►
Description
Docket #0232 - Regarding a text amendment for the Boston Zoning Code Relative to Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
A
C
B
E
Or
Carrie
did
we
because
this
screen
sharing
for.
G
B
G
At
her,
I
can
put
them
up
for
you
if
you
like,
you
can
have
them
up
as
well,
and
you
would
do
you
see
the
share
screen
feature.
Let
me
see.
C
D
H
E
B
G
E
B
Hi,
everyone
today
is
Friday
doing
sorry.
My
mindset
today
is
Tuesday
and
it's
July.
Oh
sorry,
let
me
start
again:
hi
I'm
a
counselor
Edwards,
and
this
is
a
working
session
on
Doc
at
zero.
Two
three
four.
In
order
regarding
a
text
amendment
for
Zoning
Boston
zoning
code,
my
lips
are
permanently
furthering
fair
housing.
I'm,
just
gonna
cut
right
to
it.
This
is
our
third
fourth
conversation
and
about
this.
So
we
are
doing
this
on
zoom
due
to
the
governor
Baker's
executive
order
modifying
certain
requirements
of
the
open
meeting
laws.
B
This
meeting
via
livestream
at
WWDC,
gov,
slash,
City
Council
TV,
will
also
be
rebroadcast
it
at
a
later
date
on
Comcast
8,
/,
RCN,
82,
/
/
eyes
in
1
964
profile.
The
testimony
written
comments
can
be
sent
to
the
committee
email
at
ccc
geo
at
boston
gov
and
will
be
made
part
of
the
record
and
available
to
all
councillors.
This
is
a
working
session,
so
it's
not.
We
don't
necessarily
have
a
formal
public
comment
period
and
I
will
be
directing
where
the
comments
are
going
to
be
about
and
also
moving
us
along.
B
So
we
can
get
to
as
much
work
as
possible.
Cuz
there's
a
lot
to
get
done
today
and
I'm
just
going
to
go
ahead.
An
ounce
there
will
be
another
working
session
as
we
continue
this
conversation,
but
you
know
making
history
isn't
easy:
it
takes
all
hands.
It
takes
a
lot
of
conversations.
It
takes
push
back
and
forward
and
I
think
it's
worth
taking
the
time
to
do
it
right
with
that.
B
Okay,
I'm
also
joined
joining
us
today
from
the
administration
we
have
cement,
Gandhi,
Tim,
Davis
and
Sheila
Dillon
I
believe
Brian,
glass,
John,
Greeley,
excuse
me
and
Brian
glass
is
also
here
as
well,
that's
but
from
the
BPD,
a
and
also
from
DnB.
So
what
I
wanted
to
get
to
right
away
is
what
we're
going
to
do
today
and
what
we're
not
going
to
do
today,
so
that
we
are
very
clear
about
how
we're
going
to
approach
this
massive
document
and
several
the
documents
you
got.
B
Today's
goals
are
very
I.
Would
say
simple,
and
that
is
that
we
are
going
to
present
to
you,
the
public
and
those
who
are
role
that
in
shortly
the
consensus
documents,
consensus,
zoning
amendment
this
by
consensus,
I
mean
myself,
councillor,
Bach
the
BPD,
a
and
D
and
D
sat
down
and
kind
of
went
through
the
zoning
amendment
its
body
and
said
at
a
minimum.
We
agree
to
the
following:
that
is
what
is
presented
to
you
as
the
I
guess
the
progress
update
memo
we
are
gonna
go
through
that,
but
I
want
to
be
very
clear.
B
We
are
not
approving
or
disapproving
specific
language.
We
are
not
looking
at
the
commas,
we're
not
looking
at
the
whether
you
like
the
phrasing
that
is
not
for
this
working
session.
What
I'm
asking
you
to
is
pull
back
a
little
bit
and
and
look
at
the
definitions.
Do
you
see
any
term
of
art
or
any
specific
issue
that
should
be
defined?
We're
gonna,
move
on
to
the
large
and
small
project
review
and
the
areas
of
article
80
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
to
manipulate
and
change.
Do
you
see
there
is?
B
Don't
understand
what
this
means,
but
right
now.
So
if
you
come
with
a
bunch
of
comments
about
how
we
define,
if
I'm,
only
furthering
fair
housing
that
language
we're
not
going
into
any
but
any
specific
definitions
or
language
right
now,
okay,
I
hope
that
is
clear.
The
bulk
of
this
conversation
will
be
about
the
implementation
documents.
There
are
five
documents
presented
to
you
and
that's
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road,
how
we're
assessing
what
developers
are
doing
we're
gonna
look
at
the
smart
utilities
document,
which
is
an
existing
document.
B
The
accessibility
document,
which
is
also
an
existing
document,
I'll,
be
looking
at
a
new
document
on
displacement
assessment,
where
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
going
to
be
very
interested
in
how
we
make
sure
we
have
the
right
checklist,
we'll
be
looking
at.
Also
the
sorry
one,
two
three
four
we'll
be
looking
at
a
document
that
I've
kind
of
pulled
from
councilor
box
memo.
She
sent
over
definitely
doing
the
assessment
of
kind
of
a
checklist
for
developers
in
terms
of
their
ability
to
meet
mitigation
obligations
or
at
least
to
affirmatively.
B
Mitigation
think
I
got
them
if
I
didn't
I
apologize,
but
those
were
sending
it
over
to
you
as
well
to
look
at
one
to
accessibility.
Okay,
so
that
being
said,
we're
gonna
go
now
into
the
larger
document.
That
is
the
consensus
body.
So
far
of
the
amendment
and
I
am
going
to
before
we
go
into
that.
I
will
turn
over
to
my
colleagues
if
they
have
any
opening
remarks
and
any
thoughts
in
general
about
the
goals
and
the
amendment.
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
know
we
have
a
lot
to
get
through
today,
so
I
want
to
set
the
precedent
of
being
brief
and
just
saying
I'm
excited
to
be
working
on
this
and
definitely
as
I've,
expressed
before
I.
Think
looking
at
some
of
these
implementation
documents
and
scaffolding,
documents
is
key
to
this
endeavor.
Alongside
the
zoning
amendments
so
excited
about
the
working
session
today,
Thanks.
F
A
G
B
So
this
is
a
setup
for
the
memo,
basically
summarizing
what
is
in
the
consensus
zoning
amendment.
These
are
the
minimums
we're
going
to
have
definitions
for
affirmatively,
furthering
fair
housing,
analysis
of
impediments,
displacement,
displacement,
risk
index,
a
displacement,
exclusion
index
and
small
businesses.
B
Now
going
to
the
amendment
language
and
at
this
point
folks
who
want
to
have
comments,
questions
or
concerns,
you
can
feel
free
to
raise
your
hand,
because
this
is
this
is
for
my
colleagues
and
for
the
task
force.
Members
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
being
here
today
to
kind
of
go
through.
This
is
not
a
speak
now
or
forever
hold
your
peace
moment
either
for
those
who
are
reading
this
and
realizing.
B
Oh,
my
goodness,
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
a
we're
telling
you
out
of
matter
of
transparency,
what
we
talked
about,
that's
what
good
government
does
we
reflect
what
we
talked
about,
what
we
can,
what
we
thought
made
sense.
We
hope
you
will
respond.
You
can
do
so
now.
You
can
do
so
now
and
later
you
can
do
so
just
later,
all
right
so
into
the
zoning
amendment.
B
See
where
there
were
some
parts
where
we
told
you
where
we
did
some
of
the
redlining,
this
was
to
just
break
down
for
you.
What
we
why
we
did
some
things
or
that
we
were
you,
know
deeply
involved
in
this.
We
took
out
exclusionary,
didn't
want
a
conditioned
on
displacement,
we're
just
going
to
use
displacement,
you'll
see
with
displacement
risk
index.
We
took
out
instead
of
areas
because
we
didn't
want
to
geographically
limited
to
just
putting
in
the
word
index.
B
We
did
that
for
both
historical
and
displacement
risk
index
in
terms
of
our
analysis,
and
then
we
also
included
small
businesses.
This
is
because
of
the
BP
das,
concern
and
I
think
really
great
analysis
or
great
thought
that
small
businesses
can
be
displaced
and
are
a
function
need
to
be
somewhat
protected,
released,
analyzed
and
the
zoning.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we
defined
what
is
small
business.
We
have
not
agreed
on
this
definition.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
defined
up
front.
C
B
B
A
deeper
dive
into
the
sections
of
article
80,
this
particular
section
on
the
cooperation
agreement.
We
are,
we
discussed
this
at
length
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
agreement
did
reflect
that
there
are
certain
standards
for
from
Italy
further
in
crack
houses
to
the
DPD
A's
credit.
They
noted
that
having
it
just
there
is
too
late
in
the
process
and
that
what
we're
going
to
do
ultimately
is
put
a
certain
standard
in
the
BPA
board
memo
memorandum
that
they
have
to
comply
with
much
earlier
in
the
process.
B
So
this
is
this
is
not
it's
not
sufficient
and
it
won't
be
consistent
either.
So
that
is
to
their
credit
and
you'll,
see.
We
took
out
some
language
before
at
the
very
bottom.
That
is
because
we
thought
that
the
BBD,
a
language
excuse
me,
the
PDA
language,
is
more
suited
in
the
PDA
section.
It
didn't
it's
not
deleted
permanently.
B
B
B
And
if
you're
just
one
second
Jesse
you'll,
it's
not
in
this
zoning
amendment,
but
all
the
other
numbers
have
their
own
little
paragraph,
defining
of
what
it's
going
to
happen
as
well.
So
this
is
this
being
consistent
of
what
they've
done
for
other
parts
and
other
analyses
throughout
the
BPD.
I
didn't
keep
going
down.
B
Though
10
and
11,
this
I
thought
was
very,
this
was
a
suggestion
from
the
ppb
PDA.
It
makes
complete
sense.
These
are
already
parts
of
their
analysis
for
accessibility,
which
is
very
important
to
know
that
that
document
that
we're
going
to
look
at
was
defined
and
designed
by
folks
in
the
disability
community.
They
let
on
that,
and
this
smart
utilities
is
more
of
a
function
of
several
city
government
components
that
also
let
on
that
checklist.
They
both
exist
right
now
already,
but
what
was
really
I
thought.
B
B
B
E
B
E
B
B
Again,
that's
what
a
lot
of
J
does
as
well.
It
makes
sure
again
that
the
the
approval
is
part
of
that
and
I
think
if
you'll
go,
if
you
go
a
little
bit,
did
we
skip
this
amendment
part.
B
You
know
this
is
the
section,
so
this
is
Jay's
particularly
important.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
anytime
there's
an
amendment
to
the
PDA,
because
PDAs
can
last
for
years
that
this
would
that
there
would
be
a
hook
so
that
every
time
an
amendment
happens,
there's
a
an
analysis
under
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing.
B
We
wanted
that
to
be
very
clear
and
then
I
think
that's
ready,
just
as
you
go
down
yeah
and
then
I
removed
an
entire
section
on
East
Boston,
because
we've
agreed
to
remove,
because
we've
agreed
that
there
will
be
and
certain
ongoing
developments
in
East
Boston
will
be
subject
to
the
amendment
once
it's
implemented.
So
that's
an
outside
conversation.
It
was
the
only
neighborhood
highlighted
in
the
zoning
amendment,
so
it
made
it
an
outlier
I
think
councillor,
walk
and
I
talked
about
how
having
just
one
neighborhood
put
out.
A
B
Question
and
I
and
and
a
goal
that
I
am
trying
to
meet,
though
that
there
be
PDA
and
tell
me
if
we've
met
it.
