►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - Oct. 14, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'll
call
this
meeting
of
the
Bellevue
City
Council
to
order
this
is
the
City
Council's
extended
study
session
for
October
14th
2019
I
would
like
to
add
a
quick
item
which
is
the
excusal
of
councilmember
Robertson
to
the
head
of
the
agenda.
So
with
that,
with
that
caveat,
I
would
entertain
a
motion
on
the
agenda.
A
A
B
A
A
So
you
have
three
minutes
to
speak
to
the
to
the
City
Council
on
any
topic
tonight,
with
five
people,
we
will
be
able
to
be
able
to
to
make
that
work,
we'll
make
it
within
our
half
hour.
Looking
in
the
audience,
I
think
almost
all
of
you
know
the
drill,
mr.
and
mrs.
Lee
Toth.
If
you
would
come
forward
and
I
will
just
explain
what
we're
going
to
do.
They're
both
requesting
three
minutes
they're
going
to
speak
together.
A
They
have
a
video
that
they
would
like
to
show
and
they're
also
going
to
talk
about
a
very
important
topic
that
we're
dealing
with
throughout
the
world
today.
So
with
that,
and
what
we're
going
to
do
is
just
let
both
of
them
go
too
until
they're,
they
they're
gonna
share
their
six
minutes
together,
okay,
and
so
please
go
ahead.
C
Council,
my
name
is
Saki
Leto
and
I'm,
a
resident
of
East
Gate
I'm
here
this
evening
to
ask
your
support
by
standing
with
your
local
Jewish
community,
the
Jewish
Federation
of
Greater
Seattle
recently
released
its
community
statement
on
anti-semitism
and
is
asking
for
the
support
of
our
elected
officials
by
signing
on
to
the
statement
and
making
a
commitment
to
unite
with
other
elected
and
civic
leaders
to
combat
the
rise
of
anti-semitism
and
other
manifestations.
Why
you
may
ask?
C
Is
it
important
to
single
out
anti-semitism
as
a
constant
to
defend
when
there
are
so
many
worthy
causes
of
worthy
of
your
attention?
My
answer
begins
with
additional
questions.
Why
is
it
the
Jews,
although
a
tiny
percentage
of
the
population
of
the
US
for
the
victims
of
over
half
the
reported
hate
crimes,
and
why
has
anti-jewish
rhetoric
once
confined
to
right-wing
extremists?
C
Now
infesting
the
american
left
as
well
in
a
way
Jews
can
be
considered
the
proverbial
canary
in
the
coal
mine,
in
the
words
of
Rabbi
Jonathan
Sacks
anti-semitism
is
the
world's
most
reliable
early
warning
sign
of
a
major
threat
to
freedom,
humanity
and
the
dignity
of
difference.
It
matters
to
all
of
us,
which
is
why
we
must
fight
together.
Anti-Semitism
at
its
base
is
about
the
denial
of
the
Jewish
people's
right
to
exist
collectively
as
a
people
with
the
same
rights
as
everyone
else.
C
As
you'll
note
from
the
brochure
we
handed
out
come
in
every
color
imaginable
and
are
from
many
places
around
the
world,
in
fact,
as
a
direct
result
of
these
historic
explosions,
the
Jews
in
Israel,
as
a
majority,
are
people
of
color
from
throughout
the
Middle
East
North,
Africa
and
Asia.
The
UN
recently
released
an
unprecedented
report
called
combating
combating
anti-semitism
to
eliminate
discrimination
and
intolerance
based
on
religion
or
belief.
C
It
expresses
a
serious
concern
that
the
frequency
of
anti-semitic
incidents
appears
to
be
increasing
magnitude
and
that
the
prevalence
of
anti-semitic
attitudes
and
the
risk
of
violence
again
Jewish
individuals
and
sites
appears
to
be
significant,
including
in
countries
with
little
or
no
Jewish
population
I'm,
here
this
evening
to
ask
your
support
by
joining
the
over
90
elected
officials,
who've
already
signed
on
including
I'm,
proud
to
say
our
own
council
members,
jennifer
robertson
and
jared
new
in
house.
Thank
you.
C
Both
a
link
to
the
place
to
sign
on
is
included
in
my
notes
from
the
evening,
as
well
as
links
to
informational
sources.
I've
mentioned
and
informative
videos,
the
city
of
Bellevue
vision
statement
released
in
2014
states
that
Bellevue
welcomes
the
world.
Her
diversity
is
our
strength.
Please
join
us
in
ensuring
the
statement
truly
applies
to
all.
D
Thank
you
for
letting
us
speak.
I
really
appreciate
that
my
name
is
Laura
Lee
Taub
I
live
with
Hema
nice,
cape
and
I'm
here
to
speak
about
anti-semitism
as
well,
but
from
a
more
personal
viewpoint
my
kids
have
grown
up
in
King
County,
knowing
their
lives
are
at
risk,
not
because
we
tell
them,
but
because
we
have
regular
reminders,
every
Jewish
preschool
elementary
school
evening
program,
summer,
camp
Swim,
Club
and,
of
course,
synagogue
or
College
Jewish
Community
Center
that
we
attend
is
guarded
by
armed
police
security.
That
is
including
in
Bellevue
our
kids.
D
D
I'm
good
now
sorry
Jewish
events
have
have
police
presence,
a
local
celebration
for
Israel.
A
couple
of
years
ago,
we
counted
over
50
police
officers.
For
a
couple
of
hundred
people
asked
our
local
law
enforcement,
how
many
police
they
had
at
a
recent
memorial
service
in
Bellevue
for
the
murder
at
a
synagogue
in
California.
The
events
had
come
up
in
the
news
all
the
time
the
murders
I
was.
C
I'm,
just
a
petty,
Semitic,
vandalism
and
language
is
growing
and
becoming
normalized,
which
creates
fertile
ground
for
more
for
more
hate
and
violence.
Spewing
anti-semitic
rhetoric
is
becoming
so
commonplace.
A
high
school
student
at
Parkland
had
his
Harvard
admission
rescinded
because
he
was
on
social
media
stating
things
like
kill
all
the
Jews
think
about
how
far
we
are
down
the
road
of
normalizing
anti-semitism
on
a
Harvard
bound
child
feels
like
it's
mainstream
and
expect
acceptable
to
spew
things
like
that
publicly
on
social
media
and
are
surprised
when
there's
a
consequence.
C
The
store,
the
stories
local,
high
school
and
college
students
can
tell
you
include,
being
denied
service
and
restaurants
for
being
Jewish.
Having
money
thrown
at
them
been
told
to
go
to
the
gas
chambers
swastikas
and
hate
rhetoric
written
on
their
desks
and
doors
were
spray-painted
on
the
outside
of
their
homes
and
more
and.
D
I'm
going
to
just
say
that
for
local
law
enforcement,
because
I
want
to
make
it
adhere
to
the
FBI,
arrested
and
convicted
in
junus
no
Hamish
County
white
nationalist
for
terrorizing
and
threatening
to
Massacre
Jews,
he
had
an
arsenal
and
timeline.
Western
Washington
universities
had
to
create
a
task
force
concerning
hate
crimes
against
Jews,
because
it
is
such
a
problem.
A
Somali
immigrant
from
West
Seattle
is
in
jail
awaiting
trial
for
attempting
to
kill
Jews.
D
Last
year,
college
student
was
stabbed
to
death
by
a
previous
classmate,
the
neo-nazi
organization
that
the
perpetrators
involved
in
has
a
growing
cell
in
Skagit
in
Skagit
County.
So
thank
you.
The
council
members
who've
already
signed
for
this
pledge.
We
gave
you
some
information
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
everybody
else
name
on
that
pledge.
Thank
you
so
much.
Thank.
A
You
very
much
for
your
testimony.
Thank
you
for
making
us
aware
of
that
and
with
the
link,
I
am
I,
see
that
mr.
and
mrs.
Morris
wish
to
testify
I'm
going
to
move
I,
don't
know
where
you
are
on
the
on
the
side,
or
did
you
want
to
testify?
Did
you
sign
up
I'm
going
to
move
you
up
to
this
time?
I,
don't
know
if
you're
ahead
or
behind,
but
I'd
prefer
to
do
it
that
way,
so
mrs.
Morris.
If
you'd
like
to
go
and
then
mr.
Morris,
you
could
be
next.
Thank
you.
E
E
Karen
Morris,
my
dress,
is
on
file
comment
on
things
said
at
last.
At
the
last
meeting
on
the
10
encampment
ordinance
city
staff
told
you
they
see
their
role,
not
so
much
as
regulators,
but
rather
facilitators.
It
was
said
that
a
neighborhood
fracture
had
occurred
between
the
last
days
at
TBT
and
the
city
staff
recommended
mediation,
implying
mediation
was
an
effective
way
of
resolving
such
issues.
E
There
was
no
fracture
between
neighbors
just
years
long
issues
getting
host
and
operator
to
address
with
action
unresolved
problems
the
encampment
had
created
and
had
not
been
willing
to
address
with
anything,
but
rhetoric
neighbors
documented
these
problems
and
wanted
something
substantive
done.
As
we
had
for
years
already,
we
followed
staffs
suggestion
and
entered
mediation
willing
to
try
it
accomplished
nothing
on
substantive
problems
we
presented
to
be
addressed.
More
importantly,
it
was
not
the
promised
safe
space
to
discuss
issues.
E
Host
participants
were
unwilling
to
compromise
on
these
issues
and
seemed
to
have
another
agenda
more
on
that
later
they
pulled
out
of
mediation
without
addressing
our
major
concerns
and
in
the
silent
present
of
the
city
mediator.
One
engaged
in
angry
inappropriate,
labeling
and
name-calling
before
leaving
his
issue
resentment
of
gathering
and
bringing
documentation
to
meetings
to
prove
problems,
existed,
had
been
brought
up
before
and
still
had
not
been
solved.
So
we
don't
accept
the
role
of
staff
as
facilitation
that
goes
nowhere
with
those
not
willing
to
compromise.
E
We
asked
staff
and
council
to
do
their
jobs
as
regulators
and
enforcers
to
maintain
the
public,
health
and
safety.
It
may
be
very
difficult,
but
it
is
demonstrative
ly
the
only
way
that
it
might
work
now
the
mayor's
comments
he
recognized
issues
in
our
neighborhood,
the
only
one
which
had
recent
and
repeated
encampments.
He
again
made
a
link
between
doing
other
things
on
the
homelessness
issue
and
not
having
to
have
tent
cities.
Unfortunately,
this
linkage
is
false.
E
Regulation
allows
this
use
only
as
religious
expression
and
the
presence
of
other
adequate
or
even
more
than
adequate
programs
will
not
change
that.
If
an
operator
like
Cher
convinces
a
religious
organization
to
host
them,
it
will
still
happen.
The
only
thing
the
city
can
do
and
has
a
responsibility
to
its
citizens
to
do
is
to
regulate
operations
to
protect
the
public,
health
and
safety.
This
includes
actual
enforcement
I
and
my
neighbors
speak
here
as
the
canary
in
a
coal
mine
speaks.
E
We
are
not
outliers
who
can
be
safely
ignored,
but
harbingers
of
what
can
and
has
gone
wrong,
proposed
changes,
weakened
needed
protections
and
ignore
valid
pleas
for
increased
accountability
and
responsibility.
