►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - July 12, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you
I'm
going
to
for
the
first
picture
to
go,
live
there.
We
go
great
well
welcome
to
a
regular
city
council
meeting
for
bellevue
july
2021.
We
have
a
heavy
agenda
tonight.
I'm
going
to
remind
the
council
to
keep
their
comments
with
minutes
maximum
at
a
time,
but
we're
sure
that
everybody
has
a
chance
to
speak
tonight.
C
D
A
Thank
you,
city
clerk.
Do
you
have
any
buddies
signed
up
for
oral
communication
tonight.
B
You
mayor,
there
are
actually
eight
speakers
pre-registered
this
evening.
However,
two
speakers
are
signed
up
for
a
topic
where
we
already
will
have
three
if
everyone
attends
so
with
that,
I
will
call
the
first
speaker
who
is
judy
gowdy
and
miss
gowdy.
Can
you
hear
me,
can
you
hear
me
okay?
Yes,
thank
you.
Your
time
begins
now.
Wonderful.
I
So
I
am
a
resident
of
the
city
of
bellevue
and
very
much
in
favor,
of
supporting
whatever
we
can
do
to
help
with
homelessness
and
making
housing
affordable.
I've
been
following
the
eastgate
campus
developments
and
in
in
support
of
the
organizations
and
plans
that
are
being
put
in
place.
I
The
area
the
whole
project
has
been
carefully
vetted
and
it's
unique
in
that
it
provides
a
full
spectrum
of
housing
needs
of
from
homelessness,
shelter
to
supportive
housing
to
mark
to
workforce
housing,
and
I
would
encourage
you
and
your
consideration
tonight
of
additional
funding
for
that
project
to
be
supportive
of
that
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
J
Okay,
great,
thank
you
hi.
My
name
is
cynthia
cole,
I'm
a
resident
of
lake
hills,
and
I
want
to
talk
about
the
new
land
use
codes
or
our
land
use
codes
that
will
have
to
be
updated
because
of
ordinances,
6585
and
6586.
J
J
I'm
hoping
our
legislative
lobbyists
were
allowed
to
advocate
for
the
city
of
bellevue.
It
seems
as
if
the
legislature
did
not
listen
to
cities
like
bellevue,
who
have
employed
thoughtful
land
use
planning.
The
legislature
could
have
created
a
way
for
bellevue
to
share
our
best
practices
in
land
use
planning
from
what
I've
observed.
Our
bellevue
planning,
commission
and
past
actions
by
our
bellevue
city
council
have
set
the
standard
for
being
proactive
in
balancing
the
needs
of
residents
and
the
needs
of
the
homeless
in
our
community.
J
J
I
would
like
the
bellevue
city
council
to
require
a
conditional
use
permit
for
every
change
in
land
use
code
required
by
hb
1220
requiring
conditional
use
permits
would
also
involve
public
outreach
and
input.
One
of
the
council's
priorities
is
to
make
sure
every
community
in
bellevue
has
the
chance
to
weigh
in
on
land
use
code.
Changes
equity
would
be
served
by
involving
lake
hills,
newport
hills
maiden,
bower
eastgate,
wolverton
downtown
all
of
bellevue.
J
You
know
I'm
not
a
real
on
policy
wonk,
but
I
think
it's
process.
Three
part
20.30b
120
in
our
city,
land
use
codes
that
require
conditional
use
permits
and
public
hearings
on
requirements
levied
by
the
state
to
ensure
that
their
changes
to
our
ordinances
are
compatible
with
other
nearby
land
use.
Bellevue
has
been
handed
a
tough
situation.
J
K
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
and
council
members
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
live
in
the
cougar
mountain
area
of
bellevue
and
I'm
a
passionate
supporter
of
a
wide
range
of
housing
options
to
serve
all
of
bellevue's
residents.
K
I
would
encourage
you
to
move
forward
on
support
and
approve
the
supplemental
requests
that
congregations
for
the
homeless
and
the
other
partners
at
the
eastgate
housing
site
have
put
forward
and
would
hope
that
you
would
see
your
way
to
approving
those
and
to
increasing
the
housing
and
affordable
options
for
all
of
bellevue.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
L
Thank
you,
I'm
marilyn
mcguire
and
a
resident
of
northeast
bellevue.
My
address
is
on
file
I'd
like
to
address
the
same
agenda
items
12bnc
regarding
the
housing
audit
ordinances.
We
have
discussed
housing
for
months
through
the
great
neighborhoods
program.
We
have
addressed
implications
of
affordable
housing,
not
being
truly
affordable
in
bellevue,
and
the
impacts
of
increased
density
on
neighborhood
life
and
character.
Among
other
topics.
Residents
in
northeast
and
northwest
bellevue
have
devoted
many
hours
and
a
great
deal
of
effort
to
the
development
of
their
great
neighborhoods
plans.
L
We
have
been
pleased
with
the
dialogue
and
scheduling
obsessions
both
with
great
neighborhood
staff
and
with
the
planning
commission.
We
are
surprised
to
find
these
ordinances
on
tonight's
agenda,
as
the
underlying
laws
were
passed
in
may
when
great
neighborhoods
was
in
full
swing.
Yet
no
one
from
the
city
discussed
this
with
us.
These
laws
impact
our
neighborhoods
and
are
not
specifically
addressed
in
the
plans.
Things
are
moving
at
a
very
swift
pace
and
residents
can't
be
expected
to
be
on
top
of
all
the
emerging
laws
and
decisions.
L
We
depend
upon
our
city
leaders
to
keep
us
informed.
I
hope
that
there
are
plans
to
continue
the
dialogue
with
those
who
will
live
with
these
decisions
on
a
daily
basis.
The
city
has
a
clear
duty
to
all
residents
and
the
decision
should
not
favor
one
group
over
another,
but
allow
us
all
to
work
together
to
address
needs
of
our
neighborhoods.
Let
me
be
crystal
clear:
we
are
committed
to
addressing
the
issue
of
housing
for
low
income
and
homeless
people.
The
decision
on
housing
density
is
the
first
step.
It's
not
a
complete
plan.
L
There
are
many
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
in
order
to
successfully
implement
this
plan.
What
are
the
needed
supports
for
increased
density
in
the
neighborhoods?
How
do
we
plan
proactively
for
impacts
of
infrastructure
such
as
water,
sewer,
transportation
and
traffic?
For
example?
What
are
the
safety
rails
for
both
homeless
and
residents
to
address
inevitable
conflicts
and
potential
crime?
That
happens
when
people
are
living
very
close
together
in
high
density
neighborhoods.
Seattle
clearly
illustrates
the
implications
of
not
having
a
plan.
L
An
example
we
do
not
want
to
repeat
housing
by
itself
does
not
guarantee
success
for
vulnerable
populations,
nor
the
neighborhoods
where
they
are
located.
Please
permit
me
to
give
you
an
educational
example
of
what
I'm
addressing
if
a
student
with
add
has
been
given
a
medication
to
help
mitigate
his
issues.
The
mitigation
is
intended
to
help
the
student
be
more
psychologically
available
to
learn.
L
L
They
must
be
considered
and
specific
actions
taken
in
your
process,
so
the
problems
faced
by
these
new
members
of
our
community
community
are
addressed
not
simply
warehoused.
You
have
time
now
to
look
at
the
impacts
of
this
legislation
and
to
plan
proactively
to
truly
make
a
difference
in
the
lives
of
people
who
need
help.
I
sincerely
hope
that
you
will
do
this
as
your
next
steps
and
that
our
neighbors
are
actively
engaged
in
the
process,
because
we
need
to
be
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
address
the
council.
B
B
M
M
We
do
urge
your
swift
action
and
sense
of
urgency
with
no
delays
in
moving
the
additional
finding
our
locations
forward
by
giving
direction
to
staff
today
and
preparing
for
a
full
vote.
At
the
july
19th
meeting,
we
already
sent
a
comment
letter
with
details
on
our
support,
but
I
want
to
reiterate
that
moving
swiftly
on
this
will
ensure
that
all
parties
are
involved
will
preserve
their
other
financing
commitments
and
allow
the
congregation
for
the
homeless
to
complete
their
public
engagement
process
and
payment
construction
to
begin
on
other
projects.
M
We
do
believe
that
the
east
side,
housing
campus,
will
help
the
entire
community
be
safe
by
being
bringing
people
inside,
and
we
do
commend
your
thoughtful
leadership
in
exploring
the
additional
funding
options
that
you
have
before
you
today
for
the
project
and
urge
you
once
again
to
adopt
the
recommendations
with
no
delay
to
effectively
help
the
project
complete
their
financing.
I'll
close
by
thanking
you
for
your
diligent
work
towards
addressing
the
affordable
housing
need
in
bellevue.
Thank
you.
B
B
B
A
A
C
As
you
mentioned,
we
have
two
topics
under
the
study
session
agenda
this
evening
and
the
first
study
session
matter
in
front
of
you
here
are
three
affordable:
housing
capital
funding,
requests
for
projects
located
in
bellevue,
related
to
the
eastside
men's
shelter,
the
east
gate,
permanent
supportive
housing
project
and
the
preservation
of
the
illahi
apartments
located
in
the
bel
red
area
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
city
has
dedicated
resources
from
a
number
of
sources
targeted
at
affordable
housing
and
the
three
current
requests
that
are
being
brought
forward
to
accounts
of
consideration
are
here
because
they
meet
an
immediate
need
and
are
consistent
with
city
policy
direction
and
priorities.
C
Following
the
staff
presentation
and
council
discussion,
staff
is
seeking
council
direction,
repair
legislation
approving
the
funding
requests
for
the
council
action
at
a
future
meeting
joining
us
this
evening
is
emile
king
assistant
director,
as
well
as
lindsay
masters
arts,
executive
manager
from
the
community
development
department.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
emil.
A
So
before
emil
starts,
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
for
meeting
management
I
will
be
present
for
the
men's,
shelter
discussion
and
the
eastgate
permanent
supportive
housing
discussion.
But
then
I
will
recuse
myself
for
the
illihi
discussion
and
we
will
let
the
deputy
mayor
take
over
and
I
will
return
when
that
vote
is
done.
So
go
ahead.
Emil.
E
E
E
Slide
tonight
we're
asking
for
direction
from
council
for
three
requests:
the
east
side,
men's
shelter,
eastgate,
supportive
housing
and
allahi
apartments
based
on
council
direction.
Staff
would
return
with
the
appropriate
legislation
to
award
funding
to
these
projects
at
an
upcoming
council
meeting
next
slide.
Please.
E
The
agenda
for
this
study
session
is
as
follows:
we'll
review
the
funding
requests
at
a
high
level
we'll
provide
an
overview
of
the
available
city
resources.
We
have
right
now
for
affordable
housing.
We'll
then
go
into
the
city
policy
direction.
To
use
these
funds
followed
by
a
review
of
each
of
the
three
funding
requests,
we'll
start
with
the
men's
shelter,
then
the
supportive
housing
project
and,
lastly,
the
allahi
apartments
following
each
of
the
requests,
we'll
pause
for
any
questions
and
then
ask
for
council
direction
on
each
one
individually.
E
E
E
As
mentioned
previously,
the
total
of
these
three
requests
is
eight
million
dollars.
The
city
currently
has
12.4
million
in
funding
available
for
affordable
housing
and
related
uses.
This
excludes
the
new
house
bill,
1590
revenue
source
that
went
into
effect
earlier
this
year.
The
existing
resources
are
comprised
of
seven
million
dollars
of
accumulated
funds
in
the
city's
housing
contingency.
E
E
The
bellred
land
use
incentive
system
has
provisions
for
developers
to
pay
a
fee
in
lieu
of
building
affordable
housing
as
part
of
their
project.
This
has
accumulated
3.4
million
dollars
to
date
and
is
intended
to
go
towards
bell
red
investment
house.
Bill
1406
enacted
in
2019
provides
a
local
revenue
source
for
affordable
housing
below
60
and
ami,
and
it
does
this
by
retaining
a
larger
portion
of
state
sales
and
use
taxes.
E
Please.
I
want
to
go
into
a
bit
on
the
city
policy
direction
and
priorities.
The
council
recently
confirmed
their
2021
to
2023
council
priorities.
In
addition,
we
have
the
affordable
housing
strategy
adopted
in
2017
and
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
These
three
documents
point
towards
a
serious
series
of
priorities
and
directions
for
use
of
monies.
E
The
first
is
working
toward
an
east
side
solution
for
a
permanent
men's
shelter.
The
second
is
executing
affordable
housing
by
creating
deeply
affordable
housing
for
the
less
than
30
percent
ami
range.
In
addition,
we
have
policy
direction
on
developing,
affordable
housing
on
public
lands,
pursuing
pursuing
funding
partnerships
and
pursuing
preservation,
opportunities.
E
Next
slide,
please
we're
going
to
begin
going
into
detail
on
the
funding
requests,
we're
going
to
start
with
the
east
side,
men's
shelter
and
supportive
housing
I'll
first
be
turning
things
over
to
lindsay.
Who
is
going
to
go
into
a
bit
of
detail
on
the
overall
escape
master
development
and
then
go
into
a
bit
of
detail
on
each
one
of
those
individual
funding
requests.
So
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
you
now
lindsay
please
great.
N
Thank
you
emil
and
thank
you,
council
members
for
having
me
I'm
pleased
to
be
back
here
to
talk
to
you
again
about
this
really
important
project,
the
escape
master
development.
N
It's
a
project
and
a
set
of
projects
that
you
have
supported
in
the
past,
as
each
of
these
individual
components
have
come
to
you
as
recommendations
through
the
arch
funding
round
and
to
reorient
you
as
to
how
the
development
came
about
this
started
with
efforts
by
congregations
for
the
homeless
for
many
years
to
find
a
location
for
a
permanent
shelter
for
homeless
men
inside
after
a
number
of
years
of
searching
for
sites,
they
were
able
to
secure
the
10-acre
parcel.
That
is
the
subject
of
its
development
owned
by
king
county
solid
waste.
N
The
county
just
recently
voted
out
of
the
hole
to
approve
the
sale
of
the
site
to
the
project
partners.
It's
located
on
east
gateway,
just
east
of
I-405,
and
to
acknowledge
the
opportunity
afforded
by
the
site
as
well
as
some
of
the
challenges
of
such
a
large
site.
Cfh
has
also
brought
in
additional
project.
Partners
are
have
become
a
part
of
this
campus
and
are
partnered
with
them
to
create
a
continuum
of
housing
and
services.
N
These
efforts
go
back
many
years,
starting
probably
as
early
as
2014
not
earlier,
and
the
organization
has
remained
really
steadfast
in
its
commitment
to
navigating
all
the
challenges
along
the
way,
and
it's
also
with
the
support
of
the
city
that
the
project
has
gotten
to
where
it
is
today,
including
from
the
city
being
able
to
accommodate
a
temporary
location
for
the
shelter
and
some
operational
funding
going
while
this
permanent
location
is
built
out
over
these
years.
N
800
unduplicated
endless
men
at
its
temporary
shelter,
location
and
another
700,
separate
individuals
with
a
variety
of
other
services,
so
urgency
to
move
this
project
forward
is
still
with
us
today,
as
it
continues
to
provide
those
critical
services
that
project
team
has
also
created
a
lot
of
momentum
towards.
What's
now
a
major
capital
project,
an
undertaking
for
them
they've
raised
13.4
million
dollars
in
total
financing
to
date,
and
they
are
well
underway
through
the
conditional
youth
permit
process.
N
A
really
important
part
of
this
project
is
the
polaris
workforce
housing.
This
project
is
really
going
to
anchor
the
master
development
and
provide
a
large
scale
number
of
workforce
housing
units
that
are
significantly
providing
a
number
of
family
size,
two
bedroom
and
three
bedroom
units.
All
of
the
units
in
the
project
will
be
affordable
at
50
and
60
of
this
project
has
also
been
very
successful
in
raising
significant
amount
of
other
public
and
private
funding.
N
Finally,
the
eastgate
supportive
housing
project
makes
up
the
the
final
building
site
and
plymouth
was
the
the
last
partner
brought
into
the
project
early
last
year
and
they
were
selected
to
create
another
housing
opportunity
on
the
continuum
and
it's
one
focused
on
directly
providing
housing
for
homeless
individuals
coming
directly
from
shelter,
referrals
from
the
east
side,
and
so
they've
formed
a
really
strong
and
important
partnership
with
cfh
as
a
campus
partner,
as
well
as
with
east
getaway.
We
also
expect
to
be
referring
home
from
their
eastside
shelter.
N
Let
plymouth.
As
you
know,
we
discussed
their
funding
recommendation
for
them
earlier
this
year
and
they
were
happy
to
come
and
present
and
introduce
themselves
as
an
organization,
that's
new
to
the
east
side,
but
they
are
very
excited
to
be
here
and
partnering
with
us
and
they
have
really
shown
their
commitment
as
a
project
partner
by
participating
every
step
of
the
way
in
the
good
neighbor
process
that
cfh
is
is
undertaking
related
to
its
permit.
N
N
N
Let's
move
on
to
the
next
slide,
so
I'll
go
now
into
the
specific
funding
requests
that
have
come
from
both
the
men's
shelter
and
from
the
supportive
housing
project
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
drivers
for
how
these
requests
came
about
in
the
last
couple
of
months.
The
project
team
is
really
working
towards
finalizing
their
costs
and
obtained
some
new
pricing
that
resulted
in
significant
cost
increases
to
the
project.
N
N
The
increases
are
all
driven
by
construction
related
factors,
most
notably
there's
been
significant.
Spikes
in
cost
of
materials,
as
well
as
significant
increases
in
labor
rates.
N
A
couple
of
more
minor
drivers,
unique
to
this
shelter,
is
that
cfh
has
been
responsive
to
many
of
the
requests
from
the
good
neighbor
advisory
committee
process
and
is
has
adapted
some
of
its
design
to
be
able
to
enhance
the
project
to
meet
those
requests
also
related
to
that.
