►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - June 21, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Well,
welcome
to
the
regular
bellevue
city
council
meeting
for
june
21st
2021
I
have
council
member
lee
is
excu,
wants
to
be
excused
from
the
meeting
tonight.
He
is
not
able
to
attend
and
council
member
robertson
is
going
to
join
us
late.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
excuse
council
member
lee.
A
D
C
D
A
C
G
All
right,
I
wish
to
thank
all
of
the
city,
council,
members
and
city
of
bellevue
staff
for
studying
the
issue
that
I'm
bringing
to
the
council
this
evening,
which
is
a
proposed
revision
to
the
luca
for
sequence,
one.
I
am
arguing
for
the
ability
to
extend
the
boundary
of
the
east
side
center
neighborhood
to
I-405.
G
Currently,
it
extends
under
sequence
1
to
110th,
and
the
purpose
for
this
is
to
allow
my
property
at
712th
to
enjoy
the
transfer
of
far
as
it
relates
to
excess
bonus.
Far
along
the
pedestrian
corridor.
G
Now
known
as
the
grand
connection,
it
seems
like
there's
an
inconsistency
between
the
boundary
for
the
neighborhood,
and
this
proposed
amendment
the
arguments
and
will
be
made
also
by
our
land
use
attorney,
larry
martin,
from
a
code
amendment
perspective,
essentially
the
materials
that
we
had
forwarded
to
the
council
members
outlined,
which
part
of
the
luca
20.2
a
.07,
0
f,
and
just
changing
the
one
detail
of
crossing
out
112th
avenue
and
replacing
that
with
I-405.
G
H
C
H
H
Finally,
on
april
22nd,
washington
state
became
the
first
state
in
the
nation
to
guarantee
a
right
to
counsel
to
low-income
tenants
facing
eviction
ten
weeks
between
april
22nd
and
june.
30Th
is
simply
not
enough
time
to
recruit,
hire
train
and
deploy
enough
eviction.
Defense
attorneys
to
meet
the
massive
need
for
legal
assistance
and
evictions.
H
H
C
I
I'm
addressing
item
12
on
your
agenda,
which
is
proposed
ordinance
6580,
the
grand
connection
landy's
code,
amendment
like
alex.
I'm
asking
you
to
make
one
modification
to
the
ordinance
to
correct
an
error.
I
C
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Can
you
see
me?
Okay,
I'm
on
with
my
computer,
okay.
So
next
up
is
the
report
of
the
city
manager
and
he's
going
to
give
us
an
update
on
the
eviction
moratorium.
A
If
we
have
questions
on
this,
I
would
like
to
direct
you
to
email
him
after
the
meeting
tonight
to
answer
your
questions.
We're
not
going
to
have
discussion
here
on
this,
but
this
is
just
information
only
so
mr
miyake.
J
Thank
you,
mayor
council
members,
and
thank
you
mayor
for
that
quick
introduction.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
brief
status
report
on
the
information
request
that
came
out
of
last
week's
council
meeting
under
council
business
related
to
a
temporary
moratorium,
ordinance
request
on
residential
attendant
evictions
to
bridge
the
resource
gap.
In
the
event,
the
government
does
not
extend
the
statewide
moral
tournament
by
june
30th.
J
At
the
meeting,
these
information
requests
were
essentially
a
legal
analysis
of
the
request
implications
of
such
an
action.
Information
on
the
population
at
risk
for
housing
and
security,
information
about
the
needed
rental
assistance,
as
well
as
resources
to
respond
to
this
need
and
an
assessment
of
the
recent
state
legislation
on
eviction
protections
and
purposes
for
purposes
of
next
week's
council
meeting,
which
is
on
june
28th.
J
The
staff
plan
to
bring
back
draft
ordinance
as
well
as
discuss
with
council
or
legal
analysis,
we'll
also
provide
an
overview
of
the
2021
legislation
related
to
eviction
protections
and
we'll
also
provide
high-level
information.
Responding
to
your
request,
specifically
about
belgium.
That
will
largely
need
to
be
extrapolated
from
information
collected
by
others,
such
as
the
state
and
human
service
providers,
as
well
as
relevant
staff
work
and
information
collected
by
our
mediation
group
mayor.
J
This
is
represents
the
status
report
as
this
this
evening,
and
I
will
conclude
and
look
forward
to
any
questions
after
the
council
meetings
that
the
council
members
may
ask
me.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Next,
we
have
council
business
and
new
initiatives
and
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
one
we
have
tonight.
J
This
next
item
is
under
council.
Business
is,
on
the
best
start
for
kids
levy.
This
one
was
a
request
that
was
made
by
the
council
members
upon
a
presentation
that
was
made
by
king
county
around
a
month
or
two
ago
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
charmaine
arredondo
our
city
clerk,
to
talk
about
some
of
the
the
requirements
for
the
council
to
take
a
position
on
this
particular
levy.
C
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki.
At
this
point
there
is
no
discussion
item
tonight.
The
decision
of
the
council
will
be
to
decide
whether
or
not
to
take
a
position
at
a
future
meeting.
So
if
the
council
wishes
to
take
a
position
at
a
future
meeting,
that
meeting
would
be
july.
12Th
and
state
law
dictates
the
process
and
it
is
laid
out
in
your
agenda
memo.
C
The
county
would
come
and
give
a
factual
presentation
that
pro
and
con
committees
would
be
invited
to
make
equal
would
have
equal
opportunity
to
make
a
presentation
and
then
citizens
would
be
able
to
comment
either
for
or
against
a
ballot
measure,
and
then
the
council
could
vote
on
a
resolution
at
that
time.
A
B
Yes,
there
is
mayor.
I
move
that
on
it
july,
12
2021
regular
meeting
the
council
vote
on
a
resolution
to
take
a
position
on
king
county
proposition
number
one
on
the
primary
election
ballot,
the
regular,
the
regular
property
tax
levy
for
children,
youth
families
and
communities
and
allow
10
minutes
each
for
the
campaign
supporting
and
opposing
the
ballot
measure
to
provide
testimony
and
allow
individuals,
15
minutes
per
side
to
speak
in
favor
and
in
opposition
to
the
ballot
measure.
Each
speaker
to
have
no
more
than
three
minutes
to
speak.
A
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
not
seeing
any
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
K
A
A
J
Dear
mayor,
the
public
hearing
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
for
the
relinquishment
of
a
water
easement
as
a
part
of
a
redevelopment
project
at
13620,
southeast
east
gateway.
L
The
property
is
being
redeveloped
and
our
old
water
line,
which
is
shown
here
in
orange,
highlighting
it
conflicts
with
the
development
plans.
The
property
is
currently
owned
by
king
county.
They
are
in
the
process
of
selling
the
site
to
developers
who
will
construct
low-income
housing,
supportive
housing
and
a
homeless
shelter
on
this
parcel,
the
existing
publicly
owned
water
main
will
be
abandoned
and
the
affordable
housing
developer
will
construct
a
new,
privately
owned
water
main
to
serve
the
property.
L
A
new
water
meter
will
be
placed
just
to
the
north
of
this
property
inside
the
public
road
right
away
for
southeast
32nd
street,
so
no
publicly
owned
water
facilities
will
remain
inside
the
easement.
The
developer
has
requested
a
release
of
this
easement
and
utilities.
Department
has
confirmed
that
there
will
be
no
future
need
for
the
easement
if
approved,
the
release
will
be
executed
and
recorded
following
abandonment
of
the
water
line.
L
A
Any
comments
or
questions
all
right,
I
move.
No,
is
there
a
motion
to
open
the
public?
You
can
do
it.
D
A
Okay
is
there
anybody
signed
up
for
public
comment.
C
Thank
you
mayor.
No,
there
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
for
the
public
hearing.
So
at
this
point
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
connected
to
this
call,
who
wishes
to
make
comment
during
this
public
hearing
related
to
the
water
easement
release?
Please
use
the
raised
hand,
function
or
star
9.
If
you
are
connected
with
a
phone.
D
A
Aye,
okay:
is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
the
resolution.
B
There
is
mayor
I
move
to
adopt
resolution
9958,
authorizing
the
execution
of
documents
necessary
to
release
an
existing
water
main
easement
located
at
13620,
southeast
east
gateway,
which
has
been
declared
surplus
to
the
city's
needs
and
no
longer
required
for
providing
continued
public
utility
service.
Second,.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
right,
any
opposed
all
right
that
passes.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
study
session
items
we
have
one.
This
is
a
report
back
on
the
police
use
of
force.
Mr
mccommon.
J
So
hey
mayor,
I
was
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
a
quick
introduction
here
for
you
yeah
go
ahead,
please
you
don't
mind.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
it's
a
progress
report
on
the
recommendations
identified
in
the
office
of
independent
review.
