►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - October 18, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
C
C
D
C
B
F
F
Good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
susan
papalardo
and
I
live
in
kirkland
washington
and
I'm
the
co-founder
and
board
president
of
splash
forward
on
behalf
of
splash
forward
and
the
wide
range
of
community
stakeholders
we
represent.
I
share
these
comments,
as
you
review
tonight's
recommendations
for
the
preferred
aquatic
facility
concept,
plan
site
and
next
steps.
I
hope
you
have
enjoyed
hearing
from
the
diverse
community
members
with
their
personal
stories
around
the
importance
of
having
access
to
aquatics
and
their
strong
support
for
a
new
public
aquatic
facility
in
bellevue.
F
I
have
sent
you
additional
letters
of
support
from
organizations
that
are
in
your
council
packet
tonight.
Parks
staff
presents
a
unified
facility
concept
plan
that
we
have
refined
together
over
the
past
year.
At
our
weekly
meetings,
the
130
000
square
foot
facility
encompasses
the
hopes
and
dreams
of
all
user
groups
to
meet
today's
needs
and
for
generations
to
come.
The
preferred
site
recommendation
of
bellevue
airfield
park
is
exciting
because
of
the
opportunities
it
creates,
not
only
in
the
breadth
of
complementary
recreational
and
fitness
scenarios,
but
also
in
the
process
to
update
the
2012
master
plan.
F
The
process
invites
the
public
in
and
the
greatest
opportunities
will
be
explored
that
integrate
both
indoor
and
outdoor
uses,
unique
to
this
site.
Imagine
families
using
the
soccer
and
ball
fields
followed
by
family,
swim
time
in
the
leisure
pool.
Imagine
elementary
school
aged
children
taking
a
summer
camp
where
the
morning
is
swim.
Lessons
and
the
afternoon
a
soccer
clinic
or
a
nature,
hike
on
the
local
trails,
imagine
arriving
by
bike
or
trail
from
surrounding
neighborhoods
or
the
lake
to
lake
trail
or
even
the
future
light
rail
stop
at
the
eastgate
park
and
ride.
F
Imagine
high
school
swim,
dive
and
water
polo
players
from
all
schools
arriving
at
the
facility
to
practice
and
compete
under
one
roof.
Imagine
every
community
member
having
access
to
learning
water
safety
skills.
Imagine
the
community
connections
that
will
be
fostered
because
there
is
a
safe,
inclusive
space
where
everyone
feels
they
belong.
F
This
state-of-the-art
facility
will
be
a
cross-cultural
portal
that
unites
us.
It
will
provide
opportunities
to
cross
paths,
foster
community
host
events
and
learn
more
about
one
another
in
shared
space
as
bellevue
expands
and
develops
its
transportation
infrastructure,
its
vibrant
pathways,
and
continues
as
an
indus
in
the
innovation
city
for
local
businesses.
I
encourage
you
to
include
amenities
that
invest
in
the
resiliency
of
our
community
as
high
priority
in
your
budget
planning.
F
Slash
ford
is
committed
to
reducing
barriers,
to
aquatics,
building
partnerships,
assessing
the
private
fundraising
capacity
and
leading
a
private
funding
campaign,
while
working
with
the
city
to
identify
and
develop
the
full
range
of
funding
sources.
There
is
great
momentum
for
private
funding
demonstrated
by
the
just
over
291
thousand
in
seed
funding
already
raised.
This
includes
sizable
donations
from
amazon
and
pacific
northwest
swimming
splash
ford,
looks
forward
to
hearing
your
feedback
and
urges
you
to
provide
direction
to
park
staff
on
the
outline
next
steps
that
move
this
effort
forward.
F
B
No,
no
video
one
moment
while
we
get
the
timer
started.
Thank
you.
G
My
name
is
addie
smith.
As
you
all
know,
I've
contacted
you
a
couple
of
times
via
these
council
meetings.
I
am
a
hate
crime
survivor.
I've
spoken
with
you
previously
about
how
important
it
is
to
monitor
the
arch
program
in
life
of
the
new
mfte
program.
One
of
the
reasons
I'm
speaking
before
you
again
today
is
because
had
the
arch
program
staff
been
properly
monitoring
its
program,
including
wait
lists
and
qualifications
to
live
in
a
low-income
apartment.
My
daughter
and
I
wouldn't
have
been
attacked,
stopped,
threatened
and
harassed
by
a
group
of
white
racists.
G
Not
only
did
the
arch
program
fail,
my
daughter
and
I,
but
it
also
failed
scores
of
actual
qualified
applicants,
because
the
staff
from
the
arts
program
refused
to
audit
files
or
basic
necessities
like
monitoring
the
waitlist.
I
excuse
me.
I
have
contacted
hood.
I've
spoken
with
marcia
fudge's
office
and
one
of
the
most
important
aspects
of
low
income
housing
is
decent,
safe
housing,
but
that
corporate
landlords
and
agencies,
like
the
arts
program
or
any
programs
going
into
the
future.
G
Like
your
mfte
program,
the
one
way
to
ensure
fair
housing
is
to
follow
an
applicant
wait
list.
Please
write
that
down.
Washington
state
is
more
racist
from
a
black
woman's
perspective
than
any
southern
gop
led
state,
and
I
am
from
the
south
democrats
appointed
most
of
the
judges
in
the
courts
here
in
washington,
state
and
they're.
Some
of
the
most
quote,
unquote
conservative,
but
I
call
racist
judges
in
the
nation.
G
You
have
to
keep
people
safe.
The
covet
19
pandemic
is
not
over.
Hospitals
in
washington
state
are
still
full
and
it's
not
just
from
an
influx
from
idaho
and
alaska.
It
is
from
people
right
here
in
washington,
state
doctors
are
still
overwhelmed.
Doctors
still
cannot
perform
surgeries
for
other
matters,
because
their
beds
are
still
full
from
people
with
covet.
19.
G
B
B
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
members
for
hearing
me
tonight,
I'm
not
wearing
my
climate
activist
hat
tonight,
but
I
am
wearing
a
few
other
hats.
First
hat
that
I'm
wearing
is
a
lifelong,
frequent
and
regular
lap
swimmer
and
I'm
here
to
talk
about
the
aquatic
center.
H
H
H
I
I
want
you
to
look
at
this
first
slide
because
all
of
the
red
dots
on
this
slide,
which
are
largely
within
a
three
mile
radius
from
the
proposed
site,
it's
there
with
the
the
brown
circle
around
it
all
of
the
red
dots
are
existing
swimming
facilities
in
our
south
bellevue
area.
H
H
Obviously
we're
well
covered
here
in
our
area,
so
we
don't
need
another
swimming
facility.
I
myself
go
to
a
swimming
facility
that
is
close
by
this
location,
called
samina's,
swim
and
recreation
center.
It's
also
a
fitness
center
and
it
has
a
gym
and
lots
of
other
facilities,
so
our
area
is
well
served.
Let's
move
to
the
next
slide,
please.
H
H
Right,
it
was
proposed
to
be
a
park
development
which
we
all
got
noticed
for
in
our
neighborhood,
but
it's
very
structurally
suspect
in
that
area
in
the
center
it's
an
old
dump
and
I
think
it
would
be
very
hazardous.
That's
my
fourth
hat
as
an
engineer
I
have
to
tell
you:
this
is
not
a
good
site
for
that
kind
of
building
I'll,
give
you
more
information
and
an
email
that
I'll
follow
up
with.
I
appreciate
you
listening
tonight
thanks
for
your
time.
B
I
This
is
lisha
wig,
4811
134th
place
honorable
mayor,
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
We
want
to
start
off
by
expressing
our
deep
gratitude
to
the
council
and
staff
for
engaging
with
us.
We
just
found
out
that
the
evaluation
of
the
non-residential
base
far
is
not
something
that
will
be
looked
at
in
the
eco-northwest
report,
and
so
council
could
proceed
on
this
decision.
I
I
We
are
requesting
that
council
consider
adding
more
amenities
to
the
top
tier
since
with
a
very
low
starting
base.
Far,
we
need
to
earn
a
lot
of
amenity
points
to
reach
the
maximum
far,
and
we
only
have
three
options
right
now
to
do
so,
which
may
not
be
enough
maximizing
far
should
be
in
the
community's
best
interest,
since
it
will
also
maximize
housing,
affordable
housing
and
amenities
and
provide
density
across
from
a
light
rail
station,
which
is
in
line
with
the
city's
growth
strategy.
I
Downtown
has
nine
amenity
options
in
their
top
tier,
and
the
adjacent
olb
south
only
needs
to
earn
0.5
far
to
go
from
their
base
to
their
maximum
var.
We
have
three
options
available
in
the
top
tier
and
we
need
to
earn
three
to
five
times
the
amenities
as
next
door
to
reach
our
maximum
bar.
Our
request
is
to
ensure
we
have
the
opportunity
to
earn
the
amenity
points
that
may
be
needed.
I
I
Finally,
one
item
we
brought
up
in
our
june
25th
letter,
which
we
don't
see
on
an
agenda,
is
the
width
of
the
pre-located
street.
The
code
requires
a
60-foot
wide
street
on
the
hilton
property
between
helton
and
bellevue
club,
but
the
driveway
and
bridge
over
sturdivant
creek
are
30
feet
wide.
The
60
foot
wide
street
will
double
the
width
of
the
pavement
over
the
creek
and
in
doing
so,
reduce
the
daylighting
of
a
salmon
bearing
creek.
I
We
are
concerned
about
this
environmental
impact
and
the
federal
approvals
to
build
on
top
of
the
creek
may
be
difficult.
We
would
suggest
and
propose
the
60
feet.
The
street
be
60
foot
wide
all
on
the
hilton
property,
but
the
street
could
be
reduced
to
30
feet
in
width
only
where
it
crosses
the
stream.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
J
Wig
at
48-11
134th
place
southeast
bellevue,
honorable
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
I
want
to
talk
about
an
item
today
that
is
of
paramount
importance
for
the
success
of
this
development.
J
It
is
the
block,
length
and
perimeter
requirement
in
draft
luca.
This
item
is
already
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
council
meeting
on
11
1,
I'm
bringing
it
up
now
so
staff
can
provide
their
input
before
the
11
1
meeting
to
the
council.
I've
brought
up
this
item
before
with
the
staff
for
your
information.
J
J
Small
block
requirement
will
break
up
this
above
ground
parking,
make
it
much
less
convenient,
more
confusing
and
less
efficient
for
retail
customers,
because
the
parking
is
broken
up.
We
strongly
recommend
that
perimeter
requirement
be
eliminated
and
the
150
for
350
foot
maximum
block
length
to
be
limited
to
only
112th
street
or
avenue.
J
J
This
makes
it
much
harder
to
develop
retail
in
this
area
and
for
retailers
to
survive.
Therefore,
convenient
parking
will
be
of
paramount
importance.
We
truly
hope
you
listen
to
this
need
and
limit
350
foot
maximum
block
length,
only
212th
avenue
and
and
with
no
perimeter
requirement.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
B
B
K
K
K
When
I
moved
to
bellevue,
I
was
surprised
to
see
all
the
small
private
swim
clubs
tucked
away
in
neighborhoods,
which
required
memberships
to
join.
I
realized
how
lucky
I
was
that
spokane
invested
in
community
pools.
I
came
from
a
very
poor
family
and
I
would
have
had
a
completely
different
childhood
if
private
swim
clubs
were
our
only
option
as
an
adult,
I'm
a
mom
of
four
children,
three
of
whom
are
autistic
because
our
community
is
surrounded
by
water.
It's
a
high
priority
that
I
taught
my
children,
water
safety
at
a
young
age.
K
91
of
deaths
in
autistic
children
are
due
to
drowning,
and
while
my
family
was
fortunate
to
be
able
to
join
a
private
club
and
pay
for
swim
lessons,
not
all
families
are
so
lucky.
For
that
reason,
it's
important
that
we
provide
water
safety
programming,
that's
accessible
to
youth
and
adults,
especially
those
on
the
autism
spectrum.
K
K
Water
has
been
the
great
equalizer
because
it's
individual,
although
my
kids,
were
never
good
enough
to
participate
in
the
highly
competitive
swim
team
at
our
pool.
They
were
able
to
play
with
their
peers
and
feel
like
they
fit
in.
We
spent
many
hours
at
the
pool
in
the
summer
and
after
so
much
swimming.
One
of
my
sons
knew
that
he
would
like
to
be
a
lifeguard
when
he
was
old
enough
recently,
splash
forward
offered
him
an
opportunity
to
get
his
lifeguard
and
red
cross
certification.
K
Given
my
childhood
experience
and
my
connection
to
the
disability
community,
I
know
there's
a
great
need
in
bellevue
for
an
accessible
and
affordable
public
aquatic
center
that
serves
all
ages,
abilities
and
backgrounds.
We
need
an
inclusive,
safe
place
for
our
youth
families
and
all
residents
to
come
together
and
create
community
connections.
Thank
you.
B
L
Hi,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
this
is
jesse
claussen
from
mccullough
hill
larry.
I'm
here
tonight
representing
the
bellevue
club
related
to
the
east
main
luca.
I
wanted
to
echo
essentially
most
of
what
mr
wig
said
related
to
the
perimeter
length
and
maximum
block
width.
I
know
you're
not
discussing
that
tonight,
but
wanted
to
put
it
on
your
radar
screen
from
the
bellevue
club's
perspective,
staff
has
recommended
looking
ahead,
that
an
expansion
of
the
bellevue
club
be
required
to
comply
with
such
a
requirement.
L
We
are
concerned
that
such
a
requirement
will
hamper
some
future
expansion
of
the
bellevue
club.
Just
given
you
know
how
big
of
a
use
and
big
of
a
building
might
be
necessary
to
expand
the
club
and
to
support
the
club,
so
we
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
your
screen
and
on
staff
screen
just
to
talk
about
next
time.
Thanks
very
much.
C
M
Yes,
I
can
hear
you,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,.
M
All
right,
dear
mayor
lynn,
robinson
and
members
of
the
city
council,
I
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
vishnu
manjipuri
and
I
live
at
1204
150th
avenue,
northeast
bellevue,
washington,
98007.,
I'm
currently
an
8th
grader
at
odell
middle
school
and
have
been
a
member
of
the
bellevue
youth
link
climate
action
team
for
the
past
three.
This
is
currently
my
fourth
years
I
personally
care
about
climate
because
it
will
severely
impact
the
lives
of
my
generation
and
future
generations
on
our
planet.
M
I
have
worked
towards
sustainability
by
helping
to
plan
various
continuity
sustainability
summits
and
have
spread
awareness
about
climate
change.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
past
work
on
the
environmental
stewardship
plan.
It's
great
that
bellevue
has
a
plan
so
that
we
can
move
forward
on
important
steps
for
reducing
our
emissions,
especially
for
buildings
and
transportation.
M
Full
funding
for
implementing
the
environmental
stewardship
plan
means
we
can
really
get
moving
on
increasing
access
to
clean
and
renewable
energy,
reducing
the
environmental
impacts
of
transportation,
preserving
ecosystems
and
helping
with
other
actions
as
well.
I'm
glad
that
the
environmental
stewardship
plan
is
in
its
implementation
phase,
and
I
urge
you
to
support
it
fully.
Your
support
can
ensure
that
current
staff
and
any
additional
future
staff
that
might
be
needed
can
put
the
plan
in
motion
quickly
enough
to
meet
our
goals.
M
As
you
know,
staff
can
do
many
important
things,
such
as
work
on
public
education
plan
and
manage
actions
in
the
shorter
term,
and
they
can
also
do
research
so
that
longer
range
efforts
can
take
shapes
a
livable
climate
is
absolutely
essential
to
mine
and
others
features.
Please
ensure
that
bellevue
fully
funds
our
environmental
stewardship
plan.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
mr
managu,
and
that
reaches
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
At
this
point,
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
make
comment
to
the
city
council.
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star9
if
you're
connected
with
a
phone,
and
I
see
two
additional
hands
the
first
hand
is
don
marsh.
Mr
marsh,
can
you
hear
me.
N
All
right
good
evening,
my
name
is
don
marsh
and
I
am
a
co-founder
of
the
non-profit
group
300
trees.
I'm
here
tonight
to
enthusiastically
commend
the
city's
fall
tree
giveaway
that
was
held
a
week
ago
during
the
weekend
event,
and
following
days
approximately
700
free
trees
were
distributed.
The
event
was
well
organized.
The
variety
of
trees
offered
to
bellevue
residents
was
amazing
and
the
volunteers
were
passionate.
Best
of
all,
our
customers
were
very
satisfied.
N
The
most
common
feedback
I
heard
was
this
program
is
amazing.
We
love
our
trees
and
we're
so
happy.
Our
city
is
doing
this.
We
want
to
especially
recognize
the
tireless
efforts
of
rach,
rachel
wells
and
jennifer
ewing.
Not
only
did
they
have
to
search
far
to
find
trees
in
another
state,
but
they
took
care
of
all
the
details
of
the
event
gloves
and
bags,
and
a
yummy
lunch
for
volunteers,
trees
and
signs
and
mulch
for
residents
and
a
willingness
to
carry
trees
and
get
their
hands
dirty.
We
are
blessed
to
have
such
dedicated
civil
servants.
N
N
We
have
surveyed
tree
protection
codes
in
other
cities,
both
nearby
and
throughout
the
pacific,
northwest
and
found
that
bellevue's
codes
are
not
strong.
Perhaps
we
have
been
so
blessed
in
the
past
that
we
have
come
to
take
our
tree
canopy
for
granted.
However,
we
are
encouraged
by
statements
from
council
members
and
candidates
for
the
upcoming
election.
The
time
is
ripe
for
action
and
300
trees
is
preparing
recommendations
to
help
protect
our
city
in
a
park
for
future
generations.
N
One
thing
we
are
especially
excited
about
is
an
updated
tree.
Canopy
survey.
We
are
preparing
in
partnership
with
the
city,
with
the
help
of
artificial
intelligence.
Smart
companies
can
now
identify
trees
in
satellite
imagery
to
produce
a
fast,
accurate
and
inexpensive
canopy
survey.
Every
couple
of
years
we
can
now
accurately
track
our
progress
toward
the
city's
goal
of
40
average
tree
canopy
coverage
by
2050.
N
We
will
include
these
results
and
trend
analysis
in
a
state
of
the
trees
report.
We
will
provide
to
the
council
before
the
end
of
the
year.
300
trees
will
offer
another
tree
giveaway
next
spring,
but
the
biggest
news
on
the
horizon
is
a
tree
planting
event
on
the
sammamish
high
school
campus
in
mid-november.
N
This
was
organized
in
partnership
with
students
at
the
high
school,
the
bellevue
school
district,
the
washington
department
of
natural
resources
and
ymca's
earth
service
corps.
We
have
gotten
permits
to
proceed
from
the
city
in
just
one
weekend.
We
are
hoping
to
create
a
new
mini
forest
containing
300
trees,
including
a
few
special
trees
to
memorialize
students
who
did
not
survive
the
coded
pandemic.
N
B
O
O
Hi,
thank
you
city
council,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
splash
ford,
as
a
new
community
member
in
bellevue,
as
well,
in
support
of
building
the
new
aquatic
center
on
the
proposed
site,
of
which
I
have
also
sent
a
letter
and
I'll
shortly
reiterate
some
of
my
bull
points,
but
just
would
like
to
add
I'm
a
little
bit
more
about
the
mission
of
the
work
that
I'm
very
invested
with.
That
is
going
to
drive
forward.
O
What
I
feel
is
true
community
building
in
my
neighborhood
of
lake
hills,
which
will
be
very
close
to
where
the
new
facility
is
built,
acknowledging
that
there
are
several
pools
in
the
area.
I
also
coach
swim
team
for
high
school
as
well
as
am
a
water
polo
coach
as
some
amish
and
interlake,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
there
is
not
much
access
for
us
right
now.
O
You
know
we're
outside
right
now,
after
after
this
meeting,
we'll
go
and
compete
against
auburn
riverside
at
the
edgebrook
pool
of
which,
one
by
one,
including
myself,
each
of
us
have
fallen,
sick
or
otherwise.
In
the
last
past
couple
of
weeks,
because
of
competing
in
a
in
a
water
sport,
that's
that's
outdoors,
so
first,
this
facility
for
me,
as
not
only
a
former
competitive
swimmer
and
coach,
as
well
as
aquatic
facility
facility
operations
manager
for
the
y
for
the
last
five
years
being
outside,
is
not
ideal.
O
As
I
did
my
research
to
figure
out
where
we
were
going
to
practice.
