►
From YouTube: Bellevue City Council Meeting - July 11, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Before
we
start,
I
want
to
inform
everyone
that
council
member
robertson
is
unable
to
attend
tonight
in
person
she'll
be
here
virtually
though
she's
been
exposed
to
covid
and
although
she's
tested
negative
and
feels
fine,
she's
being
careful
and
not
being
here
tonight.
So
she
will
be
virtual.
A
A
B
Thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
We
have
four
pre-registered
speakers
for
oral
communications
and
I'll
remind
the
public.
The
oral
communications
is
for
a
period
of
no
more
than
30
minutes,
and
speakers
will
be
allowed
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak.
Three
speakers
will
be
allowed
to
speak
to
either
side
of
one
particular
topic,
and
with
that
I
will
call
our
first
speaker
who's
karina
o'malley,
who
is
joining
us
virtually.
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
What
has
come
you
occupied
us,
you
know
what
this
means
they
more
dangerous
and
that's
your
communists
because
they
make
us
life
miserable.
You
know
what
I
mean
and
I
spoke
to
you
for
30
years
from
microsoft
in
96,
and
I
told
you
why
you
doing
here,
you're
freaking
a
zombie,
a
pure
creatine,
you
don't
understand
what
has
happened
when
amazon
will
become,
he
promised
25
probably
will
be
40
or
50..
You
don't
understand.
E
Why
is
he
doing
it's
not
enough
room
in
bellevue
for
everybody
in
35
years
ago,
when
I
moved
to
bellevue
this
nice
provincial
city,
I
lived
before
in
big
city
with
12
15
million
people.
I
know
what
is
mean
big
city,
better,
be
nice,
beautiful
air
traffic,
everything
good
price
for
apartment
super
guys.
Why
are
you
doing
this
with
your?
What
is
I
call
dory,
garbage
rats
instinct.
You
know
what
this
mean.
You
will
doing
nothing,
you
don't
do
nothing
for
30
years.
You
don't
understand
this.
Almost
every
percentage.
E
Thinking
right
now,
countries
go
to
wrong
direction,
a
tech
company
supposed
to
be
spoiled
stopping
by
definition,
because
when
we
don't
stop
on
them,
you
know
what
this
means
they
make
america
concentration
camp,
make
from
us
a
zombie.
Everybody
knows
this.
You
cannot
sit
all
day
in
internet
in
your
home,
look
tv.
This
is
all
this
all
us
life.
What
is
we
will
have
right
now,
this
not
come
to
my
soul.
You
know
what
this
means
but
baby.
What
is
we
have
right
now
is
a
old
zombie,
it's
a
nightmare!
E
That's
exactly
what
has
happened,
so
amazon
need
to
be
stopped,
and
I
give
you
before
experience
with
you
new
york.
You
know
what
has
meant
12
million
people.
They
don't
take
them
out,
never
give
chance
ever
for
one
open
business
or
building
guys.
What
are
you
doing
here?
Come
on
you're,
not
exactly
idiot.
By
hundred
percentage,
I
give
you
75
percentage,
but
probably
25
percent,
of
your
brain
working,
not
for
your
personal
interest
for
people
too.
It's
150
000
people
in
in
bellevue.
Now
so
with
another
25
000
idiot,
we
will
be
all
dead.
F
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members.
My
name
is
vic
bishop
chair
legislative,
chair
of
the
eastside
transportation
association.
Some
of
you
may
remember
that
I
served
two
full
terms
on
the
transportation
commission
and
his
chair
for
one
year.
The
tfp
is
a
familiar
planning
document
and
an
important
one
for
the
development
of
our
transportation
system.
F
F
F
Meanwhile,
the
pre-covered
traffic
congestion
is
back
and
the
explosive
growth
in
downtown
and
other
employment
and
commercial
activities
is
ongoing.
Eta
has
calculated
that
the
new
development
in
downtown
will
add
over
27
000
new
parking
stalls
and
5
000
stalls
in
bel
red
when
the
current
development
is
open
for
business.
F
That
number
of
parking
spaces
translates
into
over
15
000
pm
peak
period.
Vehicle
trips,
which
is
a
very
large
number.
This
plan
cannot
handle
that.
I
ask
that
you
take
staff's
second
option
for
tonight,
which
is
to
delay
the
approval
of
the
2022-2033
tfp,
send
it
back
to
the
transportation
commission
to
evaluate
which
of
the
70
plus
road
capacity
projects
that
are
included
in
the
tip
that
should
be
in
the
tfb
and
then
do
a
formal
environmental
impact
statement,
as
we've
always
done
for
this
very
significant
document.
F
In
eta's
estimation,
the
extension
of
northeast
6th
street
to
120th
avenue
northeast
from
washdot's
funded
project
ending
at
116th,
and
this
is
a
city
obligation
that
is
the
number
one
downtown
street
grid
project.
We
believe
the
council
should
accelerate
that
project
amongst
others.
Thank
you.
The
opportunity
to
comment.
B
G
Wonderful
well
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newman
house
and
council
members.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
opportunity
to
make
a
few
brief
remarks
this
evening.
My
name
is
maria
frost,
I'm
the
new
director
of
transportation
at
kemper
development
company.
I
am
also
a
board
member
of
the
east
side,
transportation
association.
However,
tonight
I
am
speaking
on
behalf
of
kdc.
G
I
appreciate
very
much
the
work
that
went
into
putting
the
tfp
together
over
the
last
several
months.
Long
before
I
was
at
kdc.
This
is
a
critical
and
exciting
time
for
the
city
of
bellevue.
I
want
to
limit
my
comments
today
to
comp
plant
policy
tr2,
which
I
believe
should
carry
weight
with
and
guide
current
and
future
tfp
decisions
and
transportation
work.
As
mr
bishop
already
pointed
out,
tr-2
states,
the
city
should
aggressively
plan,
manage
and
expand
transportation
investments
to
reduce
congestion
and
expand
opportunities
in
a
multi-modal
and
comprehensive
manner.
G
B
Thank
you,
miss
frost,
and
that
is
the
end
of
our
pre-registered
list.
I
would
ask
if
there
is
anyone
else
participating
virtually
that
would
like
to
make
comment.
Please
use
star9
to
raise
your
hand
and
anyone
joining
us
here
in
council
chambers.
Please
raise
your
hand
if
you
would
like
to
make
a
comment.
B
A
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
aye,
hi,
okay,
great,
let's
see
we're
on
to
the
consent
calendar.
Is
there
a
motion
to
pass
the
con
consent,
approve
the
consent,
calendar
and.
A
I
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
The
first
topic
under
your
study
session
agenda
this
evening
is
the
council's
consideration
of
a
proposed
parks
ballot
initiative
to
be
put
up
for
a
vote
on
this
coming
november,
general
election
and
just
by
way
of
background,
the
council
has
identified
for
consideration
a
potential
ballot
as
one
of
their
key
priorities
and
has
engaged
on
this
matter
a
number
of
times,
most
recently
on
june
6
with
the
staff.
So
tonight
staff
is
seeking
direction
to
advance
this
ballot
initiative
forward.
J
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyake
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newhouse
and
members
of
the
council,
I'm
michael
shiasaki
and
once
again
tonight,
I'm
joined
by
tony
call
the
director
of
finance
and
asset
management.
So
we
returned
tonight
for
discussion
and
direction
on
the
park's,
long
range
funding
strategy
and
we
are
seeking
direction
on
three
kind
of
specific
items.
First,
an
approval
on
the
85
million
dollar
proposed
parks,
voter
initiative
package
and
then
approval
on
the
funding
mechanism,
and
that
would
be
a
nine-year
regular
levy.
J
Lid
lift
at
a
levy
rate
of
15
15
cents
per
1,
000
of
assessed
value
for
capital,
plus
five
cents
per
one
thousand
dollars
of
of
assessed
value
for
maintenance
and
operation
to
fund
the
overall
parks
voter
initiative
package
that
would
go
on
the
ballot
this
november
and
then,
lastly,
we're
looking
for
direction
to
draft
a
single
ordinance
and
ballot
language
for
the
council
to
provide
feedback
on
at
the
next
meeting
on
july,
18th.
J
Then
I
will
review
with
you.
The
project
categories
that
you
approved
at
your
council
meeting
on
june
6th
then
provide
the
latest
feedback.
We
heard
through
an
online
survey
that
just
closed
this
weekend
and
then
tony
will
review
some
of
the
potential
parks
ballot
measure
options
that
we
previously
looked
at
then
some
additional
considerations
included
in
our
recommendation
that
we
will
go
through
and
then
follow
up
with
next
steps.
J
Just
a
slight
time
delay
this
today,
so
the
conversation
really
began
with
your
adopted
council
priority
and
that
was
to
advance
a
parks,
funding
strategy,
including
consideration
of
new
funding
for
operations,
maintenance
and
capital.
J
Gives
me
plenty
of
time?
Thank
you.
So
the
conversation
really
started
back
on
march
7th
at
your
budget
workshop,
and
that
was
the
first
opportunity
to
provide
you
with
kind
of
a
comprehensive
look
at
all
of
the
potential
parks
funding
options.
J
You
followed
up
and
asked
us
to
spend
more
time
and
look
at
some
specific
levy
and
bond
options
that
was
followed
by
the
march
28th
meeting,
where
we
provided
a
review
of
the
update
to
the
20-year
parks
and
open
space
system
plan,
a
plan-
that's
updated
every
six
years
and
that
plan
was
just
approved
on
consent
this
evening.
Thank
you
very
much
that
was
followed
on
april
18th
by
additional
information
on
park,
bonds
and
levees.
J
We
also
brought
back
some
early
information
on
a
potential
park
impact
fee,
and
then
you
provided
us
input
on
what
the
park
board
role
should
be
in
this
process.
That
was
followed,
followed
on
june
6th,
with
a
specific
direction
on
proposed
project
categories
for
funding
in
a
potential
voter
initiative.
J
So
here
is
the
overall
timeline
and
amongst
those
council
dates,
I
just
spoke
about
also
in
april,
and
in
may
the
park
board
weighed
in
and
in
response
to
all
the
input
they
received
in
the
parks
and
open
space
system
update
they.
They
first
had
a
long
discussion
and
provided
well.
They
put
together
a
package
of
recommendations
on
those
preferences
and
priorities
they
heard
from
the
public,
their
their
communication
to
you
all
was
finalized
on
may
10th,
and
that
certainly
has
been
how
the
list
of
project
categories
has
come
together.
J
So
that
brings
us
to
tonight's
discussion
and
then
followed.
Hopefully
on
june,
excuse
me
july
18th
with
the
ballot
language
and
the
ordinance
coming
back
for
your
feedback
next
time
with
final
approval
needed
by
july
25th.
J
So
here's
a
list
of
the
project
categories
that
you
approved
at
your
june
6th
meeting
they're.
These
were
the
categories
that
were
recommended
by
the
park
board
and
I
guess
these
all
have
pretty
much
stayed
consistent
in
our
recommendation.
That's
moving
forward
this
evening,
except
we
are
no
longer
recommending
that
the
2008
parks
levy
be
retired
and
there'll
be
some
additional
discussion
on
that.
In
just
a
moment.
J
So
here's
the
latest
community
feedback
that
we
just
heard
in
a
online
survey
that
was
just
completed
this
past
weekend,
and
so
this
is
the
second
online
survey.
There
was
a
statistically
valid
survey
and
an
earlier
online
survey
that
were
completed
over
the
winter
and
over
the
winter,
for
the
parks
and
open
space
system
plan
and
and
once
again,
what
we
heard
from
the
community
on
this
was
really
very
similar
to
what
we
heard
in
the
previous
two
surveys.
J
You
know
in
many
ways
people
want
us
to
equally
invest
in
continuing
to
buy
more
parks
and
open
space,
and
they
also
want
to
see
that
we
continue
to
redevelop
and
renovate
the
parks
we
currently
have
in
terms
of
overall
current
use
and
preferences
for
future
investment.
You
know
once
again:
greenways
trails,
open
space
were
the
highest
priorities
along
with
waterfront
access
and
additional
investment
in
neighborhood
and
community
parks.
J
I
would
say
one
of
the
changes
that
we
saw
in
this
survey
and
that
was
additional
preference
for
investment
in
outdoor
recreation,
specifically
sports
fields
and
sports
courts,
and
we
believe
in
a
lot
of
ways,
from
kind
of
an
open
question
that
was
asked
that
it
was
really
the
very
well
organized
pickleball
community
that
came
together
and
said.
You
know
you
really
need
to
raise
this
on
your
priority
list,
so
kudos
to
them
for
being
very
well
organized,
and
I
will
now
turn
this
over
to
tony
call.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
You
director
shiosaki
mayor
deputy
mayor,
as
always,
it's
a
pleasure
to
be
with
you
this
evening.
We've
seen
this
chart
several
times.
In
the
last
few
times,
we've
been
together
on
the
parks
funding.
These
are
the
three
major
ways
or
the
the
most
general
ways
in
which
the
council
can
choose
to
put
a
ballot
measure
before
the
voters
this
november,
the
first
column
I'll
pick
these
as
quickly
very
quickly,
the
first
column,
the
nine
year
bond
can
also
be
as
a
pay
as
you
go.
So
it
has
both
of
those
attributes.
K
The
second
year
20
year
is
only
a
pay
as
you
go,
so
there's
no
bonding
ability
for
that
second
option,
and
the
third
option
is
an
excess
voter
approved
only
bond
so
bonds
only
in
the
third
column,
and
that
does
require
a
60
approval
rating,
and
then
it
also
has
a
40
validation
on
the
last
general
election.
So
moving
forward
from
those
three
options,
staff
also
had
several
other
considerations
that
were
thought
through,
as
we
bring
you
forward
a
proposed
recommendation
for
a
15-cent
levy
this
evening.
The
first
is
an
affordability
threshold.
K
We
understand
the
community
as
well
as
the
world.
Actually
the
nation
at
this
point
is
dealing
with
increased
inflation
and
increased
interest
rates.
We
also
know
that
king
county
has
proposed
to
put
forward
a
king
county
conservation,
futures
property
tax
levy
on
the
november
ballot,
they'll
be
putting
that
ballot
on
for
six
cents
per
1000
of
av,
which
is
a
three
cent
increase
over
the
current
value.
So,
as
we
talk
about
things
that
go
into
considerations
for
the
the
levy
rate,
affordability
threshold
was
one
of
those
options.
K
The
second
item
that
mr
shihasaki
brought
to
your
attention
is
the
retirement
of
the
2008
levy.
That
levy
is
made
up
of
two
components.
The
first
is
a
capital
component.
The
second
is
an
extension
of
the
maintenance
and
operations,
as
city
was
doing
a
deeper
dive
into
that
parks
levy,
some
legal
complexities
and
limitations
in
being
able
to
draft
an
ordinance
and
ballot
language
prove
some
challenges
for
us,
and
so
staff
is
proposing
that
we
do
not
include
the
retirement
of
that
levy
on
the
upcoming
before
you
this
evening.
K
The
last
item
is
flexibility
and
project
timing.
That
goes
to
the
fact
that
we
have
projects
that
need
cash
up
front
and
other
projects
that
make
more
sense
to
be
a
little
later
in
the
nine-year
plan.
So
the
funding
mechanism
that
provided
the
option
for
both
flexibility
and
project
timing,
so
both
a
bondable
amount
and
a
pay-as-you-go
amount
was
the
nine-year
package
it
allowed
for
both
of
those
things
to
occur,
which
is
why
you
see
staff
coming
forward
with
a
recommendation
for
the
nine-year
plan.
With
that,
I
will
turn
it
back
to
you.
Mr
shiasaki.
J
So
this
is
the
nine
year
package,
the
regular
levee
lid
lift,
and
I
I
will
walk
through
what
is
on
this
chart.
It's
a
little
bit
dense,
so
in
the
column
on
your
left
are
the
overall
categories.
They
should
look
very
similar
to
what
you
approved
in
june.