J
Please
use
the
force
report,
which
was
presented
to
council
on
april
12th
of
this
year
and
by
way
of
background
on
june
11th
of
2020
mayor
robinson,
along
with
the
council,
pledged
to
review
the
police
use
of
force
policies
to
identify
any
potential
reforms
and
with
that
I'll
go
ahead
to
turn
it
on
and
turn
over
to
deputy
city
manager,
nathan
mccommon
to
to
give
the
progress
report
and
just
to
mention
this
is
informational.
No
formal
direction
is
being
requested
by
the
council
of
the
city,
nathan,.
M
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyake
and
mayor.
If
you
would
just
confirm
for
me
that
you
can
see
the
slide.
M
Yes
is
the
slide
up?
Yes,
okay,
thumbs
up
very
good,
well,
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
council.
It
is
a
pleasure
to
speak
this
evening
to
share
with
the
council
and
the
general
public
what
is
happening
as
a
result
of
the
consultant's
recommendations
that
came
out
of
the
council's
pledge
to
review
police
use
of
force
policies.
Now
this
presentation
is
for
information
only
as
city
manager,
miyaki
mentioned,
and
no
action
is
needed
this
evening
after
I
share
some
historical
context,
I
will
describe
what
actions
we
can
expect
going
forward.
M
It
has
been
one
year
as
city
manager,
miyake
mentioned,
since
the
council
unanimously
issued
the
pledge
on
june
11
2020
in
response
to
the
murder
of
george
floyd.
A
leading
concern
at
the
time
was
to
ensure
that
the
use
of
force
policy
in
bellevue
would
contain
no
guidance
that
might
lead
to
an
unacceptable
use
of
force.
M
On
april
12th
this
year,
the
consultant
presented
its
findings
and
recommendations
which
launched
step
four
of
the
pledge
to
reform
police
use
of
force
policies.
Immediately
after
receipt
of
the
final
report,
staff
began
planning
how
the
city
could
move
forward
successfully
with
the
consultant's
recommendations.
M
M
M
The
city
is
currently
working
on
policies
and
procedures
to
accomplish
these,
many
of
which
will
be
presented
to
the
union
leadership
where
required
after
july
24.
We
will
then
have
more
staff
capacity
to
accelerate
work
on
the
consultant's
recommendations
going
forward
police
administration
plans
to
return
to
council
on
a
quarterly
basis,
with
progress
reports
on
advancing
farther
down
the
list
of
the
recommendations.
M
The
goal
is
to
finish
the
work
by
june
of
2022,
and
I
will
point
out
too
that
the
police
department
will
continue
to
welcome
and
engage
the
public
in
consultation
on
policing
practices
in
bellevue
to
remain
transparent,
improve
service
and
build
community
trust
to
date.
Seven
other
recommendations
are
already
completed
on
this
and
the
next
slide.
I
list
the
recommendation
number
and
text
of
those
seven
regarding
the
40
that
are
before
us.
M
They
or
these
are
our
commitment
over
the
next
year,
and
thus,
when
police
administration
reports
quarterly
on
progress
to
the
council,
it
will
be
on
these
40..
As
an
example,
the
council
approved
funding
for
police
cameras
in
the
current
budget.
M
The
city
has
a
good
path
forward
for
implementing
cameras
and
satisfying
recommendation
number
37
in
this
case,
so
there
will
be
more
to
come
at
a
future
council
meeting
on
advancement
of
the
remaining
40
recommendations,
I'll
quickly
touch
on
the
seven
that
are
completed
so
looking
at
your
screen.
There
are
three
on
this
one
and
de-escalation
was
a
big
concern
in
the
community
feedback
and
a
de-escalation
policy
is
now
completed.
M
M
The
illustration
on
your
screen
shows
the
sequence
of
actions
that
I've
been
describing
in.
This
presentation
today
is
represented
by
the
green
circle
in
the
center
before
the
green
circle
is
one
year
and
after
the
green
circle
is
one
year
so,
starting
at
the
left.
One
year
ago,
the
council
issued
the
pledge
the
oir
group
led
the
review
of
police
use
of
force
policies
and
conducted
the
community
engagement.
M
The
consultant
then
presented
its
recommendations
in
april
this
year,
and
today
we
are
looking
forward
to
making
advancements
on
the
final
step
of
the
council's
pledge
and
are
eager
to
learn
from
police
administration
during
the
coming
quarterly
updates.
Again,
the
goal
is
to
have
achieved
the
council's
intent
with
its
pledge
by
june
of
2022.
M
This
presentation,
again
is
for
information
only
to
help
the
council
and
the
public
anticipate
what
will
come
next
on
advancing
the
council's
pledge.
I
would
like
to
offer
thanks
to
the
council
also
for
its
continued
support
ever
since
launching
the
pledge,
after
all,
self-examination
at
this
level
can
be
difficult.
M
I
also
want
to
thank
the
community
for
its
robust
participation.
The
consultant
reported
that
the
numbers
and
variety
of
communications
exceeded
typical
levels
of
participation
in
other
cities.
The
public
actually
affected
the
outcome
of
the
final
report
for
the
better,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
the
meeting
back
over
to
mia
robinson.
A
E
Thank
you
man.
It's
good
to
see
the
progress
on
this
just
a
couple
questions
as
changes
are
made
to
the
policies.
Are
they
getting
pushed
out
to
the
community
and
then
the
second
question
for
the
body,
worn
cameras?
Are
we
working
on
the
policy
in
advance
of
getting
the
camera
so
that
when
we
get
them,
we're
a
little
bit
ahead
and
ready
to
deploy
them.
N
N
If
there
is
another
way
or
or
method
that
the
council
desires
us
to
put
the
information
out,
we
will
transparency
is
at
the
foundation
of
everything
that
we
do.
But,
yes,
we
will.
We
will
definitely
put
information
out
to
the
public
and
in
terms
of
working
on
the
policy
in
advance
of
the
actual
arrival
of
the
cameras.
My
hope
and
my
plan
is
to
have
everything
laid
out
and
ready
to
go
so
when
the
cameras
arrive,
that
we
are
able
to
go,
live
as
quickly
as
possible.
N
There's
a
lot
of
processes
that
we
need
to
accomplish
to
include
engaging
the
the
union,
but
also
doing
a
community
engagement
piece
to
that
as
well
and
we're
working
on
that.
We
are
filling
a
project
coordinator
position,
it's
been
advertised
and
I'm
hoping
that
we'll
get
some
tremendous
interest
and
and
get
that
person
identified.
So
they
can
help
us
lead
the
charge
in
getting
this
in
place.
E
Thank
you,
I
guess
in
terms
of
the
communication
similar
to
how
we
push
out
notifications
through
the
various
channels,
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
yes,
sir
yeah.
It's
not
not
every
single
one,
but
maybe
on
some
regular
cadence
sure.
A
N
M
A
N
And
if
I
may
add
one
more
thing,
we
continue,
we
continue
to
do
town
hall
meetings
virtually
and
as
soon
as
we
get
out
of
kobe,
we
plan
on
doing
more
in
person
and
through
those
forms
as
well
as
you
laid
out
all
the
different
communication
methods.
We
will
use
to
get
information
out.
Absolutely
okay!
Thank
you.
Yes,
sir.
K
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
first
thank
city
manager
and
staff
and
the
police,
chief
and
and
staff
for
continuing
this
and
working
through
this.
Actually,
you
accomplished
a
lot
in
a
fairly
short
time
period,
which
is,
I
think,
sometimes
doesn't
happen
on
these
type
of
things,
not
just
with
the
police
but
other
things
as
well.
K
So
I
want
to
commend
you
for
working
steadily
on
this
and
just
to
let
the
public
know
that,
where
we're
going
and
and
how
transparent
we
are,
I
you
know,
can
you
describe
or
have
someone
describe,
how
the
information
on
the
seven
that
we've
already
accomplished
and
the
others
you
know
how
they're
going
and
what
opportunities
there
are
for
input,
and
that
kind
of
thing
just
and
let
people
know
that
anybody
wants
to
find
out
what
the
police
department's
working
on
with
the
city's
working
on
they
can
find
out
and
have
you
know,
ask
questions,
it's
really
open
and
transparent,
and
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
we're
making
great
strides.
N
So,
yes,
sir,
we
we
will
put
out
information
that
we
will
continue
to
accept
and
solicit
input
into
the
oir's
report.
You
know
that
through
the
listening
sessions
that
oir
did
and
and
mr
common,
I
think
it
was
well
over
a
thousand
communications
that
they
received
in
written
form
through.
You
know
the
different
forms
that
they
held,
so
we've
heard
from
the
public.
N
But
again
we
constantly
are
going
out
and
and
asking
for
information
and
feedback,
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that
as
we
use
the
different
communication
tools
to
send
out
updates
where
we
are
with
progress
again,
as
mr
mccommon
focused
a
comment
on
earlier
on,
we
are
really
focused.
Our
efforts
on
right
now
is
making
sure
that
we're
in
compliance
with
the
changes
in
state
law-
and
there
is
some
overlap,
but
not
a
lot
with
the
oio
report.
N
F
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chief
for
the
information.
It's
really
really
helpful
and
you
know
the
the
transparency
and
having
everything
online
centered
on
the
community,
which
is
really
the
key.
