►
From YouTube: Council Meeting | 22 July 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
the
traditional
custodians
of
this
land
and
pay
my
respects
to
their
elders
and
the
others
from
other
communities
who
may
be
here
today.
I
would
also
like
to
acknowledge
all
other
people
who
have
contributed
to
the
rich
diversity
of
this
country.
Are
there
any
apologies?
Thank
you
can
I.
Please
have
confirmation
of
the
minutes
of
the
previous
meeting
hold
on
the
17th
of
June
cancel
first,
second
councilor
Davis,
all
in
favor
that's
passed.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
governance
at
our
meeting.
A
B
C
A
C
Firstly,
on
behalf
of
Jodi,
oh
and
Katie,
Kelly,
Jack
and
Joon's
daughters.
Please
accept
their
apology-
have
not
been
in
attendance
at
the
meeting
last
many
in
June,
however,
in
their
defense
they
had
been
advised.
It
was
a
zoom
meeting
only
and
did
not
receive
advice
that
they
could
attend
until
the
morning
of
the
meeting.
C
C
My
name
is
Vicki
Dawson
I'm,
the
accountant
for
the
estate
of
Jack
Lew,
who
is
one
of
the
owners
of
the
land
involved
in
the
kill,
fair
road
subdivision.
The
purpose
of
my
submission
is
to
provide
some
background
to
the
land
holders.
The
land
subject
to
the
subdivision
being
discussed
tonight,
is
a
portion
of
the
land
jack
lil,
inherited
from
his
father
Victor
in
June
of
1953.
C
Excuse
me,
the
land
joke
inheritor
was
again
a
portion
of
the
land,
his
father
inherited
from
his
father
Willis,
who,
in
turn
and
heard
of
his
father
William
the
little
family
emigrated
from
Pomona
County
in
Ireland
and
settled
in
1846.
In
the
vanilla,
telling
districts
William,
the
pioneer
of
the
family
is
known
to
produce
the
first
non-indigenous
child
born
that
child
was
a
son
well
willis.
C
After
inheriting
the
land,
Jack
continued
the
family
farming
business
with
his
wife
Jane
until
retirement
both
Jack
and
Germer,
independently,
well
known
a
successful
business
entrepreneurs
in
their
own
right
and
well
respected
citizens
and
philanthropists
at
the
valoran
district,
since
his
inheritance
checks
from
time
to
time,
sawed
off
various
parcels
of
land
as
he
entered
his
senior
years.
However,
the
first
is
beau
as
well
as
30,
odd
acres,
compulsorily
acquired
to
establish
the
channel
system
that
was
connected
to
lighten
County
1968.
In
addition,
another
20
odd
acres
was
acquired
for
the
township.
C
There
was
temporarily
built
to
house
that,
where
force
required
for
this
project,
his
Township
was
like
Kate
and
uncle
Farrow
between
the
prison
freeway
in
the
channel
on
completion.
The
government
offered
and
Jack
bought
the
Township
land
following
this.
Land
was
compulsorily
across,
became
freeway
project
in
the
1980s
and
over
the
years.
Man
was
also
compulsorily
cried
for
government
roads
reserves,
and
these
must
be
utilities
such
as
electricity
and
water.
Excuse
me,
in
the
1970s,
a
vanilla
councils,
Local
Planning
Department,
approached
jokes.
There
was
a
shortage
of
land
for
required
for
urban
expansion.
C
Consequently,
Jackson
subdivided
the
land
now
known
as
the
Willis
dual
subdivision,
providing
sixteen
five
acre
blocks.
This
is
the
only
subdivision,
Jack
complete
in
any
socket
on
the
land.
He
inherited
encompass
the
area
from
the
corner
of
Samaria
Road,
all
the
way
to
home
screen
and
the
corner
of
compare
wrote
away.
The
channel.
Well,
though,
his
forebears
are
in
land,
far
beyond
Jack
saw
various
pulses
rant
about
the
parties,
including
that
the
developers
that
built
the
short
rock
estate
and
the
developers
have
built.
The
river
gonna
sustain
the
subdivision
on
this
discussion
tonight.
C
A
C
So
there
was
never
again,
it
was
for
urban
expansion.
This
was
never
about
property
development,
regardless
of
people's
opinion.
There
are
various
reasons
as
to
why
this
subdivision
has
been
prolonged
for
a
decade.
In
half
there
was
a
period
due
to
the
age
and
health
of
June
and
then
Jack
when
they
considered
not
proceeding
with
it.
However,
Jack
decided
to
go
ahead
with
the
sole
purpose
of
creating
a
family
legacy,
with
the
intention
to
name
the
streets
and
reserves
in
memory
of
his
family
mandate.
C
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
countless
mayor's
staff
and
others
president,
really
like
the
opportunity
to
present
at
this
meeting
tonight
my
name's
Phil
spires
I'm,
representing
the
people
in
Willis
little
Drive.
They
put
a
submission
and
objection
to
the
council
regarding
this
development
late
in
February
of
this
year,
I'm
representing
these
people
and
have
no
cost
to
them,
because
I
strongly
believe
they
need
to
be
taken
seriously
and
be
heard.
I'm.
D
A
recently
retired
local
government
engineer
hold
a
Bachelor
of
engineering
diploma
of
engineering
and
qualifications
as
municipal
engineer
and
Municipal
Building
Surveyor,
my
career
spanned
47
years,
40
years
in
rural
and
regional
councils,
seven
years
in
a
consultancy
that
did
sub-divisional
developments
of
this
kind,
I
appreciate
it's
not
an
easy
job
for
councillors.
When
you're
making
decisions
on
developments
of
this
stars,
the
development
will
be
good
for
vanilla,
but
it
needs
to
be
done
properly
and
we're
taking
aboard
the
concerns
of
the
people
that
already
live
in
the
area.
D
There
are
a
number
of
issues
of
concern
from
the
residence
of
realists
it'll
dry,
but
the
critical
one
is
the
access
in
and
out
of
the
118
lot
development.
In
my
professional
opinion,
the
key
issue
is
and
must
be
addressed
as
you
must
have
direct
access
from
cure,
Ferry
Road
and
not
fire
Willis
little
Drive.
Why
the
existing
Willis
little
Drive
payment
was
never
intended
to
take
nearly
1,200
additional
vehicles
per
day
from
their
slots.
The
existing
kill,
Farah
Road
Willis
little
driving.
This
section
was
never
designed
to
take
the
additional
turning
movements.
D
Sure
you
can
strengthen
Willis
it'll
Drive
payment.