I
found
that
there
were
plenty
of
pools
in
this
neighborhood.
However,
there
are
all
that
private
municipality
at
private
pools,
and
so
with
that
I
could
not
find
a
pool
that
was
one
adequate
for
competitive
swimming
or
water
polo
in
my
search
and
with
that,
the
cost
of
accessing
those
facilities
were
great
outside
of
my
hat
in
the
community.
O
That's
inexpensive
and
I
have
not
been
successful
in
doing
that
and
so
of
which
I'd
like
to
highlight
the
importance
of
making
sure
that
we
have
accessible
facilities
in
bellevue
and
of
which
at
splash
ford,
we've
worked
hard
to
create
aquatics
pathways
and
I'll
briefly
share
a
minute
with
our
mission
within
this
last
minute.
The
aquatic
pathways
mission
at
splash
ford
is
to
raise
awareness
and
reduce
barriers
to
aquatics
accessibility
for
all
ages
and
abilities.
O
So
everyone,
especially
our
black
african
asian
indigenous
latinx,
hispanic,
new
american
immigrant
and
refugee
communities
and
people
with
disabilities,
can
be
water
safe
and
enjoy
healthier
lives.
I
mean
we've
created
some
foundations
that
allow
us
to
get
there,
which
one
of
my
favorite
hallmarks
our
ability
to
invite
people
and
have
a
safe
space
so
that
we
can
engage
with
folks
of
a
different
diversity
of
which
living
in
this
neighborhood,
where
we
propose
to
build
the
pool.
It
is
the
most
diverse
neighborhood
in
our
city
from
my
short
year
of
living.
Here
from
what
I
understand.
O
So
it's
most
important
that
we
have
a
facility
that
the
city
centers
diversity
and
aquatics
so
that
we
can
build
positively
in
the
future,
and
that's
it
please.
Let
me
know
after
reading
my
letter,
if
you
have
any
questions.
B
A
P
Q
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki
charmaine,
can
you
see
the?
Can
you
see
the
powerpoint?
Yes,
it
looks
great.
Thank
you
perfect.
Thank
you.
I
apologize
for
the
interruption
mayor,
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
Thank
you
for
your
time
this
morning.
As
always,
it's
a
pleasure
back
in
front
of
you
this
evening.
Tonight
is
information.
Only
it's
a
heads
up
on
the
upcoming
calendars
ahead
of
us
for
the
mid
biennium
update.
As
you
remember,
we
adopted
the
2122
budget
and
the
21
to
27
capital
investment
program
in
december
of
last
year.
Q
The
mid
biennium
update,
provides
an
opportunity
for
us
to
do
a
midpoint
check-in
on
the
status
of
that
budget
and
make
corrections
as
needed.
The
mid
biennium
tends
to
be
limited
in
design
and
addresses
items
like
the
change
of
inflation,
whether
or
not
we
have
errors
and
omissions
or
corrections
that
need
to
happen
in
the
budget.
Whether
we
have
updated
fiscal
information,
whether
or
not
we
might
need
adjustments
for
impacts
of
recently
approved
legislation
or
other
items
that
come
before
the
council.
As
always,
the
adjustments
are
based
on
your
direction
and
decision
points.
Q
The
proposed
timeline
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
about
five
or
over
the
next
month
and
a
half
or
so
I'm
going
to
see
it
four
or
five
times
next
week,
director
brennan
will
be
here
to
discuss
development
services.
This
is
the
annual
fee
update
that
you
hear
each
year,
so
this
make
sure
that
we
are
ensuring
that
our
fees
reflect
the
cost
of
providing
services
and
to
sustain
adequate
resources
to
ensure
demand
throughout
the
development
cycle.
Q
That
will
be
in
front
of
you
next
week
and
then
on
november,
8th
I'll
be
back
to
talk
about
the
overall
mid-biennium
adjustments
again,
including
that
long
laundry
list
I
mentioned
a
minute
ago
and
also
review
the
general
fund
forecast
november
15th
will
be
the
public
hearing,
and
then
we
have
two
potential
options
for
adoption
of
the
mid
biennium,
depending
on
your
consideration,
discussion
and
direction.
If
we're
prepared
on
november
22nd,
we
can
certainly
bring
adoption
back
to
that
evening.
Q
If
we
still
have
items
open
for
discussion,
we
certainly
can
bring
it
back
on
december
6th.
So
we
have
a
little
bit
of
flexibility
into
how
those
the
adoption
happens.
As
always,
when
we
look
at
all
of
those
calendar
times,
each
time
has
opportunity
for
council
feedback
and
discussion
in
order
to
adopt
the
mid
binding
this
year.
The
list
is
much
shorter
than
what
you've
seen
historically
so
last
year.
If
you
remember
adopting
the
actual
biennial
budget,
I
think
we
had
12
or
13
items
that
had
to
be
acted
upon.
Q
The
mid
biennium
is
much
shorter
and
more
confined
council
will
need
to
adopt
the
development
services
fee
ordinance,
address
a
bank
capacity
via
resolution
and
set
the
property
tax
levy
ordinance
for
2022
council
will
also
need
to
adopt
the
mid
biennium
budget
ordinance,
which
we
finally
refer
to
as
the
umbrella
ordinance.
So
this
includes
all
of
our
funds
and
our
appropriation
level
by
funds.
Q
It
also
includes
some
administrative
items,
like
our
pay
plans
and
donations
under
ninety
thousand
dollars,
so
the
list
is
much
shorter
this
year
and
more
confined
mid
biennium
with
that
information,
only
just
a
heads
up
on.
What's
coming
ahead
of
you
for
the
next
several
meetings
when
it
comes
to
the
mid
biennium,
I
look
forward
to
coming
back
and
forward
in
front
of
you
with
that.
Mr
miyaki.
I
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
P
I
believe
that
concludes
our
manager's
report
for
this
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
we're
we're
here
to
answer
any.
If
you
have
any
tonight
on
this
process,.
R
I
did
have
a
question
because
last
year,
when
we
talked
about
our
biennial
budget,
we
talked
about
the
fact
that
there
were
a
lot
of
things
that
were
were
still
were
unknown.
We
looked
at
different
levels
of
budget
based
on
the
revenue
forecast
and
certainly
there's
still
a
lot
of
uncertainty,
but
will
we
get
a
robust
financial
information
on
revenue
different
than
when
we
voted
in
the
budget
a
year
ago?
R
Q
Yes,
council
members
on
tony
call
here:
yes,
we
will
bring
back
both
a
revenue
forecast
as
well
as
an
expenditure
forecast,
so
it
will
have
both
sides
of
that
equation.
Coming
back
to
the
council
that
will
come
forward
to
you,
probably
on
november.
8Th
is
when
I
anticipate
that
information
coming
forward
and.
Q
When
we
forecast
revenues,
we
forecast
them
within
a
range,
and
then
we
try
to
narrow
it
down
to
have
at
some
point
one
line
that
we're
at
least
trying
to
put
our
our
pin
on
acknowledging
that,
as
I
will
tell
all
people
that,
as
soon
as
we
produce
a
forecast,
it's
probably
wrong,
but
we
attempt
to
have
it
at
least
within
a
reasonable
range
of
reality.
So
we'll
bring
back
to
probably
a
single
line.
Q
A
Okay,
seeing
no
more
questions,
let's
move
on
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent,
calendar
and.
S
A
A
P
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
The
first
item
is
the
environmental
stewardship
initiative,
quarterly
update
by
way
background
as
part
of
the
adoption
of
the
environmental
stewardship
initiative
plan
back
in
december
2020
council
directed
staff
to
provide
quarterly
updates
on
the
plan,
implementation,
progress
and
an
annual
update
on
our
environmental
performance
metrics.
P
This
last
this
was
last
in
front
of
you.
The
last
quarterly
update
was
on
july
19th
and
focused
on
the
annual
environment
performance
metrics
update
the
presentation
this
evening
is
informational
and,
as
I
mentioned,
it
will
provide
you
an
update.
I'm
joining
us
this
evening
is
matt
cummins,
the
community
development
director,
as
well
as
emile
king
assistant
director,
in
planning
and
jennifer
ewing,
environmental
stewardship
program
manager.
With
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
team.
To
start
the
presentation.
S
Thank
you
for
the
introduction
city
manager
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
council
staff
are
excited
to
be
here
tonight
to
provide
an
update
on
actions
to
implement
the
2021
to
2025
environmental
stewardship
plan.
This
is
a
council
priority
and
staff
from
across
the
organization
have
been
busy
making
progress
on
close
to
60
of
the
77
actions
in
the
plan
in
year.
One
a
recent
highlight
was
the
tree
giveaway.
As
mr
marsh
mentioned.
S
During
oral
comments,
it
was
really
exciting
to
see
residents
getting
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
taking
collective
action.
That
seems
to
be
leading
to
more
actions
as
well.
So
we
have
a
short
presentation
for
you
tonight
and
we
are
happy
to
then
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
things
over
to
jennifer
ewing,
our
program
manager.
Thank
you
great.
T
T
We'll
talk
about
our
kind
of
overall
progress
with
implementing
the
plan,
some
key
highlights
from
the
past
quarter
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
about.
What's
next.
T
So
to
as
you
remember,
when
the
plan
was
adopted
at
the
end
of
last
year,
you
provided
direction
for
quarterly
updates
on
the
environmental
stewardship
initiative.
T
The
way
we
are
approaching,
these
is
once
a
year
we'll
do
more
of
an
update
on
our
key
performance
indicators,
mostly
because
this
data
is
available
on
more
of
an
annual
basis
like
for
the
greenhouse
gas
emissions
recycling
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
at
our
last
presentation
in
july
that
one
was
focused
more
on
our
performance
indicators
for
tonight
and
for
the
you
know,
other
three
presentations
out
of
the
cycle,
we'll
focus
more
on.
You
know
how
we're
doing
towards
implementing
the
plan
and
attached
to
the
memo.
For
this
evening.
T
There
is
a
progress
report
also,
that's
also
posted
on
our
environmental
performance
dashboard.
T
You
can
see
the
link
to
that
here
so
to
just
kind
of
recap.
This
is
what
we
presented
to
you
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
for
the
work
plan
or
some
of
the
highlights
from
the
work
plan
for
this
year.
I
won't
go
back
through
all
of
these,
but
I'll
touch
a
bit
in
the
presentation
on
just
how
we're
we're
progressing
with
these
actions,
and
then
you
know,
as
part
of
implementing
the
plan
council
also
directed
us
to
perform.
T
You
know
continued
enhanced
engagement
with
you
know
our
stakeholders
and
residents
who
are
involved
in
the
plan
update
process,
and
so
that's
really
underpinning
the
work
around
these
different
projects.
T
So,
as
emil
mentioned
of
the
77
actions
in
the
plan,
we
have
started
work
on
about
60
of
them,
so
either
for
a
project.
We've
begun
work
or
you
know,
we've
already
incorporated
something
into
more
of
our
operational
practices,
and
so
we
and
then
on
the
flip
side,
about
40
of
the
actions
we
have
not
started
yet.
However,
you
know
keep
it
bearing
in
mind.
T
This
is
a
five-year
plan
and
we're
still
not
quite
done
with
year
one
and
then
in
as
part
of
the
plan,
we
did
include
a
timeline
for
when
we,
you
know,
anticipated
working
on
all
77
actions,
and
you
know
it
was
never
really
the
intention
to
begin
work
on
all
77
on
day
one
just
due
to
you
know,
capacity
constraints
and
also
you
know
some
interdependencies
with
other
projects.
T
So,
overall
you
know
again:
we've
begun
work
on
about
60
of
the
actions
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
highlights
of
the
different
actions
we've
been
working
on
for
for,
on
the
waste
side,
our
utilities
department
has
been
working
with
businesses
in
bellevue
to
help
them
comply
with
the
statewide
plastic
bag
ban.
T
You
know
sharing
information
and
technical
assistance,
which
you
know
that
that's
just
work
has
started
more
recently,
as
the
ban
went
into
effect
on
october,
1st
we've
put
in
place
and
a
system
for
reporting
on
our
progress
working
with
our
interdepartmental
team
to
track
that
and
include
that
progress
report
on
our
dashboard.
T
On
the
municipal
operations
side,
we
have
initiated
a
green
fleet
strategy
to
look
at
how
we
can
electrify
the
vehicles
in
the
city
fleet
and
working
with
the
consultant
on
that
and
then,
as
was
mentioned
on
the
natural
systems
side,
a
couple
big
accomplishments
was
with
the
tree
giveaway
that
happened
last
weekend
and
then
we've
continued
just
over
the
past
weekend
to
we've
distributed
about
500
trees
on
october,
8th
and
or
9th
and
10th,
and
then
we've
been
delivering
some
other
trees
to
residents
and
community
organizations
residents
who
need
assistance
with
with
delivery
and
planting,
and
you
know
continuing
to
work
with
volunteers
on
that
and
we
still
have
one
more
weekend
to
go.
T
So
I
haven't
done
the
full
tally
of
the
volunteer
hours,
but
I
think
we
have
around
200
or
more
volunteer
hours
that
we've
leveraged
for
the
the
tree
giveaway,
which
has
been
really
great,
and
we
have
really
appreciated
all
the
help
from
300,
trees
and
and
other
organizations
for
the
project.
T
Another
big
project
underway
is
the
watershed
management
plan
also
included
in
the
environmental
stewardship
plan.
This
is
being
led
by
our
utilities
department
to
do
a
really
comprehensive
look
at
all
of
the
streams
in
bellevue.
T
Look
at
how
healthy
they
are
come
up
with
a
toolbox
of
strategies
and
then
perform
outreach
with
the
community,
and
then
you
know
moving
into
developing
recommendations
for
how
to
preserve
and
and
improve
the
health
of
of
all
of
bellevue
streams.
On
the
energy
side.
One
of
the
big
programs
we're
excited
to
begin
work
on
is
the
clean
buildings
act,
technical
support
program.
T
So
we
brought
on
a
consultant
and
are
working
on
designing
that
program
with
the
goal
of
launching
it
at
the
end
of
this
year,
and
the
intent
of
that
is
really
to
support
buildings
in
bellevue
that
are
over
50
000
square
feet
that
have
to
comply
with
the
state
clean
buildings
act
so
kind
of
similar
to
the
work
we're
doing
with
the
plastic
bag
ban,
we're
you
know.
Similarly,
working
with
with
buildings
and
with
businesses
in
bellevue
to
help
them.
You
know,
get
ahead
and
comply
with
this
state
law
and
also
help
them.
T
What
we've
been
doing
over
the
past
quarter
is,
you
know,
kind
of
just
establishing
some
communication
channels
with
our
community
a
more
regular
newsletter,
building
up
our
engaging
bellevue
site,
helping
our
stakeholders
and
our
residents
understand
and
just
learn
about
different
opportunities
to
plug
into
some
of
these
different
projects
that
we
mentioned,
like
the
watershed
management
plan
and
the
mobility
implementation
plan,
we've
started
one
of
our
working
groups
and
planned
to
continue
and
expand
on
those
with
our
urban
forestry
working
group
and
then
on
the
tree
giveaway
side.
T
T
So
what
are
we
hearing
from
the
enhanced
engagement?
I
you
know,
I
think
some
of
these
were
already
kind
of
mentioned.
You
know,
I
think
we
we've
heard
an
interest
in
updating
the
tree
codes,
we're
starting
to
just
scope
out
what
that
effort
would
take
and
understand
that
you
know
there
isn't
really
just
one
tree
code,
even
though
you
know
we
kind
of
all
refer
to
it.
T
That
way,
but
trees
are
actually
addressed
in
our
our
land
use
code,
our
clearing
grading
code,
transportation
code
and
utilities
code-
and
you
know,
there's
some
interrelationship
between
all
of
those
transportation
is
planning
on
moving
forward
and
updating
the
portion
of
the
transportation
code
that
deals
with
trees
in
the
right-of-way
and
then
there's
also
some
work
as
part
of
our
land
use
planning
effort
to
coordinate
when
we
might
be
able
to
work
on
on
the
tree
code
update.
T
You
know,
along
with
some
of
the
other
big
land,
use,
planning
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline,
so
we
definitely
have
heard
some
interest
there.
We've
heard,
I
think
from
you
know
some
residents
a
desire
to
scale
up
our
implementation.
T
We've
also
heard
just
you
know,
as
we've
reached
out
to
kind
of
continue
to
build
partnerships.
We've
also
had
a
couple
groups
coming
to
us
recently
to
look
at
how
they
might
support.
You
know,
in
particular,
some
of
our
urban
forestry
efforts
looking
at
working
with
the
newport
way,
library
on
some
outreach
and
education
and
with
the
audubon
society
on
tree
planting
locations
so
excited
to
you
know,
really
kind
of
continue
to
broaden
and
deepen
our
partnerships
and
then
on
the
air
quality
side.
T
Looking
at
how
we
might
you
know,
gather
some
more
information
on
air
quality
in
bellevue,
in
particular
near
our
freeways
and
then.
Finally,
as
mr
marsh
mentioned,
you
know
we've
just
after
the
tree
giveaway.
We,
we
definitely
heard
a
lot
of
enthusiasm
and
gratitude
from
our
residents
for
for
doing
this
program.
T
So,
what's
next,
you
know
one
of
the
big
things
we'll
be
working
on
over
the
next
couple
months
is
developing
and
finalizing
the
work
plan
for
the
environmental
stewardship
initiative
for
next
year
and
then
we'll
be
coming
back
to
council
at
the
beginning
of
next
year
to
provide
an
overview
of
that
on
the
programmatic
side.
T
Looking
at
launching
the
clean
buildings
act,
technical
support
program,
moving
into
starting
the
design
of
a
home
energy
retrofit
program
and
then
a
couple
other
projects
that
will
kind
of
help
feed
into
the
comprehensive
plan
update
looking
at
air
quality
and
any
you
know,
kind
of
best
practices
around
considering
air
quality,
with
land
use
planning
and
similarly
looking
at
climate
resiliency
and
and
how
we
might
take
some
of
that
into
account
in
our
comprehensive
plan
update
so
yeah.
T
Just
to
to
summarize
again
tonight
was
you
know
really
for
information
only
as
part
of
our
quarterly
update
and
yeah
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
great
thank
you
for
that
presentation,
so
no
direction
tonight,
but
if
we
have
any
questions
on
the
update
that
we
have
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand,
okay,
I'm
seeing
deputy
mayor
hold
on.
Let
me
write
this
down
deputy
mayor,
followed
by
stokes,
followed
by
lee,
followed
by
zone
councilmember
robertson.
Did
you
have
your
hand
up
no
councilmember,
barksdale,
gotcha?
Okay,
so
starting
with
deputy
mayor.
E
Thank
you
mayor
and,
first
off
jennifer
great
update.
Thank
you.
So
much
really
appreciated
really
some
good
some
good
action
on
the
plan
already
there's
a
couple
of
quick
questions
for
you.
So
one
on
the
enhanced
stakeholder
group.
Could
you
give
us
a
quick
update
on
that?
That
was
that
you
know
for
folks
that
might
not
be
familiar
with
that.
E
That
was
created
during
the
the
budget
process
there
last
time
around
and
just
curious
how
often
you've
met
with
the
group
what
that
group
is
tasked
with
so
far
any
outcomes
there
or
moving
forward
how
that
group
is
going
to
be
utilized
and
then
also
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
home
energy
retrofit
program
design?
How
what's
going
to
be
the
approach
on
that?
Just
very
interested
on
that?
I
also
want
to
thank
all
the
groups
that
were
involved
like
300
trees
in
the
tree
giveaway
program.
That
is
a
fantastic
program.
E
I
went
to
one
earlier
in
the
year
great
interest
there.
So
many
great
residents
taking
advantage
of
the
program
and
planting
trees,
a
fun
question.
I
was
curious.
What
tree
was
most
popular
if
there
was
one
but
I'll
leave
it
there
with
those
with
those
three
questions
that
should
probably
fulfill
my
three
minutes.
So
thanks
go
ahead.
T
Sure
yeah
so,
first
on
the
enhanced
engagement,
so
we
have
convened
the
the
sustainability
leaders
group
we've
had
kind
of
one
larger
meeting
with
that
group
and
have
another
one
planned
in
the
next
few
weeks
also
have
started
on
the
working
groups
with
the
urban
forestry
one
and
we'll
be
having
one
with
the
commercial
buildings
group
in
the
middle
of
november,
and
then
we
had
a
resident
community
town
hall
in
july.
