►
From YouTube: Bossier City Council Special Meeting May 3rd, 2022
Description
Bossier City Council Special Meeting May 3rd, 2022
B
C
Let
us
pray
oh
holy
father.
We
are
so
thankful
for
this
day
that
you
allowed
us
to
see.
We.
Thank
you,
lord.
For
wrestling
last
night,
we
thank
you
father
for
your
promises.
We
thank
you
for
your
word.
We
thank
you,
lord
god,
for
every
good
and
perfect
gift
from
above.
We
pray
o
lord
god
for
those
who
serve
others.
We
ask
you,
lord
god,
to
help
those
who
are
hurting
father,
those
who
are
sad,
those
who
are
depressed.
C
A
A
G
H
Council,
in
accordance
with
louisiana,
open
meetings,
laws
and
the
adopted
buzzer
city
council,
meeting
rules
resolution
the
city
council
asked
for
order
and
decorum
at
our
meetings.
Please
silence
your
cell
phones.
Anyone
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
agenda
item
may
approach
and
state
their
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
shall
be
permitted
three
minutes
to
make
their
comments
on
the
particular
item.
That's
up
for
discussion
with
up
to
four
speakers
per
side.
All
other
audience
members
are
asked
to.
H
Please
observe
the
meeting
quietly
and
if
there
is
a
need
for
audience
members
to
hold
a
conversation
or
take
a
phone
call.
You
are
asked
to
please
step
out
of
the
meeting
city
council.
Appointed
sergeant-at-arms
have
been
instructed
to
maintain
decorum
and
ask
anyone
in
violation
to
step
out
of
the
meeting
in
order
to
maintain
orderly
conduct
of
the
meeting.
A
A
A
D
E
G
J
And
whereas
gala
is
known
for
her
caring
and
kindness
to
all
her
calm,
demeanor
and
her
compassion
for
others.
Also.
She
is
also
known
as
the
receipt
police
and
her
disdain
for
any
of
any
employees
who
pay
taxes
on
department
to
mark
department
on
in
purchases
I'll
get
it
out
sooner
or
later
guys,
whereas
gayla
promised
only
five
years
to
chief
sagon
as
his
secretary,
but
has
given
him
11
years,
whereas
gayla's
final
day
with
the
bosu
city,
fire
department
will
be
thursday
may
5th
2022
through
her
legacy
will
live
on
now.
J
A
K
A
H
H
G
L
So
we
are
required
by
the
louisiana
department
of
health
to
implement
a
more
robust
backflow
prevention
and
cross-contamination
program.
This
50
thousand
dollars
is
a
one-time,
ask
that's
to
buy
some
software
and
I
had
a
contract
in
that
fact
sheet.
That
shows
what
those
costs
are.
This
will
go
mostly
to
postage
so
we're
going
to
have
to
mail
information
out
to
all
of
the
customers,
make
sure
everybody's
aware
if
you
have
a
backflow
preventer,
these
are
the
things
you
need
to
do
to
make
sure
it's
in
compliance
with
the
city's
ordinances,
which
are
already
there.
L
It
already
requires
that,
but
ldh
is
asking
the
city
to
have
firm
black
and
white
records
on
exactly
what
was
when
these
certifications
are
being
done.
Are
they
being
contacted,
and
things
like
that,
so
this
this
money
is
to
implement
that
program
moving
forward,
the
customers
that
have
backflow
preventers
will
have
to
pay
a
fee
to
have
that
certified
and
those
costs
will
will
continue
this
program
from
here
on
out.
L
L
B
H
Motion
carries
introduce
an
ordinance
to
declare
the
completion
of
the
east,
texas,
industrial
airlines,
sewer
rehabilitation
project
by
horseshoe
construction
inc
at
a
total
construction
cost
of
one
million.
Ninety
five
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
and
sixty
nine
cents,
including
change
order
number
one,
and
to
amend
ordinance
71
of
2020,
leaving
a
surplus
of
funding
to
supplement
the
sewer
capital
and
contingency
fund
first
reading.