You
can
reconstruct
the
existing
intersection,
but
surely
it
makes
a
lot
more
sense
if
you
put
that
additional
cost
into
actually
having
direct
access
via
a
hundred
meter
long
road
that
could
go
into
the
subdivision,
as
I
said
before,
not
against
the
subdivision.
It'll
be
great
for
vanilla,
but
I
believe
it
must
be
done
properly.
D
Another
reason
why
he
wouldn't
have
it
out
of
Willis
little
dry,
because
she'd
creator,
D
snow,
a
bottleneck
and
just
imagine
if
118
Lots
and
there's
a
fire
I'm,
also
a
member
of
a
fire
brigade
but
and
everyone
trying
to
get
out
there,
not
only
all
the
people
out
of
the
new
subdivision,
but
the
people
at
at
Willis
little
Drive.
So
it
makes
common
sense
to
have
access
of
cure
Farah
Road
by
itself.
D
I
can
assure
you
all
that,
through
my
experience
and
working
with
developers
over
the
years
that
most
developers
are
concerned
about
every
seat,
that
I
have
the
spent
to
make
successful
developer
counselors
the
balances
really
you've
got
to
decide
between
good
development
with
high
standards
and
one
that
just
maximizes
profits.
So
that's
what
you
must
consider
Phil.
D
Long
road
might
sound
a
lot
of
money,
but
when
you
work
it
out
on
the
total
cost
and
what
you
would
actually
get
reimbursed
with
a
hundred
and
eighteen
loss
and
the
cost
of
actually
doing
all
infrastructure,
it
represents
an
additional
two
to
four
percent.
Oh
sorry,
yeah
off
off
the
profits.
So
it's
not
a
big
deal.
The
rest
of
it.
I've
had
a
bit
of
a
look
at
the
agenda.
E
D
E
D
F
Wise
for
your
presentation
and
with
your
experience
in
local
government
when
planning
when
you
were
asked
that
these
types
of
develops
to
be
put
in
front
of
you
and
then
obviously
make
recommendations
to
your
council
when
you
put
it
out
to
the
authorities
such
as
see
if
a
VicRoads
don't
Poznan,
which
we
have
which
we
always
have
to,
and
they
all
come
back
with
no
objections.
Some
with
some
with
conditions
which
are
then
put
as
part
of
the
conditions.
D
Your
question:
they
just
have
their
pliant
things
like
you,
sent
it
off
to
the
CFA.
That
makes
sure
that
every
90
metres
is
a
fireplug
or
whatever.
What
the
council
engineers
do.
Is
they
look
at
the
infrastructure,
design
manual?
There's
guidelines
in
that
as
to
what
things
you
take
into
consideration
and
one
of
the
first
things
you
do.
Is
you
look
at
the
impact
on
the
existing
people
at
adjacent?
And
yes,
so
you
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
there.
As
far
as
the
authorities
go,
they
don't
look
at
those
things.
A
F
I
could
have
another
question
thinking,
madam
chair,
with
regards
to
your
sketch,
you
mentioned
for
an
alternative
entrance
off,
kill
fair
road
into
this
development,
so
you're,
suggesting
that
there
be
no
access
to
this
development
from
Willis
little
drop.
That's
what
I'm
suggesting
yes
so
you're,
suggesting
that
we
have
one
Road
in
one
Road
out
onto
a
bend
on,
kill,
Fair,
Road.
D
Not
onto
the
bed,
no,
no,
as
I
said
before
councillor
I
said,
it
was
to
be
positioned,
half
way
between
the
tangent
on
the
bank,
the
tangents,
where
the
curve
goes
from
the
strike
and
Willis
little
Drive,
there's
heaps
of
room
to
put
it
there
and
you'd
have
a
wide
enough
road
reserves
that
you
would
have
the
road
with
the
correct
width
that
could
take
two-way
traffic.
If
you
have
a
look
at
the
sketch,
sir
I
did
provide,
you
would
go
in
on
one
wide
road
and
the
alignment
of
the
subdivision.
F
It
was
some
concern
from
last
time
left
on
the
table
with
regards
to
it:
yes,
the
case
of
an
emergency,
the
emergency
vehicles
and
so
forth.
When
only
had
one
Road
in
one
Road
out
and
I.
Think
part
of
this
project
has
the
two
roads
into
the
project,
both
of
Willis
little
trollop,
so
you're
still
maintained
with
your
experience
that
one
road
into
a
and
one
Road
out
is
acceptable.
F
D
I
didn't
show
Neela
SH
at
one
stage,
the
an
alternative
to
put
one
in
and
one
out
or
yeah
to
access,
but
I
think
that's
a
bit
onerous
on
the
developer,
so
yeah,
that's
in
effect
just
in
rough
figures,
maybe
$200,000,
but
certainly
one
Road
in
one
Road
out
of
the
correct
width
to
take
that
volume
of
traffic
in
my
professional
opinion
would
be
sufficient.
Thank
you
very
much
are.
G
D
Thanks
counselor
for
that
question:
yeah,
that's
certainly
not
what
I
would
recommend
if
it
came
over
my
table
with
the
engineer.
I,
certainly
wouldn't
I
think
the
subdivisions
got
a
stand
on
its
own
to
face
and
habits
own
access,
not
only
the
sparse
traffic
engineering
wise,
but
ethically
you
don't
generally
tack
roads
onto
existing
ones.
I
know
Willis
little
drivers
been
there
for
probably
50
years,
40
or
50
years,
and
Road
pavements
designed
then
were
pretty
thin
compared
to
what
we
designed
them
now.
G
D
D
I
did
say
that
in
in
the
notes
there
before
you
might
as
well
put
your
money
into
having
a
proper
independent
one
where
you
actually
have
a
properly
design
I'd
intersection
to
take
your
with
1,200
1,100
NATO
in
vehicles
per
day,
because
the
infrastructure
manual
quotes
10
vehicles
per
day
generated
from
one
lot
and
and
you
do
it
properly,
that's
what
I'm
saying
the
existing
realist
little
Drive
intersection
was
never
designed
to
take
that
nor
the
road
pavement.
Thank
you.
A
B
B
But
since
the
year
2000,
the
big
fires
have
become
much
more
frequent
and
in
our
area
round
panella
we've
had
the
2003
for
fires
that
started
the
ITAT
on
and
when
south
had
told
me
and
then
over
the
ranges
into
the
edge
of
Gippsland
in
2006.
Seven
lightning
strike
near
Mali.
All
WA
caused
an
even
larger
fire
that
moved
over
the
mountains
again
and
joined
up
with
the
Gippsland
fires
that
were
also
you
know
happening
in
that
year.
B
E
Thank
you,
sir
fee
presentation
this
evening.
I
guess
the
messaging
we
viewing
tonight
is
now,
as
opposed
to
the
subdivision.
