►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - April.19, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
Yes
plea
mayor
robinson
here,
deputy
mayor
newman
house,
council,
councilmember,
barksdale.
D
D
C
E
A
E
E
Thou.
Now,
therefore,
on
behalf
of
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
bellevue
and
mayors
of
baple,
carnation,
duvall,
issaquah,
kenmore,
kirkland,
north
bend,
redmond
renton,
samantha,
seattle
and
shoreline
jointly
proclaim
april
21st
2021
as
hopelink
day
and
invite
the
community
to
celebrate
the
organization.
E
F
And
whereas
volunteers
gave
their
talents
and
energy
to
make
bellevue
the
place
you
want
to
be.
And
whereas
volunteers
are
recognized
as
an
important
partners
with
the
city
of
bellevue
in
providing
services
to
residents
and
whereas
the
city
offers
dozens
of
opportunities
to
volunteer
in
multiple
departments,
including
parks
and
community
services,
police,
fire
utilities
and
community
development,
and
whereas
the
city
of
bellevue
appreciates
its
volunteers
and
encourages
residents
to
get
involved
in
their
community,
neighborhood
and
local
government.
A
Thank
you.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda.
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Thank
you
clerk.
Do
we
have
a
some
people
who
would
like
to
do
oral
communications
tonight.
C
G
C
G
You
and
thank
you
all
for
your
time
tonight.
G
H
G
We
also
wanted
to
let
you
know
that,
after
having
long
discussions
with
the
theater
staff
and
leadership,
that
streaming
seems
to
be
our
immediate
future.
So
as
we
go
into
our
summer
programming
and
hopefully
fall
programming.
After
that,
we
were
looking
for
a
good
way
to
be
able
to
stream
our
presentations
to
help
support
social
distances.
G
Our
next
production
will
be
this.
May
it
will
be
a
radio
play
done
online
with
staff-led
students
and
participants.
G
C
J
Thank
you
good
evening,
council
members.
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity
for
the
record,
my
name
is
patience
malaba
and
I
work
for
the
housing
development
consortium
of
seattle,
king
county,
our
association
of
190
member
organizations
works
each
day
to
strive
toward
our
vision
that
all
people
live
with
dignity
in
safe,
healthy
and
affordable
homes
within
communities
of
opportunity.
J
J
J
As
you
well
know,
the
king
county
ami
increased
six
percent
between
2017
and
2018..
This
created
hardship
on
existing,
affordable
renters.
As
noted
in
the
data
that
was
analyzed
by
arch
of
the
incentive
units
residents,
the
vast
majority
of
them
were
paying
more
than
30
percent
of
income
towards
rent,
which
is
largely
due
to
ami
escalation.
J
So
capping,
mfte,
rent
increases
will
ensure
that
rent
can
never
exceed
the
ami
threshold
at
the
time
it
can
only
be
lower.
Secondly,
we
also
strongly
urge
you
to
consider
the
impact
of
packing
costs
on
the
people
residing
in
mfte
units.
We
urge
your
strong
support
of
the
east
side
roundtable
proposal
to
partially
cover
parking
costs
for
tenants
in
income
restricted
units
with
a
30
packing
discount.
J
This,
of
course,
would
center
the
needs
of
moderate
income
people
by
ensuring
that
we
are
reducing
cost
onsite
for
them.
As
you
see
through
your
discussion
today,
we
fully
understand
that
change
is
hard.
We
fear
it
and
we
fight
it,
but
you
are
leading
us
through
it
all
king
county
alone,
faced
a
shortfall
of
156
000,
affordable
homes
in
2017,
and
that
was
before
the
carpet
19
pandemic.
That
has
exacerbated
the
crisis.
J
C
K
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
mfte
program,
update
on
your
study
agenda
this
evening.
As
you
well
know,
mfte
can
be
a
highly
effective
housing
production
tool
when
properly
calibrated,
and
we
concur
with
others.
Who've
noted
that
participation
is
a
critical
measurement
of
the
program's
effectiveness.
K
As
you
consider
proposed
updates
the
program
we
offer
these
recommendations,
number
one
support
a
transportation
allowance,
equaling
a
30
discount
on
parking
spaces
for
mfte
unit
renters
and
secondly,
cap
mfte
rent
increases
at
three
percent
a
year
to
address
the
number
of
renters
to
experience,
cost
burden
after
securing
their
homes.
Htc
submitted
written
comments
with
additional
details
for
your
review,
and
we
want
to
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
another
look
at
this
program
and
for
your
service
to
the
bellevue
community.
Thanks.
C
C
L
Okay
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
I'm
prolonged
with
amazon
and
I'm
pleased
to
offer
support
for
emerging
consensus
between
the
eastside
housing,
roundtable
members
that
patients
and
and
mallory
just
mentioned,
including
leaders
in
the
private
sector
and
non-profit
housing,
builders
and
supporters
on
how
to
best
update
the
city
of
bellevue's
multifamily
tax
exemption
program.
L
This
dialogue
may
not
have
come
together
had
it
not
been
for
the
mayor's
encouragement
of
all
of
us
to
bring
our
ideas
to
the
table
and
continue
to
work
on
new
ideas,
so,
on
behalf
of
the
entire
business
community,
we
thank
you,
the
council
and
staff
for
your
efforts
to
create
policies
that
support
the
growth
of
affordable
housing
in
bellevue
tonight.
I'd
like
to
offer
a
few
points
for
you
to
consider
during
your
study
session
first
is
about
the
80
ami.
L
L
Thanks
for
considering
alternatives
that
will
allow
builders
to
go
below
a
minimum
of
15
percent
two-bedroom
units
in
return
for
deeper
affordability
or
a
greater
number
of
affordable
units.
Third,
on
layered
and
stacked
incentives,
we
propose
increasing
the
ami
for
layered
incentives
from
50
ami
to
65
ami,
while
these
scenarios
may
vary
from
site
to
site.
Our
objective
is
to
increase
the
number
of
affordable
house
units
included
in
each
project,
which
is
unlikely
to
occur
at
50
percent
ami
on
rent
stabilization
and
the
cost
burden
reduction.
L
We're
all
concerned
about
the
increased
cost
of
housing,
especially
for
those
households
whose
incomes
income
does
not
keep
up
with
rent,
and
so
that's
why
we
support
as
well
a
cap
on
mfte
rent
rent
increases
on
existing
tenants
to
three
percent
per
year,
while
allowing
higher
ami
for
new
tenants
and
finally,
the
last
point
on
parking
everybody's
favorite
topic
for
mft
renters
outside
of
downtown
bellevue.
We
agreed
to
a
30
discount
for
those
who
choose
to
rent
a
stall
parking
would
be
made
available
on
the
first
come
first
serve
basis
in
downtown.
L
However,
no
discount
would
be
provided,
as
we
hope,
to
incentivize
transit
ridership.
We
believe
these
principles
can
form
the
basis
for
unlocking
the
potential
of
the
marketplace
to
generate
more
affordable
units
with
a
set
of
incentives
that
will
actually
yield
results.
So
thanks
again
to
council
and
staff
like
for
your
collaboration,.
C
Thank
you
miss
long,
and
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
The
final
speaker
that
had
registered
is
on
the
same
talking
topic
for
the
same
side
in
support.
So
at
this
point
I
would
ask:
is
there
anyone
else
connected
to
this
call?
Who
would
like
to
make
oral
communication
to
the
council
this
evening?
If
so
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
nine?
If
you're
connected
with
a
phone
and
miss
dean,
I
see
your
hand.
Can
you
hear
me
I
can
thank
you.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
thank
you.
M
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
this
is
heidi
dean.
I
was
not
planning
to
speak
tonight
and
the
only
reason
I
am
is
my
husband
handed
me
something
literally
five
minutes
before
the
meeting
started
and
what
he
handed
me
was
a
letter
to
us
from
design
built
homes,
which
is
a
luxury
home
builder
that
is
looking
to
buy
homes
in
neighborhoods,
like
mine,
knock
them
down
and
build
ginormous
mcmansions.
M
This
is
one
of
several
home
builders
that
are
doing
this
in
neighborhoods
around
the
city.
It's
become
a
hot
topic
on
next
door
and
we
know
that
there
are
neighborhoods
such
as
newport
hills,
lake
hills,
eastgate
spirit,
ridge,
robbinswood
that
are
more
affordable
in
the
city
that
these
developers
are
targeting.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
one
representative
from
mn
custom
homes
told
an
eastgate
representative
or
an
eastgate
resident
that
they
had
plans
to
basically
do
this
to
all
of
eastgate.
M
They've
already
got
a
foothold,
they've
already
done
it
to
15
homes.
In
my
neighborhood,
just
in
a
two
block
radius,
I
have
three
mn
custom
homes
that
are
going
up
where
previously
affordable
homes
had
stood.
M
I'm
concerned
because,
as
we
talk
about
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
maintaining
the
stock
of
affordable
housing,
it's
being
wiped
out,
these
were
homes
that
could
have
gone
to
people
that
were
first-time
homebuyers
or
empty
nesters.
I
have
a
friend
who
was
an
empty
nester
and
couldn't
downsize
in
bellevue
had
to
move
away,
because
they
could
no
longer
afford
a
smaller
home
here.
M
What
really
bothers
me-
and
many
others-
is
the
fact
that
the
neighborhoods
are
being
asked
to
do
our
part
to
provide
affordable
housing
for
the
city
and
being
asked
to
densify
ourselves
through
additional
adus
and
the
dad
use
with
no
restrictions
on
them.
But
yet
these
housing
developers
are
coming
in
and
buying
up
and
and
destroying
affordable
housing
units.
You
know
our
relative
for
other
people,
and
what
can
we
do
about
that?
M
I
understand
that
there's
free
market
and
capitalism
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
it
just
doesn't
seem
right
that
this
can
happen
in
our
city
and
that
the
neighborhoods
are
supposed
to
make
up
for
it
while
these
developers
profit
from
this.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
you
aware:
my
husband
gets
these
letters
and
he
gets
phone
calls
and
texts
all
the
time
and
they've
actually
started
texting
and
calling
my
18
year
old
son.
One
developer
in
particular
is
convinced
that
my
son
owns
our
home
and
won't
leave
him
alone.
M
So
please
be
aware-
and
thank
you
for
your
time.
A
I'm
sorry
thank
you
that
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
study
session
items.
We
have
two
items
to
discuss
tonight.
Mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
first
one.
N
Skipped
a
page,
no
worries,
no
worries
so
good
evening,
robinson
and
council
members.
We
have
two
items
under
the
city
manager's
report
this
evening
on.
The
first
topic
is
an
overview
of
the
bellevue
school
district's
return
to
school
efforts
and
plans
for
the
fall,
as
well
as
an
update
on
the
budget
and
fall
enrollment
numbers.
It's
my
pleasure
to
introduce
dr
ivan
duran,
the
bellevue
school
superintendent,
to
provide
us
with
the
update
with
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
dr
grant.
I
Good
well,
thank
you,
mayor,
robinson
council
members
for
this
opportunity
to
be
able
to
I'll
give
you
a
brief
update.
I
had
an
old
zoom
link
that
dated
back
to
last
year
of
may
2020,
and
so
that's
when
I
gave
you
an
update
when
we
were
a
couple
months
in
the
pandemic
and
it's
literally
been
well
over
a
year
now,
and
so
just
really
want
to
give
you
guys
some
background,
but
I
first
just
want
to
really
give
some
thanks
and
gratitude
to
mayor
robertson
for
joining
us.
I
On
the
governor's
visit
to
phantom
lake
elementary
school,
I
sent
a
picture
to
staff
because
there
was
a
photo
and
we're
in
the
background.
I'm
talking
to
dao
constantine
and
there's
a
photo.
That's
been
circulated
in
the
new
york
times
and
used
for
numerous
stories,
so
it
was
really
nice
to
to
get
some
press
out
of
that,
but
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
on
that
visit
as
the
governor
was,
you
know,
working
and
pushing
to
get
educators
vaccinated
sooner
and
also
to
really
encourage
a
reopening
of
schools.
I
I
also
want
to
thank
city
council
for
your
overall
support
for
the
superintendent
advisory
council,
I'll
be
sharing
more
information
about
that
later
in
the
group,
that's
been,
you
know
really
helping
us
to
think
about
some
of
our
budget
decisions
and
I'm.
I
Council
member
stokes
is
not
here
because
I
wanted
to
thank
him
for
actually
participating
on
the
superintendent's
advisory
council,
which
has
been
a
group
that
was
brought
together
to
really
help
us
think
about
some
budget
in
alignment
with
our
strategic
plan,
where
we
want
to
be
moving
forward.
It's
also
more
about
that.
But
tonight.
I
On
just
our
reopening
plans,
some
of
the
things
we're
thinking
about
for
fall
a
little
bit
on
budget
and
enrollment
updates
and
then
just
briefly
touch
on
that
superintendent's
report.
There
are
some
really
good
nuggets
and
they're
going
to
be
thinking
about.
So
you
know
we
have
been
working
really
hard
to
have
our
students.
You
know
who
select
in-person
learning
to
be
back
in
our
schools
and
prior
to
spring
break.
You
know
we
have
been
serving
our
k
through
two
students
and
our
three
through
five,
our
fifth
grade
students.
