►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - July 25, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
We
have
two
proclamations
tonight.
We
have
a
proclamation
acknowledging
the
americans
with
disability
act
and
blaine
empson,
the
city's
ada
and
title
knight,
title
11,
6.,
sorry
can't
read
new
roman
numerals
title
vi:
civil
rights
administrator
is
here
with
us.
A
Virtually
I
don't
see
him
on
the
screen,
but
hopefully
we
can
pull
him
up
and
blaine
and
staff
will
be
presenting
the
city's
report
on
the
ada
self-evaluation
and
transition
plan
in
early
september,
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
hearing
that
so
and
in
addition
this
evening,
laura
kautz
on
behalf
of
the
puget
sound
personnel
will
provide
a
few
remarks
in
receipt
of
the
council's
proclamation
on
the
ada
and
then
the
second
one
is
the
muslim
american
heritage
month
proclamation,
and
we
have
dr
whitehead
making
remarks
on
that
after
that,
so
the
first
one
councilmember
robertson.
D
And
whereas
people
with
disabilities,
both
locally
and
across
the
world,
have
experienced
disproportionate
impacts
to
their
health,
social
connections
and
economic
stability
during
the
coven
19
pandemic.
And
whereas
32
years
after
the
signing
of
the
ada
individuals,
individuals
with
disabilities
still
experience
disproportionate
instances
of
discrimination,
poverty
abuse
and
health
impacts.
D
Now,
therefore,
on
behalf
of
lynn,
robinson
mayor
of
bellevue,
washington
and
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
the
week
of
july
24th
to
30th
2022
as
americans
with
disability
act
weak
and
urge
all
residents
of
bellevue
to
support
disability
equity
and
recognize
the
value
and
contributions
that
people
with
disabilities
add
to
our
city
and
community.
Thank.
E
E
The
city
of
bellevue
has
four
supported
employees
in
departments
such
as
parks,
hr,
I.t
and
transportation.
Through
this
partnership,
many
lives
have
been
positively
impacted
within
the
bellevue
community.
We
look
forward
to
continuing
this
partnership
into
the
future
to
enhance
the
lives
of
the
ada
community
and
their
families.
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
inviting
fujitsun
personnel
to
be
a
part
of
this
celebration
of
the
32nd
anniversary
of
the
of
the
american
with
disabilities
act.
Thank
you
so
much
thank.
A
You
laura
and
and
thank
blaine
also
for
all
the
work
that
he
has
done
at
the
city.
It's
a
noticeable
changes
that
he
has
made
very
much
appreciated
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
the
second
proclamation
then
we'll
come
back
and
take
pictures
for
both
okay.
So
the
next
proclamation
is
muslim
american
heritage
month
and
we're
going
to
have
council
members
on
read
that.
B
Now,
therefore,
I,
on
behalf
of
lynn,
robinson
mayor
of
bellevue,
washington,
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
july
2022
as
muslim
american
heritage
month
in
bellevue.
Recognizing
and
celebrating
the
many
contributions
of
the
muslim
american
community
in
our
city.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
dr
whitehead.
F
F
A
A
C
Thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
There
are
10
pre-registered
speakers
for
oral
communications.
I
will
remind
the
public
for
your
information.
Oral
communications
is
for
a
period
of
no
more
than
30
minutes.
Maximum
and
speakers
will
be
allowed
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak,
and
only
three
speakers
will
be
allowed
to
speak
to
either
one
side
of
a
particular
topic,
either
in
support
or
concern
or
opposition,
and
with
that
I'll
call.
Our
first
speaker
this
evening,
who
is
lawrence
graham
and
mr
graham,
is
in
person.
Thank
you.
H
I
have
to
talk
really
fast,
because
three
minutes
isn't
a
lot
of
time.
Okay,
good
evening.
First,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
a
few
points
from
a
recent
article
in
the
new
year
in
the
new
york
times
related
to
the
tree
issue.
The
area
surrounding
the
eiffel
tower
in
paris
has
recently
become
the
scene
of
furious
protests.
The
source
of
the
anger
and
protests
was
a
plan
to
cut
down
more
than
20
trees,
some
over
100
years
old,
around
the
tower
as
part
of
an
effort
to
build
a
huge
garden
and
ease
tourist
congestion.
H
These
were
massive
protests.
140
000
signatures
were
obtained
in
a
petition.
The
article
goes
on
to
point
out.
Trees
are
considered
some
of
the
best
defenses
against
the
radiation
that
contributes
to
the
heat
waves
that
are
on
the
rise
everywhere
because
of
global
warming.
They
provide
much
needed
coolness
in
urban
environments.
Young
trees
are
less
effective
than
older
trees.
One
100
year
old
tree
is
worth
125
newly
planted
trees
in
terms
of
absorbing
carbon
dioxide
and
cooling
down
the
surroundings.
So
these
trees
in
bellevue
are
150
to
200
years
old.
H
So
we're
talking,
you
know,
200
new
trees
to
replace
one
tree
in
terms
of
carbon
dioxide.
Article
goes
on
to
say:
cutting
down.
Trees
has
become
a
very
serious
question
that
causes
a
bit
of
a
scandal.
At
a
time
when
we
talk
about
fighting
global
warming
so
to
bring
the
notion
of
increased
anger
and
frustration.
The
tree
destruction
is
triggering
closer
to
home
here
in
bellevue,
quick
personal
story,
a
neighbor
of
mine
with
whom
I've
actually
enjoyed
a
great
relationship
over
the
years
recently
purchased
the
home
and
lot
next
door
to
hers.
H
The
home
itself
is
a
smaller,
older
home
that
will
eventually,
of
course,
be
torn
down
and
sits
on
a
lot
loaded
with
landmark
trees.
The
neighbor
hired
would
look
to
me
like
an
unlicensed
tree
cutter,
to
remove
what
looked
like
five
to
ten
or
many
more
large
trees.
Presumably
so
the
older
home
that
will
now
be
rented
would
enjoy
a
better
view.
Someone
who
witnessed
the
carnage
apparently
called
the
city
of
bellevue
to
report
the
cutting
the
neighbor
knocked
on
my
door.
H
One
saturday
morning
when
I
was
still
in
my
pajamas-
and
I
looked
I'm
like
I'm
going
to-
let
you
in
even
though
I'm
in
my
pajamas
because
you're
my
friend
did
you
report
me
to
bellevue.
I
said
no,
it
was
not
me
and
furthermore,
I've
learned
that
calling
the
city
does
little
good
as
the
rules
need
updating
and
enforcement
of
the
existing
poor
rules
is
almost
non-existent.
I
told
her.
I
had
no
idea
who
reported
the
activity
and
I
invited
her
into
my
home
and
I
just
showed
her
out
my
windows.
H
I
said
this
is
what
used
to
be
over
here,
and
this
is
what's
now
nothing
nothing.
You
can
see
that
the
sun
is
pouring
down
on
all
the
houses.
All
the
yards,
there's
increased
traffic
noise,
it's
just
ugly
and
look
at
what
I
retained,
because
I
didn't
this:
isn't
a
spec
home
look
at
these
trees!
Look
at
these
beautiful
trees!
Look
at
these
beautiful
trees!
That's
that's
all
we're
trying
to
do
so.
H
You
know
I.
The
the
point
is:
is
that
this
sad
interaction
with
my
neighbor
demonstrates
the
need
to
update
the
tree
code.
What
I
have
witnessed
in
my
area
of
inner
tie
is
devastating
and
sad.
It's
actually
emotionally
distressing.
We
desperately
need
meaningful,
updated
tree
rules
and
some
actual
enforcement
compliance
mechanisms
to
avoid
neighborhood
disarmament
disharmony.
We
need
clear
rules,
clear
understanding
of
the
rules.
C
C
C
I
Very
good.
Thank
you
good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
stephanie
kristen,
I'm
a
real
estate
broker
with
windermere
real
estate,
and
I
serve
on
the
board
of
trustees
of
plymouth
housing.
I
have
lived
in
bellevue
for
the
past
19
years
and
I'm
an
active
member
of
my
community
as
a
bellevue
resident.
I
know
that
our
city
is
at
its
safest
when
everyone
is
getting
their
needs
met.
I
also
see
too
many
of
our
neighbors
being
failed
by
a
system
that
lacks
adequate
access
to
shelter
and
housing.
I
I
want
to
be
part
of
the
solution
and
believe
that
bellevue
can
be
a
regional
leader
in
addressing
our
housing
crisis.
I
urge
you
to
support
measures
that
reduce
barriers
to
emergency
and
supportive
housing.
One
way
of
doing
this
is
to
support
council
member
barksdale's
amendments
that
would
eliminate
the
conditional
use
permitting
requirement
for
emergency
housing.
I
This
unnecessary
requirement
substantially
increases
time
and
cost
to
both
city
staff
and
housing
providers.
At
best,
this
requirement
leads
to
long
delays
for
our
neighbors
trying
to
access
these
life-affirming
and
stabilizing
services.
At
worst,
the
requirement
can
outright
deny
new
services
from
even
being
created.
I
Additionally,
I
urge
you
to
oppose
proposed
amendments
a1
through
a9
that
will
put
up
barriers
to
emergency
and
supportive
housing
as
a
community.
Amid
a
housing
crisis,
we
should
be
working
to
increase
access
and
availability
of
emerging
and
supportive
housing,
arbitrary
resident
caps
and
minimum
buffer
zones
between
housing
sites
significantly
limit
the
number
of
individuals
that
can
be
housed
with
so
much
need
for
these
activities
throughout
bellevue.
It
does
not
make
sense
to
put
in
policies
in
place
that
will
restrict
access
to
these
services.
I
I'm
proud
to
be
part
of
plymouth
housing
organization
and
appreciate
the
council's
past.
Support
with
the
eastgate
project
having
more
shelters
and
more
housing
is
a
win
for
our
whole
community.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
comment
today
for
addressing
our
housing
crisis,
with
the
sense
of
urgency
that
it
demands.
C
J
Very
much
hello
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members
recently
I
had
the
welcome
opportunity
to
speak
with
council
members,
barksdale
newenhaus
and
lee
at
a
neighborhood
picnic
and
walk
now
that
the
state
and
county
are
diminishing
local
local
control
of
our
representatives
and
residents.
It
is
important
that
we
secure
the
channels
of
communication
which
remain
it
would
be
wonderful
if
some
of
our
council
hearings
could
permit
this
direct
exchange
of
ideas.
J
I
understand
and
support
the
desire
to
house
the
unhowed
I've
unhoused.
I
fully
support
council
member
barksdale's
excellent
recommendation
that
the
city
of
bellevue
hire
a
licensed
psychiatrist
who
could
oversee
and
advise
all
the
shelters
and
various
housing
types
which
will
be
coming
to
bellevue
in
all
the
discussions
around
these
topics.
This
need
has
been
glaringly
acts
absent.
J
The
bellevue
police
department
cannot
be
expected
to
be
responsible
for
all
the
fallout,
particularly
with
the
handicaps
recently
imposed
on
them
by
the
state.
J
One
must
acknowledge
that
there
are
many
different
functional
levels
in
this
group,
ranging
from
those
who
were
functional
and
who
have
suffered
a
recent
medical,
marital
or
economic
setback
before
resuming
an
independent
life
to
those
who
will
require
permanent
care
according
to
leo
floor
about
10
percent
of
those
in
permanent
supportive
housing
will
move
into
independent
living.
My
comments
apply
to
the
large
group,
which
will
not
serious
mental
illnesses
are
lifelong
and
those
who
do
not
receive
ongoing
medication
and
therapy
need
to
be
protected
and
stabilized.
J
Some,
particularly
those
who
have
had
a
career
in
the
past
and
have
stabilized
with
meds,
will
do
well
without
patient
therapy
due
to
the
nature
of
their
illnesses
and
the
medications
involved
without
requirements.
Many
in
this
group
will
stop
their
meds
within
a
year
of
leaving
therapy.
Others
will
need
periodic
med
changes,
even
if
they
are
compliant.
J
Unsurprisingly,
facilities
with
requirements
have
the
highest
rate
of
positive
outcomes.
I've
been
researching
such
facilities
for
my
sister
in
another
state
and
have
discovered
that
every
area
has
a
facility
with
no
requirements
and
accepts
those
with
criminal
records.
Current
hard
drug
users
and
those
who
are
not
med
compliant.
J
However,
they
do
have
the
ability
to
quickly
hospitalize
people
who
requirement
it
is
negligent
and
far
below
the
professional
standard
of
care
to
group
heavy,
chronic
drug
hard
drug
users
with
those
who
are
mentally
ill.
Likewise,
those
who
are
not
med
compliant
pose
a
risk
to
themselves
the
other
residents
and
the
surrounding
community.
J
C
K
Hi
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
w
mayor
newman
house,
council,
members
and
city
staff,
my
name
is
stephen
pastana,
I'm
a
bellevue
resident
and
my
address
is
on
file.
