►
Description
Docket #0424 - Hearing discussing the status of Late Night MBTA Service in Greater Boston
A
A
We
will
take
public
testimony
throughout
the
hearing
if
you're
interested
in
testifying,
please
email,
ron.cob,
cobb
boston.gov
for
the
link
and
then
follow
along
on
the
live
stream
to
know
when
it's
your
turn
to
speak
and
for
those
who
will
be
speaking
during
public
testimony.
Please
state
your
name
and
affiliation
residence
and
limit
your
comments
to
two
minutes
to
ensure
that
everybody's
comments
and
concerns
can
be
heard.
Okay,
so
again,
thank
you.
So
much
for
joining
us
we'll
do
some
very
quick
opening
remarks
from
our
colleagues
on
the
council.
A
B
Off
yes,
good
morning,
everyone
thank
you,
counselor
wu
for
your
partnership.
In
co-sponsoring
this
hearing
order
alongside
our
office,
we
really
do
appreciate
your
long-term
advocacy
in
all
things.
Transit.
Your
work
in
this
space
is,
is
definitely
one
of
the
things
that
a
lot
of
people
point
to
when
we
think
about
transit
justice
and
so
really
do
appreciate
your
partnership.
B
I,
as
I'd
like
to
just
quickly
just
say
that
we
expect
this
hearing
to
go
pretty
quickly,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
this
topic
is
isn't
important.
The
issue
is
personal
and
professional
to
me
and
if
I
didn't
have
my
beat
up
chevy
nova
back
in
the
day,
I
would
probably
be
completely
stranded
on
my
way
home
from
my
late
night
work
and
so
late
night.
Tea
service
is
crucial
as
a
means
to
bring
late
night
employees
home
safely.
B
It's
also
crucial
to
support
small
businesses
and
provide
a
safe
mean
transportation
for
women,
lgbtq
plus
individuals,
and
anyone
who
finds
themselves
in
in
a
neighborhood
that
they
do
not
know
late
night
and
on
a
side
note,
as
many
of
the
employees
who
will
benefit
from
the
late
90s
service
are
also
probably
still
asleep
so
moving
forward.
We
would
need
to
find
ways
to
bring
this
conversation
to
them,
but
I
see
this
as
a
brief
reintroduction
to
this
topic
and
to
those
who
have
not
been
consistently
tied
into
this
work.
B
I
know
that
jared
had
reached
out
to
our
office
back
in
march,
but
with
covid
and
the
transition
and
everybody
being
home
remote
working,
we,
his
email
got
lost,
but
we
wanted
to
just
publicly
acknowledge
that
when
we
talk
about
all
means
all
and
those
who
are
living,
the
reality
should
be
leading
the
work.
B
A
C
Oh
thank
thank
you.
Council
will
thank
you
to
the
sponsors.
C
Thank
you
to
council
mejia.
It's
an
important
subject
that
we're
discussing
today,
a
safe,
reliable
mbta
system
is
critical
to
the
economy
of
our
state,
but
also
important
to
low-income
residents,
workers,
our
immigrants
that
rely
on
the
mbta
to
get
to
various
places
of
employment,
including
restaurants,
that
close
at
midnight
or
one
o'clock.
C
I
have
a
lot
of
constituents
in
my
district
that
work
in
the
restaurant
fields
or
at
bars,
and
they
need
the
they
need
public
transportation
to
get
home.
Also,
a
safe
and
reliable,
effective
mbta
will
keep
more
cars,
hopefully
off
off
the
street,
where
people
will
be
using
the
mbta.
It
also
hopefully,
will
improve
pedestrian
safety
safety
as
well.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
for
this
important
discussion
and
to
the
city,
administration
and
advocates
for
being
here.
Thank
you.
A
D
You,
madam
chair,
and
also
thank
you
to
councillor
mejia
for
sponsoring
this
hearing
order.
I
think
it
was
filed
way
back
in
february
and
it
certainly
was
an
issue
of
great
concern.
Then
it's
probably
an
issue
of
even
greater
concern
now,
in
light
of
the
mbta
plans
to
curtail
their
late
evening,
services
and
weekend
services
so
and
cut
back
on
some
routes
entirely.
D
So
I
look
forward
to
the
conversation
and
I
also
want
to
flag
up
that,
the
the
the
importance
of
the
mbta
to
our
essential
workers
to
to
get
to
and
for
from
their
jobs
at
all
ours
the
day
and
night,
and
it's
really
important
that
we
have
a
robust
and
reliable
public
transit
system
for
all
of
our
residents
in
boston.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
I
second
councillor
braden's
comments.
