►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
I
do
have
a
full
agenda
this
evening
with
some
changes
to
be
considered
for
our
codes,
and
so
we
will
go
ahead,
but
the
first
item
that
we
have
on
our
agenda
would
be
the
approval
of
minutes
from
the
july
18
planning
commission
session.
B
So
the
first
item
that
we
had
on
our
agenda
this
evening
was
for
a
public
hearing
for
the
consideration
of
rezoning
from
m1
light
industrial
to
r3a,
pud
apartment
community,
planned
unit
development
and
a
preliminary
development
plan
for
a
138
unit,
apartment
community
and
a
2600
square
foot
retail
building
on
10.29
acres
for
the
property
located
at
401,
north
scott
avenue
and
the
applicant
has
requested
a
continuance
of
the
public
hearing
to
a
later
date,
and
the
public
hearing
will
be
will
be
re-noticed
when
the
new
date
is
determined
director.
F
B
D
B
Of
all
right,
thank
you,
commissioner.
We
do
have
motion
and
second
for
the
continuance
on
the
public
hearing
for
this
item.
Any
discussion.
B
F
F
During
2018
and
2019
city
staff
attended
several
regional
meetings
with
representatives
of
local
and
regional
jurisdictions,
as
well
as
a
building
community
regarding
the
adoption
of
these
codes.
Since
that
time,
there
have
been
some
staff
changes.
However,
the
code
amendments
that
are
before
you
still
mirror
those
changes
that
were
discussed
at
that
time,
and
we
are
now
ready
to
bring
those
forward
for
formal
adoption.
F
So,
if
approved,
this
would
move
forward
to
city
council
next
tuesday
and
a
second
reading
on
september
27th
to
comply
with
missouri
state
law.
There
is
a
minimum
90
day
period
required
prior
to
the
effective
date
of
the
code,
so,
if
approved
on
september
27th,
the
effective
date
would
be
january,
1st
2023,
which
would
meet
that
90-day
requirement
and
give
the
building
community
the
opportunity
and
the
time
to
make
adjustments
to
any
building
plans
that
they
will
be
submitting
after
january
1st,
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
2018
codes.
F
In
the
meantime,
in
that
period
of
time,
between
september
27th
and
january
1st
we
would
be,
we
will
be
reviewing
plans
under
either
code
depending
on
the
builder's
preference,
which
code
they
would
like
to
submit
under.
F
F
E
B
B
E
B
F
All
right,
thank
you,
chair
again,
with
the
same
last,
the
the
last
public
hearing.
This
is
to
repeal
the
2012
international
fire
code
and
replace
with
the
2018
international
fire
code,
same
process
and
timeline
as
the
building
codes.
F
We
did
include
with
this
amendment
that
the
recent
change
that
was
approved
last
month
related
to
professional
fireworks
display
so
that
it's
been
captured
as
well
in
these
changes
again
an
effective
date
of
january
1st
2023,
if
appealed
or
if
approved,
and
then
we
do
have
our
assistant
fire
marshal
jason
oakley
here
available.
If
there
are
any
questions.
F
D
B
Did
I
see
a
hand,
okay,
all
right,
any
then
may
we
have
the
roll
call.
Please.
D
C
E
D
B
F
F
B
Great
question:
that's
what
I
thought
it
was,
but
I'm
glad
you
asked
all
right
any
other
questions
or
is
there
a
motion.
E
I'll
make
a
motion
for
the
consideration
of
text
amendments
to
the
unified
development
code
to
adopt
the
following
property
maintenance
code
with
local
amendments;
2018,
international
property,
maintenance
code.
D
B
Thank
you
any
final
questions
or
comments.
A
E
D
B
F
F
So
the
first
section
is
related
to
the
preliminary
and
final
development
plan
process
in
repealing
that
and
replacing
with
two
new
sections
for
the
preliminary
and
final
development
plan
and
then
alternative
development
standards
section
which
I'll
get
into
exactly
what
that
entails.
F
But
currently
our
code
is
a
little
bit
vague
on
exactly
when
a
preliminary
development
plan
and
a
final
development
plan
are
required.
So
we
are
improving
that
to
be
more
specific
of
what,
when
those
plans
are
required
to
generally
match
kind
of
how
we've
already
been
handling
it,
but
just
to
codify
that
and
make
that
clear.
F
F
Another
item
is,
is
that
currently,
a
final
development
plan
is
only
approved
by
the
planning
commission.
So
if
there
is
a
situation
where
the
planning
commission
denies
a
final
development
plan,
and
the
applicant
would
like
to
appeal
to
city
council
that
is
common
in
most
communities
and
some
of
our
other
processes
and
so
we're
building
that
in
as
a
possibility
as
well
in
the
event
that
that
does
happen.
F
Likewise,
there's
several
parts
of
our
code,
where
we
have
submittal
checklists
that
are
actually
in
the
code,
which
essentially
means
that
if
we
are
not
following
that
checklist,
exactly
applicant
is
in
violation
of
the
code,
but
some
of
those
may
need
to
be
updated
routinely
based
on
changes
in
technology.
So,
for
example,
currently
our
checklist
requires
16
copies
of
a
site
plan
we
do
not
require.
F
This
is
actually
something
that
we
have
been
doing.
We
just
don't
have
any
kind
of
review
criteria
or
standards
associated
with
it,
so
we're
building
that
into
the
process.
