►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council June15, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
D
A
So
before
the
approval
of
the
agenda,
there's
a
quick
and
we
need
to
address
the
council
has
been
following
a
process
to
allow
for
communications
during
the
feeding.
As
a
result,
there
is
a
provision-
the
council's
procedural
rules,
resolution
89,
28
that
the
council
should
temporarily
suspend
that
involves
the
process
for
accepting
communications
for
the
public,
so
section
13
of
resolution,
89
28
allows
a
council
procedural
rule
to
be
temporarily
suspended
and
when
suspension
is
requested
and
no
objection
has
offered
them
as
mayor
I
may
announce
the
rules
suspended.
A
E
Will
I
move
to
suspend
until
such
time
as
the
council
is
no
longer
holding
its
meeting
remotely
the
provisions
in
section
8,
D
2
of
resolution,
89
28
concerning
oral
communications
from
the
public
to
all
public
comment
to
be
provided
in
writing
and
read
or
summarized
during
the
council
meeting?
Second.
A
E
A
You
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
we
have
two
proclamations
tonight
and
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
working
with
us
up
until
the
final
minute
to
get
these
prepared.
The
first
one
is
world
Elder,
Abuse,
Awareness
Day
proclamation,
and
we
do
this
every
year
and
unfortunately,
we
because
of
our
code
requirements.
We
can't
have
the
Bellevue
Network
on
representatives,
come
and
talk
to
us
first.
A
F
You
mayor,
whereas
world
Elder
Abuse
Awareness
Day
was
established
in
2006
to
encourage
public
awareness
and
action
against
elder
abuse
and
whereas
Bellevue's
older
adults
are
valued
members
of
our
community,
and
it
is
our
collective
responsibility
to
ensure
that
they
live
safely
and
with
dignity.
And
whereas
abuse
of
older
adults
is
a
tragedy
inflicted
on
a
growing
number
of
vulnerable
populations
and
cross.
F
A
You
councilmember,
our
next
one
is
a
Juneteenth
proclamation
and
friday
june
19th
is
a
celebratory
day
of
June
19
June
10th
for
many
african-americans
across
the
United
States,
and
we
believe
it's
important
to
honor
an
honor
this
day
through
the
recognition
of
Juneteenth,
the
city
of
Bell
V
recognizes
the
importance
of
acknowledging
the
historical
and
current
struggles
of
black
and
brown
communities,
the
struggles
that
have
impacted
all
of
us
over
the
past
years
in
current
days
and
councilmember
Barksdale.
Would
you
please
read
the
proclamation
Thank.
G
You
mayor,
whereas
through
the
recognition
of
Juneteenth,
the
City
of
Bellevue
recognizes
the
importance
of
acknowledging
the
historical
and
current
struggles
of
black
and
brown
communities,
the
struggles
that
have
impacted
all
of
us
over
the
past
years
and
current
days.
Whereas
for
many
of
us,
we
have
with
the
fact
that
the
signage
of
the
Emancipation
Proclamation
Proclamation
declared
slave
in
Confederate
territory,
free
when
it
was
issued
on
January
1
1863.
G
Whereas
Juneteenth
celebrates
the
recognized
and
official
abolishment
of
slavery
in
the
United
States
that
all
people
in
the
matter
the
color
will
be
able
will
be
and
always
will
be
free
from
the
chains
of
slavery.
Today,
we
must
never
forget
that
shameful
period
in
our
country's
history,
but
all
men
and
women
were
legally
not
considered
equal
but
could
be
rightful
property
of
another
person,
whereas
our
current
trials
stem
from
that
historical
period
and
the
impact
of
those
bonds
and
legacies
of
slavery
continues
in
every
form
an
element
of
our
social
fabric.
G
A
Therefore,
I'll
in
Robinson
mayor,
the
City
of
Bellevue
Washington,
on
behalf
of
the
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
June
19
2020
as
June
13th
in
Bellevue
Washington,
recognizing
its
historical
importance
and
calling
on
our
community
to
join
us
and
listening
reflecting
and
acting
so
that
we
can
finally
achieve
racial
justice
for
all.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay.
Next,
we
have
an
approval
that
agenda.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
so.
A
B
You
mayor,
we
do
have
one
communication
to
read
and
if
you
would
like,
I
will
proceed.
Yes,
please,
the
email
came
in
from
Julie
Davenport
I
am
Julie
Davenport.
A
Bellevue
resident
I,
recently
learned
about
a
peaceful
protest
organized
by
educators
for
justice
on
June
5th
2020,
their
flyer,
showing
a
link
ended
with
defund,
Bellevue
PD
and
then
she's
attached
an
image.
The
city
posted
two
pictures
of
this
protest
on
its
Facebook
page
and
it
was
shared
by
educators
for
justice,
asking
city
leaders
to
heed
their
demands
again.
B
Another
attached
image
council
members
on
and
council
River
Stokes
left
supportive
comments
on
one
of
the
pictures.
Mr.
Stokes
said
it
was
a
civil
civil
and
on
message
and
Masson
said
that
she
was
present
at
the
protest.
Another
attached
image.
Mr.
Stokes
clarified
on
former
councilmember
Wallace's
Facebook
page
that
he
was
not
physically
present
at
the
protest
and
that
he
supported
a
sorrows
presence
in
schools
and
BPD
in
the
city.
Another
attached
image
I
would
like
to
ask
Masson
and
any
other
council
members
who
supported
the
June
5th
protest.
B
B
The
city
is
safer,
with
BPD
supported
and
fully
funded.
In
addition,
the
city
should
find
ways
to
support
organs,
Asians
addressing
mental
health
needs
of
youth
and
families.
Through
these
difficult
times,
the
city's
parks,
trails
and
open
spaces
have
been
a
blessing
to
many
thanks
to
the
park
staff
for
keeping
them
well
maintained
and
accessible
to
all
during
the
pandemic.
Thank
you
for
reading,
and
that
is
the
exceed
me.
Okay,.
H
H
Listening
in
the
pledge
signed
by
the
mayor
was
related
to
the
police
use
of
force
policy
as
well
as
next
steps
from
a
community
engagement
perspective
from
both
the
pledge
and
next
steps
were
intended
were
included
in
a
city
press
release
along
with
quotes
from
each
council
member
last
Thursday
and
can
be
found
on
the
city's
webpage.
With
respect
to
the
pledge,
it
commits
the
the
city
to
making
changes
within
our
taking
a
look
at
changes
within
four
areas
on
the
police
use
of
force,
one
is
to
review
the
police
use
of
force
policies.