I
think
that
you
know
I
I
was
at
the
hearings
trying
to
stop
the
mbta
from
pulling
back
on
late
night,
and
I
think
that
was
like
january
february
2016
and
it
is
beyond
discouraging
to
be
having
a
hearing
that
you
know
who
we
thought
was
going
to
be
about
revisiting
that
question
of
how
to
how
to
push
later,
how
to
do
it.
E
For
the
sake
of
our
our
restaurants,
our
restaurant
workers,
all
of
our
last
shift
workers,
many
of
whom
I
know
you
know,
live
in
councillor
edwards
district
and
for
whom
the
tea
is
a
is
a
far
preferable
option
to
paying
for
a
cab,
and
I
think,
like
that's
the
conversation
we
should
be
having
today.
Instead
we're
staring
down
these
proposed
cuts
from
two
days
ago.
That
would
pull
back
service
by
another
hour,
and
I
just
it
it
underscores
to
me.
E
I
think
the
t
has
periodically
talked
about
this
late
night
time
as
a
sort
of
shoulder
service
where
the
number
of
riders
doesn't
justify
the
service.
But
it's
not
like.
We
just
cut
off
the
tee.
You
know
at
11
to
1
on
a
sunday,
because
not
that
many
people
are
out
of
bed
like
part
like
part
of
public
good.
E
Is
that
you're
providing
it
reliably
for
when
folks
need
it,
as
opposed
to
tailoring
it
so
specifically
to
use
that
you
cause
a
vicious
cycle
where
you
lose
that
use
so,
as
folks
know,
I'm
super
concerned
about
these
cuts
and
particularly
the
way
that
they
I
mean,
I'm
concerned
about
them
across
the
board.
The
way
they
hit.
My
district
is
really
unacceptable
on
the
e-line,
closing
it
from
brigham
to
he
street,
and
we
had
a
rally
about
that
yesterday
and
are
going
to
continue
to
be
pushing
on
that.
E
But
that's
obviously,
in
the
context
of
a
larger
landscape
of
unacceptable
service
cuts
that
are
going
to
send
more
cars
into
our
neighborhoods
they're,
going
to
drive
up
asthma
rates,
where
they're,
already
high
and
and
are
just
going
to
in
a
short-sighted
way,
really
curtail
an
economic
recovery
when
we
get
there
because
we
have
so
many
businesses
that
employ
so
many
people
that
rely
on
being
able
to
have
a
later
night
service.
E
So
I'm
glad
we're
talking
about
this,
I'm
discouraged
by
the
moment
that
we're
talking
about
this
in,
but
I
think
we
just
have
to
fight
like
hell
against
the
cuts
that
have
been
proposed
on
monday.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair.
F
George,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
sorry,
to
be
coming
to
you
from
behind
my
picture.
As
soon
as
I'm
settled
and
not
in
transit,
I
will
come
in
person,
but
just
want
to
echo
the
opening
statements
of
colleagues
and
thanks
to
the
lead
sponsor
on
this
issue
and
the
unfortunate
continued
conversation
and
and
so
much
work,
not
just
left
undone,
but
what
we've
seen,
especially
over
the
last
couple
of
days
and
sort
of
a
significant
digression
in
services
and
in
those
cuts.
F
So
look
forward
to
today's
hearing
and
you
know
continuing
the
work
that
is
underway
thanks.
Madam
chair.
G
Thank
you
very
much
and
again
ayako
the
thanks
to
councillor
mejia
for
the
wonderful
opportunity
to
have
this
conversation
and
to
have
it
in
a
way
that
I
think
really
further
emphasizes
that
our
economy
depends
on
people
being
able
to
come
home
from
work.
Our
economy
depends
on
a
reliable
public
transportation
and
we
really
cannot
talk
quite
seriously
about
restaurant
revitalization
if
restaurant
workers
can't
come
home.
G
G
Our
economy
would
actually,
I
think,
improve
if
we
had
more
increased
public
transportation
right
now,
so
people
can
move
and
get
to
and
from
work.
So
that's
one.
It's
the
economic
argument,
the
other
one
is,
I
don't
know
how
we
are
going
to
claim
in
any
way
shape
or
form
we
are
becoming,
or
we're
headed
towards
being
a
world-class
city.
If
our
transportation
system
isn't
even
matching
some
of
the
basic
levels
of
other
world
cities
as
well.