I
wanted
to
speak
today
not
on
the
supportive
housing
land
use,
changes
that
are
on
your
agenda,
but
on
another
important
component
of
the
city's
housing
portfolio,
that
is
rented
homes
and
tenant
protections,
I'm
one
of
the
over
60
000
bellevue
residents,
or
just
about
half
the
city
that
rent
their
homes.
K
Here
in
city
council
meetings,
we
sometimes
hear
about
looking
to
what
our
neighboring
cities
are
doing
to
address
issues
we
have
in
common.
We
have
a
chance
to
do
this
with
tenant
protections.
Just
last
week,
the
city
of
redmond
decided
to
implement
a
suite
of
basic
common
sense,
tenant
protections,
and
I'm
asking
bellevue
city,
council
and
city
staff
to
use
those
as
a
starting
point
or
inspiration
for
implementing
tenant
protections
here
in
bellevue.
K
What
redmond
adopted
includes
caps
on
fees
and
specifying
the
number
of
minimum
days
a
tenant
must
be
notified
of
large
rent
increases.
I
sure
would
like
to
know
well
in
advance
if
my
landlord
would
have
raised
my
rent
by
100
or
more
a
month,
but
right
now
in
bellevue.
I
don't
have
that
peace
of
mind
for
those
of
us
who
rent
our
homes
in
bellevue.
K
These
sorts
of
tenant
protections
will
provide
better
housing
stability,
peace
of
mind
and
help
avoid
housing
insecurity,
as
the
city
works
on
its
comprehensive
plan.
Looking
at
our
next
20
years,
I'm
asking
that
you
consider
implementing
strong
tenant
protections
for
those
of
those
of
us
who
are
who
rent
our
homes
now,
as
well
as
for
future
generations
of
bellevue
residents,
who
will
be
living
and
working
here
in
the
decades
to
come.
These
tenant
protections
are
an
appropriate
instance
where
we
can
look
to
what
our
neighboring
cities
are
doing
to
help
residents
avoid
precarious
housing
situations.
C
L
Hello,
I'm
here
today
to
talk
about
trees,
I'm
36
years
old
and
I've
been
a
resident
of
bellevue
for
31
years,
split
between
the
somerset
and
lake
hills
neighborhoods
having
grown
up
in
somerset.
I
appreciate
the
benefit
of
landmark
trees
and
green
space
developed
in
the
late
70s
and
early
80s.
The
somerset,
lakeland
and
amherst
neighborhoods
all
have
direct
access
to
intertwining
green
belts,
the
coal
creek
natural
area
and
the
cougar
mountain
regional
wildland
park.
L
L
As
a
post-war
boom
neighborhood
full
of
starter
homes,
lake
hills
has
significantly
smaller
homes
and
lots
ripe
for
development,
along
with
the
removal
of
nearly
all
existing
canopy
on
each
lot.
As
current
city
code
allows,
for
example,
a
community
member
recently
noticed
an
unpermitted
contractor
hoskins
tree
service,
removing
four
landmark
trees
over
24
inches
in
diameter,
in
lake
hills.
L
Under
the
new
city
code.
These
trees
require
a
permit
for
removal.
After
contacting
non-emergency
police,
the
resident
was
told
that
authorities
quote
would
not
come
out
for
a
tree.
End
quote
the
city's
code.
Compliance
officer
told
this
resident.
The
company
would
not
face
any
fines
that
the
code
is
not
about
saving
trees,
but
rather
preventing
homeowners
from
removing
trees
themselves,
and
that
if
the
company
did
apply
for
a
permit
under
the
new
code,
the
permit
would
likely
be
granted
regardless.
L
L
Don't
laugh,
but
if
illegal
unpermitted
tree
removal
costs
a
company,
ten
thousand
dollars
word
will
get
out
and
fast.
Perhaps
tree
removal
license
in
bellevue
requires
companies
to
provide
a
notarized
acknowledgement
of
existing
city
codes.
We
could
even
call
it
no
contractors
left
behind
if
bellevue
is
serious
about
protecting
our
communities.
Precious
and
irreplaceable
assets
then
be
brave.
Take
a
regional
lead
in
the
fight
against
climate
change
and
demand
equitable
restitution
to
city
residents
for
unpermitted
tree
removal
in
our
most
vulnerable
and
tree
storm
neighborhoods.
L
M
Thank
you,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members
for
time
today.
My
name
is
dennis
hills.
I
work
for
plymouth
housing.
We
are
the
newest,
permanent,
supportive
housing
provider
in
bellevue
and
we're
very
excited
about
the
eastgate
campus,
I'm
here
in
support
of
ordnance
6672,
which
is
the
land
use
code
amendment
the
land
use
code.
Amendment
came
about
as
part
of
hb
1220,
which
the
state
legislature
passed
to
enhance
supportive
housing
throughout
the
state,
and
so
we're
very
thrilled
that
many
communities
are
are
taking
this
and
implementing
it
as
part
of
their
land
use
code.
M
Plymouth
housing
is
thrilled
to
provide
permit
support
of
housing
to
over
1100
individuals
throughout
the
puget
sound
region,
and
the
eastgate
project
will
allow
us
to
provide
housing
for
more
than
90
individuals.
We
serve
chronically
homeless,
individual
adults
in
support
of
the
luca.
We
also
are
members
of
the
eastside,
affordable
housing
coalition,
and
also
the
housing
development
consortium
which
is
built
up
of
many
different
housing
developers,
and
we
are
all
in
support
of
this
luca.
M
However,
there
are
a
number
of
amendments
that
are
being
considered
today
that
are
very
important
to
discuss.
Two
of
those
amendments
amen,
b1
and
b2,
both
the
east
side,
affordable,
housing,
convening
in
the
housing
development
consortium,
as
well
as
plymouth,
housing
support.
This
would
enhance
the
opportunities
for
emergency
housing
in
the
city
of
bellevue.
M
However,
we
also
have
to
oppose
amendments
a1
through
a9.
The
reason
is
because
this
would,
in
those
amendments
would
impede
our
evidence-based
model
for
delivering
permits
for
housing.
Our
housing
is
different
from
a
lot
of
other
types
of
housing.
Our
residents
are
there
permanently,
they
sign
leases.
There
are
agreements
and
rules
that
are
in
place,
and
some
of
these
amendments
would
impede
our
ability
to
deliver
that
type
of
model.
M
We
also
believe
that
if
those
amendments
were
adopted,
it
would
lead
to
the
slowing
of
future
development
of
affordable
housing
in
the
area.
So,
for
those
reasons
we
have
to
oppose
those
amendments,
we
are
very
supportive
of
the
luca
in
general,
which
will
increase
the
amount
of
supportive
housing
and
affordable
housing
in
many
of
the
different
zoning
areas
in
the
city
of
bellevue,
so
we're
thrilled
about
that
as
well.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
M
N
Good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house,
I'm
betsy
hummer
14541
southeast
26th
street.
I
want
to
thank
you
first
of
all
for
all
your
service
to
the
people
of
bellevue,
and
I
urge
you
to
adopt
the
amendments
a1
through
a9
to
help
protect
the
people
working
to
emerge
from
homelessness
and
urge
the
city
council
to
be
accountable
to
those
people
for
their
progress
through
a
trying
time.
N
N
It
doesn't
need
any
changes.
In
fact
it
needs
stuff
added
to
it.
That's
what
I
believe
the
people
emerging
from
homelessness
who
would
go
into
the
permanent
supportive
housing
ins,
residential
neighborhoods,
which
includes
apartment
houses,
do
not
deserve
to
be
clustered
together,
packed
like
sardines
into
single-family
homes
or
apartments,
or
have
no
accountability
from
the
government
that
professes
to
help
them
similar
to
the
vulnerable
population
served
by
adult
family
homes.
Homeless.
People
need
help
that
is
defined
not
by
landlords
or
funders,
but
by
their
elected
officials.
N
N
N
Keep
the
conditional
use
permits
in
place
for
those
shelters
because,
as
has
been
shown
by
the
congregations
for
the
homeless,
beautiful
new
shelter
that
I
see
every
day
as
I
drive
up
by
90
going
up,
it
looks
like
they'll
be
in
there
in
just
a
month
or
so
it
works,
and
we
all
contributed
to
the
success
of
that
land
use
code.
So
please
deny
the
other
amendments
the
bees
and
keep
our
land
use
code.
The
same.
Thank
you
again
for
your
service
and,
let's
protect
all
of
our
citizens.
O
O
We
look
forward
to
working
with
the
city
staff
on
their
outreach
efforts
in
reviewing
the
staff's
presentation.
For
this
evening.
We
wanted
to
add
our
support
to
increasing
density
beyond
the
12.6
million
square
foot
baseline
in
the
2018
cac
report
to
assist
in
providing
additional
housing
development
opportunities.
O
We
support
increased
density
throughout
wilberton,
however,
not
through
the
use
of
code
mandates,
but
rather
through
market
forces,
especially
in
the
wilberton
core,
as
it
represents
a
really
unique
opportunity
for
the
cbd
to
expand
over
the
next
century.
As
we
all
know,
it's
landlocked
on
three
sides
and
so
again
look
forward
to
working
with
the
staff
on
this
and
do
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
P
My
name
alex
zimmerman.
I
want
to
speak
about
something.
What
is
critical
right
now
about
democrats,
who
are
stealing
from
us,
are
billion
in
billion
dollars
in
exactly.
I
won't
speak
about
sound
transit.
Three,
it's
a
punch
is
him.
What
is
don't
have
a
knowledge
in
american
history
and
right
now,
people
who
responsible
for
this,
for
example,
like
console
in
country,
council
balducci,
for
example.
P
When
I
come
to
speak,
they
cut
me
first
five
seconds.
Why?
Because
I
call
this
a
criminal,
a
bandita,
aponsis
ham,
crook
would
pose
to
be
in
jail,
and
I
give
you
right
now
couple
example:
houses
working
she
promote,
for
example,
the
sound
east,
sound
transit
line.
So
right
now
everybody
knows
this.
So
for
last
couple
years
we
can
lose
only
billion
and
billion
dollars.
P
People
money
we're
talking
about
this
small
problem,
we're
talking
about
dozen
billion
dollars.
How
many
idiots
in
the
city
understand
what
is
mean
one
billion
dollars?
We
can
build
two
gospel
like
overlake
or
ten
thousand
apartment
for
poor
people.
You
understand
about
talking
if
you're
talking
about
dozens
and
dozen
billion
dollars.
So
why
counsel
balducci
cut
me
for
first
five
seconds
because
I
called
so
they
are
bandita
a
criminal
they
place
in
jail
in
all
civilized
country.
Hundred
thousand
hundred
billion
dollars
finds
this
ham.
Sound
transistor
is
supposed
to
be
in
jail
for
a
lifetime.
P
Why
nobody
touch
them
in,
like
I,
only
one
man
who
comes
this
for
many
years
and
talks
this
upon
this
hair
means
it's
a
crime
yeah,
so
they
cut
me.
She
got
another
share
cut
another
black
guy
cut
me
first,
five
seconds.
They
not
give
me
ever
open
amounts,
so
question
right
now,
very
simple:
why
they
acting
like
a
crazy
nazi
gestapo
garbage
rats.
You
know
what
is
mean
and
nobody
is
stopping
them.
Why?
P
Why
thousand
hundred
thousand
people
vote
for
democrats
who,
for
the
last
ten
years,
make
us
life
miserable
every
territory
in
every
point
and
spend
a
billion
and
billion
dollars
is
idiot
money?
You
know
what
is
mean,
what
is
make
us
life
miserable
fifty
percent,
each
american
right
now
poor
eighty
percent,
which
americans
have
trouble
right
now
when
you
spend
a
billion
in
billion
dollars
for
panzer's
ham?
What
is
this
happen?
So
I
right
now
speak
to
everybody,
stop
and
counsel
king
country
council
balducci,
because
she's
a
pure
criminal
right
now
stand
up
america.
Q
Good
evening,
that's
always
a
tough
act
to
follow
good
evening
council
members,
tonight's
vote
on
the
permanent
support
of
housing
and
transient
housing,
luca,
isn't
about
whether
homeless
people
are
bad,
whether
homeless,
service
providers
are
bad
or
whether
bellevue
residents
are
nimbies.
Q
Q
Q
I
represent
a
large
number
of
bellevue
citizens
who
are
not
here
tonight.
They
don't
come
down
to
city
hall,
but
they're,
watching
which
you
can't
see
because
zoom
meetings-
and
I
ask
you
to
do
the
right
thing
and
vote
to
adopt
council
member
jennifer
robertson's
amendments
prior
to
adoption
of
the
permanent,
supportive
and
transient
housing.
Luca
local
control
is
not
garbage.
