►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - July 5, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
A
Thank
you.
We
have
a
proclamation
tonight.
Council
members,
council,
member
Stoke
says
wondering
if
you
could
read
that
for
us.
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
programs
are
vitally
important
to
establishing
and
maintaining
the
quality
of
life
in
our
community
and
whereas
these
programs
provide
places
for
people
of
all
cultures
together,
celebrate
and
volunteer
their
time
and
talents
to
make
a
difference.
And
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
programs
build
healthy,
active
communities
and
Aid
in
the
prevention
of
chronic
disease
and
improve
the
mental
and
emotional
health
of
all
residents.
E
And
whereas
people
with
disabilities
benefit
with
opportunities
and
choices
for
recreation.
Socialization
and
learning
to
facilitate
participation
in
the
life
of
our
community.
And
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
programs
also
inhabit
enhance
a
community's
economic
Prosperity
through
the
increased
property
values
and
tourism.
The
attraction
and
retention
of
businesses
and
crime
reductions.
And
whereas
our
parks
and
natural
areas
ensure
the
ecological
beauty
of
our
community
and
provide
a
place
for
children
and
adults
to
connect
with
nature
and
recreate
Outdoors.
E
E
And
whereas,
as
a
city
in
the
park,
bellevue's
parks
and
natural
Recreation
areas
are
fundamental.
Not
only
to
the
beauty
of
our
community,
but
also
to
the
environmental
well-being,
by
improving
air
and
water
quality,
protecting
groundwater,
preventing
flooding
and
providing
vegetative
buffers
and
habitat
for
wildlife.
E
Now,
therefore,
I
Will,
athelene,
Robinson,
mayor
of
the
city
of
Bellevue
Washington
and
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
the
month
of
July
2022
as
Parks
and
Recreation
month
in
Bellevue,
and
urge
everyone
to
enjoy
and
recognize
the
many
benefits
of
our
Parks
natural
areas,
trails
and
Recreations
get
out
and
enjoy
it.
Thank
you
thank.
A
B
Thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
There
are
eight
speakers
signed
up
for
oral
Communications
and
I'll
remind
the
public
that
oral
Communications
is
for
a
period
of
no
more
than
30
minutes.
Total
speakers
will
be
allowed
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak
to
any
one
side
of
a
particular
topic,
and
with
that
I
will.
Oh
and
each
speaker
will
be
allowed
three
minutes
and
with
that
I'll
call
our
first
Speaker
who's
joining
us
I
believe
in
person,
and
that
is
Brady
Nordstrom.
F
Good
evening,
well,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
this
evening.
My
name
is
Brady
Nordstrom
and
I'm
here
tonight
on
behalf
of
the
East
Side
housing
Roundtable.
So
we
are
a
broad
Coalition
comprised
of
employers,
non-profits
businesses,
housing,
Advocates,
private
nonprofit,
housing
developers,
and
we
unite
to
support
the
creation
of
more
housing
and
diverse
housing
types
across
all
income
levels
in
the
east
side,
and
this
is
especially
critical
at
a
time
of
Rapid
job
and
Transit
expansion.
F
So
my
primary
purpose
for
being
here
today
is
to
just
Express
deep
appreciation
for
the
city's
foresight
and
willingness
to
undergo
this
next
right
work
for
affordable
housing.
F
We
recognize
and
praise
this
as
a
as
a
new
approach
for
sending
the
city's
affordable
housing
work
plan
over
the
next
12
to
18
months
so
and
within
this,
this
includes
this
collaboration
engagement
with
a
broad
set
of
stakeholders
and
working
with
an
experienced
consultant
to
help
navigate,
there's
a
lot
of
challenges
with
creating
housing,
both
with
the
urgency
and
just
across
all
affordable
affordability
levels.
So
there's
there's
a
lot
to
balance
throughout
all
of
this,
but
ultimately
it's
going
to
be
your
choice.
F
As
Council,
and
so
as
you
consider
this,
this
next
right
work,
we
urge
you
to
think
about
some
of
the
following.
First
is
impact
prioritizing
the
highest
impacts
policies
to
increase
housing,
affordability,
so,
for
example,
an
ambitious
and
appropriate
increase
to
residential
capacity
in
strategic
locations
is
really
a
foundation
for
other
policies
to
work.
F
Another
point
is
Transit
orientation,
maximizing
present
and
future
Transit
oriented
opportunities
such
as
Wilburton
and
Bel
Red
revenue
is
another
piece
just
recognizing
that
additional
revenue
is
needed
for
lower
affordability,
levels
and
finally,
time
considering
that
priorities
can
be
well
considering
priorities
that
can
be
implemented
in
Tandem
and
or
quickly,
because
time
is
a
variable
of
the
success
and
just
keeping
in
mind
that
there's
Partners
here
to
support
and
find
ways
to
expand
capacity.
F
So
that's
pretty
much
it
I
really.
Thank
you
all
for
and
as
Roundtable
members.
We
are
engaging
in
a
lot
of
hard
conversations
around
these
complex
topics
and
we
recognize
that
this
is
really
going
to
impact
future
Generations
in
big
ways.
So
we
look
forward
to
continuing
our
work
with
you
and
with
staff
to
advance
housing
affordable
to
all
income
levels.
So
thank
you
again
and
have
a
good
evening.
B
B
G
G
We're
working
to
meet
the
needs
of
our
neighbors
in
addressing
the
necessity
for
a
significant
increase
in
the
number
of
affordable
homes
available
to
people
living
in
East,
King
County
I'm
here
today
to
talk
about
the
next
right
work
effort
that
is
set
to
come
up
on
your
agenda
a
little
bit
later.
I
want
to
start
off
by
specifically
making
sure
to
thank
both
the
consultant
AP
Hurd,
as
well
as
your
planning
staff.
We
were
afforded
multiple
opportunities
to
discuss
our
thoughts
on
the
affordable
housing
needs
for
Bellevue,
and
we
do
deeply
appreciate
that
engagement.
G
That
being
said,
however,
I
would
urge
you
to
look
very
closely
at
this
report.
In
your
presentation,
you
will
see
that
there
was
a
wide
variety
of
topics
that
was
proposed,
many
of
which
landed
on
the
consultant's
report
in
that
little
blue
chart
there
at
the
end.
Sadly,
however,
of
those
16
items
that
were
determined
to
have
a
high
degree
of
support
and
impact,
only
four
were
included
in
the
final
recommendations.
G
That's
only
25
you've
heard
myself
and
others
call
on
the
city
of
Bellevue
to
take
bold
action,
but
25
simply
doesn't
meet
that
standard.
It's
not
to
say
that
the
four
on
this
list
aren't
good
we're
strongly
in
support
of
all
four
of
these
suggested
recommendations
from
implementing
a
commercial
linkage
fee
to
removing
barriers
to
micro
Apartments,
to
allowing
higher
fars
for
affordable
residential
projects
and
reducing
permit
fees
for
affordable
housing
projects.
These
are
all
good
things
and
should
be
pursued,
but
even
by
the
analysis
of
the
planning
staff
and
consultant.
G
Only
one
of
those
four
is
considered
high
impact
and
two
of
them
are
considered
low
impact.
We
are
in
the
housing
crisis
right
now
and
bold
action
needs
to
be
taken
today.
I
know
some
of
the
items
in
this
report
are
classified
as
being
an
ongoing
work
or
in
the
broader
country,
comprehensive
plan,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
there
is
some
movement,
but
it's
too
easy
to
say
that
something
is
simply
ongoing
and
then
lose
track.
G
I
would
urge
the
council
to
conclude
more
of
the
topics
from
the
Consultants
report
as
part
of
our
next
right
work,
including
including
inclusionary
zoning,
to
require
the
production
of
affordable
housing,
completion
of
the
2017
housing
strategy
that
particularly
around
C1
establishment
of
a
fund
dedicated
to
increase
the
production
of
affordable
housing
and
changing
codes
to
allow
dadu's,
adus,
duplexes,
triplexes,
quad,
plexes
and
mechanisms
for
separate
ownership
in
all
zones.
I
would
also
urge
you
to
grow
the
planning
department
to
reflect
that
amount
of
work.
That
needs
to
be
done.
H
H
So
I'll
tell
you
about
a
scenario
in
the
day
in
the
life
of
a
indigenous
black
female
living
in
Seattle,
so
I'm
sitting
on
the
first
floor,
because
the
seventh
floor
is
still
not
open
to
the
public
I'm
waiting
with
honorable
Michael
B
Fuller
to
go
upstairs
to
speak
at
the
council
meeting
a
foreigner
guard
comes
up
to
us
and
say
you
can't
sit
here.
I'm
like
what
I
said
we're
going
to
the
council
meeting.
It's
canceled.
There
was
no
canceled
meeting.
I
said
well
I'm
going
in
the
elevator.
No,
you
can't
go
in
there.
H
I
was
like
see,
you
wouldn't
want
to
be
you
and
that
right
there
was
enough
to
really
I
guess,
cause
a
major
explosion.
Then
today
Claudia
baladucci,
which
you're
all
familiar
with
she
says
Mr
Shard.
You
can't
say
that
say
what
all
I
do
is
do
I
said
I
go
to
Bellevue.
They
don't
tell
me
I,
can't
say
that
say
what
so
now
I'm
really
really
really
Beyond
a
reason.
I'm
always
like
I,
said
consciously
thinking
what
should
I
do
next,
because
this
kind
of
stuff
has
to
stop.
H
It's
called
malicious
harassment
and
there's
laws
attached
to
that.
So
I'm
really
concerned
and
I
always
will
be
because
of
the
fact
that
we
we
are
supposed
to
have
free
speech
and
then,
when
you
start
getting
into
all
those
other
little
isms
and
stuff,
that's
where
those
name
callings
come
from,
like
Nazi
Pig
psychopath,
whatever
you
want
to
call
yourself
in
terms
of
what
you're
trying
to
do
to
someone
that
has
a
right
to
be
here.
Everybody
has
the
right
to
the
Tree
of
Life.
H
That
was
really
kind
of
like
a
bad
thing
for
indigenous
black
people
still
locked
in
Chains
and
it's
a
shame
to
have
to
come
to
any
council
meeting
Town
Hall
meetings,
whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
where
you're
using
those
King,
those
same
kind
of
change
chains
on
us
to
do
what
I
mean
I'm
I'm,
just
still
in
shock,
I'm
still
trying
to
think
of
how
Miss
baladucci
should
be
handled
because
Kathy
Lambert
did
that
same
thing
and
she
is
no
longer
around
anymore.
I
Fascist
map
bandida
in
psychopath,
my
name
Alex,
Zimmerman
and
I-
want
to
speak
about
Amazon
Mafia
I
want
to
speak
about
Amazon
Mafia
for
many
reasons,
because
I
lived
here
for
35
years
before
35
Fury.
What
is
I
see
what
is
AC
on
my
zone
in
Microsoft
2
from
beginning
I,
talk
about
this
30
year
ago.
Destroy
us
totally!
So
it's
not
because
it's
my
personal
opinion,
like
professional
opinion,
you
know
what
is
mean
like
a
business
consultant
is
because
I
totally
respect
president
Trump.
I
What
is
talking
so
we
need
stop
and
Tech
they
company,
like
Amazon
Google
Microsoft.
They
destroy
a
fundamental
principle
of
America.
What
has
happened
for
last
two
years
under
covet
is
so
they
won't
make
from
America
concentration
camp.
When
people
cannot
speak,
he
cannot
fight
with
them.
If
we
cannot,
it's
exactly.
What's
happened
in
Seattle
in
Bellevue
right
now,
some
as
on
one
bring
25
000
people,
that's
a
BS,
but
it's
not
a
point
point.
We
need
to
stop
and
then
because
I
give
you
classic
example.
I
What
is
civilized,
people
do
in
New,
York
12
million
people
per
couple
years
ago.
Refused
Amazon
Amazon
for
12
million
people
like
New
York
is
look
like
a
small
bed
bug.
You
know
it
is
me
and
who
care
about
this
yeah
25,
000
people
or
30
for
12
million
is
nothing
but
they
sinking
like
civilized
people,
and
you
don't
do
it
nothing
for
a
story
here
in
96
with
Microsoft
come
in.
Try
destroyers
with
fifty
thousand
dollars,
Factory
and
I
told
many
times.
20
miles
away
is
empty.
Place
go
build
everything.
I
I
What
they're
supposed
to
be
citizens
chamber
you
make
us
life
miserable
price
for
apartment
right
now,
jump
like
a
crazy
and
look
right
now
for
another
apartment
for
moving,
so
for
two
months:
price
jumped
by
300
bucks
more
than
10
percentage,
so
every
year,
10
percentage
is
it
Seattle
have
right
now,
whereas
price
three
thousand
dollars,
fifty
percentage
in
Seattle
around
state
Washington
make
less
than
fifty
thousand
dollars
how
you
can
afford
this
Mafia?
What
has
come
from
amazona?
How
you
can?
Why
are
you
so
quiet
I?
Don't
understand?
I
J
Hello,
my
name
is
Hal
Ferris
I'm
representing
imagine
housing
and
the
Eastside,
affordable
housing
Coalition
tonight,
I
want
to
thank
all
of
you
for
the
work
you
do
for
our
city
and
the
patients
that
show
our
community
as
a
whole.
We
very
much
appreciate
what
you're
doing
I'm
here
to
support
the
priorities
identified
by
in
the
staff
report
for
the
next
right
work.
However,
given
the
urgency
of
our
housing
crisis
and
the
office
development
underway,
we
must
do
more.
Now.
J
You
heard
those
items
specifically
that
Ryan
Donahue
represented,
who
also
is
a
member
of
the
Coalition
we've.
Our
Coalition
has
recommended
additional
tools
that
we
feel
can
make
a
significant
impact
on
our
community
in
the
short
term,
to
increase
the
production
and
preservation
of
affordable
housing.
J
J
J
In
return
for
an
increase
in
development
capacity,
the
owner
developer
can
one
provide
affordable
housing
on
site.
They
can
provide
affordable
housing
off-site.
They
can
provide
deed
in
lieu
of
of
provide
land
in
lieu
of
the
development
which
on
which
affordable
housing
can
be
developed
or
they
can
pay
a
fee.
All
of
these
options
can
be
calibrated
to
encourage
development
482
jurisdictions
across
the
country,
including
Redmond,
Kirkland,
Issaquah,
King,
County
and
Seattle
have
such
a
structure.
This
is
not
a
new
Endeavor.
This
is
something
we
can
do
with
this,
so
Council
support
the
staff.
J
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Ferris,
then,
is
our
third
and
final
speaker
speaking
in
support
of
item
10B,
the
next
right
work
item,
the
next
speaker
on
our
list
is
Jessica
Claussen.
K
Hello,
Council
Jessica
Claussen
I'm,
the
co-chair
of
the
Bellevue
Chamber
Of
commerce's
plush
committee.
We
sent
a
letter
to
you
earlier
today
outlining
some
thoughts
and
concerns
that
we
do
have
with
the
next
right
work
proposal.
First
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
Outreach
that
was
conducted
for
this
report
was
really
great.
The
consultant
AP
heard
did
a
fabulous
job
of
going
I.
K
Think
you
heard
by
to
from
Ryan
Donahue
going
around
and
really
drilling
down
with
people
asking
them
what
strategies
we
can
bring
forward
to
help
affordability
in
Bellevue
and
so
Bravo
to
her
and
Bravo
the
staff.
For
that
Outreach
effort
it
was
phenomenal.
The
report
was
also
one
of
the
best
I've
read
in
terms
of
really
drilling
down
on
a
lot
of
the
actual
details
of
these
proposals.
That
being
said,
the
plush
committee
remains
very
strongly
opposed
to
a
commercial
linkage
fee.
K
A
commercial
linkage
fee
without
a
trade
in
density
is
illegal
under
state
law
and
federal
law
actually,
and
so
we
would
encourage
Bellevue
to
look
at
legal
options
if
it
chooses
to
charge
fees
or
require
affordable
housing
in
exchange
for
additional
density.
Bellevue
is
not
Seattle.
Obviously,
Bellevue
is
not
Redmond,
it
cannot
be
compared.
K
Bellevue
cannot
be
compared
to
other
cities
who
may
have
adopted
these
types
of
fees,
and
we
would
encourage
the
city
council
not
to
do
things
just
because
other
jurisdictions
have
done
so,
but
to
do
things
in
a
Bellevue
Way,
which
is
to
say
calibrate
fees
in
a
way
that
actually
do
the
thing
that
I
think
you're
trying
to
do,
which
is
support,
affordable
housing
and
increase
Behavior
by
developers
and
others
that
you're
looking
to
get.
We
don't
want
you
to
lose
momentum.
Also,
I
think
this
report,
as
I
said,
is
a
really
really
good
one.
K
We
are
concerned
that,
as
Ryan
said,
only
25
percent
of
the
16
recommendations
are
stated
to
move
forward
by
staff.
You
have
a
major,
comprehensive,
Plan
update
undergoing
right.
Now.
There
is
a
really
good
opportunity
to
look
at
these
things,
while
staff
is
actually
changing.
The
comprehensive
plan
I
would
encourage
all
16
things
to
be
strongly
looked
at
in
the
comprehensive
plan
and
include
in
that
the
ability
to
do
contract
rezones
in
growth
centers.
K
B
Thank
you,
Miss
Claussen.
That
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
As
I
said
earlier,
we
have
reached
three
folks
in
support
of
the
item
10B
next
right
work.
If
there
is
anyone
else
who
has
a
comment
on
a
different
item
that
is
joining
us
here
in
council,
chambers
or
online,
please
raise
your
hand
and
to
do
so
online
is
star
nine.
L
Hi
and
good
evening,
Council
I,
actually
hadn't,
planned
to
say
anything
at
all
during
oral
Communications
tonight
until
I
just
got
here
and
realized
I.
What
I
was
listening
to
I
do
find
it
interesting
to
listen
to
folks
representing
the
developers,
whether
they
be
with
imagine
housing
or
attorneys,
representing
developers
saying
you
know
that
it's
illegal
to
to
ask
the
developers
to
to
put
the
housing
in
the
affordable
housing
in
you
can't
do
that.
L
L
So
that
is
my
concern
is
that
our
development
community
in
Bellevue
doesn't
want
to
have
to
take
part
in
that,
but
they
keep
pushing
that
towards
the
neighborhoods
that
we
are
supposed
to
Bear
the
burden
of
their
growth,
their
success
and
sitting
there.
Listening
to
this
really
made
me
upset
and
angry,
because
I
hear
all
the
time
about
the
need
for
affordable
housing,
but
our
development
Community
doesn't
want
to
take
part
in
that
they
don't
want
to
lose
their
profits,
but
our
neighborhoods
will
bear
the
burden
for
it.
L
So
please,
as
you
go
forward,
bear
that
in
mind.
Neighborhoods
are
not
supposed
to
be
growth.
Centers
now
I
know
they're,
probably
talking
about
neighborhood
shopping
centers
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
again
there's
right
size
for
everything
and
I'm
really
concerned
about
that
and
I
know.
You
know
that
Miss
Claussen.
So
thank
you
very
much.
A
Those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
we
have
a
public
hearing
tonight,
I'm
going
to
clarify
that
this
is
just
a
vote
that
we're
going
to
be
discussing
to
extend
the
current
ioc.
It's
not
about
the
merits
or
lack
of
merits
of
the
ioc.
It's
just
about
extending
it.
So
I
will
ask
Mr
Miyake.
Would
you
like
to
introduce.
O
At
eight
o'clock
this
morning,
yeah
a
little
worse
for
wear
but
still
at
eight
o'clock
so
good
evening,
and
thank
you
for
having
us
this
evening.
I'm
joined
tonight
by
Caleb
Miller
also
from
the
development
services
department,
and
he
is
going
to
be
presenting
a
short
PowerPoint
to
introduce
the
Supportive
Housing
and
emergency
housing,
shelter,
interim
official
control
or
ioc
extension
topic.
As
you
recall,
the
the
ioc
has
been
effect
for
just
under
one
year,
so
it
is
time
to
extend
it
again
and
cut.
Q
Sure,
thank
you
Liz,
so
the
action
staff
are
requesting
tonight
is
for
Council
to
hold
the
public
hearing
on
orders
number
6668,
which
is
the
ioc
extension
ordinance
and
then
following
the
public
hearing,
adopt
ordinance
6668
for
our
presentation
tonight.
We'll
give
you
an
overview
of
the
history
and
objective
of
the
ioc,
followed
by
the
specific
components
included
in
the
ioc
ordinance
and
then
an
overview
of
the
Luca
process.
