►
From YouTube: Boston City Council Meeting October 9, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
Thank
You
mr.
clerk
I
am
informed
by
the
clerk
that
a
quorum
is
present
at
this
time
our
lovely
clerk
clerk
is
gonna,
bring
us
through
the
invocation,
so
I
asked
all
guests
staff
complete.
My
colleagues
to
please
rise
I.
Ask
that
you
remain
standing
after
the
invocation
as
he
leads
us
in
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
B
B
B
D
D
B
Number
one
for
two
for
message
in
order
authorizing
the
city
of
Boston
to
accept
and
expand
the
amount
of
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
four
hundred
dollars
in
the
form
of
a
grant
for
the
fiscal
year.
20
local
cultural
council
program
awarded
by
the
Massachusetts
Cultural
Council
to
be
administered
by
the
arts
and
culture.
The
grant
will
fund
Boston
cultural
council
sub-grants.
D
D
B
Docket
number
one:
four:
three
nine
notice
was
received
from
the
mayor
of
the
reappointment
of
Raymond
Oh
as
a
member
of
the
ball
Board
of
Review,
effective
October,
3rd
2019
and
docket
number
144,
zero
notice.
What
you
see
from
the
mayor
of
his
absence
from
the
city
from
4:30
p.m.
on
Thursday
October
3rd
2019,
until
9:30
p.m.
on
Saturday,
October,
5th
2019.
D
Thank
You
mr.
clerk
dockets
one
four,
three:
nine
through
one
four
four
zero
will
be
placed
on
file
before
I
move
on
to
the
next
docket
I
just
want
to
quickly
acknowledge
I
saw
a
group
of
young
fabulous.
Looking
young
people
in
the
chamber
here
for
a
council
meeting.
We
always
appreciate
youth
in
our
presence
and
I've
learned
there
from
their
commanders
school.
So
thank
you
guys
so
much
for
being
here.
We
appreciate
you
being
here
and
participating
I
just
want
to
give
you
guys
a
quick
shout
out
and
a
big
round
of
applause.
B
E
You,
madam
president,
I
just
wanted
to
officially
transmit
the
report
through
the
council
agenda,
given
that
this
is
largely
a
report
back
of
my
time
and
learnings
and
research
and
conversations
and
findings
serving
as
chair
of
the
Committee
on
planning,
development
and
transportation.
So
I
owe
you
all
found
Cutler
easier
to
read
copies.
We
run
out
of
the
the
printing
run
that
we
had
just
done
for
earlier
in
the
week,
and
so
those
will
be
delivered
to
your
offices,
but
you
can
see
the
black
and
white
version
in
the
packet.
E
Essentially,
the
report
runs
through
a
few
different
sections,
one
on
the
history
and
legacy
of
the
Boston
Redevelopment
Authority,
now
BPD
a
what
it
has
accomplished
in
the
city's
neighborhoods
and
why
it
was
created,
because
that
underpins
a
lot
of
how
that
agency
continues
to
function
today.
Section
2
is
comparison
to
what
the
city
of
Boston
might
be
missing
out
on.
E
Our
challenges
around
housing,
affordability,
around
mobility,
traffic
and
congestion
around
the
climate
crisis
and
equity
are
directly
related
to
how
and
weather
we
are
addressing
all
of
them
together
in
a
big-picture
way,
rather
than
parcel
by
parcel.
The
third
section
is
really
explaining
that
it's
a
complicated
process,
but
one
that
is
fairly
straightforward.
There
are
three
processes
that
could
happen
concurrently
if
the
city
wanted
to
move
forward
with
abolishing
the
B
PDA
and
setting
up
a
different
planning
structure
in
its
place.
E
The
first
would
be
to
restore
city
control,
realizing
that
the
B
PDA
is
self-funded
now
and
therefore
not
subject
to
City.
Council
oversight
doesn't
have
to
come
before
us
for
the
same
type
of
up
or
down
vote
on
their
budget
and
the
scrutiny
and
transparency
that
comes
along
with
that,
and
that
also
drives
the
incentives
for
the
agency,
because
their
properties
and
their
revenue
streams
fund
their
operations
that
happens
on
its
own.
