►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
All
right,
thank
you.
We
have
several
items
that
we
will
be
going
through
tonight,
including
a
public
hearing
which
will
be
one
of
our
first
items
that
we
have
on
the
agenda.
A
Considering
the
the
rental
inspection
program,
and
then
we
have
a
non-public
hearing
on
the
capital.
Improvement
program
so
have
a
lot
to
to
learn
about
this
evening,
and
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
started.
The
first
item
that
we
have
would
be
the
approval,
a
motion
for
the
approval
of
our
Planning
Commission
minutes
from
the
March
7th
meeting
and
would
entertain
a
motion
for
that
approval.
A
Motion
in
a
second
thank
you:
are
there
any
additions,
questions
comments
that
need
to
be
brought
forward
on
those
minutes
as
printed
seeing.
None
all
those
in
favor
of
approval,
say
aye
aye,.
C
A
Any
opposed
thank
you.
Those
minutes
have
been
approved,
so
our
next
item
will
be.
We
will
call
to
order
a
public
hearing
for
the
consideration
of
unified
development
code,
UDC
text
amendments
UDC
202301,
for
amendments
to
adopt
a
rental
inspection
program
for
rental
and
non-owner
occupied
dwelling
units
director.
All.
D
Right,
thank
you,
chair
McPherson,
before
this
evening.
Our
UDC
tax
amendments
amendments
for
the
adoption
of
a
rental
inspection
program
included
in
the
agenda
packet
as
a
staff
report
that
includes
the
history
of
the
city's
efforts
to
adopt
a
program
since
2018,
including
the
most
recent
effort
that
started
in
November
2022..
The
proposed
code,
language
is
included
for
review
and
consideration
on
the
table
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report,
which
is
on
the
screen,
provides
a
synopsis
of
the
proposed
program.
D
The
following
is
a
summary
of
the
proposed
amendments.
This
program
would
be
for
the
rental
and
non-owner
occupied
dwelling
units
to
require
unit
inspection
Whenever.
There
is
a
turnover
so
when
the
unit
is
unoccupied
between
tenants,
The
Code
Enforcement
advisory
committee
also
recommended
a
minimum
of
one
inspection
every
five
years
and
that
there
be
voluntary
inspections
requested
at
any
time,
staff
did
add
to
that
a
maximum
of
one
voluntary
inspections
per
year,
just
to
keep
from
tenants
to
who
may
continuously
call
for
an
inspect
a
re-inspection
every
couple
of
months.
D
So
again,
this
would
just
be
between
tenants.
As
you
can
see
in
the
middle
column
was
the
original
proposal
that
was
put
forward
to
the
community
back
in
January,
which
would
require
which
would
have
required
an
inspection
every
two
years
of
every
unit
based
on
feedback
that
we
received
from
both
landlords
and
tenants.
There
were
concerns
about
the
ability
to
opt
to
access
the
unit
when
it
was
occupied,
as
well
as
privacy
concerns
from
tenants.
So
by
removing
that
and
just
requiring
an
inspection
between
tenants.
D
We
I
think
that
is
something
that
would
be
a
better
perceived
by
the
community.
The
next
item
is
changing
from
a
qualified
third-party
inspector
to
City
staff
handling
the
inspections.
That
was
something
that
was
brought
up
through
the
process
and
was
also
viewed
favorably
in
the
survey
that
staff
conducted
and
we
do
have
the
Staffing
that
can
accommodate
that
at
this
time,
and
we
could
reevaluate
staffing
needs
based
on
how
well
the
program
is
rolled
out.
D
That
includes
a
list
of
safety
items
that
are
related
to
Electrical,
Plumbing
and
mechanical,
as
well
as
safe
Ingress
egress
from
the
unit
which
includes
interior
and
exterior
handrails,
guard
rail,
stairs
and
decks
being
secured,
as
well
as
a
safe,
continuous
and
unobstructed
egress
between
units
and
the
right-of-way
and
exterior
doors
and
windows
that
are
in
working
order.
That
can
be
accessed
in
the
event
of
an
emergency.
D
Some
additional
items
that
were
included
previously,
we
did
not
have
any
requirement
on
how
old
a
unit
or
how
young
a
unit
could
be
to
require
an
inspection.
We
did
propose
five
units
or
sorry
five
years
of
age,
so
any
unit
that
was
over
five
years
would
require
inspection.
The
code
enforcement
advisory
committee
recommended
decreasing
that
to
three
years,
we've
also
added
that
property
taxes
must
be
paid
before
an
inspection
will
be
approved
and
then,
if
a
unit
does
fail,
its
inspection,
a
reinspection
must
be
called
within
14
days.
D
The
last
item
that
we
added
just
for
clarification,
though
something
that
our
code
already
does
allow,
is
that
any
structural
conditions
or
Hazard
that
are
deemed
as
an
immediate
threat
to
the
life's
health
safety
or
welfare.