T
So
we
are,
you
know,
I'd,
say,
kind
of
ramping
up
our
engagement
with
you
know
both
our
stakeholder
group
and
our
residents
as
we've,
you
know
I'd,
say
ramping
up
engagement
as
some
of
our
you
know.
New
projects
and
programs
are
ramping
up.
So
the
the
group
at
this
point
is,
you
know,
really
kind
of
tasked
with
providing
input
just
staying
up
to
date
on
what
we're
working
on
and
then
a
lot
of
the
you
know.
Real
engagement
is
going
to
be
happening
more
at
like
the
working
group
levels.
T
Although
you
know
the
the
participants
are
kind
of
welcome
to
share
input
at
any
point,
so
yeah,
we're
kind
of
expecting
to
you
know,
deepen
a
lot
of
that
engagement
later
this
year
and
as
we
move
into
next
year.
Oh
that's
great
to
hear
okay
and
then,
let's
see
with
the
home
energy
retrofit
program,
you
know,
I
think
a
couple
of
the
goals
for
that
program
are
really
to
kind
of
build
on
some
of
the
incentives
that
already
exist
between
pse
and
our
home
improvement
and
home
weatherization
programs.
T
T
Also,
looking
at
how
we
might
you
know
for
folks
who
are
taking
advantage
of
the
weatherization
program,
are
there
other
pse
incentives
they
could
take
advantage
of?
So
I
think
the
intent
is
to
kind
of
help
fill
any
gaps.
I
would
say
and
leverage
existing
programs,
but
we
are
kind
of
at
more
the
beginning
stage
of
designing
that
one.
T
But
those
are
just
some
of
the
kind
of
principles
we
have
in
mind
and
then,
let's
see,
I
think
your
third
question
was
question
was
about
the
most
popular
tree,
which
was
by
far
and
away
fruit
trees,
which
we
found
well.
We
actually
thought
it
might
be
flowering
trees,
so
I
think
for
next
year
we
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
desire
for
fruit
trees.
Although
you
know
we
kind
of
intentionally
wanted
to
have
a
nice
variety
of
species.
To
give
away.
T
Just
to
you
know,
continue
to
increase
diversity
of
trees
in
bellevue.
U
Yeah
jennifer
and
staff.
I
really
appreciate
this.
I
think
we're
seeing
the
benefits
that
we
were
hoping
for
in
terms
of
having
a
little
more
reporting,
and
I
think
it
gives
us
a
much
better
sense
and-
and
it's
so
hard
to
you
know,
do
something
in
a
year
and
explain
everything
like
this
and
I
it
looks
like
in
a
way,
I
would
guess
it's
kind
of
helping.
U
You
know
it
helps
any
organization
to
have
a
kind
of
plan
like
this
moving
forward,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
the
effort
to
do
this
and
respond
to
that.
I
and
and
appreciate
the
comments
have
been
made
so
far
and
a
couple
of
things
on
it.
I
thought
that
was
very
good
about
what
we're
hearing
and
all
all
of
three
of
those
are,
and
the
gratitude
is
really
important,
and
it's
good
to
know
that.
U
I
think
all
of
those
are
three
good
questions
to
talk
about
and
and
see
what
we
can
do.
I
think
scaling
up
implementation.
Of
course,
that
takes
takes
more
staffing
or
other
work,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
and
getting
things
together.
It
seems
like
you're
pulling
things
together.
U
Better
as
you
go
along
and
the
scoping
efforts
and
how
and
all
these
things,
it
kind
of,
I
think,
gets
us
a
sense
of
what
you're
focusing
on
and
what
you're
looking
at
and
again,
I
think
it
helps
the
the
community
to
understand
what
we're
doing
a
lot
of
partnership
opportunities
and
that's
something
I
appreciate,
and
I
think
we
all
think
that's
really
important
and
so
looking
forward
to
seeing
what's
next-
and
you
know
the
the
scaling
up
is,
I
said,
implementation
is
very
important,
and
one
of
the
things
I
did
wonder
about
just
as
a
little
aside
is,
is
not
not
really
criticizing.
U
U
Okay:
okay,
oh
very
good.
I
really
appreciate
this
and
I
appreciate
your
responding
to
to
our
request
and
I
think
it's
always
good
to
have
that
conversation
and
then
that
way,
we're
all
getting
on
the
same
same
page,
a
lot
and
great
work.
It
sounds
like
we're
making
really
solid
product
progress
and
we
need
to
keep
working
with
you
to
help
you
even
attain
better
heights,
which
we
can
all.
Thank
you.
V
Thank
you.
I
participated
in
the
300
program
a
couple
of
months
ago,
and
so
I
was
really
happy
to
also
participate
in
a
tree
giveaway
program.
This
last
weekend
I
was
very
impressive.
V
I
went
on
saturday
and
wasn't
too
many
people
there
you
know
so
on,
but
I
went
to
sunday
and
it's
amazing
when
the
cars
were
lining
up
all
the
way
in
three
lines
and
the
sun
came
out.
It's
just
amazing
and
people
are
very,
very
much.
You
know
waiting
anxious
and
lots
of
different
people,
all
kinds
of
people,
big
trucks
and
small
cars
and
economy
whatever,
and
I
think
answer
the
question
which
tree
is
the
most
popular,
I
think
absolutely
flowering
in
fruit.
V
But
after
that,
it's
magnolia,
it's
southern
magnolia
and
I
learned
there's
something
called
galaxy
technically,
you
know.
So
that's
that's
very
good
anyway.
So
I
want
to
compliment
you
know
what
again
jennifer
rachel
and,
of
course,
volunteers
that
really
worked
out
those
volunteers.
They
were
lifting
parts
and
heavy
stuff
and
directing
traffic.
I
think
they
they
had
a
great
time.
So
it
worked
out
very
well.
So
thanks
again,
one
thing
I
want
to
focus
on
is
engagement.
V
I
think
we
still
are
not
letting
people
know
what
we're
doing
we're
doing
great
things
other
stuff
going
on,
but
people
don't
know
people
just
you
know
I
legitimately.
You
know
if
they're
anxious
they
want
to
do
more
things.
I
understand
absolutely,
but
there's
a
lot
of
things.
They
don't
really
unders.
They
don't
really
know
what's
going
on,
for
example,
you
know
this.
Maybe
it's
a
problem
of
one
structurally.
How
do
we
do
that?
I
think
we
need
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit.
V
I
have
some
ideas,
but
I
won't
talk
now
because
I
only
have
maybe
half
a
minute
left,
but
I
cut
some
of
the
programs
it's
difficult
because
they
belong
to
many
other
departments,
not
just
your
department,
jeff,
it's
not
environmental
stewardship
program.
So
it's
hard,
for
example,
the
city
program,
green
fleet.
You
know
how?
Where
are
we
and
stunned
by
somebody
else
right?
Who
is
we
don't
know
we
are
making
progress,
but
what
is
it?
Another
question?
That's
you
know
watershed.
You
know
people
ask.
V
We
know
we've
been
free
by
department,
transportation,
about
lewis,
creek
and
sunset
creek,
so
we
know
something
about
it,
but
then
the
question
was
right:
how
about
cokery?
What's
going
on?
What's
the
what's
the
environment
going
on
there,
you
know
we,
as
I
just
heard
you
you
were
talking
about.
You-
know
the
the
cookie,
the
other
creek
program
we're
doing,
and
but
it's
done
by
some
other
groups
that
we
are
not
focusing
on.
So
I
think
we
need
to
focus
on
some
of
the
programs.
V
We
can
really
look
at
and
then
communicate
with
folks
and
getting
people
involved.
So
they
know
what's
going
on,
you
know.
So
the
last
one
I
want
to
suggest
is:
you
know
just
a
new
idea.
We
have
projects
we
did
before,
but
I
think
it's
still
very,
very
feasible.
It's
doing
partnership
with
purchase
energy.
We
have
solar
panel
program,
we
did
a
number
of
years
ago.
It
was
very
successful
where
people
come
in.
We
do
workshop.
V
T
Yeah
sure,
just
to
the
kind
of
communication
piece
I'll
speak
to
that,
I
think
that's.
That
is
something
that
that's
been
on
our
radar,
where
we
have
really
tried
to
look
at
kind
of
both
communicating
about
what
we're
working
on
and
then
also
helping
people
know
kind
of
where
and
when
there's
opportunities
for
them
to
kind
of
get
involved
and
share
their
input
or
volunteer.
Or
what
have
you?
So
you
know
that
that
has
been
a
bit
of
our
focus
with
the
enhanced
engagement
over
the
past.
T
Several
months
was
just
kind
of
you
know
getting
in
in
a
process
in
place
to
kind
of
get
that
information
out
to
people
through.
You
know
our
different
channels
and
then,
with
the
the
progress
report,
you
know
really
right.
We
have
heard
from
folks
okay,
what's
happening
on
some
of
these
specific
actions,
so
you
know
really
trying
to
to
start
a
process
of
reporting
on
that
more
regularly
that
you
know
the
specifics
of
all
the
actions
in
the
plan
and
where
we're
at.
R
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
Well,
thank
you.
I
have
my.
We
love
our
tree
sign
in
my
yard
now,
and
I
also
enjoyed
helping
out
with
the
tree
giveaway
and
giving
out
the
the
bags
and
and
the
signs-
and
I
just
have
to
say
thank
you
so
much
because
I
feel
like
we
have
a
small
yet
mighty
sustainability
team
and
you
are
doing
so
much
to
advance
our
esp.
R
You
know
a
couple
things
I
just
want
to
lift
up
and
really
appreciate
is
updating
the
tree
codes.
I
think
it's
well
over
time
to
do
that.
We
hear
from
our
community
the
importance
of
that
your
comment
about
air
quality.
We
do
have
free
large
freeways
that
run
through
bisect
or
trisect
our
city,
so
actually
having
focus
on
that,
I
think
is
important.
R
The
home
energy
retrofit
program,
I
think,
that'll-
be
really
complementary
to
the
sea
pacer
program
that
is
targeting
more
of
the
commercial
and
the
multi-fourplex
units
to
be
able
to
help
with
energy
retrofit.
So
I
I'd
really
like
that.
The
vulnerability
assessment.
Thank
you.
It
looks
like
that's
going
to
be
on
the
plan
next
year.
I
didn't
see
environmental
equity
assessment
is
that
so
that's
one
of
my
questions
is
seems
like
that's
another
one,
that's
important
for
us
to
get
going
with
right
away.
R
You
know
with
both
the
community
and
the
municipal
actions.
What
I
also
heard
you
talk
about
is
the
fact
that
we
need
to
scale
up
implementation,
and
that
is
one
area
that
I'm
concerned
about
is
whether
we
have
sufficient
staff
to
be
able
to
work
on
both
the
municipal
and
the
community
actions
heard.
R
My
colleagues
talk
about
right,
the
level
of
engagement
and
the
work
that
we
have
ahead
of
us,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
to
be
able
to
go
after
the
and
leverage
the
partnerships
and
the
grant
opportunities,
we
may
need
to
have
more
resources
to
work
on
that,
and
then
lastly,
you
know
I
know
as
part
of
k4c.
We
we
show
the
wedge
analysis
and
what
it
shows
is.
R
T
Great,
thank
you
yeah.
I
think
with
the
looking
at
the
impact
of
different
actions
and
the
timing,
I
think
that
is
a
good
consideration
for
us
with
the
with
the
work
plan,
and
I
think
we
did
that
to
a
certain
extent.
You
know
when
we
developed
the
plan
in
terms
of
thinking
about
the
timing,
and
then
you
know,
I
think,
there's
kind
of
different
aspects,
but
as
we
look
at
our
emissions,
you
know
they
primarily
come
from
from
buildings
and
transportation.
T
So
on
the
building
side,
we're
looking
at
you
know
how
we
both
kind
of
existing
buildings
and
new
construction
and
then
on
the
transportation
side.
You
know
the
mobility
implementation
plan
and
that
the
transportation
department
is
leading
is
a
you
know,
pretty
comprehensive
planning
effort
to
look
at.
T
You
know,
strategies
and
priorities
for
creating
mobility
options,
but
you
know
a
big
part
of
that,
of
course,
is
you
know,
making
our
transportation
more
efficient
and
you
know
in
turn
reducing
emissions,
so
those
are
are
some
of
the
kind
of
big
considerations
but
yeah
for
this
year.
A
couple
of
the
big
things
we've
been
trying
to
get
off
the
ground
are
the
you
know,
looking
the
commercial
buildings
program
and
then
the
home
energy
retrofit.
So
those
kind
of
two
big
ones
to
look
at
for
buildings
and
then.
R
So
is
it,
so
is
it
possible
for
us
to
create
our
own
wedge
analysis
based
on
our
77
actions,
bucketed
into
different
places?
So
that's
one
of
my
ask
for
later.
T
Oh,
I
see
we
did
create
a
wedge
analysis
as
part
of
the
plan
update
that
did
kind
of
look
at
the
the
impact
of
those
so
yeah.
We
we
have
that
information
that
you
know
we
looked
at
more
kind
of
cumulatively
of
the
the
kind
of
relevant
actions.
You
know,
there's
some
important
actions
in
the
plan
that
maybe
don't
necessarily
play
into
the
wedge
analysis,
but
they're
they're
still
important,
so
yeah.
We
we
did
perform
that
analysis.
W
Thank
you,
mayor
jennifer,
thank
you,
as
has
already
mentioned
the
small
team,
but
doing
a
lot
of
work
here
and
making
a
lot
of
impact.
I
do
agree
with
figuring
out
a
way
to
help
your
team
scale
and
in
order
to
make
more
progress,
I
mean,
I
think,
if,
if
we
are
going
to
hit
our
target,
we're
going
to
need
to
figure
that
out
so
a
mid-by
discussion.
W
Possibly
as
I
know,
other
council
members
have
brought
up
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
the
action
so
kind
of
building
on
what
councilmembers
I
mentioned
in
terms
of
some
actions
are
more
impactful
than
others.
Is
there
a
way
for
us
to
indicate
that
on
the
chart
and
like
on
the
dashboard,
so
that
we
can
keep
track
of
like
where
we
are
with
those?
My
original
question
was
really
going
to
be.
Can
we
commit
to
at
least
one
action
per
area
per
year,
and,
if
so,
what
would
that
look
like?
W
What
would
it
take
in
order
to
do
that
kind
of
building
into
the
increasing
scale?
A
couple
of
areas
that
I'd
noticed,
for
example,
like
the
residential,
has
a
large
percentage
of
natural
gas
use,
and
so
maybe
this
is
the
home
energy
retrofit
program.
W
First
of
all,
I
didn't
easily
find
that
on
the
website,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
can
make
that
easier
to
discover
for
everyone,
but
does
that
cover
things
such
as
helping
people
convert
from
natural
gas
to
electrical,
so
heat
pumps,
water
heaters
and
such
and
then
in
terms
of
recycling,
so
commercial
and
multifamily
are
some
of
the
biggest
contributors
and
residential
is
pretty
low
and
but
they're
also,
what
was
it
the
anyway?
I
can't
remember,
but
it
was
a.
W
They
were
one
of
the
largest
contributors
and
one
of
the
least
recycling
as
well
right,
so
is
there
a
way
to
is
there?
Can
we
do
something
in
that
space?
I
know
there
was
some
earlier
conversation
around
them,
not
having
recycling
or
compost
bins
at
those
facilities.
W
T
Yeah
in
terms
of
thinking
about
how
we
might
flag
the
actions
that
are
more
impactful
than
others
for
from
an
emissions
reduction
standpoint,
I
might
have
to
give
a
little
more
thought
to
just
what
that
would
look
like
and
and
how
we
could
kind
of
report
on
that.
Although
you
know
I
think
that
has
been
part
of
the
thinking
in
our
our
work
planning
for
this
year,
but
yeah.
T
T
So
we
don't
have
much
information
on
it
yet
on
the
website,
but
we
we
definitely
will
and
then,
on
the
recycling
standpoint,
the
utilities
department
is
kind
of
trying
to
scale
up
some
of
their
outreach
for
commercial
and
multi-family
buildings.
You
know,
in
particular
to
encourage
more
organics
collection
and
in
both
commercial
multi-family
buildings.
You
know,
I
think
some
of
that
outreach
has
obviously
been
obviously
been
a
little
bit
hampered
with
with
kovid,
because
we
do.
They
normally
do
a
lot
of
in-person
outreach,
but
yeah.
T
I
think
there
there
has
been
a
desire
to
kind
of
shift
focus
to
the
the
types
of
buildings
where
the
recycling
rates
are
are
lower.
W
T
Oh
yeah,
I
have
we've
had
you
know
some
initial
discussions
with
the
intergovernmental
affairs.
I
think
we
can
follow
up
and
and
see.
If
there's
any
kind
of
specifics
we
could
add.
I
there
have
been
some
updates
to
that
over
the
past
year
or
two
that,
I
think
are
still
you
know
pretty
relevant.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
any,
you
know
significant
changes
that
that
would
be
needed
based
on,
I
think,
the
the
last
update
from
from
last
year.
A
So
I
just
think
that
there's
a
big
interest
from
the
community
community
in
looking
at
our
tree
codes
and
looking
at
maybe
what
we
can
do
with
the
the
lots
and
the
in
the
clear
cutting
that's
going
on
and
it
seems
like.
I
know,
that's
on
your
list
of
things
to
do,
and
I
know
we
have
priorities,
but
I'd
be
really
interested
when
we
go
into
the
mid
by
and
we
look
at
where
we
are
having
kind
of
a
line
item
of
what
it
would
cost
to
address
those.
A
In
addition
to
the
other
things
that
are
on
your
list
right
now,
maybe
move
that
up
and
and
of
course
everybody
would
have
to
be
interested
in
doing
that.
But
I'd
like
to
see
some
numbers
on
that
and
then
down
the
road,
I'm
really
interested
in
seeing
what
it's
going
to
take
to
encourage
retrofitting
of
some
of
our
older
buildings,
and
maybe
we
can
start
working
on
some
partnerships
for
that.
A
A
So
I
think
that's
consistent
with
what
you've
heard
from
a
lot
of
everybody
is,
I
think,
in
the
bid
by
if
it's
possible,
to
come
up
with
some
line
items
of
if
certain
things
were
to
be
prioritized,
what
it
would
cost
and
what
it
would
take.
Do
we
need
to
hire
more
people
or
you
know
what
kind
of
what's
the
time
line
for
some
of
these
things?
D
Thanks,
I
just
I've
just
been
listening
to
the
conversation
and
the
idea
about
the
tree
code.
I
think
that
there
is
more
pressure
or
interest.
I
guess
is
a
better
word
for
that.
D
I
have
been
asking
not
on
the
dice,
but
behind
the
scenes
to
see
if
we
can
get
a
planning
work
plan
come
back,
we
used
to
get
them
where
we
would
council
could
prioritize
the
planning
work
once
a
year
or
once
every
other
year,
sometimes
more
frequently
we
haven't
had
one
for
a
while,
and
the
tree
code
would
have
to
be
something
that
goes
in
the
land
use
code,
and
so
I'd
like
to.
D
If
that's
something
that's
of
interest
to
the
council,
I'd
like
to
see
that
idea
put
into
you
know
the
planning
work
plan
and
that
way
council
can
prioritize,
because
we
have
been
putting
a
lot
of
energy
into
encouraging
our
staff
to
go
much
much
faster
on
some
of
the
planning
work
plan
items,
and
so
I
think
that
it
might
be
time
to
look
at
everything
that's
on
there,
particularly
if
the
council
is
interested
in
adding
more
work
to
that
agenda
or
work
to
do
that
work
plan.
D
So
that's
just
an
ask,
and
I
don't
know
if
staff
is
gonna
bring
that
forward.
I
think
doing
it
as
part
and
parcel
of
the
midby
which
I've
talked
to
the
city
manager's
office
about
would
be
really
appropriate.
So
thanks.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
really
appreciate
that
we're
gonna
take
a
break
we'll
come
back
at
7
30
and
we'll
resume
our
study
session
so
we'll
see
you
then.
P
Yes,
ma'am:
this
is
actually
the
the
second
one.
Second,.
P
This
is
on
the
land
use
code
amendment
for
the
east
main
station
area
tonight
is
the
sixth
in
a
series
of
study
sessions
for
the
council
to
consider
the
draft
land
use
code,
amendment
for
the
east
maine
station
area.
Tonight's
staff
will
present
information
that
responding
to
questions
that
were
raised
in
the
previous
study
session
on
topics
related
to
the
floor
area
ratio
also
known
as
far
the
amenity
center
options
and
development
agreements,
also
known
as
the
d.a.
