►
From YouTube: Belton City Council Meeting - July 11, 2023 - 6pm
Description
Council Meeting Agenda - https://www.belton.org/files/assets/public/city-council-meetings/agendas/2023/july-11-2023-city-council-agenda-packet.pdf
C
D
F
G
All
right,
almost
everybody
we'll
leave
Michael
and
I.
Guess:
okay,
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
is
an
integral
part
of
communities
throughout
the
country,
including
Belton
Missouri
and
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
promotes
health
and
wellness.
Improving
the
physical
and
mental
health
of
people
who
live
near
parks
and
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
promotes
time
spent
nature
which
positive
positively
impacts.
G
Mental
health
by
increasing
cognitive
performance
and
well-being
and
alleviating
illnesses
such
as
depression,
attention,
deficit
disorders
and
Alzheimer's,
and
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
encourages
physical
activities
by
providing
space
for
popular
sports,
hiking
trails,
swimming
pools
and
many
other
activities
designed
to
promote
active
Lifestyles
and
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
is
a
leading
provider
of
healthy
meals,
nutrition
services
and
education.
And
whereas
Parks
and
Recreation
programming
and
education
activities
such
as
out
of
school
time,
programming,
Youth,
Sports
and
Environmental.
G
Now,
therefore,
Norman
K,
Larkey
senior
mayor
of
the
city
of
Belton
does
hereby
recognize
the
month
of
July
as
Parks
and
Recreation
month
in
the
city
of
Belton
Missouri.
We
urge
all
citizens
to
visit
the
beautiful
parks
in
Belton
in
witness
whereof
mayor
Larkey
has
here
unto
set
his
hand
and
caused
the
Seal
of
the
city
to
be
affixed
in
the
city
of
Belton
Missouri.
This
11th
day
of
July
in
the
year
of
our
Lord
2023.
D
I've
had
to
think
it's
through
that,
in
fact,
I
wish
this
whole
thing
would
have
came
out
in
a
recycling
call
card
about
probably
a
month
or
so
so
we
could
think
about
it,
where
we'd
put
it
and
everything
else
right
now,
I'm
in
a
some
pretty
good
shape
around
it
greetings
with
both
my
wife
and
I
being
retired.
We
both
are
on
both
fixed
incomes.
We
also
do
not
normally
produce
much
trash.
D
In
fact,
I
put
out
the
trash
for
tomorrow,
I
have
one
13
gallon
bag
in
a
grocery
sack,
and
that's
about
all
we
have
our
current
65
gallon
and
according
to
our
Public
Work
guy,
that's
69
gallons
I
didn't
know
that
research
people
go
in
our
garage
and
we
do
not
want
to
take
on
the
added
liability
of
storming
one
under
our
rear
deck,
which
I'll
probably
put
it
under
there
and
chain
it.
So
it
doesn't
get
stolen.
We've
lived
in
Belton
since
early
1993,
after
a
retired
on
the
Navy.
D
In
that
time,
we
personally
saw
the
abuses
to
the
previous
recycling
programs
here
in
Belton,
when
recycling
dumpsters
were
first
on
a
city-owned
lot
in
Second,
Street
and
city
hall,
and
then
later
behind
the
fire
department,
163rd
and
Mullen.
We
observed
drywall
from
houses
and
bag
trash
that
had
been
put
into
those
dumpsters.
Another
issue
that
city
council
and
our
fellow
Citizens
need
to
consider
is
the
additional
damage
to
our
city
streets
that
will
eventually
come
about
and
running
in
the
digital
additional
heavy
vehicle
on
these
streets
under
recycling
instruction.
D
It
says
that
materials
inside
the
cart
should
be
clean,
loose
and
drive.
My
wife
and
I
both
can
tell
you.
It
takes
up
to
three
days
to
dry
out
an
empty
apple
juice
bottle
if
we
reuse
it
to
freeze
melt.
So
that's
something
that's
going
to
take
a
little
time.
The
bottom
line
is:
why
should
people
like
us
who
see
the
financial
insufficiency
of
recycling
to
our
fellow
citizens,
and
probably
our
city
government,
have
to
pay
for
a
service
that
we
don't
need?
D
We
do
not
believe
that
a
private
business
could
survive
under
such
wasteful
spending
and
people,
power
and
resources,
but
those
who
want
to
recycle
do
it
under
their
own
expense,
not
the
rest
of
us
who
might
not
agree
on
a
small
scale.
Recycling
has
failed
in
the
past
year
in
Belton.
This
begs
the
question
as
to:
why
is
our
city
government
trying
to
do
it
again
in
a
big
scale?
My
wife
reminded
me
that
the
last
time
Belton
tried
curbside
recycling
with
small
containers
that
it
failed
respectfully
Bob
and
Marianne
Olson.
B
H
H
B
B
I
Yep,
thank
you.
Mayor
council,
before
this
evening
is
a
request
for
a
new
tax
abatement
project
in
Old
Town
Belton
at
712,
Main
Street
and
the
applicant
is
requesting
approval
for
twenty
eight
thousand
dollars
in
exterior
improvements
to
the
property,
which
includes
a
roof
replacement,
new
gutters,
exterior
painting
and
staining
a
new
storm
door
and
new
Landscaping.