Q
C
A
R
Mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
and
that's
right
as
the
council
and
the
viewing
public
is
aware,
we're
in
line
for
some
very
hot
temperatures
this
week
and
we
wanted
to
get
in
front
of
the
council
as
well
as
the
public
tonight,
to
talk
about
some
of
the
ways
we're
going
to
be
supporting
our
community
during
this.
This
heat
wave
so
joining
us
this
evening
is
carl
luneck,
our
bellevue's
emergency
manager.
To
briefly
share
with
the
council
some
of
the
measures
the
city
is
taking
during
the
seaway
carl.
S
Bellevue
communications
has
and
will
continue
to
be,
taking
point
on
communicating
with
the
public,
sending
out
suggested
recommendations,
ways
for
residents
to
stay
safe
and
beat
the
heat
and
stay
cool.
This
information
is
available
through
the
seti
website
press
releases,
a
number
of
social
media
platforms,
as
well
as
on
the
city's
website
news
page.
It's
also
there
translated
into
multiple
languages.
S
The
bellevue
fires
cares
program.
Those
staff
members
have
been
very
proactive
in
distributing
cold
beverages
and
water
to
our
unhoused
population,
and
also
working
with
a
couple
of
senior
care
facilities
to
provide
sunscreen
installation
so
basically
covering
some
windows
for
them
very
effective
program.
S
In
addition,
we
have
partnered
with
the
county
to
communicate
specific
locations,
both
public
and
private,
where
citizens,
residents
and
others
can
go
to
cool
off
publicly
available
spaces
shopping,
centers
public
buildings
as
well,
that
offer
air
conditioning
that
information
can
be
found
in
king
county
office
of
emergency
management
or
at
kcemergency.com.
S
And
we're
providing
updated
information
at
that
one
local
site,
which
is
shared
across
the
region.
The
office
of
emergency
management
will
continue
to
monitor
the
forecast.
Obviously,
fortunately,
this
year
we
don't
have
smoke
to
mess
with
at
the
same
time,
so
we'll
continue
to
monitor
things
and
make
additional
recommendations
and
actions
if
needed
in
the
future,
and
then
finally,
I
wouldn't
be
doing
my
job.
S
A
A
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent,
calendar
the
consent
calendar,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
opposed.
So
we
have
a
public
hearing
tonight.
It's
pretty
straightforward,
mr
miyake.
Could
you
introduce
us
sure.
R
R
These
were
declared
surplus
on
the
consent
calendar
at
the
may
23rd
council
meeting
tonight.
Following
the
public
hearing,
the
council
will
be
asked
to
take
action
on
the
proposed
resolution
to
release
the
surplus
easements
joining
this
evening
for
our
brief
staff
reporter
laura
matlick,
real
property
manager
and
eric
mcdaniel
assistant
director
of
finance
and
asset
management,
lauren.
T
The
property
is
being
redeveloped
as
a
multi-use
building,
and
the
developer
has
requested
the
releases
during
their
permit
process.
The
existing
sewer
easement
shown
here
in
green
and
the
two
water
easements
shown
in
yellow
will
be
removed
by
the
developer,
so
easements
will
no
longer
be
needed.
New
services
will
be
provided
from
the
facility
from
facilities
within
the
public
right-of-way,
so
no
new
utility
easements
will
be
required
for
this
project.
A
C
Mere
there
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
for
this
public
hearing
and
the
council
did
not
receive
any
written
comments
related
to
this
hearing
either.
At
this
point,
I
would
ask
if
there's
anyone
in
council
chambers
who
is
joining
us,
who
would
like
to
make
comment
regarding
this
public
hearing
or
online.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed
any
comments
or
questions.
Okay
is
there?
Would
you
make
a
motion?
Please.
E
A
Okay,
we
have
one
study
session
item
tonight
and
then
we'll
take
a
break
after
this.
Mr
miyaki,
would
you
like
to
introduce
this
for
us.
R
Sure
thank
you,
mayor
council
members.
Tonight.
Staff
are
here
to
provide
updates
on
the
bellevue's
comprehensive
plan,
as
well
as
the
work
on
the
wilberton
vision
implementation.
Just
by
the
way
background
council
launched
the
comprehensive
plan
update
back
in
february
28th
and
the
wilton
vision
implementation
plan
back
on
april
25th.
R
We
have
worked
at
that
time
committed
to
bring
back
updates
to
the
council
on
these
particular
topics
and,
as
mentioned
in
your
packet,
this
is
an
informational
briefing
and
no
council
action
is
required
so
joining
this
is
the
this
evening
is
emile
king
assistant,
director,
tara,
johnson,
comprehensive
planning
manager
and
janet
skull,
strategic
planning
manager
all
from
the
department
of
community
development.
With
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
emil
to
kick
off
the
presentation,
emile.
U
Staff
from
the
community
development
department
are
very
happy
to
be
here
tonight
to
provide
an
update
and
also
review
the
growth
concepts.
For
these
two
highly
integrated
and
important
planning
efforts.
They
are
going
to
set
the
stage
for
the
next
20
years
and
more
of
growth
in
the
city,
so
they're
pivotal
efforts
that
we're
working
on.
I
also
want
to
note
that
this
is
truly
a
one
city
effort.
We
are
from
the
community
development
department
here,
but
we
do
represent
a
much
broader
staff
team.
That's
working
on
this
planning
work
as
we're
moving
forward.
U
Tonight's
update
is
for
information.
Only
staff
will
provide
project
updates
on
the
community
engagement
we've
done
over
the
past
few
months,
as
well
as
other
early
work
on
the
initiatives
and
then
we'll
focus
the
majority
of
the
update
on
the
growth
concepts
that
we
recently
discussed
with
the
city's
planning
commission
and
will
be
using
in
the
upcoming
alternatives,
development
and
environmental
analysis.
U
You'll
see
we're
bringing
forward
a
range
of
growth
ideas
to
study
that
seek
to
further
the
direction
we
receive
from
council
to
create
more
housing
choices,
further
sustainable
city
planning
and
create
a
more
equitable
city.
At
this
point,
we're
trying
to
really
cast
a
wide
net
of
ideas
to
be
studied
in
more
detail
as
we
move
further
in
the
process.
U
U
U
The
goal
is
to
ultimately
have
the
comp
plan
policy
adopted
in
may
of
2024,
and
this
is
well
in
advance
of
the
state
mandated
deadline
of
december
2024
and
we
also
committed
to
bring
the
wolverton
comp
plan
policies
to
to
council
as
soon
as
possible.
Our
target
is
q4
of
2023,
so
that's
well
in
advance
of
the
of
the
comp
plan.
Adoption
of
the
policies
you
also
see
on
the
bottom
part
of
this
calendar,
the
environmental
impact
statement
or
eis.
U
For
short,
that's
going
to
be
the
the
lion
share
of
the
technical
work
that
we'll
be
doing
in
the
summer
and
fall
of
this
year,
and
we
hope
to
have
the
draft
eis
in
q1
of
2023
and
then
what's
called
the
final
eis
in
q3
of
2023.
So
these
are
real
important
documents
for
analyzing
these
growth
concepts,
and
you
also
see
on
the
top
of
this
graphic.
We
have
the
council
updates,
so
our
commitment
was
to
give
updates
to
council,
as
we
moved
along
in
this
two-year
process,
for
both
the
comp
plan
update
and
wolverton.
U
V
So,
as
emil
said,
we're
going
to
start
off
with
just
a
brief
recap
on
council
direction
on
both
the
comprehensive
plan
periodic
update
and
the
wilberton
vision
implementation.
As
you
may
remember,
both
of
these
initiatives
were
recently
launched.
The
comp
plan,
periodic
update,
was
launched
by
council
in
february
and
wilberton
was
launched
in
april,
as
emil
talked
about
for
the
overall
schedule.
We
are
incorporating
a
combined
eis
for
both
initiatives.
V
We
thought
this
was
a
really
good
approach
in
terms
of
efficiency.
Both
projects
are
considering
changes
in
land
use
categories,
which
will
influence
capacity
for
both
residential
and
commercial
development.
So
using
a
combined
eis
to
evaluate
both
of
these
approaches
is
is
really
an
efficient
way
to
to
move
forward
upon
launching
the
periodic
update
council
provided
direction
and
guidance
on
emphasis
areas
that
would
be
part
of
the
update.
V
These
include,
of
course,
housing,
affordability
across
a
variety
of
income
levels,
a
focus,
an
emphasis
on
sustainability
and
climate
resilience,
placing
a
climate
placing
an
equity
lens
along
outreach,
our
entire
process,
as
well
as
policies
and
then
council
direction
relating
to
the
wolberton
vision.
Implementation
was
to
utilize
the
2018
cac
baseline
alternative,
as
as
our
baseline
approach
for
wilberton.
V
V
V
V
We
had
the
little
masters
chinese
youth
group
participate
and
they
really
assisted
us
with
having
additional
surveys
completed
so
really
exciting,
to
see
the
youth
really
energized
and
engaged.
With
this
effort,
the
survey
survey
respondents
provided
feedback
on
a
number
of
various
issues
and
areas
of
emphasis,
something
the
community
really
connected
with
was
bellevue's
commitment
to
parks
and
open
space
quality
of
life
within
the
city,
sense
of
community
and
then
safety
and
cleanliness
concerns
that
were
raised
through.
V
This
graphic
shows
a
representation
of
the
response
responses
we
received
on
the
survey.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
majority
of
respondents
73
were
homeowners,
all
areas
of
the
city,
so
all
neighborhoods
from
the
city
were
represented
within
the
survey,
the
majority
of
respondents
were
fell
under
white
or
asian
ethnic
groups,
so
we're
definitely
going
to
be
trying
to
really
reach
some
of
those
other
groups
with,
as
we
move
forward
through
our
various
engagement
approaches
through
the
the
remainder
of
the
phases
within
within
the
update.
V
So
now
we're
going
to
transition
to
the
focus
of
our
discussion
tonight,
which
really
revolves
around
our
growth
concepts.
These
really
set
the
stage
for
developing
growth.
Alternatives
which
we'll
be
analyzing
in
the
eis
followed
by
which
follows,
following
the
analysis,
will
be
selection
of
a
preferred
alternative.
V
Emile
touched
on
the
five
concept
areas
that
we're
really
going
to
be
talking
about
in
detail
this
evening.
The
first
area,
geographic
amount
of
growth
or
geographic
location
of
growth,
really
evaluates
and
looks
at
where
growth
should
be
located
within
the
city
as
we
evaluate
these
various
alternatives.
V
The
next
concept,
placemaking
and
character,
really
looks
at
what
kind
of
is
desired
in
each
area
of
the
city
as
we
plan
for
this
additional
growth,
the
next
concept
area,
which
of
course
aligns
very
closely
with
council's
direction
on
next
right.
Work
relates
to
housing,
typologies
and
what
kinds
of
housing
should
be
added
to
various
areas
of
the
city,
and
then
the
last
area
focuses
on
affordable
housing
and
the
approaches
that
we,
the
city,
should
be
taking
to
establish
and
develop
more
affordable
housing
to
meet
the
community's
needs.
And
again,
where
should
this?
V
V
V
So
the
first
concept:
geographic
location
of
growth,
we're
looking
at
where
growth
occurs
within
the
city,
particularly
housing
growth.
V
They
could
range
from
focusing
new
growth
in
what
we're
calling
a
growth
corridor,
so
downtown
east
maine,
wilburton
and
bel
red
to
our
county-wide
centers,
and
that
includes
all
the
growth
corridors,
our
mixed
use,
centers
and
then,
in
addition,
factoria
and
crossroads,
it
could
also
include
neighborhood
centers,
which
are
much
smaller
scale,
both
existing
and
potential
new
centers.
V
V
Then
the
next
concept
area,
which
is
the
amount
of
growth
that
we
would
be
looking
at
and
analyzing
as
part
of
the
eis,
really
starts
off
with
looking
at
our
established
growth
targets.
So
this
graphic
shows
our
current
number
of
housing
units
in
the
city,
which
is
just
under
66
000
and,
as
you
may
recall,
our
established
growth
target
through
the
cpp
process
was
35
000
additional
housing
units.
V
We
currently
have
capacity
for
27
000
housing
units,
which
means
that
we
have
to
create
capacity
for
an
additional
8,
000
housing
units,
given
just
the
job
growth
that
we've
seen
regional
requirements
relating
to
affordable
housing
and
a
number
of
other
factors.
V
As
part
of
the
eis
process,
we
are
proposing
to
analyze
a
range
of
options
for
additional
housing
capacity
that
go
right
from
35
000
right
up
to
potentially
thousand
additional
housing
units
when
it
comes
to
jobs.
We
currently
have
a
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
jobs
within
the
city
and,
as
you
may
recall,
our
established
job
target
is
seventy.
Seventy
thousand
additional
jobs
which
could
include
20
000
within
wilberton,
as
well
as
other
increases
throughout
the
city,
and
we
do
have
capacity
to
accommodate
those
existing
jobs
or
sorry.
Additional
jobs.