They,
the
time
that
it
has
taken
to
undertake
the
conditional
use
permit
process,
has
moved
their
construction
timeline
further
out
from
their
their
campus
partners,
whereas
their
original
costs
had
assumed
some
synergies
from
being
able
to
do
much
of
the
site
development
simultaneously.
N
These
funds
would
be
structured
consistent
with
our
existing
awards
to
the
project.
The
funding
would
be
an
up
to
funding
amount
based
on
the
actual
final
costs
and
needs,
and
we
would
be
tracking
the
continued
process
to
conduct
value
engineering
and
bring
that
actual
final
cost
down
as
much
as
possible.
N
N
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
presentation.
So
this
is
going
to
now
be
a
discussion
about
the
eastside
men's
shelter
and
we
will
take
a
vote
at
the
end
of
that
to
determine
whether
or
not
we
provide
additional
funding.
So
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
call
in
this
order:
councilmember
barksdale,
robertson,
zahn,
deputy
mayor
newton
house,
council,
member
stokes
lee
and
then
myself
so
councilmember
barksdale.
Would
you
like
to
start
us
off.
D
Sure
thank
you
mayor.
I
I
support
the
providing
the
supplemental
funding
to
them
and
to
for
the
eastside
men's
shelter.
Cfh
has
done
an
outstanding
job
with
helping
to
manage
or
address
homelessness
in
our
community,
and
I
think
you
know
we're
gonna
need
to
continue
to
provide
the
support
for
them
to
continue
to
provide
support
in
the
community.
So
I
support
it.
H
This
has
been
a
long
time
coming.
I
have
a
quick
question
for
lindsay
is
cfh?
Are
there
any
strings
from
the
county
or
anyone
else
on
their
funding?
That
is
requiring
them
to
be
in
the
coordinated
entry
for
all
program.
H
Good
because
I
know
that
they're
really
important
to
serving
the
men
who
find
themselves
homeless
in
values,
so
I'm
absolutely
in
favor
of
this.
I
wish
we'd
gotten
this
done
sooner.
I
know
that
it
took
a
long
time
for
them
to
acquire
the
property
and
that
caused
some
delay
and
there's
a
lot
of
driving
factors
with
particularly
under
covered
construction
materials
have
skyrocketed,
and
so
I
would
be
surprised
if,
if
they
didn't
have
a
significant
increase,
so
yeah
I.
O
Yes,
I
too
support
the
the
project
and
moving
with
urgency,
because
I
do
think
there's
some
time
sensitivity.
Construction
cost
is
only
escalating
quicker
and
quicker.
The
more
we
wait.
I
did
have
a
question
because
you
mentioned
that
because
of
the
the
good
neighbor
process,
that
the
project
is
now
from
a
schedule
standpoint
out
of
sync
with
the
rest
of
the
development,
so
we
are
actually
spending
money
to
support
this
project.
O
So,
as
we
vote
on
this
funding
increase,
I
think
that
we
should
be
also
as
much
as
possible
being
as
fiscally
responsible
as
possible.
So
if
being
able
to
issue
a
clearing
and
grading
permit
allows
us
to
have
cost
savings
so
that
our
money
goes
farther
and
can
be
used
for
other
things.
I
think
that's
something
we
should
consider.
G
So,
thank
you
for
the
question
council
members
on
this
is
mike
brennan,
director
of
development
services.
It
is
a
a
decision
that
is
an
administrative
decision
in
response
to
the
mayor's
question
about
where
it
falls,
so
that
decision
does
lie
with
with
director,
so
the
codes
are
providing
some
fairly
specific
guidance
on
this
particular
question.
G
So
the
clearing
grading
code
has
language
that
essentially
says
that
if
there's
an
underlying
land
use
decision
or
environmental
sipa
decision
required
to
allow
a
project
to
proceed
that
that
process
needs
to
run
its
course
to
approval,
allowing
the
public
engagement
to
occur
before
construction
begins
or
before
a
clearing
and
grading
permit
can
be
released.
G
I'm
guessing
the
reason
that
that
was
put
into
the
city's
code
was
to
show
that
you
know
we
are
listening
to
the
public
and
didn't
want
to
presuppose
an
outcome
by
allowing
construction
to
begin
before
that
public
process
had
completed
its
course,
so
we
are
working
very
closely
with
cfh
moving
as
quickly
as
we
can
through
the
conditional
use
permit
process
working
with
the
good
neighbor
agreement
advisory
committee.
It
has
been
very
productive
discussions
as
you've
heard
and
we're
working
to
try
to
get
this
permit
out
as
quickly
as
we
can.
I
do
understand.
G
There's
some
sequencing
challenges
that
they're
having
we
will
continue
to
work
with
them
to
try
to
find
anything
that
we
can
do
to
save
them.
Costs.
O
F
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
very
much
in
support
of
moving
this
forward
as
well.
Obviously,
as
my
colleagues
have
said,
this
is
urgent.
You
know
due
to
the
due
to
the
acquisition
and
the
other
partners
involved.
Obviously
this
has
been
a
priority,
not
just
for
this
council,
but
prior
councils
as
well,
so
we
need
to
keep
moving.
F
This
forward
need
to
compete,
continue
to
support
those
agencies
like
cfh,
for
this,
for
this
eastgate
campus
and
we
need
to
support
them
to
ensure
it's
gonna
be
successful,
and
I
just
want
to
take
to
thank
all
those
also
that
are
on
this
good
neighbor
advisory
group
that
have
dedicated
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
to
put
forward
to
ensure
that
you
know
this
is
a
project
that's
embraced
by
the
community
and
embraced
by
small
businesses
or
even
large
businesses
in
that
area,
and
to
play
a
very
large
role
in
that,
and
even
if
that
did
add
some
additional
costs,
I
think
that's
money
well
spent.
F
So
this
is
just
great
news
all
around
wish
wish.
We
could
have
done
this
sooner,
but
we're
here
now.
So,
let's
support
it
keep
moving
this
forward
and
I
also
want
to
thank
the
staff
you
know
mike
camille
lindsey.
Thank
you
so
much
for
looking
for
those
opportunities
to
move
this
even
closer
or
move
move
this
even
quicker,
if
possible,
or
anything
that
we
can
do
to
cut
costs.
F
I
I
know
that's
something
that
we've
been
actively
looking
at
for
for
quite
some
time,
so
you
know
this
city
and
this
council
is
dedicated
to
making
this
a
success.
So
thank
you
for
all
your
efforts
and
yeah.
I'm
ready
to
move
this
forward.
P
Yeah
I
appreciate
the
comments
have
been
made
so
far.
It
is
it's
time
I
just
thinking
back
on
this.
This
is
like
going
on
seven
years
of
trying
to
get
this
done
and
it's
been
a
long
process.
So
it's
always
exciting
to
get
to
this
stage.
We
started
out,
and
I
have
I've
found
it's
looking
through
some
material.
P
We
had
14
sites,
we
were
looking
at
and
this
was
one
of
them
and
there
were,
you
know,
questions
about
and
everything,
but
I'm
hoping
that
the
time
wasn't
misspent
in
a
sense
that
maybe
this
in
conjunction
with
the
other
thing
we'll
be
talking
about
tonight,
actually
gives
us
probably
the
best
best
opportunity
to
make
this
work
really
well,
and
I
appreciate
all
the
comments
made
about
the
you
know:
the
neighborhood
and
every
thing
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
good
neighbor
groups
work
plan
and
everything
I
don't
think
we've
I
may
have
missed
it,
but
it'd
be
nice
for
us
to
have
that
and
see
what
how
that
is
turning
out
and
just
really
excited
about.
P
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
groundbreaking
and
I
love
the
fit
we
have
in
the
affordable
housing
part
of
it,
how
that's
all
going
so
and
the
other
factor
is
the
public
understand.
This
is
a
permanent
location
for
a
temporary
shelter
that
is
a
very,
very
needy
part
in
bellevue
to
meet
our
obligations
and
the
things
we've
been
talking
about
since
I
came
on
council
in
terms
of
we
needed
to
do
this
and
we're
doing
it
and
that's
that's
the
exciting
thing,
so
I'm
all
for
this.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Well,
good
things
don't
happen
quickly.
It
takes
time
weeds
go
fast,
but
this
is
a
very,
very
important
project.
I'm
very
thankful
that
we
are
getting
to
where
we
are
thanks
to
the
staff
thanks
to
the
public,
especially
this
good
neighbor
agreement.
You
know,
I
think
the
way
the
staff
now
is
calling
is
enhancement.
Q
Q
You
know
we
were
briefed
on
this
budget
a
few
months
ago
and
we
look
at
it
and
the
partners
we
know
congregation
homeless,
they're,
always
a
good
partner
and
plymouth
has
proven
to
be
wonderful
people
who
have
lots
of
experience
to
do
this
and
this
workforce
housing.
That's
a
another,
a
piece
of
very
important
element
to
make
sure
this
whole
thing
works.
Q
Q
We
take
the
time
and
we
look
at
getting
the
good
partners,
and
I
want
to
give
the
neighbors
the
people
who
are
supported
and
have
patience
and
stay
with
us
and
see
this
happen
and
the
people
who
have
concerns
about
it,
I'm
very
happy
to
they
are
working
with
us
and
seeing
that
it's
going
to
work
out
and
it's
going
to
meet
our
goal
in
priority
for
this
region.
So
I'm
really
happy.
But
my
question
is:
we
understand
some
of
the
costs.
We
have
to
pay
and
avoidable.
Some
of
the
costs.
Q
I
think
councilman
robertson
already
boiled
out
all
kinds
of
you
know
taxes,
sales
tax
and
this,
and
that-
and
I
think,
I'm
sure
the
city
staff
already
worked
very
hard
to
make
it
as
efficient
as
possible.
But
are
these
other
things
such
as
you
mentioned
taxes?
Oh,
do
we
can
we
provide
any
tax
incentive?
We
do
that
with
our
multi-family
tax
exempt.
You
know
what
what
what
opportunity
would
that
be
for
us
to
reduce
costs
if
the
country
can
do
something
about
it
in
terms
of
policy,
so
mike?
What
do
you.
E
Yeah,
why
don't
lindsay
jonah
go
for
a
bit
on
the
the
thought
from
cfh
when
they
were
looking
at
the
costs
and
if
there
were
anything
that
synced
up
with
some
of
council
member
lee's
questions?
As
far
as
trying
to
thank
you
to
reduce
costs,
please.
Q
You
save
us
all
money,
and
so
why
not
thank
you-
and
I
want
to
compliment
arch
too,
I'm
very,
very
happy
archers
involved
because
they
have
proven
to
be
whether
wonderful
regional
housing
not
just
advocate
they
are
actually
doing
it
for
these
years
and
I'm
very
glad
that
you
know
it's
all
working
out
so.
R
N
N
They
are
likely
to
be
able
to
have
a
tax
exempt
status
as
a
non-profit
shelter,
so
they
would
not
be
impacted
by
property
taxes,
but
they
would
have
to
paying
sales
tax
on
all
of
the
construction
costs.
Just
as
a
as
a
matter
of
what's
applicable
to
the
project,
we
are
looking
at
a
couple
other
opportunities
to
bring
the
total
cost
down,
for
instance,
looking
at
a
new
grant
program
that
could
help
reduce
the
utility
hookup
fees,
so
we're
going
to
continue
working
on
that
in
the
coming
months.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
Well,
I
really
appreciate
all
the
comments
it's
so
gratifying
to
have
a
council
unified
in
support
of
this
men's
shelter.
I
don't
think
there's
anybody
in
the
city
who
feels
good
about
seeing
somebody
living
out
in
the
open
and
it's
certainly
not
healthy
for
the
individual
and
if
we're
going
to
address
our
homelessness
problem,
which
we
have
a
very
real
homelessness
problem
in
bellevue,
it's
imperative
that
we
get
this
done.
A
I
think
you
know
I
like
what
council
members
on
and
lee
were
talking
about
in
trying
to
reduce
any
costs,
and
I
think
you
were
referencing
the
linkage
fees
that
sometimes
are
a
project
like
this
could
be
exempt
from.
So
if
there's
any
policy
that
you
would
recommend
that
we
look
at
as
a
council,
you
might
recommend
that
to
us
that
we
could
have
that
presentation
on
that
as
we
move
forward.
But
thank
you
of
course.
A
A
All
in
favor
say
aye
aye
aye
any
opposed
great
that
passes.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
up
we
are
going
to
hear
about
the
eastgate
permanent,
supportive
housing
done
by
plymouth.
So,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
speakers
on
this.
C
E
Yeah,
so
if
we
could
bring
up
slide.
E
13.,
thank
you,
and
so
now
we're
focusing
on
the
the
eastgate,
supportive
housing
or
the
plymouth
housing
project
and
I'm
gonna
hand
things
over
to
lindsay
to
briefly
go
over
some
of
the
background
on
the
cost
increases
and
then
similar
to
what
we
just
did
for
the
shelter
we
will
be
asking
for
direction
on
this
one.
So
I'm
going
to
hand
things
over
to
you
lindsay.
N
Thanks
emil,
yes,
so
some
of
these
are
going
to
sound,
very
familiar.
I've
talked
to
you
about
the
general
project
background
and
that
it
will
be
creating
95
units
of
permanent,
supportive
housing
that
are
going
to
be
really
important.
Part
of
the
continuum
to
help
individuals
actually
move
out
of
that
shelter
into
long-term,
stable
housing.
N
G
N
So
that
leaves
a
remaining
gap
of
400
000,
that's
requested
from
the
city
and
again,
these
are
driven
by
construction,
related
factors,
most
significant
material
and
labor
costs,
and
then
the
associated
impacts
on
how
much
sales
tax
on
those
as
well.
N
It
would
also,
as
we
discussed
earlier
this
year,
be
the
first
permanent
supportive
housing
project
on
the
east
side
and
therefore
be
making
a
really
significant
effort
in
bellevue's
contribution
towards
our
our
region's
efforts
to
to
address
homelessness
and
people
into
stable
housing,
and
with
that,
I
think
we
will
move
to
seek
some
direction.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I'm
going
to
give
everybody
again
a
chance
to
participate
in
this
discussion.
I'm
going
to
go
in
this
order:
council,
member
stokes,
deputy
mayor
newton
house,
council,
member
zahn,
lee
barksdale
robertson
and
then
myself
so
council
member
stokes.
Can
you
start
us
off?
Please.
P
Yeah,
I
sure,
can
thank
you
very
much.
This
is
I'm
just
very
excited
about
this,
I'm
very
proud
of
this
that
we're
doing
it
and
that
will
be
the
first
firm
and
supportive
housing
on
the
east
side.
It's
you
know.
It's
really
great
again.
We've
been
working
on
this
for
a
long
time
and
bring
to
reality
the
things
that
we
worked
on
and
thought
about
and
dreamed
about
in
the
affordable
housing
strategy
in
2017.
P
It's
just
exciting
to
see
this,
and
you
know
the
work.
That's
been
done
to
put
all
this
together
to
and
again
sometimes
you
know
you
look
at
different
places
and
all
and
something
kind
of
comes
together
and
it's
kind
of
magical
that
we're
doing
it
that
at
this
place,
along
along
with
the
temporary
housing
and
shelter.
So
I'm
just
very
excited
about
it.
I
do
want
to
comment
the
yellow
material
stuff's
gone
up.
P
I
know
that
a
six
foot,
two
by
four
is
triple
from
about
250
to
five,
almost
six
dollars
or
more
so
the
cost
of
all
of
this
is
is
great,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
we're
we're
getting
at
a
point
where
this
is
going
to
be
something
that
we
will
be
what's
going
to
change
bellevue
in
in
a
very,
very
positive
way,
and
the
change
lies
for
these
men
in
a
way
that
we've
been
talking
about,
and
now
we're
actually
going
to
help
on
that.
P
So
I'm
just
very
pleased
with
this,
and
let's
get
that
400k
to
finish
this
off
and
really
looking
forward
again
to
the
groundbreaking
to
celebrate
that
the
city
of
bellevue
is
really
stepping
out
and
saying
that
we're
not
only
you
know
talking,
but
we're
walking
the
talk-
and
this
is
just
this
is
exciting,
so
I'm
ready
to
go
with
it.
Thank
you.
O
O
So
that's
one
of
my
questions
and
then
I
appreciate
seeing
that
there
are
sustainability
elements
with
the
energy
code
so
to
the
degree
possible
if
there
are
other
sustainability
elements
that
could
be
implemented
so
that,
as
we
look
at
the
total
cost
of
ownership
that
we're
not
only
looking
at
first
cost,
but
the
operation
and
maintenance
and
long-term
sustainability
as
well,
because
you
know
this
building
is
going
to
be
around
for
many
many
years
and
if
we're
trying
to
get
to
net
zero
by
2050,
this
building's
certainly
going
to
be
there
by
that
time
and
then.
O
Lastly,
as
we
think
about
the
the
building
of
this
to
the
degree
that
that
we're
able
to
bring
on
diverse
businesses
to
be
building
as
well
as
workforce
development,
which
we
talk
a
lot
about
in
bellevue,
to
be
able
to
have
apprentices
on
those
on
these
three
projects,
I
think
that
would
be
an
important
part
of
bringing,
in
the
whole
view
of
the
council
vision
of
sustainability,
workforce
development,
as
well
as
supporting
the
very
population
that
we're
trying
to
help.
So
thank
you.
N
Yes,
absolutely
so
the
baseline
staffing
model,
which
put
successfully
to
operate
many
projects
already
in
their
portfolio,
does
provide
that
24,
7
on-site
staffing
and
as
well
as
case
management,
and
then
often
they
will
have
to
connect
people
to
additional
medical
and
clinical
services
at
other
locations.