A
H
I
I
L
Great
question:
I
put
some
information
there
in
front
of
you.
It
looks
like
this
and
it's
an
excerpt
from
a
presentation
that
we've
been
using
to
update
the
council
or
really
the
administration
on
our
efforts
there
and
it's
a
lot
of
technical
data.
I'm
going
to
try
to
go
quick
and
and
consolidate
it,
but
the
first
page
of
that
and
chris
just
kind
of
goes
to
your
your
question.
What
what
are
we
doing-
and
this
particular
graph
shows
kind
of
the
initial
study
and
what
you're
looking
on
here?
L
L
L
So
the
next
slide
chris
in
in
council,
is
kind
of
an
overview
of
exactly
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
by
this
effort
and
and
concentrate
on
the
graph
there
on
your
your
right
side
of
the
page
and
what
you
see
that
sort
of
orange
line
decreasing
over
time,
that
is,
the
chlorine,
the
residual
chlorine
and
in
bosure's
water
over
a
15
day
period.
And
so
what
we're
doing
is
taking
these.
L
L
So
we're
we're
showing
that
by
blending
this
water,
we
took
a
75
25
blend,
so
75
percent
of
what
was
coming
out
of
the
pilot
blended,
that
with
25
of
our
traditionally
filtered
water,
we
were
capable
of
meeting
our
disinfectant
byproducts
on
chlorine
only
and
the
chlorine
residual
stayed
above
the
maximum
contaminant
level
for
more
than
15
days.
That's
a
very
long
time
to
have
that
in
there
so
very
happy
about
that
result,
so
check
check
we're
doing
good
here's
where
the
problem
comes
in
on
the
next
page.
L
So
as
we
continue
the
study,
you
can
see
what
we're
calling
pre-filter
screens
with
manganese
fouling,
and
this
was
a
phenomenon
we
were
not
expecting
as
part
of
the
pilot.
So
you
see
all
that
black
debris.
You
got
four
filters
there
that
are
completely
clogged
up
and
one
that's
white
and
what
was
happening
is
this
material
is
getting
into
that
spiral
wound
nf
membrane,
it's
requiring
more
pressure.
All
that
particulate
gets
caught
in
the
fabric
requires
more
pressure
and
the
fabric
blows
it
no
longer
filters
and
you're
getting.
L
You
know
organics
through
those
membranes,
and
so
our
ask
here
is
to
help
understand
what's
causing
this,
and
how
do
we
eliminate
that
moving
forward
because
it
was
very
unanticipated?
That's
why
you
do
pilots.
Had
we
not
gone
through
this
process
and
thought
hey
everything
looks
great
and
you
get
a
full
scale
unit
out
here
and
you're
dealing
with
this
it'd
be
a
multi-million
dollar
problem.
L
So
we've
we've
begun
that
effort.
You
can
kind
of
see
the
the
line
graph
here
and
what
we're
trying
to
show
is.
Where
is
the
manganese
coming
from,
because
this
isn't
a
this
isn't
an
issue
that
we
normally
have
with
bossier's
water?
We
don't
deal
with
manganese
where's
it
coming
from
so
the
line
graph
there
again
on
your
right,
you
kind
of
see
it
come
down
and
then
goes
back
up
so
you're,
looking
at
pre,
uf
membrane,
so
pre,
membranes
and
and
those
are
the
existing
membranes
we
have.
L
L
So
the
next
sheet
shows
some
conclusions
that
we've
we've
come
and
I've
highlighted
a
couple
boxes
but
pay
attention
to
the
the
the
box
there
in
yellow
with
the
red
around
it.
That's
on
the
bottom
left,
and
so
you
can
see
the
numbers
pre
uf
membrane
at,
and
these
are
manganese
levels.
You
can
see
it.
You
know
down
to
the
hundredth
point:
zero,
three,
five
and
point:
zero,
two
nine
and
then
post
uf
membrane.
Again
these
are
the
you.