V
Then
and
now
I'm
going
to
pass
things
on
to
janet
and
she's
going
to
walk
us
through
some
of
the
growth
concepts
relative
to
wilberton.
W
So
with
that,
I
just
want
to
mention
that
our
growth
concepts
include
for
the
wilberton
study
area,
no
action,
and
that
is
the
the
alternative
that
is
required
through
the
eis
process
and
what
we
mean
by
no
action
which
would
be
modeling
growth
concepts
that
assume
there
are
no
changes
to
the
existing
land-use
designations.
So
that's
the
first
you
see
on
the
slide.
W
W
In
the
growth
concept
that
we
refer
to
as
ad
development
nodes.
That
approach
would
be
to
consider
additional
smaller
nodes
within
the
study
area
that
might
recognize
access
to
transit,
existing
and
emerging
employment,
centers
catalyst
project
sites,
and
this
approach
can
also
consider
where
additional
housing
capacity
might
be
best
accommodated.
W
So
that's
really
an
overview
of
what
we're
looking
at
for
wilberton
within
the
context
of
the
city-wide
approach,
and
I
just
will
close
out
my
comments
by
re-emphasizing-
that
the
work
we're
doing
on
wilberton
and
considering
growth
concepts
is
being
done
hand-in-hand
with
the
comprehensive
plan
team
we're
having
regular
communication
with
them.
So
we
are
doing
our
best
to
make
sure
the
approach
for
wilberton
is
considering
the
city-wide
approach,
and
so
now
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
tara.
To
finish
our
presentation,
thank
you.
V
Thank
you
janet,
so
now
we're
going
to
switch
to
the
next
concept
area,
next
concept
topic
which
is
place
making,
and
this
really
focuses
on
the
kind
of
experience
that
that
is
desired
in
each
area
of
the
city.
As
we
plan
for
all
this
new
growth,
as
well
as
the
scale
and
character
of
residential
and
mixed
use
development.
V
These
concepts
could
apply
differently
to
each
area
of
the
city
and
range
from
resid,
quite
residential,
only
areas
all
the
way
to
mixed-use
areas
with
office,
retail
housing
and
the
resulting
activity
throughout
the
day
and
night.
Other
concepts
include
retail
centers
that
cater
to
a
broad
diversity
of
visitors
or
neighborhood
nodes,
and
these
place
making
concepts
will
be
key
to
defining
the
appropriate
vision
for
the
city.
V
V
Many
of
these
middle
scale
typologies,
would
fill
a
missing
gap
in
our
housing
options
today
and
provide
more
variety
and
opportunities
for
families.
We
currently
see
primarily
one
bedrooms
and
studios
on
one
end
of
the
spectrum
in
our
higher
density
development
and
then,
on
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum.
We
see
a
lot
of
a
lot
more
single
family,
larger
single
family,
four
bedroom
type
developments.
V
So
these
next
couple,
slides
are
gonna,
really
provide
some
examples
of
what
we
were
talking
about
relating
to
housing
typologies
as
we
look
at
opportunities
to
expand,
either
high-rise
or
mid-rise.
Again
we're
looking
at
the
higher
density
forms
of
development,
so
studios
in
one
bedrooms,
essentially
and
there's
some
graphics
that
show
you
some
examples
of
that.
V
Other
options
would
be
to
add
typologies
like
town
homes
within
the
city
and
then
the
last
sort
of
thematic
area
within
housing
typologies
are
lower
rise
or
lower
scale
development
like
cottage
housing,
duplexes,
triplexes,
adus,
both
detached
and
attached.
V
So
our
last
concept
area
relates
to
affordable
housing,
which,
of
course,
we've
had
lots
of
conversation
about
recognize
that
there's
a
significant
need
in
the
region
and
in
bellevue
and
as
many
of
you
have
been
involved
in
some
of
our
regional
committees
and
discussions,
you're
aware
that
there
are
affordable
housing
targets
that
are
still
being
developed
and
will
be
will
be
a
requirement
that
we
need
to.
We
need
to
address
as
part
of
our
periodic
update.
V
For
any
of
these
concepts,
the
geographic
applicability
could
range
from
areas
where
they
currently
exist,
where
the
incentives
currently
exist
like
downtown,
bel,
red,
east
maine
and
eastgate,
or
we
could
use,
we
could
expand
them
to
certain
focus
areas
within
the
city
or
have
them
citywide.
Essentially
so
with
that
that
covers
our
our
various
concept
areas,
I'm
going
to
turn
things
over
to
emil,
to
wrap
things
up.
Yeah.
U
Thanks
tara,
so
mayor,
this
does
complete
our
formal
presentation
again.
This
is
for
information
only
for
the
council,
we're
at
a
a
you
know,
gaining
momentum
period
of
our
comp
plan
update
and
the
wolverton
work.
So
we
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
share
these
growth
concepts
or
ideas
to
you
as
we
further
refine
these
and
go
into
our
environmental
analysis.
Thank
you.
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much,
we'll
start
with
councilmember
barksdale
and
robertson
stokes
lives
on
deputy
mayor
and
myself
all
right.
Thank
you
just
to
clarify.
Are
you
looking.
X
I'll
just
say,
I
really
appreciate
the
the
work
that
you're
doing
to
streamline
the
two
wilburton
and
the
overall
comp
plan
update
because,
as
you
mentioned,
they
are
interrelated.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
schedule
like
seeing
how
each
of
it
each
of
the
parts
tied
together
in
terms
of
I'll
just
comment
generally
on
growth.
X
I
think
every
part
of
bellevue
has
a
responsibility
here,
and
so
it's
interesting
because,
even
as
you
were
going
through
the
different
options,
I
could
see
them
playing
out
in
different
parts
of
the
city
right,
the
really
high
intense
development
in
the
tod
areas
and
then
even
mid
along
the
arterials
and
then
some
of
the
lower
density
in
the
neighborhood.
So
I
look
forward
to
what
you
bring
back
and
also
just
in
terms
of
wilburton.
D
I'll
just
be
brief,
thank
you
for
the
presentation
glad
to
see
this
work
progressing.
I
think
you
guys
are
looking
at
all
the
right
things.
I
know
this
is
information
only,
but
if
you
want
feedback,
I
I
liked
the
core
plus
node,
and
I
like
that
we
are
looking
at
all
the
different
types
of
housing
types
in
the
different
areas.
I
think
that
that's
exactly
the
right
thing
that
we
should
be
doing
so
just
keep
it
up.
D
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
next
update
in
what
november
and
following
the
progress
all
along
anytime,
we
could
do
something
a
little
faster
it'd
be
great
if
we
could
do
that,
because
I
know
the
council's
been
very
eager
to
get
this
across
the
finish
line,
but
I
know
that
things
take
time
to
do
right.
So
thanks
councilmember.
A
Y
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
agree
with
me
so
far.
This
is
really
an
amazing
effort
and
I
don't
think
I
think
we
can
agree.
We
really
haven't
seen
anything
like
this
in
terms
of
putting
it
together
and
so
congratulations
to
approach
on
it
and,
as
I
think
we
all
agree,
you
know
we're
things
are
at
a
different
tempo
now
and
it's
growing
faster
and
everything
else
and
we're
examining,
of
course,
some
concepts
of
what
is
wilter
wolverton
now,
which
is
wilbur
to
not
wilton
10
years
ago.
Y
So
that's
and
we're
doing
it
in
a
very
good
way.
I
appreciate
that
very
much.
Another
thing
I
did
want
to
compliment
you
on
is
going
out
to
the
awards
and
commissions.
You
had
a
very
good
presentation
for
the
parks
board
and
I
think
was
very,
very
helpful
to
get
the
parks
board
looking
at.
How
does
that
all
fit
in
with
the
rest
of
of
the
pieces
and
the
growth
there
and
so
getting
all
these.
Y
You
know
the
groups
in
the
city
working
together
and
looking
at
this
and
knowing
what's
going
on,
I
think,
is
very,
very
helpful
and
again
will
help
us
move.
This
you
know
in
a
more
positive
and
faster
way,
so
congratulations
really
appreciate
it.
Looking
forward
to
actually
making
this
happen.
Z
Well,
we
all
know
lots
of
things
are
going
on
happening
over
you,
so
it's
a
long
due
overdue
to
look
at
wilburton.
I
think,
is
good
timing
and
timely
and
appreciate
you
working
on
it.
So
we're
looking
forward
to
it
and
and
one
key,
is
you
know
if
we
waited
too
long?
You
know
if
opportunity
exists,
you
may
not
be,
you
know
compatible,
we
might
miss
opportunities,
you
know
when
things
are
happening
elsewhere,
like
bauer
corridor
downtown
and
even
even
main
street
right.
Z
So
I
think
this
is
very
good,
but
what
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
or
yeah,
then
maybe
just
a
comment.
You
you
mentioned
two
things:
it's
when
you're
doing
outreach
you
measure
under
represent
a
group.
Z
What
what
do
you
mean
exactly
as
the
underrepresented
group,
and
so
that's
the
question
then,
together
with
it,
you
also
mentioned
when
you
are
outreaching
with
your
work.
Now
you
mentioned
youth
presentation.
I
want
to
know
what
kind
of
response
are
you
getting
from
youth?
You
know,
are
they
really
interested?
Are
they
engaged
and
you
know
well,
I'm
very
excited
that
you're
doing
that,
I'm
even
more
excited.
You
know
if
they
have
a
lot
of
great
input
and
make
a
difference
in
our
planning
effort.
So
that's
one
question
but
two
pieces.
Z
So
answer
me
that
then
I
will
make
a
comment.
Thank
you.
U
Another
group
are
people
who
might
be
most
comfortable
talking
about
things
in
a
in
a
non-english
language,
so
having
some
workshops
in
in
non-english,
languages
has
historically
been
a
way
where
we've
had
underrepresented
individuals
in
our
groups
in
our
outreach
and
I'll.
Let
tara
talk
a
bit
about
our
youth
engagement
efforts.
V
Thank
you
emil.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
Councilmember
lee.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
we
had
some
presentations
with
a
couple
schools.
You
know,
so
we
went
to
the
schools
and
provided
that
overview
we
also
had
the
little
masters
chinese
youth
group
come
to
city
hall,
provided
an
or
you
know
brief
presentation
on
the
comp
plan
really
engaged
with
them.
V
We've
started
working
through
the
next
phase
of
community
and
community
engagement
and
outreach,
what
we're
calling
a
strategy
team
and
so
we're,
and
we
had
our
first
kind
of
community
outreach
event.
We
had
several
members
of
the
several
youth
attend
that
from
a
high
school
and
so
I'd
say
they
are
definitely
very
engaged
and
very
interested,
and
so
that
was
like
a
two
and
a
half
hour
hour
event.
V
They
attended
that
we're
trying
to
get
more
youth
representation
on
our
strategy
team,
so
we'll
continue
to
keep
building
those
relationships
as
we
move
through
the
process-
and
you
know
it's
it's
an
iterative
process,
it's
not
something
we're
gonna,
you
know
just
stop,
stop
building
those
relationships
so,
as
time
goes
on
and
we
intend
to
use
these
relationships
that
we've
created
for
other
efforts
and
other
initiatives
post.
The
comp
plan
update
as
well.
Z
Great,
thank
you.
I'm
really
glad
you're
used
to
what
you
literally
illustrative.
That
means
you
take
time
when
you
build
relationships.
You
also
take
time.
So
I'm
glad
you
have
begun,
but
you
know
we'll
see
and
you
will
have
to
continue
so
thanks
and
the
comment
I
make
is
that
some
of
us
went
to
the
neighborhood
walk
and
you
know
with
the
city
manager
organized.
You
know
very
well
worthwhile
and
we
happened.
You
know
that
I
was
at
the
wilberton,
you
know,
neighborhood
walk
and
one
comment
I
heard
is
it's
neighborhood
outreach?
Z
They
all
know
wilburton
is
being
looked
at.
We're
going
to
develop,
except.
The
comment
I
heard
is
where,
where
is
wilberton,
where
is
oregon
development
happening?
Is
there
going
to
be
a
neighborhood
where
we
are
at?
You
know
we're
near
the
park,
beautiful
trees
and
residential
areas,
or
is
it
going
to
be
all
the
things
that
you're
talking
about?
So
I
think
there
needs
to
be
probably
some
kind
of
a
communication,
but
I
think
they
were
asking
just
what's
the?
How
do
you
better
define?
Z
You
know
what
are
all
the
things
you're
talking
about,
so
by
looking
at
your
presentation.
You
know,
if
you
don't
really
know
the
boundary
or
even,
if
you
do,
you
will
have
questions
of.
Are
we
affected?
What
really
is
the
area
that's
going
to
be
affected
and
how
it's
going
to
be
affected?
So
I
think
that's
a
very
key
thing
to
remember
so
you
know
I
also
support
that.
You
talk
about
single
core
ad
development
notes
and
all
that
stuff.