Up
to
this
point
and
ioc
process,
I
should
say
so
for
a
quick
history.
This
work
is
necessary
to
conform.
Q
In
response
to
this,
an
interim
official
control
was
originally
adopted
by
Council
about
a
year
ago
on
in
July
of
2021,
and
then
it
was
subsequently
extended
again
in
December
under
ordinance
6637.
right
now.
It
is
set
to
expire
on
July
12th
unless
it
is
extended
tonight
and
then
should
it
be
extended
tonight,
it
will
be
replaced
by
the
permanent
Luca
upon
adoption.
Q
So
for
a
quick
overview
of
the
housing
types
addressed
in
the
house
bill
1220,
the
two
on
the
left
are
permanent,
supportive
and
transitional
housing.
These
are
meant
to
be
long-term
or
permanent
residency
for
their
occupants,
and
these
can
be
paired
with
Comprehensive
individualized
Supportive
Services.
You
know
these
are
meant
to
just
be
long-term
residential
operations.
Q
Q
As
I
noted,
this
ioc
was
adopted
in
July
of
2021
and
extended
in
December
of
2021,
and
then
should
it
be
extended
tonight
following
the
public
hearing,
it
will
be
replaced
by
the
ioc
following
its
adopt
or
sorry
it
will
be
replaced
by
the
Luca
following
its
adoption,
and
so
with
that
again,
staff
are
seeking
Council
to
hold
a
public
hearing
on
this
ordinance
and
then
following
the
hearing
adopting
the
interim
official
control
and
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you,
mayor.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
There
are
actually
two
registered
speakers
this
evening
and
then
before
I
call
names
I'll.
Let
the
public
know
that
there
is
no
set
time
limit
for
public
hearings
and
each
speaker
is
allowed
to
speak
up
to
three
minutes
and
for
the
council's
information
there
was
one
written
comment
received
for
the
public
hearing
tonight
and
that
is
included
in
your
desk
packet.
L
L
Good
evening,
everyone
regarding
the
Luca
that
you're
talking
about
I
know
there
was
concern
councilmember
Stokes.
You
said
you
didn't
want
the
legislature
to
come
back
and
say
can't
you
read
because
of
Any
amendments
or
changes
that
were
made
to
the
proposed
Luca.
L
You
were
one
of
the
mayors
that
signed
that,
as
did
most
of
them
in
this
area,
except
for
Penny
Suite
in
Kirkland
and
then
the
next
month
after
that
Patty
Cooter,
our
senator
for
the
48th
legislative
district
made
an
amendment
that
actually
made
the
overreach
on
local
planning
Authority
even
worse.
So
no
they.
They
can't
come
back
and
say
that
they
left
us
wiggle
room
in
their
room
to
make
mitigations
and
amendments
and
I
do
think.
The
things
that
have
been
proposed
were
very
responsible
and
reasonable.
L
As
I've
sat
here
through
these
meetings,
I've
heard
a
number
of
things
that
have
happened.
We
know
that
there
are
subsets
of
the
homeless
many
subsets
actually
and
that
some
are
more
appropriate
than
others
to
be
living.
You
know
in
the
neighborhoods
and
I
heard
a
lot
of
conflation
I
heard
conflation
this
last
meeting
with
Arch
units
and
Section
8
housing.
L
There
was
a
lot
of
kind
of
dramatization
about
the
question
of
density
and
and
kind
of
clustering.
There
was
the
comparison
of
the
lgbtq
service
providers
and
vets
being
in
the
same
cul-de-sac
and
I
just
feel
like.
L
We
need
to
acknowledge
that
there's
a
lot
of
talk
on
this
Council
about
Equity,
Equity,
Equity,
Equity
equity
and,
if
you're
not
going
to
stand
by
that,
if
you're
not
going
to
put
mitigations
into
to
disperse
this
permanent
Supportive,
Housing
and
transient
housing
in
the
different
areas,
please
don't
ever
talk
about
Equity
again,
you
have
to
put
your
money
where
your
mouth
is,
walk
the
talk,
please
don't
dramatize,
don't
conflate
just
do
it.
They
gave
you
the
tools.
Do
it.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you,
mistine
I
previously
said
we
had
two
pre-registered
speakers,
but
I
have
received
an
email
from
that
second
speaker
that
they
incorrectly
registered.
So
at
this
point,
that
is
the
end
of
our
list.
If
there
is
anyone
here
in
council
chambers
who
would
like
to
make
comment
during
this
public
hearing
or
joining
us
online,
please
use
the
raise
hand
function
which
is
star
nine.
If
you're
connected
with
a
phone
or
raise
your
hand
here
in
Chambers,
okay,
I
see
no
additional.
A
A
Okay
and
I'm,
going
to
clarify
again
that
this
vote
is
about
just
extending
the
current
ioc.
It's
not
about
the
permanent
land.
Coast
code
use
code,
amendment
that
we
are
going
to
be
discussing
later
this
month,
so
any
comments
or
questions
on
extending
the
temporary
ioc,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
thank
you!
So
we
are
on
to
our
study
session
items.
We
have
two
topics
tonight
I'm
going
to
ask
Mr
Miyake
to
introduce
them.
Thank.
N
You
mayor
and
council
members.
The
first
topic
is
the
city's
housing
stability
program,
also
known
as
the
city's
1590
program,
and
tonight
the
staff
are
seeking
direction
to
bring
back
legislation
at
a
future
council
meeting
to
implement
the
housing
stability
program
based
on
a
policy
framework
which
will
be
presented
to
you
this
evening.
So
joining
us
this
evening
is
our
Emil
King
assistant
director
from
the
Community
Development
Department
Tony
Esparza
assistant,
director
from
the
parks
and
human
services
department
and
joining
us
remotely
is
Lindsay
Masters.
Our
Arts
executive
director
is
Lindsay
on.
B
R
R
We
use
the
term
one
city
for
this
type
of
effort.
It's
a
true
cross-departmental
effort,
you're
going
to
hear
tonight
about
how
we,
as
a
city,
are
going
to
deliver
housing
and
needed
services
to
bellevue's
most
vulnerable
residence,
and
we
look
to
do
this
in
a
thoughtful,
effective
and
efficient
manner.
R
Staff
are
seeking
some
direction
tonight
from
Council
will
be
reviewing
the
proposed
approach
for
implementing
the
housing
stability
program
and
with
Council
concurrence
on
our
recommendation,
we'll
move
forward
with
year
two
of
implementation.
This
is
going
to
also
include
the
ongoing
staff
resources
to
be
authorized
at
an
upcoming
meeting,
and
that
is
going
to
come
out
of
the
tax
collection.
So
there's
no
competition
with
existing
resources
in
the
city.
R
Foreign,
the
agenda
for
tonight
is
going
to
include
how
the
housing
stability
program
relates
to
the
2017,
affordable
housing
strategy.
A
recap
of
implementation
during
the
first
year
in
2021,
including
a
review
of
Lessons
Learned,
our
recommended
framework
for
the
ongoing
program
and
finally,
next
steps.
R
The
housing
stability
program
does
further
a
number
of
key
areas
of
the
city's
2017,
affordable
housing
strategy.
That
strategy
contemplated
how
additional
resources
could
be
used
in
meeting
the
city's
needs,
especially
for
the
lower
income
and
vulnerable
populations.
The
affordable
housing
strategy
also
talks
about
a
Continuum
of
actions
for
affordable
housing,
and
this
program
is
really
going
to
be
able
to
address
the
affordable
housing
through
preventing
residents
from
falling
into
homelessness,
to
providing
an
array
of
targeted
housing
options
based
on
individual
needs
of
these
specific
populations.
R
R
Council
approved
a
HB
1590
local
interest
statement
in
February
of
2021,
and
that
is
included
in
your
Council
library
for
reference.
The
first
of
two
2021
rfps
were
issued,
starting
in
May
2021,
with
1.6
million
ultimately
awarded
in
August
for
Behavioral
Health
and
housing
related
Services
as
a
follow-up
in
August
2021.
We
did
a
second
RFP
for
Capital
expenditures
and
that
ultimately
resulted
in
1.6
million
for
the
life
wires,
hope
Starts
Here
project
in
Bellevue.
R
Thank
you
year,
one
was
successful
and
that
we
deployed
needed
resources
in
our
community,
but
it
also
served
as
a
really
good
learning
experience
to
set
up
our
future
program.
First
off.
We
learned
that,
with
this
Resources
with
this
resource,
we're
really
going
to
need
to
balance
the
unit,
production
and
operation
and
maintenance
of
those
buildings
with
the
general
Behavioral
Health
and
housing
related
Services.
R
The
funding
for
the
o
m
and
on-site
Services
is
essential
for
the
housing
stability
program
projects,
and
this
was
identified
by
Council
as
a
best
practice
a
number
of
times
when
you
were
discussing
Supportive
Housing,
for
example,
to
get
the
most
out
of
this
funding.
We're
really
going
to
need
to
continue
the
coordination
and
have
flexibility
to
leverage
other
resources,
the
more
we
can
partner
with
others.
The
farther
the
money
is
going
to
go
next,
the
the
capital
funding
in
year,
one
will
ramp
up
as
projects
have
more
time
to
incorporate
this
funding.
R
Continuing
with
a
couple
more
Lessons
Learned,
there
are
opportunities
for
Partnerships
such
as
preservation
of
units
and
securing
land,
and
we
hope
to
explore
these
further
in
the
future
and
based
on
the
the
staff
and
Council
interest
in
upfront
bonding.
We
will
need
to
take
some
time
to
firm
up
those
funding,
opportunities
and
projects
before
we
rush
out
and
bond
against
this
Revenue
source
and,
lastly,
it's
very
important
to
recognize
this
Revenue
source
as
a
way
to
prevent
people
from
falling
into
homelessness.
R
I
want
to
give
just
a
a
brief
review
of
the
state
enabling
law,
that's
included
in
the
in
the
RCW
Revised
Code
of
Washington
it.
It
states
that
at
least
60
percent
of
this
money
does
need
to
go
towards
facilities
and
programs
for
specific
populations,
as
listed
in
your
your
Council
memo,
and
this
can
include
both
the
construction
or
acquisition
of
properties
and
can
also
include
land
for
those
types
of
uses.
R
R
R
Now
we're
going
to
shift
into
the
proposed
framework
that
is
coming
to
council
from
staff
all
lead
things
off
and
then
hand
it
off
to
Lindsay
and
Tony
as
an
orientation.
This
is
our
stack
of
how
the
monies
are
proposed
to
be
used.
You'll
see
that
we
have
percentages
that
do
add
up
to
the
100
of
annual
revenues
and,
as
I
said,
this
is
about
10.3
million
expected
in
2022.
R
you'll
see
that
this
does
have
a
balance
between
unit
production
and
things
like
Behavioral,
Health
and
Human
Services.
So
as
we
walk
through
this
Lindsay
and
Tony
will
be
going
into
a
bit
more
detail
on
these.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
things
over
to
Lindsay
Masters,
the
executive
director
out
at
Arch.
S
Thanks
Emil,
can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
yes,
awesome!
Well,
thanks
for
allowing
me
to
participate.
Virtually
I
am
truly
excited
to
be
here
as
a
part
of
this
amazing
team
and
to
be
able
to
help
the
city
initiate
a
program.
That's
going
to
truly
be
making
significant,
ongoing
investments
in
housing,
stability
for
vulnerable
residents
in
the
community
and,
while
doing
so,
adding
to
our
long-term
permanent
supply
of
affordable
housing.
We've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
in
front
of
us
and
we're
excited
to
get
going
with
that.
S
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
all
the
work
that's
gone
into
getting
us
here
and
all
the
all
the
deeply
affordable
housing
that's
going
to
be
created
with
the
initiation
of
this
program.
The
first
area
of
the
program
that
I
want
to
talk
about
is
on
the
slide.
You
have
in
front
of
you,
and
this
investment
area
creates
a
pathway
for
the
city
to
be
able
to
deploy
up
to
40
percent
of
the
revenue
towards
timely
Capital
opportunities
and
Partnerships.
S
Potential
Investments
that
we've
discussed
and
are
eager
to
work
on
include
acquisition
of
existing
housing
already
in
the
community
to
preserve
that
affordability
for
the
communities
that
are
here
and
at
risk
of
displacement
and
potentially
buying
down
rents
to
even
more
affordable
levels.
In
addition,
we'd
be
interested
in
seeking
opportunities
to
make
significant
land
Acquisitions
that
would
enable
future
affordable
housing
development.
S
We're
excited
that
there's
some
past
successes
that
the
city
could
build
from
in
this
Arena,
particularly
including
Partnerships,
with
the
King
County
Housing
Authority,
around
preservation
and
leveraging
federal
resources
that
the
Housing
Authority
has
the
unique
opportunity
to
bring
into
the
city
as
as
compared
with
the
second
area
that
I'll
talk
about
in
a
moment.
This
is
that
first
area
I
just
want
to
mention
it
allows
the
city
also
to
be
able
to
advance
these
types
of
Investments
throughout
the
year,
not
just
on
a
once
a
year
basis.
S
An
important
addition
to
this
the
RFP
this
year
and
in
future
years,
would
be
the
ability
to
invite
proposals
for
ongoing
funding
that
would
support
the
operations,
maintenance
and
on-site
Supportive
Services
that
are
so
critical
in
the
types
of
projects
we
want
to
invest
in
this
RFP
would
be
coordinated
with
the
annual
Arch
trust
fund
round,
which
is
itself
built
on
many
years
of
coordination
with
other
local
and
Statewide
funding
programs
for
affordable
housing.
This
alignment
is
really
critical
in
helping
us
to
continue
leveraging
City
funds
for
even
greater
local
impact.
S
S
This
this
area
of
the
program
was
really
tailored
to
a
lot
of
the
stakeholder
feedback
that
City
investment
in
those
ongoing
operations
and
services
is
really
essential
to
making
sure
projects
are
going
to
be
successful.
In
supporting
ongoing
housing
stability
for
residents
with
significant
needs,
the
city
is
recommending
initially
that
Investments
can
be
made
up
to
12
500
dollars
per
unit
per
year,
with
funds
to
be
provided
through
five-year
renewable
grants.
S
This
structure
is
designed
to
recognize
that
we're
making
long-term
investments
in
these
developments
and
in
the
community
and
kind
of
consistent
with
the
long-term
requirements
that
we
would
be
imposing
through
our
Capital
Investments,
similar
to
the
first
area.
The
priorities
for
these
Capital
funds
are
consistent
with
the
overall
priorities
the
council
established
in
2021.
P
Good
evening,
council
members,
this
next
part
of
the
framework,
would
deploy
approximately
15
percent
of
the
revenues
to
behavioral
health
and
housing
related
services
that
are
not
affiliated
with
capital
funded
projects
through
this
Revenue
source.
So
this
is
similar
to
what
the
council
approved
in
2021
when
we
issued
an
RFP
as
early
wins
funding,
Behavioral
Health
Services
at
some
of
our
shelters
case
management
and
supportive
services
at
some
of
our
housing
providers,
and
also
standing
up
Behavioral
Health
Services
for
some
of
our
residents,
who
are
underserved
in
our
community.
P
So
the
recommendation
moving
forward
includes
allocating
15
percent
of
the
revenue
that
would
go
out
in
an
RFP
once
every
two
years,
similar
to
The
Human
Services
fund.
Those
recommendations
would
be
formed
for
funding
by
the
Human
Services
Commission,
relying
on
a
established
process
that
already
works
very
well
and
then
those
recommendations
would
come
to
the
commit
to
the
council
for
approval
and
would
go
out
in
two-year
contracts.
R
The
last
five
percent
of
the
annual
revenues
would
go
towards
staff
support,
so
we
looked
at
other
models
out
there
and
how
much
they
allocated
for
Administration
and
oversight
and
came
up
with
a
five
percent
number.
This
would
be
used
to
fund
a
truly
one
City
team
involving
staff
from
Community,
Development,
the
human
services
staff
and
parks
and
community
services,
and
then
our
support
that
we
received
from
Arch
as
well,
and
this
would
be
backed
by
revenues
collected
through
the
tax.
R
So
I'll
just
touch
on
next
steps
before
I
hand
it
back
to
the
mayor
or
our
immediate.
Next
steps
would
be
a
request
for
proposals
for
affordable
and
Supportive
Housing
capital
and
O
M,
and
this
would
be
with
the
rollover
money
from
year,
one
it
would
be
10.5
million
available
on
this
disco
round,
as
Tony
just
described,
we'd
have
an
RFP
for
Behavioral
Health
and
housing
related
Services
of
approximately
1.55
million,
and
we
would
to
set
up
future
bonding
discussions
continue
with
our
due
diligence
on
preservation
and
land
acquisition
opportunities.
R
In
addition,
with
Council
direction,
we
would
recruit
an
onboard
staff
to
help
run
the
housing
stability
program
and
we'd
report
back
to
council
with
our
regular,
affordable
housing
updates
and
clearly
Monitor
and
recommend
any
adjustments
as
needed
moving
forward.
So
with
that
I'd
like
to
hand
things
back
to
the
mayor,
okay,
great.
A
M
Sounds
good!
Thank
you
mayor,
first
of
all,
great
presentation,
really
precise
and
and
really
appreciate
the
the
timeliness
and
and
the
speed
in
which
we
continue
to
move
forward
on
this
I
think
the
first
year
we
we
made
some
great
progress
when
we
continued
to
do
that.
As
we've
all
said,
and
as
the
community
has
told
us,
this
is
of
utmost
concern
for
for
our
community.
M
So
I
really
appreciate
keep
keeping
this
moving
forward
and
doing
so
very
quickly
a
couple
of
quick
questions
so
and
as
a
mayor
Lew
to
being
the
liaison
to
the
Human
Services
Commission.
We
hear
time
and
time
again
the
Behavioral
Health
Services,
being
such
an
important
piece
and
one
of
the
cornerstones
of
this
is
preventing
people
from
falling
into
homelessness.
M
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
how
did
we
come
up
with
15
percent
for
this
particular
area?
Knowing
that
such
a
large
percentage
of
those
experiencing
homelessness
are
suffering
from
mental
health
issues
are
suffering
from
drug
or
substance
abuse?
Should
we
need
or
do
we
need
to
put
a
higher
priority
on
that
balanced
with
with
with
with
the
housing
piece
on
here?
But
would
love
for
you
to
speak
to
that
just
just
for
a
moment
before
I
continue
yeah.
R
R
We
did
look
at
15
and
20
percent
for
that
that
what
I'm
calling
the
Standalone
Behavioral
Health
and
Human
Services
RFP.
So
we
did
look
at
two
toggles
on
it.
We
did
land
on
the
15
percent,
but
we
did
look
at
two
options.
It
is
important
to
note
that
the
the
middle
tier
there
that's,
the
the
capital
projects
along
with
on-site
Services,
is
going
to
include
a
significant
amount
of
on-site
services
within
buildings,
so
that
is
service
dollars
that
are
coupled
with
that
Capital
project
40.
R
So
the
15
is
not
the
only
amount
of
money
that's
being
used
for
what
I'm
going
to
call
the
the
human
interface
and
interaction
with
people
who
are
in
need.
There
is
going
to
be
a
growing
amount
coming
out
of
that
that
middle
bucket,
as
Lindsay
described,
where
we're
looking
at
funding
up
to
12
500
per
unit
per
year.
If
people
can
make
case
for
needed
on-site
services
for
their
buildings
and
that
that
does
add
up
to
a
significant
amount
of
money,
as
you
kind
of
go
out
over
time,.
M
Thank
you
and
then
could
you
also
speaks
for
a
moment
about
the
targets
here,
so
on
the
on
the
bonding
for
affordable
housing,
Partnerships
and
projects,
we've
got
a
minimum
of
170
units
and
then
for
the
next
one,
we've
got
130
to
170
and
that's
under
the
capital
projects
that
you
just
mentioned
there.
Can
you
just
give
me
just
a
brief.
You
know
how
you
came
to
the
those
numbers.
R
It's
based
on
the
second,
it's
it's!
What
we
think
we
can
actually
create
with
with
that,
with
this
Revenue
source,
and
once
you
you
don't
have
the
the
Human
Service
needs,
whether
it's
in
the
building
or
the
separate
RFP
we
wanted
to
have
a
you
know.
It's
a
relatively
conservative
estimate,
we'd
able
to
un
to
over
promise
what
we
would
deliver
on
this
monies.
That's
why
it
says
minimum
amount
right.
R
The
the
things
that
relate
to
the
actual
unit
delivery
is
going
to
be
the
leverage
that
we
can
get
with
others
helping
to
invest
in
these
properties,
whether
it
be
through
the
arch,
Housing,
Trust,
Fund
or
the
private
sector,
helping
out
with
these
so
the
view,
those
as
minimums
they
are
on
par
with
the
the
King
County
program
it.
