►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - January 3, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
C
E
D
B
You
so
first
on
our
agenda
is
the
election
of
the
mayor
and
the
deputy
mayor,
and
I
have
quite
a
bit
to
read
here
so
bear
with
me
as
temporary
chair
you'll,
recall
on
december
13th
2021.
The
council
meeting
selected
me
to
be
the
temporary
chair
to
preside
over
the
election
of
the
mayor,
which
is
the
first
item
of
business
tonight.
B
For
those
of
you
not
wholly
familiar
with
how
bellevues
govern
we
follow
the
council
manager
form
of
government
which
calls
for
the
mayor
to
be
elected
from
among
our
seven
council
members
by
our
seven
council
members
every
two
years.
The
mayor
acts
as
the
city
council's
presiding
officer,
represents
the
city
on
a
number
of
forums
and
performs
a
number
of
ceremonial
roles
at
the
conclusion
of
tonight's
election
of
the
mayor.
B
The
new
mayor
will
take
the
gavel
and
preside
over
the
election
of
the
deputy
mayor
at
the
december
13th
meeting,
the
council
voted
to
amend
our
rules
to
put
in
place
an
alternative
method
of
conducting
the
election
this
evening.
This
method
is
characterized
by
voting
on
all
nominees
simultaneously.
Instead
of
one
vote
at
a
time
and
the
votes
will
be
conducted
using
roll
call
voting,
so
tonight's
election
will
proceed
as
follows.
As
temporary
chair,
I
will
call
for
nominations
for
the
position
of
mayor
nominations
do
not
require
a
second.
B
Each
council
member
may
nominate
no
more
than
one
person
for
the
position
of
mayor
council
members
are
allowed
to
nominate
themselves
for
the
position
when
no
other
nominations
are
forthcoming.
I
will
close
the
floor
denominations.
Once
nominations
are
closed.
The
council
will
vote
on
the
candidates.
Even
if
there
is
only
one
candidate,
the
council
must
still
conduct
a
vote.
The
city
clerk
will
call
each
council
member
in
alphabetical
order.
When
your
name
is
called.
You
must
state
the
name
of
the
candidate
you
wish
to
vote
for
at
the
end
of
roll
call
vote.
B
The
city
clerk
will
announce
the
results
once
all
council
members
have
voted.
If
a
council
member
receives
a
majority
vote,
that
is
at
least
four
votes,
he
or
she
will
be
declared
elected,
and
the
new
mayor
will
assume
the
gavel
and
repeat
these
steps
to
elect
the
deputy
mayor.
If
the
council
does
not
select
a
mayor
from
the
first
round
of
balloting,
the
balloting
will
be
repeated
using
the
same
process
as
many
times
as
necessary
to
obtain
a
majority
vote
for
a
single
candidate.
B
B
D
Madam
chair,
I
nominate
lynn
robinson
for
the
position
of
mayor.
Thank
you.
B
Councilmember
stokes
nominates
councilmember
robinson
any
other
nominations,
checking
okay,
not
seeing
any.
We
will
proceed
with
the
vote
so
clerk.
Would
you
please
do
the
voting
process?
Roll
call
vote?
Yes,
thank
you.
A
A
B
Thank
you
very
much
and
if
you'd
like
to
see
the
actual,
what
we
described
of
the
rounds,
the
multiple
rounds
of
voting,
taking
a
break
and
going
back
to
voting
go
back
to
eight
years
ago,
and
you
can
see
that
in
the
process.
B
Okay,
so
now
we're
gonna
go
and
do
the
same
thing
only.
This
is
for
deputy
mayor
and
everything
that
I
said
about
the
mayor.
Election
is
the
same
for
the
deputy
mayor
election,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
first
if
there
are
any
questions
about
electing
the
deputy
mayor,
okay,
seeing
none
are
there
any
nominations
for
deputy
mayor
councilmember
robertson
and
then
follow
councilmember
stokes.
I
D
I
nominate
councilmember
janice
zahn,
I
didn't
realize
we
could
make
comments
on
this.
I
think
it's
councilman
rizzon
is
served
on
committees
and
served
very
well
in
the
council,
and
I
think
there
are.
She
would
be
a
great
addition
and
it's
you
know
nice
to
have
some
change.
B
A
A
A
B
Congratulations.
Thank
you.
Everybody.
Okay.
Moving
on
to
approval
of
the
agenda
may
have
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
I'll.
B
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye
any
opposed,
okay
and
we're
on
to
oral
communications
city
clerk.
Do
we
have
anybody
signed
up
for
oral
communications?
Yes,.
A
A
A
J
I
would
first
like
to
state
that,
I'm
speaking
for
myself
and
not
the
bridal
trust
community
club,
because
I'm
co-president
of
that
organization,
2012
itcher
city,
listed
a
project
to
replace
the
pikes
peak
water
reservoir
in
bridal
trail
state
park,
going
from
one
mega
gallon
to
three
million
gallons
in
2013.
J
It
was
a
project
that
just
had
to
be
done:
systemic
issues,
volume,
etc.
The
bridal
trust
community
club,
the
bridal
towns
foundation
and
direct
neighbors
knew
nothing
about
it.
Why
should
they?
It
was
just
an
engineering
project.
The
engineering
process
had
trail
uses
aesthetics,
environmental
concerns
all
concerns
for
the
community.
It
was
a
just
get.
It
done,
process
that
had
long-term
infrastructure
needs
only
after
collaboration
was
it
understood
by
all
the
level
of
understanding
and
basic
trust
that
resulted
in
the
innovation
planning,
best
shared
plan
and
continued
success
of
the
project.
J
J
I
know
that
we're
urged
by
just
do
something
about
zoning.
Will
the
adus
fulfill
that
need?
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
past
projects
that
was
successful.
Did
us
intersect
many
policy
areas
like
the
water
tower?
It's
not
simple,
it's
not
a
shortcut.
You
cannot
simply
decide
the
right
and
wrong
solution
based
on
multiple
choice,
questions.
J
Is
it
a
right
fit
for
value?
Is
it
fit
our
economics?
We've
learned
that
bellevue's
long-term
level
of
commitment
to
high
quality
and
living
in
such
areas
of
equity
in
its
parks
is
very
different
than
other
cities
in
the
state.
Do
we
understand
each
other?
Have
we
made
common
definitions,
scopes
and
goals?
J
J
A
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Next,
we
we
have
a
report
of
the
city
manager,
mr
miyake.
K
K
Tonight
I
just
wanted
to
take
an
opportunity
to
acknowledge
all
the
city
staff
that
worked
24
7
throughout
the
holiday
season
in
order
to
clear
our
roads
and
to
just
provide
what
we
consider
exceptional
public
service
to
our
residences
and
businesses,
and
I
wanted
to
just
mention
that
next
week
we'll
provide
a
more
in-depth
report
on
our
response
to
the
snow
event.
That's
all
I
have
to
report
tonight
mayor.
Thank
you.
B
K
B
B
Okay,
council,
oh
okay,
yes,
council,
business,
so
council,
member
lee,
I
believe
you
are
making
a
recommendation
for
to
put
for
an
appointment
to
environmental
services.
Commission.
Would
you
like
to
to
introduce
your
recommendation.
E
It
is
my
pleasure
and
to
introduce
the
following
recommendation
to
the
council
to
fill
a
partially.
E
Unexpired
term
on
the
environmental
services
commission,
I
want
to
thank
the
chair
ronya
for
her
input
and
help
me
in
the
selection
process,
and
we
obviously
are
very
fortunate
to
have
a
great
pool
of
applicants
and
we,
after
interviewing
several
individuals.
E
So
if
the
mayor
allows
me,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
nominate
and
approve
a
point.
Mr
dupres,
in
this
position.
B
You
have
a
new
commissioner,
then
terrific.
All
right
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent.
Calendar.
B
K
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
The
first
item
is
the
transportation
commission's
2022
through
2033
transportation
facilities,
plan
preliminary
project
list,
the
transportation
transportation
facilities
plan
by
way
of
background,
also
known
as
the
tfp
is
the
city's
12-year
intermediate
range
capital
facilities
plans
of
priority
transportation
projects
which
the
transportation
commission
is
actually
charged
with
updating.
K
B
F
So
good
evening,
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house,
members
of
the
council,
so
as
city
manager
miyake
mentioned,
I'm
planner
in
the
transportation
department
and
I'm
joined
tonight
by
the
chair
of
our
transportation,
commission,
lauriana,
marciante
and
we're
here
to
share
with
you
the
process
that
we've
been
working
on
to
update
the
city's
transportation
facilities
plan.
F
So
the
commission
has
recommended
a
list
of
priority
projects
and
we'll
share
with
you
the
process
that
we
use
to
develop
this
list
of
projects
and
and
walk
through
the
the
projects
that
are
on
the
list.
So
you
have
an
understanding
of
how
we
got
the
list
that
we
were
sharing
and
and
what's
in
it
specifically.
F
What
we're
seeking
tonight
is
a
direction
from
the
council
to
proceed
with
the
tfp
update
process
and
pursue
invite
the
environmental
review
phase
based
on
this
project
list.
F
F
We
will
look
at
the
projects,
how
we
identified
candidates
and
how
we
then
evaluated
projects
to
develop
this
list
and
and
we'll
look
at
the
component
projects
of
the
list
itself.
F
F
The
transportation
facilities
plan
is
financially
constrained,
as
I
mentioned,
so
it's
really.