They
also
ignore
recalcitrance
and
lack
of
cooperation.
I
will
be
waving,
my
feathers
when
statements
are
made
that
are
untrue
or
misleading,
and
as
usual,
it
will
be
something
I
can
back
up,
not
just
belief
or
opinion.
F
Good
evening,
I'm
John
Morris
and
my
addresses
on
file
happens
to
be
the
same
as
the
person
who
just
left
here.
I
want
to
talk
tonight
about
the
temporary
encampment
toluca,
and
particularly
the
agenda
memo
that
came
out.
The
bellevue
staff
has
recommended
for
topic
areas
in
the
agenda
menu
concerning
the
temporary
encampment
yeah,
based
on
questions
directed
to
them
by
the
City
Council.
F
The
topic
areas
are
very
valid
ones
and,
if
addressed
with
actual
input
from
all
stakeholders
would
reflect
the
real
situation
with
in
effect
areas
and
give
you
the
City,
Council
good
information
with
what
to
make
informed
decisions
on
this
topic.
The
agenda
menu
uses
the
term
stakeholders
very
liberally.
Stakeholders
are
share,
the
hosts
the
church
council,
greater
Seattle
and
the
neighborhood's,
whether
you
agree
or
not.
The
reality
is
that
the
host
and
the
CCGs
are
have
proved
that
they
will
always
align
and
vote
with
share.
F
F
Well,
I'll
bet
they
did
so
what
did
the
staff?
Do?
They
made
up
a
story
that
the
focus
group
in
that
momentous
single
January
meeting
expressed
support
for
increased,
permitting
flexibility
instead
of
requiring
a
permit
every
time
the
staff
deducted
deduce
that
a
five-year
permit
was
a
great
idea,
and
each
new
stay
within
that
five
years
would
only
require
the
following
of
the
hosts,
a
courtesy
letter
that
they'd
be
there.
That's
great
description
of
the
proposal,
arrival,
departure
dates
and
identification
of
any
modifications
they
wanted
to
make.
F
This
is
a
joke
and
an
insult
to
the
neighbors
who
have
dealt
with
the
situation
in
good
faith
for
close
to
15
years.
The
staff
is
caved
into
what
share
has
wanted.
They
subjugated
themselves
not
to
the
citizens
of
Bellevue,
but
to
the
leaders
of
groups
whose
members
largely
are
not
even
Bellevue
residents.
Thank
you.
G
What's
going
on
yeah
like
this
to
jus,
you
know
this
mean
II,
don't
understand
what
is
going
on
so
a
few
months
ago,
in
May
or
at
Seattle
console
v,
Brown
console
latina,
who
represent
only
seven
pretend
so
by
definition,
is
not
by
US
Constitution,
yellow
to
make
a
new
city
console
code.
So
right
now
everybody
who
have
different
opinion
can
be
trespassed
for
one
year
is
no
analogy
in
American.
History
is
a
pure
fascism.
G
Yes,
because
alex
is
everybody
knows
so
a
couple
weeks
ago
say
make
another
correction
right
now
say:
correct,
I,
hate
speech,
so
you
say
hello,
criminal,
sorry,
I,
hate
speech
before
it's
very
complicated.
Now
what
is
mean
so
right
now
they
make
us
a
misdemeanor,
so
everybody
right
now
can
go
in
jail.
So
this
look
to
me
absolutely
indentical.
What
is
Nazi
bit
gustaba
disavowed
communist
bit
KGB?
It
is
exactly
what
the
Seattle
token
and
this
judge
Juhu
here,
a
little
bit
sick
from
them.
G
You
know
what
is
mean
because
Jewish
organization
and
anti-defamation
league
support
one
party
system.
Seattle
is
one
party
system
who
stand
for
my
understanding.
I'm
a
story
year
is
a
support.
This
is
a
fascism,
how
you
can
support
fascism,
little
bit
correction.
So
right
now,
I
speak
to
everybody
who
listen
to
me,
guys
go
Luke,
Seattle
console
call,
you
will
be
surprised,
it's
got
bigger
and
bigger
and
bigger.
So
right
now
this
will
be
in
Valken
country
state
Washington.
G
Another
couple
year
we
all
bill
bill,
one
party
or
fascism,
is
exactly
what
has
happened
so
I
right
now
speak
to
everybody
who
listened
to
me.
Stand
up.
America
I
leave
a
hair
approximately
35
year
and
I'm
sick
from
fascist
before
half
my
life,
so
we
need
cleanses
Dory
chamber
from
this
console.
Elmer
Durgin
who
X
us
prosecutor
so
approve
my
two
trespasses
for
my
speech
in
console
chamber
time.
G
H
Good
evening,
Michael
Ramos
with
the
church
council
greater
Seattle,
as
I
heard,
our
name
used.
I
decided.
We
should
speak
for
ourselves
as
opposed
to
being
spoken
for
related
to
the
proposed
Henan
Kampmann
Luka
I
just
want
to
introduce
that
the
faith
communities
will
be
taking
up
seriously.
The
legislation
I
know
you've
been
working
on
that
we'll
have
some
recommendations
as
we
gather
to
be
able
to
meet
in
the
coming
weeks.
H
We
had
not
planned
that
this
would
be
taken
up
this
year
and
I
think
it
had
been
set
at
a
previous
meeting
that
the
faith
community
asked
for
such
a
change
and
we
did
not
at
least
a
Church
Council
of
Greater
Seattle
did
not.
We
are
a
signer
on
the
consent
decree
as
you
know,
and
follow
closely.
The
good
work,
that's
being
done
on
homelessness
within
this
city.
H
From
a
strategic
vantage
point,
and
also
a
principled
vantage
point,
and
so
I
just
want
to
mention
a
few
things
for
consideration,
and
then
we
will
have
further
conversation
in
the
coming
weeks
and
with
the
public
hearing
coming
up
in
in
early
November
as
I
understand
it.
First
that
there
has
been
there
are
laws
protecting
religious
institutions
and
they're
exercising
of
ministry
and
hosting
the
homeless.
Since
the
consent
decree
there
has
been
relevant
state
law
that
has
passed
and
also
other
ordinances
and
other
cities.
H
That
may
be
relevant
and
helpful
for
your
consideration
that
it
should
at
least
be
examined.
As
you
are
aware,
faith
communities
operate
from
a
principle
basis
that
treatment
of
homeless
people
as
human
beings
is
fundamental,
who
have
a
basic
dignity
and
rights
and
and
should
be
respected
within
the
faith
communities
where
they're
hosted
and
there's
a
balancing
with
concerns
that
may
exist
within
the
community,
but
I
would
submit
that
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
are
part
of
the
community
as
well.
H
H
Unfortunately,
those
principles
and
values
were
not
taken
up
in
discussion
here,
and
they
one
first,
they
were
bypassed
by
other
cities
who
passed
ordinances
without
taking
into
account
what
we
had
submitted.
So
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
submit
those
principles
for
your
consideration
in
the
discussion
and
to
have
further
conversation
with
you
at
the
appropriate
time
again,
thank
you
for
entertaining
talking
with
the
faith
communities
directly
and
how
we
can
continue
to
serve
and
honor
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
in
your
city
and
throughout
the
East
Side.
A
A
I
I
A
I
I
would
agree,
and
it's
the
first
that
I
had
heard
about
this
document.
So
we
hear
about
lots
of
things
and
so
I
think
if
council
members
so
choose
they
can
they
can
go
and
lend
their
name
to
it.
I
think
that's,
that's
a
good
idea,
so
anything
else
that
would
bring
us
to
a
discussion
on
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
a
briefing
on
implementation.
Mister
Miyake.
J
As
you
mentioned,
we're
here
tonight
to
give
the
council
an
update
on
the
implementation
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy
strategic
plan,
just
by
way
of
background,
this
plan
was
actually
adopted
by
the
City
Council
back
in
June
of
2017.
At
that
time,
the
council
asked
to
bring
for
updates
twice
a
year
on.
The
last
update
to
the
council
was
back
on
March,
4th
and
so
tonight
we're
bringing
another
update
back
to
the
council
in
particular
how
we've
been
doing
in
terms
of
the
generation
of
affordable
units.
J
K
Thank
you
see
the
manager
Miyake
we're
happy
to
be
back
this
evening,
giving
this
next
update
on
the
affordable
housing
plan,
implementation,
and/or
unit
creation.
By
way
of
introduction,
the
council
is
going
to
be
undertaking
a
number
of
affordable
housing
dialogues
in
the
coming
months
and
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
tonight,
because
there
are
yet
a
number
of
strategies
contained
within
the
affordable
housing
strategic
plan
that
haven't
yet
been
fully
implemented.
K
The
purpose
of
tonight's
presentation
will
really
be
an
update,
and
so
you
all
may
recall,
at
the
last
dialogue
we've
been
talking
about
how
best
to
update,
not
just
the
council
but
the
community
on
progress,
and
so
tonight
we're
setting
out
an
agenda
that
we
intend
to
replicate
at
each
of
these
update
meetings
to
talk
about
some
similar,
topical
areas.
Each
night.
K
We
do
this
with
you
on
twice
a
year,
meaning
unit
creation
which
strategies
we're
finding
are
the
most
effective
in
creating
those
units
where
we
are
in
implementing
the
overall
strategic
plan
and
then
what
our
next
steps
are.
So
we
hope
to
get
into
a
rhythm
with
you
all
for
the
updates
being
very
different
in
the
creation
of
new
policy,
where
you'll
have
a
completely
separate
study
session
to
evaluate
new
strategies
and
procedures
going
forward.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
mr.
K
L
Good
evening,
let's
see
I
think
that
Mack
and
city
manager
these
topics-
let's
see
this-
is
just
for
information.
These
are
the
things
that
we
plan
to
cover
tonight:
affordable
housing,
zuccini
effectiveness
of
the
programs
and
the
implementation
of
the
actions
in
the
strategy
council
adopter
the
affordable
housing
strategy
in
June
of
2017,
but
the
21
actions
of
the
strategy
will
be
adopted
over
a
four-year
phased
work
program.
We've
seen
delivery
of
affordable
homes
increase
over
our
historical
averages,
such
as
before
we
adopted
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
L
L
L
So
this
slide
shows
the
adopted
actions
are
achieving
the
affordable
units.
Note
that
there's
actually
three
columns
going
on
there
with
three
sums
at
the
bottom
row.
The
first
sum
is
our
10-year
yield
that
was
estimated
in
the
adopted,
affordable
housing
strategy
of
over
2500
units.
The
next
is
the
units
achieved
like
we
said,
226
and
a
pipeline
of
485
and
then
back
to
the
top.
Yes,.
B
L
The
voluntary
incentives
they've
resulted
in
64,
affordable
units
and
a
pipeline
of
65,
affordable
units,
and
that
pipeline
represents
about
six
apartment
proposals,
market
apartment
proposals
in
bel,
red
and
downtown
that
are
not
yet
permitted
going
down
to
a-1.
The
council.
Support
for
a-1
preservation
of
existing
affordable
housing
is
a
priority.
L
That's
the
30
bellevue
project
that
opened
last
year
and
a
pipeline
of
80,
affordable
units,
and
that
80
is
an
estimate
of
what
will
yield
from
councils
action
to
to
set
to
put
the
spur
property
at
the
OMF
ii
for
affordable
housing
as
a
surplus,
land
donation
and
then
finally,
I.
