►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting February 16, 2021
Description
Bellevue City Council Regular Session
A
C
C
A
A
D
You,
madam
mayor,
whereas
february
19
marks
the
anniversary
of
president
franklin,
delano
roosevelt
signing
executive
order
9066
in
1942,
which
authorized
the
united
states
government
to
create
military
exclusion.
Areas
frequently
referred
to
as
internment
camps
for
japanese
americans
living
on
the
west
coast
and.
H
A
Whereas
the
city
of
bellevue
recognizes
the
value
of
its
diverse
residents,
workers
and
visitors
and
is
committed
to
inclusion,
access,
equality
and
opportunity
for
all
now,
therefore,
I
lynn,
robinson
may,
or
the
city
of
bellevue
washington
and
on
behalf
of
our
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
the
week
of
february
14th
through
the
21st
as
a
week
of
action
and
remembrance
and
urge
the
residents
of
bellevue
to
reflect
on
this
enforce
unfortunate
time
in
our
nation's
history.
The
city
further
reaffirms
its
commitment
to
protecting
the
civil
rights
of
everyone
in
our
community.
A
Okay
on
to
the
approval
of
the
agenda.
H
I
A
Okay,
next,
we
have
oral
communications
city
clerk.
Do
we
have
anybody
signed
up
to
speak
tonight?
Yes,.
B
J
J
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
members
of
the
council.
This
is
randy
banneker
representing
the
seattle
king
county
realtors.
I
wanted
to
chat
with
you
again
tonight
and
thank
you
for
your
work
on
the
accessory
dwelling
unit
and
unit
lot
subdivision
code
amendments
and
encourage
your
passage
of
those
pieces
of
legislation
tonight.
These
two
code
amendments
represent
important
housing,
affordability,
strategies
and
expanded
home
ownership
opportunities
consistent
with
the
city's,
affordable
housing
strategy.
J
Edu's
are
a
great
tool
to
inject
some
affordability
into
the
city
while
contributing
to
neighborhood
quality
and
stability.
Through
the
flexibility
these
units
offer
homeowners,
edu's
can
serve
as
an
income
stream
to
help
with
the
mortgage
or
other
expenses.
They
can
allow
homeowners
on
fixed
incomes
to
age
in
place
by
running
the
adu
or
moving
into
the
adu
and
running
the
primary
residence.
J
J
This
is
important
because
condominium
condominium
construction
liability,
while
easing
through
amendments
to
the
state
condominium
act,
remains
a
costly
barrier
to
new
condo
construction.
As
a
result,
condos
affordable
to
middle-income
murders
aren't
being
built
in
the
numbers
that
we'd
like
to
see
them
unit
lot.
Subdivisions
offer
a
viable
alternative
thanks
for
your
time
tonight,.
B
K
K
I
strongly
endorse
this
ordinance
and
I
hope
you'll
support
it
next
month,
we'll
mark
three
years
since
my
husband
and
I
moved
into
our
newly
built
forever
home
when
we
designed
it,
we
envisioned
that
his
dream
garage
workshop
could
someday
be
converted
into
a
small
apartment
for
guests,
family,
family
members,
a
long-term
tenant
or
perhaps
a
caretaker
for
us,
as
we
age
he's
still
using
that
shop
space.
But
it's
nice
to
know
it
has
a
future
use.
Accessory
dwelling
units
are
a
type
of
housing
that
sorely
lacking
in
bellevue.
K
Some
have
called
it
the
missing
middle.
It's
the
housing,
that's
affordable
for
those
who
make
too
much
to
qualify
for
publicly
subsidized
housing,
but
can't
afford
to
rent
in
the
gleaming
new
towers.
We
see
downtown
much
less
buy
in
our
expensive
real
estate
market,
but
this
is
also
the
housing
for
those
who,
like
the
calmer,
older,
leafier
neighborhoods.
K
This
is
the
infill
housing
for
young
people,
starting
out
in
their
careers
for
small
families,
for
our
underpaid
teachers
and
healthcare
workers
are
boomerang
millennials
and
for
homeowners
who
are
helping
to
supplement
their
income,
so
they
can
age
in
place.
Thank
you
again
for
helping
to
create
the
missing
middle
housing
in
bellevue.
B
L
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
good
good
evening,
robinson
council
members.
I
have
two
items
to
report
under
under
the
city
manager's
report
this
evening
and
the
first
one
is
a
quick
overview
of
the
city's
wraparound
services
program,
which
is
housed
in
the
parks
and
community
services
department,
and
it's
about
how
the
program
has
adapted
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
most
vulnerable
students
and
families
during
the
pandemic.
L
M
Good
evening
mayor
robinsons,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
members
and
city
manager
miyake,
I'm
excited
to
join
you
this
evening
to
share
the
good
news
about
the
wrap
around
services
program.
M
M
So
today
the
city
of
bellevue
has
two
wraparound
coordinators
who
serve
the
communities
of
stevenson
and
lake
hills,
elementaries
and
odell
and
highland
middle
schools.
As
you
can
see,
these
are
some
of
the
most
diverse
schools
in
bellevue.
M
M
A
few
of
the
outcomes
of
work
done
by
the
city's
wrap-around
coordinators
includes
increased
school
readiness,
a
sense
of
belonging
and
ownership
among
children.
Families
are
more
involved
in
their
children's
education.
Families
feel
welcome
at
their
their
child's
school
and
they
have
increased
access
to
services
using
a
strengths-based
approach.
Our
wraparound
program
addresses
social
issues,
recreation,
health,
academic
needs,
family
services
and
community
needs.
M
A
few
practical
examples
of
this
work
have
included
connecting
children
and
families
to
mental
health
services,
creating
partnerships
that
provide
children
with
school
activities,
including
sports,
fine
arts,
robotics
and
cultural
celebrations,
also
hosting
community
fairs
for
families
to
access
immunizations
information
from
city
leaders
attend
legal
clinics
and
learn
about
community
service
providers
also
providing
support
to
families,
thus
ensuring
access
to
housing,
food
and
clothing
and,
lastly,
collaborating
with
community
partners
to
provide
children
with
access
to
tutoring,
mentoring
programs
and
early
screening
for
learning
disabilities.
M
The
hardship
of
the
pandemic
will
leave
a
lasting
impact
which
will
result
in
many
families
experiencing
an
increased
need
for
human
services
for
some
families.
This
is
a
complex
and
truly
unfamiliar
process
to
navigate
as
our
schools
gradually
reopen
and
some
adults
are
able
to
return
to
work.
The
support
and
collaboration
of
our
wrap-around
services
program
will
remain
critical.
M
A
I
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
yeah,
I'm
very,
very
glad
and
proud
to
do
this.
I
The
wrap
around
program
was
that
was
the
thing
that
really
brought
together
the
school
district
and
the
city
and
the
city
got
getting
involved
and
patrick
foreign
was
as
at
that
time.
The
park's
director
was
very
involved
in
that,
and
I
got
involved
with
through
the
bellevue
schools
foundation.
I
We
were
involved
with
this
and
as
as
well
as
with
the
bellevue
council
ptsa,
and
particularly
the
four
schools
that
are
involved
in
this
were
the
ones
that
we
started
really
working
on
and
when
I
we
formed
this
bridging
the
achievement
gap
committee
to
help
those
schools
who
didn't
get
the
big
support
from
the
ptas
and
others
and
needed
it.
And
we
worked
with
the
wraparound
group
as
well,
and
then,
frankly,
it
was
one
of
the
things
that
really
led
to
the
formation
of
east
side
pathways.
I
So
it's
all
been
an
interwoven
thing
and
it's
a
very
great
partnership
that
has
continued
and
grown
and
is
something
that
bellevue
as
a
city
can
be
very,
very
proud
of
in
the
school
district
as
well.
So,
thanks
for
letting
me
talk
about
this
because
it's
something
that's
very
dear
to
my
heart
and
I'm
glad
to
see
it
going
and
and
doing
so
well.
Okay,
thank
you,
michael.
A
It's
a
great
program,
thank
you
very
much,
and
then
we
I
asked
mr
miyake
to
provide
us
a
report
on
the
snow
plowing,
because
this
is
the
first
snow
incident.
I've
had
since
I've
been
a
council
member
where
I
didn't
get
one
single
complaint
from
the
residents
about
snow
and
and
then
I
read
about
this
amazing
concoction
that
they
used,
and
so
I
thought
we
should
all
hear
more
about
it.
So
mr
miyaki
yeah.
L
Thank
you.
Marriage,
as,
as
many
of
you
know,
we
got
some
snow
this
weekend.
Many
of
you
got
over
12
inches
of
snow
and
so
joining
us
this
evening
is
mark
poe,
as
well
as
brian
breeden,
from
our
transportation
departments,
to
provide
that
you
know
the
city's
report
on
our
response
to
this
most
recent
snow
event
this
weekend
so
mark
thanks.
N
Mr
miyagi,
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
new
in-house
and
members
of
the
council,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
now
and
we
have
a
few
powerpoint
slides
for
you.
A
N
There
we
go
yeah
put
this
okay,
so,
let's
start
with
just
a
summary
of
the
event,
we
went
into
around
the
clock,
staffing
mark.
J
N
Okay,
fantastic,
thank
you,
and
let's
go
into
that.
Can
you
still
see
it?
Yes,
okay,
great!
So,
like
I
mentioned,
we
went
into
around
the
clock
staffing
back
on
thursday,
the
11th
at
11
a.m.
We
did
receive
a
high
volume
of
snow,
as
the
city
manager
manager
mentioned
over
a
foot
in
places
and
with
that
that
impactful
snow
really
started
friday
night
kind
of
went
into
saturday
morning.
We
expected
a
break
on
saturday.
N
We
didn't
get
it
kept
snow
on
saturday
and
then
well
into
sunday
very
dry,
snow
and
then
the
snow
through
sunday
into
monday,
was
more
wet
and
and
did
compact,
even
more
so
in
high
snow
volume.
Events
like
this,
it's
really
good
to
have
prioritization,
because
we
can't
get
everywhere
at
once,
and
so,
with
this
snowfall
we
stayed
on
the
primary
arterials
and
then
those
primary
neighborhood
routes
into
sunday
sunday.
We
started
to
get
to
some
of
the
secondary
routes
and
then
on
monday
we
started
concentrating
on
all
other
roads
in
bellevue.
N
Just
some
quick
statistics
we
placed
over
13,
000
gallons
of
liquid
de-icer
and,
as
the
the
mayor
mentioned,
we
have
a
little
more
on
that
story.
Coming
up,
600
tons
of
solid
de-icer
product,
we
affectionately,
call
it
the
ice
slicer
and
also
on
this
event,
noteworthy.