If
that's
what
we
wanted,
the
amendment
language,
because
PDAs
inevitably
do
change
or
they'll
come
back
for
some
sort
of
change
and
when
they
come
back,
we
wanted
that
analysis
to
include
the
PDR
this.
This
standard
I
could
be
wrong
at
the
BPD.
A
could
correct
or
add
to
what
I
just
said.
J
I'm,
that's
thank
you
concentrated
for
the
weekly
question.
Yes,
we're.
Definitely
thinking
about
those
I
mean
the
fact
that
when
PD
has
come
back
for
amendments,
we
want
to
be
sure
that
the
commitments
made
when
the
PD
is
first
approve
is
not
watered
down.
So
that's
something
that
we
definitely
agree
with
and
we'll
be
working
through
this
language
to
see
how
it
impacts
already
approved
PDAs.
So
thank
you
for
that
question.
We've
made
that
point
as
well
amongst
ourselves
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
capturing,
or
at
least
addressing
it
responsibly
way.
A
B
B
L
L
Thank
You
counsel,
Edwards.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
on
this
important
issue.
I
strongly
support
what
the
proposal
that
you
are
outlining.
My
my
goal
like
yours
is
to
make
sure
that
Boston
is
a
welcoming
city
to
all,
especially
for
people
in
need
for
our
seniors
for
our
immigrant
neighbors
and
that's
the
low-income
residents.
L
That's
what
I'm
I
hope
to
partner
and
work
closely
with
you
in
the
administration
on
and
there's
a
lot
of
major
developments.
I
think
counselor
Braden
outlined
it
as
well.
There's
a
lot
of
major
developments
in
and
around
my
district.
You
know.
I
would
certainly
like
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
opportunity
in
their
space
in
those
developments
for
low-income
residents
or
for
seniors,
well,
communities
of
color
and
our
immigrant
neighbors
I
thinking
out
loud.
L
B
As
I
mentioned,
there
were
two
documents
that
already
exist
that
the
BPD
a
uses
that
are
now
going
to
be
part
of
the
zoning
code.
That's
the
smart
utilities
and
the
accessibility
document
and
I
think
in
our
conversation
to
Mayberry,
the
BPD
may
very
clear,
there's
certain
stakeholders
who
are
not
here
right
now,
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
accessibility
for
folks
with
disabilities.
They're
not
here
at
this
table
and
so
I
wanted
to.
B
You
know
I
think
everything
deserves
a
fresh
set
of
eyes
to
look
at
that,
but
to
manipulate
or
make
commitments
about,
changes
will
make
to
already
existing
documents
informed
by
the
community.
Directly
impacted
by
them
is
a
commitment
that
we're
not
comfortable
making
right
now
that
I
did
I
characterized
that
correctly
so
now,
you're.
E
B
The
smart
utilities,
one
also
has
some
stakeholders,
mostly
industry
in
city
folks,
and
certain
agencies
within
the
city,
but
I'm
glad
that
they're
at
the
table,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
this
document,
where
I
think
most
of
the
advocates,
are
on
the
front
lines
of
dealing
with
displacement.
Gentrification
I
want
your
perspective
on
this,
so
we're
going
to
turn
now
since
an
assessment
from
the
BPD
I.
Nothing.
If
you
could
share
your
screen.
J
Sure
so,
just
for
the
record,
we
just
we
didn't
receive
any
of
the
documents
ahead
of
time.
I
just
asked
Jesse
for
them
by
email.
I
just
got
them
two
minutes
ago.
So
just
want
to
be
clear
that
we
didn't
get
any
of
these.
J
This
set
of
documents
ahead
of
time,
but
you
know:
we've
seen
the
displacement
assessment,
of
course,
and
the
spa
utilities
and
disabilities
checklists
are
existing,
so
I'm
happy
to
walk
through
this
colleagues,
Tim,
Davis
and
Lizzy
are
also
on
this
call
who
you
know,
did
a
lot
of
the
work
on
putting
these
together.
So
as
we
go
through
these,
as
there
are
questions
or
happy
to
defer
to
them.
B
I
just
want
to
address
apologize,
you
didn't
get
it
I
thought
I
had
sent
it
out
to
everyone.
I
thought
we
sent
it
out
as
a
group
from
from
Christine
to
everybody
participants.
Luckily,
four
of
the
three
of
the
four
documents
you
guys
already
have.
These
are
your
documents
yeah.
The
only
one
thing
is
new
and
that's
just
a
part
pulled
out
from
councillor
box
memo
yeah.
J
J
Section
1
is
really
the
and
I
know
Jesse
you're
you're
driving
some
I'll.
Let
you
drive
as
I'm
talking
section.
1
is
a
product
overview.
It's
it's
really
the
you
know
that,
based
on
information
about
the
project,
the
project
name
address
one
other
thing.
I'd
like
to
add
is
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
standardizing
what
we're
asking
of
all
developers
and
also
ponents.
So
this
was
a
way
to
make
sure
we're
getting
this
similar
same
information
from
all
proponents,
so
project
name
address
total
number
of
phases
or
buildings
in
the
project.
J
The
primary
contact,
the
owner
proponent,
who
the
attorney
is
the
marketing
company,
the
BPD,
a
project
manager.
You
know
the
staff
person
to
be
PD
a
will
be
leading
this
through
the
article
80
process,
the
BPD,
a
planner,
the
purchase
date
of
the
product
site,
the
planning
area.
What
whatare
does
is
belong
in.
We
have
a
lot
of
planning
areas
happening,
the
city
right
now,
planning
initiatives
and,
if
it,
if
it
belongs
and
others
initiatives,
what
area
is
it
in
and
then
what
stage
of
development
review
process
is
it's
a
project
in
on
the
date?
J
The
successive
missing
pulled
out
so
counselor
bleedin.
This
might
this
would
address
your
comment
earlier
about.
You
know
part
is
coming
back
in
after
they
are
approved,
we're
looking
at
large
project,
expanded
large
project
response
and
notice,
the
project
change
and
the
resubmission
prior
to
be
arable
condition
board
consideration
the
building
classification.
What
is
the
construction
classification.
B
E
M
B
I
might
check
in
with
my
colleagues
first
if
they
had
anything
to
say,
apologies
but
to
councillor
Jamie
and
to
councillor
Makia
we're
screen
shattering
WP,
DA's
document
or
checklist
for
the
to
make
this
zoning
amendment
real
the
implementation.
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at!
We
just
see
if
you
could
scroll
up
so
you're
just
dealing
with
councillor.
Excuse
me
section
a
that's.
J
B
The
overall
section-
and
that
is
what
we're
looking
at
right
now
and
so
we're
gonna
anybody-
have
any
questions
about
that
particular
section.
We're
gonna
have
folks
do
that.
I
had
one
question
and
that
was
specifically
around
the
role
of
would
it
be
announced
in
this
part
of
who
the
diversity
inclusion
officer
is
who
is
reviewing
that
or
someone
on
their
staff
as
to
be
guiding
the
community
process?
Is
this
where
you
put
that
in
there
I
noticed
you
put
another
BPD,
a
staff.
B
J
Think
I
think
I
mean.
Are
you
talking
about
the
diversity
inclusion
director
that
we
the
job
the
job
that
we
have
out
right
now?
Yeah?
Oh,
so
you
know
that's
how
that
person
start
and
then
we
can
know
this.
This
is
a.
This
is
a
first
step
at
this
and
as
soon
as
that
person
starts,
we
can
put.
We
can
start
filling
in
the
details,
but
this
is
meant
to
be
a
baseline
and
we
can
certainly
start
you
know.
J
E
Okay,
anyone
else
on
section
a.
E
L
B
J
J
Let's
take
a
note
here
and
I'll:
take
it
back
to
the
team,
and
you
know
I,
don't
want
to
make
a
commitment
today,
but
I
definitely
can
take
that
as
a
team
and
to
see
how
we
can
make
sure
we
getting
that
information
in
the
right
way,
because
the
financing
you
know
we've
heard
that
financing
partners
can
also
change
as
the
project
evolves.
So
I
kind
of
want
to
be
responsible
as
to
how
we
ask
that
question
so
we're
getting
the
right
information,
the
right
kind.
B
F
I
Think
that
it's
worth
just
kind
of
gauging
kind
of
what
their
portfolio,
if
you
will
looks
like
so
I'm,
just
wondering
if
there's
any
way
for
us
to
be
able
to
identify
that,
and
if
we
can
name
the
you
know
the
locations
or
just
probably,
this
zip
codes,
if
whatever
some
some
sort
of
data
that
we
can
assess
and
then
I'm
also
curious.
If
this
is
this
stage
here,
is
it
possible
to
know
what
role
community
has
played
in
terms
of
informing
this
project?
I
M
This
is
this
is
Tim
Venus.
There
are
questions
we
haven't
gotten
to
in
forum
that
do
discuss.
Ask
the
developer
to
tell
us
more
about
what
they
are
going
to
do
around
the
ffh.
I
think
that
there
could
be
a
possibility
of
including
in
that
question
or
in
that
series
of
questions,
a
question
that
says:
how
did
they
come
to
that
conclusion?
What
kind
of
community
input
did
they
use.
I
That
would
be
helpful,
Tim
councillor
David.
Thank
you
for
that
and
then
in
regards
to,
is
it
possible
to
also
I
just
it
would
just
be
helpful
and
I'm
gonna
assume
this
is
gonna,
be
public
information,
but
to
have
a
sense
of
just
the
the
developers
portfolio
like
how
many
projects
already
in
production
in
certain
neighborhoods
kind
of
like
you
know.
How
can
we
keep
track
of
that?
B
J
Okay,
thank
you,
I
think
that
does
make
sense
as
well
I'm,
not
sure
if
it
belongs
in
this
assessment
per
se,
but
appreciate
what
you
were
saying
console
me
here
about
the
developer
portfolio.
It's
not
we're
getting.
You
know,
folks
who
are
who
are
kind
of
responsible
developers
and
have
done
you
know,
I've
done
good
work,
and
so
we're
not
kind
of.
We
definitely
heard
that
comment.
Yeah
and.
I
B
I
A
Just
a
quick
question
in
terms
of
the
Tim
mentioned
that
that
this
overview,
this
review
can
be
proud,
triggered
at
different
stages,
is
it
possible
and
for
the
community
stakeholders
to
ask
for
a
in
review
again.
You
know
if
you
don't
just
if
they
assume
that
there's
maybe
an
issue
that
can
community
stakeholders
asked
for
for
an
overview,
a
project
overview
again
to
trigger
another
review,
as
things
go
forward.
B
A
B
You
know
the
analysis
for
several
things,
not
just
this
for
them
to
make
sure
they
come
back,
but
the
traffic
is
still
flowing
the
way
they
promised
it
would
that
their
parking
is
still
at
the
ratio.
They
said
that
the
environment,
environmental
impact
is
still
the
same,
and
so
we
want
this
also
in
that
list
as
well,
but
it's
usually
developer
triggered.
J
Now
I
would
I
was
going
to
add.
You
know.
You've
got
several
stages
off
article
80
development,
so
we've
got
the
you
know:
dly
you've
got
the
PMF
and
then
you've
got
a
they
get
scoped.
So
this
would
be
part
of
the
scoping
session
is
called
Mia
termination
and
then
they
file.
You
know
responses
to
the
comment
responses
to
the
comments
received
on
this
company
termination,
so
this
would
be
part
of
that
filing,
so
article
80,
has
you
know.