G
G
So
with
all
of
these
reasons,
I
firmly
believe
that
we
lean
in
to
preventing
people
from
further
going
into
poverty.
We
lean
in
towards
revitalizing
our
restaurants.
We
lean
in
towards
a
greener
economy,
and
by
doing
all
of
that,
requires
us
to
lean
into
a
robust
public
transportation
system,
including
late
90s
service.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
H
Great
good
morning,
thank
you
so
much
for
allowing
me
to
go
first
and
for
this
for
this
invitation.
I'm
really
pleased
to
be
here,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
the
sponsors,
the
co-sponsors
and
all
the
counselors
for
being
here
to
talk
about
something
that
is
essential.
My
name
is
anna
leslie
and
I
direct
the
austin
brighton
health
collaborative
and
though
that
is
nelson
brighton.
H
So
I
want
to,
I
guess
I
will
focus
my
comments
on
health
and
on
public
health,
and
I
know
many
of
the
counselors
have
already
spoken
to
this
this
morning.
There
are
literal
safety
issues
with
keeping
public
transit,
open
and
accessible
and
making
sure
that
people
get
home
safely
and
are
not
reliant
on
potentially
unsafe
spaces
and
systems,
and
we
have
tragically
seen
examples
of
that.
In
our
city
in
recent
years,
so
keeping
systems
as
open
and
accessible
for
all
people
is
essential
to
to
literal
health,
both
mental
and
physical.
H
But
I
also
want
to
talk
about
economic,
health
and,
and
counselors
have
touched
on
that
as
well.
Austin
brighton,
as
councillor
braden
knows,
is,
is
rich
with
late
night
activity,
with
restaurants,
with
artists
with
people
who
rely
on
these
services,
it's
also
rich
with
development
and
with
new
financing
coming
into
a
neighborhood
that
is
coming
there.
H
For
that
reason,
because
of
the
richness
already
there
and
honestly
is
looking
to
benefit
and
profit
off
of
the
systems
and
the
richness
already
there,
instead
of
contributing
to
those
systems,
and
so
the
fact
that
we
have
a
system
right
now
that
is
economically
strapped
and
strained
and
our
boston
transportation
department
is
doing
everything
they
can
to
keep
pace
with
all
of
the
requests
and
all
of
the
changes.
H
And
we
have
a
development
system
that
is
loading
more
people
into
our
neighborhoods
and
loading,
increasing
stress
and
strain
on
a
neighborhood
and
on
several
neighborhoods
that
have
a
richness
of
of
culture
and
of
small
business
and
of
things
that
rely
on
systems
that
they
are
taking
advantage
of.
They
need
to
pay
into
these
systems.
This
is
an
economic
opportunity
where
we
as
a
city
and
as
advocates,
need
to
go
back
very
strongly
to
any
development
proposed
and
say
you
need
to
contribute
to
our
already
functioning
public
transit
system.
H
Do
not
create
your
own
private
system.
We
have
a
shuttle
service,
it's
the
mbta
put
money
into
that
system.
In
the
same
way,
our
large
institutions,
our
colleges,
our
universities,
are
hospitals.
H
Their
folks
are
relying
on
late
night
service,
be
they
their
students,
be
there
their
staff,
and
they
are
also
yes,
strapped
and
strained
in
in
a
global
pandemic,
but
they
also
have
immense
reserves
that
people
like
myself
do
not
and
they
need
to
pull
on
those
reserves.
The
rainy
day
has
arrived.
H
You
need
to
open
up
your
rainy
day
funds
and
contribute
to
our
public
transit
system,
so
that
is
all
an
issue
of
public
health.
H
I
think
the
term
public
health
has
come
into
the
modern
vernacular
more
than
it
ever
has
this
year,
but
it's
not
just
about
epidemiology
a
course
I
took
10
years
ago
and
I've
forgotten
everything
about
it
is.
It
is
about
community
health.
It
is
about
preventative
wellness.
H
It's
about
the
the
curb
cut
effect,
which
is
the
analogy
that
I
love
the
most
in
in
the
70s
when
advocates
moving
around
our
city
spaces
could
not
actually
exit
a
sidewalk
and
cross
because
there
was
no
cut
in
the
curb
for
for
somebody
in
a
wheelchair
or
somebody
with
a
stroller,
so
they
cut
the
curb
themselves,
and-
and
that
is
the
reason
that
we
have
cuts
and
curbs,
because
people
made
that
change
and
that
has
allowed
for
everybody
to
access
systems,
not
just
people
that
need
that
curb
cut.
