►
From YouTube: Belton City Council Meeting - March 28, 2023 - 6pm
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
A
A
H
F
A
I
I
Traditionally
most
of
the
cards
are
out
of
there
by
6,
15
620,
so
for
the
benefit
of
Staff,
we're
going
to
move
that
up
to
six
o'clock
and
try
to
flush
them
out
and
move
on,
and
just
if,
if
there's
a
chance
of
rain
that
we
would
rain
out
on
the
Saturday,
the
plan
is
to
do
it
the
next
day,
if
that
particular
Sunday
rains
out
we'll
just
see
them
next
month.
H
A
H
J
I
just
wanted
to
to
thank
everybody
for
their
participation
in
the
process
for
this
year's
budget.
We
started
with
public
meetings
in
October
and
went
through
the
process
with
some
workshops
on
CIP
and
then
operations
and
we've
made
a
lot
of
tweaks
and
adjustments
throughout
the
time
and
I.
Think
we've
been
pretty
responsive
to
the
to
the
public
in
this
budget
as
much
as
we
possibly
could
so
I'm
very
proud
to
present
this
budget,
and
hopefully
we
can
move
forward.
K
A
G
A
H
C
J
Honestly,
I
don't
know
how
it's
been
in
the
past.
We've
just
said
it
was
a
budget
year.
We
are
not
raising
residential
rates
for
water
or
sewer.
We
are
raising
other
rates.
C
J
L
M
N
B
L
A
A
J
Ahead,
if
I
may
looking
at
the
current
code
of
ordinances,
it
appears
that
in
the
past
years
it's
been
really
all
over
the
map,
there's
some
that
were
done
in
March,
some
that
were
done
in
May,
and
so
there
really
isn't
a
consistency
to
you
know
historically
to
when
we
do
the
rates.
A
C
H
A
N
F
G
F
G
L
O
The
Harden
hand
thrift
store
at
305,
North
Scott
has
requested
approval
of
especially
for
an
electronic
message.
Monument
sign
and
the
sign
does
meet
all
the
north
Scott
overlay
sign
design
requirements
as
well
as
most
Monument
sign
requirements,
except
for
the
modifications
of
the
heightened
setback.
They
are
requesting
to
increase
the
height
from
six
feet
to
11
feet
and
the
setback
from
10
feet
down
to
just
under
a
foot
to
allow
the
sign
to
be
installed.
The
same
location
as
the
previous
pole,
sign
added
height
will
make
the
sign
visible
over
parked
Vehicles.
O
As
shown
in
the
images
in
the
staff
report,
the
Planning
Commission
did
hold
a
public
hearing
on
March
7th,
no
one
spoke
in
favor
or
in
opposition
of
the
request,
and
the
commission
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
the
request
and
the
applicant
is
here
this
evening.
If
there
are
any
questions
on.
C
O
And
the
conditions
are
just
there
to
clarify
the
modifications
that
have
been
proposed,
as
well
as
the
standard
requirements
that
go
along
with
the
electronic
Message
Board
in
terms
of
the
intensity
of
the
lighting.
The
frequency
of
the
change
of
the
sign
and
all
those
will
be
reviewed
and
stipulated,
with
the
sign
permit
as
well.
All.
K
Owen
Lumber
has
a
similar
sign.
Is
that
right.
O
P
Discussion,
thank
you
mayor
and
members
of
the
council,
as
was
discussed
at
the
last
work
session.
This
ordinance
Upstate
updates
the
city's
offensive
sections
in
regard
to
marijuana,
given
the
passage
of
amendment
3,
which
enacted
article
XIV
of
the
Missouri
Constitution
section
2,
and
made
some
slight
revisions
to
section
one
that
aren't
applicable
in
this
situation,
what
city
staff
and
I
have
done?
P
Is
it
basically
track
exactly
with
the
Missouri
constitution
in
regards
to
the
use
of
marijuana
in
public
places,
the
ability
to
possess
marijuana
in
the
amount
stated
in
the
Constitution
and
the
prohibition
against
driving,
while
under
the
influence
of
marijuana,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
H
P
At
this
time
there
is
not
a
blood
alcohol
style
test
for
marijuana.
That
is
why
there
is
additional
requirements
regarding
the
observation
of
the
person
if
they
are
deemed
to
potentially
be
under
the
influence
of
marijuana
and
also
Chief
can
Chief
and
I
kind
of
have
talked
about
this
a
couple
times.
There
are
certain
officers
that
may
have
qualifications
such
as
what
is
it
drug
recognition
experts,
but
also
they
are
not
mandatorily
required
by
the
Constitution
But.
To
answer
your
question
plainly:
no,
there
is
no
blood
alcohol
level
style
test.
Okay,.
P
Q
F
L
J
Mr
Mayor
I
I'm
happy
to
bring
this
resolution
forward
to
formally
create
a
budget
and
finance
committee.
This
this
resolution
does
not
have
anybody
named,
yet
we
will
bring
a
resolution
forward
in
April
to
actually
appoint
members
to
this
committee.
The
purpose
behind
the
committee
obviously,
is
for
us
to
look
at
our
budgeting
practice,
how
we
budget
our
overall
Finance
system
and
how
the
budget
is
laid
out.
J
J
We
anticipate
meeting
quite
a
bit
to
be
for
to
be
honest,
not
that
I,
someone
from
the
public
could
meet
often
but
I
I
anticipate.
This
will
be
a
pretty
frequent
meeting
for
a
little
while
to
get
everything
lined
up.
G
L
R
I
have,
after
our
presentation,
I
have
updated
the
numbers
based
upon
the
budget
process,
you'll
notice
on
the
summary
sheet.
That's
page
three
row,
T5
I
do
have
a
scrivener's
there.
There
and
a
formula
did
not
add
up
correctly,
so
I
will
correct
that
before
it's
posted
online,
and
so
it
is
basically
the
same
document
that
I
presented
earlier
to
you.
Just
with
some
budget
numbers,
adjusted
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
N
In
November,
when
you
we
had
this
at
a
work
session,
one
of
the
comments-
maybe
there
more
than
one,
was
one
of
the
top
five
things
that
residents
want
our
sidewalk
improvements,
but
I
didn't
see
anything
in
here.
Maybe
it's
hidden
in
one
of
these.
But
if
you
could
point
out
where
it
is
I
appreciate
it.
J
We
don't
have
sidewalk
improvements
in
here
in
in
Mass
I
know.
In
the
operations
budget
we
have
a
little
bit
of
money
for
a
sidewalk
program.
That
is
a
cost
share
program.
J
That's
the
only
new
new
programming
we
have
for
sidewalks
for
this
budget,
including
in
the
capital
Improvement
program
where
we
are
with
the
sidewalks,
is
we
are
in
the
process
of
of
stud
of
not
just
studying
but
taking
a
essentially
a
a
poll
of
the
sidewalks
and
trying
to
measure
where
we
need
them,
where
they're
in
disrepair
and
then
we'll
be
working
on
a
a
plan
from
that
how
we're
going
to
fund
it.
We
don't
know
yet.
N
Well,
I
would
suggest,
and
I
only
know
why
it
why
exactly
it's
in
here,
but
Economic
Development,
450
000!
What's
what's
how
does
that
relate
to
Capital
Improvement?
Well,
how
can
why
couldn't
that
be
really
reduced
a
little
bit
to
make
room
for
sidewalks,
because
sidewalks
are
going
to
come
up,
hopefully
in
the
next
five
years,
maybe
not
that.
J
Was
from
the
arpa
funds
that
we
had
discussed
previously
in
budget?
You
know,
last
week
or
last
meeting,
we
talked
about
the
budget
that
those
are
the
arpa
funds
for
economic
development.
That's
designed
to
be
seed
money
for
the
potential
to
help
us
to
essentially
get
some
some
properties
redeveloped
in
in
some
specific
areas
that
could
help
in
our
downtown
core
or
and
or
North
Scott
area.
D
Is
there
a
way
to
indicate
sidewalks
is
on
a
priority.
J
Well,
yeah
I
mean
we
are
working
on
coming
up
with
a
plan
and
we'd
be
glad
to.
If
we
need
to
bring
in
a
a
committee
that
includes
people
from
the
public
to
help
us
prioritize.
Once
we
determine
the
overall
need,
then
then
we
could
do
something
like
that
to
to
ensure
that
everybody
is
gets
to
have
some
feedback.
N
Well,
I
guess
too,
it
said
someplace
in
here
that
this
is
reviewed
annually.
N
So
if,
in
the
next
12
months
this
committee
or
staff,
or
somebody
assesses
sidewalk,
needs
and
comes
up
with
a
figure,
then
can
this
be
changed?
I
mean
this
isn't?
This
is
a.
J
Five-Year
plan,
but
we
do
it
as
part
of
the
budgeting
process
every
year,
so
it's
a
rolling,
Five-Year
Plan.
So
essentially
next
year
we'll
we
will
be
looking
at
the
25
through
29
Capital,
Improvement
plan,
and
so
the
stuff
that's
already
on
here
for
25
through
28
will
roll
on.
To
that
we'll
add
29.
We
can
add
and
subtract
things
for
next
year.
It's
it's
not
set
in
stone.
At
that
point,
the
only
thing
set
in
stone
from
this
specific
program
is
the
24
expenditures.
N
R
Hopefully,
in
about
three
to
four
months,
we
have
the
plans
turned
in
and
we're
getting
the
environmental
cleared
right
now,
the
environment
environment
will
be
cleared
in
the
middle
of
April.
Modot's
got
to
prove
the
plans,
approve
all
the
easements
and
then
they'll
give
us
approval
to
bid
the
job.
So
it's
going
through
their
process
to
get
it
out
the
door.
K
Yeah
I
have
some
significant
issues
with
the
June
30th
to
July
1st
proposal.
K
Parks
is
offering
very
similar
programming
25
days
before
the
first
weekend
of
June.
It's
really
similar
to
Summerfest
an
annual
Belton
Parks
event.
So
essentially
we
would
be
using
taxpayer
dollars
to
hold
two
summer
events
25
days
apart
to
do
an
Apples
to
Apples
comparison.
K
Summerfest
on
June
3rd
is
7
500
and
it
will
include
a
cornhole
tournament:
Pedal
Pull
for
kids,
adult
trike
race,
foam
party,
mascot
Mania,
live
music,
fireworks
plus
food
trucks,
vendors
and
Inflatables.
The
price
tag
on
that
is
7
500,
a
hundred
percent
of
which
came
from
sponsorships
The
Proposal,
we're
looking
at
for
downtown
Belton,
main
streets
event,
June,
30th
and
July.
1St
includes
live
music,
Inflatables
food
trucks,
vendors
and
fireworks
and
runs
forty
thousand
dollars,
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
of
which
we're
being
asked
to
fund.
K
Even
though
downtown
Belton
Main
Street
themselves
are
printing
in
fifteen
thousand.
I
haven't
seen
an
element
of
this
coming
from
sponsorship
other
than
the
city
in
downtown
Belton,
Main
Street,
so
I
do
not
support
this
proposal.
Additionally,
six
thousand
dollars
in
the
twenty
five
thousand
dollar
proposal
is
earmarked
as
miscellaneous
or
to
be
announced.
So
perhaps
we'll
see
another
proposal
down
the
line,
that's
a
little
more
detailed,
but
with
the
similarity
to
Parks
programming,
I,
don't
support
this.
H
C
I
saw
some
documents
on
here
from
some
acts
and
I.
Think
part
of
this
was
part
of
the
budget
process
that
we
started
back
in
October
November,
trying
to
keep
the
150th
birthday
party
going
that
a
lot
of
residents
said
they
enjoyed
I,
think
Carolyn.
C
Do
I
wish
that
the
parks
in
this
organization
could
have
come
together
and
created
something
together,
absolutely
I
wish.
We
could
always
work
together
in
and
be
on
the
same
page,
because
I
think
when
we
all
come
together,
our
our
events
are
going
to
be
even
better
than
what
they
are
today.
So
I
hope
that
in
the
future
that
that
can
happen
also.
D
D
When
this
was
initially
raised,
I
was
100
for
it,
then,
the
next
morning,
I
woke
up
and
I
started
thinking.
Well,
if
other
organizations
came
to
us
and
asked
they
wanted
to
do
a
party,
would
we
give
them
twenty
five
thousand
like
if
Home
Depot
came
to
us
and
asked
we
want
to
do
a
party
in
our
parking
lot?
Would
we
give
them
25
000
to
do
it
and
I
was
I
had
mentioned
it?
A
couple
of
people
and
I
was
told.
No,
we
probably
wouldn't
so
then
I
started
thinking.
Well.
D
N
Go
ahead!
Well,
as
recently
as
last
meeting,
we
were
told
that
it
was
that
this
hadn't
been
that
nobody
no
vendor
for
this
had
been
chosen
and
and
then
all
of
a
sudden.
