►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - March 8, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
E
F
D
C
So
this
is
women's
history
month
and
I'm
going
to
read
a
proclamation.
C
Women's
history
month
celebrates
the
vital
contributions
of
women
to
our
society
and,
whereas
women's
history
month
began
as
women's
history
week
in
1981,
when
congress
authorized
and
requested
the
week,
beginning
march,
7th
1982
and
whereas
american
women
of
every
race,
class
and
ethnic
background
have
made
historic
impacts
to
the
growth
and
strength
of
our
nation,
state
and
local
communities
in
countless
recorded
and
unrecorded
ways.
C
And
whereas
american
women
have
been
leaders
not
only
in
securing
their
own
rights
as
suffrage
and
equal
opportunity,
but
also
in
the
abolitionist
movement
for
advanced
demands
of
emancipation,
movement,
the
industrial
labor
movement,
the
civil
rights
movement
and
other
movements,
including
the
peace
movement
which
strives
to
create
a
more
fair
and
just
society
for
all.
And
whereas
we
must
reflect
on
the
significant
and
unequal
burdens.
C
Now,
therefore,
I
lynne
robinson
mayor
of
the
city
of
bellevue
washington
and
on
behalf
of
its
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
march
as
women's
history
month
and
call
upon
all
bellevue
residents
to
observe
this
month
and
to
celebrate
international
women's
day
on
march
8
2021
with
appropriate
programs,
ceremonies
and
activities
deputy
mayor
newton
house.
Would
you
please
lead
us
in
the
flag
salute.
G
G
H
C
D
B
B
I
am
dick
thompson.
I
reside
at
3115
103rd
avenue
northeast
in
northwest
bellevue.
My
comments
pertain
to
the
content
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
Implementation,
update
that
you
will
be
hearing
tonight,
specifically
discussions
and
strategies
b,
1
and
b
2
that
affect
our
neighborhoods
b-1.
Discussions
include
reducing
requirements
for
off-street
parking
in
areas
served
by
public
transportation.
B
This,
I
believe,
is
not
appropriate
in
many
neighborhoods,
certainly
not
in
northwest
bellevue
for
safety
reasons
in
northwest
bellevue
north
of
northeast
24th
street.
There
is
only
one
street
that
has
sidewalks
and
that
is
bellevue
way
northeast
everywhere
else,
east
and
west
of
bellevue
way.
Roads
are
curvy
and
undulating
all
with
visibility
challenges.
B
B
B
B
Detached
adus
will
make
this
worse.
Another
update
being
proposed
is
removing
current
requirements
that
the
property
owner
live
on
site.
It
is
not
a
myth
that
rental
properties
with
absent
landlords
can
be
poorly
maintained.
This
occurred
at
a
home
with
an
adu
in
my
neighborhood
just
two
years
ago.
This
certainly
degraded
the
character
of
our
neighborhood.
B
Fortunately,
the
strategy,
the
strategy
documents
themselves,
restrict
the
implementation
of
these
proposals
to
self-selected
neighborhoods,
and
I
sincerely
hope
that
this
will
allow
the
incorporation
of
neighborhood
preferences
in
the
current
great
neighborhoods
activity
prohibiting
some
of
these
policies
in
our
neighborhoods.
Thank
you
very
much
for
listening.
I
I
have
an
issue
about
appointment
of
good
neighbor
committee
members,
not
in
opposition
to
anyone,
but
about
process.
I
followed
process
which
created
the
requirement
for
this
group
and
discussion
about
its
purpose
and
composition.
I
have
closely
followed
the
issue
of
homeless
services
in
this
area
and
their
impact
on
surrounding
neighbors
for
15
years.
I
have
considerable
lived
experience
and
have
spoken
to
many
residents
of
these
shelters
about
their
experiences.
I
Along
with
other
neighbors
and
volunteers,
I
tried
to
improve
safety
and
security
procedures
to
benefit
both
residents
and
surrounding
neighbors
and
businesses,
but
to
do
that
effectively,
neighbors
have
to
be
listened
to.
They
particularly
need
to
be
in
processes
where
decisions
affecting
them
are
being
made.
There
has
been
a
pattern
of
difficulty
making
that
happen.
Unfortunately,
this
has
been
an
example
of
that
pattern.
I
There
are
two
g,
a
members
to
be
appointed
by
council,
to
represent
bellevue
citizens
at
large,
those
not
directly
by
the
site,
but
still
potentially
impacted.
I
watched
cob's
website
under
homelessness,
tracked
weekly,
permit
bulletins,
neighborhood
and
bellevue
news,
etc.
Finally,
I
contacted
staff
after
nothing
showed
up,
but
a
permit.
Things
were
then
put
on
the
website,
but
nothing
about
process
for
these
gna
appointments
appeared.
I
attended
both
zoom
public
meetings
at
the
first
staff
mentioned
composition
of
the
gna
and
that
those
interested
in
the
close-in
neighborhood
positions
should
contact
them.
I
No
mention
of
a
contact
for
the
at-large
positions
was
made
after
watching
and
waiting
at
the
next
meeting.
I
specifically
asked
why
and
was
told
staff
was
not
handling
that
not
even
to
gather
names
or
keep
a
list
of
those
interested
staff
said.
The
committee
would
stand
up
at
the
end
of
february
and
that
public
process
on
at-large
members
would
be
at
council
meetings.
I
I
watched
agendas
nada
now.
It
finally
appears
as
names
chosen
to
be
voted
on.
Does
the
council
consider
this
to
be
the
outreach
and
open
transparent
public
process?
We
keep
hearing
that
we
will
get.
I
don't,
nor
will
others.
It
concerns
me
greatly
that
the
staff
does
open
positions
on
boards
commissions
or
other
groups
are
usually
publicized
by
numerous
methods.
I
D
D
F
F
I
have
been
chosen
to
be
on
the
gna
and
feel
that
I
will
add
a
lot
of
value,
but
I
do
have
great
concern
over
the
overall
makeup
of
the
gna,
which
has
really
been
under
the
radar.
It
doesn't
feel
like
it's
been
a
transparent
process
and
you
know
in
all
honesty,
I
actually
have
very
little
faith
that
the
gna
is
going
to
accomplish
anything.
F
You
know
outlining
what
we're
going
to
do
and
I
appreciate
everybody's
busy,
but
I've
also
been
I've
been
involved,
not
as
long
as
karen,
but
I've
been
involved
for
the
last
few
years.
My
hope
moving
forward
was
that
my
involvement
would
help
keep
everybody.
F
On
task
accountable,
you
know,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
that's
what's
really
happening,
so
I
am
participating
because
I
feel
it's
an
obligation,
but
I
go
into
this
with
great
trepidation
and
not
a
lot
of
confidence.
Thank
you
very
much.
D
D
C
Great
okay
welcome
council
member
stokes.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar.
C
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
we
have
two
study
session
items
tonight,
mr
miyaki,
would
you
like
to
introduce
these?
Yes
thank.
J
You
mayor,
council
members,
the
two
items
on
your
agenda
study
session
agenda
are
related
to
housing.
J
J
this
evening.
No
action,
formal
action
has
been
required.
It
is
an
informational
briefing
and
it
also
provides
an
opportunity
for
the
council
to
ask
questions
to
provide
comments.
Joining
us.
This
evening
is
emil
king
assistant,
director
and
tara
johnson,
comprehensive
planning
manager
both
from
the
community
development
department.
With
that
I'll
hand,
it
off
to
you
email.
A
Thank
you
for
the
introduction
city
manager.
Tara.
Could
you
please
go
to
the
next
slide
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
members
of
council
tonight,
staff
from
the
community
development
department
will
provide
an
update
on
the
affordable
housing
strategy
implementation.
As
the
city
manager
noted.
No
action
is
requested
from
council
tonight.
A
While
we're
making
good
progress
as
you're
here
tonight
and
delivering
results,
we
acknowledge
there's
more
work
to
do
in
the
future.
We
look
forward
to
providing
you
with
this
progress
report
tonight
in
the
coming
weeks,
we'll
be
returning
to
brief
council
on
the
details
of
individual
initiatives
that
are
in
process.
Such
as
the
mft
update,
before
I
hand
it
off
to
tara,
I
would
like
department,
director
matt
cummins,
to
offer
a
few
introductory
comments
as
well.
K
K
As
the
council's
aware,
there
are
a
number
of
ongoing
initiatives
and
when
we
first
started
talking
to
you
all
about
doing
a
more
regular,
affordable
housing
update,
the
intent
of
tonight's
presentation,
as
assistant
director
king
was
just
mentioning,
is
to
talk
about
the
summation
of
all
of
those
different
efforts
and
kind
of
how
they
all
fit
together.
K
When
there's
big
initiatives,
they
come
separately
to
the
council.
So,
for
example,
next
week
you'll
be
taking
up
the
mfte
program,
which
is
identified
as
a
strategy
within
the
affordable
housing
program,
but
we
won't
have
an
in-depth
discussion
on
mfte,
we'll
simply
show
its
its
progress
tonight
and
explain
how
it
fits
together
with
the
creation
of
new,
affordable
housing.
K
As
we
get
into
some
of
this
a
couple
of
things.
There
are
a
number
of
other
dialogues
going
on
out
in
the
community
relating
to
the
jobs,
housing
imbalance.
K
We've
talked
a
little
bit
through
our
economic
development
plan,
update
efforts
and
the
needs
of
housing
overall,
but
particularly
affordability
and
housing
to
our
companies,
and
they
are
beginning
to
participate
more
and
so
we're
having
dialogues
with
them
about
public,
private
joint
ventures
and
funding
streams
and
other
things
that
they
want
to
help
participate
in
here.
K
So
I
think
from
from
our
standpoint,
we
wanted
you
to
know
that
affordable
housing
is
a
topic
that
is
covering
multiple
service
lines
at
the
city,
really
across
several
different
departments,
but
particularly
through
community
development,
in
the
economic
development
and
planning
arenas,
and
when
emil
jumps
back
on
he's,
also
going
to
walk
you
through
what
has
been
going
on
at
the
regional
level
because,
as
we
get
set
up
for
our
next
major
comprehensive
plan
update,
there
are
a
host
of
things
that
we'll
be
doing
around
the
affordable
housing
front
and
I'll
just
say.
K
Overall,
study
of
housing
and
how
it's
being
provided
in
the
community
so
just
know
that.
There's
a
lot
of
efforts
coming
relating
to
housing,
some
of
which
were
part
of
the
2017
plan
and
some
of
which
are
just
part
of
the
community
development
department
work
program.
So
we're
happy
to
answer
questions
and
talk
about
those
as
well
so
I'll
hand
it
back
to
assistant
director
king
and
take
it
from
there.
Yeah.
A
Thank
you
mac
for
that
introduction,
tara.
Why
don't
you
continue
on
with
the
slides
and
take
it
from
here?
Thank
you.
L
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
members
of
the
council,
members
of
the
public
and
staff
that
are
present
this
evening.
I'm
going
to
be
walking
you
through
some
of
the
aspects
in
providing
an
update
on
the
affordable
housing
strategy
as
part
of
our
discussion
and
update
this
evening,
just
a
little
bit
of
background
to
ground
you,
I
know
you're
all
very
familiar
with
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
L
We'll
also
provide,
as
part
of
our
presentation
and
update
on
the
progress
that
we've
achieved
through
several
of
the
actions
that
are
within
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
We'll
provide
an
overview
of
some
of
the
effectiveness
of
the
different
actions
within
the
strategy
and
then
how
we
intend
to
implement
some
of
these
actions,
some
of
which
we've
already
achieved
progress,
some
of
which
are
ongoing
efforts
that
both
mac
and
emil
have
talked
about
mfte
and
c1.
L
L
In
a
little
more
than
three
years
since
its
adoption
of
the
2017
strategy,
we've
seen
some
significant
progress
on
several
fronts,
relating
to
incentives
that
have
been
adopted,
both
in
east
gate
and
downtown,
which
have
been
utilized
to
a
fair
extent,
action
to
improve
and
extend
the
mfte
program,
which
council
initiated
a
second
evaluation
last
october,
which
will
be
coming
to
council
shortly
at
your
next
council
meeting.
L
In
fact,
we've
also
seen
delivery
of
affordable
housing
units
increase
over
averages
prior
to
adoption
of
the
strategy
from
about
50
to
80
units
a
year
to
now
we're
looking
at
nearly
an
average
of
400
units
per
year.
L
However,
staff
does
acknowledge
that
while
we
have
seen
a
significant
amount
of
success,
we
do
acknowledge
that
it
is
going
to
take.
You
know
a
fair
amount
of
ongoing
work
and
commitment
with
various
strategies
and
and
policy
initiatives
that
we
have
ongoing
to
to
meet
our
goal
of
2500
units
over
the
next
10
years.
L
L
We
have
an
ongoing
list
that
we
monitor,
and
these
are
just
grouped
by
different
types
of
actions
relating
to
ranging
from
preservation
to
adus
that
have
been
developed
from
2017
to
2020
other
opportunities
like
direct
subsidy,
as
well
as
some
of
our
market
incentives
like
mfte,
which
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
in
a
in
a
week
as
well
as
other
incentives
within
the
downtown
and
bel
red
sub
areas.
L
In
addition,
we
also
have
a
total
of
740
units
over
700
units
that
we're
anticipating
will
come
online
as
the
years
progress
between
2020
and
2022,
between
additional
incentives
incentive
units
within
the
bel
red
and
downtown
sub
area.
We
also
have
some
mfte
projects
that
are
coming
online,
that
we
are
anticipating,
we'll
see
more
affordable
units
through
that
avenue.
L
L
Transit
included
in
your
council
packet
as
attachment
a
we
provided,
provided
this
table,
which
essentially
goes
through
and
lists
the
different
actions
grouped
by
and
then
the
number
of
units
achieved
under
each
of
the
actions,
and
this
is
how
we
have
been
monitoring
it.
This
is
the
format
you
would
have
seen
previously
and
then
we
we
intend
to
continue
monitoring
by
each
of
these
actions
to
assess
how
successful
each
of
these
different
actions
have
been,
and
then
what
more
we
can
do
in
terms
of
achieving
additional
units.
L
I
would
like
to
point
out
a
highlight
a
few
things
of
note
to
city
council.
We've
had
we've
seen
measurable
success,
so
market
incentives
like
mfte
and
density
bonuses,
have
achieved
about
173
units
over
the
last
three
years
in
strategies
relating
to
an
actions
relating
to
housing
preservation.
L
That's
really
something
that
we've
achieved
a
significant
amount
of
success,
so
we've
achieved
642
units
there
and
then
through
direct
subsidy.
L
I
did
want
to
walk
counsel
as
well
through
some
of
the
different
implementation
efforts
that
are
that
are
undergoing
that
are
underway
rather
and,
as
we've
talked
about
previously,
we
have
we've
made
significant
success
under
action
a1,
which
relates
to
preservation
of
existing,
affordable
housing.
Of
course,
this
is
going
to
be
something
that's
ongoing,
something
we
work
with
king
county
housing
authority
to
look
for
opportunities
for
existing
preservation.