The
tenant
May
initiate
the
dangerous
building
and
structures
process.
So
that's
not
something
that
typically,
the
inspector
would
be
specifically
looking
at,
but
if,
while
they
are
in
the
unit
looking
at
these
other
items,
they
do
notice
something
that
would
initiate
that
process.
It
would
be
documented
and
that
process
would
be
initiated.
D
The
effective
date
of
this
program
will
be
determined
by
the
city
council.
However,
staff
is
proposing
a
delayed
start
to
give
ample
time
to
landlords
and
tenants
to
be
notified
of
the
programming
requirements,
as
well
as
for
internal
improvements
to
be
made
to
streamline
the
licensing
and
inspection
process
based
on
this,
the
program
may
not
take
effect
until
spring
or
summer.
2024..
D
Additional
changes
will
also
be
need
to
make
to
the
business
licensing
requirements
in
chapter
six
of
the
code
of
ordinances
as
well
as
fee
updates.
Those
again
would
be
determined
based
on
the
outcome
of
the
program
itself,
the
vote
of
it
by
the
city
council.
So
again,
the
the
effective
date,
the
licensing
requirements
and
the
fee
updates
will
be
reviewed
once
we
know
if
this
specific
program
is
acceptable
to
the
city.
A
All
right,
since
we
are
in
a
public
hearing
I'm
going
to
ask
I
know
we
had
a
couple
of
people
that
misunderstood
as
far
as
the
sign
in
and
signed
in
thinking
they
were
signing
in
their
attendance,
so
I'm
going
to
ask
John.
Is
there
anything
that
you
would
like
to
bring
in
the
way
of
questions?
If
you'll
come
over
to
the
microphone
and
at
the
podium
here
at
the
side,
and
just
give
us
your
name
and
then
definitely
you
can
address
any
of
those
questions
to
our
to
our
staff.
A
Okay,
if
you'll
just
come
to
the
podiums
again
state
your
name
and
appreciate
you
coming
this
evening
and.
A
E
My
name
is
Mary
Watkins
I
have
rentals
here
in
Belton,
I
actually
live
outside
of
the
Town
I.
The
question
I
had
I
guess.
One
I
saw
something
about
pre-inspection
and
I,
didn't
understand
what
that
was
referring
to.
B
D
Okay
yeah,
so
the
pre-inspection
I
believe
that
that
was
in
here,
and
that
was
more
based
on
when
we're
looking
at
fees.
Reinspection
fees.
Our
goal
is
to
have
a
lower
fee
for
the
initial
inspection
as
an
incentive
to
for
the
landlord
and
the
Tenant
to
kind
of
pre-inspect
the
units
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
program.
The
fees
would
increase
based
on
re-inspection.
That's
that's
the
intent.
Okay,.
D
Not
a
pre-inspection
per
se,
that's
that
would
be
handled
privately
without
us.
We
we're
just
asking
that
the
landlords
and
the
tenants
look
at
the
list
make
sure
that
they
have
addressed
all
those
items
before
they
call
in
for
an
inspection
that
way
the
inspection
process
runs
smoothly,
and
we
only
have
to
do
that
once.
Okay,.
E
D
We
have
not
quite
yet
determined
that,
and
it
may
be
where
we
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we're
looking
at
the
number
of
units
and
the
actual
units
would
then
be
assessed
based
on
the
business
with
the
business
license.
So
you
just
pay
one
fee
annually
and
that
covers
your
inspections
that
way
you're
not
having
to
write
a
new
check.
Every
time
you
do,
an
inspection
reinspections
may
have
an
additional
fee.
On
top
of
that,.
E
D
Us
we've
not,
we
haven't,
run
those
numbers
yet
because
we're
trying
to
First
figure
out
exactly
what
the
program
will
be
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
come
back
and
determine
that
assessment.
E
Okay
and
then
I
guess
another
question
that
I've
come
across
in
properties
that
I've
had
is
and
specifically
I.
Don't
know
that
I
can
point
one
out.
But
what
about
grandfathered
items
that
maybe
something
in
the
building
that
is
maybe
not
up
to
current
codes
but
would
be
cost
prohibitive
to
bring
it
up
to
code,
but
that
because
it's
been
there,
for
you
know
pretty
pretty
much
since
the
building
was
built,
say
back
in,
say,
1960
or
something.
E
D
So
the
only
electric
line
that
we're
looking
at
is
just
making
sure
there
aren't
any
exposed
wires
and
the
gfcis
are
installed
within
six
feet
of
a
water
source.
So
we
understand
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
of
structures
that
were
built
not
up
to
current
code.
It's
just
as
long
as
those
certain
safety
items
have
been
met,
there's
not
a
requirement
to
bring
everything
up
to
code,
Electrical,
Plumbing,
mechanical,
all
those
things
and
Demetrius.
