was
glad
to
share
with
councilmember
robertson
on
you
know,
going
down
and
in
to
the
you
know
at
least
virtually
to
the
legislature
and
and
supporting
the
the
bill
to
end
this,
because
I
think
things
change
and
what
I'm
hoping
is,
and
I've
had
some
conversations,
sometimes
with
different
members
of
the
council,
and
sometimes
it
was
this
feeling
of
or
kind
of
complaint.
K
Well,
you
kind
of
ignore
us
because
we're
the
counseling,
you
know
these
issues.
Well,
I
think
that
barrier
is
gone.
If
there
is
one
and
you
can
be-
and
you
are
a
very
important
part
of
the
city-
and
I
think
actually,
your
contributions
are
going
to
be
greater
in
a
sense
of
looking
at
the
whole
picture
and
and
the
regional
piece
too.
So
join
you
know
we're
all
joining
together
and
I
think
we
have
great
legacy
and
take
great
legacies
and
make
them
even
better.
K
So
really
appreciate
your
particularly
in
this
time,
working
through
this
in
a
very
rational
and
helpful
manner,
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
great
partnership
with
the
community
as
part
of
the
greater
community
in
bellevue.
So
thank
you
very
much
any
other.
Okay,
all
the
other
people
been
involved
in
it.
So.
P
P
N
So
there
were
in
the
examples
of
the
definitions:
there
were
definitions
that
were
just
specific
to
properties
developed
within
the
east,
bellevue
community,
council,
jurisdiction,
and
so
those
would
be
eliminated,
and
there
are
definitions
that
apply
city-wide.
That
would
now
be
applicable,
and
so
it
would
just
remove
the
definition
that
only
applied
to
properties
as
they
were
developed
or
as
they
exist
within
that
jurisdictional
boundary.
P
M
I
believe
there
are
duplicate
definitions,
if
that's
what
you're
asking
so,
for
instance,
recreational
vehicle
is
one
where
there's
a
different
definition
in
the
ebcc
versus
what
is
applicable
citywide.
M
P
All
right,
thank
you,
and
then
I
too
want
to
thank
betsy
and
the
ebcc
council
members
just
for
all
your
many
years
of
dedicated
service.
I
know
that
lake
hills,
neighborhood
has
always
been
very
welcoming
and
open
to
sharing
information,
knowledge
and
dialogue
in
conversation
and
look
forward
to
many
more
years
of
engagement,
and
just
thank
you
very,
very
much
for
all
your
service.
Q
So
I
think
so
I
support
the
luca,
but
I
also
think
the
rest
of
the
council
has
already
echoed
my
sentiments,
but
I
do
want
to
add
that
being
on
the
planning
commission
and
serving
as
chair,
I've
really
enjoyed
the
engagement
with
you,
betsy
and
also
other
ebcc
council
members.
You
know
it's,
I
mean
a
lot
of
hairy
topics,
but
you
know
being
able
to
engage
in
depth
on
those
topics
with
you
all
has
been
very
rewarding.
Q
I
guess
I
would
say
it's
it's
not
every
day
that
people
dig
into
the
land
use
code
and
the
comp
plan,
but
I
felt
like
you
all,
really
knew
those
as
if
you
know
I
don't
know
like
almost
you,
you
memorized
them
to
an
extent
or
just
had
a
lot
of
experience
with
them,
but
I
just
really
appreciate
that
level
of
commitment
from
you
and
and
the
rest
of
the
council.
Thank
you.
A
A
All
right,
we
got
two
to
one:
anybody
need
a
break,
or
should
we
keep
going
keep
going
all
right?
You
may
take
a
break
if
you
need
one
all
right
next
up
under
other
ordinances
resolutions
and
motions.
Is,
I
think,
it's
an
ordinance
that
we're
looking
at.
I
don't
have
that.