E
Secondly,
is
on
urban
renewal
areas
and
I
know,
so
many
of
us
have
been
at
those
meetings
every
six
months
about
how
and
why,
and
and
and
when
urban
renewal
impacts,
the
city.
It
is
a
set
of
extraordinary
powers
that
was
given
out
in
response
to
a
federal
movement
to
displace,
demolish
and
facilitate
large-scale
development,
and
it
no
longer
matches
the
needs
of
Boston.
Today
when
we're
thinking
about
development,
the
challenge
is
not
so
much
how
to
facilitate
massive
large-scale
projects,
but
rather
to
manage
the
growth
in
a
way:
that's
livable,
equitable,
sustainable
for
everyone.
E
And
finally,
there
will
be
state
approvals
needed.
The
VRA
was
created
as
a
through
an
act
of
a
state
legislature,
along
with
the
Zoning
Board
of
Appeals
and
Zoning
Commission,
and
other
issues
that
councillor
Edwards,
for
example,
has
been
working
on.
It
would
require
a
final
Home
Rule
petition
to
formalize
things,
but
what
I
hope
section
3
points
out
is
that
so
much
of
it
can
functionally
be
accomplished
right
at
the
city
level
without
any
home
roll
petition
whatsoever,
and
then
finally,
there
is
a
set
of
steps
that
the
City
Council
could
take
immediately.
E
You
know
next
week
next
term
to
start
laying
the
groundwork
and
really
having
that
process.
What
I
want
to
emphasize
most
of
all
about
this
is
that
this
is
a
first
version.
This
is
a
starting
point
for
a
larger
conversation
about
how
we
should
be
thinking
of
the
city's
future,
how
we
should
be
engaging
residents
in
having
say
in
to
the
trade-offs
that
are
required
to
plan
out
that
future.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
planning
zoning
a
development
is
all
about
trade-offs.
We
can't
make
everyone
happy.
E
If
we
think
about
planning
in
a
different
way
that
it
empowers
residents,
but
also
to
look
back
and
remember
that
the
reason
why
we
are
the
incredible
city
we
are
today
with
so
many
beautiful
parts
in
every
neighborhood
and
such
history
and
culture
is
largely
related
to
decisions
that
were
made
generations
ago
in
some
cases
hundreds
of
years
ago.
So
our
decisions
today
will
have
tremendous
impact
as
well.
So
we
kicked
off
with
a
listening
session
in
the
south
end
I'm,
going
to
thank
councillor
Baker
and
counselor
Flaherty.
E
For
being
there,
we
will
have
many
more
councillor.
Edwards
and
I
have
one
scheduled
on
both
of
two
pieces
of
work
in
East
Boston
next
week,
we're
working
on
several
others
in
in
different
neighborhoods.
So
I
look
forward
to
having
this
long,
thorough,
inclusive
and
iterative
conversation,
because
ultimately,
that
is
a
type
of
process
that
I
and
I
think
many
others
would
hope,
replace
the
B
PDA,
and
we
need
to
model
that
even
in
talking
about
how
we
get
there.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
look
forward
to
your
feedback.
Thank.
D
C
F
That
was
one
did
not
even
have
a
have
a
phone
number
in
the
BR
a
to
to
contact
people
up
there.
This
this,
this
new
V
PDA
I've,
been
through
numerous
planning
planning
initiatives.
Doclock
was
one
of
them
that
lasted
for
six
years,
a
highly
activated,
thoughtful
I,
AG
planning
process
so
B,
which
I
think
is
a
win.
Some
of
my
some
of
my
colleagues
tell
me
about
how
much
how
much
they
enjoy
south
base
hope.
It
was
a
four
year
process
with
be
PDA
with
another
thoughtful
I
AG
process.
F
We
have
Glover's
corner
being
planned,
planned.