P
Following
these
discussions,
the
staff
is
seeking
direction
on
these
topics
for
incorporation
of
land
use
code
per
the
council
direction.
That
was
given
to
us
at
the
last
meeting.
P
So
with
that,
I
am
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
the
staff
mike
brennan,
who
is
the
director
as
well
as
tristan
tana's,
consulting
attorney
and
nick
whipple
code
policy
plan
manager,
all
from
the
development
services
department,
matt,
cummins,
director
and
emile
king
assistant,
director
from
community
development,
and
after
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
mike.
X
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
I'm
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
the
council.
As
mr
miaki
mentioned,
we
are
returning
to
continue
the
discussion
with
the
council
providing
information
that
we
shared
on
october
4th
and
responding
to
questions
or
additional
information
requested
by
a
council
at
that
meeting.
So
you
could
continue
your
discussion
and
decision
making
next
slide.
Please.
X
We
are
seeking
council
direction
this
evening,
as
mr
miyaki
mentioned,
on
the
maximum
and
the
base
floor
area
ratio,
the
amenities
incentive
system
options
and
a
development
agreement
and
how
those
can
be
used
as
departures
in
certain
specific
areas
of
the
code
next
slide,
please
so
that
in
general,
we'll
just
be
covering
very
quickly
here,
just
a
quick
touch
on
the
timeline
where
we
are
and
what's
coming
next,
with
respect
to
the
work
in
the
landis
code,
amendment
for
east
maine,
the
sequence
of
review
topics,
and
then
the
land
use
code
topics
for
this
evening.
X
The
far
amenities
in
the
daa
next
slide,
please,
the
this
is
a
high
level
timeline
that
shows
essentially,
where
we
are.
This
is
I'll
remind
the
council.
Again,
we
held
the
public
hearing
or
you
held
the
public
hearing
for
this
language
code
amendment
in
july
and
following
that
public
hearing,
the
council
can
now
adopt
the
land
use
code.
Amendments
for
east
maine
when
you
are
comfortable
with
the
content
of
the
code
and
any
amendments
that
you
would
like
to
make.
Y
Y
As
council
moves
through
these
study
sessions,
we
have
and
we'll
update
this
table
to
document
council's
feedback
and
direction.
We
know
that
council
would
like
to
move
this
luca
forward
as
quickly
as
possible
to
that,
and
we
have
laid
out
council's
review
on
these
topics
to
achieve
this
desired
efficiency.
Y
We
added
the
study
session
tonight
in
response
to
council's
requests
so
that
we
can
return
with
additional
information
to
address
some
trade-offs
and
understanding
of
trade-offs
between
higher
base
far
and
the
lower
base,
fir
and
other
information
to
round
out
council's
discussion
on
amenity
options
and
prioritization
of
amenities.
At
the
next
study
session.
On
november
1st,
we
will
present
information
and
analysis
on
floor
plate
and
miscellaneous
topics
such
as
fiendly
for
affordable
housing
and
exceptions
to
non-conforming
provisions
and
expansions
of
the
bellevue
athletic
club.
Y
There
are
several
factors
to
keep
in
mind
just
to
let
you
all
know
this
new
requests,
modifications
to
requests
and
new
topics
will
likely
add
some
time
and
process.
If
so,
is
any
additional
environmental
or
other
in-depth
analysis.
Y
And
lastly,
this
relies
on
council
being
able
to
provide
direction
on
that
november,
15th
date
to
finalize
the
luca.
Y
So
recalling
council's
discussion
a
couple
weeks
ago,
we
wanted
to
bring
additional
items
forward
to
help
with
council's
deliberation
of
the
larger
topics
of
non-residential
base,
far
and
amenity
options.
The
first
item
is
regarding
pedestrian
and
bicycle
connectivity
in
and
around
the
east
main
area.
We
originally
slotted
this
discussion
for
a
later
study
session,
but
want
to
cover
this
tonight.
As
this
topic
was
raised
at
the
last
council
meeting,
there
are
two
larger
connections
around
the
east
main
area.
As
you
see
in
this
map.
Y
First,
there
is
the
lake
to
lake
trail
shown
in
orange
and
that
runs
east-west
adjacent
to
the
east
main
station
area
along
main
street.
The
second
there's,
a
lake
washington
loop
trail
shown
in
green
that
connects
north
and
south
running
along
114th
avenue.
Y
There
is
another
off-site
trail
in
dash
green
on
the
right-hand
side
of
the
screen
here,
which
is
the
east
rail.
With
those
the
two
adjacent
regional
trails,
the
lake
lake
trail
and
the
lake
washington
loop
trail
in
mind.
There
are
three
existing
or
required
connections
and
first
existing
south
e6
shown
in
that
gray,
color
in
the
middle
of
the
screen,
and
then
the
pre-located
street,
just
above
that
shown
in
a
dark,
solid
black
line.
Y
This
is
located
entirely
on
the
hilton
property
just
north
of
the
bellevue
athletic
club
and
then
the
pre.
Just
to
note,
the
pre-located
street
ish
is
vehicular
low-volume
private
street
that
will
also
have
pedestrian
facilities
and
if
the
developer
chooses
may
contain
bicycle
facilities,
the
last
required
connection
is
also
an
east
west
route,
which
is
based
on
council's
direction
from
last
july.
Y
This
is
pedestrian
and
bicycle
connection
through
the
east
main
site.
So
this
is
the
dash
black
line.
This
is
located
just
between
the
hilton
site
and
the
red
lion
site.
Y
So
the
next
table
here
shows
the
options
in
foreign
council
option
a
is
what
is
in
the
current
draft
code.
This
is
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
path
that
dash
black
line
that
you
just
saw
the
previous
screen
located
between
the
hilton
and
red
lion
sites,
and
then
the
stakeholders
have
asked
for
instead
of
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
connection
at
this
location.
Y
The
next
column
shows
the
pre-located
street.
The
existing
draft
code
does
have
the
pre-located
street
only
on
the
hilton
property,
and
it
is
not
a
public
right-of-way.
It
is
a
private
road
for
council's
direction.
Again
from
last
july,
the
stakeholders
have
asked
the
for
the
same.
What
is
in
the
draft
code,
so
we
are
in
agreement
as
to
what
the
stakeholder
is
asking
for
and
what
the
staff
is
recommending
forward.
Y
Y
Stakeholders
have
requested
to
expand
the
affordability
level
to
100
percent
ami
for
owned,
affordable
housing
or
condos
similar
to
what
is
allowed
in
the
bellrand
code.
Staff
supports
this
request,
as
it
seems
consistent
with
prior
council
feedback
and
so
again
for
in
regarding
to
the
pedestrian
bicycle
connection
and
affordable
housing.
Y
So,
as
noted
earlier,
the
bulk
of
our
presentation
tonight
is
focused
on
the
topics
of
far
amenity
incentive
options
and
development
agreement
options.
Y
Y
Y
This
is
accurate,
though,
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
critically
various
code
that
will
be
triggered
and
for
any
development
with
critical
areas
on
their
site.
Y
Of
course,
critical
areas
code
is
really
intended
to
protect
sensitive
areas
and
to
impose
regulations
so
that
there
is
protection
in
place
for
the
function
and
values
of
these
areas.
We
do
want
to
note,
though,
that
the
draft
code
includes
certain
exemptions
that
apply
to
all
sites,
whether
encumbered
with
a
critical
area
or
not.
These
exemptions
allow
for
a
floor
area
to
be
not
counted
for
towards
far
so,
for
instance,
ground
floor
uses,
which
includes
a
very
expansive
set
of
uses
for
council's
previous
direction.
Y
So
restaurants,
breweries,
retail
office
residential,
are
fully
exempt
far
on
at
the
ground
floor
and
50
is
exempted
when
located
on
the
second
floor.
So
the
end
result
is
that
the
actual
maximum
far
will
be
greater
than
5.0,
even
with
any
reductions
due
to
critical
areas.
If
you
do
count,
this
exempt
far
spaces.
Y
So
back
to
this
canada's
table
option
a
does
include
a
first-year
amenity
list
of
affordable
housing
for
residential,
open
space,
child
care
potential
street
for
non-residential
and
a
second
tier
list.
Also,
there
is
no
d
a
option
for
this
option,
a
just
because
at
that
time
we
didn't
have
any
direction
from
cancel.
To
include
the
da
option
b
is
what
staff
is
recommending
forward.
It
has
the
same
base
and
max
far
as
in
the
draft
code.
Y
The
first
tier
amenity
options
are
also
the
same
in
the
second
year,
however,
we've
added
three
amenities,
so
pedestrian
bridge
special
amenity
and
performing
arts.
These
are
in
red
font,
color
and
then,
under
the
va
items,
we've
added
four
different
provisions
that
could
be
departed
from
so
maximum
height
maximum,
far
non-conforming
requirements
and
then
adding
a
special
amenity.
Y
The
last
row
here
shows
what
the
stakeholders
have
requested.
Again,
we've
highlighted
and
read
what
are
some
of
the
differences
between
what
stakeholders
have
been
asking
for
and
then
what
the
our
recommended
option
b
includes.
Y
So
one
more
slide
before
I
turn
over
to
neg
to
go
through
some
of
the
more
detailed
information
I
did
want
to
show
this.
We
wanted
to
show
this
non-residential
far
context.
Y
As
you
see
on
the
map
here.
Just
north
of
the
east
main
site
is
downtown
oil
b
south
and
there's
a
4.5
as
the
base
non-residential
far
and
a
5.0
maximum,
far
again
non-residential
going
counterclockwise
again.
Y
This
is
just
to
show
the
context
of
some
of
the
other
land
use
districts
and
the
densities
of
the
far
base
and
maximum
around
the
east
main
area
counterclockwise
to
dtolb
south
is
downtown
mu,
and
this
has
a
4.5
as
well
as
a
5.0
maximum
the
same
as
for
non-residential
the
same
as
doesn't
well
be
south
and
just
below
that
is,
are
the
overlays
b3
overlay
and
a3
overlay.
This
is
directly
across
the
street
from
surrey,
downs,
single-family
neighborhood.
Of
course.
As
you
know,
it
is
scaled
way
down
for
non-residential.
Y
It
has
a
1.5
a
base
far
and
a
max
amount
of
1.5
again
for
non-residential
development,
and,
of
course,
you
east
main,
is
also
across
the
street
from
surrey,
downs
and
just
lays
to
the
east
of
surinames,
and
we
have
currently
in
the
draft
code
and
what
staff
is
recommending
is
a
2.5
base
far
and
a
5.0
max
far
for
non-residential.
Y
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
the
presentation
to
netball
to
go
into
more
detail
about
these
options
on
base
non-residential,
fpr
amenity
options
and
da
items.
Nick.
Z
Thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
city
council,
as
tristan
mentioned,
I'll,
be
presenting
information
on
the
base,
far
and
amenity
options,
and
then
the
use
of
development
agreement
tool
as
a
follow-up
to
our
october,
the
october
24th
council
meeting,
and
so
at
the
last
council
meeting.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
around
the
base
far
and
questions
about
what
the
effect
of
increasing
the
non-residential
base
far
from
2.5,
which
is
the
the
recommended
base
far
to
3.5
and
what
that
effect
would
be
on
the
voluntary
incentive
zoning
program.
Z
Z
It's
in
that
light
blue
area,
where
public
benefits
be
provided
in
exchange
for
floor
area
up
to
the
maximum
allowable
floor
area,
which
the
draft
has
a
maximum
allowable
floor
area
of
five
far
so
if
the
light
blue
area
gets
smaller
than
the
amount
of
public
benefits
that
would
be
provided
through,
the
incentive
program
will
also
decrease.
Z
Z
The
report
also
indicates
that
any
base,
far
above
a
2.5
for
non-residential
use,
may
rule
out
large-scale
use
of
the
incentive
system
which
would
not
deliver
the
public
benefits
stopped
by
by
the
council.
So
in
this
slide
we
are
providing
a
hypothetical
example
of
sample
amenities
that
may
be
provided
to
achieve
floor
area.
This,
the
the
numbers
that
you're
seeing
here
the
square
footages
are
relating
to
the
hilton
and
the
red
lion
parcels.
Z
So
it
does
assume
that
2.5
far
would
be
earned
through
the
provision
of
this
list
of
amenities
on
the
left
here,
so
open
space
potential
streets,
child
care,
uses,
public
art,
enhanced,
streetscape
and
stream
restoration,
so
bear
in
mind
that
the
developer
may
already
build
just
over
a
million
square
feet
of
office
development
without
meeting
the
threshold
to
provide
the
public
benefits
that
we're
seeing
on
the
left
side.
There
next
slide,
please.
Z
So
this
slide
illustrates
what's
likely
to
happen
if
the
base
far
is
increased
by
one
far
so
essentially,
almost
a
half
a
million
square
feet
on
top
of
the
million
plus
square
feet
in
the
draft
code
would
be
provided
without
an
exchange
for
public
benefits
or
requirement
to
provide
public
benefits.
Z
So
the
developer
will
not
have
to
earn
as
much
floor
area
to
reach
the
maximum
development
potential
on
the
site.
So
with
that
you'll
see,
you
would
see
fewer
benefits
provided
and
we're
seeing
a
reduction
in
the
amount
of
open
space
and
potential
streets
that
would
be
provided
as
well
through
the
incentive
zoning
program.
Next
slide,
please.
Z
So
this
slide
is
a
it's
showing
the
calculation
that
a
developer
would
make
to
decide
how
they
want
to
earn
building
square
footage
above
the
base
far
so
we
can
see
from
the
total
circled
in
each
table
that
the
far
is
is
less
the
the
amount
of
fdr
they
need
to
earn
is
less
with
the
base
set
at
3.5.
Z
It
does
show
a
majority
of
the
square
footage
being
earned
through
the
open
space
potential
streets
and
child
care
uses
which
are
proposed
as
as
tier
one
amenities
for
non-residential
development
in
east
maine
and
in
fact,
almost
80
of
the
square
footage
is
earned
just
from
the
two
amenity
options:
the
open
space
and
the
potential
streets
in
this
example
for
the
for
the
red
lion
and
the
hilton
parcel.
Z
So
two
amenities
could
provide
potentially
eighty
percent
of
the
floor
area
that
they
would
be
needing
to
to
move
on
to
that
remaining
tier,
where
they
have
an
expanded
list
of
amenity
options.
Z
Those
same
two
amenities
we
can
see
in
the
example
below,
with
the
base,
far
increased
to
3.5
and
those
two
amenities
are
enough
to
earn
100
of
the
square
footage
above
the
base.
Far
next
slide
please.
Z
So
this
is
just
a
side-by-side
comparison
of
the
draft,
luca
recommendation
and
the
stakeholder
request
and
what
the
two
options
would
provide
in
terms
of
use
of
the
amenity
incentive
program.
So,
as
mentioned
earlier,
as
the
light
blue
area
above
the
base,
far
gets
smaller
than
the
amount
of
floor
area.
That
would
be
earned
through
the
incentive
program
reduces
so
that
the
developer
would
not
need
to
provide
as
many
public
amenities
in
exchange
for
building
a
bigger
project.
Z
So
we
have
just
two
more
two
more
slides
to
walk
through
here,
so
the
amenity
options
are
the
red
text.
As
tris
I
mentioned
earlier
with
the
summarized
table
of
options,
it
shows
what's
been
added,
since
the
draft
code
was
published
and
what
we
have
here
are
additional
options.
These
were
directed
by
council
and
also
suggested
by
wig
properties.
Z
Z
This
would
be
an
efficient
way
to
advance
this
type
of
amenity
now
under
the
framework
of
a
special
amenity,
and
then
we
could
continue
to
explore
a
more
fixed
or
defined
small
business
amenity
option
for
the
land
use
code
and
future
initiatives
such
as
wilberton.
If
that's
amenable
to
council,
the
draft
luca
also
allocates
amenities
in
a
way
that
provides
a
focus
on
open
space
potential
streets
and
child
care
as
a
top
priority
for
non-residential
developments.
Z
Z
So
essentially,
a
developer
must
choose
from
a
more
focused
list
of
amenities
to
earn
most
of
the
building
square
footage
before
moving
on
to
the
remaining
options
on
the
list.
So
for
for
this
slide,
we
were
referring
to
those
kind
of
priorities
as
first
year
and
second
tier
the
options
are,
are
all
provided
based
on
council
direction.
Z
Previous
council
direction,
as
well
as
priorities
identified
by
council
through
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
the
effect
of
adding
additional
amenities
from
or
moving
additional
amenities
from
the
second
tier
into
the
first
tier
would
provide
developers
more
choices
to
earn
the
bulk
of
their
building
square
footage.
But
it
may
also
result
in
other
top
tier
amenities,
not
getting
built
or
as
shown
in
that
hypothetical
example.
Z
The
base
far
was
increased,
then
really
the
the
first
tier
amenities
would
be
what's
what
what's
built
on
for
the
tod,
so
so
again,
yeah
adding
more
items
into
tier
one
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
those
amenities
would
be
built.
But
this
list
is
available
for
council
discussion
to
choose
those
priorities.
Next
slide,
please,
and
so
on.
Z
So
staff
is
recommending
the
use
of
a
development
agreement
to
consider
proposals
for
for
non-conforming
situations
when
they
reach
a
certain
threshold
and-
and
we
have
a
conversation
planned
for
november.
First
on
that
topic
and
a
special
amenity
was
also
added
to
the
list,
so
the
da
tool
would
be
used
to
accommodate
developer,
proposed
amenities
not
identified
in
the
list
of
11
options.
From
that
previous
slide
and
in
exchange
for
these
departures,
affordable
housing
and
other
city
developer
negotiated
public
benefits
would
be
provided.
Z
Stakeholder
away
properties
has
requested
a
development
agreement
tool
for
a
few
additional
items
that
are
listed
in
red,
so
the
catalyst
project,
which
is
something
we
have
in
the
bell
red
land,
use
district
departures
from
the
open
space
requirements
and
then
other
code
provisions
as
needed
in
exchange
they've
suggested
that
cipa
be
the
only
requirement
and
and
just
for
council
on
the
public's
information.
Cipa
is
a
process
requirement
that
would
be
applicable
to
a
development
agreement,
regardless
so
staff.
X
Thanks
nick
so
again,
I'm
trying
to
provide
some
additional
information
respond
to
questions
that
council
asked
on
october
4th.
We
are
here
this
evening
to
answer
any
additional
questions
the
council
may
have
and
are
seeking
council
direction
on
these
three
topic
areas.
Mayor.
A
Thank
you
all
right,
I'm
trying
to
make
a
note-taking
grid
here,
so
I
can
keep
track
of
what
everybody
says
and
thank
you
for
that
presentation.
A
X
So
the
development
agreement
would
be
a
tool
that
would
be
allowed
for
those
departures
within
all
of
the
east
main
area,
so
not
just
for
a
specific
developer,
but
the
developer
or
the
property
owner
or
developer
could
take
the
auction
of
a
development
agreement
for
additional
height
or
additional
far
with
with
additional
public
benefits.
A
A
So
I
just
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear,
and
so
I'm
going
to
call
in
an
order
on
people
in
a
certain
order,
so
that
I
can
take
notes
and
I'm
going
to
start
with
councilmember
zhan.
Do
you
have
comments
or
questions.
R
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
appreciate
staff
continuing
to
work
with
the
wigs
and
bellevue
club
understanding
their
their
needs
and
threading
a
needle
between
what
the
city's
wants
and
needs
are
and
the
developer,
and
I
also
appreciate
the
side-by-side
comparison
between
the
2.5
and
the
3.5.
Far
for
the
non
being
able
to
eat,
I
think
was
really
important.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that.
I
agree
with
the
consistency
with
bell
red
with
the
condos
at
the
100
ami.
A
R
I'll
get
a
little
closer
to
my
laptop
okay.
How
about
now
is
it?
Okay
sounds
good,
okay,
sorry
about
that.
Okay,
the
public
comment
about
the
street
width
over
the
stream
of
30
feet
and
the
block
length.
Will
those
be
the
the
next
item
or
will
you
will
that
be
addressed
at
the
next
item?
R
I
would
be
concerned
with
diluting
the
tier
one,
if
too
many
more
tier
one
and
I
support
the
da
to
work
through
some
of
these
additional
items
with
the
developer
on
the
individual
properties
and
so
the
staff
recommendation
of
option
b.
R
X
So
that
try
to
respond
so
the
letter
from
east
side
housing
roundtable-
we
just
received
that
just
before
the
council
meeting,
so
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
really
digest
that
and
interpret
it
or
go
back
and
ask
for
clarification,
but
I
think
the
key
issue
that
they
were
raising
there
was
a
fee
in
lieu.
