►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
C
D
A
To
Second
Mr
Walton,
thank
you
are
there
any
corrections
updates
that
need
to
be
noted,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
of
approval,
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Thank
you.
That
motion
did
carry
first
item
of
business
this
evening,
then
or
second
item
would
be
our
non-public
hearing,
which
is
the
consideration
of
a
final
development
plan
for
the
other
place
located
at
the
southeast
corner
of
North,
Cedar
Street
and
Given
Avenue
for
the
property
addressed
as
311
North,
Cedar,
Street
and
director.
E
Thank
you,
chair
McPherson,
before
this
evening
is
a
request
for
a
final
development
plan
for
the
other
place,
which
is
a
proposed
Bar
and
Grill
Restaurant
to
be
located
near
the
southeast
corner
of
North
Cedar
Street
and
Given
Avenue
in
The
Crossroads
of
Belton
development
on
the
subject,
property,
Zone,
C2,
General
commercial,
which
permits
restaurant
and
bar
uses
by
right.
The
site
plan
includes
a
5150
square
foot
single
story,
building
with
outdoor
patio
on
the
North
half
of
the
property,
with
parking
on
the
south,
half
of
the
property.
E
The
final
development
plan
does
meet
all
of
the
development
standards
within
the
UDC,
with
the
exception
of
four
modifications
that
are
requested
with
the
development
plan.
That
includes
a
four
foot
reduction
in
the
front
setback
along
Given
Avenue
from
25
feet
to
21
feet,
and
this
would
accommodate
the
covered
patio
that
does
encroach
four
feet
into
that
25
foot
setback.
E
There
is
also
a
request
to
reduce
the
total
green
space
for
the
site
from
20
to
17.2
percent.
Also,
some
modifications
to
the
parking
stall
sizes
which
would
align
with
the
existing
saw
sizes
to
the
parking
lot
on
the
south
half
of
the
site
that
serves
the
inline
tenants
north
of
Price
Chopper,
and
then
a
request
for
one
additional
wall
sign
for
a
total
of
four
wall
signs
for
the
business
staff.
E
Athletes
of
these
requested
modifications
will
not
negatively
impact
surrounding
properties
and
does
meet
the
general
purpose
and
intent
of
the
UDC
for
The
General
commercial
zoning
District,
based
on
the
proposed
205
seat,
seating
capacity.
The
site
has
required
52
parking
spaces.
The
plan
provides
55
spaces,
however,
as
part
of
the
condition
staff
is
recommending
that
one
space
be
removed
in
the
first
row
of
parking
to
widen
the
stall
sizes
to
nine
feet,
rather
than
eight
feet
to
better
accommodate
the
parking,
particularly
the
Ada
spaces.
In
that
first
row,.
E
I'm,
a
conceptual
landscape
or
a
final
landscape
plan
has
been
provided
in
the
packet
on
page
28,
which
does
provide
a
mix
of
trees,
Evergreens
and
deciduous
shrubs,
as
well
as
ornamental
grasses.
Due
to
existing
and
proposed
utility
easements
on
the
north
and
east
side
of
the
building.
There
is
not
limited
space
for
trees.
Additional
shrubs
have
been
added
in
lieu
of
trees
in
those
locations.
E
E
This
top
elevation
here
is
the
north
elevation,
which
is
what
would
face
Given
Avenue.
Everything
under
this
area
here
is
the
covered
patio.
The
main
entrance
would
face
there's
the
South
elevation,
which
would
face
the
internal
parking
lot
as
part
of
the
inline
shops
next
to
Price
Chopper.
E
E
The
East
facade
of
the
building
will
serve
as
the
service
area
for
the
building
and
will
also
contain
the
trash
enclosures
for
the
dumpsters,
with
a
gate
at
the
service
entrance
Drive,
the
site
does
include
foreground
mounted
light
poles
in
the
parking
lots,
two
of
which
already
exist
and
two
which
have
two
will
be
new
lighting
spillover
is
greater
than
one
foot
candle
at
the
property
lines
along
the
interior
lot
lines
which
include
shared
access
drives
and
parking
areas
for
the
shopping
center.
E
That
spillover
does
exceed
the
maximum
of
one
foot
candle
up
the
property
line.