L
We
also
have
looked
at
different
types
of
incentives,
so
the
mfte
extension
we're
evaluating
that
under
action,
c3
that
will
come
to
city
council,
as
I
said
next
monday
for
your
first
study
session,
where
we're
going
to
be
evaluating
and
and
looking
for
opportunities
where
we
can
expand
the
program
and
make
it
even
more
successful
than
than
it
has
been.
L
We
already
have
incentives
under
action
c4
within
our
downtown
and
east
gate.
We
have
existing
code
provisions
that
allow
density
bonuses
for
affordable
housing
provision
and
those
have
been
utilized
by
the
development
community
as
well.
L
Action
d2
relates
to
changes
in
state
law,
around
condo
provisions
and
caddo
legislation,
and
that's
something
council
has
already
seen
some
success
with.
We
recently
bought
a
luca
before
city
council
for
adoption
and
city
council
recently
approved
code
provisions
to
allow
for
unit
lot
subdivisions
to
remove
some
of
the
existing
barriers
to
townhome
development.
L
We're
going
to
be
talking
shortly
about
1590,
which
council
recently
passed
that
state
law
provision
and,
of
course,
council's
going
to
be
very
involved
with
with
development
of
that
program
and
how
that
gets
implemented
over
the
next
few
years
and
then
also
authorization
of
funds
which
we're
estimating
is
about
625
000
per
year
and
a
house
bill
1407.
Oh
sorry,
sorry
1406.!
L
In
addition,
mac
spoke
to
this
in
his
introductory
comments,
we're
also
working
with
pursuing
partnerships
with
amazon
and
microsoft.
Looking
for
opportunities
for
additional,
affordable
housing
development,
we've
also
had
several
conversations
with
them
relative
to
our
work
on
mfte
c1.
L
We
have
city
council
as
part
of
the
c1
initiatives.
We
we
pa.
We
had
a
specific
policy
around
a
demonstration
program
so
that
those
are
all
provisions
that
we
our
success,
that
we've
already
seen
adopted
by
city
council.
L
This
next
table
provides.
I
know
it's
there's
a
lot
of
information
on
this
on
this
slide,
but
essentially
it
gives
gives
city
council
a
screenshot
or
just
a
one.
One
time
glance
at
all
our
different
21
actions
and
the
timelines
that
we're
looking
at
so
as
you
can
see
from
from
this
chart,
you'll
see
that
some
of
some
of
the
actions
have
already
been
implemented.
L
So
far,
a
lot
are
still
undergoing
and
we're
looking
at
a
substantive
body
of
work
in
late
20,
starting
in
late
2020,
going
all
the
way
out
to
the
end
of
2021,
where
we're
going
to
be
working
on
things
like
the
wilbert
and
lucca,
the
east
main
loca,
some
of
the
townhouse
town
home
provisions.
That's
something
that
council
has
recently
approved
the
adu
provisions.
L
That's
something
that
is
both
ongoing
as
well
as
council
has
touched
already,
with
removing
some
of
the
barriers
to
the
to
the
existing
regulations
in
terms
of
the
three-year
rule,
but
there's
also
ongoing
conversations
as
part
of
the
great
neighborhoods
work.
We're
also
actively
participating
in
monitoring
different
bills
that
are
going
through
the
state
legislature.
L
At
this
point,
ranging
from
changes
to
mfte
law
to
some
clarifications
within
the
1590
provisions,
as
well
as
adu
provisions,
in
addition,
there's
also
legislation,
that's
being
considered
by
the
state
relative
to
gma
and
housing-related
actions,
which,
of
course,
all
of
that
ties
would
tie
into
our
periodic
comprehensive
plan,
update
and
really
inform
a
lot
of
those
policies
as
we
move
forward
with
that
whole
process.
L
I
did
want
to
highlight,
as
we
look
at
some
ongoing
work,
which
we'll
be
talking
about
shortly.
I
did
want
to
highlight
a
couple
actions,
and
I've
already
talked
briefly
about
them.
That
recently
came
to
city
council
in
february
for
for
final
action
under
action.
B2
city
council
recently
approved
the
luca
to
amend
the
adu
three-year
provision.
L
L
In
terms
of
ongoing
ongoing
initiatives,
as
as
we've
talked
about
previously,
there
are
a
number
of
initiatives
that
we're
currently
working
on
and
there'll,
be
others,
of
course,
that
come
that
come
online
too,
as
as
the
months
progress
currently
we're
working
on
developing
specific
code
provisions
relative
to
action,
c1,
which
city
council
adopted,
adopted
three
comprehensive
plan
policies
in
support
of
this
work,
and
this
we
anticipate
this
will
come
before
city
council
in
the
second
quarter
of
this
year.
L
As
you
know,
city
council
recently
has
been
involved
with
some
of
those
conversations.
There's
been
more
progress
on
the
development
agreement
and
agreements
working
with
sound
transit,
we're
going
to
be
bringing
the
mfte
expansion
program
and
evaluation
to
you
next
week
under
action,
c4
staff
is
currently
working
on
east
main
code
provisions,
which
will
include
affordable
housing
incentives
and
then
in
the
next
next
month.
L
So
to
conclude,
as
we've
as
we've
indicated,
we've
we've
seen
measurable
success
with
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
the
overall
goal
of
achieving
2500
units.
Over
the
next
10
years,
we've
learned
the
importance
of
implementing
a
variety
of
strategies
and
working
to
achieve
additional,
affordable
housing
from
a
variety
of
mechanisms
ranging
from
density,
bonus,
incentives
to
preservation
to
direct
subsidy
and
really
looking
at
this
mix
of
different
opportunities.
L
In
addition,
we're
also
working
both
on
a
state
level,
as
well
as
a
regional
level,
to
evaluate
public
policy
relating
to
federal
housing
and
seeing
how
that
translates
to
our
specific
comprehensive
plan
with
that.
That
concludes
our
presentation
and
pass
it
over
to
emil
to
provide
any
concluding
remarks.
A
Thank
you
tara.
So
that's
that
completes
our
presentation
tonight
mayor
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
hear
feedback
from
the
council.
C
Great,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
going
to
this
is
just
for
information
only,
but
we
can
certainly
make
comments
and
ask
questions
so
in
this
order.
I'll
call
in
council
members,
stokes
deputy
mayor
new
in-house
council
members
on
council
member
robertson,
councilmember
barksdale,
councilmember
lee
and
myself
and
I
went
with
council
member
stokes
first
because
he
was
mayor
when
we
approved
our
affordable
housing
strategy.
So
councilmember.
M
Stokes
yeah,
I'm
good
yeah
thanks
very
much.
Yes,
this
is
something
a
subject
matter
and
strategy,
that's
very
dear
to
my
heart,
since
I
put
a
lot
into
it,
putting
it
together
and
I'm
really
excited
to
see
the
progress
you
made.
I
do
have
some
questions
and
I've
asked
one
of
these
things.
I've
brought
up
before
is
well
a
couple
of
things
one.
M
Obviously,
the
10-year
goal
of
2500,
affordable
homes
is
not
very
realistic
or
or
acts
are
even
aggressive,
and
we
know
that
I
mean
things
have
changed
drastically
in
the
last
three
years
and
I
was
glad
to
see
you
know
that
we
can
achieve
beyond
that
goal.
I'm
not
sure
why
we
picked
10
years,
there's
so
many
changes
in
three
years
that
it
does
become
very
unrealistic,
but
so
I
think
we're
making
a
lot
of
impact.
M
The
other
question
I
have-
and
I
raised
it
last
time
and
it
it
concerns
me
and
I
think
it's
a
little
well,
it
just
doesn't
get
the
picture
properly,
counting,
what's
somewhere
around
742
or
depending
on
what
the
polaris,
how
that
goes
into
it.
Pushing
on
you
know,
almost
a
thousand
units
of
preserved
housing
is
not
addressing
the
need
for
more
affordable
housing
and
that's
confusing
and
I've
had
some
conversations
with
people.
Who've
noticed
that
and
say
wait
a
minute.
M
I
mean
that's,
that's
it's
kind
of
we
can
go
out
and
purchase
a
number
of
buildings
that
have
people
who
are
living
in
affordable
housing
now
and
making
sure
that
they
keep
living
there,
and
if
we
count
that
as
meeting
our
goals,
we
haven't
really
achieved
anything
because
we're
just
keeping
the
status
quo
going.
M
So
the
goal
I
would
like
to
see
us
have
a
goal
of
two
things.
One
is
an
aggressive
program
to
keep
as
many
affordable
housing
units
going
now,
which
is
something
we've
done,
and
that
was
you
know.
The
highland
village
thing
was
was
a
highlight
of
of
the
council
and
the
city
in
this
area,
and
we
can
keep
that
going.
The
second
is,
I
think,
it's
time
for
us
to
look
at
what
are
some
realistic
or
reachable
goals.
What
do
we
need
to
do
in
the
next
five
years,
ten
years
on
affordable
housing?
M
What
is
the
real
need?
What
is
the
real
goal
and
go
big
I
mean
we
can
you
know
2510
years
is,
is
not
going
to
do
the
job,
so
I
think
you
put
together
a
really
good
program
moving
this
forward
good
actions,
but
I
would
like
to
see
us
come
back
and
really
have
a
kind
of
heart
to
heart
about
we
have
these
new
gold
new
tools
to
use.
We
have
new
incentives.
M
I
think
we
have
a
new
attitude
even
stronger
about
this,
so
we
can
do
better
and
I'd
like
to
see
us
kind
of
address
that
and
see
where
we
go
from
there,
but
at
the
current
point,
I'm
very
you
know
feel
very
good
about
it.
It's
a
lot
of
good
work
and
I
like
the
way
you
put
the
program
together.
It's
just
that
we
need
to.
M
We
need
to
have
a
large,
larger
vision
and
larger
actions
going
forward
because
we're
going
to
get
behind
if
we
don't
but
a
great
great
presentation,
and
I'm
really
excited
about
and
looking
forward
to
falling
to
continuing
the
discussion
thanks.
G
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
great
presentation,
thank
you
so
much
sarah
mack
emil
for
for
the
presentation
and
the
great
data.
Certainly
you
know
a
lot
of
things
to
be
very
excited
about,
certainly
making
a
significant
dent
in
in
that
10-year
plan
and
the
2500
affordable
units,
which
was
the
goal,
and
I
think
council
member
stokes
actually
makes
a
a
good
point.
G
You
know
we
should
reevaluate
that
goal
or
or
perhaps
create
a
stretch
goal
for
ourselves
because
clearly
we're
going
to
hit
the
2500
units
already,
but
I'm
kind
of
curious.
If,
if-
and
I
know
this-
maybe
for
for
mac
or
mill,
but
how
do
other
cities
determine
what
you
know
how
many
affordable
units,
any
one
city
should
have?
How
how
do
you
come
up?
Come
up
with
that
number?
G
What's
a
healthy
number
or
what's
a
healthy
number
for
for
bellevue
I
mean
certainly
there's
certainly
the
the
demand
for
it,
but
you
know
we
can
only
create
so
many,
but
what
you
know,
what
what
might
that
process
be
in
order
to
determine
what
a
healthy
number
of
affordable
housing
units
in
any
one
city
might
might
look
at.
K
I
think
I'm
going
to
start
the
answer
and
probably
have
emile
jump
in
too,
because
it's
a
very
big
question
and
one
thing
that
at
the
staff
level,
we
would
not
propose
getting
sort
of
analysis
by
paralysis,
meaning
spending
a
lot
of
time
trying
to
generate
the
number
as
compared
to
looking
at
the
opportunities
to
aggressively
pursue
the
creation
and
or
preservation
of
affordable
housing,
and
there
are
some
some
significant
steps
that
are
coming
your
direction
coming
up
with
things
like
east
main
policy
objectives
and
launching
into
wilburton
all
sorts
of
things
around
the
c1
strategy
or
the
mfte
things
that
are
like
stuff.
K
That's
happening
right
now,
you're
asking
a
very
poignant
question,
and
so
the
variables
that
go
into
deciding
you
know
how
do
you
come
up
with
a
healthy
number?
A
lot
of
those
are
very
much
values
based
discussion,
so
how
much
of
our
own
resident
population
do
we
want
to
capture
just
in
general
versus
import
from
a
job
creation
standpoint
of
that
capture
rate?
K
Is
it
a
percentage?
Is
it
just
as
many
as
you
can
get
or
what
is
the
affordability?
You
know
what
are
you
looking
for
and
those
are
all
really
value-based
things
we're
going
to
be
launching
on
our
major
comprehensive
plan
update
within
the
next
year
or
so,
and
a
lot
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
background
work
on
housing
and
housing
needs
and
a
full-blown
needs
assessment.
K
So
those
kinds
of
value
judgments
are
going
to
be
able
to
be
built
into
either
that
process
or
a
separate
process.
Should
the
council,
you
know
want
that,
we
would
probably
tell
you
at
this
point.
You
have
enough
policy
when
you
take
up
these
individual
action
items
to
be
as
aggressive
or
or
not
as
you
would
like
to
be
in
the
creation
of
housing.
So
I
mean,
I
think,
without
stopping
to
go.
K
Do
a
study
which
we
wouldn't
propose
as
we
bring
things
to
you,
we'll
try
to
put
them
in
context
of
of
the
spectrum
of
how
aggressive
you
can
be
and
what
you'll
get
by
being
that
aggressive
and
then
we
can
also
have
a
parallel
effort
to
be
working
on
the
values
based
thing
that
I
think
you're
asking
about.
K
I'll
ask
emil
to
weigh
in
because
so
I've
been
at
four
different
cities
and
every
city
has
a
different,
slightly
different
set
of
values
based
variables
and
therefore
the
answer
is
slightly
different.
So
not
the
same
for
any
two
would
be
my
answer
for
you,
but
those
are
the
variables
okay.
A
Yeah
and
then
to
to
briefly
continue
on
deputy
mayor
we're
in
a
fortunate
time
right
now,
where
the
region
recently
adopted
vision
2050
it
had
equity
inclusion,
affordable
housing
as
a
prime
lens
of
that
new
vision
for
the
region.
We're
also
in
the
midst
of
updating
the
county-wide
planning
policies
for
king
county,
affordable
housing
is
a
regional
issue,
but
how
we
want
to
tackle
it
at
the
local
level.
A
We
have
a
lot
of
staff,
expertise
and
interest
in
in
furthering
how
we
grow
as
a
city
having
a
good
jobs,
housing
balance
and
doing
as
much
as
we
can
to
accommodate
the
housing
need
in
the
city.
So
there's
there's
more
to
learn
in
the
coming
months
in
2021
as
we
refine
those
county
policies
and
figure
out
what
makes
sense
and
how
we
can
take
our
share
of
the
affordable
housing
for
the
region
in
bellevue.
G
I
mean
obviously
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
mfte
again
and
seeing
how
we're
going
to
extend
that
and
if
we
need
to
you,
know
sweeten
that
incentive,
if
you
will
and
and
always
looking
for
opportunities
to
either
maintain
existing
housing
or
grow
affordable
housing
so
really
appreciate
the
aggressiveness
that
staff
shows
to
to
to
the
numerous
strategies
that
we
have
for
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
then
just
one
more
quick
question
on
the
on
the
50
90
money.