That
program
is,
as
you
might
expect,
quite
a
bit
bigger
than
our
city
alone,
and
that
was
about
1600
units.
R
So
you
know
my
math
shows
a
minimum
of
300
hundred
to
340
units,
just
in
Bellevue
over
a
20-year
period.
So
we
made
some
assumptions
about
leverage
rate
minimum.
We
would
get
and
that's
a
good
data
point.
The
construction
costs
are
are
high,
that's
that's
the
other
factor
that
goes
into
it,
but
a
great
great
question
about
how
we
came
up
with
those
great.
M
Thank
you,
and
yes,
generally
supportive
of
this
again
great
work
and
continue
to
move
this
forward
as
quickly
as
we
possibly
can
so.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
councilmember
Stokes,
followed
by
councilmember
Robertson.
Thank
you.
E
Yeah
this
is
this
is
very
exciting.
We're
getting
to
this
point
no
I'm
just
thinking
about
it's
been
five
years
since
we
put
together
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
we've
made
a
lot
of
progress
in
that,
and
you
know
I
I
like
to
say
the
end
of
the
world's
turn,
we're
not
in
2017
anymore,
and
it's
it's,
the
the
need
is
even
greater
things
are
going
faster.
We
also
have
a
lot
more
support
than
we
had
at
that
time.
E
So
I
think
a
lot
of
stuff
has
come
along
I
I,
you
know,
I
I,
think
Deputy,
mayor's
questions
are
good
and
we
know
we're
going
to
into
the
you
know
how
much
money
and
all
these
things
were
in
there
and
I
think
it's
kind
of
assuring
to
have
the
answers
and
I
do
believe
and
trust
that
and
from
everything
I
see
that
the
staff
has
done
a
tremendous
job
in
with
other
people
helping
to
get
to
these.
These
recommended
actions.
E
A
What
I'm
just
going
to
clarify
that
we're
talking
about
the
1590
money,
the
house,
bill
1590
and
the
housing
stability
program
and
not
the
affordable
housing?
First
best
steps
best
work.
E
U
Right
thanks
going
on
to
the
slide
that
has
the
buckets
there
I'm
just
going
to
start
at
the
bottom.
First
of
all,
I'm.
You
know
I'm
so
glad
that
we
opted
into
the
1590
where
we
can
really
take
this
and
and
do
some
good
with
it
and
I
was
also
pleasantly
surprised
to
see
that
the
estimated
annual
revenue
from
this
program
is
actually
growing.
We
expect
the
growing
to
continue.
I
mean
I
know
that
sales
tax
is
very
economic
dependent.
U
R
U
Well,
10
million
a
year,
I
was
thinking
20
years,
that's
200
million
dollars,
and
we
can
do
a
lot
of
good
on
that.
So
first
I
do
support
using
the
five
percent
for
the
cost
of
the
program.
I
think
that's
really
appropriate
and
I
also
support
having
the
carve
out
for
Behavioral
Health.
That
is
off-site
behavioral
health
and
I
am
glad
that
we
have
the
on-site
Behavioral
Health
baked
into
the
40
bucket
I.
U
Think
the
on-site
Services
is
a
best
practice
and
if
we're
going
to
have
Supportive
Housing
projects,
affordable
housing
projects
that
need
services
to
keep
people
housed
to
help
people
stabilize
having
them
on
site
is
really
great
and
that's
something
I
want
I
definitely
want
to
support
and
I
appreciate
that
we're
doing
a
one
City
team,
the
the
thing
I
have
a
little
heartburn
about
a
couple
of
things.
One.
We
know
that
building
housing
is
less
expensive
when
the
private
sector
does
it
than
when
the
public
sector
or
non-profits
do
it.
U
So
when
I
was
doing
a
little
math
and
at
80
of
the
200
million
160
million
dollars
over
20
years
to
build,
say
best
case
scenario,
340
units,
because
you
said
170
and
170.-
that's
470
588
dollars
per
unit
that
it
would
cost.
If
we
do
it
fully
public
sector.
So
I
absolutely
support
the
program
in
doing
the
RFP
I
understand
about
the
need
for
an
annual
RFP,
because
there's
other
sources
that
come
on
that
annual
cycle.
U
But
I
look
at
as
we
are
in
in
the
next
agenda
item.
We're
going
to
talk
about
the
next
right
work
on
helping
the
private
sector
as
well,
grow,
affordable,
housing
and
I
see
every
project
where
there's
multiple
dwelling
units
being
constructed
as
an
opportunity
and
it's
an
opportunity
to
potentially
invest
some
of
this
money
to
buy
down
affordability.
If
we
have
a
private
developer,
that's
using
mftve,
that's
using
the
affordable
housing
bonus.
U
I.
Think
that's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
then
also
enter
into
a
contract,
to
give
some
of
this
money
to
that
private
developer,
to
buy
down
permanent
affordability
to
have
the
instead
of
80
Ami,
60
or
50
Ami,
and
that
could
be
something
that
would
be
really
good
for
the
public,
because
one
you're
getting
the
disperse
dispersion
of
the
units
throughout
the
city
and
throughout
different
projects,
but
also
would
be
a
lot
less
than
the
470
000
plus
per
unit
that
we
will
pay
if
we
do
it
on
the
non-profit
government
generated.
Only
so.
U
I
would
really
like
to
see-
and
we
talked
about
this
when
I
had
my
briefing
on
this.
To
the
extent
we
don't
appropriate,
all
the
money.
Every
cycle
I'd
like
to
see
that
fund
be
able
to
be
used
in
a
Nimble
manner.
If
we
have
private
developers
building
housing
to
be
able
to
partner
with
them
to
help
them
make
the
affordable
housing
pencil
by
maybe
putting
some
Direct.
U
U
So
it
might
be
something
that
we
do
later
I,
but
I
don't
want
that
money
to
lie
fallow
in
the
meantime,
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
put
that
money
to
work
in
order
to
help
develop
more
housing
and
more
affordable
housing
across
the
city
of
Bellevue.
So
thank.
A
U
I
guess
I'll
ask
a
question:
while
you
do
that
mayor,
so
would
we,
as
we
discussed
the
potential
to
have
the
unappropriated
funding,
be
nimble
if
something
comes
up
where
we
can
invest
that
to
create
more
affordable
housing
units?
Is
that
something
that,
as
the
project
and
the
scope
and
the
different
buckets
of
money
is
presented
tonight,
that
we
would
be
able
to
do
or
do
you
need
additional
direction
from
Council
in
order
to
do
that,
because,
well,
everyone
wants
to
see
this
money
put
to
work.
U
R
The
the
top
bucket
that
was
the
preservation
and
land
acquisition
as
Lindsay
described,
that
would
be
a
an
open
process
and
it
wouldn't
have
an
RFP.
So
that's
that's
the
the
nature
of
that
top
bucket
that
we
described
the
middle
one
with
the
the
capital
RFP.
We
did
Envision
that
as
an
annual
RFP
with
the
unused
funds
rolled
over
into
the
next
year's
RFP.
R
If
there
was
Council
direction
to
reserve
any
unused
Monies
to
use
between
the
RFP
processes
that
we
would
I
guess
politely
ask
for
Council
direction
to
do
that,
because
that
wasn't
something
that
we
were
necessarily
contemplating
after
our
briefing
I.
We
did
think
about
how
to
reach
out
to
the
the
private
sector
developers
to
get
them
more
knowledgeable
about
this
RFP
process
so
that
they
could
participate
in
the
annual
process
and
be
engaged
in
that
way.
U
Okay,
well
then,
I'll
just
say:
I
I,
don't
know
what
the
rest
of
the
council
thinks
I
would
support
allowing
people
to
apply
in
between,
particularly
if
they're
they
don't
need
to
be
on
the
Stacked
Capital
public
sector
side.
I
think
that
it
would
be
a
good
way
to
continue
to
build
units
all
year
long.
C
Thank
you
I'm,
so
glad
that
this
is
in
front
of
us
I
Echo
comments
that
my
colleagues
have
already
made
specifically
about
The,
Upfront
bonding
and
really
the
word
that
you
use
was
strategic.
So
how
do
we
make
sure
we're
leveraging
opportunities,
we're
strategic,
creating
as
much
flexibility
as
possible,
so
I
support
the
instead
of
making
it
a
annual
only
on
this
date
that
we
should
be
poised
for
if
an
opportunity
shows
up-
and
it
fits
these
criteria
and
there's
money
that
we
look
at
how
we
might
support
that?
C
You
know
when
I
thought
about
last
year
we
had
25
applications
for
3.3
million
dollars
and
we
only
had
1.66
this
year.
We
have
slightly
less.
You
know.
My
sense
is
that
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
support
behavioral
health
services,
then
we
really
need
to
look
at
on
that
metal
bucket
that
40
percent.
You
know
if
there's
funding
available
and
there's
potential
Behavioral
Health
Services
being
requested,
that
we
really
need
to
look
at
how
we
might
support
that.
C
The
the
one
that
you
talked
about
on
the
proposed
framework
on
the
staff
support
of
the
five
percent
I'm.
Also
thinking
about
the
fact
that
our
community-based
organizations,
some
oftentimes,
don't
have
the
capacity.
In
fact,
last
week
the
East
Side
Human
Services
Forum
had
a
discussion
about
pay,
equity
and
uncompensated
labor,
so
I
think
that
there
is
potentially
needs
from
the
community
Human
Services
side
of
of
also
staff
support.
So
one
of
my
questions
would
be:
could
some
of
the
funding
be
used
for
that?
C
C
Can
some
of
the
funding
be
used
for
the
other
thing?
That's
going
to
be
coming
back,
which
is
our
safe
parking
program,
considerations
and
some
of
those
services.
So
some
of
my
questions
are
around
what
kind
of
flexibility
do
we
have
within
the
law
to
leverage
those
funds,
and
you
know
really,
then,
as
I
think
about
this
program.
That
gives
us
a
lot
of
flexibility.
How
do
we
make
sure
that
we
shape
it
in
a
way
that
is
a
win-win
for
both
the
city
and
the
providers
and
the
clients
we're
trying
to
serve
so?
C
What
I
mean
by
that
is?
We
might
think
about
how
those
rfps
can
be
streamlined,
the
most
efficient
and
effective.
Can
it
be
for
a
multi-year
instead
of
every
single
year
they
have
to
apply,
you
know,
can
we
so
anyway,
some
kind
of
policy
questions
related
to
how
we
might
frame
those
services
and
then,
lastly,
how
might
this
play
into
potential
grant
funding
that
might
be
available
for
988
Services,
which
would
then
be
right?
Someone
calls
into
988
we
triage
and
and
recognize
that
there's
Behavioral
Health
Services
needed.
C
R
I
said
why
don't
I
start
off
and
then
Tony
can
help
out
as
well
as
far
as
monies
towards
permanent
Supportive
Housing
as
an
example.
That
would
typically
come
out
of
that
middle
tranche
of
money,
so
that
is
I,
think
Geared
for
capital
investment
with
the
required
essential
on-site
services
and
o
m.
So
that's
where
the
support
of
Housing
and
that's
where
that
connection
can
be
made.
R
We
talked
a
bit
about
the
safe
parking
idea
and
that
would
most
likely
make
sense
to
apply
for
the
behavioral
health
and
housing
related
Services
if
they
thought
that
was
a
good
fit
for
that
RFP.
So
there
is
an
Avenue
for
things
like
that
to
apply
as
far
as
the
I
heard
a
bit
about
the
the
desire
for
some
flexibility
with
RF
RFP.
So
it
sounds
like
that
similar
to
councilmember,
Robertson's
idea
of
if
there's
unused
money
don't
sit
on
it
but
deploy
it.
R
R
There
are
some
things
to
be
thinking
about
if
you,
if
that
amount,
kind
of
yoyos
from
year
to
year,
up
and
down
and
and
Tony,
can
elaborate
on
some
of
the
expectation
management.
If
you
have
a
high
number
one
cycle
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
back
down
to
a
lower
number
and
what
that
does
for
some
of
the
the
providers.
R
And
if
you
wanted
to
respond
to
that
Tony
and
as
well
as
the
grant
funding
question
there,
yeah.
P
Absolutely
thanks
for
your
questions,
council
members
on
so
a
few
of
the
topics
that
I
heard
you
talk
about.
One
was
related
to
the
ongoing
effort
for
Human
Services
providers
to
achieve
pay
equity
for
their
Frontline
service
providers
and
1590,
or
the
housing
stability
program
will,
just
by
existence,
help
with
that
in
some
way,
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
we
already
ask
our
providers
when
they
apply
to
please
apply
for
what
you
actually
need.
P
Please
don't
temper
your
expectations
to
how
much
you
think
we
have
available,
because
of
that
our
providers
do
tell
us
the
need,
and
so,
for
example,
for
the
Human
Services
fund.
For
this
year,
we've
received
requests
in
excess
of
10
million
dollars
and
we
have
five
and
a
half
million
dollars
available.
P
So
the
council,
by
adopting
this
Revenue
Source,
has
infused
dollars
in
critical
areas
that
will
allow
that
slice
to
not
be
so
thin
and
it
will
allow
agencies
to
recreate
and
receive
funding
closer
to
what
they
request
or
for
us
to
to
more
fully
fund
agencies.
So
there's
no
quick
solution
to
get
us
there,
but
just
the
very
existence
of
this
revenue
does
help
move
us
forward.
P
As
far
as
988
I
have
heard
that
there
will
be
some
grant
funding
that
may
come
with
that
from
other
sources,
but
I
do
not
have
concrete
answers
for
you
on
that,
as
we
get
more
information.
I
can
definitely
share
that
with
you,
but
I
I
do
know
that
that
too
could
lead
to
an
infusion
in
the
community,
for
hopefully
some
additional
Behavioral,
Health
Services
and
then
to
your
point
of
the
timing
of
RFP.
So
they'll
run
a
little
different.
P
The
the
services
that
will
be
attached
with
the
capital
projects
will
get
funded
for
five
years
and
then
be
eligible
for
Renewal.
We've
recommended
at
this
point
on
the
services
side
that
it
be
once
every
two
years,
so
not
every
year,
at
least
in
the
beginning,
to
allow
us
to
coincide
with
the
same
timing
for
our
other
Human
Services
contracts.
To
your
point
of
trying
to
make
this
a
little
easier
for
our
providers,
there's
the
potential
that
down
the
road.
P
We
would
need
to
explore
with
legal,
only
issuing
one
RFP
and
then
on
the
back
side,
doing
the
work
to
evaluate
which
would
be
the
best
funded
through
the
housing
stability
program
funds
or
which,
through
the
Human
Services
fund,
again
with
the
eye
on
what
you've
suggested
of.
How
do
we
make
this
easier
for
providers
and
not
complicate
a
process
and
just
let
them
do
their
good
work
in
the
community.
Yeah.
C
P
Correct
yes,
yeah
and
so
the
last
one
that
Mr
King
brought
up
in
response
to
one
of
your
questions.
There
are
pros
and
cons
to
adding
extra
dollars
to
Human
Services
funding
as
it
becomes
available
and
then
knowing
it
won't
be
available.
The
next
time
and
while
in
the
midst
of
the
pandemic,
the
Council
made
some
great
allocations
that
responded
to
a
critical
and
Urgent,
hopefully
temporary,
need
for
the
long
term.
P
V
I'm
really
glad
to
say
that
we
took
advantage
of
the
the
you
know:
State
Bill,
to
give
us
money
that
we
choose
to
keep
it,
that
we
can
have
our
team
an
excellent
team
to
implement
this
work,
because
I
think
we
have
a
great
planning
department,
as
we
know
they
can
plan
so
well
and
they
do
a
good
job
always.
But
of
course
it's
only
you
know,
intentions
and
estimates,
and
what
this
really
needs
is
this
team
that
get
implemented
and
I
believe
we
have
a
great
team
in
place.
V
We
have
Arch
I've
always
said
that
Arch
is
a
great
successful,
proven
success
in
the
past,
with
a
regional
approach
to
really
address
the
housing
situation
and
human
situation.
You
know
human
situations
are
trust
by
our
human
services
department.
V
Unquestionably,
but
I
just
want
to
make
a
few
comments
that
we
want
to
have
like
you
know
a
councilman
Robertson
mentioned.
We
need
to
have
some
flexibility
because
it
needs
change.
You
know,
right
now
we
say
we're
on
40
year
when
15
they
went
five
percent
there
we
don't
know,
needs
change,
right,
opportunity
comes,
and
we
want
to
bond
no
question
about
it,
but
how
the
bond,
when
to
bond
what
the
bond?
That's
up
to
you,
guys
right
the
staff
we
know
over
the
years.
You
know
how
to
manage
it
again.
V
We
have
proven
success.
You
come
to
us.
We
talk
about
it,
we
say
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
That's
the
right
thing
to
do
so.
I
believe
that
it
needs
to
be
flexible,
Nimble,
and
you
know
we're
always
there
to
to
listen
to
you
to
support
you
and
I
believe
that
when
you
talk
about
whether
the
projects
can
be
done,
like
councilman
Robins
mentioned
privately
or
publicly,
if
Bobby
has
always
depend
on
the
private
side,
doing
things
even
our
Human
Services,
we
we
can't
show
with
non-profits
they
do
it.
V
Well,
we
plan
it.
We
have
a
goal,
we
set
the
targets
and
we
work
with
them,
and
if
we
do
a
job
right,
we
can
actually
increase
our
goals.
We
can
be
more
efficient,
effective
and
otherwise
we
can
always
adjust
I.
Think
that's
important,
so
I
believe
that
you
know
we
can
even
in
our
own
process,
when
we
do
it,
you
go
on
the
bill.
V
We
use
ifp
as
a
process
right
when
you
do
ifp
I
would
imagine
you
use
certain
criterias
for
contractors
and
that
we
can
learn
from
the
private
sector
right,
hopefully
that
those
programs
are
successful.
The
way
we
do
it.
The
private
sector
says
gee,
we
want
to
do
it
too.
In
that
case
we
say
well
great,
you
guys
can
do
it.
You
know
so
I
think
it's
really
a
very
symbiotic.
V
What
we
do
so
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
be
locked
down,
one
thing
or
the
other,
but
it's
we
are
setting
an
example
right
now
we're
leading
because
the
private
sector
is
not
doing
yet.
We
haven't
figured
how
to
do
it.
We're
gonna.
We
have.
We
have
to
work
through
it,
which
is
beginning
the
process,
begin
the
project
so
as
we
learn
we'll
develop
ways
that
we
can
have
everybody
working
on
it,
so
I
believe
that,
as
as
long
as
you
know,
it's
also
a
20-year
plan
right.
V
This
is
all
set
up
right
now,
you
know,
and
so
after
5
10
20
15
years
things
can
change.
So
I
really
like
the
way
you're
set
up.
I,
really
believe
in
you
guys.
We
believe
our
teams
other
thing
we
got
reasonable
amount
of
money
to
work
with,
and
if
we
do
it
well,
the
private
sector
will
take
over.
Then
we
don't
even
have
to
worry
about
money
right.
So
so
I
really
think
it's
a
great
project,
I
support
it
and
go.
Thank
you.
W
Right,
thank
you
mayor
all
right.
Thanks
for
the
presentation,
Tony
and
email,
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
this
this
is
provides
an
opportunity
for
also
we've
talked
about
Community
responder
and
crisis
response,
and
we,
as
council
members
I
mentioned.
W
Any
sort
of
grant
funding
for
community-based
organizations
which
has
come
up
that
provide
Behavioral,
Health
Services,
is
covered
by
this
framework,
but
having
staff
Behavioral
Health
Specialists,
who
can
work
closely
with
other
staff
as
part
of
crisis
response
is
not
currently
accounted
for.
Is
that
correct.
R
That
is
correct
and
we
we
looked
a
bit
at
if
there
were,
if
there
were
proposals
to
do
it.
As
a
you
know,
a
non-city
employee,
doing
it.
There
are
avenues
for
that
to
be
applied
for
so
I
think
that
would
be
most
likely
in
the
15
tranche
right
there.
R
As
far
as
having
kind
of
increasing
the
five
percent
number
and
having
what
I,
what
I
was
hearing
of
dedicated
crisis
response
staff
as
part
of
this
program,
our
I
think
our
recommendation
is
to
look
into
that
a
bit
more
and
we
are
in
a
a
budget
drafting
year
right
now
and
Council
will
be
looking
at
the
city
budget
upcoming
and
if
that
dovetails
with
any
other
ideas
in
the
city
for
providing
that
that
service
and
we
would
our
goal-
is
to
get
this
program
up
and
up
and
running
in
year
two
and
get
the
money
flowing,
and
there
I
think
there
always
is
the
opportunity
in
a
future
year
as
soon
as
next
year,
to
look
back
and
see
if
we
do
want
to
increase
that
administrative
part.