However,
staff
does
believe
that
the
intent
of
the
outdoor
lighting
standards
have
been
met
by
providing
adequate
lighting
within
the
shopping
center
without
negatively
impacting
nearby
Residential
Properties.
The
lighting
spillover
does
not
exceed
the
one
foot
candle
at
Given
Avenue
to
meet
that
requirement.
E
The
building
elevations
do
include
four
wall
signs,
as
I
previously
mentioned.
However,
that
is
one
additional
sign
beyond
what
code
allows.
However,
none
of
the
signs
do
exceed
the
10
percent
wall
coverage.
There
is
also
the
option
of
a
monument
sign
in
the
future
if
the
applicant
does
decide
to
provide
that
staff
believes
that
the
findings
of
fact
for
the
development
plan,
as
well
as
the
review
criteria
for
the
modifications
for
development
standards
and
signage,
have
been
met.
E
D
Yeah
I
got
a
couple.
Well,
the
fourth
wall
sign
is
going
to
be
on
the
east
side,
then.
Is
that
why
it's
not
on
the
drawing.
E
D
E
The
first
all
of
these
rows
of
parking
are
new
just
below
the
the
boundary
here
is
where
there's
existing
parking
so
they're
just
mirroring
that
as
they're
moving
north
of
water
of
those
I
believe
that
they
are
nine
feet
wide
I
believe
they
might
be
less
than
20
foot
deep,
which
is
what
the
code
requires.
Oh
so,
they're,
less
so
I
think
the
width
on
those
meets
the
requirement.
It's
the
depth.
That
is
a
little
bit
shallower.
D
Okay,
if
it
wasn't
the
with
the
width,
was
the
problem
that
they
could
take.
Those
middle
two
take
two
lots
out
of
that
and
make
it
wider
further
up
that
middle
section
yeah.
You
could
yeah
two
lots
of
two
spots
out
of
that.
If,
if
the
width
was
a
problem
but
that
ain't
problem
yeah,
that's
all
I
had.
A
F
At
one
time
we
had
pickleball
courts
shown
just
to
the
east
of
this
lot,
which
would
be
to
the
right
of
the
sheet
and
which
is
a
long
given
and
north
of
the
existing
strip.
There's
a
undeveloped
area
there.
The
operator
the
other
place
at
this
time
does
not
find
those
financially
viable
and
they
don't.
F
F
Yes,
if
absolutely
if
Mouse
at
the
time,
sure
first
off
I'd
like
to
commend
staff,
this
is
a
difficult,
existing,
relatively
narrow
property.
It's
kind
of
a
trailer
house,
it's
long
and
narrow
and
needling
a
project
of
this
size
into
that
width
has
has
been
a
little
difficult
and,
as
Matt
pointed
out,
the
north
end
of
that
property
is
just
full
of
utilities
and
we're
having
to
bring
some
more
in
across
from
given
to
get
the
domestic
and
Fire
Protection
water.
F
And
so
this
has
been
a
little
bit
of
a
challenge
for
all
of
us,
but
staff
was
really
flexible
and
and
at
the
same
time
protecting
the
interests
so
I'd
like
to
start.
There
I
think
the
the
only
comment
that
we
would
have
and
and
item
that
we'd
like
to
have
considered
the
only
parking
stalls
that
are
shown
as
eight
feet
wide
are
the
disabled
parking
stalls
on
that
North
row.
That's
closest
to
the
building.
All
of
the
standard
parking
stalls
are
nine
feet.
F
We
have
an
ADA
Compliant,
eight
foot
width
on
the
disabled,
aisles
and
the
disabled
parking
stalls
there
and
we'd
like
to
we'd
like
to
leave
that
at
eight
feet.
Otherwise
we're
going
to
lose
a
parking
stall
there,
as
I'm
sure
you're,
aware
in
restaurants,
and
especially
ones
that
have
a
bar
presence
parking,
can
be
really
critical
and
especially
close
to
the
building.
So
we'd
really
like
to
not
lose
a
parking
stall.
I
think
we're
certainly
accommodating
the
disabled
everywhere
in
the
world.
F
E
The
minimum
Ada
standard
nationally
is
eight
feet
wide.
Our
code
does
require
nine
feet.
Staff's
thought
was
just
making
sure
that
the
Ada
space
was
equal
to
the
standard
spot.