H
Two
is
engagement
of
the
community
by
including
a
diverse
range
of
input,
experiences,
experiences
and
stories
in
the
review.
Third
reporting,
the
findings
of
the
review
to
the
community
and
seeking
feedback.
The
fourth:
the
reform,
if
necessary,
the
police
use
of
force
policies,
the
city
manager
I,
will
be
working
with
staff
to
establish
an
action
plan
to
respond
to
each
of
these
areas.
The
City,
Council
and
committee
will
be
partners
in
this
effort
and
we
will
be
bringing
back
updates
along
this
with
this
process.
H
First
I
want
to
acknowledge
a
few
points
about
the
approach,
while
most
of
the
national
conversation
has
placed
the
focus
on
law
enforcement.
I
want
to
leave.
No
doubt
that
Bellevue
is
committed
to
looking
across
the
organization
in
our
areas
of
operations
and
seeking
feedback
and
making
changes.
The
call
to
action
requires
a
careful
look
at
our
current
policies,
practices
and
culture
and
to
make
appropriate
changes.
As
I
noted
in
a
message
to
city
staff
last
week,
systemic
racism
is
very
real.
H
It
persists
because
it
is
in
many
of
our
everyday
process
and
practices
we
need
to
address
gaps
beyond
law
enforcement,
cluding
health,
housing,
education
and
other
services.
Second,
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
are
not
starting
from
zero.
In
this
journey,
the
council
adopted
the
diversity
Advantage
plan
in
2014,
which
has
a
specific
section
on
public
safety,
and
that
work
has
been
an
ongoing
priority
for
the
organization.
I
want
to
thank
that
the
only
Police
Department
for
their
commitment
to
serving
the
community.
H
In
recent
weeks,
the
police,
staffs
long
hours
and
commitment
to
protecting
all
members
of
the
community,
including
peaceful
protesters,
has
been
on
full
display.
Our
our
Police
Department
has
shown
an
openness
for
having
these
conversations
and
we
think
of
the
police
department
for
their
hard
work
and
dedication
to
the
profession
of
being
a
police
officer.
H
I
also
want
to
recognize
chief
on
that
for
five
years
of
investing
in
the
community
conversations
and
building
connections,
they
all
views
a
culture
of
a
continuous
improvement,
make
it
possible
to
take
this
pledge
and
know
that
our
conversations
are
listening
and
taking
action.
We've
all
been
beat
the
positive
changes.
Finally,
looking
at
the
details
of
the
pledge,
the
biggest
step
at
this
moment
is
engagement
with
the
community.
This
engagement
has
already
begun,
and
right
now
much
of
it
is
listening
to
the
various
groups,
speaking
out
with
inputting
their
experiences.
H
We've
heard
from
members
of
the
public
expect
more
in
the
coming
weeks.
The
city
has
also
been
approached
by
several
leaders
within
the
black
community
here
in
Bellevue
and
I'm
involved
in
active
conversations
on
what
is
the
most
effective
approach
to
ensure
all
voices
are
heard
and
from
this
evolving
conversation
I
will
bring
back
a
more
formal
set
of
action
to
the
council
for
your
review,
complete
with
near-term
and
as
well
as
long-term
commitments.
Make
no
mistake:
we
take
this
work
very
seriously.
H
A
A
H
Specifically,
staff
are
seeking
council
direction
to
prepare
the
land
use
code
for
public
hearing,
as
well
as
finding
a
finding
of
necessity
to
keep
this
at
the
council
level
versus
sending
it
over
to
a
Planning
Commission
I'm
joining
us
this
evening
or
note
for
our
staff
members
Mike
Brennan,
the
director
of
our
development
services,
as
well
as
Tristan
Tanis,
who
is
our
consulting
attorney
and
Nick
Whipple
senior
planner,
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Mike
for
an
additional
information
and
presentation.
Mike.
Thank.
I
You,
mr.
Miyagi
good
evening,
mayor
Robinson,
deputy
mayor,
Newman
house
and
council
members,
as
Mr
Mac.
You
mention
we're
here
this
evening
to
ask
the
council
to
initiate
updates
to
the
flood
plain
regulations
that
are
included
in
the
city's
land
use
code
in
February.
Fema
notified
the
city
about
recently
updated
funds
that
designate
they're
located
within
the
city
along
some
of
our
lakes
and
streams,
and
also
updates
to
regulations
that
are
part
of
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program.
I
The
next
slide
cities
and
counties
are
that
participated
in
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program
they're
required
to
update
the
local
regulations
by
August
19th
to
maintain
eligibility
with
within
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program.
So
we're
working
on
a
fairly
tight
fine
line
here
to
meet
the
state
and
federal
requirements,
and
so
because
of
that
short
period,
we
are
asking
that
the
council
find
achieve
a
finding
our
intro
finding
of
necessity
and
processing
with
the
City
Council.
I
Really
the
only
way,
I
think
we
can
make
it
to
that
August
19th
timeline,
given
the
steps
that
we'll
discuss
here
in
just
a
few
minutes.
So
for
the
specifics
on
the
amendments,
the
process
and
the
timeline
that
we
are
proposing
out
passed,
astute
risen
and
Nick.
Who
can
share
that
information?
Trishna
thanks.
J
Mike
good
evening,
mayor
that
good,
a
mayor,
councilmembers
and
city
manager
reaction
thanks
for
having
us
tonight
for
this
item,
I
want
to
begin
by
going
through
our
agenda
for
this
evening.
First,
we
will
be
giving
the
next
slide
please.
We
will
be
giving
a
brief
explanation
about
the
floodplains
regulatory
framework
and
then
we'll
talk
about
the
objectives
of
this
Luca
and
kind
of
expanding
on
with
Mike
just
mentioned
about.
J
J
So
this
Luca
is,
is
a
conformance
update
to
the
city's
frequently
flooded
areas,
regulations
just
to
provide
some
background
information
on
the
city's
regulations
into
land
use
code
under
the
land
use
code.
Frequently
flooded
areas
include
land
subject
to
100-year
flood,
which
in
other
words
lambda,
has
a
1%
or
more
chance
of
flooding
in
any
given
year,
and
also
areas
that
are
identified
on
the
countywide
flood
insurance
rate
maps
for
firms
in
the
flood
insurance
study
fi.