I
believe
thorough
said
that
the
clarifications
might
be
forthcoming
there.
G
Do
we
have
any
insight
into
what
those
clarifications
might
be
in
terms
of
how
that
money
can
be
spent.
K
So
deputy
mayor
we'll
be
giving
you
a
a
full
presentation
on
1590
in
the
next
study
session.
Okay,
yeah
we're
well
the
quick
answer
to
this
question,
though,
is
yeah.
We
know
there
are
some
things
that
are
moving
through
the
state
legislature,
we're
actually
holding
off
from
these
presentations
on
what
those
are,
how
they
affect
it.
We
build
those
into
our
regional
presentations
that
occur
through
joyce
nichols
office.
K
So
when
the
proposed
changes
come
forward
and
there's
a
need,
if
there
is
a
need
for
council
to
weigh
in
and
have
a
position,
that's
that's
the
venue
that
we
bring
that
stuff
to
you,
so
we're
kind
of
tracking
parallel
there,
because
we
know
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
spend
1590
money
and
so
we're
trying
to
move
towards
not
hold
up
the
whole
program
for
the
changes
that
are
coming
in
1590
right
now,
fair
enough.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you,
emil
and
mack
for
and
thera
for
all
of
this
work.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
regularly
look
at
this.
Certainly
at
the
retreat
right.
We
thought
that
affordable
housing
was
one
of
the
most
important
values
that
we
have,
and
especially
the
the
job
and
housing
balance
and
making
sure
that
we
are
building
housing
to
the
degree
that
we
need,
because
when
I
think
about
was
the
data
like
90
of
the
people
that
work
in
bellevue
don't
live
in
bellevue.
N
N
I
notice
in
b2,
which
is
the
micro
apartments,
that
the
number
projected
is
still
showing
zero
so
seems
to
me
that
maybe
that's
another
area
that
we
need
to
really
move
with
more
urgency,
because
not
everyone's
going
to
want
large
units.
I
think
that
you
know,
having
grown
up
with
my
younger
years
in
hong
kong,
where
the
the
units
are
very
small
and
those
that
come
from
other
countries
that
have
smaller
living
spaces
may
not
want
a
really
large
space.
N
I
agree
with
deputy
mayor
that,
looking
at
that
1590
money
and
how
we
can
leverage
that
money,
perhaps
with
public
private
partnerships,
I
do
want
to
just
point
out
one
thing,
and
that
is
that
when
we
have
the
table
talking
about
the
the
number
of
beds,
I
I
would
suggest
that
we
don't
include
the
bed
men's
shelter
as
part
of
the
the
zero
to
thirty
percent,
because
I
believe
that
those
hundred
beds
are
really
intended
to
be
a
bridge
bed
as
we
as
men
are
being
helped
to
move
out
of
homelessness.
N
So
I
don't
know
that
we
should
be
counting
that
as
part
of
our
affordable
housing,
bed
count
and
really
just
moving
quicker,
because
our
goal
was
that
housing
choices
abound
and
that
affordable
housing
is
city-wide.
N
D
O
Thank
you
great,
so
good
discussion
so
far,
and
I
was
really
struck
by
during
our
retreat,
how
we
are
so
unified
about
making
sure
that
we
have
more
housing,
more
affordable
housing
in
bellevue.
So
I
think
the
discussion
about
increasing
the
goals
is
a
really
good
one.
I
know
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
that
housing
study.
Thank
you
for
that
information,
emil
and
mack.
My
thought
was
that,
as
gmpc
is
doing
the
counterweight
planning
policies
they're
going
to
be
doing
growth
targets
for
cities,
affordable
housing
is
part
of
that.
O
But
in
addition
to
looking
at
the
affordable
housing
targets,
we
also
need
to
look
at
housing
in
general
because
we
don't
have
enough
affordable
housing,
but
we
also
don't
have
enough
housing
and
the
missing
middle
has
been
really
something.
That's
become
very
apparent
in
the
last
several
years
around
the
region,
and
so
I
think
that
we
need
to
not
lose
sight
of
that.
O
We
have
the
1590
money
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
next
time,
but
we
can
use
for
the
60
percent
and
below,
and
I
think
we
can
leverage
that
really
well,
whether
it's
public
private
partnership,
which
I
think
is
a
great
idea,
there's
things
being
built
right
now.
We
can
use
that
to
get
some
units
at
60
or
below,
but
there's
also
the
other
tools
that
we
have
in
our
code.
The
two
main
ones
that
I
think
have
an
ability
to
get
us.
A
lot
of
units
is
the
mfte.
O
If
it's
done
correctly
and
expanded
and
incentive
incentives
in
the
development
code,
the
mfte
I
know
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
and
we
want
to
expand
it
to
all
multi-family
areas
of
the
city.
O
One
thing
that
is,
we
haven't
talked
about
and
because
it's
not
in
our
code
is
that
when
people
are
building
multi-family
housing
in
bellevue
using
the
mfte,
they
are
forced
to
provide
a
free
parking
spot
for
every
affordable
unit,
and
I
wasn't
aware
of
it
because
that's
not
in
bellevue's
code,
it's
not
in
our
mfte
code
and
no
other
city
in
arch
requires
that,
but
our
but
because
arch
wants
it,
we
require
it.
O
We
would
get
more
units
if
we
just
fixed
that
the
other
thing
we
might
consider
is
adding
a
missing
middle
level
of
mfte
like
an
80
level.
Perhaps
it's
more
units
at
80
percent.
If
we
had
a
sliding,
you
know
fewer
units
to
get
the
credit
at
the
lower
levels.
More,
you
know
more
units
at
the
higher
levels.
O
Some
cities
use
the
mfte
just
to
incentivize
housing,
there's
no
affordability
about
it.
They
just
if
you
build
multi-family
housing,
you
can
get
the
mfte
tax
credit,
I'm
not
suggesting
that,
but
we
might
want
to
think
about
using
this
for
the
missing
middle.
Finally,
with
regard
to
land
use
incentives,
I'm
glad
to
see
wilburton
and
east
main
on
the
very
large,
very
dense
graphic
that
was
put
up
on
the
screen.
O
I
belread
is
not
there,
but
we
need
to
do.
We
need
to
look
at
that
as
well
to
me,
it
seems
like
we
should
be
using
the
land
use
incentive
where,
if
they're,
building
housing,
this
is
what
we
did
in
bel
red
all
these
years
ago,
if
they're
going
to
build
housing
in
order
to
unlock
the
housing
incentive
system
or
the
incentive
system,
they
have
to
do
affordable
housing
or
they
can't
get
any
of
the
incentives
at
all.
O
As
as
our
codes
are
today,
you
can
choose
the
affordable
housing
incentive,
but
if
you're
building
housing,
you
can
also
choose
some
other
incentive
like
child
care
or
something.
So
I
think
that
if
we're
having
housing
being
developed,
particularly
in
the
transit
nodes,
the
very
first
incentive
should
be
the
affordable
housing
incentive
and
then,
when
you
do
that,
maybe
you
get
you
know
a
lot
more
density,
but
it
unlocks
it.
It
unlocks
everything
else,
because
a
lot
of
those
other
incentives
are
important
and
I
value
them,
but
we're
in
a
housing
crisis.
O
So
that
should
be
the
first
one.
It
should
be
the
very
first
step
you
want
more
than
the
base
zone
allows
and
you're
building,
and
it's
a
residential
development.
That's
multi-family,
you
got
to
do
affordable
housing
and
then
you
can.
Then
you
can
get
the
goodies.
So
I
think
that
that
would
be
really
really
helpful.
I
guess
I'll
just
hold
there,
but
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
continuing
this
discussion.
O
Please
you
know,
I
know
staff
knows
the
urgency
of
this.
I
agree
with
council
members
on.
We
need
to
do
all
this,
particularly
a
lot
of
the
land
use
planning
with
more
urgency.
We
are
running
out
of
time
light
rail's,
opening
tod
is
being
built
and
we're
not
going
to
get
the
housing
we
need.
So,
let's
let's
go
forth
and
do
thanks.
O
E
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
thanks,
email,
tara
and
and
mac
for
the
great
presentation
I
just
wanted
to
bring
forward
the
planning
commission
recommendations
and
just
kind
of
get
a
sense
of
how
reducing
further
reducing
the
barriers
for
dadus
might
impact
us,
providing
or
enabling
more
housing
choices.
So,
in
addition
to
making
sure
that
we
have
increased
units,
also
making
sure
that
we
have
more
housing
choices
in
our
community,
because
we've
got
the
a
lot
of
single
family
and
a
lot
of
multi-family,
both
I
mean
and
which
I
totally
agree
with.
E
Having
more
of
that
multi-family,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
providing
housing
choices
for
people
in
our
community
and
so
seriously.
If
there
was,
if
there's
an
opportunity
to
understand
sort
of
the
needs
and
concerns
around
a
citywide
adu
policy
and
understand
the
impacts
of
having
something
like
that
relative
to
the
housing
need.
A
I
can
go
ahead
and
answer
that
one
for
the
for
the
recent
code
changes
on
the
attached
adus
and
the
three-year
rule
with
any
new
code.
We
set
up
a
monitoring
system,
so
we
can
see
how
that
new
code
provision
is
working
over
time.
So
that's
how
we'll
we'll
basically
monitor
that
attached,
adu
change
in
the
the
two
initial
great
neighborhood
areas
of
northwest
and
northeast
bellevue
as
part
of
the
housing
affordability
discussion.
We
are
talking
with
those
two
neighborhoods
about
some
of
the
the
benefits
and
barriers
to
doing
detached
adus.
A
Yeah
as
part
of
our
presentation
on
the
management
brief
we'll
have
numbers
about
engagement,
some
of
the
successes
that
we're
having
for
reaching
the
public
and
then
some
of
the
limitations
that
we've
had
under
the
covet
environment
as
well.
H
H
So
when
we
first
start
looking
at
this
looks
like
wow.
This
is
awesome,
that's
a
big
goal.
You
know
how
we're
gonna
make
it
and
what
you
have
presented
means
very
impressive
and
we
have
21
actions.
I
mean
I
can
see
that
it's
so
well
planned.
So
much
of
have
you
accomplished,
you
know
moving
from
50
to
80
units
to
400,
and
I
just
like
most
people.
You
know
because
w
said
2500
units
seems
to
be
very
much
of
a
reachable
goal,
and
so
I
do
believe.
H
Yes,
we
need
to
have
you
know
more
affordable
housing.
Affordable
housing
has
always
been
a
challenge
for
the
city
of
belgium,
because
such
a
desirable
place
and
the
people
want
to
move
to
live
here.
So
price
is
high
and
I
think
what
we
should
be
looking
at
inside,
like
most
people
are
saying,
we
need
to
find
more
options,
more
choices.
There
are
many,
many
folks
who
want
to
live
here.
We
should
live
here
and
the
employees
that
you
know
have
business
here.
H
They
want
to
have
their
employees,
people
avoided,
and
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
so
it
needs
to
be
affordable.
The
key
is,
we
know
we
need
to
provide
many
many
different
kind
of
choices.
We
we
want.
We
don't
know
exactly
what
we
can
figure
out
in
case
as
we
move
forward
and
we
are
actually
doing
a
lot
of
kind
of
housing
and
we
have
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
we
test
it.
We
approve
it.
That's
the
right
kind
that
we
really
people
would
prefer
to
live
in.
H
You
know
it's
not
it's
age,
it's
a
you,
know:
preference
income,
it's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
need
to
provide.
So
I
really
support
you
know.
I
think,
because
remember
robertson's
suggestion
we
need
to
have
housing
for
of
all
kinds,
and
I
think
even
you
know
we
talk
about
choices
and
that's
important.
We
need
to
figure
out,
you
know
it.
The
question
was
asked.
I
think
that
that
you
may
have
what
what
is
the
goal?
What
what's
the
target?
The
answer
is
it's
based.
H
H
There's
no
question:
you
know
we
need
more
choices,
more
affordable
housing,
more
available
housing,
and
so
people
can
have
the
choices
to
live
here.
You
know
if
they
want
to.
I
feel
that
you
know
one.
One
thing
I
I
want
to
make
sure
we
have
the
arch
and
arch
has
not
been
specifically
mentioned.
You
know,
that's
a
wonderful
process,
wonderful
organization,
one
wonderful
program
that
I've
been
doing
and
I
hope
that
they
could
incorporate
as
part
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
H
I
don't
want
to
have
a
regional
success
to
be
lost
in
everything.
What
we're
doing
here.
So
maybe
you
know
you
can
say
it
now
or
later
how
this
arch
is
part
of
this
strategic.
You
know
process
going
forward
in
achieving
the
affordable
housing
for
all
good
job.
Well
done
puts
his
mind
to
us.
You
know
we
make
things
happen,
so
I
just
want
to
make
that
conclusion.
C
Thank
you
councilmember
lee,
so
I
I
just
can't
underscore
enough
how
much
I
feel
that
we
need
that
full
spectrum
of
affordabilities
in
bellevue
and
that
number
of
10
percent
of
the
people
who
work
in
downtown
live
live
in
bellevue.
I
really
want
to
move
that
number
up
to
50,
because
I
think
that's
going
to
affect
the
quality
of
life
of
those
individuals
and
relieve
a
lot
of
the
congestion
we
have
of
people
coming
and
going
into
bellevue
to
work
every
day
in
a
normal
year.
So
I'm
really
excited
that.
C
We
have
so
much
support
for
this.
This
was
you
know
one
of
the
top
priorities
at
our
council
retreat
and
I'm
excited
to
be
reworking
the
incentive
program.
I
agree
with
councilmember
robertson
on
the
need
to
do
that.
I
agree
not
counting
homeless
meds
as
a
affordable
housing
units.
I
I
really
do
so.
I
hope
we
can
change
that
in
terms
of
preserving
housing.
C
I
realize
that
we
are
not
creating
new
units
when
we
do
that,
but
we
are
creating
new
permanently
affordable
units
and
that
is
different
than
a
an
older
building
that
happens
to
be
affordable.
At
that
moment
that
can
easily
be
sold,
bought
torn
down
and
rebuilt
as
high-end
something
else
and
all
those
tenants
not
able
to
afford
to
live
there
anymore.
C
So
I
really
do
count
the
retention
of
affordable
housing
as
a
win
and
making
that
more
of
a
permanent
thing
in
terms
of
the
parking
code
with
mfte,
I'm
really
comfortable,
putting
them
to
the
same
task
that
we
do
all
our
our
affordable
housing
development
or
any
development.
C
So
I
hope
that
we
can
change
that.
C
I
do
think
that
our
10-year
goal
is
woefully
low.
It
seemed
out
of
reach
at
the
time
that
we
adopted
it,
but
we're
all
a
lot
more
knowledgeable
about
the
need
and
what
can
be
done
and
I
don't
think
it
compares
to
the
county's
goal
so
hope
that
we
can
look
at
what
the
county
is
looking
for
in
a
region
and
we
can
set
a
goal.