They
were
noting
for
both
residential
and
commercial
residential
is
a
concept
that
we
do
have
in
the
land
use
code
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
X
Commercial
fee
in
lieu
is
not
something
that
we
currently
have
in
the
land
use
code,
so
there
would
be
some
significant
additional
work
to
actually
put
together
that
particular
alternative
here,
but
again
we
have
not
seen
the
work
from
the
chamber,
so
just
speculation
right
now
and
what
that
might
be
so
we
will
need
to.
You
know,
take
a
look
at
it
when
it
arrives.
X
The
the
other
question
regarding
the
road
council
members
on
so
the
road
we
we
don't
have
that
as
an
alternative.
Just
our
discussion
at
an
upcoming
council
meeting.
We
could
certainly
do
that.
The
road
standards
are
essentially
administered
through
transportation.
We
deal
with
both
the
transportation
needs,
but
also
the
impacts
from
critical
areas
and
the
balancing
has
to
happen
when
we
do
a
development
review
and
decide
what
is
appropriate
in
trying
to
ensure
we're
meeting
all
of
those
interests.
X
So
the
the
it's
a
little
challenging
to
actually
dive
into
what's
an
appropriate
road
profile
without
having
a
development
and
understanding
really
the
specifics
that
we're
dealing
with
with
respect
to
the
critical
area.
But
again
we
will,
through
the
development
review
process,
look
at
all
that
and
determine
what
is
an
appropriate
configuration.
Y
A
You,
okay,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house.
E
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
want
to
thank
staff
as
well
for
the
great
presentation
and
continue
to.
E
On
this
on
this
on
this
timetable
here
and
working
so
closely
with
all
the
stakeholders
really
appreciate
that
ongoing
work,
a
couple
of
quick
questions
for
you
number
one
and
I'm
just
referring
now
to
the
and
I'm
sure
staff's
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
The
letter
that
came
in
from
from
the
wigs
from
the
stakeholders
here
I
wanted
to
just
just
draw
one
thing
to
your
attention
and
that's
regarding
the
child
care
size
limit.
E
Z
Sure,
yes,
deputy
mayor
thanks
for
the
question,
so
the
the
current
draft
has
a
limit
on
the
amount
of
bonusable
square
footage
for
child
care
service
uses.
So
certainly
daycare
is
15,
000
square
feet
or
even
larger
could
be
provided
in
east
maine,
but
the
amount
of
bonus
able
areas
capped
at
10
000
per
building.
So
in
the
scenarios
we
presented
to
council,
it
does
assume
two
day
cares:
totaling
20,
000
square
feet
provided,
and
that
would
achieve
the
full
bonus.
E
Okay,
well,
then,
I
would
suggest
that
we
take
a
look
at
expanding
that
to
to
15.
per
I.
I
just
don't
know
what
the
options
are
to
have
two
different
child
care
facilities
with
with
and
both
at
ten
thousand.
When
you
know
when
my
daughter
went
to
child
care,
most
of
those
places
were
at
least
fifteen
thousand,
so
rather
than
having
two,
it
might
be
better
just
to
have
one
at
twenty
thousand
or
fifteen
to
twenty
thousand
versus
two
to
get
there
on
those
bonus
level.
E
Points
so
just
wanted
to
raise
that
issue
and
then
really
appreciate
that
the
map
in
there,
comparing
the
other
downtown
codes
or
to
the
downtown
code
and
on
the
amenities
piece.
E
Z
Yeah,
so
the
stakeholders
were
correctly
noting
nine
options
for
downtown
and
those
are
all
public
realm
related
options,
so
open
space.
The
grand
connection
is
in
there
major
public
open
spaces,
which
is
a
key
piece
along.
The
grand
connection
is
also
included
in
there,
so
nine
options
aren't
necessarily
available
to
all
of
the
downtown,
but
there
are
certainly
nine
options
that
are
kind
of
considered
in
that
for
75
percent.
Z
E
Well,
as
someone
likes
to
give
different
options
and
we're
talking
about
incentivizing-
and
I
think
a
lot
of
these
amenities
are
important
and
will
have
a
public
benefit,
I
would
certainly
like
to
see
that
pedestrian
bridge
and
the
performing
arts
moved
over
into
tier
one
to
give
the
stakeholder
some
additional
thoughts.
It's
gonna
take
quite
a
bit
for
them
to
accrue
those
points
anyways.
E
I
think-
and
I
appreciate
the
examples
that
you
gave
there
as
well
nick,
but
I
am
more
in
favor
of
3.5
for
for
both
non-residential
and
residential,
but
if
we're,
if
the
my
colleagues
are
more
set
on
2.5,
I'm
okay
with
that,
but
I
would
like
to
really
increase
the
number
of
amenities
that
the
developer
could
could
select
from
this.
So
I'll
stop
there.
Thank
you.
W
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor,
thanks
to
staff
for
looping
back
on
the
mom
and
pop
shop
amenity.
That
sounds
good
and
then
for
showing
the
difference
between
the
2.5
and
3.5.
For
the
question
I
had
last
time,
I
think
we
sort
of
started
to
touch
on
that
on
clarifying
the
point
that
came
up
during
public
comment.
Can
you
speak
to
is?
Is
there
a
limitation
or
challenge
with
reaching
getting
all
the
amenity
points
with
the
three
is
that
can
you
speak
to
that.
Z
So
councilmember
barksdale,
at
least
in
the
example
that
we
had
provided
if
the
base
far
was
set
at
2.5
80
of
the
amenity
points
could
be
earned
through
providing
four
potential
streets
which
are
going
to
be
used
to
to
meet
the
minimum
block,
size
requirements
and
40
000
square
feet
of
open
space,
so
less
than
an
acre
of
open
space,
which
would
be
required
as
part
of
the
10
open
space
requirement.
Z
So
with
those
two
amenities
they
would
achieve
80
of
the
floor
area
that
would
be
needed
to
move
on
to
the
next
tier
got.
It.
D
Thanks
so
I'll
start
with
where
my
the
colleague
spoke
before
me
just
left
off
on
the
amenities
and
on
the
far
base,
so
I
do
agree
with
council
member
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
about
that.
We
should
have
more
amenities
brought
up
to
the
tier
one.
I
think
that
the
pedestrian
bridge
that
connects
the
light
rail
station
across
112th
to
this
property,
which
is
going
to
be
a
very
busy
activated
transit-oriented
development,
should
definitely
be
on
tier
one.
I
really
want
to
see
that
built.
D
I
want
to
incentivize
it
it's
going
to
be
expensive
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
built
so
as
well
as
the
performing
arts
center
as
well.
I
know
that
councilmember
stoke
spoke
passionately
about
that
last
session,
so
I
also
am
still
inclined
towards
3.5
3.5
as
a
base.
If
the
council
decides
to
do
2.5,
we
could
also
just
do
three
as
a
compromise.
D
If
we're
kind
of
still
split
on
that,
but
if
we
do
2.5,
I
think
it's
even
more
important
that
we
have
options
in
the
amenities
system.
Oh
we
already
decided
on
height
on
on
far
I
wanted
to
ask
trisna
a
question.
D
One
of
the
things
that
I've
spoken
about
is,
if
we
don't
maximize
the
density
on
this
site,
it
will
be
a
miss.
It
will
be
a
fumble,
for
you
know,
unforced
error.
If
you
will
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
doing
the
land
use
code
such
that
we
can
have
max
density
reached
with
reasonable
costs,
where
it's
still
going
to
pencil
for
the
developer,
we'll
see
this
in
in
the
relatively
near
term
and
so
the
full
five
far.
D
I
know
that
there's
additional
far
potentially
available
through
da,
but
I
want
to
be
reassured
that
there
is
still
the
full
five
far
available
and
trisna
spoke
about
some
uncounted
space.
So
if
you
take
that
uncounted
space
and
you
count
it,
would
this
site
be
able
to
develop
with
the
full
five
far
given
the
critical
area.
So
that's
a
question.
Y
So
thanks
councilmember
robertson
for
that
question,
so
I
did
speak
about
exempt
far,
so
these
are
spaces
and
areas
that
would
not
be
counted.
The
square
footage
would
not
be
counted
towards
calculating
far
the
we
don't
have
information
on
the
the
exact
size
of
the
critical
areas
or
buffers
or
any
of
those
kind
of
that
detail
of
information.
Y
So,
in
our
estimation,
however,
if
there
are
ground
floor
uses
as
well
as
second
floor
of
spaces
that
are
exempted
at
50,
there
would
be
you
would
be
able
to
accomplish
at
least
five
or
even
beyond
the
five.
If
you
ended
up
kind
of
counting
the
exact
far
s
part
of
your
far,
so
we
believe
that
you
could
the
development
could
accomplish
that.
However,
we
don't
have
the
full
information,
we
don't
have
a
development
proposal.
Obviously
we
don't
have
any
of
the
critical
area
information.
D
I'm
very
interested
in
seeing
the
full
five
so
then,
on
the
d.a
I
am
oh.
I
also
support
the
100
ami
on
ownership
housing
that
councilman
rosanne
spoke
about
on
the
d.a.
I
do
support
what
the
staff
has
put
forward
as
well
as
greater
flexibility.
We
don't
know
if
there's
something
that
we
might
want
to
flex
later,
so
I
I'm
interested
in
having
a
little
bit
more
than
just
the
very
constrained
list.
D
Now
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
schedule
because
in
looking
at
the
attachment
b,
there's
some
items
the
council
hasn't
decided
about
that,
aren't,
don't
look
like
they're
coming
back
and
that
is
the
housing
minimum
at
the
housing
minimum.
We
had
a
discussion
about
that.
We
didn't
make
a
decision
and
I'm
wondering
when
that's
coming
back,
because
we
need
to
make
a
decision,
particularly
after
we
get
the
eco
northwest
report.
D
So
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
add
a
session
another
session,
so
we
can
meet
the
november
15th
deadline
or
not
and
before
you
answer
I'll,
just
weigh
in
and
say
also
I
support
expanding
the
child
care
to
that
15
000..
We
we,
the
pandemic,
has
shown
us
how
much
we
need
more
child
care,
so
consent
can
someone.
Maybe
director
brennan,
can
address
the
schedule,
because
council
didn't
make
a
decision
on
housing
minimum
so
so.
X
The
the
code
is
in
its
entirety
is
essentially
open
for
council
consideration,
as
you
know,
until
you
finally
adopt
it.
It's
generally
how
it
goes
so
if
the
council
would
like
to
have
some
additional
discussion
about
fee
and
lou
or
any
additional
information,
like
the
chamber
noted
in
their
letter
today,
it
will
take
more
time.
There's
really
no
question
about
that.
X
As
far
as
what
we've
got
on
the
calendar
right
now,
we've
got
two
meetings
in
november
and
another
meeting
in
early
december,
and
it's
probably
about
all
we're
going
to
going
to
be
able
to
get
in
this
year
before
we
get
in,
go
to
holiday
break
so
most
likely
if
we
do
want
to
have
a
more
robust
conversation
about
the
minimum
housing
and
some
additional
information
that
the
chamber
is
we're
anticipating
receiving
from
the
chamber.
We
will
anticipate
scheduling
some
additional
time
in
in
january
to
complete
the
work.
D
X
Yeah,
so
we
we
absolutely
will
at
the
next
meeting,
we
can
frame
that
question
for
you
as
well
councilmember
robertson
as
far
as
the
housing.
I
think
that,
as
well
as
the
fee
and
lou
information,
I
think
are
areas
that
I've
heard
several
council
members
express
an
interest
in
so
we'll
try
to
figure
out
how
we
incorporate
that
into
the
into
the
upcoming
discussions.
Y
U
Very
interesting
discussion
so
far.
I
really
appreciate
the
staff's
work
on
this
and
laying
it
out
the
way
you
have
right
at
the
beginning.
Let
me
just
make
clear
I'm
in
favor
of
the
2.5
3.5
and
I
understand
all
the
concerns
have
been
raised
and
back
and
forth,
but-
and
I
appreciate
very
much
and
agree
on-
a
number
of
comments
have
been
made
by
my
colleagues
before
me
speaking
here
and
yes,
councilman
robertson.
U
I
am
passionate
about
performing
arts
and
you
know
performing
arts
and
this
art
public
art
can
be
part
of
that.
I
think
that's
something
that
will
again.
This
is
an
area
of
the
city.
We
need
this
and
so
that
to
me,
that's
that's
a
really
important
thing
and
something
that
I
think
if
I
were
the
developer,
I
would
be
really
excited
about
doing
this
and
making
this
part
of
the
community.
U
U
I'm
really
interested
in
that,
and
that's
one
of
those
things
where
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
the
cost
and
all
that,
but
moving
some
things
over,
I
think
is,
is
a
good
thing
to
do,
but
I
again
I'm
very
comfortable
basically
with
what
staff
has
laid
out
on
this,
and
I
think
it's
all
been
part
of
a
long
conversation
that
we're
getting
a
lot
closer
together
on
and
reading
over
what
the
chamber
or
the
east
eastside
housing
consortium
has
proposed.
U
Just
in
the
first
go
through
it,
I
think
they've
really
done
an
outstanding
job
and
I
think
they
made
it
very
clear.
They
they
proposed
a
2.5
3.5.
U
I
think
they
show
a
lot
how
we
can
expand
and
make
this
project
really
do
a
lot
more
than
we
talking
about
to
a
certain
extent,
and
I
agree
we
should
talk
about
and
add
the
the
items
that
were
just
that
micah
was
talking
about
finding
some
room
and
I
think
we
can
do
it
this
year
and
get
have
the
conversation.
U
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
a
big
conversation
on
those
additional
items,
because
I
think
we're
all
coming
together
on
this
and
trying
to
just
get
the
best
thing
going
and
frankly,
if
we
could
get
this
done
by
the
end
of
the
year
and
the
developer
could
get
going
with
the
da
and
they
could
start
their
project
and
put
this
great
thing,
something
that's
not
just
a
twinkle
in
somebody's
eye
but
a
reality.
It
comes
about,
and
we
have
a
lot
more
things
to
move
on
to.
U
So,
let's
see
if
we
can
do
that,
that
would
be
really
great,
and
I
certainly
and
my
daughter
would
not
be
happy
with
me
if
I
did
not
champion
the
child
care
to
the
the
footage
that
it
needs,
and
so
I
mean
early
learning
and
child
care
is
a
big
big
thing.
She
works
on
in
her
real
work.
So
I'm
I'm
very
happy
with
this.
I
think
it's
it's
it's
like
anything
else.
You
have
to
get
to
a
certain
part.
There's
some
compromises,
some
things
we
worked
out.
U
I
think
staff
has
responded
very,
very
well
very
aggressively
very
thoughtfully
and
we've
had
great
discussions
on
this
and
I'm
confident
that
if
we
get
this
put
in
place
as
it
is
now,
we
will
have
a
great
development
in
that
area
and
I
think
we're
going
to
be
all
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
first
a
big
event
in
in
one
of
those
places
and
I
think
we're
looking
at
that
whole
area,
and
I
did
I
do
like
the
way
we're
approaching
it
with
the
other
parts
of
the
of
the
area.
U
As
well
so,
let's
just
let's
get
this
wrapped
up
and
move
on.
V
Thank
you.
We've
been
at
this
for
a
long
time
and
I
thank
the
staff
for
staying
there
with
us
and
did
a
lot
of
work.
I
support
3.5
3.5
5.0.
V
The
reason
is
that
we
all
agree
with
the
amenities
I
mean
we
have
the
same
goals.
We
want
to
see
these
things
happen,
and
I
mean
we
have
different
ideas.
Obviously,
but
we
have
to
come
to
real
estate
agreement,
which
I
think
we
are
getting
to
it.
If
we
were
not
already
there.
I
believe
we
are.
You
know
I
mean
I
could
say
gee
I
like
to
have
a
quest
descent
actually
on
site.
V
That's
a
joke,
you
know
or
taj
mahal
right,
but
no
we
are
asking
those
we're
asking
the
real
things
that
we
want
amenities,
that's
benefiting
the
city,
our
people,
you
know
such
as
child
care.
Centers
such
as
you
know,
pedestrian
bridge
such
as
the
the
culture
center.
Whatever
you
know,
so
it's
a
matter
of
how
we
get
that
and
I
think,
by
giving
them
the
opportunity
to
do
it,
that's
giving
them
incentives,
but
it's
the
way
it
sounds
to
me.
It's
like
we
are
actually
blackmailing
them.
V
We
said
unless
you
build
them,
we're
not
going
to
give
you
this.
No,
let's
say
that
we
will
give
you
this,
you
know.
If
you,
then
we
can
encourage
to
build
it.
It's
because
you
know
it's
in
good
faith.
We
have
to
work
with
people
with
trust,
good
partners,
it's
a
partnership.
They
have
to
build
it.
We
make
sure
we
get
incentives
right
which
is
good
for
us,
so
they
don't
know
for
sure.
V
If
they
don't
know
for
sure,
then
we
can
come
up
with
the
agreement
exactly
what
it
is,
but,
as
we
know
the
uncertainties,
you
know
we
talk
about
sensitive
areas,
so
we
really
don't
know
what
the
cost
would
be.
We
don't
know
cost
of
money.
We
know
the
cost
of
labor
so
un
until
they
actually
start
doing
the
project.
V
A
Can
I
ask
you
a
specific
question:
could
you
tell
us
what
base
far
you're
going
for.
V
V
I
I
I
I
don't
care
what
the
amenities
we
agree
with
a
lot
of
them.
I
care
I
want
all
of
them,
which
we
agree.
As
I
said,
we
can
argue
about
each
one.
I
want
the
taj
mahal
and
the
aquatic
center
the
door
thrown
in
there,
but
that's
not
going
to
happen,
so
we
want
whatever
we
can
realistically
what
the
developer
can
do.
V
That's
it.
We
don't
know
what
it
is.
Unless
we
until
we
get
the
project
going,
we
don't
until
we
know
how
how
much
it
take
to
put
that
bridge
over
the
six
foot
whatever
why
no
60
feet
wide.
We
don't
know
that
it's
all.
We
have
two
cost
comparison.
Studies.
We
don't
know
what
it
is
right.
So
how
do
we
know?
This
is
what
uncertainty
is.
The
only
way
he
addresses
uncertainty
is
we
have
to
work
by
not
by
blackmailing
good
faith.
Is
that
we
negotiate
development
agreement.
V
We
know
we
are
dealing
with
people
in
good
faith.
Okay,
if
they
cannot
do
it
nothing
much.
We
can
do
about
it.
If
they
can
do
it,
they
may
add
more
if
the
cost
is
not
as
much
if
they
say,
hey
our
cost
estimates
higher
than
we
expected
they're
showing
you
more
amenities.
I
love
that
you
know
so
I'm
not
going
to
nitpick
all
right,
okay,
but
I've
got
cheering
and
I
may
come
up
with
a
few
if
they
prove
that
gee
we
got
lots
of
money
left
over.
A
I
okay,
thank
you,
so
I'm
gonna
take
my
turn
here
and
I'm
going
to
say
that
I
am
very
interested
in
looking
at
as
an
amenity
for
non-residential
the
potential
for
the
fee
in
lieu
for
affordable
housing,
because
I
think
it
would
be
a
real
missed
opportunity
not
to
include
that
in
this
and
in
all
the
rest
of
our
development
properties.
A
There's
the
potential
for
the
owner
to
carve
off
a
portion
of
the
property
and
and
use
that,
in
partnership
with
a
an
affordable
housing
developer,
to
really
do
deep,
affordable
housing
there
and
that
could
be
the
fee
in
lieu.
So
I
I
do
want
us
to
consider
that,
and
I
think
eco
northwest
would
be
good
to
work
with
on
that.
We
won't
be
the
first
city
to
do
that.
A
So
then,
when
we
talk
about
the
streets,
whether
they're
the
required
or
the
potential-
I
just-
I
think
you
alluded
to
this,
but
I
do
want
to
have
the
configuration
of
whether
it's
pad
by
straight
or
curved
that
all
be
in
the
development
agreement.
A
I
don't
think
that
should
be
have
to
be
so
predicted
before
the
development
is
completely
baked,
and
then
I
I'm
a
little
conflicted
with
this
100
ami
condos,
the
homeownership
is
great,
but
that
just
doesn't
feel
like
real,
affordable
housing
to
me.
I
I'm
it's.
It's
certainly
more
affordable
than
some
of
the
other
things
being
built
in
bellevue
nowadays.
So
I
get
that,
but
geez
we're
right
across
the
street
from
a
light
rail
station.