J
Specific
sections
in
the
specific
deliverables
are
based
on
what
they're
filing
for
the
article
80
process,
the
LOI,
the
PMF,
the
scoping,
your
termination,
the
something
on
documentation
at
EPA
are,
and
so
this
would
be
part
of
that
filing,
so
that
so
I
think
it.
You
know.
We
also
don't
want
to
make
this
completely
burdensome
and
yeah.
You
know
want
to
make
this
too.
The
way
is
valuable
to
both
the
community
and
and
meaningful
for
the
community
as
well.
J
So
I
mean
I,
don't
read
it
out,
but
I
think
it's
on,
maybe
one
screens
but
we're
looking
to
ask
and
other
building
classification
description.
The
construction
classification
is
this
new
construction
site
area
and
then
kind
of
what
I
know
what
a
part
of
article
80
that
the
project
is
such
a
review
under
so
is
it
ATB
Your
Honor,
a
DC
which
is
large
project
and
PDA
and
then
also
the
part
is
located
within
a
landmark
district
or
a
conservation
district.
So
we
wanted
to
get
that
information
as
well
as
part
of
this
assessment.
J
B
This
be
a
place
to
put
in
the
the
question
about
that
council
media
had
about
concentrations
of
I,
don't
know
poverty.
Concentrations
of
people
of
color
are
concentrations
of
because
she
had
asked
where
the
project
is
going
to
go.
Is
it
going
into
a
traditionally,
you
know
Asian
community?
Is
it
going?
Is
this
with
this
being
appropriate
question
nice.
J
One
a
week,
scroll
down
is
I
think
we
have
the
analysis
that
I
see
it
yeah
you're
right,
yeah.
Okay,
maybe
you
know
I
think
if
we
go
through
the
form
we
might
be
able
to
answer
some
of
the
questions
but
but
I'm
having
these
questions
asked
now
is
actually
really
helpful
because
you
can
start
identifying
where
and
this
in
the
assessment
we've
actually
started
thinking
about
those
things
or
address
those
things.
One.
I
B
Does
come
later
in
the
form?
Okay,
I
think
it
does?
No,
no
that's
fine!
So
we,
unless
anyone
has
any
questions
about
B
and
C
we're
gonna
go
into
scroll
down
Gussie
to
addressing
the
displacement
and
project
site
cancer.
I'm
awesome
off
wow.
J
I'm
joining
Tim
in
this
hey.
Thank
you,
alright!
So
addressing
displacement,
so
the
system
you
know
displacement
at
the
project
site.
We
want
to
be
sure
that
we're
looking
at
commercial
development
here
as
well,
which
I
thank
you
for
matching
that
at
the
beginning
of
this
session,
so
we're
looking
at
previous
and
current
you
just
at
the
project,
site
and
property
and
Tim.
Please
really
jump
in
on
any
of
this.
If
I
may
speak
or
does
any
more
information
you
want
to
give
on
any
of
these
comments.
J
But
really
you
know
getting
a
good
kind
of
baseline
information
about
what
you
know
what
has
been
previous
and
current
leaders
on
this
site?
What
was
there
and
what
is
there
on
this
site?
So
have
there
been
any
buildings
on
this
site
and
any
time
in
the
last
two
years?
Any
bill
is
on
this
site
currently
and
then,
very
importantly,
if
yes
are
they
currently
vacant,
you
know:
are
they
really
vacant
or
not?
J
If
yes,
we'd,
like
to
have
more
information
and
you'll,
see
that
we
actually
ask
for
more
detailed
information
as
we
scroll
down
that
there
are
tenants,
have
they
been
informed
of
any
changes
in
ownership
if
I'm
looking
at
a
different
I'm
looking
at
my
computer
so
because
I,
it's
very
difficult
to
read
the
small
writing
there.
So
I
have
a
different
control
here
and
then
this
is
the
details
that
we're
asking
for
for
residential
tenants,
total
number
of
units.
What
is
the
current
vacant
vacancy
rate?
Are
there
any?
J
This
is
really
important,
current
or
expiring,
affordability,
restrictions
or
special
property
tax
agreements.
So
you
know
if
we,
if
we're
looking
at
buildings
or
projects
that
have
affordability,
restrictions
and
if
they're
expiring,
how
do
we
look
at
those
and
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we're
addressing
any
expiring
affordability
restrictions,
office
of
housing
stability?
Isn't
really
we
can
resource?
Have
the
tenants
been
informed
of
this
source?
J
This
is
gonna
family
units,
so
I
really
is
placing
is
this
project
displacing
families
I
think
that's
a
really
important
one
that
we
wanted
to
capture
household
income
residents
for
not
option
in
English
and
if
there
are
any
any
relocation
of
financial
assistance
that
have
been
provided
or
will
be
provided
to
tenants
to
a
short
housing
stability
and
then
similar
questions
on
commercial
space,
the
number
of
commercial
spaces.
You
know
the
square
footage,
the
tenancy,
etc
on
commercial
spaces
and
then
any
notification
center
tenants
related
to
the
proposed
redevelopment
of
the
property.
M
J
M
Think
that
the
challenge
for
us
is
knowing
exactly
how
far
we
can
look
back.
I
mean
there's
not
a
easy
answer
that
we
thought
that
one
year
was
certainly
too
soon.
Two
years
seemed
you
know
typical.
Usually
if
someone
is
clearing
out
a
property
they're
not
going
to
sit
on
it
for
two
years
before
they
then
submit
it
for
development
review.
So
we
felt
like
two
years
would
capture
any
of
those.
M
We
are
looking
for
information
on
that
last
two
years,
even
if
the
owner
of
the
current
owner
not
own
it
for
that
two
years,
so
if
they
bought
the
property
from
someone,
they'll
have
to
submit
to
the
best
of
their
knowledge
who
is
living
in
the
property
even
before
they
bought
the
property.
We
know
that's
difficult.
It
may
take
work
on
the
on.
The
BPD
may
have
to
do
some
work
to
maybe
try
to
identify
if
there
were
in
the
tenants
there
to
kind
of
flush
out.
M
B
B
B
B
You
asked
about:
are
they
currently
vacant
and
I'm?
Assuming
you
mean,
therefore,
there's
that
the
building
is
completely
I,
think
it's
I,
don't
know,
I
think
there
should
be
some
wiggle
room
for
some
people
who
are
under
eviction,
orders
I,
think
that
should
be
in
there.
You
should
be
asking
if
anyone's
under
an
eviction
order.
Do
you
plan
on
filing
an
eviction
order
in
order
to
do
or
to
have
your
building
put
through
and
also
asking
if
anyone
has
been
recently
evicted
in
the
last
two
years,
at
least
from
that
building?
B
B
About
the
tenants
currently
inhabiting
any
buildings
on
the
project
site
I,
this
maybe
means
being
too
technical,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
have
it
who
inhabit
buildings,
who
are
not
officially
tenants
right,
so
I,
don't
I
still
want
that
to
be
part
of
the
analysis,
I
mean
whether
they
have
a
legal
right
to
stay
there
or
not.
They
could
be
squatting,
they
could
be
in
the
middle
of
fighting
about
their
tendency,
so
I
just
think
narrowing
it
down
to
tenants
versus.
Are
there
any?
B
E
L
M
Think
that
ought
to
be
señal,
but
that's
I
think
that's
the
reference
to
the
question
where
it
asks
about.
Are
there
any
special
property
tax
agreements
on
section
8,
120,
180
121?
Be
it's
asking
for
that
information?
That
would
tell
us
that
this
project
may
have
some
special
special
requirements,
and
we
do
this
as
a
BPD,
a
I
when
I
was
a
VP
da
when
we
had
a
project
that
had
an
agreement
like
this
on
it,
it
was
already.
M
B
Trying
time
whether
it's
deed,
restricted
yeah,
it
depends
on
how
much
it
flows
with
with
the
property
counselor
fund,
I'm
thinking
like
121
days,
maybe
you're
thinking
about
that
right
with
certain
parts
or
long-term
tax
relief.
Given
for
the
developer
to
do
something,
and
sometimes
they
don't
do
it.
Whatever.
L
L
B
M
Yeah,
so
so
I
think
this
question
is:
is
meant
to
for
the
developer
to
tell
us
what
they
understand.
The
project
already
has
agreements
on
so
that
we
can
include
that
in
the
process
in
terms
of
figuring
out
what
the
project
can
or
can't
do.
Given
those
agreements,
the
it's,
it's
a
coming
up
on
the
VPD,
a
to
kind
of
make
sure
that
they
have
that
ground
cover
it
anyway,
because
those
agreements
could
then
obviously
change
what
the
project
can
be.
Yeah.
L
Yeah
Tim
I,
guess
I'm
just
thinking,
if
maybe
10
years
ago,
if
there
was
a
company
that
received
a
major
tax
break
to
come
to
the
city
and
they
received
that
tax
break,
and
now
they
may
want
to
sell
that
building.
So
they
got
the
land
for
a
song
and
now
the
selling
it
for
for
a
profit.
Do
you
envision
that
happening?
I.
J
Think
I
think
I
understand
what
you're
saying
councilor
flame,
which
is
it's
the
it's
a
tax
break
to
a
developer
or
it's
the
who
it's
the
who
and
then
it's
the
it's
and
it's
the
where
so,
I
I
think
you're
I
think
I.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
you're,
trying
to
understand
kind
of
if
tax
break
was
given
to
a
developer,
a
particular
proponent,
who
is
now
no
longer
part
of
the
project.
What
happens
when
that
tax
break?
Is
that
what
you're
trying
to
understand
yeah.
J
You
know
it's
it's
something
that
we
also
definitely
look
at
and-
and
this
is
this
is
our
way-
the
reason
that
this
was
added
here.
A
big
reason
for
that
is
to
capture
that,
as
Tim
mentioned,
it
is
part
of
our
kind
of
review,
and
this
was
a
way
to
memorialize.
It
I'm
gonna
put
a
pin
on
that,
because
I
think
it's
an
important
point.
Counselor
I,
don't
have
an
answer
for
you
today,
but
I
think
it's
an
important
point.
I
mean
I'll
put
up
here
on
that
you're
right,
yeah.
L
N
Thank
you
so
much
councillor
Edwards
for
allowing
me
to
ask
a
question
and
I'm
sorry
if
this
is
somewhere
else
in
the
document
and
I'm
missing
it,
but
wouldn't
we
also
want
to
know
the
racial
and
ethnic
composition
of
the
units
and
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
and
I'm,
not
sure
I
see
this
those
questions
anywhere
in
this
particular
document
and
if
I
missing
it.
Please
show
me
where
it
is,
but
I
think
that
would
be
important
to
know.
E
Thank
you,
revenuers.
M
That's
what
all
want
me
to
answer
that
with
the
question
about
the
neighborhood
will
come
later
the
question
about
the
specific
tenants.
We
can
certainly
add
something
asking
the
race,
ethnicity,
I,
think
the
only
thing
is
obviously
the
question
be
whether
the
landlord
is
making
that
assertion
of
what
the
race,
ethnicity
of
the
tenant
or
the
occupant
is
or
whether
or
not
the
tenant
themselves
is
making
that
statement.
But
yes,
we
could
Bo
include
that.
E
H
H
H
I
M
B
C
I
Yes
and
I'm
just
curious
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
in
this
section
or
even
legal
to
ask
but
and
I'm
sure
counselors
will.