Now
we
have
dbmsi
agreement
and
they
did
an
excellent
job
on
the
150th
I.
Don't
see
why
they
wouldn't
do
a
good
job
on
this,
but
I
don't
know
that
it
was
ever
all
open
to
other
groups.
I
mean
we
when
we
well
in
my
brief
experience
here.
N
When
we
spend
money,
we
have
a
we
open
it
up
to
other
group
to
several
groups
or
several
companies
that
can
do
the
job
so
I'm
kind
of
along
the
lines
of
what
Brett
said.
Also
I
noticed
that,
under
the
dates
that
they're
doing
things,
I
know
that
in
this
might
have
changed
too,
but
at
the
last
dbmsi
meeting,
which
I'm
not
on
their
board,
but
I
go
just
to
see
what
they're
doing
they
voted
to
have
a
Christmas
event
on
November
25th,
but
I.
N
Don't
even
see
that
on
here,
I
only
see
December
dates.
So
I
think
this
is
somewhat
inaccurate,
but
so
I
I.
Maybe
we
can
correct
that,
and
maybe
that
would
be
okay,
but
right
now
it
doesn't.
This
doesn't
look
like
a
accurate
document
to
me
is.
A
M
I
know
that
our
last
downtown
Belton
meeting
it
was
agreed
upon
and
voted
on,
that
we
would
continue
to
have
the
downtown
Belton
main
Street's
Christmas
event
on
the
25th,
the
same
day
that
we
have
the
shop
small
for
Belton
and
we
have
had
a
parade
the
past
couple,
two
or
three
years,
and
we
decided
and
voted
that
we
would
continue
with
that
Christmas
parade
that
day,
I
understand,
Norman
or
mayor
I'm.
M
Sorry
that
you
all
had
decided
to
change
the
date
of
the
tree
lighting
to
December
the
2nd
and,
at
that
point,
I
know
that
Gary
Mallory
was
going
to
come
and
talk
with
you
Joe,
and
that
we
have
a
meeting
coming
up
this
coming
Tuesday.
So
whatever
the
reason
the
resolution
was
for
that
we
have
not
talked
anymore
about
it,
but
that
was
we
went
ahead
and
voted
that,
yes,
we
would
have
the
parade.
Yes,
we
would
celebrate
it
on
a
small
business
Saturday
on
the
25th
of
November.
M
M
C
S
K
Just
find
some
alignment
with
councilmember
Clark
and
council
member
White's
comments.
I
agree,
the
150th
was
a
great
event.
The
turnout
was
great
I've
shared
the
feedback
with
parks
that
people
like
programming
on
Main
Street.
They
like
the
musical
acts.
This
is
all
things
that
you
know.
If
we
had
gone
to
Parks
first
and
said:
let's
recreate
it
and
gave
him
25
Grand,
they
could
do
it.
You
know
what
I
mean
as
our
our
events
and
programming
arm
of
the
city.
K
They
kind
of
should
have
first
right
of
refusal,
so
not
not
taken
away
from
the
150th.
That
was
meant
to
be
a
once
in
150,
Year
party
and
belton's
birthday
is
in
August.
So
if
we
were
looking
to
recreate
that
magic,
the
timing
doesn't
make
sense
for
me
and
then
to
councilmember
White's
comments.
I,
don't
think
we
should
be
in
a
position
to
give
grants.
If
there's
a
budget
surplus,
I,
don't
think
putting
on
events
or
programming
separate
from
Parks
makes
sense.
K
We
do
a
lot
of
support
in
kind
for
these
events
with
staff
hours
and
I'm
happy
to
continue
to
support
it.
That
way,
but
like
I,
said
this
proposal
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
to
support.
H
T
A
T
What
I
had
spoken
with
Diane
about
and
spoke
with,
Joe
about
was
having
all
of
the
groups
that
were
involved
in
the
planning
of
150th
being
Parks
dbmsi
bcpi
Darren
Jones,
who
helped
plan
the
parade
all
of
those
still
coming
together
and
creating
something
like
what
we
did
for
the
150th
and
something
like
what
we've
always
had
for
Community
Days
in
the
future,
and
that
was
kind
of
what
I
was
under
the
understanding
as
to
where
we
were
going
to
go
with
that.
T
T
It
is
important
to
me
that
as
a
city,
we're
fair
in
how
we
offer
any
kind
of
donations,
and
so
I
would
prefer
there
to
be
a
policy
for
how
to
apply
for
any
kind
of
funding
or
events
that
you
know
are
going
to
encourage
the
economic
development.
I
I
do
think
that
an
event
like
this
would
be
a
great
opportunity,
but
I
I
really
would
like
to
have
a
better
policy
in
place.
C
Go
ahead,
I
want
to
go
back
to
address
councilwoman
Lawson's
comments,
I
think
I
I.
We
threw
so
much
stuff
at
the
parks
over
the
last
three
to
five
years
and
we
keep
throwing
stuff
at
the
parks.
I
mean
we
gave
them
to
car
shows
I,
don't
gave
we
hey,
we
want
to
take
this
over.
They
took
over
Summerfest,
they
kept
taking
over
everything
and
to
me,
when
you
have
an
organization
with
volunteers
and
our
employees
don't
have
to
keep
working
weekends
and
I,
don't
know
how
that
affects
the
overtime
budget
or
anything
like
that.
C
But
if
Parks
puts
it
on,
then
all
their
employees
got
to
be
there
putting
it
on
it's,
not
a
volunteer
organization.
It's
a
paid
organization
where
this
organization,
everybody
is
a
volunteer
and
I
know.
Last
year
during
150th
birthday
party,
we
did
have
public
works
up
here,
doing
trash
and
some
stuff
like
that
and
police
officers
that
are
being
paid.
We
would
have
the
same
thing
with
this
organization
too,
but
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
downtown
Main,
Street
Merchants
got
the
Chamber
of
Commerce
and
Diane
got
to
come
out
and
actually
volunteer.
C
There
are
times
and
help
put
that
or
that
that
event
on
we
moved
the
mayor's
Christmas
tree
for
that
purpose.
So
employees
don't
have
to
work
the
Thanksgiving
weekend,
so
I
mean
to
keep
throwing
stuff
out
Parks
as
much
as
I
love
our
parks
and
our
Park
people
I
mean
I
to
me
it's
if
we
can
get
a
volunteer
organization
and
put
events
like
this
on
that
bring
people
to
downtown
Main,
Street
I
think
that's
a
that's.
A
win.
K
Additionally,
if
the
proposal
was
for
some
programming
that
was
remarkably
different
than
what
parks
offers
and
they
wanted
to
volunteer
staff,
it
let's
talk
about
it,
but
this
proposal
is
so
similar
and
within
25
days
again.
This
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
and
not
to
mention
the
cost
difference
I.
C
M
M
Ahead,
real
quick
one
of
the
things
was
downtown
Bolton
Main
Street
has
always
tried
to
to
do
our
businesses
on
Main,
Street,
small
business
Saturday
is
that
25th
there's
the
Saturday
after
Thanksgiving,
that
is
our
whole
purpose,
is
to
coordinate
the
small
business
Saturday
with
the
parade
with
the
lighting
with
everything
else
now.
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
you
all
have
attended,
downtown,
Belton
lighting
ceremonies
or
the
mayor's
Christmas
tree,
but
everybody
thinks
it's
always
been
on
Saturday.
It
has
not.
It
was
always
the
first
Monday
after
Thanksgiving.
M
M
It
has
always
been
that
we
changed
it
to
coordinate
with.
So
we
could
draw
people
to
Main
Street.
Have
the
lighting
have
the
parade?
Have
the
different
events?
The
majority
of
the
people
that
have
worked.
The
city,
employees
that
have
worked
have
been
the
fire
department
and
most
of
them
are
the
ones
that
are
on
duty:
the
police
department
they
TR.
We
tried
to
do
with
them
when
they
were
on
duty,
the
park
department.
They
were
involved
in
collecting
the
canned
goods
and
sorting
the
canned
goods
that
was
their
deal.
M
They
did
that.
So
you
know
I
think
we're
getting
kind
of
out
there
and
we're
not
pulling
all
of
our
thoughts
together
with
some
of
this,
but
we're
trying
to
promote
small
business
Saturday
and
bringing
people
to
Main
Street.
Unfortunately,
if
people
have
five
hundred
dollars
to
spend
for
Christmas,
we
need
to
try
to
capture
that
500
on
Main
Street
Belton
not
have
them
go
to
Lee's
Summit
or
to
Overland,
Park
or
somewhere
else.
We
need
to
try
to
capture
that,
for
me,
being
a
marketing
person
and
having
a
retail
business
in
the
past.
M
So
for
me,
I'm
thinking
on
the
2nd
of
December
they've,
already
gone
to
the
Black
Friday
events,
the
small
Saturdays,
the
other
lighting
ceremonies
and
now
we're
going
to
get
leftovers.
So
if
I've
already
spent
450
dollars
in
my
500,
we
only
have
fifty
dollars
less.
So
we
are
trying
to
get
the
people
on
Main
Street
as
soon
as
we
can
to
spend
their
discretionary
income
and
go
from
there.
That's
what
I
want
to
say.
You
know
we're
going
to
have
the
parade.
M
It
was
already
voted
on
we're
going
to
have
the
parade
on
the
25th
unless
something
changes
on
Tuesday
night.
That's
what
we
voted
on,
we're
still
going
to
celebrate
small
business
Saturday.
Our
our
merchants
on
Maine
have
done
that
Sally
at
Whistle.
Stop
has
done
that
for
years
has
been
the
one
that
organized
that
event
for
all
the
merchants
on
Main
Street
that
wanted
to
participate.
So
that's
what
we're
we're
interested
in.
So
anybody.
J
Else
have
any
questions
if
I
may.
This
is
this.
This
is
mainly
about
the
the
June
30th
July
for
us,
because
we're
not
I'd
like
to
make
a
couple
of
points.
One
point
is
that
the
25
000
I
was
earmarked
in
the
budget
would
not
exist
if
it
would
not
have
been
for
a
conversation
we
had
when
we
were
doing
a
budget
Workshop
about
this
specific
event.
J
Okay,
so
the
money
wouldn't
exist,
so
I,
don't
think
it
would
make
sense
for
us
to
potentially
open
it
up
for
others
to
apply
for
that
money.
At
this
point,
because
that's
not
what
the
money
was
designed
for.
The
second
point
I'd
like
to
make
is
sometimes
when
you're
playing
an
event
like
this.
It
takes
some
time
to
of
there's
a
a
prolonged
period
of
planning
that
must
take
place.
If
we're
going
to
book.
Ax
you've
got
a
book
ax
months
in
advance.
You
can't
wait
till
two
months
before
the
event
and
then
decide.
J
Okay,
yeah
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
book
you
they're
going
to
be
booked
at
that
point.
The
reason
I
brought
this
up
during
the
budget
Workshop.
The
way
I
did
was
to
try
and
get
as
much
of
a
consensus
as
I
could
behind
the
support
for
this
allocation,
the
folks
that
are
planning
this
took
that
agreement
and
up,
and
it
wasn't
a
formal
approval,
yes,
but
that
was
a
show
of
support
by
the
council
members
at
that
time.
That
said,
yes,
let's
go.
Do
that
the
folks
that
are
planning
this
event
went
and
booked
acts.
J
J
So
for
us
to
come
back
now
and
say:
well,
we
don't
really
like
the
process
I'm,
not
sure
that
this
is
fair.
Well.
First
of
all,
fairness
is
one
of
those
issues
that
you
have
to
consider.
How
many
events
have
brought
12
000
people
down
to
the
main
street
Summerfest
is
a
great
event.
It
doesn't
bring
12
000
people
down
to
Main
Street,
it's
not
on
Main
Street
at
all.
That's
fine
I'm,
not
saying
there's
anything
wrong
with
Summerfest,
it's
just
it's
a
different
type
of
event.
J
It
is
not
the
same
thing
as
what
we're
doing
with
this
June
30th
July
first
event
so
I
would
just
I
would
be
wary.
If
I
were
the
council,
you
guys
can
decide
this
obviously
I
would
be
very
wary
of
of
backtracking
now
on
the
twenty
five
thousand
dollars,
because
that
could
have
a
domino
effect
that
could
negatively
affect
one
our
reputation
when
it
comes
to
what
we're
supporting
and
two
this
event
in
and
of
itself
could
I.
Don't
know
this
for
a
fact,
but
there's
a
good
chance.
T
Two
two
quick
things:
one,
my
understanding
when
it
was
brought
up
at
the
meeting
was
that
it
was
going
to
be
all
of
the
groups.