They're
just
account
format
whether
concern
for
emergency
management,
I,
guess
the
axis
of
the
CFI
big
pole,
Ambulance,
Victoria,
etc,
and
to
either
get
in
or
get
out.
Would
that
be
a
fair
coin?
Yes,
okay,
thanks
is
are.
B
H
Good
evening,
counselors
and
executive
offices
we're
neighbors
to
the
119
lot
subdivision
and
I
presented
at
the
previous
council
planning,
meeting,
I,
repeat
two
counselors
and
cancel
that
you
should
defer
making
a
decision
tonight.
True,
the
strategic
analysis
is
needed
to
be
undertaken
regarding
a
diamond
interchange.
It
would
be
wonderful
to
have
a
forum
to
discuss
this
exciting
opportunity
that
will
otherwise
be
lost
forever,
without
due
consideration.
I
believe
that
it
would
be
beneficial
to
have
a
forum
for
all
the
parties
being
ourselves.
The
applicants
to
the
subdivision.
H
H
I
Think
you
better
change
and
counsel.
Let's
think
it's
the
opportunity.
The
gloating
Club
began
its
operations
in
banaue
in
1952,
it's
the
largest
user
of
the
aerodrome,
some
200
members
40
planes
and
up
to
80
club
and
private
gliders
during
the
peak
season
which
is
October
to
November.
It's
not
unusual
to
see
50
like
50
glider
movements
per
day
on
any
particular
runway,
and,
of
course
we
are
talking
about
the
one
seven
left
runway
that
goes
right
out
of
the
top
of
this
proposed
development.
I
I
I
The
application
contemplates
removing
this
valuable
safety
buffer
by
construction
of
these
homes
in
this
estate.
Govt
is
concerned
that
removing
any
safety
buffer
and
construction
of
so
many
residential
lots
in
such
close
proximity
to
the
airport,
in
line
with
the
north-south
flight
path,
would
create
a
safety
risk
lonoa
to
its
members,
but
to
the
residents
of
those
lots
are
removing
vacant
land
which
could
be
used
and
has
been
used
in
emergencies.
I
Gcv
accepts
that
residential
development
in
vanilla
is
inevitable
and
in
fact,
we
encourage
and
we
support
what
we
consider
to
be
appropriate
residential
development
at
around
vanilla,
especially
as
an
increasing
number
of
our
members
are
relocating
to
the
town
to
enjoy
their
sport.
I
took
of
approximately
25%
of
our
members
that
now
live
in
vanilla.
We
are
just
guys
for
Melbourne.
I
However,
the
GCV
also
notes
that,
under
the
planning
scheme,
planning
has
to
recognize
the
need
for
as
far
as
practical
contributors
contributed
to
the
must
contribute
towards
health,
well-being
and
safety
in
your
Clause
11,
based
on
GCS
understanding
the
application.
The
GCV
is
concerned
that
the
application
at
present
does
not
meet
that
requirement.
She
sees
these
position
is
that
a
safety
concerns
will
be
mitigated
by
a
clean,
clear
strip,
green
strip
of
land,
to
served
to
the
east
of
Willis
little
drivin
north-south
direction.
I
And,
lastly,
the
noise
I've
spoken
about
the
noise
complaints
before
this
will
impact
never
negatively
on
the
GCV
will
have
publicity
issues
will
be.
We
could
be
be
imposed,
a
noise
abatement
procedures
for
the
runway,
which
would
again
compromise
our
safety
and
that
of
the
residents
GCV
request
council
to
ensure
that
every
application
is
approved,
that
the
respective
residents
are
fully
aware
of
the
likelihood
of
aircraft.
I
Noise
and
I
can
tell
you
that
noise
that
the
aircraft
boundaries
over
90
decibels
per
tug
taking
off,
and
these
are
low-flying
aircraft
over
this
house,
but
these
houses
should
I,
say
I.
Also
in
closing,
I
noticed
that
on
tonight's
meeting
the
notes
issued
that
the
land
is
situated
and
the
subdivision
meets
all
requirements
associated
over
length.
There
is
no
requirement
in
the
planning
scheme
to
provide
buffers
for
the
aerodrome
I
urge
you
I
urge
you
to
do
so.
Thank
you
very
much
for
you.
F
I
Well,
that
was
on
the
plane,
and
that
was
also
part
of
the
notes
of
this
evening.
I
was
suggesting
that
a
section
once
that
a
section
32
overlay
of
noise
would
be
the
way
to
go,
but
I
was
told
by
the
town
planners
after
that
matter
was
raised
by
myself.
That,
in
fact,
that's
not
possible.
That's
done
at
a
later
stage
of
the
sale
of
the
property,
but
I
can't
see
why
you
cannot
do
that.
I
I
It's
disturbing
me
because
I
know
the
amenity
that
they
will
lose
with
a
section
32
overlay,
which
probably
can't
be
done,
but
I
understand
that
as
a
housing,
buyer
I
bought
my
house
in
vanilla
and
there
were
flood
overlays
and
there
were
all
sorts
of
overlays.
We
need
a
noise
overlay
for
the
airport.
F
I
Not
and
there's
not
as
I
described
to
you
last
meeting
when
we
take
off
towards
the
west
on
our
grass
runway,
which
is
next
door
to
that
main
bitumen
strip
to
the
north
of
that
street.
We
turn
prior
to
the
housing
and
vanila
other
aircraft
fly
over
the
top
because
they
they
they
can't
turn
they're
not
supposed
to
they're
supposed
to
get
to
500
feet
and
then
do
they
turn
away.
I
We
have
a
special
dispensation
to
turn
our
tugs
and
gliders
away
from
town
at
250
feet,
and
we
do
that
to
protect
that
section
of
vanilla,
we're
very
close
there
to
the
aerodrome.
This
is
a
lot
closer.
This
is
right
there
and
stage
one
and
two
is
right
where
we
would
need
to
be
and
also
see,
there's
thirteen
percent
been
allocated
to
open
areas.
It's
insufficient
in
the
event
of
an
emergency.
Look
what
happened
in
Essendon
with
that
kingi
and
that
went
into
the
buildings
if
those
buildings
weren't
there.
I
Those
five
people
may
well
will
be
alive
today
because
they
would
have
landed
on
the
grass.
Please
don't
take
away
the
opportunity
for
us
as
aviators,
and
it's
not
just
gliding
Club
over
and
is
this
a
lot
of
other
people
use
the
runways
as
well
to
have
that
opportunity.
If
the
thing
costs
and
I've
got
nowhere
to
go,
please
give
me
somewhere
to
go.
J
J
I
By
the
decibel
meter
makes
no
more
noise
than
the
others
I've
measured.