J
So
first,
the
first
category
is
open
space
trails,
wildlife
quarters.
You
know
certainly
one
of
the
most
well
used
and
an
area
that
the
community
would
really
like
to
see
us
continue
to
make
progress
on
so
20
million
dollars
in
that
category,
for
primarily
I'd,
say,
acquisition
of
additional
open
space
and
then
trail
development.
J
Next
category
is
neighborhood
parks.
I
think
you've
heard
there
are
definitely
neighborhoods
in
this
city
that
are
lacking
in
neighborhood
parks,
and
I
will
of
course
bring
up
eastgate.
We
just
went
on
a
great
neighborhood
walk
this
past
week
there,
and
we
certainly
heard
that
and
we've
continued
to
hear
that
that
we
need
to
make
progress
on
acquiring
neighborhood
parks,
particularly
there
and
in
factoria.
J
Next
up
is
a
category
of
recreation
and
community
facilities,
and
this
is
seed
money
for
these
you
know,
potentially
larger
facilities,
indoor
facilities
like
an
aquatic
center
or
a
cross-cultural
center.
Next
up
is
waterfront,
either
redevelopment
restoration
or
development,
and
you
can
see
the
list
of
potential
projects
there.
J
You
know
access
to
the
waterfront
is
a
priority
by
people
who
live
in
bellevue
and
and
some
of
those
parks
are
really
seeing
very,
very
heavy
use
in
need
of
renovation.
J
The
next
category
is
bell
red
and
wilburton,
and
this
is
really
putting
together
a
park
system
there
in
those
areas
that
that
definitely
do
not
have
that.
Yet
there
is
no
park
system
for
the
most
part
in
bel
red
and
we're
really
trying
to
jump
start
that
effort
next
category
is
emerging
sports.
J
This
includes
things
like
pickleball
and
cricket
and
off
leash
areas.
That,
I
think
awfully
sure
is
something
I
hear
about
more
than
just
about
any
issue
right
now
and
then
the
next
category
is
maintenance
and
operations
dollars
for
existing
facilities,
as
we've
seen
some
some
reduction
in
our
budget
over
the
years.
This
will
help
return
some
better
levels
of
service
in
our
system,
as
we
as
we
maintain
and
operate
existing
parks.
J
J
So
there
are
the
recommendations
that
we're
bringing
to
you
this
evening,
both
continuing
with
the
current
levy
and
excluding
it
from
this
package.
J
Next
is
the
85
million
dollar
package
for
this
new
parks
initiative
that
I
just
went
through
and
once
again,
the
rate
at
15
cents
per
thousand
for
capital
improvements
and
five
cents
per
thousand
for
maintenance
and
operations,
and
I
think
that
leads
us
to
the
next
steps,
and
that
would
be
to
respond
to
any
other
questions
that
you
have
that
we're
not
able
to
address
this
evening
and
then
to
draft
this
single
ordinance
and
ballot
language.
For
you
to
consider
at
your
next
meeting
next
monday
and
then
finally,.
J
Those
are
the
areas
once
again
that
we
are
seeking
your
direction
on
this
evening.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
L
Mayor,
so
I
am
in
favor
of
moving
ahead
with
this
tonight.
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
we've
heard
from
people
is
how
much
we
value
our
park
system,
how
we
want
to
grow
our
park
system
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
interests
there.
I
think
that
the
list
category
list
is
good
and
I
absolutely
will
be
voting
in
favor
of
moving
this
forward
tonight.
I
would
like,
however,
the
recreational
community
facilities
to
have
a
little
bit
more
funding.
L
So
I'm
I'd
like
to
ask
mr
shiiyosaki,
if
we
wanted
to
add,
say
another
five
million
to
that.
How
would
you
balance
that.
J
So
so
you
are
suggesting
I'm
assuming
that
we
stay
at
the
85
million
dollar
number
correct.
J
You
know,
I
think,
as
we
look
at
the
overall
list,
if
you
wanted
to
add
some
additional
funding,
I
mean
there
could
be
a
little
money
shaved
off
of
the
community
parks
category
and,
let's
see
and
perhaps
under
neighborhood
parks.
Even
though
that's
a
real
priority,
you
know,
I
think
there
could
be
some
shaving
off
of
some
of
those
other
categories
to
add.
Maybe
another
two
or
three
million
dollars
to
recreation
and
community
facilities.
L
So
yeah
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
could
add
5
million
to
the
recreation
and
community
facilities.
Those
are
some
big
projects
that
but
they're
important
big
projects
that
are
going
to
need
capital
from
a
lot
of
different
sources,
and
this
is
this
is
one
of
the
many
sources
that'll
be
required.
L
So
I
would,
I
would
personally
like
to
see
that
brought
up
to
15
million
and
bigger
staff
could
figure
out
how
to
adjust
the
other,
the
other
fund
levels
to
do
that
so,
but
other
than
that.
I'm
very
happy
with
this
would
love
to
see
it
move
forward.
Love
to
see
the
council
vote
in
favor
of
putting
this
on
the
ballot
thanks.
A
Thank
you
so
councilmember
stokes
I'll
call
on
you
next,
and
so
we
have
three
we'll
put
that
screen
back
up
with
the
three
items
we're
discussing
and
then
I'd
like
council
to
weigh
in
on
councilmember
robertson's
suggestion
of
moving
money
from
one
source
into
recreation
and
community
facilities.
M
M
You
know
the
families,
kids
and
everything
out
and
getting
the
community
out
to
really
embrace.
This
was
just
a
fundamental
change
in
what
we
were
doing
funding
at
that
time,
and
that
was
a
lot
of
money
for
that
time,
but
look
what
we
have
done
and
it's
taken
a
long
time
to
get
to
a
lot
of
these
places,
but
I
think
we
can
look
back
and
and
realize
that
if
we
had
not
done
this,
we
would
not
be
the
city
we
have
today
by
any
means,
so
we
have
a
great
foundation.
M
What
we're
talking
about
now
is
building
on
that
and
for
the
future.
It's
you
know.
We
are
sitting
in
park
and
people
love
getting
out
for
all
of
these
things.
We've
talked
about
in
terms
of
financing.
This
is
a
it's
a
large
amount,
but
it's
a
very
small
amount
compared
to
everything
else.
That's
going
on
so
it's
it's
a
balance
there
and
I
think-
and
I've
now
been
involved
with
this
and
worked
actually
worked
with
jennifer
robertson.
M
She
was
just
on
the
council
at
that
time
we
worked
together
with
parks
issues
and
was
involved
with
main
bar
bay
and
finally
getting
downtown
park
after
I
don't
know
what
10
20
years
finished,
but
there
are,
as
we
pointed
out
here,
that
one
of
the
things
we
have
with
the
increased
population
and
the
the
diversity
the
different
type
people
coming
in
so
many
people
coming
here
to
bellevue
to
enjoy
themselves
to
work
here
and
all
we
are
just
behind
in
terms
of
capacity.
M
So
this
is
a
very
well
thought
out
levy
and
and
plan
going
forward.
The
arts
I
mean
the
not
arts.
Well,
arts
has
also
been
involved
a
little
bit
because
there
are
some
aspects
of
this
in
terms
of
the
parks
in
that
part,
but
the
parks
board,
which
I'm
liaison
for
and
was
on
the
parks
board
for
three
years
for
cambridge
council,
did
a
tremendous
job
of
working
through
this
and
talking
to
people
getting
the
information
out
and
and
they're.
M
You
know
seven
people
who
live
in
the
communities
who
believe
in
bellevue
who
love
bellevue
and
who
have
different
viewpoints
and
all,
but
they
came
together
and
really
really
worked
hard
with
mr
shiosaki's
and
and
staff's.
You
know
assistance
in
terms
of
the
numbers
and
what
this
means
and
all
that
and
came
up
with
a
very,
very
solid
plan
and
fortunately,
going
out
to
the
community.
The
community
is
saying
yes,
this
is
what
we
need.
M
This
is
what
we
want,
so
I'm
very,
very
excited
about
this
I'll
I'll
make
some
comments
later
on
the
particular
place
thing
that
councilman
robertson
has
brought
up
and
helped
me
look
at
that.
But
I'm
I'm
very
excited
about
this,
and
this
is
something
we
can
do.
M
We
should
do
and
we
will
do
because
it's
it's
really
well
thought
out
it's
what
the
people
in
the
community
want,
and
it's
so
important
for
bellevue
going
forward
with
all
and
the
more
big
buildings
the
more
we
have
people
coming
in
the
more
we
need
outdoor
space,
the
more
we
need
to
continue
to
be
a
city
and
a
park
and
really
mean
that
for
every
citizen
and
anybody
coming
into
bellevue.
So
I'm
very
happy
to
to
approve
this
and
ready
to
get
get
going
and
get
it
passed
and
get
to
work
on
him.
H
Thank
you,
vladimir.
I
support
this
levy.
It's
because
you
know,
as
we
all
know
about,
you
is
city
in
the
park,
and
the
quality
of
life
is
important
to
all
of
us
and
with
the
development,
economic,
economic
growth.
You
know
all
these
has
to
similarly
be,
you
know,
be
updated
to.
H
You
know,
to
meet
the
demands
and
the
the
needs
of
the
community
and
the
community
is
changing.
So
there
has
to
be
a
different,
newer
and
various
different
type
of
facilities,
so
it
all
makes
sense
what
you're
proposing.
I
agree.
I
think
you
need
to
have
the
mno
levy
that's
going
to
continue
and
you
want
to
continue
the
the
for
the
previous
mno
life.
H
If
that
makes
sense,
because,
as
I
mentioned,
things
are
getting
older
and
the
city
provides
services
that
normally
need
to
be
a
continued
to
be
kept
up
with,
so
you
need
to
figure
out
money
to
do
it.
H
So
I
support
that.
I'm
also
emphasizing
that
you
know
we
have
needs
that
still
need
to
be
met.
So
we
want
everything.
Obviously
everything
we
need.
We
need
a
lot
more
than
we
do
so
we
have
to
be
fiscally.
You
know
prudent,
making
sure
that
we
set
priorities.
What
we
need
to
do
when
we
can.
So
I
appreciate
what
you're
doing
considering
the
economic
situations
the
factors
of
levy
burden
the
city
is
facing
right.
We
can
just
say:
well,
tough
luck.
We
just
have
to
catch
the
pay.
We
have
to
balance
it.
H
You
know,
so
I
think
it's
really
very
thoughtful.
So
I
think
this
is
a
very
thoughtful
process,
but
the
thing
that
we
heard
is
from
council
member
robertson.
Yes,
we
there
are
more
active
sports
needed,
but
so
do
so
are
other
things.
So
it's
really
a
balance.
H
You've
gone
through
was
a
very
deliberate
consideration.
You
come
up
with
85
million
dollars,
so
we
now
want
to
maybe
put
another
5
million
somewhere
and
that's
a
prob.
That's
a
challenge.
I
don't
have
a
problem
now
without
changing
the
85
million,
because
you're
going
to
be
cutting
back
on
something
else
unless
you,
unless
it's
built
into
the
budget.
Well,
that's
fine!
So
I'm
suggesting
that
maybe
there's
some
flexibility
to
this.
That's
what
I'm
saying
right
and
as
time
goes
on
situation
can
change.
Our
financial
situation
might
change.
H
We
can
do
something,
so
I
would
appreciate
our
support,
maybe
some
flexibility
into
this
and
that's
something
that
we
have
to
come
get
from
your
staff
right,
because
we
don't
know
tony
knows
how
exactly
you
build
into
this.
Are
you
having
to
just
the
last
dollar?
I
hopefully
not
because
you
know:
that's
not
prudent
financial
management.
H
I
would
like
to
have
a
few
million
dollars
more
too
for
some
other
things
right,
but
we
got
to
make
those
considerations
and
sacrifices,
so
I
support
councilman.
Robertson's
need
wants
to
have
more
money.
I
I
think
throughout
the
discussion
as
we
move
forward,
there
will
be
possibly
other
you
know,
requests
to
you
as
well,
but
there
will
be
other
adjustments
that
can
be
made.
So
I'm
just
asking
that
maybe
this
is
something
you
take
seriously.
H
Maybe
you
can.
If
you
can
show
us,
you
can
come
back
with
some,
you
know
tweaking
that'd
be
great,
but
if
you
cannot,
I
would
hope
again.
We
have
the
opportunity
you
come
back
hey.
You
know.
I
know
we
have
other
opportunities
with
private
partners,
private
funding.
These
are
all
the
considerations,
so
I'm
not
going
to
give
up
or
hopefully
say
wow.
H
H
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
members,
on
followed
by
deputy
mayor.
N
Yes,
thank
you
tony
and
michael.
I
too
support
your
thoughtful
recommendation
really
trying
to
balance
affordability
and
supporting
existing
facilities.
O
m
neighborhood
park,
because
they
really
are
community
building
and
and
definitely
living
in
south
bellevue,
east
gaydon
and
factoria
are
a
bit
of
park
desert
and
then
strategic
investments
and
all
of
the
the
sports
of
pickleball
cricket
and
off-leash
aquatic
center
cross-cultural.
N
N
And
so
I
know
that
you
can
take
a
look
at
that
to
see
what
that
looks
like,
because
it
does
appear
that
all
of
the
haircut
came
from
the
same
category
and
then
I,
the
other
question
I
have
or
a
question
that
I
have
is.
I
thought
last
time
when
we
came
and
we
were
talking
about
the
categories
we
talked
about,
how
rigid
the
allocations
are
to
the
categories.
N
So
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
comment
on
the.
What
we
see
here
are
those
locked
in
that
says
if
this
says
10
million,
that
we
would
if
there
was
an
opportunity
for
an
acquisition,
purchase
or
a
partner
that
was
willing
to
help
us
but
needed
some
matching
funds
that
were
locked
into
these
percentages.
Or
could
you
help
with
that
and
then
I,
the
last
question
I
have
just
to
clarify
for
everyone
is
for
the
levy
these
are
based
on
the
dollars
and
the
actual
rate.
N
K
Ahead,
okay,
I'll
I'll
take
a
stab
at
both
of
those
counselors.
On
the
first
question,
you
asked
related
to
flexibility.
I
think
when
we
it's
good
feedback,
when
we
bring
back
the
draft
ordinance
next
week.
That
is
the
place
where
you
would
be
able
to
see
that
language
and
the
flexibility
in
that
in
that
and
the
clauses
there.
The
last
time
we
did
a
levy
which
was
for
transportation
and
parks
back
in
2016..
K
We
talked
about
categories
but
didn't
really
allocate
specific
dollars,
except
for
on
the
congestion
projects,
and
instead
we
said
these
are
the
things
we're
trying
to
accomplish.
So
we'll
take
a
look
at
that
language
and
pay
attention
to
that
as
we
bring
that
back
to
you
next
week
and
want
me
to
take
the
second
question.
Do
you
want
to
add
anything
to
that
before
I
move
on
you.
J
Know
the
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
briefly
was
about
leveraging,
I
think
we're
assuming
just
as
it
has
been
accomplished
through
the
2008
levy.
Leveraging
has
been
a
huge
part
of
what's
been
able
to
be
accomplished
thus
far,
I
mean
whether
it's
non-profit
partners,
like
the
bellevue
botanical
garden
society,
we're
very
hopeful
on
splash
forward
in
the
future,
but
I
think
there's
also
many
grants.
The
recreation
and
conservation
office
through
the
state
has
provided
many
dollars
for
land
acquisition
and
development
so
leveraging
these
dollars
big
part
of
it.
N
K
Certainly
so
this
property
tax
the
way
it's
set
up.
It
is
under
rc
code
8455,
which
I'm
sure
you
all
have
memorized,
but
just
in
case
you
don't
the
the
it
works
just
like
our
existing
property
taxes
work.
So
once
2023
comes,
that
will
be
the
only
year
in
which
it's
quote
unquote
a
millage
rate,
so
that
year
will
be
15
cents
times
assessed
value
divided
by
a
thousand.