However,
if
the
Planning
Commission
does
not
think
that
that
is
necessary,
you
could
make
a
recommendation
to
strike
condition
number
three
from
the
recommendation
from
staff.
C
Right
there
is
a
lot
of
other
parking
in
this
area
and
I
realize
that
those
are
those
are
as
required
for
the
existing
businesses
that
are
there,
but
I,
don't
know
if
anybody's
ever
driven
by
there,
I
I
guarantee
they're,
never
full.
So
there
is
amp
not
not
to
not
to
alter
the
this
gentleman's
concern
about
that,
but
there's
plenty
of
parking
in
that
area.
A
F
The
entire
development
has
full
cross
access,
meaning,
as
the
city
manager
pointed
out,
at
what
the
current
tenant
lineup
in
the
inline
there's.
Certainly
plenty
of
parking
there
to
be
shared.
Obviously
over
time
is
more
development
happens
on
that
North,
End
and
and
in
the
event
the
users
change.
Then
the
parking
demands
can
alter
over
time,
and
you
know
you
obviously
address
those
with
each
new
development
plan,
but
for
the
current
situation,
I
think
there's
more
than
enough
parking
to
be
sure.
A
F
Developer
has
brought
several
new
tenants
recently
there's
they
brought
a
frozen
yogurt
right,
Allstate
Insurance,
which
doesn't
generate
a
lot
for
the
CID
and
then
the
medical,
marijuana,
dispensary
and
the
other
place
and
there's
some
there's
some
other
Earnest
prospects
so
coming
out
of
the
whatever
you
want
to
call
the
flu
nonsense
of
the
last
three
years.
That's
that's
a
pretty
good
accomplishment,
you're,
not
seeing
a
lot
of
brick
and
mortar
infill.
A
I
know,
I,
have
seen
and
heard
a
number
of
comments
asking,
because
people
like
on
social
media
they've
seen
the
sign
and
it's
like
when
is
it
coming?
Where's
it
going
to
be
and
and
I
know
that
there
had
originally
been
talk
of
maybe
moving
into
one
of
the
existing
spaces.
I
think.
F
The
end
cap
of
the
inline
we
were
within
two
weeks
of
submitting
for
building
permit
the
drawings
were
virtually
done
and
the
medical
marijuana
dispensary
group
had
been
unable
to
find
a
home
and
they
were
going
to
lose
their
license
for
Belton
and
Belton,
wouldn't
have
gotten
another
license.
It
would
just
evaporate.
F
A
And
is
there
a
second
that,
let
me
clarify
that
includes
striking
the
space
change
for.
A
So
the
recommendations
would
have
included
the
additional
signage,
the
changing
from
eight
foot
to
nine
foot
and
we're
striking
that
requirement
of
of
doing
the
eight
to
nine,
which
I
think
was
part.
What
three
yeah.
A
So
we
can
make
sure
and
get
that
clear
in
the
in
the
recording
of
what
we
are
doing.
A
D
A
E
You
and
and
I
will
note
that
condition
number
six
on
there
was
related
to
three,
so
six
is
automatically
removed
as
well
from
that
list
of
conditions.
Okay,.
A
E
Yep,
thank
you
chair
before
you
this
evening
are
several
code
amendments,
most
of
which
are
to
bring
the
code
into
compliance
with
Missouri
State
statutes.
The
first
section
of
the
amendments
are
to
articles
5
and
6
in
Chapter,
2
of
the
UDC
for
the
board
of
zoning
adjustment
and
the
Planning
Commission.
E
E
For
Board
of
adjustment,
oh
board,
yeah
Board
of
adjustment
has
five
members
yeah
I'm,
that's
right.
Sorry,
my
for
Planning
Commission,
which
was
the
original
purpose
of
the
Amendments
this
evening,
was
to
remove
the
specific
date
referenced
in
the
code
for
meetings.
This
has
been
replaced
with
a
generic
statement
that
regular
and
special
meetings
will
be
connected
or
conducted,
but
without
a
specific
date
time
or
location,
to
allow
flexibility
and
scheduling.
E
Additional
amendments
include
adding
a
reference
to
the
secretary
position,
which
is
reference
in
State
Statute,
and
that
secretary
position
serves
as
the
vice
chair.