I
You
know
in
half
days
and
right
before
spring
break.
We
were
also
able
to
have
our
secondary
students
back
for
two
days
a
week.
You
know
part
time
before
spring
break
and
we
look
forward
to
having
them
all
back
next
week
this
week,
for
us
after
spring
break
was
a
quarantine
week
that
we
had
bargained
with
our
association,
so
we
needed
to
honor
that
agreement,
and
so
we
look
forward
to
having
our
students
back.
I
You
know
who
have
chosen
to
receive
in-person
services
next
week
and
we're
going
to
be
really
working
hard,
so
we
can
provide
more
in-person
services
for
our
students.
We
are
currently
following
the
six-foot
guidelines
right
now
and
we're
working
closely
with
our
education
association
and
the
other
nine
bargaining
groups
that
we
have
to
work
with
to
really
maximize.
You
know
the
space
that
we
have
and
do
all
that
we
can
so
that
we
can
serve
more
students
and
increase
the
time
that
you
know
they
receive
some
of
their
educational
services.
I
So
really,
I
think,
that's
important.
I
really
just
want
to
say
that
I
am
deeply
concerned
about
the
mental
health
and
well-being
of
our
students
and,
I
believe,
having
them
back
in
person
will
serve
them
best
at
this
time.
We
are
also
really
working
closely
to
support
our
students
have
not
fared
as
well
in
the
remote
learning
and
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
work
to
catch
some
students
up
and
we'll
do
everything
we
can.
But
up
to
this
point
it
has
been
wonderful
to
have
our
students.
You
know
back
in
our
schools.
I
Our
educators,
have,
you
know,
done
a
phenomenal
job
over
this
last
year
and
now
you
know
we're
having
to
adjust
and
make
some
changes
as
we
have
students
in,
but
we
have
numerous
risk
mitigation
strategies
are
in
place.
You
know
we
have
had
some
cases
in
schools,
but
we
have
not
had
any
spread
in
our
schools,
so
we
know
that
the
risk
mitigation
strategies
have
been
working.
I
I
do
want
to
share
that.
We
are
also
working
to
have
a
and
planning
on
a
full
return
in
the
fall,
knowing
that
more
people
are
going
to
be
vaccinated-
and
you
know
we'll
still
follow
all
the
health
and
safety
protocols
that
are
in
place
at
that
time,
but
you
know
we're
likely
we'll
be
having
you
know.
The
three
foot
guide
guidance
in
place
then-
and
so
you
know
we're
really
looking
to
how
we
can
ensure
that
we
have
our
students
back
and
get
back
to
us
as
close
to
normal.
As
we
can.
I
You
know
the
16
year
olds
are
now
eligible
for
the
vaccine,
so
that's
going
to
just
help.
If
we
have
more
people
who
can
you
know,
get
vaccinated
just
another
layer
of
mitigation
strategies
that
will
really
support
our
reopening
plans,
we
are
also
working
to
have
some
type
of
virtual
options
for
some
of
our
9th
grade
through
12th
grade
students.
We
haven't
worked
out
exactly
what
that's
going
to
look
like,
but
we
know
that
we'll
probably
have
some
type
of
package
curriculum
and
some
of
our
educators
are
actually
supporting
our
students
in
that
way.
I
But
we
know
that
there
are
some
students
that
you
know
really
may
need
to
have
that
option
so
we'll
be
finalizing
some
of
that
work
over
the
next
couple
weeks
and
make
that
announcement,
because
we
have
staffing
and
courses
and
all
kinds
of
things
that
we
need
to
get
ready
for
for
the
fall,
and
then
I
think
it's
just
so
important
to
say
that
you
know
all
of
us,
I
think,
as
a
community.
I
think
we've
done
a
pretty
amazing
job
over
this
last
year,
but
we're
not
through
this.
I
Yet
you
know
we're
still
in
a
pandemic
and
we
we
all
just
need
to
pay
close
attention
to
all
the
safety
numbers
and
guidelines
at
this
time,
and
I
just
cannot
stress
how
important
is
for
everyone
to
still
wear
a
mask
to
follow
physical
distancing,
wash
your
hands
and,
if
appropriate,
you
know
and
and
meet
your
personal
convictions.
You
know
to
get
vaccinated
and
all
these
are
layers
of
mitigating
strategies
that
keep
us
all
safe.
I
And
today
I
was
a
little
concerned
because
our
king
county
numbers
are
199.4
for
every
100
000
cases
and
we're
watching
that,
along
with
hospital
rates,
because
those
are
the
two
measures
that
we're
keeping
track
of
and
both
of
those
numbers,
you
know
reach
a
certain
elevation.
You
know
we
can
end
up
going
back
in
phase
two
and
we
definitely
don't
want
to
be
going
backwards.
I
But
if
that
does
happen,
what
we
currently
have
in
place
in
our
schools
will
be
able
to
continue,
but
it's
again
just
something
we're
all
going
to
need
to
be
watching.
So
that's
kind
of
a
brief
update
on
where
we
are
with
our
return.
What
we're
thinking
about
for
the
fall-
and
I
just
really
want
to
briefly
just
mention
you
know
some
aspects
around
budget.
I
Almost
all
that
money
was
allocated
through
title,
one
percent
numbers,
and
so
districts
that
have
high
large
numbers
of
free
reduced
numbers
in
their
school
district
will
receive
higher
amounts
of
money,
which
I
fully
support.
You
know,
but
the
biggest
challenge
that
we're
dealing
with
right
now
is
that
this
pandemic
has
impacted
all
of
our
students.
You
know
from
our
students
who
receive
special
education
services
to
our
language
students
who
receive
language
services
to
students
who
experience
homelessness.
I
It's
not
just
a
an
issue
around
poverty,
and
so
you
know
we
have
been
really
advocating
closely
with
our
legislators
to
try
to
provide
additional
state
funding
and
supports
for
us.
You
know,
but
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen
at
this
time
and
you
know
today:
we've
spent
about
25
million
dollars
on
covet
19.
That
ranges
anything
from
supplies
to
staffing.
You
know:
we've
spent
a
lot
of
our
reserves
to
cover
that
amount
and
again
we're
grateful
for
the
federal
funds
that
are
coming
in
we're
getting
probably
about
20
million
dollars.
I
You
know
we
probably
have
enough
for
about
one
or
two
years
worth
of
recovery
work,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
really
be
thinking
creatively
around
our
budget
and
uses
of
our
funds
and
really
consider
about
what
else
we
need
to
do
so
that
we
can
support
our
students
in
the
best
way
possible.
So
we
didn't
get
what
we
hoped
from
for
legislators.
I
As
far
as
we
know,
right
now,
and
so
I
know
our
local
delegation
was
really
trying
and
advocating
for
us,
and
so
I
know
next
year,
there's
possibility
we're
ready
for
a
supplementary
budget
and
we
will
definitely
be
working
with
the
city
of
bellevue
and
our
council
members
to
help
us
in
that
advocation
to
try
to
get
more
funds
because
we're
definitely
going
to
need
it,
and
then
I
just
briefly
want
to
also
mention
that
you
know
our
enrollment
numbers
have
gone
down.
You
know
this
year
alone.
We
were
down
about
800
students.
I
We
are
projecting
to
be
down
another
600
students
next
year.
So
that's
a
total
about
1400.
You
know,
there's
a
multiple
reasons.
You
know
from
just
the
high
cost
of
housing.
Remote
work,
you
know,
has
really
become.
You
know
a
really
big
thing
now
I
don't
know
how
many
companies
are
gonna
go
back
full
time.
So
I
think
you
know
families
have
chosen
to
move
to
other
places
and
then
you
know
obviously,
we've
had
reduction
of
international
work
visa
and
you
know
families
that
have
chosen
to
move
at
this
time.
I
So
we're
watching
those
numbers
closely
because
that's
where
our
biggest
source
of
revenues
come
from,
and
so
I
really
need
to
you
know:
pay
close
attention
to
that
and
we're
going
to
have
to
really
re.
You
know
think
differently
about
our
budget
and
think
about
how
we
can
prioritize
some
of
the
work
that
we
need
to
do
to
ensure
our
students
have
success
and
our
educators,
our
support
in
the
best
way
possible-
and
I
briefly
now
I
sent
this
over
to
you
all
earlier,
and
hopefully
you
can
get
this
in
your
packet.
I
But
this
is
just
a
brief
report
from
our
superintendent's
community
advisory
group,
and
this
was
a
group
that
we
put
together
that
represented
you
know:
community
members,
business
leaders,
students,
educators,
a
really
wide
range
of
people
served
on
the
committee,
and
we
put
them
together
earlier
in
the
year
just
to
help
us
think
through
you
know.
Here's
our
strategic
plan
here
are
our
goals.
Here
are
the
things
that
we
want
to
do.
What
are
some
other
ways
that
we
can
think
about
it?
I
I
And
then
the
final
part
of
the
report
was
a
little
bit
more
bigger
thinking
that
they
shared
for
us
around.
Just
what
we
can
think
about
at
a
larger
scale,
which
is
going
to
take
a
lot
more
involvement
from
our
community
from
our
city.
I'm
thinking
about
universal
pre-k
thinking
about
how
we
can
develop
more
global
competency
with
our
students
to
think
about
how
we
can
better
increase
the
social,
emotional
learning,
how
we
can
provide
better
professional
development
for
our
staff
and
then
really
the
the
big
one
that
came
out.
I
There
is
really
also
thinking
from
an
operations
and
and
well-being
stand
pointers
around.
How
can
we
restructure
our
middle
schools
to
just
to
increase
connection
and
relationships
and
social
emotional
learning?
So
we're
really
excited
about
some
of
those
recommendations
that
came
to
us
from
this
council
and
we're
going
to
really
be
taking
them
to
heart
and
again
looking
at
what
we
can
do,
knowing
that
we're
going
to
have
some
obviously
budget
concerns
that
we
have
to
do.
I
But
we
look
at
our
box
of
people
time
and
money
and
think
about
how
we
maybe
possibly
need
to
reallocate
some
funding.
So
we
can
meet
some
of
these
needs,
but
I
think
these
are
going
to
be
so
important
for
us,
especially
the
mental
health
and
well-being,
as
we
have
more
students
back
and
we
start
to
see
some
of
the
impact
that
this
pandemic
has
had
on
our
students
and
our
families.
So
just
thank
the
mayor
and
the
city
council
for
this
and
mr
miyaki
for
having
me
as
part
of
your
update,
really
appreciate
this.
A
A
N
And
that
is
with
regard
to
the
pharaoh
federal
american
rescue
plan
act
funding.
This
is
the
second
topic
I
just
alluded
to
under
the
city's
manager's
report,
and
this
is
just
a
very
quick
update
on
the
rescue
plan
funding
and
what
we
know
about
it.
As
of
today,
as
many
of
you
are
aware,
the
city
of
bellevue
is
spotted
to
receive
20.7
million
dollars
and
here's
what
we
know
about
that.
N
This
coming
may
will
receive
guidance
from
the
federal
government
on
how
those
funds
can
be
spent,
as
well
as
how
we
might
access
additional
federal
funding.
At
this
point,
they're
just
many
moving
pieces
right
now
and
we'll
be
back
to
the
council
once
we
know
more.
I
just
bring
this
up
because
there's
been
a
lot
of
interest
by
the
community
as
well
as
the
council
members
on
this
and
again
we'll
be
back
once
we
know
more.
Thank
you,
mayor.
A
A
E
You,
yes,
I
would
like,
as
we
all
do,
many
of
us
have
day
jobs
as
we
call
them
and
oh
and
our
spouses
have
jobs
and
businesses.
My
husband's
business
is,
does
business
with
the
proponent
or
the
property
owner
in
the
next
public
hearing,
I
co-own
his
business,
although
I'm
not
active
in
it,
and
so
in
order
to
avoid
a
conflict
of
interest,
I
am
recusing
myself,
I
will
be
leaving
the
meeting
and
then
the
clerk
will.
Let
me
know
when
I
can
log
back
in
so
thank.
N
Yes,
mayor,
as
you
mentioned
this
this,
that
topic
is
a
public
hearing
and
it's
also
subsequent
action
to
relinquish
a
portion
of
a
of
this
existing
sewer
easement
as
well
as
construction
easement
joining
us
this
evening.
For
our
brief
staff
report
is
I'm
mcdaniel
the
real
property
manager
following
the
public
hearing,
we
are
seeking
council
direction
to
take
action
on
a
proposed
resolution
to
release
these
easements
with
that
I'll
turn
over
to
ira.
O
Ira,
thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
and
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
Our
staff
report
tonight
is
regarding
a
request
to
release
a
portion
of
a
sewer,
easement
and
the
entirety
of
a
construction
easement
located
at
12855
coal,
creek,
parkway
southeast
and,
as
always,
tonight's
public
hearing
is
to
allow
the
public
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
this
release.
O
First
up
is
just
a
vicinity
map.
This
parcel
lies
just
off
of
south
southeast
coal
creek
parkway,
and
now
we
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more
on
the
parcel
in
question,
so
this
property
is
being
redeveloped
and
the
owner
is
relocating
a
part
of
their
sewer
line
within
their
property
as
a
part
of
their
permitting
process.