The
Old
Town
Belton
board
recommended
unanimous
approval
of
the
request
on
June
15th
and
a
public
hearing
notice
was
sent
to
taxing
jurisdictions
on
June.
I
C
A
E
A
B
I
Before
this
evening,
our
UDC
tax
amendments
for
public
noticing
and
alternative
development
standards
for
Platts
staff
is
recommending
changes
to
the
public
noticing
process,
to
streamline
the
process
and
limit
the
potential
for
noticing
errors.
Currently,
it
is
the
applicant's
responsibility
to
send
certified
public
hearing
notices
to
all
Property
Owners
within
185
feet
of
the
property
staff
is
proposing
to
resume
this
responsibility.
Responsibility
as
it
was
prior
to
April
2018.
letters
will
only
be
sent
via
regular
mail,
which
will
reduce
the
cost
of
postage
while
still
providing
appropriate
notice.
I
Staff
is
asked
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
look
into
the
notification
distance
to
see
if
any
changes
should
be
made.
Saftas
did
research,
eight
other
cities
in
the
metro
area
and
found
that
six
cities
have
the
same.
185
foot
notification,
distance,
two
cities
notify
at
300
feet
and
then
Raymore
notifies
at
185
feet
as
well,
but
they
also
send
mailed
notice
to
ward
council
members
and
an
HOA
representative.
I
If
there's
an
HOA
within
that
185
foot,
boundary
staff
is
also
adding
recommendations
to
add
alternative
development
standards
to
the
platting
process,
which
would
allow
minor
modifications
to
be
requested
through
a
plotting
process
where
a
variance
or
PUD
is
not
warranted.
Some
possible
examples
of
that
could
include
a
modification
to
a
lot
size
or
a
lot
width
or
a
build
line.
I
J
J
The
second
thing:
I,
what
we've
added
in
our
process
over
the
last
couple
years
is
putting
that
sign
out
which
allows
people
more
than
185
feet
to
see
that
as
they
drive
by
and
just
I've
noticed
one
today
that
I
talked
to
you
about
earlier
and
I
think
that's
probably
a
better
thing
to
do.
Anyhow,
just
because
more
people
farther
out
we'll
see
that
as
they
drive
by
it,
so
I
think
currently
what
we're
doing
and
what
you
want
to
change.
I
reckon
I
agree
with
so.
F
J
K
So
I'm
I'm
agreeing
with
the
signs
one
of
the
things
that
was
over
in
Bradford
Place
with
the
apartments
is
there
were
people
that
were
notified,
but
across
the
street,
who
even
still
had
direct
line
of
sight,
didn't
receive
notification
because
it
didn't.
They
were.
You
know
a
few
feet
longer
than
185
and
they
were
just
as
affected
as
those
across
the
street.
So
I
think
we
do
need
to
think
about.
Since
they're.
L
I
would
note
for
the
benefit
of
the
council
and
the
public
that
the
185
feet
measurement
is
statutory
and
it
is
sent
out
because
those
are
the
property
owners
that
can
file
a
valid
protest
petition
in
regards
to
rezoning,
which
increases
the
approval
majority
required
by
the
city
council.
That
is
why
the
185
foot
standards.
J
C
Go
ahead
well,
following
up
on
this
I
think
the
signs
are
a
good
idea
too.
In
fact,
I
think
it
should
be
signs,
maybe
185
fit
on
either
side
of
the
property
of
on
the
street,
because
a
lot
of
times
when
you're
going
down
lower
Scott
there's
a
property
in
the
back
there,
and
it
has
sign
for
the
longest
time,
but
nobody
noticed
it
because
it
was
like
40
feet
off
the
road
if
it
was
right
on
North
Scott
people
would
at
least
slow
down,
maybe
and
try
to
read
it.
C
J
I
C
Okay:
okay!
Well,
then,
that
would
have
corrected
what
I
saw
in
on
North,
Scott
and
I
guess.
My
second
thing
is
I've
had
a
couple
people
who
actually
saw
this
and
saw
what
was
going
to
be
proposed
and
called
and
had
a
question
about
the
certified
mail
and
I
was
going
to
ask
a
question
but
Dave
preempted
Me
by
answering
the
question.
C
If
anybody
on
the
council
had
seen
new
of
residents
who
actually
took
certified
mail
and
ignored
it,
and
apparently
they
do
so
I'm
I'm
kind
of
shocked,
because
when
I
get
certified
mail,
I
mean
that's
at
the
top
of
my
mail
list.
But
I
would
think
if
we're
doing
away
a
certified
mail
and
it
doesn't
cost
anything
extra.
I
It
suits
it's
easier
for
us
to
track
that
internally
than
rely
on
on
the
applicant
to
provide
us
with
that
information.
So
we'll
keep
mailing
lists
of
everybody
that
we
did
mail,
the
letters
to
and
then
in
regards
to
the
certified
mail.
I
had
a
call
this
afternoon
from
somebody
who
just
picked
up
their
certified
mail
for
a
public
hearing
that
was
last
week.
So
they're
they're
not
getting
that
information.
They
would
probably
get
it
easier
more
quickly
if
it
was
just
regular
mail.
C
C
J
F
B
I
I
I
Included
in
the
program
is
a
list
of
items
to
be
inspected,
all
of
which
are
related
to
the
health,
safety
and
Welfare
of
the
tenant.