J
As
you
see,
you'll
see
these
kind
of
acronyms
repeated
throughout
our
presentation
tonight:
FEMA
periodically
updates
the
firm's
and,
if
I
ask,
and
the
last
update
was
in
1995,
the
purpose
of
floodplain
regulations
at
federal,
state
and
local
levels,
just
like
the
city's
land
use
code,
includes
making
sure
that
we
identify
and
delineate
those
areas
that
are
flood
prone.
Of
course,
this
is
to
make
sure
that
development
that
is
proposed
in
these
areas
follow
the
appropriate
standards
and
regulations.
J
J
So
we
want
to
show
you
a
map
of
the
city
with
the
frequently
flooded
areas
alienated
as
you
can
see.
Lake
Bellevue,
Larsen,
Lake,
phantom
Lake,
Lake,
Sammamish
and
most
streams
in
the
city
are
included.
Note
that
Lake
Washington
is
not
included
because
the
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
controls
the
lake
levels
to
less
than
two
feet
annually.
J
So
there
is
a
direct
relationship
between
the
city's
frequently
flooded
areas,
regulations
with
federal
flood
insurance
and,
as
such
I
want
to
provide
some
background
information
on
the
federal
Flood
Insurance
Program.
This
flood
insurance
program
is
called
the
National
Flood,
Insurance,
Program
or
NFIP
you'll
see
that
acronym
also
mentioned
how
to
add
this
presentation.
The
city
has
participated
in
the
NFIP
since
December
1st
1978,
so
it's
been
quite
a
number
of
years.
J
Participation
means
that
Bellevue
residents
and
businesses
can
obtain
the
NFIP
back
flood
insurance.
The
city
also
has
a
classified
rating
in
FEMA's,
community
rating
system
or
CRS.
This
is
a
system
of
between
9
and
1
class.
5
rating
equals
a
25
percent
discount
on
these
federally
backed
flood
insurance
in
terms
of
Kandahar.
This
rating
system
works
and
use
a
new
community
that
enters
into
the
program
starts
at
a
class
9
or
a
5
percent
discount,
and
as
that
community
engages
in
mitigation
activities,
its
rating
rises
in
five
percent.
J
Increments
mitigation
activities
include
public
information
efforts
such
as
outreach
of
providing
flood
maps
providing
educational
and
other
flood
related
information,
as
well
as
maintaining
flood
plain
Maps
and
corresponding
regulations
such
as
requiring
open
space
and
stormwater
provisions
or
performing
flood
preparedness
activities
like
levees
dams
or
having
an
early
morning
capability
in
Bellevue.
As
of
April
17th
of
this
year,
the
NFIP
has
paid
out
sixty
five
flood
claims
totaling
over
$900,000.
J
We
do
want
to
point
out,
though,
that,
because
Bellevue
has
had
an
effective
floodplain
management
and
regulations,
there
have
only
been
five
claims
that
are
of
substantial
amounts
since
1978
next
slide.
Please,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
FEMA
updates
the
countywide
flood
insurance,
Maps
and
flood
insurance
study
periodically
in
setting
the
communities,
eligibility
and
rating
for
the
NFIP
as
a
federally
backed
flood
insurance.
Fema
uses
the
flood
insurance
maps
and
displayed
insurance
study,
as
well
as
whether
the
community's
regulations
are
consistent
with
federal
and
state
standards.
J
This
is
the
relationship
between
FEMA
eligibility
and
rating
for
the
NFIP,
the
flood,
insurance,
Maps
and
flood
insurance
study,
and
then
the
communities
in
our
case
values
frequently
flooded
areas
regulation,
as
Mike
mentioned
at
the
outset,
in
February
FEMA
transmitted
to
the
city,
a
new
flood
insurance,
Maps
and
flood
insurance
study.
This
Luca
is
to
adopt
those
new
maps
and
study
and
conform.
The
city's
frequently
flooded
area
regulations
into
lanius
code
to
federal
and
state
standards.
J
J
K
You
good
evening,
council
members
I
will
be
going
over
the
proposed
amendments,
as
well
as
the
public
engagement
strategy
with
this
land
use
code
amendment
and
then
the
process
and
timeline.
So
the
city's
floodplain
management
regulations,
as
mentioned,
were,
are
located
in
2025
H
of
the
land
use
code.
That's
our
critical
areas
of
ordinance.
K
August
19
2020
staff
has
worked
closely
with
ecology
and
FEMA
to
ensure
that
the
amendments
comply
with
the
minimum
standards
of
the
model
ordinance
and
the
draft
amendments
to
the
floodplain
management
regulations
in
attachment
a
include
the
current
regulations
with
new
text
shown
and
underlined
and
then
removed
text
shown
with
the
strikethrough.
So
the
necessary
amendments
to
the
land
use
code
occur
in
four
different
topic
areas
and
I'll
briefly
run
through
those.
The
first
topic
area
relates
to
definitions.
K
The
definitions
are
revised
to
match
terms
that
are
now
used
in
the
frequently
flooded
areas:
development
standards
section
altogether.
There
are
12
new
definitions
and
six
existing
definitions
that
will
be
amended
for
clarity
and
consistency
with
FEMA
requirements.
The
next
category
is
with
the
building
performance
or
development
standards.
K
It's
important
to
note
that
existing
critical
areas
and
shoreline
management
regulations
were
in
conjunction
with
floodplain
management
regulations
to
require
protection
to
critical
areas,
mitigation
for
any
impacts,
and
then
minimization
of
the
potential
for
flood
damage,
oftentimes
setbacks
or
buffer
requirements
will
push
development
outside
of
the
flood
hazard
area,
but
in
the
event
that
development
must
occur
within
a
frequently
flooded
area.
These
performance
standards
would
continue
to
apply
and
they
would
require
new
development
activities
to
consider
environmental
impacts
and
provide
mitigation
measures
where
necessary
to
develop
in
a
responsible
manner.
K
The
amendments
to
the
performance
standards
require
that
new
development,
including
utilities
with
infrequently
flooded
areas,
be
flood
proof
in
order
to
minimize
risk
to
people
and
damage
to
property.
Amendments
to
the
section
reinforce
the
requirements
for
flood
proofing
measures
to
protect
natural
drainage
by
allowing
floodwaters
to
flow
in
their
natural
courses.
K
The
amendments
also
remove
texts
relating
to
legally
existing
development
from
the
floodplain
section.
Specifically,
the
land
use
code
does
have
a
provision
in
the
critical
area
section
that
applies
to
existing
legally
established
primary
structures
and
that
resides
in
2025
H,
and
this
would
this
provision
for
legally
established
existing
primary
structures
would
apply
to
development
in
frequently
flooded
area.