We
can
only
include
in
this
plan
the
projects
or
the
comp
components
of
projects
that
we
can
reasonably
expect
to
pay
for
and
to
afford
in
that
12-year
period.
So
it's
our
first
cut
at
taking
all
the
many
many
projects
we've
identified
in
long
range
plans
and
in
our
modal
plans
and
determining
what
really
are
the
priorities
for
the
12
years.
What
can
we
afford
to
do
in
this
plan
period
with
each
update
of
the
transportation
facilities
plan?
F
We
do
an
environmental
review,
and
that
includes
a
look
12
years
out
at
how
we
expect
the
transportation
system
will
perform.
So
with
all
the
growth
we
expect
and
the
amount
of
demand
that
we
expect
to
have
on
the
system
in
12
years,
so
2033
in
this
case.
F
How
do
we
expect
the
system
to
perform
and,
and
that's
part
of
the
environmental
analysis
we've
done
a
little
bit
of
work
on
that
so
far,
but
not
thoroughly,
yet
that'll
be
the
next
phase
and
then
finally,
the
penn
station
facilities
plan
includes
a
subset
of
the
projects
in
the
transportation
facilities
plan,
those
that
serve
vehicular
capacity
needs
and
that
are
needed
in
at
least
in
part
to
serve
new
development
are
designated
as
impact
fee
projects
and
that
impact
fee
project
list,
then,
is
a
key
component
of
our
impact
fee
program,
and
this
is
how
we
update
that
list
on
a
periodic
basis.
F
For
the
current
tfp
process,
we
started
in
september
of
2020
with
the
transportation
commission
and
over
the
course
of
10
meetings.
We
went
through
a
number
of
steps
and
we'll
summarize
we'll
evaluate
those
or
look
at
those
here
in
the
next
few
slides,
but
through
over
the
course
of
10
meetings.
F
When
we
then
further
drill
down
at
the
plan
period,
the
first
six
years
essentially
are
already
programmed
in
the
cip.
So
through
2027,
the
council
has
already
identified
what
the
priorities
are
and
how
much
to
spend
so
the
additional
revenue
that's
really
available
in
those
out
years
from
2028
to
2033.
F
We
anticipate
to
be
139
million
dollars,
that's
what
we
came
to
with
with
our
finance
staff.
So
that's
the
additional
amount
that
we
had
to
work
with
or
on
the
tfp
process
that
we'll
walk
through
here
in
the
next
few
slides.
F
F
For
the
purposes
of
this
tfp
process
and
really
all
our
hdfp
cycle,
we
start
by
looking
at
the
pool
of
candidate
projects
and
those
come
from
the
current
tfp.
F
L
Thank
you
mike
hi,
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
tonight.
So
the
project
evaluation
process
we
start
off
by.
We
have
these
criteria
that
the
commission
develops,
ranking
or
awaited
criteria,
and
so
for
this
round
the
commission
decided
to
maintain
the
previous
criteria.
So
there
was
no
change
from
the
previous
tfp
process
and
you
can
see
them
here:
safety
level
of
service.
L
You
know
safety,
thirty
percent,
twenty
percent
transit,
twenty
percent
dependent
by
twenty
percent
and
then
ten
percent,
which
allows
us
to
identify
projects
that
are
competitive
for
grant,
process
and
other
elements
and
then
there's
other
considerations
that
are
qualitative.
L
If
there's
has
been
significant
investment
in
the
project
to
date,
whether
it
be
public
process
or
actual
dollars,
the
city
has
spent
also
ability.
When
there's
a
project,
there
might
be
an
opportunity
to
coordinate
with
other
agencies
such
as
washed
up
and
see
some
examples
of
those
and
then
also
take
into
consideration
public
input
and
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
public
input
we
have
for
for
this
tfp
process.
There
was
a
pretty
extensive
public
input.
L
There
was
one
online
open
house
and
then
a
tfp
online
survey
as
well,
where
you
could
see
that
an
interactive
project
map,
then
the
tfp
was
on
our
agenda
for
the
transportation
commission
for
10
meetings
and
the
public
can
pertain,
participate
there
as
well
as
they
have
in
the
past,
and
provide
comment
when
the
trans,
when
the
tfp
is
on
the
agenda-
and
we
also
take
in
into
consideration
what
the
citizens,
the
information
they
provide
through
the
city
budget
survey
as
part
of
public
input
and
what's
important,
if
you
want
a
full
report
of
this,
this
is-
has
been
available,
is
available
in
the
council
library.
L
So
more
details
on
this
isn't
that
report
on
public
outreach
and
public
comments
that
you
have
available
and
now
I
think,
it's
time
to
get
into
the
projects
a
little
bit.
I
will
not.
There
are
71
projects.
My
intent
is
not
to
go
through
each
one
of
them.
That
would
be
too
detailed,
but
staff
has
provided
a
set
of
themes.
I
would
say
now:
they're
they're.
Some
of
our
projects
are
multimodal
and
might
fall
into
one
or
the
other.
So
I'll
talk
about
that.
L
As
I
go
when
you
see
this,
but
it's
it
helps
to
separate
them
into
different
thin
themes
to
simply
be
able
to
see
it
against
the
map
so
like.
If
we
could
go
through
the
first
one
should
be
familiar
to.
You
perhaps,
is
the
16
projects
that
are
fully
funded
in
the
current
2021-2027
cip,
and
at
this
point
I
want
to
just
stop
for
a
moment
and
talk
about
the
legend
as
well.
As
you
can
see.
In
the
legend,
there
are
three
different
colors
purple.
L
That's
more
of
the
roadway
intersection
projects,
the
pedestrian
or
orange,
and
the
bicycle
projects
are
green
and
then
the
each
of
those
has
a
different
shade.
If
they
are
dark
shade,
that
means
the
project
has
been
fully
funded.
So
all
of
the
projects
you
see
here
are
in
the
dark,
shade
and
you'll
see
some
of
the
projects
in
in
the
next
section
where
they're
they
might
not
be
fully
fully
funded
through
the
tfp
cycle,
but
there
might
be
some
early.
L
So
the
next
element
that
you
can
see
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
mike
the
14
priority
projects
that
support
growth
and
mitigate
congestion.
So
you
these
are
essentially
where
our
growth
areas
are
at
the
moment
downtown
the
bell
red
corridor
and,
of
course
the
the
bellevue
way
is
experiencing
a
lot
of
congestion
will
continue
to
do
so
as
our
downtown
grows
and
more
access
is
needed
into
I-90.
So
these
are
the
projects
that
you're
seeing
on
the
screen
right
now.
L
Some
are
fully
funded
and
some
are
not,
then,
the
next
set
of
projects
they're
they're
similar,
but
but
they
mitigate
impacts
of
growth
more
in
their
residential
areas,
and
so
there
are
places
where,
at
peak
hour,
residents
from
those
neighborhoods
are
having
a
hard
time
accessing
their
homes,
and
so
these
are
the
the.
These
are
five
projects
that
are
specifically
to
mitigate
growth
in
those
areas,
and
then
the
next
set
of
projects
are
projects
that
are
to
be
implemented
with
with
others.
L
L
The
next
category
are
nine
projects
to
improve
transit
and
seven
of
those
projects
are
really
directly
from
the
master
plan.
The
sort
of
connectivity
centers
that
are
in
the
transit
master
plan
and
another
two
are
an
actual
capital
project.
So
for
in
terms
of
what
you
see
on
the
map,
I
also
wanted
to
clarify
these
lines
represent
existing
routes
that
are
currently
correct,
connecting
some
of
these
seven
centers,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
final
route
or
the
final
solution
will
be
exactly
on
that
location
or
serve
that
particular
route.
L
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
to
make
sure
that
that's
not
misunderstood
in
that
way,
and
you
also
see
the
route
continues,
so
you're
showing
the
full
route,
whereas
so
it's
not
exactly
from
center
to
center.
As
you
can
see,
they
go
beyond
our
borders
because
that's
what
the
current
transit
line
does
and
then
the
next
one
that
we
have
is
the
pedestrian
network
and
might
feel
like
four
is
too
small.
But
these
are
actually
projects
that
are
just
pedestrian.
L
There
are
a
lot
of
projects
you
know
intersections
and
roadways
that
create
sidewalk
improvements,
as
well
as
bicycle
projects
that
create
sidewalk
improvements.
So
in
some
cases
a
lot
of
these
projects
are
already
multimodal.
So
it's
deceiving
to
just
sort
of
think
that
this
is
just
for,
and
we
also
I'm
going
to
talk
about
an
other
set
of
programs
where
projects
might
not
yet
be
identified.
L
But
we
have
some
reserve
allocation,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
that
in
the
next
slide
and
then
the
the
next,
the
last
set
of
projects
are
bicycle
projects
to
build
out
the
bicycle
network,
and
here
you
not
only
see
specific
routes,
but
there
are
three
distinct
bicycle
network
areas
that
are
sort
of
in
the
shaded
area,
and
I've
got
some
notes
about
what
those
are
exactly
called.
L
So
we
have
the
growth
quarter,
bike
network,
that's
that
that
one
is
fully
funded
and
currently
in
the
cip,
and
then
there
are
the
other
two,
which
is
this
east
bellevue
bicycle
network
and
the
south
bellevue
bicycle
network,
and
so
rather
than
thinking
of
bicycle
projects
as
distinct
routes
is
the
the
trend
is
to
start
thinking
about
this
as
networks
and
connectivity,
and
so
this
provides
opportunity
to
really
build
out
these
these
networks
and
these
different
areas
of
our
city,
that
that
really
need
it
and
then
the
last
element,
if
we
could
go
on
to
this,
is
our
reserve
allocation.