Those
include
electrical
outlets
within
six
feet
of
a
water
source
smoke
and
carbon
monoxide
detectors,
exterior,
address
numbers,
interior
and
exterior
handrails
guard
rails,
stairs
and
decks.
Plumbing
fixtures
need
to
be
in
working
order.
I
If,
during
an
inspection,
the
inspector
notices
any
structural
conditions
or
hazards
that
may
be
an
immediate
threat
to
Life,
Health
or
safety,
the
enforcement
official
May
initiate
the
dangerous
buildings
and
structures
processes
defined
in
the
UDC.
Any
failed
inspections
have
14
days
to
correct
any
items
and
schedule
a
follow-up
inspection.
Any
deficiencies
that
are
not
corrected
or
failure
to
follow
up
on
a
inspection
will
result
in
a
violation,
notice
being
sent
and
follows
the
standard
code
enforcement
violation
process.
I
The
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
met
on
February,
23
2023
and
they
recommended
approval
and
they
also
added
some
conditions,
two
of
which
are
included
in
this
program,
and
then
one
has
been
removed.
That
one
item
was
requiring
at
least
one
inspection
being
conducted
every
five
years,
regardless
of
vacancy.
I
The
Planning
Commission
held
a
public
hearing
on
March
21st
2023,
at
which
two
landlords
did
speak,
requesting
clarification
on
those
items.
They
were
not
specifically
speaking
in
favor
or
in
opposition
of
the
program.
The
Planning
Commission
recommended
unanimous
approval.
The
proposed
tax
amendments,
including
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee's
recommendations
staff,
did
bring
forward
the
program
to
the
city
council
on
March
28,
23
2023
as
part
of
a
work
session.
Based
on
the
concerns
expressed
at
that
work
session
staff
did
remove
the
recommendation
of
the
one
inspection
every
five
years
from
the
final
text.
Tonight.
I
All
inspection
and
program
monitoring
will
be
conducted
by
City
staff.
There's
no
increase
in
staff
currently
being
proposed,
and
then
we
are
currently
bringing
forward
a
separate
UDC
tax
amendment
to
Planning
Commission
next
week,
which
will
come
to
City
Council
in
August.
They
would
establish
a
10
rental
inspection
fee
on
the
landlord
business
license
will
remain
at
70
annually,
with
no
additional
rate
added
per
unit,
which
had
been
discussed
as
a
potential
option
that
most
cities
do
use
based
on
those
fees.
The
fees
would
be
the
lowest.
I
The
least
expensive
of
any
program
in
the
region.
Staff
is
proposing
an
effective
date
of
July
1st
2024,
which
aligns
with
the
business
license
senior
and
gives
staff
almost
a
year
to
notify
current
landlords,
as
well
as
coordinate
with
utilities
and
ownership
data
to
locate
and
notify.
Current
landlords
who
are
not
licensed
this
additional
time
will
also
allow
us
to
complete
the
Central
Square
upgrade
that
will
streamline
the
licensing
and
inspection
process,
and
then
it
will
also
allow
us
time
to
conduct
staff,
trainings
and
certifications
for
the
program.
K
I
have
requested
from
day
one
that
we
put
in
a
mechanism
to
get
a
name
of
a
particular
individual
that
we
could
make
contact
with
I've,
even
provided
cities
to
staff
that
have
done
that
and
to
date
I
still
don't
know
of.
If
that's
happened,
so
I
do
see
in
the
definition
of
owner
it
says
any
person
having
legal
or
Equitable
interest
in
the
property.
K
I
I
K
I
F
J
A
couple
things
I
thought:
when
we
got
done
in
March,
maybe
Allison
she
went
back
and
watched
it.
So
maybe
she
can
answer,
but
I
thought
we
kept
it
at
every
units.
Three
years
or
younger
didn't
have
to
be
inspected,
and
this
one
says
five
years.
I
thought
we
kept
it
at
three
years,
but
maybe
I'm
mistaken
on
that
second
thing
is
we
never
talked
about
money.
J
My
concern
is
going
to
be
I,
know
me
and
mayor
and
Joe
had
talked
about
one
time
of
having
a
flat
fee
and
not
having
a
business
license
anymore
and
now
you're
saying
having
a
business
license
and
charging
ten
dollars.
I
just
I've
always
thought
the
city
has
always
maintained
that
we
have
to
pay
for
the
services
rendered.
J
So
if
we
have
an
employee
there,
making
forty
thousand
dollars
a
year
doing
an
inspection
and
they're
there
for
30
minutes,
we
have
to
have
that
time
sheet
and
they
got
to
pay
exactly
what
his
his
or
her
time
is
and
I
don't
know.
If
ten
dollars
is
going
to
do
that.
So
I
guess
my
concern
is
making
sure
if
we're
doing
the
inspections
that
we
are
funding
this
properly
to
pay
for
those
also.
I
J
That
I
mean
I'm
conversations
that
we
had
off
script
and
all
that
stuff,
but
I
thought
we
needed
around
40
or
50
dollars
per
unit
to
actually
pay
for
somebody,
so
I
mean
everything
that
I
guess
Andrea
has
told
me
over
the
years
is
when
we
do
a
study,
we
basically
trying
to
find
out
how
long,
like
the
sunshine
laws,
how
long
it
takes
us
to
copy
and
all
that
stuff,
and
then
we
charge
for
that
that
service
and
I
just
I
think
we
got
to
do
the
same.