They
ask
the
city
to
release
the
portion
of
the
sewer
easement,
that's
shown
here.
In
gray,
the
new
route
for
the
sewer
line
will
be
covered
by
a
new
easement
shown
in
purple.
O
The
owner
has
also
asked
that
we
clear
an
old
construction
easement
from
their
title,
which
is
shown
here
in
yellow
that
easement
was
only
intended
for
the
initial
construction
of
that
line
back
in
the
80s,
but
it
didn't
have
a
set
expiration
date,
so
we're
basically
just
cleaning
that
up
following
the
public
hearing
staff
requests.
Council
action
on
the
proposed
resolution
authorizing
the
release
of
the
easements.
This
ends
our
staff
report
and
we
will
be
available
following
the
public
hearing
for
any
questions.
Okay,.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
clerk.
Do
we
have
any
buddies
signed
up
for
public
comments
on
this.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
There
are
no
registered
speakers
and
we
did
not
receive
any
written
comments
on
this
public
hearing.
So
at
this
point
I
would
ask
if
there's
anyone
connected
to
the
call
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
during
the
public
hearing.
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
you're
connected
with
the
phone.
C
M
Can
thank
you.
I
just
had
a
question,
so
I
know
that
this
must
be
in
relation
to
the
basil
newsport
townhomes
down
there
in
on
around
the
coal
creek
basin,
and
I
was
just
wondering
how
the
the
new
sewer
easement
and
the
utilities
easements
and
rerouting
those
things.
What
impact
will
it
have
will
have
any
impact
on
on
coal
creek
in
in
doing
so.
I
know
that
dan
murray,
who
lives
down
in
the
125th
hauler
down
there,
cannot,
he
can't
even
add
on
a
bathroom.
M
He
lives
in
a
very
small
home
because
of
concerns
with
his
location
to
coal
creek,
and
these
things
will
be
even
closer.
So
I
that
was
just
what
I
was
wondering
and
I
don't
know
if
that
will
be
covered
in
this
or
not.
So.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
I
I
in
the
opposed
okay.
So
I'm
going
to
open
this
up
for
discussion
and
I
think
all
of
us
would
like
to
hear
the
answer
to
the
question
that
was
asked
in
the
public
comments.
But
if
you
have
a
comment
or
question
counsel,
please
raise
your
hand.
I
can
see
you
I'm
not
seeing
any
so
ira.
Could
you
answer
that
question
that
we
got.
O
Yeah
I'll
hand,
this
off
to
sean
wells,
our
utility
development
review
manager
he's
probably
better
equipped
to
answer
this.
One:
okay,
hi.
P
Council
members
yeah,
the
sewer
easement
is
being
relocated,
it's
basically
ira.
Perhaps
you
could
pull
up
slide
six
and
share
that
as
an
example,
the
sewer
line
comes
down,
factoria
boulevard
and
cuts
through
the
property.
Currently,
the
future
alignment
of
the
sewer
is
going
to
where
it
crosses
from
factorial
boulevard
and
crosses
coal
creek
parkway.
It
will
then
parallel
coal,
creek
parkway.
A
A
It
does
for
me
counsel
any
further
questions
or
comments
from
the
council.
Not
seeing
any
is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
resolution
9924.
B
I
move
to
adopt
resolution
9924
authorizing
the
execution
of
documents
necessary
to
release
a
portion
of
an
existing
sewer
easement
in
the
entirety
of
a
construction
easement
located
at
12855
coal
creek
parkway
southeast,
which
have
been
declared
surplus
to
the
city's
needs
and
are
no
longer
required
for
providing
continued
public
utility
service.
Okay,.
A
N
Yes,
sir
sure,
mayor
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
we
have
two
items
topics
for
your
for
the
study
session
this
evening.
The
first
one
is
the
development
of
the
21
22
human
services
needs
update.
This
is
actually
an
overview
of
the
the
process
itself
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
human
services
needs.
Update
is
a
actual
bi-annual
report
that
provides
comprehensive
data
on
human
service
needs
of
value
residents,
including
highlights
the
voices
of
our
community
members.
N
The
report
is
one
of
the
primary
sources
of
data
used
by
the
human
services
commission
to
guide
them
in
making
funding
recommendations
to
the
council.
Tonight,
council
is
being
asked,
provide
staff
with
any
feedback
on
any
additional
elements.
They
would
like
to
see
included
in
this
report,
which
will
be
slotted,
I
believe,
to
come
to
council
in
january
of
22..
N
So
joining
us
this
evening
are
tony
esparza
our
associate
director
of
our
parks
and
community
services
department,
as
well
as
christy
stanglin
human
services
associate
planner
and
alex
o'reilly
human
services
manager,
both
of
all
of
them
from
the
parks
and
community
services
department.
Then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
the
staff.
Q
Mr
miyake,
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
we
are
excited
to
be
speaking
with
you
this
evening
about
the
human
services
needs
update.
It
is
a
key
report,
as
city
manager
miyake
mentioned,
that
guides
our
recommendation
for
the
allocation
of
human
services
funds,
so
that
those
decisions
are
data
informed
and
equitable.
It
also
guides
the
work
of
our
staff.
Q
Your
feedback
is
essential
to
ensure
that
we
include
your
priorities
as
we
gather
this
data
from
our
residents
and
our
providers
and
our
constituents
here
in
bellevue,
ms
christy
stangland.
Our
human
services
planner
will
provide
an
overview
of
the
needs,
update
and
the
methodology
that
will
be
used
to
gather
data
missed
england,
great.
A
R
Great,
so
the
purpose
of
tonight
is
to
ask
council
for
feedback
on
the
development
of
the
2020
or
2021-2022
human
services
needs
update.
I
will
be
providing
at
the
background
and
the
overview
of
the
development
of
the
human
services
needs,
update
and
then
I'll
be
asking
for
feedback
from
council
to
ensure
that
council
priorities
are
included.
R
I'll
start
by
discussing
the
diagram
of
our
two-year
funding
cycle,
the
human
services
fund
provides
funding
for
agencies
in
our
community
to
provide
direct
services
to
the
residents
of
the
community.
This
chart
shows
that
the
human
services
needs
update,
is
a
core
element
of
the
human
services
activity
and
describes
where
the
report
fits
into
the
work
of
our
department.
R
You'll
see
identify
needs.
This
occurs
through
the
research
completed
in
the
human
services
needs
update,
which
includes
the
residents
consumer
and
the
non-profit
providers
input
through
several
approaches,
as
well
as
existing
research
and
databases.
I'll
be
speaking
about
this
in
detail
later
tonight.
R
The
request
for
proposal,
our
upcoming
upcoming
funding
cycle,
will
begin
in
march
of
early
march,
when
the
application
is
released
to
the
nonprofit
agencies
and
the
application
will
be
due
in
early
april
of
2022.,
the
last
application
process.
We
received
seven
million
dollars
in
request
for
the
4.1
million
dollars
in
funds
that
we
had
to
allocate
to
over
a
hundred
applications
for
funding
recommendations.
R
R
the
commissions,
focus
on
equity
and
prioritizing
funding
to
historically
underserved
communities
in
their
funding,
recommendations
for
city
or
for
council
action.
The
staff
in
the
commission
present
the
funding
recommendations
to
the
human
services
general
fund
and
the
community
development
block
grant
to
the
council
for
approval
for
the
contracting
contract,
monitoring
and
ongoing
data
collection.
R
R
So
the
human
services
staff
are
constantly
gathering
changing
data
participating
in
community
meetings
and
working
closely
with
our
community
agencies
to
ensure
that
we're
aware
of
the
changing
needs
in
our
community.
For
instance,
the
human
services
division
allocated
close
to
four
million
dollars
additional
since
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic,
which
was
outside
our
normal
funding
cycle.
Due
to
the
ongoing
data
collection,
the
human
services
staff
and
commission
were
able
to
identify
the
most
critical
needs
in
the
community
during
the
pandemic
and
make
recommendations
to
address
to
direct
these
additional
dollars
to
those
needs.
R
Next
slide,
please,
you
know
back,
but
could
you
back
it
up
one,
but
there
we
go.
Thank
you,
tony.
At
previous
council
meetings,
there
have
been
questions
asked
about
how
we
track
the
effectiveness
of
our
services.
R
Here
are
the
list
of
ways
that
we're
able
to
measure
the
effectiveness
of
our
funds
agencies
submit
quarterly
reports
which
include
the
following:
documentation
for
funds
spent
spent
on
approved
services,
so
I'll
use
behavioral
health
as
an
example
for
this
slide.
If
personnel
is
the
approved
expense,
they
would
send
personnel
backup
documentation.
R
They
report
on
the
unduplicated
bellevue
residents
that
receive
these
services
in
the
contracted
year
and
the
service
units,
so
such
as
hours
of
counseling
provided
and
then
a
narrative
report
which
can
include
client
stories,
successes
and
or
challenges
for
our
year-end
report.
They
include
all
of
the
items
that
were
listed
above
and
for
the
quarterly
report.
They
also
submitted
outcome
reports,
an
outcome
for
behavioral
health
may
be
improvement
in
mental
health,
such
as
decreased
depression,
and
they
submitted
a
demographics
report.
R
R
The
reason
for
this
is
simple:
in
order
to
represent
the
broad
human
services
needs
of
all
of
our
residents,
we
have
found
that
it
is
critical
to
have
accurate
and
comprehensive
data
that
includes
community
voice
from
throughout
the
city.
Human
services,
commission
and
staff
strongly
believe
that
this
is
a
report
about
people
about
helping
all
bellevue
residents
to
reach
their
full
potential
and
all
be
contributing
members
of
an
innovative,
vibrant
and
caring
community.
R
The
human
services
commission
has
provided
input
that
has
informed
our
presentation
this
evening
and
the
commission
will
continue
to
provide
input
throughout
the
development
of
the
needs
update.
The
needs
update
is
a
combination
of
qualitative
and
quantitative
data,
an
analysis
of
trends
and
issues
and
a
forecast
of
the
changes
in
human
services.
R
As
I
mentioned
earlier
in
my
description
about
the
funding
cycle,
the
needs
update
is
used
to
guide
the
funding
process
by
identifying
clients
needs
and
creating
priorities.
This
is
one
of
the
primary
sources
used
by
the
human
services
commission
to
guide
them
in
making
funding
recommendations
to
the
council.
As
I
previously
noted,
the
human
services
staff
also
continually
collect
data
to
ensure
that
we
are
being
responsive
to
the
changing
needs
in
the
community
and
are
aware
of
the
critical
needs
as
they
arrive.
R
In
addition,
it
also
guides
the
work
of
the
human
services
division,
staff
and
other
groups
that
make
good
to
make
good
decisions
relative
to
how
they
use
these
resources
to
ensure
that
bellevue
residents
have
the
assistance
they
need
to
enjoy.
A
high
quality
of
life.
Bellevue
human
services
needs
update,
provides
import,
important
data
for
the
entire
community.
It
is
used
by
providers,
community
groups
and
those
involved
in
regional
planning.
R
Listed
here
is
a
list
of
areas
of
focus
in
the
human
services
needs
update
the
special
focus
area
adjusts
to
the
changing
needs.
The
spoke,
the
special
focus
area
for
this
document
will
be
covered
in
its
impact
on
human
services.
We
are
constantly
looking
for
new
and
improved
ways
to
clearly
display
data.
In
this
year's
report,
we
will
be
adding
a
section
to
each
chapter
to
identify
any
possible
disproportional
impacts
of
human
services
needs
to
residents
based
on
their
race.
R
So
we
gather
qualitative
and
quantitative
data
in
a
variety
of
ways.
For
this
report.
Due
to
covid,
we
will
be
adjusting
some
of
our
methods
of
gathering
data
to
follow
cova
guidelines
and
account
for
the
fact
that
many
of
our
providers
are
offering
virtual
services
a
statistically
valid
phone
and
online
survey
will
be
conducted
by
come,
engaged
research
and
will
reach
over
400
bellevue
residents.
Asking
questions
about
both
household
and
community
health
and
the
human
services
needs.
R
R
We
also
conduct
a
consumer
survey
that
provides
important
feedback
from
bellevue's
residents
that
use
or
need
human
services
due
to
covid.
Most
of
our
providers
are
now
providing
service
virtually.
So
we
will
be
adjusting
our
approach
to
ensure
that
we
get
the
important
voice
of
our
consumers
and
those
with
lived
experience
we'll
be
working
with
non-profit
providers,
community
partners
in
the
internal
city
of
bellevue
programs
to
get
the
survey
distributed
as
widely
as
possible.
The
survey
will
be
distributed
as
a
paper
survey,
a
qr
code
and
an
electronic
link
to
provide
various
options
for
completion.
R
These
surveys
will
be
available
in
russian
spanish
korean
vietnamese,
simplified
chinese
and
english
to
ensure
that
the
data
that
we
are
collecting
is
representative
of
all
community
voices.
We
will
be
provided
or
will
be
prioritizing
community
conversations
and
consumer
input
from
historically
underserved
communities,
including
those
with
disabilities,
the
lgbtq
community,
the
youth,
those
who
are
unhoused
and
the
bipod
community.