Guess
what
we're
seeing
here?
Because
we
know
those
are
the
main
actions
that
are
achieving
the
unit's
up
to
date
and
those
units
are
being
across
both
market
incentives
and
Direct
Subsidy,
which
also
gets
us
a
range
of
affordability.
L
Incentives
adopted
in
East,
Lake
and
affordable
housing
incentives
adopted
in
downtown
we've,
updated
and
extended.
The
multifamily
tax
exemption
program.
Council
supported
state
legislative
changes
to
this
condo
statutes
to
increase
condo
development.
We
hope
that
we
see
more
development
response
from
that
soon
and
very
substantially.
L
We're
working
to
achieve
well,
work
with
Sound
Transit
and
across
our
city
to
achieve
affordable
units
both
at
the
OMF
II
site
and
the
130th
station
areas,
we're
looking
to
working
with
finance
and
other
departments
to
implement
the
sales
tax
option
for
affordable
housing.
Hb
1406
before
December
we're
working
to.
Let's
see,
Development
Services
has
a
number
of
work
program
items
either
now
or
upcoming
Luca
for
East
Main.
L
That
will
include
affordable
housing
incentives
and
then
I
think
in
upcoming
work
program
working
on
the
zero
lot
Lange
townhomes,
which
will
help
us
have
another
kind
of
more
affordable
housing
created
in
Bellevue
and
a
very
targeted
change
on
accessory
dwelling
units.
That's
going
to
be
restricted
just
to
releasing
that
restriction
that
you
can't
include
affordable
or
ad
use
in
new
construction.
M
L
Think
that
what
we're
trying
to
message
here
is
that
there
is
a
good,
robust
pipeline
for
new
and
preserved,
affordable
units
that
includes
incentives
and
direct
direct
subsidies.
That's
working
in
Bellevue,
the
actual
number
of
affordable
homes
is
expected
to
increase,
as
we
implement
all
the
twenty-one
actions
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
that
the
current
pipeline
gives
us
some
sense
that
the
current
work
program
can
achieve
our
goal
of
10-year
goal.
Twenty
five
hundred
portable
units
and
again
Bellevue's,
affordable
housing,
programs
working
and
it
seems
to
be
gaining
momentum.
L
B
N
You,
deputy
mayor
great
presentation,
thank
you
so
much
so.
My
first
question
is
so
250
units
a
year,
so
I'm
grappling
with
this.
Just
because
great
list
seems
like
we're
on
track
to
hit
our
goals,
but
is
it
enough?
Do
we
need
to
update
that
number?
But
how
do
we
know
what
that
number
looks
like
in
terms
of?
Are
we
creating
enough
affordable
housing
units
out
there?
So
what
is
your?
L
Well,
I'd
first
just
make
the
comment
that
it's
not
a
number
that
will
meet
the
needs.
It's
a
number
that
when
we
adopted
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
we
went
through
a
process
of
seeing
what
we
could
achieve
with
the
tools
that
we
were
able
to
put
on
the
table.
We
have
a
process
in
play
where
we're
coming
in
every
every
six
months
to
em
to
update
you
we're
also
looking
hard
at
what
we've
achieved,
what
we've
achieved
and
how
the
tools
are
are
working
there,
for
example,
with
the
voluntary
mandatory
we've
talked
with
council
about.
K
Absolutely
we're
keeping
our
eye
on
the
on
the
ball.
Okay
there,
but
to
Jana
to
point
when
the
original
tag
was
put
together.
There
was
not
a
relationship
between
the
total
housing
need
for
affordability
and
trying
to
hit
that
number.
Okay.
It
was
more
about
a
robust
discussion
at
a
time
about
inclusionary
housing
versus
incentive
based
housing
and
how
many
units
could
be
created.
Okay
and
that's
how
I
was
ready.
N
Well,
during
our
next
update
be
great
if
we
maybe
looked
at
that
a
little
bit
more
more
closely.
My
other
number
so
based
on
the
packet
that
we
that
we
got
is
that
we
had
raised
2.4
million
based
off
of
the
fee
and
LU
yeah
does
that
go
into
the
into
the
general
fund,
or
does
that
go?
Where
does
that
money
go
and
what
do
what
does
it
use
for
its.
L
N
Only
in
bel
red,
but
then
is
that
money
looked
upon
to
acquire
units
or
it
can
can
they
be
used
for
other
ways
to
help
facilitate
more
units.
For
example,
if
a
developer
wanted
to
do,
some
kind
of
partnership
of
some
sort
could
be
used.
As
that
I
guess
I'm
saying,
is
this
flexible
or
is
it
can
only
be
used
in
certain
ways
that
two-point-four.
L
Okay,
you
know,
in
addition
to
the
2.4,
we
also
have
another
2
million
that
we
see
coming
in
in
29
right.
L
K
We
are
in
discussions
with
development
services,
now
look
out
that
and
so
in
many
of
our
neighborhood
areas,
meaning
Belgrad
versus
downtown.
There's
a
provision
that
allows
the
city
staff
to
reduce
parking
requirements
of
into
a
parking
study
which
has
to
do
with
the
types
of
units
that
are
being
creating
the
geographic
location,
proximity
to
transit.
Okay,.
K
K
N
O
O
O
Yeah
I
think
what
we're
I
mean
when
you
look
at
the
numbers
and
we're
talking
about
25,
2500
and
10
years,
and
we
did
250.
Obviously,
if
we
do
250
this
year,
we're
not
meeting
the
need
for
the
next
year
and
also
I
think
it
leads
to
what
we've
been
discussing
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
looking
at
what
what
does
increase
focus.
O
Think
what's
been
really
helpful,
is
putting
in
a
more
recognition
of
workforce
housing
as
an
important
issue,
and
that's
one
that
of
course,
Microsoft
is
very
interested
in.
That's
correct,
in
addition
to
that.
Our
range
is
not
just
that
at
the
eighty
percent
or
at
a
certain
level,
but
it's
a
full
range
and
we're
looking
at
all
of
us.
Sometimes
they
get
those
questions
about.
Are
we
just
doing
80
percent?
Well,
no
they're.
Looking
a
lot
yeah,
so
I
guess
what
we're?
O
O
L
I
L
I
Great
and
then
I
remembered
you
talked
about
the
Microsoft
funding
and
part
of
their
funding.
Was
they
also
had
a
menu
of
code
revisions
that
they
wanted
cities
to
consider?
Are
we
actually
looking
at
that?
Is
it
one
of
the
and
what
is
the
the
timing
for
us
looking
at
that
and
actually
making
any
modifications.
I
That
makes
sense,
and
then,
when
you
were
talking
about
partners
and
a
variety
of
stock,
I
mean
Saturday.
Several
of
us
were
on
a
panel
talking
about
affordable
housing
as
part
of
the
teaming
up
and
it
and
I
thought
the
most
interesting
part
of
the
discussion
was
actually
the
tabletop.
After
where
the
discussion
was
around
the.
If
we
were
looking
at
ways
to
partner
with
the
faith
communities
that
might
have
land,
what
is
it
that
they
need
from
us
and
what
is
it
that
we
need
from
them
and
I
guess?
I
My
question
is,
as
we
have
identified
some
that
may
be
interested
in
looking
at
some
other
land.
Do
they
contact
the
city
to
start
looking
at
possibilities,
because
I
understand
that
there
was
one
that
actually
we
had
one
that
sold
their
properties.
So
it
was
not
eligible.
Actually
there's
another
one.
L
There
were
a
lot
of
restrictions,
one
of
them
was
in
a
single-family
zone
and
the
other
one
was
a
smaller
parcel
and
they
did
an
RFP
and
they
just
decided
that
the
the
highest
and
best
good
they
went
with,
and
fortunately
the
funds
that
were
raised
on
that
race
Lutheran
was
turned
over
to
affordable
housing.
Okay,.
I
Well,
that's
good
and
then
my
last
one
is
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
comments
that
were
made
earlier
about.
Let's
look
at.
If
we
can
do,
we
can
the
micro
housing
and
the
ability
to
have
smaller
units
that
then
become
a
pipeline
for
people
moving
up
as
in
size
of
their
family
as
well
as
maybe
seniors
that
want
to
stay
in
our
community
as
well
as
a
to
use.
I
My
concern
with
a
to
use
is
that,
right
now
the
the
neighbourhood
planning
is
his
on
hiatus
and
when
it
restarts
it's
gonna,
be
you
know,
six,
seven
years
before
we
get
through
all
the
neighborhoods.
So
how
do
we
start
having
that
calm
sation?
What
discreet
neighborhoods
that
might
be
interested
sooner.
K
K
There
were
some
neighborhoods
that
seem
somewhat
supportive
of
the
concept
but
wanted
to
work
through
how
they
would
be
developed.
You
know
what
on
the
Lots
themselves,
and
there
were
some
neighborhoods
that
were
really
not
for
the
whole
program
and
the
city
committed
at
that
time,
even
though
it
would
take
years
to
kind
of
work
through
that
we
would
do
it
through
neighborhood
planning
so,
but
if
the
counts
would
like
to
revisit
that,
we
can
certainly
work
with
you
on
the
presence.
I
So
I'm
not
advocating
for
some
citywide.
What
I
am
saying
is
that
when
we
look
at
the
first
two
neighborhoods,
you
know
we
were
looking
at
how
long
it
had
been
since
they
had
gone
through
planning
to
determine
which
ones
were
first
and
so.
For
this
particular
item,
we
were
not
necessarily
focused
on
which
communities
may
be
more
interested
in
having
this
conversation
around
ad
use.
So
is
there
a
way
to
look
at
a
strategy
for
doing
that
just
greatly
with
neighborhoods.
L
P
J
P
L
L
P
L
J
P
L
P
P
Because
this
is
the
part
of
process
use
that
you
mentioned,
it's
really
a
learning
process.
All
right
we
quit
so
I
would
like
to
see
the
next
report
that
you
have
or
before
the
report
to
include
what
we
have
learned.
You
know
I
think
that's
the
basis
where
we
can
figure
out
what
ideas
on
what
we
can
do
right.
Hopefully,
when
you
have
some
information,
you
will
say:
hey
we
can
make
500
a
year,
250
right,
okay,
we
know
those
two
that's
I
think
basis
the
questions,
but
yes,
so
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
taking
and
running
the
meeting,
I
needed
to
get
back
and
didn't
quite
get
everything
finished
for
dinner.
Frankly,
I
am
so
there
was
I
was
approached
a
while
back
by
an
individual
who
has
some
property
in
the
Belgrad,
or
has
some
investors
interested
in
it,
and
maybe
this
was
asked,
but
it
was
about
a
zero
parking
building.
Did
you
ask
about
that?
Councilmember
yeah,
you
did
then
I'll.
Leave
it
at
that.
So
I
can
I
can
go
back
and
review
the
the
record.
B
So
that's
comforting
and
in
in
terms
of
the
budget
next
time
you
come,
I
really
would
like
to
talk
about
what
the
possibilities
are
with
that,
because,
as
I
understand
it,
we
can,
you
know,
with
our
incentives,
get
80%
AMI,
but
the
funding
is
really
going
to
be
necessary
to
get
anything
below
60.
We
like
to
focus
the
funding.