A
I
would
hope
that
we
could
get
80
ami
or
less
so
I
think
I'm
going
to
leave
that
with
there
and
if
the
developer
wants
to
do
an
additional
housing
with
some
100
ami
or
more
condos,
that's
fine.
I
mean
they
can
do
that,
but
I'd
like
to
have
at
least
some
80
ami
in
there
and
I'm
all
for
increasing
the
amenities.
A
I'd
like
to
add
that
I,
as
I
understand
it,
the
child
care
size,
it's
not
that
they
can't
build
it
bigger
it's
just
they
don't
get
the
points
beyond
a
certain
size.
Is
that
correct.
A
Yeah,
so
I
you
know,
change
them,
I
I
we
definitely
want
to
have
child
care.
I
think
that's
a
priority
for
all
of
us
and
if
it
needs
to
be
a
certain
size,
I
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
restrict
that.
But
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
that
the
way
it's
written
actually
restricts
it
right
now
I
like
the
pedestrian
bridge,
added
to
a
tier
one.
A
I
like
performing
arts
and
public
art
added
to
tier
one,
and
I
I
guess
that's
it
for
me
and
I'm
for
the
two
five
three
five
base
that
they
are.
A
So
does
this
make
sense
to
you
guys
to
trisna
and
mike
and
mac
does
what
we
and
nick
do?
What
is
the
feedback
making
sense
to
you
because
I've
written
it
all
down,
and
I
can
read
it
back
to
you,
but
I
you've
probably
got
it
gotten.
It.
X
I
think
we
have
I've
taken
notes
as
well
mayor.
I
think
I'm
gonna
need
a
little
more
clarity
on
the
two
five
three
five
to
make
sure.
I
don't
know
that
I
I
got
everybody
so
right.
I
don't
want
to
take
the
a
misstep
there.
If
I
count.
A
No,
that's
fine
and
I
mean
that's
something
we
can
vote
on
because
that's
that's
pretty
clear.
So
do
you
want
us
to
vote
on
that
right
now
and
just
get
that
out
of
the
way
and
then
go
through
the
other
things
that
be
helpful.
U
A
So
I
see
council,
member
robertson
and
councilmember
lee
are
no
and
then
the
other
five
are
yes.
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
So
that's
that.
A
Well,
let's
make
sure
that
we
don't
want
to
discuss
this
anymore,
but
yes,
you
may
when
we
get
there.
So
where
are
you
with
that?
Mike.
X
So
I
heard
and
I'll
do
my
best
here,
so
I
heard
an
interest
in
expanding
the
daycare
use.
The
request
that
we
received
from
the
stakeholders
was
to
go
to
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
at
their
suggestion.
X
I
heard
an
interest
in
adding
performing
arts
to
tier
one
and
the
ped
bridge
to
tier
one,
but
I'm
not
quite
sure
I
have
the
majority
of
the
council
over
there,
but
those
are
several.
There
are
a
two
that
I
heard.
X
A
Yeah,
let's
bring
that
one
back.
Maybe
we
can
have
a
special
session
just
for
that,
but
are
the
are
the
amenities
consistent
with
residential
and
non-residential?
Are
we
looking
at
them
separately.
X
So
I
think
it's
been
relatively
clear
that
the
residential,
the
top
tier
one
residential,
is
affordable
housing,
which
is
in
line
with
the
council
direction.
I
think
it's,
the
commercial
tiers
that
have
been
the
point
of
discussion,
whether
to
add
additional
to
pull
some
of
those
options
from
tier
two
up
into
tier
one.
A
So
so
the
residential
amenity
tier
one
would
only
be
affordable,
housing.
A
Okay,
and
so
I'm
asking
that
that
be
at
eighty
percent
ami
and
I'd
like
council's
feedback
on
that,
we'll
get
back
to
that
and
then
for
the
non-residential.
A
X
So
the
it
is
yeah,
so
the
the
use
of
the
streets.
You
are
they're
bonus,
able.
X
A
Yeah,
so
all
right,
can
you
put
the?
Can
you
put
a
slide
up?
That
shows
me
because
I
I
I've
got
all
these
this
paper.
I.
C
C
G
C
C
A
A
A
Square
feet,
so
is:
can
you
just
nod
your
head
if
you're?
Okay,
with
with
that.
R
R
It's
only
that
the
first
10
000
is
part
of
the
amenities,
because
I
am
concerned
about
the
level
of
dilution
of
the
amenities
when
we
move
potentially
three
more
over
here
and
increase
the
the
amenity
points
for
the
child
care,
it's
one
thing
to
say
that
potentially
it
will
be
built
anyway,
it's
another
to
say
that
we're
going
to
dilute
the
incentive
bonus
points
that
are
being
provided.
R
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
before
we
vote
on
all
these,
so
we're
not
saying
that
we
would
be
that
we're
prohibiting
anyone
from
building
larger
child
care.
It's
just
how
many
points
they
would
get
is
that
right
staff.
X
R
R
A
Okay,
well,
let's
take
a
vote
on
the
child
care
size.
Let's
vote
on
pardon.
Z
Yeah
so
councilmember
stokes
there
there's
no
proposal
right
now
for
child
care
use
in
the
example
that
staff
provided
to
just
show,
you
know
some
sample
of
amenities.
The
developer
could
choose
to
reach
the
maximum.
Z
Far
in
that
specific
example,
staff
chose
to
provide
within
the
hilton
and
the
red
lion
parcel
to
child
care
service
uses
to
earn
you
know
towards
their
maximum
far,
and
in
that
case
we
maxed
out
the
child
care
service
for
those
two
properties,
so
that
you'd
have
20
000
square
feet,
total
provided
for
the
redline
hilton
property
to
earn
the
far
that
was
needed
in
the
first
tier.
So
it's
just
an
example,
though.
U
A
Now,
that's
that's
increasing
the
point
system
to
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
on
a
child
care
site.
Instead
of
ten
thousand,
you
could
have
two
fifty
yeah,
okay.
U
Z
Z
Okay,
so
so
stakeholder
wig
properties
has
suggested
the
15
000
square
feet
as
the
the
amount
that
the
city
should
should
provide
bonus
square
footage
for
so
right
now.
It's
capped
at
ten
thousand
square
feet
in
the
draft
code.
If,
if
fifteen
thousand
were
selected,
you
could
still
have
you
know
two
child
care
service
uses
provided
at
fifteen
thousand
square
feet
a
piece
and
then
it
would
be
thirty
thousand
square
feet
bonus
able.
Z
So
just
following
kind
of
that
same
example,
we
don't
put
a
cap
on
the
amount
of
child
care
use
that
can
be
provided
in
earning
those
bonuses
other
than
one
per
building,
so
they
could
have
multiple
child
care
service
uses
within
the
tod
each
earning
whatever
council
decides,
as
the
appropriate
amount
of
of
square
footage
to
give
bonus
for.
So
if
that's
10,
000
or
15
000,
that
would
be
what
that
developer
could
choose
to
to
do.
X
X
It
gives
more
options,
but
if
you're,
if
you're
trying
to
hit
a
specific
target,
your
your
opportunity
to
actually
hit
that
specific
target
gets
a
little
bit
less.
I'm
not
saying
that
all
of
those
things
aren't
valuable.
It's
really
a
values
discussion
for
the
council.
What
what
do
you
want
to
achieve
from
the
land
use
code
and
using
this
incentive
system?
What
are
those
highest
priority
outcomes
that
you
would
like
to
see
as
part
of
the
development
and
that's
what
you
bonus
and
then
that's
generally,
what
gets
built.
U
A
A
D
You
know
two-thirds
of
the
amenity
points
for
based
on
the
market
size.
So
for
me,
I
think
this
seems
like
a
no-brainer.
If
we
support
child
care,
which
I
do,
I
think
we
should
do
it
based
on
the
size
that
we
expect
to
actually
have
built
rather
than
trying
to.
I
think
that
dilutes
the
chance
of
getting
child
care,
if
we
don't
right-size
it,
so
I'm
absolutely
in
favor
of
adding
that
thanks.
R
Oh
actually,
after
listening
to
my
colleagues,
I
support
this
piece.
I
think
it.
I
had
questions
about
what
this
meant
and
it's
helpful
for
me
to
understand,
but
it
does
then
drive
how
I
would
vote
for
the
subsequent
ones
if
we
are
talking
about
trying
not
to
dilute
from
the
very
things
we're
care
about
and
if
we're
gonna
increase
care,
because
it's
important
to
us.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
V
Thank
you,
madam
here
we
have
a
motion.
Actually
councilmember
robertson
was
making,
and
so
why
don't
we
go
on
with
that.
A
A
D
I'll
make
a
motion.
I
move
to
change
child
care
in
the
first
tier
to
bonus,
able
up
to
15
000
square
feet
in
size
for
each
child
care.
Second
grade.
C
A
The
next
one
I
have
is
well.
I
was
going
to
go
performing
arts
public
arts.
We
did
the
child
care
facilities,
then
pedestrian
bridge
than
the
ami,
but
sure
let's
go
pedestrian
bridge
next.
Okay,.
D
V
A
W
W
I
don't
understand
what
you're
saying
I
I
was
just
gonna
comment
that
I
don't.
I
don't
think
you
need
to
bring
all
of
them
over.
I
think
the
only
other
one
that
would
make
sense
given
past
conversations
that
we
had
we've
had
in
general
as
a
council
in
terms
of
priorities,
would
be
affordable
housing.
So
that's
the
only
other
one.
I
would
support.
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
guess
my
question:
is
you
know,
by
starting
the
base
fir
as
low
as
we've
chosen
to
do
it
there's
more
room
for
amenities,
but
you
know
the
delusion
that
council
members
on
use.
That
phrase
is
good
because.
A
A
The
next
one
is
no.
U
Question
I
just
did
you
catch
my
vote?
I
said
no,
oh,
you
did.
A
Okay,
all
right,
the
next
one
is
performing
art.
Moving
that
to
the
forefront.
Is
there
a
motion?
Councilmember
stokes?
You
want
to
make
a
motion
on
that.
One.
A
U
I
was
trying
to
get
out
of
that
yeah.
I
moved
to
move
performing
arts
from
second
tier
to
first
tier
second,.
P
A
B
A
Know
I'm
trying
to
get
it
so
council,
let's
just
say,
go
through
council
member
stokes.
U
W
A
Okay,
councilmember
lee.
V
C
A
U
Yeah,
I
move
that
we
move
public
art
from
the
second
tier
to
third
to
first
tier.
A
Sarah
second,
second,
any
comments
or
questions
all
right:
council,
member
stokes.
How
do
you
vote.
U
AA
V
AA
A
I
vote
yes,
I
have
a
reason
for
that:
okay
and
then
the
affordable
housing.
A
D
D
A
Well,
that's
a
good
question.
I
guess
my
concern
I'll
speak
to
it
is
that
I'm
concerned
that
instead
of
having
rental
there'll
be
ownership
at
100
ami
instead
of
rental,
if
we
allow
both
to
be
in
the
tier
one,
so
I'm
not
interested
in
having
100
afford
homeownership
in
tier
one.
So
this
would
just
be
for
rental
in
tier
one
and
leaving
home
ownership
at
a
hundred
percent
if
it's
home
ownership
at
eighty
percent,
I'm
okay
with
that.
A
V
Yeah,
I
agree.
I
agree.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have.
You
know
flexibility.
The
only
question
I
have
here
is:
you
know
this
reflected
ownership,
100
rental.
Everything
gives
the
developer
some
flexibility.
V
You
know
in
the
event
that
you
know,
rental
is
very
high
in
demand
and
in
need,
and
they
will
have
a
lot
of
unit
in
rental.
V
If
nobody,
you
know,
if
you
know
it
depends
on
the
market,
it's
a
marketable
condo
or
market
for
rent,
and,
if
there's
a
you
know,
so
I
believe
that
it
gives
them
a
odd
alternative
flexibility
and
they
can
accommodate
both.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing.
A
Okay,
so
the
motion-
I'm
just
looking
at
a
motion
that
would
reflect
that
any
affordable
housing
in
tier
one
would
be
at
80
percent
ami,
whether
it's
rental
or
home
ownership.
A
H
A
W
V
A
D
So
then,
can
we
bring
the
condo
that
if
people
want
that
to
be
in
tier
two,
we
I
think
we
need
to
add
it
by
motion.
Okay,.
A
D
You
make
a
motion
and
I'll
just
can
I
explain
my
vote.
I
supported
80
ami
for
rental.
I
just
thought
that
I
want
to
encourage
homeownership.
So
that's
why
I
voted
no
on
that.
If
it
was
limited,
so
I
would
add
to
tier
2,
100
ami
for
owner
occupied
units
for
the
residential
for
the
residential
development
in
east
maine.
Second,.
A
V
A
W
C
A
Those
are
the
things:
what
about
special
amenities?
Did
we
want
those
in
tier
one.
A
Special
amenities
are
in
tier
two,
but
they
were
asked
to
be
moved
over
to
tier
one.
So
does
anybody
want
to
make
a
motion
to
move
special
amenities
over
to
tier
one.
A
R
A
A
X
X
Okay,
okay,
so
we
we'll
have
to
wait
and
until
we
get
that
information
we
we're
not
producing
that.
So
it's
not
on
our
schedule,
so
we'll
have
to
to
see
what
it
is
and
do
some
assessment
when
we
receive
it.
A
X
I
believe
so
rest
of
the
team
are
we
any
gaps
are.
Do
we
have
what
we
need
for
these
three
topic
areas
this
evening.
A
Do
you
have
anything
you
can
show
me
a
visual
trisona.
Y
You
see
the
the
slide
here
mirror.
A
Okay,
that's
a
good
idea!
So
councilmember
stokes
yeah.
U
I
had
my
hands
up
for
this
before
we
moved
to
another
thing.
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
for
everybody
to
understand
and
for
the
public
understand
I
wanted
to
read
off
the
yes
items
that
are
moving
from
second
to
two
first
tier
just
so
it's.
U
X
So
we
moved
the
council
moved
the
pedestrian
bridge
to
tier
one
or
the
first
tier.
The
council
moved
performing
arts
to
the
first
tier.
The
council
clarified
under
affordable
housing
that
80
rental,
affordable
housing
is
considered.
X
A
A
So
there
are
three
requests
from
the
stakeholders
to
make
changes
and
I
had
asked
that
the
streets
where's
my
notes,
sorry.
A
X
The
you
mean
the
list
of
items
that
listed
under
the
development
agreement
for
departures.
A
Well,
I
I
think
I
made
a
special
request
that
the
configurations
are
required
in
potential
streets
and
whether
they're
straight
or
they're,
curved
that
that
be
taken
up
in
the
development
agreement.
X
So
the
you're,
referring
to
the
block
size
configuration
that
is
currently
in
the
code.
The
council
did
have
you'll
recall
in
july
of
2020
a
discussion
about
the
potential
streets
and
and
the
the
required
road
one
down
by
between
the
the
bellevue
club
and
the
hilton.
X
So
if
you
want
to
have
a
departure
for
block
sizes,
I
think
we
probably
need
to
come
back
with
additional
information,
but
certainly
that
would
be
an
option
to
do
that.
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
we're
going
to
configure
the
space.
But
again
that
could
be
within
the
framework
of
a
development
agreement.
A
X
So
that
that's
a
that's
really
a
development
review
question,
so
we
have
road
standards
depending
upon
the
demand
for
the
roads,
the
certain
configuration
for
turn
lanes,
pedestrian,
etc.
Then
we
have
critical
areas
codes
as
you're
aware
that
also
sometimes
come
in
tension
with
what
we're
trying
to
develop.
So
we
would
be
dealing
with
those
standards
together
during
development
review
at
this
point
in
time,
putting
a
maximum
road
width
in
a
land
use
code
generally
isn't
where
we
deal
with
that
question.
A
D
Thanks,
I
think
you
were
had
some
good
ideas
mayor
about
allowing
more
flexibility.
Yes,
we
don't
we're,
not
gonna.
D
No
city
is
going
to
allow
a
road
standard
to
flex
below
anything,
that's
safe
or
required,
but
there's
there's
a
lot
of
details
in
this
east
main
overlay
or
district,
and
so
I
I
think
that
if
we
allowed
other
flexibility
and
just
kept
as
a
catch-all
within
the
departures,
then
that
could
be
negotiated
at
the
time
and-
and
it's
not
like
it
doesn't
then
come
back
to
the
council,
because
da's
do
so.
D
If
there's
the
better
solution
that
maybe
gets
us
more
affordable
housing
or
provides
better
safety
for
ped
bike,
that's
not
strictly
compliant
with
the
land
use
code,
as
we
will
adopt
it.
I'd
like
the
opportunity
for
the
developer
and
the
city
staff
to
negotiate
that
out
because
remember
in
order
to
have
a
departure
under
development
agreement,
it
has
to
add
more
public
benefit
than
the
code
as
it
stands
at
that
time.
So
we
could
get
a
better
solution
with
more
flexibility
if
we
add
a
catch-all
of
or
other
east
main
standards.
D
I
was,
I
wouldn't
say
all
the
standards
in
the
land
use
code,
but
other
standards
in
the
east
main
district.
I
would
be
open
to
that.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
way
to
go,
so
I
I
so
if
people
are
interested,
I
could
make
that
motion,
but
it
could
be
for
things
like
you
stated
mayor.
W
X
You
let
me
before
I
understand
your
question.
Councilman
barcelona,
you
mean
the
development
agreement
why
it
comes
to
council
procedurally.
W
X
And
other
staff
can
weigh
in
here
as
well.
So
first
of
all,
the
development
agreement
is
something
that
we
have
elsewhere
in
the
land
use
code.
That
is
usually
for
departures
for
specific
areas.
So
it's
a
fairly
constrained
in
where
it
is
applied.
We
don't
have
a
kind
of
a
as
suggested
here,
there's
kind
of
a
broader
ability
to
essentially
depart
from
the
code.
That
creates
a
lot
of
uncertainty
too.
X
What
I
think,
when
you
do
that
there
would
be
a
significant
amount
of
additional
work
if
it's
kind
of
more
wide
open
and
what
can
and
can't
be
negotiated.
So
that's
can
be
a
good
thing.
It
also
can
create
some
turmoil.
I
guess
in
the
process,
as
we
try
to
deal
with
the
development
as
it's
being
advanced,
so
other
staff
members
is
from
a
procedural
standpoint,
having
a
much
broader
development
agreement
option
any
thoughts
feedback
from
the
council
on
that.
AB
Hey
hey
mike,
this
is
mack,
I
think
I'll
jump
in
just
quickly
on
this
concept.
One
of
the
main
things
that
the
council
has
talked
quite
a
bit
about
is
predictability
and
transparency
in
what
to
expect
in
and
around
land
use
coding
and
districts,
and
the
question
you're
asking
yourselves,
I
think,
is
under
what
circumstances
you
would
want
to
allow
maximum
flexibility
and
you've
discussed
things
around
giving
height
for
housing
if
that's
a
a
new
popular
term,
that's
being
thrown
out
there.
AB
So
the
idea
of
setting
some
parameters
under
which
you
would
allow
deviation
from
the
code
to
continue
that
predictability
and
have
a
very
streamlined
development
review
process
from
an
economic
development
standpoint
has
been
a
pretty
important
concept
that
you've
all
promoted.
You
know
in
the
past,
so
I
think
the
question
of
what
types
of
public
benefits
you
would
get
and
why
you
would
want
to
open
a
bigger
net
is
a
question
that
I
think
you're
asking
yourselves
right
now.
AB
You've
all
specifically
mentioned
height
and
some
of
the
non-conforming
uses
and
then
specifically
mentioned
we'd
want
to
get
affordable,
housing
at
least
one,
but
some
potential
other
other
benefits.
As
well,
I'm
not
sure
through
all
of
this
we've
heard
a
lot
about
kind
of
a
catch-all
for
other
things
in
the
east
main
zoning
code,
but
happy
to
help
you
through
that.
I
think
it's
the
predictability
question
that's
going
to
be
the
most
important
here.
D
Thank
you
yeah.
I
would
just
add
that
the
predictability
is
something
that
benefits
developers,
because
they
know
that
they
what
they
need
to
do
to
come
in
and
just
get
approved
so
and
the
cost
of
a
development
agreement
is
also
paid
for
by
the
developers.
So
it's
only
in
the
case
where
a
developer
sees
that
the
the
code
is
written,
really
doesn't
work
for
the
project
they
want
to
bring
and
the
project
they
want
to
bring
is
a
better
outcome
and
they
need
some
flex.