R
We
analyze
the
data
from
many
sources,
including
the
one
the
one
year
and
five-year
estimate
of
the
2019
american
community
survey,
the
census
data
and
other
reports
and
websites
that
pertain
to
bellevue
and
east
king
county
through
throughout
or
through
this
data
gathered
in
the
past
or
sorry.
Through
data
gathered
in
the
past
year,
we've
reached
over
700
people.
All
of
this
data
will
be
analyzed
and
summarized
in
a
comprehensive
report.
We
will
be
incorporating
feedback
from
that.
R
Council
has
given
us
during
our
presentation
on
february
2020
for
the
findings
of
the
human
services
needs,
update
and
our
presentation
on
november
of
2020
on
the
human
services
funding,
recommendations
based
on
feedback
staff
will
be
have.
Staff
have
prioritized,
including
information
in
the
following
areas:
immigrants
and
refugees,
behavioral
health,
including
youth,
mental
health,
suicide
and
substance,
use,
disorder,
homelessness
and
homelessness,
prevention,
lgbtq
and
underrepresented
groups,
specifically
the
latinx
community.
R
So
here's
an
overview
of
our
timeline
so
we'll
be
we'll
be
collecting
data
through
the
summer
of
2021.
A
draft
report
will
be
provided
to
our
commission
on
in
november
and
we'll
be
coming
back
to
present
our
findings
to
council
in
january
of
2022,
and
then
we'll
distribute
our
report
online
in
february
of
2022..
Q
A
B
Thank
you
mayor,
so,
first
off
great
presentation,
tony
and
christy
very
certainly
very
robust,
and
I
think
certainly
think
it
covers
the
the
vast
majority
of
this
is
not
the
the
first
time
to
the
rodeo.
Here.
B
You've
been
doing
this
for
quite
a
number
of
years,
so
you've
certainly
got
a
down
pack,
but
I
also
see
little
things
here
that
we
continue
to
improve
and
that's
really
really
good
to
see
to
get
that
full
data
and
get
that
full
that
full
scope
that
full
understanding
of
the
needs
in
in
our
community
right
now,
so
just
very
proud
of
the
work
that
staff's
doing
on
this,
and
it
really
will
help
us
set
those
priorities
for
funding
for
2022.
B
So
two
quick
questions
for
you:
one
have
we
historically
ever
checked
with
our
public
safety
folks
fire
our
cares
team
program
or
police
in
terms
of
what
they're,
seeing
in
terms
of
any
trends
in
the
in
the
community
as
well,
because
certainly
you're
speaking
to
all
the
all
the
wonderful
providers
in
our
city
and
and
community
members.
But
are
you
checking
in
with
them
as
well
as
part
of
this
overall
needs
update.
Q
Yes,
sir
excellent
point
and
that
most
definitely
does
occur.
And
while
I
might
answer
your
question,
we
also
have
miss
o'reilly,
our
human
services
manager
on
the
phone
and,
of
course,
ms
stanglen,
who
can
jump
in
as
well.
But
that
has
historically
been
included
both
input
from
our
public
safety
departments
and
also
to
other
departments
in
the
city.
B
And
then,
how
often
are
we
checking
in,
because
you
know
2022
seems
in
some
ways
during
this
pandemic
quite
quite
a
ways
away
and
certainly
could
get
much
better,
hopefully,
as
we
continue
to
vaccinate,
but
it
could
also
get
worse
due
to
these
variants.
So
how
often
are
we
checking
back
in
as
we're
progressing
through
this
and
collecting
this
data?
You
know:
are
we?
Q
Yeah
excellent
point:
thank
you
deputy
mayor,
so
I
think
reflectively.
Looking
back,
we
faced
this
challenge
from
the
very
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
Luckily,
our
human
services
team
has
always
remained
dedicated
to
getting
ongoing
data
collection
even
prior
to
the
pandemic
and
not
having
it
become
static
in
this
report.
So
they
already
had
practices
in
place
that
allowed
for
that.
Q
We've
continued
that
throughout
the
pandemic
and
we'll
continue
that
throughout
this
data
gathering
effort,
even
when
we
extended
our
application
process
in
earlier
in
the
year
of
2020,
we
went
back
to
the
providers
a
second
time
to
get
an
update
from
them,
so
they
submitted
their
applications
and
then
we
went
back
out
and
asked
for
them
for
an
update
on
the
impacts
from
the
pandemic.
Q
Other
methods
that
our
staff
use
to
continue
to
bring
in
updated
and
current
data
are
through
presentations
to
our
commission.
As
you
know,
deputy
mayor,
so
that
we
are
are
hearing
ongoing
and
current
presentations
of
the
needs.
We've
recently
had
presentations
from
our
probation
division
from
police
from
the
prosecutor's
office
and
from
the
defense
office,
so
that
we
could
hear
the
needs
that
they
are
seeing
firsthand
in
the
community.
Q
In
addition,
our
human
services
staff
participate
in
a
variety
of
regional
meetings
that
help
them
stay
informed,
both
from
a
provider's
perspective,
but
also
from
a
residence
perspective
and,
of
course,
staying
in
touch
with
those
that
are
providing
frontline
services,
including
those
you
mentioned,
and
our
wraparound
coordinators
who
serve
in
bellevue
public
schools.
It
helps
us
get
the
perspective
of
what's
happening,
live
in
our
community
to
include
in
our
decision
making.
A
Okay,
who
else
I
see-
councilmember,
barksdale
and
councilmember,
lee
and
council
members
on
go
ahead:
councilmember
barksdale.
D
Awesome,
I
just
really
wanted
to
say
thanks
to
tony
and
staff,
for
the
holistic
approach
and
looking
at
the
intersectionality
of
race
relative
to
the
other
demographic
characteristics,
and
then
there
was
one
question
I
did
have
in
terms
of
some
of
the
changes
that
we're
making,
which
I
appreciate
are.
Is
there
a
way
that
we
could
sort
of
get
a
feedback
loop
on
those
to
see?
Did
we
actually
were
we
actually
able
to
achieve
the
goals
that
we
were
trying
to
as
we?
Q
Yes,
absolutely
so
councilmember
barksdale,
if
I'm
hearing
you
correctly,
I
think
you're
referencing,
the
new
added
data
that
we'll
be
collecting
around
the
intersection
of
race
and
actually
the
impacts
of
covid
as
well.
So
those
are
the
two
specific
items
we
called
out
as
shifts
in
the
report,
so
ways
that
we
will
be
able
to
be
responsive
to
that
data.
Moving
forward,
specifically,
the
intersection
with
race
will
be
through
our
demographic
data
collection
and
our
reports
and
making
sure
that
we
are
reaching
those
that
the
intersectionality
identifies
as
being
most
disproportionately
impacted.
H
Yes,
I
always
respect
and
the
good
work
you've
done
on
this
human
service
needs
assessment
report.
It's
a
excellent
documentation
of
what's
happening
and
a
lot
of
people
look
at
it.
You
know
that's
a
real
great
reference,
keeping
up
with.
What's
going
on,
you
know,
because
we
need
to
be
responsive
to
current
needs
right
and
I
think
one
I
just
want
to
do
two
things.
One
is
in
a
big
broad
picture,
and
then
I
have
some
questions
specifically
to
a
couple
of
things
that
you
mentioned.
H
The
big
thing
I'm
interested
in
is
I've
always
been
thinking
about
building
capacity.
I
mean
we
got
all
kinds
of
needs
and
we
cannot
meet
all
the
needs
if
we're
lucky,
you
can
be
high.
You
know
50
percent
of
these
even
less,
because
many
people
don't
even
apply
because
they
know
it's
not
on
the
horizon.
H
Doesn't
matter,
that's
why
perfection
is
actually
you
know
the
friends
of
failure
whatever
okay,
so
I
want
to
know
you
know
they'll
trade
when
we
do
most
of
the
funding,
so
human
services
you'd
be
great
that
you
know
the
human
service
commission
did
a
good
job,
excellent
work.
They
always
been
done
under
traditional.
You
know,
financing
models,
you
know,
grant.
We
got
them
like
cbsdbg.
H
H
We
really
appreciate
it.
All
the
city
money
that's
been
put
on
the
cover.
Nighting
has
been
able
to
accomplish
some
of
that
goal.
So
I
really
want
to
encourage
you.
Okay,
that's
the
good
thing,
so
I
want
to
know
in
in
to
build
this
capacity.
How
are
you
being
responsive,
how
to
be
responsive,
responsive
to
that?
Need?
You
don't
have
to
tell
me
now.
Okay,
you
might
be
completely
because
I'm
sure
we're
all
limited
with
time,
but
I
want
you
to
focus
on
that.
Maybe
come
back
to
us.
H
How
are
you
responsive
to
that
particular
building
capacity
needs?
Okay,
then
go
down
to
more
specific
things.
You
talk
about.
You
mentioned
about
clovernight
team.
You
know
because
this
was
happened
last
year,
so
we
are
working
very
hard
and
that
that
data's
going
to
it's
showing
it's
showing
up
right.
It
shows
up
in
your
data
lots
of
need
in
there,
so
we're
planning
to
do
other
stuff.
I
think
it's
good.
H
We
have
to
do
it,
but
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
cover
19
doesn't
distort
your
long-term
assessment
long-term
need
because
yeah
it
could
be.
You
know
it
could
be
all
gone
and
hopefully,
hopefully
closing
our
fingers.
We
got
back
to
normal
the
two
two
years
from
now.
We
never
know
so
I
don't
want
you
to
be
distorting
your
data
okay,
so
I
want
to
just
put
that
in
your
mind.
I
hope
you
are
thinking
about
that,
and
so
anyway
tell
me
also
later.
H
H
R
So
is
is
what
I
was
I'm
going
to
be.
Translating
it
into
is
the
top
languages
that
are
recommended
by
our
diversity
of
staff
for
city
of
bellevue,
so
it's
the
languages
that
are
translated
currently
on
our
website,
we're
definitely
open
to
other
languages.
We
have
not
started
trans
translation
for
any
of
them,
so
I
think
that
we
can.
R
R
I
didn't
I
didn't
remove
it.
I
had
went
on
to
our
website
and
looked
at
and
and
then
talked
to
the
university,
and
I
think
it
was
just
an
overlook,
so
I
will
add
that
to
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilman
member
lee
thank.
S
You
I
would
just
like
to
add
that
the
simplified
chinese
was
selected
for
the
the
translation
of
our
online
and
phone
survey.
So
that
was
the
written
part
of
the
translation
that
was
available
for
the
in
the
company
that
we
are
using
to
do
our
translation
services
for
the
phone
and
online
survey.
But
for
there
is
a
possibility,
as
as
christie
said,
to
use
additional
languages
or
types
of
of
the
of
chinese.
H
I'm
surprised
because
I've
always
in
all
the
chinese
language
I
have
seen
the
city
has
been
doing,
has
improved
both
simplified
and
the
traditional
chinese
written
chains.
Unless
you
change
that
as
you
change
to
a
new
translator
or
something
we
decided
not
to
you
know,
I
would
like
to
know
why
what
justified
the
use,
if
you
yeah
that's
written
language,
is
the
more
important
way
people
read,
and
that
is
different
and
it's
always
been
used
for
chinese.
F
My
sense
is
that
it
is
a
report
about
people
that
is
used
regionally,
and
I
especially
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
collect
both
qualitative
and
quantitative
data,
because
I
think
sometimes
we
we
think
that
only
quantitative
matters,
but
the
stories
and
the
information
also
matters
to
help
us
better
understand,
because
there
may
be
communities
where
the
qualitative
is
actually
more
meaningful
and
if
we
don't
collect
that
part,
we're
missing
part
of
that
that
data
and
getting
the
disparity
around
race
and
intersectionality.
Thank
you
for
that.
F
I
think
that's
also
important,
because
certainly
what
we
saw
during
the
pandemic
was
that
was
the
the
health
outcomes
and
who
was
getting
colvid
was
very
much
related
to
some
of
the
disparities
we
were
seeing
around
many
other
items.
So
I
really
like
that.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
going
to
continue
to
have
the
simplified
application
process.
I
think
that's
what
I
heard
so
appreciate
that
as
well.
F
A
couple
of
questions
that
I
have
one
is,
as
we
have
been
in
covet
now
for
over
a
year,
are
you
finding
new
partners,
new
community-based
organizations
that
we
have
now
partnered
with
in
collaboration
and
I'd
like
to
understand
a
bit
more
about
where
some
of
those
areas
might
be,
and
then
the
second
one
is.
You
know
dr
duran
talked
about
the
school
district
and
the
fact
that
they
really
only
have
recovery
funding
for
one
to
two
years
when
in
reality
he's
seeing
five
to
ten
years
before
they
really
emerge
fully.
F
So
are
there
some
needs
from
the
families
and
the
students
that
may
be
even
more
exasperated
now,
as
as
we
recover
from
cobid
and
how
we
might
tease
out
some
of
those
needs,
the
the
other
one
is
that
I
don't
know
if
we
normally
would
have
small
business
and
and
recovery
and
support
as
part
of
the
human
services
needs,
but
I
definitely
am
concerned
about
all
of
the
small
businesses
that
we're
losing
in
bellevue
and
whether
that
is
an
aspect
of
human
services
or
if
it's
completely
different
and
there's
no
crossover
there
and
then.