L
So
these
are
projects
that
are
not
identified
truly
identified.
Yet
we
have
a
congestion
reduction
levy
placeholder.
So
over
that
period,
15.9
million
is
allocated
to
projects
that
come
from
the
congestion
reduction
levy
that
are
not
yet
identified,
but
hopefully
will
be
by
then
there's
an
our
neighborhood
sidewalk
program
that
improves
a
number
of
sidewalks
is
continuously
improving,
sidewalks
along
the
city,
and
so
those
projects
might
not
yet
be
identified,
but
that's
18.3
million.
L
For
that
one
and
then
the
transit
master
plan
has
a
transit
connections
reserve,
and
so
that's
the
seven
that
I
talked
about.
The
two
million
can
be
used
for
any
of
those
seven
connections
from
the
transit
master
plan,
and
that
is
the
hopefully
a
concise
way
of
sharing
our
71
projects
that
we
have-
and
I
believe
we're
gonna-
take
a
pause
here
and
see.
If
you
have
any
questions.
B
Okay,
great
thank
you,
chair
marciante,
for
being
here
tonight.
We
really
appreciate
it.
I'm
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
go
down
the
list
here,
starting
with
council
member
robertson,
who's,
the
liaison
to
the
transportation
commission
and
then
council,
members
on
deputy
mayor
councilmember,
stokes,
councilmember,
barksdale,
councilmember
lee
and
then
myself
so
councilmember
robertson,.
I
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you,
chair,
marciante,
for
coming
tonight
and
happy
new
year.
So
just
really
pleased
to
see
this,
I
don't
really
have
any
questions
but
really
pleased
to
see
this
come
forward.
I
think
it's
gonna
time
out
nicely
with
our
budget.
This
is,
as
we
all
know,
this
is
a
budget
year
this
year
and
I
just
really
wanted
to
praise
the
commission
for
its
work.
We
have
been
listen.
I
They
have
been
listening
to
council
discussions
and
to
the
public
and
looked
at
how
to
value
the
different
projects,
including
looking
at
safety.
You
know
highly
rating
that
making
sure
that
this
tfp
is
a
truly
multimodal
plan.
So
you
know
I,
like
I
said,
no
questions
really
pleased
with
the
work
I
went
after
we
finish
discussion.
I
B
Thank
you.
Okay,
councilmember
zan,.
G
Yes,
thank
you.
I
also
appreciate
the
work
of
the
transportation
commission.
I
know
how
challenging
it
can
be
to
go
through
a
long
list
of
projects
to
really
put
it
together
in
a
way
that
is,
is
clear
and
understood.
I
love
the
maps
and
that
we're
looking
at
performance
metrics
from
a
mobility
implementation
standpoint.
G
One
thing
I
guess
I
I
would
like
to
get
from
staff
at
another
time
is
I
like
seeing
the
transit
connection
map
of
the
projects.
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
to
also
see
the
same
thing
for
the
bike
network.
Just
so
we
can
see
when
we
have
these
projects
implemented.
G
What
the
whole
grid
looks
like
from
the
standpoint
of
connectivity
and
access
similar
to
the
transit
one.
I
appreciate
seeing
that
tfp
290,
which
is
a
placeholder
for
future
vision,
zero
projects
in
there.
My
my
question
would
be
whether
in
the
tfp
4.6
million
dollars
over
the
12
years
is
sufficient,
because
what
we've
certainly
seen
is
that,
from
a
traffic
incident
standpoint
we're
seeing
actually
nationwide
more
and
more
concerns
related
to
that
so
vision.
G
Zero,
as
currently
budgeted,
may
not
be
sufficient
for
looking
at
those
the
areas
of
more
vulnerability
from
a
predictive
standpoint
and
then
my
other
question
would
be
the
the
northeast
mountain
to
sound
greenway.
I
don't
see
the
connection
that
the
the
more
expensive
one
that's
going
to
go
across
148
150th.
F
G
G
G
That,
as
as
we
look
at
it,
that
is
one
of
the
areas
of
of
interest,
is
to
make
sure
that
we
actually
look
holistically
at
what
would
it
take
to
actually
go
all
the
way
across,
because
if
we
have
segments
going
up
to
it,
and
then
you
still
have
to
cross
that
pretty
gnarly
intersection
to
go
east?
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
thanks
mike
and
chair
marciante,
for
your
presentation
and
for
all
your
good
work
so
far
yeah.
I
would
echo
the
the
comments
by
council
members
on
I'm
very.
C
The
the
18
projects
that's
related
to
the
to
the
bike
network,
but
I
certainly
would
like
to
see
that
map
and
see
how
they're
all
connecting
or
not
connecting
that
would
be
great
to
see.
I
love
the
balance
of
the
different
projects
in
terms
of
balancing
the
safety
vehicles,
pedestrian
bike,
transit
and
then
that
plant
that
planned
consistency
so
very,
very
good
approach.
C
My
one
question
that
I
had
at
this
point
was
in
terms
of
of
outreach.
You
had
mentioned
a
couple
of
different
outreach
items
here,
but
I'm
I'm
I'm
kind
of
curious
how
many
people
that
we
actually
hear
from
during
the
process,
and
not
just
residents
but
also
from
stakeholders
as
well.
Could
you
dive
a
little
bit
deeper
into
that
in
terms
of
numbers,
but
also
in
terms
of
different
stakeholders
and
some
of
their
thoughts
and
concerns
about
the
plan.
F
I
can
speak
to
that,
so
we
received
responses
from
over
200
distinct
into
respondents
to
the
to
the
survey,
and
I
don't
have
the
exact
number
in
my
head
right
now.
I
want
to
say
230,
some
and-
and
we
received
several
hundred
s
specific
comments
regarding
projects.
F
So
it's
a
pretty
good
number.
It's
down
a
little
bit
from
last
tfp
cycles.
When
we
actually
were
able
to
go
out
into
the
community
and
hold
in
person
open
houses.
We
usually
do
three
of
them
in
person.
We.
We
have
to
do
obviously
all
online
this
time,
so
it
fell
off
a
little
bit,
but
we
felt
like
it
was
still
a
pretty
thorough.
You
know
input
that
we
got.
F
We
we
did
receive
communication
from
you
know,
from
from
residents
and
from
members
of
the
business
community.
They
were
interested
in.
You
know
various
projects
we
did
not
do
actually
any
specific
briefings
to
you
know,
boards
or,
or
you
know,
community
groups.
We
have
not
done
that
in
the
past
either,
except
when
invited,
and
so
we
do
not.
You
know,
reach
out
and
offer
that
this
time,
okay,
I.
C
Would
suggest
there
might
be
there?
Might
that
might
be
part
of
the
process
going
forward?
I
think
that'd
be
great
to
hear
from
those
groups,
especially
those
groups
that
have
a
certain
expertise.
That
would
be
good
to
hear
their
feedback.
You
know
be
it
either
chamber
cascade,
you
name
it.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
different
groups
out
there
that
would
that
would
like
to
share
their
opinion.
I
think
it'd
be
great
if
we
could
do
some
outreach
to
them
versus
waiting
for
others
to
respond
going
forward,
but.
D
I
first
have
to
unmute
yeah.
I
appreciate
the
comments
have
already
been
made.
I
think
this
is
it's
always
an
amazing
process
and
having
gone
through
several
of
these.
This
is
a.
This
is
a
very
well
done
one.
I
had
some
questions
that
I've
I've
heard
and
from
other
people
and
talking
about
this
and
looking
at
it
and
and
when
you
this
is
a
lot
of
money.
It's
a
long
time
period
and
before
before
I
go
to
that
and
forget
it.
I
appreciate
the
deputy
mary's
comments
there.
D
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
actually,
the
chamber
of
commerce
has
a
very
active
transportation
group
that
has
worked
with
us,
and
I've
worked
with
them
in
the
past
on
this
and
others
in
the
council
as
well,
and
and
but
you
know,
we
need
to
always
make
sure
that
we
talk
with
them
and
downtown
business
association,
and
I
think
the
the
businesses
as
a
whole
have
been
involved,
but
it
is
always
important
to
get
them
in
there,
as
well
as
people
in
the
community.
D
We've
done
a
lot
and
after
the
levy,
I
think
we
did
a
lot
of
communication
on
that
and
then
going
forward,
and
the
commission
has
done
a
lot.
So
it's
it's
always
good
to
point
that
out
and
just
to
make
sure
we
don't
you
know,
sometimes
let
it
slide,
because
it
is
important
to
have
people
understand
this.
This
is
this
is
complex.
I
mean
you're
looking
at
a
lot
of
money.
D
One
of
the
questions
I
had
big
question
is-
and
I
know
you've
gone
over
this,
but
it
would
be
good
to
have
some
context
of
what
are
the
needs
versus
resources
and
the
other
thing
when
I
talk
to
people
about
this,
or
sometimes
they
look
and
they
say
well,
how
can
you
plan,
and
why
is
it?
You
know
we're
planning
for
things
six
years
out.
You
know
12
years
out
and
we
know
if
we
look
back
the
last
12
years.
Things
have
changed
dramatically,
and
so
how
do
we?
It's
always
that
question?
D
D
Have
we
are
we
kind
of
catching
up
with
things
or
are
we
really
looking
forward
because
of
the
development
and
the
change
and
the
patterns
and
the
needs?