These
are
the
membranes
that
exist
out
there.
L
They
escalate
quite
dramatically
and
what
we
believe
that's
occurring
is
when
those
existing
uf
membranes
go
into
a
cleaning
cycle.
We
use
chemicals
to
clean
them
and
that's
oxidizing,
this
manganese,
which
is
becoming
problematic
for
a
nf
membrane,
to
filter
out.
So
the
intent
of
this
next
phase.
Should
the
council
appropriate
money
towards
it
would
be
to
study
that?
Okay,
so
take
a
look
at
what
is
what
is
creating
the
manganese
issue?
We
think
we
have
two
ways
of
handling
it.
One
would
be
in
the
settling
basins
existing
settling
basins
out
there.
L
We
want
to
run
a
study
that
will
provide
what
we're
calling
enhanced
coagulation
to
get
the
manganese
out
before
it
ever
hits
the
filter.
The
other
is
to
look
at
some
processes
prior
to
going
into
the
nf
membrane.
That
would
remove
that
manganese.
So
you
have
those
two
tracks
and
then
the
other
issue
we're
fighting.
Is
this
this
compromise
of
the
nf
membrane?
So
we
talked
about
those
higher
pressures
and
those
pressures
are
what
ruptured
the
membrane
and
got
all
the
organics
through.
L
L
We
feel
passionate
about
it,
but
ultimately
it
takes
money
to
continue
down
and
the
reason
we're
doing
it
is
because
we
feel
long
term
for
bossier
it's
going
to
be
best
to
get
off,
chloraminated
water
and
onto
free
chlorine,
water,
and
to
do
that
we
have
to
have
another
mechanism
in
our
process,
so
that,
in
a
nutshell,
is
a
whole
bunch
of
time
and
energy.
As
simply
as
I
can
condense
it,
you
know
to
to
show
the
council
what's
going
on.
I
L
I
Picking
contaminants
up
on
the
way
would
we
be
better
served
taking
american
rescue
plan
money,
which
is
probably
only
going
to
happen
once
in
our
lifetime
and
invest
that
into
underground
infrastructure,
because
neighbors
across
the
river
have
a
consent
decree
forcing
them
to
update
theirs
and
while
we're
not
even
close
to
that
would
would
it
be
better.
If
we
were
a
little
proactive
and
said.
Maybe
we
should
take
this
money
and
update
underground
infrastructure.
L
L
What
what
we
see
currently
using
chloraminated
water
is
what
they
call
nitrification
in
the
lines.
That's
the
issue
we
fight
all
the
times.
While
we
have
to
have
an
annual
chlorine
cleanse
burn
where
we
swap
the
system
over
to
chlorine,
we
clean
out
all
of
that
nitrification
and
then
we
go
back
to
chloramines
a
chlorine
only
system.
You
would
never
have
to
do
that
again.
So
that's
the
benefit
that
you
get
rid
of
that
nitrification.
L
L
We
didn't
feel
like
it
was
a
worthwhile
endeavor,
but
ultimately,
when
it
comes
down
to
this
is
how
much
it's
going
to
cost
to
implement
a
system
like
this,
we'll
be
back
here
again
talking
about
that,
so
whether
a
nano
filter
is
good
today
or
down
the
road
at
some
point
in
the
future
understanding
what
bozier's
options
are
to
continue
to
be
ahead.
You
know
not
to
get
behind.
Like
you
mentioned,
you
know
our
neighbors
across
the
street,
but
to
continue
to
be
on
the
cutting
edge
of
the
technology
out
there.
L
You
have
to
do
stuff
like
this,
so
we're
fortunate
in
ambosia.
You
guys
have
allocated
a
lot
of
resources
to.
Let
us
do
that.
I
wish
chris.
I
wasn't
up
here
telling
you
man
this
pilot's,
it's
it's
dragging
on,
and
I
wish
I
had
better
news
for
you,
but
the
only
way
we
get
to
that
is
to
continue
that
effort
and
look
at
it,
and
most
of
that
cost
is
for
membranes
and
membrane
manufacturers
and
the
sampling
and
everything
else
that
goes
involved
in
that.