F
Lastly,
I
was
also
thinking
about
the
the
number
of
dollars
that
we
might
be
allocating
towards
human
services,
so
certainly
with
the
20.7
million
dollars,
we're
getting
from
the
rescue
plan,
how
we
might
sort
out
how
much
money
we
should
allocate
towards
human
services
for
the
next
couple
of
years
to
hopefully
prevent
people
from
being
evicted
and
mental
and
be
mental
health,
and
I
think
we're
very
concerned
also
about
yeah
people's
emotional
health.
And
all
of
that.
Thank
you.
Q
Absolutely
excellent
questions
council
members
on.
Thank
you.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
touch
base
on
a
few
of
them
for
you,
so
your
first
was
around.
Q
In
addition,
we
in
years
past
have
partnered
and
funded
the
ymca,
but
we
have
not,
in
the
very
most
recent
years,
received
applications
for
funding
from
them
and
they
came
back
through
in
the
time
of
the
pandemic
and
requested
some
funding
for
both
rent
assistance
and
food
assistance,
and
so
we
re-engaged
them
as
a
partner
as
well.
So
those
are
our
two
agencies
that
were
provided
funding
via
pandemic
dollars
that
we
otherwise
were
not
providing
funding
to
via
our
human
services
fund.
Q
Small
businesses
is
indeed
distinct
from
the
human
services
fund,
and
that
is
a
great
question
around
where
future
dollars
will
go
from
the
recovery
plan,
and
I
don't
think
that
I
have
an
answer
for
that.
I
know
that
our
city
manager
indicated
there's
still
more
information
to
come.
That
will
guide
our
use
of
those
dollars.
S
One
thing
I
might
add
in
regard
to
the
last
question,
human
services
staff
have
had
several
conversations
with
economic
development
staff
who
are
hearing
from
local
businesses
about
the
need
for
child
care.
So
we
are
definitely
prioritizing
getting
funds
to
child
care
scholarships
both
in
the
bellevue
school
district
and
through
child
care
resources,
and
we
have
actually
put
our
economic
development
staff
in
touch
with
several
subject
matter
matter.
S
Experts
around
child
care
to
see
how
there
might
be
some
other
supports
that
the
economic
development
team
might
be
able
to
offer
businesses
via
their
information
on
what's
needed
in
terms
of
child
care.
A
Thank
I
have
a
three
quick,
quick
questions.
Are
we
collecting
general
data
on
who
has
received
rental
assistance
so
that
we
have
an
idea
of
the
number
of
households
that
have
received
rental
assistance
and
and
some
general
demographics
on
that.
Q
A
My
yeah
I'm
looking
more
at
getting
an
idea
of
how
many
people
in
our
city
needed
rental
assistance
and
where
they
were
able
to
receive
it
from
and
then
the
third
question
is
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
many
people
are
going
to
have
trouble
paying
rent
when
the
moratorium
eviction
ends.
So
obviously
those
who
receive
rental
assistance
are
not
going
to
have
a
backlog
of
rent
due,
but
those
who
did
not
will-
and
so
I'm
trying,
I'm
wondering-
are
we
preparing
for
that
kind
of
need
when
that
moratorium
is
lifted.
Q
Yes,
I
think,
unfortunately,
we
and
again
I
welcome
input
from
christie
or
alex,
miss
england
or
miss
o'reilly.
I
don't
think
that
we
have
a
100
clear
answer
on
what
families
are
not
getting
their
needs
met.
Q
We
do
receive
updates
from
agencies
when
they
are
out
of
funding
and
beginning
to
develop
a
wait
list,
and
so
that
gives
us
some
insight
and
also
just
the
sheer
demand
and
hopefully
for
many
families
that
have
received
rent
assistance.
You
are
correct
that
would
eliminate
their
backlog.
We
do
know
some
families
that
received
rent
assistance
that
only
partially
paid
for
their
backlog,
and
they
do
still
have
additional
back
rent
or
they
have
found
themselves
in
a
secondary
crisis.
A
Q
Yes,
in
fact,
christie
or
alex,
could
one
of
you
answer.
I
know
that
that
is
included,
but
I
know
you
would
be
able
to
speak
to
that
better
than
me.
How
exactly
that's
represented
in
this
survey.
R
Yeah,
I
can
take
that,
so
we
are
asking
questions
because
we
I
do
realize
that
that
is
a
huge
impact
and
so
we're
asking
questions
around
the
impact
of
cova
financially
to
households
and,
I
believe,
there's
a
question
around
their
ability
to
pay
next
month's
rent.
I
have
to
go
and
confirm
that,
though,
that
that
still
did
remain
in
our
survey.
A
Well,
I
don't,
I
just
think
we
should
consider
getting
an
idea
of
who
is
impacted
by
this
and
what
the
demand
will
be
when
the
evictions
lifted,
so
that
we
can
prepare
ourselves.
If,
if
you
think
that
would
be
a
good
idea.
R
And
I
also
think
we
there's
opportunity,
through
our
community
conversations,
there's
a
group
of
nonprofit
providers
that
meet
that
discuss
the
financial
assistance
on
the
east
side
and
so
joining
that
group
and
seeing
the
impact
and
the
waiting
lists.
The
different
agencies
have
both
the
agencies
we
fund
and
the
ones
we
don't.
I
think,
will
be
really
useful.
Great.
A
A
N
Yes
mayor,
thank
you.
The
next
study
session
is
is
on
the
multi-family
tax
exemption
program,
also
known
as
the
mft
program.
T
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki,
mayor
robinson
members
of
the
council.
It's
good
to
be
back
with
you
this
evening.
Talking
about
this,
this
pretty
exciting
topic
for
us
as
we
look
to
try
to
make
improvements
in
our
affordable
housing
program
that
will
help
utilization
and
create
more
units
that
are
affordable
for
residents
of
the
community.
T
T
Probably
all
now
received
correspondence
regarding
some
of
the
things
that
came
up
during
oral
communications
this
evening
with
some
ideas
around
some
new
things,
maybe
to
potentially
put
into
the
program
that
we're
not
part
of
of
the
program,
particularly
around
rent
stabilization
and
what
that
might
look
like.
T
If
there's
a
desire
from
the
council
to
look
deeper
into
those
issues,
we
can
be
very
nimble
and
be
back
with
you
pretty
quickly
to
talk
about
some
of
them.
So
I
think
maybe
I'll
I'll
just
pause
there
and
see
how
you'd
like
to
progress.
A
Thank
you.
You
know
when
we
started
talking
about
this
at
our
our
last
council
meeting
where
this
was
on
our
agenda.
A
I
I
know
all
of
us
got
a
tremendous
amount
of
feedback
from
both
developers
and
from
affordable
housing
advocates,
giving
us
kind
of
conflicting
feedback
as
to
which
direction
we
should
be
heading
with
all
this
affordable
housing
work
that
we're
doing
and
a
lot
of
it.
A
You
know,
although
we've
seen
it
in
other
cities,
this
is
really
pretty
cutting
edge
for
a
city
to
be
adopting
all
these
unique
policies
to
bellevue,
and
so
we
have
received
a
lot
of
feedback,
and
I
asked
that
the
representatives
from
the
developers
from
business
and
from
affordable
housing
somehow
come
together
and
be
able
to
provide
us
with
a
recommendation
that
they
had
a
consensus
on,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
chamber-
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
parties
that
were
involved
for
participating
in
this.
A
I
want
to
thank
hal
ferris,
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
spent
a
lot
of
time,
including
our
staff,
who
worked
with
these
groups
to
evaluate
the
recommendation,
and
so
today
we
received
the
housing
development
consortium
and,
from
the
bellevue
chamber,
a
recommendation
that
has.
A
Four
different
proposals
that
we
consider
adopting
and
we
can
take
these
one
at
a
time.
Some
of
them
are
similar
to
what
staff
had
brought
forward
before.
Some
are
modifications
and
some
are
new,
and
so,
if
council
is
interested
in
pursuing
looking
at
these
recommendations,
we
can
take
them
one
by
one
comment
on
them
and
decide
whether
we
want
to
move
this
forward
and
have
staff
bring
it
back
to
us.
So
can
I
get
a
head
nod
or
a
shake
if
this
a
head?
Not
if
this
is
of
interest
to
you
to
consider
this
recommendation.
A
H
I'm
I'm
ready
to
about
discussion
and
make
some
decisions.
A
F
A
Thank
you.
I
didn't.
I
didn't
pick
up
on
it.
It's
a
little
hard
on
zoom.
Okay,
that's
great!
So,
let's
start
with
number
one
which,
if
you
have
this
in
front
of
you,
it's
an
alternative
to
two
bedroom
unit
options.
E
So
I
think
that
the
recommend
so
with
the
staff
recommendation
was
for
people
and
and
just
to
put
context.
The
purpose
of
this
was
for
developments
that
didn't
have
the
standard
mix
of
studio,
one
and
two
bedroom
units.
If
their
only
studio
or
one
bedroom,
they
wouldn't
have
to
then
produce
two
bedrooms,
but
this
would
allow
this
to
be
applicable
to
other
to
ones
that
have
a
traditional
mix,
but
might
not
have
quite
15
percent
two
bedrooms.
E
So
the
second
thing
was
to
maintain
the
20
of
units,
but
drop
it
from
80
to
70
was
the
staff's
recommendation
and
the
joint
development
community
and
a
non-profit
community
recommended
that
the
ami
for
two
bedrooms
stay
at
eighty
percent,
even
if
it's
dropped
to
seventy
percent
for
the
one
and
betterment
studios.
So
I
just
wanna
make
sure
I'm
understanding
it
correctly
because-
and
I
would
support
that-
I
think
it's
fair
and
appropriate.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
what's
on
the
table,
you.
A
A
Okay,
any
other
comments
or
questions,
so
is
there
consensus
to
move
this
forward
and
ask
staff
to
bring
it
back
and
something
that
we
could
possibly
vote
on,
or
we
will
vote
on
possibly
pass?
Okay.
So
that's
number
one.
Okay
number,
two
I'll
try
to
read
the
whole
thing
this
time.
This
is
oh,
go
ahead!
All
right.
D
Just
really
quick
so
does
bringing
it
back
mean,
don't
provide
some
commentary
about
how
this
relates
to
the
in
terms
of
affordability,
for
example
relative
to
their
original
plan.
Or
is
it
like
bringing.
A
T
A
F
Mayor,
I
I'm
wondering
for
anyone,
that's
watching
that
might
not
have
this
information
to
follow
along
whether
mac
could
pull
it
up
on
the
screen
so
that
we
can
all
be
looking
at
the
same
thing
or
if
that's
important.
I
just
realized
that
this
wouldn't
be
in
the
packet.
So
anyway,
just
for
clarity.
T
Yeah,
I
think
I'm
going
to
look
to
our
staff.
Thank
you
for
the
comment.
Council
members
on
the
issues
you're
now
discussing
came
in
the
form
of
a
letter
that
was
addressed
to
the
city
council.
T
M
A
A
Okay,
so
we
are
on
the
recommended
recommendation
to
which
is
layered
and
stacked
incentives
in
our
prior
council
meeting
we
talked
about
layered
incentives
and
this
adds
a
stacked
incentive,
and
so
the
proposal
is
to
increase
the
ami
for
layered
incentive
units
from
50
percent
to
65
percent
ami.
A
And
then
they
may
developer
may
either
stack
the
benefit
for
a
total
of
28
percent
of
the
units.
That
means
that
you
could
do
mfte
for
20
of
your
units
and
use
an
incentive
for
an
additional
eight
percent
of
your
units
and
at
the
end,
you'd
have
28,
affordable
units,
that's
stacking
or
you
can
do
the
layering,
which
is
where
you
take
twenty
percent
of
your
units
mfte
and
take
eight
percent
of
those
and
make
those
utilize
the
incentive
program
for
those
for
an
additional
affordability.
A
T
I
I
think,
just
in
speaking
to
this
mayor,
what
we
would
say
is
thinking
about
how
the
two
programs,
when
overlapped
or
how
the
the
double
bonusing
should
work
we'd,
be
looking
at
this
through
the
lens
not
just
of
how
these
two
programs
work,
but
also
the
addition
of
the
rent,
stabilization
concept,
which
is
the
next
one.
You
know
on
your
list
and
potentially
having
a
greater
public
benefit
when
coupled
or
combined
together
than
standalone
concepts.
A
Yes,
yeah,
I
understand
that
so,
let's
take
this
as
a
whole,
then
not
take
them
one
by
one,
because
they
don't
really
they're
not
standalone.
They
really
are
a
collection
that
work
together
and
then
we
can
decide
whether
we
want
to
move
the
whole
batch
of
recommendations
forward
any
comments
or
questions,
though
on
number
two
councilmember
robertson.
A
E
You
so
yeah
when
we
talked
about
the
layered
or
stacked
incentives.
Last
time
I
know
that
we
had
four
council
members
who
wanted
to
keep
it
at
80,
ami,
the
other
four
really
didn't
say
one
way
or
another,
all
four,
and
so
it
was
left
at
fifty
percent
for
the
purposes
of
this
meeting,
but
we
really
never
came
to
a
decision
on
that.