It
I
think
because
of
the
eight
people
hear
it
differently,
but
I've
measured
it
time
and
time
and
time
again
it's
between
92
and
96
decibels.
During
the
world
competitions
we
took
off
to
the
left
over
her
window
and
I
had
a
person
standing
on
the
apron
with
a
DB
meter,
the
vase
made
no
more
noise
than
the
lycoming
engines.
In
fact,
the
lycoming
engines,
with
a
two
blade
propeller,
make
more
noise
than
the
v8
engines.
Do.
K
Yeah,
thank
you,
Robert.
The
one.
Seven
three
agreements
far
as
I'm
concerned
will
cover
the
noise
issue
because
people
that's
on
their
title,
so
they'll
be
aware
before
they
buy
the
block
of
land
at
any
stage
that
there's
an
aerodrome
next
door.
There's
planes
flying
over
the
top
is
the
hell
of
a
lot
of
noise.
If
you
want
to
buy
the
house
so
be
it
and
I,
don't
think
we
can
be
any
clearer
in
a
173
agreement
than
that,
but
getting
back
to
the
safety
very
large
area
of
clear
and
to
the
South
I
haven't.
I
K
I
I
That
close
to
an
aerodrome,
that's
my
submission,
sir.
You
know
if
you've
made
some
provision.
Thank
you
I
think
you
ought
for
making
that
provision
and
for
listening
to
what
the
gliding
Club
says
in
what
I'm
saying
myself
personally,
but
as
a
tuk
pilot
who
goes
over
there
all
the
time
up
to
20
times
a
day,
I'm
look
I'm
listening
to
my
engine
like
crazy,
you
know,
saying:
don't
cough
now,
don't
cough
there!
M
A
Just
just
since
Paul's
name
was
put
down
who
you
both
be
speaking,
or
will
it
just
be.
A
M
Answer
some
questions
result
it's
after
presentation.
Okay,
thank
you.
You
know
me
sorry,
counselor,
on
Tolliver's,
okay,
thank
you
all
right.
Firstly,
thanks
for
you
need
to
make
a
short
presentation
and
apologies
for
not
taking.
The
last
meeting
was,
as
explained,
was
chewed
a
bit
of
a
mix-up,
so
we're
the
consultants
to
the
little
family.
M
We've
been
involved
in
this
proposal
since
2015
and
the
plan
application
was
launched
in
2018,
so
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
done
over
the
years
to
get
it
to
where
it
is
now,
we're
very
grateful
these
systems
we've
had
from
council
offices
and
also
from
council
and
the
support
which
has
some
council
this
far
thus
far.
So
the
the
proposal-
cats,
total
of
117,
low-density,
residential
lots
of
2,000
square
meters
in
area
or
more
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
zone
and
the
schedules
and
the
overlays
there's
an
elder.
M
We
provide
a
lot
of
additional
information
to
the
process
by
way
of
the
cultural
heritage,
management
plan.
Traffic
and
transport
assessment
also
referred
to
as
a
traffic
impact
assessment
in
the
officer
report,
a
stormwater
management
strategy
and
a
freeway
traffic
noise
intrusion
assessment.
So
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
over
the
years.
We've
also
modified
the
the
proposal
to
take
into
account
additional
information.
That's
come
to
light
over
the
time
as
a
result
of
these
requests
for
further
information
from
the
council,
and
it
was
resolved.
M
These
reports
that
we've
undertaken
I
haven't
previously
provided
information
to
the
council.
In
response
to
some
of
the
objections
and
some
of
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
and
the
main
ones
and
I'll
just
summarize
these
quickly
the
Wills
little
drive
and
comfy
Road
intersection,
we
have
provided
details
of
the
upgrading
of
will,
sell,
drive
and
the
intersection
in
regards
to
the
traffic
and
transport
assessment
and
the
peer
review
that
council
organized
for
that
assessment.
M
M
The
second
issue
was
the
kill,
fury
road
share
path,
and
we
did
provide
a
chef
path,
one
kill
for
a
road,
the
internal
road
treatment.
We
provided
some
amended
requirements
for
footpaths
and
traffic
coming
and
a
reversing
the
section
treatment
for
the
internal
intersections
vegetation
removal.
We've
addressed
internal
road,
a
buddy
in
the
public,
open
space
and
that's
been
relocated
to
avoid
a
large
treat
located
at
that
corner.
A
M
Did
nicely
time
this
when
I
wrote
it?
So
thank
you.
Fifthly,
stormwater
management.
We
have
reposition
the
retention
basin
in
the
corner
to
provide
a
better
site
drainage
solution
to
respond
to
the
DDO
1
requirements
for
the
area.
The
objective
concerns
the
officer's
report
provides
really
detailed
and
adequate.
We
consider
an
adequate
response
to
all
the
concerns
raised
and
I've
also
provided
additional
information
to
the
counselors,
but
summarize
from
that,
the
first
one
was
the
additional
road
access
to
kill,
fury
road.
M
The
reports
that
we
have
from
card
know
the
traffic
assessment
report
does
not
indicate
that
Wilson
Drive
is
going
to
be
compromised
by
the
additional
traffic.
If
we
do
the
additional
treatments
to
it,
so
we've
actually
proposing
to
do
some
right
and
left
turns
and
also,
as
I
said
before,
widening
up
will
still
drive
to
a
7.3
I
think
some
points
really
made
a
wide
carriageway
and
obviously
there'll
be
some
works
to
actually
strengthen
the
pavement
and
undertake
works
to
bring
it
to
a
current
standard.
M
The
other
point
to
make
is
that
the
council
officer's
report
supports
that
approach
and
also
does
not
support
the
addition
of
a
secondary
road
or
an
additional
row
mailing
to
to
the
effect
that
her
fury
road
is
a
main
around
and
such
additional
road
access
points
should
be
restricted
and
that's
covered
under
clause.
I
think
20
1.07
of
the
planning
scheme,
which
respects
the
number
of
additional
road
accesses,
and
there
I
probably
would
disagree
with
mr.
Squires
slightly.
M
M
This
subdivision
I,
said
before
it's
been
through
this
year
with
a
lot
of
authorities
and
no
authority
has
raised
in
the
issues
regarding
emergency
access.
There's
been
no
real
discussions
on
the
council
level
about
that.
Cfa
have
been
indicated
in
recent
discussions.
They
have
no
issues
with
the
with
the
road
layout
and
the
and
the
emergency
access
situation,
the
future
going
to
change.
Really
that
comes
down
to
this
no
strategic
braces
to
support
that
proposal.