B
A
A
Our
next
topic
tonight
is
the
temporary
encampment
land-use
code,
which
we
heard
some
testimony
about
today,
so
I
will
and
and
as
the
people
are
coming
up,
one
of
the
things
that
is
driving
us
toward
this,
and
maybe
I'll
have
a
couple
of
questions
about
it.
Is
that
the
consent
decree
that
we
have
had
for
I
think
13
years
do
federal
court
expires
at
about
the
end
of
January
roughly,
so
that's
the
reason
that
we
are
making
this
up,
but
I
will
turn
it
over
to
mr.
Miyake
to
introduce.
J
J
The
council
initiated
the
code
amendment
process
for
temporary
encampments,
then
on
September
23rd,
the
staff
met
with
council
beginning
the
conversation
of
two
of
the
four
recommended
areas
in
terms
of
how
we
move
forward
on
the
land
use
code
amendments
and
tonight
the
staff
is
going
to
go
over
the
remaining
to
recommend
recommended
areas
with
the
hope
of
getting
some
direction
from
the
council
or
purposes
of
drafting
a
land-use
code.
A
draft
land
use
code,
an
amendment
for
purposes
of
a
public
hearing
to
be
held
in
November,
so
joining
us
tonight
is
Mike
Brennan
who's.
R
You
mr.
miyagi
Mariel
Manette
deputy
Robinson
members
of
council
good
evening,
it's
good
to
be
back
continuing
the
conversation
on
the
topic
of
temporary
encampments.
This
evening
we
are
seeking
council
direction
on
the
topic
areas
that
mr.
manioc
you
mentioned
that
we'll
talk
about
in
more
detail
in
just
a
moment
for
inclusion
in
a
draft
Landy's
code
a
minute
that
we
would
advance
to
a
public
hearing
that
is
scheduled
for
November
18th.
R
So
again,
we
want
to
quickly
just
provide
an
overview
of
what
was
included
in
an
initial
in
the
initial
draft
Lanie's
code
amendment
that
has
reflects
the
content
of
the
consent
decree
and
how
we've
been
operating
with
temporary
encampments
over
the
last
13
or
so
years.
There
are
a
handful
of
additional
refinements
that
we
have
set
up
here
as
the
topics
for
consideration.
We
want
to
review
again
with
you
tonight
seeking
counsel
direction
on
if
you
would
like
to
include
any
amendments
in
the
draft
land
use
code
for
that
public
hearing
in
November.
R
The
draft
land
use
code
initially
covers
essentially,
as
I
mentioned,
the
the
issues
that
align
with
the
consent
decree
and
how
we
operate,
which,
for
the
most
part,
are
the
first
topic
area
are
the
health,
health
and
safety
standards.
The
three
remaining
topic
areas
looking
for
direction
this
evening
on
neighborhood
engagement,
duration
and
frequency
of
encampments
in
the
city
when
permitted
and
then
streamlined
permit
process
for
repeated
hosting
of
an
encampment
at
a
specific
site.
R
Again
looking
for
council
direction
on
these
topics
this
evening,
real
quick
overview
of
that
schedule.
Just
as
a
quick
reminder
again,
we
are
in
council
study
session
deliberation
about
the
content
of
the
draft.
We
will
be
holding
a
courtesy
public
hearing
with
the
East
Bellevue
Community
Council
on
the
13th
of
November,
the
public
hearing
here
with
the
City
Council
on
November
18th,
and
will
be
looking
for
final
deliberation
and
adoption
by
the
council
following
that
public
hearing.
R
Q
Q
The
goal
of
this
initial
draft
Lucca
is
to
codify
to
the
greatest
extent
we
can
the
operations
that
we
have
been
operating
under
for
the
administration
of
temporary
encampments
since
2006,
when
the
consent
decree
went
into
effect.
So
in
some
ways
it's
sort
of
like
a
baseline
Lucca
for
how
we've
been
doing
things
for
the
last
13
or
so
years.
Q
I
do
recognize
that
the
concept
of
a
baseline
is
a
little
bit
unusual
in
the
circumstance,
because
our
adopted
code
was
never
implemented,
as
adopted
due
to
our
legal
action
taking
place
immediately
after
the
issuance
of
the
first
permit
and
the
way
the
consent
decree
modified
the
code
that
was
adopted.
So
this
draft
looka.
Q
So
if
you
look
at
attachment
a
for
your
convenience,
we've
provided
kind
of
a
comparison
of
the
initial
adopted
code
and
then
the
provisions
of
the
consent,
decree
that
modify
the
code
and
this
draft
Luthor
tries
to
adopt
and
take
up
all
of
the
issues
that
were
are
in
that
right-hand
column
of
attachment.
A
so.
Q
The
this
is
kind
of
how
the
luca
would
look
if
the
council
were
to
only
adopt
amendments
to
the
land
use
code
that
reflect
how
we
operate
today,
and
if
the
council
were
to
adopt
this
version
of
a
land
use
code
amendment
when
the
consent
decree
expires,
we
would
be
able
to
continue
operating
as
we
currently
do
so.
Per
the
status
quo
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
Tony,
who
will
explain
kind
of
a
few.
M
Thank
You
Cindy,
so
tonight,
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
four
topics
for
council
consideration
a
matter
last
meeting
we
introduced
topics,
one
and
two
for
council
consideration,
I'm
going
to
reintroduce
those
tonight
and
then
delve
into
topics
three
and
four
for
your
review.
So
with
our
first
topic,
the
alignment
of
the
health
and
safety
standards
to
the
consent
decree.
It
is
our
recommendation
for
council
consideration
that
the
health
and
health
and
safety
standards
be
amended
to
reflect
the
operations
under
the
consent
decree,
which
is
noted
in
attachment
C.
M
So
we,
the
reason
for
this
recommendation
is,
is
that
we've
operated
in
this
manner
for
over
13
years.
The
health
and
safety
standards
have
proven
to
be
effective
because
we
haven't
had
any
incidents
of
diseases
and
it's
been
protective
of
Public
Health
and
it
also
aligns
with
the
realities
of
how
TCP
guards
to
numbers
of
showers
sinks
and
toilets.
M
So
that
is
our
recommendation
under
Health
and
Safety.
Moving
to
the
next
topic,
which
is
neighborhood
engagement,
there
are
two
items
for
council
consideration
here.
The
first
is
the
removal
of
the
litter
requirement
from
the
land
use
code
and
then
the
second
is
the
to
add
an
optional
post
issuance
meeting
between
the
encampment
host
and
neighborhood.
So
to
take
the
first
item,
which
is
the
litter
requirement.
M
The
reason
that
we
recommend
removal
of
this
requirement
is
is
that
when
I
went
out
and
I
held
public
meetings
universally,
the
neighbors
would
say
that
they
were
uncomfortable
with
the
requirement
that
it
introduced
non-residents
to
their
neighborhood
and
created
loitering
within
the
neighbor.
So
that's
the
rationale
for
that
request.
In
regards
to
the
optional
post
issuance
meeting,
we
want
to
continue
lines
of
communication
between
the
encampment
host
and
the
neighborhood.
We
want
to
be
able
to
establish
a
point
of
contact.
M
So
moving
to
our
next
topic,
which
is
duration
and
frequency.
So
currently,
under
our
framework,
a
temporary
encampment
host
can
get
a
maximum
of
90
days.
It
is
our
requirement
that
these
days
be
increased
from
90
to
120
days
now.
The
rationale
for
that
increase
in
days
is
that
when
we
went
out-
and
we
had
conversation
with
the
signatories
of
the
consent
decree,
they
stated
that
they
wanted
add
a
minimum
of
a
hundred
and
twenty
days
or
even
more
days,
so
that
they
can
host
temporary
encampments
on
their
property.
M
Now,
conversely,
the
neighborhood
focus
group
stated
that
they
understood
that
the
temporary
encampment
landscape
had
changed
since
2005,
that
it
wasn't
the
same
and
that
the
regional
standard
had
moved
to
a
hundred
and
twenty
days.
So
when
staff
also
did
the
work
that
you
saw
an
attachment
B
and
looked
at
how
other
legislation
has
been
taking
place
within
the
region,
it
appears
to
us
that
there
that
there
is
a
movement
to
a
hundred
and
twenty
days
regionally
now
moving
to
the
topic
of
frequency.
M
M
So
moving
to
our
final
topic,
which
is
the
streamlined
permitting
process.
So
what
this
graphic
is
intended
to
show
is
the
year
1
application
requirements,
so
temporary
encampment
host
and
an
operator
would
have
to
supply
all
of
the
items
in
this
column.
This
is
how
a
temporary
encampment
application
takes
place
today.
This
is
how
we've
done
it
for
the
past
13
years.
The
only
thing
that's
different
now
is
that
an
temporary
encampment
host
would
gain
a
five-year
approval,
and
this
would
only
be
available
for
sites
that
are
in
good
standing.
M
So
moving
to
our
next
graphic,
which
is
intended
to
show
the
subsequent
years
so,
contrary
to
what
you
saw
with
the
first
graphic,
with
the
preponderance
of
information
that
was
required
for
that--some
it'll,
there's
only
four
items
that
are
will
be
required
for
the
subsequent
application
years.
We
would
like
for
the
encampment
host
an
operator
to
send
a
courtesy
letter
to
neighbors
description
of
the
proposal,
arrival,
departure
dates
and
identify
any
modifications
that
may
need
to
take
place,
but
there's
two
other
items
that
I'd
like
to
highlight
under
this
subsequent
year.
M
Application
in
the
first
is
is
that,
with
the
year
1
approval
I
want
everybody
to
keep
in
mind
that
that
year,
one
application
approval
contains
conditions
of
approval.
Those
conditions
remain
in
full
force
and
effect
for
the
duration
of
the
5-year
approval.
The
second
is
is
that
when
Temple
B'nai
Torres
submitted
their
first
application
in
2005,
it
somewhat
became
the
gold
standard
for
how
subsequent
applications
should
be
submitted.
So
what
happened
is
is
that
we
noticed
that
the
subsequent
host
took
what
Temple
B'nai
Torres
submitted.
M
They
copied
it
only
thing:
they
changed
was
the
religious
tenants,
the
site
plan
makeup
and
that's
what
so,
they
were
already
searching
for
ways
to
try
to
create
a
streamlined
process
for
themselves.
So
so
that's
the
overview
of
the
proposed
process
that
we
have
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
Mike.
So.
R
R
A
We
ran
out
of
time.
We
were
the
last
time
that
we
had
this
so
I
would
like
to
if,
if
council
members
want
to
to
spend
some
time
on
this,
we
definitely
have
the
time
to
do
it.
I
have
some
comments
and
concerns
at
some
point
in
time
in
here,
but
I'm
just
looking
to
see
if
whether
than
call
on
someone
who
would
like
to
go.
First
all
call
on
the
deputy
mayor.
Thank.
M
B
A
I
A
question
because
actually
maybe
a
couple
of
them,
so
we
heard
from
this
the
speaker
earlier
that
there
were
a
list
of
principles
that
the
Church
Council
of
Greater
Seattle
has
that
they
wanted
the
cities
to
consider
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
where
it
falls
within
these,
because
we
now
have
one
County
in
three
cities
that
we're
comparing
ourselves
against.
We
have
an
old
consent
decree.