H
H
This
topic
was
last
discussed
by
council
at
your
june
6
meeting,
where
council
directed
staff
to
draft
an
ordinance
that
establishes
permitting
requirements
to
remove
landmark
trees
defined
as
a
tree
with
a
diameter
at
breast
height
of
24
inches
or
greater,
with
the
intent
that
this
interim
regulations
will
sunset
at
the
end
of
2023
or
when
permanent
or
when
the
permanent
code
is
adopted.
Whichever
is
earlier
so
joining
us
this
evening
for
a
brief
staff
report
is
liz
stead,
our
interim
co-director
at
the
development
services
department.
L
Thank
you,
city
manager
and
good
evening
again,
council
members.
I
noticed
that
councilmember
zahn
did
not
take
the
paper
copy.
I
presume
you're
saving
some
trees
there
as
we
move
through
this.
L
Tonight
we're
going
to
go
through
and
talk
about
some
of
the
questions
that
council
asked
during
our
last
encounter
and
we
also
did
bring
back
the
tree
ordinance
for
adoption.
So
some
of
the
clarification
that
we
heard
requests
regarding
was
about
who
can
remove
landmark
trees.
What
is
a
potential
height
threshold?
We
also
heard
some
requests
for
more
public
information
and
also
what
data
could
be
gathered
through
the
permitting
process.
L
L
Any
sort
of
soft
measuring
tape
measure
around
the
tree
divide
by
3.14
and
you'll,
have
your
diameter.
So
we
will
provide
that
in
all
of
our
public
information
for
ease
of
use.
So
that
we
don't
have
any
confusion
for
our
applicants
as
well,
this
does
also
provide
an
opportunity
for
us
in
the
future
to
incorporate
variations
for
specific
species
or
other
considerations
in
the
future
code
updates,
and
we
can
also
continue
to
pursue.
Are
there
any
height
other
height
analysis?
L
We
also
had
a
question
about
how
the
public
information
will
be
provided.
We
do
have
a
section
on
the
city
internet
page,
that
is
around
tree
removal
and
already
provides
some
information,
so
we
would
actually
add
this
in
to
that
section.
We
also
will
put
something
into
our
city
newsletters
and
also
on
social
media.
To
let
people
know
hey,
this
is
happening.
Regulations
have
changed,
be
aware,
you
know
understand
what
those
are.
L
The
other
question
that
has
brought
up
is:
what
is
the
data
that
will
be
gathered,
and
I
think
this
was
really
important
because,
as
we
do
move
into
permanent
regulations,
we
can
use
this
to
help
assist
us
understanding.
What
the
needs
are
as
we
move
forward.
So
we
will
be
able
to
gather
data
on
the
location
and
neighborhood
of
what
trees
are
being
removed
so
that
we
can
determine
if
there's
more
removal
in
some
neighborhoods
than
others,
we'll
also
be
able
to
determine
the
number
and
the
size
of
the
trees
that
are
being
removed.
L
L
The
next
steps
moving
forward
would
be
this
evening.
If
you
choose
to
take
action
on
the
proposed
ordinance
that
we
have
provided,
we
would
go
ahead
and
implement
that
through
staff
training
and
public
information,
and
then
we
would
then
move
into
once.
We
have
that
move
forward.
We'd
continue
work
to
initiate
the
tree
regulation
amendments.
The
more
comprehensive
package
that
we
see
coming
to
you
for
initiation,
probably
in
september,
is
what
we're
thinking,
depending
on
council's
schedule
and
timing.
A
You
thank
you
very
much
deputy
mirror.
Would
you
like
to
make
a
motion.
A
Okay,
any
comments
or
questions
councilmember
robertson,
followed
by
council
members
on.
O
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
explanation
and
I
appreciate
your
drawing
my
attention
to
the
sunset
section
before
I
didn't
notice
that
before
I'm
supportive
of
this,
but
I
think
it
could
be
a
little
clearer.
O
The
council
had
some
comments
last
time
about
limiting
the
height.