So
that's
that's
the
calculation
that
first
time
that
will
generate
a
pot
of
revenue.
K
After
that,
the
pot
of
revenue
is
the
only
thing
that
adjusts
and
adjusts
by
your
direction
on
a
one
percent
allowable
each
year
and
new
construction.
So
once
you
get
past
the
first
year
of
2023
assessed
value
is
not
really
related
to
the
amount
of
revenue
it
generates
because,
again,
washington,
state
law,
property
taxes
is
revenue
generated
and
you
increase
that
or
choose
not
to
increase
that
each
year
through
your
property
tax
vote
at
the
end
of
the
year.
So
does
that
make
sense
to
you,
council
members.
N
A
Okay,
deputy
mayor,
followed
by
council
member
barksdale.
Thank
you
mayor.
C
So,
michael
antoine,
thank
you
so
much
for
the
great
presentation
and
just
a
couple
of
quick
questions,
but
in
general
I'm
certainly
in
favor
of
this
and
I've
talked
to
a
couple
of
residents
today
that
share
concerns
about
inflation,
the
economy,
obviously
we're
going
to
go
through
a
difficult
or
challenging
budget
cycle.
Is
this
the
right
time?
But
you
know,
ultimately,
we
have
heard
time
and
time
again
from
residents
that
parks
are
important
to
this
community
time
and
time
again.
C
Second
of
all,
the
residents
are
the
ones
who
are
going
to
make
the
decision
on
this
through
through
through
an
actual
campaign
in
actual
through
their
voting.
So,
but
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
about
that
survey:
did
we
make
it
clear
that
we
were
considering
this
levy,
or
was
that
survey
really
just
more
pie
in
the
sky?
What
kind
of
facilities
do
you
use
in
the
city
and
if
we
were
to
make
investments?
Where
would
you
like
to
see
it
well.
J
You
know
as
a
part
of
the
it's
your
city,
article
that
went
out
to
all
bellevue
residents.
That
was
a
that
was
a
part
of
the
discussion
that
you
all
were
considering
this
next
potential
parks
voter
initiative,
and
it
was
a
chance
to
weigh
in
on
what
you
we
were
all
considering
at
this
point.
So
I
believe
the
two
were
definitely
linked
as
a
part
of
this
open
survey.
That
was
that
just
went
out.
Okay,.
C
C
For
me,
though,
tell
the
top
two
priorities,
for
me:
are
the
neighborhood
parks,
especially
for
the
east
gate
victoria
area.
C
You
know
if
we
acquire
any
other
parks
property
before
we
we
take
care
of
the
folks
there.
I
think
that'll
be
a
real
shame,
so
I'm
really
hoping
that
we
can
get
a
park
in
that
area
and
then
on
the
recreation
community
facility.
So
we
have
in
here
the
aquatics
cross-cultural
center.
Are
there
any
other
facilities
under
that,
and
have
you
even
considered
at
this
point,
how
we're
going
to
separate
or
delineate
the
percentage
of
money
in
that
bucket
goes
towards
each
one
of
those
facilities.
J
C
Forward,
okay,
okay,
great
I'm
glad
we
can
still
provide
some
direction
on
that
so
very
much
in
favor
of
moving
this
forward,
and
I
also
agree
with
councilmember
robertson.
I
would
like
to
see
a
little
bit
of
an
increase
in
this
bucket.
I
think
we've
all
been
very
impressed
and
very
supportive
of
the
aquatic
center,
but
as
well
as
the
cross-cultural
center
that
needs
funding
as
well.
So
we
need
to
support
that
as
well.
So
thank
you
very
much.
O
Thanks
for
the
presentation-
and
I
support
proceeding
with
what
you
have
in
terms
of
what
you're,
seeking
and
looking
at
the
possibility
or
exploring
the
possibility
of
moving
five
percent
and
would
just
like
to
know
the
impact
of
what
that
would
mean
in
terms
of
the
actual
items
where
it
comes
from
a
couple
questions
one:
where
might
urban
farming
fit
in
these
buckets.
J
That
is
well,
you
know,
let's
see,
we
could
put
it
in
the
bucket
of
emerging
sports,
not
that
it's
a
sport,
but
it
is
emerging.
So
you
know
I
I
think
we
could
definitely.
It
depends
on.
You
know,
maybe
it's
in
a
community
park
site
or
a
neighborhood
park,
so
I
think
there's
ways
that
we
could
definitely
look
at
that
yeah.
O
Okay,
yeah,
I
think
it's
of
growing
importance.
I
mean
we
have
an
urban
garden.
We
have
one
that
is
sort
of
a
space
that
is
focused
on
sustainable
urban
gardening
and
even
though
community
members
can't
directly
plant
in
that
area,
some
of
the
food
does
go
to
shelters
and
such,
but
then
also,
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
growing
interest
in
there
is.
We
have
a
few
spaces
now.
O
I
think
where
people
can
plant
residents
can
plant
whatever
they
want
in
terms
of
food,
so
I
think
providing
for
some
funds
for
grant
funding
in
that
space
would
be
important
and
then
just
in
terms
of
the
flexibility
conversation
that
we've
been
having
what's
the
value
add
of
separating
community
parks
and
neighborhood
parks,
just
because
last
time
this
came
to
council,
I
was
asking
about
how
residents
might
even
understand
the
difference
between
the
two
so
and
and
we're
talking
about
being
a
bit
more
flexible
with
funding.
J
J
You
know,
some
of
the
community
parks
are
those
larger
facilities
like
mercer
slough,
like
wilburton
hill.
I
think
there
has
been
in
what
we've
heard
from
the
community:
more
of
a
need
for
those
walk
to
neighborhood
parks
that
we're
trying
to
distribute
throughout
the
city
and
in
providing
that
you
know,
10-minute,
walk
for
every
resident
to
a
park
site,
and
so
there's
been.
J
I
think
there
were
overall
categories
that
were
also
in
the
parks
and
open
space
system
plan
that
we're
kind
of
responding
to
also
so
that,
so
that's
in
part
why
they've
been
kind
of
separate
categories.
O
J
It
it
could,
you
know,
I
think,
we're
both
trying
to
provide
some
specificity
to
voters.
What
they
will
see.
Hopefully,
is
this:
should
this
levy
move
forward?
So
I
think
you
know
some
specifics
on
what
people
are
buying,
along
with
some
flexibility,
as
we
acquire
properties
that
maybe
there's
just
site,
that's
available
first
in
factoria,
as
opposed
to
eastgate,
so
we
want
some
flexibility
as
this
moves
forward,
because
part
of
it
is
opportunistic
in
terms
of
land
acquisitions,
specifically.
A
Yeah
I'll
speak
to
that
just
for
a
minute
having
been
on
the
parks
board,
so
you
have
like
your
neighborhood
parks.
You
have
your
community
parks,
you
have
your
regional
parks
and
they
all
have
different
funding
sources
like
you
can
get
money
from
the
state
or
from
the
feds
to
pay
for
regional
parks
and
sometimes
community
parks,
but
not
necessarily
a
neighborhood
park.
So
I
think
it's
important
to.
I
agree
with
what
everybody
is
saying
tonight
that
we
need
to
have
the
flexibility
and
the
ability
to
leverage
funds.
A
I
would
like
to
do
that
without
taking
it
away
from
anything,
but
to
say
that
if
we
can,
you
know
have
the
opportunity
to
leverage
this
funding
and
get
more
funding
into
this
at
this
time
without
taking
it
away
from
another
area.
I
would
be
all
for
that
so
because
I
think
the
pool
and
the
cross-cultural
center
are
very
important.
A
You
know
the
the
value
of
the
parks.
I
think
this
is
such
a
great
investment,
because
our
parks
are
free.
You
know
you,
don't
you
don't
have
to
pay
to
go
there.
If
you
live
in
a
place
where
you
don't
have
a
yard,
like
me,
the
parks
become
your
yard
and
it's
the
place
where
you
can
go
with
your
family
or
friends
and
and
play
and
hang
out,
take
your
dog
and
maybe
sometimes
garden,
and
so
it
really
is
a
huge
part
of
our
lives
in
bellevue.
A
I've
lived
in
cities
that
don't
put
a
lot
of
funding
into
that
and
they
may
have
parks,
but
nobody
wants
to
go
there
because
they're,
so
filthy
and
they're
not
safe
and
they're,
just
not
a
pleasant
place
to
be
so
I'm
so
proud
of
the
maintenance
that
we
do
at
our
parks
really
am,
and
I
see
you
know,
workers
out
there
every
day,
making
it
a
really
nice
pristine
place
for
anybody
who
wants
to
visit
our
parks-
and
I
love
that.
So
I
appreciate
this
proposal
that
you
have.
A
I
approve
the
first
three
things
and
with
council
member
robertsons.
I
I
think
what
I
liked.
What
council
member
lee
said
about
having
that
flexibility
and
council
members
on
set
about
leveraging,
so
is
that
enough
direction?
Great,
I
do
believe,
I
think,
are
we
doing
a
vote
yeah.
Okay,
so
I
mean
enough
direction
on
council
member
robertson's
or
how
do
you
want
to
handle
that.
L
I
think
so
I
mean
obviously
having
flexibility
is
good,
I
think
also
sharing
with
the
public
what
to
expect
it
has
value,
and
I
really
appreciate
it
councilmembers
on
pointing
out
that
that
is
the
category
that
took
a
lot
of
the
brunt
of
the
reduction
in
the
in
the
proposed
levy
amounts.
So
I
I
would
like
to
see
that,
and
if
that
can
just
come
back
next
week,
when
we
take
action
on
this,
that
would
be
great.
I
definitely
heard
several
council
members
be
interested
in
that
issue,
so.
A
J
You
know
I
I
can
put
a
very
specific
proposal
on
the
table
right
now
for
you
to
consider,
and
that
would
be
in
coming
up
with
the
five
billion
dollars
to
add
to
recreation
and
community
facilities.
I
would
recommend
taking
a
million
from
community
parks
taking
2
million
from
waterfront
restoration
and
development,
taking
a
million
from
bell
red
wilberton
and
taking
a
million
from
emerging
sports,
so
that
would
be
what
I'm
recommending.
I.
A
Just
hold
on,
let
me
see
if
there's
a
list
here
somewhere
that
I
can
work
with
here.
We
go
okay,
yeah!
Well,
I've
got
it
on
my
packet
here,
so
minus
a
million
from
community
parks
correct
minus
two
million
from
waterfront
waterfront.
L
That
would
be
fine
with
me
or
we
could
take
two
million
from
bellred
wilberson.
We've
spent
a
lot
of
resources
in
that
area
already,
and
we
should
see
some
developer
constructed
public
amenities
in
those
areas
as
well
in
the
years
ahead.
K
I
think
that
would
probably
cause
us
to
go
back
and
look
at
that
15-cent
levy
rate.
I
don't
know
what
the
outcome
would
be
to
that,
but
I
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
that.
Yeah.
K
Q
K
Think
that
16
to
17
cents
is
my
gut
instinct
guess
I
don't
have
that
math
quickly
in
my
head,
but
that's
doing
some
rationing.
O
R
J
Actually
suddenly,
but
I
think
we'd
probably
try
to
leave
it
at
the
four
million
dollar
total
number
per
year
it
might
switch
which
category
it
went
under
a
bit
but
yeah.
I'm.
A
Gonna
follow
my
question
up
a
little
bit
here
because
I
remember
when
I
was
on
the
parks
board.
Sometimes
opportunities
came
to
add
funding
to
a
project
that
then
gave
us
funding
that
we
could
put
somewhere
else
from
the
levy,
and
so
I
guess
personally
that's
what
I
would
like
to
have
that
flexibility
to
do
without
actually
taking
away
from
anything
intentionally.
But
that's
just
me
so
we
could
put
a
motion
on
the
table.
A
B
M
Mean
I
I
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
the
aquatic
center,
I
swam
in
college
and
always
been
a
swimmer,
and
I
it's
a
great
thing.
What
I
think
we're
trying
to
balance
here
is,
and
it's
a
hard
thing
one
we
talk
about,
having
flexibility
and
the
other
thing,
we
want
certainty
and
you
can't
have
both
of
those
all
the
time,
and
so
I
don't
know
where
what
I
guess
we're
struggling
with
is
how
do
we?
How
do
we
have
some
flexibility
but
not
leave
everything
every
time,
there's
something
to
be
done.
M
We
have
a
discussion
or
how,
where
we're
going
to
take
it
from
what
is
the
flexibility?
Who
decides
the
flexibility,
how
much
and
all
that
so
I'm
just
concerned
about
getting
it
too
complicated
at
this
stage.
Thinking
this
through
when
what
we're
really
looking
at
is
this?
Is
this
a
good
number?
Do
we
have
the
the
things
that
are
important
in
that?
I
think
the
quiet
center
is
extremely
important.
It's
also
the
one
that
we
can
probably
get
more
support
in
the
community.
M
In
addition
to
this-
and
I
think
having
flexibility
is
not
saying,
let's
have
flexibility
by
putting
a
definite
number
over
here.
For
this.
That's
not
actually
flexibility
except
for
a
particular
project.
So
I
think
you
were
almost
hitting
on
something
that
was.
Is
that
actually,
as
we
go
and
as
mr
shiazaki
said,
these
are
you
know,
numbers
that
are
flexible
and
we,
as
we
know,
as
we've
gone
through
the
last
since
2008,
these
numbers
change
as
things
come
up
and
we
have
other
opportunities.
M
So
I
think
if
we
have
an
expression
that
we
clearly
want
to
maximize
what
we
can
for
the
aquatic
center,
because
that's
a
big
lift,
but
it's
also
a
huge
thing
for
bellevue,
but
not
get
to
a
point
where
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
from.
You
should
be
eight
or
nine
or
nine
and
a
half
and-
and
also
I
don't
know.
It
looks
really
good
to
be
saying.
Well
we're
going
to
take
something
here
from
here
from
here.
M
A
Okay,
so
we
have
two
ideas
out
here:
we
have
council
member
robertson
who's
asking
for
a
specific
ad
to
recreation,
community
facilities
with
a
recommended
subtraction
from
four
different
areas
versus.
If
we
get
the
opportunity
to
add
to
recreation
community
facilities,
we
would
do
that
are
the.
Is
there
any
other
comments?
Councilmember
lee,
I.
H
Support
councilmember
robertson's
proposal
based
on
especially
the
staff's
recommendation,
and
I
believe
that
is
a
very
this
is
the
first
time
we
really
had
a
concert
discussion
on
this,
so
I
think
after
our
conversation,
they
responded
and
I'm
very
satisfied
with
it
for
a
number
of
reasons.
One
is
the
place
that
they're
taking
it
from
like
bell
right
corridor.
Barracuda
is
a
wild
made
plan,
it's
a
big
development
and
it's
going
to
be
going
on
for
many
years
and
there's
a
commercial,
viable
recreation.
Everything
is
there.
H
So
I
believe
that
I
have
a
high
confidence
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
assets,
a
lot
of
financial
support,
a
lot
of
opportunity
to
develop
what
we
want
to
be.
What
we
talk
about
is
just
really
not
very
much,
but
so
I'm
very
confident
that
this
is
a
place
that
will
not
miss
or
not
suffer.
You
know
taking
away
some
of
the
money
so
on
the
other
one,
the
others
you
suggested
just
by
on
a
rational
basis.
H
I
can
see
without
going
going
through
the
details,
because
I
trust
that
by
going
through
the
list,
you
have
a
very
good
picture.
I
trust
that
you're
very
thoughtful,
so
I
feel
that
this
recommendation
fits
very
well
with
councilmember
robertson's
recommendation,
so
I
support
that.
C
You
yeah,
I
think
councilman
stokes
actually
makes
a
good
point
if
we're
talking
about
flexibility
and
now
we're
going
to
get
very
precise
about
which
buckets
we're
putting
this
money
into,
but
but
in
general,
as
I
previously
stated,
you
know
I
am
in
favor
of
adding
to
the
the
the
bucket
of
the
of
the
recreation
community
facilities.