It's
part
of
the
information
outreach
right.
Z
A
You
councilmember
lee.
Next
we
have
council
members
on.
B
Yes,
oh
thank
you.
I
too
really
enjoyed
hearing
the
presentation
and
I
was
especially
thinking
about
engaging
with
our
youth
and
even
our
younger
kids,
because
you
know
when
you
made
the
comment
about
setting
the
stage
for
20
years.
These
very
policies
we're
working
on
are
going
to
come
into
play
as
things
are
being
built.
You
know
20
years
from
now,
potentially
so
as
our
as
our
kids
grow
up
and
they
want
to
come
back
to
bellevue.
B
Having
this
300
acres
within
the
study
area
is
a
huge
opportunity.
We
do
not
want
to
lose
sight
of
or
leave
opportunities
on
the
table.
So
if
you
are
looking
for
some
feedback,
I
would
say
that
I
support
looking
at
expanded
housing
of
the
two
to
one,
so
we
really
are
trying
to
gain
on
being
able
to
build
housing
versus
the
four
to
one.
That
was
one
of
the
options
and
then,
as
I
think,
about
what
you
have
in
there
about
you
know
place
making
and
character
across
the
different
areas.
B
I
think
that,
in
addition
to
the
development
nodes,
the
concept
of
area-wide
and
really
looking
at
what
are
the
different
housing
choices
that
make
sense
without
within
the
area
and
and
creating
some
space
for
these
different
options,
all
the
way
down
to
the
the
micro
units
makes
sense.
You
know
to
me
when
I
think
about
opportunity.
B
B
Others
of
us
I
mean
I
spent
the
first
10
years
in
hong
kong,
where
we
had
a
lot
of
us
that
were
all
living
together,
and
I
don't
know
that
we
saw
that
that
was
something
unusual,
so
we
might
want
to
think
about
how
do
we
create
spaces
for
multi-generational
families
and
folks
that
may
be
from
europe
or
asia,
where
they're
used
to
much
smaller
spaces
as
housing
so
anyway?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you,
mayor,
emil,
thor
and
jenna.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
great
presentation
and
great
to
see
the
the
the
slide
in
terms
of
where
we
are
and
where
we're
going
and
appreciate
pushing
this
along
so
quickly,
especially
appreciated
on
slide
17,
that
these
parcels
were
not
included
necessarily
on
this
map
here
in
the
2018
study,
but
will
be
considered
for
future
use.
As
my
colleagues
have
said,
multiple
times
I
think
already
tonight.
You
know
this
is
not
the
wilberton
ten
years
ago.
G
You
know
I
I
I
would
hate
in
a
couple
years
time
we're
going
if
only
we
had
more
density,
if
only
we
had
more
affordable
housing
in
in
the
in
the
study
area,
and
I
keep
referring
it
to
the
study
area,
because
councilmember
lee
is
correct.
When
we
went
on
that
neighborhood
walk,
there
was
a
clear
request
to
have
a
different
name
or
clearly
a
different
way
to
delineate
kind
of
the
residential
single-family
neighborhood
versus
what
we're
talking
about
here,
which
is
this.
G
This
study
area,
which
is
really
meant
for
this
high
density,
which
I
I
think
should
mimic
more
of
of
downtown
than
it
should
a
wilberton
neighborhood.
So
I
think
there
there
is
some
confusion
there
and
I
think
we
could
certainly
hopefully
clarify
that
and
I'm
sure
we
can
come
up
with
with
with
the
name
that
would
aptly
describe
it
and
that
the
wilberton
residents
would
would
appreciate
that
but
great
job.
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
about
this
and
in
the
future
and
and
keep
pushing
hard.
A
Thank
you.
I
love
that
you're
leading
with
equity
and
sustainability.
I
like
the
the
values
that
you're
you're
planning
from
and
I'm
just
going
to
say
a
few
things
that
stood
out
to
me.
First
of
all,
side,
17.
What
deputy
mayor
mentioned,
I
believe
that's
evergreen,
court
and
glendale
apartment
properties.
A
A
A
I
think
the
challenge
there
is
that's
not
as
much
of
a
transit-oriented
neighborhood
as
wilberton
will
be,
so
I
think,
it'd
be
even
more
successful
in
wilberton.
I
think
also.
I've
heard
that
it's
hard
to
get
the
fire
trucks
on
those
small
lanes,
so
I
know
we
just
was
able
to
purchase
a
smaller
fire
truck
for
up
in
cougar
mountain
area.
So
maybe
we
should
consider
that
for
a
new
fire
station
I'd
love
a
goal
of
50
of
affordable
housing
in
wilberton.
A
A
R
Which
relates
to
the
proposed
parks
and
community
services
ballot
measure
for
the
november
8th
general
election
and
just
by
the
way
background
at
the
july
18
council
meeting
council
directed
staff
to
prepare
the
ordinance
for
council
consideration
and
final
action
this
evening.
So
joining
us
this
evening
are
michael
shihasaki,
our
parks
and
community
services
director,
as
well
as
tony
call,
our
director
of
finance
and
asset
management
I'll
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
you,
michael.
AA
AA
A
AB
A
Y
Yes,
I'm
very
pleased
to
have
this
presented
to
us
and
I
think
we
had
a
very,
very
good
discussion
last
meeting
and
went
over
all
the
pieces
of
the
levy,
the
ordinance
and
I'm
ready
to
vote
for
this
and
in
the
positive
and
ready
to
get
going
on
the
levy.
A
D
So
I
just
wanted
to.
I
was
reflecting
during
the
comprehensive
plan
presentation
that
the
questionnaire
the
people,
what
people
love
think
about
he's
doing
great,
is
the
parks
and
open
space
and
one
of
those
word
clouds
with
city
in
a
park.
So
this
is
very
consistent
with
that.
D
I
think
that
one
of
bellevue
bellevue,
the
city
of
bellevue's
values,
is
stewardship,
making
sure
that
we
take
care
of
our
parks
and
open
space
that
we
acquire
more
parks
and
open
space
while
we
can
and
that
we
continue
to
build
out
the
system
as
the
as
all
those
jobs
and
housing
units
and
people
come
to
bellevue
in
the
future.
I
think
it
shows
excellent
stewardship
and
I
am
very
pleased
to
have
this
come
forward
and
to
vote
yes
tonight.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
deputy
mayor,
would
you
like
to
make
the
motion
certainly.
G
Mayor,
I
move
to
adopt
ordnance
6671,
providing
for
the
submission
to
the
qualified
electors
of
the
city
at
an
election
to
be
held
on
november,
8th
2022
of
a
proposition
authorizing
the
city
to
lift
the
levy
limit
in
chapter
84-55,
rcw
for
parks,
open
space
and
related
purposes
to
pay
and
or
finance
costs,
to
acquire,
improve
and
develop
open
space,
neighborhood
community
and
recreation
facilities
and
parks,
and
to
pay
costs
of
maintaining
and
operating
open
spaces.
Neighborhood
community
and
recreational
facilities
and
parks.
A
Those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
You
know
five
out
of
seven
of
us
council
members
have
either
been
parkly,
liaisons
or
members
or
both
to
the
park
sport,
and
so
we're
very
enthusiastic
about
this
all
seven
of
us
and
it's
really
exciting
to
move
forward.
So
thank
you
for
all
your
work
on
this.
The
next
next
item
is
also
part
of
this.
Mr
miami.
R
C
You
city
manager
and
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members,
so
as
city
manager
miyake
said,
the
council
now
has
the
responsibility
of
appointing
pro
and
con
committee
members
to
prepare
statements
in
favor
of
and
in
opposition
to
the
ballot
measure
related
to
the
parks
and
open
space.
The
committee
members
must
consist
of
members
of
the
public
who
commit
to
write
a
statement
either
in
favor
or
in
opposition
to
the
ballot
measure
in
pursuant
to
state
law.
Each
committee
is
limited
to
three
members.
C
C
C
Names
and
application
materials
were
emailed
to
you
on
friday
and
were
in
your
desk
packet
this
evening
and
again,
the
sole
role
of
the
council
with
respect
to
the
pro
con
committees
is
to
appoint
the
individual
members
notification
of
those
committee.
Appointments
are
due
to
king
county
by
august
2nd,
and
I
will
be
handling
that
notification
as
well
as
notification
to
the
appointed
members,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
back
to
you.
Mayor.
A
C
Y
Yes,
I
move
to
a
point
as
pro
and
con
members
committee
members,
the
following
and
I'll
say
their
names
and
I'll
make
a
little
comment
on
each
for
pro:
sherry,
grenlin,
kevin,
wallace
and
giovanna
harris.
Y
Cherry
greenland
is,
she
was
a
parks
board
member
been
the
city
a
long
time
very
active
in
the
city
over
many
many
years
and,
very
importantly,
a
reporter
writer
for
the
seattle
times
retired
now,
but
sherry
is
a
very,
very
accomplished
writer
and
communicator
kevin
wallace,
we
know
kevin
was
a
council
member
and
is
now
and
continuing
to
be.
You
know
active
in
the
business
community
in
the
development
community
and
giovanna.
Y
Alaris
is
a
young
woman
who
is
a
actually
one
of
the
apparently
a
world-renowned
youth
qriket
player
and
is
out
right
now
in
a
in
a
contest
and
made
a
very,
very
appealing
and
very
intelligent
and
very
supportive
comments.
The
last
meeting,
so
I'm
very
satisfied
that
all
three
of
these
are
will
be
very
excellent
and
will
do
a
great
job
for
us
and
we'll
help
you
know
get
messages
out
on
on
the
con.
Y
Someone
we've
known
for
a
long
time
also
david
plummer
david,
has
been
very
active
in
communicating
with
the
city
very
concerned
on
financial
matters
and
communicates
very
well
and
will
do
a
very
good
job
on
the
con
site.
So
I'm
very
pleased
that
we
have
these
four
people
to
get
going
on
this
and
take
a
great
step
forward
to
the
next
part
we
are
doing
in
getting
the
campaign
going.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AB
D
I
support
the
motion,
obviously,
since
I
seconded
it,
but
I
wanted
to
thank.
We
had
10
people
apply
for
the
pro
committee
and
I
wish
we
could
put
them
all
on
and
I
hope
that
the
pro
committee
will
work
with
the
other
members
who
applied,
including
our
chair
of
the
park
board,
dave
hamilton
and
our
vice
chair
of
the
parks
board
paul
clark
on
working
on
this
matter.
So,
but
I
support
it.
D
We
have
to
window
it
down
and
I
think
this
is
a
good,
broad
swath
of
representatives
to
serve
on
the
pro
committee.
Thanks.
B
A
Yes,
this
is
going
to
be
her
first
voting
this
year
at
this
first
election,
so
she's,
just
18..
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
great.
Thank
you
and
then
we
have
one
more
ordinance.
Mr
miyake.
R
Yes,
mayor
can
council
members
our
final
topic
this
evening
is
ordinance
6672
regarding
the
support
of
an
emergency
housing
land
use
code,
amendment
for
final
counsel
action
again.
By
way
background
council
discussed
the
this
particular
land
use
code,
amendment
on
june
21st
and
actually
directed
staff
to
work
with
council
members,
robertson
and
barksdale
on
proposed
amendments
that
they
were
contemplating.
R
Tonight's
staff
have
prepared
the
ordinance
for
final
action
and
adoption,
as
well
as
an
analysis
of
the
amendments
expected
to
be
proposed
by
council
members,
robertson
and
barksdale
joining
us
this
evening
are
liz
dead,
interim
co-director,
nick
whipple
code
and
policy
planning
manager,
caleb
miller,
senior
planner
all
from
the
development
services
department.
We
are
also
joined
by
kathy
gerlar
city
attorney
and
mac.
Mcfarland
are
city
from
the
city
attorney's
office
as
well
to
for
this
particular
matter.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
liz
dead.
To
begin
the
presentation.
AC
Thank
you
city
manager,
good
evening,
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse,
council
members.
We're
happy
to
be
back
at
council
this
evening
with
an
ordinance
for
consideration
to
amend
the
land
use
code
to
allow
and
regulate
permanent
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing
and
non-transient
emergency
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
residential
uses
or
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed.
AC
The
ordinance
will
also
regulate
transient
emergency
housing
and
shelters
as
homeless
service
uses
and
will
allow
those
uses
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed.
This
luca,
when
approved,
will
replace
an
interim
official
control.
The
council
extended
earlier
this
month
at
your
july
5th
meeting
and
that
ioc
will
expire
in
january
of
2023.
AC
The
proposed
ordinance
will
advance
the
council
vision
of
bellevue
as
a
community
that
assists
all
community
members
to
achieve
their
potential
and
is
equitable.
Many
of
our
community
members
need
more
assistance
in
reaching
stable
housing,
and
this
work
that
council
is
undertaking
this
evening
will
support
the
provision
of
more
housing
types
in
the
city
next
slide.