We
did
not
place
any
traction
sand
and
this
you
know
our
de-icer
products
were
sufficient
with
our
plows
to
go
ahead
and
service.
This
event
that
has
some
real
advantages
from
an
environmental
standpoint.
We
don't
have
to
pick
it
up
after
the
event
is
over.
N
N
Just
want
to
give
you
a
glimpse
into
what
a
typical
shift
looks
like
so:
we've
been
on,
around-the-clock
shifts
two
12-hour
shifts,
and
that
involves
about
25
staff,
plow
operators,
dispatchers
field
coordinators,
a
vegetation
crew.
Of
course
we
have
the
mechanics
helping
us.
We
have
scouts
looking
for
downed
trees
and
wires
on
the
road,
so
that
the
plow
operators
don't
have
to
deal
with
that.
And
importantly,
we
also
have
a
picture
taker
and
you
might
wonder
why
do
you
have
a
picture
taker?
N
I
also
want
to
talk
about
something
new,
and
this
is
straight
out
of
our
smart
mobility
plan
and
it's
avl
or
what
we
call
automatic
vehicle.
Locating
this
is
the
very
first
event
we
were
able
to
test
our
new
abl
technology
and
although
we
still
have
some
bugs
to
work
out
and
some
features
to
add,
we
are
already
seeing
some
significant
benefits
because
of
vehicle
tracking,
the
plow
tracking
is
automated.
N
We
can
dispatch
those
vehicles
sooner.
We
can
better
track
which
routes
they're
on
and
which
ones
have
been
serviced
and
when
they
were
serviced
and
because
we
know
where
all
the
vehicles
are,
we
can
dispatch
the
closest
plow
to
a
call
from
fire
or
police
or
a
critical
citizen
call
that
commonly
come
in.
During
the
events.
We
can
dispatch
that
closest
vehicle
to
deal
with
that.
So
I'm
going
to
leave
you
with
kind
of
a
a
cool
story
that
came
out
of
this.
N
It's
from
the
maiden
bauer
area.
There's
some
confusing
streets
around
there.
Fire
called
us
to
assist
with
a
medic
unit
that
could
not
get
to
their
call
without
the
help
of
a
plow.
So
with
abl,
we
quickly
identified
where
the
closest
plow
was
was
a
new
plow
operator
new
to
the
city
of
bellevue,
and
we
noticed
when
they
started
responding
to
the
medic
unit.
They
took
a
wrong
turn
and
we
could
actually
see
that
now
in
real
time,
we
immediately
got
on
the.
I
N
Hey
get
that
thing
turned
around
need
to
go
this
way.
We
talked
him
into
the
medic
unit,
got
the
medic
unit
unstuck
and
up
to
the
call
so
again,
just
seeing
immediate
benefits
from
this
and
more
to
come,
but
we'll
keep
you
up
to
date
with
this
technology
and
any
other
new
technologies.
We
employ
with
events
like
this
and
now
to
the
de-icer,
so
our
de-icer
is
calcium,
chloride,
liquid
and
in
solid
form.
N
So,
just
to
summarize,
this
now
is
the
third
year
in
a
row
that
we've
had
a
major
snow
event,
another
very
successful
interdepartmental
response.
I
want
to
congratulate
brian
who's
on
the
call
and
his
crews
for
another
great
job,
huge
thank
you
to
our
residents
and
our
businesses
for
all
their
help,
staying
off
the
roads
when
they
could
and
just
all
their
support
in
general
and
then.
Lastly,
of
course,
just
a
huge
thank
you
to
our
crews
and
all
the
people
that
have
been
working
around
the
clock
for
the
last
six
days.
N
Putting
their
lives
on
hold
to
make
sure
other
lives
are
of
higher
quality
and
very
much
appreciated.
So
I'm
happy
to
announce.
We
went
off
event
response
today
at
12
30
and
we
have
stood
down
and
the
event
is
over,
hopefully
for
the
last
event
of
the
year
when
it
comes
to
snow,
we'll
see,
but
we'll
be
ready
either
way
with
that,
I
think
we
might
have
time
for
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
A
Actually,
we
have
such
a
full
meeting
tonight.
I
think
we'll
bypass
that,
but
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much
for
this
presentation
and
for
the
excellent
response
really
appreciated.
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
say
I
great
okay
doing
a
public
hearing
next,
mr
miyaki,
would
you
like
to
introduce
this.
L
L
These
easements
are
being
released
as
part
of
sound
transit's
redevelopment
of
the
site.
This
was
last
in
front
of
you
back
in
january
of
this
year
of
2020,
actually
on
consent
where
the
easements
were
declared
surplus
and
whether
the
date
for
tonight's
public
hearing
was
set
following
the
public
hearing,
council
will
be
asked
to
take
action
on
the
proposed
resolution
of
releasing
easements
joining
us
this
evening
is
our
mcdaniel,
our
real
property
manager,
manager
from
finance
and
asset
management
department.
O
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
Our
staff
report
tonight
is
regarding
a
request
to
release
eight
utility
easements,
and
these
easements
lie
within
sound
transit's
omfv,
which
is
an
assemblage
of
nine
parcels
that
they
own
here's
a
map
showing
the
the
location
of
their
their
property.
This
is
on
the
west
side
of
120th
avenue
northeast
generally
between
northeast
spring
boulevard
and
north
of
way.
O
Just
east
of
the
east
side,
rail
corridor
and
as
as
always
tonight's
public
hearing
is,
is
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
comment
on
the
request
to
release
these
easements
so
as
a
part
of
their
redevelopment
of
the
site
into
the
omf,
sound
transit
has
removed
all
of
the
previously
existing
utilities.
O
All
the
city-owned
utilities,
within
their
property
and
they've,
requested
that
the
city
release
our
utility
easements
within
within
the
site,
which
includes
two
sewer
easements
the
entirety
of
four
water
easements,
as
well
as
two
additional
portions
of
two
additional
water
easements
due
to
the
size
and
the
shape
of
the
site.
I've
split
it
up
onto
two
slides,
so
you're,
looking
at
the
north
end
of
the
property
and
on
the
next
slide.
O
Here
is
the
southern
portion
of
the
site,
so
sound
transit
did
construct
new
utilities
to
serve
their
their
property,
and
most
of
those
new
facilities
are
owned
and
maintained
by
sound
transit,
not
the
city.
There
are,
however,
four
small
locations
where
there
are
water
facilities
that
the
city
will
own.
O
A
Terrific,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
well,
let's
go
ahead
and
open
the
public
hearing
and
then,
if
we
have
any
questions
after
we're
done,
if
there's
comments
from
the
public,
we
will
take
those.
So
this
is
a
six
full
and
two
partial
small
in
one
resolution
that
we
are
looking
to
possibly
adopt
tonight.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing?
I.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye.
Are
there
clerk
weathering
answer
public
comments.
B
Thank
you.
There
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
for
the
public
hearing
this
evening,
so
at
this
time
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
connected
to
this
call,
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
at
the
public
hearing?
Please
raise
your
hand
with
the
raised
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
you're
connected
with
a
phone.
A
Hearing
all
those
in
favor
say:
okay,
so
I'm
going
to
make
it
so
I
can
see
everybody
hold
on
there
we
go.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
or
comments
on
this?
H
I
moved
to
adopt
resolution
98
authorizing
the
execution
of
documents
necessary
to
release
the
six
utility
easements
and
portions
of
two
additional
utility
easements,
which
have
been
declared
surplus
to
the
city's
needs
and
are
no
longer
required
for
providing
continued
public
utility
service.
Second,.
A
L
Your
good
evening,
robinson
customers
on
your
study
session
this
evening,
is
a
discussion
of
funding
allocations
being
recommended
by
the
arts
executive
board,
which
is
a
regional
housing
coalition
for
the
fall
round
of
applications.
Just
by
way
of
background,
the
arch
executive
board
annually
reviews
and
recommends
funding
applications
for
affordable
housing
projects.
Bellevue
is
a
member
city
of
arts
and
contributes
to
the
projects
recommended
for
funding
along
with
other
cities.
L
Tonight
staff
are
seeking
direction
to
prepare
legislation.
Improving
the
arts
recommending
funding
requests
for
action
at
a
future
meeting
joining
us
this
evening
is
emile.
King
of
the
assistant
director
in
community
development,
as
well
as
joining
him
is
lindsay
masters
executive
manager,
as
well
as
claus
from
a
senior
planner
for
a
regional
coalition
for
housing,
also
known
as
arts.
With
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
emil
emil.
P
Thank
you
so
much
lindsay
if
you'd
like
to
start
the
powerpoint.
P
P
Thanks
lindsay
good
evening
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newen
house
and
members
of
council,
I'd
like
to
offer
a
few
opening
comments
on
behalf
of
the
community
development
department.
This
evening
the
city
of
bellevue
has
a
strong
partnership
with
arch
that
dates
back
over
25
years.
As
you'll
hear
tonight,
the
housing
trust
fund
has
been
able
to
contribute
to
a
range
of
projects
over
the
years
across
the
east
side.
The
city's
continuing
support
for
the
arch
trust
fund
is
consistent
with
bellevue's,
affordable
housing
strategy
adopted
by
council
in
2017.
P
bellevue's
strategy
has
the
overarching
bull
to
create
more
affordable
housing.
The
annual
arch
funding
rounds
will
further
action
in
bellevue's
plan
relating
specifically
to
developing,
affordable
housing
near
transit
hubs,
pursuing
partnerships
that
are
key
to
most
all
affordable
housing
projects
and
opportunities
for
preservation
projects
when
they
arise.
I'd
now
like
to
hand
things
over
to
lindsay
and
kloss
for.
Q
Good
march,
and
thank
you
for
having
us
our
main
agenda
tonight,
is
to
deliver
a
set
of
funding
recommendations
for
you,
but
in
advance
of
that
we'd
also
like
to
take
the
time
to
just
give
you
a
brief
background
on
the
housing
press,
pro
trust
fund
program
and
looking
back
at
some
past
accomplishments.
Q
An
overview
of
the
request
we're
bringing
forward
tonight
is
a
total
request
for
funding
of
621
and
900.
That
would
be
allocated
to
three
different
projects
which
will
go
over
located
in
bellevue,
bothell
and
kirkland.
Combined.
These
projects
would
create
467
units
of
long-term,
deeply,
affordable.
A
Excuse
me,
I'm
going
to
interrupt
you
for
one
moment.
I
don't
know
if
it's
just
me,
but
it's
coming
over
kind
of
broken
up,
and
I
wonder
if
you
might
want
to
turn
off
your
video
to
see
if
the,
if
we
can
hear
it
better
sure
I'll
give
that
a
try.
Okay,
thank
you.