Let
me
know
about
myself,
but
I'm,
just
curious
as
to
whether
or
not
we
can
ask
the
racial
diversity
of
the
developers
company
is
that
information
we
could
ask
without
you
know
violating
any
laws,
but
I
would,
if
it's
not
anywhere
I'd
like
to
know
it
if
it's
possible
to
get
a
sense
of
the
makeup
of
the
developers,
studio
or
whatever
that
you
want
to
call
it
about
their
office.
So.
J
J
So
I
just
want
to
just
caution
before
making
that
commitment
today
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
can
legally
ask
that
question
about
race
and
ethnicity
in
this
assessment,
so
number
one
that
and
number
two
counsel
me
to
answer
the
question
about
the
makeup
of
the
developer
team.
You
know
we,
we
do
get
pretty
detailed
information
about
the
developer
development
team
and
you
know
kind
of
and
and
a
lot
of
times
we
we
do.
J
You
know
the
developers
will
submit
to
us,
and
this
is-
and
this
is
this
is
our
makeup
of
our
development
team
when
it
comes
to
women
and
gender
etc.
But
again,
I
want
to
be
very
careful
about
making
commitments
about
asking
about
race
and
ethnicity
before
you
know,
to
make
sure
we've
gotten
input
from
our
from
from
the
legal
minds
and
I'm.
Not
a
lawyer.
I
want
to
be
sure
that
we've
we've
done
this
through
our
legal
team.
So
we're
asking
questions
that
we
legally
permitted
to
ask
about
yoga.
I
And
that's
fair,
that's
really
fair
I
hate
that
anything
that
I
would
like
to
just
kind
of
like
add,
and
just
kind
of
a
word
of
caution
is
that
I've
been
in
enough
of
these
development
meetings.
You
know
whether
it
be
as
a
member
of
the
Civic
Association
or
just
a
busybody
or
just
a
city
councilor,
and
all
these
spaces
that
I've
been
in
what
I
have
seen
is
that
a
lot
of
developers
come
and
they
usually
have
a
partner.
I
So
I
think
whether
while
I
appreciate
the
whole
notion
of
not
being
able
to
I
really
identify
and
and
all
that,
I
just
think
that
there
needs
to
be
something
that
we
can
do
to
ensure
that
people
are
not
just
doing
things
to
just
check
off
the
box,
but
that
the
people
of
color
that
are
participating
in
these
processes
and
in
these
projects
really
do
have
a
formal
voice
and
not
something
that
is
just
transactional
and
I.
I
Don't
know
how
we
assess
that
in
this
type
of
environment
or
if
this
is
even
something
that
we
can
address
and
within
this
intake
form,
but
I
just
really
do
want
to
ensure
that
these
things
are
not
transactional
and
that
there
is
some
real
accountability
about
who
is
at
the
table
and
what
these
developers
are
committing
to
and
what
you
know
what
their
background
is.
I
guess
no.
B
Thank
you,
I
would
say,
there's
a
similar
process
with
cannabis.
Where
we
do
ask
about
their
ownership
structure,
we
do
have
assigned
points
and
we
actually
basically
grade
their
who
they
are,
what
where
they
were
there
from
there,
the
impact
of
the
war
on
drugs
on
them.
We
do
ask
if
they're
a
person
of
color,
we
listed
the
different
method,
ethnic
group,
so
the
city
does
that
I,
don't
know
how
it
is
done.
I
don't
think
we
do
again.
Zoning,
but
I
did
want
to
say
we
have
a
similar
process
for
other.
B
H
J
Yeah
and
thank
you
for
that
comment,
I
think
you
know
again.
We
want
to
be
very
careful
about
convenient
reality
as
well
when
it
comes
to
tenants.
So
here
the
I
hear
that
sentiment
very
loud
and
clear,
but
you
know
it's
it's
virtual.
We
want
to
do
as
much
as
we
possibly
can
in
this
assessment,
but
we
also
want
to
be
clear
when
we're
going
to
be
sure
that
we
are
asking
questions
that
we
can
legally
ask
and
also
respect.
J
You
know
people's
confidentiality
and
if
you
know
tenants
don't
want
to
get
information,
they
don't
so
you
know
making
it
a
requirement
would
be.
Is
is
great,
but
it's
also,
you
know
it
takes
two
to
tango
as
well.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
asking
questions
that
we
can
get
answers
to
in
the
right
way
and
in
the
right
time
in
the
process.
Absolutely.
J
B
J
Thank
you,
alright,
so
commercial,
you
know
a
number
of
commercial
spaces
and
no
tenants
in
any
building
in
the
project
site.
What
has
been
the
vacancy?
The
you
know
how
much
occupied
how
much
vacant,
what
the
square
footage
is.
The
most
recent
place,
holder,
name,
the
type
of
business,
the
name
of
business.
Is
it
a
nonprofit
organization?
J
20
of
the
tenancy
is
a
let
you
know.
I
mean
I
won't
lead
with
all
this
honest
on
your
screen,
but
you
know
we've
kind
of
captured
a
list
of
things
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
getting
from
developers
when
it
comes
to
the
commercial
space
on
on
on
a
project
site,
and
then,
if
the,
if
there
has
been
any
relocation
of
financial
assistance
that
has
been
provided
or
will
be
provided
to
show
us
ability,
we
will
also
give
you
know,
make
sure
we're
getting
the
information
from
the
proponents.
Thank.
B
B
If
it's
the
only
bodega,
if
it's
the
only
laundromat,
which
I've
seen
you
don't
happen,
you
know,
if
that's
what's
going
to
be
displaced,
I,
think
it's
worth
noting
how
many
other
options
the
community
has
and
and
and
to
really
push
for,
especially
in
the
only
ones
what
kind
of
relocation
assistance
within
the
community
within
the
sub
community.
It's
one
I
mean
you
know.
East
boss
is
big,
so
someone's
displaced
from
Jeffrey's
point
as
the
only
laundromat
and
you
put
in
an
orient
height.
So
that's
not
helpful.
J
Get
it
I
think
I
think
it
brings
into
into
the
question
then
becomes
of
the
you
know
the
radius.
What
is
the
radius
of
relocation
and
a
radius
of
analysis?
So
I
yeah
I?
That's
that's
a
that's
a
good,
especially
for
grocery
stores
and
bodegas,
which
which
me,
if
there's
only
one
soul,
that
does
make
a
significant
impact
on
the
community
so
totally
get
that
yeah.
B
Then
also
in
terms
of
if
a
developer
is
providing
commercial
space,
how
many
small
businesses
are
they
providing
it
to?
Are
they
providing
long
term
leases?
You
know
one
of
top
displacement
issues
we
found
is
that
many
small
businesses
don't
have
long-term
leases.
They
have
their
their
a
month
a
month
and
they
have
absolutely
none
of
the
protections
and
a
lot
of
tenants
do
so
just
curious
about
the
leasing
structure.
They're
gonna
provide
for
small
businesses.
Maybe
asking
about
that
yeah.
J
So
this
is
where
this
is,
where
I
think
the
the
issue
of
private
development
versus
city-owned
property
comes
into
play
as
well.
You
know,
and
not
that
I
just
want
to.
You
know
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
having
having
done
this
kind
of
work
for
many
years
now.
I
think
what
we
hear
from
private
development
is
it's
very
difficult
to
to
get
tendencies
in
certain
locations,
and
that
might
that
might
be
a
you
know.
J
It's
yes,
absolutely,
but
you
know
one
of
me
careful
about
what
the
results
are
and
kind
of
be
realistic
about
how
we
can
make
sure
that
we're
achieving
those
goals
on
private
development,
where
we,
the
city,
really
has
not
doesn't
have
as
much
leverage
as
we
do
with
public
public
property.
So
I
totally
hear
what
you're
saying
I
just
want.
B
J
Here
that
it's
just
it's,
it's
I'm
going
I'm
thinking
about
the
kind
of
the
enforcement
and
reporting.
So
if,
if
I
develop,
if
you
know,
if
we've
said
that
this
must
be,
you
know
small
businesses
on
this
much
of
a
site
and
it
doesn't
happen.
Do
you
do
a
variety
of
reasons?
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
put
a
pin
on
that
to
say
this.
F
F
Potentially,
like
type
of
employees,
so
whether
it's
a
full-time
salaried
employee
versus
an
hourly
worker,
whether
or
not
we
can
ask
about
wage
rates
because
it
would
it's.
You
know
to
me
it's
important
to
know
what
types
you
know
how,
when
a
typical
when
a
type
of
business
is
put,
is
moved
or
put
it
out
of
business
or
closed
or
whatever,
because
of
a
development.
What
is
the
lost?
F
Two
jobs
in
particular,
so
I,
don't
know
how
much
detail
we
want
to
go
into
and
I
appreciate
that
a
lot
of
the
focuses
around
the
residential
piece
and
the
impact
on
the
resident,
but
the
business
you
know
we
know
locally
owns
businesses,
do
typically
pay
higher
wages
and
play
a
different
role
in
a
particular
community.
So.
L
L
Immigrants,
many
immigrants,
you
know,
as
the
city
was
booming
prior
to
covert
19.
Many
of
them
were
afraid
that
they
were
going
to
be
displaced
and
eventually
that
that
seems
likely.
You
know
both
the
last
thing
I
want
to
see
in
my
district
is
is,
is
moving
a
successful
small
business.
That's
doing
well,
that's
employing
a
handful
of
people.
It's
it's
women-owned
that
it's
its
immigrant
owned.
What
what
are
we
doing
for
that
small
business
to
stay
in
in
that
location?
We're
able
to
make
these?
L
L
E
B
Counselor,
that's
an
absolute
priority
and
needs
to
be
something
that
is
part
of
our
analysis,
especially
in
the
economic
development
office
of
economic
development.
Who
is
going
to
be
at
the
seeds
of
keeping
a
lot
of
businesses
open,
as
you
know,
with
the
liquor
licensing
and
all
that
other
the
grants
are
coming
from
the
economic
development
right.
The
small
grants
I
don't
know
that
that
makes
sense
for
this
particular
checklist
unless
I
think.
B
Actually
the
checklist
does
ask
them
how
they're
helping
or,
if
they're,
relocating
a
business
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
but
they're
financing
and
the
ability
to
keep
them
open.
I.
Don't
think
that
it
belongs
in
this
checklist,
but
we
should
definitely
look
at
how
this
checklist
works
with
economic
development.
Does
that
make
sense
this
councillor
Flynn?
Yes,.
B
Are
great
points
I
mean
that
they
all
do
marry
each
other,
but
just
on
a
checklist
point
councillor,
Braden
I
want.
A
B
Just
did
to
say:
yes,
we
I
think
no
one
disagrees
with
you.
Councillor,
Braden
I.
Do
think
part
of
that
analysis,
though,
is
in
the
form
it
does
ask
who
was
there
before
in
the
last
two
years?
It
does
ask
you
know
what
kind
of
business
was
there,
and
that
does
help
us
in
terms
of
tracking
and
understanding
how
the
person
is
moving
in
the
city.
B
What
businesses
or
areas
are
buying
up
and
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
really
important
for
us,
because
I
can
point
to
some
developers
and
he's
the
boss
and
they
specifically
buy
up
car
garages
or
auto
mechanic
places
on
purpose
to
turn
it
into
you
know:
y'all,
zing
and
stuff,
so
I
agree
with
you.
The.
A
B
J
I,
just
I
just
want
to
piggyback
on
that
Thank
You
councillor,
Edwards
I,
think
it's
important
to
be
very
disciplined
as
to
kind
of
what
this
will
do
with
this.
What
what
this
cannot
do
and
where
all
the
points
that
were
raised
that
have
been
raised
are
extremely
valid.
