►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - August 2, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Well,
welcome
to
the
regular
city
council
meeting
for
the
city
of
bellevue
on
august,
2nd
2021,
it's
a
beautiful
evening.
We
have
a
packed
agenda
and
this
is
our
last
meeting
before
a
month
break
so
looking
forward
to
working
with
everybody
tonight
clerk.
Could
you
please
call
the
roll?
Yes.
B
C
A
Thank
you.
We
have
a
proclamation
today,
international
overdose
awareness
day,
councilmember
lee.
Are
you
ready
to
read
that
please.
G
G
Thank
you,
whereas
international
overdose
awareness
day
is
a
global
event
that
is
held
on
august
31st
of
each
year
to
remember
those
gone
too
soon
from
overdose
deaths,
and
whereas
no
community
in
washington
is
immune
to
accidental
international
inter
or
intentional
overdose
and
drug
overdose
deaths.
More
than
1100
in
2018
remain
high
across
the
state
and
in
bellevue.
G
Now,
therefore,
I
can't
really
on
behalf
of
lynne
robertson
may
of
bellevue.
Washington
do
hereby
proclaim
august
31
2021
as
international
overdose
awareness
day
in
bellevue,
encouraging
residents
to
stand
by
the
growing
number
of
neighbors
who
have
lost
loved
ones
to
an
overdose
and
are
battling
a
substance
use
disorder
themselves.
A
Thank
you,
city
clerk.
Oh
no,
deputy
mayor
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda.
C
G
B
D
You
hear
me:
yes,
thank
you.
Your
time
begins
now.
Thank
you
good
evening.
Everyone,
my
name,
is
ells
blomer.
I
live
in
northeast
bellevue.
My
address
is
on
file,
we've
been
hearing
a
lot
about
affordable
housing
and
about
the
need
for
more
housing
in
general,
and
now
we're
also
heavily
discussing
providing
housing
for
the
homeless
in
our
neighborhoods.
D
What
is
the
city's
overall
housing
strategy
at
this
point?
It
seems
like
many
different
proposals
are
on
the
table
and
various
projects
are
being
pushed
down
on
us
by
the
state
and
the
county.
The
neighborhoods
had
been
promised
for
years
that
certain
housing
decisions
would
be
made
when
the
sub-area
plans
are
updated
in
new
neighborhood
area
plans.
D
Months
have
now
gone
by,
and
we
have
not
heard
of
any
plans
for
such
discussion.
We're
eagerly
awaiting
this
housing
discussion
and
resulting
proactive
plans
with
a
roadmap
for
success
for
all
after
the
draft.
Neighborhood
plans
had
been
completed.
We
found
out
through
reading
city
council
agendas
that
the
state
had
passed,
laws
that
allow
no
barrier,
homeless,
shelters
and
housing
in
our
neighborhoods
and
eliminate
caps
on
unrelated
residents
in
a
dwelling.
D
In
addition,
king
county
is
purchasing
hotels
to
house
the
homeless.
One
is
coming
right
across
the
kindercare
daycare
center
here
in
overlake
close
to
bellevue
schools.
This
shelter
isn't
even
going
to
be
to
house
our
homeless
people,
but
it's
mostly
for
homeless
people
busting
from
seattle
and
elsewhere.
D
Will
this
also
be
the
case
for
other
homeless,
housing
and
shelters
that
will
come
to
our
neighborhoods?
How
does
all
this
fit
into
bellevue's
overarching
plans
for
housing?
How
are
you
communicating
at
the
state
and
county
levels
to
protect
our
interests?
How
are
you
collaborating
with
surrounding
cities?
D
D
Let's
take
a
step
back,
give
staff
a
chance
to
perform
or
outsource
the
task
in
the
interest
of
time
to
study
the
proposed
supportive
housing
best
practices
and
assess
the
needs
requiring
consideration
before
final
decisions
are
made
on
supportive
housing
see
how
all
this
fits
into
the
overall
housing
strategy
for
the
city
and
ensure
that
all
the
implications
are
adequately
addressed
and
resolved
before
moving
forward.
Thank
you.
B
B
I
Now,
thank
you
mayor
robinson
and
city
council
members
for
this
opportunities
to
speak.
My
name
is
sally
lawrence.
I
live
at
104
174th
place
northeast
in
bellevue.
I've
lived
in
bellevue
for
28
years,
I'm
a
retired
water
quality
specialist
for
state
department
of
ecology.
I'd
like
to
point
to
a
deficiency
in
bellevue's
planning
process.
I
The
deficiency
is
the
inability
to
take
a
big
picture
approach
to
planning
and
to
consider
the
growth
happening
in
adjacent
neighborhoods.
When
the
adjacent
neighborhood
happens
to
be
in
a
different
city,
I
participated
in
the
great
neighborhoods
process
for
northeast
bellevue.
Over
the
past
two
years
we
residents
have
asked
our
city
planners
to
work
with
city
planners
in
redmond
because
we
are
already
hugely
impacted
by
microsoft.
Next
door
and
redmond
is
planning
a
big
city
jump
in
intensity
in
the
overlake
commercial
area.
I
This
request
to
have
some
kind
of
city
to
city
conversation
in
the
planning
process,
was
ignored.
Similarly,
in
south
bellevue,
the
city
of
bellevue
is
starting
a
watershed
planning
effort
for
coal
creek.
This
is
a
really
good
thing
to
do.
However,
if
we
really
wanted
to
save
coal
creek,
which
is
one
of
only
two
salmon
streams
in
bellevue,
we
would
have
taken
this
watershed
approach
years
ago,
because
the
bellevue
planning
process
does
not
take
a
regional
approach.
I
I
The
appropriate
and
legal
way
to
assess
such
cumulative
and
regional
impacts
is
through
a
full
environmental
impact
assessment
for
any
future
and
and
current
developments
on
coal
creek.
I
will
be
making
this
request
to
the
head
of
bellevue
planning,
but
I'm
here
tonight
to
alert
you
to
these
big
picture
problems
that
have
significant
impacts
on
our
environment
and
the
future
quality
of
life
in
bellevue.
B
J
Thank
you
good
evening
may
robinson
and
council
members.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
for
the
record.
I
am
patience
malaba
director
of
government
relations
and
policy
at
the
housing
development
consortium.
J
I
am
calling
to
express
both
gratitude
and
concern
today,
as
it
relates
to
the
memo
2157,
which
is
the
work
program
around
supportive
housing
best
practices.
J
J
We
are,
however,
concerned
now
about
the
city,
conducting
a
study
on
best
practices
and
regulations
for
supportive
housing
for
two
fundamentally
important
reasons
that
I
want
to
note.
The
first
one
is
that
conducting
a
study
on
best
practices,
many
of
which
housing
providers
already
use,
would
usher
in
further
regulation
for
supportive
housing.
It
would
dis
incentivize
the
production
of
this
critically
needed
housing
and
unnecessarily
bedding
the
city
staff,
with
the
responsibility
to
study
these
practices
and
regulations.
J
Secondly,
a
separate
study
in
and
itself
is
an
effort
to
reinvent
a
will
that
already
exists.
Rather,
we
respectfully
encourage
you
to
allow
the
compilation
of
best
practices
that
providers
already
use
into
a
leaflet
or
pamphlet
that
can
be
shared
with
other
providers
of
supportive
housing
to
encourage
uniform
news
and
education
on
them.
I
so
appreciate
your
leadership
through
this
change
and
growth
as
a
city,
we
know
that
change
is
really
hard.
J
B
K
Oh,
hey
thanks:
everybody
you're
doing
a
really
good
job.
I
appreciate
all
the
hard
work.
Finally
getting
milot
out
of
here.
I
mean
he
left
didn't
fire
him,
but
then
we
don't
have
to
pay
for
breaking
his
contract.
I
get
it.
It
makes
sense
gotta
play
by
the
rules
play
by
the
book
right.
The
problem
with
facebook
I'm
having
right
now
is.
I
just
can't
talk
on
the
police
main
page,
it's
weird
and
they
don't
respond.
You
know
facebook
doesn't
respond,
I'm
trying
to
talk
to
them
about
it.
K
I'll
just
make
a
new
account,
and
if
that
one
can't
post,
then
obviously
it
must
just
be
on
my
end.
So
that's
that's.
I
shouldn't
make
a
silly
thing
about
that.
They
did
ban
me
in
2015
before
trump
got
over
and
messed
the
doj
up
and
ruined
everything.
But
there's
complaints
going
on
about
that.
It's
not
about
you
guys
and
the
council.
I
mean
you
knew
about
it,
but
you
know
it's
not
you.
I
think
we
should
get
police
having
cameras.
Now
we
have
the
technology.
To
do
that.
K
I
mean
I
got
a
camera
in
the
car.
Now
it
takes
no
power.
The
technology
is
great
for
the
resolution.
There's
no
excuse
to
have
that
absent
in
the
department.
Everyone,
a
camera
has
to
be
policy.
Citizen
complaint
review
board
would
be
a
a
good
thing.
I
think
too
just
so
people
can
double
check.
It's
always
good
to
verify.
I
think
there
should
be
no
more
gas
commercial
landscaping
stuff.
K
I
run
a
landscaping
business,
it's
hard
to
get
any
work
right
now
for
me,
but
my
brother
does
a
lot
of
stuff.
We
just
use
electric
tools,
it's
cheap.
It
was
easy,
it's
silent.
We
can
work
on
a
sunday,
no
one.
We
don't
wake
babies
up.
There's
no
noise,
there's
no
gas,
it's
fantastic!
I
would
recommend
if
the
city
can
work
towards
that.
I
mean
yes,
if
you
are
a
residential,
you
have
commercial
people
come,
they
should
have
electric
stuff.
If
you
pay
for
it,
I
mean
it's
worth
the
money,
no
more
gas.
B
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
we
have
council
business
and
we
have
a
new
initiative.
We're
going
to
start
with
council
member
barksdale's
recommendation
to
the
planning
commission,
councilmember
bart
steele,
all.
L
Right,
thank
you
mayor.
I
recommend
creighton
as
the
new
planning
commissioner,
to
fill
the
open
position
on
the
commission
on
the
planning
commission
creighton
understands
where
we
are
as
a
community
and
how
important
the
work
pertinent
to
the
planning
commission
is
to
ensuring
bellevue
is
affordable,
welcoming
and
sustainable.
L
Creighton
has
completed
bellevue
essentials
shows
up
prepared,
you've
read
about
the
relevant
plans
and
initiatives
such
as
the
grant
connection
and
the
neighborhood
plans
prior
to
the
interview
and
cares
deeply
about
ensuring
the
community
is
engaged
in
the
planning
process.
So
I
put
forward
creighton
webplay
as
a
for
recommendation.
A
He's
also
a
very
good
tennis
player.
So
is
there
a
second
to
that
I'll?
Second,
okay,
all
those
in
favor
pointing
creighton
geppel
to
the
planning
commission,
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
terrific.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
up
we
have
a
new
initiative
that
council
member
robertson
asked
staff
to
report
on
or
propose
to
us,
and
I'd
actually
like
to
allow
councilmember
robertson
to
introduce
this
first
and
then
half
staff
do
their
presentations
so
go
ahead.
Councilmember
robertson,.
M
Thank
you
mayor.
So
last
week
I
talked
about
the
reason
I
wanted
to
look
at
best.
Practices
for
supportive
housing
is
that
it
seems
like
the
right
time
right
now
when
we
are
starting
to
fund
supportive
housing
and
when
the
planning
commission
is
engaging
on
the
interim
official
controls
related
to
supportive
housing.
M
Both
stabilize
live
a
high
quality
life
and
get
the
help
they
need
to
move
on
to
whatever
they
want
to
do
next.
So
the
first
step
is
figuring
out
what
the
best
practices
are
for
supportive
housing
at
that
point,
staff
would
come
back
to
council
and
we
would
discuss
the
best
practices
and
decide
do
we
want
to
create
a
leaflet,
for
example,
to
educate
about
what
best
practices
are?
M
Do
we
want
to
put
these
into
our
funding
agreements
so
that
they're
a
condition
of
funding,
or
do
we
want
to
potentially
put
something
into
the
land
use
code?
I
don't
know
which
of
those
three
or
combination
thereof
is
the
right
approach,
but
I
do
know
that
I
want
that
the
people
who
live
in
support
of
housing
projects
to
have
adequate
support-
and
I
want
them
to
be
accepted-
the
projects
to
be
accepted
by
the
neighborhoods
and
you
know,
be
good
neighbors
and
have
neighbors
be
good
neighbors
back
to
them.
M
M
M
A
Thank
you,
okay,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
staff
two
percent.
N
Sure
sure,
mayor
from
the
staff
take
taking
a
look
at
and
the
lead
staff
on
this
is
matt
cummins,
along
with
mike
brennan,
who
have
taken
a
look
at
that.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
mac
to.
There
was
a
memo
included
in
your
packet
with
I'm
answering
some
of
the
questions
that
were
just
raised
by
councilmember,
robertson
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
max
kind
of
walk
through
that
memo
with
the
rest
of
the
council.
O
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miaki,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council.
We
submitted
a
memo
that
was
in
your
packet
here
and
was
out
for
public
review
over
the
weekend
effectively
answering
some
questions
that
the
council
had
at
last
week's
meeting
relating
to
this
item.
So
as
a
quick
recap
during
your
discussions
last
week
about
whether
or
not
to
initiate
a
work
program,
amendment
council
asked
us
some
questions
about
opportunity,
cost
how
big
or
what
was
the
scope
of
the
work
that
was
being
requested.
When
could
it
be
brought
back
and
so
forth?
O
So,
and
there
was
one
other
set
of
considerations
relating
to
timing
as
council
member
robertson
just
mentioned,
the
city
will
be
taking
up
later
tonight,
work
on
interim
official
control
ordinances
and
referring
that
work
to
the
planning
commission.
So
there
were
questions
about
the
co-dependency
of
these
two
bodies
of
work
or
how
the
different
timing
considerations
would
work.
So
what
we
did
was
put
together
a
memo
for
you
all
to
outline
our
thoughts
on
how
this
could
proceed
forward.
O
O
There
could
also
be
impacts
to
resourcing
both
at
the
staff
level
and
potentially
funding,
and
so
we'd
want
to
take
a
look
at
that
and
bring
that
back
to
you.
Should
you
choose
to
implement
additional
regulations
around
permanent,
supportive
housing?
So
what
we've
tried
to
give
you
this
evening
is
a
recap
for
what
the
next
90
days
or
so
would
look
like
as
we
start
that
analysis.