M
The
land
is
appropriately
signed
for
the
development
and
there's
no
public
acquisition
overlay
in
place,
I
suppose
getting
to
the
summary
of
added
there's
no
such
easy
basis
or
planning
justification
for
Levin's
present
time,
nor
as
an
amenity
I,
don't
think.
We've
got
any
objection
to
the
use
of
any
appropriate
section.
1
7,
3
controls
as
detailed
down.
That
would
be
part
and
parcel
of
any
reasonable
subdivision
approach,
and
that
would
inform
potential
purchases
of
these
issues.
M
I
risk
I
noted
the
comments
of
the
previous
speakers
about
that,
but
we
haven't
been
made
aware
of
any
particular
forest.
There's
no
push
for
management
overlay
over
the
land
and
to
see
if
they
have
not
raised
any
enforcement
matters
during
the
subdivision
process.
We
wouldn't
maintain
that
the
development
lane
will
reduce
fuel
loads
in
the
area.
The
maintenance
of
the
public,
open
space
area
by
council
once
we
hand
it
over
to
them
or
decreases
the
risk
of
that
particular
area.
M
M
Last
one
emergency
aircraft
landing
issue-
we've
addressed
all
these-
is
in
the
penny-tee
related
to
the
DA
and
the
ddos
there
to
address
the
issues
associated
with
the
area,
so
we've
complied
with
all
those
requirements.
As
pointed
out
by
one
of
the
counselors,
the
proposal
already
provides
13%
of
the
total
area.
The
subdivision
is
public
open
space.
K
M
The
reason
for
the
staging
weren't
clear
to
me
to
be
honest
with
you
I
think
it
was
a
bit
of
a
drafting
glitch,
so
the
plan
that's
been
submitted
over
the
last
few
days.
Numbers
first
of
sixteen
is
identical
to
the
previous
plan.
That
was
being
the
version
11
plan
and
four
somehow
there
was
a
plan
submitted
in
the
interim,
which
I'm
not
sure
the
actual
origin
of
the
plan
or
I
know
where
it
came
from
from
my
office,
but
we're
not
exactly
sure
why
that
was
put
out.
M
M
M
M
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
pain
clinic
condition
in
their
lights.
At
this
point
in
time
in
which
we
would
be
anticipating
that
wouldn't
be
until
the
first
couple
stages
and
there
was
enough
traffic
there
to
actually
justify.
Obviously
it's
a
big
expense,
the
intersection
treatments
and
the
widening
and
the
other
matters.
We
would
would
see
that
depending.
N
N
M
M
M
It's
in
the
officer's
report
on
page
18
floors,
21:07
available
in
east
gable
advisors
to
restrict
the
number
of
access
points
to
main
roads
in
the
entryway
to
the
new
safety
Cooper
Road
is
a
road
zone
category
to
which
is
deemed
to
be
a
main
local
road
access
points
to
this
road
should
be
restricted,
which
has
been
achieved
by
the
applicant
with
this
proposal.
So
basically.
M
A
F
M
G
G
M
G
Reason
for
the
question
was
that
we
are
piggybacking
a
right
split
him
for
another
subdivision.
Ironically,
it
was
possibly
by
the
same
applicant.
That's
putting
this
one
email,
but
after
a
period
of
time,
I'm
led
to
believe
the
road
from
another
mission
goes
to
the
council
to
get
looked
after,
that's
right.
So
what
I'm
saying
is
in
good
faith?
Could
this
could
this
little
will
destroy
it?
If
this
is
the
answer
be
upgraded
from
day,
one
to
show
good
faith,
it
could
be
thank.
M
K
M
F
Yeah
mr.
Huxley,
with
regards
to
the
staging
of
justice,
done
account,
found
the
recommendation
or
the
number
22
is
Nellie.
She
just
said
stage:
4
is
when
you're
thinking
of
doing
the
works
on
the
road
and
intersection
by
my
calculation.
That's
35
blocks
that
you
will
have
built
and
you
will
have
also
built
part
of
the
road.
The
second
connection,
road
into
the
subdivision.
M
F
M
B
L
Thanks
Ben
appeared
from
Carolyn
Riccardi,
counselors
and
executive
officers.
Thank
you
for
reading
aloud
my
submission
tonight.
My
company
owns
land
which
adjoins
to
kill
Ferry
Road
overpass
and
Hume
freeway.
My
brother
Phillip
Murphy
made
his
submission
to
the
June
planning
meeting
on
the
17th
of
June
2020
I
wanted
to
elaborate
on
some
of
the
points
that
were
debated
at
the
meeting.
There
was
general
consensus
amongst
that
a
third
him
freeway
interchanges
needed
for
banana
City.
L
We
shouldn't
need
to
change,
happened
with
three
options:
our
one
Yarrawonga
Road
extended
along
the
existing
Pearson
Road
to
kill
Ferry
Road
three
Tatem
Road
in
our
opinion,
kill
Ferry
Road
stands
out
as
a
logical
place
to
establish
the
third
interchange
kill.
Ferry
Road
already
has
the
bridge
structure
in
place.
It
would
need
two
roundabouts
plus
four
on
off
ramps
to
be
constructed
there.
There
are
no
buildings
to
remove
no
creeks
or
streams
to
cross
an
era.
Walker
Road
extension
and
overpass
will
have
to
be
built
and
would
logically
be
only
half
a
diamond
interchange.
L
Further
logic
would
dictate
that
a
we
are
a
longer
road.
Interchange
is
probably
20
years
away
from
fruition
and
would
need
a
major
uptake
of
the
industrial
land
along
Yarrawonga
marine
and
links
roads
of
roads.
There's
also
many
kilometers
removed
from
the
city
center
of
banila.
At
a
toll,
road
we've
observed
that
for
an
interchange
there
there
it
appears
one.
A
number
of
bridges
are
required
to
cross
small
streams
to
significant
vegetation.
Removal
is
required.
Three
proximity
to
broken
River
and
Holland
Creek
in
event
of
major
flood
Tatem
Road
will
go
under
water.
L
Before
kill,
Ferry
Road
does
fall,
a
Jehovah's
Witness
church
would
likely
be
acquired.
Please
consider
two
final
points:
why
not
to
get
to
kill
for
a
road
from
the
banana
CBD?
It's
a
straight
line
from
the
banana
hospital,
so
ease
of
access
to
counsel
owns
land
at
southwest
corner
of
Airport
has
frontage
tomorrow,
Mauri
Mauri
until
Farah
Road
a
logical
inclusion
when
a
future
extension
to
the
town
boundary
from
all
that
it's
considered.
L
Surely
this
site
should
be
used
for
urban
development
rather
than
hay
cropping
approximately
35
hectares
that
vanilla
ratepayers
should
be
sharing
a
warden
of
uptake
in
venue.