From
my
perspective,
I've
gone
back
and
watched
the
meeting.
E
I've
read
the
minutes,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
really
clear
tonight
on
what
percentage
the
deeper
affordability
should
come
back
moving
forward.
I
personally
would
like
to
see
it
at
70.
I
think
that
that
extra
10
is
adequate.
It
is
really
really
hard
for
a
fee
developer
to
do
affordable
housing
at
the
60
level.
I
I
think
that
65
is
hard.
E
If
that's
the
compromise,
that's
fine,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
try
to
push
it
lower,
because
one
of
the
goals
of
us
amending
our
mfte
code
is
to
have
greater
utilization
of
it,
and
if
people
aren't
going
to
use
the
land
use
incentive
and
the
mfte
to
either
give
us
additional
units,
whether
it
goes
from
eight
percent
to
twenty
percent
or
eight
percent
to
twenty
eight
percent,
either
way
we
get
more
affordable
units,
it
just
won't
be
worth
it,
and
so
I
really
and
and
as
mac
pointed
out,
the
rent
stabilization
is
a
very,
very
big,
give
on
behalf
of
the
development
community
to
balance
these
things.
E
So
I
think
that
if
we're
going
to
do
the
rent
stabilization,
the
deeper
affordability
should
not
be
any
lower
than
65
I'd
be
more
comfortable
with
it
at
70.
and
then,
but
otherwise,
if
we
don't
take
this
recommendation
as
a
whole,
I
don't
think
we
should
cherry
pick
it.
E
I
think
it
needs
to
be
all
or
nothing
because
some
of
the
get
some
of
the
trade-offs
that
were
given
for
some
you
know
for
some
of
the
deeper
affordability
rent
stabilization
would
not
be
something
that
the
development
community
would
be
willing
to
do
at
all
and
use
mfte
without
the
other
components
to
balance
it,
and
so
I
think,
that's
really
important
to
keep
in
mind,
and
I
just
wanted
to
lay
that
on
the
table.
E
I
I
think
that
it
would
be
very
helpful
if
council
gave
clear
direction
tonight
about
the
deeper
affordability
level.
If
we
want
to
see
65,
if
you
want
to
see
50,
if
you
want
to
see
70.,
because
that
was
a
point
of
confusion
after
the
last
meeting-
and
I
don't
want
to
leave
this
meeting
with
that
point
of
confusion.
A
So
thanks
so
yeah.
This
is
a
this
whole
document
is
a
big
compromise
and
it's
a
it
is
a
compromise
in
whole,
not
in
part.
So
we
do
need
to
consider
the
whole
just
a
moment.
Really.
We
do
need
to
consider
the
entire
recommendation,
but
looking
at
the
recommendation
and
the
compromise
that
was
between
developers
and
affordable
housing
for
them
with
65
ami,
that
seems
like
a
true
compromise
between
the
50
and
the
70..
So
I'm
I'm
good
with
keeping
65
percent,
as
recommended
by
this
by
the
consensus
of
this
group.
H
H
A
You
any
other
comments
or
questions
on
this
number.
Two.
D
I
sent
a
question
around
so,
if
I
remember
correctly
and
mac,
please
clarify
if
you
could,
we
have
programs
that
take
us
up
to
60
ami.
Is
that
right
and
then
we
have
mfte.
That's
the
next
and
there's
there's
a
gap
there
is
that
correct.
There's.
T
You
are
yes,
thank
you,
councilmember
barksdale.
I
think
another
way
to
articulate
that
point
is
previously.
Mfte
was
trying
to
be
used
both
at
80
and
for
deeper
affordability,
but
as
we
found
other
funding
programs
to
help
fund
some
of
the
deeper
affordability,
a
policy
question
is:
should
we
be
using
mte
more
as
an
80
or
closer
to
workforce
housing,
affordable
housing
program,
which
is
where
the
council
has
indicated
you'd
like
to
go
generally
speaking,
and
then
there's
a
few
of
these
issues
around?
T
D
Sorry
so
my
my
point
is
I
mean
I,
I
am
interested
in
sort
of
how
this
compares
to
the
existing
policy,
but
I
guess
I
could
see
it
at
60.
I
just
want
to
make
my
big
thing
is:
make
sure
there's
no
gap
between
the
programs
that
we
currently
have
and
it's
if
and
what
is
possible,
maybe
through
mft.
So
if
that
answers
the
customer
robertson's
point,
I
think
the
60,
but
I'm
also
curious
about
how
it
compares
to
staff's
original
recommendation
and
in
whole.
A
I
think
staff's
original
recommendation
was
50
ami
and
the
compromise
recommendation
is-
and
this
is
for
the
incentive
program
that
that
is,
I
think,
currently
available-
only
in
downtown
in
bell
red.
But
the
recommendation
modified
that
to
65
ami.
F
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
think
I.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
this
is
a
whole
package
and
I
look
forward
to
walking
through
all
of
the
the
recommendations
of
the
package
I
mean,
I
would
say
that
it
certainly
is
important
that
we
understand
and
have
a
range
of
tools
for
affordable
housing,
because
our
1590
funds
goes
up
to
60
percent
and
then
we've
got
mste
at
80
percent
and
as
we
look
at
the
the
layering
to
have
deeper
affordability.
F
At
the
same
time,
I
appreciate
and
understand
that
that
the
other
provisions
that
are
part
of
this
is
a
package,
and
I
think
for
me
the
biggest
thing
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
is
creating
a
program
where
the
goal
is
to
actually
have
this
program
be
used
so
that
we
can
get
affordable
housing
in
the
city
with
some
urgency,
and
I
also
think
that
having
as
many
options
as
possible
gives
us
some
more
flexibility,
so
I
want
to
understand
all
the
rest
of
the
provisions.
Thanks.
F
A
And
then
deputy
mayor,
where
are
you
at.
B
Yeah,
actually,
if
I
could
have
a
question
answered
by
mac
mac,
isn't
it
true
that
at
60
and
below
is
typically
tax
credit
backed?
Isn't
that
correct.
T
Yes,
council,
member
generally,
the
there
are
a
couple:
different
kinds
of
tax
credits,
but
I'll
just
say
in
general.
A
lot
of
programs
use
either
30
or
60
as
kind
of
threshold
barriers
and
then.
N
B
Thank
you
yeah,
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
the
you
know.
If,
if
the
incentive
needs
to
be
strong
enough
at
70
percent,
I
think
that'd
be
great.
I
could
compromise
at
65
on
this
as
well,
but
I
think
we
need
to
reiterate
something
that
councilmember
robertson
mentioned
as
well,
and
I
too
would
like
to
see
you
know
the
comparison
to
the
original
plan
as
well,
but
I
think
we
need
to
keep
in
mind
that
there
are
a
lot
of
compromises
in
here
as
well.
B
B
You
know
be
it:
the
affordable
housing
community,
the
agencies,
individuals
advocating
on
affordable
housing
developers,
the
the
chamber,
in
particular
joe
fain,
who
really
rallied
a
lot
of
folks
together
to
come
up
with
a
really
great
compromise
that
really
you
know,
epitomizes
the
wa
in
so
many
ways
where
we're
really
able
to
get
to
the
best
possible
solution
for
this
community.
B
So
I
I
just
support
this
wholeheartedly
and
on
this
one
in
particular,
again,
the
65
to
70
is
what
I
would
be
looking
at
at
this,
but
I
really
hope
my
colleagues
will
just
kind
of
keep
that
frame
of
reference
that
there
are
a
lot
of
give
and
takes
here
from
from
from
everyone.
Everyone
who's
got
an
incentive
or
everyone
who
has
an
interest
on
this
affordable
housing
program
has,
you
know,
really
weighed
in
here
and
everyone's
happy
with
this,
so
I.
J
A
Okay,
terrific,
so
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
number
three,
which
is
a
new
recommendation
from
this
group.
It's
rent
stabilization
and
cost
burden
reduction.
A
So
mac,
do
you
want
to
speak
to
this,
or
do
you
want
me
to.
T
So
and
we
looked
back
and
that
has
actually
happened
a
couple
of
times
in
the
last
seven
or
eight
years,
and
so
the
proposal
here
would
be
to
cap
increases
at
three
percent,
which
is
a
fairly
reasonable
amount
of
rental
increase
to
have
year
over
year,
compared
to
say
seven
or
eight
percent,
which
is
about
the
most
that
has
occurred
in
any
one
year.
So
the
idea
would
then
be
to
cap
that
so
that
we
would
be
able
to
know
that
people
don't
become
cost
burdened
or
immediately
have
a
rent
problem.
T
Because
of
a
lot
of
high
income
job
growth
in
any
one
particular
year,
and
then
there
could
be
a
potential
here,
that's
shown
as
a
bank.
That
would
then
be
used
in
years
where
there's
no
inflation
or
no
increase
at
all,
to
sort
of
stay
near
that
three
percent
number,
but
there's
a
significant
potential
protection
for
affordable
renters
in
the
event
of
a
significant
ami
increase
in
any
in
any
one
year
or
year
over
year.
Over
a
couple
straight
years,.
A
I
don't
have
never
seen
this
volunteered
by
a
group
of
developers
before,
and
I
really
appreciate-
because
I
think
this
is
a
lot
of
what
the
community
has
been
crying
out
for-
is
to
somehow
limit
our
affordable
housing
rent
increases,
as
our
city
does
well,
it's
just
really
puts
a
burden
on
the
renters,
and
so
that
is
a
rental
cap
for
mfte
units
to
increase
maximally
at
three
percent
per
year.
A
H
Thank
you.
I
want
to
add
my
two
cents
worth.
I
think
this
is
a
great
compromise
from
the
the
developers
into
the
goal
we
have
is
we
want
to
have
developers
build
these
things
so
that
they
can
actually
live
with
it?
You
know
economically,
and
I
think
we
talk
about
ami
increase.
Absolutely
you
know
the
renters
are
gonna,
be
the
first
hit,
and
so
we
want
to
give
them
some
assurance
and
for
the
you
know
worst
case
protection
at
the
same
time.
H
You
know
we
talk
about,
you
know,
grant
amen,
can
go
up
a
lot
higher
and
the
same.
Then
it's
true
I
want.
Maybe
it
won't
go
higher
and
they
still
get.
You
know,
rent
increase,
but
at
the
same
time
the
developers
they're
putting
their
money
out
there
and
they
want
to
make
sure
that
in
the
future
the
cost
doesn't
go
up
in
china,
whatever
that
may
be,
we've
seen
costs
going
up.
H
If
I
don't
know
when
inflation
come
back
right-
and
so
I
think
this
is
a
good
commitment
on
the
developer
side,
so
we're
limited
so
that
we
can
yeah
have
some
making
sure
you
know
we
have
some
expectations.
H
So
I
think
that
everything
takes
faith,
good
faith
and
I
think,
there's
a
good
good
faith
and
the
key
is
that
we
want
people
to
feel
that
they
are
going
into
this
with
good
faith
and
make
a
lot
of
plans
that
are
affordable,
because
if
they
don't
see,
we
have
a
program
they're
not
going
to
build
it.
We
cannot
force
them
to
right.
So
we
we're
wasting
our
time
talking
about
these
wonderful
things
and
never
happened.
So
I
think
this
we're
coming
from
the
developers.
H
H
H
E
Thank
you
first,
I
want
to
thank
you
mayor
for
your
leadership
in
in
getting
people
together
to
work
out
a
grand
bargain.
If
you
will
on
how
we
can
make
sure
mfte
works
really
well
for
the
people
who
need
affordable
housing
as
well
as
for
the
people
who
are
fee
developers,
building
affordable
housing.
So
I
think
that
that's
tremendous.
So
thank
you
for
your
leadership
on
that
this.
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
how
important
this
rent
stabilization
is.
It's
it's
a
huge
it's.
E
As
you
said,
it
hasn't
been
done
before
in
mft
that
I'm
aware
of
it
is
a
huge
concession-
and
you
know,
on
behalf
of
the
development
community,
in
order
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
people
who
need
affordable
housing.
So,
but
this
won't
work
if
we
change
the
deeper
affordability
below
the
65
in
the
prior
one
and
it
won't
work
if
we
don't
take
the
parking
parking
suggestion
in
the
next
topic
item
it.
E
This
is
a
central
piece
that
is
the
give
in
order
to
have
more
reasonable
regulations
for
the
mfte
as
a
whole.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out,
because
this
is
huge.
This
is
huge.
We
didn't
come
up
with
this.
The
development
community
and
the
affordable
housing
community
came
up
with
this,
and
this
is
going
to
be
really
beneficial
to
the
people
who
are
living
in
these
units
and
really
all
the
risk
of
if
the.
E
A
It
is,
it
is
an
equation
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Okay,
the
council
members
only
get
you
in
a
second.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
this
has
to
pencil
out,
it
has
to
work.
You
know
we
want
to
create
as
much
affordable
housing
as
possible
in
our
city,
but
it
has
to
pencil
out
for
the
developer
and
there's
all
these
different
parts
of
the
equation,
and
so
this
is
a
balance
of
the
give
and
take.
As
councilmember
robertson
said,
council
members
on.
F
A
Any
other
comments
or
questions
on
this
all
right.