Please
staff
is
here
tonight
asking
that
council
adopt
ordinance
6672
following
up
on
the
june
21st
meeting
with
the
city
council
requested
that
staff
return
to
this
meeting
with
an
ordinance
for
adoption.
AC
Our
agenda
this
evening
will
provide
counsel
with
background
information
about
the
luca
and
the
context
that
brings
this
to
your
attention.
Staff
will
also
discuss
what
housing
types
are
addressed
in
the
ordinance
and
walk
through
with
council.
How
each
housing
type
is
addressed
in
the
proposed.
Luca
staff
will
also
introduce
a
set
of
amendments
to
the
ordinance
that
have
been
proposed
by
councilmember
robertson
and
also
two
amendments
proposed
by
council,
member
barksdale
and,
lastly,
staff
will
request
action
from
council
to
adopt
ordinance
number
6772.
AD
Great
thank
you
liz,
so
to
provide
some
background
in
context.
A
slide
that
is
familiar
to
council
at
this
point
is
really
about
what
this
look
has
been
designed
to
do,
which
is
to
respond
to
recent
changes
in
state
law,
rcw
35a,
21
430,
which
does
require
that
cities
allow
for
permanent
supportive
housing,
supportive
housing
or
I'm
sorry,
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
we
allow
for
residential
dwellings
in
hotels
and
motels,
and
then
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelters
everywhere
that
we
allow
for
hotels.
AD
The
law
also
allows
for
reasonable
occupancy,
spacing
and
intensity
of
use
requirements
to
be
imposed
on
these
housing
types
in
order
to
protect
public
health
and
safety.
However,
those
the
imposition
of
those
requirements
may
not
prohibit
siting
of
these
housing
types
or
prevent
the
siting
of
a
sufficient
number
of
these
housing
types
necessary
to
accommodate.
Bellevue's
projected
need
for
these
housing
types.
AD
The
luca
also
advances
policies
to
support
regional
efforts
to
prevent
homelessness
and
make
homelessness
rare
brief
and
one
time
when
it
occurs.
It
also
provides
a
range
of
affordable
housing
options,
the
policies
to
support
efforts
to
move
individuals
and
families
experiencing
homelessness,
to
long-term
financial
independence
and
for
countywipe
planning
policies.
The
focus
is
on
the
need
to
inventory
and
analyze
the
existing
and
projected
housing
needs
for
all
segments
of
the
population,
including
the
number
of
existing
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelters,
and
permit
supportive
housing
facilities
and
units
or
beds.
AD
The
county-wide
policies
also
include
a
charge
to
increase
housing,
supply
for
extremely
low
and
very
low
income,
households
and
households
with
special
needs,
and
then,
lastly,
the
council
vision
and
priorities.
The
2021
and
2023
time
frame
talk
to
achieving
human
potential
in
equitable
communities
and
the
priorities
affirm.
That
bellevue
is
a
diverse,
caring
and
welcoming
community.
AD
So
for
this
luca
the
process
and
schedule
just
to
recap
this
process
we
have
included
five
study
sessions
with
the
planning
commission
as
well
as
a
public
hearing.
Tonight
is
our
third
study
session
with
the
city
council.
On
this
luca
and
again,
the
interim
official
control
has
been
extended
to
january
of
2023,
with
this
luca
to
replace
that
ioc.
AE
AE
I
forget
the
reference
off
the
top
of
my
head,
so
in
the
rcw
section
that
applies
to
this
luca,
the
first
on
the
left,
we
have
permanent
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing.
These
tend
to
be
fairly
similar
in
function.
They
have
medium
to
long-term
residency,
with
transitional
housing
up
to
two
years
under
the
rcw
and
then
permanent,
supportive
housing
being
a
more
permanent
or
at
least
very
long-term
residency.
AE
These
tend
to
be
paired
with
more
individualized
services
that
may
either
transition
the
resident
into
independence
in
the
case
of
transitional
housing
or
to
support
them
long
term,
so
they
can
maintain
their
tenancy
as
long
as
they
need
on
the
right.
We
have
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter
for
emergency
housing.
These
are
the
short
term
short
to
medium
term
residency
with
more
generalized
basic
services
and
then
for
emergency
shelter.
These
tend
to
be
very
short-term,
typically
with
stays
of
less
than
24
hours.
AE
Next
slide,
please,
oh
sorry,
next
are
just
how
these
housing
types
under
the
planning
commission
recommendation
are
slotted
into
the
land
use
code
for
the
city,
so
for
supportive
housing.
These
would
include
permanent,
supportive
and
transitional
housing,
as
well
as
non-transient
emergency
housing.
All
of
these,
with
the
distinguisher
of
having
longer
than
or
30
days
or
longer,
duration
of
stay
for
homeless
services
uses.
These
would
include
transient
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter,
and
these
would
be
less
than
30
day
durations
of
stay.
AE
So
next
we'll
go
through
the
amendments
proposed
by
the
council,
members,
robertson
and
barksdale
this
evening.
The
amendments
shown
here,
starting
in
a
will
be
councilmember.
Robertson's
amendments
and
b
will
be
come
from
barksdale's
amendments
we'll
go
into
each
of
these
in
more
detail
on
the
following
slides,
but
first
I'll
just
note.
They
touch
on
different
things,
with
the
a
amendments
really
touching
on
the
supportive
housing
requirements
that
are
that
would
be
placed
in
the
land
use
code
and
b
is
more
about
the
definition
of
emergency
housing
and
the
applicability.
AE
So
here
are
the
first
set
of
council
member
robertson's
amendments
in
the
center
column,
you'll
see
the
planning
commission
luca
and
then
on
the
right
column,
you'll
see
council
member
robertson's
proposal,
starting
with
a1.
This
would
impose
an
occupancy
limit
for
supportive
housing
in
single-family
districts.
The
proposal
is
a
maximum
of
eight
adult
residents,
and
this
would
match
the
adult
family
home
provisions
in
our
under
state
law.
AE
Amendment
number
a2
would
has
to
do
with
density
standards
that
are
applicable
to
supportive
housing.
The
planning
commission
recommendation
uses
far
or
floor
area
ratio
instead
of
dwelling
units
per
acre
for
density
and
mixed-use
land-use
districts
for
supportive
housing,
specifically
councilmember
robertson's
proposal
would
reapply
the
dwelling
unit
per
acre
density
limits.
This
would
be
similar
to
other
residential
uses
in
those
districts,
and
yes-
and
this
would
also
fdr-
would
also
be
applicable
as
well
so
both
would
apply
instead
of
just
far.
AE
The
next
amendment
is
a3
a
separation
requirement.
This
was
not
included
in
the
planning
commission
recommendation,
but
there
are
under
council
member
robertson's
proposal.
There
are
two
different
requirements
for
less
intensive
supportive
housing
uses
a
quarter
mile
radius.
AE
Sorry,
a
quarter
mile
separation
would
be
required
between
two
of
those
uses
for
more
intensive
supportive
housing
uses
ones
with
more
than
25
percent
of
their
floor
area
dedicated
to
services.
Those
would
require
a
half-mile
separation
between
two
of
those
uses.
AE
Next
a4
are
minimum
standards
for
a
safety
and
security
plan.
The
planning
commission,
luca
recommended
luca,
did
include
a
requirement
for
a
safety
and
security
plan
council
member
robertson's
amendments
would
add
minimum
standards
to
these
plans,
including
things
like
behavioral
health,
crisis
management,
de-escalation
methods
and
communications
with
emergency
services
and
finally,
on
this
slide.
A5
is
the
same
thing:
minimum
standards
for
the
code
of
conduct.
Again,
the
planning
commission
recommendation
did
include
a
code
of
conduct
requirement.
AE
And
the
last
set
of
council
member
robertson's
amendments
number
a6
is
an
operational
agreement.
This
would
be
an
agreement
between
the
provider
and
the
city
that
would
include
certain
performance
standards
for
the
provider
such
as
24
7,
24,
7,
on-site
staffing,
a
provision
of
on-site
services
would
be
required
and
a
resident
prioritization
or
a
requirement
to
work
with
the
city
to
find
local
clients
for
intake
within
supportive
housing.
AE
Number
a7
is
an
occupancy
limit
that
would
apply
to
supportive
housing
in
mixed-use
districts.
A
maximum
of
100
residents
is
proposed
under
this,
and
this
would
apply
to
all
of
the
mixed-use
districts
in
the
city,
such
as
downtown
bellred,
eastgate
and
so
on.
AE
This
amendment
would,
it
would
keep
in
place
the
exemption
for
confidentiality
needs,
but
would
instead
apply
a
registration
requirement
for
those
with
zero
to
25
of
the
floor
area.
This
would
be
distinct
from
some
other
ones.
The
way
it's
written.
It
would
only
require
this
registration.
I
wouldn't
require
notice,
or
the
safety
and
security
plan
code
of
conduct
and
so
on
and
finally,
a9
is
a
community
relations
plan.
This
would
be
an
additional
submittal
requirement
for
the
non-exempt
supportive
housing.
AE
Moving
on
our
council
member
barksdale's
amendments,
these
are
being
presented
as
two
separate
options,
as
I
noted
earlier.
Each
of
these
have
more
to
do
with
the
where
transient
or
sorry
where
emergency
housing
is
going
to
be
regulated,
how
it's
defined
and
the
applicability
for
the
planning
commission
recommended
luca.
AE
As
I
noted
the
there
is
a
distinction
between
transient
and
non-transient
emergency
housing
with
transient
uses
or
those
with
up
to
30
day.
Durations
of
stay
would
fall
under
the
homeless
services
uses
category
and
non-transient
with
30
days
or
longer.
Durations
of
stay
would
fall
under
supportive
housing
under
option
b1.
This
would
define
all
emergency
housing
as
supportive
housing
and
therefore
emergency
housing
would
be
permitted
in
residential
and
hotel
and
motel
districts.
AE
AE
As
it's
proposed.
There
would
be
no
additional
notice
or
registration
required.
It
would
simply
just
state
emergency
housing
as
a
separate
land
use
permitted
in
the
applicable
districts
were
required
under
state
law,
and
so
that
is
all
we
have
for
you
this
evening.
Again,
staff
is
seeking
action
from
council
to
adopt
ordinance
number
6672,
and
I
will
pass
it
back
to
the
mayor.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Let's
go
ahead
and
hear
a
motion
that,
as
has
provided
us,
and
we
can
work
from
there.
A
Second,
thank
you
so
on
the
table
is
what
is
basically
the
planning
commission's
recommendation.
Councilmember
robertson,
I'm
going
to
start
with
you,
let
you
introduce
your
amendments
and
we'll
go
through
that
and
we
will
vote
on
each
one
individually
and
then
council
member
park.
Sale
will
go
to
you
with
yours
so
and
then
we'll
all
have
a
chance
to
make
comments
and
ask
questions.
D
So
I'd
like
to
make
some
little
overarching
comments
so
that
way
I
can
use
my
time
more
wisely
on
each
individual
one.
So
first
I'd
like
to
thank
the
city
attorney's
office
for
assisting
me
in
drafting
the
amendments,
and
I
would
also
point
out
to
the
council
that
you
have
my
matrix
of
the
amendments
in
your
email
from
thursday
and
also.
A
AE
We
have
the
whole
list
of
the
amendments
for
both
council
members,
robertson
and
barksdale.
They're.
Just
on
a
single
list
is
that.
A
Yeah,
I
just
knew
that
hers
were
on
that
two
different
slides
in
your
presentation,
but,
however,
you
can
do
it
go
ahead
and
show
us
okay,
yeah.
I.
D
Didn't
get
that
so,
but
I
had
an
email
with
my
amendments
that
that
I
wrote
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
saw
that
if
you
haven't
we'll
put
out
the
presentation
slide
up,
that's
not
the
one,
that's
on
the
on
the
desk
so
and
anyway.
So
I
just
wanted
to.
Let
folks
know
that
these
amendments
are
different
than
the
ones
that
we
talked
about
a
couple
months
ago.
There
have
been
some
changes.
D
D
D
D
People
out
of
homelessness
and
towards
stability
is
critical
so,
like
I
said
all
of
these
make
things
better
and
they
also
make
sure
the
uses
are
harmonious
with
other
uses
with
with
regard
to
the
zone
so
and
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
this
more
in
depth,
but
the
making
sure
that
we
do
not
have
clustering
making
sure
that
we
have
compatible
uses
like
a
single
family
use
in
a
single
family
zone.
That's
what
we
do
all
the
time
with
land
use.
D
D
D
So
a1
is
has
single-family
dwellings.
The
residency
limitations
are
the
same
as
for
adult
family
homes
in
bellevue,
which
is
eight
adult
residents,
eight
adult
residents
there
could
be
extra
children
and
there
also
will
be
staff
on
board.
So
this
is
not
in
any
way
making
a
single
family
home
inconsistent
with
single
family
uses,
most
single
family,
the
average
single
family
home
in
bellevue
has
two
and
a
half
residents
in
it.