R
If
we're,
if
there
truly
is
an
unmet
need
in
the
community,
for
it
so
I
think
there's
some
options
there,
I
I,
think
staff
is
not
recommending
that
we
change
this
framework
right
now,
but
look
at
the
overall
City
budget
and
how
how
and
if
that
service
should
be
provided
at
a
city
staff
level.
W
Okay,
understood
so.
W
When
would
that
maybe
come
back
and
what
effort
would
be
required
to
be
able
to
shift
that
in
the
framework?
At
a
later
point,.
A
W
A
I
will
mirror
that
in
my
just
in
my
comments
as
well.
All
right
all
right,
thank
you
all
done.
Thank
you,
okay,
so
I'd
like
a
generous
time
here.
Please,
yes,
I
have
a
good
company,
I
I'm,
just
so
excited
about
this.
I
love,
the
name
of
it.
You
know
when
we
were
at
a
retreat.
We
put
on
preventing
homelessness
as
one
of
our
Council
values
and
this
Falls
right
into
that.
So
really
appreciate,
focusing
on
stabilizing
people's
lives
and
preventing
homelessness
and
preventing
crisis
as
much
as
we
can.
A
A
Does
it
make
sense
to
increase
the
Human
Service
fund,
or
is
that
kind
of
doing
this
or
I'm?
Just
not
sure
you
know
we
provide
more
services
with
the
15
90
money
and
they
go
through
the
Human
Service
allocation.
Are
we
dumping
it
right
into
the
fund
and
going
from
there
or
is
it
a
separate
way
of
dispersing.
P
Yeah,
thank
you
great
question
so
for
this
year.
For
sure
it
would
be
a
separate
RFP,
because
the
Human
Services
fund
RFP
was
already
issued
and
the
Human
Services
Commission
is
already
under
review
and
deliberation,
so
it
would
most
definitely
be
a
separate
RFP
if
we're
coming
back
regularly
and
we
continue
to
monitor
I
think
it's
something
we
were
going
to
evaluate
for
the
next
cycle
to
determine
again
balancing
all
interests.
P
What
accomplishes
the
goals
at
the
council
what's
best
for
providers
to
streamline
and
make
it
easier
for
them
to
apply
yet
still
making
sure
we
accomplish
the
goals
of
the
housing
stability
fund,
and
so
we
would
need
to
kind
of
balance
those
interests,
the
housing
stability
program.
These
15
do
create
new
services,
and
so
they
created
new
services
with
the
RFP
in
2021.
Those
providers
can
now
apply
to
maintain,
but
providers
that
are
currently
funded
under
the
Human
Services
fund
aren't
coming
back
to
look
for
these
funds.
P
A
N
It's
one
of
the
when
the
the
CCAP
program.
Well,
the
CCAP
program
we
were
taking
very
seriously
is
looking
at
it
for
the
my
proposed
budget
to
you,
so
I
think
we're
looking
at
alternative
funding
sources.
This
could
be
one
of
them,
as
you
mentioned,
councilmember
Parksdale,
but
more
to
come
in
the
very
near
future.
A
I
really
appreciate
the
emphasis
on
housing
preservation,
there's
so
much
value
in
that
you
take
housing
that
was
going
to
be
torn
down
and
redeveloped
and
you
retain
the
housing
you
you
keep
all
that
out
of
the
landfill
it
gets
fixed
up.
It
goes
well
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
you
keep
the
whole
Community
that's
in
there,
while
while
creating
permanently
affordable
housing.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
emphasis
on
that
council
member
Robertson
said
something
interesting.
I
know
in
our
next
discussion
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
micro
units
and
I'm.
A
You
know
there's
so
many
people
who
are
currently
homeless,
who
could
afford
individuals
could
afford
300
a
month
units
and
we
just
don't
have
those,
but
maybe
we
could
buy
micro
units
down
and
maybe
that's
something
that
we
could
think
about,
and
you
know
I'm
very
curious
in
our
next
conversation
about.
Can
we
incentivize
developers
to
put
micro
units
in
with
regular
size
a
variety
of
size
of
housing,
so
we
have
all
different
types
of
housing
in
the
same
building.
A
So,
okay
I'm
on
six
housing
connector,
that
is
a
startup
that
helps
people
find
housing,
affordable,
housing
and
I-
think
Diane
Carlson
was
going
to
get
back
to
the
people
who
asked
questions
about
that.
So
I'm
really
interested.
You
don't
have
to
tell
me
right
now,
but
maybe,
if
you
want
to
it's
up
to
you,
what
which
your
thoughts
are
on
that
if
this
could
fund
any
of
that.
X
Thank
you
mayor
good
question
and
yes,
we
do
want
to
follow
up
with
them.
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
opportunities
with
that
organization
and
they
may
also
very
well
be
eligible
for
the
15
okay.
A
Category
yeah
I
think
that's
a
great
an
asset
and
then
just
reiterating
the
quarter,
the
desire
for
a
quarterly
report
so
that
we
can
be
nimble
as
you
requested
and
kind
of
see,
what's
working
or
if
we
need
to
shift
at
all
so
that
those
are
my
comments,
so
I
think
we're
ready
for
a
motion.
M
A
Second
study
session
item:
Mr
Miyaki:
would
you
like
to
introduce
this?
Yes.
N
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
As
you
mentioned,
this
is
the
second
topic
for
your
studies.
The
second
last
topic
of
your
study
session
this
evening,
and
that
is
what
the
next
right
right
work
should
be
as
part
of
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy
and
tonight's
staff
are
seeking
Council
Direction
on
what
the
next
priority
affordable
housing
work
should
be
over
the
next
12
to
18
months.
That
would
complement
an
existing
significant
body
of
affordable
housing
work
already
underway
and
just
by
way
of
background.
N
This
work
is
consistent
with
your
adopted
Council
policy
priorities,
the
2017,
affordable
housing
strategy,
as
well
as
Council
feedback
received
earlier
this
year.
This
work
and
staff.
The
staff
recommendation-
is
also
based
on
community
feedback,
as
well
as
our
Consultants
analysis.
So
joining
us
this
evening
are
Emil
King
assistant,
director
and
Community
Development
Department
Tris,
natanis,
Consulting
attorney
from
the
development
services
department
and,
along
with
them,
is
AP
Hurd,
our
consultant
from
skipstone
and
available
for
questions
in,
in
addition
to
presenters
after
the
presentation
are
listed
as
well
as
Michael
cotterman.
R
Thank
you
for
the
introduction
city
manager,
Miyaki
and
good
evening
again,
mayor
Deputy,
Mayor
members
of
council
staff
from
Community
Development
and
development
services
are
really
excited
to
be
here
tonight,
along
with
ap
Hurd
from
skipstone
Consulting
to
present
information
on
the
affordable
housing.
Next
right
work.
R
Staff
are
seeking
direction
from
Council
tonight,
we'll
review
staff's,
recommended
actions
to
be
included
in
the
next
right
work
to
occur
over
the
next
12
to
18
months
once
they're
launched.
These
would
support
a
large
body
of
ongoing
work
that
will
review
with
you
tonight
and
other
next
right.
Work.
Ideas
that
aren't
selected
tonight
would
remain
for
future
discussion
and
consideration
by
Council.
R
The
agenda
for
not
to
for
tonight
is
going
to
include
a
bit
of
background
on
this
effort
and
its
relationship
to
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
We'll
do
a
process
overview
of
what
we've
done
over
the
past
few
months,
we'll
review
the
key
considerations
in
evaluating
these
next
right
work,
ideas,
AP
will
then
review
the
consultant
effort
and
give
some
highlights
of
her
analysis
and
findings,
and
then
trisna
will
review
the
staff
recommendations
and
next
steps.
R
A
little
bit
on
the
background
of
this
work,
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
affordable
housing
continue
to
be
a
top
priority
for
the
city
as
a
whole
and
the
city
council.
The
2017,
affordable
housing
strategy
did
provide
a
great
framework
for
implementation
over
a
10-year
period.
It
did
have
a
target
of
2500
units
or
beds
over
a
10-year
period
and
based
on
our
most
recent
update
with
you
and
even
projects
that
have
occurred
in
those
intervening
months.
R
We
are
on
track
to
exceed
that
10-year
Target,
so
we
have
about
a
little
over
2,
000,
new
or
preserved
units
or
beds
and
another
roughly
700
units
in
the
pipeline.
So
you
can
see
just
where
we're
at
now
we're
going
to
far
exceed
that
2500
Target.
So
now
really
is
an
opportune
time
to
look
at
this
this
Target
and
try
and
determine
what
should
be
the
next
right
work
over
the
next
12
to
18
months.
R
At
the
at
the
center
of
the
past,
few
months
of
work
has
really
been
this
stakeholder
engagement
process.
We
heard
some
positive
feedback
during
oral
comments,
as
well
as
written
communication
regarding
our
efforts
to
engage
the
stakeholders
out
there.
This
has
provided
a
great
opportunity
to
review
past
current
and
new
ideas
and
what
might
make
sense
for
Bellevue.
They
generally
fall
into
three
topical
areas
that
do
complement
one
another,
there's
a
set
about
generating
new
revenues
for
affordable
housing,
increasing
unit
production
for
housing
and
affordable
housing,
and
then
streamlining
permits
and
procedures.
R
R
This
is
the
graphic
that
trisna
and
I
used
on
March
the
21st
during
our
Council
visit
on
the
the
land
use
planning
initiative,
work
plan
for
2022
and
2023,
it's
noteworthy
to
point
out
a
number
of
initiatives
that
relate
to
housing
and
affordable
housing
that
are
already
underway
or
were
both
recently
launched
as
well.
The
comp
plan
periodic
update
is
a
very
large
body
of
work
underway
and
will
have
a
number
of
community
discussions
regarding
housing,
typologies
and
affordability
across
the
city.
R
We
also
have
the
C1
phase
two
work
that
is
looking
at
additional
development
capacity
for
housing
and
faith-based
properties
in
the
single-family,
Zone
and
trisna,
and
the
development
services
team
are
also
working
through
the
emergency
housing
Supportive
Housing
Luca
as
council
is
well
aware
of
the
next
right
work
during
that
presentation
to
council
put
an
estimate
of
about
two
to
four
additional
initiatives
that
could
occur
alongside
this
large
body
of
ongoing
work
that
the
staff
was
doing.
R
I
want
to
take
a
moment
just
to
walk
through
the
overall
process.
We
took
with
the
ideas
for
potential
actions
that
the
council
could
give
us
Direction
on
I.
Have
this
listed
out
as
a
step
one
through
five
there
in
the
middle
of
this
this
slide
here
we
we
started
back
in
our
stakeholder
Outreach
with
46
ideas,
and
this
was
really
a
combination
of
previous
technical,
Advisory,
Group
ideas
from
the
original,
affordable
housing
strategy.
It
had
some
ideas
from
Council
included,
Community
ideas
and
then
other
examples
from
from
other
cities.
R
So
that
was
the
initial
46
ideas
indicated
in
in
box
one
there.
During
the
stakeholder
engagement
process,
we
added
roughly
nine
or
ten
new
ideas,
so
that
brought
us
up
to
about
55
ideas
that
were
discussed
and
contemplated,
and
in
step
three
AP
took
the
the
55
ideas
and
looked
at
some
of
the
the
considerations
and
her
expertise
as
a
strategist
to
come
up
with
what
we're
calling
the
top
16
ideas
and
we'll
we'll
get
to
those
in
a
in
a
number
of
minutes.
R
In
the
presentation
and
tonight
you
will
see
staff's
recommended
four
actions
that
are
part
of
the
top
16.
It
is
important
to
note
that
there's
a
number
of
items
on
the
top
16
list
that
we
are
doing
right
now
as
part
of
things
like
the
comprehensive
plan
periodic
update
step
five
in
this
or
excuse
me
step.
R
Four-
is
Council
actually
giving
us
Direction
on
what
you
view
as
the
best
next
right
work
to
to
move
forward
with
it's
important
to
note
as
well
that
any
ideas
that
were
brought
up,
discussed
contemplated
during
this
effort
are
not
lost
ideas.
So
all
these
ideas
could
be
brought
back
at
a
future
time
for
Council
discussion
and
prioritization,
as
as
you
see
fit.
R
I
also
did
want
to
note
one
idea
that
that
council
did
discuss
on
May
the
9th
when
we
launched
the
C1
phase
two
effort.
We
do
have
additional
information
tonight
that
we're
happy
to
share
with
the
council
at
the
end
of
this
presentation.
It's
one
that
did
not
make
the
top
16
list,
but
there
could
be
an
adjustment
to
an
already
launched
project
that
might
meet
some
Council
priorities
for
modifying
that
C1
phase:
two
work.
If
Council
would
like
to
discuss
that
I'll
be
ready
for
that.
R
This
is
the
list
of
considerations
that
were
given
to
AP
during
her
her
analysis,
she'll
go
into
a
bit
more
detail
when
she
gets
to
her
slides,
and
these
are
both
a
combination
of
Standalone
and
in
some
ways,
Consolidated
measures
that
AP
took
the
liberty
of
thinking
through
how
we
can
look
at
this
whole
range
of
considerations.
Think
about
things
like
the
opportunity
cost
between
doing
different
things
and
come
up
with
a
set
of
ideas
for
Council
consideration
in
the
top
16..
R
So
with
that,
I
am
going
to
hand
it
over
to
AP.
Hurd
I
want
to
thank
her
for
helping
us
out.
We've
we're
constantly
trying
to
expand
our
our
staff
capacity
to
do
things
and
it's
great
to
be
able
to
hire
Consultants
to
come
in
and
and
help
us
get
more
work
done
in
a
short
amount
of
period
and
really
focus
on
engaging
our
stakeholder
community
and
having
some
strategic
thinking
about.
What's
going
to
be
best
for
the
city
of
Bellevue,
moving
forward
so
hand
it
over
to
AP.
Y
The
big
one
yeah
thanks,
Emil
hello,
council
members,
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
with
you
thanks
for
engaging
me
to
help
you
and
the
city
think
through
some
of
these
strategies.
Y
You'll
see
on
this
slide
a
little
bit
of
an
outline
of
what
I'm
going
to
go
over.
Some
of
it.
Emil
has
already
covered
so
I'll
try
to
skip
through
some
of
those
parts,
but
I
wanted
to
start
out
a
little
bit
by
describing
the
stakeholder
engagement
process.
Y
We
reached
out
to
a
really
broad
group
of
stakeholders.
You
can
see
in
the
right
hand,
column
who
some
of
those
are,
and
we
realized
in
mid-may
that
we
were
underrepresented
on
the
last
three
groups
in
that
bullet
list,
and
so
in
order
to
have
more
representative
input,
we
actually
did
an
Outreach
survey
and
we
conducted
four
more
workshops
to
reach
out
to
these
groups.
Y
We,
we
did
ask
a
question
in
our
little
survey
to
try
to
find
other
people
whether
there
were
folks
who
wanted
to
live
in
Bellevue
and
couldn't
afford
to,
and
we
got
at
least
one
response
like
that.
But
it
was
noteworthy
that
among
the
single-family
homeowners
who
responded
to
that
survey,
I
don't
think
any
of
them
had
bought
their
first
home
in
the
last
five
years,
which
is
sort
of
speaks
to
the
price
point
and
the
challenge
of
getting
into
this
market.
Y
For
people
who
are
younger
because
we
were
reaching
out
to
such
a
broad
range
of
stakeholders.
We
actually
had
a
couple
of
different
Outreach
tools.
I'll
show
them
on
the
next
page,
but
one
of
them
was
a
more
open-ended
question,
worksheet
to
ask
people
about
the
needs
and
priorities
that
they
saw
both
for
subsidized,
affordable
housing
and
for
overall
housing
Supply,
and
it
also
asked
people
a
little
bit
about
their
experiences,
whether
they
had
suffered
from
housing
shortage
or
not.
But
what
they
observed
is
some
of
the
challenges
facing
the
city.
Y
The
other
Outreach
tool
that
we
had
was
a
list,
as
Emil
said,
of
about
46
strategies
that
are
generally
kind
of
implemented
in
different
cities
across
the
U.S
and
there
there
we
did
provide
space
for
people
to
contribute
additional
strategies
on
that
list
and
also
in
the
open-ended
questions.
People
contributed
additional
ideas
and
strategies
which
we
also
evaluated.
Y
So
you
can
see
here,
this
is
just
a
little
snippet
of
the
worksheet.
That
was
actually,
on
the
left
hand,
one
more
space
to
answer
the
questions,
but
you
can
see
there
was
some
sort
of
visual
questions
about
scale,
some
questions
about
the
the
need
and
the
orientation
towards
transit
or
not,
and
what
people
saw
as
the
barriers
and
strategies
and
then
on
the
right.
Y
You
can
see
the
this
is
the
list
of
all
some
just
a
snippet
of
the
list
of
strategies,
but
one
of
the
things
that
was
quite
fun
here
is:
we
gave
people
a
chance
to
say
not
just
what
they
liked,
but
what
they
didn't
like,
and
that
was
helpful
to
us
in
understanding,
not
just
where
there
was
things
that
people
supported,
but
also
where
there
was
relatively
strong
consensus,
because,
of
course,
when
you
know
what
some
people
like,
you
might
have
something
that
some
people
like
a
lot
but
then
there's
also
a
set
of
people
who
really
dislike
it,
and
so
those
were
things
that
we
were
considering.
Y
Y
Okay,
so
Emil
touched
on
this,
but
where
did
these
ideas
come
from?
So
some
of
them
were
things
that
staff
there
was
a
list
of
about
10
items
that
staff
brought
to
the
process.
There
was
also
other
items
that
that
had
been
discussed
in
other
parts
of
the
Bellevue
process,
though
not
necessarily
part
of
the
next
right
work,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
thought
is.
Y
If
we're
going
to
do
this
big
Outreach
effort,
we
should
ask
you
know
people
in
the
community
that
may
be
hard
for
them
to
understand
like
where
does
this
slot
into
the
city
staff's
processes,
the
seleucas,
this
a
comp
plan
change
for
most
people
in
the
community?
They
just
think
like
I,
want
to
give
you
Direction
about
what
I'd
like
to
see.
You
can
slot
it
in
wherever
you
want.
Y
Some
of
the
ideas
were
proposed
by
Council.
There
was
definitely
a
handful
of
them
that
came
by
email,
I,
think
verbally
to
staff,
and
so
we
added
those
in
and
participants
as
I
mentioned
added
in
some
of
them.
This
is
I
think
this
is,
you
know,
not
a
concluding
slide,
but
to
me
this
is
a
really
important
slide.
Y
Changing
how
we
do
things
to
get
a
different
result
is
always
difficult,
and
it's
really
difficult,
because
people
love
what
is
today
and
they
cannot
possibly
love
something
that
doesn't
exist
yet
and
so
I
think
one
of
the
very
challenging
things
for
you
as
city
councilors
is
you
have
to
bring
people
along
to
love
things
that
are
different
than
what
they've
known
in
the
past?
Y
The
reason
that
we
have
challenges
around
housing
in
the
Pacific
Northwest
is
because
we
have
had
policies
for
70
years
that
restrict
the
supply
of
housing
in
right.
After
the
second
world
war
in
1945,
there
were
homes
built
in
Mountlake
Terrace
that
were
five
thousand
dollars
each.
They
were
built
out
of
CMU,
which
is
concrete
mechanical
units.
Y
They
had
two
bedrooms,
they
had
a
bathroom,
they
had
a
little
yard
and
if
you
inflate
that
all
the
way
to
today's
dollars
using
all
kinds
of
inflationary
indexes,
you
get
to
a
price-
that's
somewhere
around
two
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars.
So
if
houses
increased
in
value
just
the
same
as
everything
else,
they
wouldn't
cost
as
much
as
they
do
today.
They
cost
about
five
times
more
than
that
in
Bellevue
right
now,
and
so
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
reasons
we
got
to
where
we
are
and
then
I
think.
Y
Y
They
spend
their
whole
day
trying
to
find
a
place
to
shower.
There
are
people
who
are
commuting
for
two
hours
a
day,
each
way
like
four
hours
total
to
get
to
their
jobs
in
Bellevue,
and
there
are
women,
and
there
were
four
of
them
who
brought
this
up.