D
That's
when
da's
happen,
and
so
I
really
am
not
a
fir.
I
mean
I
write
a
lot
of
das
as
a
lawyer,
and
so
I'm
not
really
afraid
of
having
more
flexibility
in
east
maine,
because
I
think
you
can
end
up
with
a
lot
better
outcome
and
you
and
it
has
to
under
state
law.
You
have
to
have
a
public
benefit,
that's
better
than
the
code
as
it
is
as
it
exists.
D
You
know
the
flexibility
outcomes
provides
a
public
benefit,
that's
better
than
the
code,
so
I'm
in
favor,
of
adding
more
flexibility
and-
and
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
just
to
do
so-
to
add
flexibility
to
under
the
east
main
zone
so
from
the
east
main
standards
in
the
east
main
zone
under
the
development
agreement.
Okay,.
R
Yes,
I
would
say
that
we
spent
a
long
time
talking
about
affordable
housing,
whether
it's
rental
or
home
ownership,
and
I
will
just
yet
again
bring
up
that
the
more
we
leave
it
completely
broadly
open.
We
dilute
from
the
very
vision
that
we
have
of
the
hardest
things
to
get.
So
I
would
support
a
more
tailored
piece
where,
if
we're
talking
about
departures
that
support,
affordable,
housing,
rentals
or
homeownership,
then
I'm
interested
in
that.
But
if
it's
a
broad
piece
about
opening
it
to
anything
that
comes
in,
then
it
dilutes
it
too
much
for
me.
U
You
know
I
I
agree
with
what
councilmember
zahn
just
said.
I
I
think
putting
it
just
wide
open
is,
I
think
it's
just
an
invitation
to
maybe
another
year
or
two
of
not
having
this
project
go
forward.
U
I
I
I
understand
what
councilman
robertson
said,
but
I
just,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
flexibility
here.
Already
special
amenity,
you
know,
city
developer,
negotiated
public
benefits
and,
if
there's
something
really
burning,
they
come
up
with,
they
can
come
back
to
us.
I
I
just
don't
think
this
is
the
time
we
need
to
just
open
this
up,
because
I,
I
just
think
I
don't
think
it's
necessary.
V
Thank
you.
My
concern
is
that
the
developer,
when
they
maybe
find
the
situation
where
they
cannot
do
it
economically,
if
they
don't
have
the
flexibility,
then
we
lose
whole
opportunity
of
getting
the
amenity
we
want,
and
I
believe
that
you
know
we
all
agree
on.
V
What's
the
benefit
the
city
going
to
get,
we
want
warehousing
all
that
stuff
and
ultimately,
if
they
don't
do
it
they're
going
to
come
back
to
us
anyway,
because,
as
counselor
robertson
said,
we
are
the
one
that's
going
to
approve
it
after
they
come
back
to
us,
negotiate
and
it
has
to
be
more
abandoned,
has
to
be
better
than
what
was,
and
so
we
are
still
in
the
driver's
seat.
The
only
thing
is
we're
allowing
them
to
have
the
flexibility
based
on
the
market
situation,
conditions
of
economy,
and
they
can
do
it.
V
If
we
don't
they're
not
going
to
build
it,
we're
going
to
sit
there
with
pieces
of
empty
land
and
nothing's
happening.
So
we
want
to
see
it
done.
We
want
to
see
the
benefits,
let's
trust
them,
give
them
the
flexibility,
and
if
they,
you
know,
have
the
conditions
where
they
can
do
it.
Why
why
wouldn't
they?
Why
wouldn't
they
and
that's
where
we'll
get
the
project
we
can
get
our
benefits
everybody's
happy.
A
D
To
just
add
a
clarifying
comment
so
about
in
response
to
the
comment
about
dilution,
the
benefits
versus
the
departures.
So
all
I'm
asking
I'm
not
asking
to
change
the
public
benefits
which
would
be
the
standard
of
affordable
housing,
which
is,
if
you
guys
remember
when
we
had
that
crossroads
da,
come
forward,
and
I
said,
wait
a
second
there's,
no
affordable
housing
in
this
as
a
public
benefit.
I
don't
want
to
move
forward
unless
we
have
it,
and
the
council
supported
that.
D
D
What
I'm,
what
my
motion
speaks
to
is
the
departures,
because
the
departure
list
right
now
is
very
limited
and
so
having
it
be
a
little
bit
broader
to
other
performance
standards
in
the
east.
Maine
chapter
allows
there
to
be
other
departures
for
in
exchange
for
the
public
benefits
like
affordable
housing
or
other
negotiated
benefits.
D
So
if
they
wanted
to
say
bring
in
a
whole
bunch
of
40
ami
housing
that
and
they
wanted
to
move
height
around
or
they
wanted
to
have
different
block
lengths-
and
you
know
we
could
decide-
the
council
can
decide
after
a
public
hearing
that
we
think
that
that's
a
good
thing
and
to
me
that
beats
having
them
come
back
and
ask
for
a
land
use
code
amendment.
D
So
we
can
go
through
this
process
for
another
three
years,
it's
very
specific
to
the
project,
and
so
I
I'm
going
to
support
the
motion
and
I
hope
my
council
colleagues
will
as
well,
because
the
benefits
we
get
to
decide
if
it's
enough
of
a
benefit,
that's
totally
in
the
council.
It's
just.
We
allow
the
staff
and
the
stake
and
the
property
owner
to
negotiate
on
a
broader
list
of
menu
items
thanks.
V
A
A
D
It
would
allow
a
development
agreement
to
have
departures
from
the
east
maine.
You
know,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
Land
use
code
in
exchange
for
public
benefits
of
affordable
housing
or
other
city
developer,
negotiated
public
benefits.
So
it's
just
flexing
those
standards
that
are
specific
to
east
maine,
because
I
don't
know
what
specific
thing
might
be.
The
thing
that
keeps
a
project
from
happening
and,
like
I
said
we
get
a
better
outcome
because
we
get
to
decide
if
the
public
benefit
is
offered
is
adequate
enough.
D
U
U
Some
response
from
staff
on
that,
I'm
I'm
I'm
trying
to
get
there.
I
think
that
that
makes
some
sense,
but
I'd
just
like
to
have
a
little
bit
more
open
discussion
about
it.
X
So
I
I
think
it
it
is
a
balancing
act.
It
does
open
things
up
to
fairly
broad
negotiation,
which
can
take
significant
amounts
of
the
significant
amount
of
time,
depending
on
what
it
is.
So
again,
remembering
council
that
da's
do
has
already
been
mentioned,
come
to
the
council
for
final
approval.
X
AB
Yeah,
hey
mike,
I
might
add,
also
councilmember
stokes.
One
thing
that
I
am
thinking
about
as
you're
all
having
this
conversation
is
depending
on
the
breadth
of
something
that
might
happen
in
this
hypothetical
situation.
AB
There
could
be
an
issue
with
compliance
with
the
city's
comp
plan
and
we
would
need
to
be
able
to
give
you
some
advice
about
how
that
process
would
work.
Should
some
developer
come
in
and
propose
a
project
that
eliminates
a
number
of
development
standards
and
then
makes
the
project
non-compliant
with
the
comp
plan,
because
there's
always
a
foundational
assumption
that
any
land
use
code
is
consistent
with
the
comp
plan.
R
R
X
So,
there's
a
significant
amount
of
discretion
in
what's
considered
a
public
benefit,
but
things
like
affordable
housing,
enhancing
the
wetlands,
providing
additional
public
space
or
open
space
public
art.
There
are
a
number
of
things
that
could
be
identified
as
public
benefit.
I
mean
the
amenities
that
we
have
listed
are
examples
of
public
benefits,
so
it
is
really.
There
is
some
fairly
broad
discretion
about
that.
I
guess
the
the
one
one
more,
I
guess
concern
I
would
express
without
any
parameters
around
what
can
be
negotiated.
X
It
does
get
to
be
a
little
tricky
from
the
staff's
perspective
at
deciding
what
is
and
isn't
on
the
table.
From
the
council's
perspective,
when
we
get
into
a
negotiation
like
that,
so
having
some
boundaries
is
generally
helpful
and
the
code
normally
provides
those.
So
this
is
a
fairly
broad
approach.
I'm
not
out
of
the
question
that
we
couldn't
manage
it,
but
it
would
add
some
additional
challenge.
R
So
I
would
just
say
for
me:
I
would
be
supportive
if
we
were
talking
about
departures
strictly
supporting
affordable
housing,
which
is
what
we
have
spent
the
bulk
of
our
time
in
the
last
few
meetings.
Talking
about
in
this
particular
area.
A
Councilmember
robertson,
would
you
restate
your
motion?
Sorry,
can
you
do
that.
D
Yeah
I
mean
if
I
had
a
list
of
all
the
standards
I
could
pick
and
choose,
but
but
as
far
as
expanding
this,
but
my
motion
was
to
allow
departures
for
the
standards
within
the
east
main
chapter
of
the
code
for
public
benefits
such
as
affordable
housing
and
other
city
developer,
negotiated
public
benefits,
so
it
would
allow
more
flexibility
and
I'll
just
if,
since
you
asked
me
to
speak
I'll
I'll,
just
add
one
thing
and
the
discussion
about
allowing
this
city-wide,
I
think
we
should.
I
think
we
should
adopt
a
development
agreement.
D
I've
been
saying
this
for
six
or
eight
years.
I
think
we
should
have
a
development
agreement
chapter
in
the
bellevue
land
use
code
that
allows
flexibility,
particularly
for
benefits
like
affordable
housing
and
a
long
flexibility
and
obviously,
if
it's
not
compliant
with
the
comp
plan
staff,
wouldn't
support
it.
It
would
have
a
problem
with
cipa
and
the
council
wouldn't
support
it.
So
I
think
that
that's
a
bit
of
sophistry
there,
but
anyway,
that's
that's
the
content
of
my
motion.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
Y
Be
council
member
barcelona
would
be
very
similar
to
the
land
use
code.
Amendments
that's
in
front
of
you
before
and
and
your
time
during
the
planning
commission
sort
of
similar
to
that
it
would
be
something
that
would
be
initiated
by
council
staff
would
be,
would
develop
that
amendment
to
add
or
remove
these
certain
provisions
in
the
departures
section
of
the
development
agreement
section
and
you
know
bring
that
through
planning,
commission
and
potential
then
back
to
council.
Y
So
it
really
is,
you
know
it's
as
straightforward
or
as
complicated
as
that.
A
normal
land
use
could
amendment
process.
B
W
A
Hard
to
know,
okay,
council
member
stokes.
U
Yeah
just
one
comment
on
this
too:
I
I
like
the
proposal
that
councilman
robertson
put
out
there,
but
it
seems
to
me
if
this
is
something
that
would
be
good
for
us
to
change.
U
City-Wide
taking
a
specific
action
on
one
area
is
kind
of
already
having
that
conversation
and
and
pointing
us
in
a
direction
without
actually
having
the
conversation
for
the
city.
What
I'm
saying
is
this
will
set
a
precedent
and
I
I
don't
think
that's.
This
is
not
the
appropriate
way
to
set
that,
and
if
we,
if
seriously,
we
need
to
redo
the
whole
code
in
this
fashion.
We
should
do
it
that
way
and
I
don't
think
kind
of
buzz.
U
I
I
I
think
what
we
have
in
here
in
the
green
and
for
that
will
give
them
ample
any
any
developer
ample
opportunity
to
work.
This
out,
I
mean
special
non-conforming
special
amenities.
All
these,
I
think,
they're
just
a
lot
of
things
already
in
here
and
we're
just
adding
some
language,
that's
going
to
confuse
it
and
I
think
it
will
end
up
a
lot
of
delays
just
because
it's
there
and
enticing.
A
D
I
I
and
I
I
agree-
I
I
think
we
made
it
pretty
clear
to
staff
when
the
last
da
came
forward,
that
if
it
didn't
have
affordable
housing,
we
weren't
going
to
do
a
d.a.
So
I
I
think
that
if
we're
going
to
have
this
be
more
flexible,
it
should
be
affordable,
housing
and
obviously
so,
and
I
would
if
I
think,
deputy
mayor
seconded
by
motion
if
it's
acceptable
to
him.
I'll,
add
that
to
my
motion.
D
A
V
Q
A
Of
councilmember
robertson's
motion
say
I
I
guess
I'm
gonna
have
to
call
on
you,
I'm
so
sorry
hold
on.
Let
me
get
my
little
list.
B
AA
E
U
A
Okay,
one
two
three
four:
okay,
so
that
passes
for
three
okay.
So
now,
is
there
any
reason
to
look
at
the
stakeholder
requests
down
here?
I
just
look
at
it
and
let
me
know
if
there's
a
motion
to
address
those
or
not
okay,
so
we'll
leave
this
as
it
is.
Okay.
Is
there
anything
staff?
Is
there
anything
else
that
we
have
not
covered
that
you
would
like
us
to
make
an
official
direction
on.
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
right.
It
is
9
28
we
have
the
aquatics
update.
Mr
miyake.
Is
there
any?
I
don't
want
to
rush
this,
but
we
also
you
know
it's
a
long
night.
Is
there
any
room
in
our
schedule
coming
up
to
put
this.
P
A
All
right
we
will
power
through
then,
why
don't
you
introduce
this
one?
Please
sure.
P
P
Just
by
way
of
background
at
the
august
3rd
2020
meetings,
council,
director
staff
to
continue
work
on
developing
the
facility
recommended
concept
plan,
as
well
as
identifying
public
private
partnership
opportunities,
recommending
a
preferred
site,
as
well
as
identifying
financial
strategies.
Tonight's
staff
seeks
direction
with
regard
to
these
steps,
and
so
I
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
michael
shihasaki,
the
director,
as
well
as
ken
kruger,
our
project
manager
parks
and
community
services.
They've
been
warned
in
advance
that
you
know
time
is.
P
We
are
running
short
on
time,
so
we'll
try
to
get
through
the
presentation
as
efficient
as
possible.
Michael.
AC
Great
thank
you,
city
manager,
miyake
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
members
of
the
city
council,
I'm
michael
shiasaki,
and
tonight
we
return
with
an
update
on
the
aquatic
center
feasibility
study,
and
I
have
heard
brevity
is
a
gift
here,
so
we
will
try
to
move
through
this
very
quickly.
So
next
slide.
Please.
AC
So
this
evening
park
staff
seek
direction
on
a
preferred
concept
plan
for
the
aquatics
facility,
a
preferred
site
and
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
a
partnership
opportunity,
so
next
slide
ken.
AC
AC
So,
very
briefly,
on
the
background,
so
you
know:
bellevue's
history
with
public
pools
goes
back
to
1968
in
the
king
county
forward
thrust
bond
at
that
point,
16
pools
were
built
throughout
the
region
and
including
bellevue's
odell
pool
less
than
half
of
those
pools
are
still
in
operation
and
really
are
approaching
the
end
of
their
typical
lifespans
and
and
a
point
here.
No
new
public
pools
have
been
built
in
bellevue
in
over
30
years,
so
in
2017
with
renewed
regional
interest,
including
the
formation
of
splash
forward.
AC
AC
AC
Momentum
council
asked
the
staff
to
continue
to
work
with
splash
forward
to
develop
a
single
preferred
aquatics
facility
concept
plan,
identify
potential,
private
and
public
partnership
opportunities,
identify
a
preferred
site
for
the
aquatic
facility
and
develop
financial
strategies
to
support
moving
the
project
forward,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
over
the
presentation
to
ken
crager
to
cover
the
preferred
concept
plan
and
the
preferred
site,
thanks
kim.
AA
Thank
you
michael.
Yes,
as
mike
was
saying
that
city
staff
and
splash
ford
have
worked
together
to
develop
this
single
unified
concept
plan.
It's
the
we're
recommending
a
contemporary
state-of-the-art
facility
that
meets
the
aquatic
needs
of
not
only
bellevue's
community,
but
all
our
potential
partner
groups
in
a
place
that
promotes
community
health
and
wellness.
AA
AA
So
these
as
you've
seen
before
in
the
past,
the
go
big
or
go
home
scenario.
The
key
program
elements
include
the
50
meter
pool
with
movable
bulkheads
the
separate
deep
water
tank.
The
therapy
and
wellness
pool
a
lesson
in
program
pool
and
leisure
pool
amenities,
while
on
the
dry
side,
spaces
are
included
to
support
both
the
aquatic
programming
and
the
community
use,
including
cardio
fitness
spaces,
flexible
community
use
rooms,
lobby
and
spectator
seating.
We
want
to
note
that
the
spectator
sitting
is
900
capacity
in
the
stands
at
720
on
a
deck.
AA
And
for
our
preferred
site,
when
we
presented
to
the
council
previously,
we
were
directed
that
the
preference
would
be
to
remove
two
of
the
project
sites
at
marymore
and
lincoln's
center,
and
the
preference
was.
The
new
facility
would
be
either
at
bellevue
college
or
bellevue
airfield
park
unless,
if
there's
some
other
identified
site
within
the
city
limits
that
we
could
find,
we
need
approximately
10
to
11
acres
for
a
development
of
this
size
for
an
aquatic
center
available
acquisition,
property
opportunities.
AA
Large
enough
to
support
this
kind
of
facility
have
have
been
reviewed,
but
the
cost
of
property
and
limited
parcels
in
the
market
of
this
size
have
made
acquisition.
The
costliest
and
least
preferred
option
and
staff
has
been
working
with
bellevue
college
on
a
regular
basis
throughout
the
past
month
year
and
we've
been
trying
to
come
up
with
a
partnership
with
bellevue
college,
the
college
site
offers
potential
opportunities
of
access
and
a
prominent
location
off
of
I-90.
That's
served
well
by
public
transportation.
AA
The
site
is
large
enough
at
27
acres
to
completely
incorporate
the
new
aquatic
center,
and
we've
been
working
with
our
engineering
and
master
planning
teams
to
develop
to
refine
our
cost
premiums
associated
with
the
landfill
and
making
the
airfield
park.
The
most
economically
feasible
choice
so
are
saying
the
site
is
large
enough
to
have
the
preferred
concept
plan
and
the
parking
can
be
met
in
combination
of
new
and
on-site
parking
by
using
the
shared
parking
agreement
with
adjacent
properties,
as
well
as
introducing
and
integrating
the
new
aquatic
center
into
the
airfield
park.
AA
Development
could
offer
expanded
outdoor
recreational
opportunities
that
are
not
located
in
any
of
the
other
sites
and
there's
still
very
good
access
from
I-90
there's,
limited
traffic
impacts
to
the
adjacent
neighborhood
and
there's
adequate
transit
services
in
the
area.
With
that
said,
I'll
turn
this
back
to
michael.
Thank
you.
AC
Thanks
ken
so
moving
on
to
potential
partnerships,
so
we've
begun
the
work
to
explore
partnerships
and
sponsorships
both
private
and
public
agencies,
to
construct
and
operate
an
an
aquatic
facility
who
share
our
common
interests.
Partnership
development
will
require
further
work
with
the
following
groups,
and
this
is
this
is
definitely
not
comprehensive.
At
this
point,
the
bellevue
school
district
continues
to
support
the
city's
endeavor
to
develop
the
aquatic
center
to
help
meet
the
needs
of
their
competitive
aquatics
programs
and
is
exploring
capital
funding
options.
AC
City
staff
and
splash
forward
have
worked
to
develop
a
single
preferred
concept
plan
that
you
just
saw
a
moment
ago
and
we've
also
worked
to
communicate.
Aquatics
needs
concepts
and
engagement.
Potential
funding
partners,
as
you've
heard
splash
forward,
is
a
non-profit
aquatic
advocacy
organization.
AC
The
organization's
mission
is
to
provide
our
community
with
an
inclusive
year-round
aquatic
health
and
wellness
facility
with
affordable
access
to
aquatic
programming,
so
that
every
everyone
can
be
safe
in
the
water.
Drownings
are
prevented
and
community
connections
are
fostered
and
everyone
can
enjoy
a
lifetime
of
healthy
lifestyle
opportunities.
AC
The
organization
is
willing
to
partner
with
the
city
and
commit
to
a
fundraising
effort
to
help
garner
the
capital
funding
necessary
to
build
the
aquatic
center
preferred
concept.
Plan
staff
is
recommending
the
city
and
splash
forward
develop
a
memorandum
of
understanding
to
capture
our
mutual
interests.