H
So
we
need
to
think
about
the
people
that
need
that
equity,
because
that
lifts
all
ships
and
that
that
is
the
core
of
public
health,
and
so,
when
we
think
about
late
night
service,
we're
thinking
about
the
people
that
need
that
service
at
the
baseline
that
lifts
all
ships
that
that
supports
all
of
us-
and
maybe
I
am
not
using
late
night
service,
but
I
benefit
because
somebody
else
does
use
it.
H
H
I
Thanks
and
thank
you
to
counselor
mejia
for
calling
this
hearing,
I
know
that
the
intention
was
to
have
this
a
while
ago,
but
the
timing
seems
perfect
in
an
unfortunate
way
and
thanks
obviously
to
the
council
for
holding
this
and
for
all
of
you
for
being
here.
You
know,
I,
I
think
it's
an
advantage
that
you
know,
as
as
I
look
around
this
space,
the
administration,
the
advocates
and
the
council
are
all
on
the
same
page.
I
You
know,
as
an
advocate,
I'm
not
showing
up
in
this
space
to
try
to
convince
anyone
here
that
we
need
late
night
service,
and
so
I
am
interested
in
bringing
the
information
that
I
know
that
I
think
is
powerful
to
this
group
and
then
focusing
on
actions.
We
can
take
and
so
happy
to
dig
into
any
of
the
wonk.
But
that's
sort
of
the
intention
of
my
my
testimony
today,
of
course,
never
a
dull
moment.
I
I
always
want
to
just
get
stuff
done
so
first,
I
do
just
want
to
thank
you,
kessler,
bach,
for
bringing
up
2016..
You
know.
We've
been
on
this
roller
coaster,
around
late
night
service
for
a
decade,
some
of
I've
seen
this
go
up
and
down
it's
a
pilot,
and
then
we
stop
and
it's
a
pilot
and
then
we
stop
and
there's
always.
I
This
narrative
there's
just
quite
aren't
quite
enough
people,
and
we
can
only
do
it
for
six
months
or
eighteen
months
and,
as
you
mentioned,
counselor
mejia,
transit
matters
and
the
city
of
boston
spent
like
an
enormous
amount
of
time
and
energy
working
on
the
2018
pilots
that
were
successful.
I
That
early
morning,
service
is
actually
where
we
saw
the
biggest
bump
because
folks
need
to
get
to
their
jobs
and
that
service
was
needed
seven
days
a
week,
even
though
you
know
you
know
service
bumps
around
on
saturdays
and
sundays,
and
that
when
we
looked
at
that
sort
of
10
p.m
to
2
a.m,
window
that
folks
did
use
that
increased
service
in
communities
like
dorchester,
roxbury,
charlestown,
everett,
east
boston,
lynn,
more
bus
trips
in
those
neighborhoods
were
were
used
right,
and
so
we
don't
need
more
information.
We
don't
need
another
pilot.
I
We
don't
need
to
convince
anyone.
We
already
know
from
the
work
that
we've
done,
that
people
use
the
service
and
people
need
this
service.
But
what
we
also
know
is
that
there's
an
over
reliance
on
fares,
you
know
the
city
of
boston
already
pays
in
to
the
system.
Quite
a
bit.
I
We've
had
hearings
on
that
and
that
every
time
we
talk
about
this,
it's
like
well,
we
can't
jam
the
bus
like
sardines,
like
we
do
at
five
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
so
it's
not
worth
it
and
that's
just
not
a
good
way
to
plan
a
transit
system.
So
you
know,
I
think
we
we
we
need
to
be
using.
I
literally
took
these
statistics
off
of
the
mbta's
website
where
they
talk
about
how
successful
these
pilots
were.
So
I
think
we
need
to
start
using
that
information.
I
Saying
like
look,
we
referenced
your
data,
so
why
are
you
cutting
this
service
when
you've
already
made
the
case
to
yourself
and
the
public
that
this
service
is
necessary
and
good,
and
that
when
you,
when
you
build
it,
they
do
come?
And
then
I
think
you
know
from
the
the
council's
perspective
and
areas
where
we
would
love
to
partner
with
you
all
and
the
administration.
I
I'm
you
know
part.
This
is
really
rooted
in
a
chronic
underinvestment
in
the
mbta
and
even
if
we
get
federal
stimulus
to
help
fill
the
mbta
gap.
That
does
not
solve
the
late
service
problem
and
it
does
not
solve
these
sort
of
chronic
issues.