O
Our
thoughts
are
that
it
is
symbiotic
with
other
work
program
items
that
are
already
ongoing,
but
would
have
an
impact
in
terms
of
potential
delay
of
some
of
those
items
because
they're
the
same
people
that
are
working
on
things
that
are
trying
to
get
through
the
commission
or
trying
to
bring
things
back
to
the
council.
We
see
those
delays
in
weeks
and
think
it
would
be
better
if
you
chose
to
initial
initialize
this
and
take
it
start
it
tonight
to
actually
fold
it
into
the
work
program
rather
than
completely
stopping
something
else.
O
To
start
this,
that
would
allow
all
the
housing
work
to
keep
going,
but
it
would
have
a
delay
effect
in
a
few
in
a
few
areas,
and
we've
outlined
those
in
the
memo.
So
you
know
with
that
I'll
be
happy
to
stop
here.
If
the
council
wanted
to
initiate
tonight
one
or
all
of
those
items,
we
think
that
the
october
november
time
frame
would
still
allow
enough
time
for
anything
that
was
referred
to
the
planning
commission
to
still
be
worked
into
the
ioc
work.
O
A
A
A
A
A
G
Oh,
thank
you
three
minutes.
I
support
what
the
councilmember
robertson
brought
up.
As
we
heard
last
week.
We
talk
about
supporting
supportive
housing,
supportive
services.
It's
very
important
battery
is
the
key
word.
You
know
the
also.
The
second
thing
is
double
is
detail
and
we
have
been
doing
a
lot.
The
city
bellevue
the
last
few
months,
more
than
a
lot
of
other
people
have
said
they
have,
and
I'm
very
proud
of
this
and
we're
doing
it
in
a
very
good
speed.
G
G
The
question
now
is
with
the
plymouth
housing
and
we
definitely
support
the
model,
the
keys
operationally.
How
do
we
make
sure
that
we
have
the
best
practice,
but
to
me
it's
even
more
than
best
practice.
You
know
I
didn't
step
into
when
you
add
this
sex.
Over
writing
thing.
Bellevue
has
to
lead.
We
are
leading
in
this
effort.
It's
not
just
copying.
G
What
other
people
have
done,
but
it
has
to
be
specific
that
it
works
and
we're
proving
this
work,
so
we're
going
to
do
more
to
make
it
works,
so
I
would
really
say
that
it's
the
bellevue
way,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
look
at
all
the
ways
that
can
make
the
project
work
and
for
the
whole
overall
benefit
overall
program,
including,
as
we
mentioned,
consistently
mental
health.
That's
very
key:
how
do
you
make
that
work?
What
does
the
detailed
maker
work?
You
know?
G
I
mean
this
depends
on
the
situation,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
emphasize
that.
So
I
think
the
engagement,
the
neighborhood
eventually
I'll
reach
number
five.
I
want
to
emphasize
that
one
all.
The
rest,
I
think,
is
good.
They
just
have
to
work
on
the
details,
but
find
one
neighborhood.
It's
not
just
outreach.
I
think
we
need
to
engage
them.
We
don't
want
to
just
have
all
done
and
say
well,
it's
time.
You
know
we
already,
and
you
know
what
it
is
gonna
happen.
G
I
believe
that
we
need
to
have
their
help,
just
like
we've
had
in
congregation
for
homeless,
that
the
neighborhood
group
has
been
very,
very
productive,
helping
to
make
sure
that
whatever
we
do
fits
and
is
right
for
the
bellevue
way.
So
I
like
to
make
that
modification.
While
this
reminds
us
when
we
do
it,
it's
not
just
outreach
say
we
have
done
it
and
you
just
know
about
it,
but
we
actually
want
them
to
hear
them
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
make
it
work
for
all
of
us
for
the
inmates
for
the
patients.
G
I
use
the
wrong
word,
not
humans
for
the
client
for
the
people
we
serve
for
all
of
us.
I
think
it's
very
important.
It's
the
whole
program,
so
I'm
really
interested,
and
I
support
this.
We
don't
want
to
do
it
delay
it,
but
I
think
we
can
do
it
and
I
believe,
also
the
last
one
if
we
need
resources,
it's
our
council's
responsibility
to
provide
resources,
it's
important
to
us.
Okay,
so
that's
our
job
find
resources.
Do
it.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
I
really
appreciate
the
staff
outlining
all
of
this
and
looking
at
this,
you
know,
as
I
said
before,
I
think,
we're
to
a
certain
extent
a
solution
proposed
solution.
C
Looking
for
a
problem
and
a
lot
of
it
is
just
kind
of
signaling
and
I
my
biggest
concern
is
waste
taking
a
lot
of
time
to
redo
stuff
or
look
at
stuff
in
a
way
that
is
kind
of
prescriptive
of
the
things
we
don't
like
government
kind
of
doing,
and
not
really
coming
together
on
this
and
spending
time
that
could
be
spent
on
something
more
productive
and
also
setting
up
again
a
concept
that
it's
it's
saying
that
we
don't
quite
trust
the
people
who
are
doing
this
business
and
we
don't
quite
trust
the
people
who
go
in
there
to
behave
themselves
and
I
think,
there's
a
better
approach
to
it.
C
I'm
sorry,
my
dog
is
responding,
my
voice.
I
guess
I
just
I
think
we're
we're
over
overloading
this,
and
I
think
patience.
Malaba
made
a
very,
very
good
point.
We
can
work
on
this
without
going
through
this
whole
construct
of
complex
process.
We
can
get
best
practices.
We
can
talk
to
why
don't
we
start
out
by
talking
to
the
people
who
provide
the
services?
C
You
know
by
the
way,
plymouth
housing
is
not
they're
already
doing
this
project,
so
we're
not
talking
about
them,
but
as
we
know
from
them,
they
already
have
processes
in
place,
and
I
just
think
we
have
to
be
careful
that
we
don't
continue
to
say
that
bellevue
is
a
difficult
place
to
actually
get
care
for
our
city,
or
you
know,
citizen,
homeless
and
working
and
need
assistance,
and
it's
it's.
We
can
do
this
without
making
it
look
like
so
prescriptions.
C
That's
my
my
biggest
concern
and
I
I
think
we
could
do
this
and
I
don't
like
to
keep
putting
other
things
off.
You
know
we
took.
There
was
an
article
in
the
paper
today
about
the
light
rail
and
why
light
rail
is
so
expensive
and
the
years
it's
taken
to
get
something
decided
on
that
even
simple,
more
simple
things
like
this
takes
us
forever
and
I
just
think
it's
it's
a
solution
that
is
overblown
for
what
we're
trying
to
reach
and
I
think
we
get
it
to
it
with
in
a
better
way.
C
But
I
do
support
the
whole
idea,
and
I
appreciate
house
member
robertson
bringing
this
up
and
then
that
let's
look
at
best
practices,
let's
come
up
with
something
fairly
simple,
but
we
start
asking
people
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna
start
asking
people,
you
know
the
a
safety
and
security
plan
requirement
for
it.
Well,
they
probably
have
one
a
ratio
of
staff
caregivers
to
residents.
Are
we
gonna
dictate
the
numbers
of
those?
C
I
think
these
are
just
things
that
it's
a
good
idea,
but
we're
just
over
doing
it
and
imposing
on
things
that
are
even
more
to
get
to
get
involved,
so
I'm
just
having
a
kind
of
concern.
Why
we're
we're
doing
this
at
this
time?
For
particularly
since
we're
not
talking
about
projects
in
place,
I
just
think
we
can
take
a
lower
key,
better,
more
positive
and
better
actually
doing
a
job
in
the
long
run
by
not
going
this
in
the
in
this
depth
in
this.
In
this
approach,.
A
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
would
say
that
council
member
stoke
said
a
lot
of
what
I
have
been
thinking
about,
which
is
also
what
council
member
barksdale
brought
up
last
week,
which
is
the
fact
that
we
can
have
this
conversation
and
a
compilation
of
best
practices
into
a
pamphlet,
and
I
believe
that
patience
malava
actually
talked
about
the
fact
that
those
very
providers
that
know
the
most
about
how
to
ensure
the
most
success
for
supportive
housing
would
be
at
the
center
of
providing
that
type
of
document.
E
So
I
guess
I
I
think
about
having
these
conversations
in
a
way
that
isn't
a
burden
to
our
staff.
That's
already
working
on
the
very
things
that
we've
said
is
the
most
important
to
us
and
not
reinventing
the
wheel
for
things
that
already
exist
from
the
very
providers
of
the
service,
and
when
I
look
at
the
list
here,
it
isn't
that
there's
no
impact
because
we
have
said
that
working
on,
affordable
housing
is
the
most
important
piece
that
we're
working
on.
We
also
last
week
talked
about
spending
some
time.
E
E
So
I
what
I
see
is
that
by
adding
this
to
the
work
plan,
these
other
things
are
going
to
get
pushed.
So
my
concern
is
that
we
can
work
in
partnership
with
the
very
providers
that
are
the
experts
in
this
area.
Instead
of
asking
our
staff
to
do
a
study
and
do
this
work
ourselves,
so
I'm
absolutely
committed
to
the
success
of
supportive
housing.
I
just
don't
believe
that
this
is
the
approach,
that's
the
most
appropriate
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
I
really
appreciate
the
conversation
so
far
and
a
lot
of
good
comments
and
certainly
councilman
robertson.
I
appreciate
you
moving
this
moving
this
forward
and
also
with
staff
just
and
outlining
this
in
the
in
the
memo
you
know
from
from
my
perspective,
you
know,
there's
little
to
no
impact
can
be
done
in
90
days.
H
I
think
the
timing
is
right.
I
would
certainly
like
to
know
that
the
city
of
bellevue
is
adhering
to
best
practices
when
it
comes
to
supportive
housing,
and
I
I
really
don't
see
any
downside.
I
don't.
I
don't
see
that
at
this
point
right
now.
In
the
conversation
we
need
to
make
a
decision
in
terms
of
which
ones
we
may
want
to
look
at,
including
in
the
luca
or
or
further
emphasizing
it
through
through
different
channels,
as
councilman
robertson
mentioned.
H
You
know
for
for
me,
I'd
just
like
to
start
to
come
back
list
some
of
the
best
practices
and
then,
as
a
counselor,
we
can
make
decisions
about
the
ones
that
we
feel
are
appropriate
or
not
appropriate.
I
think
we're
all
on
the
same
page
in
terms
of
we
do
not
want
to
slow
down
any
any
progress
that
we've
made
as
as
a
city,
I
don't
think,
that's
our
intention
at
all.
At
the
same
time,
I
want
to
what
I
want
to
know
what
these
best
practices
are.
H
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
adhering
to
them.
You
know
it
kind
of
goes
back
to
what
we
heard
during
oral
communications
from
elsa
bluma.
H
You
know,
I
I
think
you
know
residents
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
approaching
this
in
the
right
way,
we're
looking
at
the
impacts
to
any
community
or
neighborhood
and
and
we're
balancing
that
with
moving
as
fast
as
we
possibly
can
to
create
this
type
of
housing.
So
I
don't
see
any
harm,
there's
very
minimal
impact.
So
I
look
forward
and
to
to
supporting
this
and
hopefully
looking
forward
to
a
good
relation
or
a
good
discussion
with
staff
is
able
to
come
back
with
some
recommendations
or
best
practices
for
us
to
debate
and
discuss.
A
L
All
right,
sir,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
think
councilman
amazon
and
councilman
stokes
have
hit
some
similar
points
that
I
would
have
hit.
You
know,
I
guess
the
way
I
see
this
is
we're
delaying
strategies
that
would
create
affordable
housing,
which
we've
talked
a
lot
about
for
strategies
that
would
make
it
difficult
more
difficult
for
affordable
housing
or
permanent
supportive
housing
to
be
built
in
the
city.
L
I
think
the
approach
that
that's
already
been
mentioned
in
terms
of
talking
with
the
permanent
supportive
housing
developers
is
a
really
good
way
to
find
that
out
and
capture
those
in
a
pamphlet
so,
and
I
think
the
permanent
support
of
housing
developers
are
already
incentivized
for
their
projects
to
work
in
the
community
because
they
they're
not
in
the
business
of
just
you
know,
generate
of
generating
property
they're
in
the
business
of
trying
to
help
the
people
that
they're
serving
through
permanent
support
housing.
L
A
Thank
you
and
I
was
going
to
say
the
same
thing.
These
are
not
profit
making
projects,
I'm
not
interested
in
creating
a
more
burdensome
process
for
the
developers
who
are
able
and
willing
to
create
the
supportive
housing
that
we
need
to
serve
the
people
in
our
community.
A
So
I
I
will
not
be
voting
yes
on
all
of
these,
but
there
are
two
that
do
interest
me
and-
and
we
are
voting
to
ask
staff
to
look
further
into
this.
It's
not
yes
or
no
on
actually
adopting
anything.
It's
just
tonight
we're
looking
at
asking
staff
whether
or
not
we
want
them
to
go
beyond
eight
hours
to
look
further
and
make
a
recommendation
to
the
council
with
pros
and
cons.
A
So
number
two,
I'm
very
interested
in,
because
I
know
that
supportive
services
require
are
required
for
success
with
the
population
that
we're
housing
and
and
on-site
is
the
best
thing
you
can
do
for
them.
So
I'm
going
to
be
very
interested
in
knowing
based
on
best
practices
for
the
population
being
served.
A
What
kind
of
on-site
supportive
services
staff
would
recommend
or
how
we
might
put
that
into
something
an
agreement
and
then
number
five?
You
know
we
recently
have
experienced
what
happens
when
we
don't
have
community
outreach
when
redmond
is
citing
permanent,
supportive
housing
in
redmond,
but
on
the
border
at
bellevue
and
there's
been
no
outreach
to.
F
A
Bellevue
community
to
the
people
who
live
in
bellevue
in
that
area
or
who
frequent
these
services
there-
and
I
don't
know
about
the
rest
of
the
council,
but
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
emails
from
concerned
residents
that
that
would
probably
support
this
if
they
knew
more
about
it.
So
I
I'm
very
interested
in
having
information
on
how
we
might
require
community
outreach
if
we're
signing
a
facility
like
that.
A
A
The
people
doing
it
are
not
doing
it
to
make
money
they're
doing
it
to
help
the
community,
so
the
best
practices
are
going
to
be
changing
year
to
year
population
to
population.
So
we
need
to
have
some
flexibility
in
what
we
we
require.