So
the
removal
of
this
text
is
to
avoid
duplication
and
to
comply
with
FEMA
requirements.
Next
slide,
please.
K
The
next
topic
area
relates
to
this,
the
variance
process.
So
when
a
project
is
unable
to
comply
with
certain
performance
standards,
the
city
has
a
variance
process
that
an
applicant
can
take
advantage
of
to
deviate
from
any
of
the
required
standards
under
current
code.
Certain
development
standards
would
be
able
to
be
modified
through
a
critical
areas.
K
So
the
amendments
are
going
to
include
additional
criteria
that
the
director
must
consider
when
deciding
whether
to
grant
a
variance
to
floodplain
regulations
in
the
next
topic
area
has
to
do
with
amendments
to
procedures.
So
this
is
the
last
set
of
amendments
they
relate
to
our
procedural
requirements,
including
a
new
section.
That's
created
in
the
land-use
code
for
required,
submit
all
documents
when
developing
in
a
frequently
flooded
area.
K
A
K
I
can
I
can
repeat
that
I
apologize,
so
the
the
last
set
of
amendments
that
were
proposing
here
has
to
it
relates
to
our
procedural
requirements.
So
we
are
creating
or
developing
a
new
subsection
that
pertains
to
submit
all
documents
and
the
Seminole
documents
would
be
what
the
director
determines
is
necessary
when
reviewing
development
in
a
frequently
flooded
area.
Many
of
the
items
that
we
are,
including
in
this
list,
are
required
by
FEMA,
but
they've
already
been
implemented
through
our
our
procedures.
K
Fema
also
requires
the
city
to
cite
the
applicable
enforcement
and
penalty
provisions
for
violations
of
the
floodplain
regulations,
so
this
is
included
in
the
amendments
as
well
as
a
new
subsection.
This
amendment
does
not
change
development
services
code,
compliance
procedures,
it
just
clarifies
which
which
enforcement
procedures
apply.
So
that
summarizes
the
four
topic
areas
at
their
core.
The
proposed
changes
in
these
four
areas
ensure
development
in
frequently
flooded
areas
is
designed
to
minimize
and
eliminate
and
eliminate
flood
damage
and
prevent
one
property
owner
from
increasing
flood
damage
to
their
neighbors.
K
The
changes
follow
standard,
floodplain
management
practices
and
are
consistent
with
federal
and
state
requirements
and,
if
approved,
the
amendments
would
also
maintain
the
city's
membership
in
the
NFIP,
which
will
continue
to
allow
our
residents
to
purchase
flood
insurance
next
slide.
Please,
with
this
land
use
code
amendment
we
are
proposing
three
modes
of
outreach.
So
the
purpose
of
the
Public
Engagement
is
to
inform
the
public
of
the
new
firms
that
will
take
effect
on
August
19
and
to
inform
them
of
the
amendments
to
the
land
use
code.
With
these
modes.
K
We
have
a
process
for
requirements
so
with
that
notification
in
the
city's
weekly
permit
bulletins
will
be
provided
both
for
the
notice
of
application
for
the
land
use
code
amendment
as
well
as
the
CEPA
notification,
and
then
we
would
also
provide
notification
of
the
upcoming
public
hearing.
The
next
mode
of
outreach
is
a
direct
mailer
to
all
properties,
with
either
a
structure
or
property
located
within
an
identified,
frequently
flooded
area.
K
So
we
did
send
out
a
courtesy
letter
to
inform
people
of
these
changes,
and
we
also
provided
a
link
in
that
letter
to
the
city
web
page,
where
move
into
our
next
outreach
mode,
which
is
the
online
presence.
So
so,
with
that
we've
launched
a
web
page
as
of
last
week,
which
includes
our
frequently
asked
questions.
We
have
the
project
status
and
timeline
on
there,
as
well
as
contact
information
for
public,
and
we
will
continue
to
update
this
webpage
as
the
Luca
progresses
next
slide,
please
so
the
Luca
process.
K
We
plan
to
meet
with
the
e
BCC
on
June
30th
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
land
use
code
amendment
and
then
we
plan
to
return
to
Council
for
a
public
hearing
in
July
and
then
return
to
the
e
BCC
on
August
4th
for
a
public
hearing
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
land
use
code
amendment
and,
as
mentioned
earlier,
failing
to
adopt
the
amendments
would
jeopardize
the
city's
enrollment
status
in
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program,
and
that
concludes
presentation
on
the
proposed
amendments.
Public
engagement
and
land
use
Code
process.
Next.
Ladies.
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
That
was
a
great
presentation.
We're
gonna
call
on
the
council
members
in
this
order:
council
member
Stokes,
followed
by
council
member
Robertson,
Barksdale
deputy
me,
our
new
in-house
council
members
on
council
member
Lee,
and
then
me
so,
let's
start
with
council
member
Stokes.
Oh.
D
D
F
F
Sure,
let
me
set
my
timer
so
that
I
alrighty,
so
a
couple
of
things.
One
is
I
think
that
we
need
to
set
up
a
website
with
the
map
and
the
study
and
the
draft
regulations,
because
I
don't
know,
I
haven't
seen
those
yet
they
weren't
part
of
our
packet
I,
don't
know
if
all
of
a
sudden
we're
adding
additional
properties
into
the
floodplain
I
know
it's
a
county
map,
but
those
people
need
to
be
notified
because
it
could
pretty
significant
impacts
on
their
ability
to
use
their
property
if
they
want
to
renovate
redevelop
cetera.
F
So
I
would
recommend
that
we
get
our
IT
people
to
quickly
do
a
website
so
that
we
can
finish
this
information
out
to
people.
Second
of
all,
I,
don't
know
how
many
residents
actually
have
the
federal
flood
insurance
or
if
they
mostly
have
private
insurance.
So
I
don't
know
how
big
of
a
threat
missing
the
deadline
really
I
know.
It
sounds
like
a
really
big
threat
that
maybe
it's
not
a
threat.
F
If
no
one
has
the
federally
backed
flood
insurance,
so
I'd
like
to
have
an
understanding
of
that
so
I'd
like
to
also
have
an
understanding
of
whether
the
Lake
Sammamish
floodplain
is,
is
raised
based
on
the
county's
failure
to
manage
the
outflow.
Well,
other
people
are
going
to
be
losing
more
of
their
property
as
a
result
of
the
new
floodplain
map
and
having
that
property
regulated
that
they
wouldn't
otherwise.