C
My
my
only
and
and
I
think
staff
makes
a
a
a
great
recommendation
off
the
cuff
there.
My
only
comment
would
be
not
to
take
it
from
community
parks.
Leave
community
parks
there
to
me,
that's
that's
a
priority,
but
I,
like
the
other
suggestions
in
terms
of
waterfront
bell
red
wilberton
in
the
emerging
sports.
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
but
I
would
leave
the
community
parks,
as
is
thank
you.
O
K
A
Well
hold
on
we're
still
discussing
yeah
and
no
so
councilman
resign.
N
So
could
we
have
you
come
back
whether
it's
this
exact
off
the
top
of
your
head,
throwing
out
where
the
haircuts
need
to
come
from,
so
both
that
coming
back
with
where
the
haircuts
are
best
to
get
to
the
5
million
into
the
recreation
community
facilities
and
the
kind
of
language
that
gives
us
some
of
that
flexibility
and
the
allocation
of
dollars,
because
I
think
we
actually
want
both
and
if
there's
a
way
to
create
that
language
that
gives
us
both
the
adjustments
now
and
some
language
of
flexibility.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful.
A
So
I'm
hearing
two
things:
I'm
hearing
add
5
million
to
recreation,
community
facilities
by
subtracting
from
other
categories,
and
then
I'm
also
hearing.
We
want
to
be
able
to
leverage
and
be
flexible
with
the
amount
of
funding
that
we've
raised,
so
we
can
take
advantage
of
opportunities
as
they
come.
A
I
think
I
totally
agree
with
council
members
on
that.
We
want
that
kind
of
language,
but
what
I'd
like
to
vote
on
tonight
is,
if
we
are
the
the
motion
in
front
of
us
is
to
add
five
million
dollars
to
recreation
and
community
facilities
by
subtracting
from
other
categories.
So
if
somebody
could
make
that
motion.
M
To
ask
for
that,
but
so
I
guess
I
I
I
want
this
aquatic
center
as
much
as
anybody
does,
but
I'm
looking
at
trying
to
look
at
this.
What's
one
we've
got
to
get
this
proposal
passed
and
what
concerns
a
little
bit
is
we're
doing
some
horse
trading
now
and
to
say
that
this
one
is
more
important
than
people
with
community
parks,
or
you
know,
waterfront
restoration
or
whatever.
M
That's
a
group
of
voters.
That's
a
group
of
people.
Have
they
don't
want
a
big
facility?
We've
already
gotten
some
comments
about.
We
don't
want
this
park
changed
with
a
huge
another
building
out
there
and
it
seems
to
me
we're
kind
of
opening
up
this
a
little
bit
and
there
is,
as
you
said,
early
on
and
as
we
know
from
the
past
history,
there's
flexibility
where
we
need
it.
M
I
would
like
to
hear
whether
we
could
add
a
little
bit
more
of
to
the
85
million
that
would
go
to
to
increase
the
the
recreational
I
mean
the
waterfront.
You
know:
where
am
I
trying
to
get
it?
The
yeah,
the
con
recreation
community
facilities,
because
that's
a
big
big
piece-
and
I
think,
if
we
do
that
and
not
give
the
idea
that
we're
kind
of
putting
some
in
a
lower
rank,
will
help
us
a
lot
more
in
terms
of
getting
this
thing
passed
that
we
actually
have
the
money
to
do.
M
A
We
do
because
the
original
proposal
is
to
approve
the
85
million
dollar
proposed
park
ballot
ballot
proposition
and
do
a
nine-year
regular
levy.
Lid
lift
at
this
rate
of
15
cents
per
thousand
blah
blah
blah
blah,
okay
and
so
she's,
proposing
something
separate
that,
after
with
the
85
million
that
we
raise,
we
take
five
million
out
of
some
of
the
other
categories
and
put
it
into
the
recreation
and
community
facilities.
I.
M
A
A
M
L
I
was
going
to
address
what
council
member
stokes
was
asking
about.
So
if
this
motion
passes
or
if
it
fails
there
could
be,
I
believe
it
would
be
in
order
for
another
motion
to
increase
the
amount,
and
so
if
this
one
passes
and
you
increase
the
amount,
then
staff
could
re-calculate
what
the
different
categories
would
be
exactly
so
and
then
we'll
vote
on
the
total.
So
I
I
don't
think
that,
regardless
of
how
the
vote
on
this
motion
comes
out,
I
still
think
that
councilmember
stokes
should
you
want
to
make
a
motion
to
increase
it.
L
A
N
I
still
don't
completely
understand
what
the
viability
is
of
of
not
taking
haircuts
from
the
other
categories
and
asking
for
a
higher
levy
rate.
So
I
feel,
as
though
there's
some
information
missing
in
order
to
vote
on
this
particular
one,
because
although
I
agree
that
this
category
of
recreation,
community
facilities
had
20
million
the
last
time,
we
saw
it
and
now,
instead
of
everything
getting
a
haircut,
this
one
got
cut
by
50
percent.
So
that
doesn't
that
seems
like
it's
taking
the
the
over
the
burden
of
the
reduction.
N
But
what
it's
not
clear
to
me-
and
maybe
you
could
help
explain-
is:
are
we
running
more
of
a
risk
if
we
don't
take
haircuts
from
the
other
categories
and
actually
choose
to
raise
the
levy
rate,
because
you
just
finished
telling
us
from
an
affordability,
threshold
and
and
whatnot
and
a
bunch
of
other
factors
that
the
recommendation
was
the
15
cent
levy
rate?
So
I
feel
as
though
I
need
a
little
bit
more
information
in
order
for
us
to
for
me
to
feel
comfortable
voting
up
or
down
this
particular
item
and.
J
Well,
you
know
I'd
say
we
are
trying
to
be
very
sensitive
to
the
affordability
of
this
potential
voter
initiative.
So
I
think
that's
why
we
landed
more
in
the
15
cent
rate
range
for
for
the
capital
side.
I
I
think
in
terms
of
the
recreation
and
community
facility
category
the
reason
it
took
the
the
largest
cut,
at
least
at
this
point,
with
a
nine-year
level
we're
thinking
of
this
as
seed
money.
J
We
know
there
is
much
more
money
for
both
of
those
projects
that
will
need
to
be
raised
as,
and
so
we
thought
this
would
would
be
the
amount
of
money
that
could
help
move.
Those
continue
to
have
those
projects
move
forward.
I'd
say
they
have
a
little
less
certainty
than
some
of
the
other
projects
on
here,
and
that
was
part
of
the
calculation
in
reducing
that
amount.
A
Okay,
so
the
motion
on
the
table
is
to
add
five
million
dollars
to
recreation
and
community
facilities
by
subtracting
from
other
categories.
It's
been
seconded.
If
there's
no
more
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
say
I
can
you
raise
your
hands
if
you
say
I,
okay,
there's
three
and
all
those
opposed
say:
no,
no,
no,
okay!
So
that
does
not
pass
so
now
we
have
the
original
motion
which
deputy
mayor.
Could
you
read
please.
C
Certainly,
I
moved
to
approve
the
85
million
dollar
proposed
park
ballot
proposition
to
be
funded
by
a
nine-year
regular
levy.
Lid
lift
at
the
levee
rate
of
15
cents
per
thousand
dollars,
av
for
capital
improvements,
plus
five
cents
per
thousand
av
for
maintenance
and
operating
costs,
and
direct
staff
to
draft
the
ordinance
and
ballot
language
and
return
to
council
on
july
18th.
N
N
A
N
And
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because
you
know
when
we
talk
about
recreation,
community
facilities
and
seed
money.
If,
ultimately,
we
need
a
little
bit
more
in
that
category,
because
that's
how
much
matching
funds
are
needed
in
order
to
move
something
along,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
lose
that
capability.
A
Okay,
any
other
discussion
or
questions
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Okay,
thank
you.
Do
you
want
me
to
take
a
break,
or
can
we
continue
on
all
right?
Oh,
let's
go
okay,
so
we
have
another
study
session
item
our
our
legislative
agenda.
Mr
miyake.
Yes
thank.
I
You
mayor
and
council
members,
yes
you're
right,
it's!
The
next
topic
is
a
state
ledge
interim
update
for
you
all.
As
you
may
recall,
the
state
legislature
concluded
its
most
recent
session
in
march
on
our
state
legislative
team,
along
with
state
legislators,
joined
you
for
a
debrief
of
the
session
in
may
tonight.
Our
team
has
a
major
update
for
you
on
how
a
number
of
those
interim
conversations
are
going
to
give
you
contact
as
you
look
ahead
to
adopting
a
state
ledge
agenda.
I
This
fall
for
the
2023
session,
so
joining
us
this
evening
are
genesee
adkins,
our
chief
of
external
affairs,
lacey,
jane
wolf
assistant
director
of
intergovernmental
relations,
both
from
the
manager's
office
as
well
as
brianna
murray,
our
consultant
from
gordon
thomas
honeywell,
that'll
turn
over
to
you.
Genesee.
P
P
P
So
tonight
we
want
to
take
this
opportunity
with
a
long
session
ahead.
We
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
a
good
runway
ahead
of
us.
So
here
are
the
things
we're
going
to
cover
tonight.
P
First,
we're
going
to
run
through
a
handful
of
emerging
top
issues
that
lacie,
jane
and
brianna
will
give
you,
as
kind
of
again
a
compact
snapshot
on
where
these
are
right.
Now
at
this
moment
in
time,
and
then
we're
also
going
to
talk
about
the
state
budgets
like
you,
the
state
is
getting
ready
to
write
its
budgets
and
of
course,
there
are
three
of
those
we'll
talk
about
those
later.
But
that's
getting
underway.
P
S
Wonderful
genesee,
thank
you
for
the
introduction
and
mayor
and
council,
it's
great
to
be
before
you
this
evening.
Virtually
I'm
going
to
start
our
review
of
interim
issues
and
work
groups
with
by
talking
about
the
washington
state
tax
structure,
work
group,
which
the
legislature
created
in
2017
to
identify
changes
to
the
washington
state
tax
code
to
make
it
more
fair,
adequate,
stable
and
transparent.
S
They
are
tasked
with
recommending
legislation
to
the
2023
legislature
that
reflects
a
consensus
agreement
of
the
work
group
on
tax
code
changes
and
that
are
those
changes
that
are
revenue
neutral,
meaning
they
don't
generate
more
or
less
revenue
for
the
state.
The
work
group
has
been
meeting
since
2017
and
has
conducted
significant
public
outreach.
S
They
narrowed
down
a
very
long
list
of
potential
tax
code,
changes
to
the
five
that
are
included
there
on
the
screen
and
they're
meeting
in
september
to
review
these
five
particular
ideas
and
get
more
information
from
the
department
of
revenue.
After
that
september,
meeting
they're
going
to
be
providing
guidance
on
which
of
these
five.
S
Moving
on
to
the
next
interim
issue
is
related
to
the
blake
decision
and
the
legislative
response.
You'll
recall
that,
in
february
of
2021,
the
washington
state
supreme
court
ruled
in
the
state
versus
blake
decision
that
the
state's
statute
making
the
possession
of
controlled
substances
a
felony
was
found
to
be
unconstitutional.
S
S
That
vacating
process
was
very
time
and
resource
intensive
at
the
local
level.
The
legislature
recognized
that
by
allocating
21.5
million
in
the
2022
supplemental
budget
to
cities
to
address
resentencing,
vacation
and
refunds
of
legal
and
financial
obligations
associated
with
those
convictions,
counties
received
similar
appropriated
funds.
S
As
far
as
the
policy
of
possession
of
controlled
substances
suddenly
being
legal,
the
legislature
enacted
a
temporary
policy.
They
made
the
possession
of
controlled
substances
a
misdemeanor.
Previously
it
was
a
felony
current
law
is
that
it's
a
misdemeanor
with
a
requirement
that
law
enforcement
officers
divert
individuals
found
to
be
in
possession
of
a
controlled
substances
prior
to
booking,
into
jail
or
to
prosecution.
Q
Thanks
brianna
now
we're
on
slide
six
regarding
police
reform
and
vehicle
pursuits.
As
you
will
recall,
the
legislature
passed
a
number
of
police
reform
bills
in
the
2021
session
and
in
the
2022
session
they
adopted
three
main
police
clarification
bills
that
provided
greater
clarity
and
implementation,
consistency
to
those
reform
bills.
Those
are
listed
for
you
on
the
slide
here.
Q
Another
reform
bill,
clarification
that
was
considered
but
did
not
pass,
is
senate
bill
5919
regarding
when
and
how
police
may
engage
in
vehicle
pursuits
and
that
bill,
though
it
received
a
lot
of
robust
discussion
and
went
through
many
iterations
as
these
other
bills
advanced
and
they
all
morphed
in
and
ended
up
complementing
each
other
senate
bill
5919
did
not
pass
in
the
past
session,
and
so
we
expect
this
to
be
a
continued
topic
of
conversation
in
the
next
upcoming
legislative
session
in
2023.
Q
Moving
on
to
the
next
topic
and
slide,
seven,
please
is
land
use
and
housing.
You
all
have
heard
heard
several
updates
from
me
last
year
about
these
two
bills.
These
are
two
of
many
land
use,
reform
bills
that
were
considered
during
the
2022
session.
As
you'll
recall,
the
stated
intent
behind
these
bills
was
really
to
address
the
housing
affordability
crisis,
which
I
know
is
a
priority
for
our
council
as
well
the
method
of
using
these
bills.
Q
This
was
a
very
high
priority
of
the
association
of
washington
city's
members,
and
I
know
that
it's
a
it's
a
party
and
a
discussion
topic
for
our
own
council
as
well,
and
we're
excited
that
the
association
of
washington
cities
has
now
hired
a
facilitator
to
do
some
work
with
cities
over
this
summer
and
discuss
where
the
association
of
washington
city's
members
would
like
to
go
on
this
topic
so
very
interesting
and
exciting.
For
those
of
us
who
love
policy
and
now
we'll
turn
it
back
to
brianna.
Please.
S
Great
thanks,
lacey
jane
the
last
of
the
interim
issues
we
wanted
to
brief
you
on
is
around
the
growth
management
act
in
recent
legislative
sessions.
We
have
seen
the
legislature
consider
and
enact
several
different
bills,
making
changes
to
the
growth
management
act,
and
several
of
these
proposals
have
created
additional
cost
burdens
for
cities.
S
P
Not
unlike
the
city
zone
budget
development
process,
then
they
take
all
of
that
input
from
their
agencies
and
see
what
will
fit
more
or
less
into
the
shape
and
space
in
general
of
the
three
budgets
and
then
the
governor
typically
will
roll
out
his
budget
and
usually
the
third
week
of
december,
and
then
the
legislature
picks
those
up
and
that's
usually
how
they
kick
off
the
first
week
of
session
in
the
appropriations
committees.
P
The
good
news
right
now
is
that,
based
on
the
most
recent
snapshot
from
the
economic
and
revenue
forecast,
council
revenues
are
up
slightly,
which
is
good
news.
There's
been
really
good.
Construction,
employment
and
housing
permits
lately
so
good
activity
there,
so
they
are
encouraged
and
they've
on
total
across
the
budgets
have
an
increased
projected
revenue
of
more
than
an
additional
billion
dollars
across
the
three
budgets
for
the
next
two
biennia.
P
I
think
it's
1.3
in
the
next
in
the
current
biennium,
the
one
that
we're
right
now
in
2123
and
then
a
half
a
billion
in
the
2325
biennium
and
that's
the
one
they'll
be
writing
one
for,
but
they
always
look
at
a
four
year
snapshot.
P
So
we're
really
excited
to
get
that
together
and
we're
also
excited
to
see
more
details
in
the
move
ahead.