Q
So
there
will
be
a
combined
total
of
467
units
of
long-term,
affordable
housing
within
these
projects,
at
a
cost
of
a
little
over
10
000
per
unit
in
arch
funds,
and
those
funds
comprise
about
three
percent
of
the
total
project
costs,
so
we're
leveraging
a
significant
amount
of
other
funding.
Bellevue's
portion
of
the
arch
funds
that
are
being
pooled
into
these
projects
is
a
little
over
12
percent
of
all
the
total
funds.
Q
So,
moving
on
to
some
some
brief
background
about
the
housing
trust
fund
program,
this
this
program
has
been
in
existence
pretty
much
since
the
beginning
of
arch
over
30
years
ago.
In
that
time
it
has
accomplished
a
lot.
It
has
accommodated
a
wide
array
of
projects
and
local
priorities
served
a
diverse
set
of
populations,
including
some
of
the
projects
you
featured
here.
Q
It
has
been
driven
over
the
years
by
a
set
of
investment
principles,
sort
of
the
long-term
strategic
principles
that
drive
the
investments
and
things
that
we
are
striving
to
accomplish
each
year.
One
of
those
as
you
as
we've
discussed
in
the
past,
is
geographic
distribution,
so
trying
to
make
sure
that,
as
a
as
an
east
side
region,
we
are
providing
housing
choice
across
the
east
side,
not
just
in
any
one
neighborhood
or
in
any
city.
Q
We
have
a
citizen
advisory
board
that
helps
us
achieve
a
community
community
shaping
of
the
projects
before
they
are
delivered
to
you
to
be
recommended
for
funding.
Q
We
are
looking
at
the
long-term
sustainability
of
these
investments,
so
we
look
at
them
as
long-term
community
assets
since
we're
evaluating
their
performance
over
time,
and
we
also
try
to
promote
competition
so
creating
a
significantly
wider
pool
of
projects
to
compete
for
these
resources
than
we
could.
If
we
were
doing
this,
just
in
one
city.
Q
In
that
time,
the
housing
trust
fund
has
accomplished
a
lot.
It
has
created
more
affordable
housing
than
any
other
program
on
the
east
side,
getting
close
to
4
500
units
of
housing,
including
some
number
of
shelter
beds
as
well.
Those
have
been
well
distributed.
I
think
we've
done
a
good
job
of
accomplishing
that
goal
of
geographic
distribution
and
important
to
remember.
Q
The
housing
trust
fund
is
one
in
a
set
of
tools
to
create
affordability,
and
so
we
also
rely
heavily
on
land
use
and
incentive
programs
to
to
create
an
even
further
housing
choice
and
diversity.
So
both
of
those
mapped
here
green
and
orange
dots.
Q
I
appreciated
the
comments
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
talking
about
racial
equity.
That's
something
that
we
value
deeply
and
we
see
affordable
housing
as
a
key
strategy
for
helping
cities
to
become
inclusive
and
welcoming
and
important
to
that,
for
us
is
the
time
to
look
at
who
is
accessing
all
this
housing
that
we've
created.
Q
Q
The
housing
trust
fund,
as
you
can
see
here,
has
created
housing
for
people
with
extremely
low
incomes.
Significant
majority
of
people
are
earning
under
30
of
the
median
income.
You
can
see
a
chart
to
the
right
which
shows
you
what
that?
What
that,
what
those
household
income
like
another
slice
of
information
that
we
pulled
out
of
the
data
there
is
well
over
400
households
who
have
come
into
permanent
housing
in
the
trust
fund
from
homelessness,
both
families
and
individuals.
Q
This
slide
shows
the
racial
and
ethnic
demographics
of
that
same
population.
We
see
significant
share
of
different
communities
of
color
within
households
and
then
we've
shown
kind
of
a
comparison
to
the
broader
renter
population
in
eastern
county.
So
you
can
kind
of
see
what
this
housing
access
means
for
the
broader
community.
Q
R
So
the
request
for
this
project
is
500
000
and
the
assistant
advisory
board
made
the
recommendation
to
the
executive
board
for
500
000
for
towards
this
project.
It
will
bring
95
units
to
the
east
eastgate
project.
This
is
the
final
piece
to
make
that
that
whole
campus
a
reality.
R
It
is
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
the
population
that
will
be
served
in
these
studio
units
are
homeless,
single
adults
generally,
we
are
setting
it
up
to
transition
from
the
congregations
for
the
homeless,
shelter,
as
well
as
the
sofia
way,
shelter
and
the
location
obviously
is
at
the
13520
southeast
east
gateway
in
bellevue,
the
next
project.
Lindsey.
Could
you
move
the
slide
so.
Q
Q
I
I
am
gonna
talk
as
soon
as
I
tell
my
computer,
not
to
restart
at
the
moment
hold
on
there
we
go,
so
we
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
permanent
supportive
housing.
We
know
some
of
you
are
well
familiar
with
this,
but
because
this
is
a
housing
model
that
arch
has
not
funded
in
the
past,
we
thought
it
was
worth
mentioning
some
of
the
important
features
of
this
housing
type
permanent,
supportive
housing
is
long-term
or
non-time
limited
housing.
Q
The
goal
is
to
create
housing
stability
for
the
individuals,
and
the
key
feature
is
that
it
is
really
housing.
That's
paired
with
intensive
wrap
around
services
that
match
the
needs
of
the
population.
Q
Just
typical
building
features
that
come
along
with
permanent
supportive
housing.
There
is
frequently
24-hour
staffing
at
the
at
the
front
desk,
just
to
create
a
secured
entry
in
and
out.
There
is
ample
space
for
community
building
community
space,
as
well
as
dedicated
private
office
space
for
social
services
that
are
delivered
on
site.
Q
There
is
an
ample
research
base
that
has
studied
this
housing
model
over
time,
and
that
has
demonstrated
it
is
successful
in
creating
long-term
housing
retention
for
the
population,
improved
health
outcomes
for
the
population
and
reduction
and
cost
cost
of
serving
the
population,
both
in
in
comparison
with
emergency
room
visits,
as
well
as
other
emergency
systems.
So
we're
happy
to
follow
up
with
more
information
about
this
in
the
future.
If
there's
additional
questions
and
now
I'll
turn
it
back
to
thanks
class.
R
So
this
is
a
map
of
the
the
campus
on
the
lower
shelf
is,
of
course,
the
polaris
project,
which
is
350
units
of
family
housing,
predominantly
workforce
housing
and
on
the
upper
shelf,
sharing
that
that
piece
of
real
estate
with
the
congregations
for
the
homeless
hundred
bed
shelter,
is
this
phase
three
plymouth
housing
project,
95
units
93
units
for
clients
in
the
balance
for
their
supportive
staff.
R
So
this
is
the
final
piece
that
allows
the
acquisition
from
the
city
from
the
king
county
and
next
slide.
R
So
the
next
project
you
saw
last
year,
the
recommendation
last
year
was
to
take
joint
cities,
cdbg
contributions
and
fund
the
acquisition
of
the
site
for
this
samus
senior
project
in
bellevue
in
bothell.
It
is
on
on
the
redeveloped
area
of
bothell,
near
the
bothell
landing
and
they're
looking
for
an
additional
500
000
to
realize
a
larger
project
that
you
saw
than
last
year.
R
R
So
this
is
a
project
that
is
modeled
after
the
together
center
redevelopment.
This
is
called
a
horizon:
housing
polaris
at
totem
lake.
The
partnership
between
inland
and
horizon
housing
is
asking
for
four
million
dollars,
and
the
executive
board
recommends
that
councils
accept
a
recommendation
for
up
to
four
million
dollars
for
this
project.
R
R
So
this
is
on
the
south
side
of
124th
in
kirkland,
and
there
is
also
an
additional
eight
million
dollars
committed
by
microsoft,
and
that
is
the
fund.
That
arch
is
ministering
for
microsoft
through
the
city
of
bellevue.
So
I
believe
that
is
it
for
my
slides
other
than
to
show
what
these
requests
are.
So
it's
a
five
million
dollar
request
similar
to
last
year,
500
000,
each
for
those
first
two
projects
and
form
up
to
four
million
dollars
for
the
last
project.
A
Great
okay,
thank
you
for
this
presentation
and
I'm
gonna.
Everybody's
gonna
have
comments
and
questions
so
I'll
call
in
this
order.
Councilmember
stokes,
followed
by
leigh
zhan,
robertson,
barksdale,
deputy
mayor
moon
house
and
myself
so
councilmember
stokes.
Would
you
like
to
start
us
off.
I
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
You
know
this
is
very
exciting.
I
It's
it's
really
good
to
see
the
work
that's
been
done
by
arch
for
so
long
with
all
of
us,
working
together
in
the
region
and
benefiting
the
communities,
and
this
one
seems
to
be
compared
to
others
a
real
step
forward
and
really
working
with
our
goal
in
our
our
affordable
housing
strategy
and
the
strategies
of
the
of
the
cities
around
us,
and
actually
I
like
the
fact
that
we're
working
on
doing
things
that
actually
tie
in
with
the
14
1590
funding
as
well.
I
I
mean
that
that
concept,
we're
making
really
advances
here
in
terms
of
dealing
with
homelessness
and-
and
you
know,
the
issues
of
affordable
housing
in
various
ways,
and
I
think
it's
a
big
step
forward
and
I
think
we're
making
a
great
investment
for
this
and
continuing
the
good
work
that
arts
has
done
to
advance
these
goals
for
a
long
long
time.
I
I'm
just
very
excited
and
exciting
to
see
this
that
our
complex
on
you
know,
yanisgate
is
coming
along
and
also
seeing
this
work
being
done
just
in
our
neighborhood,
because
we're
all
people
live
and
cross
over.
The
lines
and
work
over
across
the
lines,
so
it's
exciting,
I'm
really
pleased
with
it
and
very
supportive
about
it.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
lee.
D
Thank
you,
vladimir
wow
art.
What
a
wonderful
trajectory
and
path
you've
come
through
over
the
years
I
mean
this
is
indeed
the
model
of
regional
cooperation.
D
You
know
it
started
so
many
years
ago
and
still
true
today
and
I'm
really
impressed
with
your
presentation
as
well.
I
mean
the
technology.
Has
you
know
giving
you
the
opportunity
to
show
wonderful
pictures,
presentations
and-
and
it's
very
impressive,
but
the
key
is
that
you're
still
upholding
the
principle
and
of
you
know
a
regional
project
that
has
all
the
members
starting
out
initially
with
bellevue.
Now
we've
grown
up
to
more
than
a
dozen
cities
all
on
the
east
side,
and
because
we
know
that
homelessness
and
affordable
housing
knows
no
boundary.