It
just
sort
of
is
a
stop
gap
and
we'll
be
having
the
same
hearing
and
the
same
conversation
late
in
2021
again.
So
I
think
you
know
many
of
you
have
gotten
on
the
transit
is
essential
bandwagon.
All
of
you.
I
You
know
sad
that
you
want
to
delay
these
cuts,
but
I
I
think
we
need
to
really
work
on
collectively
with
the
boston
delegation,
the
state
house,
to
make
sure
that
we
are
putting
together
balanced,
progressive
revenue
packages
that
actually
meaningfully
fund
the
mbta.
There
are
a
lot
of
advocates
working
on
that
and
you
know
I
know
you
all
talk
to
our
state
electeds.
We
do
too.
I
Maybe
we
could
be
a
little
more
coordinated
or
think
together
about
how
we
have
a
consistent
message
and
really
push
that
through,
because
that's
that's
the
sort
of
golden
ticket
is
getting
sustained
long-term
funding
that
is
not
so
dependent
on
fares.
I
think
the
second
piece
is
is
pushing
back
on
the
new
fare
collection
system.
I
You
know
again,
the
t
is
the
t
is
spending
a
billion
dollars,
nearly
a
billion
dollars
on
this
new
fare
collection
system,
because
they're
banking
on
again
funding
the
system
through
fares
and
so
asking
some
hard
questions
about
about
that
program.
Anna's
also
heavily
involved
in
that
we're
happy
to
have
there
been
a
few
hearings
on
this,
but
what
works
and
what
doesn't-
and
why
are
we?
I
Why
are
we
so
excited
about
nickeling
and
diming
bus
riders
when
their
fares
have
gone
up
300
and
the
gas
tax
has
gone
up
17
in
the
last
30
years?
Like
that's
a
good
question
to
ask-
and
I
think
the
third
piece-
and
I
know
the
city's
doing
this-
is
we
need
to
continue
to
invest
in
bus
infrastructure,
whether
the
t
is
going
to
run
that
service
or
not,
so
the
work
that
we're
doing
to
put
bus
lanes
down
the
work
that
we're
doing
to
improve
bus
stops
like
we.
I
That
is
what
we
control
and
that's
what
we
need
to
do,
because
we're
going
to
fight
like
hell
to
get
that
service
back,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
bus
lanes
ready
for
when
we're
running
buses
on
them.
So
that's
my
thoughts
on
actions.
We
can
take
happy
to
chat
more
with
any
of
you
offline
or
in
this
conversation.
Thank
you
for
the
time.
J
Thank
you,
counselors
for
hosting
this
council
hearing,
it's
very
timely
and,
as
you
know,
the
administration
is
supportive
of
what
what
the
different
counselors
and
what
stacy
and
anna
have
mentioned,
and
thank
you
stacy
for
talking
about
the
success
of
nate
light
service.
I
was
just
looking
at
some
previous
letters
and
I
saw
that
in
december
of
2018,
the
administration
came
out
strongly
suggesting
that
the
pilot
for
late
night
service
be
made
permanent
and
we've
quoted
statistics
about
how
successful
the
service
has
been.
J
J
J
Of
essential
workers
continue
to
rely
on
transit
during
the
pandemic,
so
we
are.
The
administration
is
completely
in
support
of
opposing
this
late
night
service
card.
The
city
is
doing
its
part.
As
stacy
mentioned,
we
are
very
engaged
and
are
expanding
city
resources
for
bus
lanes.
J
Improving
bus
stops
working
with
the
mbta
on
a
daily
basis
to
see
how
we
can
get
them
to
keep
service
to
our
residents
intact
and
improving,
and
for
sure
you
know
all
the
city
councilors
have
been
supportive
with
the
to
the
administration's
efforts,
and
particular
thanks
to
stacy
and
anna
for
the
advocacy
they've
been
doing,
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
matt.
We
can
get
into
the
specifics
of
some
of
the
things
that
you're
looking
at
relative
to
late
night
service.
J
A
K
Great,
thank
you
very
much
for
any
of
that
introduction
and
good
morning.
Madam
speaker,
members
of
the
council.
Thank
you
for
your
time,
thanks
of
course,
to
the
advocates
for
their
time
and
everyone
who
is
listening
today.
So
my
name
is
matt
moran.
I
work
for
the
boston
transportation
department
and
I
lead
the
transit
team
here
at
btd.
K
These
workers
are
concentrating
the
fields
of
transportation,
food
preparation
and
serving
office,
administrative
support,
construction
management
and
healthcare
practitioners
technicians
further.