Washington
transportation
funding
package-
I
know
you
all
did
some
excellent,
advocating
in
the
last
session
and
frankly
in
those
before
that
for
the
city
of
bellevue
and
for
a
lot
of
our
partners.
P
So
washout
is
working
on
that
right
now,
they're
engaging
local
governments
as
well,
so
we're
really
really
excited
to
see
how
that
continues
to
play
out,
because
there
are,
of
course,
major
investments
both
on
highways,
but
also
in
fish
passage
and
in
culvert
removal
and
then
also
in
transit
and
non-motorized
transportation
as
well.
So
we're
very
excited
to
see
that
turning
toward
the
elections,
this
is
just
for
your
information.
P
P
You
can
see
we've
included
in
here
the
current
house
and
senate
makeup,
and
so
there
is
a
possibility
that
the
majority
could
change
hands
or
the
majority
splits
could
change
really
early
to
say
right
now,
because
we're
still
ahead
of
both
the
primaries
and
the
general,
and
there
is
only
one
statewide
race
on
the
ballot
this
year
and
that's
the
secretary
of
state,
and
so
it
will
be
a
less
busy
year
at
the
statewide
level
than
it
will
at
the
legislative
level
and
then
finally,
to
wrap
up
next
steps
ahead
for
us
this
summer
and
fall
we'll
continue
to
work.
P
You
heard
us
mention
awc
more
than
a
few
times.
Several
of
you
are
engaged
with
them
went
to
the
annual
meeting
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
we
appreciate
you
putting
in
the
time
to
do
that,
to
build
bridges
with
other
city
officials
and
then
also
working
with
the
large
city
committee
council
member
robertson.
P
So
we're
really
looking
forward
to
that
again.
This
is
just
an
informational
update,
so
we're
not
looking
for
any
action
out
of
you
this
evening.
I
just
really
wanted
to
give
you
a
good
midpoint
update,
so
that
we
didn't
come
to
you
cold
for
adoption
of
an
agenda
in
the
in
the
chilly
fall.
So
with
that
we're
happy
to
field
any
questions
between
the
three
of
us
that
you
might
have
but
appreciate
your
time
tonight.
A
Great
thank
you.
So
this
is
information
only
and
I'm
really
happy
to
hear
that
in
september,
you're
going
to
do
council
and
individual
briefings
to
get
our
input
on
this
legislative
agenda.
I
appreciate
that
so
any
comments
or
questions
from
anybody.
Okay,
I
have
deputy
mayor
and
council
members
on
deputy
mayor
great.
C
Thank
you
great
presentation
and
thank
you
so
much
sorry
and.
C
All
right,
thanks
for
the
great
presentation
and
thank
you
even
even
more
for
what
I
feel
really
starting
to
get
ahead
and
working
on
this
ledge
agenda
early
getting
prepared
and
I
think
the
the
earlier.
We
are
the
more
of
an
impact
we
are
going
to
have
in
olympia
and
what
are
the
key
priorities
for
us
as
a
council
will
really
hopefully
shine
through
and
really
be
well
understood.
So,
thank
you
so
much
for
for
for
doing
that.
Ahead
of
time.
C
I
had
two
comments
on
two
different
issues,
so
one
on,
and
I'm
so
glad
to
hear
about
at
least
lacey
drain.
It
sounds
as
if
5919
looks
like
it
will
be
addressed
or
it
looks
like
there
is
enough
momentum
that
hopefully,
because
I
was
sorely
disappointed-
they
did
not
come
up
for
a
vote
on
that
last
day
of
the
legislative
session.
C
So
it
sounds
like
that
will
be
something
that
hopefully
will
be
voted
on
at
some
point,
because
it
certainly
did
seem
to
have
a
lot
of
bipartisan
support
and
especially
with
the
data
that
we're
seeing
right
now,
where
washington
state
patrol
alone
has
had
over
a
thousand
incidents
where
individuals
have
refused
to
pull
over
when
being
tried
to
pull
over
with
police.
We're
on
record
are
on
a
record
pace
right
now
to
have
over
50
000
vehicle
thefts
in
the
state,
which
will
be
an
all-time
record,
so
this
desperately
needs
to
be
addressed.
C
So
I'm
really
I'm
really.
I'm
really
hopeful
that
this
will
be
addressed
during
the
during
this
session.
And
then
you
spoke
about
the
the
tax
structure
and
boy.
What
what
a
amazing
state
that
we
can,
even
during
some
challenging
times
with
the
pandemic
and
now
and
if
with
inflation,
etc,
we're
seeing
some
all-time
highs
in
terms
of
revenue
coming
into
the
state,
as
you
just
mentioned
just
recently,
the
1.5
billion
in
tax
revenue.
We
just
learned
about
that
and
there's
what
the
10.5
billion
dollar
increase
in
revenue.
C
Overall,
I'm
wondering
if
there
is
any
consideration
at
all
that
you're
hearing
about,
and
maybe
this
might
be
a
question
for
brianna
about
any
kind
of
tax
relief
for
for
for
residents.
P
Brianna,
I
I
want
to
turn
to
you
in
one
second,
the
one
thing
that
I'll
underscore
that
I
know
she
did
mention
about
the
tax
revenue
work
group
is
that
their
objective
or
kind
of
their
charge
is
to
bring
forward
revenue
neutral
proposals,
so
that
is
the
one
and
and
consensus
bipartisan
proposals,
so
we
won't
see
anything
emerge
and
I'll.
P
Let
brianna
correct
me
if
I'm
stepping
in
it,
but
I
believe
we
won't
see
anything
brought
forward
to
the
legislature
that
doesn't
meet
those
criteria,
and
so
that's
one
thing
that
will
be
interesting
to
look
for
is
whether
or
not
things
can
be
consensus
based
and
bipartisan
and
revenue
neutral,
and
so
really
not
revenue
generating,
but
just
a
reorganization
of
tax
sources.
Brianna.
Do
you
want
to
address
that
question
about
what
you're
hearing
around
tax
rates.
S
There
was
recently
a
call
for
governor
inslee
to
provide
a
gas
tax
holiday
or
reduction.
He's
publicly
announced
that
he
is
not
inclined
to
do
that
from
looking
at
the
various
revenues
available
in
the
three
budgets,
the
transportation
budget
is
the
one
that
is
most
challenging,
so
that
explains
some
rationale
into
that
decision.
Making
what
we
have
seen
other
states
doing
is
enacting
other
sorts
of
rebates
back
to
individuals
that
meet
certain
income
thresholds,
and
I
can
envision
some
proposal
along
those
lines
depending
on
the
economic
environment,
political
environment.
N
Yeah,
thank
you.
You
know.
I
too
appreciate
hearing
about
the
emerging
top
issues
now,
because
I
do
think
it
helps
us
to
be
as
proactive
as
possible
coming
back
in
september,
so
that
we're
ready
to
go,
and
so
that
september
october
means
that
we'll
we
will
have
our
ledge
agenda
ahead
of
committee
days,
because
that's
normally
in
november
for
the
legislature,
so
we're
actually
going
to
be
lined
up
for
that.
N
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that's
great
good
to
hear
about
the
current
revenue
projection.
Is
that
we're
actually
at
the
state
level
collecting
even
more
revenue?
I
think
that's
positive.
I
I
do
want
to
make
sure
we
are
paying
attention
and
advocating
for
any
any
tax
relief
support,
whether
it's
grants
or
some
other
pieces
of
funding.
I'm
also
wondering
in
the
tax
structure
work
group-
one
of
the
items
in
here
is-
is
replacing
the
b
o
tax.
N
So
that's
one
of
my
questions
and
then
my
other
question
is
related
to
on
the
project
phasing
for
the
move
ahead,
washington
there's
what
is
it
25,
30
million
dollars
for
israel
so
that
we
actually
get
that
completed?
N
S
I'll
take
the
bno
yeah
and
I
can
certainly
help
out
on
the
other
one
too.
So
the
tax
structure
work
group
is
evaluating
the
five
options,
including
the
bno
item
that
was
out
that
was
outlined
on
the
slide
and
at
their
september
meeting
they're,
going
to
be
getting
more
information
and
choosing
what
combination
of
those
five
items
to
advance
forward
I'll
share
with
you
that
at
this
stage
with
the
work
group,
not
having
the
full
amount
of
information,
so
it's
very
early
stage
very
early
indications.
S
Changing
making
changes
to
the
bno,
particularly
and
adjusting
it
for
margins,
does
seem
like
something
that
that
may
have
the
consensus
of
the
work
group
amongst
the
all
those
items
listed
there
on
on
the
slide.
So
so
that
seems
to
have
some
some
momentum
behind
it,
although
it
is
very,
it
seems
almost
too
early
to
say
that
so
take
that
with
a
large
grain
of
salt
genesee,
you
do
you
want
to
answer
the
easter
trail
one,
or
would
you
like
me
to
speak
to
that.
P
I
think
I
think
we're
in
good
shape.
I
think
right
now
with
east
trail.
I
think,
because
it
got
a
good
mark
in
there-
and
I
know
councilmember
stokes
and
others
have
been
very
active
with
the
local
coalition
and
oversight,
and
I
know
katie
cousinball
halsey
is
also
working
really
closely
with
them
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
only
coordinating
at
the
site
level,
but
also
coordinating
on
the
additional
funding
needed
to
complete
the
full
corridor.
Brianna
anything
left.
S
I
I
think
that
pretty
much
covers
it.
Washdad
is
going
to
be
making
their
recommendations,
and
I
don't
know
that
they
have
gotten
to
the
nuts
and
bolts
or
details
of
that
work,
and
so
it's
also
just
a
bit
early
in
the
process
and
to
be
doing
a
full
core
press
advocacy
like
we've
done
in
years
past.
N
I
think
that's
just
making
sure
that,
in
that
earlier
phases
is
really
where
we
want
them
to
be
recognizing
that
we're
the
middle
section
of
that
whole
corridor.
So
without
this
component
we're
not
able
to
go
all
the
way
from
renton
up
to
woodenville.
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
hopefully
the
b
o
tax
does
move
and
get
some
legs,
because
this
kind
of
change
would
really
support
our
small
and
local
businesses.
A
L
Three
comments:
first
on
the
housing
bills
and-
and
I
shared
this
and
had
a
discussion
at
the
awc
large
city
advisory
committee-
talking
about
the
housing
bills,
I
think
that
it's
really
going
to
work,
there's
going
to
be
a
bunch
of
bills,
this
next
session,
and
I
think
that
it
would
really
be
in
bellevue
and
all
cities
best
interests
for
us
to
try
to
come
up
with
what
principles
we
could
support
the
type
of
framework
we
could
support.
L
Rather
than
j.
I
mean
I'm
a
huge
fan
of
local
control,
but
let's
see
if
we
can
get
them
to
do
an
incentive
based
or
a
you
know,
minimal,
tiered
approach,
something
like
that,
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
talking
with
all
of
our
other
cities
about
you
know
what
are
the
principles
that
we
could
support?
What
are
what's
the
framework
we
could
support,
because
if
the
cities
go
to
go
to
the
legislature
next
session,
saying
this
is
what
we
will
support.
L
I
think
that
we
stand
a
much
better
chance
of
having
something
that
will
really
work
well
for
cities,
as
well
as
get
the
outcome
that
everyone
wants,
which
is
more
missing
middle,
more
affordable
housing
throughout
the
state
of
washington.
So
to
that
end,
usually
the
legislative
agenda
is
something
that
we
share
with
our
legislators,
and
this
is
bellevue's
position.
L
I
do
think
it
would
be
very
useful
for
us
to
try
to
work
with
other
stakeholders
and
other
cities
to
try
to
come
up
with
something
on
housing
and
whether
that's
something,
I
would
assume
would
be
a
document
other
than
our
legislative
agenda.
But
then
our
legislative
agenda
could
tie
to
that.
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
working
on
that.
L
L
That
says
that
the
state
cannot
take
any
adverse
action
against
a
woman
that
has
had
an
abortion
or
anyone
that
has
facility
assisted.
L
Yet
the
extradition
clause
of
the
us
constitution
says
we
have
to
extradite
people
to
face
charges
where
we
could
have
women
and
doctors
try
to
be
extradited
to
another
state
to
face
charges
which
is
directly
contrary
to
our
own
state
law.
That
says,
we
cannot
take
any
adverse
action,
so
cities
are
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
that,
where
you
know
we
don't
know
what
you
know,
we
don't
know
what
to
do.
L
I
know
that
the
governor
has
directed
state
patrol
not
to
work
out
of
the
extraditions,
and
cities
are
starting
to
talk
about
this,
but
I
think
that
it
would
be
really
helpful
if
the
state
legislature
took
this
up
and
the
state
attorney
general
took
this
up
so
that
we
all
know
what
we
can
and
cannot
do
and
how
much
discretion
we
have
to
receive,
for
example,
refused
to
extradite
a
doctor
who
prescribed
you
know
the
morning
after
pill
or
an
abortion
pill
to
a
patient
in
washington
who
then
took
it
in
idaho.
L
So
that's
something
you
don't
need
to
comment
on
that,
but
it's
something
that
we
need
to.
I
think
the
legislature
needs
to
deal
with.
I
don't
know
if
that
should
be
in
our
alleged
agenda
or
not,
but
it's
it's
it's
an
emerging
issue.
Finally,
I'm
wondering
if
any
of
this,
if
brianna
or
any
of
the
staff
know
whether
we
are
still
in
a
state
of
emergency,
I
haven't
seen
governor
inslee,
lift
it
and
what
is
the
status
of
that?
Do?
L
We
expect
to
be
out
of
a
state
of
emergency
now
in
six
months
next
session.
Do
we
have
any
insight
into
that
thanks.
S
Yeah
absolutely
so
I
will
I
will
show
so
I
was
out
of
the
office
last
week.
I
don't
think
there
was
a
change
but
I'll
just
copy
out
my
comments
with.
If
there
something
may
have
happened
in
the
last
week.
I
may
not
be
fully
up
to
speed.
Last
that
I
checked
in
with
the
governor's
office
staff.
We
do
still
have
a
state
of
emergency.
S
One
of
the
reasons
the
state
of
emergency
is
still
in
place.
It
is
that
it
is
providing
the
authority
for
the
requirement
around
masking
in
sensitive
environments
like
healthcare
settings,
long-term
care
facilities,
things
along
those
lines.
It
is
also
providing.
It
is
also
necessary
in
order
for
the
state
to
fully
pull
down
federal
assistance,
and
so
until
all
of
the
funds
dollars
are
sorted
out,
there's
a
desire
to
have
the
state
of
emergency
remain
in
place.
S
Genesee
did
you
want
me
to
speak
to
the
housing
topic
as
well
sure
go
ahead,
sure
so,
council
member?
I
I
want
to
first
sort
of
commend
you
all
for
doing
a
lot
of
work
during
this
legislative
interim.
I
know
you
recently
had
a
conversation
around
your
next
right.
S
Work-
and
I
want
to
share
with
you
that
you
know
our
our
interaction
with
our
legislators-
extends
above
and
beyond
just
during
the
legislative
session,
but
also
during
the
legislative
interim,
and
so
we
are
in
the
in
the
coming
weeks,
genesee
lacy,
jane
and
myself
meeting
with
our
legislators
to
keep
them
informed
on
the
hard
work
that
you
all
are
undertaking
in
that
space
of
housing
policy.
S
And
then
I
would
just
highlight
the
comment
that
lacie
jane
made
that
the
association
of
washington
cities
has
hired
a
facilitator
to
lead
us
through
a
process
that
we
are
hoping
to
participate
in,
so
that
we
can
have
the
collaboration
with
the
other
stakeholders,
like
you,
mentioned
council
member
and
go
into
the
2023
session,
with
a
good
vision
on
the
best
policies.
Moving
forward.
S
So
feeling
like
we're.
Doing
some
really
positive
work
in
that
space.
To
put
us
in
a
good
position
for
2023.
A
I
had
a
I
had
a
question.