N
I
know
they
have
expressed
interest
in
partnering
with
cfh,
to
be
able
to
apply
for
some
future
city
funding
considerations
to
be
able
to
bring
behavioral
and
mental
health
services
to
the
campus,
so
that
it's
their
on
site,
but
they
do
believe
they
can
successfully
operate
for
just
at
a
minimum,
with
the
funding
that
they
have
secured
now
and
be
able
to
have
a
successful
project.
Just
with
that.
O
That's
great
I
mean
if,
if
there
is
that
additional
need,
you
know
our
1590
money
is
certainly
one
of
the
focus
is
on
the
the
behavioral
and
mental
health,
and
maybe
we
can
have
a
separate
conversation
to
understand
about
the
the
workforce,
development
and
the
sustainability
elements.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
very
much,
as
I
said
before,
we're
really
lucky
to
have
a
arch
in
a
regional
coalition
working
on
this
topic,
and
it
takes
a
lot
of
work
and
proven
infrastructure
and
people
to
put
us
together.
We
know
that
you
know
kirkland,
you
know,
has
soviet
way
taking
up
the
woman's
housing
project
and
then
we
know
ramen
has
you
know
for
the
youth
people,
young
people
and
bellevue?
You
know
it's
doing
this
for
men.
This
is
the
biggest
and
most
challenging
project
we
put
together.
Q
But
really
this
tampa
demonstrates
the
total,
the
wholeness
of
how
to
work
on
this
homeless
problem,
and
this
is
really
the
pinnacle.
I
think
we
are
completing
this
homeless
situation
in
a
way
you
know
we
have
a
long
way
to
go,
obviously,
but
at
least
we're
doing
the
right
way.
So
thank
you.
This
is
something
that
I
we
are
very
lucky
fortunate.
Q
One
thing
I
just
want
to
mention
when
we
will
briefed
on
this
issue
before
I'm
very
impressed
with
you
know
the
people
of
plymouth
housing
working
on
it
and
I'm
impressed
with
the
management
with
their
vision.
Q
The
only
thing
I
mentioned
to
our
staff
is
that
we
want
to
be
sure
this
philosophy
this
management
continues.
You
know
this
doesn't
just
happen
now,
because
we
have
the
people
who
are
supporting
it,
but
you
know
when
we
go
down
the
line.
Suddenly
it
may
change.
Q
So
I
want
to
be
sure
we
have
some
muscle
in
our
agreement
with
the
service
providers
with
management
that
we
can
have
some
tooth
some
teeth,
enforcing
our
vision,
our
goal,
that's
set,
you
know
on
a
sustainable
way
so
well,
and
I
I'm
very
very
grateful
the
staff
is
making
sure
that
will
be
the
case.
D
All
right,
thanks
mayor,
I
support
the
supplemental
funding
for
similar
reasons
in
terms
of
need,
but
also
because
I
think
it's
going
to
be
key
to
the
site's
overall
success.
Thank
you.
H
Thanks
so
good
comments,
good
conversation,
I
also
support
the
funding.
I
think
that
this
is
a
really
important
project,
and
I
am
so
pleased
that
plymouth
is
the
one
that's
going
to
be
doing
the
first
supportive
housing
project.
H
They
have
really
shown
how,
at
least
through
to
date,
how
you
can
partner
with
the
neighborhood,
how
you
can
partner
with
other
shelters,
to
make
sure
that
this
supportive
housing
project
works
really
well
for
the
men
and
women
and
children
who
may
live
in
it,
as
well
as
for
the
homeless,
folks
who
are
coming
there
from
shelters
and
how
it
can
be
a
good
neighbor
to
the
affordable
housing
next
door
and
to
the
greater
neighborhood.
So
I'm
really
pleased
with
that.
H
But
since
this
is
the
first,
I
think
that
it's
really
important
that
we
develop
a
set
of
whether
it's
a
checklist
or
conditions
in
agreements
when
we're
funding
to
make
sure
that
every
supportive
housing
project
that
comes
to
bellevue,
because
we
know
this
is
only
the
first-
not
the
last
are
done
in
a
way
that
really
works
well
to
help
people
get
moved
out
of
homelessness
into
stability,
and
I-
and
I
think
that
we
just
need
to
keep
in
mind
that
we-
I
agree,
this
one's
going
to
be
done
really
well,
but
there's
been
some
that
haven't
been
so
well.
H
There's
supportive
housing
projects
in
seattle
that
are
the
most
dangerous
block
in
terms
of
medical
and
police
calls
in
the
city
of
seattle.
We
don't
want
that
type
of
thing
to
happen
in
bellevue,
so
I
really
would
like
to
hear
from
staff,
not
necessarily
tonight,
but
before
we
take
action
on
the
on
the
contract,
on
the
on
the
grant
contract
on
what
kinds
of
information
will
be
in
there
to
make
sure
that
the
promises
that
plymouth
has
made
will
continue.
H
You
know
that
they
will
continue
to
be
living
up
to
them
moving
forward
and
also,
I
think
that
the
reason
I
want
to
do
that
isn't
so
much
because
of
plymouth.
It's
just
you
know
begin
as
you
want
to
go
on.
I
always
say
so.
H
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
grant
agreement
and
condition
expectations
for
the
next
supportive
housing
project,
and
this
is
one
that
I
fully
expect
to
not
just
help
with
with
the
capital
funding
today
or
when
we
vote
on
this
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
but
for
some
of
the
operational
funding
moving
forward
with
the
behavioral
health.
H
We
want
this
to
be
one
that
is
really
really
successful,
so
that
we
so
that,
when
we're
bringing
more
to
the
east
side,
whether
in
bellevue
or
in
some
of
our
neighboring
cities,
people
know
how
well
it
can
be
done
and
how
effective
it
can
be
and
how
it
will
work
for
the
people
who
are
living
there
and
surrounding
so
I
talked
at
length
to
emil
and
lindsay
today.
They
provided
me
some
excellent
information.
H
A
H
Agreement
in
terms
of
the
agreements
and
the
conditions
of
the
grant
agreement
so
that
we
could
I've
seen
some
of
the
terms
in
terms
of
one
term
in
terms
of
the
coordinated
entry
for
all.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
they
be
committed
to
taking
bellevue
residents
from
the
bellevue
shelters,
but
there's
also
the
accountability.
The
safety
security
plan,
the
good
neighbor
participation,
which
they've
all
done
and
they
have
bought
into.
H
A
So
I
I
just
want
to
make
clear
that
you're
kind
of
putting
a
contingency
on
your
yes
vote
for
this
funding
that
you
wouldn't
vote
for
this
without
pardon
we're
not
voting
on
it
tonight.
We're
just
voting
well
we're
voting
to
bring
it
back
for
a
vote
so
that,
when
it
comes
back,
your
vote
is
contingent
on
that
information.
A
C
If
you,
if
I
made
lindsay
or
emil,
are
you
able
to
comment
on
councilmember,
robertson's
questions.
E
Yeah,
I
can,
I
can
start
off
and
then
hand
it
over
to
lindsay,
so
we
had
a.
We
had
a
excellent
conversation
with
councilmember
robertson
this
afternoon
and
think
we
we
understand
some
of
the
the
topics
that
she's
looking
for
information
on.
So
we're
happy
to
list
out
some
of
the
provisions
in
the
draft
funding
agreements
to
satisfy
council
member
robertson's
request,
as
well
as
elaborate
a
little
bit
on
how
operational
provisions
are
put
in
place
and
then
renewed
over
time
as
well.
E
So
lindsay
you
want
to
elaborate
any
more
on
things
that
we
could.
We
could
bring
back
for
councilmember
robertson's
review.
N
I
I
think
you've
covered
it
well
and
would
be
happy
to
go
into
detail.
I
think
some
of
what's
in
the
contract,
will
address
that
accountability
over
time.
The
things
that
we
are
set
up
to
monitor
it
may
not
cover
the
gamut
of
details
related
to
the
additional
agreements
with
campus
partners
that
the
city
and
arch
are
not
a
party
to
but
happy
to
provide
within
our
draft
contract.
A
I
think
the
entire
council
is
going
to
be
interested
in
seeing
that,
so
maybe
that
can
be
in
the
packet
before
you
bring
this
back,
and
if
anybody
wants
to
have
a
staff
discussion
on
before
the
a
briefing
before
the
next
meeting,
maybe
that
could
be
included
in
it
council
member
robertson,
of
course,
you're
invited
to
join
in
on
that.
So
you
can
get
the
information
in
advance.
H
A
You
well,
this
is.
This
has
been
a
really
thoughtful
discussion
and
I
so
appreciate
hearing
my
fellow
council
members
thoughts
on
this.
I've
been
on
the
mental
illness,
drug
dependency
oversight
committee
for
over
five
years
and
looking
at
the
annual
reports
each
year,
I
can
tell
you
that
it
doesn't
matter
how
much
money
you
put
into
helping
people
who
are
homeless.
If
they
are
not
housed,
they
cannot
be
helped
it
just.
They
have
a
very,
very
single
digit
success
rate.
A
A
Maybe
we
should
make
that
a
requirement
that
part
of
the
project
is
going
to
include
on-site
services
or
at
least
access
nearby
same
day,
services
to
these
populations,
so
that
they
have
the
best
chance
of
success,
and
that's
probably
going
to
cost
more,
and
I
do
hope
that
plymouth
comes
back
and
asks
us
for
more
money.
50
90
money
to
pay
for
the
services
that
we
need
to
make
this
a
successful
program
for
those
involved
and
that's
what
that
money
is
for.
A
C
P
Understand
this
last
issue
is
not
you're,
not
suggesting
this
be
decided
one
way
or
other.
A
P
D
F
A
E
We
may
proceed.
May
I
please
call
for
the
powerpoint
to.
E
E
The
alahi
apartment
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
bel
red
road,
just
east
of
140th
avenue
northeast
it's
right
near
highland
park
and
community
center.
You
can
see
that
it
is
within
the
bellred
sub
area,
which
is
that
green
area
on
the
map-
and
it's
also
just
just
outside
of
the
half
mile-
walk
shed
from
the
future
130th
light
rail
station.
So
the
apartments
are
a
good
proximity
to
light
rail
and
they're,
also
close
walking
distance
down
140th
to
the
bus,
rapid
transit
on
northeast
8th
street
next
slide.
Please.
E
The
people
often
ask
me
what
does
alahi
mean,
so
it
means
earth
or
country
in
the
native
language.
So
that's
the
the
meaning
of
the
word.
The
the
illahi
apartments
is
a
36
unit
project.
It's
in
generally
good
conditions
spread
over
seven
buildings
as
it
stands
now
it's
a
mix
of
one
bedroom
and
two
bedroom
units.
So
the
concept
here
is
that
this
project
would
be
preserved
for
affordable
housing.
It's
what
we
call
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
right
now.
E
The
average
rents
for
the
project
are
1378,
which
is
below
the
market
rents
in
bellevue
and
the
east
side.
It's
it's
in
an
area
of
bell
red
where
redevelopment
is
occurring.
I
think
many
council
members
will
notice
quite
a
few
of
the
older
commercial
buildings
on
the
south
side
of
bel.
Red
road
are
being
torn
down
for
new
town
house
development,
so
this
property
was
initially
marketed
as
a
redevelopment
opportunity
by
the
property
owner.
The
king
county
housing
authority
took
action
to
acquire
the
project
that
will
preserve
the
housing
and
prevent
displacement
of
bellevue
families.
N
This
will
enable
the
project
to
serve
people
with
extremely
low
incomes,
people
who
are
most
likely
at
risk
of
homelessness,
either
paying
over
50
percent
of
their
income
towards
housing
or
who
have
other
risk
factors
for
homelessness.
So
really
creating
that
deeply
affordable
housing
in
the
interim.
They
are
allowing
all
of
the
current
residents
to
stay
and
they
will
not
be
requiring
a
little
kick
to
make
sure
that
no
one
is
placed.
N
Go
to
the
next
slide
arch
was
happy
to
help
review
these
requests
sort
of
outside
of
the
the
typical
funding
annual
funding
process
that
I
think
this
was
presented
as
a
really
timely
opportunity
to
leverage
the
housing
authority's
ongoing
work
and
partnership
with
amazon,
and
so
the
housing
authority
has
been
able
to
hear
a
commitment
from
amazon
of
four
million
dollars,
with
the
request
to
the
city
to
match
that
and
provide
another
four
million.
N
N
They
would
also
be
pledging
to
ensure
that
future
funding
for
any
renovation
that's
needed
to
happen
also
does
not
come
from
the
city,
but
comes
from
another
funding
source.
So,
in
summary,
this
is,
I
think,
a
compelling
opportunity
to
make
an
immediate
impact
right
here
in
bellevue,
providing
some
housing
opportunities
for
families
with
immediate
needs,
as
well
as
creating
long-term,
deeply
affordable
housing
with
permanent.
B
F
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
king.
Thank
you
lindsay
for
the
presentation.
I'm
sure
we're
all
going
to
want
to
weigh
in
on
this.
So
I'll
go
in
this
order,
then
lee
robertson,
stokes,
barksdale
and
zahn
so
councilmember
lee.
Would
you
like
to
kick
us
off?
Thank.
Q
You
thank
you.
I
believe
that
you
know,
as
we
discussed
before.
This
is
all
very
important
necessary
and
I'm
glad
that
arch
is
also
you
know
working
on
this,
and
this
is
right
in
line.
We
did.
You
know
one
apartment
before
I
don't
remember
the
exact
name.
Q
The
the
one
question
I
have
is
in
the
previous
discussion.
You
know
on
affordable
housing.
We
talked
up
talked
to
them
before
we
know
we
have
funding
available,
and
you
know
it's
something
that
we
are
committed
to
do.
This
is
something
that
I
am
not
quite
sure
about
the
funding
of
four
million
dollars,
so
I
support
it,
but
I
want
to
be
sure
that
our
city
is,
you
know,
positioned,
not
not
to
do
that.
Q
We
are
not
adversely
impacted,
we
have
to
choose
priorities
and
so
on,
and
so
perhaps
if
the
city
manager
can
say
where's
the
funding
source,
are
we
prepared
to
handle
this?
What
would
be
our
you
know,
financial
impact
on
the
rest
of
our
priority
for
the
city?
That
would
be
good
to
to
know,
but
I
saw
this
concept
just
wondering
about
you
know
the
money.
Q
C
In
addition,
I
did
want
to
mention
that
we
also
included
in
the
balance
of
the
money
that
we
showed
the
council.
What
was
not
included
in
there
was
the
hp
1590
money,
as
well
as
the
1403
money,
so
there's
additional
monies
in
addition
to
what
we
have
in
the
bank
right
now.
Does
that
answer?
Is
there
any
questions?
Customers.
Q
H
Thank
you,
deputy
mayor,
I'm
supportive
of
this
100.
I
think
it's
it's
great,
so
this
is
exactly
the
kind
of
thing
we
are
hoping
to
use.
1590
and
other
of
these
resources,
for
I
do
have
a
question
that
I
don't
think
was
in
the
packet
or
in
the
presentation.
H
What
is
the
ami
level
that
well,
king
county
has
willing
county
housing
authority
run
this
who's
going
to
operate
it
to?
What
is
the
ami
level
that
we're
going
to
set
for
this,
and
then
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
about
additional
money.
So
those
are
my
start.
Two
questions.
N
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
that
and
those
are
really
great
and
important
questions.
I
also
wanted
to
make
sure
to
thank
steven
norman
executive
director
for
the
king
county
housing
authority.
I
know
he
was
in
the
audience
and
had
hoped
to
provide
public
comment,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
get
a
spot,
so
he
will
hopefully
welcome
back
at
the
next
meeting,
so
this
project
will
be
owned
and
operated
by
kcha.
N
They
obviously
are
a
experienced
large
housing
provider
in
these
in
the
nation.
They
have
a
commitment
again
to
be
able
to
accommodate
the
current
residents
to
stay
in
the
property.
So
we
have
a
bit
of
a
sort
of
two
layers
within
our
sort
of
ongoing
covenant
conditions,
some
with
respect
to
the
current
residents
and
that
future
long-term
goal
to
be
able
to
serve
people
from
the
public,
housing
waitlist,
so
immediate
term.
N
Before
that
federal
housing
subsidy
is
turned
on,
we
would
not
be
having
additional
income
restrictions,
but
once
those
federal
subsidies
are
brought
in,
there
would
be
eligibility
that
matches
up
with
eligibility
for
public
housing.
That
is
almost
always:
families
with
household
families
with
household
income,
less
than
30
percent
of
the
median
income.
N
H
So
30,
so
that's
good.
I'm
really
pleased
it's
going
to
prioritize
the
homeless,
students
and
families
for
all
of
you.
I
know
that
the
value
here
is
300
000
a
unit,
and
I
assume
that's
because
the
land
value
is
greater
than
the
improvement
value,
because
it's
subject
to
redevelopment.
H
My
question
is:
will
there
be
additional
funds
either
that
will
be
asked
from
bellevue
to
do
renovation
to
these
facilities?
Do
they
need
renovating
or
updating?
I
know
you
said
they
were
in
really
good
shape.
N
To
answer
that
as
well,
so
I
think
we
do
know
that
the
property
does
require
some
renovation,
they
that
they're
currently,
of
course
habitable
and
everything
right
now
they
have
several
units
that
were
affected
by
a
fire
and
they're
in
the
process
of
bringing
those
back
online,
but
there
are
some
longer
term
sort
of
capital
needs
that
they
will
probably
have
to
address.
They
have
pledged
to
the
city
that
they
would
not
be
coming
back
to
bellevue.
For
that
funding,
they
would
go
back
from
from
other
funding
programs.
H
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
answering
my
questions
and
I
100
support
this.
P
You
know
this
is
I'm
just
looking
up
the
little
sign
up
here.
This
is
a
highland
village
too.
I
mean
really
exciting
that
we
have
this
opportunity
and
it
fits
right
in
with
our
plans.