F
If
the
county
actually
managed
the
property
as
they
were
supposed
to
under
their
agreement
from
the
70s
with
the
Corps
of
engineering,
so
I
need
to
have
an
understanding
of
that.
I
also
need
to
have
an
understanding
of
how
this
impacts,
use
and
redevelopment
for
property
owners
and
how
it
impacts
people's
property
values
if
they're
not
able
to
use
it
as
they
were.
If
they
can't
replace
buildings
if
they
have
to
move
their
footprint
if
they
renovate
etc.
That's
gonna
impact
people's
property
values.
F
F
Although
the
process
piece
of
it
do
we
have
time
to
get
into
the
meat
of
it
if
we're
not
sending
it
to
the
Planning
Commission,
and
do
you
think
that
we
can
have
a
study
session
briefings
ahead
of
the
public
hearing,
so
I'm
I'm
at
almost
at
three
minutes?
So
if
staff
will
answer
that,
I
will
yield
my
time
after
their
answer.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
Yes,
so
we
have
been
working
as
Nick
mentioned,
we've
been
working
really
closely
with
both
Department
of
Ecology
as
well
as
FEMA.
We
have
asked
that
question
multiple
times
through
our
contacts
there
to
kind
of
check
again
with
the
as
councilmember
Robertson
mentioned,
with
the
covin
situation,
it's
been,
there's
been
some
complexities
and
difficulties,
and
the
answers
that
we've
been
given
is
that
no,
there
is
no
extension
that
is
planned
or
even
kind
of
on
the
table
at
this
point
in
time.
G
You,
mayor
I,
don't
have
any
specific
questions,
but,
as
liaison
to
the
plan,
Commissioner
would
be
interested
in
following
up
on
councilmember
Robertson's
questions
about
the
impact
on
land
use
code,
and
just
you
know,
as
well
as
upcoming
projects,
and
now
we
have
a
number
of
affordable
housing
projects
coming
up
or
topics
on
the
Planning
Commission
just
be
interested
in
how
that
might
affect
some
of
the
work
that
we're
gonna
be
doing.
That's
it.
L
There
we
go
now
I'm
in
muted,
yes,
well.
Thank
you.
I
want
to
appreciate
staff
for
being
so
responsive
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
process
to
meet
the
August
19th
for
the
land
use
code,
adoption
of
these
maps,
because,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we've
been
dealing
with
a
lot
of
things
of
it
and
many
other
items
so
to
the
degree
that
we
can
jump
on
this
and
walk
through.
There
are
a
lot
of
edits
in
the
land
use
code.
L
So
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
that
I
want
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
about
so
do
we
know
how
many
of
our
businesses
or
residents
actually
are
using
the
national
flood
insurance?
One
question
the
other
one
is
so
just
to
confirm
that
we
must
adopt
all
of
the
FEMA
and
do-e
provisions
in
order
for
the
flood
insurance
to
be
able
to
be
offered
Oh.
Is
that
correct?
And
then
on
the
procedural
side?
What
I
thought
I
heard
is
that
the
submittal
requirements
are
already
baked
into
our
process,
but
we
just
need
to
codify.
L
A
L
Maybe
that's
something
that
you
can
come
back
to
get
back
to
me
on,
because
I
think
it
does
go
to
the
question
about
right.
These
may
be
surprises
to
folks
whose
properties
are
gonna,
be
impacted.
So
do
we
even
understand
what
kind
of
it
is?
This
might
be
because
to
the
degree
that
the
National
Flood
Insurance
is
helpful
to
our
communities,
then
certainly
this
is
a
good
thing,
but
if
it's
creating
more
of
concerns,
we
would
want
to
understand
what
that
is
understood.
I
And
then
council
members,
on
your
other
questions
about,
do
we
need
to
adopt
at
all,
including
the
submittal
requirements
and-
and
so
we
have
been
working
with
and
handed
to,
Nick
and
Tricia,
with
the
Department
of
Ecology
and
representatives
from
FEMA
really
pushing
hard
to
make
it
cut
out.
There,
no
I'm
sorry
push
pushing
really
hard
to
make
sure
that
what
we
bring
forward
is
really
the
minimum
requirement
to
maintain
our
eligibility
for
the
National
Flood
Insurance
Program.
I
L
So
I
do
think
we
need
a
study
session
to
better
understand
because
I
also
read
in
there
about
enforcement
of
floodplain
regulations,
and
so
I
have
questions
about.
Is
that
us
is
that
the
state?
So
how
does
this
whole
thing
work?
So
I
don't
want
to
take
up
time
here
for
that
I
think
we
will
need
that
extra
time
to
understand.
Thank
you.
E
But
since
there's
no
indication
that
we
might
get
an
extension,
I
just
want
to
put
that
encouragement
that
we
continue
to
go
forward
as
much
as
we
can
and
make
it
up
through
that
study
session
or
briefings
or
whatever
else
we
need
to
do,
and
given
that
do,
we
have
a
back-up
plan
just
in
case
and
heaven
forbid.
We
have
a
second
wave
of
Kovan,
19
and
restricted
once
again
on
issues
that
we
can
take
action
on
before
august
19th.
E
J
So,
as
far
as
we
know,
the
the
consequence
is
kind
of
what
we
had
explained
earlier
is
that
we
would
the
city
would
lose
eligibility
in
that
insurance
program.
We,
you
know
this
again.
This
has
been
asked
by
a
number
of
other
communities
that
are
in
the
same
places
as
value
is
in
terms
of
how
to
make
this
happen
during
this
kind
of
current
time.
J
Okay,
some
of
the
communities
we
have
heard
have
elected
to
do
this
as
a
interim
official
control,
as
you
guys,
as
you
all
went
through
the
last
month,
we
we
are
able
to
do
that
in
a
much
more
quicker
pace
than
we
would
in
a
regular
Luca
where
we
have
to
follow
the
process
for
procedural
requirements.
So
some
of
our
counterparts,
other
communities,
are
doing
that
as
a
interim
official
control
to
be
able
to
meet
that
that
August
19th
deadline.
Okay,.
E
I
Think
this
is
really
just
for
natural
occurrences.
I,
don't
know
specifically
good
I,
think
other
insurance
homeowners
would
cover
if
you
have
a
pipe
that
breaks
in
your
house
or
the
city,
obviously
through
our
utilities
department.
If
it's
a
City
facility
would
deal
with
claims
for
damage
caused
by
a
failure
of
a
city
utility,
great.