So
is
there
any
do
you
want
to
go
around
again?
Is
there
anybody
else
who'd
like
to
speak?
A
L
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I,
I
guess
just
one
question
a
couple
questions
one:
what
time
would
it
take
to
look
at
a
subset,
so
the
two
that
were
mentioned
and
and
how
does
that
impact
the
work
plan
and
then,
secondly,
I
know
that
I
think
councilmember
robertson
said
and
other
best
practices.
So
how
does
that
play
into
that
idea
of
looking
at
these.
O
Mayor,
if
it's
okay,
I
think
I'll
I'll
respond
to
that.
The
obviously
having
only
two
of
the
five
things
will
reduce
the
total
amount
of
staff
time
in
terms
of
research,
analysis,
generating
pros
and
cons,
and
you
know
where
the
the
two
things,
how
they're
best
done
for
for
cities
that
do
regulate
permanent
supportive
housing
in
those
areas.
You
know.
Obviously,
then
what
would
happen
is
there'd,
be
less
delay
for
the
items
that
we've
suggested
could
experience
a
delay.
O
You
know,
should
you
advance
forward
on
the
second
part,
I'm
not
sure
I've
heard
from
the
council
yet
individually
or
collectively
about
a
catch-all
for
all
best
management
practices.
We
understood
that
to
be
hey
while
you're
out,
you
know
talking
to
providers
or
other
cities.
If
there
are
things
we
should
be
thinking
about,
please
don't
just
immediately
eliminate
them,
but
bring
them
back
to
us
as
well,
but
probably
be
good
to
get
some
specific
direction.
O
If
council
wants
us
to
be
out
with
a
with
a
catch-all
on
all
things,
permanent,
supportive
housing.
L
I
I
I
guess
just
my
uncertainty.
There
is
just
if
you're
out
and
you
observe
things
and
they
come
up
and
you
would,
I
would
imagine,
and
you
bring
them
back
to
council.
I
would
imagine
that
that
means
you
would
have
had
to
spend
time
digging
into
those
as
well
in
order
to
get
to
any
level
of
confidence
and
bring
those
back
to
council,
so
the
scope
might
creep
beyond
just
the.
O
Yeah,
I
think
what
we
would
want
to
look
for.
Some
direction
from
the
council
is
probably
to
to
either
make
sure
we're
all
on
the
same
page
that
be
relatively
narrowly
scoped.
O
So,
if
there's
a
topical
area
that
is
a
permanent
supportive
housing
thing
that
is
typically
regulated
somewhere
else,
we
could
look
at
that
and
bring
it
back
to
you,
but
but
not
be
sending
significant
staff
time
out
looking
for
that,
that
would
have
a
significant
impact
to
the
work
plan.
So
the
way
this
came
up
last
week
and
the
way
we
evaluated
it
was
basically
not
to
eliminate
something.
O
If
we
saw
something
in
our
research
that
we
thought
the
council
should
know
about,
but
not
to
be
aggressively
out,
you
know
looking
for
something
that
hasn't
come
up
in
conversation.
Yet,
okay,.
C
Well,
I
think
that
narrowing
into
these
two
is
interesting.
I
suspect
well
one.
The
question
was
brought
up
about
seattle
or
about
redmond.
The
requirement
for
certain
on-site
supportive
services
actually
is
a
requirement
that
the
king
county
has
in
the
1590
funding,
and
that
would
be
a
really
easy
one
to
find
out
about
the
number
five
net
outreach
and
relationship
building.
That's
that's
a
good
thing
to
do
so.
We
can
agree
on
those
things.
C
I'm
just
not
sure
that
we
need
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
back
and
trying
to
find
all
this
stuff
out
and
what
I'm
concerned
about
again
is.
Is
it
says
in
the
in
the
agenda
item
here
or
in
the
of
above?
There
are
some
significant
things
that
will
be
delayed
that
are
ongoing
right
now
and
again
it's
this
idea,
and
this
optics
of
so
bellevue
is
getting
itself
and
get
engaged
in
process
and
and
looking
at
things
and
studying
and
taking
time
and
80
days.
C
90
days
is
a
lot
of
time
on
things,
we're
doing,
because
we're
just
not
concerned
about
we're
controlling
things
too
much
and
we're
worried
about
having
these
these
people
developers
come
in.
Who
are
doing
this
work
and
not
you
know,
they're
not
doing
for
profit
and
requiring
all
these
things
for
these
people,
so
we
can
keep
them
from.
You
know
interrupting
the
neighborhood.
I
just
it
the
optics
and
the
the
tone
of
this
is
just
not
what
we
need
to
be
doing
now
in
bellevue.
C
We
can
get
to
these
things
and,
frankly,
I
think
we
go
around
and
talk
to
people
who
are
doing
this
they're
going
to
say
yes,
like
plymouth
did
okay
here
it
is.
This
is
what
we
do.
We
don't
go
around
and
talk
to
people
who
are
putting
up
a
you
know:
housing
unit,
a
regular
apartment,
complex.
Do
you
have?
How
do
you?
How
do
you
control
people
in
your
apartment
from
doing
things
which
they
do
all
the
time
I
mean
it's
just
human
nature,
so
I
just
I'm
just
concerned
about
the
optics
of
this.
C
Good
best
practices
without
spending
a
lot
of
staff
time
on
really
needy
things
to
be
done
in
these
next
three
months
or
so
going
into
the
new
year,
because
we
are
really
moving
forward
and
I
think
it'll
put
a
little
breaks
on
what
we're
doing
and
then
we're
gonna
have
to
come
back
with
all
of
these
things
and
then
we're
gonna
have
to
talk
about
them
and
given
practices
in
the
past
it'll
be
three
months
to
a
year
before
we
come
up
with
a
final
solution
on
these
things.
C
So
I'm
just
having
a
hard
time
really
thinking.
Why
we're
spending
time
on
this
now
when
we
could
get
a
better
solution
and,
frankly,
if
we
could
go
out
and
have
staff
talk
to,
or
I'm
sure,
they're
already
talking
to
them,
but
people
who
are
in
the
business
now
find
out
what
they're
doing
other
places
find
out
what
king
county
is
doing.
Redmond
has
practices
in
place,
they're,
not
just
throwing
a
thing
out
there.
C
I
do
think
the
idea
of
having
on
the
neighborhood
part
in
the
bottom
or
of
our
way,
to
communicate
better
with
our
neighborhood
with
our
other
cities.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
actually
redmond
was
putting
out
information.
I
saw
it
in
next
door.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilmember
robertson,.
M
Sure,
no,
I
agree
that
we
should
be
able
to
get
these
answers
in
a
few
weeks,
and
that
is
what
staff
said.
It
would
take
they're
already
doing
work
on
supportive
housing,
they're
already
doing
work
on
these
issues,
so
this
would
just
be
to
expand
it
a
little
bit
to
see
how
we
can
do
things
the
best
way
when
bellevue
decided
to
take
the
1590
money.
M
That
meant
that
we
were
going
to
control
and
fund
supportive
housing
projects,
homeless,
shelters,
affordable
housing,
what's
the
other
category
and
blanking
on
it,
but
all
the
different
kinds
of
housing
that
are
so
needed.
If
we're
funding
them,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
they're
done
in
the
best
way
possible.
I
would
fully
expect
that
the
work
of
figuring
out
the
best
practices
would
involve
talking
to
providers
would
involve
talking
to
and
looking
at
what
other
cities
are
doing.
M
That's
the
work,
we're
talking
about
doing
we're
not
talking
about
we're
going
to
adopt
this
thing
in
the
land
use
code,
we're
going
to
put
such
and
such
as
a
condition
of
the
funding
agreement,
or
we're
going
to
put
it
into
a
pamphlet.
If
we
want
to
do
anything
and
understand
these,
I
personally
need
to
know
more
about
making
sure
that
what
comes
to
bellevue
comes
above
you
in
a
really
effective
way
for
the
people
living
there.
M
That's
where
we
don't
want
to
see
that
happen
here,
because
that's
not
good
for
the
people
that
are
living
in
those
facilities,
and
it's
not
good
for
the
people
who
are
living
around
those
facilities.
Supportive
housing
is
something
where
the
folks
need
support.
So
I
appreciate
the
mayor
looking
at
the
on-site
supportive
services,
that's
one
of
the
key
things
that
can
make
these
work
depending
on
the
type
of
supportive
housing
project
that
it
is.
So
this
is
not
a
big
delay.
M
We
need
to
know
what
the
best
practices
are,
because
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
and
how
can
we
evaluate
supportive
housing
projects
they're
asking
bellevue
for
funding?
If
we
don't
know
what
makes
the
makes
the
different
projects
really
effective?
M
So,
yes,
the
nonprofits
are
going
to
know
a
lot
more,
the
ones
that
are
doing
it,
but
I'm
of
the
belief
that
you
know
trust
but
verify
right.
We
need
to
look
at
what
is
happening
because
there
are
some
nonprofits
like
plymouth
that
are
far
better
and
more
effective
than
others,
and
so,
if
we
don't
know
what
the
best
practices
are,
how
can
we
ever
evaluate
it?
I
need
that
input
from
staff.
M
I
don't
want
to
have
to
look
through
every
grant
agreement
and
say
well
what
is
this
and
investigate
every
one
as
an
individual
already
employed
outside
the
home
full-time,
as
well
as
being
a
council
member
on
every
time
we
have
a
project
come
forward.
I
want
to
have
a
set
of.
This
is
what
we're
looking
for.
This
is
what
we
know
works.
This
is
the
supports
that
this
group
needs
it.
Does
this
project
meet
it?
M
Yes,
let's
fund
it,
that's
what
I'm
looking
for,
and
so
I
would
hope
that
we
would
have
considering
what
limited
impact
this
has
on
the
work
plan
that
we
would
have
support
for
that,
because
that's
the
that's
the
information
I'm
going
to
need
going
forward
every
single
time.
We
can
do
it
once
or
you
know
we
can
do
it
every
time
I
mean
this
seems
like
the
best
way
to
go
so
because
we're
already
doing
this
work
now,
so
I'd
appreciate
support
of
the
council
and
my
colleagues.
Thank
you.
A
E
Council
members
on
yes,
thank
you
mayor.
So
as
I'm
listening
to
the
comments,
I
guess
here's
where
I
am,
I
am
wondering
so
this
particular
item
as
it's
currently
framed,
is
talking
about
item
for
study,
best
practices
and
regulation,
and
yet,
when
I
think
about
those
two
items
mayor
that
you
brought
up,
I'm
trying
to
understand
as
well.
So
item
number
two.
E
E
So
is
this
so
so
I
guess
my
whole
comment
is
that
if
what
we're
trying
to
study
in
number
two
is
what
level
of
on-site
supportive
services
we're
gonna
need,
so
that
we
are
adequately
funding
the
1590
money
for
that.
That
is
a
different
discussion
than
study,
best
practices
and
regulation.
It's
more
about
holding
ourselves
accountable
that
we
are
going
to
fund
adequately
because
we
chose
to
take
the
1590
money
instead
of
king
county,
so
it
doesn't
seem
like
it
completely
fits
into
this
particular
item
that
we're
talking
about.
E
But
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
in
the
context
of
this
particular
item
in
framing
whether
this
is
the
best
way
to
get
at
that
or,
if
it's
more
of
connecting
with
the
very
folks
that
are
providing
these
services
for
how
best
to
to
do
that
outreach
versus
putting
it
into
some
land
use
code.
Thank
you.
A
Well,
remember
we're
voting
on
asking
staff
to
evaluate
this
and
make
a
recommendation
with
pros
and
cons.
So
this
is
a
start,
but
they
may
come
back
with
a
different
recommendation.
That
is
then,
is
written
here.
Excuse
me,
five
councilmember
lee.
G
I
am
here
to
make
sure
that
this
project
is
the
best
it's
good
project
that
naturally
works
for
all
for
everybody,
for
the
clients
as
well,
for
people
who
live
there,
because
it
is
to
improve
their
welfare
and
being,
and
I
think
that
the
what
the
public
believes
in
you
know
we
all
as
each
council
member,
have
our
own
ideas
and
thoughts,
but
you
know
we
have
seen
that
and
that's
why
we
put
so
much
emphasis
on
neighborhood
on
the
community
engagement
because
they
have
been
very
successful,
demonstrated
and
we
represent
them.
G
They
are
the
community
and
they
are
on
board
and
we
need
to
have
them
to
help
us
to
make
sure
that
is
the
best.
And
you
know
we
don't
have
a
simple,
quick
formula.
This
is
not
a
a
simple
project.
This
is
a
big
deal.
You
know
we
haven't
had
a
real,
clear
success
example.
G
However,
we
need
to
be
sure
that
it's
more
than
that,
it's
something
that
we
as
a
community,
we
as
consumers,
resent
them
that
we
can
help
to
make
it
even
better
if
it's
possible,
if
it's
already
the
best,
it's
fine,
we
use
it,
but
I
think
it
needs
to
be
considered,
and
I
agree
with
the
mayor.
You
know
I
don't
know
all
about
that
stuff,
maybe
others
when
we
start
looking
at
best
practices.
G
There
are
other
things,
that's
the
staff's
responsibility
to
tell
us
what
makes
this
the
best
there
is
well
the
best
we
can
make
it,
and
you
know
so.
I
I'm
not.
You
know
that
I'm
the
one
that
I
really
agree
with
the
mayor
that
I
personally
is
the
supportive
citizen
is
important.
We
all
recognize
that
so
that
needs
to
be
there,
and
I
also
agree,
as
I
said,
neighborhood
engagement,
but
it's
more
than
just
outreach
more
than
just
using
the
signing
board,
but
actually
have
them
help
us.
G
G
It's
not
just
for
us
for
the
rest,
but
for
the
rest
of
the
wellbeing,
but
it's
safety
and
security
for
all
everyone,
people
who
live
there,
the
clients,
the
people
who
are
you,
know
living
there,
and
so
they
have
to
be
safe.
They
have
to
be
secret,
it's
for
them.
So
I
think
all
these
are
things
that
we
need
to
learn.
We
need
to
find
out
more.
G
We
need
to
have
the
community
helping
us
support
us,
because
that's
how
we
can
get
support,
that's
how
we
get
encouragement
so
on
and
we
represent
the
public,
and
now
we've
seen
it's
booming.
There's
a
good
neighbor
plan,
that's
working
well
with
congregation
homeless.
So
why
not
have
them
help
plymouth?
I
I
have
a
good
experience.
I
mean
I've
seen
the
good
presentation
they
made.