I
would
like
to
put
in
here
a
the
definition
of
a
landmark
tree
defined
as
any
tree
with
a
diameter
at
breast
side
of
24
inches
or
greater
and
which
is
20
feet
tall
or
taller.
I
just
think
that
that
will
get
away
from
people
having
to
get
a
clear
and
grade
permit
to
grind
a
stump.
I
mean
the
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
right
height,
but
there's
also
some
severely
top
trees
that
are
only
20
feet
tall.
O
I
think
this
won't
apply
to
a
lot
of
trees
that
are
24
inches
in
diameter
or
greater,
but
the
ones
that
it
does
apply
to,
I
think,
should
be
allowed
to
be
removed
without
going
through
permitting
that's
number
one
number
two,
I
understand
about
the
diameter
equals
pi.
You
know
times.
Pi
is
the
circumference
which
is
75.4
inches,
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
easier
to
actually
put
in
the
circumference
in
a
para
in
parentheses,
and
also
to
put
in
actual
measurements
from
breast
height.
O
I,
my
good
friend
google,
told
me
that
breast
height
is
four
point
average
4.3
feet.
You
said
it's
4.5.
Breast
type
for
me
is
probably
about
four
and
for
my
nephew
who's,
6
11,
it's
probably
around
five
and
a
half
feet.
You
know
so
I
it
might
be.
O
It
might
be
nice
to
say
when
measured
from
four,
if
it's
4.5
4.3,
whatever
the
right
number,
is
when
measured
from
4.5
feet
above
the
ground.
I
just
think
that
that's
we
talk
about
equity
and
inclusion
here.
This
is
one
where
it's
like.
Oh
who
does
this
apply
to
so
I
think
having
standard
measurements
regardless
of
the
height
of
the
person
taking
them,
would
be
really
helpful
and
I'm
happy
to
make
those
motions
if
my
colleagues
support
them.
So
those
three
things
are
under
20
feet
tall.
O
Add
the
circumference,
which
is
75.4
inches
for
clarity
for
homeowners
and
three
cr,
add
instead
of
breast
height.
Add
when
measured
from
and
I'm
not
sure,
I'd
defer
to
liz
when
measured
from
either
whatever
is
4.3
4.5
feet
above
ground.
I
think
that
that
would
make
it
clearer-
and
I
absolutely
support
doing
this
so.
A
Just
to
clarify,
I
think
you
said
in
your
definition
of
landmark
trees.
It
was
20
feet
or
taller
20
feet
or.
P
Yeah,
I
was
going
to
say
I
agree
with
my
colleagues.
That
was
what
I
was
going
to
bring
up,
because
last
time
I
was
saying
you
know
people
are
going
to
measure
around
their
circumference.
So
the
idea
you're
going
to
take
24
times
3.14
I
mean,
let's
simplify
as
much
as
possible.
I
mean.
Can
we
even
round
so
we're
essentially
saying
circumference
of
six
feet
or
more
is
considered
a
landmark
tree
and
four
feet
above
ground
or
if
you
want
to
make
them
the
same.
P
It's
like
six
feet
around
and
six
feet
above
ground
just
to
simplify
as
much
as
possible,
because
I
do
think.
If
we're
gonna
have
people
do
math,
it
just
creates
a
little
more
or
the.
I
have
to
admit.
I
was
going
and
looking
for
what
dbh
stood
for
myself
for
a
while
trying
to
figure
out
and
then
I'm
like.
Oh
wait
a
minute.
I
thought
the
b
stood
for
base
and
then
I'm
and
then
I
read
it
and
I
thought
oh,
no,
it
stood
for
breast
okay,
so
it
did
create
some
confusion.
P
So
if
we
could
agree
on
just
right,
simplified
measurements,
I
think
it
would
be
helpful.
I
like
having
some
height
that
says,
because
I
was
actually
thinking
well,
what's
the
right
height
so
that
it
wouldn't
hit
a
house.