This
is
kind
of
complex
complex,
but
when
I
was
thinking
about
the
state
picking
a
preemptive
strike
on
our
middle
housing
in
our
in
our
cities
and
had
they
said
that
every
neighborhood
needs
would
be
able
to
if
they
wanted
to
well,
they
would
have
to
even
if
they
didn't
accept,
adus
or
ndadu
development.
A
I
wonder
how
that
works
with
our
neighbor,
our
neighborhoods,
that
have
covenants.
So
if
you
have
a
neighborhood
in
bellevue
that
doesn't
allow
that,
and
the
state
says
that
you
can.
The
reason
I
bring
it
up
is
because,
when
councilmember
barksdale
first
got
on
the
council,
I
really
liked
this
what
he
said,
which
was
whatever
we
do
in
one
neighborhood.
We
should
do
in
all
neighborhoods,
and
so
I
feel
like
if
the
state
were
to
make
a
law
about
middle
housing.
A
P
S
It
did
lisa
jane,
do
you
want
to
speak
to
it,
or
would
you
like
me
to
I.
S
Absolutely
so
the
issue
around
covenants
comes
up,
in
particular,
related
to
homeowners,
associations
and
covenants
that
are
put
in
place
by
homeowner
associations.
S
We
saw
language
pertaining
to
those
covenants
included
in
both
house
bill
1782,
as
well
as
house
bill
1660
on
accessory
dwelling
unit
regulations,
the
the
hospital
1660
got
further
through
the
legislative
process,
so
the
language
pertaining
to
hoas
and
covenants
evolved
further
in
that
proposal
than
in
the
1782,
which
dealt
with
all
the
middle
housing
types
and
the
way
that
language
evolved
is
the
legislature
was
inclined
to
exempt
hoas
from
any
of
the
preemptive
language
and
that
caused
significant
heartburn
with
legislators,
as
well
as
many
different
stakeholders,
but
they
felt
that
they
needed
to
provide
that
exemption
in
order
to
comply
with
legal
concerns
that
were
being
raised
by
the
hoas.
S
S
A
Okay,
well,
that's
something
I'd
like
to
include
in
our
conversations
as
we
move
forward
with
the
missing
middle.
Absolutely
thanks
mayor,
mr
miyake
as
well.
All
right,
let's
see
we
have
council
member
lee,
followed
by
council
member
stokes.
H
Thank
you.
That
was
a
great
conversation.
I
really
appreciate
this.
It
gets
you
know
us.
What
early
on
to
have
a
conversation
which
is
more
important
is
the
discussion
of
collaborations
working
with
other
stakeholders.
You
know,
I
think,
that's
emphasized
very
much
so
you
know,
especially
we
are
all
different
right.
It's
jurisdiction,
we're
now
the
same.
So
in
order
to
come
to
some
conclusions,
agreements
moving
forward,
we
need
to
have
discussions,
collaborate
on
the
things
we
can
do
and
understand
the
differences
we
cannot.
H
So
I
think
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
ask
is
tax
structure
workshop.
You
know
that
seems
to
be
pretty
major
discussion.
It
started
in
2017,
you
know
it's
continuing.
Does
how
does
bellevue
participate
in
this?
Do
we
have
the
opportunity
to
give
our
input
our
yeah?
How
do
the
how
value
is
included
in
this
conversation.
P
Brianna,
do
you
want
to
talk
about?
We
how
we
are
engaging
our
staff
here
at
the
city's
finance
department
in
terms
of
trying
to
kind
of
shuttle,
information
back
and
forth
with
that
work
group,
it's
a
public
work
group
and
so
I'll
make
sure
that
you've
got
a
link
to
be
able
to
see
their
proceedings.
But
brianna.
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
the
kind
of
the
bellevue
voice
and
how
we've
worked
on
that.
S
Yeah
absolutely
and
I
apologize
the
lights
go
off
automatically
after
a
few
minutes
in
my
office,
the
so
so
I
will
say,
the
association
of
washington
cities
is
a
part
of
the
work
group,
and
so
as
the
city
of
bellevue,
we
can
submit
to
our
representative
on
the
work
group
representing
awc
and
other
cities,
any
thoughts
or
concerns
that
we
have.
We
have
briefed
the
finance
and
asset
management
staff
at
city
at
the
city
to
evaluate
impacts
from
these
different
policy
decisions.
At
this
time.
S
The
the
information
that
has
been
released
on
these
five
proposals
is
not
detailed
enough
for
us
to
really
be
able
to
evaluate
the
impacts
so
we're,
as,
as
the
work
group
convenes
in
september,
we're
anticipating
a
great
deal,
more
detail
which
we
will
share
with
with
with
city
staff
and
evaluate
and
then
provide
feedback
and
input,
and
then,
of
course,
in
addition
to
the
formal
process
of
providing
feedback
to
our
representative
through
the
association
of
washington
cities.
S
P
And
then
I
would
just
add
on
to
that
that
council
member,
I
know,
there's
a
link
in
the
memo
that
accompanied
the
materials
tonight
there's
a
link
to
be
able
to
see
their
work.
And
so,
if
you
wanted
to
follow
that,
you
could
see
it
there
as
well,
but
we're
working
directly
with
awc
and
through
our
representatives
to
just
try
to
analyze
the
detailed
proposals
as
quickly
as
they
are
released.
H
H
You
know
like
sca,
suburban
science,
cities
and
awc
and
obviously
psrc,
and
we
all
sit
on
different
committees
that
may
affect
different
issues
that
might
come
up
and
discuss,
and
this
is
also
where
we
have
opportunity
to
collaborate
talk
about
issues,
so
it
might
be
good
that
the
city
might
have
a.
H
I
don't
know
how
formal
has
to
be
maybe
at
least
a
information,
informative
conversation
on
some
of
these
topics,
just
so
that
we
can
share
and
our
information
and
our
position
and
then
also
perhaps
even
more
active.
H
You
know
role
in
collaborating
with
others,
because
that's
that
was
brianna
mentioned
before
you
know.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
we
can
share
with
others.
People
may
not
know
which
might
influence
the
state
legislature.
If
we
talk
about,
if
we
formally,
you
know
let
people
know
about
it.
The
best
example
is
housing.
We've
done
more
than
any
other
cities
in
the
region
than
anybody
else.
You
know,
hudson
is
doing,
and
I
think
and
we're
doing
even
more.
You
know.
H
So
I
think
these
are
the
things
that
we
can
have
the
the
help
from
the
state
legislation
other
cities.
They
know
that
we
are
working
on
something
that
is
beneficial
to
the
rest
of
this
state.
I
think
that's
a
good
model
good
example
of
collaborating
one
of
which
I
I
have
another
point-
is
again
belvie's
good
mother.
I
appreciate
deputy
mayor
asks
the
question
about.
H
Certain
issues,
so
I
you
know,
I
know
that
oftentimes,
we
don't
know
what
we
don't
know.
I
don't
know
how
much
we
can
influence
the
ut
asks.
What
is
the
the
progress?
What's
the
consensus
of
the
state
legislature
and
the
response
I
get
as
well,
they
are
working
on
it.
You
know
they,
like
you,
talk
about
the
revenue
collection,
we're
collecting
a
lot
more,
but
the
decision
may
seem
to
have
been
made
by
the
governor
and
obviously
the
state
legislature
can
do
something
on
our
behalf.
H
But
it
sounded
to
me
that
it's
already
agreed
that
it's
going
to
be
revenue
neutral
and
we
may
have
different
ideas.
You
know
for
our
own
community
specifically.
So
how
do
we
get
involved
in
expressing
our
opinion?
May
you
have
an
influence
on
you
know
the
the
policy
decision
that's
already
made.
I
understand
we
have
to
play
within
the
the
guideline.
You
know,
obviously,
but
if
we
have
the
opportunity
to
participate
to
speak
out
voice,
that
might
be
something
that's
worthwhile.
H
P
Right,
our
hope
is
that,
by
coming
back
for
adoption
of
a
state
legislative
agenda
in
october,
we
hopefully
hit
the
sweet
spot
of
having
a
lot
of
those
different
issues
that
you
got
briefed
on
by
lacie,
jane
and
brianna.
They
will
have
started
to
land
and
gel,
and
so
we
can
really
start
to
identify
what
are
bellevue's
interests
and
what
are
our
priorities?
P
What
are
to
council
member
robertson's
point
earlier?
What
are
the
principles
or
the
frameworks?
If
not
the
very
you
know
tiniest
details,
what
are
the
broad
strokes
or
the
really
important
themes
that
we
want
to
represent
and
carry
forward,
and
then
there
are
a
lot
of
different
audiences.
As
you
identify
that
tax
restructure
work
group,
they
have
that
kind
of
compact
that
operating
compact
among
themselves
that
they
will
be
revenue,
neutral
proposals,
bipartisan
consensus
proposals
once
they
forward
whatever
one
two
five
zero.
P
P
So
there'll
be
different
touch
points
along
the
process,
but
the
agenda
setting
an
agenda
kind
of
in
that
kind
of
gelling
fall
period,
tries
to
find
that
sweet
spot
between
not
being
so
late
that
we
can't
meet
with
other
partners
and
coalition
members
to
build
support
for
what
is
important
to
bellevue,
but
also
not
so
early
that
nothing
has
landed
yet.
So
that's
our
hope
is
to
really
hit
that
and
and
not
get
swept
up
in
the
elections
either
which
come
in
november,
so
we're
trying
to
really
hit
the
mark
with
october.
P
But
there
will
be
continued
opportunities
to
come
back
and
verify.
Oh,
this
bill
has
changed.
How
does
this
impact
bellevue
it's
modified
yet
again,
what
do
we
think
of
it
now
and
we
will
bring
forward
the
analysis,
of
course,
from
our
staff
to
help
inform
that
which,
because
of
the
the
immature
state
of
these
proposals
so
far,
we
don't
have
that
today,
but
we
will
certainly
keep
bringing
that
to
you
as
it
evolves.
H
M
I
think
this
is
really
good
and,
following
on
several
other
comments
that
we
we
need
to
do
more
of
this
and
then
I
think
work
on
this
better
on
it.
But
you
know
it's
it's
it's
fascinating!
I
think
that
when
we
look
at
these
different
things
that-
and
I
appreciate
the
comments
that
councilman
robertson
said
and
on
this
earlier.
M
Yes,
we
we
like
to
have
local
control
and
all
that
and
that's,
but
that's
something
that
generally
is
used
to
not
do
something,
and
I
think
what
we've
all
learned
is
that
you
know
these
boundaries
really
are
kind
of
artificial.
In
a
sense
people
move
around
to
different
cities
where
our
city,
what
we
do
here
is
actually
not
different
than
they're
doing
in
countries.
You
know
30
000
miles
away
from
us.
I
mean
it
all
comes
down
to
we're
all
human
beings
working
on
these
things,
and
so
what
we're
doing
better
and
better?
M
I
think,
and
bellevue
has
gone
from
this
attitude
years
ago,
just
passed
on
from
other
people
that
you
know
you
do
it
bellevue
just
does
it
dances
to
its
own
tune?
Everybody
else
goes
off
and
I
think
we're
in
the
part
we're
really
working
together,
more
and
leading
and
also
learning
from
this,
and
so
I
think,
that's
very
positive.
M
You
know
I
and
and
what
would
be
helpful,
it
seems
I'm
kind
of
jumping
around
this,
because
this
is
a
jumping
around
thing
we've
been
doing,
but
I
think
doing
more
of
the
this
kind
of
conversation
and
working
on
our
legislative
pieces
more
effectively
and
being
able
to
like
several
of
us
did
at
various
times
going
down
and
actually
testifying
or
getting
involved,
and
the
other
is
being
active
in
like
we
are
and
bellevue
has
done.
M
We'd
be
big,
but
the
interesting
thing
is:
we
have
cities
who
are
they're
different
from
just
the
communities
talking
to
each
other,
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
really
attack
these
issues
and
work
on
this
and
have
people
who
we
have
more
people
focusing
on
how
to
be.
Do
good
government
move
things
along
then
seattle
does,
I
think,
of
all
the
council
members.
M
Think
of
all
the
staff
in
this
area
same
area,
same
number
of
people
or
even
more,
but
we
have
so
it's
it's
something
I
think
we're
doing
very
good,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
conversation
and
I
think,
comments.
Councilman
really
had
some
good
points
on.
That,
too,
is
how
do
we
just
learn
more?
How
can
we
be
more
effective
for
these
different
groups?
M
I
did
want
to
make
a
comment
on
the
taxing.
It's
fascinating
that
that
you
have
groups
that
who
want
to
keep
things
that
it's
you
know
neutral
on
it
and
not
that
that
is.
I
mean
I
understand
people
doing
that,
but
it's
the
thing
that
really
makes
us
not
advance
if
we
would
get
away
from
that
attitude
of
well,
if
we
get
more
revenue
and
because
the
revenue
is
produced
by
something,
that's
positive
and
it
goes
up,
revenue
doesn't
just
pop
it
by
itself.
It
has
a
you
know,
a
basis
for
it.
M
It
grows
and
if
we
could
use
that
instead
of
making
net
revenue
neutral,
we
could
actually
have
405
already
done
in
brt
and
we're
never
going
to
get
transportation
in
and
and
parks
and
and
all
these
other
things
we
want.
If
we
keep,
you
know
freaking
out
every
time
we
get
a
little
bit
more
money
coming
in
and
not
make
it
so
that
the
community
and
economics
go
go
forward,
and
I
I
think
I
think
that's
something
to
think
about.
M
So
I
this
focusing
on
the
legislative
part
really
does
make
us
look
at
all
of
these
pieces
together,
because
that's
where
the
big
ideas.
This
is
where
the
things
are
set
up
at
the
state
level.
And
then
we
come
to
the
county
level
into
into
the
cities.
And
it's
a
it's.
A
two-way
street
on
it
and
you're
helping
us
make
it
be
more
of
a
two-way
street
than
it
has
been
in
the
past
and
I'm
just
kind
of
rambling.
O
O
If
that's,
maybe
a
niche,
a
topic
that
might
be
fitting
for
that
work
group
and
then
in
terms
of
vehicle
pursuit,
I
would
15
19.
I
would
like
for
us
to
think
critically
about
that.
I
think
it
can
pose
a
risk
to
everyone,
including
the
officers
I
was
actually
this
was
years
ago
in
an
uber
coming
from
some
place
and
state
patrol
was
actually
pursuing
a
vehicle
and
they
hit
our
car
and
state
police
stopped
to
check
to
make
sure
we
were
okay,
but
I
just
think
it
just
can
be
a
risk
to
everyone.
O
So
I'm
wondering
if
there
are
other
strategies
that
we
can
consider
in
terms
of
investigative
techniques
and
technology
and
so
forth
to
I
just
want
us
to
think
critically
about
that
and
in
terms
of
the
timeline
you
know
there
were.
There
was
at
least
one
topic
that
council
member
stokes
raised
that
we
talked
about
during
the
retreat,
which
was
local
control.
O
So
I'm
curious
if,
if
we
had
time
to
maybe
discuss
as
a
council,
if
the
if
it's
coming
back
in
october,
if
we
may
need
another
session
to
to
hit
on
maybe
a
couple
of
hairy
like
deep
topics.
P
So
our
I
shouldn't
look
over
my
shoulder
to
see
who
may
give
me
what
look,
but
our
hope
is
to
come
back
for
a
modest
slice
of
time
with
you
in
september,
to
kind
of
tee
things
up
with
a
draft
and
then
meet
with
each
one
of
you
individually
to
really
help
refine
and
inform
that
and
then
come
back
for
adoption
in
october.
So
you
don't
just
have
kind
of
one
swing
in
it.
P
Instead,
we
kind
of
bring
it
to
you,
make
sure
that
it
feels
like
something
everybody
can
be
comfortable
with
and
on
board
with
and
then
go
forward
to.