So
I
understand
it's
a
hard
ask
you
know.
L
L
Certainly
in
support
of
it,
I
won't
there's
no
mandate
by
ldh
to
do
it.
You
know
we
do
get
seemingly
every
year
new
and
more
stringent
regulations
on
water
treatment
and
the
quality
of
the
water.
And
it's
you
know
it's
the
surface
water
system,
that's
the
most
difficult
to
treat
we're,
not
groundwater.
L
C
A
C
L
L
L
A
H
H
H
F
A
C
C
C
J
J
C
C
J
E
Well,
we
talked
about
and
just
discussions
with
manchac
they
were
going
to
build
certain
rates
for
certain
services
and
certain
personnel.
The
the
problem
that
the
mayor
had-
and
you
know
it
left
it
somewhat
open-ended,
which
makes
it
hard
to
know
what
to
budget
for
engineering
services
come
budget
time.
So
we
discussed
that,
but
between
the
administration
and
manchak,
and
we
came
to
the
number
that
for
bin
services
and
clinton
services,
plus
all
the
man
support
services
that
back
that
up.
B
C
L
My
time
is,
is
already
lumped
into
that.
What
we're
looking
at
here
is
a
a
reasonable
rate
to
have
clinton
patrick
involved
in
there
he's
the
day-to-day
eyes
and
ears
in
the
engineering
department.
He
answers
to
me
and
we
work
together,
but
that
costs
us
money
to
to
put
him
in
there
and
again
he's
working
40
plus
hours
a
week
in
that
role.
So
the
way
we
envision
this
our
contract
that
20
000
isn't
structured
based
on
what
would
you
you
would
consider
a
standard
engineering
fee
rate?
It's
less
than
that.
L
B
L
Love
working
in
bozier,
we
see
it
as
part
of
the
whole
picture
and
we
enjoy
working
for
the
administration
and
the
council
there,
and
so
the
vision
for
this
contract
is
to
use
that
to
supplement
what
we're
already
doing.
So
you
have
clinton
patrick
working
in
there
myself
and
and
the
delta
would
be
used
to
support
our
construction
administration
efforts.
So
right
now
you
have
myself
and
clinton
and
two
inspectors
to
manage
150.
L
Sometimes
you
know
right
now
we're
hovering
around
130
million
dollars
worth
of
work,
and
that
becomes
difficult
when
the
expectation
is
perfection,
so
our
desire
is
to
use
some
of
that
contract
amount
to
bring
in
a
little
bit
more
resources
associated
with
managing
the
construction
administration
efforts
in
the
engineering
department.
So
that's
the
intent
again.
We
understand
it's
unusual.
It's
a
it's
a
it's
an
ask,
but,
as
you
know,
I
get
calls
from
the
administration
and
the
council
all
day
long.
L
All
night
and
we're
out
here
and
we're
very
reactive,
we
got
a
little
sign
over
here.
Can
we
move
it
away
from
the
tree?
We
got
this
drain
over
here
and
what
we
don't
have
is
the
ability
to
stand
back
and
look
at
the
problems
that
are
facing
this
community
and
really
develop
good
solutions
for
transportation
and
drainage
and
water
and
sewer,
and
that's
because
we're
in
this
perpetual,
reactive
mode.
L
B
D
I
think
you
know,
mr
mayor,
that
if
you
would
have
come
to
us
and
asked
for
more
money
for
a
you
know,
you
had
that
right
to
change
that
when
y'all
were
back
doing
the
budget,
that
you
could
have
changed
the
line
adam
and
came
back
to
the
council
with
more
money
that
you
know
we
could
have
hired
a
city
engineer
and
kept
manchak
on
as
a
consulting
basis.
Because
a
city
engineer
came,
I
mean,
there's
no
way
a
city.
One
person
can
handle
everything
that
you're
doing.