So
how
tall
is
a
house
and
what's
that,
right
height,
if
that's
the
goal
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
getting
the
permit,
because
it
goes
then
to
my
last
question,
which
is
when
I
think
about
these:
the
need
for
to
cut
down
a
tree
and
the
cost
of
the
permit.
P
I
think
last
time
you
had
given
us
a
number:
wasn't
it
like
six
hundred
dollars
to
get
a
permit?
That
seems
like
an
awful
lot
of
of
money
to
get
a
permit.
I
mean
I
understand
we
want
to
collect
data.
We
want
to
be
thoughtful
about
making
sure
that
they're
using
a
licensed
contractor,
but
I
am
concerned
with
the
cost
of
food
and
everything
else
that
that
just
seems
like
a
really
high
number.
P
So,
whether
there's
anything
we
can
do
about
the
cost
of
getting
the
permit,
because
I
think
the
goal
is
not
to
collect
money
from
people
so
much
as
making
sure
we
don't
have
folks
that
are
cutting
down
trees
that
aren't
licensed
so
one.
Can
you
remind
me
of
the
dollars
for
the
permit
and
then
two,
whether
there's
anything
we
could
do
about
the
cost.
Well,.
L
I
can
go
ahead
and
take
that
the
current
cost
is
consistent
with
regulations
in
bridal
trails
to
remove
trees
as
well.
So
it
was
pegged
to
the
same
benchmark.
It
is
464
dollars
for
two
or
less
trees,
and
three
or
more
trees
would
be
857.
L
The
cost
involved
in
that
is
to
have
the
bring
the
permit
in
review
the
permit
and
also
provide
inspections
once
the
work
is
being
done.
So
development
services
is
a
cost
recovery
operation.
We
do
have
a
lot
of
costs
associated
with
staffing
and
with
the
all
the
systems
that
we
have.
So
that
is
the
number
that
has
been
determined
over
time
to
be
the
amount
of
time
that
it
requires
us
to
do
this
body
of
work
for
these
permits.
P
Okay,
because
I
was
just
thinking
here,
what
we
really
want
is
for
people
to
actually
get
a
permit
and
to
get
a
licensed
contractor
and
if
they
shy
away
because
of
the
cost,
I'm
just
concerned
about
it,
I
understand
the
process
and
how
we
think
about
cost
recovery.
I
just
wonder
if
there's
some
ways
to
reduce
the
cost
or
subsidize
in
some
way,
so
that
we
actually
are
incenting
people
to
do
the
right
thing
and
get
the
permit
and
use
a
licensed
contractor
thanks.
Q
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
what's
been
said
in
terms
of
clarifying
the
code,
simplifying
it
and
setting
a
height
all
right,
I'm
into
that
last.
During
the
last
time,
this
was
discussed
at
council
that
having
a
height
was
would
help
so
there
we
go.
I
think
in
terms
of
what
that
height
should
be.
It's
just
whatever
achieves
the
goal,
so
it
sounds
like
similar
to
what
councilmember
zhan
said
to
prevent
injury
or
damage.
I
don't
know
if
that
is
maybe
clarify,
but
I
do
support
it.
A
And
I'll
just
say,
I
I
concur
with
defining
what
a
landmark
tree
is
by
the
diameter
of
24,
inches
or
greater
and
a
height.
If
we
can
legally
do
that,
I
like
the
20
foot
or
whatever,
but
you
know-
and
I
I
appreciate
specifying
what
height
you
measure,
the
circumference
at
for
the
public
and
also
converting
the
diameter
to
a
circumference
just
to
make
it
easy.
But
I
know
you
have
to
legally
put
consistent
language
in
the
code
or
in
the
permit
requirements,
so
just
in
parens
to
maybe
clarify
for
the
public.
C
Yeah,
I'm
supportive
of
this,
and
thanks
for
the
great
presentation
and
for
taking
all
of
our
feedback
last
time.