We've
talked
for
a
long
time
about
not
only
finding
more
new,
affordable
housing,
but
keeping
the
stock
that
we
have
and
that's
such
an
important
concept,
and
we
need
you
know
they're
more
of
them
going
down
now.
P
So
it's
good
to
have
this
particular
one
go
forward,
and
I
appreciate
and
appreciate
the
comments
and
questions
that
councilman
robertson
asked
about
this,
and
I
think
that
this
is
gonna,
be
another
success
story
and
again
it's
the
partnership
and
appreciate.
I
really
appreciate
your
work
on
this
and
having
arch
really
kind
of
more
integrated
working
with
us
on
this
whole
project.
You
know
all
the
affordable
housing
pieces
and
as
it
goes
and
work
from
the
staff
has
been
superb
on
this,
so
I'm
excited
about
it.
P
Let's
just
get
it
done,
and
actually,
let's
putting
four
four
million
in
is
fairly
small
in
terms
of
the
impact
it's
going
to
have,
so
I'm
ready
to
go.
Thank
you.
D
Councilman,
remember
barcelo
all
right.
Thank
you.
Debbie
mayor
I'd
support
this
funding,
the
supplemental
funding.
I
think
it's
also
pretty
awesome
that
we're
not
gonna
be
displacing
residents
and
to
that
end,
to
preventing
the
possibility
of
people
experiencing
homelessness.
So
I
support
it.
Thank
you.
O
Yeah,
I
too
support
this
project.
It
is
highland
village
too,
and
I
love
the
fact
that
this
is
preservation
and
it's
prioritizing
bellevue
families,
and
it's
also
really
a
public
private
partnership
right
so
amazon
is,
is
putting
in
four
million
dollars
and
they're
looking
for
a
match
from
the
city,
so
we
would
be
looking
for
a
lot
more
money,
but
for
the
partnership
with
our
business
community.
So
I
think
we,
this
is
definitely
a
win-win-win.
O
O
So
that
would
also
allow
us
to
keep
the
money
that
we
collected
in
bell
red
to
invest
back
in
bell
red,
so
that
really
makes
sense
to
me.
I
guess
my
question
is
on
the
fee
in
lieu.
What
what
percentage
of
ami
do
we
build
with
the
fee
and
lube
monies
I
mean.
Certainly
this
would
be
well
within
it
because
it's
30
ami,
so
that
was
one
of
my
questions
and
then,
as
I
thought,
about
the
1590
money
versus
our
affordable
housing,
cip,.
O
The
60
ami
is
the
1590
money.
The
affordable,
housing,
cip
is
unrestricted,
so
just
being
cognizant
of
using
the
monies
that
are
that
are
the
best
fit
for
this,
because
you
know
we
want
to
be
able
to
to
save
the
money
that
we
have
that's
unrestricted
to
be
able
to.
You
know
perhaps
look
at
the
the
65
percent
ami,
because
the
multifamily
tax
exemption
only
gets
us
to
65
percent
and
not
down
to
60..
O
E
Yeah,
I
can,
if
it's
okay
with
the
deputy
mayor,
I
can
answer
this.
One
bell
red
projects
that
do
on-site
performance
for
affordable
housing
typically
produces
at
the
80
percent
ami
level.
So
these
monies
come
into
the
city
when
a
developer
chooses
on
their
own
behalf.
E
Not
to
do
that
so,
as
lindsay
said,
this
might
be
able
to
actually
get
some
30
ami
units
eventually
in
the
bellred
area,
and
that's
consistent
with
policy
direction
for
a
range
of
of
ami
levels
in
bell
red
and
once
we
get
council
direction
tonight
on
funding
these
three
requests,
then
we'll
work
with
the
city
manager
and
his
staff
on
the
the
best
buckets
of
money
to
use
to
retain
the
most
flexibility
in
the
future.
F
Great,
thank
you.
Council
members
on
yeah
I'm
this
is
just
fantastic
and
preserving
affordable.
Housing
is
just
as
important
to
this
council.
I
believe
it's
creating
more
additional
housing,
affordable
housing.
So
you
know
I
want
to
thank
the
county
for
moving
so
quickly.
On
this,
I
want
to
thank
amazon
continuing
to
show
they're
a
great
great
great
partner
for
this
city,
as
it
preserves
more
affordable
homes
here
prevents
displacement
of
existing
bellevue
residents,
and
I
did
actually
have
a
question
on
that.
Does
this?
F
Is
it
set
up
that
we
would
prioritize
families
that
have
kids
in
the
bellevue
school
district
right
now?
I
know
we
do.
I
believe
I
stand
here.
We
do
prioritize
family
families
with
immediate
housing
opportunity,
but
do
we
do
we
prioritize
those
that
have
kids
and
those
that
are
in
the
bellevue
school
district
emile?
I
don't
know
if
you
can
answer
that
or
lindsay.
N
Sure
I
can
go
ahead
so
during
this
period
of
time,
where
they
have
flexibility
outside
of
the
federal
regulations
that
will
come
with
public
housing
subsidy.
They
are
absolutely
prioritizing
100
percent
of
those
vacancies
for
that
referral.
F
N
F
H
I'm
happy
to
deputy
mayor,
I
moved
to
direct
staff
to
prepare
legislation
approving
the
ill
ill
bill
preservation,
request
for
council
consideration
and
action
at
a
future
meeting.
F
C
Sure
I
could
go
ahead
and
introduce
deputy
mayor
if
you
like
so
mayor,
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
The
next
study
session
topic
on
your
agenda
this
evening
is
an
informational
update
on
the
city's
transportation
capital
plan
and
an
update
on
the
levy
funded
projects.
As
council
is
aware,
despite
the
covet
19
pandemic
design
and
construction
of
infrastructure
projects
continued
on
in
bellevue
and
since
the
last
cip
levy
update,
several
projects
have
been
completed
with
many
others
and
processed
tonight.
C
Staff
will
provide
you
with
an
update
on
the
status
of
the
many
projects,
with
a
focus
on
our
major
capital
projects
and
projects
funded
through
the
neighborhood
safety
connectivity
and
congestion
management
levy.
Tonight's
presentation
is
informational
and
there
is
no
formal
direction
that
is
being
sought
of
the
council
this
evening.
With
that
joining
me
this
evening
is
ron
kessick
assistant
director
and
john
murphy
senior
planner,
both
from
the
transportation
department,
that'll
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
iran.
S
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
council
members.
I
I
must
say
that
that
we're
just
very
happy
to
continue
sharing
the
good
news
tonight.
This
is
this
is
really
exciting
stuff
and
we're
happy
to
keep
the
good
news
coming.
Tonight's
presentation
is
information
only,
and
we
do
have
a
lot
of
good
news
to
share
with
you
on
the
agenda
tonight
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
we
manage
construction
through
the
through
the
covid
pandemic.
S
We
will
be
providing
updates
on
some
of
our
major
capital
projects,
as
well
as
an
update
on
all
of
the
levy
projects
that
we
are
working
on
and
have
completed
during
the
pandemic,
and
then
I
will
wrap
up
with
a
big
thank
you
to
kind
of
the
unsung
heroes
that
kept
things
going
through
through
this
copic
pandemic.
For
us.
S
S
Like
everybody
else
who
ended
up
working
from
home.
We
also
had
to
figure
out
how
to
continue
our
collaborative
design
processes
to
keep
our
projects
going,
working
with
all
of
the
city
departments
who
provide
input
to
our
projects
and
we
needed
to
to
meet
the
the
public
requirements
for
things
like
how
we
advertise
our
projects
for
design
and
construction
and
how
we
conduct
public
bid
openings
to
meet
state
law.
All
of
these
things
we
had
to
to
address
in
a
very
short
manner,
very
short
time
frame
to
keep
our
work
going.
S
All
of
our
projects
followed
the
direction
and
the
guidance
from
state
and
the
county
to
assure
the
safety
of
the
public,
our
contractors
and
our
staff
very
early
on.
We
worked
with
the
city
attorney's
office
to
provide
early
guidance
as
to
the
essential
status
of
our
projects
to
our
contractor
groups
and
worked
with
labor
and
industries
and
others
to
provide
direction
to
our
contractors
to
enable
them
to
to
rapidly
take
steps
to
continue
work.
S
Some
of
our
contractors
even
comment
commented
back
that
they
appreciated
so
much
our
early
efforts
on
to
provide
them
with
positive
guidance
so
that
they
could
continue
to
work.
It's
really
important
to
note
that
the
contractors
were
eager
to
help
in
our
efforts.
They
wanted
to
continue
work
and
wanted
to
continue
to
provide
employment
to
their
staff
on
all
of
our
projects.
S
Working
with
the
state
were
able
to
produce
a
a
bid
process,
opening
online
using
zoom
that
provided
a
safe
environment
for
submittals
and
the
required
public
forum
for
bid
openings,
and
certainly
in
one
respect,
I,
I
would
have
to
say
the
pandemic
greatly.
Aided
construction
and
the
reduction
of
traffic
was
really
a
boon
to
construction
efforts
and
we
were
able
to
to
do
a
lot
more
work
under
the
the
lower
traffic
volumes.
S
Looking
back
to
december,
council
adopted
a
a
capital
budget
of
234
million
dollars
over
the
seven
year
time
period
for
the
transportation
department.
This
represented
35
of
the
city's
capital
budget,
with
our
tiffy
loan
of
100
million
dollars
being
a
substantial
portion
of
that
that
funding
jumping
right
into
tiff
yeah.
S
S
We
are
excited
also
to
let
you
know
that
during
this
process
we
have
been
watching
interest
rates
and
attended
a
a
conference
led
by
the
u.s
department
of
transportation,
build
america
bureau
on
refinance
options
for
artifia
loan
based
upon
that
we
have
applied
for
a
tiffia
refinance.
It's
essentially
the
same
process
that
we
went
through
to
get
the
original
tiffy
alone
been
working
with
the
build
america
bureau
staff
on
that.
S
All
of
our
materials
have
been
submitted
and
our
hope
are
hopeful
that
should
interest
rates
stay
low
and
and
it
continues
to
show
of
benefit
to
to
refinance
artifia
loan.
We
hope
to
close
in
the
next
month
or
two
council
will
need
to
take
a
couple
actions
on
this
next
week.
You
will
see
in
an
action
to
fund
the
legal
review
of
the
tiffia
loan,
which
is
a
requirement
from
the
usdot
any
tiffy
alone
standard
practice.
S
S
S
S
We
have
also
made
great
progress
on
the
west
lake
sammamish
parkway
phase
2
project.
S
This
project
enhances
the
the
the
transportation
elements
that
are
already
in
place
by
providing
greater
safety
and
some
with
some
separated
pedestrian
facilities,
as
well
as
as
bike
lanes
on
the
the
parkway.
S
This
is
a
joint
project
with
the
utilities
department,
where
we
are
also
installing
water
main
down
west
lake
samamish
parkway
and
into
adjacent
neighborhoods
using
a
new
technology.
This
is
earthquake
resistant,
ductile
iron
pipe,
which
provides
a
great
deal
of
resiliency
in
a
very
sensitive
area
and
very
substantial
water
main.
It
serves
not
only
this
area
but
actually
extends
down
into
issaquah
as
well.
S
I'd
certainly
be
remiss
if
we
didn't
talk
about
the
northeast
12th
street,
multipurpose
path.
This
this
was
a
project
of
great
concern
in
the
community
and
is
a
project
that
that
connects
pedestrian
to
bikes,
bicycle
facilities
to
the
bellred
area,
via
the
improvements
made
on
spring
boulevard
zones,
one
and
two,
and
also
the
108th
avenue
bike
facilities
project.
S
That
john
will
be
talking
about
when,
when
we
talk
about
the
levy
projects
coming
up,
we're
very
excited
about
the
the
completion
of
this
project,
which
includes
a
widened,
sidewalk
pathway
area,
as
well
as
a
widened
planting
bed
adjacent
to
the
street,
so
that
the
trees
have
room
to
grow
and
expand
without
heating.
The
sidewalks
and
heating,
the
roadway
as
they
were
before.
S
S
As
have
been
mentioned
previously,
materials
costs
are
all
over
the
board.
These
days,
council
member
stokes
mentioned
the
cost
of
lumber,
and
I
have
to
tell
you
that
lumber
has
been
extremely
volatile,
as
have
several
other
commodity
costs
associated
with
our
projects.
We
are
monitoring
those
on
a
daily
basis.
S
R
Thank
you
ron
good
evening,
I'm
here
to
share
some
great
news
about
our
2016
voter
approved
neighbor,
neighborhood
safety,
connectivity
and
congestion
levy.
R
This
was
a
ballot
measure
that
the
voters
approved
in
2016
to
increase
their
property
taxes
to
really
supplement
a
lot
of
our
existing
neighborhood
and
safety
programs
that
we
have
funded
in
the
city,
recognizing
that
a
lot
of
these
existing
programs
have
long
backlogs
of
project
needs
that
we
just
haven't
been
able
to
get
to
at
the
rate
that
we
would
like
to
so.
The
levy
by
design
helps
us
to
accelerate
a
lot
of
our
existing
program
priorities
and
helped
to
deliver
in
six
key
pro
program
areas.
R
There's
about
two
million
dollars
a
year
raised
for
the
express
purposes
of
congestion
reduction
projects.
That
was
a
desire
by
the
city
council
to
specifically
set
aside
an
amount
just
for
congestion
reduction,
and
then
the
remedy
remaining
approximately
six
million
dollars
a
year,
helps
to
fund
sidewalk
and
trail
maintenance
projects,
intelligent
transportation
projects,
sidewalks
safety
projects
and
bike
facilities.
R
Next
slide,
please
my
previous
visits
here
I
had
a
look
toward
what
is
to
come.
We
are
four
years
or
so
into
the
project,
planning,
design
and
construction
of
this
program,
and
I
can
now
say
that
we
we've
done
a
lot
since
the
the
early
months
and
years
of
this
program,
we've
invested
in
every
bellevue
neighborhood
to
the
tune
of
22
plus
million
dollars.
R
We've
completed
over
51
projects,
a
lot
of
projects
as
we'll
go
through
a
few
examples.
Tonight
are
often
not
just
a
crosswalk.
A
project
could
mean
10
crosswalks,
so
the
number
of
actual
investments
in
our
neighborhoods
is
likely
greater
than
the
51
projects
may
indicate,
and
when
the
levy
was
passed,
we
really
had
to
start
from
scratch.
We
had
to
start
the
design
of
a
whole
suite
of
projects
and
we've
gotten
to
a
place
of
relative
maturity
in
this
funding
stream.
R
R
So
to
go
through
a
few
examples
of
some
projects
that
have
recently
been
completed,
I
won't
go
through
every
project.
That's
been
completed
I'll,
be
here
all
night,
though
lots
of
great
news
to
share
the
the
first
one
is
the
project
that
ron
mentioned
the
108th
avenue
northeast
complete
streets
project
in
our
downtown
spine.
R
This
phase
two
of
the
project
kind
of
went
the
extra
mile
and
made
the
transit
capacity
and
lane
markings
a
bit
more
visible,
provided
some
conduit
for
some
intelligence
transportation
system
projects
and,
as
you
can
see
in
the
bottom
right,
really
try
to
create
a
bit
more
separation
for
people
biking
through
our
downtown
area.
R
The
levy
has
provided
the
opportunity
to
do
some
firsts
in
the
city.
Bellevue
is
home
to
a
few
washdot
built
roundabouts
in
the
southeast
corner
of
our
city
on
west
lake
city
parkway,
but
the
levy
has
helped
to
fund
three
mini
roundabouts.
These
are
smaller
in
scale.
R
They
provide
opportunity
to
reduce
congestion
at
neighborhood,
porous
points
and
also
help
reduce
the
severity
of
potential
crashes
and
shortens
crossing
distance
for
people
biking.
So
we
get
the
kind
of
triple
benefit
of
safety,
congestion,
relief
and
safety
for
people
walking
as
well.
The
picture
here
is
on
the
edge
of
our
downtown
at
100th
and
northeast
10th
street.
R
So
to
that
end,
we've
really
started
to
make
some
good
progress
on
those
congestion
reduction
projects.
R
So
we
went
through
a
fairly
robust
round
of
evaluation
and
traffic
studies
to
identify
those
places
with
the
greatest
need
to
figure
out
where
we
could
focus
our
investments,
and
fortunately,
you
all
on
the
council-
are
supportive
of
this
work
and
passed
some
additional
funding
to
help
fund
the
construction
of
a
lot
of
these
projects
that
we
were
just
able
to
study.
R
With
with
the
levy
funding,
the
extra
funding
helps
us
to
actually
move
some
dirt
and
make
some
improvements,
so
the
the
five
locations
that
you
see
here
are
kind
of
in
the
design
process.
Right
now-
and
this
is
in
addition
to
the
recently
completed
improvements
at
150th
avenue,
southeast
in
newport
way,
which
was
our
first
project
to
kind
of
get
out
the
door
to
help
ease
congestion
in
the
eastgate
area.
R
R
If
we're
looking
to
build
a
signal
at
northeast,
24th
and
112th
like
we
are
at
the
montessori
school,
that's
a
fairly
significant
disturbance
and,
as
we
were
out
there,
we
identified
a
lot
of
other
kind
of
sidewalk
needs
to
ensure
that
they
are
compliant
with
ada,
and
the
levy
is
really
afforded
the
opportunity
to
tackle
these.
All
these
disparate
needs
all
at
once
find
one
contractor
to
try
to
get
the
work
done
with
as
minimal
impact
as
possible
to
the
greatest
benefit.
R
This
sidewalk
project
that
is
set
to
begin
construction
shortly
provides
a
critical
missing
gap
of
sidewalk
from
wolverine
way
where
bellevue
high
school
is
located
to
main
street
to
to
the
north,
and
this
is
another
example
of
collaboration
internally
in
in
finding
out
that
there
is
a
sidewalk
priority
identified
from
the
community
and
also
a
traffic
safety
ident
identified
in
the
area
as
well,
and
the
levia's
helped
force
some
of
that
collaboration
internally,
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
kind
of
smart
with
the
way
we
design
package
and
build
these
projects,
and
I
would
expect
this
project
to
be
complete
through
at
the
end
of
this
year,
2021.