An
example
would
be
the
last
meeting
when
popeyes
came
in
and
asked
for
a
modification
of
their
signage.
That's
been
fairly
common
with
signage,
some
minor
setbacks.
Things
like
that:
a
waiver
of
a
parking
space
or
two.
So
those
are
our
common
requests
and
we
just
want
to
build
that
into
the
code
to
define
that
process.
F
The
next
section
is
for
residential
driveways
repealing
that
section
and
replacing
the
main
changes
here
are,
as
we
already
addressed
in
the
last
last
item,
is
regarding
ribbon
driveways
and
a
requirement
that
the
entire
parking
surface
must
be
paved.
I'm
also
adding
clarification
to
the
driveway
limits.
Currently,
homes
cannot
any
single
family
lot
cannot
have
more
than
35
percent
of
their
front
yard
covered
for
driveways,
but
that
does
create
issues
on
some
lots
with
three-car
garages
where
they
may
exceed
that
35
percent,
and
so,
rather
than
having
to
go
through
a
variance
process.
F
And
the
benefit
to
that
is
that
does
allow
it
does
encourage
more
off-street
parking
as
well
as
allows
homes
with
three-car
garages
for
the
fencing
section
again
repealing
and
replacing
entirely
we
have.
Since
I
started,
we
have
probably
denied
more
than
half
of
our
fence
permits,
and
that
creates
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
time,
trying
to
go
back
and
forth
with
fence
contractors
and
citizens
on
trying
to
explain
the
fencing
requirements
with
them
and
a
lot
of
times.
F
It
applies
to
corner
lots
where
we
have
currently
a
requirement
that
the
front
yard
the
side
yard
on
a
corner
street
corner
has
to
have
the
same
setback
as
the
front
yard
fence,
which
is
typically
25
or
30
foot
setback
which,
when
you
add
that
to
the
right
of
way,
puts
fences
at
least
36
feet
from
the
back
of
the
curb
for
a
privacy
or
chain
link
fence
which
is
well
outside
of
the
site
triangle,
or
any
kind
of
site
visibility
issue.
And
so
we
are
recommending
to
reduce
that
to
a
six
foot.
F
Currently
we
are
one
of
the
most
restrictive
cities
for
that,
but
there
are
many
other
examples
of
that
around
the
city
that
were
built
under
a
previous
fence
code
and
we
have
not
had
any
issues
or
concerns
with
with
those
fences.
We
also
currently
have
a
prohibition
on
wood
fences
in
commercial
and
industrial
development.
We
are
the
only
city
with
that
prohibition
and,
in
fact,
the
north
scott
corridor
overlay
plan
specifically
encourages
private
wood,
privacy,
fences
in
lieu
of
vinyl
or
other
materials.
So
this
would
be
in
keeping
with
that
and
be
allowed
citywide.
F
F
F
F
F
F
We
do
have
feather
flags
that
are
put
up
illegally
around
the
city
and,
if
they're
treated
like
a
temporary
sign,
they
could
meet
the
temporary
sign
requirements
with
a
sign
height
exception.
So
we've
built
that
into
that
and
then
the
last
item
is
regarding
the
maintenance,
removal
of
abandoned
and
illegal
signs.
F
F
For
example,
if
a
business,
a
business
has
vacated
their
premise,
they
are
supposed
to
currently
remove
their
signage,
but
there's
no
timeline
on
that.
Most
cities
have
a
number
of
days
and
we
have
built
that
in
at
90
days.
So
after
a
business
is
closed
within
90
days,
they
do
need
to
remove
their
signage
or
that
would
be
in
violation
of
the
code,
same
thing
for
legal
non-conforming
signs
such
as
a
poll
sign
if
it.
F
F
The
current
code
has
a
number
of
processes
that
are
in
there
that
are
not
accurate
to
how
we
are
currently
taking
applications
through
the
process.
So
this
table
is
just
being
cleaned
up.
We've
changed
board
of
aldermen
to
city
council
on
this
list
and
clarified
exactly
what
types
of
applications
require
public
noticing
and
added
references
within
the
code
to
other
sections
that
apply
to
each
application
type.
Just
to
make
that
clear
of
other
references
that,
if
you're
looking
at
a
special
use
permit.
F
There
was
also
in
here
similar
to
the
development
plan
where
there
was
several
checklists
for
the
development
review
committee.
We've
removed
that
as
well
and
just
added
some
information
about
exactly
what
the
when
a
when
a
pre-application
meeting
is
required
and
what
the
what
is
being
reviewed
at
those
applications
or
at
that
meeting
and
then
some
general
information
about
applications,
deadlines,
completing
applications
and
the
staff
review
process.
F
So
that
is
a
summary
of
the
items
that
are
before
the
planning
commission.
These
would
go
before
city
council
next
week
for
first
reading
september
27th
for
second
reading.
Unlike
the
building
code
and
property
maintenance
code
and
fire
code
amendments
these,
if
approved
on
september
27th,
would
take
effect
at
that
time.
There's
no
90-day
waiting
period
for
those.
B
D
B
A
E
C
D
B
F
F
So
we
hope
we
will
have
a
number
of
kind
of
new
rebranded
documents
and
guidebooks
coming
forward
here
in
the
next
month
and
a
half
or
so.
B
Any
the
next
meeting
that
we
have
scheduled
is
for
september
the
19th.
So
you
want
to
put
that
on
your
calendar
and.