According
to
this
analysis,
most
employees
who
arrive
late
night
at
work
are
using
a
cab
about
46
or
ride
sharing
service
or
drive
alone.
That's
about
39.
K
Within
late
night
service.
We
have
three
overarching
goals
sort
of
since
we
began
the
pilot
a
few
years
ago
and
moving
forward.
So
our
first
goal
is
to
increase
equity.
This
is
especially
true
for
the
30
or
more
of
residents
in
east
boston,
dorchester
mission,
hill,
longwood
and
roxbury,
who
do
not
have
access
to
vehicles
and
have
household
incomes
less
than
52
000
a
year.
The
absence
of
late
night
bus
service
limits
economic
opportunities
or
requires
workers
to
use
more
costly
means
of
commuting.
K
K
This
has
been
mentioned
before
so
not
to
labor,
but
a
little
bit
of
background
about
our
late
night
bus
efforts,
so
the
city
of
boston,
in
partnership
with
the
cities
of
cambridge
and
somerville
transit
matters
and
livable
streets,
among
others,
proposed
an
overnight
bus
service
pilot
program
to
the
mbta
in
2017..
K
The
mbta
accepted
this
pilot
program
and
an
early
morning
pilot
was
launched
in
april
of
2018,
an
overnight
pilot
was
launched
in
september
of
2018..
These
pilots
had
essentially
three
components.
The
first
component,
as
mentioned,
was
in
the
earlier
starts
to
existing
trips.
The
second
component
were
later
ends
to
existing
bus
services
and
routes,
and
the
third
was
a
new
overnight
bus
system,
roughly
between
2
am
and
5
am
to
cover
the
gap
between
when
services
ended.
K
K
Unfortunately,
the
mbta
decides
to
curtail
the
overnight
bus
routes,
meaning
that
there's
essentially
no
mbta
service
between
1
30
to
5
am
so
moving
forward.
We
understand
that
late
night
bus
service
might
not
have
drawn
the
initial
ridership
as
hoped,
but
we
know
that
there's
demand
there
just
based
on
the
numbers
of
employees
who
are
commuting
in
the
boston
area
during
those
late
night
hours.
K
We
are
pleased
that
the
t
decided
to
expand
that
the
extend
the
pilot-
that
was
those
in
place
with
the
sort
of
later
evening
and
sort
of
earlier
morning,
trips.
But
we
know
that
these
services
are
under
threat
right
now
and
we're
hoping
to
get
to
continue
working
as
we
hopefully
come
out
of
the
pandemic,
to
improve
and
increase
overnight
bus
services
with
the
t
and
with
the
council
and
with
advocates
here
for
the
benefit
of
our
residents
to
improve
mobility
options
and
improve
equity.
A
B
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
great,
so
thank
you
again
to
all
for
your
testimonies.
I'm
curious,
I'm
going
to
start
with
anna,
just
when
you
talk
about
holding
developers
accountable
by
paying
into
public
transit.
Do
you
see
that
as
a
policy
action
item
or
something
where
we
were
just
not
just
showing
up
in
spaces
and
yelling
at
developers.
H
It's
definitely
both,
but
I
do
think
it
there's
a
there's
more
opportunity
for
partnership
with
boston
planning
and
development
agency
and
also
boston
transportation.
Department
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
around
this
with
some
of
the
advanced
transportation
demand,
management
and
tapas
acronyms,
which
I
either
know
the
acronym
and
or
don't
know.
I
know
the
anyway.
H
Those
are
their
plans,
but
they
kind
of
outlined
for
developers
a
sort
of
a
suite
of
services,
be
they
either
mitigations
or
community
benefits
that
they
need
to
contribute
when
when
they
build
and
it
the
the
challenging
thing
at
a
regional
level
at
a
neighborhood
level,
is
that
that's
all
done
for
the
most
part,
that's
done
project
by
project,
so
you
could
have
a
10-story
development
happening
and
they're
committing
to
improving
the
streetscape
just
in
front
of
their
development,
and
it
doesn't
extend
across
the
system.
H
So
there
there
are
definitely
opportunities.
I
think
for
for
you
all
as
a
council
to
to
look
at
how
we
we
require
that
proponents
and
developers
look
at
it
from
a
system
perspective
and
that
could
be
a
geographic
system.
So
so
a
corridor
and
we're
doing
a
lot
of
work
with
that
and
also
writing
right
now
with
the
western
ave
corridor
and
rezoning
project.