For
this
too.
J
If
someone
has
one
unit,
but
if
somebody
has
you
know,
200
units
I
mean
they're,
paying
seventy
dollars
plus
was
that
2
000
bucks
and
I
mean
they're
getting
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
many,
how
many
hours
it's
going
to
take
one
of
our
people
to
go
through
all
those
units
and
I
know
it's
not
going
to
be
every
year,
but
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
they
might
go
through
25
or
30
units
every
year.
But
if
you
think
it's
feasible
I
mean
that's,
the
city's
got
to
pay
for
it.
C
To
answer
your
first
question
on
page
35,
10-142
B,
it
says
an
inspection
is
not
required
for
dwelling
units
that
are
less
than
three
years
old.
Matt's
handout
was
slightly
confusing
because
later
in
his
handout,
it
has
the
thing
that
public
works.
I
mean
that
the
Planning
Commission
voted
on,
where
it
was
five
years
but
the.
C
But
if
you
look
at
page
35
you'll
see
that
it
says
three
years
but
I
wanted
to
make
a
motion
to
amend
this
to
put
back
in
the
requirement
of
every
five
years,
and
that
would
simply
mean
putting
back
in
the
sentence
that
was
taken
out,
which
says.
However,
regardless
of
occupancy.
At
least
one
inspection
shall
be
conducted
every
five
years
for
long-term
occupancies,
so
I
I
make
that
motion
to
amend.
G
What
I
am
weighing
more
heavily
right
now
is
the
input
from
the
community,
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
and
the
Planning
Commission
that
presented
it
to
us
with
the
five-year
re-inspection
I'll
call
out
that
council
member
Richardson
had
a
good
idea
about
a
waiver
option.
If
we
were
to
notice
these
people
that
hey
it's
been
five
years,
it's
time
to
reinspect
you
as
the
tenant
are
the
only
one
that
can
sign
the
waiver.
I
think
that's,
maybe
some
flexibility
that
would
make
the
program
more
feasible
so
anyway,
to.
C
C
Now
you
might
just
say:
hey:
they
just
have
to
buoy
up
and
do
it
anyway,
but
I
don't
see
any
reason
other
than
if
they
don't
want
it
and
then
I
would
I
would
take
Chris's
or
councilman
Richardson's
example,
or
a
a
further
motion,
I
guess
to
amend
my
amendment
to
add
that
if
the
tenant
actually
signs
off
that
they
don't
want
it,
then
that
would
solve
the
problem.
All.
A
A
J
I,
just
this
was
a
compromise
that
I
think
was
made
for
people
like
me
that
are
flat
out
against
anything
like
this
I'm,
a
personally
I'm
against
the
rental
inspection
program
altogether,
but
when
it's
unoccupied
I
can
live
with
it.
I
have
tenants,
came
up
to
me.
That
basically
said
How.
Can
you
how
dare
you
come
into
my
house?
I
have
an
agreement
with
the
landlord
they
take
care
of
me
and
I.
Don't
want
you
in
my
house
and
I
think
what
we
did
here
was
a
first
step
to
get
this
going.
J
M
I
M
J
I'm
fine
with
someone
voluntarily
wanting
to
do
it,
hey
that's
on
them,
I'm,
fine
with
that
either
the
landlord
or
the
tenant
can
voluntary
call
up
every
year
and
have
us
come
out
and
inspect
it
I'm
perfectly
fine
with
it.
I
just
don't
want
to
be
that
person
that
interferes
with
someone's
legal
documentation
between
a
rental
agreement
that
and
they're
happy
it
wasn't
just
one
I've
had
four
or
five
Tenants
come
up
to
me
and
said:
I
don't
want
anybody
in
my
house.
A
A
K
G
I'll
just
add
revisiting
a
lot
of
what's
being
said.
Right
now
was
also
said
on
March
28th
and
we
all
kind
of
took
a
guess
that
the
tenant
turnover
is
two
to
three
years.
No
one
knows
we
don't
have
that
data
point
I,
think
that
will
make
a
more
informed
decision,
but
we
have
to
start
the
program
as
it
is.
C
Well,
just
again,
I'll
reiterate
the
codes
enforcement
advisory,
Council
11,
regular
citizens,
just
like
us
all,
unanimously
voted
for
the
five-year
and
also
the
Planning
Commission
for
the
five-year,
and
so
we
all
have
different
experiences.
You
have
experiences
of
tenants
who
don't
like
that
and
they
had
experiences
from
their
neighbors
of
tenants
that
were
scared
and
hanging
on
by
the
edge
of
their
teeth
to
keep
their
apartment.
C
A
J
E
A
E
A
K
I
J
J
The
three
years
was
basically
most
units
are
turned
over
at
least
once
have
not
twice
in
every
three
years,
and
that's
why
the
first
three
years
are
brand
new
and
after
that
they
were
going
to
require
inspections
starting
after
three
years,
which
I'm
fine
with
you
change
it
to
five
again
I'm
fine
with
that
I.