I
was
very
impressed.
G
A
So
you
know
I
really
liked
what
councilmember
zahn
said
about
the
requirement
is
not
just
for
the
provider,
but
also
for
the
the
city
that
if
we
ask
for
support
services
based
on
best
practices,
it
probably
also
is
a
commitment
that
we
will
fund
those
services.
A
I
come
to
this
as
the
representative
on
the
mental
illness,
drug
dependency
oversight
committee
and
I've
looked
at
their
research
for
five
years,
and
I
know
that
there
are
some
supportive
services
that
are
more
effective
than
others,
for
example,
on-site
drug
addressing
drug
and
alcohol
addiction.
On-Site
services,
for
that
is
extremely
effective,
and
you
may
have
to
pay
more
to
have
that
as
opposed
to
sending
somebody
on
a
bus
across
to
a
site
in
seattle.
A
So
they
can
get
the
services
there.
Most
people
won't
pursue
that.
So
it
is
important
to
me
that
we
have
high
standards
of
support
services
that
actually
have
been
shown
to
work
and
that
were
committed
to
funding
providing
the
funding
for
them
so
that
the
people
in
bellevue
who
require
the
support
and
are
in
this
type
of
a
facility,
have
the
best
chances
of
recovery
and
success.
A
So
that
is
my
pitch
for
number
two
and
I
think
we'll
go
ahead
and
I
will
read
each
of
these
as
proposed
by
councilmember
robertson,
with
the
edition
of
number
six,
and
I
would
appreciate
if
you
could
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
voting,
I
so
that
I
can
see
so.
A
So
I'm
under
you.
A
B
This
is
the
city
clerk
since
you're
not
going
to
be
taking
them
comprehensively.
As
one
motion,
I
would
just
suggest
taking
them
as
individual
emotions.
A
G
A
M
Did
in
listening
to
the
discussion
I'd
like
to
just
make
a
call,
we
have
a
lot
on
our
agenda
tonight,
I'd
like
to
make
a
comprehensive
motion
that
I
think
we'll
get
hopefully
get
to
where
the
council
at
least
the
majority
of
the
council
is
so,
and
if
we
don't
do
that,
we
can
take
them
up
one
by
one,
but
I
am
going
to
move
to
direct
staff
and
and
to
council
member
lee's
point.
M
A
M
That's
two
and
five
yeah
number
two:
I
said
best
practices
for
supportive
housing,
including
on-site
supportive
services.
That's
number
two
and
neighborhood
outreach
engagement
and
relationship
building,
that's
number
five
and
to
bring
these
items
back
to
council
for
discussion.
Just
we're,
gonna,
learn
about
them
and
potential
future
implementation.
Just
clarity,
yeah.
L
O
A
O
L
O
It
would
definitely
take
over
eight
hours
for
sure
and
it
will
have
an
impact
to
some
of
those
other
housing
programs.
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
big
or
small
impact.
I
think
those
are
sort
of
value
based
words.
The
impact
will
be
likely
some
delays
in
in
the
items
that
we've
listed
off,
which
is
some
of
the
remaining
items
in
the
housing,
affordable,
housing,
work
program
and
or
a
few
things
that
are
trying
to
work
their
way
through
commissions.
E
Yes,
I
I
wondered
councilmember
robertson,
whether
you'd
be
willing
to
read
that
one
more
time
I
want
to
make
sure
I
I
caught
all
of
what
you
said.
Thank
you.
M
Sure,
and
and
as
I'd
remind
the
council
that
max's
mac
had
said
weeks,
this
is
not
as
far
as
any
additional
time
to
work
on
the
work
plan.
Okay,
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
initiate
work,
to
evaluate
and
bring
back
for
council
consideration
best
practices
for
supportive
housing,
including
on-site
supportive
services
and
neighborhood
outreach
engagement
and
relationship
building
and
to
bring
these
items
back
to
council
for
discussion
and
potential
future
implementation.
C
E
A
M
I
should
really
rewrite
it:
it's
not
a
little
bit
repetitive
there
for
cons.
The
consideration
is
used
twice
or
bring
back,
but
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
initiate
work,
to
evaluate
and
bring
back
for
council
consideration
best
practices
for
supportive
housing,
including
on-site
supportive
services
and
neighborhood
outreach
engagement
and
relationship
building,
and
to
bring
these
items
back
to
council
for
discussion
and
potential
future
implementation.
M
M
From
mac
is
that
as
they
learn
about,
if
they
learn
about
other
best
practices,
they'll
bring
them
back,
but
they're.
This
isn't
going
to
mean
that
they're
going
to
start
doing
a
deep
dive
on
everything,
they're
going
to
look
at
the
two
issues
and
then,
if
something
pops
up
when
they're
looking
at
that,
they'll
bring
that
back
too.
That
would
be
my
expectation.
C
Well,
that's,
that's
not
the
way,
it
reads
I
mean
it
basically
you're
saying
you
want
to
look
at
best
practices
in
general,
including
these
two.
C
O
Mayor,
thank
you.
I
I
do
follow.
Council
members
stokes
point
so
without
wordsmithing
too
much.
If,
if
the
actual
motion
is
to
evaluate
all
best
practices
that
could
insinuate
that
there's
a
much
larger
universe
than
I
think
has
been
the
intent
of
the
conversation
here,
it
would
be
good
if
the
intent
is
to
really
focus
on
those
two
things
I
mean.
I
hope
this
is
always
the
case.
O
If
we're
out
doing
work
for
the
council
and
see
something
you
all
haven't,
thought
of
and
didn't
come
up
in
conversation,
we
we
try
our
best
to
bring
best
practices
to
you.
I
think
the
intent
is
we're.
Trying
to
understand
is
what
is
the
scope
of
what
the
council's
trying
to
move
forward
with
this
exercise.
A
So
my
original
proposal
was
for
number
two
was
a
requirement
for
on-site
supported
services
based
on
best
practices
for
the
population
served.
Is
that
different
enough
to
specify
that
we're
looking
at
that
and
not
the
whole
gambit
or
is.
A
A
C
A
I'm
amending
I'm
amending
the
first
motion,
but
can
you
state
it
councilmember
robertson?
Are
you
able
to
state
the
motion
to
work
with
the
way?
Yes.
M
Of
course,
I
am
I'm
happy
to
you
know.
The
thing
about
this
is
staff
knows
what
we're
talking
about
they're,
not
going
to
get
confused.
They've
heard
the
whole
discussion,
but
I'm
happy
to
amend
the
motion
and
wordsmith
it.
So
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
initiate
work
to
evalu,
evaluate
best
practices
for
supportive
housing
instead
of
including
I'll
say,
specifically
evaluating
on-site
supportive
services
based
on
best
practices
for
population
served
and
for
neighborhood
outreach,
engagement
and
relationship
building,
and
to
bring
these
items
back
to
council
for
discussion
and
potential
future
implementation.
A
M
D
C
C
I
assume
that
we
will
look
at
the
best
practices
we
did
that
with
with
plymouth.
We
we
will
look
at
this,
so
we're
just
we're
kind
of
asking
to
do
something,
they're
kind
of
going
to
do
anyhow,
but
I
do
like
cutting
it
down
to
a
smaller
amount,
because
it's
not
just
weeks
it's
it's
three
months
or
more
and
guaranteed
these
things
take
longer.
C
So
this
is
an
improvement.
Q
L
I
guess
I
guess
it's
a
question
about
so
I
know
we're
trimming
it
down
to
to
fit
with
to
to
minimize
the
impact
I
mean.
I
wonder
if
there's
a
way
to
just
limit
the
time
frame,
if
it's
eight
hours
in
this
this
matter
of
weeks,
can
we
say,
like
put
it,
put
a
max
time
that
we
want
staff
to
spend
on
it.
O
Well,
one
of
the
things
we
always
strive
for,
of
course,
is
to
do
work
very
well.
You
know
and
bring
back.
O
So
as
we
look
to
bring
this
back
to
you,
our
our
best
advice
for
you,
if
you
want
to
take
some
of
these
up
and
now
there's
discussion
about
two
of
the
five
that
we
would
want
to
try
to
fold
that
into
our
existing
work
program
compared
to
stopping
something
else
completely
and
then
just
working
on
this
and
then
getting
back
to
it,
but
it
would
have
an
impact,
there's
only
so
many
bodies
at
city
hall,
doing
all
this
different.
A
A
Are
you
through
council
member
barksdale,
or
do
you
want
to
try
to
put
some
sort
of
time
limit
on
this?
I
think
I
mean
I
feel
like
what
was
proposed
for
all
five
was
120
hours.
You
said
about
three
weeks
right
and
so
to
limit
it
to
80
hours,
which
would
be
two
weeks
or
40
hours,
which
would
be
one
week
of
time
based
you
know
and
taking
into
consideration
what
staff
has
just
told
you.
O
Mayor
just
as
a
point
of
clarification,
I
don't
believe
we've
estimated
number
of
hours
going
into
this.
We've
talked
about
90
days
plus
or
minus
getting
through
the
end
of
october.
There
are
actually
a
number
of
staff
and,
depending
on
the
issues
that
come
up,
you
know
there
could
be
legal
analysis
involved
and
so
forth.
So
not
knowing
exactly
all
the
issues.
Yet
we
have
not
honed
in
on
a
number
of
hours
across
all
these
different
departments.
It's
likely
to
be
much
more
than
that
over
a
three
month
span.
But
again
we
haven't.
A
O
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
I
can
clarify
that
the
delays
in
the
other
work
programs
are
likely
to
be
in
weeks
not
months.
So
if
something
flips
back
one
commission
meeting
to
the
next,
that's
a
two-week
delay,
because
this
work
is
being
fit
in.
So
it's
in
weeks,
not
in
several
months
back
on
all
these
other
items.
A
O
L
N
Can
I
just
weigh
in
I
mean
I,
I
agree
that
the
council
will
be
up,
but
there
will
be
a
number
of
staff
on
vacation
as
well
as
well.
So
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
for
consideration.
E
Comment
yeah.
I
did
because,
as
I'm
listening
to
the
comments
about
the
fact
that
staff
is
already
overburdened
with
the
work
that
we
have
at
hand
and
what
patience
malava
gave
in
public
testimony
about
not
reinventing
the
wheel
and
wanting
to
work
in
partnership
with
us
to
develop
a
compilation
of
best
practices,
whether
we
really
should
be
having
staff,
do
the
outreach
to
those
that
know
the
most
about
best
practices
to
be
doing
more
of
this
work
of
compilation
versus
staff
spending
a
lot
of
time.
E
So
I
keep
thinking
about
the
fact
that
you
know
it
seems
like
we're
asking
staff
to
do
something
that
the
community,
that's
really
focused
on.
This
work
would
be
able
to
provide
us
the
most
information.
So
I
just
wonder
whether
this
is
the
best
use
of
staff
time
or,
if
they're
or,
if
the
way
that
this
this
motion
or
is
framed,
actually
would
have
staff.
E
A
Well,
in
my
field
of
work,
best
practices
means
you're.
Looking
at
research
of
what's
already
been
established
as
successful
and
as
a
best
practice,
it
doesn't
mean
you're,
you
are
creating
the
best
practice.
So
it's
looking
at
what
has
been
successful.
What's
considered,
you
know
the
the
gold
standard
and
and
and
what
would
that
look
like
for
bellevue
to
do
so?
It's
kind
of
reviewing
what
the
work
work.
That's
already
been
done
and
choosing
what
would
be
good
for
bellevue.
So
I
don't
see
staff
as
creating
these
standard.
O
Council
members
on
I,
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
groups
that
have
done
research
on
the
continuum
of
housing
and
continuum
of
care.
And,
yes,
there
are
undoubtedly
a
variety
of
different
potential
best
practices
that
have
been
published
out
there.
O
The
key
would
be
to
thread
the
needle
and
look
at
those
and
how
applicable
they
are
to
bellevue
and
what
we
already
regulate
and
what
we
don't.
And
then
you
know
having
a
chance
for
the
council
to
kick
around.
Do
you
want
to
add
regulations
or
not
and
for
what
specific
outcomes,
and
that
would
be
your
november
conversation
if
you
chose
to
take
this
up
tonight.
E
Okay
and
and
the
timing
is
such
that
we
need
to
do
this
now,
because
I
was
also
thinking
about
the
fact
that
the
oven
school's
looking
for
projects
from
organizations
for
their
students
to
work
on
and-
and
I
just
keep
thinking
about.
What's
what
staff
should
be
working
on
in
the
city
and
how
burdened
they
are?
I.
A
Don't
think
it's
up
to
us
to
tell
staff
how
to
do
this
work.
I
think
it's
up
to
us
to
direct
whether
we
want
them
to
do
the
work
and
they
can
determine
whether
they
want
to
use
interns
or
or
the
evan
school
or
or
whatever,
but
they're
looking
for
us
for
direction
tonight.
If
they
even
want
to
pursue
this
information,
however,
they
decide
to
do
it
so
councilmember
lee
you
had
your
hand
up.
I
don't
stokes
councilmember
stokes.
Did
you
have
your
hand
up
as
well
or.
C
G
Thanks
I'd
like
to
make
a
proposed
amendment
to
councilmember
robertson's
motion,
I
like
to
include
best
practices
to
look
at
safety
and
security
plans.
C
M
I
would
be
happy
to
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
initiate
work,
to
evaluate
best
practices
for
supportive
housing,
specifically
evaluating
on-site
supportive
services
based
on
best
practices
for
population
served
and
for
neighborhood
outreach,
engagement
and
relationship
building
and
to
bring
these
items
back
to
council
for
discussion
and
potential
future
implementation.
A
A
A
N
Sure
mayor,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
we
have
two
public
hearings
in
front
of
you
this
evening.
The
first
one
is
the
public
hearing
on
ordinance
6585
regarding
permanent
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter,
and
just
by
way,
background
ordnance
number
6585
was
adopted
on
july
12th,
imposing
an
interim
official
control
to
one
allow
permanent
support
of
housing
and
traditional
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
residential
uses
in
hotel
motels
are
allowed
and
two
allow
homeless
services
uses
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed.
N
The
interim
official
control
was
adopted
in
response
to
the
recent
state
legislation
house
bill,
1220,
passed
and
signed
by
the
governor
and
joining
us
this
evening.
For
a
brief
staff
report
are
mike
brennan
the
director,
as
well
as
tristan
tanis,
consulting
attorney
caveman
miller,
senior
planner,
all
of
from
development
services.