The
committee
that
had
originally
planned
that
150th,
including
the
chamber
and
I,
feel
like
that
somehow
then
changed
into
its
Diane
and
Michelle
and
dbmsi,
and
that
those
other
groups
are
no
longer
a
part
of
that.
So
that
is
where
my
concern
came
that
I
became
concerned
with.
T
All
of
that,
my
other
question
is:
is
this
motion
to
approve
that
funding
as
well
as
provide
the
public
support
the
in-kind
donation
as
well,
or
is
that
just
yesterday.
H
D
I
expressed
my
concern
and
I
at
the
time
it
I
I'd,
like
the
150
to
continue
I,
was
a
little
disappointed
in
afterwards
about
how
things
are.
Some
groups
are
being
left
out.
Some
groups
are
in
I'm,
not
going
to
back
up
and
I
was
a
part
of
the
yes
in
the
work
session,
I'm
not
going
to
redraw
my
yes,
but
I
am
expressing
my
concern
that
this
is
a
city
thing
in
the
city's.
D
It
doesn't
feel
like
it's.
It
feels
like
it's
downtown,
controlling
it
and
it's
not
a
city
thing
now,
I'm,
not
saying
that's
real
I'm,
just
saying
that's
how
it
felt
that's
how
it
feels
when
it
comes
across
about
who's
planning
it
and
that
bothers
me,
but
I
will
not
back
I.
My
yes
was
one
of
the
reasons.
One
of
the
eight
reasons
that
we
kind
of
said
yes
go
for
it,
I'm
not
going
to
withdraw
that.
Yes,
but
I
will
be
very
cautious
next
time
in
jumping
into
that's
fair.
Yes,
because
I.
C
Think
but
I
think
going
on
what
you
said
councilman
on,
why
it
is
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
Joe
wanted
to
do
is
get
it
away
from
the
city
involvement
other
than
helping
them
fund
it,
because
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
we
did
with
the
150
and
the
time
commitment
that
our
staff
had
to
put
in
for
that
because
it
was
a
city
event.
We
would
like
to
keep
it
going,
but
again
without
City
staff,
doing
it
all
and
I
go
back
to
what
I
said
earlier.
C
I
mean
even
at
parks,
I
mean
I.
Think
Parks
wants
to
be
engaged
in
this
event,
that's
great,
but
it
has
to
be
on
what
they
want
to
do
also,
and
do
they
want
to
do
take
on
a
two-day
event.
Most
of
their
events
are
one
days
just
like
the
I
mean.
The
greatest
event
to
me
is
a
Halloween
Day,
their
Halloween
trick
or
trunk
or
trunk
or
treat
and
I.
C
Don't
know
how
many
thousands
of
people
they
get
to
that,
but
they
do
a
great
job
on
that
one
they
do
the
car
shows
and
that's
a
wonderful
event.
They
put
on,
we
just
got
dates,
I
mean
the
car
shows.
I
have
people
from
all
over
the
city
that
tell
me
they
go
to
Belton
on
third
Saturday
month
or
whatever.
That
is,
and
they
do
great
events,
but
I
don't
want
to
put
them
out
there
for
a
two-day
event.
C
Particular
group
I
will
tell
you
this
seeing
how
much
time
they
put
in
last
year,
if
there's
another
organization
that
wants
to
put
in
that
much
time
and
put
that
much
effort
into
it.
They
were
to
come
forward
because
I
haven't
found
that
person
I
know
Diana
Michelle
put
a
whole
a
whole
lot
of
time,
and
that
committee
put
a
whole
lot
of
time
in
there.
So
if
somebody
else
has
that
bring.
J
A
J
Uncommon
for
cities
to
support
a
big
event
for
their
Community,
okay,
I've
seen
other
cities
do
that
you
know
it's
and
they
don't
make
it
available
for
everybody
now.
If
someone
wants
to
come
and
say
yeah
I'm
going
to
bring
an
event,
that's
going
to
bring
20
000
people
to
your
to
a
certain
area
that
you
think
is
you're
trying
to
build
as
not
only
your
economic
but
your
cultural
downtown.
That
has
a
a
huge
quality
of
life
component
to
it
then
yeah.
Let's,
let's
bring
it
let's.
J
Let's
have
that
conversation,
maybe
the
city
should
be
involved
in
supporting
something
like
that,
and
so
that
that's
my
point
on
this
is
that
it's
not
unprecedented
for
this
type
of
support
to
go
to
these
big
events
that
have
a
huge
Community
impact,
because,
let's
be
let's
be
real,
they
don't
happen
all
the
time.
That's
why
that's
such
a
huge
impact
now,
if
someone
else
could
do
it
and
pull
it
off
without
the
funding
of
the
city,
that'd
be
even
better
but
a
lot
of
times.
That's
just
not
the
reality
of
it.
K
Is
a
comment
then
to
the
process-
and
this
is
not
a
process
for
developing
a
grant
or
letting
other
orgs
come
to
us
for
money.
I!
Don't
support
that,
but
when
you
say
that
Council
expressed
support,
I
went
back
and
I
watched
the
January
31st
meeting
and
it
the
dollar
amount
figure
originated
with
you,
and
you
said
20
to
30.
council
member
clerk.
You
had
originally
said
yeah.
We
support
them
with
staff
hours
and
we
we
do
all
this
good
stuff.
We
move
barricades
and
then
you
countered
with
25
and
that's
where
we've
landed
here.
K
So
the
process
criticisms
I
have
are
for
us
as
a
council
and
Joe
you,
a
city
manager,
that
we
don't
end
up
in
a
situation
like
this
again,
because
there
there
are
big
bumps
in
the
road
to
how
we
got
here
from
January
31st
when
it
was
first
presented
to
council
to
we
got
the
proposal
five
days
ago.
I
have
concerns
about
the
proposal.
Now
our
feeder
to
the
fire,
because
contracts
were
already
signed.
N
J
N
Yeah,
when
we
back
in
January
or
whenever
it
was
a
generic
event,
everybody
wanted
an
event.
I
thought
it
was.
Generic
Angela
thought
it
was
a
group
of
people,
but
we
all
had
in
our
back
of
the
minds.
But
what
like
you
just
said,
it
was
just
simply
a
dollar
figure
for
an
event
period
And.
As
recently
as
two
weeks
ago,
when
we
were
discussing
the
budget
I
asked
well,
is
this
open
for
other
groups
to
put
on
I'm,
not
saying
there's
any
other
groups
qualified
but
and
I
said?
N
J
U
J
Technically,
you
know
when
we
were
discussing
approving
the
budget.
I
didn't
want
to
hold
up
the
entire
Budget
on
a
25
000
conversation,
so
my
point
was-
and
it
still
stands
it's
in
the
budget
now.
So
if
you,
if
you
guys,
decided
collectively
to
dedicate
that
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
to
someone
from
New
Mexico
or
some
other
event,
you
you
have
that
that
ability
to
do
so
because
it's
in
the
budget
now
okay.
J
J
N
H
E
Ahead,
I
have
no
problem
with
what
we
decided
to
do
with
the
money
there
is.
A
Allison
does
have
a
point
that
there
is
a
redundancy
here
and
it's
too
bad
that
the
two
couldn't
get
together
and
maybe
put
it
on
together,
as
opposed
to
being
in
competition
with
each
other
within
a
month.
That
was
that's.
The
only
situation
I
see
that
could
should
would
help
the
parks
and
who
well.
C
J
T
I
just
had
a
clarification
question.
The
motion
that
we're
voting
on
that
does
include
time
from
Parks
doing
items
for
them
as
requested
police
trash
things
like
that
as
well
correct
the.
J
J
We
provide
some
police
support
to
ensure
that
there's
there's
security
and
the
safety
we
provide
some
Public
Work
support
for
barricade
and
stuff
like
that,
it's
not
over
and
above
that,
necessarily
it's
a
and
it's
really
not
much
of
a
commitment
from
Parks,
usually
that's
kind
of
a
separate
thing
that
they
would
work
out
with
parks,
and
so
this
resolution
shouldn't
necessarily
affect
parks
at
all,
but
it
would
you
know
it's
essentially
saying
we're
supporting
those
events
in
the
normal
way.
J
We
support
every
event
just
about,
and
the
meat
of
this
resolution,
though,
is
the
25
000
allocation
for
that
event:
June
30th
and
July
1st
they're,
just
wrapped
together,
because
it's
it's
all
one
show
of
support
for
all
of
the
events
that
main
Street's
putting
on
this
year.
J
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
wanted
to
get
this
out
of
the
city
and
into
into
another
entity's
hands
is
last
year.
You'll
recall
the
original
approval
was
for
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
the
event
and
then
what
they,
the
budget,
went
up
to
75
000
with
the
event
with
the
intention
that
the
city
would
only
pay
thirty
thousand
dollars,
probably
of
that,
and
they
try
to
raise
the
difference
right.
Well.
J
I
think
the
city
ended
up
being
on
the
hook
for
about
forty
four
thousand
dollars
of
the
event
total,
because
any
overages
was
going
to
become
the
responsibility
of
the
city
at
that
point,
because
it
was
a
city's
event
now
that
that
another
entity
downtown
Main
Street
is
is
taking
on
the
responsibility.
For
this
event,
any
overages
do
not
fall
on
the
city's
lap.
They
they're
it's
a
downtown
Main
Street
event.
J
So
if
they
go
over
budget,
that's
that's
not
our
responsibility
necessary
to
necessarily
to
cover
that
said,
I'm,
not
saying
that
we
shouldn't
ask
for
the
for
clarification
on
this
extra
six
thousand
dollars.
I.
Think
that's
a
very
fair
question
to
ask,
but
that's
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
that
point
out
should
we.
A
C
A
Guess
should
we
change
this
to
it?
It
is
up
to
25
000,
and
the
city
will
only
pay
with.
C
The
only
thing
I
see
is
the
miscellaneous
is
two
thousand
dollars.
I,
don't
see,
six
I
mean
if
you
talk
about
who's
going
to
do
the
food
and
drinks
for
two
thousand,
it's
to
be
announced,
who's
doing
it,
who
they
buying
a
10
from,
is
a
thousand
to
be
announced
that
they're
getting
a
10
from
so
it
doesn't
say:
they're
not
buying
it
or
renting
a
tent
or
doing
food.
They
just
haven't
got
that
vendor.
C
B
K
In
in
an
effort
to
firewall
this
project
from
the
150th,
because
it
was
a
great
event-
and
there
is
a
process
element
there
to
do-
a
retrospective
I
didn't
want
to
talk
about
the
overages,
but
they
were
about
50
over
budget.
So,
as
a
new
proposal
comes
in
with
the
same
organizers,
I
think
it's
fair
that
we're
a
little
more
critical
and
and
that
the
proposal
is
thorough.
The
statement
of
accounts
at
the
end
is,
you
know,
gives
us
peace
of
mind.
That's
not
unreasonable,
Joe.
M
I'm
going
to
tell
you
you
better
worry
about
it
because
we're
going
15
000
and
that's
it.
We
donated
eighteen
thousand
dollars
to
the
150th
and
we
were
within
budget
and
that's
very
important
for
us
right
now
to
be
within
budget
we're
paying
for
Cinco
de
Mayo
we're
paying
15
000
on
this
event,
we're
putting
on
two
or
three
other
events
that
we're
funding.
J
Nobody's
nobody's
blaming
Green
Street
for
last
year,
nobody's
blaming
mainstream.
M
M
A
Before
my
thought
gets
lost
and
you
stand
in
there
and
we
can
continue
the
reason
that
shifting
gears
to
Christmas
the
reason
that
I
made
a
decision
to
change
the
date
from
Thanksgiving
weekend
to
the
next
weekend.
Two-Fold
I
had
city
employees
come
to
me
and
say:
hey,
can
you
change
this
because
we
can't
be
with
our
families
on
Thanksgiving
and
then
I
had
citizens
call
me
and
say:
hey?
Is
there
any
way
to
change
this,
so
we
can
celebrate
Thanksgiving
outside
the
city.
A
A
M
S
A
N
Question
so
this
because
I'm
trying
to
gather
whether
this
is
a
city
event
or
dbmsi
event
sounds
like
it's
a
dbmsi
event
that
the
city,
at
least
for
for
one
of
the
four,
is
contributing
some
money,
and
so
in
the
in
the
proposal
it
says
that
dbmsi
is
on
the
hook
for
getting
permits
and
stuff.
So
in
the
past,
what
I've
been
told
is
if
it's
a
City
Event,
then
you
don't
need
permits
the
city
can
just
do
it,
but
with
dbmsi
doing
it
they
need
permits,
and
so
is
that
the.
N
N
And
everything,
okay
and
second
I,
understand
and
I
appreciate
that
the
that
the
staff
and
the
and
everybody
that
works
for
Belton
would
like
to
be
Thanksgiving
and
I.