Who've
had
to
quit
their
jobs
who've
had
to
quit
their
jobs
because
they
cannot
get
around
and
get
back
to
their
child
care
in
time
to
pick
up
their
children
with
all
of
the
distance
that
they
have
to
cover.
Y
So
the
human
consequences
of
an
action
here
are
I,
just
I
want
to
highlight
them,
because
so
often
we
talk
about
equity
and
we
talk
about
community
and
access,
and
we-
and
we
forget
that,
like
this
rule
here-
is
super
hard
on
people.
Okay,
the
there
was
some
places
where
there
was
unbelievable
consensus
in
this
work.
That
was
huge
support
for
a
housing.
Levy
I
was
really
surprised
across
the
board
that
even
like
with
the
business
groups
and
the
the
individuals,
there
was
a
few
homeowners
that
didn't
support
it.
Y
But
there
was
a
lot
of
consensus
around
that
people,
rated
the
problem
as
severe
or
very
severe.
There
was
strong
support
for
additional
density
around
Transit,
not
not
people
saying
that
everything
had
to
be
about
Transit,
but
about
75
percent
of
new
capacity
on
Transit,
which
is
great
because
you
guys
have
six
brand
spanking
new
Transit
stations
that
are
about
to
open,
and
so
the
mobility
capacity
is
there
to
support
that
growth.
Y
One
of
the
things
that
was
that
I
mentioned
before
is
that
we
were
trying
to
understand
not
just
where
there
was
a
lot
of
support,
but
where
there
was
a
lot
of
a
high
level
of
consensus
around
that
support,
which
is
that
makes
things
sense.
It's
a
little
different
thing
right.
A
high
support
is
a
high
average
score
and
a
high
degree
of
consensus
is
the
same
for
all
you
Mathies
out
there
as
a
low
standard
deviation.
Y
It
means
all
your
answers
are
grouped
around
that
thing,
so
that
was
pretty
important,
because
obviously
it's
easier
to
do
things
where
there's
support
and
consensus
around
that
the
other
thing
that
we
did
in
addition
to
just
kind
of
looking
at
the
ratings
that
people
gave
things.
We
use
this
thing
called
natural
language
processing,
which
is
when
you
look
at
verbal
responses
and
then
you
sort
of
tally
up
which
things
are
coming
up,
frequently,
which
themes
are
coming
up
frequently,
so
that
you
can
take
qualitative
data
and
give
it
some
kind
of
quantitative
meaning.
Y
So
we
we
use
that
as
well
out
of
the
about
56
total
strategies,
which
was
the
46.
We
started
with
plus
about
10
more
that
were
articulated
several
times
by
participants,
so
out
of
the
56,
we
whittled
it
all
the
way
down
to
16.
Y
and
so
to
me
the
it's
important
to
realize
that,
like
when
you
make
a
bundle
of
16,
which
was
kind
of
my
job
as
the
consultant.
That's
kind
of
what
I
handed
back
to
the
staff
you're
trying
to
find
things
that
have
high
consensus
and
high
support
and
that
sort
of
are
balanced,
so
balanced
in
the
sense
of
like
there's
things
that
need
revenue
and
there's
things
that
generate
Revenue.
Y
There's
things
that
tax
new
development,
but
there's
also
things
that
ask
the
community
to
provide
broad
support,
there's
things
that
are
helpful
to
increase
production
and
then
there's
things
that
are
helpful
specifically
to
affordable
housing
providers,
so
that
16
was
kind
of
a
a
balanced
list
and
I
also
I
know.
This
is
an
eye
chart.
Okay
and
I'm
I
tried
and
tried
to
figure
out
a
way
not
to
do
this
slide
as
an
eye
chart.
Y
But
I
wanted
to
kind
of
highlight
for
you
that
the
columns
at
the
top
here
are
the
criteria
that
the
council
provided
to
Emil
the
last
time
he
presented
about
three
months
ago,
so
you
guys
had
asked
us
to
come
up
with
recommendations
that
considered
geographic
distribution.
So
you'll
see
there.
We
thought
about
things
that
could
happen
everywhere,
things
that
could
happen
near
Transit
things
that
could
happen
in
single-family
zones.
You
asked
us
to
consider
rental
and
ownership,
and
we
came
up
with
a
balanced
list
that
considered
rental
and
ownership.
Y
You
asked
us
to
consider
different
Ami
levels,
including
things
that
were
more
deeply
affordable
and
things
that
were
missing
middle
or
Workforce
housing.
You
asked
about
speed
of
entitlement
and
construction,
things
that
increased
the
ability
to
attract
Capital
things
that
increase
Equity
outcomes
and
sustainability
outcomes.
Y
So
I'm
happy
to
come
back
and
answer
questions
about
this
later.
If
there
are
any
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
trisna
who's
now
going
to
talk
about
how
staff
took
this
and
then
brought
it
down
to
four
strategies
and
you'll
see
these
same
strategies
on
trisner
slide.
It's
formatted
quite
differently,
but
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
reassure
you.
So
you
can
follow
the
breadcrumbs
that
the
next
page
has
the
same
16
strategies
just
color
coded
differently.
Z
Z
All
the
colors
are
different,
so
let
me
take
a
moment
to
just
format
you
to
this
table
and
then
to
orient
them
those
watching
also
to
this
table.
So,
on
the
left
hand,
column,
which
is
the
next
right
work
actions.
Those
are
the
top
16.
So
there
are
16
items
on
this
list
and
they
are
categorized
into
the
three
categories
that
Emil
spoke
of
earlier.
So
that's
the
white
font
with
the
black
background.
The
first
category
are
those
that
would
generate
revenue
for
affordable
housing.
Z
So
with
that,
as
you
can
see,
most
of
the
items
fall
within
that
middle
category
of
producing
housing
and
or
affordable
housing
units.
So
in
terms
of
the
columns
on
the
right
hand,
side
there
are
three
columns.
The
first
one.
That's
currently
highlighted
orange
one
shows
how
we've
rated
how
these
actions
would
impact,
how
impactful
they
are.
So
we
kept
the
ratings
fairly
simple,
low,
medium,
high
and
they're,
really
just
intended
to
give
you
a
sense
of
how
these
actions
would
perform
relative
to
each
other.
Z
The
second
column,
that's
now
highlighted.
Also
this
one
is
the
amount
of
effort.
We
believe
that
we
would
take
to
accomplish
each
of
these
actions,
and
this
effort
includes
the
science
staff
working
on
it
as
well
as
managers,
other
departments,
staff,
city
managers,
office,
Etc,
all
the
way
to
Planning
Commission
and
the
city
council,
and
certainly,
very
importantly,
the
the
members
of
the
public
who
wishes
to
participate
and
who
would
want
to
participate
in
these
in
giving
us
feedback
and
input
on
these
actions.
Z
The
ratings
here
are
also
low,
medium
high,
where
we
just
wanted
to
again
give
a
sense
of
how
many
of
these
we
can
complete
in
the
as
part
of
next
right
work,
so
the
next
12
to
18
months
and
then
the
last
column
here
shows
if
that
action
is
already
part
of
ongoing
or
scheduled
work
and
there's
a
yes
or
no
in
this
column,
so
where
an
action
is
part
of
ongoing
or
scheduled
work.
That's
part
of
the
2022-23
work
plan
that
Emil
just
walk
us
through
just
a
little
bit
ago.
Z
There
are
four
that
we've
highlighted
in
yellow,
and
these
are
our
recommended
actions
for
next
right
work.
So
the
first
is
commercial
linkage
fees.
The
second
is
to
eliminate
barriers
for
micro
Apartments.
The
third
is
to
allow
higher
density
for
residential,
so
you
can
really
encourage
residential
development
and,
fourth
is
to
reduce
permit
fees
for
affordable
housing.
Z
So
after
your
discussion
tonight,
we
are
looking
for
direction
from
Council
to
conduct
scoping
and
do
some
pre-launch
work
on
those
next
right
work
items
that
are
selected
and
we
will
return
to
council
with
that
additional
information
and
to
formally
launch
these
actions
at
that
time.
If
any
of
these
actions
are
determined
to
not
be
feasible
either
to
timing
or
scoping
concerns
or
issues,
then
we'll
want
to
swap
those
out
with
another
one,
that's
on
the
docket
list.
Z
A
E
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
guess
you
know
what
I'm
going
to
talk
about.
E
You
know
this
is
as
I
said.
This
is
something
we
started
worked
on
for
a
long
time
going
back
even
before
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
and
it
was,
it
was
identify
his
strategies,
not
plans
to
be
stuck
on
the
shelf
and,
and
we
agreed
at
that
time,
we
knew
we
had
to
do
things
quickly
and
work
on
it
and
five
years
later,
it's
gotten
probably
quadrupled
the
pressure
on
that,
and
so
I'm
really
excited
to
see
this
moving
forward.
E
I
want
to
get
something
straight,
that
I
think
just
I,
don't
know
if
it's
dawned
on
everybody,
because
we're
still
looking
at
this,
as
we
have
four
things
we
are
promoted,
are
picked
to
work
on
now.
The
reality
is,
is
I
understand
this
just
so.
We
all
know
that
the
consultant
report
and
and
the
top
16
ideas
we're
not
just
saying
we're
going
to
do
four
things
now
and
these
others
we'll
get
to
later.
E
R
Yes,
that
is
correct.
The
the
yellow
items
are
the
the
new,
the
new
items
that
we
weren't
currently
working
on,
and
then
we
do
have
a
series
of
existing
things
that
we're
doing
as
part
of
the
Bell
red
look
forward
or
comprehensive,
planned
periodic
update
as
examples.
AA
R
There
are,
there
are
five:
there
are
five
things
on
the
list
that
are
not
recommended
to
move
forward
right
now.
So
if
you
take
the
full
16
there's,
what
is
it?
Three?
Four
five
six
plus
the
4
gets
us
up
to
11..
So
we
have
a
series
of
green
labeled
things
that
are
ongoing
work
right.
The
four
that
are
the
next
drive
work
and
then
there
are
a
handful
that
are
not
moving
forward
right
now,.
E
Yeah
and
well
yeah
the
ones
that
are
green,
and
so
the
green
and
yellow
so
I
mean
I.
Think
that
helps
a
lot
in
terms
of
looking
at
this,
and
that
that
gives
me
a
lot
a
lot
more
hope
that
we're
on
a
path
that
is
really
going
to
make
a
difference
and
I.
E
You
know
the
mayor
mentioned
earlier:
the
numbers
we
talk
about
the
numbers
of
housing,
we've
had
we've
done
and
we
knew
back
in
2017
that
2000
new
houses
was
I
mean
it
was
a
lot
more
than
we
were
doing,
but
we
knew
that
wasn't
adequate
at
all.
So
and
obviously
the
changes
we
have
here
in
the
last
five
years
has
really
made
us
cognizant
of
what
we
really
need
to
do.
In
the
end,
the
legislature
has
done
a
pretty
good
job
of
saying.
Okay,
you
need
to
step
up.
E
This
is
a
it's,
not
just
the
city
of
Bellevue
problem.
It's
not
just
a
regional
problem,
it's
not
a
county
problem.
It's
a
state
problem
all
together!
So
I
think
this
is
a
it's
really.
An
amazing
piece
of
work
and
I
noticed
that.
Y
So
had
very
high
support
and
a
high
level
of
consensus,
like
I,
said
before
I'm
the
risk
of
diving,
a
tiny
bit
into
tax
policy,
a
housing
Levy
if
you're
trying
to
raise
money
to
subsidize,
affordable
housing,
a
housing,
Levy
peanut,
butters
that
Capital
raising
that
tax
raising
over
the
existing
tax
base
and
something
like
inclusionary,
zoning
or
or
commercial
linkage
fee
says.
Okay,
any
new
development
is
going
to
pay
for
those
things
and,
in
particular
the
renters
who
live
in
buildings
that
have
inclusionary
zoning.
Y
The
higher
rent
for
the
market
rate
units
and
those
multi-family
buildings
will
help
subsidize
the
subsidized
units
in
those
buildings.
So
it's
targeting
a
narrower
segment
and
that's
just
a
sort
of
tax
policy
decision,
but
I
would
say
that
the
housing
Levy
had
quite
broad
support,
and
there
was
quite
a
lot
of
support
in
some
of
the
comments
for
something
along
the
Seattle
model.
Like
people
wrote
in,
do
something
like
the
Seattle
model.
It
works
very
well.
E
Yeah
I
mean
it
is
complicated
a
little
bit
by
the
fact
that
we're
working
on
a
Parks
Levee
coming
up
right
now
this
year,
but
that's
encouraging
to
know
that
down
the
line.
The
community
and
people
seem
to
support
that
part,
because
the
money
is
is
just
a
huge
part
of
this
and
it
doesn't
grow
on
trees,
so
unless
you're
harvesting
a
forest
or
something
but
any,
I
I
in
terms
of
questions
I,
think
you've
laid
this
out
very
well
and
I,
really
and
I.
E
Think
the
process
that
you
set
up
for
this
is
is
excellent
and
I
think
I
mean
this
is
a.
This
is
really
a
policy
issue,
not
just
a
well.
We
should
do
this
versus
this
and
what
are
the
details
and
all
that,
because
I
think
you've
set
that
out
very
well
and
I'm
I
would
be
ready
to
go
if
all
we
were
voting
on
was
the
the
things
in
yellow
I'm
absolutely
support
those
and
I
support
it
even
more.
E
M
Oh,
thank
you
mayor
boy,
a
lot
of
questions
and
comments
on
this
one
and
thank
you,
first
of
all,
so
much
for
the
great
work
and
the
effort
of
this
presentation.
M
A
lot
of
good
stuff
here,
but
I
do
have
a
couple
of
very
specific
questions
regarding
some
of
the
key
things
on
here,
so
so
number
one
based
on
some
feedback
that
we've
got
I
believe
from
multiple
parties
regarding
the
commercial
linkage
fees.
So
before
this
actually
came
back
to
us.
Did
you
check
with
legal
to
see
if
this
was
something
that
we
could
even
consider
at
this
time?
M
Or
is
this
something
that
might
be
dead
on
arrival
and
even
if
we
did
want
to
investigate
it
and
we
might
not
be
able
to
do
it
due
to
state
or
federal
law?
Is
that
is
that
something
that
we've
already
looked
at
or
not
yeah.
R
I
can
speak
on
behalf
of
staff
and
saying
that
we
have
not
done
that
more
rigorous
review
with
our
internal
City
attorney's
office,
so
that
that
would
be
something
we
would
want
to
do
and
come
back
with
some
more
information
for
a
council
before
that
were
actually
initiated
as
a
as
a
effort
from
the
from
the
city
council.
So
there
I
think
there's
the
seat
of
an
idea
here.
R
We
did
rank
well
in
in
ap's
stakeholder
process
and
was
part
of
the
top
16,
but
we
particularly
that
one
based
on
some
public
comments
and
knowledge
of
how
other
cities
have
done
it.
There
is
definitely
some
City
Attorney
office
interface.
We
still
need
to
do
on
that.
One.
Okay,.
M
So
some
public
comments.
So
that
gets
me
one
other
question,
because
we
were
talking
about
the
different
stakeholders
and
and
if
you
watch
any
of
these
meetings,
you
always
know
them
asking
about
Outreach,
and
you
specifically
mentioned
AP
that
you
didn't
hear
a
lot
from
homeowners
and
renters.
You
had
to
go
out
again,
I'm
concerned
that
so.
M
Said
the
bottom
three,
which
was
renters
homeowners
and
Renters
of
affordable
housing.
Y
R
Heavily
populated
by
that
group,
but
also
supplemented
with
some
others,
so
we
worked
with
our
you
know:
internal
lists
of
engaged
residents
out
there
and
start
had
a
starter
list
and
and
engaged
them,
and
then,
as
AP
said,
there
was
some
some
need
for
follow-up
during
our
pretty
targeted
window
to
get
the
Outreach.
Y
To
add
a
little
bit
more
color
to
that
when
the
neighborhood
leaders
came
almost
all
of
them
self-identified
as
having
lived
here
for
18
years,
25
years,
40
years,
which
is
absolutely
an
important
constituency.
But
we
realized
that
in
that
group
we
didn't
have
relatively
recent
arrivals
or
relatively
newer
homeowners,
which
seemed
important
as
well.
M
Gotcha,
okay,
thank
you
and
then
the
next
question
I
had
was
so
on
the
top
16
here.
So
there
were
a
couple
here:
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
this
or
a
couple
here
that
seem
to
check
all
the
boxes
right
so,
for
example,
encourage
townhouse,
Row,
House,
Development
stars.
All
the
way
across
didn't
make
it
into
the
staff
recommended
now.
Is
that?
Because
that
work
is
supposedly
already
being
done
through
the
comp
plan.
R
Yeah,
the
the
townhouse
Row
House,
the
some
of
the
other
ones
in
that
middle
category
really
fit
the
comprehensive
plan
work
that
we're
doing.
We
are
on
the
schedule
to
come
back
to
give
an
update
on
growth
Concepts
to
Council
on
the
end
towards
the
end
of
this
month.
So
we
viewed
a
lot
of
those
as
really
integrated
into
the
work
that
we're
doing
on
the
Periodic
Plan
update
and
probably
made
most
sense
to
keep
part
of
that.
M
Okay,
but
what
I'm
hearing
from
you,
then,
is
that
the
plan
is
to
complete
and
I
guess:
Implement
those
code
changes
necessary
to
address
all
the
ones
in
in
green,
correct
as
part
of
the
adoption
of
the
comp
plan,
the.
R
Comp
plan
focuses
on
the
policy
work.
The
code
typically
is
a
step
that
happens
after
the
policy,
so
the
the
code
is
not
adopted
at
the
same
time.
It
typically
is
a
follow-up
effort,
we're
happy
to
give
more
information
on
the
exact
timing
of
those,
but
for
for
a
number
of
those
green
ones
in
the
middle
category.
There's
significant
policy
work
that
that
does
need
to
happen
before
we
go
out
and
and
actually
do
the
code
work
on
those
got
it
so
hopefully
that
helps
Deputy
Mayor.
M
M
You
know
a
lot
of
great
ideas,
a
lot
of
great
potential
policy
options
here,
I
look
forward
to
coming
back
quarterly
and
and
the
next
time
when
we
have
a
chance
to
weigh
in
even
further
after
you've
done
some
further
due
diligence
on
these
seeds
of
of
ideas
have
a
chick
like
all
the
ones
that
start
with
either
encourage
or
incentivize
I.
M
Think
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
best
things
that
we're
doing
right
now
to
create
affordable
housing
in
our
city,
mfte
program
is
probably
on
the
top
of
the
list,
and
everyone
is
taking
advantage
of
that
in
terms
of
developers
are
taking
advantage
of
that.
So
that's
what
I'm
looking
for
and
encouraging
here
as
much
as
much
as
possible,
but
again
great
presentation,
really
making
some
great
progress
here.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah
I
really
appreciate
this
work
very
clear,
I'm,
going
to
ask
some
questions
and
and
do
some
asks
as
well
on
work
that
we're
already
doing
I
I,
don't
want
to
add
anything,
that's
going
to
delay
or,
but
you
mentioned
about
the
church
properties
that
we
could
tweak
that
a
little
without
causing
any
delay
or
take
or
supplanting
anything.
So
the
first
one
is
when
we
did
East
Maine.
A
R
I'll
hand
that
over
to
trisna
and
Liz-
and
you
can
talk
about
any
process
to
do
the
deed
and
lieu
idea.
O
Could
be
some
be
something
code
initiative,
as
we
start
to
kind
of
figure
out
how
to
implement
that.
We
do
not
currently
have
it
in
any
of
our
codes
where
we
have
fee
and
loose
systems,
but
especially
with
Wilburton
and
then
also
the
Bel
Red.
Look
forward
our
two
opportunities
where
we
may
be
able
to
review
that
more
in
depth
and
put
that
into
the
code
as
we
move
forward.
Yeah.
A
AA
I
think
that's
something
that
we
can
check
with
the
legal
department
on
and
just
see
what
would
be
involved
in
doing
that,
because
it
is
essentially
the
same
as
the
fee
in
Lewis.
Just
another
way
of
transferring
that
right
into
a
system,
but
I
think
we'd
be
looking
at
some
type
of
a
code.
Change
would
not
necessarily
be
a
policy
change
yeah,
but
we'll
look
at
it
in
the
context
of
the
other
work
that
we're
doing
as
well
and
talk
to
legal
and
just
see
what
might
be
involved
in.
A
That,
okay,
thank
you
in
the
yellow
recommendation,
one
of
the
top
before
allow
higher
far
for
residential
or
unlimited
blah
blah
blah
I
would
like
to
look
at
that
in
all
our
growth
areas,
including
downtown
I,
don't
know
if
you
already
were
going
to
include
downtown
for
that.