They
are
also
joined
by
mack
mcfarlane
assistant
city
attorney
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
mike
brennan
to
set
up
the
report
this
evening,
mike.
R
I
thank
miss
miyake,
as
the
city
manager
said.
We
are
here
this
evening
for
the
public
hearing
it's
required
for
the
interim
control,
the
interim
official
control,
which
are
lane
use
code
amendments
this
evening.
After
the
completion
of
the
public
hearing,
we
will
be
asking
the
next
slide.
Please.
S
Great
thank
you
mike
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members
for
our
brief
staff
report.
Tonight.
We
will
begin
by
explaining
the
objective
of
diocese
ordinance,
number
6585
and
explain
the
components
of
the
ordinance
and
close
with
the
description
about
the
next
steps
toward
the
lucca.
S
So,
as
you
may
recall,
in
the
past
legislative
session,
the
state
legislature
passed
and
the
governor
signed
into
law
house
bill
1220
this
bill
became
effective
on
july
25th
and
in
essence,
the
bill
requires
cities
to
allow
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use.
Districts
where
residential
and
hotels
and
motel
uses
are
allowed,
and
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed.
F
Thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
Before
we
go
into
the
amendments
for
this
ioc,
I
just
wanted
to
go
through
the
different
housing
types
addressed
under
hb
1220.
on
the
left.
You
have
permanent
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing.
These
are
the
longer
term
interventions,
a
really
more
permanent
basis
for
for
residency,
permanent,
supportive
housing
implies
permanent
residency
and
then
transitional
housing.
Supportive
services
are
provided
to
transition
people
into
more
independent
living
arrangements
on
the
right
are
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter.
F
These
are
going
to
be
your
shorter
term.
Interventions
really
more
intended
to
address
basic
daily
needs
before
transitioning
tenants
into
more
permanent
living
arrangements
such
as
permanent
supportive
housing,
both
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter
fit
fairly
well
under
the
existing
framework
of
homeless
services
uses
in
the
land
use
code.
So
with
that
in
mind,
next
slide,
please
tell
us
now.
F
The
first
is
with
the
land
use
tables
in
the
land
use
code,
new
footnotes
are
being
included
to
say
permanent
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
are
allowed
where
residential
and
hotel
motel
uses
are
allowed
further
homeless
services
uses
generally
were
allowed
in
all
zones
where
hotels
and
motels
were
allowed,
as
required
by
hp
1220,
except
for
two
districts,
the
neighborhood
mixed
use
and
the
office
unlimited
business
open
space,
so
the
land
use
tables
for
those
two
districts
have
been
updated
to
allow
homeless
services
uses.
F
That
said,
they
are
still
subject
to
conditional
use,
permit
approval,
as
well
as
supplemental
approval
criteria
for
those
uses
under
2020
455c,
speaking
of
which
the
second
component
of
amendments
will
be
to
amend.
The
homeless
services
uses
definition
to
clarify
that
this
that
they
do
include
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter,
which
I
mentioned
previously
next
slide.
Please,
in
terms
of
the
process
for
the
ioc
tonight's
public
hearing,
is
within
the
60
days
required
for
an
ioc.
F
It
is
effective
for
six
months
following
the
date
of
adoption,
so
it
does
expire
on
january.
12Th
of
2022,
the
ebcc
will
be
holding
their
public
hearing
and
action
on
the
ioc
tomorrow
evening,
august
3rd
and
then
finally,
staff
does
anticipate
a
development
of
permanent
regulations
through
the
luca
process,
which
we
will
be
asking
council
to
initiate
this
evening,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
next
slide,
please
dress.
Now.
F
Staff
does
recommend,
holding
the
public
hearing
tonight
on
ordinance,
number
6585
and
then
following
the
public
hearing,
initiate
and
provide
direction
on
the
land
use
code.
Amendment
process
with
that
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you,
mayor.
A
So
can
you
clarify
for
us
what
are
what
freedom
we
have,
whether
we
choose
to
adopt
or
not
adopt
state
law
and
what
the
implications
are
for
a
city
like
bellevue
if
we
chose
not
to
adopt
state
law.
R
So
that's
probably
a
question:
that's
best
handled
through
the
city
attorney's
office.
I
don't
know
if
they're
prepared
to
respond
to
that
question
this
evening
or
need
to
follow
up
later.
We've
got
matt
mcfarland
on
the
call
this
evening
from
the
city
attorney's
office
matt.
Would
you
like
to
respond.
T
In
september
of
this
year,
right
after
council
gets
back
from
the
break,
so
staff
did
fold
all
four
of
these
uses
into
the
interim
official
control
to
try
to
bring
the
city
into
immediate
compliance
by
the
july
deadline,
and
I
think
council
has
recognized
also
that
with
respect
to
the
emergency
housing
and
the
indoor
emergency
shelter,
what
we've
done
with
the
interim
official
control
is
regulate
those
as
homeless
services
uses.
T
But
if,
if
the
city
were
not
to
proceed
with
this
they've,
the
council's
already
adopted
this
interim
official
control,
but
if
the
city
were
not
to
maintain
this
interim
official
control,
while
we
process
the
permanent
land
use
code
amendment,
then
the
city
would
not
be
in
compliance
with
state
law.
A
T
A
State
law:
okay,
thank
you
for
that
recommendation.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
open
the
public
hearing.
Is
there
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing?
I.
A
B
Q
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
thank
you
your
time
against
now,
okay,
hi,
my
name
is
nancy
whitaker.
Q
I
live
at
1924,
160th
avenue
northeast
in
bellevue,
and
I'm
representing
some
group,
a
group
of
neighbors
from
northeast
bellevue,
and
we
just
have
some
concerns
about
some
of
these
homeless
facilities
that
would
be
brought
into
bellevue
into
our
neighborhoods,
we're
already
experiencing
that
with
one
that
is
in
redmond
technically,
but
is
right
next
door
to
us
the
silver
cloud,
but
regarding
ones
in
bellevue,
we
just
want
you
to
consider
some
things
about
how
it
might
affect
neighbors.
Q
Another
thing
that
we'd,
like
you
to
consider
is
what
type
of
support
would
be
provided
to
these
various
types
of
homeless
people,
and
will
they
have
buy-in
to
the
services
that
they're
able
to
access?
Would
these
particular
shelters
offer
wraparound
services
and
social
workers?
Can
these
services
be
required
as
a
condition
for
people
to
live
there?
What
type
of
what
time
of
day
or
night
would
the
services
be
available
and
what
kind
of
coveted
protections
would
be
put
in
place?
Q
At
these
facilities
and
what
kinds
of
activities
would
the
people
living
there
be
doing
during
the
day,
we're
concerned
about
it?
Will
there
be
panhandling
near
key
intersections
that
might
increase
traffic
hazards?
So
just
some
things
to
consider,
and
we
would
also
like
you
to
think
about
what
kind
of
support
would
be
going
to
the
neighborhoods?
Q
Q
Will
these
kind
of
people
become
targets
of
crime,
who's
going
to
clean
up
the
used
needles,
and
will
local
stores
need
to
hire
additional
security
to
make
sure
that
their
parking
lots
are
safe?
We
just
want
you
to
consider
what
would
be
the
ultimate
goal
of
this
program.
Are
we
merely
trying
to
put
a
roof
over
people's
heads,
or
are
we
going
to
treat
them,
give
them
counseling
and
guidance
and
try
to
get
them
back
on
their
own
feet?
Q
U
U
When
I
see
stats
comments
on
how
this
ioc
amendment
could
enhance
the
public,
healthy
safety
and
wealth
and
welfare,
because
it
intends
to
address
the
root
cause
of
homelessness.
End
quote:
you're
gonna
start
says
that
the
amendment
is
called
not
contrary
to
the
interest
of
citizens
and
property
owners
of
the
city
of
bellevue,
because
the
amendment
allows
for
additional
opportunities
to
cite
new
supportive
housing
and
shelters.
U
The
interests
of
current
property
owners
are
not
acknowledged
in
this
statement.
I'm
not
saying
that
this
is
an
argument
to
reject
these
changes,
but
when
the
argument
for
support
and
information
only
addresses
a
small
section
of
the
residence
with
a
vision
but
not
the
details
on
the
implementation,
it
is
very
difficult
to
have
current
residents
behind
these
changes.
U
B
Thank
you,
mr
soliz,
at
this
point,
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list
for
this
public
hearing.
If
there's
anyone
else
connected
to
this
meeting,
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
during
this
public
hearing?
Please
use
the
raised
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
you're
connected
with
the
phone
mary,
do
you
see
one
hand
and
it
looks
to
be
miss
bluma
how's
bloom
up?
Can
you
hear
me.
B
P
A
M
Well,
I
I
supported
adopting
the
interim
official
control
because
we
need
to
comply
with
state
law.
I
would
encourage
anyone
who
has
opinions
about
the
permanent
regulations
to
share
their
opinions
with
the
planning
commission,
because
they're
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
drafting
the
permanent
regulations,
which
will
eventually
make
their
way
back
to
us.
So
that's.
C
Yeah,
I
would
agree
with
council
barbara
robertson's
comments
and
I
would
like
to
somewhere
along
the
way.
I
think
it
would
really
be
helpful
if
we
could
get
a
legal
opinion
that
basically
that
we
can
tell
the
public-
and
we
can
understand
what,
by
you
know
not
complying
with
the
state
law
has
because
there
are
implement,
implement
implications,
and
I
know
it's
complex,
but
it
would
really
help
in
the
conversations,
because
you
know
it's,
it's
not
something.
C
We
do
all
the
time
and
I
think
it'd
just
be
helpful
to
have
again
to
have
an
informed
community
and,
as
the
lawyer
I
know,
that's
a
difficult
thing
to
do,
but
I
think
it
would
help
us
a
lot.
Thank
you.
H
H
A
N
Chairman,
the
second
public
hearing
this
evening
is
regarding
ordinance
6586,
which
opposes
an
interim
official
control
to
remove
residential
occupancy
limits
from
the
land
use
code.
By
way,
background
ordinance
6586
imposed
inner
interim
official
control
to
remove
all
residential
occupancy
limits
from
the
land
use
code.
N
In
response
to
recent
state
legislation
in
particular
senate
bill
5235,
which
addressed
local
authority
to
regulate
the
number
of
occupants
in
the
dwyane
unit
for
the
growth
management
act,
public
hearing
is
required
within
60
days
of
the
ilc
adoption
joining
us
this
evening
again
mike
brennan
and
tris
nathanas
and
caleb
miller,
all
from
the
development
services,
as
well
as
they're,
accompanied
by
mcfarland
assistant
to
the
attorney
of
the
city,
attorney's
office
and
I'll,
go
and
turn
it
over
to
to
mike
to
open
this
up.
Mike.
R
Thank
you
again,
mr
miyaki.
Again,
the
process
is
simply
a
repeat
of
the
last
public
hearing.
Again
we
will
be
asking
the
council
to
hold
the
public
hearing
on
the
interim
official
control
and,
following
that
public
hearing
direct
staff
to
work
with
the
planning
commission
to
initiate
the
permanent
land
use
code
through
the
luca
process.
S
Thank
you
mike
good
evening
again.
Everyone
as
as
mike
noted,
just
like
the
item
before
this
is
a
pretty
short
staff
report
tonight,
we'll
start
with
an
explanation
of
the
objective
of
this
particular
ioc,
ordinance
6586,
we'll
explain
the
components
of
the
ordinance
we'll
also
be
describing
some
code
provisions
that
are
already
in
place
and
would
not
change
that.
We
hope
will
be
helpful
to
provide
the
larger
context
of
regulations
that
are
applicable
to
housing
units
in
the
city
and
we'll
close
with
the
description
about
next
steps
for
the
luca.
S
So
the
objective
for
the
ioc
ordinance
as
noted
earlier
in
the
past
this
past
legislative
session,
in
addition
to
house
bill
1220
that
you
just
heard
about
the
state
legislature
also
passed
and
the
governor
signed
into
law
senate
bill
5235.
S
It
also
became
effective
on
july
25th,
and
at
that
point
the
provisions
in
the
bill
were
codified.
In
a
new
section
in
chapter
35,
821
of
the
rcw,
this
particular
section
contains
provisions
affecting
all
code
cities,
which
value
is
one
of,
and
this
section
in
chapter
35,
a
21
addresses
local
authority
to
regulate
the
number
of
occupants.
S
I'm
going
to
turn
now
turn
the
presentation
over
to
caleb
miller
for
the
rest
of
staff's
report.
Caleb.
F
Thank
you
trisna.
So
now
I'll
go
through
the
components
of
the
interim
official
control.
Primarily
the
amendments
will
amend
the
family
definition,
as
you
see
here
to
one
or
more
persons
residing
in
a
dwelling
and
operating
as
a
single
housekeeping
unit.
F
So
as
an
example
of
how
the
family
definition
governs
the
occupancy
of
a
single
family
home,
it
basically
means
for
a
single
family
dwelling.
One
family
operating
a
single
housekeeping
unit
may
reside
within
that
building.
Next
slide,
please
additional
amendments.
The
rooming
house
definition
was
amended
to
basically
clarify
it
that
it
any
non-owner
occupied
dwelling
that
is
rented
on
an
individual
room
basis
is
considered
a
rooming
house.
F
F
As
forza
noted,
there
are
some
codes
in
place
that
are
not
being
amended
as
part
of
this
ioc
and
that
will
stay
in
place
first
of
all,
transient
lodging
such
as
airbnb
vrbo
and
other
apps,
like
that
they
are
only
allowed
in
owner
occupied
homes
and
with
a
home
occupation
permit,
and
with
that
I'll,
also
note
that
the
accessory
dwelling
units
are
also
not
allowed
to
have
transient
lodging
situations
as
well,
so
that
will
remain
in
place
further.
F
Rooming
houses
are
still
prohibited
in
single
family
land
use
districts,
they
are
only
allowed
in
multifamily
and
mixed
use,
and
I
believe
I
believe
it's
just
multi-family
mixed
use
and
then
finally,
traffic
parking,
noise
and
nuisance
codes
are
still
in
effect.
F
F
It
will
be
effective
for
six
months
following
the
date
of
adoption,
so
january,
12
2022
and
just
like
the
1220
ioc
ebcc
will
be
holding
their
public
hearing
in
action
on
on
this
tomorrow
evening
august,
3rd
and
finally,
staff
does
anticipate
permanent
regulations
will
be
developed
through
the
luca
process.
F
Following
generally
the
similar
timeline
of
the
other
ioc.