C
That
is,
you
know,
a
quotient
of
that
county
goal
and
then
I'd
like
to
also
look
at
how
many
affordable
housing
units
we
lose
a
year,
because
that
really
tells
you
a
lot.
You
can
gain
2500
units
in
one
year,
which
is
a
lot,
but
if
you
lose
5
000
units,
you
know,
that's,
that's
frustrating.
So
I'd
really
like
to
keep
track
of
that
number
as
well.
If
we
can
do,
we
have
any
information
on
that
emile
at
this
time,.
A
We
looked
into
that
question
mayor
and
there
used
to
be
a
a
decent
data
source
for,
what's
called
naturally
occurring,
affordable
housing,
so
it's
affordable
housing
in
the
city
that
might
be
at
70
or
60
percent
ami,
but
there's
no
income
restrictions
on
it.
The
regional
capture
that
data
has
lapsed
a
little
bit
in
the
past,
so
we're
looking
at
other
data
sources
out
there
can
get
that
can
get
us
a
bit
more
educated
on
that
so-called
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
in
the
city.
C
Well,
let's,
let's
put
that
on
our
data
list,
so
that
when
you
come
back
next
time,
you
have
a
sense
of
how
how
many
affordable
units
we
have
lost
in
this.
You
know
since
you've
been
able
to
keep
track
of
it,
because
I
think
we
need
to
be
aware
of
that
as
we
try
to
reach
our
goals.
So
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
I
can
see
everybody.
So
if
you
I
see
council
member
robertson,
is
there
anybody
else
who
may
want
to
make
a
comment
or
question?
C
I
see
council
member
stokes
so
I'll
go
kind
of
through
the
list
again,
councilmember
stokes.
Why
don't
you
start.
M
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
appreciate
the
comments
have
been
made
and
I
think
we
all
agree
that
that
the
the
need
the
goal
and
our
capacities
are
all
greater
than
we're
looking
at
right
now,
so
that
that's
good
and
I
think
we
have
the
one
of
the
really
great
things
we
have
the
staff
and
the
capacity
to
do
this
so
that
that
helps
a
lot.
M
I
do
want
to
make
it
clear
that
I
was
not
saying
that
in
any
way
that
not
counting
existing,
affordable
housing,
it's
just
that
we
need
to
have
a
goal.
I
think
for-
and
I
appreciate
the
third
thing
you've
listed,
so
we
need
a
goal
for
each
of
those
they're
separate,
they're,
interconnected,
but
they're
separate.
So
looking
at
the
need
for
new,
affordable
housing,
because
every
you
know
we
lose
if
somebody's
in
a
already
in
an
affordable
housing,
you
don't
count
them
as
something
we've
done,
but
I
think
we
need.
M
You
know
we
keep
up
with
that.
We
went
a
long
time
before
we
really
understood
that
we
really
need
to
work
on
that.
So
I
think
you're
emphasizing
the
having
that
goal
and
the
fact
that
we
don't
want
to
lose
housing
is
very
important
too.
That
keeps
us
all
together.
So
I
think
I
think
we're
separating
this
out
looking
at
the
different
goals
and
how
the
old
interconnect
and
by
doing
that,
we're
really
going
to
end
up
with
a
lot
more
capacity
and
a
lot
more,
I
think,
accomplishments
over
the
time
period.
M
So
I'm
excited
about
that.
I
think
it
just
helps
to
get
clear
clarity
as
to
what
different
parts
of
it
are
because
they're
all
interconnected,
as
we
know
so
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
wasn't
misunderstood,
that
I
was
somehow
not
saying
we
should
not
keep
up
or
count
affordable
of
the
existing
housing.
As
I
said
with
you
know,
saving
highland
village
was
a
very
important
thing
to
do,
and
so
I'm
excited
about
it.
That
was
that
was
the
main
thing
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up.
O
Thank
you
I
actually
just
wanted
to
reflect
on.
This
has
been
a
great
discussion.
I
want
to
reflect
on
your
comment
about
tracking
what
affordable
housing
we
lose,
and
I
know
that
we
must
be
tracking
what
we
have
if
we're,
not
tracking
what
we
have
that's,
naturally,
naturally
affordable
housing.
O
O
So
I
think
that
that's
a
really
good,
not
that
we
want
to
get
analysis
paralysis,
but
I
think
that's
a
really
good
thing
because
it
just
like
we,
we
we
kind
of
track
what
happens
with
privately
owned
open
space,
and
if
the
people
are
going
to
want
to
sell,
we
buy
it
from
them
same
kind
of
thing,
preserving
what
we
have
for
the
people
of
the
city,
I
think,
is
part
of
our
job
and
then,
as
far
as
the
demand
on
attachment
c
page
two,
it
talks
about
what
the
percentages
are
of
income
and
you
know
percentage
of
households
and
percentage
of
units.
O
So
I
think
this
could
be
used
very
easily
for
what
do
we
need
to
focus
on
as
far
as
in
these
different
areas?
How
much
do
we
need,
as
well
as
the
growth
numbers?
Okay?
This
is
what
we
need
today,
but
this
is,
I
don't
even
know
if
this
is
today,
this
is
2016..
This
is
what
we
needed
in
2016
and
what
we
had
and
then
with
the
growth
numbers.
What
are
we
going
to
need
in
the
future?
So
I
think
that
you
know,
like
I
said,
end
of
this
year
early
next
year.
O
If
we
could
start
reworking
the
targets
and
figuring
out,
you
know
what
categories
we
need
and
try
to,
whether
it's
incentives
or
mfte
or
direct
public
private
partnership
or
1590
money.
We
have
a
lot
of
tools
and
we
have
more
tools
now
than
we
did
when
we
adopted
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
are
using
those
most
effectively
to
meet
the
demand
in
bellevue,
including
just
regular
middle
income.
Housing
thanks.
C
Okay,
great
council,
okay,
I
see
two
more
hands
so
council
member
zahn
and
then
council
member
lee.
Yes,.
N
Thank
you.
You
know.
I
was
thinking
about
all
of
the
comments
which
have
been
really
really
good
comments
that
really
get
to
all
of
the
aspects
of
this.
So
I'm
I've
been
thinking
about
the
fact
that,
as
we
look
at
the
effectiveness
of
programs,
it
might
be
helpful
to
add
a
column
that
talks
about
what
is
it
the
most
effective
tool
for
in
terms
of?
Is
it
the
lower
the
0
to
30
or
the
60
to
80
or
the
missing
middle?
N
Because
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
really
hone
these
tools,
not
every
tool
is
going
to
be
able
to
be
used,
for
you
know
all
the
different
housing
levels
and
so
to
the
degree
that
we
get
a
little
better
understanding
of
right
for
this
tool.
Maybe
it
is
helpful
for
all
income
level
kind
of
housing,
but
for
these
ones
here
we're
going
to
get
the
most
for
our
money
and
effectiveness
if
we
really
focus
on
the
zero
to
30
or
the
60
to
80
percent.
N
So
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
and
then
to
echo
councilmember
robertson.
You
know
earlier
I
had
talked
about.
Is
there
updated
information
from
the
2016.
N
and
then
I've
noticed
that
you
know
that
it
just
says
greater
than
80
ami
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
should
be,
you
know
80
to
100
and
then
100
and
over,
because
greater
than
80
to
infinity
is
a
pretty
big
range,
and
so
it
might
be
good
to
try
to
figure
out
based
on
income
levels.
What
is
a
another
good
break
point
there
in
terms
of
getting
a
little
bit
of
information.
H
Thank
you.
I
agree
that
it's
important
to
talk
about.
You
know
specifics
goals
and
numbers.
You
know
things
like
that,
because
you
know
this
is
something
that
we
have
to
establish
when
you
set
a
goal.
However,
I
don't
want
to
lose
the
emphasis
some
of
us
mentioned.
You
know
it's
a
choice.
It's
a
option.
H
It's
a
balance,
ultimately
right,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
balanced
and
so
with
those
principles
in
mind,
then
we
can
set
goals
we
can
set
like
we're
talking
about
what
what
housing
we
have
available
what's
disappearing.
What
do
we
need
to?
You
know,
increase
what
need
to
these
are
details.
H
We
have
to
work
out
absolutely
and
I
agree
with
setting
goals
and
we
need
to
set
goals
as
much
as
we
can,
but
I
want
to
be
sure
that
it's
done
with
choices
in
mind,
balancing
mind
with
people
in
mind
with
all
of
us
in
mind
and
because
I
go
out.
Ultimately,
it
goes.
The
quality
of
life
people
who
work
here
who
live
here
who
raise
family
here.
C
J
K
Thanks
city
manager
and
thank
you
to
the
council
a
lot
of
really
good
dialogue
tonight
with
a
lot
of
potentially
very
positive
path
forward,
around
housing
overall
and
affordable
housing.
I
think
what
we
will
do
is
take
all
the
comments
tonight,
as
we
look
at
our
work
plan,
start
to
think
about
how
we
can
bring
you
back
programs
that
start
to
answer
some
of
the
questions
that
you're
you're
asking
now
that
were
not
the
same
questions
the
community
or
the
city
council
was
asking
a
few
years
ago.
K
One
thing
we
have
started
to
do
is
be
much
more
deliberate
and
I
heard
a
few
council
members
ask
questions
about
which
programs
are
most
advantageous
for
different
ami
levels
or
different
types
of
particular
housing.
So,
for
example,
you'll
be
having
a
discussion
next
week
about
mfte
and
the
financial
metrics
that
go
into
mfte
and
who
are
the
best
populations
served
by
that
program?
K
Is
that
an
80
ami
program,
or
is
it
better
looked
at
a
60
because
you
can
calibrate
accordingly
so
and
whether
or
not
of
course,
you
end
up
with
more
units
depending
on
what
the
answers
to
some
of
those
questions
are.
So
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
we
are
working
on
behind
the
scenes
and
we'll
start
to
think
about
this
question.
K
So
we'll
be
working
on
all
those
things
and
make
sure
we
put
it
in
context
for
you
as
we
bring
all
these
individual
things
back
to
you,
because
you,
you
still
want
to
keep
moving
forward
on
all
those
individual
items
as
well.
So
I'll
do
some
thinking
with
all
the
different
staff
about
how
we
can
coordinate
all
that
and
then
in
the
meantime,
like
next
week,
when
we
come
back
with
mfte,
we'll
talk
about
some
of
your
questions
today
and
how
the
mfte
program
fits
into
that
that
broader
dialogue
so
perfect.
C
Perfect,
I
really
appreciate
that
that
sounds
like
a
good
approach.
So,
okay
moving
on
to
the
next
study
session
item,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to.
J
Introduce
yeah.
Thank
you,
american
council
member.
This
next
item
is,
with
the
respect
to
house
bill
1590,
as
relates
to
our
outreach
and
engagement
work
that
we've
done.
It
was
the.
C
J
So
joining
us
this
evening
is
matt
cummins,
who
you
you
heard
earlier,
who
is
the
director
of
community
development
as
well
as
stephanie
martinez,
our
homeless,
outreach
coordinator
and
lisa
olson,
our
management,
fellow
both
from
the
manager's
office?
J
All
three
were
present
presenters
in
the
last
round
of
presentations
that
we
made
with
respect
to
the
house
bill
1590
money,
which
was,
I
believe,
back
in
february,
every
one
of
2021.
So
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
Mac.
K
Mayor
robinson
members
of
the
council,
we're
excited
to
be
back
with
you
here
this
evening.
We
have
talked
to
you
all
about
wanting
to
be
back
no
less
frequently
than
every
four
to
six
weeks
to
keep
moving
forward
with
you
all
on
making
some
decisions
around
the
1590
work
plan
and
process
that
can
be
instituted
so
that
we
can
set
up
funding
rounds
and
ability
for
needed
providers
and
or
affordable
housing
developers
and
providers
to
access
this
money
to
help
serve
such
a
large
community
need.
K
So,
if
you
recall
at
our
last
two
study
sessions,
we've
discussed
putting
together
an
interest
statement
which
we
did
and
the
council
adopted,
which
identifies
all
the
relevant
policies
that
are
applicable
to
the
potential
funding
stream
for
the
1590
monies
and
then
started
in
on
the
work
plan
to
start
to
identify
what
the
various
options
are.
So
let's
go
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
K
So
when
we
got
into
idea
generation
amongst
all
of
our
different
subject
matter,
experts
on
the
staff
and
then
we
started
to
go
out
and
speak
with
the
people
that
might
want
to
access
these
funds,
it
became
very
clear
to
us
that
there
is
a
wide
range
of
discussion
topics
around
what
people
are
thinking,
and
so
the
idea
for
tonight's
study
session
is
to
walk
you
through
what
we've
heard
so
far
get
some
common
definitions
out
there
about
what
certain
mental
and
behavioral
health
services
are.
K
What
the
boots
on
the
ground
really
look
like,
what's
fundable,
what's
not
and
so
forth
and
we'll
do
a
very
similar
study
session
in
april,
which
will
be
the
next
of
the
four
to
six
week.
Apart
study
sessions
then
eventually
drive
to
a
prioritization
discussion
so
and
I'll
talk
more
about
those
subsequent
study
sessions
here
in
a
minute,
but
for
tonight
not
asking
for
any
specific
direction,
just
fyi
and
information
for
the
council.
K
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
what
we're
going
to
walk
through
tonight,
we've
mentioned
to
the
council
in
the
past.
We
think
it
will
be
good
to
go
through
1590
and
the
funding
and
what
what
it's
allowed
to
be
spent
for.
We
have
given
significant
descriptions
in
the
agenda
memos
if
any
members
of
the
public
want
to
to
look
at
that
as
well.
K
We
just
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
remind
everybody,
because
we
know
there's
some
misunderstanding
out
there
about
about
1590
and
particularly
on
the
capital
side,
the
creation
of
housing.
There
are
very
specific
populations,
the
1590s
allowed
to
be
used
to
create
housing.
For
so
we'll
talk
about
the
work
plan
and
where
we
are
tonight
and
then
the
high
level
themes.
This
is
probably
the
most
important
part
we're
starting
to
see.
K
Some
themes
happen
around
some
of
these
health
services
and
their
relationship
to
housing,
and
we
want
to
share
those
with
the
council,
because
that
will
start
to
inform
a
discussion
around
the
types
of
housing
that
we
want
to
provide
and
again
back
to
the
overall
theme.
There's
a
continuum
of
care
model
that
the
city
has
adopted
that
contemplates
the
need
for
a
wide
range
of
housing
options
and
specifically
helping
different
segments
of
the
society
to
be
successful,
staying
in
housing
and
also
getting
into
housing.
K
K
This
is
the
same
slide
that
we
used
at
the
last
presentation
and
the
most
important
part
I'll
hit
here-
and
I
know
we
keep
talking
about
this
with
council,
but
the
at
least
60
percent
of
the
funding
of
1590
has
to
be
spent
on
facilities
and
programs
that
serve
these
very
specific
populations
and
we
lifted
them
all
off
in
the
agenda.
Memo
they
are
homeless
are
at
risk
of
being
homeless,
families,
children,
victims
of
domestic
violence,
people
with
mental
behavioral,
health
issues
and
veterans
and
so
forth.