Just
don't
want
it
to
be
a
mandatory
if
residents
are
happy
with
their
current
agreement,
and
now
we
got
rid
of
the
waiver
thing.
There's
no
waiver
to
worry
about
so.
C
C
So
if
there's
some
reasonable
reason
and
not
that
Dave's
isn't
reasonable,
but
some
other
reason
that
you
might
think
this
is
this
is
inadequate,
then
I'm
willing
to
listen
but
for
now
I
know
that
after
the
March
28th
or
25th
or
whatever
city
council
meeting,
there
was
a
May
25th
seaac
meeting
and
everybody
said
we
worked
a
lot
on
this.
We
had.
We
have
the
information
from
our
neighbors.
We
know
what
we
want
and
we
want
this
back
into
the
rip,
the
rental
inspection
program
so.
J
Only
thing
with
that
Council,
councilman,
Rob
or
Powell
is
people.
Don't
call
code
enforcement
people,
don't
email
code
enforcement
people,
they
email
their
city,
council
members,
they
call
city,
council
members
and
let
us
know
what
they
think
about
this
they're
not
coming
up
to
plan,
end
zoning
and
telling
you
they
don't
want
this
and
they're
not
coming
to
code
enforcement
advisory,
Council
meetings
either
and
telling
you
they
don't
want
it
so,
but
they
do
call
City,
Council,
Members
they've
stopped
me
at
grocery
stores.
They
stopped
me
at
Terrors.
J
J
C
Ain't
coming
in
my
house,
I've
heard
me
perfectly
honest:
I'm,
a
landlord
too
I
have
one
I
rent
out
the
house
next
to
me
and
that
guy
has
in
the
womb
of
war
and
had
no
problem
with
this.
So
I
don't
know.
I
I
still
think
it's
a
it's.
It's
a
good
thing
to
have
for
people
who
are
struggling
with
broken
down.
Plumbing
Etc
not
getting
their
landlord
to
fix
it.
Well,.
J
The
other
thing
I
will
tell
you
councilman
Powell
is
this
was
brought
up
about
three
years
ago
and
it
failed
because
of
mandatory
inspections.
So
if
you
want
it
to
fail,
then
let's
do
mandatory
inspections.
If
you
wanted
to
start
and
and
have
a
starting
point,
let's
keep
it
as
it
is
and
move
forward.
J
A
G
I
councilmember
Clark
I'm
just
going
to
add
that
I,
don't
think
we,
as
the
council
should
presume
about
how
folks
that
volunteer
their
time
on
our
committees
and
Boards
gather
information
and
feedback.
Just
because
they're
not
on
the
city
website
as
Council,
doesn't
mean
that
they
don't
seek
out
input
from
their
neighbors.
G
I,
just
I
respect
their
time,
and
energy
too
appreciate
you.
Let
me
finish
that
that's
what
I
want
to
say
is
that
we
do
appreciate
their
time
and
their
input,
and
we
trust
that
they're
doing
the
work
that
the
way
they
volunteered
to
do
it,
and
it's
not
really
fair
to
disregard
it,
because
you
don't
think
they're
getting
the
same
volume
or
the
same
type
of
input.
You
are
so.
O
C
Least,
two
of
them
went
door
to
door
in
their
neighborhoods
asking
about
this,
knowing
that
there
were
rental
property
properties,
at
least
from
the
outside,
look
like
they're
falling
apart,
and
so
they
knocked
on
doors
and
they
asked
and
that's
what
they
told
they
said
I'm,
not
good.
Don't
don't
do
that!
Don't
come
in
Don't
force
me
to
call
you
just
come
in
and
then
then
I
can
blame
it
on
the
city.
I
don't
want
to
be
I.
G
They're
not
listed
like
that
I'm
saying
they
will
seek
out
information.
I
know
several
people
on
the
code
enforcement
advisory
Council
who
were
really
upset
when
we
removed
the
five-year
requirement
because
they
took
the
time
to
talk
to
their
neighbors
and
get
input.
All
I'm
saying
right
now
is
do
respect
for
them
and
their.
J
J
G
J
J
M
It
all
right
go
ahead,
so
if
we're
worried
about
their
Plumbing,
not
working
like
they
say
we
can,
they
can
make
a
call
once
a
year
and
get
an
inspection
I.
Don't
understand
why
I
get
the
five
year
with
the
waiver,
but
they
can
make
a
call
once
a
year
and
have
their
have
their
place
inspected.
So
I
don't
well.
K
G
I
mean
we've
talked
about
this
people
are
put
in
uncomfortable
positions
because
they
don't
have
enough
money
to
move
to
a
safe,
healthy,
clean
rental
and
that's
what
the
city
is
trying
to
do
with
this
program
is
eliminate
those
unsafe,
unhealthy,
rentals,
the
finer
detail
of
the
five
years
or
not
this
program
is
a
good
thing
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
just
call
for
question.
J
A
F
F
K
A
C
F
J
K
K
L
L
Issue
with
getting
into
this
is,
we
are
now
talking
about
the
corporate
governance
and
structure
of,
in
some
cases,
extremely
large
llc's,
with
multiple
llc's
within
them.
So
to
for
us
to
verify
and
to
prove
that
somebody
has
the
legal
authority
to
sign
something,
we
would
need
resolutions
approving
it
from
all
llc's
that
might
be
involved
or
have
any
sort
of
ownership
or
majority
ownership
interest
in
that
entity.