We
have
the
Dorchester
corridor
being
planned,
so
just
to
say
that
there's,
a
lack
of
planning
on
I
think
is
a
bit
disingenuous
Glover's
corner
Lovins
corner
back
from
clubs,
corner
66
units
of
affordable
housing,
of
which
20
of
them
I
believe,
will
have
a
neighborhood
preference
done
through
work
through
that
I
AG.
F
Through
that
planning
process,
an
acre
and
a
half
of
open
space,
150
trees
planted
a
connection
in
between
meeting
house
Hill
down
into
sand
hill
train
station,
so
transportation
plans,
camera
plans,
yeah,
so
I've
had
good
experience.
Not
all
great
experiences
there's
some
that
you
walk
away
frustrated,
but
there
is
plenty
going
on
I'm
involved
in
my
planning
and
just
wanted
to
let
that
be
known.
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
Thank.
G
You
have
the
floor.
Thank
you.
I
I
applaud
my
good
friend
from
Roslindale,
however,
to
have
a
report
like
this
and
not
speak
to
those
of
us
district
counselors,
especially
who
slept
and
not
slept
a
lot
because
of
all
these
projects
that
we
participate
in
myself
12
years
now,
I
can
speak
to
a
lot
of
dysfunction,
but
there's
a
lot
of
great
people
up
there
that
do
some
very
hard
work
and
it's
about
the
article
80
process.
G
Now
we
can
I
didn't
read
the
report
yet
so
I'm
not
going
to
sitting
here
to
be
critical
of
the
report.
There's
always
room
for
improvement,
however.
I
think
the
state
of
our
city
right
now
with
the
development
boom
going
on
there's
a
lot
of
thoughtfulness
going
on
and
and
to
kind
of
imply
that
we're
not
talking
about
climate
change
or
transportation
impacts.
G
That's
all
part
of
the
process,
and
it's
also
kind
of
denigrating
all
the
folks
that
serve
on
I
AG
s,
all
the
people,
regular
folks
that
we
all
get
to
nominate
to
serve
on
these
I
AG's
that
are
the
eyes
and
ears
of
the
neighborhood
that
inform
us
as
elected
officials.
I.
Think
again,
it
pains
me
because
so
many
people
give
so
much
time
and
effort
and
thoughtfulness
to
these
processes
and
then
not
to
include
us.
G
A
The
committee
also
heard
testimony
from
members
of
the
public
in
a
variety
of
stakeholders:
rich
McGinnis,
deputy
director
of
climate
change
and
environmental
planning
for
the
VRA,
spoke
on
behalf
of
the
administration
explaining
these
issues
touches
on
article
97
and
the
Commonwealth's
Constitution
regarding
protected
open
space.
Deputy
director
McGinnis
also
pointed
out
that
there
is
already
a
quote
web
of
easements
in
and
around
the
Long
Wharf
area,
and
that
these
are
typically
done
through
legislation,
especially
in
the
case
of
the
Apostle
being
a
being
a
br.
A
A
property
josh
Sydney
on
behalf
of
capital
properties,
explained
that
they
were
actually
unaware
of
the
legislative
requirements
of
the
utility
installation
process.
Until
recently,
Capitol
properties
agreed
to
send
more
detailed
information
in
meet
with
neighborhood
groups
prior
to
beginning
their
work.
The
BPD
a
had
sent
met
with
the
Boston
Wharf
District
Council,
which
represented
a
letter
of
support
of
the
legislation.
A
new
draft
of
the
legislation
was
being
presented
at
the
hearing,
in
which
we
added
a
standard
section
for
regarding
liability
to
be
assumed
by
the
utility
company
for
work
done
through
the
easement.
A
We
also
have
received
a
friendly
amendment
from
our
colleague
District
one
councillor,
who
represents
the
neighborhood.
Therefore,
darken
talked
of
one
264
will
be
amended
as
follows.
The
addition
of
section
4,
as
presented
at
the
hearing,
modified
from
the
from
the
president
DME
to
clarify
the
area
of
the
license.
A
Downtown
waterfront,
neighborhoods
of
the
City
of
Austin
at
this
time
is
chair.