But
I
would
like
to
see
that
council
members
on
when
we
had
the
church
property
conversation
talked
about
expanding
the
distance
from
Tod
or
from
transit
to
five
or
a
thousand
feet
and
I'm
interested
in
looking
at
500
feet.
A
Expanding
that
I
know
it's
going
to
the
Planning
Commission
I.
Don't
know
that!
That's
going
to
be
a
big
deal
to
increase
that
distance,
that
we
allow
the
church
properties
to
take
advantage
of
the
development,
but
I'd
like
to
do
it
to
500,
because
as
we
get
further
into
the
neighborhoods,
I'm
really
excited
about
the
option
to
incentivize,
affordable
senior,
housing
and
I.
Think
that's
a
longer
discussion
and
I
think
that
that's
I
want
that
to
go
through
a
whole
process,
so
I'm
not
asking
for
that.
A
But
let's
see
number
four:
the
reducing
the
permit
feeds
for
affordable
housing.
Oh
don't
know!
Excuse
me,
it
was
the
commercial
linkage
fees
do
we
have
like
if
that,
if
somebody
comes
back
and
says
you
just
can't
do
that,
I
don't
expect
we
will,
but
if
they
did
do
you
have
an
alternate
to
put
in
there.
A
AA
And
I
think
I
can
address
number
four
okay
briefly,
so
on
the
the
the
commercial
linkage
fee,
we're
viewing
that
differently
than
the
other
three
recommendations.
Can
you
all
hear
me?
Okay,
yes,.
AA
I
could
never
tell
if
I'm
shouting
too
much
that
probably
won't
work
so
for
the
other
three,
if
the
council
says
yes,
we
want
you
to
come
back
with
these
and
do
the
scoping
on
the
other
three
recommendations.
We
would
come
back
to
you
with
at
least
two
of
them,
possibly
three
of
them,
ready
to
launch
with
the
commercial
linkage
fee.
For
some
of
the
reasons
that
have
been
raised.
AA
A
Well,
I
I,
like
the
ones
that
you've
highlighted
I,
am
fully
supportive
of
that
and
I
like
that.
We
can
come
back
and
look
at
it
again
and
re-prioritize
the
next
four
or
whatever
that
we
want
to
implement
without
too
much
time
going
by,
but
I'm
kind
of
eager
to
start
moving
on
something
okay,
councilmember
Robertson,
followed
by
councilmember
Barksdale.
Thank.
U
First,
thanks
for
for
this
on
the
top
16
I
I
share
Deputy
Mayer's
comment
of
five
of
these
items
have
the
four
stars
yet
I
think
only
one
of
those
five
is
flagged
for
next
right
work.
So
why
is
that?
U
And
these
are
the
encouraged
townhouse
Row
House
Development,
dad
who's
adus
duplex
Triplex
quad
plexus
eliminate
parking
minimums
which
isn't
even
flagged
for
doing
at
all,
ease
of
rezones
through
broader
comp
plan
designations
to
create
a
comp
plan,
contract
rezones
and
then
the
planned
action
Eis.
U
Those
all
five
have
the
four
stars,
which
means
they
have
speed
of
entitlement
and
construction
ability
to
contract
capital
and
scale
up
Equity
outcomes
and
sustainability
outcomes.
So
why
I
guess
which
one
of
those
are
we
doing
in
the
next
12
to
18
months?
If
any,
and
why
not?
Why
weren't
these
the
five
that
are
recommended
instead
of
the
other
four.
R
Yeah
I
can
speak
for
the
the
the
three
in
the
middle
category.
Again
we
looked
at
what
efforts
we
already
had
underway
and
as
we're
developing
those
growth
Concepts
as
part
of
the
comprehensive
Plan
update
the
townhouse
row
house
development
is
integral
to
that
thinking
about
significant
new
opportunities
in
the
city.
For
that
to
happen.
So
there's
a
clear.
R
You
know
policy
component
to
that
and
some
economies
of
scale
of
looking
at
it
as
a
as
a
package
with
the
with
the
Planning
Commission,
the
recommendation
from
from
AP
was
to
treat
the
dadu's
adus
duplex,
Triplex,
quad
Plex,
and
the
mechanism
for
separate
ownership
is
one.
So
one
of
the
details
of
her
report
was
don't,
don't
initially
start
breaking
that
up,
so
we
we
felt
that
as
a
as
a
body
that
was
a
high
level
of
effort,
All
Things
Considered-
and
you
know
there
were
a
couple
others
in
that
middle
category.
R
We
thought
would
be
more
obviously
effective
to
do
now,
because
there
are
things
that
we
weren't
already
doing
so
again,
the
dad
who's,
one
that
falls
into
the
category,
we're
doing
some
work
on
that
already
the
The
increased
use
of
the
rezones.
We
are
we're
looking
at,
what's
primarily
a
one-to-one
relationship
in
the
comp
plan
of
comp
plan
designation
to
zoning
designation.
There
are
some
exceptions,
so
there's
some
cases
where
people
can
do
rezones,
but
we're
really
taking
a
a
serious
look
at.
R
R
We,
we
were
looking
at
the
level
of
effort
on
that
and
the
potential
impact
and
acknowledging
the
the
commission
and
Council
just
reviewed
parking
not
too
long
ago
with
about
six
months
ago
or
so
did,
did
make
some
reductions
to
residential
and
affordable
parking
clearly
didn't
go
down
to
no
minimum,
but
there
was
some
relatively
recent
work
on
the
parking
front.
So
that's
why
I
didn't
really
tick
up
to
a
staff
recommendation
on
that
one
and
the
Planned
action
I'll
hand
it
over
to
Liz
and
trisna.
For
that
one.
O
Thank
you,
sorry,
a
little
awkward
too
many
people
at
this
table,
I
guess
the
planned
action.
We
did
not
move
forward
at
this
time.
That
is
something
that
we
can
move
in,
but
in
the
next
12
to
18
months,
we
felt
that
we
had
so
much
other
work
moving
forward,
but
that
does
stay
on
the
list.
This
by
is
by
no
means
falling
off
the
list
and
certainly
is
something
that
we
can
move
into
our
work
plan
in
the
next.
O
You
know
in
the
next
year,
even
as
we
start
to
look
forward
on
that,
but
at
this
point
in
time
we
did
not
feel
that
we
had
the
capacity
to
take
that
on
as
well
as
some
of
the
others
that
that
level
of
effort
with
the
city
attorney's
office
and
with
the
same
staff
from
development
services
was
going
to
be
quite
High.
Okay,.
U
So,
on
the
green
items,
the
six
items
that
are
going
to
be
part
of
the
comp
plan
I
understand
that
the
comp
plan
should
be
delivered
by
second
quarter
2024,
but
these
won't
be
done
by
then.
They
will
then
need
to
have
land
use
code
done.
So
are
we
think
thinking
that
these
six
items
might
be
done
by
what
second
quarter
2025
I
mean?
What's
the
best
case
scenario
and
I
mean
I,
guess
even
what's
the
worst.
R
Yeah
I
I
can
start
off
and
then
have
Tristan
and
Liz
chime
in
we're
as
we
get
towards
the
ending
part
of
the
comp
plan
update
process.
So
it's
it
is
roughly
a
little
less
than
two
years
from
now
that
we've
committed
to
deliver
a
adopted
plan,
so
our
Target
date
is
no
later
than
the
end
of
May
2024,
even
though
the
state
pushed
out
their
deadline,
another
six
months,
we're
sticking
with
our
original
deadline.
R
We'd,
probably
be.
You
know,
definitely
looking
at
how
we
can
mobilize
the
the
code
writing
staff,
which
is
Liz
and
Tristan
and
the
team,
and
as
we
get
the
the
policy
Direction
kind
of
firmed
up
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
have
a
nice
draft
recommended
draft
that
goes
to
the
council.
We
can
actually
start
some
of
that
work
on
the
the
Lucas
that
actually
implement
the
policy
Direction.
So
we
don't
need
to
wait
until
May
of
2024
to
start
the
work
on
it.
We
want
to
we're
looking
at
overlaps,
essentially
so.
Z
You
know
it's
really
hard
to
put
a
date
certain
on
that
councilmember
Robertson
I
do
think
as
part
of
our
as
you
probably
remember.
When
we
talked
about
the
land,
use
planning,
initiative
process
and
the
process
Improvement
that
happened
there.
There
is
quite
a
bit
of
overlap
that
we
now
do
with
Community
Development
and
development
services
staff
so
that
we're
in
tandem
as
much
as
possible.
So
we
do
anticipate
starting
that
work
as
soon
as
we
can
as
soon
as
that,
those
policies
are
firmed
up.
Z
As
a
male
noted,
it
really
depends
also
on
exactly
what
those
policies
are
as
to
what
the
code
Amendment
scope
would
be.
So
that's
the
part
that
I
hesitate
in
giving
at
a
certain
date
on
when
we
feel
like
all
of
those
items
would
be
complete,
but
I
think
the
commitment
is
that
we
would
work
on
them
as
soon
as
we
can
in
Tandem
and
overlapping,
with
the
policy
work
and.
AA
Picking
up
on
tourism's
point,
I
think
once
we
get
closer
to
the
adoption
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
we
have
a
better
sense
of
those
policies,
then
we
can
identify
which
of
those
codes.
We
can
start
a
little
bit
sooner
and
and
possibly
end
faster,
and
we
can
come
back
to
you
at
that
time.
We'll
have
a
better
idea
at
that
time,
but
right
now
it's
just
difficult
to
say:
what's
going
to
be
involved
in
writing
those
so.
U
It
makes
it
really
difficult
for
me,
as
a
council
member,
to
say
what
I
want
fast
tracked
in
the
next
12
to
18
months,
when
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
in
the
green
shaded
category.
That
I
think
need
to
be
done
sooner
rather
than
later
and
they're
going
to
be
wrapped
into
the
comp
plan,
which
we
know
will
be
done
in
two
years
time,
but
then,
but
people
won't
be
able
to
start
releasing
capital
capital
and
investing
and
doing
projects
under
them,
because
the
land
use
code
won't
be
written.
So
it's
it's!
U
It's
it's
distressing
to
me
where
we
want
to
Fast
Track
stuff,
but
I
want
to
Fast
Track
the
stuff,
that's
going
to
be
most
effective
and
some
of
the
stuff
that's
most
effective
is
on
the
green
shaded
area.
So
and
mayor
just
interrupt
me
when
you
want
me
to
take
another
turn
later,
but
well
hold
it.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
interrupt
you
now,
I
have
a
lot
more
to
say
and
I
want
to
weigh
in
on.
U
This
is
a
good
stopping
point
for
you
and
talk
about
staff
capacity
and
resources
as
well
so
and.
A
We'll
come
back
to
you.
Thank
you.
You
can
finish.
Okay,
hold
on
sorry
lost
my
list,
councilmember
Lee,
followed
by
no
no
council
member
Barksdale,
followed
by
council
member
Lee.
W
Thank
you
mayor
all
right.
Thanks
for
the
presentation,
thanks
AP
for
your
work
as
well.
I
want
to
build
on
a
couple
of
comments.
One
councilmember
Roberts,
there's
Robert
Robertson's
comment
around
the
what
I
brought
up
earlier
in
terms
of
characteristics,
opportunity,
costs
and
I
think
that
kind
of
Builds
on
the
point
that
she
was
making
so
I
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
some
of
these
items.
W
So
one
of
the
one
of
the
items
that
I'm
interested
in
here,
especially,
is
the
item
five,
surprise,
surprise
and
specifically
interested
I
think
in
what,
as
you
as
you're
doing
the
scoping
work,
what
if
any
part
of
that
could
be
Advanced
or
expedited,
so
I
I
think
you
are
coming
back
anyway
at
some
point
with
what's
possible
or
what's
doable
near
term
versus
longer
term,
so
I'd
be
interested
in
that
one
and
then
the
second
piece
around
the
commercial
linkage
fees,
I.
W
Think
the
mayor
brought
up
if
that
one's
not
possible.
What
other
item
could
fill
that
and
one
one
item
that
came
up
in
the
comments
that
I
noticed
and
I
read
your
comment
about
it.
Ap
and
the
report
in
your
report
was
a
mandatory,
affordable,
housing
and
I
know
it's
not
popular,
but
I,
guess
just
for
the
sake
of
a
full
picture.
Y
Well,
I
I
think
to
me
the
the
most
interesting
tax
distinction
is
the
one
that
I
mentioned
where
two
of
the
sources,
the
commercial
linkage
fee
and
mandatory
inclusionary
zoning
you're
trying
to
get
it
from
the
new
projects,
which
I
think
there's
often
a
sense
that
like
then
it
comes
out
of
the
developer's
pocket
and
as
someone
who
is
a
developer,
I
need
to
like
correct
that
mischaracterization,
because
developers
use
institutional
Capital.
That
Capital
goes
to
the
place
where
they
can
get
the
best
return
for
their
pension
fund.
Y
So
they
have
a
fiduciary
obligation
to
other
people
so
that
those
people
can
retire.
And
so
what
really
happens
is
the
cost
gets
passed?
It
either
impacts
the
land
cost
of
it
or
gets
passed
on
to
the
people
who
will
rent
those
buildings.
And
so
the
question
is
you
know:
can
you
confer
enough
additional
benefit
in
an
up
Zone
to
offset
that?
Y
Otherwise,
your
rents
for
commercial
or
your
rents
for
market
rate
renters
are
going
to
go
up
and
they're
gonna
bear
the
burden
of
creating
your
affordable
housing
Supply,
which
is
a
thing
that
only
a
city
council
can
determine
and
then
in
a
in
a
housing,
Levy
you're,
because
it's
based
on
the
property
tax
value
you're,
essentially
taxing
the
people
who
are
already
there,
who
may
have
had
a
lot
of
asset
appreciation.
So
it's
a
little
bit.
Y
It's
a
different
tax
policy
decision
yeah,
but
there
is
a
lens
through
which
you
might
say,
I
have
to
add
this
there's
a
lens
through
which
you
might
say
that
inclusionary
zoning
is
more
regressive
than
a
housing
Levy,
in
the
sense
that
the
people
who
are
paying
the
housing
Levy
are
people
who
generally
are
owners
and
have
substantial
assets,
whereas
if
you're
passing
it
on
to
renters
they're
the
very
people
who
are
trying
to
save
to
own
a
home.
So
it's
just
worth
considering.
V
Well,
I
I
just
want
to
State
one
more
time
that
the
state
of
Bellevue
started
doing
a
wonderful
stuff.
I
mean
we
just
heard
earlier
that
we
have
done
so
much
with
the
full
housing
of
course
more
to
come
and
even
based
on
the
program
we
already
have.
But
even
before
that's
finished,
you
know
that's
going
to
continue.
You
already
come
here
with
this
new
right.
You
know
oh
ways,
I
think!
That's
that's
great
work,
brother!
That's
good!
You
right
away!
Works
what
a
couple
questions
for
our
information
gathering.
V
V
Y
So
there
was
no
one
idea
that
was
totally
universally
popular,
so
all
all
ideas
would
require
some
consensus.
Building
and
I
would
say
that
a
commercial
linkage
fee
was
absolutely
your
spot
on
less
popular
with
some
of
the
business
interests,
but
compared
to
some
of
the
other
strategies
it
had
a
higher
degree
of
support
across
the
whole
spectrum
of
who
we
talk
to
and
a
higher
degree
of
consensus
than
some
of
the
other
ideas.
Y
So
this
was
absolutely
a
relative
ranking
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
represent
that
there
was
any
of
the
ideas
that
were
you
know
an
absolute
winner,
but
I
think
that's
also
in
my
comments.
I've
talked
about
the
16
being
a
balanced
list,
so
one
of
the
tricky
things
in
whittling
from
16
down
to
four
is
when
you
have
16.
You've
got
this
list
that
sort
of
scratches
a
lot
of
the
different
itches.
Y
If
you
will
and
then
one
of
the
challenges
and
I
wasn't
part
of
this,
of
the
staff
bringing
it
down
to
four,
it's
it's
hard
to
recreate
that
balance
between
all
the
different
Council
goals
and
the
sources
and
uses
of
funds
and
the
business
interests
and
the
resident
interests
and
all
those
things
and
that's
not
a
critique
of
Staff.
That's
just
a
comment
about
the
nature
of
the
process.
Very.
V
Good,
thank
you
for
the
explanation,
because
this
is
very
sensitive
for
some
of
us.
It's
a
policy
issue
and
we
are
making
College
policies.
So
so,
thanks
for
for
that,
you
know,
I
want
to
emphasize
I
I
feel
that
similar
to
councilmember
Robertson
said
there
are
certain
things
that
to
me:
it's
obvious
that
streamlining
permits
and
procedures
that
seems
to
be
no-brainer.
V
It's
the
only
controversial
it's
something
the
city
should
do.
That's
our
responsibility.
It
helps
improve
our
efficiency.
We
are
a
city
of
efficient
government,
you
know
all
that
stuff
and
that
is
under
control.
You
know
we
can
allocate
our
resources,
but
it's
something
for
us
to
determine
what
to
talk
about,
but
I
would
imagine
anything
that
has
potential
impact,
and
it's
not
out
of
the
question
of
you,
know
the
The
Impossible
efforts.
V
We
should
stop
working
on
those
things
right
because
we
don't
need
to
say
well,
we
got
to
do
it
tomorrow
right,
but
it
has
should
be
on
the
list
when
the
opportunity
comes.
When
we
have
the
stuff
available,
we
need
to
be
work
handles
and
then
they
all
seem
to
have
pretty
good
rating
right
and
you
know
so
I
I
would
make
that
like
a
comment,
but
you're
going
to
do
a
lot
depends
on
our
resource
availability.
You
mentioned
about
city
council
time.
V
The
the
I
didn't
say
it,
but
you
know
the
commercial
linkage
fee.
It
is
a
sensitive
thing
you
know,
but
it's
the
same
thing
as
mandatory
inclusive.
You
know
so
many
you
know
yeah
sorry,
the
same
thing
so
I
think
we
need
to
really
have
a
serious
consideration.
Discussion
on
what
the
policy
is
before.
We
even
know
whether
it's
legal
or
not
legal,
you
know
so
that's
my
comment.
V
The
one
of
the
things
I
I
believe
that
no
one
has
mentioned,
but
I
think
the
media
may
have
mentioned
it.
It's
like
increasing
zoning
in
downtown
in
high
rises.
You
know
I
think
that's
a
good
thing,
because
we
have
probably
the
most
efficient
way
of
increasing
housing
units
while
we're
building
you
know
taller
buildings,
even
though
they
may
be
more
expensive,
but
I
think
that
can
be
accommodated
in
ways
we
can
figure
out.
V
How
do
we
get
more
money
to
do
whether
the
private
developer
might
be
able
to
do
it
with
the
incentive?
Or
maybe
the
city
can
do
something
whatever
so
I
think
there's
opportunity,
so
I
think
that
would
be
because
we
are
building
a
lot
of
commercial
properties
and
they're.
All
very
I
think
desirable.
It's
spread
out
whatever
and
without
going
to
the
residential
neighborhoods
or
whatever.
V
Y
C
Yeah
I
want
to
thank
you
for
this
recommended
list.
C
I
mean
it's
really
obvious
that
you
put
a
lot
of
work
and
effort
and
really
thoughtfully
considered
how
we
actually
create
more
housing
and
more
affordable
housing
and
really
throughout
the
city,
and
looking
at
that,
balance
and
I
really
appreciate
my
colleagues
for
really
talking
about
the
complexity
and
the
Nuance
of
of
how
we
move
from
where
we
are
today
forward,
because
I
don't
think
that
these
are
easy
policies
to
ultimately
land
on
something
that
has
the
right
balance
and
yet
moves
with
the
very
urgency
on
focusing
on
outcomes
and
impact
and
I
do
want
to
really
stress
that
I
think
councilman
barksville
talked
about
the
moving
with
urgency,
as
well
as
councilmember
Robertson
of
how
we,
how
we
make
sure
that
we
don't
take
so
long
in
getting
this
work
done,
that
we've
lost
the
opportunity,
as
housing
continues
to
be
built
to
create
more
housing
and
more
affordable
housing.
C
At
the
same
time,
it's
I
always
think
of
it
as
a
yes
and
and
that
this
is
ultimately
about
people.
We're
talking
about
people.
It
can
seem
like
we're
just
talking
about.
Like
esoteric
things,
but
these
are
people
and
their
lives
that
we're
talking
about
I,
appreciate
you
clarifying
that
those
seven
green
items
are
currently
underway.