L
L
L
C
J
J
So
I,
just
I
think
this
is
a
great
compromise
from
what
Matt
and
the
staff
did
with
the
landlords
and
attendance
over
at
the
police
station
that
one
night,
some
of
the
stuff
that
came
out
of
our
city
council,
meeting
on
May,
25th
or
28th
whatever
day
that
was
I,
just
I
think
this
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction
and
I
think
from
everybody.
I
talked
to
I
think
we
can
live
with
it.
B
C
But
you've
reminded
us
that
on
the
business
license
form,
there
is
a
requirement
for
a
local
con
I
hate
to
use
the
word
contact,
because
that
just
seems
he's
going
to
pick
up
the
mail,
but
somebody
who
can
locally
get
in
touch
with
the
owner.
So
my
question
is
what
is
local
I
mean
I
was
going
to
propose
within
30
miles,
but
I
mean,
but
local
might
mean
a
guy
lives
in
Europe
and
he
has
his
brother-in-law
living
in
Illinois
who's,
his
local
contact-
that's
not
local
to
me,
but.
C
C
The
the
procedures
to
track
down
these
people
I
think
Brett
has
excellent
points.
They
we're
not
finding
them.
We
got
llc's
on
top
of
llc's
and
we
really
need
a
name
of
a
person
who
you're
right
can
make
it
here
and
make
decisions
and
say
we
are
not
going
to
fix
that
plumbing
or
we
are
calling
the
plumber
tonight
or
whatever,
and
not
somebody
that
has
to
fly
in
from
Texas
or
Illinois
or
California
or
wherever
so
I
don't
know.
Is
there
a
issue
with
defining
what.
L
Local
means
so
under
the
current
licensing
scheme
in
form,
specifically
like
the
application
form,
are
developed
and
approved
by
the
license
officer,
which
is
the
city
clerk.
Who
also
then,
has
the
authority
to
interpret
the
answers
and
the
provisions
of
not
only
the
licensing
section,
but
also
the
application,
so
given
kind
of
the
discussion
I
think
at
least
at
a
minimum,
the
city
clerk
could
inquire
as
to
how
local
local
was
so,
for
example,
if
a
landlord
applied
listed
somebody
and
then
asked
okay,
where
is
this
local
representative
actually
located?
L
F
J
Mean
I
guess
my
question
to
you
is
and
I'm
sure
you
don't
have
the
answer,
but
just
like
with
councilman
Powell
said
it.
He
had
a
house
in
Ohio
and
he
lived
in
Houston.
How
many
times
do
we
have
that
same
scenario
that
we
don't
even
know
about
that
they're
rented
out
to
maybe
a
family
member
or
somebody
like
that,
because
they
probably
don't
come
out
and
get
a
business
license
if
it's
just
one
single
home
and
again
I?
J
Don't
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
there's
people
out
there
that
have
a
management
company
that
in
his
situation,
that
also
because
of
releasing
it
in
their
800
miles
and
they're
using
their
management
company,
but
I
just
try
to
think
as
a
staff.
We
just
got
to
try
to
get
as
many
phone
numbers
as
possible
that
we
can
contact
people
locally.
J
J
C
C
K
Say:
okay,
there's!
That's
my
family
member
yeah
go
ahead.
You've
convinced
you
all
have
convinced
me
to
vote
for
this,
but
I
am
very
concerned
because
I
know
the
city,
clerk
and
I
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
trying
to
identify
the
corporates
at
the
state
level
and
they
were
still
llc's
written.
There
was
no
individual
names
and
we
couldn't
identify,
especially
the
ones
that
were
in
Bradford
Place.
We
couldn't
identify
names
upon
who
has
the
authority
to
make
decisions
now
the
truck
that
comes
by
that
does
maintenances
I
talked
to
them.
K
They
couldn't
tell
me
names
of
people
to
call
even
at
a
closer
level,
so
I'm
very
concerned
about
that,
because
also
residents
of
traditions
complained
about
that
that
they
didn't
know
how
to
contact
certain
people
for
things
that
they
may
need.
So
I'm
very
concerned
that
that
this
is
something
that's
going
to
drop
and
I.
You
know
we're
talking
about
our
citizens
that
can't
contact
other
than
a
maintenance
person.
L
L
Additionally,
as
written
right
now,
it
says
name
of
local
emergency
contact,
KC,
metro
area,
so
under
with
the
parentheses,
KC
metro
area,
so
I
think
you
know
the
broadest
interpretation
of
that
would
be
the
CSA
and
the
more
reasonable
interpretation
of
that
would
be
the
MSA.
So
basically,
a
30
mile
ring
around
Kansas
City,
as
is
currently
written
and
provided
on
the
current
landlord
application.
Business
license
application.
H
B
I
Right
before
this
evening
is
a
request
for
a
special
use
permit
to
convert
an
existing
static
billboard
to
a
digital
billboard.
The
billboard
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
I-49,
south
of
163rd
Street
and
North
of
Hampton
Inn,
the
billboard.
The
billboard
was
constructed
in
1989
and
does
not
meet
the
current
placement
standards,
size
and
setbacks
from
property
lines
with
the
special
use
permit.