Let's
move
on
to
the
parking,
so
the
first
one
is
pertains
to
anywhere
except
downtown
bellevue
and
it's
talking
about
renters
of
mfte
units
and
it's
decoupling,
the
affordable
units
from
parking
requirements,
and
so,
if
you
are
in
an
mft
unit
and
you
choose
to
have
a
parking
stall
which
you
may
not
because
you
may
be
right
next
to
light
rail
or
a
high
frequency
transit
and
you
may
be
able
to
go
where
you
need
to
go
without
a
car.
A
So
there
was
a
question
that
I
heard
who
determines
what
the
market
rate
is
for
a
parking
stall
mac.
T
So,
typically,
the
building
owners
determine
what
they
want
to
charge
for
rent.
You
know
for
the
parking
stall
and
then
the
concept
here
would
be
simply
be
30.
You
know
discount
if
somebody
chose
to
rent
one.
I
think
another
important
concept
is
this
discount.
This
would
only
be
given
to
people
that
use
parking,
not
all
mft
renters
in
the
building
and
it
would
be
on
a
first
come
first
serve
basis,
and
so
the
affordable
renters,
the
mfte
units
would
be
on
list
trying
to
get
parking
if
they
wanted
it.
A
So
any
comments
or
questions
on
part
a
of
two
parts:
council
members
on.
F
Yes,
thank
you.
I
was
just
trying
to
understand
how
to
put
this
recommendation
in
context
with
what
the
staff
memo
actually
talks
about,
so
what
this
recommendation
of
the
30
discount
would
be.
F
T
Yes,
council
members
on
that's
right,
I
think
the
concept
here
is
to
think
about.
Where
are
our
portions
of
the
city
right
now
that
are
really
ready
to
to
completely
decouple
parking?
So
where
do
you
have
access
to
goods
and
services
and
supermarkets
and
jobs
and
and
good
transit
and
the
staff
we've
been
talking
about
this
particular
issue
with
a
whole
bunch
of
the
stakeholders
for
a
long
time?
We
firmly
believe
that
downtown
is
in
that
position
right
now.
The
transitioning
areas
of
the
city
that
are
having
really
expensive
parking
be
built.
T
You
know,
but
yet
people
that
live
in
those
buildings
are
likely
to
still
need
cars.
The
the
compromise,
if
that's
the
right
term,
we
think,
is
very
fair
to
to
give
some
amount
of
discount
in
those
areas
of
the
city,
but
completely
decoupled
in
downtown,
for
the
reasons
that
I
was
talking
to
before.
T
So
when
we
had
our
memo
that
went
to
you,
the
main
objective
we
were
trying
to
think
about
is
what
does
it
mean
to
be
cost
burdened
or
how
do
we
define
affordability,
and
I
think
everybody
really
is
after
the
same
objective
here.
So
how
do
we
make
mfte
a
program
that
people
will
want
to
participate
in
and
I
think,
finding
a
discount
for
some
parking
costs
here?
Should
someone
really
need
it,
for
some
of
the
reasons
I
was
alluding
to
earlier
is
a
pretty
good
approach.
F
Okay-
and
that
makes
sense-
because
perhaps
you
know
as
they
as
we
think
about
these
units-
maybe
they
have
programs
like
car2go
or
other
other
programs
where
folks
really
need
a
car,
they
can
have
access
to
it,
and
then
the
only
other
question
I
have
in
this
item
is
in
your
memo.
It
it
talked
about
a
transportation
allowance.
F
This
would
be
consistent
with
the
planned
archwide
parking
approach.
So
I
understand
that
arch
is
part
of
the
housing
development
consortium.
So
if
we
looked
at
this
proposed
language
would
would
arch
have
to
look
at
changing
their
parking
approach
or
what
did
that
sentence
actually
mean
in
the
memo.
T
Councilmember
john,
how
about
I
answer
the
the
first
question,
which
I
think
will
lead
to
you
know
a
explanation
of
all
the
process.
So
arch
is
our
administering
agency,
so
when
we
adopt
mfte
policies,
arch
will
implement
those.
Now
one
of
the
things
all
the
member
cities.
Work
with
arch
on
is
consistency.
So
there's
an
administration
part
for
the
art
staff.
If
every
city
has
a
totally
different
rule
on
every
single
component
of
something
it
can
be
very
unwieldy
to
administer.
T
However,
some
of
the
dynamics
in
bellevue,
especially
around
the
construction
costs
of
parking
and
the
types
of
density
and
development
that
we
are
getting
really
are
very
different
than
some
of
the
other
east
side
communities.
So
we've
been
in
contact
with
the
arts
program
manager
around
how
we
can
make
some
of
these
kinds
of
decisions
and
work
with
them
to
have.
It
still
be
implementable.
So
should
the
council
choose
to
go
in
this
direction?
T
F
Great
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
don't
have
any
more
questions
on
this.
A
The
this
is
something
that
I
think
we
got
the
most
pushback
from
the
developers
on
was
this
requisite
of
providing
a
parking
stall
for
any
mfte
unit,
and
this
seemed
to
be
an
impediment
to
utilizing
the
program.
So
this
is
kind
of
a
compromise
that
works
for
the
affordable
housing
and
the
developer.
H
Thank
you
very
much.
You
know,
I
said
we
know
to
build.
Affordable
housing
is
to
keep
the
costs
down
right,
that's
one,
and
so
we
we
don't
want
to
add
costs
to
the
developers.
H
If
they
do,
they
are
going
to
build
it.
Okay,
so
we
want
to
keep
the
cost
down
and
it
costs
money
to
build
parking
spaces,
and
you
know
how
much
the
space
would
cost
mercury
or
not
whatever,
and
it
depends
on
the
market.
You
know
developers
aren't
going
to
charge
lots
of
money
where
nobody's
going
to
move
in
there
or
rent
a
space.
You
know
again
it's
a
and
that
I
think
that
is
a
good
gauge
of
what
the
market
rate
will
be
and
the
question
is,
you
know
what
does
it
cost?
H
The
the
renters
you
know
have
mfte
renters
and
I
believe
that
you
know
the
miss
per
leon
from
amazon.
You
know
made
a
real
good
recommendation
earlier
that
downtown.
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
already
opportunity
not
to
use
cars
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
you
know
it's
possible
and
even
if
they
do
use
cars,
I
think
that's
our
goal.
It's
to
give
them
options
so
that
they're
discouraged
to
use
cars
not
to
say
well,
you
know
so
giving
a
given
subsidized
parking.
H
Well
no
fee
for
parking,
that's
not
discouragement,
they
say!
Okay,
you
know,
don't
you
don't
need
a
car,
you
don't
you
shouldn't,
have
a
car,
maybe
you
don't
want
to
have
a
car,
but
let's
just
have
a
car
anyway,
that's
not
right!
Well,
we'll
just
say:
oh
just
take
a
empty
space,
not
use
it.
That's
not
right
either
and
also
it's
a
choice.
The
in
those
cases.
If
they
have
a
choice,
then
it's
a
choice
they
have
to
make.
So
I
can
see
downtown.
We
already
decided
it's
good,
but
outside
downtown
there's
other
places.
H
Yes,
there
may
be
not
convenient,
they
may
have
to
have
a
car.
Absolutely
they
may
want
to
use
a
car
absolutely
and
it's
a
free
choice
to
use
a
car,
and
in
that
case
you
know
it's
a
choice
that
they
can
afford
it.
H
It's
going
to
be
limited
market
rate
as
anybody
I
want
to
use
a
car
and
it's
only
as
needs
based.
Okay,
if
I
need
a
car,
I
want
it
because
I
have
to
do
it
and
if
there's
no
other
options
but
we're
trying
to
provide
other
options,
that's
what
the
city
is
aiming
at.
So
how
can
we
be
developing
options
at
the
same
time,
encouraging
them
not
to
use
those
options?
H
That's
oxymoron,
so
I
think
we
need
to
to
give
them
the
choice
and
if
they
do
want
to
make
choice,
then
it's
up
to
them
and
the
developer
to
see
how
economically,
like
mia
said.
You
know
it
has
to
make
a
work,
and
so
if
they
feel
that
they
need
it
absolutely
and
the
developer
in
this
case,
as
I
may
have
mentioned,
is
surprising.
H
You
know
they
are
willing
to
to
it's
a
cost
to
them
and
something
they
don't
know.
What
happens
you
know
in
the
event
they
build
it,
it's
costing
money
and
it
could
be
empty
and
they're
going
to
lose
money.
It
will
be
not
and
whatever
so
they
are
willing
to
at
least
to
come.
You
know
with
some
well
that's
their
choice.
H
You
know
I
mean
it's
a
private
enterprise
if
they
don't
want
to
they've
done
whatever
they
want
to
do
you
want
to
subsidize
or
they
don't
pocket
what
they
want
to
not
make
as
much
money.
I
hope
that
they
are
not
being
too
greedy
right.
That's
the
whole
principle
of
this
whole
thing
is,
I
mentioned
earlier:
it's
trust,
it's
social
responsibility.
H
H
You
know
people
and,
if
they're
willing
to
give
a
discount,
I
think
that's
great,
you
know
I
compliment
them,
pat
them
on
the
back,
and
it's
not
penalizing,
I
hope,
the
renters,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
other
ways
and
other
things
and
we
provide
options
and.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
lee,
my
position.
Okay,
thank
you
any
other
comments
or
questions
on
part.
A
of
this
recommendation.
A
I
think
we
all
agreed
that
we
should
increase
the
mfte
to
all
areas
that
allow
multi-family
development,
but
we
didn't
talk
about
the
high
density
zones,
which
I
think
we
currently
allow
the
incentive
program
and
high
density
zones
in
bellred
and
downtown
bellevue,
and
this
pertains
to
b,
because
I
think
we
should
consider
increasing
the
incentive
program
to
all
high
frequency
zones
and
throughout
bellevue,
and
so
remember,
the
high
frequency
zone
is,
I
think,
any
transit
node
that
has
service
for
four
times
an
hour.
Is
that
right
mac?
Am
I
remembering
that
correctly.
T
U
Yeah
mayor
we
had,
there
were
the
work
that
mike
brennan
and
dsd
had
in
the
parking
code
did
have
different
definitions
for
the
the
high
frequency
network
and
four
four
times
per
hour
was
one
of
the
definitions.
A
Okay,
so
when
we
talk
about
parking
requirements,
it's
very
different
if
you're
in
a
high
frequency,
high
frequency
transit
area
versus
not-
and
you
can
have
mfte
in
a
high
frequency
area
and
that's
where
we
talk
about
layering
or
stacking
incentive,
zoning
for
the
incentives
versus
the
mfte
program,
but
with
it
only
being
allowed
in
in
bell
red
and
downtown
it
kind
of
limits.
Our
discussion
here
so
mac
and
emil.
Is
it
fair
to
throw
out
there?
Can
we
increase
the
incentive
zoning
to
all
high
frequency
transit
areas
in
bellevue.
T
Yeah
mayor,
I
think
what
we
would
suggest
if
this
is
an
idea
the
council
is
interested
in.
We
can
loop
back
with
our
colleagues
in
development
services,
because
the
code
update
would
likely
not
be
to
the
mfte
code.
It
would
be
built
into
the
high
frequency
transit
zone
and
the
actual
land
use
code
and
what
the
land
use
code
requires
for
parking.
So
I
think
everyone's
going
to
be
after
the
same
objective,
which
is
how
do
we
get?
T
You
know
the
right
amount
of
affordable
housing
as
much
as
possible,
built
and
think
about
what
the
requirements
of
that
are.
So,
if
there's
a
desire
to
build
this
into
the
work
plan,
we've
we've
talked
to
our
ds.
Colleagues,
today
and
and
similar
concepts
are
already
in
the
work
plan,
and
so
we
would
just
talk
to
them
about
when
they
plan
on
bringing
the
high
frequency
network
back
to
you
all
and
what
the
parking
requirements
could
be
and
then
we
could
handle
it.
That
way.
A
Is
there
anybody
other
than
me
who's
interested
in
exploring
expanding
the
the
incentive
zoning
to
all
high
frequency
zones?
So
I
see
one
two
three,
I
see
a
head
nod
for
anybody
else,
conrad
or
jeremy
thumbs
up.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
all
right.
Well,
I
think
we
have
enough
support
to
bring
this
back
to
us
and
have
a
discussion.
So
thank
you
for
that.
So
now
we're
looking
at
part.
The
second
part
of
the
parking
recommendation
developers
must
perform
a
parking
study
and
receive
director
approval
to
build
below
the
code
requirement
of
0.75
spaces
per
unit
in
high
transit
frequency
zones.
A
They
are
proposing
that
we
remove
the
parking
study
requirement
for
projects
with
mfte
units
so
that
they
can
go
down
to
0.5
stalls
per
unit,
and
I
guess
I
would
just
add
to
that
in
high
frequency
zones,
because
I
think
we
all
have
the
same
concern
that
we
reduce
parking
requirements
in
areas
where
there
isn't
a
lot
of
transit
and
and
then
you
see
people
parking
in
the
neighborhoods
which
we
don't
want
to
get
into
that.
So
I'm
hoping
that
will
couple
with
my
idea
of
expanding
high
frequency
zones,
councilmember
robertson.