But
you
know
we
want
to
be
careful
about
kind
of
where
where's
these
issues.
J
J
You
know
kind
of
being
kind
of
discipline
as
to
our
thinking
as
to
what
we're
asking
here
and
the
results
that
we
can
expect
from
this
process
and
what
you
know
that
what
belongs?
Why
is
it
very
important,
but
is
addressed
in
you
know,
is
being
addressed
by
other
efforts
across
the
city.
So
I
just
want
to
be
kind
of
very
cautious
about
that,
because
I
don't
want
to.
You
know
be
a
situation
where
we're
over
promising
something,
and
it
does
not.
You
know
this.
J
This
is
this
is
limited
to
the
zoning
code
and
limiting
limited
to
kind
of
what
we
can
do
on
a
project
site
for
private
developers,
and
so
there
are
limitations,
but
the
all
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
are
extremely
valid,
and
thus
you
know
the
city
is
well
equipped
to
deal
with
a
lot
of
these
issues
in
you
know,
development,
etc.
So
I
just
want
to
kind
of
echo
what
counsel
Edwards
has
said
as
well.
So
thank
you.
If.
B
J
Thank
you
so
so
this
is
some.
This
is
something
that
we
are
excited
about,
which
is
a
displacement
risk
analysis,
which
is
a
kind
of
a
heat
mapping,
tool
or
mapping
tool
that
will
that
we're
in
the
process
of
developing
it
has
not
been.
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
academic
research
nationwide
that
speaks
to
displacement
and
I.
You
know,
councillor
Bach
has
been
extremely
extremely
helpful
in
identifying
the
academic
experts
both
locally
and
nationwide,
that
have
been
looking
at
this,
so
we
can
create
a
tool
that
is
specific
to
Boston.
J
That
looks
at
displacement
risk
analysis.
You
know
and
has
a
list
of
criteria
that
we
can
use
to
say
this
is
a
kind
of
a
you
know,
a
higher
displacement
or
risk
area,
and
so
we're
working
on
that
want
to
put
a
pin
on
that.
It's
an
asterisk
tools
we
developed,
so
that's
something
that
we've
got
our
research
folks
and
some
really
really
smart
academic
folks
working
on
so
we'll
have
more
on
that
later
is.
J
Is
that
a
headline
there
but
wanna
just
highlight
that
that
piece
and
then
we're
also,
you
know,
I
won't
wait
this
out.
I'm,
not
ready
I'm,
not
a
very
good
reader,
but
you
know
it's
it's.
What
are
the
measures
that
will
be
taken
to
avoid
displacement
of
existing
residents
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood?
J
You
know,
reading
from
the
bottom
of
the
heart
want
to
do
a
good
job
and
want
to
have
the
ability
to
have
you
know,
provide
creative
solutions
to
the
impacts
that
they
might
have,
and
so
we
wanted
to
give
the
developers
an
opportunity
to
to
the
narrative
addressing
how
they're
assisting
the
current
residents
of
the
surrounding
area
to
remain
in
the
community,
the
future
for
housing
and
find
pathways
to
economic
opportunity.
So
this
is
this.
J
Is
this
is
a
place
where
we
you
know
were
we're
looking
to
develop
or
surprise
information,
and
not
that
you
know
we.
We
do
have
a
list
of
things
that
we'd
like
them
to
do,
but
this
is
a
way
that
we
can
say
what
else
are
you
doing
and
and
what
are
you
doing?
First
of
all,
and
what
else
are
you
doing
that
we
might
not
have
thought
of
and
that's
I'll
stop
there
because
then
we'll
get
into
the
section
three.
E
B
B
Really,
you
know,
cool
blue
was
cool
like
less
likely
to
happen,
and
it
got
you
know
the
red
or
the
zone,
the
more
likely
people
were
to
be
displaced
or
I
think
it
was
evicted,
but
part
of
the
concerns
about
that
was
how
the
data
like
in
order
to
inform
that
mapping
to
be
really
up-to-date.
The
eviction
data,
for
example,
was
a
year
or
two
behind.
So
just
one
of
the
things
in
terms
of
that
the
mapping
that's
going
to
be
developed,
the
research
and
the
research
behind
it.
J
I'm
hoping
so
I
don't
know,
that's
so
that,
as
for
that
is
because
there's
so
much
organic
research
and
I
think
everyone
on
this
call
can
attest
to
that
everyone's
seen
a
study
on
displacement.
You
know
there
have
been
some
cities
that
have
done
some
of
this
work,
we're
looking
at
LA,
Seattle,
New
York,
you
know
it's
it's
it's
it's
it's
not
a
science!
It's
it's
not
a
hard,
a
fast
lines.
J
This
is
this
is
complicated,
and
so
we've
got
some
really
smart
people
working
on
this,
hoping
that
this
can
get
done
as
we
you
know
in
a
the
goal,
is
to
get
this
done
parallel
to
this
process.
So
so
that
is
the
goal,
but
let's
not
let
a
timeline
be
the
enemy
of
a
good
quality
product.
So
this
is
the.
This
is
the
goal
that
we're
working
with
and
we're
hoping
to
have
something
that
we
can
respond
to
a
look
at
you
know
whenever
you
know
the
experts
in
this
field
feel
like
they.
J
You
know
we
can
have
something.
We
can
look
at
that's
specific
to
Boston
and
that's
an
important
point
as
well,
because
what
works
in
LA
or
Seattle
may
not,
we,
you
know
pertinent
to
Boston,
so
it
this
will
take
time,
but
I
think
it'll
be
time.
Well
spent
and
I
hear
you
on
the
update
information.
You
know
in
its
its
so
we're
also
we're
also
cognizant
of
that
and.
M
One
thing
we're
trying
to
sorry
one
thing:
we're
trying
to
balance
on
the
data
is
data
that
is
fairly
easily
and
publicly
available,
as
well
as
the
timing
issues,
and
even
the
Census
say
that
we
commonly
use
for
a
lot
of
these
kinds
of
analysis
have
some
lag
time
that
we
can't.
We
would
certainly
love
to
have
it
to
be
more
act
more
accurate
to
today,
but
we
have
to
kind
of
do
what
we
can
get
from
the
Census
Bureau.
D
Thank
you
so
much,
madam
chair,
yeah
I,
just
wanted
to
chime
in
on
this
I
mean
I.
Think
I
think
this
tool
is
really
important.
My
office
has
also
done
a
bunch
of
research
just
into
kind
of
the
options
that
are
out
there.
D
I
think
the
mapping
displacement
paper
that
came
out
recently
for
a
bunch
of
MIT
folks
was
very
helpful
and
in
that
it
threw
up
a
bunch
of
the
options
that
are
being
used
by
other
cities
and
then
said
what
does
it
look
like
if
you
apply
these
to
Boston
and
I,
really
just
want
to
stress
sonam's
point
about
connecting
it
to
Boston
I
think
this
needs
to
be
a
recursive
process.
D
Where
you
know
the
research
team
at
BPD,
a
and
DND
puts
together
something
that's
based
on
the
existing
options
that
are
out
there
and,
like
Tim,
said
sort
of
publicly
available
data,
because
in
my
mind
we
really
don't
want
a
situation
where
we're
asking
any
developers
to
come
in
with
proprietary
data.
Sets
that,
like
nobody,
can
scrutinize
and
understand,
but
you
have
a
you,
have
that
tool
and
then
and
then
we
test
it
right.
D
We
see
what
is
it,
what
does
this
tell
us
and,
and
then
actually
you
know,
Justin
steel
in
the
paper,
authors
and
MIT
use
the
phrase
ground.
True
thing
right
where
you
you
take
that
map
and
you
look
at
it
and
we
have
a
conversation
with
advocates
and
neighbors
and
folks
is
like
how
does
this
reflect
what
we
sort
of
see
on
the
ground
and
then
to
the
extent
that
it
doesn't?
What
is
it
that
you
would
need
to
change
about
the
analysis
because
you
don't
just
say:
oh
this
place
is
an
exception.
D
D
Part
of
this
process,
and-
and
so
my
instinct
is,
it
will
make
sense
for
like
I-
certainly
hope
that
we
can
have
a
draft
at
something
this
summer,
just
to
put
it
out
on
the
table
and
do
some
of
that
like
ground
truthing,
because
I
don't
think
that
that
perfecting
will
happen
all
in
one
swoop.
And
I
also
think
I
wanted
to
reflect
on
the
fact.
D
That's
why
we
changed
that
language
right
from
the
zones
to
index
doesn't
create
like
zones
where
people
have
to
do
something
and
then
like
zones
in
terms
of
doing
anything
to
it.
From
really
further
fair
housing,
because
we
don't
want-
we
don't
want
there
to
be
that
kind
of
sharp
divide
based
on
what
might
be
a
data,
artifact
and
so
I
think.
That's
why
it's
good
to
have
two
indices.
It's
good
to
have
them
be
something
this
will
be
my
last
point,
but
something
that's
publicly
available.
D
Like
a
you
know,
basically,
that
you
can
go
before
you
even
buy
a
piece
of
property
and
put
in
its
address
and
kind
of
see
what
the
risk,
the
displacement
risk
and
historical
solution
dynamics
for
that
neck
of
the
woods
is.
These
are
neither
like
city
of
Boston,
because
I
think
that
also
lifts
some
of
the
mystery.
D
You
know
we
sometimes
have
an
issue
in
a
city
around
like
when
people
buy
lamb
sort
of
what
are
their
expectations
about
what
zoning
authorization
they're
going
to
get
and
what
they're
gonna
be
asked
to
do
and
I
think
the
more
with
moving
fair
housing
into
zoning.
We're
setting
really
clear
expectations
across
the
board
about
the
of
the
kinds
of
contributions
we're
going
to
look
for
people
to
make
to
this,
like
overall
civic
goal,
the
more
more
sort
of
like
consistent
and
clear.
D
We
are
about
that
the
better
and
to
me,
that's
it
that's
a
good
reason
to
have
these
tools
be
something
that's
publicly
accessible
once
once
we've
got
them
developed,
so
those
are
just
some
thoughts
on
all
that.
I.
Definitely
I
know
that
the
city
folks
aren't
aren't
ready
yet
to
sort
of
road
test.
Something,
but
I
do
hope
that
that's
something
we
can
do
with
the
kind
of
larger
community
of
advocates
and
councillors
and
everyone
before
we
settle
on
on
anything
for
sure.
So
thank
you.
B
B
K
You
go
so
I
think
this
is
existing
residents
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
says
the
neighborhood
that
sort
of
surrounds
the
development-
and
you
know
I,
don't
think
I
focused
on
it
before,
but
I
think
we're
not
saying
we're
not
saying
is
clearly,
maybe
as
we
could.
We
also
want
to
avoid
displacement
of
existing
residents
or
commercial
businesses
of
the
of
the
the
site
that's
being
developed.
We
asked
the
question
about
financial
assistance
or
temporary
permanent
relocation,
but
we
don't
know
this
I
heard
this
upfront
I
think
counselor
Clin.
K
K
Think
you
know,
for
me,
that's
kind
of
oftentimes
the
most
important
you
know
thing
that
we're
looking
at
and
I
don't
see
it
clearly
spelled
out
here.
I
think
it's
just.
We
need
to
just
change
the
wording
stump
thanks.
E
B
The
on
section
three
I,
don't
know
concert
Bach.
Did
you
want
to
discuss
the
list
of
ideas
you
had?
This
was
on
a
separate
document.
I
pulled
it
out
at
this
point.