D
D
L
D
L
I
Through
its
designated
representative,
benjamin
roschenbach
will
serve
as
the
interim
head
of
the
city's
engineering
department,
and
so
it
doesn't
mention
clinton
in
the
ordinance.
And
so
that's
that's
that's
one
where
my
problem
is.
Is
we
have
we're
going
to
be
appointing
manchak
and
ben
and
we're
going
to
subsidize
manchak's
business
to
allow
another
employee
to
help
and
I'm
not
saying
he's
not
worth
the
money.
I
I'm
just
saying
that
if
the
city
back
when
mr
hudson
worked
here
and
every
city
engineer
previously,
we
haven't
had
a
need
for
two
department
heads
in
that
department-
maybe
maybe
we
maybe
the
city
has
grown
and
we
do
now
and
we
need
to
if
we
ever
get
around
to
a
charter
commission,
maybe
we
that
can
be
something
we
can
add
into
the
city's
charter
for
two
department
heads.
But
currently
our
charter
says
one
engineer.
I
I
I
For
the
next
three
years,
there's
there's
there's
no
way
that
this
we're
bound
to
this.
We
can't
we
can't
change
our
minds,
there's
no
there's
no
way
so
there's
there's
no
way
out.
So
if
we
choose
to
go
back
to
paying
a
city
engineer,
151,
000
or
50
000,
whatever
it
is
salary
and
benefits,
we
couldn't
do
that
because
we're
bound
to
this
and
I'm
curious
about
the
word
interim.
I
I
think
it
would
only
be
fair
to
manchak
if
this
is
the
horse
that
you're
going
to
ride
on
that
you
commit
to
them
through
the
end
of
your
term,
and-
and
I
mean
it's
not
fair
to
them-
to
you're-
not
going
to
find
an
engineering
company
or
engineer
in
may
of
2024
entering
your
last
year
of
your
term
to
commit
with
politics
at
play.
So
in
my
opinion,
there
needs
to
be
a
way
out
for
the
city.
If
you
change
your
mind
or
you
just
need
to
commit
to
manchak
through
june
of
2025.
I
J
Speak
now
during
my
campaign,
I
did
push
to
get
my
own
city
engineer
me
and
my
people
in
my
office
have
gone
through
six
people.
Since
last
may
we
thought
we
had
each
one
hired
each
one
for
some
reason,
the
other
backed
out.
It
was
really
seven
tell
you
the
truth.
We
have
over
105
million
dollars
worth
of
contracts
out
there
right
now
we
do
bozo
city
is
growing
so
much
right
now
that
we
do
need
another
engineer,
all
right.
I
J
I
A
Just
ask
them:
no,
I'm
just
asking
if
they
don't
back
that
up
I've
been
here
a
long
time.
You
know,
may
not
interrupt
you,
but
we
did
have
two
engineers
at
one
time:
okay,
one
of
them
dropped
off,
and
when
you
have
one
engineer,
let
me
tell
you,
you
won't
get
nothing
done
and
when
I
say
that
chris
I'm
telling
you
the
truth,
it's
hard
for
one
guy
to
to
get
out
and
do
all
the
things
these
guys
do.
Now
we
didn't
have
a
road
program.
It
was
like
mark.
A
I
need
to
get
this
done
well,
we
might
get
that
done
next
year.
Sometime
now
we're
going
to
schedule
every
year
we're
doing
our
roads,
our
streets
and
roads,
and
I
said
like
when
I
spoke
up
yeah.
I
called
ben
and
and
clinton
regularly.
I'm
sure
they
get
tired
of
hearing
from
me,
but
you
won't
find
two
two
better
more
people,
that's
dedicated
to
their
job
and
dedicated
this
city
ben's
from
bossier,
and
I
don't.
I
J
I
B
L
L
Also
before
you
speak,
you
mentioned
the
charter
chris,
and
the
charter
does
allow
for
the
city
engineer
to
have
an
assistant
city
engineer.
It's
not
a
dual
department.