I
agree
with
that.
I
just
think
that
we
have
a
proposal
that
leaves
out
the
date
that
dbmsi
has
already
agreed
to
do
something
so
until
they
change
that
I
mean,
and
they
don't
have
any
events
planned
so
far
for
second
9th
or
16th.
N
N
I
just
have
the
the
agenda.
N
Like
that,
no
no,
no,
no,
no,
no
they're!
Well!
I
I!
Try
to
go
to
all
our
meetings
and
just
take
notes
and
and
like
Connie
said,
Miss
Hubbard
said
they.
They
voted
for
November
25th.
They
haven't
said
anything
about
December,
2nd,
9th
and
16th,
and
yet
in
our
agreement
with
them,
we're
seeing
we're
saying,
December,
2nd,
9
and
16th
and
we're
not
saying
November
25th
I
I
have
no
problem.
We
just
pencil
in
November
25th,
so
we
have
four
dates
and
then
you
can
choose
from
all
of
them,
but.
F
K
A
J
All
right,
yeah,
this
resolution
would
essentially
allow
us
to
read
a
three-year
extension
of
our
current
agreement.
We
did
get
a
letter
from
I.
Think
I've
shared
this
with
with
the
with
mostly
council
members,
but
the
public
should
probably
know
this.
We
did
get
a
letter
from
from
our
trash
company
saying
that
they
would
raise
the
rates
a
dollar
and
a
cent
is
actually
seven
percent
CPI,
which
would
have
resulted
in
a
one
dollar
and
one
cent
increase
in
our
trash
rates.
J
But
then
we
got
this
contract
of
for
this
three-year
extension,
which
would
include
trash
and
curbside
recycling
and
that
that
dollar
one
was
not
factored
in
there,
so
I
that
that
tells
me
that
there
that,
if
we
don't
go
with
recycling,
then
our
bill
is
going
to
go
up
a
dollar
in
a
penny
which
we
would
have
to
pass
along
to
customers
most
likely.
J
At
least
we
don't
have
to
that's
a
decision
we
can
make,
but
but
without
it
then
then
we're
going
up
to
about
it's
a
six
dollar
increase
total
that
includes
our
carts
and
I.
J
Think
that
we
can
take
some
of
the
money
that
we're
using
for
carts
in
our
current
bills
and
dedicate
it
toward
that
we
can
use
a
little
bit
of
money
in
our
fund
balance,
and
so
I
would
definitely
welcome
a
discussion
on
what
the
rate,
what
the
rate
cap
would
be
for
residents
as
part
of
this
resolution,
if
you
so
choose
to
do.
J
For
instance,
I
think
that
it
would
be
very
fair
for
us
to
to
eat
half
of
that
cost
with
with
the
current
funding
mechanisms
and
pass
along
essentially
a
three
dollar
per
resident
increase
or
cap
it
at
three
dollars
at
the
most,
and
we
can
always
hone
in
on
that
when
we
get
a
little
closer
to
the
date,
because
it
wouldn't
take
effect
until
August
1st
so
go.
H
C
I
passed
out
a
pamphlet,
something
I
came
up
with
that
with
the
mayor.
We
sat
down
and
had
a
conversation
on
how
we
think
we
could
get
this
done.
I'm,
currently
our
trash
I'm,
not
a
Wordsmith
like
councilwoman
Lawson.
So
my
word,
you
might
not
be
perfect
in
here,
so
I
apologize
up
front,
but
my
trash
service
right
now
they
say
that
1441
and
our
bin
cost
right
now
we're
charging
residents
of
the
dollar
80,
so
it's
16.21
and
then
add
into
six
dollars
on
there.
C
So
what
Joe
had
said
is
we
can
drop
since
we
don't
have
to
buy
the
bins
anymore?
We
can
drop
the
bin
costs.
I
think
we
need
to
keep
something
in
there,
so
I
kept
50
cents
in
there,
so
we
can
buy
bins
in
the
future
that
would
drop
trash
actually
down
to
14.91
when
we
take
off
the
30
cents
or
dollar
Thirty
from
that,
currently
our
budget
over
cash,
that's
right
terminology
right!
C
Our
cash
is.
We
have
about
465
000
and
the
utility
budget
from
the
the
bins
that
we've
taken
money
from
the
residents
over
the
past
three
years,
four
years
and
and
keeping
it
at
50
cents.
If
you
go
down
to
let's
say
page
two:
it
talks
about,
we
have
750
meters,
I,
have
the
basic
75
or
78
50.,
78.50
I.
Think
that's
what
you
told
me
right
about.
C
If
we
paid
three
dollars
the
first
year
from
the
utility
count
and
the
residents
paid
three
dollars
second
year,
we
bumped
that
up
a
dollar
for
the
residents
down
a
dollar
from
the
utility
and
then
the
third
year
we're
basically
the
resident
will
pay
five
and
the
utility
account
will
still
pay
one.
We
would
actually
deplete
that
utility
count
that
we
had
in
there.
C
It
would
leave
us
about
sixty
thousand
dollars
to
buy
bins
if
we
still
need
to
buy
bins
for
residents
the
second
line
down
there,
basically,
so
the
first
year
talks
about
what
the
utility
count
would
pay,
so
that
would
be
565
thousand
down
below
that's
going
to
talk
about
the
money
that
we
generate
in
the
utility
account.
So
we
have
465
000
each
year,
we're
going
to
generate
about
forty
seven
thousand
based
off
the
current
meters
that
I
have
there
the
78.50
so
going
forward,
especially
in
the
first
year.
C
If
you
look
at
it,
we
actually
are
being
charged
16.79
right
now,
if
you
look
at
your
bill,
so
our
bill
is
16.79
and
that
first
year,
if
we
do
this
proposal,
it's
just
a
it's.
My
thoughts
trash
would
be
14.99.
Recycling
would
be
three
dollars
of
what
they
would
see
on
their
bill
and
the
total
amount
would
be
17.91.
C
We
would
actually
only
be
adding
a
dollar
twelve
to
the
utility
bill
for
curbside
recycling
weekly
for
the
first
year.
The
second
year
would
go
up
a
dollar.
The
third
year
would
go
up
another
dollar
from
there,
it's
a
three-year
contract.
So
after
three
years
we
can
always
reevaluate
all
of
this.
So.
J
I'll
remind
people
folks
that
the
the
resolution
we
can
amend
it
right
now
to
put
the
exact
rate,
we
could
put
a
top
number
we
and
come
back
and
fine-tune
the
exact
rate.
If
we
decide
to
do
so,
this
essentially
just
giving
the
go-ahead
either
yes
or
no
for
us,
but.
C
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
have
some
type
of
a
plan.
So
when
we
come
back
and
do
an
ordinance
that
actually
set
rates,
we
have
something
that
we
can
gravitate
to
and
say:
hey
we
like
this,
we
don't
like
it.
Someone
else
has
a
different
proposal.
You
want
to
amend
what
I
have
here.
It
doesn't
matter,
but
at
least,
if
we
have
some
type
of
a
dollar
figure
that
we
think
we
can
get.
This
done
by
I
mean
I.
Think
a
dollar
twelve
adding
on
for
weekly
recycling
is
pretty
cheap
to
get.
It
started.
C
D
Go
ahead
so,
while
my
numbers,
the.
H
D
No,
you
go
okay,
while
my
numbers
are
small
they're,
not
representative
of
any
sample.
I
have
not
had
a
single
individual
call
me
or
come
to
my
meeting.
That
says
they
want
recycling
or
curbside
recycling,
the
ones
who
have
talked
about
it
would
prefer
a
drop
off
or
they
want
to
continue
to
go
to
Redbridge.
They
do
not
want
curbside.
D
So
now
the
sample
is
small,
about
14
15
people's
off
so
and
I
know
that
we
talk
about
the
survey
and
the
survey
is
got
a
95
confidence
level,
but
confidence
level
is
not
the
same
thing
as
accuracy
because
of
sampling.
Biases
confidence
means
it
didn't
happen
by
chance,
but
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
the
survey
is
accurate
because
the
the
types
of
people
who
responded
may
not
be
similar
to
the
overall
sample
because,
for
example,
those
who
don't
give
a
excuse,
my
language
threw
it
in
the
trash
that
represents
the
majority.
D
They
may
have
a
different
opinion
than
the
few
that
responded,
and
so,
while
I
believe
in
the
sample,
I
read
a
study
today,
where
only
while
confidence
level
at
95
percent
of
most
samples
are
actually
only
60
percent
accurate.
D
So
we
can't
always
buy
that
the
samples
are
100
accurate
that
just
because
we
have
a
sample
doesn't
mean
that
it
really
is
representative
of
what
we
need,
but
so
I
just
wanted
to
pass
on
what
my
citizens
have
said
about
Recycling
and
I've
not
had
a
single
one.
Call
me
and
say:
Yes
I
want
curbside,
make
sure
we
get
it
go
ahead.
H
T
I
did
just
want
to
say
you
know
my
set
of
preferred
curbside
over
the
drop-off
site
and
if
we
are
able
to
tap
it
at
the
three
dollars
and
be
able
to
get
a
hardship
policy
for
what
citizens
who
could
not
afford
up
to
that,
three
dollars
could
go
through
to
possibly
get
that
either
waived
or
donated
by
a
non-profit.
Something
like
that.
Then
I
am
absolutely
all
for
the
three
dollar
curbside.
P
Go
ahead,
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
note
and
kind
of
piggyback
on
what
councilmember
Clark
said.
Specifically,
this
resolution
is
an
agreement
between
the
city
and
WCA,
and
the
rate
that
is
stated
within
that
resolution
is
the
rate
that
the
city
has
to
pay
not
passed
along
to
the
citizens.
This
resolution
does
not
amend
and
cannot
amend
because
it's
a
resolution,
section
11-106
c
of
the
code
of
ordinances.
That
is
the
actual
document
that,
in
that
places,
imposes
the
rate
for
residential,
solid
waste
collection.
J
J
What
we're
going
to
pay?
This
is
our
agreement.
We
were
going
to
start
the
service
on
August
1st
and
that's
and
that's
what
this
agreement
would
do
now,
if
you
want
to
do
it,
that's
why
I
said
I
would
I
would,
if
you
guys
want
to
put
something
like
well.
Yes,
we
do
this
with
a
three
dollar
cap
on
the
rate
increase
per
user,
and
then
we
come
back
when
we
do
the
ordinance
and
we
we
make
sure
that
we're
under
the
three
dollars
then
we'd
be
essentially
following
that
yeah.
K
Council,
member
clerk,
are
you
using
bin
budget
and
utility
accounts
synonymously
in
this?
No.
C
I'm
just
using
well
the
utility
count.
The
bin
budget
has
a
465
thousand
dollar
overage
from
the
years
that
we've
been
collecting
on
that
and
having
Bob
Benz.
That's
in
our
budget
right
now,
I
mean
if
you
look
at
2024
budget
I
think
they
have
projected
in
their
765
000,
but
that's
us
keeping
a
dollar.
Eighty
in
Tech.
C
C
K
Okay,
speaking
to
my
experience
with
residents,
they
are
excited
about.
Curbside
people
are
excited
about
having
the
service
of
recycling
there's
a
vocal
minority
that
has
probably
gotten
in
all
of
our
ears
to
some
degree
saying
they
don't
want
any
additional
costs,
so
I'm
going
to
represent
the
folks
that
are
excited
about
recycling,
because,
in
my
experience
that's
a
greater
number
of
people.
S
C
C
If
we
don't
do
recycling
they're
going
to
raise
our
rate,
seven
percent
I
believe
it
is
so
I
mean
it's
I
mean
this
is
eight
cents
difference
on
what
they're
doing
and
all
we're
trying
to
do
today
was
show
you
some
type
of
scenario
that
we
can
add
Recycling
and
when
we
do
an
ordinance
in
the
future.
Here's
what
we
could
do,
if
you
guys
want
to
do
it
something
similar
to
this
I'm.
C
Just
I
put
something
down
what
I
come
up
with
with
the
money
on
the
budget
and
trying
to
make
it
the
most
economical
for
people
at
least
the
first
year
to
get
it
going
and
Studies
have
stated
that
curbside
recycling
will
increase
the
amount
of
people
recycling
compared
to
a
drop-off
site,
meaning.
N
N
I,
probably
should
have
went
to
her
and
how
to
draw
it.
Well,
you
got
all
the
numbers
in
the
right
columns
anyway
and
they,
it
seems
to
add
up
from
what
you
said
at
the
very
back
end,
but
we
did
have
a
award
for
a
meeting
and
eight
people
showed
up
and
all
eight
of
them
were
against
recycling.
On
the
other
hand,.