And
frankly,
the
number
of
people
using
transportation
in
bellevue
is
so
much
different
from
just
five
years
ago,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
great
planning,
but
are
we
being
you
know
this
adequate
is
the
other
question
I
had
is.
D
I
know
that
these
next
six
years
we
have-
you
know
163.9
million
and
then
the
next
six
years
after
that's
only
140
million,
and
we
know
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
more
people
and
a
lot
more
transportation
questions
and
things
going
on
in
that-
and
I
guess
the
answer
you
give
somebody
is
that
it's
to
certain
extent
it's
kind
of
a
projection
and
placeholder.
D
It's
not
a
it's,
not
a
real
number
in
a
sense
like
the
163.9,
because
that's
pretty
going
out
is
that
the
chair
commission
chair
is
that
pretty
much
a
good
assessment
of
that
part.
F
Actually,
I
can
probably
answer
that
so
a
couple
of
things:
yes,
we
are
being
somewhat.
We
think
prudent
and
conservative
in
what
we
revenue
we
anticipate.
So
that's
part
of
the
picture
we
have,
but
but
the
other
part
of
the
picture
of.
Why
there's
that
difference
and
let
me
just
go
up
there.
So
we
all
remember
what
we're
looking
at
here.
So
the
164
versus
the
139
in
the
in
the
out
years
is
the
current
cip
includes
the
entire
cost
of
projects.
F
D
D
Of
that
is
when
people
are
looking
at
this,
this
is,
I
mean
it's,
it's
pretty
well
etched
in
stone
to
a
certain
extent,
but
obviously
we
go
over
these
every
couple
years,
and
so
I
think
people
need
to
understand
that
too
it's
it's.
Sometimes
they
it's
a
little
mind-boggling,
so
to
understand
how
this
goes
and
it's
an
ongoing
process.
And
again
you
know
just
kudos
to
both
the
commission
and
and
the
staff
our
department
for
moving
this
along,
and
hopefully
the
council
has
been
helpful
on
that
part
of
it.
D
But
I
think
it's
very
exciting.
As
I
say,
I
think
what
I'm
really
interested
in
is
just
making
sure
that
we
that
we
have
the
flexibility
and
that
we're
we
have
the
boldness
to
look
forward
and
come
back
on
this,
and
I
think,
hopefully,
next
year
in
the
budget,
that's
where
we
can
have
some
good
conversations
about
the
future
and
resources
and
how
do
we?
D
How
do
we
adapt,
but
I
I
think
it's
an
excellent
overall
program
and
process
and
kudos
to
both
the
commission
and
staff
for
bringing
this
forward,
and
you
know
we
will.
We
will
try
to
match
you
in
doing
doing
the
work
on
this,
so
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
L
This
tfp,
you
know
that
the
cip,
as
mike
was
discussing
are
the
projects
that
you
have
approved
in
your
budget
they're,
a
budgetary
process
that
makes
it
fully
funded.
What
the
work
that
we
do
is
starting
to
identify
and
shape,
needs
and
opportunities.
So
they're
not
already
defined
projects
when
you're
looking
12
years
out,
it's
a
planning
tool
to
identify
we're
looking
at
something
that
might
be
a
problem,
let's
figure
out
how
we
can
do
it
and
so
staff.
L
You
know
the
light
shade
is
a
potential
need
that
we
don't
quite
know
how
to
solve
just
yet,
and
so
we
need
to
get
that
ready
for
you
to
make
that
consideration
of
the
final
funding
and
also
for
us
to
pursue
grant
funds
external
funds.
So
in
the
future
years.
Yes,
there
might
be
more
funding
available
for
these
projects
because
we'll
go
for
additional
grant
funding
or
it
you
know.
L
Definitely
it
will
be
the
council's
job
to
compare
the
the
need
and
the
the
needs
that
we're
starting
to
see
with
the
tfb
and
how
far
along
we
can
get
to
the
actual
growth
and
challenges,
and
so
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I
think
that's
that's
really
good
way
of
looking
at
it.
It's
not
etched
in
stone,
but
it
is
a
planning
tool
that
allows
us
to
get
to
a
capital,
a
set
of
capital
projects
for
for
the
budget,
consideration.
H
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
also
thanks
to
the
commission
and
staff
for
the
work
on
this.
A
couple
couple
points
one.
I,
the
idea
of
having
the
existing
networks
in
to
reference
would
be
helpful,
as
as
councilmembers
I
mentioned,
would
love
like
the
interactive
approach
that
you
went
through
with
the
slides
I'd
love
to
have
that
as
part
of
that
in
the
future,
but
also
the
scoring.
H
So
I
looked
at
the
list,
but
I
didn't
see
the
scoring,
so
I
would
would
love
to
see
the
scoring
that's
applied
to
each
one
of
the
items.
This
gets
me
to
a
question
around
the
evaluation
criteria
and
that's
safety
and
a
clarifying
question
around
multimodal.
So
safety
is
pretty
broad,
so
I
get
why
it's
30.
I
just
want
to
clarify
one
that
safety
is
not
just
vehicular
safety,
but
also
bike
head
safety
as
well,
and
then
the
second
clarifying
question
I
had
was
around
multimodal.
H
So
when
we
look
at
the
map
it
looks
like
and-
and
I
know
you
mentioned-
chaired
the
that
it
is
a
multi-modal
list
across
projects-
it
looks
multi-modal,
but
I
was
curious
if
within
project
per
project,
is
it
also
multimodal?
So
that
was
a
clarifying
question.
I
had.
L
F
So
I
I
I
can
address
those
those
two
questions:
councilmember
barksdale
at
the
in
terms
of
safety.
Yes,
absolutely
we're
looking
at
safety
for
all
users,
pedestrians,
vulnerable
users,
pedestrians
and
bicyclists,
as
well
as
motorists,
and
so
with
each
project,
we're
looking.
You
know
what
what
is
the
need
for
safety
you
know.
Is
there?
Is
there
a
history
of
a
problem
here?
Do
we
know
if
there's
a
safety
issue
or
concern
and
and
then
does
the
project
that
has
it
we've
identified?
Does
that
project?
To
what
extent
does
it
really
address
that
concern?
F
H
H
Is
it
accurate
to
say
that
like
if,
if
it
has,
if
it's
multimodal
it
bubbles
up
higher
on
the
list,
because
it
meets
more
of
these
criteria,
that's.
F
If
we
already
have
the
ped
facilities
in
place
and
we
don't
think
we
want
or
need
bike
facilities
or
they're
already
there
and
and
there's
no
net
improvement
for
pads
or
bikes,
it
would
get
zero
on
that,
so
it
it
would
only
score
on
the
vehicle
side,
so
yeah
for
each
project,
we're
looking
at
at
the
extent
to
which
it
benefits
each
of
those
modes.
H
E
Thank
you
randomly
well
happy
new
year
cheer
loriena.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
concise
presentation
and
my
question
is
kind
of
relates
to
the
criteria
you're
talking
about
you
mentioned
it's
the
same
as
before.
E
So
how
is
that
criteria
established
and
how
often
does
the
criteria
change
and
what
is
the
significance
of
the
criteria,
because
I
have
a
little
bit
of
confusion
based
on
the
last
question
asked
by
councilmember
box
dave
if
it's
the
scoring
criteria
and
if
the
multimodal
gets
all
the
points
on
most
of
the
points
and
if
it's
not
a
multimodal,
if
it's
only
single
modal
issue,
it's
not
never
going
to
score
very
high,
so
I
don't
know
whether
that's
meant
for
that
purpose.
E
L
Very
well
so
this
this,
I
would
say,
was
the
major
tool
that,
as
transportation
commission
we've
had
I've
been
part
of
this
process
for
about
two
or
three
rounds
and
and
we've
gone
into
a
lot
of
detailed
conversations
in
the
past,
and
so
I
can
say
that
sometimes
level
of
service
used
to
be
higher
and
transit
impede,
lower
and
things
change
and
plan.
Consistency
might
have
been
only
five
percent,
so
this
percentage
is
the
piece
that
the
transportation
commission
usually
most
looked
at
and
debated.
L
I
believe
this
year,
I
guess
we
hit
a
a
good,
a
good
allocation,
because
we
all
felt
it
was
good
the
way
it
was
again.
Safety
we
feel
is
very
important.
It's
something
that
should
have
the
most
waiting.
A
safety
issue
should
have
the
most
weighting
and
then
particular
modes.
L
We
just
simply
split
it
the
same
to
all
of
them,
and
that
means
that
yes,
projects
that
can
address
all
of
them
would
do
better,
but
it
also
doesn't
prioritize
transit
over
a
pet
bike,
project,
etc,
and
so
it
starts
to
guide
us
to
that
multimodal
feeling.
It
doesn't
mean
that
all
projects
most
of
our
projects,
don't
address
all
of
them.
So
it
just
gives
us
a
sense
of
balance
and
make
sure
we're
not
prioritizing
one
mode
over
the
other
by
having
a
consistent
weighting
across
the
three.
L
So
I'm
actually
really
excited
about
the
next
round,
where
we
can
start
fresh
with
all
those
mmlos
metrics.
Hopefully.
L
That's
how
we
had
that's,
how
we've
done
it
so
far,
and
that's
it.
That
was
the
general
sentiment
of
the
commission,
of
how
these
percentages
got
set
originally,
and
it
seemed
like
a
good
approach
for
this
tfp
cycle
as
well.
E
Yeah,
I'm
eager
to
look
forward
to
what
you're
talking
about.