Head
clinton
is
serving
under
me
as
the
interim
assistant
city
engineer,
and
that
was
something
that
I
thought
for
the
benefit
of
the
city,
which
I
care
about
deeply
that
it
only
made
sense
to
have
somebody
in
there
because
I'm
already
very
involved
in
other.
You
know
infrastructure
needs
of
the
city
and
it's
worked
well
and
it
is
by
charter.
L
L
You
know,
I
can't
argue
to
you
know
why
not
go
out
to
the
private
market
and
you
know
solicit
other
quotes
coming
in,
but
you
know
we
try
hard
to
to
inject
an
immense
amount
of
value
in
what
we
do.
It's
very
important
to
us
and
you
can
go
look,
but
you
will
never
find
somebody
more
passionate
about
this
city's
infrastructure
than
I
am.
I
promise
you.
I
And
I
believe
that
I
truly
do
and-
and
I
echo
mr
darby-
you
are
the
utmost
professional
and
I've
enjoyed
every
minute
that
we've
gotten
to
work
together
and
get
to
know
each
other
on
a
personal
level.
This
is
just
me
doing
my
job
as
well,
and
so
I
I
do
feel
like
that.
We
we
ought
to
take
this.
If
we're
going
to
go
the
route
of
a
private
company
and
see
what
bozier
companies
can
offer
us.
I
I
also
think
that
mayor
chandler,
you
just
said
you're
still
looking
for
an
engineer,
yet
there's
no
exit
clause
for
this
in
this
ordinance,
that's
written.
So
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
amend
this
ordinance
to
include
some
language
that
should
the
city
decide
to
cancel
this
contract
within
30
days
that
we
have
that
ability
to
do
so.
M
A
I
Percent
increase
and
we're
not
giving
a
66
66
increase
to
any
other
city
employee,
and
maybe
that's
our
fault.
Maybe
we
need
to
look
at
that,
but
if
we
cannot
properly
fund
city
employees
who
are
leaving
left
and
right
and
you'll
have
to
understand,
we
see
that
we
see
it
on
the
agenda
every
week
and
we
have
first
responders
that
deserve
to
be
paid
more.
D
I've
got
one
just
one
question
before
you
all
move
forth
with
any
new
language.
It
says
right
here,
whereas
the
compensation
for
those
services
shall
be
20,
000
monthly,
beginning
november
2021
through
may
2024,
so
we're
going
to
have
to
go
back
to
november
2021
and
pay
the
difference
no.
Well
I
mean
that
this
to
me,
this
whole
thing
needs
to
be
rewritten.
E
Well,
there's
a
reason
for
liability
purposes
is
that
we
had
debate
make
it
retroactive,
because
we
do
not
have
a
current
contract
in
place
with
manchac
the
most
recent
contract.
The
12-5
contract
expired
on
october
31st
of
2021
and
without
a
contractual
relationship
with
manchak,
then
we're
not
named
as
an
additional
insured
on
their
insurance
policy.
E
E
There
is
still
money
in
the
engineering
budget
that
should
the
mayor
find
a
qualified
candidate
and
the
the
qualifications
of
the
charter
are
very
onerous
five
years
and
a
supervisory
capacity
licensed
engineers.
Those
guys
are
making
200
you
know
250
a
year
plus
and
to
expect
one
person
to
manage
150
million
dollars
worth
of
projects.
Is
it's
not
realistic?
E
So
the
reason
for
the
retro
activity
is
to
protect
the
city,
so
there's
no
gap
in
the
contract
and
and
then
should
the
mayor
find
a
qualified
candidate
as
a
practical
matter
with
the
amount
of
projects
that
the
city
has
going
on.
It
would
take
the
city
engineer
if
one
were
to
be
hired
confirmed
by
the
council.
E
You
know,
months
or
years
to
get
up
to
speed
with
all
the
details
of
these
projects,
the
same
thing
that
if
you
were
to
go
out
and
do
rfps
requests
for
proposals
to
professional
engineering
firms
again
manchac
is
here.