There
is
also
the
addition
that
a
public
hearing
is
required
prior
to
removal
of
any
citizen
member
if
they're
non-voluntarily
removed
and
the
last
amendment
is
a
full
replacement
of
the
powers
and
duties
of
the
Planning
Commission.
Currently
the
list
is
quite
lengthy
and
the
redline
version
has
been
provided
in
the
packet
on
page
52.
E
The
reason
for
redoing,
that
is,
to
specifically
reference
State
statutes
on
the
powers
and
duties
of
the
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
provide
a
more
succinct
reference
to
appendix
B
in
the
UDC,
which
does
outline
all
the
planning
applications
that
the
commission
does
review
and
what
what
that
does
is
having
this
section
more
narrowly
tailored,
does
allow
that,
when
State
statutes
or
appendix
be
in
the
code
are
updated.
That
this
section
also
does
not
need
to
be
amended.
E
The
next
section
is
related
to
window
signage,
which
is
currently
not
addressed
in
the
code,
and
there
is
no
clear
guidance
on
how
it
should
be
regulated.
The
new
section
and
the
sign
code
would
add
a
definition
as
well
as
location,
size
and
design
standards
for
exterior
signage,
exterior
signage
will
require
a
signed
permit,
while
interior
window
signage
is
exempt
from
regulations
and
permitting,
which
is
currently
the
case.
Staff
is
proposing
that
Windows
sign
is
be
allowed
to
cover
up
to
50
percent
of
transparent
windows
and
doors
for
non-residential
buildings.
E
Those
statutes
have
been
included
in
the
packet
for
reference.
Due
to
the
number
of
revisions
needed
staff
is
recommending
a
complete
replacement
of
section
40-4,
section
2,
which
is
the
residential
home
occupation.
E
Section
again,
due
to
the
number
of
changes,
a
red
line
version
has
been
included
in
the
packet
on
page
56
for
comparison
staff
arrived
at
these
conditions
that
we
believe
both
complies
with
the
intent
of
the
state
statutes,
while
which
is
to
provide
no
impact,
home-based
businesses,
the
ability
to
operate
with
minimal
regulation
or
oversight,
while
still
protecting
residential
neighborhoods
from
businesses
that
may
have
a
negative
impact
on
health
safety
in
certain
nuisances,
so
I'll
just
kind
of
go
over
the
highlights
of
where
there
are
significant
changes
for
the
commission
to
be
aware
of.
E
The
restriction
on
employees
and
clients
on
the
premises
has
been
updated
and
is
now
based
on
occupancy
limits
which
could
potentially
allow
more
employees
or
clients
on
the
premises
than
what
would
have
previously
been
allowed
in
the
past.
No
impact
home
occupations
or
home-based
businesses
are
not
required.
A
business
license,
however,
any
business
determined
to
be
of
impact,
but
still
allowed
or
a
day
care
center
that
has
required
a
state
license
is
required.
A
business
license.
E
The
list
of
Home
occupations
has
is
not
an
exhaustive
list
and
has
been
reduced
to
seven
General
businesses
that
in
the
past
have
been
treated
as
home
businesses
and
have
previously
been
allowed
in
the
code.
E
Public,
Health,
sanitation
and
safety
is
not
in
compliance
with
building
our
fire
code,
creates
substantial
traffic
or
generate
Solid
Waste
hazardous
waste
pollution
and
our
noise,
that
is
out
of
character
for
residential
property,
is
prohibited.
E
So
staff
believes
that
that
that
prohibited
section
gives
us
the
power
to
not
issue
a
business
license
or
pursue
any
kind
of
Code
Enforcement
needed
to
shut
down
a
business
that
is
illegally
operating
in.
That
is
not
in
compliance
with
these
provisions.
E
There
are
several
other
sections
that
do
need
to
be
amended
to
accommodate
the
changes
for
home
occupations,
and
that
does
include
revisions
to
the
definitions
for
home
occupation,
day
care
center
and
home
occupation.
Signs
that
does
include
deleting
daycare
and
daycare
home
as
definitions
as
they
are
now
covered
by
the
revision
to
the
general
day
care
center
definition
So.
Currently,
we
have
three
different
definitions
for
daycares
and
we
are
combining
them
into
a
single
definition.
E
E
In
the
land
use
table,
we
are
striking
daycare
home
and
adding
day
care
center.