That's
why
we're
here.
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
hiring
the
project
coordinator
position
to
do
the
community
outreach.
A
couple
of
questions.
F
I
guess
maybe
in
a
comment
one
is
the
timing
of
the
cameras
and
when
we
think
that
that
will
actually
be
launched,
and
then
when
I
was
thinking
about
the
annual
report,
I
know
we
already
have
an
annual
report
for
the
police
that
we
do
every
year.
F
So
is
the
intent
that,
as
we
move
forward
that
we're
not
having
three
different
reports
right,
one
one
overall
one
and
then
one
on
the
use
of
force
and
then
this
other
professional
standards
that
they
would
be
consolidated
into
one
document,
then
that
would
go
out
to
the
community
so
that
there's
is
as
easy
as
possible
to
have
everything
in
one
place.
I
know
that
right
now
we're
we're
putting
pieces
in
and
so
we're
not
quite
there
yet,
but
I
guess
that
would
be.
F
My
comment
is
to
the
degree
we
can
have
everything
in
one
place.
It
would
be
a
lot
easier
to
find
information
and
I
think
that's
helpful
for
for
everyone,
and
the
reason
I
asked
about
the
timing
of
the
cameras
is
that
I
think
that
absolutely
the
community
engagement
will
be
so
important
because,
when
I
think
about
cameras,
there's
always
going
to
be
the
question
about
right,
privacy
or
people
getting
filmed,
and
so
the
more
that
there's
an
understanding
of
that.
F
N
Yes,
ma'am,
we
we
will
be
seeking
feedback
from
the
community
as
we
build
our
policy
and
before
we
launch
the
project,
I
can
tell
you
stories
of
other
large
cities
that
that
implemented
camera
programs
without
community
input
and
it
kind
of
blew
up
in
their
face,
and
it
was
lessons
learned
that
we're
going
to
capitalize
on,
and
so
we
will
be
putting
that
request
out
for
information
from
the
from
the
community
while
at
the
same
time
doing
education.
N
There
are
a
lot
of
legal
requirements
that
we
have
to
meet
and
then
there's
also
best
practice,
and
I
turn
to
kalia
and
our
accreditation
team
to
make
sure
that
whatever
policies
we
have
in
place
are
the
best
in
the
industry
and
again
working
alongside
the
unions
and
and
and
such
as
we
craft
it.
N
The
second
part
of
your
question:
you
know
where
we
can
consolidate,
we
will.
But
what
we
found
is
that
in
the
annual
report
document
itself,
it
it's
28,
30
pages,
long,
adding
more
documents
in
there.
It
causes
people
frustration
because
they
they
want
to
get
straight
to
what
they
want,
and
so
we
always
incorporate
some
of
the
information
that
oir
recommended.
We
publish
on
our
website
was
some
of
it
was
already
in
our
annual
report,
but
then
what
they
were
recommending
was
a
standalone
data
portal.
N
I
understand
what
you're
saying
consolidate
as
much
as
we
can
and
just
have
one
but
we'll
evaluate
it
and
again
we'll
get
our
customers
feedback
as
well.
I
think
it's
a
great
recommendation,
but
we'll
we'll
solicit
input
from
the
customers
as
well.
F
So
maybe
it's
a
yes
and
right,
those
that
really
want
to
dig
in
there's
a
place
for
them
to
go.
Look
at
everything
and
then
those
that
want
the
consolidated
there's
a
place
for
that
too,
because
you
know
people
digest
data
in
different
ways
and
then
our
ability
to
take
data
into
information
into
insights,
which
then
help
us
be
even
better,
will
be
really
important.
N
F
B
Thank
you,
mayor,
great
presentation,
nathan.
Thank
you
chief,
my
lad,
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight
and
thank
you
to
your
entire
department.
That's
been
said
before
for
their
willingness
and
transparency
and
and
willing
to
go
through
this
process,
I
think,
as
nathan
said,
it
can
always
be
difficult
to.
B
You
know
self
self-examine
once
when
somebody
going
through
a
process
like
this,
but
it's
important
that
we
do,
but,
on
the
other
hand,
as
far
as
I've
been
on
this
council,
it's
no
different
than
what
this
department
has
done
all
the
time
or
has
always
tried
to
achieve
in
terms
of
being
very
transparent
in
terms
of
always
listening
to
residents,
and
I
really
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
you
to
the
residents
that
played
a
major
role
in
this
process
as
well.
B
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
to
engage
and
to
talk
about
your
experience
with
our
police
department.
I
think
going
through
this
process
is
only
going
to
make
our
police
department
better.
B
It
truly
is,
and
it
certainly
highlighted
a
few
things
that
we
need
to
clean
up
the
the
the
47
number
you
know
for
some
folks.
You
know
joining
us
tonight
for
the
first
time
that
might
seem
like
a
lot,
but
I
would.
I
would
also
say
that
a
lot
of
these
things
tend
to
be
more
administrative
or
updating
manual
policies.
B
The
department
might
have
been
doing
these
things
already,
but
it
wasn't
explicit
in
the
policy
and
I
and
I
don't
know
we
should
have
it
explicit
in
the
policy
and
it
should
be
posted
on
the
website,
those
reports
and
and
everything
else,
so
this
is
only
going
to
make
the
the
department
much
stronger
overall,
but
again,
I
just
really
commend
you
and
the
entire
department
for
that
willingness
to
to
go
through
this
oir
rapport
process
and
I
think,
we're
going
to
end
up
being
even
stronger.
B
On
the
other
side,
once
we
get
through
all
47.,
I
had
one
question
and
it
was
principally
kind
of
brought
up
by
what
nathan
had
said
about
the
de-escalation
that
came
up
numerous
times
during
during
this
whole
process
and
engagement,
and
I
and
I
think
part
of
it
was
education
too.
You
know
I,
you
know
if
you've
never
had
any
interaction
with
the
police.
B
Why
would
you
be
curious
about
the
de-escalation
policies,
but
what
is
the
core
difference
between
what
oir
has
suggested
in
terms
of
de-escalation
versus
kalia
or
versus
what
we
were
already
doing
as
a
department?
Was
there
much
of
a
difference,
or
was
it
really
just
you
know
some
some
minor
tweaks
and
again
updating
a
policy.
N
Thank
you
for
the
question
deputy
mayor.
There
was
no
change,
it
was
just
taking.
It
was
just
taking
what
we
were
doing
in
practice,
okay
and
creating
a
policy
for
it,
and
I
agree
with
you,
sir,
that
you
know-
and
I
want
to
thank
the
council
for
your
willingness
to
sign
on
to
the
pledge,
because
I
do
believe
that
it
strengthens
our
policy
and
we
are
used
to
self-examination
through
kalia
and
and
and
we're
constantly
doing
that.
N
But
to
answer
your
question
no
sir,
there
was
we've
been
doing
de-escalation
long
long
time,
and
it
was
just
the
realization
that
we
don't
have
it
in
our
formal
policy.
It's
in
all
of
our
training
manuals,
everything
that
we
do
so
their
recommendation
that
that
a
lot
of
you
know
that
one
specifically
was
solid
right
on
and
we
got
it
done
right
away.
We're
actually
doing
it
getting
ready
to
launch
the
policy
fantastic.
A
So,
chief,
I
really
appreciated
when
we
embarked
on
this,
how
you
embraced
the
recommendation
that
came
from
the
community,
that
we
evaluate
our
policies
and
it
was
so
good
to
have
you
on
board
with
that
and
to
participate
in
the
in
the
process.
A
N
No,
no
ma'am
pushback,
no
there's
questions.
There's
trying
to
understand
what
the
what
the
recommendation
was
and
how
it
fits
in
best
practice
there.
There
is
really
only
one
recommendation
that
we
will.
We
we
acknowledge,
but
we're
gonna,
we're
not
gonna
choose
to
publish
on
our
website
some
information,
and
I
can
go
into
more
detail
with
that.
If
anybody
has
questions
but
other
than
that,
there's
clarification
that
maybe
modification
is.
N
Mr
gennako
said
what,
in
his
presentation
his
expectation
was
that
you
know
we
would
take
these
recommendations
and
customize
them
to
our
use,
I'm
paraphrasing
a
little
bit,
but
he
would
have
been
shocked
if
we
would
have
taken
every
single
one
of
the
recommendations.
It's
for
us
to
challenge
ourselves
and
to
see
if
it
fits
with
best
practice
and
what
the
community
needs
to
include
what
our
officers
need.
A
N
Mccomb
and
I'll
kick
that
back
over
to
you,
you
know
it
would
it.
There
will
be
an
assessment,
I
will.
We
are
evaluated
by
clea
constantly
and
what
they
did
this
about
four
years
ago.
It
was
a
three-year
evaluation
cycle.
They
made
it
four
and
every
year
is
almost
like
a
mini
on-site
or
mini-evaluation.