I
recommend
the
dark
of
1
to
64
message
and
order.
Approving
a
home
rule
petition
to
the
general
court
entitled
an
act
authorizing
the
boss.
Every
Toronto
authority
to
grant
easements
for
utility
purposes
over
a
portion
of
certain
parcel
and
located
in
the
city
of
Boston
ought
to
pass
in
a
new
draft
and,
through
the
chair,
offer
our
district
colleague
an
opportunity
to
opine
on
her
district.
Thank.
D
D
H
You
very
much
council
priority.
I,
really
appreciate
your
leadership
and
navigating,
which
was
at
some
points,
a
tense
conversation.
We,
the
process
itself,
had
started
off
a
little
bumpy.
There
was
a
lack
of
I
felt
community
involvement
and
that
I
don't
want
the
imperfect
process
to
get
ahead
of
or
to
impede
progress.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
these
are
easements.
This
is
about
getting
electricity
to
a
building,
and
it's
about
making
sure
that
tenants
can
have
well.
They
could
pay
rent
and
also
move
in
and
have
local
businesses
thrive
there.
H
D
You
very
much
Council
Edwards
anyone
else
looking
to
speak
on
this
docket.
At
this
time,
council
Flaherty,
whose
chair
of
the
Committee
on
government
operations,
seeks
acceptance
of
the
committee
report
and
passage
of
docket
1
to
64
in
a
new
draft,
all
those
in
favor
of
passage,
say
aye,
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
the
eyes
have
it.
Docket
1
to
64
has
been
passed
in
a
new
draft.
Moving
on
to
matters
recently
heard
for
possible
action.
Talking.
E
You,
madam
president,
I
want
to
thank
councilor
Baker
for
joining
this
hearing
that
we
had
yesterday.
The
petitioners
attended,
as
well
as
representatives
from
the
police
department
and
from
the
Boston
transportation
department,
captain
al
Andres
from
the
Hackney
division
and
has
furred
and
bill
Conroy
was
also
there.
E
We
went
through
the
standard
set
of
questions
about
the
operations
and
the
plans
and
the
plan
pick
up
locations
and
routes
and
fares,
and
all
of
that-
and
there
were
several
issues
that
lead
me-
to
recommend
rejection
without
prejudice
to
allow
the
petitioners
to
continue
having
conversations
and
resolve
some
of
these
issues.
First
was,
as
pointed
out
by
the
Transportation
Department
when
doing
interstate
pickup.
So
this
is
mostly
a
Boston
to
New
York
bus
route.
E
They
need
a
permit
from
dpu
from
the
state
regulators
that
then
will
require
the
Transportation,
Department
and
Council
to
have
a
say
there.
But
this
is
not
the
appropriate
venue
to
issue
that,
essentially
the
route
from
New
York
to
Boston
and
back
and
forth.
They
were
not
able
to
run
this
head
of
south
station
because
there's
not
capacity
there.
So
the
petitioner
was
seeking
to
do
this
out
of
Dalton
Street
in
Back
Bay
near
the
Sheraton
Hotel.
E
The
hotel
had
also
sent
a
representative
in
opposition
because
there
are,
there
are
already
many
many
tour
buses
that
pick
up
there.
There's
concerns
about
Destry
and
safety
and
additional
traffic
impacts
with
that.
So
they
have
a
little
more
work
to
do
and
I
would
defer
to
councillor
Baker
if
he
wants
to
chime
in
from
the
hearing
or
councillor
Flynn,
as
the
representative
for
the
area
to
weigh
in
but
I
would
recommend
a
vote
to
deny
this
petition
without
prejudice.
Thank
you.
I
You,
madam
president,
I,
want
to
say
thank
you
to
council
wolf
for
her
great
work
and
leadership
on
this
issue.
As
counselor
wool
mentioned
a
the
opportunity
to
visit
the
owner
of
the
bus
line
at
1:00
Dalton
Street
several
months
ago
and
as
counsel
will
expressed,
there
are
many
challenges
of
adding
another
bus
to
that
that
busy
street
in
his,
and
there
was
some
other
concerns
from
businesses
in
the
area
about
parking
and
traffic.