But
I
think
it's
also
an
opportunity
to
look
at
it
from
a
line.
H
I've
been
talking
with
the
t
and
and
with
btd
about
those
opportunities
and
possibilities,
but
but
perhaps
it's
looking
at
the
86
or
or
the
57
routes
that
I
know
better
and
if,
if
the
86
is
delayed
in
sullivan
square,
that
matters
to
somebody
waiting
for
it
on
western
ave,
and
so
it
doesn't
really
matter
to
improve
the
western
ave
section
of
the
line
if
the
problem
is
in
sullivan.
H
So
how
so
that
obviously
moves
us
beyond
a
municipal
contribution
and
into
a
system
contribution.
So
how
can
that
money
go
to
the
t
and
and
think
about
it
from
a
from
a
system
perspective?
So
so
those?
I
think
those
are
a
couple
options.
There's
definitely
a
lot
of
on
the
ground
advocacy
happening
with
sort
of
advocates
and
residents
who
are
part
of
the
the
impact
advisory
groups,
starting
to
beat
the
same
drum
on
expectations,
around
transportation,
mitigations,
but
also
really
defining.
H
These
these
are
mitigations
you're
you're.
You
are
benefiting
from
coming
to
us.
What
are
you
going
to
do
to
mitigate
your
impact?
I
I
would
also,
lastly,
really
maybe
push
for
more
detail
specifically
on
the
transportation
analyses
that
come
from
these
projects
and
corridor
studies
writ
large.
I
very
consistently
see
those
analyses
coming
back
saying
that
it
is
either
it
could
be
a
10
story,
building
or
a
22
story
building,
and
the
analysis
always
says
there
will
be
no
increased
impact
on
the
system,
which
is
categorically
impossible.
H
So
I
I
you
know,
I
think
that's
another
opportunity,
both
within
the
council
and
within
the
city
of
austin.
You
know
as
an
institution
to
to
ask
for
more
clarity
there.
So,
yes,
a
lot
a
lot
of
of
policy
opportunities.
B
Yeah-
and
I
know
that
you
have
a
hard
stop,
but
I
just
want
to
ask
one
more
question.
You
know
I
I
understand
that
it's
the
planning
and
development,
but
I
also
think
that
there
is
an
opportunity-
and
maybe,
if
you
have
any
information,
if
there's
been
any
traction
in
this
particular
area,
is
like
employers.
B
You
know
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
are
working
in
the
city
of
boston
who
have
commercial
real
estate,
and
there
needs
to
be
when
I
think
about
accountability,
it
has
to
be
360.
Everybody
has
to
feel
a
sense
of
responsibility
for
transit
and
oftentimes.
It
just
falls
in
different
pockets
and
I'm
new
in
the
conversation,
but
I'm
just
curious.
What,
if
any
traction,
are
we
looking
at
in
terms
of
employer
accountability
if
any
agreed.
H
And-
and
I
think
we
see
the
accountability
at
the
larger
levels
so
again,
also
brighton
perspective,
like
new
balance,
huge
employer
in
the
neighborhood,
and
so
there
certainly
put
more
in
the
spotlight
on
what
their
contribution
is,
but
you're
absolutely
right.
H
There
are
myriad
types
of
of
businesses
contributing
to
and
benefiting
from
the
system,
so
the
t
does
have
some
mechanisms
of
encouragement,
be
they
mbta
passes
that
are
that
are
grouped
so
that
there's
a
discount
for
the
employers
as
a
whole,
but
I
think
to
stacy's
point:
that's
a
focus
on
the
fares
and
that's
a
focus
on
the
individual
instead
of
the
business
proactively,
contributing
to
improving
the
system,
which
I
see
a
lot
less
of
so
so.
Yes,
I
think
there
there
are
real
opportunities
there.
H
I
definitely
defer
more,
I
think,
to
to
stacy
and
and
vinnie
and
matt
on
those
but-
and
I
I
lost
my
other
train
of
thought
there,
but
I
think
that
that's
absolutely
a
good
point
and
an
opportunity-
and
I
think,
lastly,
to
stacy's
point
that
there's.
H
I
think
all
of
us
here
really
are
on
the
same
page
with
this.
So
if
there
is
more
one
band,
one
sound
that
we
can
we
can
muster
and
because
on
the
ground,
people
are
beyond
frustrated
and
beyond
over
it.
So
how?
How
do
we
carry
that
voice
forward
in?