C
So
that's
good
to
know
that
what
we're
doing
is
validating
that
those
seven
things
we're
working
on
in
green
are
still
important
matches.
What
we're
hearing
from
the
community
and
all
the
stakeholders,
as
well
as
these
additional
ones,
I,
am
concerned,
because
when
we
had
our
briefing,
what
I
was
told
is
you
know
really
if,
if
we
had
a
senior
who
wanted
to
age
in
place
and
submit
a
permit
for
a
Dadu
you're
we're
talking
about
2025?
So
that's
three
years
away
before
we
really
move
forward,
and
that
is
I.
Think
too
long.
C
You
know
we're
hearing
from
the
community
that
you
know
if
they
seniors
want
to
age
in
place,
they
want
to
have
their
their
grandkids
come
back.
Their
kids
here
be
able
to
support
teachers
and
others
that
that
duration
just
doesn't
work
so
with
councilman
Robertson
I
want
to
understand.
If
we
have
more
staff
resources,
what
could
we
actually
do
more
concurrently
than
we
currently
are
recognizing
that
it
is
both
a
a
heavy
lift
for
staff
for
us,
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
the
community?
C
And
yet
there's
a
part
of
me
that
thinks
this
is
actually
Community
Building,
because
when
we
actually
go
out
and
talk
about
about
this
work
of
how
we
create
all
different
housing
choices
throughout
the
city,
we're
actually
going
to
build
community.
While
we're
having
these
conversations
so
I
think
we
want
to
lean
into
that
and
figure
out
how
we
actually,
you
know,
go
all
hands
on
deck.
C
Mayor
I
appreciate
your
wanting
the
option
of
the
500
feet.
I
might
ask
that
it's
a
yes
and
because
I
would
like
us
to
also
look
at
a
quarter
mile
walk
shed
to
transit,
to
look
at
that
C1,
because
I
think
that
you
know
that's
an
opportunity
to
look
at
how
we
might
be
able
to
minimize
parking
and
be
able
to
build
more
housing,
which
then
leads
to
the
the
ones
that
had
a
lot
of
stars.
I
know
several
of
you
brought
this
up
as
well.
C
C
You
know
it's
a
balance
of
what
we
give
versus
what
we
get
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
incorporate
the
how
we
actually
streamline
the
code
and
the
permit
so
that,
when
we
are
talking
about
what
we
want
to
get
we're,
actually
we
actually
have
more
to
give
or
or
enough
to
give
to
be
able
to
get
so
somewhere.
There
I
think
that
we
probably
have
more
discussion
to
be
had,
even
though
I
know
it's
it's
adding
more
on
the
plate
of
staff.
So
I
look
forward
to
hearing
more
from
my
colleagues.
Okay,
thank.
A
E
Yeah,
a
couple
of
questions
and
I
I'm
still
thinking
we're
we're
all
not
quite
consistent
on
what
what
goes
first
and
everything
like
that.
I
think
that
would
help
to
look
at
that
I
and
and
one
of
the
things
that
looking
at
this
is
a
notice
of
the
four
we're
picking.
You
have
two
that
are
high
and
high,
both
on
impact
and
level
of
effort,
and
then
two
they're,
low
and
low.
So
you've
got
a
couple.
We
could
not
going
to
have
a
big
effect
and
we
can
do
it
pretty
quickly.
E
E
Just
don't
think
we
have
I
mean
I,
hope
we're
not
just
saying
we're
going
to
do
these
four,
a
couple
of
them,
which
apparently
won't
it's
not
a
whole
lot,
not
going
to
make
a
lot
of
difference
when
it
comes
down
to
it.
As
opposed
to
a
number
of
other
things
that
we're
by
2023
we're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
these
things
done,
if
we
don't
we're
not,
we
could
do
these
four
and
not
do
the
others,
and
we
we'd
have
some
movement,
but
it's
not
as
strong
and
I
noticed.
E
There
were
recommendations,
the
ones
with
the
Stars
there's
some
things
in
there
that
weren't
considered,
but
anyway,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
not
setting
up
this
in
a
way.
That
seems
to
be
contrary
to
what
you're
actually
saying
you're
doing
here
again,
it
says
these
are.
These:
are
ongoing
work,
part
of
the
current
plan
and
we're
going
to
work
these
other
pieces
into
that,
but
we're
not
going
to
take
these
aren't
going
to
be
the
focus
and
everything
else
dropped
and
I
think
we
need
to
clarify
that
so.
AA
I
would
I
would
love
to
try
mayor.
Thank
you
so
I
and
I
appreciate
the
the
comments
and
the
questions
councilmember
Stokes,
because
it's
important
that
we
understand
what
all
is
involved
in
this
list
and
I
think
we've
we've
talked
about
that
this
evening.
The
council
I
think,
has
identified
the
fact
that
we've
got
several
things,
we're
already
working
on
or
are
part
of
a
work
program.
Those
are
the
green
items.
Staff
is
recommending.
AA
The
other
four
items
that
are
in
yellow
to
your
point
about
two
of
them
are
low
low
and
two
of
them
are
high
high
part
of
what
we
have
to
look
at
as
staff
is
what
we
have
the
capacity
to
do
over
that
next
to
12
to
18
months
and
going
back
to
one
of
the
slides
that
Emil
showed
in
the
presentation.
We
have
all
those
other
things
that
we're
working
on.
AA
We
set
aside
a
certain
amount
of
capacity
to
do
this
work,
so
staff
will
be
looking
at
what
the
direction
we
get
from
the
council
this
evening,
which
items
you
would
like
us
to
move
forward
and
come
back
to
you
with
that
balance
and
say
these
are
the
things
that
we
can
do
within
that
18
months.
These
are
the
things
that
would
take
longer
and
we
could
still
work
on
them.
We
just
may
not
get
them
done
in
that
amount
of
time.
Some
of
them
will
take
the
policy
change.
AA
Others
will
just
require
code
work
and
those
we
might
be
able
to
get
done
a
little
bit
faster,
but
that's
the
kind
of
information
we
will
come
back
to
you
with
what
we're
hoping
to
get
from
the
council
this
evening
for
staff
direction
is
what
are
the
items
that
you
want
us
to
come
back
with
a
scope
to
be
ready
to
Launch?
What
are
the
items
that
you
want
us
to?
Look
at.
AA
You
know
that
maybe
aren't
those
four
they're
on
the
list
of
16
but
they're,
not
those
four
that
we're
recommending
that
you
would
like
us
to
come
back
with
a
scope
to
see
if
you
want
to
continue,
want
us
to
continue
on
and
then
launch
that
work
and
we'd
like
to
keep
that
to
a
manageable
number.
So
we're
saying
we
could
we
think
we
can
do
those
four
in
the
way
that
I've
described
them
to
you
with
the
commercial
linkage
fee
being
a
little
bit
different.
AA
If
there's
a
couple
others
you
want
us
to
scope
to
come
back
and
say
this
is
what
it
would
take,
but
it
would
mean
we
can't
do
these
others
at
this
time.
That
would
be
part
of
that
discussion
that
we'd
bring
back
to
you.
Does
that
help
to
because
the
question
you're
asking
is
about
the
balance
and
that's
what
we're
we'll
be
trying
to
figure
out
as
well,
when
we
do
that
scope.
E
Yeah,
the
other,
the
other
thing-
and
you
know,
listen
to
everybody
else
and
looking
at
this
too,
is
is
again
at
least
strengthen
the
the
idea
that
what
you're
recommending
that
you
focus
a
little
more
on
is
actually
as
important
or
as
actually
more
important
than
other
things
lined
out
here
and
an
idea
of
what.
If
you
were
just
looking
at
this
from
a
standpoint
of
what?
E
What
is
really
what
are
the
things
that
really
will
make
an
impact
in
the
next
two
to
three
years
in
affordable
housing
and
and
because
that's
the
big
issue,
it's
going
to
get
worse
and
so
I
think
the
information's
here
is
just
how
do
we?
How
do
you
parse
and
how
do
you
come?
Look
at
it
yeah?
What
is
the
overall?
What
is
their
overall
goal?
E
Has
that
real,
that's
the
lens
we
want
to
make
we
want
to
be.
We
want
to
do
it
better
than
anybody
else,
because
we
can,
but
the
real
reason
we're
going
to
do
this,
because
I
need
need
it
for
people
and
need
it
for
the
community
to
continue,
and
so
that's
that's.
What
I'd
like
to
see
is
is
how
do
you.
AA
And
I
think
we've.
What
we've
tried
to
present
here
is
to
give
you
that
information
so
that
you
can
see
which
ones
the
staff
thinks
could
have
the
highest
impact
understanding
it's
going
to
may
take
more
effort
to
get
us
there
as
well.
So
it's
really
looking
at
what
are
the
council's
priorities
because
you're
absolutely
right.
There
are
things
that
the
priorities
may
change
over
time
in
three
years.
The
priorities
may
be
very
different.
What
are
the?
AA
Y
So
we
have
processes
and
cities
have
processes.
This
is
not
unique
to
Bellevue
that
even
limit
how
quickly
we
can
change
things
that
we
want
to
fix,
and
that's
what
we're
all
coming
up
against
here
in
this
new,
and
so
one
interesting
thought
that
I've
had
is,
it
might
be
interesting
to
have
the
staff
come
back
and
scope
these
four
items,
but
also
scope.
Y
What
would
it
take
to
make
that
pipe
bigger
and
then
you
would
know
what
is
it
going
to
take
to
push
more
things
through,
which
might
be
things
that
even
you
need
to
authorize
that
the
staff
can't
go
ahead
and
change
without
your
okay,
but
if
you
knew
what
it
would
take
to
make
that
pipe
bigger,
that
might
be
the
first
meta
question:
yeah.
That's
really.
M
M
Thank
you
like,
by
the
way,
I
always
start
that
usually
when
I
say
so,
let's
continue
to
focus
on
those
items
at
the
at
that
and
for
the
most
part,
I
think
you
have
but
focus
on
those
high
level
of
success
items
focus
on
those
items
that
are
going
to
encourage
and
incentivize
focus
on
the
opportunity
costs
and
those
actions
that
can
have
the
biggest
impact
in
those
12
to
18
months,
and
let's
get
some
easy
wins
right
out
of
the
gate
too.
M
I
think
someone
here,
you
know
I
think
could
be
I
mean
I
know,
staff
has
stretched,
but
removing
the
barriers
for
micro,
Apartments,
reducing
permit
fees
for
affordable
housing
expedite
in
the
permitting
for
affordable
I
can
see
that
one
being
a
little
bit
longer,
but
still
and
I
would
say
that
of
the
four
here
that
you've
suggested
I
would
take
off
the
Implement
commercial
linkage
fees,
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
legalities
around
that
and
I
think
we're
also
asking
for
a
fight.
M
M
Be
IT
staff,
be
it
consultant,
be
it
working
with
partners,
because
that's
going
to
get
us
to
where
we
want
to
go.
We
can
talk
about
all
these
ideas
and
there's
a
lot
of
great
ones,
but
unless
we
have
the
capacity
to
actually
work
on
them
more
than
just
type
it's
you
know
we're
going
to
be
talking
again
in
the
next
12
to
18
months
about
okay.
M
What's
our
next
next
actions,
because
we
weren't
able
to
accomplish
most
of
them
the
last
12
to
18
months,
because
we
didn't
have
the
capacity
so
I
think
our
focus
of
one
of
these
four
should
be
just
on
that.
How
do
we
expand
capacity
because
as
councilor
Barksdale
and
Robertson
have
mentioned?
Now
is
the
time
to
get
this
done?
M
We
there's
such
an
opportunity,
cost
here
right
now
and
we're
behind,
and
we
need
to
get
ahead
of
it.
Oh
we're!
Never
going
to
create
the
amount
of
affordable
units
that
we
truly
want
to
create
in
the
city.
You
know
across
these
vast
different
opportunities
and
actions
that
we
have
before
us,
so
I
would
I
would
add
capacity.
As
that
fourth
item,
that's
my
suggestion
to
my
to
my
colleagues.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You,
oh
good
job,
all
right,
I'll,
just
say
I.
You
know,
I
appreciate
the
recommendation.
I
think,
like
everybody,
I'm
very
eager
to
move
forward.
I
know
that
anything
we
don't
do
in
the
first
year
we
will
get
back
to
I,
am
very
interested
in
the
Capacity
Analysis.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
I
can
add
that
on
to
the
four
you'll
have
to
check
your
capacity,
but
I
I
like
the
recommendation
and
I
like
Capacity
Analysis
councilmember
Robertson
thanks.
U
U
The
linkage
fees
are
problematic
to
me
as
next
right,
not
as
next
right
work,
because
they
don't
work
unless
you
and
they
aren't
legal,
most
likely
unless
they're
tied
to
an
increase
in
density
or
intensity,
and
so
the
increases
in
density
and
intensity
are
being
considered
in
the
comp
plan.
So
how
can
we
do
the
linkage
fees
ahead?
Of
that
I
mean
we
just
I.
Just
don't
think
we
can.
So
if
we
want
to
revisit
linkage
fees
as
part
of
the
land
use
code,
implementing
the
comp
plan
with
greater
intensity.
U
That
should
be
Revisited
then,
and
not
now
so
I
would
remove
that
from
the
next
right.
Work
I
to
the
streamlining
I
would
add
number
10
which
the
which
AP
encouraged
us
to
link,
which
is
not
just
reducing
the
permit
fees
for
the
affordable
housing,
but
also
number
10,
simplify
the
permitting
process
and
expedite
permitting
with
specific
time
goals
for
processing
that
was
recommended.
U
So
I
I
think
we
should
add
number
10
to
number
14
in
the
next
right
work
and
take
11,
which
is
the
linkage
fees
off.
So
that's
what
I
would
move
forward
now
with
regard
to
the
comp
plan
and
talking
about
the
different
missing
middle,
the
row
houses
the
duplexes
triplexes
adus
Etc
I
would
like
to
add
to
that
as
part
of
the
comp
plan,
other
types
of
housing
in
single
family
we
years
ago
when
I
was
first
on
the
Planning
Commission.
We
had
a
someone
come
to
us.
U
I
voted
yes
on
that
and
Council
agreed
and
that's
called
The
Botch
family
rezone
back
in
about
2003
and
I'd,
like
to
see
more
of
that.
We've
heard
from
neighborhood
residents
that
they
would
love
to
see
smaller
homes,
maybe
more
of
them
them
on
the
same
amount
of
land,
but
as
opposed
to
Mansions
I.
Think
if
those
type
of
of
innovative
or
options
optional
housing
is
not
included
in
the
row,
houses
Daddy's
Etc
discussion
on
on
the
comp
plan.
They
need
to
be
included
because
that's
the
one
of
the
ways
that
seniors
can
age.
U
U
Talking
about
comp
plan,
it's
not
on
here,
okay,
it's
there's
the
there's,
the
duplexes
triplexus
quadplexes
row
houses,
I'm,
saying
we
need
to
also
be
looking
at
different
single-family
housing
types,
allowing
additional
density
in
exchange
for
smaller
scale
and
I
use
that
one
example
from
about
2004
when
that
was
done.
So
I'd
like
to
add
that
as
part
of
the
missing
middle
would
that
be
any
part
of.
Y
I
think
it
is
the
intent
of
three
and
four
that
it
include
the
possibility
of
different
configurations
and
I'll
also
just
say
that
number
six
does
involve,
which
is
one
of
the
ones
that's
in
yellow,
does
involve
reducing
dwelling
or
eliminating
dwelling
unit
per
acre
limits,
which
would
also
be
supportive
of
that
goal.
U
In
particularly
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
verbalized
it
in
case
it
wasn't
included
in
what
we're
looking
at
I
think
there's.
That
could
be
a
really
good
thing
for
the
future
of
the
city.
I
also
would
support
doing
planned
action.
Eis's
I've
been
told
it's
too
late
to
do
it
for
Wilburton,
which
is
unfortunate,
but
I
definitely
think
we
should
tee
that
up
for
the
Bell
red
look
forward
and
any
Tod
update
that
we
do.
We
plan
to
action.
U
Eis
is
a
great
way
to
go,
and
so
here's
that
in
this
that's
number
15.,
okay
and
contract
reasons,
number
eight
I
definitely
would
like
to
I'm
not
saying
initiate
those
now
but
I.
Definitely
those
are
important.
I
think
you.
U
A
U
With
that
so
go
back
to
it,
I'll
go
back
to
that.
What
I
want
to
see
right
now
is
the
three
things
you
listed,
not
including
linkage
fees,
but
to
the
streamlining
which
is
number
14,
I
want
to
add
number
10.
yeah.
Those
were
two
meant
to
be
linked
together
and
then,
if
there's
time
I'd
like
to
see
the
contract
rezone
added
to
the
list,
if
we
have
the
capacity
but
I
think
you're
gonna
have
to
come
back
on
that.
Okay,
thank
you.
U
So
I
started
with
that
and
I
said
talked
about
the
comp
plan.
The
things
I
want
to
see
now
I'm,
just
going
to
close
with
capacity
I'd
like
to
see
come,
you
come
back
with
a
Capacity
Analysis
I'd
also
like
to
see
what
we
can
do
with
more
money.
We
have
had
some
of
our
partners
offering
significant
funding
to
us
without
strings
attached,
they're,
not
getting
a
special
privilege
to
help
fund
some
of
this
work
and
we
aren't
taking
it.
U
We
and
I'd
like
to
see
a
consideration
of
that
if,
if
private
parties
want
to
give
money
to
the
city
as
a
donation
to
help
us
fund
this
faster,
what
does
that
look
like
and
I
definitely
want
to
see
a
line
item
in
the
budget
for
accepting
donations
for
this
for
this
purpose?
So
thank
you.
Okay,.
T
A
D
W
Thank
you,
so
I
didn't
keep
track
of
each
of
the
items,
but
I
will
say
I
know.
We
said
three
out
of
the
four
removing
the
linkage
fees
but
I
think
for
that
one.
It
was
just
about
figuring
out
what
what's
possible,
so
I
mean
I,
guess
I
would
still
be
interested
in
knowing
what's
possible
before
we
make
a
decision,
especially
given
that,
in
terms
of
funding,
it's
a
it's
a
key
source
and
then
we
can
compare
it
with
other
private
and
so
forth.
W
What
what
the
outcome
would
be
based
on
compared
to
those
other
funding
sources
and
I
had
mentioned
five
before,
but
I
was
looking
at
the
action
so
scoping
encouraging
the
Ada
to
use
ads
and
duplex
Triplex
and
happy
to
add
what
councilmember
Robert
Robertson
said
in
terms
of
looking
at
additional
housing
types
as
well
and
seeing
how
we
can
accelerate
that
I
think
that's
all
I
had,
though
yeah.
A
All
right
so
we're
seeing
some
support
for
adding
10
and
we're
seeing
some
support
for
removing
linkage
fees.
We
have
some
support
for
Capacity
Analysis,
councilmember
Lee.
V
10.,
okay,
I
support,
removing
commercial
linkage
fees,
I
I
support,
councilman
Robertson's,
including
10,
and
14,
combined
and
I,
actually
I
believe
that
within
streamlining
permits
and
procedures,
there's
one
others
is
a
competing
plants,
action
c,
Bar
review.
You
know
that
one
is
within
our
City's
capacity.
You
know,
I
mean
that's
why
I'm
supporting
capacity
after
we
talk
about
this
we're
going
to
realize
we
need
capacity,
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
improved.
V
It
has
to
be
in
order
to
do
these
things
so
I
like
to
include
complete
plan
action,
zipper
review,
because
I
can
see
that
you
put
in
level
Alpha
medium
and
you
can
have
potential
impact
medium
for
a
city
effort,
that's
pretty
decent.
V
We
already
some
I
believe
I,
like
eight
is
already
included.
So
sorry,
the
other
one
is.
C
Yes,
thank
you.
So,
let's
see
what
so
I
like
the
one
about
simplifying
the
permit
process
and
Expediting
permit
for
affordable
housing
and
adding
that
item
to
the
mix.
C
I
also
agree
with
looking
at
our
budget
to
see
if
we
can
add
more
resources,
especially
to
that's
the
lean
thinking
right.
How
do
we
Inc
unkink
the
pipe?
How
do
we
make
the
pipe
bigger
so
we
can
get
more
water
through
and
to
that
end,
I'm
also,
you
know.
Maybe
it
doesn't
fit
into
this
exact
next
right
work,
but
it
seems
to
me
we
can
simplify
the
land
use
code.
Then
everybody
wins
right
because
when
I
think
about
this,
it's
not
just
the
people
that
are
trying
to
develop
it's
our
own
staff
right.