I
J
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
I
rise
to
wreath
on
this
audience
to
regulate
recovering
homes
in
the
city
of
Boston,
also
known
as
silver
homes,
because
they
like
sufficient
regulations
and
I'm
being
feared
across
the
city,
as
was
widely
reported
in
the
Media
last
week,
there
have
been
serious
issues
of
concern
with
the
sober
homes
across
the
Commonwealth
and,
more
specifically,
in
the
north,
show.
There
was
a
recent
example
of
silver
homes
owner
who
was
convicted
of
financially
emotionally
and
sexually
abusing
the
residents
of
his
sober
homes.
J
Here
in
Boston,
I've,
seen
and
heard
of
silver
homes
owners
making
moving
into
neighborhoods
without
proper
inform
residents.
Yet
they
set
up
shop
and
start
their
operation
with
very
little
supervision
and
regulation
from
the
city.
Sometimes
the
owners
of
these
homes
take
advantage
of
residents
for
their
own
financial
benefit,
all
operating
in
an
unsafe
environment
and
doing
very
little
to
help
these
residents
in
recovery.
J
The
City
of
Austin
has
a
responsibility
to
ensure
the
silver
homes
run
in
the
safest
way
possible,
and
also
bring
about
the
best
outcomes
for
those
who
have
problems
with
substance
abuse.
I
believe
this
audience
is
a
concrete
step
in
the
right
direction
to
finally
regulate
sober
homes
in
the
City
of
Austin.
Thank
you,
madam
president,
and
I
asks
for
suspension
of
the
rules
and
passes
of
the
soul.
D
Thank
You
councillor,
garrison
I,
am
seeing
a
few
few,
so
I'm
assuming
for
I
see
a
few
I
would
welcome
I'm
putting
out
on
the
the
floor.
There
is
a
motion
to
suspend
the
rules
and
pass
this
ordinance
I'm,
seeing
a
lot
of
faces
which
assume
that
I'm
gonna
have
some
folks
actually
object
to
this.
Thank
you.
I
see
people
give
me
eyes
so
I
just
want
to
reflect
on
the
record.
D
A
About
a
president,
too
important
an
issue
just
to
suspend
and
pass,
but
that
would
work
with
the
lead
sponsor
to
have
an
expedited
hearing.
So
we
can
get
folks
in
here
from
the
recovery
community
and
beyond,
to
have
a
robust
dialogue
with
respect
to
these
issues
and
the
issues
that
the
author
describes
in
the
ordinance,
OPA
and
I'll
work
with
through
the
giro
through
her
staff
to
set
that
up
as
soon
as
possible.
Thank.
H
You
I
just
wanted
to
echo
council
Flaherty's
comments,
but
also
note.
This
is
an
important
conversation
and
I
think
it's
worth
the
robust
conversation,
because
it's
not
just
about
how
to
keep
the
folks
safe
in
the
sober
homes
you're
right.
In
many
cases,
some
communities
don't
feel
that
there's
notice
about
the
sober
home
coming
but,
more
importantly,
I,
think
that
we
need
to
talk
about
the
stigma
about
people
who
are
in
recovery
and
being
able
to
be
integrated
into
our
communities.
H
So
that
is
why
this
is
where
they
have
a
full
hearing
with
many
people
discussing
these
things
and
making
sure
that
we're
providing
the
resources
necessary
I
want
sober
homes
to
thrive,
I
want
people
to
feel
that
they
can
come
home
and
that
they
can
be
integrated
back
into
our
communities.
So
I
don't
want
this
to
be
seen
as
a
NIMBY
type
of
ordinance
to
prevent
their
integration
or
to
prevent
them.
Coming
in.
This
is
a
conversation
that
we
need
to
have
so
I
actually
initially
wanted
to.
I
wondered
if
this
is
a
state-level
conversation.