N
So
we
will
incorporate
the
changes
to
oir
and
they
will
fit
nicely
with
our
kalia
standards
and
if
there's
any
conflict,
we
will
find
out
there.
You
know
if
there's
issues
and
we
can
modify
them
as
needed,
but
mr
common
I'll
take
it
back
over
to
you
if
you're,
okay
with
that.
A
I'm
not
seeing
anybody.
Okay,
we
have
a
land
use
quasi-judicial
rezone.
Mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
that.
J
Sir
sure,
thank
you
mayor,
robinson
council
members.
As
you
mentioned,
the
matter
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
a
rezone
application
on
behalf
of
the
corporation
srm
for
the
development
for
a
parcel
located
at
100
bellevue
way
southeast.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
process.
Three
quasi-judicial
matter
and
tonight
will
be
the
council's
initial
consideration
of
this
particular
item
tonight.
Council
will
hear
a
brief
staff
report
and
we'll
have
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
if
any
no
action
is
being
sought
by
the
council.
J
This
evening,
staff
will
return
a
future
meeting
tentatively
set
for
july
12th
for
final
action
joining
this
is
us
this
evening
is
kathy
burleigh
city
attorney,
as
well
as
liz
stead,
our
land
use
director
and
mike
mark
brennan
senior
planner,
both
from
the
development
services
department.
With
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
kathy
for
ex-parte
disclosures
first
kathy.
O
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki
good
evening
council.
As
mr
miyaki
indicated,
this
is
a
process
three,
which
means
that
the
hearing
examiner
makes
a
recommendation,
and
the
council
makes
the
final
decision.
The
hearing
examiner
has
recommended
approval
and
there
was
no
appeal
filed
so
before
I
turn
it
over
to
miss
dead
and
mr
brennan
to
give
a
presentation
and
an
overview
of
the
of
the
rezone
application
proceeding.
O
What
I
do
want
to
do
mayor
is
suggest
that,
because
this
is
quasi-judicial
and
therefore
subject
to
the
appearance
of
fairness
doctrine
that
each
council
member
be
given
an
opportunity
to
disclose
on
the
record
any
ex
parte
excuse
me
communications
that
they
may
have
had
with
any
person
supporting
or
opposing
the
project
and
council
staff
have
already
looked
in
your
council
email
boxes.
So
you
would
only
only
need
to
disclose
if
you
had
something
other
than
what's
in
your
council.
Email
boxes.
O
E
P
A
Q
Thank
you
good
evening,
I'm
mayor,
robinson,
w
mayor
known
house,
thank
you
for
having
us
here
this
evening.
We
are
here,
joined
by
mark
brennan
who's,
an
associate
planner
in
land
use
and
he'll
be
giving
you
a
presentation
that
he
originally
presented
to
the
hearing
examiner
on
this
rezone.
Q
As
you
know,
any
decisions
you
make
will
be
based
on
the
record,
so
you
will
be
seeing
the
same
powerpoint
that
was
presented
to
the
hearing
examiner
when
we
gave
our
recommendation
to
them.
Q
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
just
quickly
go
over
this.
This
is
almost
a
cleanup
rezone.
The
parcel
is
fully
located
within
the
downtown
boundary.
The
downtown
boundary
had
been
changed
in
2020,
so
this
is
really
just
bringing
into
compliance
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
I
will
go
ahead
and
turn
this
over
to
mr
brennan,
the
other,
mr
brennan,
as
we
call
him
in
our
department,
he
gets
a
lot
of
emails
meant
for
mike,
which
is
sometimes
unfortunate,
but
he's
all
he
handles
it
with
grace.
R
D
Q
D
R
K
R
R
R
R
As
you
can
see
on
this
map,
the
parcel
is
currently
split:
zoned
between
the
downtown
mixed
use
district,
as
shown
in
orange,
and
the
office
district,
as
shown
in
yellow
the
rezone,
will
be
removed,
office
zone
and
extend
the
dtmu
zone
over
the
entire
parcel,
thereby
creating
consistency
with
the
previously
adopted
comprehensive
plan.
Designation
for
the
parcel
notice
of
application
and
public
meeting
was
published
on
february
11th
this
year
a
public
notice
sign
was
installed
on
the
site
that
day
and
notice
was
also
mailed
to
property
owners
within
500
feet
of
the
subject
property.
R
The
city
held
a
public
meeting
on
march
3rd
of
this
year
for
the
project.
No
one
from
the
public
attended
the
meeting
and
there
have
been
no
party
record
comments,
notice
a
recommendation
notice.
A
public
hearing
was
published
on
april
29th
and
subsequent
to
that,
the
hearing
examiner
held
a
public
hearing
for
the
rezone
on
may
20th
and
subsequently
published
a
report
recommending
council
approval
of
the
application.
R
The
proposal
has
met
five
criteria
for
land
use
approval,
as
shown
it
will
be
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
It
will
bear
substantial
relation
to
public
health
safety
welfare.
It
is
warranted
in
order
to
achieve
consistency
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
It
will
not
be
materially
detrimental
to
uses
or
property
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
the
subject
property
and
it
has
merit
and
value
for
the
community
as
a
whole.
R
The
hearing
examiner
found
that
the
proposal
will
achieve
consistency
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
applicant
has
met
all
decision
criteria
as
fully
documented
in
the
hearing
examiner
report
located
in
the
packets
provided
for
you,
the
hearing
examiner
also
adopted
the
following
condition,
as
proposed
by
the
director.
Her
land
use
code,
part
20,
30a.
R
The
approval
of
this
rezone
does
not
constitute
an
approval
of
any
land
use,
entitlement
review
or
any
other
ancillary
permits
that
may
be
required
for
the
design
and
construction
of
any
proposed
development
or
improvements
on
this
rezoned
site.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
of
the
100
bellevue
rezone.
Are
there
any
questions.
A
All
right,
we
have
an
ordinance
tonight,
6580
mr
miyake.
J
So
thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members
in
front
of
you
this
evening,
using
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
downtown
land
use
code
to
add
new
grant
connection,
design,
guidelines
and
standards
and
accompanying
conformance
amendments
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
grant
connection
is
a
council
priority
to
implement
the
major
place,
making
feature
that
connects
the
maine
bauer
bay
park
through
downtown
bellevue
to
the
wilburton
area.
The
grand
connection
route
is
separated
into
two
sequences
sequence.
J
One
addresses
the
area
from
old
bellevue
through
downtown
to
the
east
end
of
the
transit
center,
and
that
is
sequence.
One
is
the
focus
for
this
land
use
code,
amendment
being
adopted
tonight,
sequence:
two
encompasses
the
area
of
110th
avenue
northeast
and
includes
the
crossing
of
I-405
to
the
wilkin
area,
and
the
east
trail
work
on
sequence.
2
is
part
of
the
council's
priority
for
21
the
21
23
priorities
that
you
adopted.
J
Action
to
adopt
the
ordinance
for
grant
connection
design
guidelines
and
standards
is
what
is
the
direction
that
is
needed
by
council
this
evening
joining
us
this
evening
for
a
brief
staff
report
is
emile
king,
our
assistant
director
of
community
development,
liz
stead
who
was
also
just
joined
us
a
land
use
director
of
development
services
and
christina
gallant,
senior
planner
of
development
services.
For
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
emil.
S
Thank
you
for
the
introduction
city
manager
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
members
of
council
tonight,
we've
reached
a
significant
milestone
on
the
work
on
the
grant.
Connection
council
is
being
asked
tonight
to
adopt
the
grand
connection
sequence
1
guidelines,
as
the
city
manager
described.
This
defines
the
ground
level
improvements
that
are
going
to
implement
the
grand
connection
from
110th
avenue,
northeast
west
to
old
bellevue,
as
described
in
the
council
vision
and
framework
plans.
S
The
grand
connection
is
a
key
part
of
bellevue
being
a
livable
city
and
supporting
our
economic
development
and
mobility
options
for
residents,
workers
and
visitors.
Some
of
the
things
to
look
forward
to
are
the
sequence.
2
work,
that'll
look
at
the
civic
center,
the
I-405
crossing
in
wilberton,
as
well
as
other
implementation
efforts
that
are
ongoing.
T
Thank
you
emil
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
and
members
of
the
council
I'll
now
walk
through
just
a
brief
presentation
outlining
some
of
the
a
reminder
of
some
of
the
key
components
of
this
luca.
T
T
T
There
will
be
other
projects
to
follow,
to
activate
the
grand
connection
working
on
intersection,
improvements,
wayfinding
and
another.
A
number
of
future
projects
that
are
impacting,
but
not
necessarily
directly
part
of
the
grand
connection,
such
as
the
I-405
lid
concept
and
civic
center.
T
T
So
the
objectives
for
this
specific
luca
were
to
implement
certain
elements
of
the
grand
connection,
framework
plan
and
comprehensive
plan
amendment,
and
our
goal
was
to
update
the
pedestrian
corridor.