Do
you
have
anything
else
you
want
to
add
to
that.
F
Yeah
just
that
some
of
the
amperages
that
were
amperages
that
were
initial
with
the
building
of
the
structure,
some
of
those
still
have
60
amp
services
and
they
might
be
a
little
outdated
for
all
the
electricity
that
tenants
use,
so
those
might
have
to
be
upgraded
in
the
past.
I've
tested
some
of
those
and
asked
an
electrician
to
run
some
numbers
and
make
sure
everything
was
okay
and
safe.
F
Because
tenants
like
to
you
know,
add
you
know
humidifiers
and
heaters
and
fans
and
stuff.
So
in
those
instances,
I
would
maybe
ask
for
an
electrical
master
electrician
to
run
some
numbers
and
make
sure
the
configuration
still
works
for
that
unit.
E
C
E
Fact,
I
probably
need
to
talk
to
you
on
that
anyway,
but
I
think
that's
all
that
I
had
on
inspection
just
so
that
we
could.
You
know,
stay
informed
as
to
what
the
changes
are,
so
that
we're
kind
of
be
able
to
be
prepared
for
that.
You
know,
especially
the
cost,
because
you
say,
including
with
licensing.
D
Yeah
and
and
like
I,
said
what,
if
the
program
is
adopted
by
the
city
council,
we
we
still
are
expecting
a
pretty
lengthy
amount
of
time
between
the
effect
day
of
the
program,
so
that
will
give
us
plenty
of
time
to
notify
the
landlords
of
what
those
fees
will
be.
Yeah.
E
G
Chairman,
if
I
may
yes,
I
I,
also
would
like
everybody
to
understand
that.
One
of
the
reasons
that
we
are
trying
to
do
this
in-house,
rather
than
doing
it
by
Contracting
inspectors
out,
is
to
help
us
keep
costs
down.
So
it
can
help
us
keep
the
cost,
that
of
of
the
inspections
down
and
so
and
I.
Don't
want
to
speak
out
of
term
because
we
haven't
run
the
numbers
yet,
but
I
don't
anticipate
these.
G
E
E
G
A
Those
were
the
two
that
I
had
on
our
list
that
had
signed
in
is
there.
Anyone
else
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
or
in
opposition
at
this
point
for
our
public
hearing.
A
Ask
one
more
time:
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
to
speak
concerning
that,
for
during
our
public
hearing,
seeing
none,
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
it
will
open
it
up
to
the
commission
to
see
if
we
have
any
additional
questions,
we
would
like
to
ask
of
staff
at
this
point,
commissioner,.
D
That
is
a
requirement
to
get
a
rental
license
from
the
city.
I'm
sure
that
there
are.
There
are
some
homes
that
do
not
have
that,
but
that
is
something
that
we
do
Monitor
and
that's
something
that
we
will
also
have
to
work
through,
as
we
roll
out
the
program
working
with
utility
billing
to
make
sure
that
we
know
what
units
are
missing
their
rental
licensing
and
make
sure
that
we're
not
only
getting
that
licensing
but
also
the
inspections
yep.
So
that's
something
that
yeah.
That's
something
that
we'll
be
working
through.
H
D
Think
their
concern
was
from
a
building
standpoint.
Five
years
is
still,
you
know,
the
building
should
still
be
structurally
sound.
I
think
there
are
concerns
were
depending
on
you
know.
If
a
tenant
goes
in
there
I
mean
you
could
potentially
have
three
different
tenants
in
there
in
those
first
three
years
and
after
three
years
not
know
what
the
condition
of
the
unit
was
so
I
think
their
concern
was
just
if
there's
frequent
turnover,
potentially,
how
quickly
does
that
unit
degrade
if
it's
not
properly
maintained.
H
D
Yeah
I
mean
that
would
be
a
case
by
case
kind
of
like
with
with
a
Code
Enforcement
issue.
If
there's
something
that's
a
larger
issue,
that's
going
to
take
more
time
to
resolve
an
extension
or
a
plan
can
be
made.
We
can
work
with
the
landlord
on
making
sure
that's
still
addressed
in
a
timely
manner,
but
progress
is
being
made
on
getting
that
addressed.
H
A
D
Correct,
yes,
that
is,
that
is
the
effort
that
we're
we're
making
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
that,
of
course,
will
be
evaluated,
probably
within
the
first
year,
if,
if
it's
working
or
if
we
do
need
an
additional
staff
member
to
handle
that
we
do.
What
is
nice
is
that,
with
the
we
do
have
a
number
of
units
coming
online
right
now
that
are
rentals
and
those
won't
need
to
be
inspected
for
a
few
years.
So
it
may
be.