M
M
M
The
owner's
ability
to
protect
I
think
we
need
to
be
a
little
bit
more
careful,
more
considerate,
how
what
kind
of
back-up
plan?
What
can
the
recourse
we
may
have
and
I
know
that
this
you
know
may
be
limited
I
think
it
was
as
generous.
How
many
people
are
potentially
affected?
I,
don't
know
is
a
big
big
population
or
it
isn't.
But
regardless
you
know,
when
it
happens,
it's
just
it's
a
great
impact
property
owners,
so
so
I
think
we
need
to
have
some
understanding
some
solution,
some
recourse.
M
If
we
are
tying
our
hands
by
writing
through
this.
What's
the
consequence
and
how
can
we
reduce
the
impact?
I
think
that's
the
main
question,
hopefully,
is
just
maintaining
eligibility.
Maybe
we
are
making
going
through
this
process
without
really
tying
our
hands
too
much
without
really
facing
the
negative
consequence
to
significantly
so
you
know
you
mentioned
in
the
beginning
of
the
presentation,
only
less
than
you
know
a
dozen
or
more
of
the
claim
that
has
been
made
during
the
last,
how
many
years
so,
maybe
is.
Maybe
it's
not
significant.
M
Maybe
it's
limited,
however,
in
the
to
our
fact,
it
still
would
be
significant,
so
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
to
have
us
understand
a
little
bit.
I,
don't
know
how
much
we
can
do
about
it,
but
at
least
I
think
we
can
consider
you
know.
What's
the
if
it's
significant,
what's
the
back-up
plan,
what's
the
recourse?
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
those
are
all
great
comments
and
we
just
had
it
one
question
about
the
public
process,
because
I
always
get
a
little
nervous
that,
for
whatever
reason
is,
and
especially
during
this
time,
that
things
are
so
unusual
that
people
don't
get
the
information
that
they
need.
So
having
put
out
all
the
information
that
you
have
so
far,
have
you
gotten
much
response
for
it
from
your
outreach.
K
So
so
far,
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
we've
received
have
to
do
with
people
just
generally
curious,
whether
or
not
they're
parcel
is
in
a
mapped
floodplain
property
owners
that
had
map
changes
to
their
parcels
were
notified
by
the
city
with
a
letter
in
2017,
and
they
were
also
invited
to
a
FEMA
map,
revision,
open
house
and
Kent,
which
was
hosted
by
FEMA,
and
that
was
during
the
firm
update
process.
So
I've
been
I,
guess
fielding
some
of
those
questions
by
reviewing
some
of
the
firm
maps
and
their
personal
information.
K
But
really
a
lot
of
the
questions
have
to
do
with
whether
or
not
they're
there
now
in
a
mapped
floodplain
or
if
that's
changed,
and
much
of
the
changes
to
the
firm's
we're
really
incorporating
prior
letters
of
map
amendments
because,
as
we
mentioned
earlier,
the
firm's
effective
date,
the
current
one
is
is
in
1995.
So
there
has
been
a
quite
a
few
studies
since
1995
that
are
now
going
to
be
incorporated
in
the
August
19
2020
firms.
A
A
Okay,
so
we've
heard
the
presentation
we've
given
a
lot
of
comments
and
gotten
answers
to
our
questions,
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
test
the
pulse
for
if
we
can
ask
staff
to
move
this
forward
toward
a
public
hearing,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
the
council
again
in
the
same
order
except
I'll
put
deputy
Mary,
where
you're
supposed
to
be
and
see
if
we
are
comfortable
with
option
1.
So
it's
it's
not
a
vote,
I'm,
just
getting
a
sense
since
I
can't
see
you
so
council
member
Stokes.
D
F
Okay
to
move
forward
so
long
as
it
can
happen,
oh
shoot.
Why
do
I?
If
someone
keep
muting
me
I
mean
that?
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
I
thought
someone
else
was
in
the
control
room
anyway.
Thank
you,
sir
main.
Wake
up
anyway.
I'm
fine
to
move
forward.
I
would
like
to
strongly
urge
us
to
have
a
study
session
on
this.
F
I
A
F
H
A
M
Have
to
do
this
so
I'm,
all
for
it
and
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
consider
what
you
suggested,
making
sure
we
know
who
are
affected,
how
they
gonna
be
affected
and
what
some
of
the
negative
impacts
and
if
we
have
some
ways
to
mitigate
that,
and
but
that
can
be
done
like
you
suggested
you
know
through
briefing
or
something.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
H
You,
mayor
and
councilmembers,
this
next
item
in
front
of
you
is
where
staff
are
seeking
direction
to
prepare
an
amendment
to
the
city's
code
as
it
relates
to
the
transportation
impact
fee
program,
and
the
purpose
of
the
amendments
are
to
really
reduce
the
temporary
financial
burn
on
developers,
as
well
as
reduce
the
administrative
burden
on
cityscape
tonight.
We
are
looking
for
direction
to
bring
this
back
at
a
future
meeting
depending
on
direction
from
depending
on
comments.
C
You
to
city
manager,
Miyake
mayor
mayor
Newhouse
and
members
of
the
City
Council
joining
me
tonight
is
Eric
Miller,
the
implementation
planning
manager
in
knowledge
on
said
about
the
review
manager
with
the
Transportation
Department
in
April
and
May
May
staff
individually
briefed
all
the
members
of
the
City
Council
about
this
topic.
Tonight
we
will
be
discussing
housekeeping
changes
and
transportation
to
impact
V
coordinates.
These
changes
are
intended
to
align
the
ordinance
with
current
practices.
No
changes
in
the
rates
are
proposed
this
time
tonight
we'll
go
through
the
presentation.
N
Good
evening
Council
can-can
I
am
I,
can
I
be
here
yes
good
evening
queue.
Thank
you,
and
this
slide
was
covered
by
both
the
mayor
and
the
director
single
akka.
So
next
slide,
please
at
a
high
clip
this.
This
is
we're
not
here
to
talk
about
any
kind
of
a
major
overhaul
to
the
city's
transportation
impact
fee
program.
We
are
only
really
minor
adjustments.
We
are
proposing
to
allow
deferred
fee
payment
for
two
development
types
and
we'll
talk
about
those
specifics
and
and
the
rest.
N
We
really
would
classify
as
more
of
the
housekeeping
or
clarifications
to
some
of
the
codes,
definitions
and
references
between
plan
plans
that
the
city
has
adopted
next
slide.