I
The
applicant
is
requesting
approval
of
alternative
development
standards
to
allow
the
billboard
to
be
converted
in
its
current
form
and
location,
which
would
allow
the
billboard
to
be
located
closer
to
an
interchange
and
property
lines
than
currently
allowed
and
the
billboard
to
remain
five
feet
above
the
current
maximum
height
of
30
feet.
Staff
does
not
believe
that
approval
of
these
modifications
will
have
any
negative
impact
and
will
be
an
improvement
to
the
existing
billboard.
I
The
Planning
Commission
held
a
public
hearing
on
June
20th,
at
which
no
one
spoke
in
favor
or
in
opposition
to
the
request.
The
Planning
Commission
recommended
recommended
unanimous
approval
of
the
request
and
staff
also
recommends
approval.
Modot
has
reviewed
the
application
and
has
also
approved
the
request,
and
the
applicant
is
here
this
evening
if
there
are
no
unanswered
questions
or
concerns.
With
the
request.
This
evening,
staff
does
request
a
double
read:
to
allow
the
applicant
to
proceed
with
the
permitting
process,
foreign.
C
At
some
point
you
say
oh
yeah,
in
C
3C,
you
say
in
your
staff
recommendation
in
case
of
malfunction.
The
sign
display
should
be
defaulted
to
a
blank
screen,
but
in
the
letter
from
formatko
who
makes
the
sign
they
say,
if
the
photocell
fails,
then
it
will
revert
to
a
timed
on
and
off
based
on,
I
guess,
the
season
of
when
it's
daylight.
When
it's
night
and
not
on
the
light
that
it's
getting
from
the
Sun
and
if
the
PC
fails,
it
will
still
revert
to
a
timed
position
until
it
actually
goes
off.
P
C
P
Default
and
then
separately
for
for
metco
that
was
more
particular
to
the
photo
technology
that
automatically
adjusts
the
lighting
of
the
digital
faces,
based
on
the
ambient
light,
and
so
going
from
dust
to
midnight.
Things
like
that.
So
if,
for
some
reason
one
of
the
photocells
malfunctions,
then
it
goes
to
a
particular
setting.
So
it's
almost
it's
two
separate
scenarios:
okay,.
C
C
Because
it
says
here
in
in
format,
thank
you
for
that
explanation
for
sure
for
metco's
letter,
though
it
does
say
upon
losses.
Sorry,
if
the
control
system
for
the
face
loses
framing
data
from
the
player
PC,
the
sign
goes
dark
based
on
a
configuration,
timer
Why
didn't
it
just
say,
goes
dark
immediately.
C
P
It's
a
it's
a
multiple
Point
photocell
technology
that
takes
all
manufacturers
into
consideration
for
the
ambient
lighting
because,
in
addition
to
sun
and
dusk,
it
also
takes
into
account
any
ambient
lighting
from
commercial
activity
nearby,
so
I
think
that
they
worded
it
longer
than
need
to.
But
in
a
malfunction
scenario
it
does
go
dark
completely.
Dark.
C
P
M
C
F
A
E
H
A
B
I
Professional
registration
through
the
state
of
Missouri
staff
has
been
working
on
code
amendments
that
would
remove
the
special
use
permit
process
for
body
art
service
businesses
in
the
future.
The
Planning
Commission
held
a
public
hearing
on
June
20th,
at
which
no
one
spoke
in
favor
or
in
opposition
to
the
request.
The
Planning
Commission
recommended
unanimous
approval
of
the
requests
and
staff
also
recommends
approval
again
with
like
with
the
billboard.
If
there
are
no
unanswered
questions
or
concerns
with
requests.
J
C
B
J
N
J
N
A
F
A
B
H
O
Ahead
good
evening,
this
is
for
equipment
that
we'll
be
installing
in
our
trucks
or
basically
laptops
and
the
mounting
equipment
to
hook
them
up.
This
will
be
a
new
thing
for
us.
Police
Department's
been
used
to
mobile
data
terminals
for
a
while.
It
basically
links
us
with
the
computer
dispatching
system
to
help
transmit
information
more
instantly
to
transfer
notes
that
we
might
not
want
to
put
over
the
air
gives
us
the
ability
to
go
in
route
by
just
touching
screens
instead
of
consuming
time.
So
it's
a
technology.
O
That's
been
around
the
the
new
CAD
system
that
the
ESB
is
working
on.
Currently
this,
this
will
work
much
better
with
it
than
what
we
had
before
it
was
budgeted
for
this
year.
It
did
come
in
a
little
bit
higher
than
what
we
thought
by
the
time.
We
got
everything
to
hook
it
up.
However,
we
do
have
a
couple
other
Capital
out
outlay
items
from
this
year's
budget
that
we
are
going
to
have
plenty
of
excess
to
be
able
to
cover
the
overages.
F
J
Ahead,
this
might
be
a
question
for
mayor
Larkey
because
you
sat
on
that
board.
I
guess
my
question:
is
we
had
a
9-1-1
board
here
for
the
county
that
we've
been
paying
taxes
into
for
this
I
thought
type
Services
I
mean:
can
we
and
they're
not?
They
never
created
a
911
county-wide
board.
What
is
that
money
going
to,
and
why
aren't
they
is
there
a
grant
program
that
we
can
get.