R
and
then
another
kind
of
long
long
awaited
project.
This
is
this
is
a
project,
and
this
is
the
the
one
I
mentioned
that
is
actually
10
projects.
This
is
a
big
crosswalk
improvement.
R
Job
on
forest
drive,
camber
road
and
160th
avenue
southeast,
that
is
either
building
brand
new
crosswalks
or
existing
existing
crosswalks
like
you
can
see
on
highland
drive
and
while
a
lot
of
these
projects
are
not
expressly
branded
as
a
vision,
zero
project
per
se,
a
lot
of
them
have
fairly
obvious
connections
to
the
safety
of
people,
walking,
biking
and
and
driving.
So
they're
really
reinforcing
that
commitment
to
realize
zero,
serious
injuries
and
deaths
on
our
streets
by
2030,
which
is
the
goal
of
vision,
zero,
then.
Finally,
upcoming.
R
This
is
kind
of
a
lighter
touch
project
out
in
the
northeast
bellevue
and
lake
hills.
Neighborhoods,
the
east
bellevue
demonstration
greenway
that
is
looking
to
create
a
more
comfortable
environment
for
people
walking
and
biking
in
the
northeast
part
of
the
city.
It
offers
a
a
two
mile
contiguous
corridor,
that's
just
parallel
to
the
164th
avenue
corridor,
where
we
have
lower
traffic
speeds
and
volumes
where
it's
inherently
a
little
more
comfortable
to
walk
and
bike
and
with
the
treatment
of
some
of
these
low-cost
applications
that
you
see
here,
we're
helping
to
really
reinforce
that.
R
This
is
a
corridor
where
the
connects
to
parks
and
and
places
and
makes
it
a
little
more
comfortable
for
folks
in
the
neighborhood.
R
And
then,
just
on
the
horizon,
another
kind
of
hallmark
of
the
levy
is
to
be
able
to
be
as
smart
with
with
the
the
community's
investment
as
we
can
be.
To
that
end,
we
recently
received
notice
of
a
safe
route
to
school
grant
in
northwest
bellevue
that
is
connected
to
a
larger
sidewalk
project
along
the
100th
avenue
corridor.
This
is
near
chinook,
middle
school,
clyde,
hill,
elementary
school,
and
we
received
about
700
000
from
the
state
to
help
build
some
of
those
pieces
of
sidewalk
from
the
schools
to
100th
avenue.
R
Like
I
mentioned,
the
the
project
pipeline
is,
is
full.
I'm
just
sharing
a
smattering
of
the
projects
that
were
recently
completed
or
are
on
the
horizon,
so
you'll
continue
to
see
those
blue
levy
signs
and
our
our
mailers
that
are
branded
with
with
levy
iconography,
to
really
show
to
the
community
that
thank
you
for
your
vote
and
we
will
continue
to
make
investments
in
the
neighborhood
the
end
of
this
year,
we're
looking
to
put
together
a
progress
port
report
to
share
with
the
wider
community
all
the
good
news
that
we're
sharing
with
you.
S
A
Great
thank
you
for
that
fantastic
presentation.
It's
so
fun
to
see
all
the
fruits
of
your
labors
and
I'm
sure,
there's
a
lot
of
comments
and
questions
here.
So
why
don't
you
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand
and
I'll
call
on
you
if
you
have
something
you'd
like
to
say,
councilmember
robertson,
followed
by
zahn
and
ewen
house
and
stokes
go
ahead.
H
Councilmember
robertson,
thank
you.
I
love
this
slide.
24
4
with
the
people
in
the
capes,
because
I
think
that
really
captures
a
lot
of
people.
Who've
been
involved
in
our
transportation
improvements,
and
this
is
one
of
those
things
that
bellevue
does
really
well.
We
are
taking
money
and
using
it
where
it's
needed,
we're
continuing
to
improve,
maintain
and
upgrade
infrastructure,
add
new
infrastructure
and
we're
also
keeping
an
eye
on
the
bottom
line
when
it,
whether
it
comes
to
you,
know,
recasting
bonds,
so
that
we
get
a
better
interest
rate.
H
So
it
allows
us
to
do
more
projects
and
pay
less
interest
or
whether
it
comes
to
managing
project
implementation.
H
So
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
raise
my
hand
to
really
thank
staff
and
this
council
for
always
making
sure
that
we
support
funding
of
these
kinds
of
projects
and
the
voters
who,
when
we
went
out
for
a
levy,
it
was
the
first
levy,
we'd
done
in
a
long
time.
H
Councilmember
zahn-
and
I
I
think
were
on
the
pro
committee
for
the
ballot
initiative
for
that
transportation
levy
and
the
people
of
bellevue
supported
it,
as
well
as
the
fire
facilities
levy
and
we've
been
able
to
do
really
good
things
that
I
think
matter
and
make
bellevue
more
livable.
So,
but
we
couldn't
do
it
without
all
this
great
staff
and
ron
and
john
and
andrew
and
all
of
the
folks,
the
right-of-way
inspectors,
street
maintenance
street
signals
and
operations
etc.
H
O
You
go
ahead,
you
know,
I
agree
ron,
you
know
this
is
tough
work
to
manage
construction
and
make
sure
we
do
it
with
this,
as
least
impact
as
possible,
and
the
fact
that
bellevue
was
able
to
keep
the
construction
going
and
not
end
up
with
covet
cost
over
time
is,
is
to
be
commended.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
that
and
and
keeping
our
inspectors
and
all
the
construction
workers
safe
as
well,
especially
in
the
beginning,
when
there
really
weren't
any
good
guidance
or
how
to
keep
construction
going.
O
O
I
remember
going
to
so
many
community
discussions
where
you
had
the
chart
board
up
there
and
and
some
you
even
had
the
the
table
with
with
little
cars,
so
that
people
could
really
see
what
things
look
like
and
what
are
some
options
for?
Is
it
a
signal?
Is
it
a
crosswalk?
Is
it
better
queuing
so
really
appreciate
the
level
of
engagement
there?
O
What
I'm
wondering
is,
do
we
come
back
afterwards
and
do
some
kind
of
a
satisfaction
survey
to
get
a
sense
for
how
that's
working
and
then
my
other
question
was
around
I'm
glad
we're
doing
some
roundabouts,
because
you
know
studies
have
shown
that
just
the
act
of
having
to
go
around
the
roundabout
means
the
speeds
are
reduced
and
pedestrians
are
safer
as
well
as
cars.
O
So
are
we
going
to
get
a
a
vision,
zero
report
of
some
kind
that
really
looks
at
the
kind
of
projects
that
we
are
investing
in
around
vision,
zero,
both
from
the
levy
funding,
as
well
as
perhaps
the
broader
cip.
O
So
that
was
my
my
second
question
and
then
my
my
last
one
is.
This
is
amazing
that
we're
going
through
a
refi
on
the
tiffia,
because
the
the
more
money
well,
the
less
we
have
to
pay
in
interest
the
more
money
we
have
to
spend
on
other
things
instead
of
debt.
O
S
Certainly-
and
let
me
take
your
questions
in
order,
the
you-
you
asked
a
question
about
a
follow-up
survey
or
follow-up
review
with
the
community
on
completion
of
our
projects
on
our
major
capital
projects.
Yes,
we
do
go
back
out
to
the
community
and
and
get
feedback
on
how
things
went
and
we,
you
know,
get
everything
from
you
know.
I
appreciate
the
construction
I
hated
the
the
traffic
impacts
to
you
know
just
across
the
board
in
comments,
and
we
do
try
and
incorporate
those
comments.
S
S
You
know
we
design
projects
with
safety
in
mind.
We
design
projects,
you
know
to
improve
pedestrian
and
cycle
safety
as
well
as
vehicular
safety,
and
you
know
as
vision.
Zero
rolls
out
more
thoroughly
as
a
program
in
and
of
itself.
We
do
need
to
take
a
look
at
all
of
those
elements
and
report
back
on
all
of
those
projects
that
provide
those
safety
measures
that
that
work
towards
the
vision,
zero
objective
that
the
council
wants
and
and
the
community
wants.
S
Lastly,
on
the
tiffia
payback
start,
if
I
my
feeble
memory
is
correct:
it's
24
for
the
first
payment.
F
You
mayor
well
great
presentation,
ron
john,
really
appreciate
it
and
you
know
andrew
had
his
hand
in
this
as
well.
So
thank
you
all
for
for,
for
all
the
great
news
I
mean,
what's
not
to
like
right,
improved
capacity,
improved
safety,
connectivity,
improvements,
pedestrian
and
bicycle
facility.
I
mean
this
is
all
really
good
stuff.
So
thank
you
so
much.
My
first
question
is
around
and
I
think
ron
you
just
mentioned
about.
You
know
pivoting
during
covid
having
to
change
your
operations
and
processes.
F
I'm
just
curious,
were
you
able
to
move
quicker
through
covid
and
will
you
keep
any
of
the
maybe
key,
learnings
or
maybe
process
improvements
that
you
had
to
shift
to
because
of
covid?
Will
you
keep
that
going
now
in
order
to
move
some
of
these
projects
along,
even
even
quicker
than
than
before?
I'm
just
curious.
S
That's
a
that's
an
interesting
question.
One
of
the
the
well
a
substantial
number
of
the
benefits
realized
were
were
due
to
a
reduction
in
traffic
and
traffic
volumes
on
our
streets,
and
you
know
that
helps
in
in
so
many
different
ways.
It
helps
in
traffic
control
and
reduction
of
traffic
control
costs
and
labor
hours.
Yeah.
F
S
The
interesting
thing
will
be
to
see
how
the
community
handles
telework
and
things
like
that
going
forward.
Are
we
going
to
see
a
return
to
you
know
previous
traffic
volumes,
where
you
know
where
we're
dealing
with
significant
traffic
throughout
the
city
or
are
the
traffic
volumes
going
to
be
reduced.
D
S
S
F
Ron
appreciate
you
answering
it
and
then
a
second
question
for
for
john.
So
john,
you
know
I'm
I'm
a
bike
guy.
I
love
seeing
all
these
improvements
to
our
to
our
bike
facilities.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
about
the
east
bellevue,
the
demonstration
greenway
there
and
the
bicycle
pavement
markings
that
you're
looking
to
do
there
on
165th
correct.
F
I'm
just
wondering,
because
I
see
cyclists
on
164th
quite
a
bit,
it's
more
of
a
direct
shot.
Yes,
it
is
much
more
frequently
traveled,
but
it's
also
a
street
that
you
know
if,
if
someone
were
on
the
lives
on
the
west
side
of
the
street,
they
have
to
cross
the
street
in
order
to
get
their
their
mail,
which
is
a
little
bit
dangerous
and
increasingly
dangerous.
F
As
we
see
traffic
start
to
increase
again,
there's
limited
sidewalks
there,
so
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
why
why
the
decision
to
move
to
165th
is
that
really
just
from
less
traffic
or
congestion
perspective
and
safety
perspective
or
and
or
what
is
the
plan
for
164th,
which
you
know
granted?
This
is
you
know,
kind
of
my
neighborhood,
and
this
is
just
a.
This
is
a
street
that
I
hear
more
and
more
about
that.
R
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
Thank
you
and
I
think
the
way
we're
looking
at
this
corridor
is
that
it
doesn't
preclude
any
other
future
investment
specifically
on
164th,
because
we've
heard
some
of
those
comments
from
the
community
as
well.
In
some
of
our
early
outreach
on
this
demonstration
greenway
we
do.
There
is
some
funding
in
the
levy
to
take
a
more
comprehensive
look
at
overall
bike
connectivity
in
in
on
that
164th
spine.
R
That
would
be
in
addition
to
this
greenway.
That's
really
meant,
for
you
know,
kind
of
all
ages
and
abilities.
You
probably
won't
see
that
bike
commuter.
That's
you
know
going
from
cougar
mountain
to
microsoft,
on
on
this
route
right,
but
this
facility
does
help
encourage
folks
of
all
abilities
and
those
those
legends
just
help
provide
the
wayfinding
along
along
the
way,
because
it
does
kind
of
wig
and
wag,
as
our
street
isn't
perfectly
north
south
so
more
to
come
on
164th
this.
R
This
project
does
build
on
the
healthy
streets
pilot
project
that
the
city
undertook
last
year
during
kova
to
provide
a
little
more
separation
or
more
space
for
people
to
travel.
This
was
the
corridor
where
we
actually
got
some
of
the
best
feedback
from
the
community
council
members
ons
point
about
evaluation.
We
did
some
follow-up
surveys
on
the
healthy
streets
pilot
and
we
saw
an
increase
in
use
on
where
we're
planning
to
do
this
demonstration
greenway.
R
In
addition
to
kind
of
favorable
remarks,
and
that's
something
that
we're
it's
really
a
hallmark
of
this
project,
moving
forward
that
we
will
it's
a
it's
a
demonstration,
because
it's
kind
of
a
new
type
of
facility
for
bellevue.
So
we
want
to
see
how
the
community
responds
to
it
so
we'll
be
doing
continuous
community
feedback
as
we
roll
it
out.
P
Yeah
yeah
thanks
very
much
his
staff
and
and
the
presentation
I
mean
it's
just
amazing.
I
think
the
variety
there's
a
lot
of
good
questions
and
you
know
how
we're
doing
these
things,
I
think,
have
been
brought
up,
and
I
agree
with
those-
and
I
I
think,
looking
back
on
this
it
just
and
for
the
public
to
understand
too,
is
good
that
we,
the
things
we
do,
and
I
I'm
looking
at
two
projects,
particularly
that
are
exciting
one-
is
the
sidewalks
neighborhoods
problem.
P
You
know
on
under
the
the
levee
issue
and
we
we
look
at
that
and
it's
how
it's
amazing,
how
much
in
a
little
neighborhood
that
doesn't
have
a
sidewalk,
how
excited
they
are
when
you
have
a
sidewalk-
and
I
remember
going
out
to
one
of
the
first,
you
know,
openings
of
a
celebration
of
completion
was
on
a
neighborhood.
P
I
can't
remember
the
name
right
now
when
48
148th
right
south
of
northeast
on
northeast
state
yeah
that
area-
and
you
know
they
were
just
really
excited
about
it-
really
it
they
talked
about
how
it
makes
it
so
much
accessible
how
they
can
get
on
the
road,
how
they
can
get
around
their
neighborhood,
and
they
just
really
were
appreciative
of
the
whole
thing
and
then,
on
the
other
end,
and
that
was
in
you
know,
2000
and
right
after
the
levy
somewhere
in
there,
and
then
you
go
back
to
2016
and
on
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum.
P
P
P
The
only
one
was
the
parks
one
which,
by
the
way
we
need
to
work
on
and
and
to
have
the
the
foresight
and
the
the
get
up
and
go
to
say:
let's
do
these
two
pieces
and-
and
we
went
a
little
bit
more
than
we
actually
talked
about
making
the
amount-
and
it
has
just
been
a
tremendous
success
and
we
have
a
long
way
to
go
on
this,
but
the
staff
has,
I
think,
just
done
an
amazing
job
over
the
years
of
putting
this
together,
and
so
I
think
we
should
give
ourselves
a
real.
P
You
know,
pat
on
the
back,
but
more
pat
on
the
back
for
the
community,
because
they
really
embraced
all
this
and
then
supported
this,
and
we
just
need
to
keep
doing
more
of
it.
So
the
staff
has
just
been
great.
Let's,
let's
keep
going
and
I'm
I'm
excited
about
it
and
glad
to
hear
the
report.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you.
Vladimir
staff
has
done
a
great
job.
As
we
know,
transportation
is
very
important
element
of
the
community
everything
we
do
every
activities
we
have.
We
have
to
go
from
here
to
there
it's
transportation
and
affects
us
every
day.
You
know,
especially
during
last
year,
under
the
pandemic.
You
know
we
got
stuck
home
for
over
a
year.
We
realized
you
know
gee
how
challenging
become
so.
Q
It's
really
a
very
important
piece
of
what
the
city
the
government
provides,
and
you
know
I
I
cut
my
teeth
in
politics
and
city
through
transparency
commissions.
I've
always
realized.
I
have
a
love
for
you
know
what
you
guys
do
and
you
guys
do
a
good
job
with
federal
government
file,
state
government,
everything
that
we
do
local
budgets,
and
so
you
know
that's
just
great,
and
I
believe
that
this
is
a
something
you
guys
are
doing
through
this
covert
period.
Q
Things
are
changing,
things
have
changed,
previous
behavior
has
changed
and
we
are
seeing
this,
how
it
affected
the
community,
the
people
and
our
quality
of
life.
So
I
think
we
can
have
a
lot
of
information
observation
from
what
you
do
on
the
ground
to
see
how
traffic
patterns
may
have
changed,
how
people's
you
know
changing
of
a
behavior.
Q
So
I
think
that
would
give
us
a
lot
of
good
information.
How
do
we
structure?
How
do
we
take
care
of
some
of
the
way
that
we
move?
I
think
that's
very
important,
so
I
have
very
con
lots
of
confidence.
You
want
you
guys
do
one
specific,
so
I
really
appreciate
what
you've
done
and
you
have
to
be
flexible.
I
have
to
be
adaptable,
see
what's
going
on
and
you
make
it
work
and
I'm
very
impressed
during
again
the
pandemic
spot
just
going
on.
Nothing
really
has
stopped
just
keep
blinding.
Q
So
under
all
that
circumstances,
you
know
you
guys
make
it
work.
Question
is
in
north
north
northeast
bellevue,
bellevue,
ramen
area.
You
know,
because
of
development
from
brandman
development
from
spring
district
from
bellevue.