I
We
have
new
state
laws
that
have
changed,
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
that
if
we're
going
to
be
doing
this
cleanup
of
the
land
use
code,
we
would
want
to
understand
all
of
the
pieces
associated
with
it
and
I
guess
I'm
out
so
wondering
if
having
three
cities
and
one
County
is
a-
is
a
good.
It
doesn't
seem
like.
Statistically
that's
a
very
large
data
sample
of
understanding
what
other
cities
might
or
counties
might
be
doing.
So.
Can
you
help
me
with
that?
So.
R
R
This
is
a
very
high
level
kind
of
overview
or
comparison,
but
there's
more
specific
information
that
you're
looking
forward
more
than
happy
to
provide
that,
since
we
did
research,
the
ordinances
and
those
in
the
county
and
in
the
neighboring
cities,
with
respect
to
the
additional
information
on
principles,
certainly,
we
are
open
and
available
to
receiving
any
information
that
that
any
stakeholders
or
parties
would
want
to
submit
for
consideration
and
information.
So
I
have
not
seen
anything
on
that
point
yet,
but
certainly
I
expect
it
will
be
coming.
It.
I
Seems
like
that
would
be
good
to
understand,
because,
especially
when
I
look
at
the
the
location,
frequency
just
looking
at
the
four
samples,
we've
got
no
gap
six
months,
12
months
and
18
months,
so
they're
there
I'm
having
a
hard
time
actually
finding
consistency
amongst
that
data
set,
and
so
that's
what's
prompted.
Maybe
some
questions
in
my
mind
about
that
and
then,
when
I
think
about
the
neighborhood
engagement,
we
talked
about
a
post
issuance
meeting
being
optional.
I
guess
my
question
was:
why
would
why?
Wouldn't
we
make
that
a
mandatory
meeting?
I
And
then,
if
not
very
many
people
come
because
they
think
things
are
going?
Well,
then
people
are
sitting
around
having
cookies
and
I
guess.
The
last
one
comment
would
be
that
once
the
encampment
leads
it
seems
like
that
would
be
a
good
point
to
do.
A
post
assess
host
kind
of
discussion
to
see
what
are
some
lessons
learned
so
that
we
have
that
baked
into
our
learning
and
whatnot.
So
just
a
couple
of
thoughts.
N
Tony
City
Mike,
thanks
for
the
presentation
and
thanks
for
really
focusing
on
the
four
areas
here.
It's
just
beneficial
for
us
to
focus
in
on
that
easily
the
the
health
and
safety
standards,
no
problem
with
that
whatsoever.
Some
providing
some
comment
here
as
well
as
a
few
questions,
but
that
makes
complete
sense
to
me
on
the
neighborhood
engagement
piece.
N
N
To
me,
it's
kind
of
a
depending
upon,
if
you
heard
at
some
point
a
number
of
residents
saying
that
but
to
me
I
think
if
we
can
keep
our
neighborhood
clean,
I,
don't
see
an
issue
with
that.
So
I'm
curious
how
many
people
you
talk
to
or
said
that
it
was
it
statistically.
I
guess
relevant
is
my
point.
I.
A
M
N
N
M
The
neighbors
would
say
was
what
was
the
purpose
of
this
requirement?
We
haven't
had
litter
previously,
okay.
Why
would
we
develop
this
issue
now,
and
that
was
the
response
that
many
of
the
attendees
of
the
public
meeting
generally
said?
Okay,
and
so
there
were
oftentimes
requests
from
neighbors
to
not
do
this
requirement
so.
N
So
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
adopt
this
to
make
it
optional
if
litter
does
become
an
issue
in
that
neighborhood
that
they
could
address
that
on
a
ad-hoc
basis,
make
it
make
it
optional
if
it
does
become,
if
it
doesn't
become
an
issue-
and
there
is
no
neighborhood
or
residents
complaining
about
it,
then
we
just
leave
it
as
is,
but
if
it
does
become
an
issue,
then
perhaps
they
can
take
some
action
along
with
councilmember
is
on
here.
I
feel
like.
N
We
should
keep
that
that
post
insurance
issuance
meeting
this
because
I'm
just
a
strong
advocate
of
neighborhood
engagement,
piece
and
even
if
not
as
many
people
show
up
I,
still
think
there
is
value
to
that.
I
really
do
on
the
on
the
duration
and
frequency.
So
I
heard
the
argument
of
we're
trying
to
more
to
regional
standards,
but
for
me
yeah
again,
I
just
got
a
poke
at
this.
A
little
bit
more
is
that
a
regional
standards
I
mean
it's
working.
Does
that
mean
it's
better
for
our
community?
Is
that
better
for
our
residents?
N
Just
because
it's
a
regional
standard,
I'm,
not
sure
that's
a
convincing
argument
in
and
of
itself
so
beyond
that
is
there
more
convincing
evidence
that
we
should
go
to
that
longer.
Duration,
like,
for
example,
if
you
told
me
the
longer
duration
with
therefore
give
the
temp
encampments
to
find
their.
You
know
their
next
location
or
you
know,
would
help
them.
You
know
streamline
their
operations
in
some
way.
Okay,
that
that's
you
know
that
makes
more
sense
to
me,
but
just
for
the
sake
of
regional
I,
understand.
R
N
N
R
The
for
the
hosts
so
a
longer
period
we
would
require
that
they
have
to
you
know,
relocate
less
frequently
so
clearly
that
that's
an
upside
benefit,
our
experience
with
encampments
as
we've
kind
of
refined.
The
approach
has
been
successful
without
significant
concerns.
Obviously,
there
have
been
challenges
and
we've
tried
to
respond
to
those
challenges
directly.
I
think
that,
but
the
experience
has
been
that
they're
managed
in
a
way
that
has
not
created
a
dramatic
impact.
Let's
say,
although
not
without
a
path:
okay,.
N
R
N
I
think
that's,
but
that's
great,
become
more
efficient
at
this,
but
I
would
like
to
put
some
teeth
in
it
in
terms
of
if
the
operator
is
not
living
up
to
the
standard
sub
P
of
the
agreement,
there
are
X
number
of
residents
that
are
complaining
or
have
concerns,
then
a
way
that
we
can
adjust
and
reevaluate
that
they're
not
part
of
that
five
year
or
if
they
were
initially
approved
for
that
five
year
permanent.
Then
we
put
him
back
on
a
year-to-year
something
along
those
lines.
So.
R
We
absolutely
would
incorporate
that
sort
of
requirement
or
assessment
into
the
end
of
the
regulation
and
if
they
were
not
successful
in
meeting
the
conditions
of
the
permit
and
managing
the
encampment
to
meet
city
standards,
then
then
that
kind
of
ability
to
have
that
simplified
process
would
be
taken
away.
We
had
a
revisit
the
right
the
way,
the
main
great.
N
P
Yeah
I,
like
customer
new
house,
suggestion
and
streamlines
a
little
requirements
and
I
appreciate.
You
know
the
staffs
consideration,
your
response
that
you
were
considering
either
that's
a
good
thing,
because
I
do
see
a
streamlined
process,
it's
good
as
long
as
to
working
properly
and
in
terms
of
duration
and
frequency
III,
but
have
visited.
P
You
know,
he's
Kampmann
and
I've
seen
what
operation
is
like
and,
generally
speaking,
I'm
very
impressed
in
how
they
run
campsites
and
and
I
think
if
it
works
well
again,
if
the
house
and
the
neighbors
are
happy
with
it,
I
see
the
advantage
of
having
longer
generation.
You
know
biggest,
you
mentioned
you've,
gotta,
look
for
a
place.
You
know
and
difficult
and
I've
heard
stories
that
you
think
can
I
find
a
place.
P
They
have
to
go
to
the
to
the
woods
that
they
go
to
see
a
know
that
we've
got
go
under
the
bridges
and
freeways
you
notice
people,
so
I
can
understand
that
so,
and
alignment
of
health
and
safety
standards
to
the
consent,
decree
I,
think
that's
a
no-brainer
I.
Think
that's
very
good.
So
ultimately,
it's
the
neighborhood
Gatemouth,
which
you
know
I,
think
it's
very
important
and
because
the
flexibility
you
want
to
have
in
terms
of
and
the
process,
you
know
the
requirement
process.
P
My
approval
process
and
also
in
terms
of
the
duration
frequency
I,
can
understand
the
reason
why
it
would
be
good
for
the
encampment
that
the
people,
the
clients,
but
it
obviously
has
impact
for
the
neighborhoods,
so
I
would
love
to
see
that
the
neighborhoods
more
engaged
in
better
informed
and
I
think
that
was
suggested
by
both
cuz.
We
resign
your
house
that
there
needs
to
be
more
continuing
conversation
as
we
go
along
and
we
heard
a
couple
neighbors
today.
P
You
know
talking
to
us
before
the
council
meeting
that
they
still
believe
that
engagement
needs
to
be
better.
Somehow
I
I,
don't
know
how
much
or
how
little
you
know.
It's
a
it's
a
relationship.
You
know
situation
so
I
think
we
need
to
pay
attention
there.
We
need
to
work
with
the
neighbors
and
come
up
with
a
process
that
we
can
actually
hear
from
each
other
so
that
we
don't
have
people
coming
to
us
about
yeoman.
Listen
to
us.
You
know
so
thank
you.
Thank
you.
O
Putting
this
together
and
making
it
more
effective,
efficient
and
probably
serving
the
people
that
need
a
lot
better
and
the
same
time
taking
some
of
the
burdens
off
of
the
operators
in
the
congregations
on
this
like
overall
think
it's
very
good-
and
the
things
have
been
pointed
out
are
good.
Yeah
I
knew
already
you
proposed.
Is
he
I
agree
on
adopting
the
proposal
that
you
have
put
forward
on
the
streamline
permit
process?
I,
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So,
on
the
neighborhood
thing?
O
What's
I
know
every
you
know
anytime,
we
get
in
these
there's
there.
Always
some
people
concerns
and
my
impression
from
everything,
I've
read
and
been
involved
in
this
for
some
time.
Is
that
that
overall,
the
the
impact
and
the
the
understanding
of
it
and
all
is
pretty
well
accepted
in
the
neighborhoods
I
mean
some
some
neighbor
its
kind
of
concerned
that
it's
it's
not
one,
that
we
hear
a
lot
of
people
complaining
about
their
concerns
and
they
did
I
think
we
have
the
important
thing
and
they
were
good.
O
Communication
is
if
there
are
concerns
raised,
and
you
look
at
them
and
take
action
on
those.
If
they
are,
you
can
verify
and
they're
serious
actions
which
you
will
do,
but
my
impression
is
that
the
neighborhoods
and
neighbors
in
general
understand
this
is
a
a
very
important
thing
to
do
and
we
are
operating
under
the
consent
decree.
So
we
have
obligations
and
it's
not
something
we
can
just
dismiss
because
somebody's
not
happy
with
it
so
but
I
do
think.
O
Following
up
with
and
having
periodic
input
or
opportunity
for
people
to
you
know
talk
is's
is
fine
and
it's
never.
We've
always
had
people
sending
us
emails
if
they
have
a
problem.
So
but
I
do
appreciate
your
actually
addressing
some
of
the
issues
that
will
probably
make
it
a
better
product
in
the
long
run,
so
I
think
that's
important
piece.
I.