C
Every
time
we
have
inefficient
processes,
we're
actually
creating
more
work
for
ourselves
as
well
in
in
the
entire
process,
and
so
I
really
think
it's
important
to
actually
have
that
as
part
of
the
next
right
work
and
it
and
I
wonder
if
that
could
be
a
bucket
of
work,
that
we
could
bring
some
limited
duration
staff
or
consultant
to
support
how
we
might
simplify
the
land
use
code
related
to
that
I.
C
Also,
really
like
eliminating
the
minimum
parking
I
mean
I
I
know
we
recently
went
through
that
process,
but
I
keep
thinking
about
the
fact
that
you
know
that
balance
of
how
we
actually
allow
developers
to
figure
out
what
the
right
Market
is
for
parking
is
a
give
that
we
can
provide.
While
we
look
at
right,
the
I
want
to
understand,
what's
possible
with
the
commercial
linkage
fee
before
we
abandon
that
as
as
a
non-starter
and
what
I
want
to
understand
is
within
all
these.
C
R
Mandatory
inclusionary
did
not
rise
to
the
top
16
in
the
consultant
process.
The
I
think
it
remains
to
be
seen
during
the
comp
plan
process
that
we
just
started
how
that
comes
up
in
the
public
dialogue,
so
I
think
it
remains
to
be
seen
in
the
in
the
overall
comprehensive
Plan
update
how
it
comes
up,
but
it
is
not
on
this
page
right
now.
So
it's
not
part
of
the
1
to
16
next
drive
work.
C
AA
I
think
it's
it's
more
I
think
it's
more
appropriate
in
the
next
next
right
work,
because
it's
looking
at
it
as
a
package,
and
it's
also
looking
at
in
the
context
of
the
comprehensive
plan
like
Camille,
was
saying
so
it's
something
that
would
come
out
of
that
effort
and
kind
of
getting
back
to
councilman
Robertson's
point
it's
something
we
would
be
doing
in
up
zone
four
in
order
to
put
those
in
place.
So
it
could
be
part
of
that
discussion
before
we
actually
approve
an
upsell.
So.
AA
Y
Just
clear
clarify
that
the
the
notion
behind
allowing
higher
far
for
residential
was
to
make
residential
uses
more
competitive
with
commercial
uses
in
transit
oriented
zones
so
that
you
wouldn't
have
a
lot
of
parcels
flipping
to
Commercial
and
that
you'd
have
people
thinking.
God
I
can
pay
a
bit
more
for
this
land
if
and
I'm
a
residential
developer,
I'm
going
to
win
that
parcel
and
I'm
going
to
develop
it
as
residential.
So
it
was
about
incentivizing
residential.
Y
You
can
couple
that
increase
with
mandatory
inclusionary
zoning
because
you're
giving
an
increase
at
the
same
time
that
you're
creating
a
requirement,
but
at
that
point
it
will
not
have
the
incentivizing
effect
of
creating
more
residential
Supply
that
you
or
it
will
weaken
that
effect,
depending
on
the
ratio
of
how
you
do
it.
Does
that
make
sense.
C
Okay,
I
see
and
then
I'm
wondering
maybe
this
isn't
going
to
fall
into
here,
but
I
but
I'm.
Listening
to
my
colleagues,
we
I
think
we're.
We
are
trying
to
understand
the
timing
for
these
different
policies.
When
the
policy
work
will
come
back
when
we
would
work
on
the
the
comp
plan
and
the
code
so
that
we
can
more,
we
can
better
understand
when
any
of
these
are
actually
going
to
be
done.
So
someone
can
actually
submit
an
application
is.
Is
that
something
we
can
get
in?
The
of
information?
A
What
I'm
hearing
is,
there's
a
consistency
to
not
eliminate
the
commercial
linkage
fees,
but
to
put
it
back
in
the
pot
that
may
be
something
we
analyze
later
decide
whether
we
want
to
implement
that
or
not
but
I.
Think,
what's
rising
to
the
top,
is
One
removing
barriers
to
micro
housing,
which
you
recommended
to
allowing
for
higher
far
and
residential,
which
you
recommended
three
reducing
permit
fees
which
you
recommended
and
then
there
seems
to
be
a
majority
of
people
who
would
like
to
add
number
10.
A
As
your
fourth
item,
which
is
simplifying
the
permitting
process
and
in
addition,
there
was
an
appetite
for
doing
some
kind
of
a
Capacity
Analysis
and
that
might
be
in
the
budget
process.
I,
don't
know
that
would
indicate
you
know
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
to
increase
our
capacity
for
the
next
best
work
that
we
go
through
and
I
had
one
more.
Yes,.
A
Well,
I,
don't
know
that
I
see
a
majority
who
want
to
do
it
in
the
first
four
batch
of
four
I
think
there's
an
appetite,
but
we
can
vote
on
it.
So
we'll
see
okay
but
I'm.
Just
throwing
this
out
here
to
see,
if
there's
any
comments
on
this
so
I'm,
not
quite
yet
I'm
not
but
I
will
in
a
second
so.
A
M
All
right,
I
move
to
confirm
the
recommended
list
of
next
right
work.
Actions
to
undertake
in
the
next
12
to
8
months
to
supplement
ongoing
housing
work
that
list
comprised
of
remove
barriers
to
micro
housing,
allow
higher
far
reduce
permits,
remove
the
commercial
linkage
fees,
simplify
the
permitting.
A
Okay,
so
he's
suggesting
that
we
put
forward
as
our
next
best
work,
removing
barriers
to
micro
housing,
which
is
one
of
the
original
recommendations
allowing
higher
far
and
residential,
which
is
another
original
recommendation.
Reducing
permit
fees,
which
is
another
original
recommendation
and
adding
number
10.
A
A
E
I
just
hope
that
this
I
mean
again,
these
are
we're
doing
some
low
low
impact
things
that
are
also
don't
take
a
lot
to
do
and
we're
leaving
a
lot
of
things
that
have
high
or
medium
impact
that
we're
not
including
those.
E
My
concern
is
not
just
doing
things
that
look
kind
of
like
we
can
do
in
an
actor
or
whatever
I
want
to
see
actions
that
actually
make
a
very
significant
impact
on
the
housing
issue
and
I'm
not
sure
these
four
are
going
to
they'll,
be
good
for
us
to
do,
but
I
don't
see
them
as
being
as
strong
as
we
could
do
and
I
just
don't
want
to.
E
E
E
U
Robertson
thanks
I'm
in
favor
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
my
comments
on
about
the
missing
middle
is
I.
Think
that
I
was
adding
to
the
things
I
wanted
them
to
consider
the
comp
plan
process
because
I
think
we
can't
do
it
ahead
of
that
I
think
it
has
to
go
in
the
compound
I
wish.
We
could
do
it
ahead
of
it.
If
the
capacity
shows
we
can
do
it
ahead
of
it.
I
will
be
we'll
be
supporting
that
motion
later,
but
that
was
I
just
wanted
to
clarify,
but
I
support
the.
W
I
support
I
think
my
My
Hope
was
that
staff
would
at
least
take
a
look
at
seeing
what
what
part
of
that
one
they
could
expedite.
So
nice
is.
W
W
A
AA
O
Robinson
yeah
I'm,
sorry,
if
I
could
also
add,
we
will
need
to
look
at
scoping
for
simplifying
the
permit
process.
That
is
a
quite
a
a
big
task
and
we
are
in
a
current
development
cycle
that
is
really
taxing
all
the
people
that
would
be
tasked
with
that
work.
So
we
will
scope
that
and
bring
that
back,
but
I
think
we
need
to
put
a
little
time
into
I.
A
O
Just
a
different
group
of
people
that
are
involved,
and
at
this
point
in
time
we
have
one
of
the
highest
development
Cycles
we've
ever
had.
So
we
okay
just
a
little
I'd
like
to
scope
it
out.
I'll.
A
Take
your
advice
on
that.
Thank
you,
so
number
10
and
the
what
what
number.
T
A
A
Then
we
added
number
10,
which
is
to
simplify
the
permitting
process,
but
we've
just
been
advised
that
perhaps
we
should
ask
staff
to
scope
that
out
before
we
include
it
in
the
batch.
So
we
have
two
things
right
now
that
are
being
asked
to
have
scoped
out.
One
is
number
10
which
is
simplifying
the
permitting
process
and
the
other
one
is
looking
at
dadus
and
adus
with
the
homeownership
component
as
well.
So
those
two
for
scoping,
but
moving
forward
with
these
three
to
start
with
very.
V
A
V
C
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
so
I
think
like
Liz
says,
if
this
is
the
highest
development
cycle,
we've
ever
had
it's
all
the
more
important
that
we
accelerate
this
work
as
soon
as
possible,
so
I
support
the
capacity
and
Analysis
I
support
Expediting
item
four
of
those
green
items
that
we're
working
on
and
I
believe.
That's
scoping.
C
W
So
so
it
was,
it
would
be
scoping
to
see
what
parts
of
that
line
item
we
could
accelerate.
C
C
C
So
what
we're
saying
is
that
we
are
lifting
up
an
ad
to
housing
Levy
as
the
revenue
generating
Source
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear
that
that's
what
we're
talking
about,
because
I
know
that
some
of
my
colleagues
have
you
know
raised
concerns
about
raising
taxes
and
levies,
and
so,
if,
if
that's
what
we're
talking
about,
then
I
just
want
to
be
really
clear
that
that's
the
only
one
that's
sitting
here.
That's
left
that
is
green,
that
we're
working
on.
R
I
have
staff
clarify
that
that
one
line
item
would
be
important.
It
was
shown
as
green
and
the
note
there
was
ongoing
discussion
at
the
arch
board.
So
if
we
look
back
at
the
the
2022
Arch
work
program,
there
is
a
discussion
of
Arts
facilitating
conversations
with
member
cities
on
identifying
and
exploring
dedicated
revenues,
and
it
could
either
be
at
the
local
or
Regional
level.
So
I
don't
want
to
overstate
what's
happening.
R
There
have
been
a
couple
discussions
just
at
the
archboard
they're
very
early
discussions,
so
I
think
that's
what
was
meant
by
the
green
light.
I
line
item
on
that
is.
We
do
have
our
Arch
exec
board
representative
participating
in
some
early
discussions
that
were
part
of
the
the
arch
work
program
if
any
of
those
were
suitable
for
the
city
to
actually
talk
more
about.
That
would
be
a
future
discussion.
C
Subsidy,
that's
likely
going
to
be
needed
to
build
to
scale,
and
so
I
agree
with
with
all
of
these
pieces
and
I
also
understand
that
we
are
supposed
to
be
seeing
the
numbers
from
Vision
2050
and
for
the
35
000
housing
units,
what
Ami
levels
they're
going
to
be
because
I
think
that
will
help
inform
us
about
where
we
want
to
focus
on
which
Ami
is
the
the
most
in
need
in
the
Gap.
Thank.
U
Means
that
we're
moving
ahead
on
the
next
right
work,
you're
gonna,
the
first
thing
you're
going
to
do-
is
scope
them
right
and
bring
them
back.
So
I.
Don't
think
the
amendment
is
needed
because
it's
going
to
be
scoped
anyway
and
what
we,
but
what
we
do
need
an
amendment
for
is
to
add
the
number
four
to
the
scoping.
That's
what
we
need
an
amendment.
U
N
You
know
we're
going
to
have
to
bring
something
back
so
and
maybe
once
we're
done
with
this,
if
you
could
restate
and
if
the
staff
could
restate
would
the
council
is
voting
on
that
we
could
actually
come
back
and
deliver
on.
AA
AA
The
work
for
the
following
items:
encouraging
dad
who's,
adus,
duplex,
Triplex,
quadflex
and
separate
ownership,
remove
barriers
to
micro,
Apartments,
allow
higher,
far
or
unlimited
in
residential
to
incentivize
residential,
simplify
the
permitting
process
expedite
permitting
for
goals
for
processing
and
reduce
permitting
fees
for
affordable
housing
projects.
AA
A
AA
A
AA
So
we
would
be
doing
the
three
yes,
that
we
recommended
and
we'd
come
back
with
those
ready
to
launch
yes,
and
then
we
would
scope
the
other
three
items
and
thank
you
for
the
capacity
I
didn't
forget
that
I
just
didn't.
Look
at
it
on
the
list
here.
So
we
would
also
scope
those
other
three
items
and
then
you
could
tell
us
which
ones
which
one
probably
of
those
that
you
want
us
to
do
in
the
next
12
to
18
months,
exactly
okay,
which.
A
Is
why
I
do
want
to
do
so?
Maybe
we
go
with
Jared's
motion,
so
maybe
we
need
a
random
motion.
It's
not.
That
is
the
motion.
That
is
the
motion.
Okay,
that's
fine!
That
is
the
motion.
Councilmember
Lee,.
V
A
A
B
Y
A
M
M
B
Yeah
so
debating
mayor's
amendment
is
to
move
item
10
and
4
into
scoping.
A
A
No,
simplifying
the
permitting
process
is
in
the
scoping
yeah
okay,
so
his
Amendment
changed
the
first
one.
So
so
what
we're?
We
voted
to
amend
the
amendment
so
now
the
amendment
reads:
to
remove
barriers
to
micro
housing,
allow
higher
far
reduced
permit
fees
as
our
three
that
we're
advancing
to
number
10
and
number
four
in
and
out
I'm
like
losing
my
mind
and
Capacity
Analysis
s
scoping.
Thank
you.
That
was
the
word
I
forgot,
and
that
is
the
amendment
before
so
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Thank.
R
You
mayor
there
was,
if
you
would
like
to
give
any
direction
on
the
C1
phase
two.
That
could
be
a
very
brief
discussion
if
we
wait
too
long
on
that,
it's
going
to
miss
this
year's
annual.
R
So
there
was
a
request
made
from
council
members
on
to
look
at
from
300
feet
to
multi-family
or
commercial
for
qualifying
properties,
to
extend
that
out
to
500
feet
or
a
thousand.
R
If
you
extend
it
out
to
500
feet,
you
add
three:
additional
faith-based
properties:
Calvary
Lutheran
Cross
of
Christ
and
First
United
Methodist
two
are
in
Lake
Hills
one
is
in
Northwest
Bellevue.
If
you
extend
it
out
to
a
thousand
feet,
you
do
add
five
additional
faith-based
properties,
I
think
the
staff
recommendation
would
probably
be
to
go
with
the
extended
out
to
500
feet
and
add
three,
and
we
could
incorporate
that
into
an
ongoing
process.
R
M
A
A
C
When
I,
when
I
think
about
this
particular
topic-
and
we
we
talk
about
watches
to
arterials
and
transit
in
that
quarter,
mile
income,
so
it
makes
sense
to
me
that
we're
looking
at
a
similar
distance
of
the
thousand
feet
and
being
able
to
create
that
that
space
for
housing,
along
with
our
faith-based,
you
know,
Neighbors
and
so,
and
and
that's
not
to
say
that
these
faith-based
properties
are
all
going
to
raise
their
hand
and
say
they
want
to
do
this
right.
C
This
is
just
saying
that
we're
allowing
for
that
possibility
now,
instead
of
pushing
it
out
much
farther
down
the
road,
because
development
is
happening
and
I
think
that,
to
the
degree
that
we
need
to
create
more
housing
more
quickly,
this
is
one
tool
in
our
toolbox.
That
I
think
we
could
be
leveraging
a
lot
more.
A
And
I'm
going
to
speak
to
why
I
wanted
the
500
and
then
I'll.
Let
you
speak
to
your
your
questions.
I
would
like
to
limit
it
to
500
because
in
that
next
500,
which
is
closer
to
single-family
neighborhoods
I,
want
to
see
if
there's
any
way
that
we
can
incentivize
housing
for
older
adults,
because
we
have
so
many
older
adults
living
in
single-family
homes
that
really
don't
have
any
place
they
can
afford
to
downsize
and
stay
in
their
neighborhoods
and
I
hear
this
all
the
time
from
the
community.
A
So
if
I,
if
we
just
allow
that
development,
there's
no
guarantee
we're
going
to
get
something
suitable
for
older
adults.
So
I'd
like
to
give
a
little
more
time
to
that
last
500.
feet
to
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
something
but
I'm
fine
with
the
first
500
of
creating
opportunities.
So
okay,
councilmember
Robertson.
U
When
we
talked
about
C1
last
time,
I
was
out
of
state
at
a
wedding,
so
I
just
want
to
sorry
about
that.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
know
what
the
proposal
is.
So
the
C1
strategy
allowed
properties
that
are
on
an
arterial
within
a
half
a
mile
of
frequent
Transit
and
within
300
feet
of
a
jurisdiction,
more
multi-family
or
commercial
or
jurisdiction.
Other
properties,
where
they're
already
permitted
those
would
be
allowed
to
up
zone,
is
that
right,
and
so
what
are
we
changing
the
300
feet
to
500?
Yes,.
R
A
The
it's
only
talking
about
was
two
more
three.
U
Yeah
I
haven't
seen
the
map
on
that,
but
and
what
was
the
discussion
on
May
9th?
Why
did
we
stick
with
300.
U
A
R
C
Yeah
we're
there
on
May
9th.
This
was
brought
up
on
May
9th
and
what
we
were
told
is
that
we
weren't
going
to
consider
it
there,
but
that
it
would
be
brought
back
as
discussion
during
the
next
right
work,
which
is
tonight.
So
that's
why
we're
having
this
conversation
and
I
believe
that,
as
you
looked
at
that
map,
the
other
part
of
this
was
when
it
came
in
May.
It
had
to
be
a
church
property
that
was
on
an
arterial.
C
C
R
A
Yeah,
okay,
I'm
gonna,
let
Deputy
Mayor
speak
to
his
questions.
M
Well,
it
just
feels
a
little
ad
hoc
tonight
to
be
discussing
I'd
also
like
to
see
well
see
a
heat
map,
but
on
the
other
hand
you
mentioned
two
of
those
properties
would
be
in
Lake
Hills.
Earlier
tonight
we
were
talking
and
some
of
the
oral
Communications
coming
forward
about
equity
and
the
distribution
of
yes.
They
it
may
not.
You
know
those
faith-based
properties
may
not
take
advantage
of
it.
However,
that
could
have
a
significant
impact
of
the
Lake
Hills
neighborhood.
M
So
I'd
like
to
see
how
close
they
are,
what
the
potential
impacts
could
be
to
that
many
immediate
vicinity
there
so
yeah
it
I
I
just
like
to
see
that
before
before
making
a
decision
on
that
that
could
greatly
impact
that
immediate
Community
right
there.
Okay.
M
R
Foreign,
we
haven't
gotten
to
that
point
in
the
in
the
code,
part
of
it
yet,
but
if
they're
I
mean
if
there
is
more
information
that
you
or
other
council
members
we're
happy
to
bring
that
back,
we
just
wanted
to
note
that
it
was.
We
did
want
to
give
an
update
on
our
thoughts
on
this
as
part
of
the
next
drive
work
and
knowing
that
we're
getting
right
close
to
the
August
break.
But
clearly
we
don't.
If
there's
a
desire
for
more
information,
we
can
get
more.
M
Info
this
is
going
to
come
back
to
us,
but
no
matter
what
right,
because
going
to
Planning
Commission
is
going
to
come
back
to
us
so
I'm.
Fine,
then
having
the
Planning
Commission
take
a
look
at
it,
but
please
pass
along
my
concern
about
the
distance
and
then
we'd
come
back
with
all
the
properties.
That
would
be
great
to
see
as
well
and
then
as
well
as
look
at
the
senior
housing
potential.
I.
Think
that'd
be
great.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
E
A
C
Yeah
can
I
ask
you.
I
am
trying
to
understand
why
a
thousand
feet
would
not
be
possible
for
seniors
housing.
It's.
A
Not
that
it's
no,
no,
that's
not
what
we're
saying
so
we're
looking
at
just
opening
it
up
to
housing
in
the
zero
to
500,
from
multi-family
and
from
the
500
1000
I'm
I!
Don't
want
to
go
there
because
I
want
to
actually
have
us
look
at
what
kind
of
an
incentive
we
could
put
in
to
get
affordable
senior
housing
in
that
area
and
putting
this
in
front
of
the
Planning
Commission
Now
does
not
get
me
there.
C
AA
Y
D
A
Oh
okay:
well,
let's
just
get
our
head
knot
first,
so
are
we?
Okay
with
the
500
feet
to
the
Planning
Commission
I'm,
seeing
everybody
okay,
we
got
it!
Thank
you.
So
let's
talk
about
the
Capacity
Analysis
hold
on
for
one
second
Debbie
mirror.
Could
you
please
extend
the
meeting.