This
is
before
the
council
just
a
couple
of
quick
questions
before
that
I
agree
with
the
mayor.
I
mean
councilman
robertson
in
terms
of
the
height
and
and
just
making
this
as
easy
as
possible
for
for
for
everyone
to
understand
what
the
requirements
are.
C
So
you
know
we're
not
getting
into
arguments
between
residents
and
co-compliance,
and
I
thought
you
meant
this
and
the
other
so
so
that
would
be
really
great.
I
I
shared
council
arizona's
concern.
C
That
would
be
correct
right.
Okay,
so
you
know
it
would
be
great
if
we
followed
what
utilities
does
in
terms
of
any
hardship
cases
and
they
cannot
afford
to
for
for
for
that,
permit
that
we
provide
some
type
of
subsidy
or
partial
subsidy
so
that
they
can
still
address
that
issue,
because
I
know
one
of
the
reasons
that
mayor
robinson
brought.
This
forward
was
from
a
safety
perspective.
C
So
we
certainly
want
to
encourage
people
to
certainly
do
the
right
thing
and
if
a
tree
does
need
to
come
down
for
safety
reasons,
they
take
that
action.
So
we'd
love
to
see
that
in
included
and
then
just
from
the
engagement
or
outreach
standpoint,
because
I
I
know
we
always
put
up
a
a
a
web
page.
C
I'd
like
to
see
us
maybe
do
something-
and
not
just
with
this,
but
with
other
topics
as
well,
but
just
a
little
bit
more
aggressive
in
terms
of
the
the
the
outreach
to
notify
folks
about
this.
You
know,
maybe
it's
a
bill
insert
when
people
get
their
utilities
bill
because
everybody
gets
one
in
the
city.
So
that's
one
way
to
make
sure
that
everybody
in
the
city
understands
this
is
a
new
ordinance
coming
their
way
and
what
the
requirements
are.
A
A
R
You
I
don't
want
to
repeat
to
everything,
but
I
do
support
deputy
mayor
and
also
the
mayor's
emphasis
on
the
safety
aspect
of
it.
So
that's
a
good
thing.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
K
We
need
to
make
that's
to
make
sure
everybody
understands
that,
and
I
think
it's
a
great
step
forward
and
rational
rule
at
this
point,
and
we
should
we
should
do
it
and
include.
I
agree
with
the
deputy
mayor's
comments
about
you
know
in
hardships
situations
and
I
think,
as
we
go
further
down
the
line
looking
at
this
in
terms
of
overall
impact
and
our
goals
and
everything
else.
Maybe
we
take
a
look
at
you
know
the
cost
and
everything
else,
but
at
this
point
that
would
not
be
appropriate
to
do
that.
C
At
the
commandant
I'm
sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
that
yeah
it'd
be
great.
If
we
can
include
that
in
the
data
analysis
that
that
we'll
be
tracking
how
many
hardship
cases
are
there
were.
Thank
you.
O
And
I
was
going
to
make
a
motion
to
amend
listening
to
the
conversation
about
the
language
so
that
we
can
pass
it
tonight.
So
on
the.
If
someone
has
an
emergency
where
they
have
a
tree,
that
gets
it's
half
blown
over
by
a
windstorm,
they
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
diseased
and
the
limbs
are
falling
off,
is
do
do.
Do
we
usually
have
an
exception
in
our
in
codes
that
would
allow
someone
to
do
the
work
to
make
it
safe
and
then
come
get
a
permit
afterwards.
Would
that
apply.
L
Here
we
have
had
that
in
the
past
and
generally
what
has
happened
when
people
have
called
us
and
said
hey,
you
know:
we've
got
a
tree
that
is
in
danger.
We
believe
it
may
fall
over.
We've
actually
tried
to
provide
someone
from
staff
to
review
it
immediately
and
get
through
that.
So
it's
more
been
a
process
versus
a
code.