You
know
amendments
and
adoption
in
october,
so
it
won't,
hopefully
just
be
one
slice,
but
instead
you
know
get
it
ready
and
frankly,
we
may
yet
learn
more
between
september
and
october,
the
next
revenue
forecast,
for
example,
is
coming
out
in
the
third
week
of
september,
so
we
may
have
even
more
accurate
information
about
the
state
budget
picture,
for
example.
A
L
Mayor
I'm
here,
but
my
husband
just
brought
me
dinner,
so
I'm
going
to
have
my
camera
off
for
a
couple
minutes.
A
Thanks,
okay,
so,
mr
miyaki,
would
you
like
to
introduce
the
last
study
session
sure.
I
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
This
last
study
session
agenda
topic
is
related
to
our
state
parking
program.
Tonight's
report
on
the
state
parking
response
directly
to
the
city
council's
2021-23.
Priority
number
17
to
explore
a
safe
parking
program
from
homelessness
response.
Tonight.
Staff
is
seeking
direction
to
move
forward
with
development
of
a
pilot
state
parking
program
which
will
provide
vehicle
residents
with
a
designated
place
to
park
as
as
well
as
rest,
as
well
as
the
access
to
social
services
and
other
resources.
I
So
joining
us
this
evening
for
presentation
is
bianca
siegel
assistant,
director
of
our
citywide
policy
programs
within
the
city
manager's
office,.
T
H
T
And
the
clicker
works
there
we
go
okay,
so
we
will
be
asking
for
your
direction
to
consider
directing
us
to
develop
a
detailed
implementation
plan,
including
legal
analysis,
as
well
as
a
budget
proposal
that
would
support
recommended
pilot
program
components
to
move
forward
with
the
safe
parking
pilot
program
in
the
presentation.
I
will
give
you
a
little
background
on
the
research
that
we've
conducted.
I
will
talk
about
some
of
the
program
models
that
are
available
for
safe
parking
and
our
recommendations
and
next
steps.
T
T
As
of
the
2020
point
in
time,
count
about
300
vehicle
residents
were
identified
across
the
east
side
and
at
the
end
of
last
year,
staff
conducted
an
informal
count
within
bellevue
and
identified
83
vehicles.
At
that
time.
It's
important
to
note
that
any
point
in
time
count
is
generally
recognized
to
to
represent
an
under
count
of
the
actual
need.
T
Vehicle
residents
include
a
whole
range
of
folks
families,
people
with
pets
or
couples
who
may
not
be
able
to
access
congregate,
shelter
together,
folks
on
limited
income,
including
seniors
or
people
with
disabilities,
are
also
well
represented.
Among
this
group,
interestingly,
vehicle
residents
are
more
likely
to
be
employed
than
other
unhoused
residents
about
24.
T
There
are
about
four
existing
safe
parking
sites
across
the
east
side,
which
together
have
a
capacity
of
around
70
vehicles,
and
so
there
is
definitely
a
need
for
additional
capacity
to
serve
to
serve
these
folks
due
to
the
specialized
needs
of
people
living
in
vehicles
and
the
potential
impacts
from
vehicle
encampments.
The
entire
community
can
benefit
from
providing
an
additional,
safe
and
accessible
location
for
for
vehicle
residences
that
provides
connection
to
services
such
as
mental
health
and
job
training
and
housing
navigation.
T
On
the
slide,
you
see
some
of
the
issues
that
we
have
investigated
so
far
in
our
research
and
program
analysis
and
that
we
will
continue
to
develop.
Should
we
move
forward
with
a
safe
parking
pilot
program
we'll
be
discussing
in
a
few
minutes.
Some
of
the
first
items
listed
on
this
slide
around
operational
and
locational
models
and
the
site
management,
as
well
as
potential
costs.
T
If
directed
to
continue
with
this
work,
some
of
the
key
next
steps
would
include
legal
evaluation.
Careful
attention
to
each
of
these
items
is
needed
to
ensure
program
success.
Fortunately,
we're
able
to
learn
from
a
number
of
active
programs
and
other
jurisdictions
both
locally
and
across
the
country,
as
well
as
input
from
people
with
lived
experience
of
homelessness
and
vehicle,
residency
and
other
community
members
and
we'll
continue
to
work
with
those
folks,
as
we
move
forward
so
shifting
gears
to
talk
about
some
of
the
program
models,
we'll
start
with
operational
models.
T
There's
a
centralized
operational
model
in
which
a
jurisdiction,
contracts
for
site
services,
a
privatized
model
or
individual
model
where
each
site
operates
individually
and
separately,
and
the
organization
that
sponsors
it
handles
everything
surrounding
site
operations.
There
are
also
municipally
staffed
models
in
which
a
jurisdiction,
hires
or
identifies
city
staff
who
are
responsible
for
operating
the
program.
T
T
T
We
would
suggest,
as
part
of
our
pilot
program,
to
support
the
success
of
religious
organizations
that
are
interested
in
hosting
safe
parking
by
providing
a
start-up
guy,
a
guide
and
other
information
that
was
developed
partly
through
the
city's
livable
city
year.
Partnership
with
the
university
of
washington
a
few
years
ago,
and
to
facilitate
information
sharing
among
those
organizations,
as
well
as
to
offer
access
to
a
city
contracted
site
and
case
management
service,
to
help
support
their
operations
and
ensure
consistency
of
programs
across
sites.
T
T
A
city
hosted
pilot
can
offer
some
greater
flexibility
than
some
of
the
other
models.
We
could
consider
allowing
for
a
variety
of
vehicle
types,
both
cars
and
rvs,
for
example,
potentially
finding
space
for
a
larger
number
of
vehicles
than
other
facilities
might
be
able
to,
and
can
also
think
about,
providing
flexibility.
The
type
of
residents
that
would
be
able
to
access
the
site
on-site
program
management
that
we
just
discussed
a
minute
ago
is
a
critical
component
for
this
pilot
program.
T
There
are
a
number
of
challenges,
as
you
might
imagine,
in
developing
or
identifying
sanctioned
on
street
parking
zones
that
include
you
know:
street
maintenance
and
program
oversight,
hours
of
operation,
potential
impacts
to
adjacent
properties,
and
so
again
we
are
not
recommending
that
we
pursue
this
option.
T
A
N
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
Well,
you
know.
Thank
you
bianca
for
this
thorough
study.
I
am
so
excited
that
this
priority
item
from
our
retreat
last
year
that
we
have
this
thoughtful
proposal
and
recommendation
in
front
of
us
because,
as
we
heard
from
karina,
o'malley
who's
been
involved
in
the
safe
parking
program
on
the
east
side
for
a
number
for
well
over
10
years.
N
N
I
also
support
not
having
not
looking
at
on
street
zones,
because
I
don't
think
that
that
actually
creates
the
kind
of
community
and
support
that
those
that
are
sleeping
in
their
cars
are
looking
for.
I
was
fortunate
to
visit
the
city
of
vancouver
safe
parking
program.
They'd
had
for
two
years
it's
across
the
street
from
a
middle
school
and
a
high
school,
and
you
know
they
were
sharing
that
75
percent
of
the
people
in
that
had
their
car
in
that
facility
in
that
location
were
working.
N
The
others
were
seniors
folks
with
disabilities.
Don't
have
enough
funding
to
actually
afford
to
be
able
to
move
into
an
apartment,
there's
couples,
they
have
pets,
and
so
I
really
support
this
very
much,
and
my
sense
is
that
at
the
same
time,
working
with
religious
organizations
to
help
them
understand
what
the
program
is.
N
There's
a
very
small
one
right
next
to
my
house
at
a
church,
and
you
know,
I
think
that
it's
gone
really
well
and
my
sense
on
the
religious
part
is
that
it
tends
to
be
self-limiting,
because
the
the
religious
organizations
will
take
on
the
size
of
the
the
number
of
vehicles
that
they
can
support
with
their
shrinking
congregation
in
a
lot
of
ways.
So
I
really
support
this.
N
There
would
be
an
rfp
and
that
in
hopefully
early
next
year
we
would
actually
see
a
pilot
being
stood
up
because
it's
especially
with
the
higher
rents,
I'm
really
concerned
with
the
number
of
people
that
potentially
are
going
to
need
to
live
in
their
cars
because
they
can't
pay
the
the
20
rent
increase
that
we're
hearing
about
in
our
community.
So
I
just
want
to
understand
a
little
bit
about
timing.
N
T
T
We
would
also
have
the
detailed
implementation
framework
that
would
come
back
to
you
as
well
and
then,
once
those
pieces
are
confirmed,
if
and
when
they
are
confirmed,
we
would
be
able
to
release
an
rfp
and
move
forward
with
with
the
program
in
the
meantime,
we'd
be
looking
at
identifying
specific
sites,
and
that
would
be
part
of
a
specific
site,
and
that
would
be
part
of
the
framework
that
comes
back
to
you.
So
I
can
promise
to
work
on
it
as
quick
as
quickly
as
we
can
and
hope
to,
and
the
facilities.
N
Side
because,
actually
I
remember
meeting
two
women
who
actually
were
at
bellevue
college
studying
and
living
out
of
their
cars
up
in
kirkland,
so
would
the
with
the
city-owned
property
actually
have
infrastructure
being
able
to
plug
in
for
that
they
actually
are
able
to
do
their
homework
charge
up
their
laptops
or
their
phones.
That
would
be
part
of
the
proposal
right.
N
L
Thank
you,
yeah.
I'm
supportive
of
additional
study
moving
forward
on
this,
both
the
city
pilot,
as
well
as
continuing
to
work
with
some
of
our
religious
organizations
who
you
know
many
of
them
do
do,
for
example,
the
congregations
for
the
homeless
rotating
shelter.
So
I
know
that
there
are
a
number
of
facilities
that
may
be
willing
to
do
this,
especially
if
they
have
guidance
from
the
city
and
support
from
the
city.
L
I
I
would
be
very
interested
and
I
think
that
we
should
identify
potential
locations
sooner
rather
than
later,
as
we
move
through
this
and
then
so
I
guess
my
question
is
yes
is
my
answer?
Is
yes
and
yes,
this
and
the
religious
institutions,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
process
for
identifying
location,
etc
and
public
outreach
on
that,
then
also
if
we
adopt
and
open
a
safe
parking
facility.
L
Does
this
provide
the
city
more
ease
of
enforcing
some
of
the
parking
problems
we
have
seen
in
certain
parts
of
the
city
where
we
have
people
expressing
concern
the
for
example,
south
of
factoria
mall?
We
get
a
lot
of
emails
about
that.
So
how
does
this
work?
Bellevue
has
a
compassionate
enforcement
process.
L
We
provide
services
we
enforce
as
well
and
then,
before
you
answer,
I
just
want
to
say
I
I'm
hoping
this
will
be
something
that
is
not
a
forever
project,
because
the
goal
is
to
make
sure
that
we
have
stick-built
housing
for
people
to
move
into
that
is
affordable,
not
finding
safe
parking
where
people
can
live
in
their
vehicles.
It's
certainly
not
ideal
for
people
to
live
in
their
vehicles,
but
in
the
interim
I
think
we
need
to
try
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
safe
parking
but
bianca.
L
T
T
It
is
complex
due
to
recent
state
supreme
court
decisions
about
enforcing
parking
and
and
vehicle
living.
Those
complications
remain,
and
so
we
would
work
closely.
T
You
know
again
with
the
city
attorney's
office
and
in
addressing
that,
but
having
an
alternative,
we
anticipate
will
really
help
folks
to
not
need
to
park
on
the
street
so
that
we
can
welcome
them
to
an
established
facility
in
terms
of
zoning
on
on
city-owned
property.
T
We
would
need
to
again
investigate
this
further,
but
but
we
could
likely
pursue
that
as
a
temporary
public
safety
facility
with
city
manager,
authorization.
T
L
T
We're
working
with
the
with
the
property
team
in
fam
and
part
of
that
is
identifying
what
facilities.
I
don't
have
a
specific
answer
for
you,
because
we're
just
in
the
initial
stages
of
that
investigation,
but
we
would
look
at
you
know,
available
property
that
has,
you
know
open
space
on
it
or
surface
parking
on
it
already.
What
facilities
might
already
exist
that
could
help
support
safe
parking
and
it'll,
be
an
assessment
about
costs
of
providing
anything
additional
that
would
be
needed
on
the
site
and
the
potential
vehicle
capacity.
O
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I
think
the
points
already
made
I
support
moving
forward
forward
with
this.
We
talk
about
housing
choices
and
right
now
this
is
realistically
and
practically
one
of
the
choices
right,
given
our
current
situation,
so
I
support
moving
forward
with
it.
H
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
a
very
good
program
to
address
the
situation
we
have
now
with
people
parking
on
the
street.
So
I
might
my
question
concerns
similar
to
what
councilmember
robertson
had
is
that
we
do
need
to
see
when
we
take
care
of
the
people
that
they
do.
You
know
not
stay
on
the
street,
not
have
other.
You
know
or
different
people
that
not
going
to
go
to
these
facilities,
but
instead
they
will
continue
to
do
so.
All
the
people
will
move
into
that
place.
H
So
I
think
the
facility
we
are
talking
about
we're
providing
it's
good
good,
good,
good
good
program
need
to
provide
the
service
that
they
see
more
value
to
it,
which
is
really
the
wraparound
service,
because
people
going
there
they're
not
just
going
to
like
councilman
roberts
mentioned
again,
not
just
stay
there
forever
or
do
whatever
they
do,
but
they
actually
just
look
for
other
assistants
that
would
get
them
out
of
the
facility.
I
know
people
who
do
that
and
I
go
to
crossroads.
H
H
T
Yes,
that
that
would
be
the
majority
of
that
would
be
for
those
all
right,
that'd.
H
Be
that'd
be
good,
so
I
hope
that
this
would
set
a
hope
and
model
for
people
who
can
be
helped
and
move
on,
and
so
it's
a
pilot.
So
we
want
to
see,
you
know,
obviously
no
guarantee,
but
it's
a
good
way
good
to
move
forward.
Thank
you.
M
You
know
bianca
that
is
very,
very
encouraging
and
I'm
glad
to
see
us
moving
us.
We've
been
talking
about
it
for
a
long
time,
and
I
think
this
is
an
excellent
approach
on
it
and
and
I
I
gather
that
there
can
be
some
combination,
I
mean
the
the
religious
institutions
can
be
doing
this
and
we
can
encourage
more
of
that
and
we
can
learn
from
them,
of
course,
which
is
good.
M
I
think
the
important
thing
is
that,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
not
a
permanent
solution,
but
it's
it's
a
big
upgrade
from
where
a
lot
of
people
are
staying
now.
So
this
is
a
very
important
thing
and
it
I
think
it
also-
and
I
like
I
think
several
council
members
have
noted
this-
that
this
is
again
it's
not.
This
isn't
the
goal.
M
You
know
parking
on
the
streets
and
it's
just
it's
a
very
good
state
step
forward,
and
I
wish
we
could
do
it
a
lot
faster,
but
we're
we're
getting
on
a
pretty
good
path,
and
I
appreciate
that
and
we
need
to,
of
course,
do
it
right
and
all,
but
I
think
I
think
you
have
a
council
that
is
very
supportive
of
this
staff
is
very
supportive
and
appreciate
your
leadership
on
it
and,
let's,
let's
get
it
done.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
mayor,
yes,
well,
I'm
also
supportive
of
this,
and
it
was
great
to
hear
from
karina
o'malley
who
I
worked
with
when
I
was
on
the
board
of
the
sofia
way
and
no
one
knows
more
about
safe
parking
lots
than
her,
so
she's
a
she's,
a
great
resource
for
this,
as
we
as
we
as
we
move
forward,
I
like
the
way
you've
outlined
the
the
pilot
project.
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
get
a
provider
on
on
city
property.
C
It'll
be
interesting
when
you
come
back
in
terms
of
your
criteria,
assessment
of
where
that
lot
would
be,
as
councilman
robertson
have
pointed
out,
but
you're
you're.
Absolutely
right.