Please
here's
our
obviously
very
circular
project
process
timeline
and
while
we
have
been
developing
our
list
of
proposed
amendments
to
this
code,
section
for
well
over
a
year
now
really
the
formal
process.
Internally,
we
kicked
off
in
January.
We
did
hold
briefings
with
each
of
you,
council
members
in
May
in
April
and
May,
and
we
have
been
going
through
our
stakeholder
outreach
process
back
in
May.
N
We
did
hold
a
briefing
with
the
Chamber
of
Commerce
and
their
permitting
and
land
use
committee.
We
invited
all
permittees
within
the
city
for
commercial
and
major
multi-family
residential
developments
over
the
last
three
years
and
and
held
up
briefing
on
remotely,
of
course,
with
those
folks
and-
and
we
happen
to
have
a
presentation
with
the
Bellevue
Town
town
association
or
one
of
their
committees
actually,
tomorrow
and
so
far,
we
have
had
absolutely
no
specific
opposition
to
these
code
amendments.
N
N
There
we
go
this
and
the
next
slide.
We
will
really
cut
this
kind
of
meat
of
the
proposal.
Well,
I
will
jump
in
on
the
first
of
these
impact
fee
or
improvement
processes,
and
then
it
will
pass
it
off
to
tamale
and
she
will
return
it
to
me
for
the
wrap-up,
but
the
first
bullet
here
there
sub-bullet,
apply,
refund
and
reimbursement.
N
Cap
really
refers
to
the
fact
that
our
current
code
currently
requires
a
reimbursement
of
the
percentage
of
the
value
of
land,
that's
dedicated
to
the
city
or
construction
that
ik
developer
conducts,
but
both
of
these
really
only
apply
to
an
impact
fee
project
which
I'll
mention
a
little
bit
more
about
this
later.
But
those
are
the
roadway
capacity
projects
that
are
specified
as
impact
view
projects
within
the
city's
transportation
facilities
plan.
The
current
code
requires
this.
N
This
is
requirement,
is
not
a
requirement
of
state
law
and
there
in
the
Revised
Code
of
Washington
and
in
our
research
on
this
topic,
no
other
city
in
the
state
reimburses
beyond
the
value
of
the
fee.
So
that's
what
the
cap
refers
to
is
we
would
cap
the
refund
or
the
credit
to
a
development
at
the
amount
of
the
impact
fee.
N
They
owe
and
not
go
beyond
that
to
to
pay
them
back,
and
this
is
something
that's
typical
of
all
development
within
the
city
if
their
development
is
required
to
dedicate
for
frontage
improvements
or
construct
those
front
of
the
improvements
there,
they
are
not
given
any
tour
any
reimbursement
from
the
city.
There's
only
applies
again
if
it's
an
impact
fee
project
and
that's
that's
the
proposed
change
and
it
will
we'll
stop
for
questions
at
the
end,
so
I'm
going
to
pass
that
to
tamale
at
this
point.
For
the
next
couple
of
bullets,.
O
However,
usually
the
tenants
haven't
been
picked
and
we
don't
know
exactly
what
the
uses
are
going
to
be
for
a
year,
maybe
even
two
years
after
that,
so
we're
guessing
what
the
tenants
will
be
and
holding
onto
money
and
then
we
get
into
where
sometimes
we
have
to
collect
extra
money
depending
on
what
the
tenant
is
or
we
have
to
give
a
refund.
So
that
process
doesn't
work
very
well.
O
Collection
is
for
affordable
housing
developments,
affordable
housing
units,
either
individual
units
or
full
developments
are
eligible
for
an
exemption.
However,
in
order
to
receive
the
exemption,
then
we
need
to
complete
some
paperwork
that
doesn't
get
done
until
towards
the
end
of
close
to
when
the
units
are
ready
for
occupancy.
So
what
we
would
like
to
change
here
is
to
allow
if
the
paperwork
is
submitted
and
executed,
is
to
allow
us
to
then
defer
these
fees
to
give
til
the
certificate
of
occupancy,
to
give
the
applicant
time
to
complete
the
paperwork
and
record
the
paperwork.
O
Otherwise,
what
we
end
up
doing
is
we
take
the
money
for
the
affordable
housing
developments
or
units
we
hold
on
to
it,
and
then
we
refund
it,
which
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
So
this
makes
more
sense
both
for
the
city
and
for
the
applicant
we
aren't
holding
on
to
their
money
when
we're
gonna
give
it
back
anyway,
and
then
I
have
to
go
to
the
next
slide.
O
O
So
that's
something
that
we
need
to
go
ahead
and
put
into
the
code,
because
that's
the
way
we
do
the
process,
the
these
are
collected
on
net
new
tricks
because
we
update
our
modeling
every
couple
of
years.
The
new
trips
are
trips
that
are
in
the
system
within
about
two
years
of
when
we
look
at
the
the
uses
so
there's
a.
We
have
also
included
a
limit
that
the
use
needs
to
be
in
place
within
two
years
of
when
the
land
use
application
comes
in.
This
is
one
that
we
did
get
a
question
on.
O
O
The
other
thing
we
want
to
clarify
was
kind
of
how
fees
are
calculated,
because
we
have
a
prescriptive
system
right
now.
It
states
that
the
first
thing
we
do
is
look
for
another
fee.
That's
similar!
That's
on
the
list.
That's
not
really
consistent
with
the
standard
methodology
used
in
trip
generation
development.
So
we
want
to
change
that
instead
to
looking
at
the
IT
trip
generation
manual
or
other
accepted
methodology,
Eric
you
want
to
do
the
next
one
Thank
You
Molly.
N
Yeah
now
we're
really
into
the
the
clarification
section
and
there's
numerous
definitions
in
the
impact
fee
code
and
in
references
to
other
plans.
For
example,
the
the
state
law
and
an
hour
code
indicates
that
the
in
transportation
impact
fee
program
is
based
upon
the
Capitol
facilities
plan,
which
is
an
element
of
our
comprehensive
plan.
N
N
Mentioned
that
we
are
continuing
our
outreach
with
a
with
a
Bobby
downtown
Association
committee
tomorrow,
we've
been
working
with
staff
at
the
BDA
for
some
time
to
get
this
scheduled
and
just
didn't
work
out
until
unfortunately,
right
after
the
the
council
study
session
tonight
staff,
we
will
be
certain
to
relay
any
any
significant
messaging
that
we
hear
from
the
BDA
back
to
council.