D
You
know
it's
a
what
we
all
have
to
deal
with,
and
so
this
model
has
been
working
and
I'm
really
impressed
with
what
you've
come
up
with,
because
affordable
housing
has
become
such
a
important
thing
for
the
whole
region,
and
we
have
to
you,
know,
face
the
issues
as
well
as
anybody
else
has,
and
you
have
again
continue
to
be
the
model
of
working
together
with
other
cities
and
leveraging
and
our
ability
produced
in
providing
land
or
money
talents,
whatever
each
city
can
do
and
and
at
the
same
time
you
know
we
are
responding
to
the
new
challenges,
we're
facing
homelessness
and
all
that-
and
I
think,
you're
doing
a
great
job
to
have
this.
D
You
know
getting
to
where
you
are,
I'm
very
impressed.
The
one
one
thing
of
course
is
that
you
know
we
have
an
injection.
I
mean
if
it's
going
such
a
big
scale
with
having
500
million
dollars
of
microsoft
money,
that's
a
giving
you
a
big
jump.
It
value
the
ability
to
do
a
lot
more,
but
the
important
thing
is
that
we,
you
know,
have
to
respond
to
the
needs
of
the
community.
D
The
concerns
of
the
community
and
the
real
solutions
you
know
of
this
this
problem-
it's
not
just
money,
you
just
throw
money
around,
and
so
I
really
like
to
see
the
projects
you're
talking
about
in
eastgate,
particularly
and
you're
providing
services.
You
know
that
you
know
and
we're
talking
about
zero
to
thirty
ami,
that's
very
important,
and
so
the
key
is,
you
know.
As
we
talk
about
the
city
is
now
going
to
take
one
percent
of
our
property
tax.
D
I
think
sixty
percent
of
all
forty
percent
whatever,
but
a
big
chunk
of
it,
will
be
used
to
address
mental
health
and
other
services.
That's
important
to
make
sure
that
the
people
who
to
live
in
these
facilities
are
going
to
be
in
fact,
indeed
assisted
and
helped
to
get
out
of
the
situation
that
got
them
into
in
the
first
place.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
emphasize
that
important
that
you
know
with
all
the
wonderful
things
you're
learning.
D
We
are
all
learning
that
we're
going
to
put
into
a
facility
like
this
in
our
neighborhood.
We
got
to
be
sure
that
it's
not
just
giving
money
but
building
it
and
then
so
away
the
keys.
No,
you
have
to
be
traditionally
like
archie
has
always
done
when
you
build
a
project
in
neighborhood,
you
stay
with
it.
You
work
with
the
residents
and
they
they
through
the
model
you
use.
When
you
first
describe
it,
it's
sustainable.
D
It's
a
partnership.
It's
people,
you
know
cross
government,
it's
not
just
you.
Do
it
give
money,
somebody
else
take
care
of
them.
No,
all
the
community
cities
are
involved
in
addressing
all
the
continuing
problems
working
together.
Now
to
me,
that's
truly
partnership,
cooperation,
collaboration
and
that
can
be
sustained.
D
So
I
like
what
you're
saying,
but
you
know
my
only
concern
caviar-
is
this
the
most
the
the
two
projects
you're
describing
in
the
eastgate,
particularly
working
with
congregation
homeowners,
this
great
great
outfit,
great
partners
we're
working
with
these
are
relatively
still
things
that
we
haven't
had
that
much
experience
with.
So
we
need
to
be
really
careful,
really
thoughtful
and
really
working
with
the
community
making
sure
our
money
is
going
to
the
right
places
and
doing
the
right
things
so
that
we
can
truly
help
the
people
there
and
be
able
to
sustain
that.
D
20
years
later,
we
can
say
very
great.
We
still
can
continue
to
do
it
instead
of
saying
wow,
we
made
a
mistake.
What
are
we
going
to
do
so?
I
really
like
what
you
have
to
say
appreciate
it,
and
I
want
to
encourage
you
to
keep
the
same
principle
and
that
you
can
work
with
the
people
in
art,
styles,
change
and
don't
know
a
lot
of
you
anymore,
but
the
principles
the
same
and
your
product
and
what
you
have
done
seems
to
me
are
still
very
consistent.
D
A
Thank
you,
council
members
on
yes,.
F
Thank
you
lindsay
and
klaus
very
great
plan
that
you
presented
to
us.
You
know
to
me
it's
a
very
thoughtful
regional
approach.
That's
getting
us
results,
so
what
I
heard
was
ten
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars
per
unit.
That's
amazing
to
be
able
to
get
the
467
units,
and
it
also
includes
right,
a
a
plethora
of
housing,
right,
supportive
housing
for
people
exiting
homelessness,
senior
housing
as
well
as
workforce
housing.
So
to
me,
it's
a
good
plan
because
we're
not
focusing
on
only
just
one
area,
we're
really
looking
at
a
broad-based
opportunities.
F
So
I
really
appreciate
that
work.
The
focus
on
racial
equity.
As
you
look
at
this
work,
I
think,
is
also
very
important,
as
we
saw
in
our
wraparound
services
and
the
families
that
are
here
on
free
and
reduced
lunch
that
are
struggling.
So
those
things
are
important,
having
housing
choices,
the
ultra
high
energy
efficiency
and
being
able
to
actually
build
these
units
where
we're
not
just
looking
at
first
costs,
but
really
the
cost
of
someone
living
there
and
their
energy
bills
being
as
low
as
possible.
F
I
think
is:
is
amazing,
being
able
to
leverage
the
microsoft
funds
so
that
it
isn't
just
our
money-
and
I
agree
with
council
members
stokes-
that
as
we
look
at
our
1590
money,
how
do
we?
How
do
we
really
look
at
getting
maximizing
the
revenue
that
we're
going
to
collect
to
build
with
urgency?
Because
I
think
that,
even
with
these
467
units,
many
more
units
are
needed
in
our
in
our
broader
east
side
communities
to
support
those
that
are
in
need,
and
with
that
said,
I
do
have
a
couple
of
of
comments.
F
One
is,
as
I
think,
about
the
coordinated
entry
for
all
system
at
the
eastgate
site,
how
we
really
do
work
on
in
partnership
on
the
preference
for
folks
exiting
homelessness
from
cfh
and
sofia
way,
because
coordinated
entry,
I
think,
is
quite
challenging
in
that
regard.
Sometimes
so
I'd
like
to
really
keep
track
of
that
and
understand
where
that's
going,
the
other
one
is
the
the
eastgate
information
in
our
packet
is
slightly
different
than
the
presentation.
F
F
I'd
like
to
better
understand
that
and
then
lastly,
the
the
senior
apartments
talks
about
imagine
housing
and
we
have
gotten
a
few
emails
about
some
concerns
in
terms
of
the
property
manager
that
imagine
housing's
used
for
some
of
their
units.
So
I'd
like
to
get
a
follow-up
on
how
we
make
sure
that,
as
we
build
these
units
that
the
way
that
they're
managed
really
maintains
the
upkeep
for
the
folks
that
are
renting
those
units.
So
those
were
my
you
can
respond
now
or
just
follow
up
with
me
later.
S
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
would
be
great,
so
thank
you,
council
members
on
councilmember
robertson.
G
Thank
you,
love
arch.
I
love
all
the
the
history
of
work
that
arch
has
done
with
so
many
cities.
On
the
east
side,
I'm
gonna
start
with
the
easiest.
First,
I'm
gonna
go
in
reverse
order.
The
totem
lake
project.
With
I
love
that
project.
It's
got
a
mixed
income,
it's
what
a
great
project
it's
in
a
great
developing,
redeveloping
mixed
use
area.
G
That
is,
I
think,
a
model
for
how
a
project
should
be.
I
think
the
mixed
income
is
really
critical
in
having
projects
be
successful,
so
two
thumbs
way
up
on
the
samama
senior
apartments.
I
like
the
project,
but
normally
when
we
have
projects
in
our
own
borders,
the
city
that
has
it
in
its
borders
pays
more.
So
I'm
wondering
why
bopple's
contribution
is
relatively
small
on
that
project.
Maybe
they
gave
a
bunch
on
the
earlier
funding
round.
G
G
Well-
and
I
guess
I
have
a
question-
is:
are
the
93
units
all
low
barrier
or
is
only
a
portion
of
the
93
units,
all
low
barrier
and
the
reason
that
this
causes
me
a
lot
of
concern
if
they
I'd
like
that,
ant's
question
answered,
but
is
that
I
know
that
this
is
part
of
a
bigger
campus
and
it's
part
of
a
bigger
neighborhood
and
when
you
have
the
low
barrier
non-sober
living
with
the
people
that
are
the
hardest
house?
G
Yes,
they
need
housing,
that's
a
lot
of
units,
if
they're
all
for
that
level
of
entry,
and
it's
going
to
make
it
really
hard
for
the
people
who
are
at
the
congregations
for
the
homeless,
shelter
to
maintain
their
trajectory
towards.
You
know,
accountability
and
getting
out
of
homelessness
if,
on
their
same
property,
there's
a
whole.
You
know
very
supportive
housing
unit
where
the
people
can
be
using
drugs
can
be.
G
G
If
the
people
can
go
from
the
shelter
next
door
to
do
the
things
that
do
not
help
them
on
their
pathway
out
of
homelessness
and
to
self-sufficiency,
so
I'm
very
concerned
about
that.
I'm
also
very
concerned
about
the
impact
that
type
of
use
would
have
on
the
workforce,
housing
next
door,
as
well
as
on
the
daycare
on
the
other
side.
G
So
those
we've
seen
that
those
types
of
facilities
tend
to
have
impacts
and
the
impacts
are
ones
that
obviously
we
need
to
deal
with,
but
they
are
not
impacts
that
are
always
very
pleasant.
So
I'm
very
concerned
about
that.
Is
it
going
to
make
it
difficult
for
the
families
living
next
door
or
the
families
and
the
young
kids
at
the
daycare
on
the
other
side
to
feel
safe
to
have
a
clean
environment?
G
I
would
also
note
that
all
this,
although
this
operator,
has
an
excellent
track
record
of
a
lot
of
the
this
type
of
housing.
This
operator
had
a
murder
of
their
social
worker
at
the
seattle,
similar
type
of
of
supportive
housing
last
year.
So
you
know
that
causes
big
concerns
to
me.
I'd
like
to
see
this
addressed,
because,
if
we're
going
to
be
funding
this,
it
needs
to
be
a
good
neighbor
to
bellevue.
So
how
are
we
going
to
assure
that?
G
It
is
if
it's
going
to
be
low
barrier,
93
units
not
sober
living,
and
how
are
we
going
to
make
sure
that
we
address
the
impacts
on
the
campus
and
outside
the
campus,
so
yeah,
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
about
this
project
so,
but
otherwise,
totem
like
project
love,
it
samma
senior
apartments,
love.
It
would
like
to
know
why
bothell
has
such
a
small
contribution.