We
discussed
this
evening
next
slide.
Please,
and
with
that
in
mind,
staff
does
recommend,
holding
the
public
hearing
on
ordinance
number
6586
and
then
following
the
public
hearing
initiating
and
providing
direction
on
the
landing
squad.
Amendment.
A
B
V
I'm
dr
russ
parvecchio,
I'm
live
at
24
95
158th
place
northeast
bellevue.
My
talk
is
centered
on
finding
out
what
is
bellevue's
plan
to
regulate
the
increased
density
in
residential
neighborhoods,
which
would
follow
implementation
of
ordnance
6586.
V
What
is
your
plan
to
establish
parameters
regarding
how
many
people
related
or
unrelated
can
live
in
a
certain
square
footage
residence?
Surely
there
must
be
a
finite
number,
since
it
just
can't
be
unlimited?
What
is
your
plan
to
ensure
these
houses
are
going
to
be
brought
up
to
and
maintained
at
current
safety
and
fire
code
standards?
What
is
your
plan
to
monitor
compliance?
V
What
is
your
plan
to
implement
a
safety
inspection
program
for
rental
and
boarding
houses?
Do
you
plan
something
similar
to
that
of
the
city
of
seattle,
since
more
people
translate
to
a
larger
demand
on
our
infrastructure?
What
is
your
plan
for
ensuring
adequate
water,
gas
and
sewage
usage?
Incidentally,
I
personally
know
when
I
tried
to
add
a
one-room
bedroom
addition
to
my
house.
The
city
demanded
I
dig
up
and
increase
the
size
of
my
sewer
line
from
the
house
to
the
street.
Doesn't
bedrooming
additional
people
into
the
same
structure?
V
Translated
to
essentially
the
same
requirement,
what
is
the
plan
to
ensure
the
overall
electric
grid?
Will
there
be
inspections
to
ensure
each
home's
electrical
panel
can
handle
the
electric
additional
electronics
of
additional
people?
Want
limits
exist
or
need
to
be
modified
to
accommodate
more
parked
cars
on
the
street
for
such
increased
capacity
houses?
Remember
many
of
our
bellevue
streets.
Don't
have
sidewalks,
and
residents
have
to
walk
in
the
street
to
take
an
evening
stroll.
What's
the
plan
to
accommodate
increased
garbage
and
sanitation
needs?
V
What
is
your
plan
to
proactively
deal
with
the
known
increase
in
conflict
with
increased
density?
Will
this
require
additional
police
fire
and
emergency
services
if
increased,
living
density
promotes
greater
transmission
of
contagious
disease?
What's
your
proactive
plan
to
deal
with
this?
What's
the
plan
to
deal
with
the
impact
on
both
traffic
and
emergency
services?
I've
spoken
both
to
this
council
and
transportation
commission
regarding
traffic
and
safety
issues
for
our
mirror,
three
lifelines
in
and
out
of
northeast
bellevue,
and
can
only
shudder
at
seeing
one
more
potential
insult
to
this
critically
important
faction
of
our
existence.
V
What
is
your
plan
for
regulating
how
many
pets
can
be
housed
in
a
dwelling
how
many
dogs,
cats
etc
can
share
the
yard?
Will
these
residents
be
vested
in
our
communities?
If
so,
what's
the
plan
to
facilitate
how
these
individuals
will
feel
a
sense
of
belonging
and
assimilate
to
the
community,
saying
yes
to
expansion
does
not
exonerate
bellevue
from
merely
hoping
such
implementation
will
lead
to
improvement?
It
must
be
preceded
by
well-considered
planning
so
that
the
increased
density
does
not
result
in
a
decrease
in
quality
of
life
for
both
new
and
existing
residents.
B
A
Okay,
so
if
anybody
has
questions
or
comments,
please
raise
your
hand.
I
see
councilmember
robertson
and
then
deputy
mayor
newton
house
go
ahead.
Councilman
robertson.
M
Thank
you
so
the
I.
I
obviously
support
the
ioc,
bringing
us
into
compliance
with
the
code.
The
gross
substitute
senate
bill
5235,
which
is
the
basis
for
this,
allows
lawful
limits
on
occupant
load
per
square
foot
or
generally
applicable
health
and
safety
provisions,
as
established
by
applicable
building
code
or
city
ordinance.
And
when
we
were
looking
at
this
before,
I
had
asked
our
staff
whether
we
had
an
occupancy
limit
in
residential
zones,
and
the
answer
was
no.
M
So
I'm
not
actually
asking
the
council
to
make
a
motion
to
direct
that
be
looked
at,
but
I
wanted
to
raise
it
so
that
staff
could
consider
whether
that
type
of
occupancy
limitation
would
be
appropriate
since
we're
losing
one
occupancy
type
of
of
regulation.
But
we
still
can
do
things
for
health
and
safety,
because
the
last
thing
I
want
to
see
is
have
a
residential
unit,
whether
it's
multi-family,
an
adu
or
a
home,
or
a
single-family
home
overloaded
with
so
many
people
that
it
creates
a
health
and
safety
or
fire
hazard.
M
So
just
a
comment
from
me
to
staff
that,
because
I
really
dug
into
this,
there
really
is
not
a
lot
that
that
has
occupancy
limits
for
residential,
except
for
the
international
property
maintenance
code.
So
there
might
be
more,
but
that's
the
one
I
found.
So
I
just
wanted
to
give
that
comment
on
the
record
to
staff,
so
they
can
consider
it
when
they're
bringing
the
permanent
regulations
to
the
planning
commission.
M
H
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
similar
comments
as
councilmember
robertson.
Just
just
I
support
moving
this.
You
know
to
the
next
step
here
and
support
getting
in
compliance
with
the
state
so
but
some
similar
comments.
I
thank
russ
as
well
in
during
his
comments
on
this
senate
bill
5235,
and
I
wish
some
of
those
questions
would
have
been
asked
at
that
time
down
in
olympia,
but
it
is
what
it
is,
and
here
we
are
and
let's
move
forward
in
the
in
the
process.
Thank
you.
C
Yeah,
I
agree
with
the
comments
my
colleagues
there
on
this
and
it
that
might
help
us
kind
of
work
with
this,
and
it
is
what
it
is.
As
we
say,
I
did
have
a
question
again
on
legal
questions.
C
I
understand
that
ebcc
is
going
to
have
a
hearing
or
consideration
of
this,
but
do
they
does
ebcc
have
any
legal
significance
in
this
decision-making?
I
mean
you
think
ebcc
can't
make
it
a
contrary.
Decision
by
itself.
Is
that
correct.
N
Can
I
refer
that
to
either
nick
melisinos,
our
deputy
city
attorney
or
to
matt
okay.
Q
P
Nick
so
the
the
ebcc
is
set
to
hear
this
tomorrow
and
they
would
be
able
to
to
vote
on
it,
and
then
we
would
have
to
evaluate
it
to
see
what
they
would
do
and
what
they
had
done
in
order
to
see
if
they're
voting
in
accordance
with
what
state
law
is
requiring
or
if,
if
they
voted
a
different
way
and
voted
it
down,
so
then
we
would
have
to
evaluate
what
they
what
they
did
and
then
we
would
be
providing
additional
advice
to
the
council
at
that
time.
C
H
A
C
A
So
next
we're
into
some
study
session
items.
Mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
first
one.
N
Sure,
mayor
council
members,
the
study
session
topic
on
your
agenda
this
evening
is
a
briefing
by
king
county
on
the
washington
department
of
ecology.
Draft
puget,
sound
nutrient
general
permit,
specifically
king
county,
is
requesting
support
from
local
sewer
agencies
regarding
its
concern
with
ecology's
new
draft
puget
sound
nutrient
permit.
Tonight,
staff
is
seeking
council
direction
on
whether
to
support
king
county's
request
by
submitting
a
letter
to
ecology
outlining
the
city's
concerns
with
respect
to
the
draft
permit,
a
draft
letter
has
been
included
in
your
packet
for
this
evening.
N
Joining
us
this
evening
is
novel,
told
our
director
for
our
utilities
department,
and
she
is
here
to
introduce
the
topic
as
well
as
our
guest.
Now.
W
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki.
I
hope
everyone
can
hear
me
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members
tonight,
king
county
wastewater
treatment,
division,
director,
cameron,
guru
and
his
staff
are
here
to
present
an
overview
of
the
mpds
permit
and
share
their
concerns
about
proposed
new
permit
requirements
which
would
apply
to
county's
wastewater
treatment
plant
operations.
W
Now,
although
bellevue
does
not
own
wastewater
treatment
plants,
we
contract
with
king
county
for
wastewater
treatment
services.
Payments
to
king
county
at
over
36
million
dollars
a
year,
make
up
almost
two-thirds
of
the
utilities
annual
expenses
and
are
the
singles
largest
cost
driver
for
bellevue
sewer
utility
customers.
W
W
After
the
county's
presentation,
we
will
be
seeking
your
direction
on
whether
bellevue
should
support
king
county's
king
county
by
submitting
a
comment
letter
to
ecology,
sharing
the
city's
concerns
about
the
permit.
I'd
like
to
now
turn
it
over
to
dr
guro
to
share
his
thoughts.
X
Thank
you
very
much,
mrs
o'toole.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
all
right!
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
time
here
tonight.
It's
nice
to
see
some
familiar
faces
and
some
new
faces
at
bellevue.
I
want
to
thank
councilmember
lee
for
serving
on
our
regional
water
quality
committee
helps
provide
guidance
for
our
division.
I
thought
director
o'tale's
introduction
was
spot
on.
X
This
is
a
very
important
subject,
and
we
do
appreciate
your
time
here
tonight
we're
going
to
keep
our
presentation
very
short
so
that
we
can
answer
your
questions
and
we
did
appreciate
seeing
your
agenda
bill
and
your
draft
letter
in
your
agenda
packet
here
tonight.
I
think
those
are
well
done
and
I
would
encourage
the
council's
strong
consideration
of
sending
a
letter
to
express
bellevue's
points
of
view
in
this
very
important
process.
With
me
tonight
is
rebecca
singer.
X
She's
our
section
manager
for
resource
recovery
she's
been
running
point
for
our
division
on
this
nutrient
issue.
She'll
walk
through
a
few
slides.
We
also
have
sherman
heron
from
our
government
relations
office,
maintains
good
relations
with
the
city
in
a
number
of
ways.
So
with
that
I'll
ask
rebecca
to
start
her
presentation
and
I
believe.
Y
Thank
you
for
having
us
here
today.
I
really
appreciate
that
and
like
it
was
said,
this
is
the
draft
puget
sound
nutrient
general
permit
and
it
will
work
in
coordination
with
the
mpds
permit.
So
it
is
separate
from
that,
but
it
is
supposed
to
work
in
coordination
with
now.
I
understand
that
you
have
a
copy
of
this
presentation
so
tonight.
For
the
sake
of
time,
I'm
only
going
to
go
through
a
portion
of
it
and
I'm
going
to
pick
up
on
the
key
highlights
of
it.
Y
So
with
that
we're
going
to
get
right
into
this,
so
this
particular
permit.
It
is
going
to
ask
a
lot
of
58
of
our
utilities
around
this
around
our
region
and
those
58
utilities
are
going
to
have
to
adhere
to
specific
requirements.
Y
Y
All
of
these
things
are
going
to
require
more
than
a
utility
or
what
we
are
allowed
to
do.
It's
going
to
require
a
lot
of
land
use
management
as
well
as
planners
as
well
as
city
management,
to
better
understand
where
these
sources
of
nitrogen
are
coming
from,
but
more
important
to
better
manage
the
septage
and
sewage
that
is
coming
into
our
our
facility.
Y
Y
Residents
to
stop
flushing
the
toilet,
they're
asking
for
us
to
look
at
ways
of
diverting
the
nitrogen
that
is
coming
from
these
dense
housing
communities
and
the
only
way
to
do
that
is
source
separation,
so
basically
separating
the
solids
from
the
liquids.
Y
So
with
this
permit,
king
county
has
looked
to
determine.
Where
are
we
as
far
as
our
limit?
Their
provider
are
giving
us
a
specific
limit
or
threshold
that
we
have
to
maintain
for
our
nitrogen
effluent
and,
as
we
looked
at
our
projections,
we
are
ready
to
exceed
this
limit
in
this
coming
year.
So,
by
the
time
they
issue
this
permit,
we
will
already
be
out
of
compliance
and
be
required
to
initiate
nitrogen
implementation
into
our
planning
process.
Y
It's
also
going
to
require
us
to
implement
a
lot
of
capital
and
operating
dollars
in
order
to
achieve
that.
Now,
if
we're
out
of
compliance
two
years
in
a
row,
we
will
automatically
have
to
reduce
our
nitrogen
by
10,
and
this
is
very
significant.
That
is
a
significant
capital
investment
into
our
infrastructure
and
planning.
Y
Y
Y
Sorry
about
that
didn't
know
if
you
were
unable
to
see
those,
the
wac
specifies
small
businesses,
and
so
what
they
say
is
that
this
will
not
impact
any
small
business.
Therefore,
they
were
not
required
to
do
an
economic
analysis.
However,
small
businesses
in
all
of
our
communities
are
going
to
have
to
continue
to
pay
for
this
they're,
not
out
of
the
weeds,
those
septic
haulers
again
they're
small
businesses.
They
will
be
impacted
by
this.
Y
So
what
is
king
county's
recommending?
Well,
since
we
have
a
lot
of
other
high
expense
gray
infrastructure
going
in
such
as
additional
cso
control,
as
well
as
trying
to
maintain
our
assets
at
our
current
rate,
or
even
just
similar
rates,
adding
in
the
added
cost
of
nitrogen
removal.
We
feel
that
there's
other
alternatives
to
meeting
this
compliance.
Y
B
Y
Y
And
again
we
would
like
to
go
to
where
the
problem
is
we'd
like
to
reduce
runoff
from
farmlands
and
urban
landscapes
or
fix
failing
septic
systems,
so
that
we
can
improve
these
shallow
environments,
that
the
department
of
ecology
is
considered
impaired
due
to
low
low
dissolved
oxygen
or
increases
in
nitrogen,
go
ahead
and
move
to
slide
10,
which
should
be
the
next
one.
So
what
happens
after
comments
are
made?
So
king
county
will
be
submitting
their
comments
on
the
due
date
of
august
16th
from
there?
Ecology
must
prepare
a
response
to
comment.
Y
Y
Y
And
if
you
could
go
on
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
for
any
additional
information
we
can.