AC
AC
Here
are
our
kind
of
suggested
or
recommended
next
steps
first
is
putting
together
this
partnership
agreement
with
splash
forward
than
initiating
a
master
plan
update
at
bellevue
airfield
park
and
in
doing
that,
engaging
the
community
to
consider,
including
an
aquatics
facility
at
the
site,
next
contracting
for
architectural
engineering
and
environmental
services
to
support
the
master
plan
update
and
last
but
not
least,
continuing
to
pursue
partnerships
and
planning
grant
opportunities
next
slide,
please.
AC
A
Salient
presentation:
that's
perfect!
Okay!
Let
me
take
a
look
at
everybody,
so
yeah
leave
that
slide
up,
please,
so
that
we
can
look
at
the
direction
that
you're
asking
for
us.
Is
it
up,
michael?
Maybe
it's
just
my
view
can.
Could
you
pull
that
up
again.
AA
A
There
we
go
okay,
all
right,
so
why
don't
we
let
everybody
weigh
in
I'm
going
to
start
with
councilmember
robertson.
D
Thank
you,
I'm
so
excited
to
have
this
on
our
agenda
and
I
would
point
out
that
that
photograph
is
the
the
woman
in
that
photograph
is
the
first
black
olympic
gold
medal,
female
swimmer
for
the
united
states,
so
she's?
That's.
I
love
that
picture.
She's.
A
terrific
person
and
she's
been
really
actively
involved
with
the
usa.
D
Swimming
foundation,
make
a
splash
which
is
all
about
making
sure
that
people,
and
particularly
children,
are
not
drowning,
and
so
I
wanted
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
before
I
ask
questions
a
couple
of
questions.
As
we
get
more
dense,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
more
amenities,
including
things
like
aquatic
centers
and
parks
and
trails
and
as
we've
been
focusing
more
on
equity,
and
we
had
some
public
comments
about
that.
D
I
just
wanted
to
share
some
equity
data
about
swimming
and
children
and
drowning
79
of
children
in
households
with
incomes
under
50.
000
have
little
to
no
swimming
ability.
Research
shows
that
64
of
african-american
45
of
hispanic,
latino
and
40
of
caucasian
children
have
little
to
no
swimming
ability.
D
10
people
drown
in
the
united
states
every
single
day
of
the
year.
Formal
swimming
lessons
is
one
of
is
the
number
one
way
to
reduce
the
likelihood
of
childhood
drowning.
It
reduces
it
by
88
and
it's
the
number
one
cause
of
death
of
children
under
five
and
number
two
for
children.
Five
to
fourteen
for
accidental
death.
D
Most,
I
would
say
that
most
of
the
pools
in
bellevue's,
except
for
the
small
bellevue
aquatic
center,
are
private
clubs,
which
are
aging
outdoor
summer
only
for
most
and
can
be
costly
to
join
and
many
capped
the
total
membership.
They
are
not
open
and
accessible
to
all
members
of
the
public.
D
We
have
a
two-year
backlog
of
people
needing
swimming
lessons
and
we
have
a
lot
of
people
we're
a
majority
minority
city
people
coming
from
all
over
the
world
who
may
not
know
how
to
swim.
We
live
between
two
lakes
or
our
city
is
located
between
two
lakes
and
I
don't
want
to
see
another
summer
where
children
are
drowning
in
bellevue.
The
pools
that
we
have
that
are
existing
in
bellevue
do
not
meet
the
needs
of
our
high
schools.
D
They
do
not
meet
the
needs
of
the
club
swimmers;
they
do
not
meet
the
needs
of
master
swimming,
let
alone
things
like
special
olympics
and
king
ko
champs
for
the
high
schools
and
even
mid-lakes
champs,
which
is
the
local
swimming
summer
league.
So
we
also
have
a
shortage
of
lifeguards
because
there's
not
enough
space
to
train
lifeguards,
which
leads
to
us
closing
facilities
and
it
leads
to
reduced
safety.
D
So
I
really
am
feel
very
passionate
about
this
and-
and
let
me
just
say
for
staff's
purposes,
yes
on
the
preferred
concept
plan,
yes
on
the
preferred
site,
big
big,
yes
on
the
partnership
opportunity
and
thank
you
splash
forward
for
being
such
a
great
partner
to
us.
We
really
can't
run
this
city
and
make
it
as
livable
as
we
have
and
will
continue
to
do
so
without
partnerships
like
splash
forward
without
our
business
community,
etc.
So
my
questions
for
the
master
planning
process.
I
would
like
to
see
this
be
expedited.
D
I'm
wondering
when
it
will
go
to
the
parks
board
for
remaster
planning,
I'm
hoping
the
answer
is
first
quarter
2022
and
then
the
second
question
is
on
funding
whether
the
750
000
to
keep
this
moving
forward
is
already
appropriated
or
whether
we
need
to
appropriate
that
in
the
mid
by
and
I'm
and
the
one
list
of
funding
options.
That
was
not
on
the
slide.
I
would
look
this
up
in
the
statutes.
Today
is
real
estate.
Excise
tax
we've
had
a
lot
of
big
trades
in
bellevue
this
year.
D
I
don't
know
what
our
real
estate
excise
tax
projection
is,
but
we
can
use
that
for
parks
and
rec
facilities,
including
planning.
So
if
we
don't
have
the
funds
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
look
at
that
in
the
mid-buy,
if
we
need
the
funds
so
michael
or
or
whomever
would
can,
would
you
address
my
questions
so
master
plan,
timing
and
funding?
Do
you
we
need
to
do
something,
and
I
guess
those
are
really
the
two
thanks.
D
AC
You
know
I'd
say
we.
We
haven't
scheduled
this
yet
waiting
for
this
evening,
but
you
know,
I
think
we
try
to
start
master
planning
sometime
early
next
year.
I
think
in
terms
of
the
funding
you
know
right
now,
I've
been
working
with
the
finance
director
and
we've
been
looking
at
options
to
to
put
together
that
funding
package,
and
so
I
think,
there's
several
options
on
the
table
and
we're
hoping
to
get
that
worked
out
really
quickly.
So.
AC
You
know,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
going
to
come
through.
D
AC
U
Right,
I
appreciate
that
very
much
and
I
want
to
just
say
I
totally
echo
everything
that
councilman
robertson
said.
This
is
a
we've
been
working
on
this
a
long
time,
and
I
I
everything
you
said
I,
I
agree,
it's
a
great
concept,
it's
a
great
site
and
we
have
all
kinds
of
partnership,
opportunities
and
staff
and
and
other
people
working.
This
has
done
a
fantastic
job,
and
so
I'm
really
excited
about
it
and
there's
not
much
else
to
say,
except
that
we
need
to
do
this
and
move
forward.
U
I
like
the
idea
of
looking
into
the
read,
and
I
did
want
to
say
that
I,
I
think
particularly
you
know
finding
spaces
and
everything
sometimes
is
it's
a
hard
thing
to
do,
and
sometimes
it
just
kind
of
comes
together,
and
this
one
did
because
this
is
the
place
it
should
be.
When
you
look
at
everything
else,
you
know
jennifer.
U
We
just
should
have
thought
about
this
at
first
and
said:
okay,
this
is
it
but,
and
I
I'm
back
when
I
was
working
pta
ptsa
and
all
I
was
involved
with
original
splash
at
that
time
and
that's
what
20
20
years
ago
or
something-
and
it's
just
so
exciting-
to
see
this.
But
what
is
exciting
is
this
is
a
fantastic
proposal
and
something
we
can
do,
because
when
we
were
first
looking
at
these,
we
saw
little
cities
smaller
than
us
doing
these
big
things
and
was
kind
of
like
well.
U
We
can't
do
that,
but
we
can
have
a
larger
pool.
So
getting
to
this
is
is
really
great
and
I
totally
agree,
as
I
said,
that
airfield
park
is
the
place
to
be
in
this
and
remember.
U
We
called
it
airfield
park
because
there
was
an
airfield
close
by
and
we
when
it
finally
gets
it's
put
together,
and
I
don't
know
if
they
put
the
sign
up
yet,
but
one
of
the
reasons
we
wanted
to
do
this,
particularly
because
there
was
a
female
woman
of
pilot
who
was
one
of
the
pioneer
women
pilots
in
the
in
the
country
and
she
flew
out
of
there.
So
it
has
a
lot
of
history
there
and
it's
so
it's
located.
U
U
It's
not
intruding
on
and
their
ways
to
you
know,
handle
the
crowds
and
everything
not
intruding
on
the
neighborhood,
and
it's
it's
just
kind
of
like
it's
tailor-made,
and
this
is
this
was
meant
to
happen
and,
as
I
said
at
the
very
least
when
we
talked
on
this,
my
favorite
motto
is:
go
big
or
go
home,
and
this
is
one
that
we
are
going
to
go.
Big,
so
I'm
excited
about
it.
It's
nice.
A
A
That
pilot
that
you
reference
her
dad
owned
the
airfield
oh
yeah
and
she
was
a.
She
was
a
flight
instructor
during
world
war
ii
and
I
think
she
raised
her
family
in
view
crest,
yeah.
E
Mayor
yeah
I'll
just
echo,
my
colleagues
there
just
quickly,
but
first
michael
and
ken
thanks
for
the
great
presentation
and
absolutely
love
the
plan,
the
site
and
the
opportunity
here,
so
nothing
but
love
for
the
project
and
happy
to
move
this
forward.
This
is
going
to
be
something
special
for
for
bellevue
and
I'm
so
proud
to
be
a
part
of
it
right
now.
This
is
going
to
be
really
really
special.
So
thank
you.
C
R
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
think
it's
an
exciting
time
for
a
state
of
the
art
aquatic
center
love,
the
motto
water
for
all
water
for
life,
and
I
appreciate
splash
forward
for
your
continual
efforts
and
partnership,
and
I
also
understand
the
anxiousness
of
the
team
to
get
going
and
make
progress
and,
as
my
fellow
colleagues
have
talked
about,
to
go
big,
I
compl.
I
am
completely
on
board
with
the
concept
plan
in
talking
to
staff.
It
sounds
like
this
is
the
medium
size
that
we
had
talked
about
when
the
concepts
came.
R
It
was
kind
of
the
small
medium
large,
so
that
was
my
understanding.
I
did
have
a
question
about
the
recommended
site
and
maybe
without
the
history
some
things
talked
about.
I
don't
completely
understand
because,
when
I
think
about
a
project
of
this
size,
I'm
not
sure
I
completely
understand
what
happened
with
bellevue
college
and
why
that
was
a
site
that
we
chose
not
to
continue
discussion
and
negotiation
with
and
the
main
reason
I'm
asking.
R
This
question
is
because,
when
I
think
about
accessibility
and
transportation
choices
to
get
to
airfield
park
and
transit
as
a
regional
place,
where
we're
going
to
have
lots
of
swimmers
coming,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
how
accessible
the
location
really
is,
especially
from
an
equity
standpoint
of
folks
that
may
not
be
coming
in
by
car.
So
can
you
help
me
understand
what
happened
with
bellevue
college?
It
seemed
like
that
was
a
location
that
would
have
been
right
next
to
where
light
rail
was
going
to
be
coming
in.
It
has
great
transit.
R
We've
been
talking
about
a
bellevue
college
connection
that
would
make
that
even
easier
and
accessible
to
get
to.
So
I
just
have
about
that
for
me
completely
supportive
of
the
preferred
plan
and
the
partnership
and
at
mou,
with
splash
forward
for
looking
at
fundraising
feasibility
plan,
refining
the
finances
and
the
operating
plan
applying
for
planning
grants.
R
The
location
is
the
one
that
I'm
just
somehow.
I
think
I'm
missing
a
couple
of
of
dots
and
how
we
got
to
this
point.
AC
Sure
I'd
be
happy
to
michael.
A
AC
Sure-
and
I
will
try
to
be
brief
again
so
you
know
I
I'd
say
councilmembers
on
that.
We
we
spent
over
a
year
in
monthly
meetings
with
the
college,
and
I
I
think
we
both
came
into
it
very
open-minded
about
the
potentials
of
the
bellevue
college
site.
I
would
say
you're
right
that
slightly
better
transit
access
and
visibility.
AC
I
think,
though,
in
having
slightly
different
missions
in
terms
of
parks
and
recreation
and
the
city
being
more
focused
on
fitness
and
recreation
and
overall
health
and
wellness,
the
college's
mission
is
probably
focused
more
obviously
on
on
education,
and
I
think
when
it
came
down
to
it,
you
know
their
needs
for
future
growth
related
to
that
educational
mission,
probably
drove
the
issue
of
keeping
them
whole
on
parking.
AC
So
in
other
words,
we
would
then
need
to
build
a
significant
parking
garage
that
comes
with
a
significant
price
tag
along
with
meeting
some
of
their
needs
for
things
like
a
gymnasium
as
a
part
of
it
that
just
continued
to
add
to
costs
that
we
wouldn't
have
at
the
site
at
airfield
park.
Where
I'll
say
you
know,
for
the
most
part,
we
control
our
destiny,
a
bit
more
than
at
the
college
site.
AC
R
R
G
A
V
Well,
this
is
something
that's
coming
in
long
time.
When
I
first
got
to
the
council,
we
have
a
council
member
chris
seaton,
I
think
she's
a
very
early
person
that
start
the
splash.
I
remember
the
name
is
also
splash,
so
I'm
really
glad
that,
because
of
the
merit
of
the
project
and
his
insistence
a
lot
of
people
supporting
it,
it's
continued
and
the
timing.
The
timing
is
right.
V
You
know
when
everybody
is
when
king
khan
is
getting
rid
of
their
swimming
pool
and
they
want
to
get
out
of
the
old
pool,
and
you
know
and
bellevue
took
on
it
and
we
took
on
the
cause
of
maintaining
it.
We
turn
into
a
very
wonderful
amenity.
You
know
service
for
our
people
who
need
it.
You
know
warm
water,
too
means
for
people
who
have
you
know
medical
conditions,
you
know,
and
young
people
can
use
it,
so
it
has
proven
to
be
very,
very
beneficial.
V
Of
course
you
know
that's
used
for
a
different
purpose,
so
I
believe
that
we
are
at
the
point.
You
know
we
have
grown,
we
have
become
world-class
and
I
think,
with
the
need
and
the
as
being
articulated
by
you
know
almost
everybody
that
it's
time
for
something
like
this.
You
know
in
our
region.
You
know,
you
know
we
have
a
factual
way
that
you
know
swimming
pool,
but
that's
way
out
there
and
that's
why
I've
developed
a
lot
of
talents.
I
think
that's
all
good
stuff.
V
I
appreciate
you
know
the
staff,
the
contour,
the
detail
and
all
that,
and
I
believe
that
the
concept
we
have
now
is
a
very
good
one,
and
the
question
I
have
is
you
know
the
cost.
I
heard
that
the
bellevue
college
versus
afu
park
and
because
the
you
know,
the
initial
reason
is
what
cost
too
much
money,
and
so,
when
you
look
at
the
site,
somebody
actually
you
know
the
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
suggested.
V
You
know
because
it
used
to
be
a
landfill
and
all
that
it
may
have
some
considerations
of
whether
the
cost
would
be
what
we
anticipated
to
be.
How
do
they
compare
so?
I
would
like
to
have
the
staff
take
a
better
look
at.
You
know
the
condition
of
the
site
and
whatnot,
and
perhaps
we
can
make
some
decisions
comparing
to
what
we
have
to
do
to
make
bellevue
college
site
workable
right
now.
The
way
it
is.
V
I
agree
you
know
because
there's
different
mission,
if
that
is
the
case,
I
think
you
know
then
there's
a
good
point
to
make
to
us
to
everybody
that,
because
it's
definition
it
may
not
be
appropriate
and
the
cost
might
not
be
the
primary
driver
right.
If
that's
the
case,
then
yes,
I
would,
I
think
it's
a
very,
very
good
consideration,
but
if
it's
the
cost,
which
is
used
as
a
reason
why
we
pick
one
over
the
other,
then
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
more
about
the
cost.
V
You
know,
and
I
also
thought
that
the
council
members
on
point
of
you
know
who
are
the
client
will
be
serving
well,
that's
another
consideration.
You
know
I
don't
know
I
haven't
heard.
I
think
that
the
staff
might
want
to
look
into
that
a
little
bit
more
right.
So
there's
a
number
of
things:
perhaps
we
need
to
have
a
little
more
detailed
information,
but
I
definitely
like
the
concept
I
like
the
way
it's
designed.
I,
like
the
concept
of
you,
know
talking
about
sports
being
the
universal
activity
they're
being
put
together.
V
You
know
we
just
had
the
olympics
over
and
I
have
you
know
completely
touted
about
sports,
bring
people
together.
Nobody
talk
about,
you
know
whatever
they
come
from,
what
their
background
is,
what
color
they
are.
You
know
it's
just
doing
the
best
they
can
and
everybody's
together.
I
think
this
is
a
good
good
good
thing.
Thank.
AC
Okay,
so
you
know
I,
I
would
say
councilman
really
that
it's
based
on
both
of
those
that
there
are
slightly
different
missions,
but
the
cost
differential
also
plays
into
it.
I
think,
over
the
past
year,
since
we
last
came
to
the
council
in
august,
part
of
what
we
did
in
coming
back
with
a
preferred
site
was
look
at
some
of
the
cost
premiums
that
go
along
with
building
an
aquatic
center
at
or
near
a
landfill,
and
so
even
with
the
cost
premiums.
So
the
additional
costs
we've
had
more
engineering
study
done
over
the
past
year.
AC
The
bellfield
site
is
still
less
expensive
by
about
14
million
dollars
and
so
yeah
that
that's
what
we've
spent
the
last
year
working
on,
and
so
that
so
I
so.
I
think
it
is
based
both
on
the
slightly
different
missions
and
you
know,
hard
hard
dollars
and
cents.
Quite
honestly,.
V
W
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor,
really
excited
about
this
and
also
appreciate
the
the
team
integrating
equity
more
deeply
into
their
content
plan
in
terms
of
council.
W
Remember,
zahn's,
point
in
terms
of
access
to
the
location
and
and
given
that
we're
looking
at
partnerships,
I
have
a
couple
questions:
one
related
to
access:
is
there
an
opportunity
to
partner
with
say,
king
county
transit
to
provide
more
frequent
transit
between
the
east
cape
park
and
ride
and
the
site,
and
then
secondly,
and
has
that
conversation
happen,
and
then,
secondly,
is
the
way
I
kind
of
see
this,
and
let
me
know
if
I'm
wrong
here
is
this
is
kind
of
like
the
relationship
we
have
with
arch
or
the
together
center.
W
AC
So,
first
the
transit
issue:
we
we
haven't
reached
out
to
king
county
metro,
but
we
can
certainly
do
that.
I
think
we've
heard
access
and
we
realize
access
is
a
big
issue
in
terms
of
equity.
So
we
will.
We
will
definitely
reach
out
to
king
county
metro
on
on
that.
AC
In
terms
of
excuse
me,
the
percentage
of
funds,
I
think
we're,
I
think,
we're
still
figuring
that
out.
I
think
you
know,
king
county
has
money
designated
in
their
parks
levy
for
aquatics
facilities,
so
we'll
definitely
be
hitting
up
the
county.
We'll
also
be
looking
at
the
school
district
for
funds
in
terms
of
kind
of
the
public
side,
and
then
I
think
we're
definitely
that's
why,
in
part
we're
working
with
splash
forward
as
they're
going
to
really
help
us
kind
of
on
the
private
side
in
fundraising.
W
Got
together
yeah,
I
think
so
will
that
be
part
of
the
mou,
then
sort
of
that
cost
sharing
percentage,
and
maybe
something
like
a
tiered
approach
where
it's
like
some
percentage
comes
from
outside
the
city
and
some
percentages.
AC
You
know,
I
think
there
are
going
to
be
some
overall
targets
and
goals
within
that
mou
with
splash
forward.
Yes,.
A
A
You
know
as
councilmember
stoke
said
he
and
I
were
both
involved
in
the
original
master
planning
for
that
site,
and
there
were
some
things
that
were
really
important
to
the
community
at
that
time
that
I
would
hate
to
get
rid
of-
and
I
remember
you
know
there-
they
wanted
the
trees
to
be
maintained
and
the
forested
pathways
and
to
have
some.
You
know
wild
grass
with
a
bench
where
you
could
sit
and
just
relax
and
not
not
have
it
all
structured.
A
So
I
hope
that
some
of
those
values
can
be
maintained
as
we
think
about
citing
this
and
airfield
park.
The
original
proposal
from
staff
was
to
have
a
aquatic
facility
there,
so
it's
nice
that
it
gets
another
chance,
because
I
for
one
didn't
realize
how
important
that
was
for
the
community,
and
I
do
now
so
I
do
support
this.
Is
there
a
motion.