As
you
recall
the
last
month,
we
had
some
pretty
stimulating
conversation
on
the
council
about
reducing
congestion
or
managing
condition.
E
So
you
know
that
falls
into
the
category
of
what
you're
talking
about
right
so
that
reflecting
the
choice
that
you
make
on
the
tps
tfp,
what
projects
do
you
pick?
You
know
how
do
they
fit
into
the
specific
goal
that
we
all
you
know
agree
to,
or
we
would
like
to
support
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reason
why
wwe
was
asking
about
the
community
input
stakeholders
or
that
you
know
what
do
we
stand?
How
do
we
look
at
and
how
does
it
translate
into
your
selection
criteria?
I
think
that's
very
important.
E
E
B
Thank
you,
councilman
really,
so
I'll
just
add.
This
is
kind
of
going
continuing.
What
council
member
lee
was
saying
as
well.
You
know,
as
somebody
who
primarily
bikes
and
walks
in
downtown
bellevue,
I
would
venture
to
say
that
any
pet
or
bike
project
is
a
safety
project,
or
at
least
a
great
majority
of
them
are
so
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
how
you
differentiate
between
that,
and
my
second
question
is
on
southeast
8th.
I
see
that
that's
something
that
we
can't
expect
to
be
completed
before
2023.
B
We
really
don't
have
a
safe,
east-west
cross,
405
pathway
right
now.
The
only
one
I
can
think
of
is
well.
The
two
are
at
the
north
end
in
the
south
end
of
our
city,
but
there's
nothing
kind
of
in
the
middle
and
that
southeast
eighth
is
just
so
dangerous,
but
also
really
so
vital
for
people
who
commute
and
come
off
the
lake
hills
connector
or
come
off
of
114th
all
those
routes.
So
I'm
wondering
you
know
how.
B
F
Yes,
we
do
have
a
project
on
south
east
8th,
as
you
noted,
and
in
that
project
we
included
an
allocation
sufficient
to
make
the
improvements
from
114th
avenue
east
to
lake
hills,
connector
timeline
wise.
We
unfortunately
need
to
wait
until
after
the
washdot
work
is
completed
under
the
freeway.
F
We
try
to
the
staff
level
to
work
with
the
contractor
and
get
them
to
do
the
work
for
us,
but
they
really
weren't
able
to
offer
the
kind
of
price
that
would
seem
reasonable,
so
we'll
have
to
wait
until
they're
done
and
then
we'll
go
in
and
and
do
the
work.
And
so
that's
why
that
is
a
still
a
couple.
E
B
Thank
you.
Okay,
so
did
you
do
you
have
more
presentation
to
continue
on
with
here.
L
Yeah,
so
all
we
wanted
to
do
to
close
this
off
office
to
share.
We
got
an
opportunity
to
use
the
mmlos
performance
metrics
on
this
tfp,
so
just
to
clarify
the
mobility
implementation
plan
was
happening
at
the
same
time
as
this
tfp
was
happening,
so
we
used.
The
evaluation
process
did
not
include
this
performance
measures,
but
once
we
had
the
tfp
ready,
we
staff
got
an
opportunity
to
run
the
performance
measures
in
comparison,
and
so
we
were
I'm
personally.
L
I
was
really
nervous
the
entire
year,
not
knowing
how
it
was
going
to
turn
out,
and
so
I
was
pleasantly
surprised
and
excited
to
show
how
how
the
the
this
mlos
metrics
are,
starting
to
show
in
a
much
more
comprehensive
way,
what
the
network
needs
and
and
and
how
we're
doing,
with
our
tfp
how
we're
performing
so
in
terms
of
the
vehicular
analysis,
we
did
see
that
the
proposed
projects,
just
generally
the
location
of
the
proposed
projects,
is
where
the
system
performance
is
expected
to
be
worse
in
the
future.
L
L
Then
we
also
know
that
these
transit,
the
transit
investments
of
this
tfp,
will
improve
the
performance
of
the
connectivity
and
some
of
the
od
pairs
that
we've
already
identified.
So
we
could
see
that,
based
on
you
know
the
baseline
and
what
we
do
with
the
tfp.
We
can
see
that
transit
performance
does
improve
thanks
to
these
investments
that
we've
talked
about
today.
That
was
also
very
exciting.
L
Now
the
pedestrian
and
the
bicycle
network,
because
they're
still
lagging,
I
think
we
try
to
focus
a
little
bit
more
on
gaps.
It's
really
important
that
we
fill
in
gaps
more
than
improve
performance
at
the
moment,
so
we
currently
have
in
terms
of
the
pedestrian
network.
This
tfp
will
reduce
gaps
for
five
miles,
probably
a
little
bit
more
because
we
have
that
reserve,
but
at
least
five
miles,
and
that
takes
us
from
a
twelve
percent
gaps
in
the
system
to
eight
percent
gaps
in
the
system.
L
So
now
you
we
can
start
to
talk
about.
If
we
wanted
to
fill
a
hundred
percent
of
the
gaps,
we
that's
what
we
would
need
to
find
funding
for,
and
so
this
really
helps
find
the
understand
the
numbers
of
the
amount
of
resources
that
we
have.
How
far
can
we
get
in
meeting
our
goals
and
the
gaps
that
we
have
in
the
system
and
then
bicycle
same
way?
We
are
able
to
reduce
it
with
this
tfp
eight
miles
so
from
24
percent
of
the
system.
L
I
believe
bellevue
is
truly
lagging
and
bicycle
network
more
than
anything
else.
We're
way
behind
on
our
bicycle
plans,
and
so
we
have
21st
24
of
the
system
is
a
gap,
so
we're
able
to
reduce
it
to
18
of
of
what
our
plan
system
would
be
by
introducing
those
eight
miles
of
bicycles.
L
So
we
can
start
to
see
and
talk
about
our
transit
network
in
this
more
quantitative
way
and
understand
how
it
will
improve
in
the
measures
that
we've
we've
spent
a
year
in
the
commission
discussing
and
fine-tuning
and
making
sure
that
they're,
the
right
measures
for
our
city
and
that
is-
are
moving.
Our
network
forward,
so
this
was
it's
just
a
little
extra
thing
we
wanted
to
share.
L
I
personally
wanted
to
share
with
you
to
to
show
a
little
preview
of
what
this
might
look
like
in
the
future
when
we
are
using
the
mls
and
the
mobility
implementation
plan
for
the
tfp
evaluation.
F
F
We're
what
we're
seeking
tonight
is
your
direction
on
whether
this
project
list
is
a
good
basis
for
us
to
proceed
with
the
tfp
update
process.
B
Okay,
let
me
see,
if
there's
any
comments
or
questions
on
that,
so
you
can
see
in
your
packet
option
one
we're
deciding
whether
we
want
to
move
forward
with
that
or
modify
it
or
not.
So
any
comments
or
questions,
and
what's
council
members
on
followed
by
council
member
robertson,
followed
by
councilmember
stokes.
G
Yes,
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
all
of
the
work
and
hearing
my
colleagues
add
comments
to
this.
I,
when
I
was
thinking
about
the
the
bike
network,
I
know
it's
been
several
years
since
I
was
on
the
transportation
commission.
G
I
know
one
of
the
goals
was
two
north
south
and
two
east-west
routes
for
the
the
bicycle
network.
So
the
the
reduction
from
the
24
to
the
18.
does
that
actually
get
us
to
the
two
north
south
to
east.
West
is
one
question
and
then
my
second
one
is,
I
agree
to
move
forward
with
this.
I
I
would
still
like
to
better
understand
from
a
vision,
zero
standpoint,
whether
the
kind
of
funds
that
we
have
proposed
in
there
would
be
sufficient.
G
I
believe
when
we
increase
the
vision,
zero
funding
to
year
and
a
half
ago
in
our
budget,
we
talked
about
having
vision,
zero
updates
to
the
council,
and
so
maybe
that's
a
separate
discussion,
but
I
do
think
that,
as
we
look
at
tfp
getting
a
broader
understanding
of
how
all
this
works
together
as
part
of
vision,
zero
will
be
important.
So
those
are
my
two
questions.
F
So,
for
vision,
zero,
what
we
did
was
we
took
the
council's
allocation
of
funding
for
the
first
seven
years
in
the
cip
and
we
extended
that
out
for
the
remaining
six
years
in
the
tfp.
So
that
was
our
working
assumption
of
you
know
what
the
council
had
said.
They
we
want,
and
in
the
absence
of
additional,
like
you
say,
information
of,
what's
needed
to
pursue
vision,
zero
at
whatever
level
that
you
know
that
the
council
wants.
We
we
we
use
that
as
our
as
our
bases.
F
So
you
know
we
may
have
better
information
you
know
in
in
in
the
coming
months
or
year.
But
but
that's
that's
our
assumption
at
this
point.
With
regard
to
the
north,
south
and
east
east-west
connections,
we
currently
have
one
complete
north-south
and
one
complete,
east-west.
F
Will
it
doesn't
fully
f
fund
we're
not
full
allocation
to
complete
an
east
another,
east-west
one?
That
would
be
either
the
mounts
to
sound
route
or
the
lake
to
lake
route?
F
So
we've
got
those
are.
Basically.
If
you
go
back
to
the
map,
we
we
have,
the
you
know
the
light
colors
on
some
of
those
segments,
not
not
the
dark,
color
and
similarly
on
on
the
north
south
we
get
close,
but
we
don't
fully
complete
the
another
north-south
one.