H
K
You
so
much,
madam
president,
this
is
a
very
important
conversation
that
we
need
to
continue
to
have
on
the
council.
It
is
one
certainly
that
plagues
my
district
in
terms
of
silver
Holmes,
just
popping
up
wherever
they
want
and
and
not
doing
what
they
should
be
doing
for
the
residents
who
are
in
need
of
services
and
who
are
trying
to
live
a
sober
life.
The
incident
that
you
mentioned,
counselor,
was
in
my
district,
and
certainly
we've
had
some
conversation
here
in
the
council.
K
I
think
it's
important
that
when
we
continue
that
conversation
to
see
how
we
can
make
sure
that
there's
more
equity
in
terms
of
access
to
sober
homes,
what
we
learned
in
our
conversations
in
past
months
is
that
they
are
very
the
ones
that
voluntarily
register
with
the
state
are
concentrated
in
certain
neighborhoods.
Again,
it's
voluntary
I
think
it's
important
that
we
engage
with
our
state
colleagues.
K
On
this
conversation,
my
understanding
is
that
there
are
certain
reasons
why
we
cannot
regulate
silver
homes,
because
people
in
recovery
are
a
protected
status
of
people,
but
it
is
an
important
conversation
to
have
to
make
sure
that
those
who
need
recovery
services
are
getting
them
and
that
they
are
safe
in
that
community.
That
people
who
need
services
can
access
them
all
throughout
the
city
and
not
just
concentrated
in
certain
neighborhoods.
So
I
look
forward
to
having
a
robust
conversation
and
I
hope
that
we
engage
our
state
partners
in
this
conversation
as
well.
D
You
councillor
Janey
mr.
clerk,
if
you
could
add
councillor
Edwards
councillor,
Baker
councillor,
Flynn,
councillor,
Janey,
councillor
McCarthy,
as
well
as
the
chair
and
just
for
a
point
of
clarification.
There
was
a
motion
to
suspend
the
rules
and
pass
which
we
will
not
do
today
because
of
those
objections,
but
we
will
instead
assign
docket
one
four
four
two
to
the
Committee
on
government
operations.
D
Moving
on
to
late
files,
I
am
informed
by
the
clerk
that
there
is
one
late
file
matter
which
action
will
be
added
to
today's
agenda.
Just
a
point
of
clarification,
it's
a
letter
from
our
colleague
as
to
why
he's
absent
today,
hearing
and
seeing
no
objections.
The
matter
is
so
added.
Mr.
clerk,
if
you
could
read
it
into
the
record.
B
D
We
of
course,
wish
counselors
Jacob
and
his
family
a
wonderful
Yom
Kippur,
along
with
all
other
residents
who
celebrate
Yom
Kippur
today,
dr.
only
late
filed
matter
was
in
place.
Anyone
wishing
to
remove
her
matter
from
the
green
sheets
may
do
so
now,
one
by
the
clerk
that
there
are
zero
late
filed
matters
for
the
consent
agenda.
The
chair
moves
for
adoption
of
the
consent
agenda
at
this
time.
All
those
in
favor
of
adoption
say
aye
many
opposed,
say,
nay,
the
eyes
have
it.
H
Knowing
that
this
is
up
for
debate
even
in
2019
in
2003,
we
finally
got
rid
of
all
the
laws
that
banned
or
found
it
to
be
criminal
act
to
engage
in
same-sex
sexual
activities.
2015.
We
finally
recognized
in
a
five-to-four
decision,
so
a
close
decision,
the
right
for
folks
to
marry-
and
so
here
we
are
now
in
2019,
still
arguing
about
whether
someone
should
be
able
to
work
exist,
be
free.
H
And
be
truly
American
and
be
recognized
by
our
Constitution
and
protected,
and
it's
sad
that
we're
still
having
that
conversation.
It's
sad
that
it's
even
up
for
debate
and
again
we
oftentimes
in
Massachusetts
become
complicit
because
we
have
those
protections
here.
But
this
is
just
a
recognized.
Not
everyone
has
those
actions.
Massachusetts
is
not
an
island.