They've
performed
this
service
they've
been
involved
with
all
these
ongoing
projects.
So
it
was
my
opinion
that,
in
order
to
continue
that
level
of
service,
we
need
to
continue
with
manchac.
D
Okay,
I
still
have
one
more
question
back
to
what
I
was
saying
back
when
you
were
a
judge,
and
somebody
came
in
your
courtroom
in
a
lawsuit
and
brought
this
in
stating
that
monthly,
beginning
november
2021
through
may
2024
and
they
weren't
getting
that
money
and
it's
a
he
said
she
said.
What
would
you
rule
on
that?
You
would
say:
hey
you've
got
this
right
here
from
november
2021
through
may
2024.
D
There
is
no
trust
when
you're
coming
and
dealing
with
the
taxpayers
of
bossier
city's
money.
That's
what
everybody
is
not
understanding.
It's
not
my
money,
it's
not
the
mayor's
money.
It's
not
yours!
It's
nobody's
up
here!
I
just
want
the
wording
where
it
says,
starting
whenever
we
have
a
new
contract
with
them,
that
we
will
pay
them
twenty
thousand
dollars
a
month.
If
that's
what
this
council
agrees
on,
but
until
then
it
is
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
a
month
is
what
I'm
the
point
I'm
trying
I'm
in
construction-
I
I
know
this.
D
I
I
see
these
agreements
all
the
time
and
there
is
no
way
that
I
would
sign
off
on
this,
that
that
is
what
I'm
trying
to
get
across.
I'm
not
trying
to
say
that
ben
and
manchak
are
not
worth
their
money
because
they
are.
I
dealt
with
the
old
administration
that
was
here
in
the
problems
that
we
had
trying
to
get
projects
done.
L
L
A
D
D
D
L
A
D
E
A
D
A
C
Here,
mr
president,
yeah,
I
would
like
to
ask
mr
jacob
something
too
on
the
language
that
mr
hammond's
referred
to.
Is
it
possible
to
get
the
ceo,
mr
haydell,
to
put
in
writing
that
he
would
not
do
retroactive
requests
since
we're
talking
five
months
different?
That's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
is
that
possible.
C
C
C
L
L
So
it's
you
know
that
that
is
a
desire
that
we
share
with
the
mayor.
We've
actually
helped
in
that
process,
but
the
reality
is.
Is
we've
been
working
in
this
role
in
the
absence
of
a
contract
and
y'all
claim
to
be
great
business
people?
That's
not
good
business
for
the
city
and
that's
not
good
business
for
manshack.
We
just
are
trying
to
get
something
in.
You
know
formalized
that
allows
this
relationship
to
continue.
L
We
we,
I
don't
know
how
much
I
can
say
or
do
that
shows
you
just
how
much
we
care
just
how
much
we
we
want
to
implement
what
the
the
wishes
and
desires
of
the
administration
and
the
council.
If
he
finds
an
engineer
that
meets
all
the
qualifications,
our
objective
would
be
to
help
and
gird
up,
whoever
that
was
and
to
transition
them
into
that
role.
It
is
a
monumental
task,
one
that
I
felt
like.
L
L
L
L
A
So
he
is
up
and
brian
listen
you
and
chris
I'm
I'm
not
trying
to
here
to
argue
with
you.
You
know.
Sometimes
people
work,
I
don't
I
don't
work.
I
can
go
to
these
meetings.
I
know
you
work.
Chris
works
it's
hard,
but
somebody's
got
to
be
there.
You
know
and
that's
where
I
go,
but
I'm
sure
the
mayor
will
be
bad
to
put
you
on
the
list.
If
you
can
make
it
you
can.
You
know.
I
And
my
final
thoughts
on
this
is
again.
I
do
think
that
I
do
think
that
you'll
do
a
good
job.
I
I
I
want
to
do
my
job
as
a
city
councilman
for
the
entire
city
of
bossier
and
know
that
we're
not
entering
into
a
contract,
because,
while
I
trust
you
it
doesn't
hold
up
in
court,
should
you
ever
change
your
mind?