K
So
people
will
refer
to
this
as
an
affordable
housing
program.
It
is
that
it's
zero
to
sixty
percent
ami,
but
the
creation
of
these
these
new
units
need
to
be
for
those
very
specific
populations.
K
The
other
part
of
1590
is
that
no
more
than
40
percent
of
the
money
can
be
spent
on
the
operation,
delivery
and
evaluation
of
those
types
of
health
related
services.
Now
the
important
caveat
there
is
that
the
population
requirements
are
not
there
for
the
40
number,
so
we
can
spend
40
percent
of
our
revenue
stream
on
those
services,
not
necessarily
just
for
those
specific
populations
that
the
housing
itself
has
to
be
used
for,
so
let's
go
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
K
So
where
are
we
and
where
are
we
headed
so
hard
to
believe?
But
we
were
just
finishing
up
with
the
interest
statement,
discussion
and
moving
into,
as
I
mentioned,
a
series
of
two
study
sessions
tonight
being
the
first
and
then
moving
towards
stakeholder
analysis
and
starting
the
council
direction
on
where
you
might
want
to
put
some
money
now.
The
other
thing
we're
going
to
talk
about
in
april
is
in
a
little
bit
more
detail,
concepts
around
early
wins,
and
so
we
are
working
with.
K
Where
can
maybe
some
of
the
first
money
be
spent?
We
know
the
council
will
want
to
try
to
be
as
active
as
possible
as
early
as
possible,
so
we're
looking
into
what
some
of
those
things
may
look
like
and
propose
some
things
for
you
at
that
study
session.
So
just
look
forward
to
that.
No
news
on
that
tonight
just
that.
That's
what
we're
heading
towards
on
the
early
wins
front.
P
Great
thank
you
mac
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
members
of
the
council.
I'm
pleased
to
be
presenting
to
you
tonight
on
the
topic
of
house
bill
1590
and
our
outreach
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
what
mac
talked
about
with
our
initial
outreach
you'll
notice
that
it
really
is
focused
towards
the
mental
and
behavioral
health
services
and
the
housing
related
services.
P
As
you'll
hear
going
into
upcoming
study
sessions,
we
will
be
focusing
more
on
the
affordable
housing
piece,
but
this
is
kind
of
where
we
are
at
with
our
initial
stakeholder
outreach
and
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
lose
track
of
that,
as
we
are
looking
at
the
various
funding
streams
that
will
go
into
the
1590
funds,
so
we'll
lay
out
for
you
kind
of
some
examples
of
the
outreach
that
we've
done
with
stakeholders.
P
So
far,
we,
like
I
mentioned,
we've
engaged
with
a
lot
of
human
service
agencies
in
the
community
through
various
entities
such
as
the
east
side,
homelessness,
advisory
council,
the
bellevue
network
on
aging,
we've
also
done
really
tailored
interviews
with
agencies
who
serve
bellevue's
diverse
populations,
especially
looking
at
how
those
populations
would
be
served
by
the
1590
funding.
P
So
our
outreach
was
really
focused
on
those
topical
buckets
around
affordable
housing,
mental
and
behavioral
health
services
and
housing-related
services.
As
you'll
remember
from
our
interest
statement,
we
have
identified
needs
through
a
number
of
bellevue's
adopted
documents,
and
so
the
feedback
we
were
listening
was
to
really
understand.
P
I
turn
it
over
to
my
colleague
stephanie
that
some
of
the
themes
that
you're
going
to
hear
in
our
analysis
may
sound
similar
or
a
bit
repetitive,
and
that
you
know
what
we've
been
learning
from
these
conversations
is
that
these
topical
buckets
are
extremely
interconnected
and
are
not
mutually
exclusive
in
order
to
really
support
these
populations
under
hb
1590,
like
mac
mentioned,
you
know,
folks,
with
disabilities
domestic
violence,
survivors
veterans,
this
element
of
service
is
really
key
in
helping
people
obtain
and
retain
their
housing.
P
Q
All
right,
let's
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
so
we're
going
to
do
a
little
bit
of
a
quick,
deep
dive
into
what
these
themes
actually
mean.
So
when
our
first
theme
around
how
affordable
housing,
when
we've
heard
about
housingless
services,
what
this
really
means
is
stable
housing,
as
we
know,
can
really
support
healthy
outcomes
and
enhance
quality
of
life
for
all
residents,
but
specifically
for
those
our
most
vulnerable
populations,
such
as
individuals
with
disabilities,
domestic
violence,
survivors
and
so
forth,
and
housing
can
really
be
flexible.
Q
Q
Talking
about
housing,
stability,
case
management
and
what
that
looks
like
case
managers
can
really
focus
on
addressing
tenants,
specific,
unique
barriers
to
retaining
housing
so
for
examples
case.
Managers
working
to
towards
housing,
stability
with
an
individual
can
help.
Individuals,
for
example,
obtain
necessary,
necessary
identification
documentation
in
order
for
them
to
apply
for
employment
right
and
to
obtain
an
income,
or
they
can
refer
individuals
to
primary
care
agencies
or
mental
health
treatment
services,
so
that
those
individuals
can
really
be
connected
to
the
services
that
they
need
in
order
to
maintain
their
housing.
Q
Sorry,
mental
health
services
help
households
overall,
with
their
overall
well-being,
enhancing
quality
of
life,
maintaining
housing
supporting
their
recovery
and
what
have
you
by
providing
these
types
of
services?
Sorry
hold
on
just
a
second.
Can
you
hear
my
stepson
by
providing
these
types
of
services?
We
can
really
be
proactive
to
future
crises
and
or
help
a
household
maintain
their
housing
and
get
this
access
to
supportive
services
that
they
need.
Q
P
So
you'll
recall
like
that.
We,
this
is
part
of
our
interest
statement
that
really
increasing
housing
types
and
opportunities
are
important
to
meet
those
unique
needs
for
all
the
populations
that
can
be
served
by
the
hb
1590
funding
so
from
our
stakeholders.
P
Kind
of
around
the
distinction
between
those
two
so
permanent
supportive
housing
will
mean
that
someone
may
be
homeless
on
entry
there
may
they
may
be
dealing
with
a
disability,
such
as
mental
illness,
substance
use
chronic
health
conditions.
That
would
need
that
long-term
high
level
of
service
to
maintain
that
housing
going
into
the
future,
whereas
something
along
the
lines
of
housing
with
supportive
services.
Q
All
right
I'll
take
back
over,
I
texted,
okay,
so
mental
and
behavioral
health
services.
So
what
we
heard
under
this
bucket
was
four
key
main
findings:
around
holistic,
wrap
around
services,
culturally
responsive
and
specific
services,
as
well
as
providing
housing
beds
upon
exiting
treatment
and
behavioral
health
services
in
the
field.
So
we'll
do
a
deep
dive
into
what
these
actually
mean.
Q
Wrap
around
holistic
services
really
means
agencies
provide
varying
supports
to
meet
the
complex
needs
of
vulnerable
populations
in
coordination
with
the
variety
of
agencies,
and
these
agencies
can
include
coordinating
with
mental
health
agencies,
primary
care
agencies,
legal
options,
and
what
have
you
really?
The
purpose
and
the
aim
of
providing
holistic
services
is
so
that
the
household
can
achieve
positive
outcomes
and
stable
and
healthy
living.
Q
Mental
and
behavioral
health
services
are
considered
wraparound
services
because
they
aim
to
provide
a
support
that
treats
the
whole
person
taking
into
account
the
mental
and
social
factors
that
contribute
to
the
illness.
It's
an
approach
that
not
only
considers
mental
health
treatment
but
also
looks
at
overall
wellness
and
so
for
the
next
one,
culturally
specific
and
responsive
services
was
also
something
else.
We've
heard
from
our
stakeholders,
culturally
specific
services
are
created
by
and
for
cultural
communities,
with
an
emphasis
on
the
voices
and
experiences
of
that
community.
Q
Q
Next
slide,
a
big
one
that
we've
heard
as
well
from
our
stakeholder
analysis
was
the
lack
of
safe
and
stable
housing
and
that's
one
of
the
most
powerful
barriers
right
now
to
folks
that
are
in
long-term
recovery
from
substance
use
or
mental
health
conditions,
when
this
basic
need
of
a
housing
or
bed
upon
exit
of
treatment
is
not
met.
Folks
just
end
up
cycling
through
our
system
of
emergency
rooms,
jails,
shelters
and
so
forth,
and
so
this
is
a
national,
regional
and
local
issue.
Q
As
we
know,
there
are
different
households
with
different
types
of
needs
and
different
types
of
challenges
and
barriers
to
maintaining
housing
and
stakeholders
have
identified
the
need
for
agencies
to
have
flexible
financial
assistance
in
order
to
meet
these
varying
needs.
So,
for
example,
rental
assistance,
move-in
costs
and
eviction.
Q
Prevention
are
all
examples
that
can
help
an
individual
obtain
and
maintain
housing
as
an
example
when
we're
thinking
about
households,
transitioning
from
homelessness,
housing
or
moving
from
house
to
house
for
due
to
safety
reasons,
for
example,
individuals
may
need
help
with
moving
costs
and,
as
we
know
that
may
be
due
to
that,
that
is
due
to
application
fees
first
months
around
security,
deposit,
administrative
fees
and
all
those
things
which
could
cost
really
up
to
thousands
of
dollars.
Thousands
of
dollars
for
folks.
Q
So
it's
good
for
agencies
to
actually
have
flexible
financial
assistance,
such
as
having
access
to
moving
costs
in
order
to
help
individuals
obtain
housing
and
maintain
their
housing
over
time
and
the
last
one
supportive
services,
so
supportive
services,
as
we've
heard
throughout
this
presentation
tonight,
is
really
key
in
order
for
households
to
obtain
and
maintain
housing.
Supportive
services
really
help
households
achieve
self-sufficiency,
potential
and
housing
stability.
Some
of
these
services
can
include
employment
services,
case
management
and
tenant
education.
Q
Employment
services,
as
we
can
know,
and
as
we
can
think
about,
is
really
a
housing-related
service
because,
with
employment
comes
income
and
with
that
income,
you
can
actually
maintain
your
housing
pay.
Your
bills
have
access
to
your
basic
needs
and
an
individual
can
receive
employment
services
from
an
agency
or
from
a
case
manager
in
terms
of
getting
help
with
resume,
building
getting
connected
to
job
training,
job
placement
practicing
interviews
with
a
case
manager
and
so
forth.
Q
K
Thank
you
so,
as
we
wrap
up
here,
you're
hearing
a
lot
of
in-depth
information,
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
we
are
giving
to
you
this
evening
about
the
the
feedback
and
where
we
think
this
program
is
headed,
relate
to
a
lot
of
the
human
services
side
of
what
could
potentially
be
fundable
through
1590.
K
When
we
started
to
look
at
all
the
different
feedback
that
we
were
receiving
and
what
our
subject
matter,
experts
on
the
staff
had
for
ideas
here,
there's
just
a
wide
body
of
things
for
you
all
to
be
thinking
about
so
tonight.
For
those
of
you
that
made
specific
comments
about
things
like.
Let's
look
at
geographic
distribution
of
the
housing
units
themselves,
that
will
come
back
at
the
next
study
session.
What
about
mixed
income
buildings
versus
you
know?
One
building?
That's
just
just
zero
to
sixty
percent
ami.
K
Those
concepts
will
come
back
at
the
next
meeting.
So
we've
got
a
series
of
stakeholder
meetings
last
week
this
week
and
next
week
with
the
housing
providers
to
start
to
generate
that
next
set
of
significant
topical
areas
around
the
creation
of
new,
affordable
housing
and
how
you
may
want
to
think
about
prioritizing
funds.
So
tonight
really
is
a
an
information
only
session.
We
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
but
just
gonna
say:
recommendation
information
only
mayor,
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
take
any
preliminary
feedback.
K
C
Well,
I
really
appreciate
you
bringing
this
to
us
in
these
small
bites
and
and
often,
and
we
need
to
make
progress
on
this
and
we
all
feel
that
urgency.
So
thank
you
so
much.
I'm
going
to
start
with
deputy
mayor
noon
house
because
he's
the
liaison
for
the
human
services
commission
and
then
we
will
council
members
on
lee
barksdale,
robertson,
stokes
and
myself
so
deputy
mayor.
G
Thank
you
mayor
and
thanks
for
the
for
the
presentation
tonight
and
thank
you,
you
know
mack
and
team
here,
stephanie
liesel
for
moving
so
quickly
on
this.
Obviously
this
is
of
importance
of
the
entire
council
and
the
fact
that
we're
moving
so
quickly
on
this
is
is
really
important
and
it's
just
great
to
see
so.
First
on
the
outreach,
I
had
a
question
there.
Can
you
just
give
me
a
sense
of
because
we
are
moving
so
quickly
on
this?
G
I'm
just
curious
how
many
different
agencies
or
stakeholders
were
we
able
to
speak
to
and
engage
with?
Can
you
give
me
some
sense
of
that
and
across
what
different
sectors,
if
you
will
or
or
areas
that
they
represented.
P
Yes,
so
I'd
say
probably
for
the
human
service
agencies,
we
were
able
to
reach
approximately
15
to
20,
both
through
utilizing
existing
meetings
that
they
were
having
and
having
tailored
interviews
with
specific
human
service
agencies.
P
We
were
able
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
bellevue
network
on
aging
and
we
were
able
to,
like
I
mentioned,
reach
out
to
service
providers
who
respond
to
behavioral
health
crises
in
the
field
and
so
are
really
able
to
kind
of
speak
specifically
to
that
need.
So
that's
for
the
human
service
agencies
for
the
affordable,
housing
developers
and
providers.
I
think
we've
had
preliminary
conversations
with
probably
about
six
and
we're
looking
to
have
more
in-depth
conversations
with
those
developers
over
the
next
coming
weeks.
Okay,.
G
And
then
have
you
looked
at
a
kind
of
a
comparison
from
the
work
that
the
human
services
commission
has
done
in
terms
of
their
needs
assessment,
and
especially
the
assessment
that
we
looked
at
during
covid
et
cetera.
I
would
think
that
some
of
this
lines
up,
but
I
I
think
that'd
be
important
to
look
at
as
well
as
we
move
forward
that
this
is
matching
the
great
work
that
the
commission
is
already
doing
in
in
the
human
services
arena.
So
have
you
taken
taken
a
look
at
that
and
done
some
comparative
analysis.
P
We
have
not
done
a
comparative
analysis,
but
I
know
that
our
human
services-
smes,
who
are
part
of
our
work
team,
are
bringing
all
of
that
into
these
conversations.
But
we'll
make
a
note
of
that
to
make
sure
that
we
look
at
that
as
well.
K
Go
ahead,
deputy
mayor,
maybe
just
to
clarify
that
a
little
bit
we
we
know
there
was
unmet
need
through
the
human
services
commission
allocation
process
yeah.
Our
challenge
is
to
see
how
much
of
that
need
could
potentially
be
fundable
with
this
funding
source.