M
Everyone
all
three
members
that
Temple
B'nai
Torah
has
hosted
five
times
now.
Those
hosting
started
out
good,
but
then
the
fourth
deployment
did
not
go
as
well,
but
that
changed
with
the
fifth
deployment,
because
we
had
a
new
rabbi.
We,
he
was
very
much
put
himself
a
bit
and
made
himself
available
to
the
neighborhood.
He
gave
them
his
contact
information.
He
made
sure
to
have
office
hours,
which
is
in
R
aligned
with
the
optional
post
issuance
meeting.
Q
Yeah
and
to
address
that
point
as
well
as
council
members
Islands
question
about,
why
not
make
the
optional
neighborhood
engagement
meeting
a
requirement,
and
that
is
certainly
something
we
can
look
at.
The
kind
of
package
that
has
been
provided
to
Council
as
a
whole
of
recommendations
is
designed
to
have
a
neutral
impact
if
any
impact
on
the
rights
of
the
religious
host
to
practice
their
religious
exercise.
Q
So
modifications
to
that
may
require
a
look
look
at
the
balance
that
would
result
if
that
were
to
take
place,
but
there
are
certainly
ways
to
structure
neighborhood
engagement
that
can
be
effective
based
on
the
existing
land
use
code
framework.
We
have,
as
well
as
the
optional
methods
that
Tony
and
the
staff
are
also
available
have
today
to
use
thank.
O
A
So
I
have
I
I
have
some
concerns
about
the
whole
process
and
the
way
this
is
going,
the
so
number
one
I
would
like
a
circle
back
to
find
out
if
the
consent
decree
will
really
expire.
Okay,
if
then
I
want
people
to
understand,
you
I
know
that
it
runs
out,
but
would
it
be
renewed
so
that
that
is
one
mr.
Ramos's
testimony
today
led
me
to
believe
there's
some
confusion
on
that.
He
had
some
confusion
about
this
process
happening
so
number
one.
A
If
there
is
that
I
have
no
problem
with
this
continuing
into
next
year.
Having
said
that,
I
just
I
I
want
to
and
I'd
go
back
to
what
we
talked
about
13
years
ago.
I
can't
think
of
anything
else
that
is
in
a
single-family
neighborhood.
That
is
a
temporary
use.
That
goes
for
more
than
90
days.
Fact,
I
can't
think
of
a
single
one.
A
You
know
Sammamish,
they
basically
had
as
I
understand
it.
I
may
be
wrong,
but
it's
really
been
the
Catholic
Church.
There
has
been
the
one
that
is
hosted.
It's
not
really
right
up
against
single-family
neighborhoods.
There
may
be
some
multifamily
around
it.
It's
really
in
more
of
a
how
would
I
put
a
commercial
institutional,
because
you've
got
a
number
of
the
schools
across
the
street.
You've
got
the
church.
You
have
some.
A
Civic
buildings
that
are
there,
okay,
so
that's
a
very
different
and
I
understand
that
they
could
probably
deploy
at
a
church
that
may
be
located
in
there
Seattle
again,
it's
very
different
I,
don't
think
that
they
are
limiting
to
I,
don't
think
they
limit
to
just
churches,
I
think
they.
Actually,
that
probably
applies
to
city
sponsored
encampments.
That
is.
Q
A
question
that
particular
section
of
Seattle's
code
does
apply
only
to
religious
host
stings
and
that
use
is
treated
as
an
accessory
use,
as
opposed
to
so.
The
restrictions
applicable
to
the
religious
hosts
are
different
from
the
restrictions
applicable
to
other
hosts
of
temporary
encampments
that
are
permitted
in
Seattle.
But.
A
Well,
and
that
was
sort
of
I
thought
I
was
getting
at
just
here
in
terms
of
the
the
time
frame,
and
then
shoreline
is
often
it's
got
a
different
time
frame.
King
County,
the
again
there
the
churches
are
located
in
a
variety
of
different
different
uses,
some
of
them
yes,
definitely
up
near
homes,
some
of
them
with
some
some
buffer
between
them.
A
So
that's
that's
number
one
number
two,
a
few
weeks
ago,
miss
Morris
testified
about
the
public
safety
and
exactly
what
I
think
exactly
what
the
deputy
mayor
asked
about,
and
that
is
the
ID
I'm.
Sorry,
my
I've
got
to
get
this
back
up.
That's
kind
of
the
ID
Tex
and
that
sort
of
thing,
so
my
understanding
is
we're
not
codifying
that
in
this
new
proposal
is
that
right,
I
think.
A
Q
The
reason
that
that
was
included
in
attachment
a
was
that
the
consent
decree
explicitly
modified
a
requirement
in
the
code.
The
section
of
the
code
that
states
that
reasonable
and
lawful
steps
will
be
taken
to
obtain
verifiable
ID
and
the
resident
log
will
be
maintained
by
the
host
or
the
third-party
operator
approved
by
the
director.
The
consent
decree
only
modified
the
second
part,
which
is
who
will
hold
the
ID
log,
and
that
was
modified
so
that
the
encampment
host
manager
well
mod
will
hold
the
log.
Q
A
So,
and
that's
and
I
mentioned
this
this
morning,
I
think
this
chart
needs
another
column,
which
is
what
is
proposed.
Okay
and
at
this
point,
I
just
want
to
make
it
really
clear:
it's
a
staff
proposal
you're
getting
input
from
from
the
city.
That
is
an
area
where
I
think
that
I
will
be
asking
some
questions
about
what
should
be
in
the
code
and
what
should
be
left
up
to
the.
A
Method
of
operation,
I
will
say,
I
think
the
history
that
we
have
doesn't
lead
me
to
believe
there
should
be
a
five-year
permit,
I
think
the
the
history
that
we
just
talked
about.
There
have
been
a
couple
of
sites
where
the
hosting
has
generally
gone
well,
in
the
sense
that
we
have
not
had
lots
of
complaints.
A
However,
we
have
at
the
temple
it
has,
and
just
let's
just
go
with
the
fourth
and
fifth
one
that,
as
you
said,
was
was
bad
and
I
saw
miss
Morris,
raise
her
flag
and
one
that
she
said
was
good,
which
was
the
fifth
one
and
I
saw
miss
Morris
raise
her
flag
about
that.
So
we
really
need
to
win,
send
number
five
right.
A
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
incent
that
that's
going
to
happen,
but
if
you
do
it
once
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
it's
going
to
be
done
time
and
time
and
time
again,
so
I
think
there
has
to
be
a
little
more
within
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
more
teeth.
If
it
is
a
if
it
is
somehow
deemed
a
success,
then
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
providing
some
quicker
aspect
of
of
permitting,
but
it's
if
it's
successful
again,
then
you
get
that
benefit
again.
A
If
it's
not
successful
the
second
time,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
automatically
should
be
granting
it.
What
would
be
a
third
which
is
I
under
as
I
think
of
the
timing?
That's
really
what
you
would
be
doing
is
you
would
have
the
opportunity
in
a
five-year
period,
for
the
site
to
host
three
times.
Does
that
matter.
Q
Is
a
mom
number
of
Hosting's
for
every
five-year
permit
would
actually
be
four,
but
that's
the
absolute
maximum
and
that
would
be
subject
to
there
being
no
interest
from
other
potential
hosts
and
because
that
permit
is
still
subject
to
the
broader
requirements
of
duration
and
frequency
that
apply
to
all
hosts
in
the
city.
Okay,.
A
A
You've
got
it
I
mean
there's
something
to
say
about
I've
got
it
down,
I
could
do
it,
I
can
do
it
really
well,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
make
sure
they
can
do
it
really
well
each
time
and
if,
if
you
know,
if
they
do
it
well
the
sixth
time
great,
if
they
do
it
poorly
the
seventh
time,
you
know,
then
maybe
there
that
we
don't
want.
We
don't
want
it
to
be
an
automatic
number
eight
and
that's
in
the
camp
in
the
case
of
the
temple,
those.
A
A
Is
there
anybody
who
wants
to
tell
me
just
go
pound
sand?
That's
not
her,
and
but
this
is
really
our
chance
to
talk
and,
as
I
do
feel
passionately
about
this
particular
issue
in
the
effect
that
the
good
effect
that
it
has
on
being
able
to
house
individuals
being
able
to
house
our
community
to
exercise
its
faith.
On
the
other
hand,
it
has
to
be
an
experience
that
works
for
the
neighbors
and
I
know
that
I
think
is
what
we're
all
trying
to
get
to
miss
on
you
raised
your
hand,
yeah.
I
Could
you
raise
something
that
I've
been
thinking
about,
which
is
that
we
want
to?
We
want
to
ensure
success
during
so.
What's
been
bugging
me.
A
little
bit
is
the
idea
that
we
have
a
post
issuance
meeting
and
then
let's
say
that
it's
a
hundred
and
twenty
days
I'd
like
to
think
that
most
faith
communities
actually
want
to
engage
with
the
community
so
having
some
regular
check-ins
and
discussions
along
during
what
actually
makes
sense,
because
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
get
to
the
end.
I
Have
it
be
one
that
didn't
work
and
then
what
we're
saying
is
we
don't
want
you
to
come
back
when
the
goal
is
actually
that
it's
working
for
the
being
campement
as
well
as
the
neighborhood?
So
it's
it's
one
that,
as
you
were
talking
really
struck
me,
is
that
that
if
the
goal
is
that
wherever
it
is
during
that
duration
of
time
that
it's
successful,
then
what
are
all
the
things
we
should
be
putting
in
place
not
as
a.
I
Not
as
a
punishment
but
as
a
as
a
way
to
engage
with
the
community
for
a
win-win
for
everybody
and
the
way
that
it's
currently
written
doesn't
sound
like
it
really
gets
to
that
and
I
know.
There
was
some
discussion
about
the
fact
that
this
is
religious
freedoms
and
it
should
be
optional.
We
shouldn't
be
forcing
anything
but
I
have
a
belief
that
the
faith
community
actually
wants
to
engage
and
would
want
the
success
for
the
community.
I
O
M
What
I
was
going
to
say
is
that
we
have
had
positive,
temporary
encampment
Hosting's
throughout
the
city.
We
had
two
Hosting's
at
st.
Luke's
Church.
We
had
two
Hosting's
at
First
United
Methodist
Church,
both
of
those
went
very
well,
and
we
also
had
a
hosting
at
church
a
resurrection
so
that
we
have
a
history
of
the
church
and
congregation
reaching
out
listening
to
its
neighbors,
and
then
you
know
providing
after-action
contact
once
the
temporary
encampment
permit
has
been
issued.
So
what
we're
so
it
they
are
always
available
to
meet
with
neighbors
it
doesn't.
M
The
conversation
doesn't
stop
just
because
the
encampment
permit
has
been
issued
and
they've
demonstrated
that
very
well
through
the
previous
Hosting's
I
will
say,
though,
that
the
fourth
deployment
at
Temple,
B'nai,
Torah
I,
believe
that
that
encampment
did
not
go
very
well
because
of
two
things.
You
had
a
change
in
leadership,
Rabbi,
Morelle
retired.
We
had
an
interim
rabbi
coming
in.
He
had
no
idea
about
the
requirements
of
an
encampment
and
then
they
had
appointed
contact,
but
the
point
of
contact
wasn't
available
when
a
neighbor
would
call
to
complain
about
operational
failures.