Thank
you
once
again
for
the
opportunity
to
present
to
councillors
and
executive
officers.
I
made
the
decision
to
not
be
physically
here
to
reduce
the
potential
of
covert
19
coming
from
Melbourne
and
to
but
I.
Should
there
be
any
queries
about
this
submission?
My
brother
Phillip
is
able
to
assist
as
in
attendance
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much.
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair
president,
to
the
three-minute
chair
presenter,
the
Planning
and
Development
Committee,
the
planning
application
for
zoning
law
subdivision
11
stages.
The
stage
plan
has
been
amended
version.
16
is
the
current
version
and
has
been
circulated
around
the
application
hasn't
changed
since
the
last
presentation.
Last
month
there
has
been
some
investigation
done
and
good
evening
adds
to
questions
posed
to
the
crowds
and
also
going
through
the
archaeology
report
that
was
done
in
2006.
O
There
is
a
scar
tree
located
on
the
eastern
boundary,
where
the
overpass
is
just
for
councils
information
and
that's
also
in
the
cultural
heritage
mapping
details
available
on
the
Victorian
website
and
the
state
government
website.
The
proposal
was
referred
to
all
the
relevant
referral
authorities,
who
did
not
have
any
objection,
subjective
conditions
and
the
proposals
generally
complies
with
the
vanilla
planning
scheme.
The
recommendation
and
conditions
are
from
page
23
to
41
happy
to
answer,
cancels
questions.
We've.
G
You
wish
generally
applies,
you
just
say
generally
applies
to
the
conditions.
Can
you
just
that's
a
little
bit
late
so
well,
just
what
we're
does
not
deploy.
O
On
the
balance
of
on
the
balance,
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
vanilla
planning
scheme.
If
aspect
of
the
banana
20
scheme
was
applied,
his
ins
minuses
in
its
plus,
which
is
the
matter
that
was
brought
up
regarding
the
design
and
development
overlay
that
doesn't
control
the
subdivision
impact
itself.
It
controls
the
beautiful,
so
the
built
form
is
more
the
height
of
the
subdivision,
the
buildings
that
will
occur
in
the
subdivision,
so
that
generally
complies
with
all
the
provisions
of
the
PDL.
O
We
do
not
have
a
building
permit
or
building
application
on
hand
that
we
have
we
can
assess
into,
but
there
are
mechanisms
in
the
planning
condition
that
the
purchaser,
when
they
purchase
the
land,
will
know
what
the
height
of
their
building
needs
to
be.
So
it's
called
a
three
dimensional
building
envelope
and
that
has
been
used
on
the
Lots
opposite
willis
little
drive
for
those
buildings.
So
that's
one
aspect
of
it.
The
other
aspect
that
it
generally
comprises
the
requirement
for
public
open
space
is
five
percent.
O
A
K
O
You,
madam
see
this
minimum
driveway
with
the
six
meters
for
sheer
Lex's
path,
the
infrastructure
design
manual
states.
It
must
be
sealed,
so
that
is
the
requirement,
and
that
will
be
that's
a
separate
permit
system
which
sits
outside
the
planning
process.
So
that
will
be
to
get
it
can
seem
to
it
within
a
roadway
which
council
will
issue
and
one
of
the
drawings
is
that
it
needs
to
be
sealed
all
the
conditions
of
it.
It
needs.
K
B
K
O
There
are
various
requirements
of
these
drivable
in
walls.
So
if
you
are
outside
the
clear
zone
from
the
edge
of
seal
to
a
certain
path,
then
you
don't
require
a
trampled
in
wall,
but
if
the
speed
limit
did
taste
that
you
are
within
the
clear
zone,
then
yes,
it
would
require
a
credible
in
wall.
That
assessment
hasn't
been
done
is
part
of
the
planning.
Pavement
I
said
will
be
done
through
the
consent
to
work
within
the
rock
reserve.
J
O
O
G
O
Made
it
previously,
we've
had
experiences
McNulty
drive,
where
we've
asked
for
35
percent
of
occupation
of
the
role
prior
to
the
goods
fashion
of
the
roundabout,
that,
from
practical
experience,
didn't
work,
so
we
worked
out
on
the
back.
This
is
that
a
quarter
of
the
development
would
occur
prior
to
the
upgrading
of
the
lot.
F
F
What
would
be
the
correct
way,
possibly
asking
CEO
as
well,
if
we
were
to
change
or
making
alterations
to
number
22
from
page
28?
Could
the
compliance
to
stage
3
as
opposed
to
stage
all
the
reason
I'm
asking
is?
There
are
35
plots
going
to
be
built
by
the
time
we've
done
30
by
this
stage,
lot
of
for
there'd
be
35,
start
finished.
F
O
A
O
To
you,
madam
chair,
the
cleaning
scheme
it
is
written,
my
children
go
swimming,
one
stake
step
to
fear
road
is
zero
arterial
roads,
oh
we've
got
Road
hierarchies
and
kill
fear
road
is
the
council's
main
road.
One
of
the
issues
is
minimizing
impact
of
multiple
accesses
to
a
main
road
and
therefore
the
protection
the
planning
scheme
provides,
is
reducing
multiple
accesses
on
on
main
roads.
We've
got
just
a
little
example.
We
base
multiple
accesses
of
a
on
straight.
However,
that
is
a
50k
road,
but
there
is
multiple
excesses
in
short
intervals.
We
they
are.
O
J
G
Driving
down
that
road
now,
I
see
a
number
of
people
that
built
on
small
blocks
that
have
direct
access
on
the
kill,
fair
road
anyway,
so
we,
where
and
luring
people
other
brothers
got
a
subdivision.
The
long
killed,
fair
road
anywhere
to
come
out
and
and
get
access
to
the
road
pavement
so
having
one
more
access
for
a
hundred
and
seven
thousand.
One
hundred
and
seventeen
blocks
to
me
makes
sense
when
we're
allowing
some
of
the
boys
of
one
acre
block
there
at
the
moment
to
have
direct
access
over
the
road
anyway.
O
Three
minutes
you
we're
possible
the
roads,
the
joined
together,
where
possible,
and
as
far
as
the
old
subdivision,
Williston
Drive
subdivision,
is
concerned,
the
planning
scheme
in
protection
of
them
was
to
minimize
this
drive
voice
rather
than
intersection
itself.
An
intersection
poses
a
lot
more
cow
movements,
then
a
driveway.
So
that's
how
the
planing
skin
protects,
kill,
fear
around
from
multiple
accesses
or
multiple
Road
excesses.
K
O
O
O
A
L
That's
okay,
I'll
work
there.
Thank
you.