So
so
the
team
that
works
on
human
services
and
that's
tony
esparza
and
alex
riley
et
cetera,
are
looking
directly
into
that
and
and
if
it
is
fundable,
you'll
have
that
in
front
of
you
here
with
some
options,
because
there's
probably
additional
funding
need
1590
could
use
as
well.
G
C
Okay,
thank
you,
council
members
on
yes,.
N
So
I
too
thank
mack,
liesel
and
stephanie
for
this
presentation.
I
think
it
is
so
key
and
what
I
keep
thinking
about
is
making
sure
that
we
are
prioritizing
and
focusing
on
where
the
greatest
needs
are
and
moving
as
as
quickly
but
thoughtfully
as
possible,
because
I
can
only
imagine
that
not
only
are
we
gonna
see
more
of
that
housing
need
at
the
zero
to
sixty
percent,
but
the
mental
health
needs
associated
with
all
of
the
stress
during
the
pandemic
and
covid.
N
So
I
do
have
a
a
couple
of
questions
to
echo
the
deputy
mayor,
I'm.
I
would
like
to
also
understand
the
list
of
agencies
that
you
reached
out
to
so
maybe
at
some
point
in
a
packet
we
could
just
get
in
information
on
who
has
been
providing
that
input,
and
this
may
be
one
that
you're
reaching
out
to
the
to
the
groups
and
it's
just
not
on
the
packet
but
the
lbgtq
plus
community.
N
You
know
you
list
a
number
of
different
groups,
but
I
didn't
see
that
specifically
called
out.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
we
think
about
serving
our
lgbtq
plus
community,
that
they're
part
of
the
outreach
it
looks
like
community-based
organizations
were
a
part
of
the
outreach.
So
I'd
like
to
just
confirm
that
it
looked
like
it
was,
and
then,
when
I
think
about
up
to
40
of
the
money
may
be
able
to
be
used
for
mental
and
behavioral
health,
that's
potentially
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
a
year.
N
That's
actually
about
the
same
as
our
human
services
grants
for
the
entire
year
and
so
really
understanding,
maybe
really
what
that
need
looks
like.
So
we
balance
the
the
housing
versus
the
services
and
then
the
part
that
I'm
it's
not
really
clear
to
me
is
when
we
talk
about
substance,
use,
counseling
and
supportive
services.
Is
that
considered
mental
and
behavioral
health
so
providing
those
services?
Or
is
part
of
that?
I
see
you
nodding
so,
okay
for
those
of
us
that
are
that
are
not
in
this
world.
N
It's
hard
to
understand
when
we
use
those
terms
what
specifically
it
includes,
and
then,
lastly,
when
we,
it
also
said
move-in
cost
as
potentially
one
of
the
barriers.
N
Q
N
Okay,
that
would
make
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know
I
I
completely
agree
with
you
about
the
analysis
and
the
assessment,
it's
just
not
as
clear
to
me
with
all
of
the
different
buckets
of
money
and
the
requirements,
how
it
really
fits
into
that.
So
thank
you
for
really
looking
into
that
deeply,
so
that
we
can
maybe
target
the
funds
that
we
have
to
those
areas
that
the
1590
does
not
support
to
maximize
the
the
support
that
we
offer.
Thank
you.
K
Council
members
on,
I
think
I
just
to
jump
into
one
of
the
hardest
things.
You'll
all
have
a
chance
to
try
to
wade
into
is
what
should
the
percentage
be
in
terms
of
how
to
allocate
the
money.
So,
though,
nine
million
is
a
very
large
pot
of
money.
What
you're
gonna
quickly
learn
is
that
there's
more
need
than
there
is
even
for
that
nine
million,
so
the
percentages
or
what
it
turns
into
is
really
the
next
conversation
but
you're
hitting
on
all
the
right
things.
K
The
human
services
grants.
This
would
be
a
substantial
amount
of
money
compared
to
what
we
currently
give
out.
I
don't
have
the
number
right
in
front
of
me.
I
think
you
just
mentioned
in
the
three
million
range.
I
think
it's
actually
less
than
that
on
an
annual
basis,
but
either
way
it's
it's
a
substantial
increase
over
that
and
then
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
build,
affordable,
housing
and
you're.
All
just
talking
about
how
hard
it
is
to
build,
affordable
housing.
You
know
at
the
same
time
so
we'll.
N
Yeah-
and
I
would
just
say
that
when
this
first
came
up
you
know,
one
of
the
things
we
did
talk
about
is
that
if
we
see
an
immediate
need
bonding
against
the
revenue
so
that
we
can
take
advantage
of
the
funds
to
be
able
to
leverage
purchasing
or
building
housing
at
more
affordable
rates
today
than
it
might
be,
you
know
four
years
from
now,
so
I
I'd
like
to
see
that
in
the
mix
as
well.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
melanie.
I
got
two
questions.
One
is
I
support
question
regarding
the
stakeholders
you've
been
talking
to.
I
think
you
touched
all
the
very,
very
relevant
groups
and
issues.
I
I
like
what
you
addressed.
You
know
the
groups,
the
people,
the
services
and
the
stakeholder
nature,
except
you
know
I
would
like
to
see
a
list
of
the
actual
stakeholders
you
have
you
know
connected
with.
I
think
that
would
be
good
because
you
know
I'm
sure
we
have
some
other,
maybe
additional
crazy
ideas
that
we
can.
H
You
know,
ask
you
about
if
we
know
who
you
have
contact
or
you
haven't.
The
second
point
is
I'm
a
little
bit
not
quite
sure
about
the
60
40
percent
split
you
mentioned
60
percent
through
the
construction.
40
percent
goes
to
the
other
things
you
know,
but
I
I'm
not
sure
what
are
you
going
to
do
first
and
what
is
going
to
happen
and
how
is
the
other
one
going
to
be
worked
on?
H
I'm
not
quite
clear,
even
just
when
you're
first
addressing
council
members
on's
question
about
whether
the
the
rent
or
the
voucher
or
mental
health
versus
actually
building
the
facility
that
relates
to
all
those
things
that
we're
talking
about
like
mental
behavior
health
related
facilities.
So
how
how?
How
do
you
plan
to
do
those
things?
Are
you
going
to
wait
until
the
construction
is
all
done,
or
are
you
going
to
do
the
services
concurrently,
or
you
know
I
mean?
What's
your
thinking.
K
So
couple
things
on
that
councilman.
Really
thanks
for
the
question,
the
in
terms
of
answering
that
I
think
the
best
way
to
answer
that
is
we're
streaming
towards
setting
up
a
process
where
someone
could
apply
for
access
to
the
monies
that
could
look
like,
for
example,
on
the
human
services
side,
either
another
funding
round
or
using
the
current
process
with
the
human
services
commission,
or
it
could
be
something
through
the
city
council.
K
K
That
will
allow
people
to
then
apply
for
those
funds
in
order
to
help
guide
them
and
help
them
through
that
we're
going
to
try
to
work
with
you
all
at
the
next
study
session
and
then
as
many
as
you
all
will
need
to
set
priorities
around
how
you
want
to
try
to
divvy
up
the
monies
and
or
what
your
highest
criteria
variables
priorities
for
the
funding.
Actually
are
that
way.
K
We
can
help
guide
this
in
a
little
bit
more
efficient
manner
for
you,
so
that
when
you
actually
have
an
application,
you
have
an
idea
of
of
the
context
that
it
fits
within.
So
it
won't
be
the
staff
that
will
be
deciding
that
it
will
actually
be
you
all.
That
will
be
setting
some
priorities
and
some
parameters
to
help
guide
that
work
moving
forward.
K
H
I
would
like
to
assume
that
you
would
give
us
some
guidance,
whether
you
know
there's
more
readiness
to
co-construct,
or
maybe
we
have
opportunities
waiting
for
us
to
provide
the
service.
You
know
which
part
60
or
40
can
be
more
ready,
more
productive
or
more
constructive.
H
You
know
for
us
to
to
be
telling
you
where
to
spend
the
money
right
so
so
you
would
be
looking
at
both
parts.
I,
I
would
assume
you
know
concurrently,
so
you'll
be
getting
information
and
back
to
us
say
this.
You
know
what
your
observation
is.
This
is
where
maybe
the
money
can
be
spent
on
right.
Give
us
a
choice.
K
So
absolutely
councilmember
lee.
We
will
be
bringing
back
a
recommendation
for
you
all
and
sort
of
what
the
basis
for
that
is
and
when
we
do
that,
just
to
reiterate
the
those
priorities
can
change
year
to
year.
So,
as
we
start
in
this
program,
we'll
be
giving
you
our
best
thoughts
about
where
the
we
should
direct
the
funds
in
the
short
term
and
then
periodically
be
coming
back
to
you.
You
know
as
part
of
each
year's
process
or
whatever
that
turns
out
to
be.
H
K
C
H
E
Thank
you
mayor
thanks,
matt,
gleason
and
stephanie
for
the
presentation.
Just
I
had
a
few
questions
around
outreach.
How
are
we
so
when
we
go
to
the
agencies?
Are
we
talking
with
the
individuals
that
that
agency
serves,
or
are
we
just
talking
with
sort
of
agency
staff.
Q
Great
question,
so
we
actually
have
started
talking
with
folks
with
lived
experience
as
well,
which
will
be
more
incorporated
in
the
april
analysis
as
well,
so
more
to
come.
E
Awesome
that's
good
to
hear
and
then
in
terms
of
identifying
gaps.
E
Excuse
me
so,
for
example,
when
it
comes
to
the
eviction
assistance,
for
example,
I
heard
that
one
thing
that's
happening
in
the
community
right
now
is
to
avoid
getting
an
eviction
because
of
the
impact
that
an
eviction
has
on
your
ability
to
to
rent
that
people
are
just
leaving.
Q
Agencies,
that's
a
great
question
so
for
the
eviction
prevention
piece,
we're
reaching
out
to
agencies
that
already
offer
eviction,
prevention,
support
and
assistance
to
hear
feedback
around
what
we
need
around
eviction
prevention,
especially
during
copic
19.
Like
you
mentioned
everything,
that's
happening
with
the
pandemic,
there's
a
lot
of
needs
around.
What
are
we
doing,
and
not
even
in
terms
of
this
funding,
but
even
providing
legal
services
that
I'm
hearing
throughout
the
communities
so
we'll
be
incorporating
that
a
little?
Q
I
guess
we'll
incorporate
some
of
that
some
more
in
april,
too,
and
then
what
was
the
second
piece
of
the
question.
E
Q
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
question
for
as
we
continue
to
develop
what
the
lived
experience
outreach
looks
like
over
the
next
few
weeks
and
as
we
start
doing,
that
I
could
even
incorporate
it
into
some
of
my
work
that
I
do
and
providing
direct
service
and
support
to
those
that
are
marginalized
living
outside.
So
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
good
strategy
to
for
us
to
use
going
forward
in
the
weeks
to
come.
E
Awesome
and
last
question
for
mack:
you
had
mentioned
the
technology,
I'm
sorry,
you
know
where
I'm
going
now,
but
you
had
mentioned
the
the
ideas
around
distributing
funds
and
maybe
through
agencies
or
other
approaches.
How
are
we?
Are
we
considering
any
sort
of
innovative
approaches?
Technology
that
might
help
us
do
that.
K
We're
what
we're
thinking
right
now
is
trying
to
set
up
an
organized
process,
the
how
of
that
process
is
probably
yet
to
be
determined.
So
we
have
a
number
of
people
that
are
knocking
on
the
door
right
now
saying
hey,
we
know,
city
of
bellevue
adopted
its
rights
under
1590.
How
can
we
access
the
money?
K
And
at
this
point
we
don't
have
a
place
to
take
them
other
than
to
call
my
department
so
we're
working
on
if
the
council
wants
to
put
somewhere
between
zero
and
more
than
zero,
but
not
more
than
forty
percent
of
the
money
into
an
affordable
or
a
human
services?
What
does
that
look
like?
Should
that
you
know
be
a
human
service,
commission
process
or
or
something
else,
and
so
there's
some
things.
K
We
need
to
bring
back
to
you
on
all
that
the
technology
piece
of
it
in
terms
of
trying
to
reach
the
most
amount
of
people
or
the
people
in
greatest
need,
or
that
we're
going
to
be
working
with
all
of
our
staff
and
any
other
ideas.
If
there
are
groups
we
should
be
talking
to
because
we're
not
reaching
the
right
people-
that's
probably
the
next
phase
in
the
process.
K
E
O
Thanks
good
presentation
and
good
discussion
so
on
the
outreach,
I'm
really
pleased
that
we're
the
who
we've
been
reaching
out
to
and
how
we
who
we
are
planning
to
react
reach
out
to.
I
know
private
developers
are
on
the
list.
I
think
that's
really
important
because
they
build
the
vast
majority
of
the
housing
that
we
have
in
bellevue.
So
I
had
think
I
had
recommended
that
we
do
outreach.
There's
a
couple
private
developers
on
the
tag
that
help
come
up
with
the
affordable
housing
strategy.
O
Are
we
doing
outreach
to
either
them
or
the
full
tag
and
then
also
have
we
considered
doing
outreach
to
the
master
builders,
the
realtors
around
housing
association,
the
school
district,
the
chamber,
maybe
as
a
representation
of
major
employers
and
the
like?
So
I
guess
that's
just
a
question.
K
On
the
topic,
I'll
just
say
who
we
have
reached
out
to
and
who
we're
going
to,
there
seems
to
be
a
fair
amount
of
either
curious
on
that
we're
going
to
send
you
all
an
email
that
just
gives
you
you
know
who
all
the
people
we've
talked
to
so
far
that'll.
I
think
answer
that
question
and
yes,
councilmember
robertson,
I
would
say
all,
but
maybe
not
all
of
the
people.
You're
referencing
have
come
up
in
previous
meetings
and
are
on
a
list.
You
know
to
get
a
call.
K
Sometimes
those
conversations
are
more
in
depth
than
others.
It
depends
on
them
more,
you
know
than
us,
but
yes,
we're.
We
do
want
to
get
in
touch
with
all
those
people
but,
for
example,
on
the
tag,
we're
not
calling
everybody
on
the
tag.
We're
calling
a
few
of
the
developers
that
have
indicated
interest
and
some
of
them
are
reaching
out
to
us
to
be
honest,
hey
I
was
in
the
tag
I'm
following
this.
I'm
really
curious.
Can
I
participate
so
that's
made
it
easier.
O
Good,
I
think,
that's
I
think
that
they
can
give
us
some
really
good
insight
on
the
mental
and
behavioral
health.
I
think
that
it
would
be
really
good,
as
I
think,
councilmember
zahn
asked
about
the
need.
I
think,
in
addition
to
figuring
out
the
need
which
there's
way
more
than
there
are
resources
when
we're
deciding
whether
to
use
zero
percent
or
40
of
the
money
on
this
or
somewhere
in
between.
O
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
also
understand
the
resources
that
are
out
there,
because
the
people
of
this
city,
they
pay
the
sales
tax
and
a
certain
percentage
of
it,
is
coming
for
this
money,
but
they
also
pay
sales
tax
that
goes
to
the
mental
illness
and
drug
dependency.