M
So
there
was
a
host
of
things
that
happened
with
that
deployment
that
were
not
typical
to
what
happened
with
the
other
deployments
or
the
nine
deployments
that
we've
had
in
the
city.
So
I
believe
it
was
an
anomaly
I.
Don't
think
that
it
was
a
norm
and
that's
why,
when
the
interim
direct
in
Turin
rabbi
became
permanent,
he
made
sure
that
he
was
available.
He
designated
himself
as
a
point
of
contact.
He
kept
office
hours,
and
that
was
the
change
and
I
would
say
that
BPD
and
myself
thought
that
that
was
a
successful
hosting.
I
J
I
R
Thinking,
as
you
heard,
Ms
Pratt
described
the
success.
The
successful
engagements
were
those
were,
there
was
ongoing
communication,
and
the
idea
behind
this
recommendation
was
to
really
take
that
expectation
up
to
a
another
level,
because
the
code
and
requirements
for
deployments
don't
have
that
post
issuance
requirement
there
or
an
expectation
so
that
that
is
the
idea
to
to
make
sure
it
is
clear
that
you
want
to
make
sure
the
lines
of
communication
are
open.
R
There
are
people
that
are
are
reachable
and
are
expected
to
be
reachable
at
any
time
when
there's
a
net
deployment
in
a
neighborhood
or
at
a
church.
So
that
is
what
we
were
trying
to
get
at.
With
this
recommendation
and
again
the
question:
it's
a
balance
about
how
far
over
to
requirement
to
get
versus
expectation
versus
the
code
is
silence,
so
this
is
meaning
into.
We
want
ongoing
post
issuance
engagement
as
an
expectation
and
how
these
deployments,
maybe.
O
O
You
know
we're
putting
a
shelter
in
place,
but
it's
not
going
to
house
everybody
who
needs
it.
This
has
been
operating
for
some
times
and
seems
to
have
general
success,
maybe
one
bad
and
season
and
we're
going
from
you
know,
90
days
to
120
days,
that's
three
months
to
four
months:
it's
not
like
it's
there
forever
and
the
time
the
difference
is
goes
pretty
fast.
I'm
not
concerned
about
the
time
as
being
a
big
Bugaboo
on
that
and
the
other
is
the
things
we've
been
talking
about.
O
How
far
can
we
go
under
a
consent
decree
to
accomplish
nice
and
if
we
can't
do
it
putting
in
a
code
or
something
like
that,
we
certainly
can
do
I
think
what
Mike
is
saying
is
the
way
to
approach
this,
and
we
probably
could
have
I
mean
it's
difficult.
Even
with
30
days,
I
mean
not
90
days
than
120
gives
a
little
more
time,
but
by
the
time
you
find
out
a
problem
with
the
the
person
in
charge
and
work
on
it.
You
know
a
lot
of
times
gone,
so
it's
it's.
O
It's
such
a
short
time
period
so
like
and
I
what
I
gather
from
your
conversation
is
we're
a
lot
more
aware
and
working
with
them
from
the
beginning
on
it.
I
think
that's!
The
key
is
to
keep
tabs
with
and
work
with
them
and
have
ways
to
if
something
is
going
south
and
in
the
first
couple
of
weeks
that
you
know
be
able
to
talk
about
it.
So
I
think
we
can
work
this
out.
O
If
this
is
going
to
happen,
we
can
make
it
work
well,
it
sounds
to
me
like
there
are
very
few
projects
that
actually
over
time
period,
five
or
six
seven
years
are
absolutely
perfect
every
time.
So
we
understand
we've
raised
issues
and
we
know
what
we're
looking
for
in
terms
of
how
to
make
it
work
better
and
seems
to
me
that
we
were
setting
it
up
in
a
better
way
to
have
it
successful.
O
A
So
I
think
actually,
council
members
on
said
something
that
sort
of
sparked
my
interest,
and
that
was
when
you
said
to
be
a
good
neighbor.
We
did
do
some
work
in
the
permanent
shelter
ordinance
on
a
good,
neighbor,
ongoing
group.
That
may
be
something
to
consider
of
any
time.
There
is
a
a
deployment
and
it
may
be
an
incentive
to
do
it.
That
could
be.
A
If
you
establish
a
good
neighbor
committee,
you
can
go
from
90
to
120
days,
I,
don't
know
and
and
I
don't
want
to
make
this
I
think
my
personal
opinion
again
is
we
made
the
good
neighbor
committee
a
little
too
prescriptive
in
the
in
the
permanent
shelter
ordinance.
That's
always
good,
but
I
think
in
this
case
a
some
form
of
that
I
and
I
think
it
reaches
that
thing
of
ongoing
dialogue.
So
it's
more
than
an
initial
meeting
you
know
and
so
that
that
is
an
idea
that
I
I
think
we
might
want
to
explore.
A
R
Again,
we
were
on
these
topics.
I
guess
the
starting
place,
as
ms
Lynn
described
is
the
draft
as
it
currently
exists,
is
essentially
aligned
with
a
consent,
decree
and
the
way
we've
been
operating
for
the
past
13
years.
The
three
other
topics
in
neighborhood
engagement,
the
duration
and
frequency
and
streamlining
were
areas
that
we
thought
warranted
additional
consideration
for
amendments
to
that
draft.
R
If
the
council
would
like
us
to
introduce
those
for
the
public
hearing,
we
can
add
them
to
the
draft
and
open
it
up
for
public
discussion,
understanding
that
it's
not
final
until
the
council
adopts
it
after
deliberation
is
following
the
public
hearings.
If
you
want
to
just
advance
the
draft
in
its
current
form,
the
public
hearing,
that's
also
an
option
in
front
of
the
council.
So
on
these
on
neighborhood
engagement,
duration
and
streamlining
the
permit
I
guess
we're
just
looking
for
a
nod.
Do
you
want
us
to
incorporate
language
for
further
discussion
in
public?
A
A
No
something
more
to
add,
I
think
if
there's
I,
don't
think,
there's
I'm
not
sure
that
everybody
I
don't
think
that
there
is
much
of
an
issue
about
the
litter
control
I'm.
Talking
about
unnamed
the
neighborhood
engagement
that
we've
just
sort
of
been
talking
about.
Should
there
be
a
good
neighbor
committee?
Should
there.
A
B
R
O
Where
I
would
begin
yes,
John
I
would
move
that
we
add
those
three
to
the
package
and
including
the
expanded
neighborhood
engagement
piece,
in
other
words,
it's
across
some
process.
As
we've
been
talking,
you
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
their
conversation.
I
think
there's
the
meat
of
its
in
there.
Okay.
B
A
B
A
Well,
I
think
the
practical
nature
of
that
is,
if
you,
if
you
give
them
a
90
day,
permit
you
really
can't
just
extend
it
again,
for
there
are
30
days
while
it's
going
on.
But
if
you
were
to
an
alternative
would
be.
If
you
meet,
let's
say
the
neighborhood
engagement
level,
you
would
get
the
hundred
and
you
could
potentially
get
the
hundred
and
twenty
days.
Yes,.
B
I
guess
my
concern
is:
if
it's
not
working,
you
know
if
it's
somehow
the
facility
is
not
meeting
the
goals
that
we've
set
up.
That
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
go
for
a
hundred
and
twenty
days
that
we
have
some
period
of
reassessment
after
90
days
where
we
could
I,
don't
know
how
best
to
do
that,
but
I
would
just
hate
to
lengthen
the
stay
to
120
days
without
some
qualification
on
that.
Well,.
A
Q
As
of
yet,
although
I
just
do
want
to
emphasize
that
that
still
is
a
option
when
things
are
going
poorly
in
such
a
manner
that
there
is,
you
know
it
there.
It
is
verifiable
evidence
that
is
not
operating
as
it
should
be
and
as
permitted,
but
we
again
are
open
to
looking
at
how
we
can
address
those
concerns
in
a
way
that
does
not
have
a
net
increase
on
the
religious
host.
Really
just
exercise
of.
N
N
So
if
you
can
and
I
know,
don't
want
to
get
too
much
into
the
weeds
here,
but
can
be
a
little
specific
in
terms
of
would
it
take
three
complaints
before
you
take
action
about
revoking
the
the
permit,
or
is
it
five
complaints
and
what
type
of
complaints
so
can
you
give
me
a
sense
of
what
the
trigger
is
for
actually
moving
the
account
or
removing
their
permit
to
allow
them
to
stay
there?
So.
N
R
When
we
get
a
complaint,
we
particularly
for
an
in-camera,
we
would
respond
very
quickly
to
investigate
so
and
determine
whether
it
was
a
you
know,
a
valid
complaint
and
our
typical
processes
is
to
seek
voluntary
correction.
We
gain
voluntary
correction
most
of
the
time,
very
rarely
that
we
don't.
If
we
didn't
receive
voluntary
correction,
we
quickly
escalate
that
up
into
a
civil
violation.
So
we
can,
you
know,
move
pretty
quickly
to
nor.
R
Days
it
can
be,
it
could
be
days
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
violation.
So
if
it's
a
safety
concern
would
be
immediate
mmm-hmm,
so
we
again
in
and
that
there's
a
whole
gradation
of
level
of
safety
concern.
Could
it
be
the
sinks
not
working
properly?
Okay,
that's
a
health
concern
right
is
it
you
know
in
imminent
danger?
No,
so
again
we
would
we
would
deal
with
us
if
we
are
in
a
situation
where
we
have
repeat
violations
in
a
non-responsive
post.
R
We
would
move
probably
fairly
quickly
to
essentially
inform
them
that
we
would
be
revoking
their
permit
if
they
don't
gain
compliance.
So
you
continue
to
to
step
up
the
level
of
authority,
I
guess
to
gain
compliance
up
to
and
including
a
potential
revocation
which
we
have
not
had
to
do
to
date
again.
N
J
R
O
I
still
think
120
days
is
reasonable
and
we're
kidding
we're
talking
about
fairly
short
time
period,
and
there
is
a
factor
of
I
hope
that
we
don't
well.
This
is
why
they
call
government
and
a
lot
of
things
of
bureaucracy,
because
we're
burek
your
appetising
this
and,
in
a
certain
extent,
we're
gonna
micromanage
it
a
lot
I
think
we
set
the
parameters
and
what
you
just
said
is
I
have
confidence.
O
If
that's
your
job
is
to
make
sure
they
meet
these
and
you
deal
with
it
and
120
days
makes
it
a
better
I
think,
a
better
experience.
All
the
way
around
I.
Don't
argue
that
one
and
I
just
hope
we
don't
get
bogged
down
in
trying
to
micromanage
a
situation
that
doesn't
appear
to
be
a
big
issue,
and
then
we
already
have
ways
to
to
deal
with
it
happen
one
time
and
was
not
good,
but
I
think
we've
learned
from
that
and
what
you
said
shows
we
can
do
something
on
it.
P
For
these
people
here,
you
come
after
many
options
if
they
are
staying
there
for
how
many
days
and
they're,
given
us,
you
gotta
move
up,
we're
gonna
do
you're
gonna
move
to
under
the
roof
in
three
ways:
that's
what
you're
gonna
get
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
strict!
Everybody
wants
some
certainty.
Predictability
when
they
plan
on
things,
maybe
six
months,
three
months
to
plan
what
what's
the
next
thing
they
can
do
so
it's
very
important
so
I
be.