It
appears
that
probably
there
are
a
couple
of
questions
that
might
like
to
be
posed
to
the
applicant
in
the
owner,
so
we
can
suspend
standing
orders
and
just
touch
that
a
little
bit
further.
If
the
council's
would
like
to
do
that
and
just
to
clarify
before
debating
the
motion
any
further,
let.
G
Thank
you
don't
know,
chair
I,
don't
think
it's
fair
on
the
applicants.
All
counseling
counsel
of
all
their
staff
here
tonight
to
be
put
in
people
on
the
spot.
I
grab
a
blade
on
the
table
tonight
and
any
questions
that
counsels
got.
We
can
run
through
our
staff
throwing
the
leash
he
can
talk
to
the
developers
and
get
some
answers
because
they
ask
people
on
the
spot
here
tonight
for
answers
to
questions,
but
they
think
it's
proper.
Thank
you,
I
think
just
a
bit
more
words
done
yet.
A
F
With
regards
to
that,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
going
to
this
project.
We've
already
left
it
on
the
table
once
we
have
had
a
lot
about
I.
Think
all
of
our
questions
answered
from
last
time.
The
staging
of
the
the
roadworks
I
think
we
can
put
that
in
now.
If
the
applicant
objects
to
that
well,
then,
the
applicant
can
not
take
up
the
recommendation
and
therefore
so
that
there's
a
form
of
negotiation.
Oh
I,
understand
what
councillor
Davis
is
saying
with
regards
to.
F
If
there
are
other
questions,
I'm
not
aware
of
them,
though,
and
I
don't
know
that,
where
we
start
negotiating
from
here
other
than
this
stage
staging
system,
so
personally
I
think
we
don't.
We
do
make
a
decision
to
not
and
change
anything
on
the
recommendations
that
the
councillors
have
a
problem
with
that's
the
start
of
the
negotiations.
I
would
suggest
and
that's
fair
on
everybody,
because
it's
not
fair
on
the
applicant
just
becoming
bad
and
presenting
to
a
council
on
what's
a
very
expensive
build
if
it
goes
ahead.
Thank.
J
A
I
think
why
I
just
want
to
have
a
ask
a
couple
of
things
while
we're
in
discussing
discussions
here
about
the
road
like
Willis
little
die.
For
example,
we've
got
stage,
one
has
five
houses
coming
off
that
will
have
direct
access
straight
onto
Willis
little
Drive
and
three
that
will
have
direct
access
straight
on
to
kill
fury
road
about
what
councillor
Firth
has
said
about
the
moving.
A
F
J
A
F
Okay,
my
counselor
alternative
recommendation
is
everything
else,
the
same
other
than
number
22,
and
that
would
read
as
prior
to
the
issue
of
a
statement
of
compliance
for
stage
three
of
the
subdivision.
The
intersection
of
Willis
little
driving
Hill
Ferry
Road
must
be
upgraded
to
comply
with
ostrich
guide
to
road
design.
Part
three
geometric
designer
Nasik
rows,
guide
to
row,
design
card
for
a
uncivilized
and
signalized
intersections
with
reference,
in
particular
to
section
3
and
section
four,
as
it
is
written
on
page
28
of
the
agenda.
A
F
It
says
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
this
actual
project
has
been
on
the
page
on
the
on
the
books
for
quite
some
time.
There
is
no
doubt
that
there
are
questions
with
every
development
that
we
do
and
make
decisions
I
mean
in
banana
and
I'm
sure
every
other
local
government,
but
with
regards
to
some
of
the
points
made
tonight,
such
as
mr.
Murray's
point
on
the
diamond
interchange
to
kill
fair
road
and
when
he
brought
it
up
last
time,
he
was
before
council
I
thought.
F
That
was
a
very
good
idea,
but
nothing's
going
to
happen
without
Rhodes
accepting
that
suggestion
and
we
have
been
back
to
VicRoads
on
a
number
and
mr.
Oxley
encode
have
a
letter
and
email
from
Vic
roads
that
are
stating.
Basically
it's
not
going
to
happen.
So
we
have
to
move
on
another
point
from
Philip
that
so
suggesting
that
we're
putting
a
hundred
alien
houses
in
the
way
of
danger,
I
find
a
little
unfair,
given
that
we
are
bound
by
the
laws
of
the
state
and
federal
governments
and
their
departments
have
no
objections.
F
Madam
chair
they're,
the
ones
that
make
the
rules
we're
the
ones
that
have
to
grow
our
community
and
our
community
is
growing
almost
exponentially
at
the
moment
given
what's
going
on
in
regional
Victoria
postcode,
not
in
whenever
that
is,
I
would
suggest
that
we're
going
to
grow
even
quicker.
If
we're
going
to
hold
our
developments
that
we
need
and
want
as
long
as
they
tick
the
boxes,
we
are
we've
given
a
great
deal
of
care.
F
So
far,
they
don't
know
they're
going
to
have
a
development
so
I
with
regards
to
all
the
issues
that
I
had
I
believe
they
have
been
addressed
and
I
believe
that
with
this,
the
applicant
agreeing
to
bring-
and
we
do
know
that-
there's
a
cost
involved-
and
we
do
know
that,
there's
a
you-
know-
profits
not
going
to
show
until
the
last
few
blasts
of
every
subdivision
and
I
do
believe.
What
we're
doing
the
fair
thing.
F
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
support
the
recommendation
like
counselor.
First,
as
previous
previously
said,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
put
into
this
a
lot
of
questions
dark
asked
and
the
answers
have
been
supplied.
We've
gone
to
all
the
referral
agencies
such
as
the
country
for
authority,
Department
of
Environment,
land,
water
and
planning
golden
broken
catchment,
Management,
Authority,
VicRoads,
northeast
water
Oz
need
a
PA
group
transport
for
Victoria,
and
nobody
has
said
that
it
shouldn't
go
ahead
or
they
have
placed
conditions
on
it
which
are
in
the
conditions
of
the
permit.
N
I
know
people
are
concerned
about
different
areas
and
I
respect
their
concerns,
and
that's
why
it's
taken
so
long
to
come
to
the
table
and
we
have
read
all
the
responses
to
the
concerns
to
the
questions.
We've
listened.
We've
listened
to
the
people,
but
I
think
that
all
our
questions
have
been
answered.
They've
been
answered
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
satisfactorily
and
I
think
the
development
would
be
good
for
vanilla
and
I'm
sure
that
in
the
fullness
of
time
we'll
see
this
was
a
great
decision
and
I
support.
The
recommendation.
E
Madam
Speaker,
against
the
recommendation
of
C
I,
concur
with
my
fellow
councillors
previously
councillor
Firth
and
council,
Alexander
and
I
actually
agree
and
support
the
subdivision.