I
mean
a
lot
of
these
folks.
Living
in
their
cars
have
gone
through
a
recent
life
event,
maybe
have
lost
their
job
divorce
or
they
may
still
be
working,
but
maybe
they
got
divorce
or
something
else
happen.
C
This
gives
them
that
opportunity,
plus
as
well
as
case
management.
You
know
in
case
there
is
a
need
there
for
mental
health
or
perhaps
any
addiction
issues,
but
really,
I
think
the
vast
majority
is
a
place
where
they
can
rest
not
got
knocked
on
the
on
the
window
and
woken
up
or
their
car
getting
broken
into
where
their
whole
life
possessions
are
in
there.
This
gives
them
some
peace
of
mind
to
get
them
on
a
path
independent.
So
very,
very,
very
supportive
of
this.
C
With
that
I'd
love
it.
If
you
take
a
look,
because
I
don't
still
don't
quite
understand,
because
this
program
has
been
or
similar
programs.
This
has
been
very
successful.
In
fact,
there's
one
in
san
diego
that
I
visited
that
was
very
successful
at
doing
this,
but
my
understanding
of
the
city
of
seattle
had
five
or
six
of
these
lots
at
one
time,
but
I
believe
they've
gotten
rid
of
all
of
them,
and
I
think
now,
maybe
it's
coming
back,
but
I'd
love
to
understand.
C
Was
it
the
model
or
did
they
just
run
out
of
financing
or
what
you
know?
What
led
that
decision?
It
would
be.
It
would
really
be
great,
as
well
as
encouraging
to
look
at
any
other
models
out
there,
that
we
would
want
to
perhaps
take
a
look
at
or
learn
from
again,
I
would
say:
look
at
what
the
city
of
san
diego
has
done.
It's
done
a
a
really
good
job
and
I
believe
the
lots
are
run
by
the
jewish
family
center.
C
C
You
know
whatever
it
might
be
in
order
to
get
again
on
that
path
to
independence.
Maybe
you
know:
go
out
interview
for
a
job
or
or
get
some
skills
or
whatever
that
might
be,
but
I've
seen
it
done
a
couple
of
different
ways.
So
I
just
encourage
you
to
kind
of
take.
Take
a
look
at
some
of
those
other
things,
but
I'll
just
leave
with
that.
C
One
question
about
the
the
city
of
seattle:
if
you
know
off
the
top
of
your
head,
what
didn't
I'm
assuming
it
didn't
work
and
it
wasn't
just
canceled
due
to
funding,
but.
T
Right
there
were,
I
think,
a
number
of
factors
involved
in
the
evolving
programs
in
seattle,
funding
or
inadequate
funding
was
one
of
them.
I
think
there
were
some
evolving
approaches
from
one
administration
to
the
next,
as
well
as
some
pushback
from
neighbors
in
certain
areas.
T
You
had
mentioned
that
yeah,
the
the
city
is
now
moving
forward
with
a
new
program.
That's
true
there,
with
the
king
county,
regional
homelessness
authority,
they've
just
awarded
about
two
million
dollars
to
lehigh
to
operate
a
safe
parking
program
which
is
aimed
specifically
at
rvs,
which
can
be
one
of
the
more
challenging
vehicle
types
to
host
and
and
then
they've
also
requested
additional
funding
for
future
budget
years
to
build
on
and
expand
that
program.
So
that's
the
focus
currently.
T
I
would
also
point
out
that
the
situation
in
seattle
is
is
far
more
expensive
in
terms
of
numbers
of
vehicles
and
demand,
and,
and
so
that
is
just
inherently
a
more
complex
environment
in
which
to
try
to
do
this
work
we
feel
like
the
scale
here
is
one
where
we
can
make
a
really
meaningful
difference
with
this
program
and
and
ensure
that
it's
well
managed
and
funded.
A
Oh,
I
just
I
think
this
is
really
important,
and
I
I
thank
council
members
on
for
bringing
this
forward
and
I'm
so
glad
bianca
that
you
are
are
presenting
this
to
us
and
that
you're
going
to
be
working
on
the
recommendation
that
you'll
bring
forward.
I
have
a
lot
of
confidence
in
you.
I
know
that
this
is
essential.
We
have
so
many
people
who
are
just
falling
into
homelessness
and
are
in
their
car
and
once
they
get
out
of
stable
car
or
housing
and
into
the
open
their
whole.
A
Everything
changes
and
getting
that
individual
back
into
stable
housing
is
so
much
harder
to
do
for
the
person
and
it
costs
so
much
more
as
well
that
if
we
can
help
people
get
from
the
car
back
into
stable
housing,
I
know
that
that's
best
for
everybody
so
on.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
using
best
practices
for
people
getting
people
into
stable
housing.
A
There
is
going
to
be
essential
to
the
success,
and
so
I'm
going
to
be
very
interested
to
know
what
the
best
way
is
to
get
people
in
into
stable
housing
so
that
they
don't
have
to
be
in
their
car,
but
until
they
have
that
having
a
safe
place
to
be
is
is
very,
very
important
so
and
I'd
also,
you
know,
we'd
have
the
men's
shelter
and
we
don't
have
other
shelters
in
our
city
that
you
know
bellevue
took
on
men,
redmond
took
on
children
and
adolescents,
young
adults
and
kirkland
took
on
women.
A
Bellevue
has
everything.
So
you
know
we
have
a
temporary
men's
shelter,
we're
building
a
permanent
men's
shelter.
I'm
wondering.
Does
it
make
sense
for
us
to
focus
on
what
we
don't
have
a
shelter
for
in
our
city?
And
that's
I
don't.
We
don't
have
to
answer
that
right
now,
but
that's
something
to
look
into
anyway.
N
A
C
A
Okay.
We
have
one
more
item
on
our
agenda
tonight,
which
is
adoption
of
the
transportation
facilities
plan.
Mr
miyaki,
thank
you.
I
Mayor
council
members
resolution
resolution
10112
adopts
the
to
2033
transportation
facilities.
Plan
joining
this
evening
is
andrew,
singalakis,
the
transportation
director,
as
well
as
mike
ingram
senior
planner
for
transportation,
as
well
as
christina
beason,
who
is
our
vice
chair
of
our
transportation
commission
and
so
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
andrew,
where
they're
all
joining
us
virtually
this
evening.
So
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
andrew
to
begin.
The
presentation.
R
Okay,
thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki,
mayo,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
the
council
and,
as
you
said,
brad
we
have
with
us
christina
beason
who's,
the
vice
chair
of
the
transportation
commission,
mike
ingram
who's,
a
senior
planner
in
the
transportation
department
and
paul
stevens
who's,
the
assistant
director
of
transportation.
R
Transportation
transportation
facilities
plan
the
last
time
that
you
saw
this
was
at
a
study
session
back
in
january
since
that's
been
through
the
transportation
commission
process,
and
we
are
seeking
your
approval
for
it
tonight
and
with
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
mike.
U
Actually,
commissioner,
beason
will
start
off
the
discussion
tonight.
V
Good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
and
council
members
on
behalf
of
the
transportation
commission,
I
am
pleased
to
return
to
you
this
evening
with
an
update
on
the
2022-2033
transportation
facilities
plan.
The
transportation
commission,
stat
staff
kicked
the
tfp
update
process
off
on
september
of
2020.
in
the
months
that
followed
and
11
meetings
of
much
thoughtful
deliberation.
V
Following
that
meeting
staff
prepared
to
seep
a
checklist
and
submitted
it
to
the
department
services
for
review,
the
public
notice
went
out
on
march
24th.
The
cipa
determination
of
non-significance
was
published
on
april
28th.
No
comments
were
received
from
the
public
following
the
publication
of
the
notice
of
application
on
march
24th
on
may
12th,
the
transportation
commission
voted
unanimously
to
recommend
the
2022-2033
tfp
to
the
council
for
adoption.
V
U
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Beeson.
As
you've
heard
from
case
for
beeson,
we
followed
a
staff
and
the
commission
followed
a
thorough
process
to
develop
this
proposed
2022-2033
transportation
facilities
plan.
U
You
did
hear
earlier
comment
public
comment
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
tonight
some
concerned
that
the
level
of
resources
available
for
the
transportation
facilities
plan
are
not
adequate
to
the
need.
The
tfp
is
a
financially
constrained
plan,
so
we
can
only
include
those
projects
in
the
plan
that
we
can
reasonably
expect
to
afford.
U
So
with
that,
I
will
turn
now
to
the
requested
action
tonight,
which
is
the
adoption
of
the
proposed
2022-2033
transportation
facilities
plan,
which
has
been
recommended
by
the
transportation
commission.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
councilman
rosan
are
you
the
liaison
to
the
transportation.
N
Commission,
I
am,
but
I
might
defer
to
council
member
robertson
who
was
involved
during
the
the
bulk
of
this
work,
to
kick
this
off,
because
I
think
that
she
was
there
during
the
2020
and
2021..
I
was
kind
of
the
the
last
inning
pitcher,
okay,
councilmember.
L
L
This
has
been
about
a
probably
a
three-year
process
to
adjust
our
concurrency
to
adjust,
how
we're
going
to
implement
our
transportation
projects
in
bellevue,
because
the
old
model
only
looked
at
one
mode,
which
was
vehicles
private
vehicles,
the
new
mode
takes
into
account
other
modes
like
transit,
like
bike
like
peds,
so
it
recognizes
what
is,
and
it
also
looks
into
what
we,
what
is
to
come
right?
The
old
one
was
the
ghosts
of
transportation
passed,
and
this
one
includes
the
ghost
of
transportation
present
and
the
goodwill's
transportation
future.
L
L
I
would
point
out
that
our
the
levy
that
the
voters
that
the
good
voters
of
bellevue
passed
in
2016
has
specific
dedicated
money
for
congestion,
and
this
council
is
going
to
continue
to
do
road
projects.
I
saw
an
awful
lot
of
purple
on
the
maps
in
the
tfp
so
and
when
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
what
we
put
into
our
capital
improvement
plan
is
what
gets
funded.
L
This
just
is
the
constrained
plan
that
we
expect
to
fund
in
the
12-year
period
so
with
that
said,
I'm
very
pleased
I
want
to
thank
the
transportation
commission
and
the
transportation
staff
for
all
the
work.
This
was
unanimously
supported
by
the
commission
and
I
will
be
voting
in
favor
as
well.
Thanks.
Thank.
A
You
council,
members
on
followed
by
deputy
mayor.
N
Yes,
thank
you.
You
know.
I
support
this,
this
tfp
plan
as
well-
and
I
appreciate-
because
I
went
through
this
when
I
was
on
the
transportation
commission.
I
was
on
the
tail
end
of
one
of
these
and
realized
just
how
much
work
goes
in
to
create
this.
So
I
really
appreciate
the
work
I
did
have
one
clarification
for,
commissioner
vice
chair
beeson,
and
that
is
that
I
do
believe
the
the
mip
framework
was
used
as
part
of
looking
at
this.
I
think
councilmember
robertson
brought
that
up
as
well.
N
U
Sure
I
I
can
clarify
that
I
mean
I'm
getting
into
the
weeds
just
a
little
bit,
but
essentially
the
new
mip
framework
has
a
measurement
component
and
we
were
able
to
utilize
that
for
this
tfp
process
it
also
includes
a
project
screening
and
about
an
identification
and
evaluation
component,
which
we
did
not
utilize
for
this
tfp
process.
It
will
be
used
for
the
next
dfb.
U
Is
this
so
the
beginning
of
the
tfp
process
is
where
the
you
know
we're
looking
at
the
candidate
projects
and
and
screening
them,
and
and
that
the
new
mip
has
a
whole
framework
for
doing
that,
and
it
was
not
yet
developed
when
we
started
work
on
this
tfp.
N
C
Anyways,
very
supportive
of
it,
and
you
know,
as
a
council,
I
think
we've
had
many
touches.
Many
briefings
on
this
really
appreciate
all
the
public
outrage
outreach
throughout
this
process
as
well
over
this
three-year
period.
So
thank
you
for
giving
all
residents
and
stakeholders
a
voice
and
creating
this
tfp.
So
I
am
ready
to
vote
yes
and
move
this
forward.
H
I
want
to
thank
the
transportation
commission
for
coming
up
with
this
list.
It's
a
very
challenging
new
cfp.
H
I
think
he
realized
that
following
the
old
you
know
it's
a
single
model
vehicle
only
model
would
be
very
limiting.
So
I
think,
like
the
you
know,
council
member
obviously
said
we
are
moving
forward
into
a
future
model
what's
to
come.
H
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
so
it's
challenging
for
the
commission,
because
you
have
to
work
with
a
new
model
and
you
have
to
balance
it.
You
know
it's
that's
important.
H
We
are
looking
at
current
situation,
you
know-
and
it's
not
perfect,
so
I
have
to
take
care
of
it,
which
is,
you
know,
has
some
people
we
heard
earlier
during
the
public
comment:
it's
the
congestion
relief
model
and,
using
you
know
what
we
have
mostly
now
is
still
vehicle
dependent
and
so
that's
a
reality,
but
we
have
to,
however,
look
into
the
future,
so
the
commitment
that
the
projects
we
have
to
develop
has
to
be
moving
toward
that.
So
it's
a
commitment
we
have
to
make.
H
So
I
think
there
has
to
be
balance.
The
balance
you
know,
that's
why
I
wanted
to
say
that
we're
going
the
right
direction,
we'll
do
the
right
thing
and
I
support
it.
However,
you
know
the
devil
is
in
the
detail.
Some
people
have
commented
like
this
earlier
on
the
public
comment.
H
The
money
funded
for
vehicle
has
dropped
significantly.
We
just
talked
about
that
earlier.
You
know
in
in
in
some
of
the
the
topic
we
just
finished
is
that
in
parks
you
know
we
cut
from
20
million
to
10
million
on
the
sports.
You
know
center
recreation,
so
obviously
this
is
something
that
people
pay
attention
to.
Then
we
need
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
looking
too
far
ahead.
H
So
I
believe
that
the
staff
made
a
very
good
response.
You
know
to
the
etas
question
and
concerns,
and
so
I
will
support
it,
but
I
just
want
to
be
sure
we
be
not
too
overboard
and
I
think
even
some
transportation
commissions
have
made
that
kind
of
conversation
discussion.
You
know,
I
believe
that
you
know,
michael
probably
can
can
say
that
so
that's
the
credit
to
the
commission.
They
do
discuss
it,
they
don't
talk
about
it.
They
talk
about
various,
you
know
concerns,
and
they
come
to
this
conclusion.
H
So
I
respectfully
support
the
transportation
commission's
recommendation.
M
Well,
I
appreciate
the
comments
made
by
my
colleagues
and
I
would
go
from
the
comment
from
councilman
barksdale
to
comments
from
councilmember
lee
and
all
in
between.
I
think,
and
it
reflects
all
that
we're
doing.
This
is
a
very
it's
a
strong
move
and
it's
something
again.
It's
pointed
out
that
mr
singalongas
has
brought
to
us
in
the
staff
great
work
in
the
in
you
know
the
commission.
So
it's
it's
all
this
group
working
together
and
we
are
moving
to
the
future.
M
and
we're
moving
to
a
different
city
in
a
great
number
of
ways,
but
we're
not
doing
it
leaving
other
things
out,
and
I
appreciate
the
comments
that
councilmember
robertson
made
at
the
beginning
and.
M
A
Well,
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
the
presentation
and
thank
you
vice
chair
beeson,
for
being
with
us
here
tonight
and
for
that
excellent
presentation
I
read,
I
was
on
a
plane,
so
I
read
every
single
project
on
this
list
and
I
was
so
excited
to
see
the
main
street
bridge
was
going
to
be
improved
for
ped
bikes
and
that
southeast
8th
from
114th
to
the
lake
hills
connector
is
funded
and
ready
to
go.
I
really
truly
appreciate
that,
so
I
support
this
very
much.
Is
there
a
motion?
Certainly.