H
L
Will
help
us
get
to
carbon
neutrality
by
2050?
It
actually
goes
even
beyond
what
was
originally
in
the
Paris
climate
Accord
that
erroneously,
in
my
opinion,
the
United
States
is
no
longer
a.
Member
of
this
is
really
good
news,
really
important
news,
as
we
have
said
time
and
time
again,
buildings
relay
or
account
for
nearly
70
percent
of
all
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
L
The
things
I
was
most
proud
of
in
this
revised
report
and
tremendous
credit
to
the
mayor
and
his
team
for
really
putting
this
forward
is
going
to
mandate
going
forward
that
all
new
municipal
buildings
will
be
Net,
Zero
Carbon,
which
is
something
we've
been
talking
about
for
many
years
in
this
body,
and
it's
it's
really
important
to
not
only
talk
the
talk
and
but
also
to
walk.
The
walk
and
I've
been
very
proud
to
partner,
with
chief
cook,
with
his
team.
L
Obviously
with
the
mayor
and,
most
importantly
with
all
of
you,
we
first
started
talking
about
net
zero
carbon
in
July
of
2017.
We
then
had
several
hearings
after
that,
in
the
fall
in
the
sump
beginning
in
the
summer,
into
the
fall
into
the
winter
of
2017
and
2018.
We
had
four
working
sessions.
Every
person
in
this
room
participated
in
that
from
that
we
came
up
with
11
policy
proposals.
L
We
had
an
additional
hearing
afterwards
in
March
of
this
year
earlier
of
this
year,
so
we've
seen
some
great
work
and
it's
true
perfect
to
see
a
great
partnership
and
see
the
council
in
the
administration
working
together
for
something
that
will
have
an
indelible
mark
on
our
future,
our
kids
future
our
grandkids
future,
and
it
was
just
a
great
win
for
this
body.
But,
more
importantly,
it
was
a
great
win
for
this
city
and,
most
importantly,
it
was
a
great
win
for
this
planet.
Thank
you,
madam
president,.
F
So
Saturday
morning,
I'm
going
to
have
a
volunteer
effort,
we're
going
to
the
Mason
school,
which
is
in
behind
Clifford
Park
on
Norfolk
Ave.
We're
gonna
try
to
over
this
weekend,
paint
to
all
the
hallways
in
the
state
ways:
it'll
be
a
full
day,
eight
o'clock
till
four
o'clock.
If
you
show
up
at
noon
time,
I'll
give
you
a
hot
dog,
a
hamburger
everybody's
welcome
to
come
the
audience
also
you're,
welcome
to
come.
You'll
get
a
hamburger,
Mason
school
yeah!
F
F
G
D
D
For
councillor
Janie
Jeff
worthy
Albert
seals,
Charlene,
Lewis,
Austin,
Johnson,
Kevin
grant
Anita,
Cooper
and
Jose
Montano
and
then
for
councillor
Janey,
as
well
as
the
chair,
Diahann
Carroll
for
councilors
Flynn
in
Flaherty,
Katharine,
Prentiss,
well,
I
think
we
also
acknowledged
last
week,
of
course,
was
Erik's
mom
dorothy
pick
up
for
councillor
baker,
ralph
verrano's,
for
counsel,
O'malley,
Margaret,
sxo
Ferris,
and
for
the
entire
council
Christine
Oh,
father,
tsk,
Reno,
Donald's,
father,
je
O'donnell
a
moment
of
silence.
Please.
D
Thank
you.
I
asked
the
chair
moves
that
when
the
council
adjourns
today
it
does
so
in
memory
of
those
aforementioned
individuals.
We
are
scheduled
to
meet
again
in
this
chamber
on
Wednesday
October
23rd.
So
there's
a
week
off
due
to
the
holiday
on
Monday
schedule
tonight,
October
23rd
Wednesday
at
12:00
noon
in
this
chamber
at
Boston,
City
Hall,
all
those
in
favor
of
adjournment,
say
aye,
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
the
I,
it's
habit.
The
council
is
adjourned.