Either,
there's
a
couple
that
we're
getting
closer
on
the
middle
along
140th
and
then
along
west
lake
samantha's
parkway
again
we
make
an
incremental
progress,
but
not
not
the
full
piece.
G
G
So
whether
as
we
look
at
the
tfp,
we
can
get
a
better
sense
of
the
gap
and
what
funding
is
needed
and
then
looking
at
whether
there's
additional
sources
of
funds
that
we
could
look
at
to
be
able
to
accelerate
the
work.
You
know,
maybe
it's
another
tipi
alone
we
just
refinanced
our
last
one
and
usdot
just
published
an
article
saying
that
they
refinanced
artifia,
and
so
maybe
that's
another
opportunity,
as
we
look
forward
to
really
where
we
want
to
go
with
having
that
connectivity
thanks.
B
And
mike
I'm
just
going
to
jump
in
here.
For
a
second
say,
I
realize
that
we
have
predetermined
north,
south
and
east-west
routes,
but
you
know
just
because
I
know
the
southeast
eighth
one
so
well,
just
by
completing
that
you
will
have
a
complete
east-west
route,
a
second
one
just
by
completing
that
project.
It
won't
be
the
same
one
that
you
have
proposed,
but
that
will
safely
get
you
east
west
completely
by
connecting
two
other
routes.
F
And
I
I
I
would
just
point
out
that
actually
is
part
of
this
proposed
set
of
projects
are
the
east
bellevue
bicycle
network
and
the
south
bellevue
bicycle
network,
and
that's
precisely
to
get
at
this
opportunity
that
you've
pointed
out,
which
is
you
know
we
may
we've
identified
for
so
many
years.
You
know
key
corridors.
We
want
to
do
major
capital
investments
to
make
it
multimodal
at
the
level
of
service
that
we
would
like
to
see.
F
And
yet
you
know
we
haven't
been
able
to
move
the
needle
on
some
of
those
some
important
ones,
and
so
by
instead
taking
a
more
kind
of
flexible
approach
and
looking
at
opportunities,
how
can
we
create
connections
between
origins
and
destinations?
Without
necessarily,
you
know
needing
to
wait
for
major
capital
investments.
F
That's
the
approach
that
was
taken
with
the
growth
corridor,
bicycle
network
that
the
council
included
in
the
cip
and
which
we've
also
now
included
in
the
tfp,
of
course,
but
the
staff
proposed
and
the
commission
agreed
to
incorporate
that
same
sort
of
approach
for
east
bellevue
and
for
south
bellevue.
I
Thank
you.
I
initially
raised
my
hand
to
I
thought
when
the
discussion
was
done.
I
was
gonna,
make
the
motion,
but
this
has
been
a
great
discussion.
I
I
think
that
it's
really
exciting
to
see
the
layers
of
work
that
are
being
done
both
within
and
without
bellevue,
with
the
multimodal
level
of
service,
concurrency
standards
being
updated,
the
mobility
implementation
plan
being
and
having
the
tfp,
which
was
ahead
of
those
two
processes
slightly
then
get
screened
back
through
that
multimodal
level
and
seeing
how
it
it
really
did
true
up
and
was
was
pretty
good
through
that
process
or
or
you
know,
showed
well.
The
project
showed
well
and
the
so
the
tfp
is.
Is
the
revenue
constraint
plan?
I
Of
course
the
tip
is
any,
is
not
revenue
constrained
in
anything
on
the
tip,
which
is
more
than
what's
on.
This
list
is
eligible
for
grant
funding,
and
so
we're
going
to
be
we're
going
to
be
grappling
with
just
to
give
context
on
what
of
the
tfp
to
fund
in
the
next
capital
budget,
but
remember
the
there's
regional
money
out
there
and
the
transportation
policy
board
at
the
puget,
sound
regional
council.
I
just
finished
my
work
on
the
project
selection
task
force,
which
creates
the
new
screening
mechanism.
I
That
is
then
moving
forward
through
the
transportation
policy
board
this
year
and
there,
for
example,
one
of
the
things
that's
going
to
be
heightened.
There
is
safety
projects
so
by
using
this
screening
at
the
bellevue
level
for
safety.
Just
take
that,
for
example,
or
from
before
pet
or
for
bike
it.
It
makes
us
much
more
aware
and
much
more
competitive
to
be
able
to
get
other
people's
money
on
the
regional
basis
from
the
federal
grants
through
the
psrc.
I
So
I
think
that
all
of
these
things,
if
you
think
about
it
in
the
bigger
picture
to
get
our
arms
around
this
is
a
really
important
piece
of
it,
and
it's
very
much
in
line
with
a
lot
of
the
goals
of
vision,
zero
and
making
sure
our
pet
bike
plan
goes
forward,
making
sure
our
transit
master
plan
goes
forward.
It's
you
know,
making
sure
that
we,
you
know,
serve
the
growth.
I
I
think
all
of
that
really
is
dovetailing
very
nicely
and
I
know
councilmember
stokes
wanted
to
speak,
but
I
would
love
to
make
the
motion
to
direct
staff
to
move
this
forward
when
the
time
is
right.
Thank
you.
D
I'll,
second,
that
for
you
yeah,
I
think
councilman
robertson
has
a
good
point
on
that
and
I
served
on
that
committee
several
years
ago
now,
but
it
is
against
it's
an
example
of
we're,
always
continuing
and
regionally
and
otherwise
in
in
reviewing
these
things
and
new
things
come
up
and
we
have
to
keep
that
in
mind.
The
other
factor
is,
you
know
what
happens
in
the
legislature
and
all
the
good
thing
about
this.
Is
we
have
this
plan
and
we're
going
forward?
D
We
know
what
the
gaps
are
and,
as
you
know,
mayor
robertson
raised,
you
know,
there's
some
things,
we've
been
talking
about
doing
for
a
long
time
and
why
can't
we
get
them
done,
and
so
I
think
the
kind
of
message
out
on
this
is
that
bellevue
and
the
council
and
staff,
the
commission
and
all
are
working
together
on
this,
and
this
is
not
a
you
know.
When
we
bake
this
cake,
it's
it's
not.
D
You
know
we
don't
put
in
a
in
in
you
know
in
a
bell
jar
or
something
it's.
This
is
something
we
look
at
all
the
time
going
forward.
So
I
think
what
we've
seen
tonight
and
I
hope
that
people
are
watching
this
understand
on
this
transportation
stuff.
We
are
really
working
to
keep
moving
along.
As
I
said,
my
biggest
thing
excited
about
his
opportunities.
D
B
Okay,
great
any
other
comments
or
questions
not
seeing
any
councilmember
robertson.
Would
you
like
to
make
the
motion.
I
N
B
K
K
K
N
Good
evening
happy
new
year,
everyone
thank
you,
mr
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house
and
council
members.
So
tonight
we
are
here
to
review
with
you
an
affordable
housing
grant
opportunity,
and-
and
this
is
something
that
we
are
partnering
with
archon
and
there
are
some
related
code
changes
to
maximize
our
opportunity
to
pursue
this
grant.
We've
got
a
pretty
tight
timeline
on
this.
The
actual
application
is
due
on
january
7th.
So
that's
why
we're
bringing
this
to
you?
N
N
Sorry,
I
just
messed
with
my
computer
bad
thing
to
do
yeah,
so
tonight
we're
going
to
be
looking
for
a
direction
from
you
on
two
pieces
of
legislation.
One
is
to
establish
a
program
to
waive
direct
connection
fees
for
new
shelters
and
affordable
housing
projects,
and
this
is
contingent
on
available
non-utility
rate
revenue
rate
funds,
non-utility
funds
to
cover
the
amount
waived.
N
The
second
thing
we
are
looking
to
do
is
to
modify
the
city's
capital
recovery
charges,
which
also
called
crcs
to
create
an
option
for
prepayment
of
these
costs,
and
and
both
of
these
need
to
be
done
by
making
code
changes.
N
So
this
is
kind
of
the
overview
of
the
items
that
we'll
be
going
through
a
little
bit
of
what
the
grant
opportunity
is,
what
are
connection
charges
and
a
description
of
our
partnership
and
and
some
of
the
eligibility
requirements
for
the
grant.
N
So
what
is
this
grant
opportunity?
It
is
a
state
of
state
department
of
commerce
has
recently
established
this
connect,
connecting
housing
to
infrastructure
program,
called
chip
and
grant
that's
for
new,
affordable
housing
projects.
There
are
two
pieces
to
this
grant.
One
is
for
connection
charges,
waiver
and
that's
funded
by
the
state
capital
budget.
The
second
piece
is
for
reimbursement
of
utility
construction
improvements
related
to
the
same
kind
of
projects,
but
this
is
funded
by
the
federal
american
rescue
plan
act.
N
So
before
we
go
into
the
grant
opportunity,
I
thought
I'd
give
you
a
little
bit
of
a
background
on
what
our
connection
charges
and
give
you
a
little
bit
of
context.
So
connection
charges
go
by
a
number
of
names,
but
they
all
mean
the
same
thing.
It's
a
utility
fee
to
serve
the
demands
of
new
development,
and
this
is
and
connection
fees
are
one
of
the
tools
used
by
utilities
to
ensure
that
growth
pays
for
growth
in
bellevue.
New
development
is
subject
to
three
different
types
of
charges.
N
These
these
fees
are
administered
over
charged
over
a
10-year
period
and
they
appeared
on
the
customer's
utility
bill.
The
second
type
of
bellevue-centric
connection
charge
is
what
we
call
direct
facility
connection
charge,
and
this
is
same
same
thing
for
growth
related
projects,
but
where
the
benefit
is
directly
to
a
particular
piece
of
property,
and
these
are
one-time
fees
and
they're
paid
at
the
time
of
development.