Major
public,
open
space
design
guidelines
that
had
previously
been
a
very
large
document,
a
kind
of
accessory
to
the
code
which
we
have
now
implemented,
the
just
the
essential
design
guidelines
to
reflect
this
updated
grand
connection
vision
within
the
code
itself
to
both
have
refresh
design
guidelines
and
provide
much
simpler,
easier
to
navigate
content.
T
So
our
update
process
began
in
2020
and
where
we
worked
with
the
planning
commission
to
devel,
develop
our
initial
lucas
structure,
then
we
went
forward
to
work
with
a
number
of
stakeholders
testing
the
draft
luca
with
some
of
our
active
projects
underway
and
then
finally,
going
back
to
focus
groups
to
refine
the
draft
further,
and
that
culminated
in
the
planning
commission
recommendation
back
in
april,
which
brings
us
to
today.
T
We've
implemented
a
number
of
strategies
for
outreach
and
engagement.
In
addition
to
the
basic
requirements
for
a
process
for
project,
we
did
look
back
to
the
2017
framework
plan
process
to
learn
from
that
engagement.
T
So
the
luca
itself,
the
core
of
it-
is
this
new
section.
2025
a175,
you
see
the
five
sub
sections
here.
They
include
general
design
requirements
that
apply
throughout
the
grand
connection
sequence,
one
as
well
as
specific
guidance
for
the
rooms,
which
are
the
concept
we're
using
to
implement
some
kind
of
local
character
within
the
overarching
character
of
the
grand
connection,
reflecting
some
of
the
variation
we
already
have
and
celebrating
it.
T
T
B
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
for
the
great
presentation
and
and
update
there
as
well.
In
terms
of
the
grand
connection,
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
to
one
of
the
comments
during
oral
communications.
I
believe
his
name
was
larry
martin,
representing
alex
smith,
and
he
made.
B
B
I
guess
immediately
and
this
stops
at
110
so
emil,
just
just
to
clear
the
record
there
can
you
can
you
address
that,
to
a
certain
extent.
S
Welcome
to
do
so,
deputy
mayor,
so
the
the
the
current
east
side
center
is
what
it's
referred
to
in
downtown
extends
from
100th
avenue,
which
is
the
road
on
the
west
side
of
bellevue
way
over
to
the
freeway
and
then
bound
on
the
north
by
northeast,
eighth
and
the
south
by
northeast
four.
So
it's
essentially
it's
the
the
center
third
of
downtown
kind
of
going
east
west
direction.
S
Okay,
in
2017,
when
we
updated
the
the
downtown
land
use
code
for
the
downtown
livability
amendments,
we
did
try
and
and
kind
of
identify
what
amenities
were
pertinent
in
different
neighborhoods
and
we
did
list
the
headquarter
at
the
time
as
being
a
amenity
that
you
could
use
in
the
east
side
center.
It
is
able
to
be
used
in
part
of
it
right
now,
but
not
the
entire
area,
even
under
the
current
code.
S
So
just
as
an
example,
the
current
ped
corridor
guidelines
go
from
bellevue
way
over
to
one
tenth
area,
so
the
I
I
would
I
I
understand
mr
martin's
comments.
I
didn't.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
exactly
at
least
portrayed
by
me
as
an
error
in
2017..
S
I
think
we're
trying
to
to
cross-reference
the
ped
corridor
amenity
and
what
neighborhood
it
applied
to
that
being
said,
his
request
is
something
that
that
would
be
looked
at
in
the
sequence:
two
work
when
we
go
back
and
look
at
the
overall
east
side
center
area,
what
the
guidelines
might
mean
down
in
in
that
area
of
downtown
and
how
the
transfer
provisions
might
want
to
be
amended
in
the
future
for
this
process,
we
just
didn't
have
it
as
part
of
the
scope
part
of
this
work?
That's
why
it
wasn't
part
of
the
recommendation.
B
Okay,
great,
thank
you
for
that
for
that
explanation,
and
you
mentioned
sequence
two.
So
when
when
did
you
know,
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
work
in
front
of
us
right
now,
but
roughly
when
do
you
think
sequence
two
might
get
going
and
what
would
sequence
two
all
entail.
S
Sequence:
two
is
a
council
priority
for
the
2021
22
23
time
frame.
So
clearly
we
want
to
respect
that
council
direction
to
work
on
it
in
that
time
frame.
S
We
I
I
mentioned
this
work
right
now
as
a
major
milestone,
because
we
are
wrapping
up
a
significant
body
of
work
as
well
as
as
well
as
the
east
main
work.
That's
still
to
be
wrapped
up.
So
then
that
frees
up
our
staff
and
community
development
and
development
services.
To
then
move
on
to
wilberton
bell
red
look
back.
It
will
be
a
question
in
the
wolverton
effort
if
we'd
like
to
do
both
sides
of
the
freeway.
S
As
part
of
that
look
because,
as
you
know,
the
the
opportunities
for
connecting
the
downtown
and
wolverton
makes
sense
to
look
at
that
vis-a-vis,
the
wolverton
and
downtown
area.
So
I
think
it
will
be
a
a
council
discussion
item
when
we
want
to
do
the
so-called
civic
center
work
after
we
wrap
up
the
sequence,
one
work
and
the
east
main
work.
That
still
remains
to
be
wrapped
up
great.
Thank
you.
B
K
That
does
help.
Doesn't
it
there
you
go.
No,
that
was
a
the
deputy
mayor's
question
was
interesting
and
I
do
know
we're
we're
basically
talking
about
from
110th
west
on
this,
and,
as
you
say,
there
are
two
sequences
in
that.
I
think
that
helps
a
lot
to
look
at
the
whole
project,
but
I'm
just
really
really
excited
to
be
getting
at
this
point
and
it's
taken
a
while
to
get
from
the
grand
connection.
K
The
original
one
has
been
around
for
a
long
time,
but
me
moving
up
to
this
one
and
being
talking
about
going
over.
We've
been
talking
about
that
since
2012.
K
and
it's
not
so
far
away,
but
that's
a
lot
of
time
and
I'm
just
so
excited
to
see
this
actually
happening
and
really
really
great
work
on
this.
I
don't
have
any
questions
on
it.
I
think
you've
outlined
everything
very
well
and
you
have
it
set
up
to
concentrate
on
the
sequence
one
piece
and
then
at
the
appropriate
time
to
sequence.
Two,
and
I
appreciate
your
comments
in
terms
of
how
we
balance
all
these
things
are
going
on.
K
We
have
so
much
going
on
right
now,
and
the
other
thing
I'm
excited
about
is
seeing
the
east
rail
connection.
To
that.
I
always
I'm
glad
we
put
that
in
there,
because
that's
a
big
part
of
this
it
makes
the
connection
even
grander.
So
thanks
very
much
really
good
work,
all
three
staff
members
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
us
putting
this
in
place
and
and
moving
forward.
F
F
Now
with
that
said,
I
I
do
think
that,
as
we
talk
about
the
timing
for
sequence
2,
perhaps
as
we
get
ready
for
our
mid
by
budget
that
we
should
be
talking
about,
do
we
have
the
right
amount
of
resources
for
all
of
the
planning
that
we
have
ahead
of
us
and,
if
sequence,
two,
that
we
need
to
also
move
this
along
quicker
along
with
wilberton
and
bell
red
look
back,
then
we
might
need
to
just
talk
about
how
to
get
more
resources
to
do
that,
because
my
sense
is
that
you
know
there's
some
urgency
in
a
lot
of
so
much
of
this
planning
work
that
we're
doing.
F
I
am
concerned
about
adding
anything
else
to
this
work
right
now
and
slowing
it
down,
especially
since
we've
done
so
much
briefings
and
focus
group
and
outreach
to
get
to
having
design
guidelines
and
standards.
So
that
would
be.
Maybe
my
ask
to
city
manager
is
whether,
as
we
look
at
our
budget
going
forward,
we
talk
about
what
additional
resources
if
we
want
to
move
sequence,
2
even
quicker.
Thank
you.
P
Thank
you,
sorry
for
being
late.
I
was
on
an
airplane
and
just
got
off.
That's
why
I
can't
be
on
video
yet
so
yeah.
I'm
excited
that
this
work
is
being
done.
I'm
definitely
supportive
of
getting
the
grand
connection
going
as
councilmember
stokes
says.
We've
been
talking
about
this
since
2012,
that's
nine
years
the,
but
I'd
like
to
give
a
little
context
and
some
history,
because
this
is
sequence
one.
It
goes
to
northeast
10th.
P
The
far
transfer
that
was
discussed
in
the
public
comment
and
was
advocated
for
at
the
planning
commission
is
a
leftover
vestige
of
the
code
from
before
downtown
livability
was
opened
or
was
finished
in
2017
and
that
at
that
time
the
downtown
boundaries
went
to
112.
P
during
downtown
livability.
Those
boundaries
were
expanded
to
405..
The
the
former
olb
zone
that
was
not
considered
really
part
of
downtown
is
now
wrapped
into
part
of
downtown.
I
think
it
was
a
mistake
I
mean,
and
I'm
not
saying
a
mistake
is
in.