We
do
have
options.
Obviously,
as
government's
might
mention,
I
mean
if
they
committed
something.
P
We
can
take
actions
so,
but
I
do
agree
with
the
mayor's
or
a
number
of
things,
but
I
think
that
can
be
resolved.
Basically,
through
engagement,
talk
to
the
community
more
frequent,
continuous
discussion
and
because
they,
the
people
who
are
in
the
temp
campement
they're,
not
they're,
not
gonna,
want
to
cut
their
own
on
throw
in
a
way
they
want
to
do
the
best
they
can
to
have
a
place
to
stay
and
I
think
they
are
pre-qualified.
P
From
that
point
of
view,
with
with
operating
people
with
the
hosts
and
I
think
we
have
seen
that
in
the
past
history,
we
don't
have
any
real
people
if
they
have
individuals
that
may
not
do
that.
I
think
the
operator
has
ways
to
take
care
of
that
right,
and
so
they
do
so
they're
not
going
to
endanger
everybody
so
and
the
only
other
thing
I
want
to
mention
which
we
did
measures.
Mr.
Ramos
mentioned
their
action
greater.
P
So
it
looks
like
that
they
are
still
working
on
some
of
the
input
that
we
made
Jews
so
I
think
that's
a
I
think
we
need
to
listen
to
that.
We
need
to
get
that
input
whatever.
That
is
I,
don't
know
honey,
but
maybe
you
know
you
have
time
to
do
that,
because
you're
just
making
a
draft
so
I
think
we
su
can
get
input
right.
That's
right,
I
think
mr.
rainbows
will
promise
to
work
with
us.
Yes
based
on
his
head.
This
is
something
we
need
to
look
Thanks.
A
I
I
M
Conducted
an
after-action
memo,
we
did
that
after
the
fifth
hosting
at
Temple,
B'nai
Torah,
so
BPD
and
I
went
out
and
we
you
know,
did
an
assessment.
What
why
was
it
so
successful?
What
were
the
things
that
were
changed
and
we
identified
you
know
we
had
a
point
of
contact
that
was
available
all
the
time.
You
know
we
they
kept
office
hours
and-
and
so
the
report
documented,
those
things
and
TC
4
was
also
part
of
the
conversation
and
they
talked
about
the
things
operationally
that
they
did
as
well.
So
it
was
all
so.
A
A
What
do
you
call
it
a
faith
in
the
system
right,
you
should
and
I,
don't
know
who
all
you
went
out
and
talked
to,
but
if
there
is
a
good
neighbor
group
that
good
neighbor
group
should
be
involved,
it
should
be
more
than
just
talking
with
the
temple
and
talking
with
the
tc4
representatives.
So
the
question
kind
of
becomes:
do
we
want?
Do
you
want
to
codify
that?
Or
do
you
want
to
just
say
that?
That's
something
that
well.
A
I
would
like
to
see
something
as
part
of
and
I
think.
This
goes
to
neighborhood
engagement,
that
that's
where,
where
this
would
go,
I
think
there's
at
least
three
of
us
who
would
like
to
do
something
along
those
lines
and
then
I
think
the
other
would
be
to
stay
at
this
point
with
the
120-day
with
a
12
month,
gap
I
have
some
questions
about
that,
but
and
then
what
our
council
members
thoughts
on?
A
What
should
we
take
forward
to
the
public
on
a
streamlined
permit
process
going
everything
from
there
is
no
streamlined
permit
process
to
the
permit
process,
streamline
that's
been
a
place,
that's
been
suggested
by
staff
and
something
in
between
and
I
think
in
on
the
especially
on
the
in-between.
We
would
kind
of
need
to
give
some
direction
as
to
what
that
in
between
is.
A
I
understand
what
the
the
post
issuance
well
I
know.
They
were
going
to
go
back
and
look
at
it.
I
kind
of
heard
several
council
members
wanting
it
to
be
a
requirement.
Yes,
correct.
Okay,
oh
and
it
may
be
that
the
post
issuance
is
supplanted
by
a
good
neighbor
type
group
I
mean
that,
just
as
an
ongoing
dialogue
again,
I
don't
want
to
write
this
on
the
fly.
I'd
like
you
to
all
have
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
So
I.
Q
A
What
you're
hearing
is
a
little
more
robust
in
the
in
the
codification
right
I
think
we
should
leave
I
think
where
we
were
was
leave
the
120
and
12
for
the
purpose.
That's
not
a
decision
by
us
that
that's
what
we're
gonna
stay
with,
but
that
is
for
the
purpose
of
going
forward
with
the
draft
and
now
I'd
like
to
come
back
to
the
streamlined
permit
process.
I.
A
O
B
What
you're
recommending
is
that
we,
if
somebody
receives
a
permit,
it's
a
five
year
permit
and
they
can,
after
a
hundred
and
twenty
days
kind
of,
have
an
expedited
Reaper
meeting
that
has
a
courtesy
letter
to
the
neighborhood.
A
description
of
the
proposal
gives
their
arrival
and
departure
dates
and
identifies
any
modification
that
was
made
to
the
previous
approval.
So.
B
M
M
Twelve
month
gap
between
a
hundred
and
twenty
day
deployment,
and
so,
as
you
can
see
from
this
graphic,
four
deployments
feasibly
could
take
place
now.
The
thing
that
I
want
to
keep
in
mind
here
is
is
that,
although
an
encampment
host
could
have
four
deployments,
what
I
found
is
is
that,
depending
on
where
these
deployments
fall,
they
may
or
may
not
even
take
the
whole
120
days
yeah.
M
B
I
have
to
ask
the
question
I
know:
we've
had
really
good
success
with
these
encampments
in
the
past,
but
just
kind
of
as
the
worst
case
scenario,
if
the
first
120
day
period
didn't
go
so
well
for
the
city
and
for
the
neighborhood,
and
there
was
a
reapplication
for
another
opportunity
a
year
later.
What
are
the
assurances
that
we
wouldn't
repeat
what
went
wrong?
The
first.
M
Time
so
we
would
learn
from
the
best
practices
and
that's
what
we
did
between
the
fourth
deployment
and
the
fifth
appointment,
BPD
and
I.
We
change
the
conditions.
We
looked
for
different
things
so
that
we
can
provide
certainty
on
how
that
those
deployments
would
take
place,
and
so
that
had
to
do
with
a
point
of
contact,
forbidding
the
operator
from
denying
residents
the
ability
to
call
9-1-1
as
an
example.
M
R
I
think
is
part
of
that.
Obviously,
it's
part
of
the
outreach
and
the
subsequent
hosting
would
really
are
touching
on
the
things
that
were
important.
The
communication
out
to
the
neighborhood
clarity
about
what
is
the
duration?
What
are
they
coming
when?
Are
they
leaving
things
that
are
important,
I
think
what
might
be
helpful,
just
listening
to
counsels
discussion
on
this
in
this
particular
kind
of
construct
would
be
providing
some
additional
language
on.
What
does
success?
Look
like
in
the
deployment?
R
What
are
those
key
elements
of
success
in
the
deployment
that
would
ensure
that
when
they
do
come
back,
they've
they've
met
the
criteria
in
the
first
one,
and
the
simplified
process
would
continue
to
apply?
If
not,
we
can
obviously
take
corrective
actions
to
ensure
that
when
they
do
return,
additional
conditions
or
expectations
are
established
and
enforced.
Yeah.
I
Is
that
clear
understanding
from
the
host
that
these
were
the
things
that
either
made
it
successful
or
the
nuances
that
had
to
be
tweaked
so
that
it
isn't
one
of
those
where
we're
reefs
like
we
are
providing
the
letter
and
the
description,
and
it's
this
mechanical
technical
piece
versus
the
the
people
part
that
actually
make
it
successful.
So
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
can
put
some
nuance
in
there
about
that,
if
possible,.
M
M
P
P
Approval
in
the
future
right,
no
so
I
think
if
we
have
a
good
engagement
process
with
a
neighbor
and
with
with
the
hosts
and
others
operators,
I
mean
that
I
never
parties
involved
and
if
we
do
it
diligently,
if
the
city
staff,
if
they
don't
do
it,
if
they
are
not
satisfactory
in
the
first
year,
you
denied
them
right.
They
should
know
you
should
know
during
the
process
during
the
first
year
what
they
have
to
do
to
maintain
good
standing.
So
they
can
get.
Secondly,
approval.
Then
they
have
the
burden.
P
O
Think
we
all
want
it
to
be
successful.
What
I'd
like
to
know
is,
can
we
have
a
session
on
which
we
discuss
the
things
that
make
it
successful
and
can
we
lined
it
out
and
what
kind
of
manual
are
we
going
to
add
op?
That
would
specify
that
so
that
you
have
something
that
look
at
and
you
check
off
the
boxes
for
them
all
right
again.
O
I
think
we're
just
we're
complicating
a
something
of
people
trying
to
help
people
and
and
and
we're
making
it
difficult
to
do
that
I
think
and
I'm
just
a
little
concerned.
We
want
I,
don't
I,
guess
what
you'd
I'd
like
you
to
come
back
then
and
tell
us
what
are
the
criteria?
What
what
does
the
congregation
have
to
do
to
be
successful
and
where
the
points
and
how
are
you
going
to
monitor
that?
O
And
what
do
you
do
if
it's
15
points-
and
they
have
is
it
they
have
to
meet
ten
and
of
them
or
five
over
or
what
I
think
we're
again?
I
just
want
to
say,
I
think
we're
just
complicating
and
not
real
complex
situation
and
we're
kind
of
ignoring
the
people
that
need
to
help
in
a
sense
and
that
the
congregation's
have
a
little
broader
authority
to
do
something.
Then
we
normally
look
at
so
I'm
just
concerned
about
because
you're
a
bureaucrat
icing
this
too
much.
But
that's
just
my
view.
R
Quick
response,
absolutely
so
I
think
you're
right
about
there's
a
question
about
what
level
of
detail
that
we
put
in
the
code
versus
we
apply
discretion
when
we're
administering
the
code,
there's
a
significant
amount
of
discretion,
and
we
do
this
every
day,
and
so
every
situation
offers
a
different
set
of
variables
and
obviously
counsel
is
being
clear
about.
You
know.
We
wanna
make
sure
that
we're
setting
this
up
so
we're
clear
about
what
success
means.
N
A
N
A
So
the
consensus
is
on
this
particular
topic:
the
five-year
approval
and
again
this
is
the
consensus
to
move
forward
to
the
public
hearing
and,
what's
in
the
code,
is
the
consensus
to
move
forward
with
the
staff
proposal,
and
we
take
testimony
on
that.
Are
there
things
that
anybody
would
like
to
see
at
this
point
modified
in
the
staff
proposal.
R
P
A
N
R
A
A
A
The
council
is
going
to
now
go
into
a
private
session
like
an
executive
session
dealing
with
a
quasi-judicial
matter.
This
is
covered
under
our
CW
42
0.3
0.1
4
0
under
/
end.
This
is
going
to
be
approximately
30
minutes
and
we
will
simply
we
will
not
come
back
into
public
session,
and
so
we
will
adjourn
out
of
executive
session.
We
will
not
be
coming
back
into
any
public
session
to
take
any
public
action.
Following
that,
okay,
we
will
go
into
executive
session.