N
The
second
type
of
connection
fees
shown
here
in
the
middle
kind
of
a
chart
called
cascade
capital
official
facility
charges
are
a
pass-through
of
cascade
connection
charges.
These
are
paid
upfront
by
the
developer
to
bellevue
and
we
turn
around
and
pay
these
to
cascade.
N
The
third
type
of
connection
fee
is
king
county
sewer
capacity
charges
which
are
built
by
king
county
directly,
rather
than
pass
through
through
city
of
bellevue,
and
these
charges
can
be
over
15
years,
but
they
have
the
option
of
paying
off
these
charges
as
a
lump
sum
at
an
earlier
opportunity
like
at
any
time
during
that
15
year
period.
N
So
one
correction
I
wanted
to
make
to
the
the
information
that
you
have
in
your
gender
memo
is
some
new
information
we
got
just
today.
N
Our
initial
information
from
king
county
was
that
they
were
not
eligible
for
this
grant
opportunity,
but
just
today
the
king
county
staff
has
notified
us
that
they
that
they
believe
that
they're
now
eligible
to
participate
in
this
grant,
and
so
we
will
be
coordinating
with
them
on
how
they
can
partner
with
us
on
on
this
application
that
we
will
be
pursuing.
So
for
the
purpose
of
the
rest
of
this
discussion.
N
We're
going
to
be
focused
on
connection
fees
that
are
built
by
belgium
and-
and
these
are
the
first
two,
the
blue
and
the
teal,
the
crcs
and
the
capital
cascade
charges.
N
So
next,
let
me
describe
a
little
bit
about
the
chip
grant
and
what
are
opportunities.
In
our
initial
assessment,
we've
identified
the
three
projects
to
apply
for
this
grant.
N
N
So
the
chip
grant
is
a
new
program
for
commerce,
and
the
timeline
line
is
very
compressed.
We
applications,
like
I
said,
are
due
this
this
week
and
final
january.
7Th
is
the
final
due
date
and,
and
the
reason
that
we
are
bringing
this
to
you
just
now
is
that
actually
the
eligibility
requirements
were
still
being
clarified
just
a
few
weeks
ago,
so
we're
just
this
is
kind
of
hot
off
the
presses
and-
and
we
want
to
leverage
this
opportunity
as
soon
as
we
can.
N
This
slide
shows
you
some
of
the
key
requirements
for
the
chip.
Grant
and
art
projects
under
are
eligible
under
this
grant,
but
there
are
two
requirements.
Well,
let
me
go
through
all
five
requirements.
First
of
all,
the
applicant,
it
has
to
be
the
city
county
or
a
public
utility
district
and
and
we
partnered
with
the
developer,
to
help
them
with
the
apply
for
we,
but
the
application
applicating
application
agency
is
us.
N
It
is
for
new
multi-family,
low
income,
affordable
housing
and
the
program
is
to
waive
connection
charges
and
that's
using
state
funds
that
that's
one
type
of
cost
that
can
be
reimbursed.
The
second
type
of
cost
that
can
be
reinvested
is
utility
improvements
necessary
for
the
project,
and
these
are
federal
funds,
as
I
mentioned.
N
So
there
are
two
proposed
code
changes
that
we
need
to
address
these
these
issues.
One
is
that
the
city
must
create
a
connection
charge
waiver
program
in
order
to
be
eligible
for
the
grant.
The
second
is
that
in
that,
in
order
to
allow
property
owners
to
prepay
crcs
that
right
now
are
paid
over
10
years.
We
want
to.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
maximizing
the
grant
opportunity
by
having
the
the
project
have
the
opportunity
to
pray
for
pre-pay
the
entire
10
years
worth
of
connection
charges.
N
So
these
are
some
of
the
key
elements
of
the
waiver
program.
Obviously,
our
key
objectives
are
that
we
meet
the
grant
requirements
and
and
that
we
are
supporting
the
reduction
of
affordable
housing
project
costs,
that
we
are
meeting
that,
while
being
true
to
the
city's
policy
of
growth,
space
for
growth
and
maintaining
self-supporting
utilities.
N
N
The
second
item
that
we
need
to
make
some
changes
on
is
the
crc
payment
in
full
option.
The
current
code
has
the
crcs
paid
over
10-year
period
and
there
is
no
premium
prepayment
opportunity
in
our
current
code,
so
the
proposed
code
changes
would
allow
us
to
maximize,
like
I
said,
the
chip
grant
opportunity
and
because
this
will
enable
payment
or
grant
reimbursement
for
the
entire
10-year
period.
N
So
tonight
we
are
looking
for
council
direction
to
return
with
legislation
in
a
few
weeks
to
one
establish
a
program
to
waive
water,
sewer
and
storm
water
connection,
charges
for
new
shelters
and
affordable
housing
projects
and
two
modify
the
city's
crc
program
to
create
options
for
prepayment
of
of
those
fees.
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
I'm
really
excited
that
this
is
coming
before
us.
I
think
we're
all
interested
in
this.
I
will
take
hands.
If
you
raise
your
hand,
let
me
know
if
you
want
to
make
a
comment
or
have
a
question.
I
see.
Councilmember
stokes
has
his
hand
up
so
I'll
start
with
him
and
then
deputy
mayor
and
then
council
members
on.
B
B
B
Councilmember
lee
did
you
have
your
panda?
Yes,
okay,
all
right,
councilmember
stokes
go
ahead.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
This
is
very
exciting.
You
know
knob
with
and
staff
her
staff
have
been
working
with.
Actually
cascade
has
looked
at
this
two
two
or
three
years
ago
we
had
some
consultants
for
some
reason
from
texas,
a
m
who
know
a
lot
about
been
working
on
equity
and
working
with
low-income
people.
In
terms
of
how
can
we
help-
and
this
is
one
of
the
issues
we
talked
about
and
the
and
either
you
know
reducing
these
fees
or
eliminating
them,
and,
of
course
it.
D
You
know
it's
one
of
those
things
as
knob
knows:
it
impacts
your
overall
cost,
so
just
doing
it
by
without
any
ex
help
from
you
know,
funding
would
be
a
difficult
thing,
but
we
talked
about
it
and
it
had
some.
D
You
know
conversations
on
this,
so
my
point
is
this
is
exciting
if
we
can
get
if
there
is
funding
for
this
and
it's
something
that
we
you
know,
we
should
start
talking
together
on
this
and
how
we
could
this
may
actually
move
cascade
and
the
other
cities
involved
to
to
do
this,
and
this
would
be
a
substantial
thing
for
helping
affordable
housing.
D
So
I'm
very
excited
about
it
and
I
think
it's
something
that
we
can
you
know
we.
We
have
some
synergy
that
we
can
work
on
and
then,
if
we
can
do
it
in
bellevue
and
work
on
this,
we
can
work
on
the
other
cities
around
us
as
well.
So
it's
a
great
thing
so
now,
if
we
we
need
to
set
up
a
meeting
up
and
kind
of
talk
about
this
and.
C
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
echo
the
enthusiasm
for
this
for
this
program.
It's
fantastic
and
thank
you
now
for
working
so
quickly
with
your
outstanding
team
to
bring
this
opportunity
to
before
us
and
for
staying
on
top
of
it,
even
under
very
tight
timelines.
It
sounded
like,
but
certainly
this
is
an
opportunity
that
we
do
not
want
to
miss.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
all
your
efforts
and
your
team
efforts
and
for
the
presentation
tonight
it's
outstanding.
C
I
don't
think
any
of
my
colleagues
are
going
to
have
an
issue
with
moving
this
forward.
Tonight
I
mean
it's
a
no-brainer,
probably
the
easiest
of
what
we're
going
to
take
all
year
for
sure,
but
a
great
great
work,
and
my
only
question
that
I
had
in
some
of
your
or
your
team's
discussion
with
the
the
commerce
department
on
this
is
given
that
I
believe,
if
I
remember
correctly,
the
numbers
in
your
presentation
that
it
has
to
be
invoiced
by
june
of
2023.
C
That
they've
mentioned
so
far
that
if
construction
has
not
begun
within
that
24
month
period
that
we
could
be
looking
at
renewing
a
program
such
as
this,
in
fact,
maybe
this
is
even
something
that
we
add
to
our
ledger:
alleged
agenda,
that
you
know
that,
if
we're
looking
for
another
tool
to
help
create
more
affordable
housing,
multi-family,
affordable
housing,
that
this
is
a
great
tool
and
we
should
be
embracing
this
and
continuing
it
past.
The
2023
so
just
curious
that
that
was
brought
up
at
all.
N
We
we're
not
aware
of
it.
We
did
not
follow
up
on
that,
so
we,
our
research,
didn't
go
that
far
what
yeah
so,
but
we
can.
We
can
certainly
follow
up
with
commerce.
What
I
do
know
is
that
this
is
the
first
wave
of
applications
and
we
wanted
to
be
in
the
first
wave.
That's
why
the
rush
to
get
this
in,
because
literally
they're
still
defining
the
program,
and
we
said
okay,
we
can't
miss
the
deadline.
N
The
first
deadline
was
january
3rd
today
and
we
actually
submitted-
and
that
was
the
pre-application-
and
we
did
that
last
week
so
that
we
would
meet
this
deadline,
and
that
was
just
and
to
to
even
know
if
we
were
eligible
and
that's
where
we
knew
that
the
shelter
was
not
eligible
for
this
funding.