They
made
the
wrong
decision,
a
mistake,
as
in
it
was
overlooked
to
include
the
far
transfer
all
the
way
to
405.,
and
so
it's
fully
within
our
bailiwick
and
within
our
authority
to
fix,
make
a
housekeeping
correction
today,
and
I
would
point
out
that
this
is
sequence.
P
One
goes
to
one
tenth,
the
code
section
that
we're
talking
about
goes
to
112.,
so
it's
either
wrong
in
that
it's
further
than
sequence,
one
or
it's
wrong
in
that
it
doesn't
go
to
the
downtown
boundaries
in
either
case.
112
is
the
wrong
demarcation
line,
and
I
think
that,
given
how
long
we
have
taken
to
do
so,
many
changes
with
our
land
use
code
with
our
comp
plan.
When
we
have
something
in
front
of
us
that
we
have
the
authority
to
fix,
we
should
do
it
and
that
this
is
one
of
those
things.
P
So
let
me
tell
you
why
I
think
we
should
do
it
other
than
just
correcting
the
error.
Number
two
is
we
have
talked.
I
mean,
I
know
that
all
of
my
colleagues
council
member
zahn,
has
talked
about
this
council
member
stokes
has
talked
about
this
and
mayor
robinson.
All
of
us
have
talked
about
the
need
to
make
sure
that
we
set
the
table
for
really
good
tod
for
housing
for
mixed-use
development.
P
I
have
absolutely
no
confidence
that
we
would
get
to
sequence
two
of
the
grand
connection
guidelines,
even
within
five
years
of
that,
because
we
have
so
many
things
in
the
queue
ahead
of
it.
So
to
me,
having
setting
the
table
to
allow
the
property
that
are
within
the
downtown
corridor
to
use
the
far
transfer
is
the
right
thing
to
do
number
one?
It
makes
it
so
that
they're
more
likely
to
develop
tod
and
have
the
density
we
need.
We
need
more
housing,
we
need.
You
know
we
need
a
another
convention
hotel.
P
Those
things
are
going
to
be
a
lot
more
likely
if
we
allow
the
far
transfer
number
two
it's
going
to
make
people
who
are
on
the
corridor,
who
may
not
be
able
to
use
all
the
far
they're
going
to
gain
more
enthusiastic
about
building
the
brand
connection,
because
then
they
have
a
market
for
it.
They
can
sell
it
get
some
of
that
money
back.
So
to
me,
it
makes
all
the
sense
in
the
world,
from
an
economic,
from
a
development,
from
a
pro
housing
perspective
and
from
a
housekeeping.
P
Let's
do
the
to
fix
the
code
when
it's
in
front
of
us,
rather
than
wait
five
years
to
fix
the
code.
We
know
it's
a
mistake.
We
know
it's,
it's
not
one.
Tenth,
it's
not
four
or
five.
It's
somewhere
in
between
it's
just
a
mistake,
and
I
and
we
should
fix
it.
We
can.
We
have
the
authority
to
do
it
tonight
by
vote.
I
would
make
a
motion
to
do
so
if
there's
any
support
whatsoever
for
that,
the
time
is
now
to
do
it.
P
If
we
want
to
see
that
development,
so
I
support
the
guidelines.
I
support
doing
it,
but
I
support
actually
having
a
passing
ordinance
that
doesn't
have
a
mistake
built
into
it,
and
this
ordinance
does
have
a
mistake
that
was
prior
to
downtown
livability
built
into
it.
We
need
to
fix
it.
E
Sure
I'll,
try,
man.
I
am
curious
from
staff.
What
impact
making
a
change
to
the
land
use
code
to
fix
this
might
have
on
the
timeline.
E
My
thought
is,
I
think
I'd
prefer
that
we
proceed
tonight
and
even
if
it's
something
that
comes
before
sequence,
two
or
you
know
as
part
of
sequence,
two-
that
we
and
we
don't
hold
up
this
plan-
use
code,
amendment
but
good
to
hear
from
the
staff.
U
Council,
member
barksdale,
maybe
I'll
jump
in
on
this
and
hand
it
over
to
emile
king,
to
give
some
more
particulars
studying
the
addition
of
far
and
the
impacts
of
that
type
of
of
growth
is
actually
a
pretty
significant
thing.
So
the
idea
of
deciding
to
look
at
you
know
how
big
or
how
intense
buildings
should
be
allowed
to
be,
has
impacts
for
transportation
systems,
utility
systems,
urban
form,
how
you
want
your
city
to
grow
and
so
forth,
and
that's
that's
not
to
say
it's
it's
good
or
bad.
U
U
How
should
private
property
interact
with
the
grand
connection
so
that
it
becomes
a
place
making
opportunity
for
the
community
broadly,
the
concept
that
you're
talking
about
now
is
a
scenario
of
transfer
of
development
rights
and
adding
extra
density
and
intensity,
making
buildings
bigger,
which
has
a
different
set
of
impacts
than
what
you're
taking
up
tonight.
So
why
don't
I
stop
there?
I'll
hand
it
to
assistant
director
king
and
he
can
talk
about
a
few
of
those
things
and
what
we
would
do
should
the
council
want
us
to
take
up
that
other
initiative.
S
Yeah,
thank
you,
mr
cummings,
just
to
elaborate
a
little
bit
more,
as
we
kind
of
thought
about
this
comment
from
mr
smith
and
mr
martin.
The
the
alex
miss
property
is
about
73
000
square
feet
and
their
their
idea
was
to
also
include
the
legacy
properties
or
that
are
on
the
south
side
of
it,
and
that's
about
150
000
square
feet
of
land
area.
S
So
when,
when
we
would
look
at
this
for
additional
fdr
we'd
be
looking
at
things
like
the
urban
form
analysis
of
what
would
happen
if
additional
far
landed
on
these
sites.
In
addition
to
the
up
zones
that
we
did
in
2017,
we
would
at
least
do
a
quick
check.
If
there
were
any
transportation
considerations,
I
don't
think
there
would
be
significant
ones,
but
that
would
that's
another
lens
that
we
typically
look
on
if
we're
putting
more
fdr
in
an
area.
S
So
those
are
probably
the
the
two
things
that
we
would
look
at
and
again.
This
is
something
that
we
would
need
to
do
at
some
point
in
the
future.
I
think
the
question
is,
you
know
the
timing
of
it.
We
view
it
as
more
appropriate
to
do
in
the
in
the
sequence
two,
but
clearly
there's
discussions
about
what,
if
scenarios
of
trying
to
do
it
earlier
than
that,.
A
Thank
you.
So
I
have
a
couple
questions.
It
seems
to
me
that
the
issue
at
hand
is
just
redefining
the
boundary
moving
it
from
112th
to
405..
S
Yeah,
the
mr
smith
and
mr
martin
are
asking
to
expand
the
far
transfer
area
from
112th
over
to
the
freeway,
so
in
effect
it
adds
alex's
property
and
the
legacy
property,
that's
to
the
south,
to
an
area
that
can
receive
excess.
S
Far
that's
developed
when
you're
building
out
the
grant
connection
or
major
public
open
spaces
such
as
compass
plaza
and
the
soon
to
be
awning
part
of
it.
So
that's,
that's!
The
the
core
of
of
their
ask
is
to
expand
the
area
that
you
can
have
density
transfer
to.
U
Hey
mayor,
maybe
I'll
jump
in
one
of
the
interesting
things
that
we're
hearing
now
is
people
want
to
talk
about
transfer
of
development
rights
in
general
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
have
a
lot
of
different
ideas
about
how
that
might
work
either
within
the
downtown
or
just
city
wide.
Some
people
have
offered
transfer
development
rights
as
a
way
to
talk
about
creating
additional
housing.
So
a
significant
question
for
you
and
the
council
is:
should
you
take
up
expansion
of
a
tdr
program?
U
Would
you
want
to
keep
all
the
same
rules
exactly
as
written,
so
they
were
written
assuming
the
pedestrian
corridor,
just
a
very
finite
period
of
place
in
downtown
along
northeast?
Sixth,
expanding
that
concept
for
a
portion
of
or
all
the
way
through
the
whole
grand
connection
route
and
whether
or
not
those
downtown
rules
make
sense.
Those
are
pretty
significant
value
conversations
for
you
all.
A
Okay,
so
when
I
look
at
the
rooms
of
the
grand
connection,
it's
surprising
to
me
that
it
stops
where
it
does
and
it
seems
like
we're
missing
rooms,
and
I
assume
that
in
the
sequence
two
you'll
be
adding
rooms
to
encompass
112th
and
going
across
the
freeway.
Connecting
to
the
east
trail.
Is
that
correct.
A
Okay,
so
my
last
question
is:
if
we
were
to
so,
I
hear
the
benefit
of
waiting
until
sequence,
two
to
talk
about
the
you
know
the
give
and
take
of
transferring
far
and
how
we
want
to
see
that
happen.
A
Q
I
can
just
come
from
a
high
level
speak.