However,
my
concern
is
from
an
emergency
management
point
of
view
and
the
access
into
the
subdivision
I
feel
that
there
needs
to
be
and
the
reason
I'm
recommending
against
it
is.
It
needs
to
go
on
record
that
there
was
someone
here
this
evening
that
was
opposed
to
the
subdivision
in
its
current
form
it
with
limited
access
to
the
subdivision,
because
you
will
have
a
hundred
eighteen
Lots
there.
E
That's
gonna,
then
look
at
approximately
in
excess
of
324
vehicles
and
the
end
of
time
when
that
subdivision
completely
did
or
trying
to
exist
on
to
the
fullest
little
drive
in
the
event
of
emergency
and,
if
anyone's
been
involved
in
emergency.
Before
you
know,
common
sense
goes
out
the
window
so
to
try
traffic
control
traffic
manage
that
big
pole,
Ambulance
Victoria
CFA,
you
are
putting
lives
at
risk.
So
that's
why
I
wanted
to
speak
tonight
against
the
recommendation.
E
G
You
three
minute,
chair,
I'm,
opposed
to
it
from
the
point
that
that's
what
counselor
I'm
upstairs
just
spoken
about
from
day
one
I
bring
them
a
bit
annoyed.
Did
that
to
see
if
I
in
there
and
there
well
and
the
emergency
services
we're
looking
at
an
error
coming
off
the
freeway,
we're
making
a
look
at
what
happened
down
you're
our
this
year
near
the
service
station,
any
panic
breaks.
Yeah
you
get
a
four
in
the
freeway.
You
get
a
fire
in
the
airports.
G
All
of
a
sudden
you've
got
the
108
any
houses
there,
plus
60
odd
passes
in
little
Willis.
Drive
all
try
to
use
that
one
row
now
I
did
ask
the
mister
Oxley
before
Stephen
about
upgrading
little
with
a
strive.
I
can't
see
why
it
could
have
been
done
stage
one
because
if
little
will
destroy
wasn't
there,
you've
got
to
have
an
ear
up
my
main
road
into
the
into
a
subdivision
anyway,
and
I'm
sure
that
100
lots
hundred
either
in
lot
subdivision,
isn't
isn't
relying
on
piggybacking
and
of
a
row.
G
G
This
is
the
last
year
all
year
before
word,
when
they're
applying
pressure,
they're
here
I,
know,
I,
know
everything's
build
around
this
then
and
I
had
to
think
that
the
our
Airport
is
going
to
be
completely
built
around
in
the
next
20
years
and
it
couldn't
move
as
I
said,
I'm
not
opposed
to
to
the
development
per
se.
If
there
was
another
entrance
off
of
a
bear,
that
of
the
saw
it.
Thank
you
thank.
K
Clarissa
portent
the
recommendation
I
understand
where
the
council's
are
coming
from,
with
the
the
only
exit
exit
from
the
subdivision
being
Willis
little
Drive,
but
we
are
all
aware
that
in
emergency
situations,
CFA
and
the
police
don't
care
where
they
get
people
in
and
out.
Then
there
is
a
and
unmade
government
road
that
runs
through
the
property
and
I'm
sure
with
a
frangible
type.
It's
just
at
call
fury
road
to
see
if
they
would
not
think
twice
about
breaking
that
to
allow
entry
and
exit
from
the
property.
K
A
F
Madam
chief,
sorry,
a
very
good
debate:
I
think
everybody
in
the
council
is
on
the
same
boat
or
on
the
same
powder.
Is
it
we
are
heading
in
a
direction,
vanilla
and
probably
a
lot
of
other
regional
towns,
rural
towns
that
again
have
to
make
decisions
such
as
this
there's
only
limited
town
space
around
our
areas,
our
communities
and
we're
going
to
have
to
make
these
decisions.
As
I
said
before,
and
councillor
Claridge
in
cancer
Alexander
has
agreed.
F
We
have
done
everything
we
think
we
can.
Our
staff
has
done
everything
that
they
can
under
the
guidance
and
rules
of
the
state
and
federal
governments.
If
I
said,
I
was
staggered.
Madam
chair,
last
time
we
talked
with
regards
to
Casa,
the
seems
to
be
the
biggest
problem
is
the
airport.
Now,
if
that's
the
case,
surely
Casa
should
be
the
ones
being
here
discussing
this?
Not
us,
we
can
only
go
on
and
all
the
Casa
is
apparently
worried
about.
F
Is
that
we
don't
know
the
house
is
too
high,
so
they
airplanes
right
into
them,
seems
ridiculous.
To
me,
however,
they're
the
rules,
we
have
to
abide
by
the
rules.
If
we
don't
go
by
the
rules,
we
will
end
up
in
a
very
expensive
case,
yet
VCAT
as
well
as
we
do
so.
Madam
chair
I
really
do
recommend
with
this
change.
The
recommendation
to
the
council.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
I'm
actually
going
to
be
against
only
for
the
same
I
actually
think
the
subdivisions,
a
good
subdivision.
It
just
needs
an
accent
and
an
emergency
exit.
I,
don't
like
the
one
Road
in
I'm,
really
worried
about
an
emergency
famous
councillor
Oxton,
so
I'll
be
going
against
two.
G
A
A
O
O
Minutes
here
presented
to
the
Planning
and
Development
Committee,
the
monthly
to
monthly
reports
for
May
and
June
2020.
There
were
ten
planning
applications
decided
under
delegation
in
Maine.
In
June
they
were
one
of
the
one
application
decided.
The
delegation
for
planning
criminal
men
meant
there
was
two
applications
decided
under
Vic
smart,
this
correction
as
well
in
the
May
1
item
number
two
da
six,
nine
eight
seven
days
address
written
on
both
sides
of
the
column,
which
he
decided
farm
shape
and
in
the
description
it
should
say,
farm
shape
and
the
address
is
correct.
O
June
there
were
two
planning
permits
issued
and
the
fixed
march.
There
were
three
planning
applications
withdrawn
in
line
and
one
in
June
and
one
a
notice
of
decision
issued
for
a
12
lot
subdivision
at
one
also,
seven
Thomas
Street,
which
is
behind
the
Freemasons
HK
facility,
which
was
part
of
the
original
plan
extreme
in
application
and
then
withdrew.
O
There
was
a
total
of
25
building
permits
issued
within
the
miscibility
out
of
which
council's
building
department
issued
25
building
permits
in
May
and
in
June
there
were
a
total
of
40
46
billion
permits
issued
out
of
which
cancels
building
department
issued
31
building
clintons.
The
recommendation
is
on
page
52
before
any
questions.
Any.