Obviously,
some
having
three
one
or
two,
but
the
average
is
two
and
a
half.
D
This
would
have
at
least
nine
as
the
maximum,
so
more
than
almost
four-fold
what
the
average
resident
is
in
a
single-family
zone.
These
are
the
requirements
for
adult
family
homes,
where
people
need
assistance
to
live
and
support
to
live
independently.
That
is
exactly
what
supportive
housing
is.
It
helps
people
especially
permanent
supportive
housing.
It
people
need
supports
to
live
and
live
independently
and
stay
housed
having
the
adult
family
home
standards
applicable
is
incredibly
appropriate.
D
It
is
an
occupancy
and
intensity
of
use
standard
that
has
stood
this
test
of
time
in
bellevue
for
adult
family
homes.
It
will
make
sure
that
if
there
are
permanent,
supportive
housing
or
other
supportive
housing
types
in
single-family
neighborhoods
that
they
fit
better
with
the
neighborhood,
I
think
that
this
is
one
that
should
be
a
no-brainer,
and
I
hope
that
my
colleagues
will
support
it.
Thank
you.
A
C
Y
Y
D
Okay,
thank
you.
I
move
a2.
Second,
all
right
this
is.
We
have
standards
dwelling
units
per
acre
for
uses
in
the
in
our
mixed
use
zones.
The
planning
commission
card
got
an
exception
for
for
supportive
housing
that
doesn't
make
sense
to
me.
It
allows
greater
density
than
is
allowed
under
the
underlying
zone.
D
I
don't
think
that
that's
necessarily
good
for
creating
zoning
consistency
across
the
city.
If,
if
it's
good
for
everyone
else,
it
should
be
good
for
this
use,
and
so
all
this
does
is
delete
two
footnotes
and
it
just
makes
these
live
under
the
zoning
that
other
types
of
housing
people
have
been
saying.
Let's
treat
these
like
housing,
this
treats
them
like
other
types
of
housing,
so
I
would
urge
of
a
yes
vote
on
this
one
as
well.
How
do
you
vote
councilmember.
A
G
D
A
second,
so
this
is
for
there's
certain
types
of
supportive
housing
that
is
exempt.
This
creates
a
separation
of
a
quarter
mile
from
other
exempt
supportive
housing
and
for
non-exempt
supportive
housing,
which
is
the
more
intensive
uses.
It
creates
a
half-mile
separation
between
the
two
non-exempt
supportive
housing
uses
and
the
reason
this
one
is
a
really
important
one.
If
we
want
to
honor
our
commitments
to
the
people
of
bellevue,
this
one's
really
important,
because
what
has
been
happening
is
some
certain
uses
are
going
to
the
less
expensive,
neighborhoods
they're
clustering
places.
D
D
D
That
would
really
make
it
very
hard
for
the
people
in
sober
living
to
work
their
steps
and
get
stabilized.
It
would
be
really
unfair
to
those
folks
so
making
sure
that
they
are
not
too
dense.
Not
too
clustered.
I
can
imagine
single-family
homes
having
you
know.
You
buy
four
homes
on
a
street
and
they're
all
different
supportive
housing
projects
that
may
not
work
well
together,
they
would
overwhelm
the
neighborhood.
They
would
create
a
non-single-family
use
in
that
area
same
thing
with
the
more
intense
ones.
D
This
is
still
leaves
plenty
of
land
plenty
of
space
to
serve
the
people
of
bellevue
who
need
these
uses
and
make
sure
that
it
fits
in
better
with
the
with
the
zoning
and
make
sure
that
the
people
who
are
living
in
these
residents
are
really
more
part
of
the
fabric
of
the
community,
instead
of
in
a
clustered
place
where
you
have
multiple
shelter,
type
and
supportive
housing
facilities
allow.
D
If
we
do
not
pass
this
amendment
we
will
be,
we
could
be
creating
far
more
intense
uses
in
some
of
the
neighborhoods
because
they
are
less
expensive.
I
think
it
would
be
incredibly
unfair
to
the
people
of
this
city
and
it
would
be
unfair
to
the
people
living
in
these
types
of
facilities.
I
urge
a
yes
vote
and
I
vote
yes,.
A
D
Okay,
this
the
draft
code
already
has
a
safety
and
security
plan,
but
there's
no
details
of
what
is
required.
This
provides
a
description
of
what
is
required
in
the
plan
and
by
being
more
precise
providers
will
know
what
the
city
is
looking
for
in
the
type
of
plan.
It
also
makes
bellevue
consistent
with
redmond
in
terms
of
what
is
required,
which
will
make
the
east
side
providers
easier
to
navigate
because
they
can.
D
What
the
plan
that
works
for
bellevue
is
the
one
that
works
for
redmond,
the
one
that
works
for
redmond
is
the
one
that
works
for
bellevue.
The
the
safety
security
plan
definitely
fills
out,
puts
meat
on
the
bones
of
what
we
need
to
make
the
facilities
work
better
for
the
residents
of
these
facilities,
and
I
care
about
the
residents
of
these
facilities,
making
sure
that
they
get
the
services
they
need
and
that
they
are
safe
and
secure.
I
urge
a
yes
vote.
D
A
D
D
Making
sure
that
there's
someone
from
dsd
in
concert
with
the
homeless
coordinator,
looking
at
this,
to
make
sure
that
if
you
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
these
places
are
good
places
and
safe
places
for
the
residents
to
live
in,
this
helps
do
that.
It
provides
it
more.
It
makes
it
more
precise.
It's
also
consistent
with
redmond,
making
it
more
of
a
consistency
across
the
east
side.
AB
D
This
is
the
operations
agreement,
this
one's
really
important,
because
it
requires
adequate
facilities
and
adequate
staffing
on
site
to
help
the
folks,
because,
remember
what
we
had.
Someone
testified
that
leo
floor
of
king
county
said
that
10
of
the
people
in
support
of
housing
may
transition
out.
90
percent
may
be
there
for
much
much
longer
because
they
have
severe
issues.
D
We
want
them
to
be
stable.
We
want
them
to
be
able
to
move
out.
This
requires
requires
on-site
services.
It
also.
I
know
that
I've
heard
this
council
say
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
serve
the
people
of
bellevue
when
we
are
funding
facilities
we
want.
We
want
that.
This
requires
coordination
with
the
city
of
bellevue,
for
local
residents
to
be
able
to
be
allowed
to
move
into
local,
supportive
housing,
and
it
also
provides
it
provides
coordination
with
local
service
providers.
D
D
So
we
don't
have
a
maximum
number
of
residents
to
our
supportive
housing.
We
could
have
one
that
has
a
thousand
residents
which
is
probably
more
than
I
don't
even
know.
That's
probably
more
than
are
in
western
state
that
without
a
maximum
number,
we
could
have
severe
impacts
and
it's
not
as
useful
to
the
people
living
in
those
facilities
to
have
a
significant
density
of
other
people
who
are
struggling
for
stability,
the
we
have
a
hundred
person
maximum
for
homeless
shelters.
This
is
consistent
with
that.
However,
it
would
allow
greater
occupancy
with
additional
mitigation.
D
D
This
one
has
the
exempt
housing
other
than
confidential
registering,
and
the
purpose
was
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have,
for
example,
long
capac.
You
know
ones
next
to
each
other,
where
you
have
someone,
that's
sober
living
and
someone.
That's
anything
goes,
go
ahead
and
use
drugs
on
site
that
would
interfere
with
the
sober
living
it
would
require.
It
would
work
with
the
separation
requirements.
It
also
allows
folks
to
know
what
is
there,
but
there's
no
requirement
to
to
do
outreach.
This
is
not
a
permit
requirement.
It's
not
a
new
permit.
D
Well,
we've
heard
lots
of
talk.
I'm
of
a9.
Okay,
we've
heard
lots
of
talks
about
how
much
we
care
about
outreach
and
transparency,
and
we've
also
heard
talk
about
how
much
we
care
about
neighborhoods,
although
it
doesn't
seem
that
that
we
really
do
the
this
requires.
Many
residents
and
providers
have
expressed
how
well
our
community
outreach
plans
have
worked
in
the
homeless,
shelter
siding
with
plymouth,
plymouth,
permanent,
supportive
housing.
D
D
It
will
create
community
outreach,
good
relations
between
providers,
the
facilities
residents
and
neighbors.
This
is
also
from
the
redmond
code,
which
creates
consistency
between
jurisdictions,
to
make
it
easier
for
eastside
providers
to
develop
the
plans
across
jurisdictional
boundaries.
We've
heard
a
lot
of
people
say
they
like
transparency
and
outreach.
Here's
your
chance
to
prove
it.
I
would
urge
a
yes
vote.
A
R
So
we
heard
the
recommendation,
I'm
looking
to
the
staff
too,
to
make
sure
that
you
understand
what
the
recommendation
or
what
the
ask
is
I'll
get
that
head
on.
AC
My
understanding
is
that
you
would
like
us
to
bring
back
the
best
practices
guide,
that
we
have
been
working
on
with
community
development
and
provide
you
with
that.
So
you
can
see
the
direction
that
we've
gone.
We've
received
direction
throughout
these
meetings
from
council
about
some
of
the
expectations
that
I
think
you
all
have.
So
I
hope
you'll
be
pleased
with
what
we
bring
back
and
council
members
on.
AC
B
So
let
me
be
more
clear
when
I
look
at
the
outline:
that's
in
our
packet
on
best
practices.
There's
there
is
work
from
our
staff
to
work
with
providers,
whether
they're,
currently
here
or
future
ones.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
within
our
budget
we
have
sufficient
resources
to
be
able
to
do
that
level
of
outreach
and
communication
help
them
with,
but
with
best
practices
and
then
on
the
grant
side.
B
A
lot
of
the
the
providers
are
actually
ones
that
request
funding
from
the
city
as
well,
and
if
there
is
not
adequate
funding,
then
I
then
we
should
talk
about
what
it
would
take
to
provide
adequate
funding.
So
they
can
provide
the
kind
of
services
that
I
believe
that
all
of
the
council
members
and
the
community
very
much
care
about,
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we're
there
yet.
So
that's
the
ask.
AB
G
We
just
voted
down
as
a
body
nine
amendments
with
minimum
minimum
best
practices
and
standards,
but
yet
now
we
want
to
bring
back
and
look
at
best
practices.
Well,
I
I
have
no
idea
what
we're
talking
about.
Okay,.
A
Y
Discussion
of
the
alternative
ways
to
go
to
this,
but
we
just
skipped
over
any
discussion
of
why
we,
the
four
people
who
voted
for
this
believe
this
was
the
best
way
to
go,
and
a
number
of
things
were
said
today
tonight
and
are
written
down
that
are
absolutely
overblown
or
off
target
or
and
and
it
it
makes
me
feel,
I
kind
of
it's
unfortunate.
We
have
to
say
no
to
something
that
we
could
have
had
some
discussion.
I
wish
we
had
and
I
didn't
think
we
would
have
it.
A
A
I
don't
mean
the
amendment
I
mean
the
motion.
Sorry,
the.
What
the
what's
on
the
table
is
the
planning
commission's
proposal
and
whatever
we
decide
to
either
modify
or
not
at
the
end.
We
can
talk
about
why
or
why
we
do
not
support
that,
but
right
now
we're
just
discussing
individual
amendments
and
we
are
on
to
council
member
barksdales
too.
A
X
All
right
can
I
provide
introductory
marks
to
okay
to
either
option
okay.
So
overall,
as
I
mentioned
during
the
last
time,
this
was
on
the
agenda.
The
intent
here
is
to
remove
the
cup
process.
X
AB
A
The
numbers
were
because
I
had
my
head
down:
okay,
go
ahead
with
b2.
X
Okay,
I
moved
b2,
okay,.
A
X
So
b2
treats
emergency
housing
allows
emergency
housing
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed,
but
without
the
cup
process
and
without
the
distinction
between
transient
and
non-transient
housing.
So
this
is
close
to
what
was
proposed
by
staff
in
the
planning
commission,
but
just
removes
the
cup
process
and
the
distinction
and
part
of
the
rationale
here
is
you
know
the
the
type
of
use
and
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed
is
similar
to
the
type
of
use
for
emergency
housing.
X
Y
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
the
motion
on
the
table
is
what's
a
better
word
than
unadulterated,.
A
Unchanged
and
it
is
the
planning
commission's
proposal
and
it
has
been
seconded
and
I
would
like
to
go
and
take
any
comments
or
questions
from
from
each
council
member,
so
councilman
robertson.
Would
you
like
to
make
a
comment
sure.
D
Stability
and
moving
on
towards
stable
housing
more
so
it's
I'm
disappointed
that
they
did
not
pass,
and
I
don't
think
I
think
the
ordinances
written
could
allow
clustering
and
putting
too
many
too
much
density
too
much
occupancy
in
places
where
it
would
not
be
consistent
with
the
underlying
land
use
code
and
with
the
uses
in
those
zones.