We
have
been
seeing
a
lot
of
development
in
this
area,
thus
far.
It
has
not
been
hindering
anything
to
date.
I
can't
speak
specifically
to
mr
smith
or
mr
smith
proposed
project,
but
we've
had
development
proposals
on
almost
every
lot
within
that
area,
some
of
which
are
completing
their
design,
review
process
right
now
and
heading
toward
construction.
So
I
would
say
that
we
have
seen
developers
be
able
to
use
the
existing
code
to
create
a
very
successful
project.
A
A
K
It's
part
of
the
some
one
of
the
responses
seemed
to
indicate
that
this
was
just
a
small
piece
of
land
that
had
this
ability
to
transfer
the
far.
Is
that
correct,
or
is
it
all
along
the
corridor?
I
mean
there
have
been
some
differences.
K
You
know,
discussions
and
and
and
and
part
of
the
the
proposal
is
because
other
people
up
and
down
the
quarter
can
do
it.
We
ought
to
be
able
to
do
it
too,
or
is
this
just
this
very,
very
small
special
circumstance?
S
Currently,
all
properties
between
bellevue
way,
112th,
4th
and
8th-
can
have
far
transferred
to
those
properties,
and
that
was
a
vestige
of
the
prior
pedestrian
corridor
design
guidelines.
So
the
planning
commission
did
not
analyze
changes
to
those
provisions
didn't
recommend
any
to
council.
It
was
outside
of
the
scope
of
their
work,
so
it's
the
language.
That's
in
the
the
ordinance
is
essentially
carry
over
language
from
the
the
previous
pedestrian
corridor.
Design
guidelines.
K
S
I
was
not
carved
out
it's
just
that
this,
mr
smith's
property
and
the
legacy
property
was
never
part
of
the
far
transfer
area.
K
Okay,
well,
that's
that's
yeah,
because
I
don't
think
that's
been
very
clear
in
the
discussions
I
mean
my
feeling
is
that
we
probably
think
this
is
a
positive
thing
to
do
in
a
way.
But
what
would
the
impact
just
to
really
get
down
to
in
trying
to
make
this
decision
if,
if
the
kind
of
consensus
was
to
to
allow
this,
but
the
question
is:
is
this
the
appropriate
time
or
is
this?
K
What
other
impact
is
this
going
to
have
on
other
projects
or
is
one
question
and
the
other
one
is
if
we
can
get
this,
if
we
don't
pass
it
tonight,
but
put
together
a
plan
to
amend
which
we
can
do
the
code
at
some
later
date?
How
long
would
that
take
and
how
would
that
would
this
be
put
off
five
years?
I
don't.
I
can't
see
that
that
would
what
happened
seems
to
me.
We
have
a
pathway
either
way.
K
In
fact,
the
I've
forgotten
the
attorney's
name,
but
the
representative
clearly
stated
in
there
there's
several
options
we
could
take
and
either
of
those
seem
to
be
acceptable,
including
you
know,
the
count
sending
it
back
to
planning
commission
or
having
the
council
go
ahead
and
decide
it
at
a
later
date.
K
So
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of.
I
don't
want
to
be
pushed
to
make
a
decision
just
because
somebody
wants
it.
I
you
know,
that's
fine
and
I,
as
I
say,
I'm
not
I'm
not
feeling
any
negatives
on
in
the
long
run,
except
that
if
this
just
adds
to
the
consideration
of
what
the
impact
will
be
with
a
a
much
much
denser
development.
K
On
the
other
hand,
we're
looking
at
you
know
in
context
of
what
is
where
denture
development
is
good.
So
it's
a
it's
a
balance
and
it
seems
to
me
what
we're
trying
to
figure
out
is
how's
the
best
way
in
terms
of
use
of
staff
and
time
and
coordination
to
do
this,
and
you
know
this
stops
at
110th.
It's
not
going
over
212
at
this
point
is
that
right,
this
sequence,
one.
K
So,
yes,
that's
correct,
so
I'm
not
even
sure
why,
to
certain
extent
it
kind
of
it's
interesting
that
we're
talking
about
something:
that's
not
not
currently
in
the
plan,
so
we
would
be
doing
something.
That's
over
the
other
line
in
sequence,
two
now
in
sequence,
one
and
I
I'm
concerned-
are
we
going
to
have
more
pressure
by
people
along
the
route
to
have
to
start
working
on
sequence?
Two
now,
and
you
know,
in
other
words,
I'm
just
looking.
How
can
we
most
effectively
orderly
make
this
happen?
K
K
You
know,
east
main,
all
the
other
bellred,
all
the
other
things
we're
concerned
about,
adding
on,
as,
as
you
mentioned,
emil,
it's
going
to
take
some
work
to
look
at
when
you
get
to
it
to
how
this
should
be
applied
and
and
all
that
and
what
so
I'm
just.
What
is
what
is
the
thing
that's
most
effective
for
us
to
do
now
that
really,
I
think,
doesn't
put
the
developer
in
a
really
awkward
position.
I
think
either
way
it
goes.
It's
going
to
be
fine.
U
So
councilmember
stokes,
maybe
I
will
attempt
to
answer
a
few
questions.
I
think
I
heard
come
out
in
there.
Okay
and
one
of
the
questions
you
were
asking
about
was
prioritization,
and
then,
where
does
this
fit?
You
know
and
how
and
what
are
the
staffing
impacts?
You
know
and
that
sort
of
thing,
and
then
I
also
heard
a
question
about
potentially
counsel
what
would
happen
if
you
tried
to
or
took
vote
tonight?
You
know
on
this
versus
remanded
it
to
staff,
you
know
and
so
forth.
U
So
I
try
to
hit
both
of
those
the
the
concepts
of
adding
extra,
far
and
evaluating
the
impacts
of
what
that
might
do
in
terms
of
the
things
that
assistant
director
king
was
talking
about
is
something
that
we
would
recommend
that
you
have
some
feedback
on
some
study
and
analysis
before
taking
action.
In
any
event,
what
was
discussed
and
moved
through
the
process
and
then
went
to
the
planning
commission
were
design
considerations
around
the
rooms
that
you
heard
miss
go
on
to
mr
king
comment
on
earlier.
U
That's,
like
you
know
what
type
of
treatments
are
on
on
the
ground
itself.
Where
are
the
sitting
areas
going
to
be
what
types
of
landscapes
are
going
to
be
out
there
like?
How
are
how
are
the
design
going
to
work
between
private
and
public
property
studying
and
evaluating
extra
far
is
something
we
would
suggest
that
we
come
back
to
you
with
it's
almost
a
different
body
of
work
than
what
you're
taking
up
tonight.
U
So
in
order
to
help
you
with
question
two,
which
is
the
prioritization
question,
we
would
want
to
talk
with
several
departments,
including
the
city
attorney's
office,
about
how
to
bring
back
a
change
like
this
in
terms
of
what
has
been
published,
you
know
in
the
draft
ordinances
and
so
forth,
because
this
concept
has
not
been
been
put
out
there.
You
know
at
all
other
than
a
letter
that
came
into
the
planning
commission,
but
they
didn't
have
discussion,
as
we
talked
about
of
course
tonight.
U
So
on
a
rough
order
of
magnitude.
Of
course,
this
would
depend
on
if
council
wanted
to
remand
the
whole
concept
back
to
the
planning
commission
or
or
have
it
just
stay
with
the
council.
That's
a
big
influencer
on
timing
and
then
we
would
want
to
get
with
the
affected
departments
by
the
concept
of
adding
extra
far
and
do
some
analysis
and
bring
that
back
to
you
so
that,
as
you
took
up
that
question,
you
know
you
would
have
all
the
facts
in
front
of
you.
K
Well,
to
follow
up
on
that
last
part,
and
I'm
trying
to
see
how
this
all
works.
So,
if,
if
we,
if
we
said
tonight,
we
would
like
to
you
know,
make
this
change,
but
it
sounds
like
we're
the
the
work
on
getting.
K
You
know
how
this,
what
what
the
far
should
be,
what
the
impact
of
whatever
you
know,
scope
of
development
they
want
to
do,
is
not
something
we're
doing
with
other
developers
at
this
point,
and
if
we,
if
we
said
okay,
let's
go
ahead
with
this,
make
the
make
the
change
in
the
in
the
you
know
the
the
outline
tonight.
K
It
doesn't
mean
that
we
have
to
immediately
start
working
on
the
project
with
mr
smith,
and
this
that
would
be
we
could.
Could
we
do
this
at
the
same
time,
we
do
this
with
other
people
who
are
already
vested
with
this
opportunity,
for
you
know,
trading
or
higher
for
more
density.
U
I
think
the
way
I
would
best
answer
that
councilman
stokes
the
it
would
definitely
have
an
impact
on
staffing
if
council
wanted
to
take
up
the
question
of
studying
additional
far
in
some
or
all
of
the
olb
land.
The
first
part
of
your
question:
when
do
we
normally
do
this?