N
Curbside,
recycling
and
and
several
of
them
think
that
it's
more
cost
effective
to
drive
to
Grandview
or
Harrisonville
than
to
pay
a
dollar.
N
When
I
again
I've
said
this
before,
when
I
think
of
all
the
time,
I
spend
I
have
three
big
bins:
I
got
one
left
over
from
Jim's
one
left
over
from
diefendorfs
or
whoever
they
were
I
got
all
these
extra
bins.
They're.
N
I
know
I,
know
well,
come
and
get
it
it's
full
of
plastic.
All
the
police,
I
got
cardboard,
I
got
plastic,
I
got
paper
and
I
got
metal
and
I
got
it.
I
every
two
nights,
I
gotta,
take
my
mixed
stuff
and
go
into
all
these
bins.
N
Then
I,
sometimes
I
have
to
make
two
trips
to
Harrisonville,
because
I
don't
have
even
in
a
van
I,
don't
have
enough
room
for
four
big
bins
and
so
to
me,
curbside
drop
off
and
the
people
that
have
come
to
me
other
than
the
ones
last
night
were
all
for
well
for
the
most
part
for
for
curbside
recycling,
and
thanks
to
some
creative
financing,
I
think
we
can
pull
it
off
with
a
minimal
cost
to
our
citizens.
H
W
He
wasn't
there
wasn't
a
huge
turnout,
I
think
we
had
six
people
show
up,
but
everybody's
for
recycling.
They
don't
want
to
pay
for
recycling
and
I
brought
up.
The
point
of
is
everybody
for
the
landfill
going
out.
Raymore
and
everybody
said
no,
definitely
not
we're
totally
against
that,
but
we
somehow
got
to
do
something
to
to
keep
these
landfills
from
filling
up
and
I.
Think
the
recycling
is
our
only
option.
So
if
we
don't
do
it
now,
there's
just
going
to
be
land
we'll
have
a
landfill
next
to
Belton.
E
J
J
If
we're,
if
we're
helping
to
you,
know,
supplement
this,
these
costs
of
this
for
these
three
years,
that
I
think
that's.
The
whole
point
is
that
we're
going
to
try
to
help
supplement
this
cost
for
three
years.
Get
us
to
that
point.
Make
sure
that
we
really
get
an
accurate
read
on
whether
people
want
this
or
not.
D
Brooke
I
really
have
not
had
a
single
person
approach
me
to
tell
me
they
want
to
spend
six
dollars
a
month
on
the
curbside
I've.
Had
people
say
that
they
would
wouldn't
mind
having
a
drop
off
and
I've
had
other
people
say
that
they
already
do
it.
They
really
don't
want
to
change.
They
kind
of
like
doing
that,
but
I
really
have
not
had
a
single
person
come.
Tell
me
whether
privately
or
definitely
not
at
the
meeting
last
night,
that
they're
interested
in
it.
H
C
If
we
take
this
on
so
realistically
after
a
three
year
period
of
time,
their
total
cost
would
only
go
up
four
dollars
and
seventy
cents
and
not
the
full
six.
So
to.
C
K
Bit
of
a
pivot,
but
this
is
just
praise
for
staff
for
running
down
the
variety
of
ideas
and
options
we
threw
at
you
I
appreciate
that
this
is
a
topic
where
we
want
to
consider
Wrangle
and
I
feel,
like
you
guys,
did
a
really
good
job
doing
the
best
you
could
to
get
the
best
proposal.
Councilmember
Clark
thanks
for
mathing
it
good
job,
everybody
yeah.
A
J
V
V
V
It
that's
what
I'm
saying
yeah,
so
we
can't
forget
that
and
as
much
as
it
pains
me
to
say
this
and
Chris
stole
it
from
Dave
Clark,
because
he
said
it
first,
we
got
to
start
recycling
because
otherwise
we
can't
complain
when
they
want
to
put
a
dump
in
our
backyard.
So
it
it's
got
to
happen
and
it's
it's
looking
like
it's
never
going
to
get
cheaper
than
now.
J
Well,
I
think,
and
if
you
look
go
back
to
I
know
this
there's
been
discussion
about
the
survey.
You
go
back
to
the
survey
that
it's
our
understanding,
that
if
we
have
curbside
recycling
that
this
could
increase
the
curb
the
amount
of
research
that's
happening
in
this
community
by
by
doubling
it.
Essentially,
the
the
survey
indicated
that
42
are
currently
doing
it
and
it
would
go
up
to
84
if
we
had
curbside,
which
would
be
a
huge
impact
on
our
dump
trash.
C
So
when
I,
when
I
hear
people
talk
about
our
the
cost
of
what
we
charge
for
trash
and
recycling,
it's
very
low
and
I
think
I
have
a
Grammy
resident
that
pays
33
dollars
a
month
because
I
got
to
go
out
and
buy
it
on
their
own
and
they
have
like
they're
paying
33
a
month
just
for
trash
and
recycling
and
they
don't
have
the
brush
or
the
large
pickup
items
either.
J
C
Wca,
okay,
doing
business
ads,
I.
Suppose
I
was
here
when
the
last
company
was
around
so
I
mean
I'll,
always
talk
great
about
gflwca,
whatever
they
want
to
be
called,
but
they've
done
a
great
job
for
us.
Over
the
last
three
years,
they've
been
our
trash,
hauler
and
I,
appreciate
them
coming
and
and
we
don't
have
I,
don't
ever
get
complaints
on
them,
so
I
I
thank
them
for
doing
their.
J
Job
I
think
we
do
have
a
very
good
working
relationship
with
our
current
hauler
at
this
point
and-
and
that
definitely
plays
into
this
as
well,
although
I
would
cost
you
to
be
careful
about
throwing
out
all
those
higher
numbers.
I
don't
want
to
get
any
ideas.
Okay,
someone
in
the
audience.
C
C
J
C
C
N
J
From
what
we
just
approved
in
the
budget
for
most
of
the
employees,
it's
they're
they're,
getting
a
seven
and
a
half
percent
Cola
two
and
a
half
percent
step
is,
is
the
gist
of
it
there.
The
other
major
Financial
consideration,
which
is
which
amounts
to
about
twenty
some
thousand
dollars,
is
not
a
huge
one.
Is
the
50
Cent
differential
pay
for
nighttime
night
shift
employees
as
well,
as
is
one
of
the
other
things
that
We've
we've
given
them
that
we
agreed
upon.
So
those
are
the
two
major
differences.
J
N
Go
ahead,
what
the
these
seem
minor
to
me,
but
they're,
probably
not
to
people
that
are
under
this
agreement.
Several
places
it
says
paid
leave,
but
then
under
funeral
leave
it
just
says:
leave
is,
is
leave
defined
as
paid
or
unpaid.
N
Well,
it's
not
defined
so
I
mean
if
if
a
police
officer's
mother
died
and
they
went
to
the
funeral,
then
he
has
a
debate
with
his
supervisor.
N
Usually
paid
I
would
be
paid
leave
yet
yeah,
okay,
because
it
other
places,
it
specifically
says,
pain,
leave
under
funerals.
It
doesn't
say
that
it
doesn't
say
the
word
paid
and
then
on
page
124
it
says
the
first
well,
the
second
or
third
step
in
a
in
arguing
against
a
suspension
or
whatever
goes
to
the
assistant
city
council
assistant
city
manager.
Do
we
have
assistant
city
manager.
J
X
E
C
L
R
I
would
like
to
just
make
a
couple
comments
about
it.
This
is
a
our
contract
to
do
all
our
striping
and
marking
throughout
the
city.
That's
marking
arrows
crosswalks,
all
those
different
things
throughout
town.
We
have
actually
bid
this
job
three
different
times
over
the
last
year,
not
getting
any
successful
bidders.
Until
now
we
took
the.
We
only
have
one
bidder
and
normally
that's
something.
We
reject
the
bids.
We
want
to
have
one
bidder,
but
because
we
haven't
had
a
series
of
bidders
in
this
job,
this
type
of
work.
R
We
need
one
of
the
things
that
has
happened
in
the
striping
industry
in
Kansas
city
is
we
used
to
have
about
eight
or
ten
different
people
who
did
striping,
and
now
one
company
has
decided
to
purchase
the
other
companies,
and
so
one
company
now
owns
I.
Think
four
or
five
of
the
other
companies
that
used
to
do
it
and
used
to
bid
this
type
of
work
and
so
now
we're
down
to
a
very
few
people
actually
bit
it
and
when
we
call
them
up
to
try
to
get
in
their
schedule.
R
B
N
Question
it
didn't
say
anything
in
here:
maybe
it
doesn't
have
to,
but
who
sets
up
the
detour
signs
and
barricades
for
when
they're
striping
them
particular
across
what
crosswalk
or
whatever
is.
R
R
R
N
Yeah
well
I
and
I
I
would
second.
What
Greg
said
is
that
for
two
years
now,
after
the
it's
been
two
years
since
they
repaved
Cedar
Street,
which
is
why
I
weigh,
which
is
a
state
highway
and
I've
called
every
six
weeks
and
asked
them?
When
are
you
going
to
come
back
and
stripe
and
they're
we're
on
the
list,
but
we're
probably
100
down?
So
it's
striping
is:
maybe
we
should
go
into
business
and
see
striping
I,
don't
know
it's
hard
to
get
stripers.
H
B
A
L
G
C
L
N
Right
in
in
reading
our
general
agreement
with
most
contractors,
it
says
that
it's
required
to
have
a
10-hour
OSHA
course,
but
for
doing
as
best
as
removal
that
you
have
anywhere
from
three
to
five
day.
Courses
for
asbestos,
removing
I
I,
went
on
the
website
of
this
company
and
they
don't
really
say
that
they
have
the
training
to
do
this
or
do.
Are
we
confident
that
they
are
in
their
proposal?
I
mean
I
know
we
didn't
get
their
whole
RFP
response
or
whatever,
but
are
we
confident
that
they're
a
trained
group?
Yes.
R
Everybody
who
does
asbestos
removal
has
to
be
licensed
to
do
it,
and
so
all
the
companies
who
bid
it
are
licensed
to
do
it
and
we'll
go
back
and
I'll
go
back
and
make
sure
that
they
hold
the
proper
license
and
the
training
that
we
put
in
all
our
contracts
is
the
minimal
safety
training
that
they
have
to
have.
But
that
doesn't
mean
that's
the
only
training
that
they
have.
N
Okay,
well,
then,
also
the
agreement
and
again
it's
our
words,
not
their
words,
but
it
says
the
city
is
the
sole
judge
to
judge
whether
the
project
is
complete.
But
if
you
want
to
do,
if
you
want
to
check
and
see
if
asbestos
has
been
fully
removed,
you've
got
to
do
wipe
tests.
You
got
to
take
to
a
laboratory
and
both
of
those
things
have
to
be
certified.
So
do
we?
N
J
J
N
Okay,
great
well,
that
that's
what
I
had
for
D
anybody.
F
N
B
K
Yeah
a
couple
updates
of
parks
programming
coming
up
this
weekend
through
April.
This
Saturday
is
the
Easter
egg
hunt,
11
A.M
sharp
at
Memorial
Park
eggs
will
be
spread
out
on
all
the
ball
fields
there
and
in
a
heartwarming
detail.
Some
of
the
8
000
eggs
were
stuffed
by
our
neighbors,
who
hang
out
at
the
senior
center.
K
Cool
again,
just
looking
at
April
there's
a
paint
party
for
kids
on
April
21st
they're,
launching
the
junior
Disc
Golf
League,
which
is
new
I,
believe
next
week
the
spring
craft
fairs
April
15th
at
high
blue,
and
they
are
hiring
for
seasonal
jobs.
You
can
be
a
lifeguard
as
young
as
15
I
believe.
So,
if
you
know
any
folks
looking
for
seasonal
work,
part-time
with
the
parks,
we
could
use
them.
S
N
Yeah
that
well
I
forget
the
date,
but
anyway
the
tdd,
since
our
last
meeting
met
as
I
reported
last
time,
they
lost
their
loan
Arrangement
when
Great
Western
Bank
was
taken
over
by
another
bank,
so
they're
looking
for
new
funding
still
for
the
Mulling
Road
Expansion
Project
they're,
also
watching
SB
161
in
the
Missouri
Senate,
which
would
eliminate
the
one
percent
food
tax,
which
is
a
significant
contributor
to
the
TDS
tdds
funding,
because
in
the
the
two
of
the
main
companies
are
Aldi's
and
HyVee.
N
So
if
that
gets
passed,
then
they
gotta
look
even
closer
at
their
funding
and
how
they're
going
to
get
a
loan
to
do
this
get
bonds
to
do
this
project.
Again,
though,
the
schedule
is
still
to
start
in
Fall
2023,
when
all
the
utilities
are
scheduled
to
be
relocated.
C
I
got
to
fill
in
for
the
mayor
the
other
day.