So,
sadly
I
will
be
voting.
No.
Y
Y
It's
too
bad.
We,
this
was
not
set
up
to
be,
have
a
back
and
forth
when
we
were
going
through
this,
but
it's
it
really
comes
down
to
a
question
of
perception
and
I
think
a
lot
of
things
have
been
said
in
favor
of
all
these
pieces
here
are
either
well
they're
more
designed
to
make
this
difficult
for
housing.
It's
more
designed
to
put
restrictions
more
designed
to
make
this
take
longer
to
get
done,
and
it's
a
pattern.
Y
That's
gone
on
for
a
long
time
in
this
whole
area
of
affordable
housing,
shelters
and
everything
else-
and
this
is
the
first
time
we
really
come
forward
with
a
well
done
laid
out
and
very
workable
accessible
and,
I
think,
will
be
successful-
a
program
that
doesn't
rely
on.
You
can't
do
this.
You
can't
do
this.
Y
We've
had
people
living
in
supportive
housing
for
years
in
bellevue,
without
all
this
laid
on
rules
and
and
constrictions,
which
they
are
we're
in
a
different,
different
time
zone.
In
this,
it's
it's
time
to
move
forward,
and
this
is,
I
think,
it's
going
to
be
very
good.
We
can
come
back
and
modify
things
in
the
future
if
we
want
to
we
need
to,
but-
and
it's
been
endorsed
by
a
lot
of
people
and
from
all
sides
of
the
of
the
community.
Y
This
will
be
something
that
will
actually
help
us
to
deal
have
people
living
in
housing
and
they
could
be
out
in
the
street
in
the
streets.
We
don't
want
them
in
the
streets,
let's
put
them
in
housing
and
do
it
now,
and
I
think
this
is
a
very
solid,
rational,
workable
program
to
go
for
and
we'll
get
things
done
so
much
quicker
than
having
to
go
through
a
lot
of
kind
of
back
and
forth
and
artificial
restraints,
and
so
I'm
very
pleased
to
move
forward
on
this,
and
I
think
we
will.
Y
A
Z
As
we
are
experiencing-
and
we
you
know,
know
that
housing
is
very,
very
complex
issue
and
it's
becoming
even
more
so
and
so
because
of
that,
I
think
we,
the
value,
I'm
very
proud,
has
done
a
great
great
great
job
in
providing
you
know.
I
mean
kudo
to
the
mayor
very
much
supportive
of
affordable
housing
and
actually
it's
housing
of
all
types
and
the
beginning
with
our
homeless,
shelter
and
it's
become
a
model
and
we
have
a
transitional
housing.
Z
We
have
mercury
housing,
we
are
providing
all
the
services
and
we
have
addressed
concerns
of
the
public,
and
you
know
this
is
a
very,
very
difficult
subject,
different
issue,
and
that's
why
I've
advocated
you
know.
We
need
to
really
let
people
know,
educate,
folks
and
the
public
and
who
most
of
them
don't
really
understand
the
complexity
and
all
they
hear
is
just
simple.
Z
You
know
phrases
and
this
and
that,
and
they
heard
about
transitionalizing
permanent
housing,
homeless,
shelter,
affordable,
housing,
whatever
it
is.
So
what
we
need
to
do
is
you
know
we
have
done
such
a
great
thing,
but
sadly,
as
my
colleague
jennifer
robertson
said,
you
know,
we
have,
we
are
undoing
the
good
work
that
we
have
accomplished
and
we'll
continue
to
do
so.
You
know
our
affordable
housing
is
me
meeting
targets
and
we're
going
to
do
more,
we're
continuing
to
start
working
more.
However,
we
got
to
get
the
public
on
board.
Z
We
have
to
have
transparency,
and
people
have
told
us.
We
have
accountability.
You
know
we
have
to
have
trust
to
show
that
we
are
building
a
relationship.
You
know,
and
people
are
anxious.
People
want
to
do
good
things
just
like
we
all
want
to.
Nobody
wants
to
have
see
people
who
are
in
the
house.
We
all
want
to
do
good
things,
but
we
got
to
do
it
in
a
way
that
we
do
it
in
an
orderly
fashion
in
a
way
that
we
can
be
supported.
You
may
have
mentioned
the
word
sustainability.
Z
Absolutely
they
may
have
mentioned
equity
absolutely,
but
you
know
we
cannot
just
separate
symbols,
separateness,
sort
out
single
out
some
things
that
would
do
this
and
then
leaving
everybody
else.
There
wondering
what
does
that
mean?
We
got
to
do
it,
the
residence
and
the
clients,
the
operators,
everybody
has
to
understand
what
we're
doing.
Otherwise.
Z
We
have
no
expectation,
there's
anxiety
and
we
don't
want
to
have
surprises.
We
want
to
have
certainty.
So
all
these
are
good
things,
but
what
we
have
done.
We
are
doing
away
with
all
that,
just
improving
what
we've
gone
through
just
now.
So
I
feel
very
sad.
Just
like
jennifer
said
you
know.
Sadly
we
are
going
through
this
and
the
public
wants
to
see.
You
know
what
we
can
do.
Z
We
have
to
be
comfortable,
show
them
and
we
have
to
show
progress
and
I
think
valve
is
doing
it,
but
now
we
suddenly
say
well,
you
know
we
can't
do
all
these
things.
People
say
well.
What
are
we
accountable?
For
you
know.
We
have
worked
very
well
with
congregation
homeless.
We
are
working
well
with
plymouth
housing,
but
now
we're
hearing
our
contract,
saying
hey,
we,
we
don't
agree
with
you
just
what
it
is
we
disagree.
You
know
I
I'm
we're
asking
staff.
Do
we?
Does
the
staff
understand
what
we
just
decided?
Z
I
don't
know
yeah
that
video
was
saying
what
did
we
do?
You
know
that
is
not
transparency.
That
is
not
giving
clear
expectations
and
that
there's
no
no
certainty
in
what
we
do.
How
can
we
have
certainty?
We
don't
know
what
our
expectation
is.
If
we
don't
know
our
rules,
we
don't
know
what
we
expect
to
have.
You
know
we
have
to
make
commitment,
as
jennifer
robinson
said,
to
the
residents
of
bellevue
and
to
do
that
we
have
to
let
them
understand.
Z
We
have
contracts,
we
have
a
contract
with
plymouth,
you
know
when
we
do
the
homeless,
shelter
thing.
We
say
what
is
the
contract?
We
have
to
conjure
expectation
with
congregations
and
we
have
done
very
well.
They
understand
what
it
is.
The
public
knows
what
it
is.
The
resident
knows
it
is
as
council
members.
I
know
what
it
is
because
I
have
to
represent
the
public,
but
what
we've
gone
through.
I
I
I
I'm
very,
very
sad
that
we
are
where
we
are
so
I
cannot
vote
for
this.
A
Thank
you
so
I'll
take
us
back
a
little
bit.
Our
last
presentation
that
staff
gave
us
was
on
the
parks
board
planning
commission's
recommendation,
which
is
on
the
table
right
now,
and
I
wish
we
had
a
slide
that
showed
what
it
is.
But
apparently
we
don't
have
a
way
to
show
that.
A
Next
time,
we'll
remember
to
make
a
slide
on
that,
but
it
was
just
a
discussion
that
we
had
for
a
long
time
a
few
weeks
ago
and
council
councilmember,
robertson
and
councilmember
barksdale
wanted
to
bring
amendments
to
that,
and
so
they
have
done
that
tonight
and
they
got
voted
down.
So
it's
really
not
as
confusing
as
it
seems,
because
we
are
back
to
the
planning
commission's
original
recommendation.
A
A
A
A
What
we
voted
on
tonight
is
a
very
thoughtful
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission
that
makes
it
easier
to
do
supportive
housing
has
it
we.
We
did
a
very
long
process
four
years
ago
on
what
we
were
going
to
require
for
a
homeless
shelter
and
we
had
a
lot
of
community
input
and
what
we
decided
on
was
a
compromise,
and
I
thought
it
was.
You
know
it
wasn't
exactly
what
I
wanted,
but
it
was.
I
felt
what
the
community
wanted,
and
so
I
am
sticking
with
the
planning
commission's
recommendation.
A
I
think
they
did
a
very
thoughtful
job
and
I'm
very
eager
to
move
forward
rapidly
on
providing
housing,
whether
it's
for
homeless
people
or
for
people
who
are
having
trouble
affording
the
rents.
In
fact,
that's
what
people
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
are:
they
are
those
people,
so
I'm
anxious
to
create
the
entire
spectrum
of
affordabilities
in
our
housing.
G
This
is
a
sad
day.
I
didn't
think
this
council
would
ever
say
that
we
can't
get
people
into
housing
without
having
standards
as
if,
like
those
two
cannot
no
longer
go
to
go
together
and
recommendations
to
me
are
optional
right.
They
are
something
given
human
nature,
they
won't
follow
them.
If
they
don't
need
to
be
it
individuals,
corporations
non-profit
providers,
they
don't
have
to
follow
it.
If
they
don't
have
to
do
it,
why
would
they
do
it?
G
G
For
me
personally,
who
ran
to
be,
have
the
pleasure
sit
in
the
seat
and
represent
the
people
of
bellevue
about
protecting
our
neighborhoods?
Today
is
a
very
sad
day,
a
very
sad
day.
Today
we
took
a
step
towards
going
towards
other
cities
that
have
absolutely
no
standards,
and
I
don't
understand
why
we're
taking
this
approach.
G
I
really
don't-
and
I
am
particularly
very
very
sad
for
those
neighborhoods
who
are,
I
mean,
of
course,
it's
on
a
sliding
scale,
but
those
neighborhoods
that
are
a
little
bit
more
affordable
than
others,
because
these
facilities
are
not
going
to
go
into
bridal
trails
or
the
more
expensive
neighborhoods
around
bellevue.
I
can
tell
you
right
now,
they're
probably
going
into
two
or
three
neighborhoods,
because
we
for
some
reason
cannot
understand
that
there
will
be
clustering
and
there
will
be
so
when
there's
three
or
four
of
these
facilities
on
a
block
or
on
the
street.
G
Not
I
was
sorry
I
wasn't
done
yet
okay,
so
you
know
we
all
claim
we
care
about
again
about
data
about
performance
standards,
about
best
practices,
but
we're
not
willing
to
enforce
it,
which
is
so
odd
because
we
just
had
this
huge
conversation
about
wilburton.
We
tell
developers
where
they
can
build,
how
they
can
build.
Who
can
live
there?
The
amenities
they
need
to
have
do
they
have
a
culture
hub.
Do
they
look
after
mom
and
pop
shops?
G
G
We
looked
at
nine
verti
in
my
mind,
common
sense
mitigation
that
would
not,
as
councilmember
robertson
said,
and
I
really
appreciate
her
bringing
forward
these
amendments
that
would
not
provide
a
barrier
to
this
type
of
housing
would
not
slow
down
their
ability
to
provide
this
type
of
housing.
It
was
simply
some
minimum
basic
standards.
Minimum.
G
G
And
I
think
I
think
our
our
residents
will
well.
We
all
want
to
take
care
of
those
that
are
experiencing
homelessness,
homelessness
in
our
city.
I
still
firmly
believe,
there's
a
right
way
to
do
it
and
the
wrong
way
to
do
it.
You
can
be
supportive
and
provide
them
with
the
services
they
need
the
housing
they
need,
but
at
the
same
time,
think
about
our
residents
and
think
about
maintaining
a
quality
of
life
in
our
in
our
neighborhoods
and
tonight
I
don't
think
we
did
that.
I
think
we
fell
short.
X
B
On
yes,
thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
the
planning,
commission,
the
community
and
the
staff
for
working
on
this,
and
I
agree
with
the
mayor
of
going
back
to
the
previous
discussions
that
we
had
about
finding
that
balance
and
creating
a
land
use
code
that
has
the
pieces
that
are
in
there
from
the
planning
commission
and
then
the
best
practices
that
staff
are
putting
together,
because
I
believe
that
the
land
use
code
is
one
aspect
of
how
we,
as
the
city,
look
at
how
things
work
in
the
city.
B
As
the
mayor
said,
we
already
have
a
housing
and
homelessness
crisis.
You
know
we've
gotten
feedback
into
our
inboxes
and
there's
a
couple
of
them
that
I
particularly
just
want
to
read
out
here.
There's
one
that
says
every
additional
home
and
bedroom
provides
a
means
for
one
more
person
to
be
to
have
a
bed
and
a
pathway
to
stability,
and
then
someone
else
wrote
in
that.
B
B
A
R
Yes,
ma'am:
we
could
accomplish
that.
Okay.
A
With
that
all
those
in
favor,
do
you
want
to
give
the
motion
again
just
for
clarity?
Oh.