This
is
allowing
for
developers
to
kind
of
the
list
of
document
ideas
that
you
had
for
developers
to
think
about
Section,
eight
vouchers
things
like
that
as
part
of
their
how
they're
gonna
deal
with
displacement,
or
did
you
want?
D
B
B
We
sent
out
the
document
too
early,
but
it
should
be
fairly
noted.
The
amount
of
work
council
block
did
basically
saying
we
don't
want
people
to
just
analyze
a
problem
that
the
goal
of
this
is
to
say
yep.
These
are
not
so
good
and
then
move
on
with
their
lives.
The
goal
is
to
move
them
towards
what
they
can
do
and
so
councilor
block
Bach
in
the
document.
That's
called
a
FH
developer
mitigation
ideas
had
several
for
developers,
and
these
could
be
part
of
a
yes
and
no.
B
B
C
Yeah,
no
thank
you.
I
was
just
wondering
I
know
these
are
in
draft
bomb.
So
then
are
they
publicly
available
to
access?
Can
we
only
see
them
if
we.
B
Can
you
can
do
that
or
Christine
third
season
CTO
at
Boston
gov?
That's
my
the
committee's
email!
Okay,
thank
you.
You're
welcome
sorry,
counselor
Bach
again,
this
is
this
is
her
great
work
of
just
trying
to
guide?
Also
yes
and
knows
what
you
have
and
haven't
done,
help
make
them
make
decisions
as
well
and
it's
a
great
way
of
asking
them
and
suggesting
at
the
same
time,
yeah.
D
Sure
so
I'll
just
say
a
little
bit
about
I
mean
basically,
you
know
in
the
part
of
the
document
we
were
about
to
get
to,
but
in
the
PDA
document.
There's
then,
that
parallel
question
about
historical
exclusion,
and
so,
as
counselor
edward
said,
you
have
sort
of
these
two
pieces
of
information
that
the
city
is
helping.
D
In
terms
of
like
we
have
a
collective
civic
goal
and
also
actually
like
federal
legal
requirement
to
affirm
we
further
a
fair
housing
and
because
we're
making
zoning
decisions-
and
these
like
in
you
know
in
our
article
eighty
processes
we
like
that
that
goal
in
need
is
implicated,
and
so
we
ask
all
projects
to
do
their
part.
I
think
in
a
lot
of
ways.
D
The
most
helpful
parallel
is
thinking
about
the
environmental
standards
we
hold
our
buildings
to
and
the
ways
in
which
we
ask
everybody
to
do
things
with
their
buildings
in
the
direction
of
Green
Building
and
that's
not
just
about
mitigating
a
harm.
But
there
are
things
where
we
might
say:
oh
you,
better
recharge
your
groundwater,
because
you're
gonna
pull
some
water
out
of
the
ground
or
something
right.
There
are
things
where
we're
making
really
direct
mitigation
asks,
but
I
think
also.
D
That
projects
can
make
to
help
them
do
their
part
and
I
think
a
bracketed
question,
which
will
probably
be
one
we
all
discuss
in
a
different
working
session,
is
kind
of
you
know.
What's
the
internal
structure
in
the
BPD
a
to
measure,
what
seems
appropriate
for
different
scopes
of
projects?
Do
we
want
to
set
a
different
degree
of
expectation
for
PDAs
versus
large
project
versus
small
projects?
Is
there
a
you
know?
D
I
just
put
in
I
put
some
kind
of
suggestions
about
the
types
of
things
that
feel
like
they
would
move
the
needle
towards
fair
housing,
citywide
I'm,
recognizing
that
really
we
have
trouble
keeping
folks
and
protected
classes
in
every
part
of
our
city
now
I'm
kind
of
regardless
of
where
those
indices
I'm
suggest
you're
sitting
so
I'll
run
really
quickly
through
the
list
here.
Just
cuz
I
know
that
not
everyone
has
that
dock
in
their
in
their
inbox,
but
so
you
know
mashing
you're,
exceeding
the
percentage
of
family
size
units
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
D
So
thinking
again
about
what
kinds
of
families
are
we
building
for,
knowing
that
family
is
a
protected
class
that
often
gets
discriminated
against,
providing
a
larger
proportion
of
accessible
units.
Thinking
about
how
we
encourage
our
rental
voucher
holders,
so
could
we
guarantee
some
kind
of
first
up?
We
firstly
set
preference
for
some
proportion
of
units
for
an
initial
year
to
rental
voucher
holders.
D
D
Just
things,
look
like
allowing
last
month's
rent
and
security
deposit
to
be
paid
in
installments
for
some
percent
of
units
for
folks
who
don't
have
a
big
chunk
of
cash
up
top
guaranteeing
preferences
for
some
percent
of
units
to
families
that
are
currently
rent
burdened
or
have
experienced
a
no-fault
evictions
or
have
experienced
eviction,
but
now
display
ability
to
pay
right.
So
something
that
kind
of
puts
those
people
again
towards
the
front
of
the
line.
I
think-
and
this
maybe
connects
to
the
subsequent
section
of
the
VPD
A's
document.
D
O
D
Or
making
a
higher
number
of
units
affordable
or
deepening
the
affordability
of
units
or
making
a
higher
proportion
of
them
a
larger
unit
size
than
your
unit
mix
would
require
I
mean
I
point
out.
These
are
adjustments
that
individual
developers
do
make
sometimes
already
as
kind
of
part
of
the
like
mitigation
package
conversation
cooperation
agreement
conversation
would
be
PDA.
D
What
we're
doing
here
is
calling
out
these
as
things
that
really
have
a
fair
housing
implication
in
terms
of
the
peep,
the
population
that
you're
serving
with
our
inclusionary
development
policy
units,
especially
when
you
think
about
deepening
affordability
or
changing
unit
size,
and
so
we're
sort
of
listing
those
as
potential
ways.
Again.
Somebody
could
kind
of
make
that
important
for
a
really
furthering
fair
housing
contribution.
You
know
I,
come
from
a
background
of
thinking
a
lot
about
the
housing
authority.
D
You
know
somebody
maybe
agreeing
to
host
new
project-based
vouchers
or
rad
units
on-site
on-site
help
get
some
of
those
builds.
There
might
be
cases
where
we
actually
encourage
a
project
to
increase
density,
but
by
adding
affordable
units
in
the
case
of
homeownership
units.
Maybe
you
know
these
are
our
IDP
homeownership
units,
thinking
about
or
they're,
not
IDP
ones
they're
just
there
and
we
think
about.
Is
there
a
way
to
give
preference
to
first-generation
homebuyers,
which
has
been
shown
to
be
a
really
good
way?
D
So,
that's
again,
a
bit
of
a
distinction
for
first-time
homebuyers
first-generation
homebuyers
is
a
really
good
way
of
thinking
about
closing
the
racial
wealth
gap
and
then
kind
of
you
know.
This
I
think
this.
This
one
I
think
was
added
by
council
edwardses
office,
but
sort
of
thinking
about.
Is
there
a
connection
here
that
we
could
make
or
facilitate
making
for
people
to
the
AOP
acquisition,
Opportunity
Program,
to
help
create
you
to
help
create
permanent,
affordable
housing
in
the
immediate
neighborhood,
even
if
it's
not
on
the
site?
D
B
B
Further
fair
housing
talk
about
developers,
but
we
also
need
to
just
give
them
suggestions
outright
suggestions
for
how
they
can
do
it
and
the
reason
why
I
also
I
added
the
AOP
was
because
a
lot
of
my
constituents
and
yours
and
councilor
friends
are
folks
who
cannot
qualify
due
to
status
or
any
of
the
aid
that
we're
talking
about
section,
8
vouchers
and
things
like
that.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
still
an
opportunity
for
them
to
help
prevent
displacement,
regardless
of
your
immigration
status
and
regardless
of
and
what
they
can
do.
B
And
that
is
you
know,
there's
a
whole
building
of
folks
who
have
mixed
status.
Families
may
be
buying
that
and
working
we're
doing
it
already
with
Suffolk
Downs
and
I
thought.
That
was
a
good
example
Sheila
and
all
of
us
are
already
working
on
how
to
get
the
developer
to
contribute
a
huge
lump
sum
to
help
local
nonprofits
buy
up
the
buildings
to
keep
them
permanently
affordable,
that
is
preventing
displacement
outright
and
for
the
deed
restrictions
and
making
sure
it
happens
forever.
B
So
that's
just
another
opportunity
for
them
to
contribute
to
prevent
current
displacement
of
folks
in
their
buildings
as
they
are.
So
that's
why
that
was
added,
but
this
is
a
councillor
Turner
Margaret
Turner
your
hand
is
noted.
I
will
when
I
finished
this.
This
list
is
not
exhaustive.
This
is
where
we
turn
to
you
guys
who
are
on
the
front
line
as
to
whether
you
know
these
are
either
tools
and
tool
box.
B
We're
going
to
give
the
developers
to
say
when
they
go
to
how
they're
preventing
displacement
to
say
we
are
going
to
do
or
we
have
committed
to
the
following
and
put
it
in
there
and
that's
what
I
think
this
is
not
a
checklist.
This
is
not
a
pointless
either.
It's
not!
You
have
to
do
these
certain
things.
This
is
just
guiding
their
perspective.
O
If
I
you
know,
built
units
are
built
pursuant
to
40
B
there
in
perpetuity,
and
that's
that
is
anyway,
something
to
be
developed,
as
as
we
get
the
Home
Rule
petition,
etc
for
inclusionary
development,
but
there's
in
any
of
it.
Some
of
these
things
should
be
not
in
negotiation
with
the
limb
the
developer,
but
but
but
you
know,
the
city
should
be
looking
at,
requiring
as
a
quid
pro
quo
for
getting
the
approval.
O
A
On
the
back
of
that,
the
IDP
in
Austin
brightly
and
tertiary
development
has
been
13%
and
the
ami
has
been
pegged
at
70
percent
of
the
area,
median
income,
which
has
been
a
great
impediment
to
us
to
getting
more
affordability
and
the
huge
amount
of
housing
that's
been
built
in
Austin
Brighton.
So
I
would
like
a
range
of
AM
eyes
included
in
the
IDP
and
that
should
go
across
the
board.
Not
just
I
think
it
will
diversify
the
number
of
folks
who
actually
qualify
for
these
affordable
units.
B
So
again,
these
are
all
amendable
drafts,
we're
just
putting
it
out
there
for
folks
to
respond
to
this
didn't
I,
understand
we're
close
getting
close
to
two
hours
at
two
o'clock:
I
I'm,
committed
and
I
hope.
Some
people
are
committed
to
continue
to
at
least
finish
this
form
this
form
checklist,
but
with
that
I
respect,
if
you
cannot
stay
on
after
two
o'clock,
I
will
continue
to
then
just
go
to
the
forum
with
whoever
can
stay
counselor
dad
Tim.
You
have
raised
your
hand
right.
M
I
just
want
to
address
Margaret
Turner's
question
earlier
about
perpetuity.
We
have
been
in
my
former
role
at
PB
da.
We
were
starting
to
look
at
doing
perpetuity
at
the
moment.
That
would
require
the
state
to
approve
that
for
each
and
every
project,
and
they
have
clearly
stated
that
they
would
not
approve
us
doing
perpetuity
on
projects
where
we
were,
including
the
neighborhood
diversity
preservation
preference.
So
it
is
an
ongoing
discussion,
but
it
is
the
desire
that
we
would
have
perpetuity
on
projects.
B
Disappointing
from
the
state,
thank
you
for
that
Tim.