A
O
So
basically,
it
supports
the
system,
it
supports
the
911
system
and
so
for
the
for
the
dispatchers.
The
cad
systems
are
covered
in
that,
but
individual
equipment
is
not
and
the
original
plan
when
they,
when
it
all
passed
and
the
original
tax
came
out
there,
that
equipment
was
included.
But
after
the
fact
when
you
updated
equipment,
it's
not
included
in
that
it's
only
for
the
911
system
itself,
so
the
the
radio
units
within
dispatch,
the
towers
that
it
takes
to
communicate
between
them
and
the
actual
9-1-1
connections.
Well,.
J
I
mean
again
I
go
back,
I
thought
they
had
a
lot
of
money
from
all
the
taxes
and
they
haven't
the
the
original
program
that
people
voted
on
years
ago.
Didn't
come
to
fruition,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
they're
doing
with
all
that
money
and
and
if
you're
sitting
there
using
it
for
their
9-1-1
system.
It
sounds
like
this
is
for
the
911
system,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
why
we're
not
getting
grants
for
something
like
this
for
from
them.
But
I
mean
it's
just
my
thoughts.
I.
A
E
A
M
G
I,
like
we
heard
about
in
the
proclamation
this
evening,
is
Parks
and
Recreation
month
and
so,
through
the
end
of
the
month
of
July,
there's
a
photo
scavenger
hunt
across
our
11
Park
so
get
out
there
and
snap
some
photos
and
I
believe
win
a
prize.
Also.
The
reminder
the
farmer's
market
is
Thursdays,
four
to
seven
at
Assembly
of
God
Church.
There
are
youth,
Sports
sign
ups,
going
on
now
the
junior
Disc
Golf
League,
I'll
start
again,
I
think
it's
the
second
year
in
September.
J
The
only
thing
I
got
is
I
was
up
here,
Friday
night
for
the
Fourth
of
July
celebrations
with
I
think
they
called
it,
and
just
want
to
thank
everybody
that
put
that
on
and
all
the
volunteers
that
helped
out
Friday
night
was
a
wonderful
time.
I
was
not
able
to
make
it
up
here
on
Saturday,
but
I
heard
Saturday
went
off
pretty
good,
especially
in
the
afternoon,
with
the
kids
function.
So
just
want
to
thank
people
that
put
their
time
and
effort
into
that
and
put
on
a
celebration
for
our
community.
F
F
C
Second
I
want
to
publicly
thank
Greg,
rocos
and
maybe
Mike
Miller
for
the
crosswalk
work,
but
particularly
for
MoDOT
painting,
the
crosswalks
on
Y
Highway
I,
heard
from
Joe
that
Craig
was
instrumental
in
doing
it
and
I
heard
from
Mike
that
he
was
instrumental
and
I
wrote
an
email
too,
but
anyway
it
got
done.
That's
the
main
thing
and
it's
a
it's
I
notice.
People
stop
more.
For
me.
C
The
only
thing
I
would
ask
if
you
could-
and
this
is
just
an
ask-
is
when
we,
when
you
write
up
the
minutes,
if
you
could,
actually
you
don't
have
to
name
names
with
say
what
some
of
the
discussion
points
are.
I
mean
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion.
The
last
couple
of
meetings
and
the
the
the
text
was.
There
was
discussion
about
the
topic
and
then
there
were
seven
votes,
yay
and
two
apps.
C
But
if,
if
we
could
say
like
in
like
in
the
points
here
10
years
ago,
somebody's
going
to
say
why
the
heck
did
that
those
guys
leave
out
this
amendment
on
five-year
annual
five-year
inspections,
and
it
would
be
nice
to
be
able
to
go
back
to
the
minutes
and
see
what
the
discussion,
what
the
pros
and
cons
were.
So
thank
you.
H
A
Yeah
he's
been
gone.
I
would
just
like
to
add
on
to
what
everybody
said
about
the
celebration
on
July
4th.
It
was
pretty
good
real
good,
not
as
good
as
last
year.
I,
don't
think
we'll
ever
top
that
again,
but
it
was
it
was
great.
I
saw
a
lot
of
people,
so
it
was
a
good
thing.
That's
all
I
have
you
have
anything
I.
E
Was
just
gonna
mention
one
thing:
gfl
mailed
out
the
cards
for
recycling,
so
everyone
should
received
a
card
at
the
home.
We
received
two
main
questions.
One
question
is:
do
I
have
to
take
a
cart
and
the
answer
is
no.
You
don't
have
to
take
a
cart
and
if
you
wish
not
to
have
one,
you
can
call
gfl
the
numbers
on
the
card
or
email
them.
Their
information
is
on
the
card
and
tell
them
that
you
don't
want
to
receive
one.
E
The
other
question
is
what's
recyclable
and
what's
not
on
that
card?
Also
it
has
got
a
website.
You
can
go
to
to
see
what's
recyclable,
what's
not,
but
when
the
carts
are
delivered,
I
worked
it
out
with
them
to
put
a
like
door
hanger
on
the
handle,
so
they
have
an
explanation
of
what
is
recyclable
and
what
is
not
right
there
on
the
card
for
you
to
take
off
and
you
can
take
inside
your
house
and
read
it.
That's
what
I
had
for
you
tonight.