D
A
And
one
other
thing:
I'd
made
a
note:
the
I
see
that
one
line
was
dropped
from
the
original
proposal,
which
had
to
do
with
free
of
insect
and
rodent
infestation.
Is
that
covered
under
that
umbrella
statement?
Then,
as
far
as
I'm
thinking,
that's
a
health
to
me.
That
seems
like
that's
a
health
issue,
so
that
would
be
covered
under
that
that
if
they
see
infestation
they
would
be
able
to
handle
that
in
a
different
way.
D
Yeah,
so
the
the
challenge
with
that
particular
issue
is
and
what
we
have
seen
other
cities
that
are
initially
were
inspecting
for
that
they
ended
up
removing
that
from
their
list,
because
that
becomes
really
more
of
a
cleanliness
issue
than
a
structural
or
building
code
issue.
It
is
a
situation
where,
if
obviously
there's
a
hole
in
the
wall
and
that's
what's
what's
causing
rodents
to
come
in,
that
would
be
an
issue
that
would
need
to
be
addressed,
but
our
our
staff.
A
D
D
C
A
Right-
and
we
have
a
second
any
final
comments-
questions
seeing
none
can
we
have
the
roll
call.
Please.
H
C
A
I
All
right,
I'll
jump
right
in
if
you're,
following
along
in
your
packet,
I'm,
going
to
go
to
page
28
here.
So
in
our
Capital
Improvements
program,
we've
got
27
projects
spread
over
eight
categories.
Categories
are
facilities,
transportation,
planning,
Wastewater,
water,
storm
water
parks
and
economic
development
in
the
facilities
category.
It's
mostly
going
to
be
AC,
Replacements
roofs,
Paving,
maintaining
our
existing
buildings
under
the
transportation
category.
I
We've
got
a
few
big
projects
coming
down
the
pipe
there's.
The
north
Scott
Avenue
improvements,
much
anticipated
from
all
the
calls
we
get
regulatory
street
signs,
Route
58
in
Powell,
which
is
hopefully
going
to
alleviate
a
lot
of
congestion
over
there
at
the
58
and
I-49
area,
the
street
and
storm
water
preservation
program
and
the
street
reconstruction
and
overlay.
I
Under
the
planning
section,
we've
got
a
comprehensive
Plan
update.
The
last
comprehensive
plan
was
done
in
1992,
so
it's
probably
time
to
revisit
that
one
under
Wastewater.
It's
a
lot
of
general
maintenance
that
comes
up
from
year
to
year,
influent
infiltration
reduction
that
involves
lining
manholes
pipes,
preventing
groundwater
from
getting
into
our
system
and
overwhelming
it
causing
backups
and
other
issues
that
are
treatment.
Plant
stream
Bank
stabilization.
I
If
the
stream
erodes
around
a
sewer
line,
we
we
want
to
get
that
one
back
underground
so
that
we
don't
end
up
with
the
situation
where
that
gets
damaged.
Illicit
discharges
and
stuff
happen.
I
The
next
few
items
under
stormwater
are
projects
that
are
underway
right
now,
and
the
funds
shown
there
just
to
finish
those
out
and
then
there's
several
several
things
under
Parks,
which
went
to
the
parks
board
for
approval.
I
They've
got
some
things
that
high
blue
and
in
a
shade
structure
over
I
believe
in
Markey
Park
and
then
Economic
Development.
There's
some
money
set
aside
to
purchase
land
put
that
back
into
productive
use
and
I
think
that
pretty
much
rounds
out
the
CIP
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
Anyone
might
have.
A
H
C
D
We
will
have
a
meeting
next
month
on
Tuesday
April
4th.
That's
our
next
meeting.
We
will
have
a
public
two
public
hearings
that
evening
there
will
be
a
public
hearing
for
rezoning
and
a
preliminary
development
plan
for
U-Haul,
which
is
proposing
a
multi-story
indoor
climate
controlled
facility
in
Cornerstone,
Cornerstone
Point,
behind
Casey's
on
163rd
Street,
and
then
we'll
also
have
the
public
hearing
for
the
UDC
text.
Amendments
to
the
land
use
chapter
updates
that
I
provided
a
brief
update
on
at
the
last
meeting.
Okay
thank.
C
A
Now
I
will
say
that
after
our
meeting
the
last
time,
I
did
go
to
the
city
website
and
I
looked
at
the
what's
happening,
Belton
and
that
is
extremely
exciting,
because
I
don't
have
to
go
to
Facebook
anymore
and
say:
what's
this
thing,
that's
going
in
at
the
corner
of
171st
yeah,
I
I!
Don't
have
to
do
that
and
so
it's
it's
not
the
same,
but
I
appreciate
having
having
the
real
information
out
there
so
that
we
can
stay
informed
on
that
and
appreciate
all
staff's
work
in
in
making
that
happen
for
us.