There's
a
lot
of
pressure
spilled
on
again
that
resulted
in
transportation
how
people
move
have
you
have
any
been
changed
noticed
during
the
pandemic?
Q
S
Question
the
yes,
we
we
have
noticed
you
know
throughout
the
pandemic,
you
know
much
lighter
volumes.
S
Certainly
you
know
microsoft's
staff
working
from
home
and
and
had
a
significant
influence
on
the
the
volume
of
traffic
out
there
throughout
the
day,
how
the,
how
they
and
how
the
community
reacts
to
a
post-covet
environment
is
actually
going
to
be
a
a
really
fascinating.
Study
of
you
know,
sociology
psychology
as
well
as
transportation.
S
You
know
what
what
what
does
you
know
this?
This
pandemic
mean
for
things
like
like
a
telework
environment
and
for
commuting.
S
You
know:
we've
heard
businesses
that
are
all
over
the
board
in
how
they
are
approaching
a
post-pandemic
work
attitude
with
with
their
staff,
we've
heard
everything
from
you'll,
be
you
know,
reporting
to
work
in
the
office.
You
know
two,
you
know
we're
going
to
be
much
more
open
with
a
telework
policy
and
you
may
have
to
come
in
once
a
week
or
you
know,
perhaps
not
even
that,
and
so
how
that
rolls
out
over
the
next
six
months
year,
maybe
even
a
little
bit
longer.
S
It
may
have
a
significant
influence
on
transportation
and
I
can't
begin
to
give
you
an
answer
other
than
we
are
going
to
be
watching
it
very
closely,
because
it
certainly
may
have
an
impact
on
on
how
we
approach
our
capital
program
in
the
future.
It's
it's
in
some
ways.
It's
it's
kind
of
exciting.
It's
it's
a
it's
a
different
world.
Q
Q
D
Thank
you,
mayor
I'll,
keep
this
short.
So
thank
you
for
the
briefing
I
actually
am
really
excited
about
the
projects.
I'm
looking
forward
to
taking
my
bike
out
on
the
walking
along
those
sidewalks.
I
think
post
covet,
hybrid,
return
to
work
or
remote
work
will
likely
mean
we
have
to
do
more
to
attract
people
to
bellevue,
and
so
my
question
was
going
to
be.
How
are
we
thinking
about
our
testing
amenities
along
these
bike
bed
routes
and
as
a
way
to
encourage
people
to
use
them
and
activate
those
spaces.
S
That's
an
exciting
question
and
that's
a
question
that
goes
well
beyond
the
transportation
department
and
involved
staff
and
from
community
development
and
development
services.
How
do
we
activate
the
right-of-way?
You
know?
In
the
past,
the
right-of-way
has
been
looked
at.
As
you
know,
the
quickest
the
quickest
possibility
from
point
a
to
point
b.
S
It's
not
really
that
way
anymore.
Things
like
like
pocket
parks.
Things
like
you
know,
gathering
places
in
unopened,
unimproved,
rites
of
way
those
opportunities
are
are
kind
of
ripe
for
the
picking
you
know
we
we
do
have
in
bellevue
a
fair
amount
of
opportunity
for
improvements
and
unopened.
Unimproved
rights
of
way
street
ends
that
end
at
lakes
that
are
right-of-way
city
property
that
provide
an
opportunity
for
a
little
mini
park
that
that
you
know
ends
of
the
lake.
S
To
make
them,
you
know
more
of
a
a
yeah,
they
can
get
you
from
point
a
to
point
b.
But
when
you
include
things
like
you
know,
arts
and
and
other
things,
make
it
much
more
attractive
and
a
an
attraction
in
and
of
itself.
D
S
Yeah,
that
also
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
public
involvement.
You
know
what
does
the
public
want
to
see
in
a
a
you
know,
a
smaller
facility
like
that
that
we
can
incorporate
and
they
don't
have
to
necessarily
be
expensive
options.
A
So
this
is
a
great
presentation.
I
just
want
to
call
out
that
congressman
adam
smith
has
been
a
real
advocate
for
this
refinancing
of
the
tiffy
alone.
I
know
that
before
joyce
left,
she
spoke
with
him
many
times,
as
did
I
so
my
fingers
are
crossed
that
we
were
successful
with
that.
I
also
want
to
thank
the
community
for
their
advocacy
for
the
sidewalk
on
newport
way
and
also
along
lake
sammamish.
A
I
mean
the
community
came
out
really
strongly
in
favor
of
those
projects
and
we
as
a
council,
voted
to
advance
those
because
it
was
such
a
safety
issue,
and
so
it
was.
It
was
fun
to
be
responsive
to
the
community,
but
I
really
applaud
the
community
for
having
such
a
loud
voice
on
that
also
that
safe
routes
to
school
grants.
A
You
know
when
we
first
did
the
levy
you
mentioned
that
we
would
be
applying
for
those
and
it's
great
to
know
that
we've
received
them,
because
when
I
speak
with
the
community,
those
who
live
around
the
elementary
schools,
that's
one
of
their
biggest
concerns
is
having
more
crosswalks
and
safer
routes
for
their
kids
to
get
to
school.
A
I
have
two
questions
for
you.
One
I
see
needs
for.
I
is
that
scrambles,
where
you
cross
both
directions.
So
I
wonder
if
we
have
plans
to
put
in
some
scrambles,
especially
now
that
the
northeast
downtown
park
entrance
is
completed.
I
just
see
that
intersection
seems
like
it
would
be
really
a
good
one
for
a
scramble
and
then
my
other
question
is
in
crossroads.
A
You
know
what
I'm
talking
about
and
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
look
at
the
properties
and
the
right
of
ways
that
you're
talking
about
and
see
if
we
can
create
some
safe
routes
for
bikes
that
are
off
the
beaten
path
that
make
it
easier
for
people
to
commute
in
those
areas
where
the
traffic
is
so
heavy
on
the
streets.
S
Okay,
coming
back
to
your
first
question:
yes,
there
will
be
some
more
ped
scrambles
coming
up,
I
don't
know
exactly
where
or
whether
there
will
be
one
at
the
downtown
park.
So
let
me
get
back
to
you
on
that.
After
talking
with
our
operations
staff,
they
they
have
a
tremendous
advantage
for
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists
to
to
get.
You
know
diagonal
across
an
intersection.
S
If
you're
a
pedestrian
or
cyclist,
all
traffic
is
stopped
in
all
directions
and
really
fantastic
for
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists,
not
so
much
for
vehicular
traffic,
but
in
some
locations.
That's
okay
areas
like
around
the
transit
center.
We
have
scramble
phase
and
we'll
have
a
scramble
phase
on
the
east
side
of
the
transit
center
once
we
make
the
intersection
improvements
there.
So
let
me
get
back
to
you
on
the
around
the
downtown
park
and
a
second
question
path.
Are
safe
routes
off
the
beaten
path.
S
You
know
where,
where
we
can
can
gain
access
to
properties
and
gain
access
to
easements,
particularly
at
low
or
no
costs
when
they
see
benefit,
you
know
to
their
development
or
to
their
properties.
S
You
know
it
can
be
certainly
be
done
easier
than
you
know,
locations
where
we
may
have
to
go
in
and
and
it's
a
bit
of
a
battle
to
do
so,
but
yeah
yeah,
certainly
for
you
know,
under
a
vision,
zero
aspect
separating
pedestrians
and
cyclists
from
vehicles
in
any
manner
strongly
supports
the
vision,
zero
effort.
A
Thank
you
I'll
just
say
as
a
somebody
who
rides
my
bike
quite
a
bit,
I
will
be
happy
to
go
a
longer
distance
if
it's
a
safer
route,
so
it'd
be
fun
to
see
if
we
can
connect
all
those
little
pathways
that
we
have
and
parkways
okay.
Well,
thank
you
that
was
that
was
great.
That's
the
completion
of
this
presentation.
We
are
going
to
take
a
break.
A
It's
8
22.
We
will
reconvene
at
8.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Come
back,
we've
got
one
two
three
four
of
us,
so
next
step
is
an
ordinance.
Mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
this.
C
Yes,
this
is
ordinance
6584,
it's
the
100,
wa
southeast
rezone,
and
so
given
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
rezone.
I'm
going
to
just
turn
it
over
to
kath
girl,
our
city
attorney,
to
introduce
the
item
kathy.
T
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
the
100
bellevue
rezone
application,
which
is
before
you
tonight
involves
a
request
to
rezone
an
approximately
.87
acre
parcel
from
downtown
mixed
use
and
office
designations
to
it.
Just
one
single
designation
of
downtown
mixed
use
for
the
entire
parcel.
This
rezone
is
intended
to
make
this
consistent,
make
the
zoning
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
that
the
council
approved
at
the
end
of
last
year.
This
is
a
process
three
quasi-judicial
proceeding.
T
The
hearing
examiner
held
a
public
hearing
and
then
has
made
a
recommendation
to
the
council.
The
hearing
examiner
recommends
approval
with
a
condition
and
no
appeal
of
the
hearing.
Examiner's
decision
was
filed,
as
you
may
recall,
at
your
june
21
meeting
mark
brennan,
one
of
the
city's
land
use
planners,
gave
a
brief
overview
of
the
project
and
you
were
presented
with
the
hearing
examiner's
record
in
this
case
tonight.
T
This
matters
before
you
to
make
a
decision
on
the
rezone
application
in
the
event
for
the
convenience
of
the
council
that
the
council
votes
to
approve
the
application
is
recommended
by
the
hearing.
Examiner
staff
prepared
ordinance
6584,
which
was
included
in
your
packets.
If
the
council
chooses
not
to
approve
and
makes
a
different
decision,
then
staff
will
prepare
an
ordinance
following
council's
direction
and
come
back
at
a
following
meeting.
T
The
other
options
besides
approval,
as
recommended
by
the
hearing
examiner,
are
to
approve,
with
additional
or
different
conditions
to
remand
back
for
a
hearing
on
a
specific
issue
to
the
hearing
examiner
or
to
deny
the
application
before.
I
turn
it
over
mayor
to
to
you
for
council
deliberation
and
vote,
because
this
is
a
quasi-judicial
matter.
T
I
would
recommend
that
the
council
be
given
an
opportunity
to
disclose
any
ex-party
contacts
they
may
have
had
with
the
applicant
or
anyone
else
opposing
or
or
supporting
the
project
and
as
usual
council
staff
have
already
searched
your
email,
so
there's
no
need
to
disclose
anything.
Nothing
was
found
in
your
email,
so
any
ex
party
communications
other
than
the
accounts,
those
emails.
If
there
are
any,
I
would
recommend
the
council
members
disclose
those
now.
A
Q
A
And
council
member
stokes,
have
you
no
and
neither
I
had
any
ex
parte
communications,
so
I
is
there
any.
Are
there
any
questions
or
is
there
any
discussions
or
are
we
ready
to
vote?
A
B
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
this
evening
the
council
has
an
opportunity,
as
you
said,
to
take
a
position
on
this
levy.
State
law
prohibits
the
use
of
public
resources
for
the
promotion
of
or
opposition
to
a
ballot
measure.
However,
there
is
a
safe
harbor
clause
in
the
statute
that
allows
council
to
take
a
position
in
an
open
public
meeting.
B
There
are
some
requirements
that
need
to
be
met
in
order
to
take
that
position,
and
one
of
the
requirements
is
that
the
agenda
for
the
meeting
must
include
the
title
and
number
of
the
ballot
proposition
itself,
and
the
second
is
that
the
members
of
the
public
and
the
council
are
afforded
an
approximately
equal
opportunity
to
express
an
opposing
view.
So
after
this
evening's
proceedings,
both
of
those
requirements
will
have
been
satisfied,
and
this
evening,
sheila
kapistani
from
king
county
department
of
community
and
health
services
will
give
a
brief,
factual
report
on
the
levy.
B
Following
her
report,
the
co-chair
of
the
pro
campaign-
dialer
dela
pardon
me
pereira-
will
give
the
pro
statement
and,
as
of
today,
staff
were
unable
to
locate
a
con
campaign
just
for
the
council's
awareness
after
the
campaign
presentations.
The
public
will
have
up
to
15
minutes
three
minutes
per
person,
and
that
would
allow
for
five
speakers
on
either
side
of
the
ballot
measure.
B
A
draft
resolution
for
the
council's
consideration
has
been
attached
in
your
packet
and
attached
to
the
agenda
memo
after
the
everyone
has
had
the
opportunity
to
speak,
the
council
can
choose
to
take
action
on
the
resolution
to
support
the
levy
or
the
council
can
choose
to
take
no
action
at
all,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
Mayor.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
So
miss
kapistani
welcome,
you're
the
division
director
from
king
county
department
of
community
and
human
services,
and
if
you
could
give
us
a
factual
report,
I'd
appreciate
it.
U
U
U
The
proposal
has
really
three
parts
to
it
and
the
first
part
is
really
about
maintaining
the
current
levy
strategies.
There's
a
lot
of
work
on
a
community
level
and
doing
research
into
finding
out
what
were
the
best
things
for
us
to
be
able
to
invest
in
in
order
to
meet
the
goals
that
we
had
set
for.
Best
starts
for
kids,
so
the
renewal
proposal,
the
first
part
of
it,
is
to
maintain
our
current
levy.
U
The
final
investment
is
around
system
supports
so
looking
at
workforce
development
for
the
folks
to
work
for
work
with
young
people,
prenatal
to
five
zero
to
five
infant,
mental
health
and
a
national
model
that
we've
replicated
this
first
time
around
and
would
continue
to
do.
Should
the
levy
be
renewed,
called
help
me
grow,
which
is
really
about,
assuring
that
families
are
connected
with
the
type
of
services
that
they
need.
Next
slide.
U
U
Our
final
general
category
is
transitions
to
adulthood,
which
is
really
the
16
to
24
year
olds,
high
school
completion
and
going
on
to
the
next
stage
of
adulthood,
and
then
we
have
a
category
that
we
call
stopping
a
school-to-prison
pipeline,
which
is
really
an
area.
That's
proposed
to
be
focused
investments
for
a
particular
group
of
young
people,
who
are
at
particular
risk
for
ending
up
in
that
pipeline
in
that
system.
U
So
the
first
part
is
maintain
the
current
levy
strategies
we
also
have.
The
second
part
is
building
upon
current
levy
strategies,
so
we
heard
from
community
that
they
would
like
us
to
to
deepen
our
investments
in
school-aged
children,
so
in
that
sustain
the
gain
the
five
to
24
year
olds,
if
we
have
that
opportunity
with
renewal,
so
the
areas
that
we
would
like
to
deepen
investments
in
include
out
of
school
time.
U
What
is
now
being
in
the
field
called
extended
learning
programs,
school-based
health
centers
to
be
able
to
get
more
school-based
health
centers
into
more
rural
areas
in
our
in
our
counties
and
more
suburban
areas
and
then
deepening
the
investment
in
transitions
to
adulthood.
For
those
16
to
24
year
olds
next
slide,
please.
U
If
the
levy
stays
projected
at
above
822
million
and
below
872
million,
then
that
up
to
50
million
would
go
towards
capital
projects
throughout
the
county
and
that
can
be
for
repairs
and
remodels,
as
well
as
helping
to
fund
for
new
construction,
so
maintain
the
levy
deep
in
the
levy
and
then
additional
new
investments
next
slide
please.
U
U
U
Obviously,
with
a
with
a
home
that
has
a
higher
value,
the
price,
the
tax
is
going
to
go
up
a
little
bit
more
and
lesser
value,
a
little
bit
less
a
lot
of
variety
throughout
the
county.
On
this
one
and
then
our
last
economic
forecast
in
march
projected
a
revenue
change
from
what
the
executive
had
proposed
at
811
million
to
872
million
that
19
cents
assessed
value
next
slide.
Please
that's
it!
So
that's
that's
the
renewal
proposal
in
a
nutshell,.
A
V
Ahead,
thank
you
very
much
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house,
members
of
the
council.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
today
and
seek
your
support
for
the
renewal
of
best
arts
for
kids.
I
am
volunteering
as
a
campaign
co-chair
for
the
renewal
of
best
arts
for
kids
and
my
day.
Job
is
as
an
executive
director
of
an
organization
that
helps
promote
maternal
health,
infant
health
and
early
learning
throughout
king
county.
V
This
is
about
hope,
and
this
is
about
the
future,
and
this
is
about
helping
our
kids
have
the
best
possible
start,
so
we're
talking
about
healthy
outcomes
in
healthy
communities
and
your
future
bike,
riders
and
future
civil
and
software
engineers.
I
like
the
previous
presentation,
which
is
why
I
bring
that
up.
V
V
We
would
be
honored
if
the
bellevue
city
council
joined
executive
constantine,
along
with
county
council
members,
mayors
and
organizations
throughout
the
county
that
are
serving
children
and
families
to
support
the
renewal
of
proposition
one.
As
the
seattle
times
wrote
in
their
endorsement.
Best
start
has
made
a
difference
in
the
lives
of
hundreds
of
thousands
of
children,
young
adults
and
families,
and
it
deserves
to
be
renewed.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
A
Ms
pereira,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments.
We
appreciate
you
being
here
tonight.
We
have
had
no
official
con
campaign
identified
so
I'll.
Ask
the
clerk
to
see
if
there's
any
other
speakers
signed
up
to
comment
this
evening.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
There
are
no
pre-registered
speakers
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
So
at
this
point
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
connected
to
the
meeting
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
in
favor
or
in
opposition
to
this
ballot
measure?
Please
use
the
raised
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
connected
with
a
phone.
A
D
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I'm
really
excited
about
how
holistic
this
that
starts
for
kids
program
is
one
of
my
questions
just
has
to
do
with
the
child
care,
so
I
think
we
as
far
as
I've
noticed
the
chalk
care
facilities
typically
are
established
in
sort
of
core
downtown
or
like
very
densely
populated
areas,
but
I
think
also
having
them
in
the
neighborhoods
closer
to
residences
is
also
helpful,
especially
if
parents
are
you
know,
trading
out
in
terms
of
responsibilities.