You
can
find
that
at
the
department
of
ecology's
website
and
I've
included
that
web
link
here.
If
you
want
to
make
comments,
you
can
either
submit
them
online
or
send
them
in
in
writing
to
eleanor
ott,
additionally
cameron
and
I
are
available
for
any
comments
or
questions
that
you'd
like
to
have
clarified
or
any
additional
information
that
you
are
looking
for
and
with
that
I
would
like
to
conclude
or
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
A
M
Thank
you
so
much
rebecca
and
camaron
for
coming
tonight.
I
think
this
is
such
an
important
issue.
I've
been
following
this
issue
for
over
a
year
and
I'm
very,
very
concerned
with
ecology's
approach,
the
science
or
the
regulation.
Now,
science
later
regulation
now
plan
later
regulation.
Now
economic
analysis
later
is
really
not
the
way
we
should
do
things
in
the
state
of
washington.
M
I
have
a
couple
of
comments
and
then
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
well
more
than
then
there's
time
for
tonight,
so
I'll
try
to
limit
it
to
just
three
one
of
the
things
that
I've
seen
in
the
data
is
that
ecology
is
wanting
to
have
the
wastewater
treatment
facilities
deal
with
this
issue,
but
the
nutrient
loads
aka,
the
nitrogen,
the
vast
majority
91
percent,
come
from
natural
sources,
not
from
wastewater
effluent,
discharges
not
even
from
stormwater
runoff
and
failing
septic
systems.
M
So
this
the
the
regulation
on
the
permit
really
only
deals
with
that
nine
percent
and
according
to
what
I've
read
if
we
spend
what
was
the
number
50
158
billion
dollars
retrofitting
was
that
the
right
number
retrofitting
all
of
the
different
wastewater
treatment
facilities
on
puget
sound,
will
address.
Seven
percent,
which
is
really
cost-benefit.
Analysis,
may
not
really
make
a
lot
of
sense.
So
my
my
concerns
are
in
three-fold
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
letter,
which
is
really
important
for
bellevue
to
weigh
in
and
not
only
does
it
let
the
college.
M
You
know
where
we're
going,
but
it
gives
us
standing
should
we
want
to
join
an
appeal
later
I'd
like
to
see
it
expanded
a
little
bit
more,
and
I
know
my
colleagues
got
a
little
document
from
me
on
these
issues.
So
the
there's
three
main
issues.
One
is,
of
course,
the
the
sources
of
nitrogen
and
pigeon
sound
and
looking
at
the
scientific
evidence.
The
second
issue
is
the
affordability
of
the
fix.
Is
the
fix
going
to
do
anything
or
do
enough
how
affordable
is
it
to
the
region?
M
And
the
third
issue
which
wasn't
in
the
city's
draft
letter
is
the
impact
on
growth,
and
I'm
going
to
start
with
that,
because
this
city
has
been
the
city
council
has
been
talking
a
lot
about
growth
and
we
just
it,
took
actually
advocated
for
king
county
to
assign
us
35
000
new
housing
units,
70
000
jobs
for
growth
by
2044..
M
My
understanding
and
this
this
will
be
the
question
for
bellevue
or
king
county
staff.
My
understanding
is
this
is
if
this
goes
forward,
the
wastewater
treatment
facilities
most
of
the
weight
water
treatment,
waste
water
treatment
facilities
included
in
one
second
county
will
automatically
be
out
of
compliance
unless
they
start
spending
a
whole
lot.
Money
to
grow,
filter,
add
another
bright
water,
etc,
and
if
we
run
out
of,
if
we
are
out
of
compliance,
then
one
of
the
main
documents,
the
first
documents
people
get
when
they
pull
a
permit,
is
a
sewer
availability
letter.
M
You
have
to
have
it
to
get
a
permit
if
we
don't
have
any
capacity
in
our
wastewater
treatment
facilities.
People
can't
get
permits
and
we
can't
grow
as
we
are
expected
to
do,
and
it's
really
the
end.
You
could
grow
in
the
rural
area
where
there's
septic
systems,
but
you
couldn't
grow
in
the
urban
area
where
there's
sewer
systems.
M
So
my
question
for
staff
is:
if
this
standard
is
included
in
the
general
permit,
is
it
your
expectation
that
king
county
will
deny
any
requests
to
confirm
sewer
availability
and
how
will
that
impact
bellevue
and
the
county's
abilities
to
comply
with
gma?
So
that's
question
number
one.
X
X
I
don't
think
we're
there
yet
to
specifically
answer
your
question,
though
I
think
it's
a
very
good
one,
councilmember
member
and
one
of
the
observations
that
we
made
to
ecology
at
their
public
workshop,
and
they
had
a
verbal
opportunity.
Offer
comments.
Is
that
as
it
stands,
this
proposed
regulation
would
appear
to
conflict
with
other
state
goals,
and
I
think
that
is
something
for
that.
It
does
fall
to
the
state
as
a
responsibility
to
reconcile
and
harmonize
across
a
variety
of
different
goals
and
responsibilities
that
they
ask
cities
and
counties
to
comply
with.
X
So
we've
identified
that
same
kind
of
issue
that
you're
identifying
here,
which
is
you're
trying
to
comply
with
gma
densify,
provide
the
urban
services
so
that
we
don't
promote
sprawl.
That
is
a
fundamental
goal
here,
and
bellevue
has
done
yeoman's
work
towards
that
that
I've
observed
in
my
career
and-
and
we
don't
want
to
put
that
at
risk.
It
seems
to
me
with
something
like
this
that
would
that
would
call
into
question
ability
to
provide
sewer
service.
X
I
won't
specifically
answer
your
question
as
to
whether
we
would
not
you
know
be
able
to
provide
treatment
services.
It's
a
duty
that
we
have,
but
I
do
think
it
calls
into
question
that
conflict.
So
I
think
you're
right
to
raise
it,
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
consider
that
for
your
letter.
M
Thank
you
so,
with
regard
to,
I
guess
I'll
leave
the
scientific
issue
alone.
I've
already
commented
on
that
with
regard
to
affordability,
what
are
the
ent?
These
are
my
last
two
questions.
What
are
the.
A
I
thought
I
got
three
questions
well,
you've
taken
quite
a
bit
of
time,
and
so
I'm
going
to
let
you
come
back
around
and
ask
the
next
two
questions,
but
maybe
nobody
else
has
a
question
here
when
and
what's
up
here
is
we
have
a
draft
ladder,
that's
in
our
packet
and
we're
discussing
whether
or
not
we
want
to
approve
that
to
be
sent
or
add
council
member
robertson's
additions
to
it
so
that
she's
proposing
here
so
is
there?
Anybody
else
has
a
comment
or
a
question
on
this,
or
shall
we
okay
councilman?
G
Thank
you
well
welcome
director
cameron
and
rebecca
as
a
member
of
the
sca's
w
regional
water
quality
committee.
G
G
That's
indicated,
you
know
also
the
question
councilmember
robertson
asked
it's
just
one
aspect
of
it
and
this
one
in
particular
we're
talking
about
doubling
our
rate
by
2030,
and
this
is,
I
believe,
it's
a
very
alarming
number
and
has
a
great
impact
on
the
rate
payers
like
nav
was
talking
about.
You
know.
This
is
just
the
tip
of
the
iceberg
at
the
committee.
G
We're
talking
about
clean
water
plan,
we're
talking
about
waste
treatment
plants
and
we
talk
about
asset
management
and
all
these
have
tremendous
financial
implications,
including
we're
even
talking
about
the
new
waste
treatment
plan.
So
I
think
it's
important.
You
know
we
have
many
issues
we
can
talk.
We
can
spend
lots
of
time
talking
about
the
the
again
king
kandi
committee
has
been
spending
the
last
number
of
years,
and
so
I
think
this
is
the
timing
is
good.
G
We
need
to
begin
educating
the
city
council,
the
impact
implication
of
the
rates
that
of
ratepayers
may
be
facing
unless
we
grab
hold
of
it
early
on,
starting
with
the
department
of
ecology
and
various
other
considerations.
G
So
I
think
this
is
a
great
sca
very
much
involved,
they're
very
interested
these
impact,
all
of
us,
so
I
appreciate
king
kandi
staff
is
coming
to
our
cities
and
telling
us
and
giving
us
a
first
glimpse
of
the
education,
and
I,
I
recommend
highly
recommend
we
need
to
approve
the
letter
and
get
the
attention
really
begin
the
process.
But,
more
importantly,
I
think
it's
a
opportunity
for
us
to
educate
ourselves.
So
we
don't
get
surprised.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilmember
lee
councilmember
stokes.
C
Anyhow,
no,
I
I
really
appreciate
the
my
comments
by
my
colleagues
and
the
presentation.
I
missed
it
a
little
bit
at
the
first
there.
Of
course,
we've
been
looking
at
it
from
a
lot
of
different
angles.
So
it's
good
to
have
this
perspective.
C
The
regional
policy
committee
has
looking
at
these,
and
certainly
we've
been
working
with
solid
waste
and
working
with
the
water
council
as
well,
but
also
the
cities
have
been
involved.
As
you
may
know,
the
city
and
the
cascade
water
line,
cities,
and
also
seattle
and
several
other
utilities.
Water
utilities
have
been
trying
to
work
with
king
county
on
the
clean
water
plan
and
and
the
things
you're
talking
about
as
well
and
part
of
the
frustration
is
there
is.
C
This
is
something
we're
all
working
together
on
and
you
know
the
building
comes
through
us.
The
rates
come
up
in
in
the
cities,
the
money
goes
into
bright
water
or
wherever,
and
it's
getting
to
a
point
where
the
lack
of
solid
trusting
relationships
is
kind
of
been
being
a
drag
in
terms
of
us
actually
all
getting
together
and
making
this
these
plans
work.
C
So
I
appreciate
your
you
know
perspective
on
this
and
and
trying
to
work
with
the
ecology
as
well,
but
it's
it's
a
it's
just
mind-boggling
when
you
look
at
what
is
being
proposed
in
all
of
these
plans
having
to
do
with
clean
water
and,
of
course,
into
something
else,
like
the
where
I
ate
salmon
recovery
council
we're
trying
to
help
the
salmon
and
it's
all
tied
to
water,
the
water
is
the
the
thing
that
keeps
it
all
going.
C
So
one
you
know,
kind
of
message
I
would
would
put
out
is:
let's:
let's
try
to
really
work
even
more
collectively
and
trust
each
other,
because
it's
been
very
difficult
to
find
out.
What's
going
to
happen,
why
the
rates
this
way?
What
what
can
we
do
when
the
answer
is,
don't
worry
about
it?
C
King
county's
got
it
covered
and
I
know
you're
doing
a
lot
to
help
in
in
this
presentation
to
actually
help
that
and
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
communicating
with
the
county
as
well,
but
appreciate
because
this
is
a
humongous
problem
and
we're
all
going
to
have
to
work
with
it
together.
So
appreciate
very
much
both
of
your
presentations
and,
let's,
let's
keep
this
in
mind
at
the
front.
So
thank
you.
A
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
support
the
letter.
I
do
have
a
a
couple
of
of
comments
and
that
is
at
the
beginning.
I
would
recommend
that
instead
of
us
saying
we
do
not
have
sufficient
information
to
support.
E
I
think
we
might
want
to
have
stronger
language
that
says
that
we
don't
believe
that
they've
completed
their
due
diligence
ahead
of
adopting
the
permit,
because
it
isn't
about
the
fact
that
they
have
information
we
haven't
seen.
Yet.
I
believe
what
I'm
hearing
is
there's
work
that
they
haven't
done
yet
related
to
due
diligence.
E
So
I
don't
know
that
the
letter
really
says
that,
and
I
would
recommend
that
that
we
include
that
part
of
the
language
in
there
and
then
the
other
part
I
wondered
about
is:
is
it
more
impactful
if
we
actually
had
a
letter
that
was
signed
jointly
by
a
number
of
cities
in
king
county
and
not
just
bellevue?
So
that
would
be
another
question
that
I
have
instead
of
it
coming
from
bellevue,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
times
in
transportation,
we
will
have
a
joint
letter
from
multiple
cities.
E
So
that's
my
comment,
number
two
and
then
three
considering
that
we're
talking
about
capital
investments
in
the
billions,
how
much
influence
do
we
really
believe
we
have
with
ecology
what
what
success
have
we
had
in
the
past
when
we
have
pushed
back
in
this
way
when
they
have
a
permit
with
conditions
that
are
not
maybe
as
well
conceived
as
we
might
believe.
So,
thank
you.
A
So
now
I'm
going
to
continue
with
the
questions
and
commentary
and
ask
that
you,
when
we're
done
answer
councilmember,
john's
questions
and
also
comment
on
your
your
opinion
of
councilmember
robertson,
anzon's
edits
to
the
letter.
What
do
you
think
the
implications
of
those
edits
would
be
so
I'm
I
like
the
draft,
I'm
okay
with
edits,
I'd
like
to
hear
more
about
what
councilmember
robertson
wants
to
add.
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
if
not
I'll,
move
on
back
to
campus?
Oh
sorry,
deputy
mayor.
H
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
I'm
supportive
of
the
letter,
I'm
also
supportive
of
the
edits
by
councilmember,
robertson
and
zaun.
To
that.
I
think
this
should
be
given
the
implications
to
our
city.
I
think
that
should
be
stronger
and
I
have
two
questions
that
you
can
answer
now
or
later,
but
and
directly
from
ecology.
So
and
and
following
up
on
a
point
by
council
members
on,
I
can't
believe
we're
the
only
city.
That's
raised
these
issues
or
have
a
letter
ready
to
go
similar
to
this.
H
Y
H
They
do
not
want
to
further
the
conversation
interesting.
Well,
then,
why
would
ecology
impose
requirements
upon
nutrient
discharges
before
I
guess
they
feel
they
have
the
data,
but
the
data
doesn't
really
seem
to
be
there.
I
guess
I'm
I'm
a
bit
flummoxed
by
that,
but
that
line
of
reasoning
coming
from
from
coming
from
ecology.
So
do
you
believe
that,
with
this
with
with
these
types
of
letters
coming
from
city
like
like
bellevue,
that
it
will
have
an
impact.
X
I'll
quickly
respond
to
that.
If
that's
okay,
madam
mayor,
I
think
city
letters
do
have
an
impact
and,
and
I'm
delighted
to
hear
you're
considering
one
we've
been
talking
with
a
number
of
cities,
sca
members
and
others,
as
well
as
sewer
districts,
and
we've
heard
pretty
strong,
pretty
uniform
support
for
commenting
and
sending
in
letters
whether
it's
joint
or
individual.