Thank
you
for
letting
us
know
so
moving
on
to
promoting
an
inclusive
community,
so
we
we
built
that
the
individual
project
we've
looked
at
the
residential.
We
looked
at
the
commercial.
We
looked
at
the
surrounding
area.
Now,
how
do
we
push
for
a
more
inclusive
community?
This
is
what
this
check
part
of
the
checklist
is
pushing
for
so
I'll
soon
all
know
I'm
still
here.
Sorry,
if
you
would
walk
us
through
this
part,.
J
J
The
analysis
of
historical
exclusion,
so
we
start
with
that
and
that
tool
you
know
again
pin
on
that
to
be
developed
still,
and
then
we
go
into
the
IDP
questions
you
know.
Does
I
this
IDP
apply
to
this
project
zone.
Are
you
in?
Are
you
creating
compact
units?
What's
your
tenure
type,
you
know,
are
you
doing
on-site
off-site
and
then
I
think?
What's
really
exciting
and
interesting
about
this
and
consider
food-
and
this
is
to
your
point-
is
a
few
things
one,
how
many
three
bedrooms
are
we
providing
this
coastal
families?
J
Are
we
providing
units
for
families
here
we're
really
trying
to
get
folks
to
not
just
give
us
studios
and
one
beds
for
IDP
units,
but
are
we
also
providing
units
for
families,
so
they
can
also
be
part
of
the
community.
Accessibility
is
a
big
part
of
our
conversation,
as
you
all
know,
and
then
the
ami
breakdown.
So
it
goes
from
you
know,
thirty
to
forty
thirty
percent
up
for
rental
than
sixty
percent
for
homeownership,
and
then
you
know,
and
then
it
goes
into
the
off
sites.
J
Looking
at
the
square
footage
of
units,
and
so
Tim
can
speak
to
that
another
bit
more
detail
about
square
footage
of
units
as
opposed
to
a
number
of
units
and
then
do
we
anticipate
making
a
payment
to
the
IDP
fund.
So
you
know
a
lot
of
kind
of
very
kind
of
conscious
look
at
what
we're
getting
out
of
the
IDP
and
making
sure
that
we
are
addressing
families
and
we
are
dressing,
am
I
going
to
as
well
and
then
like
above
an
effort.
J
You
know
a
chance
for
developers
to
provide
a
narrative
as
to
how
they're,
fostering
an
inclusive
and
welcoming
community
and
what
efforts
that
are
taking
to
ensure
that
the
project
or
projects
are
promoting.
You
know
inclusive
integrated,
welcoming
community,
so
making
sure
that
they
also
take
into
account
the
amount
of
historic
exclusion
in
their
answer.
And
so
that's
you
know
we're
offering
a
chance
for
developers
to
provide
a
narrative
to
answer
those
questions
as
well.
And
then
this
is
I
know.
J
Tim
has
a
hard
stop
at
to
say:
I
want
to
just
jump
to
this
before
we
lose
to
him,
but
this
is
the
marketing
in
tenant
selection
portion
of
the
of
the
assessment,
and
you
know
that
goes
to
and
as
we
all
know,
marketing
is
a
big
huge,
huge
partisans.
I
know
who
the
unit's
actually
go
to.
So
it
does
not
end.
This
does
not
end.
J
So
you
know-
and
it
goes
into
working
with
BPD
a
we're
working
with
BPD
and
ofHe,
and
then
that's
kind
of
where
we
end
but
I
like
I,
said
I,
don't
want
to
lose
I
know
we're
losing
Tim
in
a
couple
of
minutes
or
actually
a
minute
ago.
So,
thank
you
for
saying
Tim,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
get
Tim
to
kind
of
respond
Tim
to
be
here
to
respond
to
any
questions
that
come
up
on
marketing
and
tenant
selection
as
well.
Yeah.
M
M
What
also
asking
that
what
they're
going
to
do
with
their
non-restricted
units
in
terms
of
marketing,
because
we
obviously
have
a
bigger
role
to
play
as
a
city
and
and
detailing
what
the
mark
efforts
are
on
freakin
restrictive
units.
But
we
also
want
to
see
what
the
developers
going
to
do
on
their
market
rate
units
to
make
sure
that
is
a
more
welcoming
and
inclusive
community
of
market
rate.
M
Tenants
who
may
be
protected
classes
and
also
also
in
terms
of
tenant
selection
policies,
just
in
general
because
for
the
income
restrictive
units
they're
supposed
to
apply
the
same
tenant
selection
policies
on
their
income
restrict
units
as
they
do
in
their
market
rates.
We
want
to
clarify
that
and
also
see
what
kind
of
policies
they're
using,
because
that
it
would
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
suggest
that
they
look
at
their
tenant
selection
policies
differently
in
terms
of
things
like
credit,
history,
Cori
information,
etc.
So
that
all
tenants
are
are
treated
fairly
in
the
process.
B
Thank
You
councillor
I,
do
see
you
I
just
had
a
quick
question
before
I.
Go
turn
it
over
to
you
just
wanted
to
to
note
that
I
I,
particularly
like
on
this
form
that
the
ami
breakdown
that
you
have
so
that
people
can
actually
see
what
kinds
of
affordable
units
that
are
actually
offering.
You
know
I
think
that's
very
important
if
they're,
offering
only
you
know
other
ten
units
that
they're
doing
they
only
offer
one,
that's
thirty
percent.
The
rest
are
at
seventy
percent.
I.
B
Think
that's
really
important
for
folks
to
see
up
front
and
for
for
them
to
be.
You
know
acknowledge
that
I
also
want
I
think
it
would
be
ideals
at
that
same
kind
of
data
analysis
for
the
percentage
for
the
unit
and
also
the
homeownership
units,
if
that
is
put
for
the
surrounding
neighborhood
I
thought
that
was
incredibly
informative
when
we
were
discussing
Suffolk
Downs,
for
example,
in
our
many
meetings
to
be
able
to
see
what
the
you
know,
what
the
percentage
were,
because
what
we
have
what
we
found
with
some
advocates
is
they.
B
You
know
you
saw
the
community
where
a
lot
of
them
looked
at
a
certain
percentage
of,
am
I
right
and
they
wanted
that
replicated
in
Suffolk,
Downs
and
so
I
think
it's
really
important
for
folks
to
see
that
as
well
so
around
the
development.
What
are
we
looking
at
in
terms
of
people
at
thirty
percent?
Forty
fifty
percent?
Sixteen
seventy
percent
around
the
development
of
the
project
site.
Why
is
it
important?
B
Because
if
your
project
site
percentages
for
affordable
units
don't
match
the
community
or
are
extremely
skewed
away
from
the
community,
then
you
you
could
be
you
whether
you
mean
to
or
not,
and
it
could
be
to
the
exclusion
of
a
lot
of
people,
so
I
think
a
lot
I
think
it's
great
for
the
family
unit.
Size
I,
think
it's
important
to
have
surrounding
area
am
is,
is
also
put
down
as
part
of
your
in
the
form
of
checklist
or
or
something
in
there.
So
they
can
see
that
maybe
I'll
be
in
your
heat.
B
Indexing
Maps
I'm,
not
sure,
but
it
should
certainly
be
very
clear
upfront
you're
buying
in
a
historic
exclusion
you're
buying
in
a
place
with.
As
this
placement
you're
buying
in
a
place,
that's
ninety
percent
people
who
who
are
at
30%
ami,
knowing
all
that?
What
are
you
going
to
do
to
affirm
early
further
fair
housing?
That's
just
one
suggestion.
I
have
for
this
for
this
before
the
storm.
B
Apologize
counselor
I'm
here.
I
Wow,
that's
why
you're
in
this
role,
I,
don't
know,
stop
to
say
just
after
that
I'm
Lydia
as
good
I,
just
I
just
want
it.
This
isn't
regards
specifically
to
marketing
I'm,
just
always
really
curious
about,
and
not
just
so
much
the
translation
and
interpretation
situation,
but
I
think
it's
really
for
me.
I
It's
also
the
use
of
up
being
mindful
of
folks
who
may
be
unable
to
read
and
write,
and
what
you
saw
are
you
thinking
of,
like
maybe
the
audio
and
visuals
for
folks
in
terms
of
like
getting
you're,
getting
your
message
out
there
and
being
really
super
mindful
that
everybody
knows
how
to
read
or
write
in
their
own
native
language.
So
I'm
just
curious
about
what
we're
thinking
about
in
terms
of
that
situation
for
marketing,
or
is
that
I
don't
know
if
that's
fits
within
here,
but
I'm
just
curious.
J
I
want
to
be
again
just
these
are
all
really
important.
Point.
I
just
want
to
be
very
careful
about
setting
big
expectations
for
what
can
be
achieved
here.
What
goes
at
this
talking
and
what
goes
elsewhere.
So
those
you
know,
customer
here
important
points.
You
know
that's
a
viable
document,
you
know.
Is
it
a
marketing
plan
of
a
little
document
absolutely,
and
you
want
to
be
sure
that
you
know
that
documents
are
accessible
to
all
regardless
of
language
or
ability,
and
this
belong
as
part
of
the
zoning
code.
J
I
know
how
to
go,
but
I
would
not
commit
to
something
that
will
be
part
of
a
marketing
plan.
That's
part
of
D
and
E,
so
language
access
plans
are
extremely
important
and
you
know
we're
making
sure
that
we
have
them
as
part
of
our
earthly
review
processes
and
planning
processes.
But
when
it
comes
to
marketing
or
final
documents
that
belong
in
other
agencies,
I
would
refer
to
those
but
I.
What
you're
saying
as
making
you
know
making
sure
they're
viable
documents
accessible
to
all
yeah.
J
J
So
I
totally
understand
the
point:
I'm
just
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
be
very
careful,
intentional
and
being
very
disciplined
about
kind
of
what
belongs
where
from
as
far
as
this
assessment
is
concerned,
but
also
you
know
yes,
we,
the
the
BPD
a
definitely
is
very,
is
actively
involved
and
working
on
a
language
access
plan
that
is
inclusive.
You
know
of
all
so
I,
just
I'm
just
trying
to
be
disciplined
about
kind
of
what
belongs
where
but
I
thought
the
point
you're
making
is
extremely
important,
extremely
valuable.
So
thank.
B
You
sorry
I
was
gonna
answer
a
little
bit
too
to
your
your
question,
but
I
did
want
a
knowledge.
Council
Braden
raise
your
hand
and
in
Hajj
ours
next
in
terms
of
questions,
and
there
is
still
conversations
to
be
had
counselor
Makia
about
just
because
it
doesn't
belong
here
that
it
still
belongs
part
of
our
goal
to
affirmatively,
further
fair
housing,
and
so
there's
zoning
amendment
specific
things
that
we're
gonna
do
and
then
there's
counselor,
Bach
and
I
are
already
talking
about
that.
B
Counselor
folks
in
GDLs
have
been
talking
about
it
as
well
and
they
include
the
following
one:
are
we
going
to
look
at
a
city
wide
or
a
person,
specifically
an
auditor
who
is
going
to
be
looking
at
all
agencies
in
the
entire
city
or
how
it
is
obligated?
They
all
are
part
of
affirmatively,
further
fair
housing.
It
is
not
just
the
burden
of
the
housing
department
or
BPD
a
right.
It's
a
federal
mandate
for
us
to
push
towards
equity.
So
that's
one!
You
that's
an
auditor
component.
That's
a
question
still
outstanding.
B
The
other
one
is
an
interagency
and
I'll.
Let
councillor
Bob.