O
U
A
U
Answer
that
I
wanted
to
ask
procedurally,
is
that
I
can
answer
factual
questions.
The
the
money
and
best
starts
for
kids
is
for
a
subsidy
program,
so
it
just
goes
to
families
to
help
them
pay
for
child
care.
U
The
county
currently
has
another
investment
called
the
puget
sound
taxpayer,
accountability
account
or
pasta,
which
has
a
large
investment
in
child
care
facilities,
and
so
that
is
a
part
of
pasta,
and
it
is
the
desire
if
we
had
renewal,
that
we
leverage
those
two
programs
and
be
able
to
really
extend
to
where
our
families
need
to
to
have
child
care.
U
P
I
don't
have
any
questions
I
just
wanted
to.
I
guess
we
can
make
regular
just
general
comments
right,
yes,
okay,
so
someone
make
sure
I
wanted
to
point
out
and
it's
relevant
to.
You
know
why
this
is
something
we
should
be
doing
and
working
with
the
county
on
this
in
the
cities,
and
I
want
to
thank
sheila,
particularly
on
the
regional
policy
committee.
P
We
had
some
very
robust
discussions
about
this
a
couple
of
times
and
working
with
staff,
and
we
really
appreciate
and-
and
I
think
we've
worked
out-
something
is
really
going
to
improve
the
collaboration
between
the
cities
on
the
on
the
rest
of
the
county
and
and
and
working
on
this
together,
and
you
know
also
in
sharing
information
and
finding
out
ways
working
together.
So
we
can
get
an
idea
of
you
know
how
this
fits
in,
because
there's
so
many
different
organizations
working
on
this.
P
So
we
can
coordinate
those
things
and
again,
I
think
you
know
we
got
a
lot
done.
It
was
really
a
great
collaboration
that-
and
I
think
it's
it
to
me-
typifies
the
way
that
this
program
has
been
run
and
functioning
all
along.
So
I'm
very
excited
about
it,
and
my
other
motivation
for
being
supportive
of
it
is
my
daughter
genevieve
who
works
with
children.
Families
and
youth
continuously
reminds
me
why
this
is
really
important
that
it's
it's
a
it's.
P
It's
really
unique
the
way
the
county
and
the
the
cities
within
the
county
have
put
together.
This
best
starts
for
kids
and
that's
what
all
comes
down
to.
We've
got
to
give
every
child
the
best
start
possible,
and
this
is
a
great
vehicle
for
it
and
I'm
thrilled
to
support
it
and
vote
for
it
and
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
H
U
H
U
H
H
Is
there
going
to
be
any
money
earmarked
for
helping
kids
who
have
had
either
learning
loss
or
mental
health
challenges
as
a
result
of
all
the
school
shutdowns,
we've
got
a
significant
number
of
children
who
are
very,
very
behind
who
either
didn't
didn't,
show
up
failed,
etc,
as
well
as
mental
health
challenges
is
there?
Are
we
looking
at
that
issue,
because
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
good
use
for
this
money.
U
We're
definitely
looking
at
that
issue.
There
are
some
programs
that
are
already
embedded
in
the
current
levy
that
support
mental
mental
health
and
mental
wellness
for
young
people.
That
is,
is
slated
to
continue.
Should
the
levy
be
renewed
and
under
covid
there
was
a
youth-focused
initiative
called
community
well-being
and
it
really
focused
on
mental
health
issues.
It
focused
on
working
with
peers
to
provide
support
to
one
another
because
it
was
a.
It
was
a
pandemic
response,
as
we
saw
how
successful
it
was.
U
We've
incorporated
it
into
to
best
starts
right
now
about
mid
mid
year
last
year
and
we're
doing
it
now.
It
is
slated
to
continue
under
the
new
levee
if
it
is
renewed
again
working
with
peers
and
getting
into
schools
and
communities
to
talk
about
mental
health.
Some
of
the
mental
health
challenges
and
substance
use
prevention.
H
I
am
sure
glad
I
asked
that
question
that
is
excellent,
very
happy
to
hear
that,
and
also
just
wanted
to
give
a
shout
out
for
the
the
visiting
nurses
for
the
new
babies,
the
programs
that
help
launch
new
families.
I
I
think
that
that
is
so
important
to
the
public,
health
and
well-being
of
young
families,
especially
people
who
may
not
have
the
resources.
So
I'm
all
for
it,
and
thank
you
for
answering
my.
U
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
one
other
thing,
because
I
didn't
make
it
clear
in
the
presentation
is:
there's
still
a
three
percent
cap
on
the
levy
and
so
that
19
cents
will
go
down
over
the
life
of
the
letty
levy
as
well.
V
Go
ahead
dealer
I
was
just
going
to
add
to
your
point
that
nurse
family
partnership
are
among
our
colleagues.
O
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
think
this
is
such
an
important
piece
to
help
with
prevention,
making
sure
that,
as
we
move
forward,
that
all
of
the
kids
have
what
they
need
to
and
really
it's
about
thriving.
So
I
like
the
fact
that
it
isn't
just
about
happy
healthy,
safe,
but
it's
about
thriving,
which
is
a
forward-leaning
view.
O
I'm
also
concerned
about
the
parents
so
when
I
think
about
parents
of
middle
school
and
high
schoolers,
and
what
they're
going
through
how
they
support
their
kids
as
they
go
through
those
potential
mental
health
type
of
challenges.
So
does
this
funding
support
the
whole
family,
so
it
would
be
for
both
the
students
and
the
parents
is
that
right
just
want
to
confirm
most.
U
Of
the
funding
around
that
is
supporting
the
the
students,
but
we
do
have
a
strategy,
that's
parent
engagement
and
family
connections,
and
that,
if
we
have
a
renewal
will
probably
pivot
from
what
it
has
been
to
to
address
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
is
sort
of.
Where
is
that
stress
level?
And
how
will
parents
be
able
to
continue
to
support
their
young
people
as
they
enter
into
this
next
phase
and
then
beyond?
O
That
would
be
great
because
I
I've
heard
that
there's
been
a
a
higher
level
of
domestic
violence
and
in
the
homes,
and
so
the
ability
to
support
the
the
parents
will
be
really
important.
And
then
the
comments
earlier
about
child
care
and
to
the
degree
that
we
can
make
sure
that
the
pipeline
for
child
care
that
those
programs
and
also
ones
that
have
the
the
community
base
culturally
appropriate,
so
that
we
we
have
children
and
families
that
feel
like
they're
as
supported
as
possible.
O
Centered
for
what
they
need
to
to
be
able
to
to
thrive.
So
does
does
it
include
that
aspect
as
well.
O
O
Certainly
I,
as
a
member
of
the
king
county
board
of
health,
what
we
heard
is
that
one
of
the
best
preventions
for
youth
violence
was
more
community
centers
and
community
programs
and
actually
having
facilities
and
spaces
for
youth
to
to
go
after
school.
And
so
my
sense
is
that
if
we
look
at
all
of
king
county,
there
may
be
some
some
gaps
in
those
types
of
facilities
that
may
be
needed.
U
That
that
restriction-
thank
you
for
that,
clarifying
that
that
is
a
was
a
council
ad
and
the
the
baseline
that
they
said
as
long
as
it
doesn't
fall
under
822
million.
We're
already
projected
to
be
50
million
over
that,
so
they
were
trying
to
to
protect
the
current
investments
and
not
have
a
new
addition
impact
those
investments
that
was
already
in
the
plan,
but
to
say
if
those
levy
projections
continue
to
go
up.
This
is
how
we
will
use
those
new
dollars
and
then
they
capped
it
at
8.72.
So
it's
possible.
A
Well,
I
think
any
investment
in
a
child
is
gonna
impact
positively,
your
entire
city
and
it's
the
best
investment
we
can
make
in
our
community.
So
I
think
we
see
broad
support
here
if
there
are
no
other
comments
or
questions.
I'd
like
to
ask
our
deputy
mayor
for
a
motion.
A
A
Okay,
anyway,
so,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
first
ordinance.
C
Yes,
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
ordinance
6585
will
allow
permanent
support
of
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use.
Districts
where
residences
and
or
hotels
and
motels
are
permitted
and
to
allow
homeless
service
uses
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed.
Just
by
way
of
background
she
mentioned
house
bill
1220
was
signed
into
law
in
may
as
part
of
the
2021
state
legislative
session
and
goes
into
effect.
C
C
We
have
joining
us
mike
brennan
the
director,
as
well
as
tristan
tanner's,
consulting
attorney
caleb
miller
senior
planner,
both
all
from
the
development
services,
as
well
as
matt
mcfarlane
assistant
city
attorney
of
the
city
attorney's
office,
so
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
you
mike.
G
Thank
you,
mr
miyagi,
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house
and
council
of
members,
caleb
trishna
put
the
presentation
up
and
we'll
kind
of
track
through
this.
We
have
a
short
presentation
this
evening
to
introduce
this
ordinance
6585
that,
as
mr
miyaki
mentioned,
puts
in
place
an
inch
from
official
control
that
amends
the
land
use
code
to
align
the
code
with
recently
passed
legislation
if
the
council
next
next
slide.
Please,
if
the
council
acts
tonight,
which
is,
we
are
asking
council
act
for
action
on
ordinance
number
6585.
G
If
the
council
does
act
tonight,
it
would
require
a
public
hearing
within
60
days
of
your
action
for
interim
official
controls,
and
we
have
tentatively
scheduled
that
public
hearing
for
this
ordinance
on
august
2nd
following
the
public
hearing.
We
would
then
ask
the
council
to
direct
the
planning
commission
to
develop
the
permanent
regulations.
G
W
Thanks
mike
next
slide,
please
so
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
member,
so
as
as
mike
and
city
manager,
miyake
both
mentioned
the
purpose
of
this
interim
official
control,
which
is
one
of
two
that
you'll
be
considering
tonight,
is
to
bring
the
city
into
timely
compliance
with
washington
house
bill
1220,
and
we
will
provide
an
overview
of
what
the
interim
official
control
would
do
to
bring
the
city
into
compliance.
W
W
It
amends
several
sections
in
the
growth
management
act
and
it
also
amends
the
state
law
code
city
provisions
that
that
apply
to
bellevue
as
well,
and
it
really
addresses
four
different
types
of
housing
types
is,
is
the
way
to
look
at
it:
permanent,
supportive
housing,
transitional
housing,
emergency
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelters,
and
so
with
respect
to
the
first
two
housing
types,
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
house
bill
1220
requires
that
all
cities
allow
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
residential
dwellings
and
our
hotels
are
allowed
and
with
respect
to
the
other
two
housing
types,
emergency,
housing
and
indoor
emergency
shelters.
W
The
requirement
is
to
allow
these
housing
types
in
all
land
use
districts
where
hotels
are
permitted,
and
this
official
or
I'm
sorry
this.
This
changes
to
the
growth
management
act
and
also
the
changes
to
the
code
city
provisions
becomes
effective
on
july
25th,
which
is
why
we're
bringing
this
package
to
council
as
an
interim
official
control
and
again
it's
designed
to
bring
the
city
into
immediate
compliance
with
the
state
law.
W
And
as
I
mentioned
when
we
introduced
this
during
the
legislative
overview,
we
anticipate
that
the
interim
official
control
process
will
provide
the
public
hearing
and
the
ability
for
council
to
discuss
the
permanent
regulations
that
would
be
developed.
While
the
interim
official
control
is
in
place.
W
So
I
will
pass
it
on
to
caleb
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
specifics
of
this
particular
interim
official
control.
X
Thank
you
matt
and
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members.
First
I'll
just
discuss
these
specific
housing
types
that
are
addressed
in
hp,
1220
on
the
left,
you'll
see
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing.
These
are
supposed
to
be
long-term
interventions
to
persons
experiencing
homelessness.
X
They're
really
meant
to
either
keep
residents
in
their
homes
either
permanently
with
supportive
services
or
to
transition
them
over,
say
a
two-year
period
into
independent
living
arrangements.
Then,
on
the
right
we
have
emergency
housing
and
emergency
shelter.
These
are
going
to
be
your
shorter
term
interventions.
X
Emergency
housing
is
really
intended
to
sort
of
be
a
transition
in
itself
from
basically
meeting
their
basic
daily
needs
to
maybe
transitional
or
permanent,
supportive
housing
as
a
more
permanent
arrangement
and
then
emergency
shelter.
That's
really
intended
to
be
a
maybe
overnight
facilities
or
cooling
centers
for
hot
days,
like
we
just
experienced
recently.
X
So
we
will
be
updating
the
land
use
tables
to
reflect
the
requirements
in
hp
1220..
X
With
that
in
mind,
these
will
homeless
services
uses
will
still
be
subject
to
conditional
use,
permit
approval,
as
well
as
their
supplemental
approval
criteria
under
the
code
and
then
finally,
the
amendments
included
will
include
just
a
couple.
Changes
to
the
homeless
services
uses
definitions
to
reflect
the
emergency,
housing
and
emergency
shelter,
provisions
that
were
adopted
in
hb
1220
just
for
consistency
with
state
law.
X
And
then,
finally,
the
process
for
the
ioc,
no
public
hearing
is
required
prior
to
adoption,
but
it
is
required
within
60
days
after
adoption.
X
The
ioc
can
be
effective
for
six
months
and
it
can
be
renewed
with
another
public
hearing
for
an
additional
six
months
as
well,
and
then
finally,
staff
does
intend
to
develop
permanent
regulations
for
in
response
to
both
of
these
bills
through
the
luca
process
and
with
that
there
will
be
plenty
of
public
outreach,
particularly
with
the
planning
commission,
as
they
hold
their
study
sessions
and
eventually
a
public
hearing
prior
to
their
recommendation
to
the
city
council.
X
A
G
Independently
here
so
back
to
the
council
for
any
questions.
A
Q
What
does
that
mean?
Could
you
describe
for
everybody,
including
the
public?
You
know
it.
I
read,
you
know
through
the
our
own,
you
know
regulation,
we
allow,
you
know
a
certain
number
of
people
and
related.
You
know
in
the
in
their
home,
so
the
city
has
council.
Q
Q
Q
G
W
The
the
the
requirement
in
its
most
basic
form
is
that
all
cities
are
required
to
allow
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
land
use
districts
where
residential
dwellings
and
hotels
are
allowed
and
in
the
requirement
with
respect
to
the
emergency
housing
and
the
indoor
emergency
shelter
is
that
those
uses
have
to
be
allowed
in
land
use
districts
where
hotels
are
allowed,
and
so
the
the
mandate
from
the
state
is
to
the
extent
that
the
city's
land
use
code
does
not
allow
those
four
uses
in
the
land
use
districts
that
the
state
is
saying
they
must
be
allowed.
W
In
order
to
conform
with
that
state
mandate
and
what
we've
tried
to
do
with
this
interim
official
control
is
to
bring
the
city
into
immediate
compliance
with
a
an
interim
ordinance,
an
emergency
ordinance
before
the
july
25th
effective
date,
and
some
of
these
changes
to
the
land
use
code
are
are
consistent
with
the
way
that
we've
regulated
comparable
uses
in
the
past.
Q
W
Well,
well,
the
the
requirement
is
is
coming
from
the
state.
To
a
certain
extent,
the
state
has
preempted
local
regulation
of
these
uses,
and
so
so
the
city
would
be
required
to
comply
with
this
state
mandate.
Absolutely.
A
W
A
I'll
talk
to
talk
deputy
mayor,
you
are
next,
oh.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
actually,
councilmember
robertson
had
her
hand
up
before
me,
so
I'll
defer
to
her
right
now.
F
H
Doesn't
matter
I
apologize
for
interjecting
by
the
way
I
could
hear
someone
talking
before
when
I
thought
someone
was
unmuted
anyway,
so
thanks
so
on
this
matt,
and
I
I
I'm
personally
in
favor
of
complying
with
state
law
and
not
having
our
land
use
code,
challenged
by
applicants
and
or
being
ineligible
for
grants
for
failure
to
comply
with
gma
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
So
I
think
that
we
need
to
do
it,
whether
we
like
it
or
not.
H
So
I'm
in
favor
of
this
ioc,
I
had
a
couple
of
questions.
One
is
more
of
a
comment.
The
legal
red
line
doesn't
show
up
there's
two
on
both
these
ordinances.
H
It
says,
there's
a
legal
red
line
where
you
would
normally
have
the
strikeout
text
and
then
for
something
that's
taken
out
in
the
underlying
for
the
new
text.
I
don't
know
about
anybody
else,
but
that
does
not
show
up
and
it
doesn't
show
up
on.
I
legislate
and
it
doesn't
show
up
when
I've
pulled
stuff
down
online.
So
before
we
you
know,
can
we
at
some
point
get
a
legal
redline
of
that,
because
I
would
like
to
actually
see
it
number
two.
W
For
this
interim
official
control,
no,
there
is
not
we,
we
are
trying
to
bring
the
city
into
immediate
compliance
with
state
law,
or
one
thing
that
we
did
point
out
in
the
agenda
memo
is
that
we
did
think
that
as
council
are
we
anticipated
perhaps
that
as
council
adopted
and
processed
the
permanent
regulations
that,
with
respect
to
the
supportive
housing
and
the
transitional
housing
that
it
that
the
land
use
process
may
generate
a
distinct
regulatory
scheme
for
those
specific
uses.
W
So
to
your
question,
councilmember
robertson,
we
really
are
trying
to
meet
the
july
25th
date
with
a
fairly
straightforward
interim
official
control.
W
I
think
council
would
see
with
the
emergency
housing
and
the
emergency
shelter
we're
subjecting
those
uses
to
our
homeless
services
uses
regulations
that
are
already
in
place,
but
we
did
anticipate
without
wanting
to
anticipate
the
actual
policy
direction
that
perhaps
for
the
transitional
housing
and
the
permanent
supportive
housing.