We
normally
do
this
as
part
of
large
planning
or
up-zoning
initiatives,
so
in
sequence,
going
back
in
time.
We
did
this
in
the
downtown
livability
initiative
and
actually
added
substantial
amounts
of
far
in
on
these
parcels
in
the
olb
land
between
112th
and
the
freeway.
U
U
There
isn't
a
a
great
place
to
go
back
and
surgically
do
one
parcel
at
a
time
in
terms
of
what
the
right
far
should
be
or
how
transfers
should
work.
We're
suggesting
that
if
the
council
wants
to
take
this
up
the
most
logical
place
to
do
it
would
be
sequence
two,
because
obviously
there
are
there
are
the
only
other
way
to
do.
It
would
be
to
take
up
downtown
zoning
like
reopen
the
downtown
land
use
code.
So
that's
where
this
requirement
currently
resides.
U
Yes-
and
we
were
assuming
that
this
would
be
an
issue
that
would
come
up
and
if
we're
assuming
council
would
want
to
continue
to
take
it
up,
it
would
be
just
built
into
the
sequence
to
work
program.
E
A
U
U
That's
a
great
question:
councilman
stokes
and
then
I'll
hand
it
back
to
mr
miyake,
the
we
hear
the
question
frequently:
we
didn't
solicit
input
from
property
owners
and
developers
on
that
topic
yeah.
So
the
answer
is
this:
is
the
only
person
we've
heard
from,
but
we
didn't
ask
either
as
part
of
the
scoping
exercise.
J
So
if
I
may
just
weigh
in
you
know
often
you
refer
to
the
requirement.
I
was
wondering
if
our
city
attorney
could
weigh
in
on
this
in
terms
of
reasonable
notification,
and
you
know
the
legal
implications
on
that.
O
Thank
you,
mr
miyagi,
so
I
think
mr
cummins
alluded
to
this.
I
think
there
is
at
least
a
question
here
that
we
would
want
to
take
back
and
evaluate
for
the
council
as
to
whether
or
not,
if
there's
a
modification
being
done
tonight,
was
that
reasonably
foreseeable
as
part
of
the
notice
that
was
given
to
the
public
or
not,
because
that
may
impact
the
legal
obligation
to
actually
give
notice
to
the
public.
O
If
this
is
was
not
some
a
topic
that
was
reasonably
foreseeable
when
it
went
through
the
process,
it's
part
of
the
growth
management
act.
You
know
public
participation,
obligations.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
ask
some
questions
here
and
then
we'll
go
back
around.
If
anybody
else
is
interested
going
off
of
what
councilmember
stokes
said,
I
think
he
brought
up
a
really
good
point
that
you
know
this
is
not
even
in
sequence,
one.
This
is
a
sequence,
2
property
that
is
scheduled
to
be
examined,
and
one
there's
two
things
that
are
missing
here.
A
For
me:
one
is
you
know:
what
are
we
going
to
be
doing
about
affordable
housing
requirements
here
in
one
of
the
hottest
tod
areas
in
the
city,
and
so
it's
going
to
be
really
interesting
important
to
have
that
conversation,
and
then
the
other
part
is
what
I
mentioned
before
you
know.
We
haven't
even
defined
those
rooms,
yet
that
would
have
yet
to
be
named
going
from
one
tenth
over
to
the
east
trail.
A
So
I
don't
feel
comfortable
moving
this
forward
tonight,
but
I
am
interested
in
seeing
you
know
that
we
are
on
a
schedule
that
serves
the
developers,
but
we
we
just.
We
need
to
have
a
bigger
conversation
in
my
opinion
and
we
need
to
schedule
that
so
are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
council
members
on
and
then
council
member
robertson.
F
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
You
know
I
I
agree
with
both
your
comments
and
council
member
stokes.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
move
forward
with
sequence
one-
and
I
do
agree
that
there's
a
broader
conversation
here
about
transfer
of
development
rights
and
and
far
transfer,
and
especially
since
we've
had
eight
stakeholder
briefings
and
focus
groups
to
add.
This
now
seems
like
we're
not
doing
what
we
are
very
good
at
doing,
which
is
being
a
very
thoughtful
council
that
when
we
look
at
changing
code
that
we
have
the
conversation,
we
have
the
analysis.
F
F
P
Thank
you
so
to
me
it's
a
housekeeping
issue.
The
sequence
one
ends
at
one
tenth:
the
far
transfer
area
ends
at
1
12.
the
boundaries
end
it
I-405.
So
to
me
it's
just
a
fix
and
it
was
just
we
have
this
section
of
land
use
code
in
front
of
us.
This
section
of
land
use
code
was
in
front
of
the
planning.
Commission
people
testified
during
the
public
hearing
about
it.
I
think
we
have
the
right
to
change
it
tonight.
P
It
sounds
like
we
don't
have
the
political
will
to
change
it
tonight
and
you
know
if
we
want
to
see
the
development
that
we've
talked
about,
making
sure
that
we
can
make
the
changes
when
things
are
in
front
of
us
is
the
most
effective
way
to
do
it.
We
do
not
need
to
send
this
back
to
staff
to
do
a
bunch
of
analysis
and
bring
it
back
and
drag
it
out.
We
can
make
this
housekeeping
amendment
tonight,
take
care
of
it.
P
Then
it
allows
a
couple
of
you
know:
property,
there's
two
properties.
I
think
two
property
owners
that
that
were
inadvertently
left
out.
I
mean
it
was
a
mistake
when
we
did
downtown
livability.
I
just
want
to
fix
it,
but
I
see
that
there's
not
the
political
courage
to
do
that
tonight,
and
so
I
think
it
sounds
like
we're.
Gonna
pass
this
with
a
mistake
in
it,
which
is
okay.
D
P
Guess
you
know
people
don't
want
to
fix
mistakes,
but
that's
okay!
It's
you
know.
Next
time
people
complain
about
not
getting
stuff
done.
I
want
people
to
remember
this
moment
because
we
had
the
chance
to
change
it.
It
was
in
front
of
us
now's
the
time
we
can
do
it.
If
we
don't
want
to
that's
fine.
A
So
I
will
say
that
first
of
all,
I
think
using
the
word.
Political
courage
is
a
little
unfair,
we're
being
very
thoughtful
and
I
don't
know
actually
where
the
council
sits
on
this.
So
I
I'm
not
going
to
guess
that
we're
all
yes
or
no.
I
don't
know
at
this
point
and
we're
going
around.
We've
heard
your
opinion.
Does
anybody
else
have
an
opinion
right
now
that
they'd
like
to
give
all
right
yeah
go
ahead?
I.
E
Was
just
gonna
say
I
mean
I
I
I
do
think
given
that
it
is,
it
does
relate
to
the
transfer
development
rights
and
the
work
that
we
would
want
to
do
to
customers
on
this
point
of
being
thoughtful
like
there
are
developers
on
both
sides
of
this
right
like
if
we
delay
the
guidelines.
There
are
also
developers
who
will
be
impacted
by
that
as
well.
Q
A
Deputy
mayor,
do
you
have
any
more
a
final
comment
here,
or
do
you
want
to
make
a
motion?
No.
B
I
I
appreciate
the
conversation
and
I
think,
there's
a
number
of
good
points
being
made
here.
I
mean
I
do
agree
with
councilmembers
on.
We
are
very,
I
think,
thoughtful
deliberate
data-driven
council
and
we
really
want
to
understand
all
the.
B
Evidence
before
us,
if
you
will,
as
well
as
the
work
plan
et
cetera,
on
the
other
hand
it
does
you
know
it
does
feel
somewhat
like
it's
it's
housekeeping,
but
that
housekeeping
could
have
a
dramatic
effect
on
that
on
that
on
that
area
as
well-
and
you
know,
I
think,
taking
some
a
little
bit
additional
time
for
staff
to
take
a
look
and
come
back
to
us,
you
know
if
there's
any
way
that
we
could
expedite
it.
B
I
think
that
would
be
you
know
within
all
of
our
best
interests
to
do
so,
given
the
priorities
and
given
the
goals
of
this
council
in
terms
of
the
transit
oriented
development
and
affordable
housing,
etc.
B
So
if
there
is
a
way
to
move
this
forward,
just
this
piece
forward
a
little
bit
quicker,
maybe
outside
of
sequence
two,
but
if
it
can't
be,
it
needs
to
be
in
part
of
sequence,
two
fair
enough,
but
if
we
could
expedite
that,
I
think
that
would
be
great,
because
there
is
so
much
development
happening
right
now.
We
do
not
want
to
lose
out
in
any
opportunities
to
create
those,
affordable,
housing
opportunities
and
other
other
development
opportunities.
B
No,
no,
we
have
not.
I
waited
for
you
to
reconnect
before
putting
that
motion
forward.
A
I
appreciate
that
I
was
wondering
if
there
was
gonna
be
an
amendment
to
the
motion
made
and
I'm
not
seeing
that
so
go
ahead.
Deputy
mayor,
thank
you
for
waiting,
go
ahead
and
make
promotion.
I
moved.