I
did
a
ribbon
cutting
for
the
city
in
the
chamber
across
the
street
at
habitat
Architects
and
if
there's
a
chance
of
you
walking
by
over
there
on
a
Saturday
and
you
can
get
in
there
and
look
in
it,
I
mean
they
did
a
wonderful
job
of
remodeling
that
building
and
basically
taking
it
back
to
the
original
form
so
need
organization
on
our
downtown.
C
So
it's
kind
of
neat
to
learn
what
they
do
and
and
see
what
they've
done
to
that
building
so
I
have
the
Old
Navy
ribbon
cutting
this
Saturday,
so
anybody
that
wants
to
come
out
Saturday
at
10
o'clock
for
Old,
Navy
I,
think
the
mayor
always
goes
out
of
town
when
there's
ribbon
cuttings
happen,
but
I'll
be
there
doing
that
one
too.
So
if
anybody
wants
a
come
out
and
support
Old
Navy
that
that's
Saturday
at
10
o'clock.
V
V
Apparently
not
and
then
what
we
just
went
over
the
capital
Improvement
program.
N
No,
although
we
I
think
we
all
got
a
note
that
the
Bridge
Over
Troubled
Water
is
having
an
open
house
on
Tuesday
noon
to
two.
D
A
A
D
A
All
right,
I
got
a
few
things,
but.
H
A
H
A
I
got
a
few
things:
I
did
attend
the
training
center
ribbon
coating
last
week.
I,
don't
remember
when
it
was
someday.
21St.
J
H
J
A
A
trip
out
there,
it's
a
wonderful
place,
and
it's
going
to
do
it's
going
to
do
wonders
for
the
region.
I
I
want
to
thank
everybody
that
put
their
time
and
heart
into
them,
especially
Carolyn.
It's
going
to
be
a
wonderful
thing
and
everybody
Northpoint
School
Board
school
districts,
Western,
Central,
West,
Central
and
MCC
Community
College.
They
all
played
a
huge
role
in
it
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody.
A
A
I
want
to
thank
everybody
that
worked
on
the
budget
and
getting
that
done
with
what
we've
gone
through
the
last
year.
So
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
that,
and
I
want
to
thank
everybody
that
worked
on
the
recycling
to
get
it
to
where
we
got
it
to
and
and
the
funding
how
we
got
it
to
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
that
as
well.
J
Have
a
few
things
take
your
Sons
and
Daughters
to
Work
Day
at
the
city
of
Belton
is
going
to
be
Friday.
April
27th
in
the
morning
and
I
have
an
open
invitation.
If
any
of
the
council
members
would
like
to
participate
in
that,
there's
going
to
be
a
a
first
thing
as
part
of
that
they're
going
to
do
an
introductory
period
and
and
there's
any
special
instruction
from
the
mayor
and
if
you
guys
want
to
be
part
of
that
you're
more
than
welcome
to
join
us
again.
That's
April
27th
in
the
morning,
so
April.
C
J
Date's
right
the
day,
so
it's
Thursday
thanks
Carla.
But
yes,
if
you're
interested
in
that,
just
let
me
know
and
we'll
get
you
on
that
agenda
all
right.
J
Also,
we
are
holding
a
creating
a
culture
of
higher
performance
leadership,
training
for
30
of
our
employees,
April
12th,
the
14th,
and
they
we
are
going
to
be
holding
that
training
at
the
new
training
and
Technical
Center
of
Cass
County,
so
we're
making
use
of
the
new
facility.
We
just
had
the
ribbon
cutting
in
and
I'm
excited
about
that,
because
it
really
is
going
to
kick-start
a
lot
of
the
culture
stuff
that
we
already
are
doing
in
a
lot
of
levels
in
our
organization.
J
But
it
should
it
should
kind
of
really
take
off
from
there.
It's
it's
a
very,
very
intense
and
awesome
program
so
and
then
Southview
Commerce,
Center,
building
4.
The
mayor
mentioned
the
ribbon
cutting
we
had
on
the
21st
Hillman.
A
hardware
distributor
is
taking
about
60
of
that
building
and
they
are
going
to
be
open
here
in
the
next
few
weeks,
so
they're
coming
from
California.
J
So
that's
a
welcome
addition
to
our
our
community
and
then
our
I
want
to
remind
everybody
that
the
second
May
meeting
has
been
moved
from
May
23rd
to
May
30th.
Just
to
highlight
you
know,
I
know
we
already
sent
out
communication
to
everybody
on
that
on
the
council,
but
I
want
to
let
the
public
know
as
well
that
the
second
May
meeting
is
going
to
be
on
May
30th.
The
reason
for
that
move
is
there's
a
couple
of
us.
J
The
mayor
and
I
are
going
to
both
be
in
be
at
icsc,
trying
to
recruit
businesses
to
come
to
Belton
and
that's
all
I've
got.
C
C
Carolyn
backed
me
up
here,
but
I
think
the
new
restaurant
on
Main
Street
enroll
is
going
to
open
up
on
April
12th,
correct
yeah.
So
if
you
haven't
checked
out
their
menu,
yet
that's
where
the
tea
room
is
interesting
menu
and
can't
wait
for
them
to
open
I
met
the
gentleman
that
are
owning
it
the
other
day
at
habitat.
So
can't
wait.
A
Q
Is
twenty
seven
thousand
dollars?
It's?
The
15th
application
and
notices
for
public
hearing
were
sent
out
to
the
taxing
jurisdiction.
G
So
we
have
a
contract
for
classified
weekly
transportation
to
those
who
sign
up
for
it
for
businesses
in
Belton
and
then
on
the
fourth
week
of
the
month.
They
can
travel
to
other
businesses
or
other
cities
in
the
area
that
contract
is
up
for
expiration.
So
it
will
be
coming
back
to
the
council
soon
for
Renewal.
C
S
B
U
U
Thank
you
back
in
2018,
the
city
passed
an
ordinance
establishing
a
tier
program
for
our
lodging
establishments
here
in
the
city,
which
basically
rates
the
hotels
based
on
their
calls
for
service
the
ordinance
mandates.
The
police
department
determined
the
number
calls
for
service.
Each
establishment
had
during
a
calendar
year
divide
that
number
by
the
number
of
rooms
they
have
for
rent
establishing
a
call
for
service
radio
ratio.
This
calculation
must
be
done
by
January
31st
each
year,
not
every
calls
for
service
counts.
U
Obviously,
if
a
hotel
has
calls
or
service
in
regards
to
animal
calls,
medical
calls
illegal
dumping
things
that
nature
they
may
not
land
on
the
cost
service
list.
This
is
more
about
quality
life
and
actual
personal
property
crimes.
Some
of
the
crimes
that
do
count
against
their
call
for
service
list
include
homicide
suicides,
attempted
suicides,
suicidal
parties,
all
sex,
offenses,
robbery,
burglary,
larceny,
narcotics
violations,
warrants
arrests
on
the
property,
arson,
suspicious
activity,
vehicles
and
persons.
U
Juvenile
problems
and
arrests
runaways
from
the
hotel
are
recovered
at
the
hotel
disturbances,
noise
violations,
disturbing
peace,
vandalism,
stolen
autos
and
recovered
stolen
Autos
protection
order,
violations.
Child
abuse
and
neglects
assist
Division
of
Family
Services
calls
harassment,
trespassing
unless
it's
reported
by
the
management
disorderly
conduct
fighting
in
public
resisting
or
hindering
the
police,
abandon
Otto's
weapons,
offenses
threats
and
bomb
calls.
U
Concern
was
brought
up
early
on
the
program
could
discourage
lodging
establishment
owners
and
managers
from
calling
police
when
necessary
to
negate
this
risk.
Each
call
on
the
previous
list
was
examined
to
see
if
it
was
an
instance
where
the
hotel
was
calling
first
in
a
poor
assistance
in
an
effort
to
improve
the
conditions
at
The
Establishment
instances.
Instances
such
as
these
are
not
included
in
the
call
for
service
ratio
once
the
call
for
service
ratio
has
been
determined.
U
U
Hotel,
so
0
to
0.5
from
0.5
to
1
call
for
service
per
room
is
a
tier
two
and
a
tier
three
Hotel
would
have
more
than
one
call
for
service
per
room
per
year,
once
the
call
for
service
ratio
and
the
tier
inning
has
been
determined
for
the
preceding
year,
the
police
department
notifies
the
owner
operator
of
their
tier
rating
tier
rating
by
regular
and
certified
mail.
This
notification
also
advises
what
stab
steps
The
Establishment
needs
to
take
based
on
their
tier
rating
tier
one
requirements.
U
U
They
must
ensure
the
posting
of
registered
sex
offenders,
a
permanent
guests
which
are
more
than
30
days
or
any
registered
sex
offenders
that
are
tier,
two
requirements,
add
have
a
lounging
establishment
operator
or
designee
available
on
the
premises
at
all
times
to
install
and
maintain
an
operation.
Operational
digital
surveillance,
camera
with
recorder
in
the
lobby,
parking
lots,
indoor
and
outdoor
common
areas
of
the
establishment
24
hours
a
day.
Seven
days
a
week,
install
adequate
Lighting
in
these
areas
as
needed
for
the
camera
recorder
to
properly
work.
U
U
They
must
install
and
maintain
Lighting
in
the
lobby,
parking
lots
and
indoor
and
outdoor
common
areas
of
the
establishment
they
must
ensure
parking
passes,
are
issued
and
recorded
for
all
vehicles
allowed
to
park
on
the
premises
with
each
pass
marked
with
the
issue
date
and
expiration
date.
All
vehicles
shall
prominently
display
the
pass
on
the
front
windshield.
They
must
maintain
a
daily
key
or
key
card
log.
Each
key
or
key
card
found
to
be
missing
must
have
its
corresponding,
lock
re-keyed
prior
to
the
room
being
rented.
U
This
is
kind
of
an
outdated
requirement
and
that
most
of
these
are
digital
and
they
get
programmed
every
time
the
room
changes
hands
anyway.
Each
master
key
card
founded
me
missing
will
require
the
establishment
req
corresponding
Lots
records
of
all
rooms.
Being
re-keyed
shall
be
maintained
by
the
lodging
establishment
operator
for
a
period
of
12
months.
U
The
lodging
establishment
office
operator
shall
have
90
calendar
days
from
the
receipt
of
their
tier
classification
notice
to
implement
the
tier
requirements
as
specified
in
the
article.
A
tier
compliance
inspection
shall
be
conducted
by
The
Police
Department
fire
department
code
enforcement
department
after
the
90-day
calendar
period
fed
her
to
comply
if
the
Belton
Police,
Chief
or
designee,
with
the
code
enforcement
director
or
designee,
shall
notify
any
non-compliant.
Lodging
establishment
owner
and
operator
of
the
non-compliance
finding
such
written
notice
shall
be
directed
by
certified
and
registered
U.S
mail.
U
Regular
mail
postage
paid
to
the
business
address
on
the
business
license
application
such
written
notice
will
include
a
non-compliant
finding
placard.
The
lodging
establishment
operator
shall
Post
in
the
vicinity
of
the
registration
desk
openly
and
conspicuously
viewable
by
the
public.
The
largest
lodging
establishment
operator,
so
I
have
30
calendar
today
is
following
the
date
of
the
initial
notice
to
comply
with
tier
requirements.
During
this
30-day
calendar
period,
no
new
rentals
of
guest
rooms
may
be
made
to
any
transient
or
permanent
guest.
U
After
the
30-day
calendar
period,
a
reinspection
for
tier
compliance
shall
be
conducted
by
The,
Police,
Department,
fire
department
and
code
enforcement.
The
Belton,
Police,
Chief
or
designee
shall
refer
the
non-compliant
lodging
establishment
to
the
municipal
court
for
any
violation.
Under
this
article,
article
into
the
city
clerk
business,
license
official
to
process
under
the
administrative
procedures
of
chapter
six
business
license
and
regulations
our
current
tier
ratings
for
the
first
time
since
the
Inception
of
this
program,
every
hotel
in
the
city
of
Belton
is
at
a
tier
one.
U
U
C
U
U
L
U
Is
somebody
who's
shown
a
desire
or
intent
to
commit
suicide,
but
has
not
actually
taken
any
physical
steps
to
do
so.
Somebody
who's
saying
that
they
want
to
kill
themselves,
but
they
haven't
taken
an
action
yet
okay,
so
the
action
would
be
an
attempted
suicide.
Somebody
expressing
those
ideations
would
be
a
suicidal
party.
O
Yep
staff
received
two
proposals
for
on-call
services
for
code
enforcement
statements,
including
Mowing,
and
trash
junctive.