If
state
license
is
required,
which
is
generally
anything
any
home
day,
any
commercial
daycare
or
home
day
care
that
has
more
than
six
children.
Those
would
still
be
required
to
have
a
special
use
permit
that
would
come
through
the
Planning,
Commission
and
city
council
for
approval
under
home
occupations.
We
are
allowing
conditional
approval
in
C1,
C2
and
C3
commercial
zoning
districts.
E
The
final
section
is
related
to
the
sign
types
permitted:
we've
added
clarification
to
the
residential
district
signage.
The
current
sign
limits
on
there
apply
to
subdivision
entrances
and
amenities.
Only
home
occupations
would
be
limited
to
two
square
feet
of
wall
mounted
sign
with
no
illumination.
E
Staff
does
believe
that
these
UDC
tax
amendments
provide
clarifications
and
modifications
to
address
the
state
statutes,
as
well
as
common
Planning
and
Zoning
issues
and
staff
recommends.
Approval
of
these
tax
amendments
and
I
will
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
E
There
would
still
the
nuisance
regulations
would
still
apply,
so
that
would
include
outdoor
storage,
commercial
vehicles.
This
doesn't
open
up
the
ability
for
commercial
vehicles
that
currently
aren't
permitted
to
still
operate
or
be
stored
in
Residential
Properties,
so
those
types
of
businesses
would
would
still
likely
fall
under
the
prohit
would
be
under
the
prohibited
list
based
on
the
nuisance
regulations
and
other
codes.
We
already
have
adopted.
A
A
I'm,
sorry,
is
there
anyone
here?
Thank
you
mayor.
A
Anyone
here
that
would
like
to
speak
either
in
favor
or
in
opposition
I
had
the
list
and
nobody's
name
had
nobody
had
signed
up
on
it
and
I
I
forgot
that
we
were
we're
at
that
point
asked
once
again
any
anyone
to
speak
in
favor
or
in
opposition.
A
Then
we
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
again
for
the
commission,
any
comments
or
motions.
C
A
A
D
A
D
The
next
item,
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
postponed
this
tool-
okay
at
least
the
next
meeting.
If
not
the
meeting
after
very
good
I
understand.
A
C
D
A
A
Thank
you,
and
just
for
public
knowledge.
We
did
make
a
mistake
in
our
meeting
a
month
ago
and
the
mayor
was
elected
as
the
vice
chair
and
none
of
us
caught
the
fact
that
that
we
are
not
supposed
to.
Let
him
do
that,
and
so
I
appreciate
that
mayor,
and
we
will
definitely
move
that
to
our
as
long
as.
D
A
A
A
E
If
we
did
put
this
together
for
the
commission
for
your
review
and
approval,
so
this
is
the
2023
schedule
which
does
start
in
January
with
that
we
have
the
Tuesday
meeting
dates
starting
in
January
and
there's
only
a
few
dates.
There's
one
date
that
will
be
on
a
Wednesday
meeting,
because
4th
of
July
is
on
a
Tuesday.
So
we
have
made
that
the
Wednesday
after
4th
of
July,
rather
than
canceling
that
meeting
there
are
a
few
other
internal
deadline,
dates.
A
Any
questions
on
the
schedule
for
2023
the
director.
A
C
E
Yeah
for
the
next
meeting
we
have
scheduled
for
Monday
November
21st.
We
do
not
have
any
agenda
items
so
that
meeting
will
be
canceled.
The
next
meeting
will
be
Monday
December
5th.
We
will
have
at
least
one
item
for
the
partial
vacation
of
Street
right-of-way
in
the
downtown
area,
and
then
there
is
a
tomorrow
is
election
day.
There
is
recreational
marijuana
that
is
on
the
ballot.
If
that
is
passed
by
Missouri
voters,
we
will
likely
have
some
code
amendments
related
to
that.
E
If
passed,
there's
a
pretty
quick
turnaround
time
that
the
state
has
given
medical
marijuana,
dispensaries
the
opportunity
to
apply
and
be
approved
for
recreational
marijuana
facilities.
So
that
is
something
that
our
code
will
have
to
address
pretty
quickly,
so
that
we
will
likely
get
that
before
the
next
meeting
to
get
that
completed
in
December.
A
We
don't
have
Mr
McDonough
here
tonight,
so
someone
want
to
take
his
place.
Make.