After
that
briefing
tomorrow,
we
would
come
back
at
council
direction
for
the
review
and
adoption
of
the
code
amendments
and
and
tentatively
those
could
be
effective,
for
example,
on
September
1st
next
slide.
N
Please
and
just
to
recap
the
direction
and
we're
seeking
is
to
have
staff
come
back
with
that,
with
an
ordinance
to
to
put
these
amendments
into
the
into
the
code
and
I
think
the
last
slide
is
really
just
kind
of
a
recap
of
the
topics
that
can
be
up
on
the
screen
in
case
there's
a
council
member
questions.
Thank
you.
N
A
M
N
And
this
is
actually
fairly
rare.
We've
looked
back
approximately
over
the
last
10
years
and
there's
only
been
two
examples
of
where
this
has
occurred,
but,
for
example,
and
I'll
use
the
the
big
example
that
we
we've
had
fairly
recently
was
that
a
development,
namely
the
spring
district,
was
conditioned
to
dedicate
the
right-of-way
for
spring
Boulevard
to
the
to
the
city.
Now
the
impact
fee
code
requires
that
and
because
spring
boulevard
is
also
an
impact
fee
project
designated
in
the
transportation
facilities
plan.
N
The
the
developments
current
impact
fee
code
requires
that
both
that,
after
the
amount
of
the
fee
that
they
owe
is,
is
refund
or
credited
back
to
the
developer
that
the
city
has
to
additionally
pay
a
proportion
of
the
value
of
that
right-of-way
dedication
back
to
the
developer
and
again,
if
this
was
not
an
impact
fee
project
that
would
but
the
developer
was
required
to
make
this
dedication
and
it
would
there
would
be
no
required
reimbursement.
So
it
really
only
applies
when
it's
a
development
adjacent
to
or
around
an
impact
fee
project.
M
N
M
L
Yes,
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
the
continued
outreach
to
understand
the
nuances
and
those
details
and
really
the
unintended
consequences
of
some
of
our
codes
and
how
they
all
fit
together.
So
from
reading
the
list
it
looks
like
these
are
mostly
housekeeping
items
of
our
code,
clean
up
to
remove
inefficiencies
and
streamline
process
and
I
did
hear
directly
from
imagine
housing
some
of
the
concerns
they
had
about
collecting
upfront
fees
and
then
getting
refunded
because
of
their
own
paperwork
process.
L
So
I
appreciate
that
separating
the
corn
shell
from
the
TI
I
think,
makes
a
lot
of
sense
as
well.
My
question
is
this:
when
we,
when
you
were
talking
about
you,
know
clarifying
definitions,
when
vesting
happens,
are
we
expecting
that
these
changes
will
actually
reduce
the
time
to
deliver
on
these
development
projects?.
O
Actually
I,
they
shouldn't
make
much
difference
in
the
time
to
deliver.
It
will
make
it
easier
and
there's
fewer
steps,
so
it'll
be
it'll,
be
it'll
impact
the
time
to
deliver
the
impact
fee
notification
and
get
the
fees
posted
and
it'll
save
time
at
the
end,
if
we're
not
doing
refunds
and
recalculations
okay.
L
So
more
of
the
administrative
function
of
our
own
piece
than
anything
the
folks
outside
of
City
Hall
might
see.
So
then
it's
our
own
internal
efficiencies
of
our
own
staff,
who've
not
having
to
do
all
this
administrative
and
and
then
it's
more
of
than
development
not
having
to
to
really
front
upfront
fees
which
then
has
to
be
refunded.
At
the
end,
I
was
just
trying
to
understand
that
yeah.
L
F
Thank
you,
yeah
no
I
think
these
are
great.
I
am
very,
very
supportive
of
this.
These
are
generally
a
win
for
the
developer
and
for
affordable
housing,
the
only
because
of
the
timing,
considerations,
etc.
It's
also
a
win
for
the
city
if
we
don't
have
to
hold
money
that
were
ultimately
giving
back,
because
that's
there's
an
administrative
cost
to
holding
it
and
paying
the
interest
back,
etc.
F
So
if
these
were
in
in
order
ready
to
dodge,
not
I'd,
be
ready
to
adopt
them
and
I
would
say
that
on
the
impact
fee,
credit
I
actually
raised
that,
because,
for
in
my
day
job
we
had
a
developer
say:
are
you
going
to
cut
us
a
check
for
the
overage
Bellevue
does
not
knowing
that
I
was
related.
I
said
what
Bellevue
does?
No
one.
Does
that
so
I'm
really
glad
they're
bringing
ourselves
into
the
line
where
we're
not
having
to
cut
checks
to
developers
for
doing
projects
that
are
necessary
for
their
development.
F
I
think
that
that's
very
appropriate
and
I
and
the
wins
for
developers
in
this
are
more
than
offset
about
that
promote
issue
which
won't
apply
to
most
people
anyway.
So
my
question
is
only
whether
the
council
would
like
to
see
this
come
back
on
consent,
because
I
am
very
happy
to
have
this
just
come
back
on
consent.
F
G
E
You
mayor
yeah,
great
job,
great
presentation,
for
all
the
reasons
already
mentioned
by
my
colleagues.
You
know
unless
we
hear
any
other
substantial
stakeholder
feedback,
as
mentioned
about
the
BDA,
for
example,
happy
to
move
this
forward
and
get
this
on
a
regular
session
and
move
this
legislation
forward.
A
A
A
You
okay,
so
we
are
down
to
ratifying
a
resolution,
and
this
was
I
think
the
last
curfew
that
we
needed
to
enact
and
that
curfew
was
enacted
due
to
available
intelligence,
that
there
was
a
credible
threat
to
Bellevue
at
that
time
for
violence
and
it
was
enacted
knowing
that
we
could
terminate
it
at
any
time
when
that
threat
was
gone.
And
indeed,
although
we
voted
in
a
three-day
curfew,
we
were
enabled
we
were
able
to
terminate
it
after
one
day,
because
there
was
no
longer
a
credible
threat.
So
this
is
an
opportunity
to
ratify
resolution.
A
Nine
seven,
six,
six
and
I
am
going
to
assume
that
everybody
is
comfortable
with
just
ratifying
this,
but
I
don't
I
hate
to
make
any
assumption.
So
maybe
we
could
open
the
mic,
and
if
anybody
has
a
problem
with
ratifying
this
or
a
comment
or
question,
feel
free
to
speak
up
right
now
and
then
hearing
none
I
will
ask
for
a
motion
from
our
deputy
mayor
happy.