But
so
it's
it's
very
early
stages
and
I
think
they're
really
working
out
the
details,
but
we
wanted
to
be
in
on
this
first
wave
of
applications.
G
N
It's
that
this
we
would
do
this
if
there
is
non-utility
resources
available
that
can
be
grants.
That
can
be
other
sources
of
money,
because
the
reason
for
that
is
that,
if
a,
if
that
isn't
available,
this
becomes
every
driver
for
the
rest
of
the
rate
base.
So
that's
why,
from
our
research
most
entities
that
have
this
kind
of
program,
they
they
it's
funded
by
other
sources
rather
than
utility
rate
revenues.
G
Okay,
so
it's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
put
this
in
place,
there's
the
state
funds
potentially
available,
and
if
we
see
that
this
is
something
that's
very
helpful,
we
could
talk
about
what
we
might
want
to
do
ourselves
if
that
is
something
of
interest,
because
we
do
know
that
housing
is
less
and
less
affordable
to
build
and
more
and
more
challenging.
So,
okay,
thank
you.
B
So
nov,
I
know
we're
not
discussing
this
much
tonight,
but
the
part
that
talks
about
utility
improvements
for
affordable
housing
projects.
The
one
thing
that
I
am
concerned
about
is
when
we
talk
about
putting
in
affordable,
detached
dwelling
units
in
our
existing
homes
and
neighborhoods.
I
worry
about
some
of
the
old
infrastructure,
and
so
if
one
of
those
were
to
qualify
as
affordable
housing,
could
that
then
qualify
for
utility
improvements
to
support
the
demand
on
the
infrastructure.
N
It
is
for
multi-family,
low-income,
affordable
housing,
so
so
the
the
utility
infrastructure
we're
talking
about
is
either
directly
to
to
that
project
like
side,
zoo
or
or
you
know
that
kind
of
thing
or,
if
that
there
needed
to
be
utility
upgrades
in
order
to
make
that
happen.
So
that's,
but
it
is
really.
The
program
is
for
multi-family
housing.
B
Got
it
okay,
thank
you
for
answering
that
council
member
robertson,
followed
by
barksdale
and
then
councilmember
lee.
I
Thank
you,
so
I
just
really
wanted
to
just
give
a
strong
kudos
for
to
knob
and
the
team,
and
then
you
know
her
department,
as
well
as
the
city
manager's
office,
wow
this.
You
know
that
people
complain
about
how
slow
government
moves
and
we
have
this.
It
kind
of
comes
up.
There's
these
super
short
deadlines.
I
The
the
leadership
staff
leadership
knows
that
council
would
be
all
over
this,
and
what
do
they
do
over
christmas
break
and
new
year's
they
put
this
together
and
put
it
on
our
agenda
for
january
3rd,
I
mean
wow,
I
just
yes,
two
thumbs
way
way
up
support
bringing
this
forward.
I
just
really
wanted
to
speak,
because
this
is
just
such
an
example
of
the
excellence
of
the
people
who
work
for
the
city
of
bellevue,
and
I
really
appreciate
it.
H
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor.
No,
thank
you
to
you
and
your
staff
for
bringing
this
to
council.
I
think
it's
awesome.
As
it's
already
been
mentioned,
any
chance,
we
can
remove
barriers
for
affordable
housing.
I
did
have
one
clarifying
question:
is
there
an
ami
level
or
how
is
affordable
housing
defined
in
the
context
of
this
grant?.
N
Yes,
there
is,
there
are
income
requirements
and
I
will
I
will
get
back
to
you
on
that,
because
I
was
given
that
information,
but
I
have
lost
it,
but
there
is
a
definition
of
affordable
housing
that
and
it's
a
certain
percentage
of
ami,
and
I
I'm
actually
going
to
see-
I
told
andy,
who
has
been
with
us
only
for
a
couple
of
months,
that
I
wouldn't
put
him
on
the
spot.
But
andy.
If
you
have
an
answer,
would
you
would
you
mind
unmuting
yourself
and
joining
us?
M
Happy
to
happy
to
respond
to
that
for
the
grant
for
eligibility.
It
must
be
eighty
percent
of
ami
for
the
two
projects
that
we
have
that
are
eligible.
They
are
at,
I
believe,
fifty
percent
and
sixty
percent
of
am
I
and
that
will
help
our
application.
Our
the
scoring
of
those
projects
in
the
application
process.
E
Thank
you.
I
fully
agree
with
councilmember
robinson's
com
comment
about
our
staff.
I
mean
they.
They
they
right
on
and
they're
right
on
the
topic
when
you
know
they
feel
that
it's
beneficial
to
to
to
the
city-
and
this
obviously
is
very
important
population
involving
question,
affordable
housing.
E
Actually,
you
know,
we
all
know
how
important
it
is
to
make
the
cost
of
housing
law.
So
this
is
all
good.
But
out
of
all
this
enthusiasm,
I
just
want
to
you
know:
ask
one
question
not
to
sew
cold
water
or
anything,
but
it's
reality.
E
If
the
commerce
and
others
have
money
for
us,
you
know
we
can
pay
for
the
costs
of
you
know
it's
not
the
city's
not
paying
for
it
we're
getting
a
grant
okay.
So
if
we
have
a
grant,
we
do
it.
That's
great!
You
know
it's
something.
We
enable
the
affordable
housing.
What,
if
that
the
grant
is
not
there?
E
Are
we
committed
that
anybody
who
wants
this?
What
is
going
to
come
out
of
the
city's
budget?
Do
we
have
them
to
include
in
our
city
budget
in
the
future
to
make
this
work?
That's
the
first
question
yeah.
The
second
one
is
in
relation
to
actually
fans.
Remember
john
stokes
mentioned
about
cascade
waterlines
actually
had
talked
about
this.
You
know
people
who
are
on
low
income
and
what
you
know
ben.
What
kind
of
program
do
we
have?
E
You
know
to
help
them
to
mitigate
the
cost
of
doing
or
that
stuff,
and
I
think
each
city
has
their
own
program,
obviously,
and
maybe
some
of
them
don't.
So
how
is
it?
How
is
entity
like
has
given
the
alliance
applied
that
and
if
we
also
have
that?
How
is
that
going
to
work
together?
You
know
so
there's
some
there's
some
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
or
that's
what
I'm
asking
so
I
number
one.
E
We
got
to
look
at
all
the
aspects
of
it
so
that
we're
not
just
doing
it
for
the
sake
of
what
what
a
wonderful
thing
we
can
do.
Well,
that's
our
responsibility
to
the
public.
So
if
now
you
can
answer
those
two
questions,
I
think
sure.
N
Sure,
so
that's
why
there
are
the
the
program.
Has
the
definition
of
that
it
is
for
when
there
are
funds
available
from
grants
or
other
forces,
and
and
it
would
be
the
you
know
if
so
this
specific
change
is
broad
enough
that
it
it
it
can
be.
It
is
council's
decision
on
any
future
project
if
there
aren't
any
funds
available
on
whether
you
want
to
find
some
other
alternate
funding
or
not,
but
what
we
wanted
to
do
was
right
now
there
is
this
money
available.
N
There
are
these
projects,
so
it
was
a
perfect
alignment
to
say
this.
This
was
kind
of
like
a
no-brainer
and
as
far
as
the
cascades
program
was
concerned,
what
I
know
about
the
cascade
program
was
really.
It
would
be,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
it
where
it
went,
but
really
the
connection
charges
are
levied
by
by
they're
collected
by
their
jurisdictions.
N
For
example,
we
collect
the
charges
so
and
people
don't
go
to
cascade
for
development
charges,
so
I'm
not
exactly
sure
her
cascades
program
would
have
worked.
Maybe
a
council
member
stokes
has
and
some
idea,
but
these
like
this-
is
something
that
the
city
is
applying
on
behalf
of
the
the
projects.
D
Yeah,
that's
what,
as
I
said
now,
let's
we'll
look
at
this,
I
guess
yeah.
It
is
that
I
guess
the
cities
collect
on
behalf
of
cascade
on
that
all
those
fees
or
yeah.
It's
part
of
the
whole
deal
the
the
issue
we
had,
of
course
was.
How
do
we
replace
those
resources?
D
And
you
know
I,
but
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
doing
this
and
it's
something
that
this
may
be
a
good
catalyst
for
this
going
forward.
So
we
need
to
talk
about
it
and
see
what
we
can
do
and
I
think
it's
very
positive
and
and
us
taking
and
you
taking
the
leadership
on
this
and
and
jumping
out
there
on.
D
It
is
going
to
be
very,
very
helpful
and
I
don't
know
what
the
other
cities
around
us
are
doing
at
this
point,
but
I'm
sure
they're
looking
at
this
as
well
and
and
it's
one
of
these
things-
that's
somewhere
down
the
line.
As
I
think
the
deputy
mayor
mentioned
this,
you
know
we
may
we
may
look
at
other
ways
to
continue
this.
Even
if
this
particular
one
doesn't
go
forward
because
again
it's
it's
something
that
could
really
help
us
with
with
affordable
housing.
D
B
I
think
we
all
agree
with
that.
So
is
there
a
motion.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
return
with
appropriate
ordinances,
to
amend
the
city's
relevant
code
to
establish
a
program
to
waive
water,
sewer
and
storm
water
connection,
charges
for
new
shelters
and
affordable
housing
projects
and
modify
the
city's
capital
recovery
charges
to
create
an
option
for
prepayment
of
fees.