A
E
You
on
the
idea
of
expanding,
I
raised
my
hand
because
I
was
supportive
of
of
increasing
the
land
use
incentives
in
areas
with
the
high
frequency
transit
and
I
think,
looking
at
the
map
that
is
primarily
in
our
growth
corridors
anyway,
and
so
we
have
two
land
use
code
updates
ready
to.
E
You
know,
move
forward,
which
is
the
east
main
and
wilberton,
and
I
absolutely
expect,
based
on
conversations,
I've
made
conversations
or
conversations
you've
had
on
the
diets
conversations
the
whole
council's
had
on
the
diocese
that
we
want
affordable
housing
incentives
and
tod
incentives
for
those
zones.
So
I
would
expect
those
to
come
forward
if,
if
what
you're
talking
about
is
the
work
plan
is
something
different
than
that.
E
I
wouldn't
want
it
to
leap
frog,
those
two
things,
because
those
have
been
waiting
for
a
long
time,
but
maybe
it
could
be
added
into
those,
as
part
of
you
know,
doing
them
the
same.
E
T
Yeah,
I
I
would
not
it's
not
going
to
have
an
impact
on
any
of
the
other
things.
This
is
already
part
of
our
parking
code,
update
that
you
all
had
a
study
session
on
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
the
question
of
whether
or
not
to
expand
or
take
another
look
at
the
map
for
high
transit
frequency
zones.
To
make
sure
that
aligns
with
what
the
council
would
like
to
see
relative
to
then
being
able
to
take
advantage
of
parking
things
we
I
we
talked
to
ds.
T
E
Okay,
no
that's
great,
and
I
was
looking
at
the
schedule
and
we're
scheduled
to
adopt
the
updated
parking,
at
least
on
the
website
at
the
end
of
this
month.
That
might
need
to
push
to
take
into
account
this,
but
we're
you
know
that
interim
official
control
I
think
ends
in
may,
so
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
parking
updated
and
I
would
like
to
see
the
parking
study
requirement
that
we're
talking
about
incorporated
into
that
land
use
code
so
that
we
don't
have
to
start
over
on
that.
E
E
Okay,
it
wasn't
that's.
I
had
my
my
hand
was
up
and
that's
why
I
had
some
questions.
I
fully
expect
that,
as
we
do,
those
other
plans
we'll
be
having
the
incentive
for
affordable
housing
for
density
bonuses,
so
good,
I'm
glad
that
that's
not
a
separate
work
plan,
that's
going
to
supplant
that
other
important
work,
but
no
I'm
supportive
of
this.
I
think
it's
appropriate
and
I
think
the
timing
dovetails
really
nicely
with
our
update
to
the
parking
parking
code
that
is
has
been
in
process
for
over
a
year.
So.
E
Oh
okay,
so
I
would
like
to
see
the
overlap
of
what
that
would
do
for
non-high-frequent
non-high
frequency
transit
zones
or
if
it
was
just
an
across-the-board
parking
study
waiver.
Can
we
have
a
map
when
this
comes
back,
and
hopefully
we
can
hear
from
the
non-profit
development
community
if,
if
they're,
supportive
of
it
being
limited
to
high
frequency
zones,.
F
Yeah,
so
I
had
similar
comments.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
was
clear
about
4b
so
frame
just
so
worded
a
different
way.
What
we're
saying
is
that
the
proposal
is,
if
there's
an
mfte
project
if
the
units
are
going
to
provide
less
than
the
0.5
stalls
per
unit,
that's
when
the
parking
study
would
be
still
be
required.
So
this
is
removing
the
parking
study
only
if
the
the
number
of
stalls
per
unit
drops
below
0.5.
T
You
know
council
members
on
given
the
amount
of
dialogue
we've
had
about
all
the
financial.
The
heavy
duty
financial
stuff
up
above
I'd
probably
want
to
understand
this
a
little
bit
better
myself
and
because
it'll
be
a
land
use
code
change,
that's
ultimately
getting
proposed.
I
probably
want
to
bring
in
mike
brennan
and
trisna
to
have
a
conversation
on
that
question,
and
we
can
certainly
do
that.
We're
hearing
loud
and
clear.
T
The
council
would
be
interested
in
this
kind
of
concept
to
try
to
reduce
construction
costs,
especially
around
parking
when
it
involves
affordable
housing.
So
we'd
like
to
take
that
over
to
our
our
land
use
group
and
start
to
see
where
it's
best
codified.
F
Okay,
yeah.
I
support
that
because
in
reading
this
there
I
just
wanted
to
be
really
clear
about
what
was
actually
being
proposed.
I
mean
a
parking
study
is
not
required
if
you
go
above
the
minimum
threshold
of
spaces
per
unit
as
prescribed,
so
this
would
only
be
looking
at
a
waiver
for
being
able
to
go
below
without
having
to
do
a
parking
study.
So,
okay,
thank
you.
I
I
agree
that
we
should
put
it
together
with
the
parking
study
and
the
land
use
work.
A
Thank
you,
yeah.
It's
lowering
the
trigger
for
a
parking
study,
as
I
understand
it,
so,
okay,
so
you
would.
It
would
trigger
lower
than
0.5
stalls,
not
at
as
initial
as
it
is
now
at
0.75.
If
you
wanted
to
go
lower
than
that,
any
other
comments
or
questions
on
that.
That
sounds
like
a
robust
discussion
that
we
can
have
on
that
one.
A
Okay.
Well,
I
have
one
more
recommendation
that
I'd
like
to
run
by
you
all.
We
have
fee
and
lou
for
if
people
opt
out
of
creating
affordable
housing
and
we've
heard
a
lot
from
other
cities
about
how
and
we've
seen
it.
I
think
in
bellevue
too
that
if
it's,
if
the
fee
in
lieu
is
too
low,
then
many
developers
opt
out
and
just
pay
into
the
affordable
housing
fund
and
don't
actually
develop
affordable
housing.
I
don't
think
that's
the
goal
of
any
of
us.
A
I
would
ask
that
you
consider
the
concept
of
having
a
third
party
come
in
and
assess
our
fee
in
lieu
and
recommend,
what's
fee
and
lou,
that's
to
measure
it
with
the
financial
burden
of
actually
developing
affordable
housing.
So
it's
a
little
more
balanced.
A
E
No
I'd
be
interested
in
that
I
also
I've
had
some
folks
talk
to
me
about
whether
there
would
be
options
for
them
to
say
they're,
building
something
downtown,
but
they
also
have
land
out
in
crossroads
whether
they
could
transfer
their
or
transfer
to
another
developer,
maybe
the
obligation
to
build
additional
units
or
build
them
themselves
in
a
different
site.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
could
be
coupled
in
with
an
evaluation
of
the
fee
in
lieu.
E
Kind
of
like
kind
of
like
we
have
the
you
know
the
city
hall
sells
far,
but
instead
transfer
them
to
another
property,
and
it
would
not
work
if
everyone
started
building
all
in
the
same
area.
But
that.
E
Yeah,
I
think
that
that
would
be
worth
it
because
I've
never
heard
of
someone
saying
well.
You
know
this
is
concrete
and
steel
here,
but
we're
gonna
do
stick
built
over
there.
We
could
just
do
the
whole
project,
affordable
housing.
If
we
can,
you
know,
get
the
get
the
density
bonus
at
our
downtown.
So
just
something
to
add
to
the
discussion.
I
support
looking
at
this.
E
A
A
I
can't
remember,
I
think
the
only
thing
that's
different
is
looking
at
maintaining
the
existing
20
of
units
or
or
keeping
the
the
ami
at
80
and
looking
at
you
know
the
difference
between
I'm
sorry,
I'm
I'm
confused,
but
I
know
what
I
want
to
say:
I'm
just
having
trouble
saying
it.
Anyway.
We
talked
about
65,
we
talked
about
70
percent
and
then
60,
so
maybe
bringing
back
the
impacts
of
all
those
options.
So
we
can
discuss
on
number
two
we
talked
about,
or
is
it
was
that
number
two
that
I
just
said.
A
A
Mfte
rent
increases
at
three
percent
per
year
sounds
like
we
have
a
consensus
on
that
number
four
was
two
part
discounted
parking
in
anywhere,
but
downtown
so
that
an
mft
unit
could
purchase
a
stall
at
30
percent
discount
of
the
market
rate
and
then
number
two
was
the
parking
study
requirement
changing
that
so
that
if
you
and
I
I
offered
that
it
be
in
a
high
freq
frequency
zone,
if
you
do
mfte
units,
you
automatically
can
go
down
to
0.5
stalls.
A
N
Yes,
mayor
as
before,
we
move
forward
on
that.
I
did
want
to
ask
mac
and
maybe
the
staff
on
the
last
one.
That
sounds
like
quite
a
bit
of
work.
I
would
look
to
you
in
terms
of
from
an
expectations
management
perspective.
What
would
actually
come
back
and
you
know,
do
we
have
the
bandwidth
to
do
that?
One.
T
Yeah
thanks
city
manager,
I
I
think
what
I
would
suggest
is
there
are
a
number
of
mfte
provisions
that
you
all
definitely
want
to
move
forward
on.
I'm
hearing
broad
consensus
for
that
mayor.
I
think
that
would
be
everything
that
you
mentioned
right
up
to
the
very
last
parking
thing
that
addresses
just
land
use
code.
Things
we'll
be
in
a
position
to
bring
that
body
of
work
back
within
a
couple
of
weeks
and
happy
to
talk
here
in
a
minute
about
the
public
hearing
in
the
next
steps
in
mfte
adoption.
T
T
So
that
would
not
come
back
with
mfte
would
move
into
the
land,
use
code,
work,
program,
discussion
and
then
on
the
two
items
that
you
mentioned:
either
a
transfer
of
development
rights,
idea
that
council
member
robertson
brought
up
or
how
do
we
look
at
fee
and
lieu
and
is
that
as
effective
as
it
could
be,
those
could
be
significant
bodies
of
work.
T
So
what
I
might
suggest
is,
let
us
scope
it
a
little
bit,
maybe
bring
it
back
to
the
council
as
part
of
an
affordable
housing
update
or
or
somehow
bring
it
back
to
you
for
thinking
about
they're
likely
to
be
eight
hour.
Rule
discussions
amongst
the
council
and
so
you'll
have
to
think
about
the
other
housing
work.
You
know
that's
ongoing
and
how
this
could
fit
into
that.
A
Well,
I
think
nobody
wants
to
slow
this
down
the
the
majority
of
the
work
that
you
say
we
can
get
working
on.
So
I'm
comfortable
with
you
taking
longer
to
re-examine
the
fee
in
lieu
and
then
you
transfer
the
development
is
everybody
else?
Okay,
with
that,
okay.
A
Who
said
that?
Oh.
F
F
It
is
that
the
two
bedroom
units
would
remain
at
80
ami,
but
the
other
units
would
be
at
the
70
ami.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
that
is
the
proposed
wording,
because
it
was
slightly
different
than
your
summary
that
had
the
20
at
the
80
ami.
A
U
A
I
don't
even
know,
I
know
it
says,
maintain
the
existing
20,
the
the
recommendation
was
from
the
stakeholders,
was
to
maintain
the
existing
20
of
units
but
drop
the
ami
from
80
percent
to
70
percent
of
recommendation.
No,
that
was
what
staff
recommended
I'm
confused.
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
have
somebody
else
figure
this
out,
because
I
can't
even
think
anymore.
T
We'll
bring
it
back
to
you,
mayor,
councilmembers,
on
in
short,
you're
correct,
so
the
the
idea
here
is
well
what
happens
if
somebody
produces
some
two
bedrooms,
but
not
the
code
required
fifteen
percent.
The
proposal
is,
let's
keep
the
two
bedrooms
at
80
percent
and
then
the
rest.
The
studios
and
one
bedrooms
drop
down
in
ami
as
a
concession
for
not
producing
the
family
units
that
are
otherwise
contemplated.
F
A
T
Yes,
mayor,
I
think
we
do.
We
will
take
the
the
work
you've
done
tonight
and
package
it
with
the
other
decisions.
You've
made,
for
example,
going
city
wide
with
all
the
multi-family
zones
and
bring
you
back
an
overall
program.
T
So
you
can
see
how
all
the
pieces
fit
together,
which
is
something
a
number
of
you
asked
for
early
on
and
I
think,
based
on
the
tonight's
discussion.
T
We
would
be
confident
that
you're,
probably
in
a
position
to
vote
at
the
next
meeting,
so
we'll
put
it
all
together
for
you
and
bring
back
the
analysis
you
asked
for
here
tonight
and
then
the
next
step
would
be
to
schedule
a
public
hearing.
So
we're
looking
at
that
as
quickly
as
possible
after
your
discussion
and
so
we'll
work
with
the
clerk's
office
to
schedule.
Another
study
session.
A
I
think
that's
great
and
you
know
if
we're
not
ready
to
vote,
that's
okay,
but
let's
make
that
a
goal,
and
hopefully
we
will
all
get
the
information.
We
need
to
be
able
to
have
a
conversation
and
and
take
a
a
stand
on
whatever
we're
going
to
do
with
this,
so
there
will
be
staff
briefings
available.
I
know
to
everybody
as
we
move
forward.