I
I
If
mr
mayor,
if
you're
having
trouble
hiring
someone
based
on
pay,
you
ought
to
ask
the
council
if
we
could
appropriate
more
money
for
pay,
because
I
I
do
think
90
000
is
probably
pretty
low
for
this
job,
but
you
haven't
asked
us
for
pay.
The
first
time
you
ask
for
pay
is
for
manshack,
and
so
I
just
think
that
we
ought
to
have
done
a
little
bit
of
due
diligence
and
see
what
other
options
we
had
in
the
private
sector.
I
A
O
We
chose
to
live
here
because
of
our
first
responders
and
and
we
elected
some
councilmen
in
the
last
elections,
and
we've
got
a
south
boston
webpage
that
I've
promised
those
people
that
I
would
be
here
when
they
can't
and
I
would
represent
them.
We've
got
over
6
000
people
on
that
page,
and
my
duty
here
is
to
tell
them
if
I
feel
like
something's,
going
wrong
with
our
tax
dollars.
O
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
manshack
at
all.
I
think
I
think
him
bringing
up
chlorine
in
our
water
and
going
away
from
that
to
bleach
is
a
fantastic
idea.
Chlorine
has
many
many
issues
I
think
hazmat
can
respond
to
that.
If
there
are
issues
as
far
as
breathing
and
things
like
that
going
into
the
technology,
I
think
that's
a
great
plan
for
the
city.
O
What
I
didn't
like
here
today
was
the
bickering
and
the
arguing.
What
what
I?
What
I
do
want
to
say
for
south
bossier
is
that
I
do
like
to
say
that
I
represent
a
lot
of
people
down
there
and
in
that
grassroots
campaign
I
think
we
we
shook
some
trees
and
kicked
some
bushes
and
we
quite
frankly
shocked
some
people,
because
we
are
tired
of
here's.
The
deal
take
it.
We
are
voters,
we
pay
taxes
in
this
city
and
we
want
to
be
represented
by
golly.
We
want
to
be
heard,
we
don't
want
a
deal.
O
The
contract
with
manshack
and
and
just
they're,
I
think,
they're
a
fantastic
company.
I
had.
I
had
a
great
visit
with
you
the
other
day
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
in
fairness
to
them
is
is
finally
set.
This
down,
put
it
in
writing
and
either
make
that
commitment
to
2025,
like
you
said,
or
cut
bait,
it's
not
fair
to
them
to
go
from
day
to
day
any
longer,
they're
doing
a
good
job,
so
we're
either
on
board
or
we're
not.
O
O
I'd
just
like
to
see
in
two
weeks
a
contract
written
in
stone,
not
backdated
in
november,
but
moving
forward
from
the
17th
forward
and
and
lock
it
lock
this
in
lock
it
down.
Let's,
let's
do,
let's
either.
I
think
I
think
it's
important
for
us
as
a
city
to
have
our
own
engineer
local
here,
not
saying
anything
against
manchester.
O
I
I'm
sure
they
will,
but
I
think,
having
a
contract
written
when
we're
spending
our
tax
dollars
is
not
asking
too
much
I'd
just
like
to
see
a
resolution
on
that
for
the
17th
and
see
if
we
can't
lock
something
down
and
if
we're
going
to
do
business
with
these
gentlemen,
not
have
them
worrying
about
tomorrow,
not
being
here,
you
know
we
need.
We
need
to
settle
this.
A
J
O
O
H
C
A
H
Introduce
an
ordinance
authorizing
the
reclassification
of
the
part-time
property
standards.
Clerk
position
in
the
engineering
department
to
a
full-time
cross-contamination
manager
in
the
permits
and
inspections
division
resulted
in
an
increase
to
the
operating
budget
of
forty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
dollars
and
eighty
two
cents
to
be
covered
by
revenues
from
permit
fees.
First,
reading.