E
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
and
thanks
to
arch
and
staff,
for
all
the
work
that
you
do
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
our
community
and
our
region.
E
H
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah,
a
lot
of
great
comments
so
far
and
appreciate
the
the
the
discussion
I
echo
council
member
stokes.
I
think
these
are
some
exciting
projects,
especially
the
the
twitter
lake
and
the
and
the
salmon
project.
I
think
just
great
projects
and
great
models
and
I
believe
they'll
both
be
very,
very
successful.
H
However,
I
you
know,
I
do
share
councilmember
robertson's
concern
about
what
we're
seeing
in
in
eastgate
there
are.
There
are
some
potential
pitfalls
there,
so
it'd
be
great
to
get.
I
won't
repeat
the
same
questions,
but
have
you
know
would
like
to
know
those
answers
around
that
and
make
sure
there
is
a
good
neighbor,
almost
a
good
neighbor
agreement
in
place,
and
actually
that
leads
to
one
of
my
first
questions.
H
Like
you
know,
with
cfh,
we
have
what
I
consider
a
very
good
process
in
place
for
public
outreach
getting
residents
involved.
H
We
have
a
good
neighbor
agreement,
we're
going
to
be
shortly
placing
people
on
that
gna
committee,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
those
same
kind
of
outreach
processes
are
in
place
for
these
other
two
projects
here
and
if
there's
not,
can
we
get
something
like
that
in
place
because
I'm,
quite
frankly,
I'm
not
sure
how
much
of
our
residents
and
businesses
in
that
area
are
familiar
with
these
two
projects?
I
know
they're
they're.
They
thanks
to
the
great
work
by
staff
and
and
great
work
by
cfh.
H
I
think
they're
very
familiar
with
that
project,
but
these
other
two.
I
I'm
not
sure
that
residents
in
that
area
really
up
to
speed
on
that
and
I'm
sure
they
would
like
to
voice
their
concerns
and
be
part
of
this
process
as
well.
Again,
I
think,
if
we're
able
to
follow
what
the
great
work
that
cfh
has
been
doing,
I
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
model
for
these
other
two
projects
as
well.
H
So
I
will
leave
it
at
that,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation
and
lindsey
klaus.
It's
great
to
see
you
again
and
you
know
again
some
some.
Some
great
projects
here,
but
you
know,
share
the
concern
about
about
eastgate.
A
Thank
you.
So
I
really
liked
what
councilmember
lee
said
when
he
said
this
was
a
regional
collaboration
for
housing,
that's
good,
because
it
really
is,
and
it's
such
a
variety
of
housing
that
you're
working
on
in
a
variety
of
ways
serving
a
variety
of
clients
or
residents,
and
I
I
just
I'm
so
impressed
because
you
it
would
have
to
be
something
like
arch
to
pull
this
off
so
good
job.
A
I'm
excited
to
have
the
supportive
housing
in
our
city,
because
I
know
that
more
than
half
of
our
homeless
men
and
women
can
afford
300
a
month
and
they
would
be
independent
and
so
to
be
able
to
provide
housing
for
this
population.
To
get
them
out
of
homelessness
is
something
I'm
very
interested
in
doing
so.
My
question
is:
are
we
actually
going
to
be
serving
our
homeless
population?
Q
Great-
and
I
I
did
my
best
to
take
notes
so
I'll
just
go
one
by
one
and
if
I've
missed
something
at
the
end,
oh
in
class.
Welcome
you
to
join
me.
If
I
cover
something
out
of
quickly.
Q
Q
So
I
had
a
question
noted
about
the
I'll
start
out
with
some
of
the
easier
ones
the
contribution
from
the
city
of
bothell,
the
the
cash
contribution,
I
think,
is
proportionate
to
what
they've
been
able
to
put
into
the
trust
fund
over
the
years.
But
in
addition
to
that,
they
have
also
contributed
the
property
it
provided.
The
property
at
a
discount,
so
they've
also
gone
out
of
their
way
to
make
zoning
changes
to
accommodate
the
project,
so
they
they
really
have
stepped
up
their
support.
Q
Here
I
noted
there
was
a
question
about
imagine
housing
and
comments
from
members
of
the
community
about
concerns
around
property
management.
Q
We
also
received
that
letter
and
kind
of
took
some
immediate
actions
to
consider
the
concerns
raised
and
develop
a
couple
of
special
funding
conditions
that
are
recommend
a
part
of
the
recommendation
that
you
would
be
considering.
We
are
long
long
time
partners
with
imagine
housing
have
a
close
working
relationship.
Q
There
has
been
recent
changes
in
the
leadership
of
the
organization,
and
so
we
are
getting
to
know
this
new
leadership
and
working
closely
with
them.
The
conditions
we've
spelled
out
require
that
there
be
resolution
of
any
of
the
verified
complaints
before
we
would
contract
for
this
additional
funding
and
I'm
happy
to
go
into
more
detail
if
that's
desired.
Q
The
other
comments
I
have
noted,
I
think,
are
primarily
around
the
eastgate
supportive
housing
development,
and
I
I
think
we
recognize
that
being
the
first
of
its
kind
on
the
east
side,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
questions
and
concerns
and
scrutiny
about
how
the
development
unfolds.
I
was
very
pleased
that
that
plymouth
housing
was
selected
as
the
partner.
I
think
they
have
a
long
track
record
of
working
with
neighborhoods
working
with
communities
to
make
sure
that
their
developments
are
incorporated
and
are
good
neighbors.
Q
I
think
they
also
know
that
congregations
for
the
homeless
has
been
very
carefully
stewarding
the
development
of
the
shelter
with
that
community
and,
as
far
as
I
know,
they
have
been
an
active
participant
in
that
process,
even
though
they
are
not
really
required
to
be,
and
I
think
they
understand
the
importance
of
showing
up
as
as
a
partner
in
that
process.
Q
So
thus
far,
you
know
we
haven't,
set
any
specific
requirements
about
community
engagement,
but
I
think
we're
pretty
confident
that
they're
going
to
commit
to
that
and
they
you
know
they
had
conversations
with
us
about
the
decision
to
to
undertake
this
project
one
they
really
thought
about
and
were
we're
looking
at
seriously,
not
just
as
a
one-time
project,
but
as
an
opportunity
to
bring
this
type
of
housing
to
the
east
side
and
that
this
is
going
to
be
the
one
that
sets
the
model
for
others
to
come.
Q
Q
Q
It
has
been
done
through
coordinated
entry
in
the
past
and
we
have
included
a
set
of
conditions
in
our
award.
Q
A
Sorry,
any
any
more
questions
that
you
can
raise
your
hand.
I
see
council
member
robertson,
dippy
new
mirror.
Did
you
have
your
hand
up?
Yes?
So
I
see
those
two.
I
see
council
members
stokes.
A
I
see
council,
member
lee
okay,
councilmember
robertson,.
G
Thanks
lindsey,
how
many
of
the
units
would
be
this
low
barrier.
Q
The
proposal,
as
it
was
presented
is
that
the
whole
project
is
operated
using
a
housing
first
model,
so
they're
not
they
didn't
anticipate,
creating
any
special
set
aside
of
units
that
would
have
higher
barriers
to
entry.
Okay,.
G
So
and
you
you
said
that
arch
wants
it
to
be
high
quality,
good,
neighbor
and
long-term
success
for
the
residents
it
sounded
like
you
might
be,
putting
some
strings
in
the
agreement
with
regard
to
east
side
entry
are
you
I
would
love
to
see
some
strings
in
the
agreement
with
regard
to
the
community
engagement,
the
commitment
to
mitigate
the
impacts
and
a
commitment
to
have
a
safety
and
security
plan
and
to
implement
it.
So
is
that
something
that
we
could
put
into
the
agreement?
G
If
this
is
the
first
of
the
kind
and
the
first
one
that
arch
is
gonna
going
to
fund,
we
need
to
make
it
really
sing.
We
need
to
make
it
really
successful.
So
I
think,
having
certain
strings
in
the
agreement
will
certainly
be
part
of
me.
My
willingness
to
support
this,
but
also
what
is
really
important
to
the
success
of
this,
so
that
arch
can
do
more,
because
this
type
of
product
is
really
important,
but
it
has
to
be
done
really
well.
Q
So
I
I
believe,
the
only
one
that
was
developed
as
a
funding
condition
and
just
for
a
reminder.
These
are
conditions
that
are
sort
of
developed
through
the
evaluation
process
by
our
citizen
advisory
board.
They
form
these
recommendations
before
they
get
our
executive
board,
which,
which
then
advances
them
on
to
you,
and
I
believe
the
the
only
one
specific
to
kind
of
the
design
of
the
program
was
that
there
be
a
pursuit
of
preference
for
men,
men
and
women
coming
out
of
the
cfh
and
sofia
way
shelters.
Q
So
no,
no
additional
specific
conditions
around
the
features
of
the
program.
L
Another
time
we'll
talk
about
that
yeah,
what
we
are
looking
for
is
direction
and
and
what
to
bring
back
to
the
council
for
a
vote.
So
the
good
questions
to
be
asking
tonight
mayor
and
I
guess
in
the
in
the
end
for
tonight
we
are
looking
for
direction
on
what
to
bring
back.
A
Q
Yeah,
I
I
I
don't
know
that
there's
a
precedent
class
can
correct
me
for
individual
cities
adding
conditions.
Q
That
said,
I
I
feel
that
plymouth
would
would
be
perfectly
willing
to
comply
with
a
requirement
to
participate
in
the
community
outreach
process.
So
you
know
I,
but
through
whatever
means
we
can
accomplish
that
kind
of
accountability
and
sort
of
give
the
comfort
that
you're.
Looking
for
that,
that's
going
to
be
happening
because
I
believe
it's
going
to
be
happening
regardless
of
whether
we
needed
a
condition
or
not
but
colos.
I
don't
know
if
you've
got
any
specific
past
examples
of
how
we've
accommodated
individual
city
requests
to
add
conditions.
G
Well,
I
would
just
put
in
this:
is
in
bellevue
we're
the
bellevue
council
it
would
be.
I
would
be
supportive
of
this
if
we
have
not
only
the
community
engagement
but
a
commitment
to
mitigate
the
impacts
and
have
a
safety
security
plan,
as
well
as
the
east
side
entry.
So
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
get
some
follow-up
information
on
that
before
we
vote,
thanks
which
I
know
it
isn't
tonight,
it's
going
to
be
at
a
future
meeting,
but
yeah.
P
Oh
go
ahead,
city
manager.
This
is
neil.
What
we
can
do
is
the
the
kind
of
lead
department.
We
can
also
work
with
arch
to
to
look
back
through
past
projects
and
and
try
and
see
if
there
is
any
opportunity
and
what
would
be
the
pros
and
cons
of
doing
any
specific
conditions.