I
think
it's
sales
tax.
They
pay
into
the
veterans
human
services
levy
they
pay
into
the
affordable.
How
I
think,
there's
an
affordable
housing,
one
all
that
are
county-wide
funding.
O
One
of
them
might
be
a
property
tax
too
so
and
then
there's
state
funding
state
has
always
taken
a
big
role
in
this.
So
I
know
there's
not
enough,
but
I'd
like
to
see
a
list
of
with
you
know.
Dollar
figures
of
the
different
resources
that
we
have
so
that
we
can
identify
the
gap
and
and
how
much
of
the
gap
is
that
we
could
fill
and
how
much
is
already
how
much
of
the
what
would
have
been
a
bigger
gap
is
being
covered
by
these
other
resources.
O
So
I
think
that
that
would
be
really
helpful.
Finally,
with
regard
to
a
process
for
using
the
money,
I
I
like
that
we
are
going
that
way.
I
I
want
to
don't
want
to
become
too
bureaucratic,
at
least
in
the
initial
year
or
two
until
so
that
we
know
we
could
be
flexible.
O
That's
what
I
want
to
say
we
want,
we
can
be
flexible,
there's
we
may
see
a
project,
for
example
a
preservation
project
that
we're
going
to
want
to
jump
on
and
be
nimble
and
jump
on,
and
that
could
take
all
of
the
money
in
one
year
or
we
could.
I
just
don't
want
to
see
us
where
it's
too
bureaucratic
and
we
spread
it
like
peanut
butter,
and
we
do
a
little
bit
here
and
there
around
the
edges,
but
we're
not
doing
the
big
things
that
come
along.
O
So
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
whatever
process
we
come
up
with,
we
create
the
flexibility
on
the
part
of
the
council
and
also
with
regard
to
using
this
for
public
private
partnerships.
It
may
be
not
always
asking
people
to
apply
to
us.
I
mean
for
operations,
money
and
things
like
that.
Yes,
but
if
it's
capital
money,
it
might
be
where
a
tod
project
comes
in
the
door
and
they're
using
the
mfte
and
they're
doing
the
incentives
for
affordable
housing,
and
we
could
approach
them
and
say:
hey.
We
see
your
building
at
70
ami.
O
If
you
know,
if
we
gave
you
x
dollars
toward
this,
could
you
do
10
units
at
60
or
whatever
it
is?
I
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
they're
that
we're
open
for
for
dialogue
as
well.
So
if
you
have
any,
if
you
have
any
comments
on
that,
otherwise
I'm
really
pleased
with
the
plan
for
engagement
with
the
council
and
the
community
moving
forward
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
work
on
this
at
least
monthly.
This
year.
M
Yeah
a
very
good
conversation
and
thanks
mack
and
stephanie
at
lisa.
This
is
it's
been
interesting
listening.
You
know
listening
to
the
program
of
how
it's
going
forward
and
listening
to
other
council
members,
and
I
agree
with
a
lot.
M
That's
certainly
been
said,
and
I
appreciate
what
councilman
robertson
just
said
in
terms
of
flexibility
and
all
you
know
it's
it's
to
me:
it's
something
that
maybe
it's
not
exactly
what
we
thought
this
would
be
when
we
get
going
into
it,
but
I
think
actually
it's
it's
something
we're
moving
into
areas
that
we
really
need
to
be
into
and
to
be
engaged
to
address
homelessness,
and
you
know
people
who
have
who
are
helpless,
people
who
need
human
services.
M
This
is,
and
something
we
have
to
keep
in
mind
is
this
is
just
not
a
bucket
that
we
can
just
do
about
anything
we
want
to
do
and
it
gives
us
the
ability
to
deal
with
and
work
with
a
group
of
the
community.
We
have
just
real
hard
time
otherwise,
so
I
think
it's
it's
a
great
thing.
We're
taking
advantage
of
this
whole
thing.
M
One
of
the
questions
I
have-
and
I
think
we
in
some
of
the
conversations
we
kind
of
talk
about
as
if
we
I
mean,
I
think
the
60
40
and
the
concept
of
this
is
all
kind
of
tied
together.
So
it's
not
as
if
you
can
take
to
my
understanding,
you
can't
take
the
40
percent
and
launch
some
programs
with
people
who
are
not
connected
with
the
housing
units.
M
The
idea
is
that
the
reason
is
for
the
people
down
lower
in
in
the
the
categories
of
housing
and
availability
is
that
the
services
are
to
help
people
who
need
to
be
have
a
permanent
housing.
Actually,
as
as
we
went
through
the
process
and
went
through
the
presentation,
it's
all
tied
together.
So
in
order
to
keep
people
have
people
become
successful
in
housing,
we
need
the
services
and
those
are
connected.
M
So
I
think
that
we,
you
know
we
just
have
to
kind
of
look
at
this
as
not
two
buckets
that
we
can
go
off
and
do
things
differently.
There
are
interconnect
it's
my
understanding
am
I
is
that
pretty
much
right
or
am
I
missing
it
or
what's
your
assessment
of
how
these
two
things
are
put
together?
M
K
K
What
we
are
going
to
show
you
at
the
next
study
session
is
that
there's
a
relationship
between
wanting
those
services
directly
on
site
and
having
them
be
most
effective.
So
the
likelihood
is
that
that's
the
model
that
you
would
want
to
do
in
any
event.
But
but
our
understanding
is
that
the
two
are
not
directly
linked
and
connected,
though
the
narrative
out
there
is
that
they
are
because
a
number
of
people
that
have
more
developed,
50,
90
work
programs
are
suggesting
that
they're
planning
on
spending
all
the
money
in
an
interconnected
way.
K
So
we're
actually
breaking
down
those
questions
for
you
and
we'll
have
more
definitive
answers,
but
I
don't
believe,
there's
a
legal
requirement
in
the
bill
that
says
only
those
people
living
in
the
building
can
access
the
service
down
below
it's
more
about
providing
the
services
and
having
the
relationship
of
having
the
services
on
site
for
the
continuum
of
care
model
to
work
best.
M
Right
right,
yeah,
because
these
are
the
these-
are
people
who
really
have
trouble.
Maintaining
you
know
permanent
housing
without
resources
without
the
continuum,
so
I
I
you
know,
I
think
that's
yeah.
It's
a
good
way
to
explain
it.
I
think
that's,
I
think
it's
exciting.
I
think
it
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
do
things
we
just
haven't
had
before
so
looking
forward
to
it.
C
C
There
are
so
many
buckets
that
you
need
to
evaluate
and
allocate
the
funding
towards,
and
that's
going
to
be
the
real
challenge,
but
I
I
want
to
you
know
when
I
look
at
what
we're
doing
in
eastgate
and
the
supportive
housing
that
we're
putting
in
there
and
the
homeless,
shelter
and
the
the
hope
that
we
can
get
people
stably,
housed
and
and
solidly
on
their
feet
and
that's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
services
and
this
money
can
pay
for
the
services
required
to
help
those
people
be
successful.
C
And
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
all
the
kinds
of
services
that
we're
going
to
need
in
that
environment
and
council
member
robertson
reference
mid.
I'm
I'm
the
representative
for
mid.
So
I
know
well
the
programs
that
the
mid
dollars
pay
for
and
I'm
looking
at
a
pilot
project
that
was
done
two
years
ago
that
was
very
successful
with
the
chronically
homeless.
C
So
you
know
we
should
be
looking
at
the
programs
that
we
need-
and
I
know
you'll
be
talking
to
all
the
providers
there
and
the
people
with
the
professional
experiences
to
what
kind
of
programs
do
we
need
to
fund
in
order
to
get
the
support
for
this
population
that
they
need.
I
hope
that
there
is
an
emphasis
on
same-day
services,
same-day
treatment
services
for
people
so
that
if
they
want
to
address
any
addictions
that
they
have,
they
can
get
the
service
right
then
and
there
and
they
don't
get
put
off
for
a
month.
C
I
hope
that
we
can
pay
for
some
sort
of
a
housing
navigator.
I
know
there's
a
company
called
housing
connector
that
the
county
uses
right
now,
that's
been
very
successful
in
connecting
very
low
income
individuals
with
housing
that
they
can
afford
in
the
region,
and
so
they
have
a
great
program
computer
program
that
they're
using
to
find
these
housing
opportunities.
C
C
C
C
The
staff
want
to
have
one
last
say
here
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
item.
K
C
J
As
you
mentioned
this
evening,
staff
is
seeking
final
action
from
the
council
by
way
of
ordinance,
six
five,
six
nine
to
approve
with
conditions
the
east
gate
office
park
rezone.
This
matter
was
last
in
front
of
you
on
february
16th,
for
the
initial
consideration
with
that,
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
kathy
garlar's
city
attorney,
kathy.
R
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
mayor
and
council
members,
as
as
mr
miyaki
just
said,
the
matter
before
you
for
a
decision
tonight
is
a
decision
on
the
eastgate
office
park,
rezone
application,
which
is
an
application
seeking
to
rezone
approximately
a
14-acre
parcel
from
office
and
community
business
to
office
limited
business
2.
This
is
a
quasi
judicial,
proceeding,
a
process
3
where
the
hearing
examiner
held
a
hearing
and
made
a
recommendation
to
approve
with
conditions
the
rezone
application
and
no
appeal
of
that
recommendation
has
been
filed,
so
drew
folsom.
R
One
of
the
city's
land
use
planners
a
few
weeks
ago
gave
you
a
more
detailed
presentation
around
this
application,
and
the
hearing
examiner's
record
has
been
in
the
file
available
to
the
council.
The
decision
tonight
is
a
closed
record
proceeding
and
the
council's
decision
must
be
made
based
on
the
hearing
examiner's
record.
The
alternatives
that
you
have
tonight
are
to
approve,
as
recommended
by
the
hearing
examiner
to
in
number
two
to
add
more
conditions
or
modifications
to
the
application.
R
Your
third
alternative
is
to
remand
it
back.
If
you
think
that
there
is
something
missing
to
the
hearing
examiner
for
an
additional
hearing
or
you
can
deny
the
application,
the
ordinance
that
was
in
your
packet
ordinance
6569
assumes
that
the
council
would
be
voting
to
approve
here
to
approve
the
hearing,
examiner's
recommendation
with
conditions,
and
if
the
council
chooses
to
make
a
different
decision,
then
we
will
need
to
come
back
later
with
a
an
alternative
ordinance
based
on
your
direction.
C
C
So
are
there
any
questions
or
comments
on
what
we're
about
to
look
at
okay?
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve.
G
C
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
and
it
passes.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
We
have
one
more
item.
This
is
about
the
good
neighbor
agreement.
Advisory
committee
appointments
mr
miyagi.
J
J
J
So
this
evening
we
have
a
number
of
folks
here
for
presentation
of
this.
These
two
members
we
have
both
listed
and
and
tommy
pratt,
as
well
as
mike
brennan.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
over
to
liz
liz.
P
S
I
am
here
tonight
with
one
of
our
senior
land
use
planners
tony
pratt,
who
is
also
the
project
manager
for
the
homeless,
for
the
conditional
use
permit
application
for
the
homeless
for
the
congregations
for
the
homeless
project
tony
and
I
will
be
providing
you
some
information
tonight
for
suggested
appointments
to
a
good
neighbors
agreement,
advisory
council
and
the
that
will
inform
the
conditional
use
permit
process
to
cite
a
permanent
men's
shelter
at
13620,
southeast
east
gateway.
S
The
direction
we
are
meeting
from
council
this
evening
is
to
actually
get
council
appointment
for
the
bellevue
resident
at
large
positions
of
the
good
neighbor
agreement
advisory
committee.
S
The
agenda
for
this
evening
does
include
a
brief
summary
of
the
development
review
process
for
the
conditional
use
permit.
That
has
been
requested
by
congregations
for
the
homeless
and
some
information
about
the
intersection
between
the
permitting
process
and
also
this
good
neighbor
advisory
agreement
committee.
We
will
provide
more
information
about
the
gmat,
as
we
call
it
for
its
acronym
and
we'll
talk
about
the
makeup
of
the
of
the
group
and
also
the
two
proposed
at
large
members.
T
T
The
submitted
application
from
congregations
for
the
homeless
and
to
talk
about
specifically
the
development
review
process,
which
is
very
prescribed
by
the
homeless
services
land
use
code
amendment.
So
it
is
bifurcated
into
two
steps:
the
pre-application
and
then
also
the
the
actual
development
review
process.
So
I'm
going
to
start
tonight
to
talk
about
the
area
in
blue,
which
is
the
pre-application
timeline,
and
so
congregations
for
the
homeless
has
essentially
completed
everything
under
this
timeline.
They
met
with
us
in
september,
and
we
held
a
pre-application
meeting.
T
T
So
now,
moving
on
to
the
development
review
process
itself,
so
there's
two
ways
in
which
a
development
excuse
me,
a
homeless,
homeless
services
uses
operator
can
get
a
permit.
The
first
is
a
development
agreement
which
is
shown
on
the
top
timeline
of
the
spectrum
in
red
and
then
at
the
bottom
is
the
conditional
use.
Cfh
has
chosen
the
conditional
use
route
they
submitted
their
conditional
use
on
january
6th.
T
So
the
purpose
of
the
meet
and
confer
meeting
is
to
allow
bpd
to
have
conversations
with
cfh
to
talk
about
the
operational
and
safety
standards
for
the
forthcoming
shelter.
It
gives
an
opportunity
for
the
bpd
to
look
at
the
draft
standard
to
make
tweaks
changes
to
weigh
in
on
how
these
operations
will
occur
at
the
shelter.
The
purpose
of
the
meet
and
confer
being
located
in
this
location
is
is
that
there
is
a
requirement
by
the
land
use
code
of
a
reporting.
T
Now
on
in
between
the
public
meeting
and
the
gna
input
that
you
see
on
the
spectrum,
there
will
be
on
a
separate
timeline:
the
good
neighbor
agreement
advisory
committee
meetings.
They
will
meet
on
a
separate
track
from
what
you
see
on
the
screen,
but
their
end
product
is
due
before
the
director's
recommendation
to
the
hearings
examiner
because
that
document
informs
the
director
of
the
conditional
use
application.
T
That,
then,
is
submitted
to
the
hearings
examiner
for
review.
Now
everyone
knows
that
the
hearings
examiner
is
an
impartial
party
that
is
hired
by
the
city
for
quasi-judicial
applications
like
conditional
uses.
The
hearings
examiner
oversees
the
public
hearing
and
is
at
the
hearing
that
any
person
may
participate
by
submitting
written
comments
to
the
director
submitting
written
comments
by
to
the
hearings,
examiner
and
then
also
provo,
providing
oral
comments
during
the
hearing.
The
hearings
examiner
considers
the
recommendation
and
the
public
comments
prepares
the
record
and
issues
the
decision
on
the
proposal.
T
Now
on
this
time
spectrum
you
will
see
that
the
hearings
examiner
decision
is
subject
to
an
appeal.
If
the
appeal
happens,
it
will
come
to
city
council
and
then
subsequent
to
that.