If
she
wants
to
describe
that
an
interagency
kind
of
assessment
of
the
plans
and
the
mitigation
and
looking
at
how
we're
going
forward,
this
can
include
many
people
at
the
table
who
are
looking
at
this
and
saying
yes,
no,
so
on
and
so
forth.
B
Number
three
one
of
the
other
issues
that
had
been
brought
to
us
and
I
am
firmly
very
committed
to
figuring
this
out,
and
that
is
when
specifically
we're
talking
about
the
personalized
mitigation
on
site.
When
the
IAG
is,
you
know,
leveraging
their
power
right,
because
you
know
what
the
inter
the
IAG
is
that
folks
that
we
nominate
from
the
community
to
negotiate
with
the
developer.
B
One
thing
that
would
just
drive
me
nuts,
as
if,
after
all
this
equity
and
all
these
promises
from
the
developer
and
IAE
that
is,
does
not
reflect
the
age,
the
diversity
or
the
income,
or
even
the
rental
or
house
ownership
status
of
our
communities
turn
around
and
mitigate
and
negotiate
for
things
that
undo
the
equity
that
we
just
got
from
the
developer.
And
so
those
are
questions
that
have
come
up,
and
these
are
comments
that
have
come
up
in
our
conversation
with
the
BPD,
a
amongst
ourselves.
Not
all
of
them
will
belong
here.
B
There's
certainly
room
for
you,
myself,
counselor
boss,
to
talk
about
how
we're
going
to
get
an
executive
order,
ordinance
that
gets
em
there
cuz
we
on
it.
Thank
you
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you
so
again,
because
but
Vanessa
Nell
said
some
stuff
is
just
gonna
be
some
things
are
gonna,
be
in
here
the
zoning
amendment
and
some
aren't
I,
don't
know
councillor
Bach.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
go
to
her
jaw,
rat
counselor,
braving
first
ok,
councillor
Braden
actually
had
a
question
in
a
jar
had
a
question:
it's
more.
A
Of
a
comment
in
in
and
I'm
speaking,
always
about
our
looking
situation
here
and
also
Brighton,
we
have
a
huge
impact
institutions
in
our
neighborhood
lakes.
So
when
we
go
to-
and
you
do,
that,
a
new
developer
has
been
proposed
very
often
we
we
make
it
explicitly
state
that
this
this
housing
will
not
be
rented
to
students,
because
what
we're
finding
is
that
a
lot
of
our
three
bedrooms
units
are
being
that
aren't.
A
You
know
that
a
lot
of
our
three-bedroom
home
units
are
being
being
occupied
by
students
and
that
that
leaves
absolutely
no
room
for
family.
So
when
new
development
comes
along,
we
were
very
explicit
in
demanding
that
no
in
in
the
in
the
agreements
we
asked
them
not
not
to
rent
a
student's,
and
some
of
them
balk
at
that,
but
usually
if
they
want
to
build
the
building,
they
agree
and
students
aren't
to
protect
a
class.
So
I
think
it's
it's
legal,
but
that's
what
we
have
to
do
out
here.
H
C
O
Actually,
the
idea
is
that
BP
da
and-
and
we
were
specifically
thinking
about
it
as
as
an
outside
fair
housing
consultant
that
would
do
like
a
comprehensive
sort
of
soup-to-nuts
review
of
Boston's
zoning
because
it
is
so
complicated,
there's
so
many
different
components.
There's
the
you
know
the
IAG
process,
there's
communicating
with
the
community
there's
approvals
or
all
of
these
things
and
they're
done
in
different
ways
in
different
cities,
and
it
would
for
the
city
of
Boston
to
really
affirmatively
further
fair
housing.
O
O
I
in
preparing
for
this
I
went
back
and
looked
at
like
the
2014
and
2015
audits
that
were
on
a
different
topic,
but
those
those
were
very
comprehensive
audits
of
BPD,
a
that
said
nothing
about
fair
housing
at
all,
and
in
fact
there
were
you
know,
recommendations
made
that
you
could
see
as
sort
of
conflicting
with
the
goal
of
fair
housing
and
and
equity
and
inclusion.
So
you
know
to
us:
it
feels
very
important,
in
addition
to
the
zoning
amendment,
to
get
that
additional
point
of
view
from
an
outside
consultant.
O
B
Recommendations
of
the
many
was
this
zoning
code,
but
it's
not
the
only
thing,
and
so
so
sometimes
the
the
conversation
you're
having
and
specifically
a
lot
of
the
great
comments
from
councilor
Mejia
is
about
the
bigger
picture
beyond
this
amendment,
and
so
you
have
the
full
commitment
from
the
council
to
look
at
that
comprehensive
report
and
look
at
all
of
the
recommendations
we're
just
dealing
with
one
right
now:
that's
all
cancer
actually,
and
if
it's
okay,
it
did
anyone
want
to
have
suggestions
about
this
IDP
section,
though.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
very
quickly
say:
I,
agree,
I,
think
it's
great
to
have
this
kind
of
degree
of
specificity
around
the
IDP
policy,
I,
think
and
and
I
want
to
flag,
because
somebody
said
earlier,
you
know
well
it's
nice,
some
of
these
things
that
we
might
ask
a
developer
to
be
voluntarily
in
terms
of
deepening
affordability
or
increasing
the
count.
D
How
do
we
nudge
people
also
voluntarily
to
take
on
further
pieces
beyond
wherever
our
requirements
currently
sit?
So
to
me,
that's
it's
meant
to
be
complimentary
in
that
way,
not
sort
of
saying,
oh,
we
should
settle
for
voluntariness,
but
just
that
sometimes
that's
where
we
are
and
the
other
thing
just
to
flag
what
a
councillor
Edwards
said
is,
you
know,
I
do
think,
and
this
is
probably
more
something
to
put
a
pin
in
for
the
you
know.
D
Next
time
we
have
a
working
session
or
whatever,
but
you
know
part
of
the
whole
idea
of
having
fair
housing
and
zoning
is
that
our
you
know
is
that
these
are
public
processes,
our
processes
that
go
of
having
something
go
through
the
BPD,
a
board
that
have
a
tendency
to
create
value
right,
often
privatized
value,
and
that
and
that,
therefore
you
know
that
can
be
a
mechanism
when
we're
doing
that
of
trying
to
create
sort
of
accompanying
things
in
the
public
interest
and
I
think
that
PDAs
are.
D
J
B
B
If
you
will
about
setting
up
a
historical
kind
of
standard
for
the
city
to
to
be
by
so
it's
going
to
take
this
kind
of
time
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
commitment
in
my
finite
time
being
here
being
able
to
use
this
zoning,
but
the
rest
of
you
have
been
doing
this.
Sometimes
your
entire
entire
career,
there's
some
old
G's
on
here
who
have
been
doing
this
looking
at
you
had
to
laugh.
Robert
I
knew
you
would
know.
B
So
you
know
Bob
Darrell,
Margaret
Nadine,
your
folks
who
have
been
in
the
fight,
Michael,
Caine,
I,
say
Thank,
You
Kathy
as
well.
Kathy,
Brown
and
I
don't
mean
to
exclude
anybody
if
I,
forgot
and
I
think
the
way
was
on
here
earlier
as
well,
and
these
folks
have
been
doing
or
without
recognition
and
fighting
for
this
in
many
cycles
of
gentrification
and
many
cycles
of
displacement
for
neighborhoods
that
we've
never
even
seen
and
and
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
that.
B
So
it's
really
on
your
shoulders
and
on
your
effort
that
we're
standing
today,
it
push
us
even
further
towards
equity
and
make
this
city
a
beacon
really
for
equity.
It
would
be
the
first
in
the
country
that
does
it
this
way.
This
way
and
the
with
that
being
said,
the
zoning
amendment
we're
going
to
continue
to
have
another
working
session.
B
Now
that
you
have
the
documents
that
we're
working
off
of
right
and
the
kind
of
consensus
language
written
the
next
working
sessions,
very
likely
one
will
be
dedicated
to
language
where
our
folks
should
be
coming
back
with
this
is
this
needs
to
be
changed.
This
doesn't
make
sense
in
terms
of
what
we're
saying
in
the
the
minimums
for
the
zoning
amendment.
B
Okay,
so
that's
the
document
that
you
should
be
looking
at.
It's
the
amendment,
update
document
and
then
in
terms
of
the
actual
implementation
documents.
I,
don't
know
how
far
along
BPA
will
be
for
the
historic
or
the
displacement
you
know
kind
of
area
mapping,
but
we
do
need
to
on
this
particular
document.
We're
working
on.
There
are
a
lot
of
suggestions,
and
so
we
want
to
give
them
the
time
to
implement
those
suggestions
or
the
suggestions.
I
think
that
legally
can
can
put
in
and
so
that
we
can
have
another
draft
to
look
at
publicly.
B
There's
two
documents,
as
I
mentioned,
the
smart
utilities
and
the
accessibility.
Those
were
will
require
stakeholders
to
be
at
the
table
if
we
are
planning
to
change
them
at
all.
So
what
I
recommend
for
everybody
who's
interested
in
this
is
to
look
for
those
documents
and
if
there
is
a
change
that
you
have
to
suggest,
please
notify
us,
because
at
this
point,
I'm
less
inclined
to
change
those
documents
having
been
the
folks
in
the
disability
community
and
just
really
commissioned
poured
their
hearts
into
creating
that
accessibility
document.
B
So
unless
you
see
there's
an
equity
component,
that's
not
there
I'm
inclined
to
just
keep
it
as
part
of
the
list,
but
I'm
not
inclined
to
lead
on
that.
Unless
somebody
tells
this
committee
there
is
an
issue
and
even
even
if
they
do,
we
are
going
to
bring
the
Commission
to
the
table
to
make
sure
that
they
are
part
of
helping
to
design
that
so
I
see.
B
You
know
working
sessions
on
language
and
working
sessions
on
final
dock
implementation
documents,
but
I'm
beyond
excited
I
mean
I
just
want
to
say
also
thank
you
to
the
BPD
a
because
it
we
knew
that
if
we
came
in
here,
not
an
agreement
or
not
with
a
consensus,
this
this
conversation
wouldn't
be
as
efficient.
So
we
went
out
of
our
way
to
sit
and
talk
and
go
through
this.
To
make
sure
we
had
a
consensus
is
what
I
would
call
it
about
where
we're
going.
So
thank
you.
So
no
thank
you
Brian.
It
keeps
him.
B
Thank
you
John!
Thank
you.
What
is
it
Lizzie
because
I
know?
Lizzie
did
a
lot
of
work
on
the
displacement
documents
and,
if
I'm
missing
somebody
I
apologize,
it's
without
it's
feel
like
doing
who
left
her
a
little
early
as
well
and
so
and
just
to
let
you
know,
I
mean
one
of
the
greatest
things
about
this
process
has
been
the
expertise
of
my
now
new
colleague,
counselor
Bach,
we're
all
sweet
and
pretty
in
public,
but
we
go
back
and
forth
and
that's
a
good
thing.
B
She
challenges
me
I
hope
I,
challenge
her,
because
we
are
so
passionately
dedicated
to
this,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
you
Kenzie
publicly
for
the
back
and
forth
and
for
the
continued
push
beyond
the
zoning
amendment
and
execute
you
have
been
really
saying
it:
it's
the
baseline
and
then
beyond,
and
how
it
gets
implemented
in
real
ways.
So
with
that,
and
unless
anyone
has
any
conclusion
remarks,
I'm
going
to
end
this
working
session,
you
will
get
the
next
working
session
states
documents
well
in
advance.
My
apologies
soon
all
and
you
will
get.