In
addition
to
what's
been
discussed
so
far,.
S
A
Nay,
on
her
recommendation
as
well
as
ask
your
own
questions,
so
I'll
go
through
everybody,
but
deputy
mayor
go
ahead
next.
H
Thank
you,
and
in
in
general,
I
am
in
favor
of
of
moving
this
fa
forward.
But,
as
I
said
earlier,
my
comments,
you
know
the
the
community
engagement
piece
is
really
important
to
me
as
well,
as
you
know,
just
the
process
that
we
went
through
and
that
we're
maybe
more
familiar
with
from
the
from
the
cfh
perspective
of
the
eastside
men's
shelter.
So
if
there's
a
model,
you
know
it's
there
and
I'd
love
to
see
all
three
of
these
projects
working
in
coordination.
H
I
don't
understand
why
they're
kind
of
they're
all
part
of
this
eastgate
campus.
So
why
not
all
work
together?
I
understand
there
there
are.
There
are
different
managers
of
different
operating
systems,
different
funding,
you
know
places
in
place,
but
it'd
be
great.
They
all
work
cohesively
together,
especially
on
that
community
outreach
piece,
that's
very
important
to
me
and
would
like
to
see
some
level
of
same
in
terms
of
the
safety
and
the
security
that
council
member
robertson
had
mentioned.
H
Also,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
lindsey
additional
question.
You
had
mentioned
that
you
know
this
eastgate
campus
and
I
agree.
I
want
this
to
be
successful
unless
councilmember
robertson
said
well.
We
wanted
to
sing
so
we
want
this
to
be
successful,
and
you
said
it
was
like
the
first
one
on
on
the
east
side
like
this
and
we're
hoping
for
this
to
be
a
successful
model
going
forward,
but
that
just
raised
the
question
for
me
where
else
in
the
in
in
the
country
has
has
this
kind
of
campus
been
very
successful?
H
Are
there
other
similar
types
of
campuses
that
you
can
point
to
that
had
had
a
high
level
of
success.
Q
R
I
It
always
bothers
me
when
we
start
off
with
an
alarmist.
Oh,
my
god,
the
you
know
the
sky's
falling.
We've
got
a
problem
here
without
any
any
real
factual
basis
for
it.
So
I
I'm
glad
we're
going
to
examine
this,
and
I
don't
know
it's
it's
a
re.
We've
been
having
the
same
conversation
for
five
years
now,
and
I
I
do
I
just.
I
I
think
if
we
could
take
a
very
a
positive
approach
on
this,
obviously
we're
going
to
have
it
done
safely.
Obviously
we
want
it
to
be
successful.
Obviously
people
are
going
to
work
together
and
to
start
off
with
the
assumption
that
it's
not
planned.
Well,
they
don't
know
what
they're
doing
we
want
more
support.
We
want
more
safety
for
the
neighborhood
and
input,
and
all
that
is
is
just
kind
of
it's
an
alarmist
thing
that
I
don't
think
helps
us
on
this
whole
piece.
I
So
let's
get
over
that
and
really
examine
it,
and
I
think
we'll
find
that
this
is
something
that
needs
to
be
done
and
can
be
done
well,
there
are
examples
of
it.
It's
something
that
we
are
getting
funding
for
and
a
lot
of
the
1590
of
the
whole
idea
of
that
was
to
do
this
to
to
get
people
off
the
street
where
we
have
problems
with
them.
I
I
We
want
something
in
bellevue
that
actually
deals
with
the
problem
and
gets
people
get
help
for
them.
And,
yes,
we
will
make
sure
we'll
work
with
them
to
make
sure
that
that
happens.
I
But
I
I
would,
I
would
like
to
see
us
take
a
more
positive
and
and
hopeful
approach
to
this,
because
we
have
an
amazing
opportunity
to
do
something
that
is
really
important
for
people
who
really
need
help.
And
that's
what
we're
here
for-
and
we
can
do
this.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Councilmember
lee.
D
Thank
you
madame,
I
started,
you
know
earlier
saying
how
wonderful
archie
has
done
and
they
have
done
a
great
job,
because
they've
worked
with
the
communities,
they've
done
jobs
that
everybody
got
a
good
result
out
of
it
and
I
think
it's
done
because
of
the
all
the
considerations
some
of
the
cast
members
have
asked
and
making
sure
and
the
community
has
worked
up
front
to
ascertain
that
concerns
are
being
addressed
and
I
think
they
provide
a
great
model
and
that's
why
it's
been
sustained
over
all
these
years,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
continue
to
do
the
same
thing,
and
I
I
believe
that
you
know
we
understand
the
importance
of
affordable
housing,
including
homelessness,
and
that's
why
we
spent
a
number
of
years
talking
about
the
homeless,
shelter
you
know
at
the
eastgate
location.
D
I
think
that's
pretty
much
everybody
agreed
to.
I
don't
think
it's
a
question.
The
question
is,
you
know
we
how
how
to
do
it
right
how
to
implement
it,
and
I
think
we
have
a
good
model.
The
farmer,
the
city
is
working
together
with
congregations
homeless
and
we
have
a
outreach
group.
D
We
have
a
community
engagement
group,
we
have
the
process
that
we're
going
through,
and
I
think
this
is
already
a
good
model
if
the
city
supports
that
we
do
that,
and
I
I
I
here
heard
that
lindsey
was
saying
we
don't
have
this
arrangement
with
the
with
the
the
support
of
housing.
D
Folks,
and
that's
just
I'm
just
wondering
why
not
right
if
it's
working,
it's
working,
it's
something
the
city's
policy
is,
and
we
we're
using
it
as
the
model
to
make
sure
that
the
community's
neighborhoods
concerned
addressed-
and
I
mentioned
how
this
project
would
work
well
and
what
are
just
done
well,
because
they
have
always
worked
well
with
neighborhoods.
So
I
think
this
is
a
principle
that
you
know
I
mentioned
that
need
they
need
to
stand
firm
on.
So
as
a
result,
I
believe
that
we
can
have
the
strings.
D
That's
what
councilmember
roberts
is
talking
about.
It's
not
restrained,
it's
just
understanding
of
where
we
are.
How
do
we
do
it?
How
do
we
do
it
right?
How
do
we
well
so
that
we
have
to
support
the
community
that
we
don't
mess
things
up?
We
don't
do
it
in
such
a
way
that
archer
has
been
out
with
me.
I'm
proud
to
say
it,
I'm
proud
to
say
one
more
time.
You
know
the
citizen
advisory
board,
you
mentioned
didn't
see,
and
I.
L
D
D
F
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
lindsay
for
those
comments,
so
I
think
what
I
hear
you
saying
is
that
the
the
presentation
that
you
gave
is
is
the
correct
one,
which
is
that
at
the
eastgate
location,
all
93
units
are
0
to
30
ami
and
not
half
30
and
half
60.
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
that
is
correct.
F
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
I
I
would
say
that
you
know
to
me.
F
I
appreciate
the
level
of
diligence
that
arch
puts
into
these
projects
and
and
finding
the
right
partners
for
them,
and
I
believe
that
we
in
bellevue
can
and
are
the
model
for
how
we
do
things
right
in
so
many
different
areas,
and
this
is
one
of
them.
You
know
my
when
I
think
about
this.
F
I
guess
my
question
to
lindsay
would
be
this
when
you
look
at
the
funding
for
this
project
and
what
it's
going
to
take
to
build
this
supportive
housing
that
is
so
essential
in
our
community,
because
we
know
from
talking
with
sophia
way
and
cfh
that
when
we
have
the
community
experiencing
homelessness
ready
to
move
into
supportive
housing,
they
don't
have
the
units
for
people
to
exit
homelessness
into.
So
this
is
essential
for
our
community.
F
Q
Well,
we
we
certainly
aren't
directly
funding
the
community
engagement,
so
you
know
of
the
of
the
dollars
that
are
requested
here.
These
are
going
towards
the
construction
of
the
project,
so
that
that
would
be
one
of
the
things
that
we
would
need
to
discuss
with
them
is
what
the
level
of
expectation
would
be
around
the
intensity
of
that
process
and
the
staffing
of
it
right.
F
Because
the
designers
are
going
to
be
spending
additional
time
and
dollars
to
do
the
engagement
and
explaining
the
the
layout
and
all
the
different
features.
So
I
just
think
it's
important
to
make
sure
that
your
budget
accounts
for
this,
so
that
we're
really
clear
about
what
it
is
that
it's
going
to
take
for
this
enhanced
level
of
engagement.
F
Well,
I
I
support
this
project.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
what
they're
asking
for
does
reflect
the
level
of
of
work
it's
going
to
take.
So
yes,
so.
L
Q
Well,
I
think
that
that's
a
question
for
the
the
council
member
who's
proposing
the
idea
of
imposing
the
condition.
So
I
I.
A
Q
A
So,
for
clarification
purposes
for
the
the
homeless,
shelter
that
we
have
proposed,
we
have
a
provision
in
there.
That
requires
a
good
neighbor
agreement
where
we
appoint
a
committee
of
community
members
to
do
that.
We're
in
the
process
of
doing
that-
and
I
think
the
question
is:
can
we
apply
those
same
guides
to
this
project?
A
Would
we
use
the
same
group
and
do
it
as
a
whole,
or
would
you
have
a
separate
community
process?
I
mean
these
like
nobody
knows,
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
somebody
can
provide
clarity
or
give
me
a
path.
Q
I'm
not
sure
I
want
to
answer
that
on
the
spot
without
having
some
additional
conversation
with
them.
I
know
the
process
that
was
designed
for
the
shelter
was
was
extensive
and
detailed,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
represent
that.
That's
something
that
is
easily
replicated
or
done
on
a
parallel
track
for
this
other
development.
E
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
You
know
I
when
I
think
about
this,
I
mean
it's.
E
E
We
can't
have
it.
I
guess
where
people
are
complaining
about.
The
community
members
are
complaining
about
our
in-house
neighbors
and
then
we
sort
of
slow
the
process
of
providing
housing.
I
would
say,
and
given
that
this
is
on
the
same
site
as
the
as
the
shelter,
and
I
can't
help
but
think
that
that
conversation
is
happening
as
part
of
that
and
it's
on
the
same
site.
E
So
I
I'd
be,
I
guess,
reluctant
to
say,
let's
set
up
a
separate
one
for
the
same
site
for
a
related
project.
That's
that's
in
the
same
has
the
same
stakeholders
when
we
need
to,
I
think,
move
forward
with
with
providing
that
housing.
So
if
there's
a
way
we
can
leverage
the
existing
work,
that's
happening
without
creating
a
new
structure.
I
I
would
support
that.
E
A
Thank
you.