If
there
is
further
actions,
they
go
to
superior
court.
Lastly,
on
this
time,
spectrum
I'd
like
to
highlight
the
timeline
for
a
conditional
use.
A
conditional
use
can
take
approximately
9
to
12
months
to
go
through
our
process,
so
that's
an
overview
of
the
development
review
process.
The
next
screen.
T
T
It
requires
that
the
development
services
department
director's
recommendation
for
the
required
conditional
use
be
informed
by
a
good
neighbor
agreement.
This
agreement
will
address
operational
and
communication
commitments
tailored
to
the
eastgate
campus
site.
The
agreement
is
formed
by
the
good
good
neighbor
agreement,
advisory
committee
or
again
gnac
with
the
assistance
of
a
technical
committee
team
next
slide.
T
So
what
is
the
purpose
of
the
geonet?
What
is
it
supposed
to
do
so?
The
purpose
of
the
genac
is
to
foster
communication
between
the
community
and
the
homeless
services
operator.
The
gnac
represents
the
community
neighborhood
and
city-wide
interests.
It
ensures
that
issues
of
importance
are
identified
early
in
the
approval
process.
The
gene
act
considers
the
community
adjacent
land
uses
in
the
area
and
provides
design
guidance.
T
T
The
technical
support
team
is
composed
about
the
same
six
members,
primarily
from
city
staff,
from
parks
and
community
service
fire
employees.
The
team
will
also
include
up
to
two
members
from
either
faith-based
or
non-governmental
organizations
and
will
include
representation
from
the
proposed
shelter's
closest
neighbor
plymouth
housing.
S
Thank
you
tony
appreciate
that
tonight
we
are
asking
council
to
consider
two
bellevue
residents
to
represent
the
city
at
large
interests,
as
required
by
the
land
use
code.
This
recommendation
attempts
to
balance
the
need
for
timeliness
in
forming
the
gmac,
with
making
sure
that
we
have
good
at-large
representation.
S
Both
of
the
individuals
in
this
recommendation
have
shown
interest
in
the
shelter
and
have
requested
to
be
involved
in
this
process.
James
porter
and
pete
bryan
are
being
recommended
for
council
consideration
and
potential
appointment.
They
both
bring
a
strong
commitment
to
the
city
and
our
continued
success
as
we
endeavor
to
move
toward
a
good
neighbor
agreement.
S
Jason
porter
is
the
majority
owner
of
honda
of
bellevue
and
would
represent
the
greater
bellevue
community
and
also
be
another
voice
for
the
businesses
that
are
located
near
the
proposed
shelter.
He
would
join
three
other
representatives
from
the
nearby
businesses
to
continue
to
balance.
The
committee
jason
has
thoughtfully
brought
forward
questions
and
concerns
about
the
relationship
between
the
shelter
and
business.
S
We
appreciate
that
he
will
bring
strong
knowledge
of
the
area
and
the
business
community,
along
with
an
interest
in
finding
an
agreement
that
will
recognize
the
specifics
of
the
site
and
adjacencies
honda.
Bellevue
has
as
an
entity
than
following
this
process
for
citing
the
shelter
up
to
this
point
and
hopes
to
continue
their
involvement
with
jason
on
the
gnac
committee.
S
The
second
person
that
is
being
recommended
is
pete
bryan
and
he
is
following
his
interest
in
and
commitment
to
belgium
after
recently
completing
the
bellevue
essentials
class
last
year.
Pete
has
a
strong
record
of
involvement
in
the
northeast
bellevue
community
and
has
been
involved
in
the
great
neighborhoods
planning
effort
that
community
development
has
spearheaded.
S
C
G
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
who
to
direct
this
question
to
might
be
mike
or
or
or
liz
or
tony,
but
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
take
a
moment
to
address.
G
We
had
two
oral
communications
during
the
early
part
of
this
evening
and
I
was
wondering
if
we
could
just
cover
off
quickly
on
the
process
or
the
outreach
to
first
advertise,
these
at
large
positions
and
kind
of
what
the
process
was
to
select
these
two,
these
two
individuals
and
then
also
just
a
little
bit
about
a
little
bit
of
the
process
going
forward.
It
seems
like
there's,
maybe
some
lack
of
communication
in
terms
of
the
the
gene
act.
G
That's
already
been
put
together,
but
perhaps
you
know
it
hasn't
quite
started
yet,
but
maybe
there's
an
anticipation
that
they
should
have
received
some
materials.
So
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
just
address
looks
like
liz
might
be
best
a
position
to
respond
to
that.
But
if
you
could
address
those
those
two
comments
from
earlier
this
evening,
that
would
be
great.
S
Yeah,
thank
you
w
mayor,
I'd
be
happy
to
regarding
how
these
how
these
people
were
brought
in
for
consideration.
Both
of
these
individuals
did
express
interest
to
the
development
services
department
and
being
involved
in
the
process.
S
So
the
honda
representative
was
unable
to
participate
as
a
business
within
the
code
requirement
because
they
were
just
outside
of
a
mile
radius
quite
fit
into
that
category.
That
have
been
involved
all
the
way
along
and
brought
a
lot
of
really
good
commentary
to
it
and
have
attended
the
meetings
that
we've
had
previously.
We've
had
the
two
public
meetings
that
ms
pratt
referred
to
in
both
of
those
meetings
we
had.
S
S
He
had
initially
reached
out
to
our
neighborhoods
group,
having
done
some
work
with
them
through
all
the
essentials
and
the
great
neighborhoods
conversations,
so
both
of
those
people
did
practically
come
to
us
after
hearing
about
this
process
that
was
available
through
those
public
meetings
that
we
held,
the
public
names
were
very
well
attended.
We
had
you
know
between
the
two
meetings
you
know
about.
170
people
were
able
to
attend,
so
we
did
try
and
get
good
representation
there
out
to
the
community
and
tried
to
be
as
transparent
as
possible
within
that.
S
The
second
question
about
moving
the
process
forward
is
really
we're
just
starting.
You
know,
quite
quite
frankly,
and
honestly
ms
pratt
has
sent
out
letters
to
those
people
that
we
have
been
able
to
place
into
positions
on
the
committee,
and
we
have.
S
We
are
working
with
a
facilitator,
getting
the
facilitator
ready
to
go
we're
expecting
to
stand
that
up
as
soon
as
we
can,
but
certainly,
I
think,
with
trying
to
find
the
right
people
to
fill
the
slots
and
such
we're
we're
not
quite
where
we
wanted
to
be,
but
we'll
be
moving
pretty
quickly.
From
now
on.
These
meetings
are
going
to
be
run
under
the
open,
opma
open
public
meetings
act,
so
we
will
be
noticing
the
meetings
prior
to
them
and
we
will
have
time
for
public
comment
at
all.
U
I
might
just
throw
just
a
couple
of
quick
comments
into
mayor
as
well
responding
to
the
deputy
mayor,
so
this
this
is
the
first
time
that
we
have
implemented
this
process.
This
is
new
in
the
land
use
code
and
those
of
you
that
were
on
the
the
council.
When
the
code
was
developed,
it
was
very
thoroughly
discussed
and
trying
to
find
the
balance
between
making
sure
that
we
have
robust
community
involvement,
but
also
not
an
overly
cumbersome
process
to
get
through
at
the
same
time.
So
as
a
balance.
U
So
this
is
a
unique
body
with
the
majority
of
the
members
being
appointed
by
the
department,
the
department
director,
and
I
think
that
the
process
that
we've
gone
through
did
bring
a
fairly
broad
base
of
interests
that
we've
appointed
to
this
group
representing
business
neighborhoods
folks
that
are
concerned
about
it.
Some
that
may
be
more
supportive.
U
So
I
think
we
have
a
really
broad
set
of
representation
on
the
on
the
appointments,
so
they
will
play
a
robust
role
in
the
permit
process
and,
as
liz
noted,
we
are
just
getting
started
and
there
will
be
an
opportunity
along
the
way
here,
as
we
get
this
on
the
ground
and
moving
for
broad
community
engagement.
U
I
understand
mr
litov's
kind
of
skepticism
about.
Will
this
be
a
successful
or
not?
In
all
honesty,
I
have
a
certain
amount
of
trepidation
as
well.
I
want
this
to
be
a
successful
effort,
not
a
divisive
one,
and
that
is
the
goal
to
make
sure
that
we
are
bringing
those
voices
together
and
finding
a
place
where
we
find
compromise,
sometimes
but
resolution
to
move
this
forward.
U
This
is
an
important
service
that
the
city
needs
and
that's
been
understood,
so
we're
working
hard
to
get
this
in
place
to
get
information
out
to
those
that
have
been
appointed
to
the
group
and
we're
ready
to
get
to
work
after
we
get
the
final
two
positions
appointed.
So
thank
you
for
the
question
great.
C
Good
councilmember
robertson.
O
I
had
some
of
the
similar
questions
to
jared
debbie
mayer,
so
I
appreciate
you
going
through
that
so
thoroughly.
I
think
that
this
is
the
first
time
we've
done
it.
The
code
says
that
the
two
residents
are
to
be
appointed
by
the
city
council.
O
That
is
not
really
the
process
that
was
used
here.
What
would
process
that
was
used
here
is
the
city
council
is
confirming
appointments,
that
staff
is
recommending,
and
that's
I'm.
I
am
totally
happy
with
these
people
that
are
being
recommended,
but
this
was
really
not
us
deciding
it
was.
You
can
say
yes
or
you
can
say
no
so
the
next
time
we
do
this,
because
I
know
there
will
be
a
next
time
because
there's
a
lot
more
need.
O
I
really
think
that
the
applications
should
come
to
the
council
and
we
can
decide
who
to
appoint
or
the
mayor
deputy
mayor
can
recommend
in
the
council,
because
it's
really
not.
This
is
not
really
a
council
appointment.
It's
a
confirmation
so
but,
like
I
said,
I'm
happy
with
the
people
and
I'm
planning
to
vote.
Yes.
The
other
question
I
had
before
I
leave
that.
O
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
a
broader
request,
asking
people
who
logged
on
to
the
meeting
verbally
if
they
want
to
apply
without
sending
out
emails
to
everyone
that
was
involved
without
posting
it
on
our
website.
I
don't
think
is
really
the
way
we
do
things
we
always
advertise
for
openings
on
boards
with
commissions.
I
got
an
email
today
that
we
have
an
opening
on
our
civil
service
commission.
So
I
think
that
that
is
in
the
future.
O
What
we
should
do,
I'm
not
saying
we
should
redo
this,
but
I
think
that
would
be
better.
Finally,
I
had
a
question
about
the
k-12
representative.
I
was
looking
at
the
code
and
it
required
it
requires.
I
don't
know
where
that
feedback
is
coming
from.
It's
not
coming
from
me,
but
it
where
the
code
says.
O
The
k-12
is
a
parent
or
guardian,
representing
the
k-12
perspective,
with
local
knowledge
of
the
enrollment
area,
where
the
use
is
proposed
to
be
located.
I
really
like
melissa
davida.
I
think
she
will
be
a
great
representative.
My
question
is:
does
she
I
know
she's
the
deputy
superintendent?
Does
she
also
meet
this
criteria,
because
that
is
who
is
supposed
to
serve
on
the
committee.
T
I
can
address
that
question.
She
does
meet
the
criteria.
She
has
a
daughter
in
10th
grade
at
samamish
high
school,
so
she
fulfills
the
k-12
perspective
and
then
we
also
thought
because
of
the
homelessness
issues
that
are
presently
within
the
bellevue
school
district,
that
she
would
bring.
Some
knowledge
of
the
homeless
bases
that
the
district
is
facing
into
this
gene
act
process
and.
O
Do
you
consider
that
to
be
close
enough
for
local
knowledge
of
the
enrollment
area?
I
would
think
that
that
would
be
someone
who
has
kids
at
woodridge,
eastgate,
somerset
or
thai
middle
school
or
newport
high
school.
T
Well,
I
can
only
say
that
melissa's
daughter
goes
to
sammamish
high
school
and
that
the
way
that
the
code
language
is
written,
it's
just
specifically
says
k-12
perspective.
O
With
local
knowledge
of
the
enrollment
areas,
where
the
use
will
be
located,
I'm
okay
with
it
as
is,
but
I
think
we
need
to
justify
that
a
little
bit
better
next
time,
because
that's
not
really
what
the
council
intended.
I
think
melissa
is
going
to
be
great
and
I
want
the
homeless
families
that
are
in
bellevue
school
district
to
be
served,
but
that's
really
not
what
the
ordinance
says
so,
but
I'll
be
voting.
Yes,
thank
you.
C
I'm
just
going
to
interrupt
here
for
a
minute
and
ask
that
we
keep
the
conversation
about
the
two
appointees
that
we're
discussing
right
now.
We
can
talk
about
the
general
process,
but
let's
not
specify
the
other
appointees,
because
that's
not
what
is
on
our
agenda
tonight.
Councilmember
stokes.
M
Oh
yeah,
I
approve
both
of
these
appointments.
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
of
semantics
here
in
terms
of
the
process.
I
think
the
council
is
making
the
appointment.
The
appointment
is
only
made
when
the
council
votes
to
do
so.
M
So
I'm
comfortable
with
that-
and
I
I
trust
I
think
the
staff
did
a
good
job
of
this
and
we
can
do
another
process
differently
next
time,
but
I'm
quite
comfortable-
and
I
I
think
the
two
individuals-
and
I
know
about
jason
culture,
coulter
and
his
family
and
councilmember
robertson-
will
remember
that
they
were
very
engaged
in
the
eastgate
system
advisory
committee
and
were
very,
very
helpful,
very
collegial,
very
positive
about
things
and
I
and
what
I
hear
about
pete
ryan
is.
M
He
is
also
a
very
capable
and
good
representative,
and
I
think
the
process
process
worked
well,
so
I'm
comfortable
with
it
and
looking
forward
to
getting
through
the
semantics,
getting
through
the
process
and
actually
getting
to
the
business
at
hand.
So
I
I
will
vote
for
both
of
these.
C
H
Thank
you.
I
support
the
two
individuals,
a
hundred
percent,
and
but
I
do
feel
that
councilman
roberts
made
a
very
good
point
and
I
think
this
you
know
we
happen
to
have
a
good
two
good
persons
that
we
all
support
this
time.
But
just
you
know
for
the
future.
We
never
know
what
kind
of
people
would
be
applying
right.
So
we
need
to
follow
the
intention,
the
rules
that
we
have
established.
H
So
I
appreciate
councilmember
stokes
sentiment
absolutely
and
I
don't
think
we
disagree
with
that
yeah,
but
I
think
councilmember
robertson
made
excellent
point.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
so
I'll
just
say
the
deputy
mayor
and
I
were
consulted
on
this
before
this
recommendation
came
before
council
and
it
was
more
than
just
looking
at
two
names
that
were
pushed
to
us.
There
was
conversation
and
there
was
you
know,
analysis
of
the
choices,
so
this
was
these
were
two
people
that
we
felt
were
the
best
of
the
people
that
were
proposed,
and
so
I'm
glad
to
hear
you
do
too.
So
it's
more
than
just
a
staff
process.