Re-Removal
Sav
is
currently
reviews
and
reviewing
those
proposals
and
has
the
option
of
selecting
both
contractors
for
the
services
having
more
than
one
contractor
is
beneficial
during
Peak
mowing
season
to
help
ensure
that
abatements
are
being
completed
in
a
timely
manner.
Those
contracts
would
be
effective
for
three
years,
with
the
option
of
two
additional
two-year
period.
Renewals
and
once
we've
finished
those
reviews,
we
will
bring
those
forward
to
council.
R
To
do
with
public
worksters
we're
going
to
try
to
start
maintaining
more
of
the
states
right
away
and
trying
to
do
some
Mowing
and
trimming
you're
going
to
see
some
significant
tree.
Cutting
of
I
wouldn't
call
them
trees,
but
they're
yeah
volunteer
trees
that
are
up
in
places
that
need
to
be
removed
to
make
the
city
about
look
better,
especially
at
our
entry
points.
K
H
R
R
O
O
Staff
believes
that
the
proposed
program
that
we
plan
on
bringing
forward
addresses
the
concerns
expressed
by
both
landlords
and
tenants,
while
also
meeting
the
intent
of
the
program
to
protect
tenants,
preserve
quality
housing
and
maintain
an
enhanced
quality
or
property
values
on
the
most
significant
revisions
include
only
require
inspections
at
unit
turnover
when
the
unit
is
unoccupied,
with
the
recommended
exception
from
the
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
that
an
inspection
be
conducted
every
five
years,
regardless
of
occupancy
City
staff
will
also
conduct
the
inspections
rather
than
a
third
party
inspector
staff
would
like
council's
feedback
on
the
effective
date
of
the
program.
O
Staff
is
proposing
a
delayed
start
to
give
ample
notice
to
landlords
and
tenants
of
the
program
requirements,
as
well
as
for
internal
improvements
to
help
streamline
the
licensing
and
inspection
process
which
we
are
currently
working
with
Central
Square
on
developing
based
on
this.
It
may
be
best
to
wait
until
July,
1st
2024,
which
will
give
us
time
to
have
Central
score
operational,
and
it
also
coincides
with
the
business
license
renewal
period.
O
On
the
Planning
Commission
review
the
proposed
rental
inspection
program
at
their
meeting
last
Tuesday
and
held
a
public
hearing,
there
was
one
landlord
who
asked
questions
and
clarifications
on
a
few
items.
The
Planning
Commission
recommended
unanimous
approval
of
the
program
which
will
be
presented
to
the
city
council
for
first
reading
on
April
11th.
O
N
Last
night,
at
the
ward
4
meeting
where
the
people
were
against
curbside
recycling
anyway,
they
also
said,
and
they
were
all
a
homeowner
said.
How
much
is
this
going
to
cost
us?
Because
we
said
so,
as
we
said
that
city
employees
would
be
doing
it,
they
said
well,
they'll
probably
have
to
hire
some
other
people
and
we'll
have
to
pay
for
it.
But
it
sounds
like
what
you're
saying
you're,
considering
putting
that
into
an
additional
licensing
cost
is.
O
J
H
C
I
was
here
last
time
this
came
up
and,
and
my
thoughts
haven't
changed
I
like
the
fact
that
it's
being
done
unoccupied
I,
like
the
fact
that
a
renter
can
call
this
city
and
have
it
inspected
every
year
as
they
wish.
What
I
won't
vote
for
is
every
five
year.
So
if
we
have
a
five-year,
if
it's
occupied
I,
don't
like
that,
I
want
it
to
be
unoccupied.
C
I'm,
assuming
most
rental
units
probably
turn
over
every
two
to
three
years
at
the
most,
we're,
probably
not
talking
about
a
lot
of
units
or
people
that
stay
in
a
unit
more
than
five
years.
So
me
personally,
I
would
like
to
see
The
Five-Year
taken
away
and
just
make
sure
we
do
it
when
it's
unoccupied.
K
I'll
agree
with
you:
I
Drew,
Warren
and
councilmember
Richardson
and
I
talked
about
this
being
able
to
do
it
at
business,
license
applications
and
it
turns
when
the
water
goes
to
be
changed.
That
would
be
the
trigger
to
say.
Oh
it's
time
for
an
inspection
because
you're
turning
again
so
just
along
that
that
line
of
thought,
I,
agree
and
I
think
there's
a
good
method
to
do
that.
But
it
sounds
like
the
proposal
will
be
built
on
the
recommendation
from
the
committee,
or
will
this
be
considered
in
the
final
proposal?
What
works.
J
You
guys
have
final
say
so:
The
Code,
Enforcement
advisory
committee
is
just
one
of
those.
It's
not
ad
hoc,
but
it's
one
of
those
committees
set
up
to
look
at
things
like
this
and
they
offer
the
recommendations
and,
and
it
does
it's
not
statutorily
set
like
the
Planning
Commission.
So
you
guys
can
take
it
or
leave
it.
You
guys
can
ask
for
the
that
five-year
requirement
to
be
taken
out
and
we'll
take
it
out.
So
if
most
people
think
that's
the
case,
then.
A
C
J
C
T
I
was
just
gonna
say
from
my
position
as
the
daughter
of
someone
who
does
own
a
rental
company
business.
Most
of
their
tenants
are
there
for
longer
than
five
years.
I
would
say.
Maybe
10
is
turned
over
every
two
to
three
years.
T
I
I
think
that
it
very
much
so
will
depend
on
the
landlord
and
what
kind
of
business
they
run.
I
I
don't
see
an
issue
with
once
every
five
years.
If
there's
not
been
turnover
now,
I
mean
if,
if
there
was
turnover,
they
don't
need
to.
T
N
The
from
what
I
heard
from
a
couple
people
last
night
at
our
award
meeting,
not
during
the
meeting
but
afterwards,
is
that
at
least
in
our
neighborhood
there's
a
at
least
one
or
two
landlords,
and
not
not
any
related
to
Angela
that
are
threatening
tenants
and
say
if
this
comes
in
and
if
we
have
to
do
inspections,
it's
all
going
to
fall
on
you
anything
that
happens,
we're
going
to
pass
on
to
you
and
in
fact
we
might
even
double
your
rent,
so
people
are
already
getting
threatened
and
maybe
that's
a
police
issue.
N
J
I
will
say
that
that
type
of
of
tactic
is
the
exact
reason
why
we
need
a
program
like
this,
because
you
have
landlords
that'll
do
that
will
heavy-handedly
threaten
their
their
tenants
into
submission
to
the
point
where
they
won't
won't
report.
Anything
and
that's
why
this
thing
needs
to
have
some
legs
somehow.
A
With
this
plan
that
we're
trying
to
develop
is
going
to
come
a
minimal
fee
per
year
per
unit
and
if
landlords
want
to
double
the
rent
because
of
that
minimal
fee
I,
don't
know
that
we'll
ever
fix
that,
but
that
the
minimal
fee
that
we're
we're
trying
to
develop
will
will
take
in
the
effect
of
they
won't
have
to
pay
for
inspections.
That
fee
will
that
yearly
fee
will
pay
for
all
inspections
and
business
license
and
their
business
license.
J
N
Well,
perfectly
great
program
would
be
one
where
we
could
perceive
who
the
good
guys
are
and
who
the
bad
guys
are
and
just
focus
on
the
bad
guys.
But
unfortunately,.
A
T
I
did
have
two
other
concerns
with
it
one
being
identifying
how
many
rental
properties
actually
have
a
business
license.
Currently,
I
I
was
still
waiting
on
that
information
from
Joe
as
to
how
many
we
actually
have
right
now.
I
know
we
have
a
really
high
percentage
of
rentals
and
I'm
concerned
that
very
few
of
them
actually
got
their
business
license.
T
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
as
many
properties
that
are
rentals
are
actually
included
in
this,
so
that
we
don't
have
very
many
that
are,
you
know
just
getting
around
the
ropes
basically
and
then
my
other
concern
that
I'm,
hoping
maybe
there's
some
insight
on
this
is
I
know
that
we
took
bugs
and
mold
out
of
the
mix.
My
concern
and
I
do
understand
that
we're
not
trained
for
that.
My
concern
is
that
those
are
the
two
biggest
issues
that
I've
heard
from
renters
over
the
last
several
years.
T
That
I've,
you
know
come
to
me
asking
you
know
what
are
my
you
know:
what
can
I
do?
How
do
I
get
this
mold
situation
taken
care
of,
or
you
know,
I
am
completely
infested
with
bugs
bed.
Bugs
was
a
huge
issue
for
one
of
our
properties,
but
not
my
family's
properties,
one
of
the
properties
in
Belton,
and
it
was
the
bugs
were
going
from
neighbor
to
neighbor,
so
I
I
guess.
My
concern
is:
if
we're
not
able
to
look
at
that
at
all,
I
mean
I.
T
Get
that
we
can't,
you
know,
tell
okay,
yes,
they
have
two
bugs.
No,
but
an
infestation.
I
feel
like
doesn't
need
that
much
training.
If
you
go
into
someone's
house
and
there's
rats
nests
everywhere
and
evidence
of
mice
everywhere
that
that's
a
pretty
good
indicator
and
if
you
go
in
somewhere
and
you
see
a
bunch
of
mold
I
I,
don't
think
that
they
necessarily
need
to
know.
Oh,
is
it
black
mold
or
what
kind
of
mold
it's
mold
and
shouldn't
be
there?
It
needs
to
be
treated
and
taken
care
of.
S
S
J
One
yeah
they're
they're
I,
don't
know
that
there's
ever
going
to
be
a
100,
perfect,
ma
mode
to
identify
and
hold
accountable
all
of
the
landlords
essentially,
but
we
have
a
good
way
to
identify
the
vast
vast
vast
majority
of
them.
That's
through
Utility
Billing,
essentially
so
whether
water
bills
will
get
a
good
chunk
of
them.
Electric
bills
can
get
another
chunk
of
those,
and
so
we
can
identify
those
folks
because
it's
pretty
easy
to
identify
when
someone's
when
the
owner
of
record
is
different
from
the
person.
J
That's
on
the
on
the
account
and
if
there
just
happens
to
be
a
special
set
of
circumstances,
they
can
come
clear
it
up
with
us
and
then
they
won't
be
considered
a
rental
right.
But
but
we
do
have
ways
to
identify
a
lot
of
those,
and
so
we
have
we
haven't.
W
My
concern
on
the
on
the
five-year
I'm
not
totally
against
the
five-year
but
I
think
if
somebody
was
in
there
over
five
years
and
they
refused
to
let
you
do
an
inspection.
Is
there
a
waiver
that
maybe
we
could
do
that
the
the
tenant
themselves
could
sign
off
that
they
don't
want
to
have
a
if
they've
been
there
more
than
five
years.
That's
a
possibility,
and
my
other.
My
other
concern
was
what
Angela
said
on
the
amount
of
renters
that
aren't
registered
with
the
city.
W
H
C
C
C
So,
let's
start
with
something,
that's
basic
and
make
it
unoccupied,
no
matter
if
it's
two
years
or
ten
years
and
again
allow
the
residents
to
call
in
but
I
know.
If
the
five-year
thing
is
in
there,
I
won't
vote
for
it.
Just
because
I
have
tenants
that
tell
me
they
don't
want
us
in
there
and
they
have
great
landlords,
and
they
don't
want
that.
So
if
it's
unoccupied
I
will
support
this
100
percent.
C
Say
I,
don't
know
the
same
thing
that
she
said
up
there
a
minute
ago.
They
could
be
threatened
by
their
landlord.
If
you
don't
sign
that
waiver
I
mean
we're
always
going
to
be
in
that.
What
if
or
going
back
and
forth
I
mean
just
like
I
talked
to
one
of
our
residents
today
about
what
she's
seen
at
a
place
when
our
discussion
three
years
ago
is.
C
If
somebody
is
in
need
of
improvements
and
we
go
in
there,
we
see
nothing
but
mold
and
filthy
living
conditions
and
whatever
we're
going
to
kick
them
out,
but
they
said
well.
If
we
don't
have
something
where
that
place
is
never
going
to
be
approved,
but
I
mean,
but
if
it's
unoccupied
typically
I
hope
that
people
don't
live
in
bad
conditions.
Very
long
I
mean
our
goal
is
to
get
into
these
houses
and
look
at
them
originally.
J
I
know
we
didn't
really
address
the
second
part
of
Angela's
questions
about
the
the
infestations
and
the
mold
and
whatnot
and
and
I
think
that's
a
very,
very
fair
point.
J
The
only
thing
I
might
say
that
reason
why
we
might
not
want
to
add
that
from
the
start
is
from
the
same
rationale
that
councilmember
Clark
just
mentioned:
let's,
let's
bring
in
the
broadest
least
restrictive
version
of
this
to
start
and
then,
as
we
see
issues
that
are
that
arise
with
it,
we
can
always
bring
it
back
to
you
guys
and
say
we,
okay,
here's
what
we're
seeing.