So
you
know
I
like
what
councilmember
barksdale
said
that
we
complain
about
the
people
who
are
homeless
and
now
we're
complaining
about
the
way
we're
going
to
house
them,
and
I
don't
want
to
slow
down
the
process.
I
do
know,
because
I'm
on
the
mental
illness
and
drug
dependency
advisory
board
that
they're
doing
a
lot
more
collection
of
data
with
our
homeless
population
because
a
it
allows
them
to
benefit
from
medicaid
and
other
funding
sources
and
b.
A
It
allows
them
to
track
what
goes
on
with
our
homeless
in
a
better
way
that
informs
us
the
best
way
to
help
them,
and
so
it's
it's
not
the
same.
Five
years
ago
we
had
the
philosophy
that
we
wouldn't
ask
them
anything.
So
we
didn't
think
that
that
was,
you
know
fair
for
them,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
community
concern
about
that,
and
it's
not
that
way.
Now
they
do
ask
everything,
but
you
don't
throw
somebody
out
because
they
won't
answer-
and
I
know
talking
to
david
bowling
from
congregations
for
the
homeless.
A
He
told
me
only
one
out
of
100
people
will
refuse
to
provide
that
information.
So
it's
not
a
concern
to
me.
I
do
not
want
to
slow
this
process
down.
I
think
it's
just
essential
that
we
get
this
housing
done,
and
so
my
question
to
emil
is:
what
kind
of
a
process
do
we
have
in
our
city
for
any
neighborhood?
And
that's
my
other
point:
is
you
know
why
would
we
hold
any
community
to
a
higher
standard
than
any
other
neighborhood
that
we
have
in
bellevue?
A
A
P
Yeah,
so
I
think,
there's
been
a
a
lot
of
good
questions
tonight
mayor.
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
to
suggest
for
council's
consideration
is
that
the
city
manager's
office,
community
development,
development
services
and
arch
get
get
together,
look
at
what
was
already
being
planned
for
this
eastgate
area
for
all
the
projects.
A
Okay,
that
doesn't
answer
my
question,
but
that's
a
nice
input.
I
appreciate
that.
I
do
think
that
I
see
you
just
hold
on
for
one.
Second,
I
do
think
that
you
know
we
need
to
look
at
funding
of
the
project
and
the
management
of
the
project
and
we
need
some
insurances
on
the
management.
So
I
see
council
member
robertson,
I
see
council
member
stokes
go
ahead.
Council
member
robertson.
G
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
quick
clarifying
follow-up,
and
so
I
am
not
asking
that
we
slow
anything
down.
I
know
that
plymouth
housing
has
been
involved
with
the
good
neighbor
agreement.
The
difference
is
that
they're
not
required
under
our
code
to
get
involved
in
that
they
are
so,
but
we
can
so
we
can't
require
it
under
our
code,
because
this
isn't
a
conditional
use
permit
process
project.
However,
if
we
are
funding
them,
we
can
require
them
to
do
it
as
a
condition
of
funding
so
jointly
with
cfh.
G
I'm
great.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
handled
so
that
they
are
a
good
neighbor,
that
this
is
a
successful
project
for
the
neighborhood,
but
also
for
the
people
that
are
living
there,
whether
they're
living
here,
whether
they're
in
the
shelter
or
whether
they're
in
the
affordable
housing
next
door.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
for
everyone.
Thank
you
for
the
supportive
comments
from
my
colleagues.
I
look
forward
to
getting
the
follow-up
information
from
staff
council
member
stokes.
I
Yeah-
and
I
appreciate
that
approach
I
think
that's
that's
a
different
than
started
out
with,
and
I
don't
think
anybody
has
any
question
with
that
and
I
have
we
looked
into
whatever
the
conditions
are
in
the
other
projects.
We're
talking
about
vote
in
the
package
by
the
way.
I
So
the
point
is,
I
think
that
I
just
I
just
hope.
We
keep
a
very
positive,
and
I
appreciate
the
way
you
put
it
to
the
to
the
end,
councilmember,
that
this
is
just
the
way
we
look
at
things
and
we're
looking
at
it
in
a
way
that
will
be
supportive
of
both
the
community
and
the
people
who
are
in
need.
That's
what
we're
looking
for
and
if
we
can
keep
it
at
that
level
and
know
that
we're
going
to
do
things
right
and
we
have
a
great
opportunity
to
make
this
work
together.
I
A
So,
thank
you
so
emile.
I
think
you
you
gave
good
direction.
There
gave
us
a
good
path
for
moving
forward.
I
think
that
we'd
all
like
to
see
this
come
back
with
with
a
robust
discussion
on
what
the
what
a
community
engagement
might
look
like
for
a
project
like
this
or
what
kind
of
you
know,
plans
we
have
for
these
two.
A
We
already
know
what
we
have
for
the
shelter,
so
we're
not
talking
about
that,
but
we'd
like
to
know
what
that
looks
like
and
and
what
the
pros
and
cons
are
and
what
the
impacts
would
be
both
financially
and
on
the
timeline.
A
So
I
think
I
think,
that's
pretty
unanimous
to
move
forward
and
bring
something
back
with
that
information
as
well.
Does
that
sound
like
clear
direction
to
you.
P
L
Yeah
in
front
of
you
this
evening
is
consideration
of
the
eastgate
office
park
rezone.
L
As
you
know,
this
is
a
process
three
quasi-judicial
matter
in
which
the
hearing
examiner
issues
a
recommendation
to
the
council
on
this
evening
is
the
initial
consideration
of
this
rezone,
no
actions
being
sought
by
the
council
this
evening,
but
staff
will
and
staff
will
return
a
future
meeting
to
request
final
action,
but
here
tonight
for
a
staff
report.
We
are
joined
by
kathy
guerilla,
our
city
attorney,
as
well
as
liz
stead
and
drew
faulson
from
our
development
services
department.
So
kathy.
T
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
As
mr
miyake
indicated,
the
the
rezone
application
before
you
tonight
is
a
process.
Three
land
use
application.
The
hearing
examiner
did
hold
a
public
hearing
and
did
recommend
approval
of
this
rezone
with
conditions,
and
there
was
no
appeal
filed
of
that
recommendation.
T
Using
information
from
the
hearing
record
but
before
I
turn
it
over
to
them,
because
this
is
quasi-judicial
and
the
appearance
of
fairness
doctrine
applies
mayor.
I
would
recommend
that
at
this
point,
council
members
be
given
the
opportunity
to
disclose,
on
the
record
any
ex
parte
communications
that
they
may
have
had,
either
with
the
applicant
or
with
any
other
party
supporting
or
opposing
the
rezone
application.
U
Wonderful,
thank
you.
I
am
also
have
with
me,
drew
folsom
one
of
our
senior
libraries
planner
and
he's
going
to
share
his
powerpoint,
the
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
known
house,
council
members.
Thank
you
for
climbing
tonight
to
present
this.
I
am
here
to
talk
about
some
background
information
regarding
a
request
to
rezone
property
located
at
15325
southeast
30th
place
as
city
attorney
berlin
noted.
The
application
in
question
was
presented
to
the
examiner
as
a
recommendation
for
approval
with
conditions
from
the
development
services
department
on
december
17
of
2020
andrew
folsom.
U
The
planet
is
with
us
tonight
due
to
that
presentation
as
well.
You
are
seeing
the
powerpoint
that
was
presented,
so
it
may
be
in
a
format
that
is
not
as
familiar
for
mostly
council
meetings.
The
hearing
examiner
did
concur
with
the
dsd
recommendation
of
approval
with
commissions
and
added
his
recommendation
of
approval
with
conditions
of
the
project
on
january
4th
of
2021
and,
as
was
mentioned,
no
appeals
of
the
hearing.
Examiner
recommendation
have
been
received,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
drew
and
he'll
further
present
the
project
to
you.
V
General
information,
the
reason
is
being
requested
to
promote
redevelopment
and
revitalization
of
the
existing
site
to
allow
for
continued
economic
growth
for
the
community.
The
council
adopted
comprehensive
plan
change
from
office
and
community
business
to
limited
business
via
ordnance
6393
on
december
17
2017.
V
V
Sony
the
site
is
within
the
office
and
community
business.
Zoning
districts
surrounding
properties
are
community
business,
office
and
r5
residential
zones.
The
r5
zones
to
the
north
west
and
northeast
are
developed
with
non-residential
uses.
The
lds
church
and
the
washington
state
patrol
the
r5
district
directly
north
of
the
30-foot
multi-purpose
path
is
developed
with
single-family
homes.
The
north
270
feet
of
the
property
within
the
trans
is
within
the
transition
area,
design
district
and
provides
transition
to
the
residentially
developed
single-family
zoning
district
located
300
feet
to
the
north.
V
Site
description:
the
site
is
approximately
14
acres
and
is
within
the
east
gate
sub
area.
The
site
is
located
west
of
156th
avenue.
Southeast
and
a
small
portion
of
the
site
is
adjacent
to
southeast
east
gateway.
Access
to
the
site
is
gained
via
southeast
30th
place,
a
private
roadway
connecting
to
156th
avenue
southeast
to
the
east.
Currently,
the
site
is
developed
with
four
low-rise
office
buildings
and
surface
and
underground
parking.
The
remainder
of
the
site
is
heavily
vegetated,
with
trees
and
shrouds.
V
V
The
staff
report
discusses
the
noticing
the
property
owners
within
500
feet
of
the
rezone
and
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
a
detailed
chart
for
the
proposed
dimensional
requirements
for
oob
and
ob2
zones
are
in
the
staff
report
pages
5
through
6,
as
well
as
a
discussion
of
the
dimensional
requirements.
Limitations
on
height
within
the
area
providing
single-family
transition
to
the
residential
properties
to
the
north.
V
The
applicant
provided
a
response
to
uses
and
noise
and
proposed
the
prohibition
of
retail
eating
and
drinking
and
automotive
uses
and
dark
sky
lighting
requirements
within
the
transition
area
more
restrictive
than
those
required
by
the
land
use
code.
The
extension
of
153
is
not
proposed
as
part
of
this
project.
V
V
Zoning
and
landings
staff
provided
a
zoning
comparison
between
the
current
office
owning
the
alternative
office,
limited
business,
zoning
and
the
proposed
office
limited
business.
Two
zoning
on
pages
five
through
six,
the
most
notable
difference
being
fourier
ratio
height
and
allow
uses
maximum
flow
array
ratio
will
increase
from
point
five
to
point.
0.21
and
the
maximum
height
will
increase
from
30
to
40
feet
to
75
feet
with
bonuses.
V
However,
it
is
noticed
in
the
stab
report.
There
are
limitations
to
the
maximum
height
for
ob2
zone
property
within
the
transition
area.
The
maximum
height
cannot
exceed
the
maximum
height
of
the
single
family
district
to
the
north,
when
measured
from
the
existing
grade
of
their
south
property
line.