X
X
We
would
discourage
any
kind
of
form
letter
or
anything
that
looks
like
a
form
letter
that
looks
too
simple
and
because
we've
heard
what
happens
from
that
and
I'll
just
add
to
rebecca's
comment.
I
don't
I
don't
want
us
to
speak
for
ecology.
They
should
speak
for
themselves
and
I'll
say
they
are
good
people.
They
are
trying
to
protect
the
environment.
I
don't,
I
don't
doubt
their
motivation
to
protect
puget
sound.
I
think
we
all
have
that
same
motivation,
though,
and-
and
we
want
to
see
areas
that
are
that
are
struggling
get
better.
X
We're
asking
whether
the
regular
requirements
on
the
regulations
is
really
the
best
cure
for
the
the
problems
that
that
they
have
identified,
especially
in
those
shallow
bays,
and
you
know
if
it
was
a
few
dollars
to
do
this,
nobody
would
really
bat
an
eye.
X
It's
it's
really
a
lot
more
than
that,
so
it
makes
a
difference
where
those
dollars
go
and
when
you
start
going
down
the
road
of
big
infrastructure,
it's
a
it's
a
big
long
road
and
you
get
committed
pretty
quickly.
So,
that's
that's
why
we
want
to
want
to
try
to
at
least
get
enough
of
a
conversation
before
the
final
permit
comes
out
so
that
we
can
come
closer
together
in
our
perspectives
between
ourselves
and
sounds
like
maybe
bellevue
and
and
our
ecology.
Colleagues.
H
F
M
Anyone
else
have
a
comment
before
I
go
again,
a
second
time,
okay,
so
the
what
I've
read
is
that
king
county
has
stated
that
if
the
permit
is
approved
with
the
conditions
as
drafted,
that
all
of
king
county's
resources,
including
9
billion
that
is
to
be
invested
over
the
next
10
years
in
clean
water,
will
be
diverted
to
the
construction
of
a
fourth
wastewater
treatment
plant
and
that's
how
it's
what
one
of
the
things
that's
really
going
to
affect
rates
as
well
as
connection
fees
for
king
county.
M
My
question
for
king
county
is
what
are
the
anticipated
costs
of
compliance
with
the
proposed
general
permit,
and
does
king
county
anticipate
that
sewer
rates
will
increase
because
of
the
general
permit?
And
if
so,
how
much.
X
Yeah,
I'm
glad
you
asked
the
question,
and
we
owe
you
that
information.
It
is
literally
in
production
now,
so
it'll
only
be
another
handful
of
days
before
we
get
it
to
you,
maybe
as
early
as
tomorrow
or
the
next
day.
You'll
have
that
information.
So
in
time
for
you
to
inform
your
letter,
you've
got
a
number
in
your
letter
you
might
want
to.
X
I
probably
needs
to
change
just
a
little
bit,
but
but
the
rates
are
are
looking
to
be
significant,
and
you
mentioned
the
issue
of
a
fourth
plant,
we're
projecting
that
if
the
permit
requirements
stay
as
they
are
for
us
to
comply
the
then
an
additional
regional
plant
looks
like
it
has
to
be
constructed
and
operated,
and
that
is
a
very
significant
cost.
X
We're
going
to
try
to
provide
that
information
to
you,
as
I
said
tomorrow
or
the
next
day,
so
that
you
have
a
sense
of
where
these
costs
and
rates
are
going
and
again.
This
is
based
on
what
we're
reading
in
terms
of
the
permit
requirements.
X
If
we
are
wrong,
we'd
love
to
hear
from
ecology
that
we've
overshot
and
that
we're,
but
as
far
as
we
can
tell,
this
is
what
it
means
we're
trying
to
do
this
transparently,
so
that
they
you.
We
all
know
what
goes
into
that
process.
M
Thanks
so
talk
about
impacts
on
affordable
housing
too,
so
just
I'm
not
gonna
ask
any
more
questions.
I
think
that
the
council
and
staff
gets
a
sense
of
where
I
am
on
this.
I
I
support
all
of
the
revisions
to
the
letters
that
have
been
brought
forward
by
council
members
on
and
newton
house.
I
think
that
we
should
also
make
sure
that
we
make
the
letter
consistent
with
the
that
data,
that
we
have
that
we're
going
to
get
from
king
county,
since
it
has
to
be
done
in
the
16th.
M
This
is
our
last
chance
sitting
as
a
council
to
do
it,
but
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
yeah,
like
I
said,
as
councilmember
john
said,
a
little
bit
more
aggressive
and
I'd
like
to
see
something
about
gma
and
growth
in
there,
because
that
is
a
real
risk
of
of
this
approach,
and
so,
if
we
could
add
something
about
growth
in
there
and
then
and
then
I
would
trust
staff
to
redraft
the
letter,
they
can
send
it
to
counsel
af.
M
You
know
after
the
meeting
and
if
any
individual
council
member
has
an
issue,
but
otherwise
we've
got
to
get
this
letter
out
before
our
next
meeting.
So
I
would
support,
of
course,
the
rest
of
the
council
going
away,
and
I
would
support
that
kind
of
approach
to
this
letter
and
I'm
so
glad
you
brought
this
to
us.
I
think
it's
so
important.
Thanks.
W
Sure
I
can
certainly
tell
you
that
we
are.
We
don't
know
enough
about
what.
W
Okay,
sorry,
I
I
didn't
write
down
a
joint
letter
from
multiple
cities
is
what
I
wrote
down
and,
as
cameron
said,
each
a
number
of
cities
and
districts
sewer
districts
are
creating
responses,
and
I
do
believe
that
while
we
could
send
a
joint
letter,
I
think
there
is
bellevue
has
its
own
voice
and
I
would
recommend
that
we
send
a
letter
from
bellevue
each
each
utility,
each
city,
its
district's
issues,
may
be
different.
So
my
my
thought
is
that
the
letter
should
come
from
bellevue,
yeah
and.
W
And,
and
definitely
we
can
make
it
a
stronger
that
it's
not
that
we
don't
know,
but
that
more
due
diligence
is
needed.
I
think
one
of
the
key
things
that
I
would
like
to
put
in
our
letter
is
that
we
are
uncertain
of
the
science
behind
this
or
we
really
need
a
third
party
review.
W
We
are
not
scientists.
We
are
not
knowledgeable
of
this.
We
need
somebody
who's
knowledgeable
in
the
field
to
do
a
review
of
ecology's
proposal
and
and
our
so
I
would
say
that
we
strongly
want
a
word
that
it
needs
to
have
a
they
need
to
do.
A
third
party
peer
review
and
definitely
the
cost
implications
are
huge.
W
That's
going
to
increase
our
bill
by
80
million
dollars,
so
it's
this
is
not
insignificant
cost.
So
we
will.
We
will
work
closely
with
king
county
to
get
the
latest
numbers
of
impacts,
both
capital
and
and
operating.
As
far
as
the
impact
on
growth,
I
think
I
will
offline
with
cameron
to
fully
understand
exactly
what
the
implications
are
to
capacity.
W
I
do
understand
about
the
cost
implications,
but
I
I'm
not
quite
clear
on
why
capacity
would
be
impacted
so,
but
we
will
work
offline
with
cameron
and
his
staff
to
understand
that
more.
W
X
W
X
X
Apologize,
I
didn't
mean
to
interrupt.
I
wanted
to
just
emphasize
one
small
point,
but
I
think
it's
an
important
one.
We
would
really
recommend
that
you
copy
your
state
legislators
on
your
letter
so
that
you
can
keep
them
in
this
conversation
here.
That's
important.
X
We've
already
been
invited
to
a
state
house
environment
committee
meeting
to
talk
about
this
issue
in
mid-october,
and
so
we'd
like
to
have
your
legislators
if
they're
on
that
committee
or
other
committees
that
might
have
jurisdiction
to
be
clued
into
bellevue's
perspective
and
voice,
that'll,
be
probably
in
the
middle
of
the
period
while,
while
ecology
staff
are
working
on
responding
to
the
comment,
letters
that
they
receive.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
time
to
continue
that
conversation
and
we
want
to
recommend
that
you
bring
in
them
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
Knob,
do
you
feel
like
you've
gotten
enough
direction
to
make
edits
on
that
letter?.
W
We
do
we
do
have
enough
and
we're
looking
for
some
information
from
king
county
to
complete
that
and
we'll
work
with
them
to
get
that
information
and
incorporate
the
edits,
and
I
think,
may
robinson
we
will
work
with
you,
then,
to
finalize
that
letter.
Yes,.
M
I
just
I
was
I'd
written
some
notes
down
at
the
beginning
that
doe
hadn't
completed
the
scientific
review,
the
nutrient
management
plan
or
the
economic
and
something
economic
impacts.
Analysis.
If
that's
correct,
can
we
specifically
ask
them
for
those
three
things
before
they
adopt
a
new
rule?
W
They're
alluded
to,
but
they're
not
directly
touched
on.
A
Okay,
so
is
there
let's
see
so?
Is
there
a
motion
to
direct
staff
to
submit
the
edited
letter
to
ecology.
G
H
Thank
you
mayor.
I
moved
the
direct
stat
to
submit
a
letter
to
ecology
outline
the
city's
concerns
with
the
draft.
You
could
sound
nutrient
general
permit,
including
the
edits
by
council
member
robertson's
own
in
newinghouse.
A
X
A
Thank
you
for
coming
tonight,
appreciate
it
all
right.
We
have
a
land
use,
ordinance,
deputy
mayor,
no
city
manager.
Mr.
N
Miyake
yeah
sure
thank
you
mayor
council
members.
The
landing
signing
in
front
of
you
is
with
regard
to
the
sunset
north
lot
can
rezone.
P
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
As
you
heard,
the
next
item
of
business
is
final
action
on
the
rezone
application
submitted
by
sunset,
north
llc,
for
a
rezone
of
7.2,
acre
site
from
office,
limited
business
to
eastgate
transit,
oriented
development
and
for
clarification
of
associated
concomitant
zoning
agreements.
P
This
is
a
process
three
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
The
hearing
examiner
held
the
public
hearing
and
then
made
a
recommendation
to
the
council.
The
hearing
examiner
recommends
approval
with
conditions
and
no
appeal
of
that
recommendation
was
filed.
As
council
will
recall.
At
the
july,
19
council
meeting
drew
folsom,
the
associate
land
use,
planner
provided
a
brief
staff
report
on
the
matter
tonight.
P
Since
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
matter
and
therefore
subject
to
the
appearance
of
fairness
doctrine,
I
would
recommend
mayor
that
each
council
member
be
given
an
opportunity
to
disclose,
on
the
record
any
ex-party
communications
that
they
may
have
had
with
any
person
supporting
or
opposing
the
project.
Prior
to
your
deliberation
and
vote
on
the
matter
to
most
efficiently
enable
council
members,
disclosures
staff
have
searched
all
emails
received
at
council,
bellevue,
dot,
gov
and
individual
council
members
city
email
addresses
and
have
found
none.
P
A
Is
that
okay
charmaine,
or
do
we
need
to
get
that
verbally?
Your
microphone
is
still
off.
I'm
sorry.
L
P
Now
that
that
was
all
there,
if
there
are
any
questions,
drew
folsom
and
matt
mcfarland
is
here
as
well
as
myself
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
on
this
proposal
tonight
to
pass
this
this
application
and
adopt
the
ordinance
all
right?
Seeing
that
is
there
a
motion?
I.
H
Moved
to
adopt
ordinance,
65-94
approving
with
conditions
the
rezone
application
of
the
sunset
north
lot,
10
re-zone,
submitted
by
sunset
north
llc.
A
rezone
is
of
a
7.2
acre
site
located
at
3239th
avenue,
southeast
from
office,
limited
business
to
eastgate,
transit
orientated
development
and
for
clarification
of
associate
competent
zoning
agreements.
Second,.
A
N
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members.
You
have
two
ordinances
under
order
under
ordinances
and
resolutions
in
your
packet
this
evening.
The
first
one
is
ordinance
6595,
which
is
intended
to
refinance
the
city's
existing
tiffy
alone,
which
results
significant
savings
to
the
city
joining
us
this
evening.
To
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
on.
This
is
tony
call
our
director
of
finance
and
asset
management,
as
well
as
ron
kessick
assistant
director
in
our
transportation
department,
as
well
as
our
bond
council,
stacey
lewis,
from
pacifica
law.
N
N
Could
we
if
you'd
like
we,
could
give
a
brief
staff
report,
but
we
were
really
originally
just
opening
it
up
for
questions.
E
On
well,
I
just
have
to
thank
staff
for
wholeheartedly
for
doing
this
work
to
reduce
our
our
interest
rate
and
save
so
much
money.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
G
I
hope
to
approve
this
ordinance.
A
Okay,
there's
a
motion
to
adopt
the
ordinance
65.95
because.
S
I
A
Well,
let's,
let's
go
yeah,
let's
move
on
and
I
know
that
council
members
on
and
deputy
mayor.
A
N
Thank
you,
mayor
ordinance,
6596
adopts
the
human
service
commission's
21
to
22
house
bill,
1590
funding,
recommendation
and
authorizes
the
city
manager
or
as
designated
to
enter
into
contracts
with
local
human
service
agencies
in
accordance
with
recommendations
joining
us.
This
evening
is
matt
cummins,
director
of
the
community
development.
To
answer
questions
you
may
have
on
this
particular
ordinance.
A
M
I
move
to
adopt
the
ordinance
adopt
in
the
human
services
commission's
2021
2022
hp,
1590
funding
recommendations
authorizing
the
city
manager
or
designee
to
enter
into
contracts
with
local
human
services
agencies,
in
accordance
with
the
recommendations
amending
ordinance,
6557
adopted
december
14
2020,
as
previously
amended
to
increase
the
appropriations
to
the
2021-2022
housing
trust
fund
and
human
services
fund
each
in
the
amount
of
one
million.
Six
hundred
fifty
nine
thousand
four
hundred
twenty
two
dollars.
A
This
is
the
motion
just
to
clarify
to
adopt
ordinance
sixty
five,
ninety
six,
so
there's
a
second
okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
okay,
excellent!
Well,
that
is
the
end
of
our
meeting.
Thank
you
all
for
your
excellent
discussion.
I
really
appreciate
it.
I
hope
you
have
a
nice
month
off
and
I
will
see
you
in
september.