The
council
may
provide
us
direction
to
actually
create
a
different
regulatory
screen
scheme
for
those
uses.
As
we
move
forward
too,.
H
Great-
and
I
would
be
in
support
of
that-
I
think
that
it's
we
need
to
have
a
bellevue,
specific
policy
where,
where
we
can
legally
do
so,
so
the
other
thing
I'm
wondering
if
we're
going
to
look
at
after
we
adopt
this
and
we
start
studying,
is
if
there's
any
areas
of
the
city
where
hotels
are
allowed
but
are
not
developed,
and
maybe
we
don't
really
want
them
to
be
hotels,
because
that
might
be.
H
If
you,
if
it's
allowed
for
hotels,
then
it's
allowed
for
homeless,
shelters
and
there
might
there
and
there
it
may
be
that
every
place
where
we
currently
have
zoned
for
hotels,
we
think,
is
a
great
fit
for
hotels
and
therefore
it's
a
great
fit
for
potential
homeless
shelters.
But
I
I
would
like
to
look
at
that
issue
when
we're
studying
this
and
making
the
permanent
regulations
so,
but
if
this
just
does
exactly
what
we
need
to
do
with
a
scalpel
to
make
our
code
compliant,
then
I
am
in
favor
of
passing
it.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
I
would
agree
with
council
member
robertson,
given
where
we
are
right
now.
I
would
be
in
favor
of
just
moving
this
forward
just
stay
within
requirements
here
and
it
is
a
very
straightforward
ioc
and
then
certainly
we
can
have
the
the
public
hearing.
F
I
I
feel,
like
you're
gonna,
hear
from
some
some
disgruntled
residents
on
this
or
some
some
folks
don't
like
to
see
the
city
council's
ability
for
for
for
zoning
and
land
use
to
be
you
served
by
the
by
the
state.
So
but
my
my
only
thing
would
be
as
councilman
roberts
I
think
alluded
to.
Is
you
know
what
can
we
do
to
keep
this
bellevue
specific?
What
can
we
do
to
have
some
measure
of
control?
F
Anything
that
we
can?
You
know,
get
back
a
little
bit
of
manage
management
if
you
will
of
of
of
this
type
of
process
here
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
of
luca.
So
you
know,
I
don't
expect
you
to
be
able
to
answer
that
and
it's
probably
very
limited,
but
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
I'd
be
looking
for,
as
you
go
through
the
public
hearing
process,
and
this
comes
back
before
us.
Those
are
some
of
the
things
that
I'd
be
interested
in.
A
F
P
Yeah,
I
would
you
know,
appreciate
looking
at
it
that
way.
I
do
think
that
one-
and
I
mean
the
the
legal
authority-
comes
from
the
state-
we're
not
a
you
know
a
duchy
by
herself,
and
I
think,
hopefully
we
have
a
little
bit
open
mind
that
maybe
this
has
some
purpose
behind
it
and
it
was.
P
This
was
enacted
for
some
purpose
and
we've
been
talking
about
wanting
to
really
advance
our
emergency
housing
or
supporting
our
transitional
housing,
emergency
shelters
and
this
city
is
changing,
and
I
hope
we
look
at
it
is.
Is
this
something
that
one
we
have
to
do
and
secondly,
instead
of
spending
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
wiggle
around
it
somehow
really
take
a
hard
look
at?
How
would
this
help
us
move
forward
on
all
our
adopted
policies
or
our
actions?
We
were
taken
already
investments
we've
made
stuff.
P
P
We
explain
to
to
our
constituents
that
you
know
why
we're
doing
this
and
why
this
is
is
the
way
the
the
governmental
system
is
set
up
and
we're
doing
that,
and
I
think
it
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
maybe
do
some
things
that
we
hadn't
done
before
and
if
we
want
to
have
some
limitations
that
we
legally
can
put
in
there.
P
I
do
not
also
want
us
to
have
to
spend
a
whole
lot
of
money
on
fighting
the
state
if
we
go
off
in
some
parent
way-
and
I
I
think
everybody
appreciates
that
too.
So
you
know,
let's
get
this
done
and
then
then
we
work
on
the
permanent
part.
A
Thank
you.
Well,
I'm
going
to
weigh
in
here.
You
know.
I
I
see
the
value
of
having
the
opportunity
to
create
these
resources.
We
definitely
have
populations
right
now
who
are
not
being
served.
We
don't
serve
the
women
they
all
have
to
go
to
kirkland.
We
don't
serve
the
young
adults,
they
all
have
to
go
to
redmond.
Hardly
anybody
serves
families,
and
so
and
then
you
know,
if
you,
if
you
have
a
pet,
it's
really
hard
to
find
a
place
to
go.
A
We
definitely
need
more
opportunities
for
people
to
find
shelter,
and
but
I
would
like
to
you
know
when
this
goes
by
the
planning
commission
I
want
to
look
at
you
know.
Shelter
is
just
not
enough
that
you
need
to
have
the
services
along
with
that,
and
so
I
will
be
very
interested
to
see
if
we
can
mandate
that
the
services
coincide
with
these
facilities
because
it
doesn't,
it
really
doesn't
help
you
to
just
get
emergency
housing
when
you've
been
traumatized
and
you're
recovering.
You
need,
you
need
support
and
you
need
that
through
services.
A
So
any
more
questions
or
comments.
Are
we
ready
to
vote
council
member
lee?
I
promise
you.
I
come
back
to
you
so
here
I
am.
Q
Well,
I
welcome
the
you
know,
opportunity
to
have
new
information,
including
that
come
from
the
state
and
other
folks,
and
we
are
addressing
these
issues
right
in
front
of
us
just
you
know
this
evening,
we're
so
thankful
and
so
pleased
what
we've
done-
and
this
is
all
part
of
that,
and
so
in
order
to
do
that,
we
have
to
have
a
understanding
discussion.
Q
You
know,
one
of
which
is
what
the
mayor
mentioned.
You
know
what
we,
what
can
we
do
better,
but
instead
you
know
we
are
responding
to
a
mandate
from
the
state
because
well
that's
what
you
have
to
do,
we're
responding
to
it,
that
that
doesn't
give
us
the
opportunity
to
discuss
and
talk,
especially
let
our
public
to
to
have
hear
what
they
have
to
say.
Q
So
you
know
my
interest
is
not
to
say
no
we
want
to
do.
We
don't
want
to
do
it.
The
interest
is,
we
are
responding
to
what
they're
making
us
some.
Some
council
members
know
a
lot
more
than
others.
You
know,
I.
I
believe
that
councilmember
robertson
said
she
already
understands
what
that
is
what
it
is
about.
She
agrees
talks
about
it,
but
for
me
you
know
I
speak
for
myself
and
for
a
lot
of
people
I
believe
in
the
community.
I
don't
know
I'm
looking
to
that
closely
on
this
particular
issue.
Q
You
know
and
we
just
started
so
I
I
would
love
to.
I
would
like
to
be
in
a
position
where
I
can
discuss
it.
I
understand
it
better.
We
can't
just
say
the
state
wants
it,
so
I
got
to
do
it.
You
know
saying
that
he
said
why.
Why
were
you
here
because
they
may
or
may
not
listen
to
us.
So
I
think
we
have
the
ability
to
do
that
and
if
we
know
something
we
definitely
want.
We
support
it.
Q
I
have
no
problem
with
it
and
as
long
as
I
understand
it
give
me
the
opportunity
to
do
so
and
the
rest
of
the
community
and
plus,
maybe
more
than
just
kind
of
me
who
wants
that
information
and
the
things
I
don't
understand.
I
like
to
have
the
opportunity
to
do
it
before
I
say:
yeah
go
ahead
and
do
it.
A
G
Yeah,
so
the
the
way
we
move
forward
from
here
council
acts
this
evening
that
the
next
step
would
be
a
public
hearing
to
solicit
public
input
on
the
interim
official
control.
So
that'd
be
the
first
point.
Council
can
take
that
input.
In
addition
to
what
we've
already
heard
tonight
to
form
the
direction
to
the
planning
commission,
then
it
would
go
to
the
planning
commission
where
we
would
work
the
planning
commission
through
study
sessions.
There
would
be
public
comment
opportunities.
G
Obviously
at
planning
commission
there
would
be
a
public
hearing
with
the
planning
commission
on
the
permanent
regulations
before
it
comes
back
to
the
council
with
their
recommendation.
So
there's
there's
quite
a
few
steps
that
we
have
to
move
forward
here
and
a
significant
opportunity
for
public
participation.
A
G
Yes,
absolutely
if
councilmembers
have
questions
or
are
looking
for
additional
information
on
this
subject,
certainly
reach
out
to
me
anybody
else
with
prisoner
matt,
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
with
you
with
any
additional
information
that
will
help.
You
understand
this
and
then
move
it
forward.
A
F
Certainly,
I
moved
to
adopt
ordinance
6585
opposing
an
interim
official
control
to
amend
sections
of
the
land
use
code
to
allow
permanent,
supportive
housing
and
transitional
housing
in
all
land
use
districts
where
residential
dwellings
and
or
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed
and
to
allow
homeless
services
uses
in
all
land
use.
Districts
where
hotels
and
motels
are
allowed
and
amend
the
definition
of
homeless
services
uses
for
conformance
and
consistency
with
state
law.
Second,.
A
C
Yes,
yes,
ma'am,
robinson
and
council
members,
ordinance
6586
removes
the
residential
occupancy
limits
from
the
land
use
code
and
just
by
way
of
background
senate
bill,
5235
was
signed
into
law
in
may
as
part
of
the
2021
legislative
session.
It
goes
into
effect
on
july
25th
somewhat
just
like
the
prior
ordinance.
C
The
bill
prohibits
cities
from
imposing
occupancy
limitations
for
residential
dwelling,
except
for
health
and
safety
limits.
The
city's
land
use
code
currently
limits
occupancy
of
dwellings
to
no
more
than
four
unrelated
people.
C
Therefore,
then
interim
official
control
is
needed
prior
to
the
effective
date
of
senate
bill
5235
to
bring
the
land
use
code
into
conformance
with
the
state
law.
Council
was
given
a
preview
of
this
interim
official
control
during
the
legislative
update
on
june
28th.
Again,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
mike
brennan
and
his
team
for
further
presentation
and
to
answer
any
questions
the
council
may
have
before
you
take
a
vote
on
this
mike.
G
Great.
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki.
Again,
the
process
is
very
similar
here
or
identical
to
the
previous
discussion.
If
council
acts
this
evening
on
this
ordinance,
65
86,
we
would
prepare
for
the
public
hearing
within
that
60-day
time
limit
again.
This
would
also
be
tentatively
scheduled
for
august
2nd,
so
we'd
hold
both
of
these
public
hearings
on
the
same
evening.
G
That
would
be
our
recommendation
and
again
following
the
public
hearing,
we'll
ask
the
council
to
direct
the
planning
commission
to
develop
the
permanent
regulations
for
final
adoption
by
council
at
a
future
date,
so
again,
significant
amount
of
process
to
move
forward
and
engage
the
public
with
both
the
ioc
and
the
future
permanent
regulations.
So
for
additional
information
again
the
action
this
evening
next
slide.
Please.
The
action
this
evening
is
a
recommendation
from
staff
to
adopt
ordinance,
6586
and
I'll
hand
it
to
there's
no
tanis.
G
Y
Thank
you
mike
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
council
members,
so
we
have
a
short
presentation
for
you
tonight
next
slide.
Please
so
we'll
begin
by
providing
a
quick
summary
of
the
state
legislation
senate
bill
5235,
which
is
the
reason
for
this
particular
ioc
ordinance.
Y
Next
slide,
please
so
in
in
this
past
legislative
session,
in
addition
to
the
house
bill,
1220
that
you
just
heard
about
in
the
previous
item,
the
state
legislature
also
passed
and
the
governor
signed
into
law
senate
bill
5235,
the
bill
will
become
effective
on
july
25th,
as
you
heard
earlier,
at
which
point
the
provisions
of
this
bill
will
be
codified
in
a
new
section
within
the
rcw,
and
the
new
section
will
contain
provisions
that
will
restrict
cities
from
limiting
the
number
of
unrelated
unrelated
persons
that
may
occupy
a
dwelling
unit.
Y
We
are
proposing
this
ioc
to
quickly
and
timely
conform.
The
land
use
code
to
this
new
state
law
pending
council
direction.
We
are
planning
on
developing
permanent
regulations
to
be
processed
by
the
planning
commission.
So
next
slide,
please
and
I'm
going
to
turn
over
the
rest
to
caleb
for
the
rest
of
staff's
presentation
on
this
caleb.
X
Great
thank
you
trisna.
So
first
I'll
go
through
the
existing
occupancy
limits
found
in
the
land
use
code.
X
The
the
main
driver,
as
president
noted
is
our
family
definition
currently
allows
for
an
unlimited
number
of
related
people
and
that's
by
blood,
marriage
or
legal
adoption,
and
then
there
is
a
maximum
of
four
unrelated
adults
in
the
definition
of
family.
There
are
a
couple
other
specific
housing
types
that
have
their
own
occupancy
limits.
X
So
the
components
of
this
interofficial
control,
first
and
foremost,
we
are
proposing
to
amend
the
the
family
definition
and
the
language
pretty
much
as
proposed.
Is
here
one
or
more
persons
residing
in
a
dwelling
operating
as
a
single
housekeeping
unit,
and
then
with
that.
We
will
also
we're
also
proposing
to
amend
the
definition
for
single
housekeeping
units
to
remove
the
requirement
for
all
residents
to
be
on
a
single
lease
and
then
clarify
that
it
does
not
apply
to
occupants
in
a
transient
lodging
situation.
X
And
then,
finally,
as
I
noted,
adus
and
rooming
houses
have
their
own
occupancy
limits,
and
this
ioc
is
proposing
to
remove
those.
X
And
then,
finally,
again,
as
as
we've
discussed,
the
process
for
the
ioc,
a
public
hearing
is
required
within
60
days
after
adoption
tentatively
scheduled
for
august.
Second,
the
ioc
is
effective
for
six
months
and
can
be
renewed
with
another
public
hearing
and
then,
as
we've
discussed,
the
planning
commission
will
hold
study
sessions
and
public
hearings
in
order
to
solicit
public
input
during
the
luca
process
for
the
permanent
regulations.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
so
this
is
supe.
This
is
very
similar
to
the
other
ordinance.
In
that
it's
a
state
mandate.
There
will
be
a
large
public
process
and
council
education
will
be
available
as
needed.
So
there's
not
a
whole
lot.
We
can
do
about
that
tonight.
R
A
Q
Q
The
one
thing
that
I
I'm
not
comfortable
with
and
objective
is
we
take
the
wrong
direction,
but
we
agree
to
this
and
put
in
a
public
hearing
and
let
people
know
we
already
agree
to
this
and
tell
the
people
to
come
to
speak.
You
know
against,
as
we
know,
that's
how
the
political
process
works,
and
I
think
we
need
to
take
opposition.
Q
The
right
way
is
that
they
are
changing
our
regulations
and
code
without
you
know
us
making
the
effort
to
talk
to
our
folks
first,
and
so
I
really
objected
that
you
know
we
have
spent
a
lot
of
time
to
look
at
each
code,
each
regulation.
You
know
on
this
one
also,
particularly
I
remember
clearly
it's
not
just
something
that
happened
overnight.
Q
So
I
feel
that
you
know
we're.
Gonna
accomplish
the
same
purpose.
Yes,
public
hearing
we're
going
to
make
the
decision.
That's
fine,
but
we
just
went
the
wrong
way.
We
gave
the
wrong
message
wrong
direction
and
give
unfair
advantage
to
something
that
we
have
to
prove
ourselves.
Instead
of
this,
other
people
have
to
put
themselves
it's
called
men,
unfunded
mandate.
We
object
to
it,
but
this
case
we're
not
so
I
I
disagree
with
this.
You
know
I'm
not
make
my
mind
on
this
substance.
Let
me
support
it.
I
could
you
know,
but
I'm
just
objecting.
A
So,
council,
member
lee,
I
think
you
know
what
you're
saying
is
that
there
was
a
reason
that
we
put
in
the
ordinance
that
we
did
with
the
limitations
that
we
did
and
that
freedom
to
do
that
is
being
removed
by
the
state
mandate
here.
But
that
doesn't
mean
that
there
might
be
a
way
to
protect
the
neighborhoods
in
the
way
that
the
residents
that
asked
for
those
protections
before
might
still
have
some
confidence
in
these
ordinances.
So
that's
yet
to
be
explored,
but
we
have
to
go
with
what
the
state
recommends.
A
A
With
that,
but
I
think
that's
what
you're
saying
and
and
that's
a
process
that
we
have
yet
to
go
through
and
so
voting
in.
This
interim
ordinance
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
move
to
the
next
step
of
having
the
public
hearing,
sending
it
to
the
planning
commission,
getting
public
feedback
and
having
a
recommendation
brought
back
to
us.
That
may
or
may
not
look
exactly
like
what
we're
seeing
tonight.
So.
Q
Q
H
I
just
wanted
to
clarify,
because
I
don't
think
it
came
up
the
matt
or
mike
the
even
with
this
change,
there's
still
our
maximum
maximum.
It's
getting
late
occupancy
limits
on
residential
well
in
all
buildings,
isn't
there.
G
So
what
regulates
the
level
of
occupancy
really
is
if
it
gets
to
a
place
of
overcrowding
as
determined
by
the
building
official
or
fire
marshal,
they
can
intervene
at
that
point
to
to
ensure
that
whatever
the
overcrowding
of
the
unsafe
condition,
the
overcrowding
is
causing
is
remedied
so
that
we
don't
have
that
level
of
specificity
like
an
octagon
load
factor
doesn't
do
in
other
uses.
G
G
H
More
restrictive,
we
should
look
at
that
after
we
pass
this,
but
I
just
was
curious
about
that.
I
thought
that
might
answer
some
of
councilmember.