Okay,.
O
Got
it
so
listening
to
the
language
and
looking
at
the
at
the
ordinance
in
front
of
us,
I
would
move
to
amend
the
ordinance
to
change.
A
No,
I
think
they
got
that.
Okay,
I
need
a
second.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
legally
I
mean
you
can
write
it
with
explanation.
I
think
legally,
you
may
have
to
include
the
the
the
wording,
as
it
is
typically
said,
but
with
maybe
that
explanation,
which
I
think
we'd
all
be
okay
with
I'm
not
falling
there.
O
A
If
they
give
the
diameter
and
the
circumference
yeah
and.
T
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
it's
either.
It's
either
four
or
four
and
a
half.
T
That's
right
and
and
and
that-
and
that
goes
to
any
of
the
significant
trees
that
which
we
already
regulate
and
in
certain
land
use
districts
are
in
connection
with
plats
and
our
definition
for
significant
trees
does
talk
about
measuring
from
grade
this.
I
believe
this
is
what
council
remember
robertson
is
talking
about,
and
it
does
talk
about
the
diameter
in
that
case,
which
is
eight
inches,
but
we're
talking
about
24
here
or
greater.
T
I
also
would
point
out
that
our
land
use
code
at
that
same
section
in
20
2900.
It
does
talk
about
height.
It
talks
about
prioritizing
significant
trees
that
are
60
feet
or
taller
for
retention,
so
the
I
think
the
height
language
is
is
not
a
problem
either.
The
only
new
standard
that
we
have
and
and
what's
being
proposed
is
the
circumference
language
that
that's
not.
It
just
doesn't
track
the
way
that
we've
done
it
in
the
past
with
the
significant
trees.
T
But
if,
if,
if
conceptually,
the
full
council
is
looking
for
each
of
those
three
items,
then
I
can
certainly
work
on
the
language
to
capture
all
three
of
those.
I
O
A
O
O
A
The
homeowners,
I
think
our
direction
is
clear,
so
we're
going
to
vote
on
the
amendment
that
you
made
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed
and
then
we're
going
to
vote
on
the
ordinance.
Excuse
me
mayor.
H
S
Be
clear
about
process
here,
because
what
I
think
I'm
hearing
is
that
there's
some
potential
for
some
flexibility
in
the
actual
language
that
the
council
would
adopt.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
you
can
adopt
it
tonight,
if
you
don't
have
the
actual
language
of
the
ordinance-
and
this
is
a
regulatory,
as
you
know,
ordinance
so
precision
and.
T
Back
on
consent,
calendar
and,
and
that
would
it
would
not
be
adopted
tonight-
okay,
but
basically
based
on
what
ms
gurla
said
to
this,
which
is
a
very
good
point.
This
is
regulatory,
it's
regulating
private
property,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
bring
it
back
with
the
language
and
then
council
approves
it,
but
that
can
be
done
on
consent.
Calendar.
A
O
A
Will
take
a
break
till
20
after
thank
you.
A
In
business,
so
do
you
have
a
recommendation
on
how
we
might
word
this
amendment?
You
can
tell
councilmember
robertson
and
she
will
then
say
it
back
to
us.
T
I
do
thank
you
for
the
six
minutes
that
was
very
productive.
C
A
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
and
then
that's
a
motion
for
the
amendment
and
then
we
will
vote
on
the.
I
think
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor.
I
do
okay,
so
let's
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
we
did
it.
Thank
you.
Can
I
make
a
quick
comment?
Yes,
and
then
you
gotta
remind
me
that
I
have
to
say
something
before
we
adjourn.
O
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
we
are
going
to
conclude
the
public
portion
of
tonight's
meeting.
The
council
will
now
recess
to
executive
session
for
approximately
30
minutes
pursuant
to
rcw
4230
110
1i.
The
meeting
will
be
adjourned
from
the
executive
executive
session.
Thank
you.