V
The
decision
criteria
for
the
reason
approval
found
in
land
use
code
20.38
can
be
found
on
pages
1-13
of
the
staff
report.
In
summary,
the
proposal
enhances
the
public
health
safety
and
welfare
of
the
city
by
allowing
a
greater
mix
of
complimentary
land
uses
modest,
but
effective,
motorized
and
non-motorized
transportation
improvements
and
appropriate
increased
development
intensity
to
meet
the
demand
for
continued
job
growth
and
economic
growth.
V
V
T
And
again,
we
are
not
looking
for
a
decision
tonight
and
if
you
do
have
any
questions
between
now
and
when
this
is
back
before
you
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
please
do
reach
out,
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
and
I'll
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
the
questions
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
we're
staying
within
the
record
and
following
the
process.
A
A
L
Mayor
these
two
ordinances,
65-67
and
6568,
are
two.
L
The
matters
related
to
these
were,
as
you
mentioned,
both
in
front
of
you
a
couple
weeks
ago,
and
these
represent
the
planning
commission
recommendations,
both
of
which
were
discussed
at
the
council
meetings
and
were
were
directed
by
the
council
to
bring
them
back
for
tonight
for
formal
action,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
mike
brennan
as
and
we
are
going
to
provide
you
a
brief
staff
report
and
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
in
advance
of
you
thinking
taking
them
up
for
action
this
evening,
mike.
C
C
They,
the
amendments,
support
the
creation
of
affordable
housing
and
housing
options
which
are
aligned
with
the
city
council's
affordable
housing
strategy.
The
f
will
do
each
of
these
as
a
separate
staff
report,
and
then
I
think,
ask
for
council
action.
So
the
first
ordinance
is
a
land
use
code
amendment
that
would
remove
the
three-year
waiting
period
required
for
the
construction
of
an
adu
in
new
homes
and
for
more
detail.
On
that
I'll
hand
it
over
to
trisnatanis,
who
is
joining
me
as
well
as
nick
whipple
from
the
development
services
department,
trisna.
W
We
are
giving
a
brief
explanation
of
the
recommended
accessory
dwelling
unit
or
adu
land
use,
code,
amendment
or
luca,
we'll
describe
anticipated
outcomes
from
this
ordinance
and
then
we'll
talk
about
argument
with
the
public,
as
well
as
the
process
that
we've
gone
through
for
this
land
use
code,
amendment
and
recap
with
reiterating
what
we're
seeking
from
council
tonight.
W
So
this
recommended
adu
luca,
amends
the
regulations
in
the
land
use
code
to
remove
the
three-year
wait
period
to
establish
an
adu
within
new
construction.
In
other
words,
and
after
assuming
that
this
ordinance
is
adopted,
an
adu
will
be
able
to
be
installed
and
registered
at
the
same
time
of
initial
building
construction.
W
This
is
a
targeted
update.
Our
permitting
and
construction
data
shows
that
in
2020,
the
city
had
five
registrations
for
new
adus
and
in
2019
there
were
eight,
whereas
the
city
had
149
new
single
family
building
permits
and
they
were
issued
and
out
of
those
149
permits,
25
included
space
and
elements
to
make
it
easier
to
establish
an
adu
in
the
future.
W
So
the
this
would
this
recommended
luca
would
remove
that
three-year
wait
before
and
an
applicant
or
proper
property
owner
could
fully
add
a
second
kitchen
and
register
an
adu
at
the
same
time
as
initial
building
construction.
W
The
three-year
wait
has
been
a
barrier
to
adding
this
type
of
housing
unit
and
option
within
the
city.
So
this
code
amendment
removes
this
barrier
so
that
a
property
owner
may
install
an
adu
in
an
efficient
and
cost
effective
manner
and
at
the
same
time
they
are
constructing
their
new
home.
W
They
would
be
able
to
register
and
add
this
additional
housing
unit
as
soon
as
they
get
their
final
inspection
and
occupancy
approval.
This
luca
advances,
as
mike
mentioned
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy,
which
was
adopted
in
2017,
specifically
strategy
b2,
which
is
to
update
the
city's
adu
regulations.
W
The
luca
accomplishes
the
creation
of
housing
choices.
This
narrow
change
and
a
city's
edu
regulations
is
anticipated
to
make
adus
more
feasible
to
build
and
encourage
construction
of
this
type
of
housing
option
in
residential
neighborhoods
adus
provide
a
diversity
in
housing,
type,
size
and
geographic
location,
as
well
as
cultural
options.
S
Thank
you
and
good
evening,
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house
and
members
of
the
council
I'll
briefly
briefly
cover
the
public
engagement
for
this
luca
and
then
orient
us
on
where
we
are
in
the
luca
process
and
then
turn
it
back
to
mike.
To
conclude,
the
staff
presentation
so
for
the
adu,
luca
staff
did
provide
three
modes
of
outreach
for
the
ordinance.
The
tour
that's
being
considered
this
evening,
so
our
process
for
land
use
code
requirements.
S
Those
include
notice
of
application
and
notice
of
public
hearing
both
of
those
requirements
were
followed.
We
also
implemented
direct
engagement
and
feedback
with
our
stakeholders,
which
include
the
master
builders
association
of
king
and
snohomish
county.
It
also
includes
property
owners
that
would
be
potential
applicants
just
concerned
residents
that
have
contacted
the
city
or
interested
members
of
the
public.
S
We
did
hear
staff
heard
from
many
property
owners
that
are
interested
in
this
luca
getting
adopted
some
that
actually
would
register
for
an
adu
once
that
that
path
becomes
available,
and
as
mentioned
in
our
previous
study
session,
we
did
also
receive
some
comments
regarding
other
elements
or
other
provisions
of
the
land
use
code
as
they
relate
to
adus.
But
the
the
the
purpose
of
this
land
use
code
of
memphis
to
remove
that
three-year
wait
period,
and
we
did
see
broad
support
for
that.
S
We
also
had
an
online
presence,
so
we
launched
a
web
page
to
provide
information
related
to
this
code
amendment,
as
well
as
contact
information
for
public
comments.
So
the
website
was
updated
on
a
regular
basis
to
ensure
that
the
latest
and
most
accurate
information
was
available
to
the
public
next
slide,
please.
S
So
this
slide
is
just
to
orient
us
to
where
we
are
at
with
the
luca
process.
So,
as
mentioned
earlier,
the
planning
commission
was
introduced
to
this
land
use
code
amendment
in
december
and
held
their
public
hearing
in
january.
S
During
their
courtesy
hearing,
the
ebcc
had
good
discussion
on
the
luca
and
the
community
council.
Members
were
supportive
of
this
luca
tonight.
We
are
here
seeking
council
action
to
adopt
ordinance
number
6567.
S
I,
and
if
this
ordinance
is
adopted
by
council,
then
we
will
return
to
the
east
bellevue
community
council
on
march
2nd,
so
they
may
hold
their
public
hearing
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
ordinance
within
their
jurisdiction
next
slide.
Please
now
turn
it
back
to
mike
to
conclude
the
staff
presentation.
C
Thank
you
nick.
So
that
does
conclude
our
presentation
this
evening.
We
are
seeking
council
action
on
ordnance
6567
and
we
are
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
anybody
have
questions
or
comments.
If
you
raise
your
hand,
I
can
see
you
I'm
not
seeing
any.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
ordinance,
6567.
H
P
A
C
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
an
an
amendment
to
the
land
use
code
in
the
sections
dealing
with
subdivisions.
This
would
allow
for
unit
lot
subdivisions
that
essentially
allows
for
the
construction
of
town
homes
on
real
property,
so
they
could
be
sold
as
fee
simple.
It
would
allow
the
ownership
of
both
the
townhome
and
the
and
the
property
below
so
for
more
information
on
the
details
of
this
proposed
ordinance,
I
will
hand
it
to
trisna
trisna.
W
Thanks
again
mike
good
evening
again,
everyone,
as
mike
noted,
we
are
here
to
present
a
brief
staff
report
on
the
unit
lodge
subdivision
land
use
code
amendment
after
staff's
presentation
and
council
deliberation.
We
are
asking
council
to
adopt
ordinance
number
6568..
W
Our
agenda
includes
again
giving
a
brief
explanation
of
the
recommended,
luca
describing
anticipated
outcomes
from
this
ordinance
and
then
provide
a
summary
of
the
public
engagement,
as
well
as
the
luca
process
that
we've
gone
through
and
we'll
close
with
asking
direction
from
our
action
from
council.
W
W
The
barriers
are
those
that
are
related
to
construction
and
mortgage
financing
associated
with
condos
style
development,
so
that
that
we
will
be
encouraging
greater
housing
density
in
bellevue
and
a
diversity
of
housing
types
unit.
Lot
subdivisions
will
create
individual
fee,
simple
town
houses,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
without
changing
that
allowed
density,
also
without
changing
any
appearance
to
the
townhouse
development
that
would
already
be
allowed
by
current
zoning
requirements.
W
S
Thank
you
and
good
evening
again
so
similar
to
the
adu
luca.
This
land
use
code.
Amendment
also
had
the
process
for
requirements,
so
the
process
for
requirements
for
notice
of
application,
separa
notification
with
this
land
use
code,
amendment
the
notice
of
public
hearing
and
then
the
final
sipa
threshold
determination
were
required
and
all
process
four
requirements
were
followed.
We
implemented
enhanced
engagement
for
this
as
well,
which
included
direct
engagement
and
feedback.
S
So
we
did
have
staff
had
an
ongoing
dialogue
with
the
master
builders
association
of
king
and
tsunamis
counties
developers,
as
well
as
potential
applicants
regarding
the
proposed
amendments
and
then,
lastly,
we
encouraged
engagement
through
our
online
presence,
so
we
did
launch
a
website
a
webpage
to
provide
information
related
to
the
code
amendment
as
well
as
contact
information,
and
we
did
update
that
web
page
frequently
as
it
progressed
through
the
luca
process.
Next
slide,
please
and
very
similar
slide
to
the
last
presentation.
S
We
introduced
this
landy's
code,
amendment
to
the
planning
commission
in
december
they
held
their
public
hearing
in
january.
The
recommended
luca
was
brought
to
the
city
council
on
february
1st
council
directed
staff
to
prepare
the
ordinance
for
final
adoption,
which
which
brings
us
here,
but
I
guess
before
that
we
did
take
it.
S
The
following
day
to
the
east
bellevue
community
council,
the
east
bellevue
community
council
held
their
courtesy
hearing
the
ebcc
discussed
the
land
use
code,
amendment
and
all
community
council
members
were
supportive
of
this
unit
lot
subdivision
ordinance.
So
tonight
we
are
seeking
council
action
to
adopt
ordnance
6568.