J
We
think
we
need
to
tweak
this
for
to
allow
for
mold
or
to
allow
for
infestation
or
or
to
you
know,
maybe
the
every
five
years
we
do
need.
We
do
think
we
need
to
get
in
there
because
we
have
a
certain
issue.
We
could
bring
that
back
to
you.
So
I
almost
think
that
the
the
broader
and
the
least
restrictive
version
of
this
might
be
the
way
to
start,
and
then
we
can
hone
it
in
as
we
find
things.
D
Go
ahead.
One
of
my
concerns
is
corporate
ownerships,
not
the
individuals
that
have
a
three
or
four
people,
three
or
four
homes
that
live
in
here
and
everyone
knows
them,
and
so
I'm
still
pushing
that.
We
need
to
have
an
actual
name,
not
companies
and
companies
after
companies
after
companies.
J
I
think
that's
a
fair
point.
I
think
Patrick
has
mentioned
he's
going
to
research
that
to
to
see
if
we
have
the
right
to
put
that
into
our
our
city,
language,
sometimes
statutorily.
We
don't
have
that
right,
so
he's
going
to
check
into
that
and
if
we
do
I
think
we
maybe
we
bring
that
back
as
a
separate
issue
and
we
and
I
think
there'd
be
a
lot
of
support
for
that
I.
Think
it's
a
it's!
It's
good
to
require
a
local
agent
just
so
that
way.
J
C
J
D
C
O
We
are
currently
reviewing
an
application
for
a
rezoning
and
preliminary
development
plan
for
a
U-Haul
moving
and
storage
facility
at
Cornerstone
Drive
and
Stone
Ridge
Drive
behind
the
Casey's
on
East
163rd
Street.
The
project
includes
two
indoor
storage
buildings
truck
and
trailer
rentals
and
a
retail
sales
area
for
boxes
and
related
moving
supplies.
I'm
under
the
current
code,
a
rezoning
to
M1
light
industrial
is
required
to
permit
a
storage
facility
and
vehicle
rental.
A
public
hearing
will
be
held
for
the
rezoning
of
the
development
plan
at
the
Tuesday
April
4th
Planning
Commission.
T
J
I
I
think
that
there's
parts
of
the
north
Scott
Corridor
that
actually
would
be
on
the
Northern
edge
of
the
north
Scott
Corridor
that
actually,
this
would
be
potentially
a
reasonable
request,
I
believe
based
on
current
zoning.
So
this
is
not
something
that's
that
would
be
restricted
in
the
entire
North
Scott
corridor
plan,
necessarily,
and
just
for
clarification,
this
specific
project
and
other
projects
like
it,
we
would
I
think
we,
the
staff,
would
be
very
favorable
toward
bringing
forward
on
the
North
section
of
North
Scott.
This
is
indoor
climate
controlled.
J
T
A
C
O
So
there
are
several
reasons
for
the
review
and
proposed
tax
amendments
that
will
be
coming
forward,
which
would
include
repealing
and
replacing
that
entire
chapter,
the
last
significant
update
was
completed
in
2011
when
the
current
UDC
was
adopted.
Since
that
time,
we've
adopted
the
Norse
Scott
overlay
and
the
Old
Town
belt
and
overlay
we've
also
had
significant
growth
in
the
commercial
industrial
sectors
of
the
community,
as
well
as
changes
in
technology
and
the
economy
that
have
led
to
creation
and
evolution
of
new
and
existing
land
uses.
O
So
the
primary
reason
for
these
changes
would
ensure
that
Belton
has
a
competitive
advantage
in
the
region
based
on
those
land
uses,
and
our
goal
is
to
also
make
it
more
user-friendly,
which
will
include
a
new
land
use,
table
definitions
and
use
standards
all
in
one
chapter.
Currently,
those
are
scattered
throughout
three
different
chapters
in
the
code,
which
does
create
some
confusion
from
from
applicants
and
potential
developers
and
business
owners.
O
Currently,
we
have
five
use
groups
that
are
very
generic.
We
are
proposing
to
expand
that
to
13.
So.
Currently
we
have
residential
public
and
Civic
commercial,
industrial
and
other
we're
proposing
to
expand
that
to
a
wider
range
of
commercial
and
Industrial
uses
that
have
a
better
breakdown
of
those
use
groups,
so
it
would
include
Commercial,
Services,
restaurant
and
retail
office
lodging
all
the
marijuana
uses.
Auto-Oriented
arts
and
crafts
manufacturing
and
production,
Industrial
and
waste
related
uses
would
would
cover
all
of
the
commercial
and
Industrial
uses.
O
There
are
several
existing
land
uses
that
create
confusion
that
we're
proposing
to
consolidate
So.
Currently,
there
are
three
or
four
different
types
of
government
or
public
facility
uses
that
all
are
pretty
much
allowed
in
the
same
zoning
district
and
have
a
very
similar
definition.
So
we
are
proposing
to
consolidate
that
all
into
just
one
generic
government
and
Public
Safety
facilities,
offices
and
service
use.
O
O
We
also
just
have
a
single
motor
vehicle
repair
type,
we're
proposing
to
break
that
down
into
minor
major
and
heavy.
So
a
minor
example
of
a
minor
motor
vehicle
repair
would
be
an
oil
change
or
a
tire
change
business.
A
major
repair
would
be
more
of
a
collision
center
where
there
may
be
more
noise
and
nuisance
included
with
that,
and
then
heavy
motor
vehicle
repair
would
be
for
repair
of
heavy
equipment
or
construction
type.
Vehicles
commercial
vehicles
essentially
same
with
vehicle
and
equipment
sales.
O
Currently,
we
don't,
we
just
have
a
general
equipment
or
general
equipment
sales
and
we're
out
proposing
to
also
add
heavy,
which
better
defines
just
the
general
passenger
vehicle
sales
versus
the
sales
of
heavy
equipment,
whether
that
be
buses,
semi
trucks,
those
types
of
vehicles,
and
then
we
also
have
multiple
warehouse
distribution
storage,
uses
that
essentially
have
the
same
definition
in
the
in
the
current
code.
So
we're
proposing
to
just
combine
all
those
that
also
provides
some
flexibility.
O
For
example,
Southview
Commerce
Center
is
a
good
example
where
all
of
those
facilities
have
essentially
similar
uses,
and
they
all
function
the
same,
but
some
of
them
may
be
distribution
where
some
of
them
may
be
Warehouse.
O
There
are
a
number
of
new
land
uses
that
do
need
to
be
added
to
keep
up
with
what
some
other
communities
are
doing,
as
well
as
just
some
of
the
uses
that
we
frequently
get
inquiries
on.
So
those
would
include
Community,
Gardens,
homeless,
shelters.
The
homeless
shelter
could
already
technically
be
addressed
in
the
code
as
a
group
living
unclassified,
but
we
do
want
to
specifically
call
that
out.
Parks
and
open
space
is
not
specifically
in
the
land
use
table.
O
If
the
city
council
feels
like
we
should
allow
one
or
both
of
those
uses,
and
if
so,
what
kind
of
regulations
we
should
adopt
to
accommodate
those
outdoor
storage
yards,
self-storage
facilities,
indoor
climate,
controlled
and
Warehouse
breaking
those
down
kind
of
as
Joe
mentioned.
O
Currently
we
just
have
a
general
Mini
Storage,
which
has
primarily
been
in
the
form
of
the
traditional
warehouse
storage,
which
are
garages
generally,
but
the
indoor
climate
control
is
something
that
we
do
want
to
add
and
specify
as
a
different
than
the
warehouse
facility,
we're
also
adding
recycling
collection
facilities
which
essentially
are
neighborhood
drop-off
type
facilities
and
then
the
last
one
is
an
entirely
new
use
group
category
that
covers
a
number
of
arts
and
crafts
manufacturing
production
uses.
So
those
are
small
scale
uses
that
can
fit
essentially
in
any
commercial
or
an
industrial
district
foreign.
O
District
are
in
our
land
use
table,
for
whatever
reason
those
uses
were
only
allowed
in
residential
zoning
districts,
even
though
these
are
commonly
found
in
commercial
districts
as
well,
particularly
the
library
and
there's
a
number
of
churches
that
are
in
commercial
and
Industrial
districts.
So
we're
proposing
to
expand
that
to
be
allowed
in
those
zoning
districts
and
with
a
special
use
permit,
and
there
may
be
some
conditions
that
vary
by
the
zoning
District.
O
Small
retail,
which
are
retail
uses
that
are
less
than
a
hundred
thousand
square
feet,
are
not
currently
permitted
in
business
park
and
light
industrial
zoning
districts.
That's
uncommon
compared
to
most
cities
that
do
still
allow
small
retail
uses.
So
we're
proposing
to
add
that
we
are
one
of
the
biggest
changes
would
be
we're
recommending
that
all
auto
oriented
land
uses
be
subject
to
special
use.
Approval
that
would
include
car
washes
vehicle
repair,
vehicle
sales
and
gas
stations.
O
O
What
we
typically
end
up
what
we
could
end
up
with,
though,
is
those
types
of
facilities
being
located
in
in
certain
commercial
areas
where
they
may
not
be
appropriate,
so
it
just
adds
another
layer
of
review
there
to
determine
if
a
car
wash
or
a
gas
station
is
appropriate
at
this
particular
location,
we
are
proposing
to
remove
the
special
use
permit
requirement
for
body
art
Services,
more
commonly
known
as
tattoo
shops.
O
We
have
only
had
one
that
has
come
through
over
the
last
five
years
for
a
special
use
permit
and
there
were
no
concerns
with
where
that
was
located.
Unlike
some
of
the
other
uses
like
tobacco
shops
and
pawn
shops,
there
are
no
specific
separation
requirements
for
body
art
services,
so
there's
really
not
anything,
that's
being
reviewed
for
compliance.
So
since
that
has
been
the
case
historically
we're
just
proposing
to
allow
those
by
right
in
the
zoning
districts
where
they're
currently
allowed.
O
And
then
for
the
storage
facilities
we
are
proposing
that
they
all
be
subject
to
special
use,
permit
approval
similar
to
the
auto
warranty
juices,
but
as
part
of
that,
we
also
are
proposing
to
expand
storage
facilities
for
indoor
climate,
controlled
facilities
to
the
business
park,
zoning
and
the
flex
commercial
industrial
zoning
District
in
the
north
Scott
Corridor.
O
Lastly,
as
I
mentioned,
the
Arts
and
Crafts
manufacturing
production
uses
would
be
permitted
in
all
commercial
and
in
light
industrial
zoning
districts,
and
we
would
also
add
a
special
use-
permit
require
requirement
to
that
or
option
to
that
in
agricultural
zoning
when
it's
when
it's
included
as
an
agrotourism
use.
So
we
don't
currently
have
anything
like
that
in
the
city
limits,
but
a
good
example
would
be
Johnson
Farms
where
they
have
agricultural
use,
but
they
also
have
retail
type
components
and
special
events
related
to
the
business.
O
D
Curious
because
I
zone
out
every
once
in
a
while,
because
I'm
old,
what
about
where
would
sports
facilities
complexes
go
and
enter.
O
W
Hey,
can
you
go
back
one
page
on
the
recycling
collection
facility?
It
does
have
to
be
on
concrete
pads,
though
correct
yeah.
O
O
Right
now,
that's
not
permitted
in
the
norsecott
corridor,
which
would
include
you
know
everything
pretty
much
north
of
58
Highway.
There
are
a
few
of
the
light
purple
areas
on
Bell
Ray
place
or
Cunningham
Parkway
or
173rd.
Street,
where
that
would
be
allowed,
but
essentially
anywhere
else
in
the
city
that
would
not
be
permitted.
O
We
also
have
no
land
area.
That's
designated
for
heavy
industrial
uses
which
could
include
a
mix
of
you,
know,
waste
processing,
type
facilities
as
well
as
vehicle
repair
of
heavy
equipment
and
other
types
of
outdoor
storage
type
facilities,
and
so
one
of
the
things
where
we
would
like
some
input
from
Council
on
for
both
of
these
items
is,
are
these
items
appropriate
anywhere
in
the
city?
J
J
Why
is
because
we
do
get
requests
every
now
and
again
for
space
for
those
and
the
if
the
answers
we
thank
you,
but
no
thank
you.
That's
fine,
but
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody's
on
board,
with
that
we
don't
want
to
turn
someone
away
and
then
have
them
come
back
and
say
well.
City
of
Belton
doesn't
want
to
work
with
us.
Well,
if
you're
heavy
industrial,
maybe
if
that's
what
we
all
decide,
then
that's!
Yes,
that's
right!
We
don't
want
to
work
with
heavy
industrial
anymore.