And
you
know
counselor
right
here-
you
know
this
better
than
any
of
us
in
like
in
an
in
an
organized
and
mobilized
way.
Thank.
B
You
and
I
just
realized
that
I
only
have
like
five
to
seven
minutes
and
I've
used
most
of
my
time,
but
I
will
ask
one
question
to
stacy:
can
you
just
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
funding
systems
through
fair?
B
I
think
a
lot
of
people
think
that
the
t
is
funded
through
fairs,
but
it
isn't
that
isn't
really
the
case.
Can
you
just
point
to
other
cities
and
states
that
aren't
so
focused
on
nickel
and
diming
the
passengers.
I
I
We
have
increasingly
found
around
sort
of
like
developments
and
community
benefits
just
from
like
a
base
community
level,
a
lot
of
folks,
don't
know
what
they
can
ask
developers
for
and
so
like
we,
we
had
a
conversation
with
a
community
member
recently
where
a
developer
was
like
here
we'll
give
you
a
community
garden
and
she
was
talking
to
her
neighbors
and
they
were
so
excited
about
that
and
she's
like,
but
we
should
be
asking
for
an
improvement
to
the
the
t
stop
and
this
and
they
were
like.
I
Oh,
we
didn't
even
know
that.
That
is
a
thing
we
could
ask
for.
So
I
think
that
there's
also
like
a
real
opportunity
to
just
like
help
the
public
understand
that
we
we
can
and
should
be
asking
for
more
things
and
it's
more
than
a
community
garden
right
that
that
that
we
can
do
more.
So
I
just
want
to
put
a
pin
in
that,
because
I
know
a
lot
of
folks
in
this
group
care
about
that
community
engagement
and
then
on
the
employer.
Stuff.
I
We've
also
found
through
customer
intercept
surveys,
matt
and
vineet
know
this-
that
a
lot
of
employers
think
that
they're
they're
the
people
who
come
to
their
business
and
their
employees
drive,
and
that
when
you
do
employee
and
customer
intercept
surveys
they
and
give
those
employers
back
that
information
they're,
usually
surprised
by
how
many
people
are
actually
using
transit.
So
I
think,
in
order
you
know,
to
help
get
employers
on
board.
We
also
need
to
be
doing
some
of
that
leg.
I
Work
we're
certainly
doing
it,
but
I
think
we
could
do
more,
but
there
are
also
like
major
employers
in
the
seaport
that
invest
in
private
shuttle
services,
and
you
know
I
will
never
get
off
of
my
northern
avenue
bridge
bandwagon
where
I'm
like.
Why
are
we
spending
100
million
on
a
bridge
to
carry
private
shuttles
when
we
could
spend
half
that
amount
of
money
and
like
also
be
talking
about
how
we
could
be
investing
some
of
those
funds
into
the
mbta
and
so
like?
That
is
a
separate
hearing?
I
Probably,
but
I
want
to
flag
that
because
I
think
it
gets
to
what
you
were.
You
were
surfacing
and
then
specifically
on
fairs,
so
great
great
great
question.
Right
now.
The
mbta
expects
about
750
million
dollars
of
its
of
its
revenue
to
come
from
people
paying
into
the
system.
Communities
like
kansas
city
are
looking
at
making
their
their
transit
free
la
is
looking
at.
I
This
worcester
is
also
looking
at
this,
and
part
of
the
reason
why
they're
interested
in
fair
free
transit
is
that
it
is
so
expensive
to
collect
fares
so
as-
and
this
is
very
true
specifically
for
buses,
so
in
worcester
they
did
an
analysis
and
found
that
they
were
spending
almost
the
amount
of
money
that
they
were
collecting
fares
in
in,
like
in
the
actual
process
of
collecting
fares
right,
so
they'd
get
three
million
dollars
and
they
were
spending
2.8
million
dollars
to
actually
just
collect
that
money,
and
so
you
know,
we've
also
done
this
analysis
for
the
mbta.
I
It's
part
of
the
reason
why
so
many
small
to
mid-sized
towns
are
really
looking
at
this
seriously,
because
it's
very
expensive
to
collect
small
amounts
of
money
from
people
through
a
transit
system.
You
know-
and
so
I
went
so.
That
is
just
like
at
the
root
of
why
you
hear
things
like
free
transit,
free
buses,
but
separately.
You
know,
increasingly,
other
communities
are
looking
at
treating
transit
like
healthcare
like
education,
where
you
use
sort
of
sustained
tax
mechanisms
to
pay
for
those
services
and
treat
them
like.
I
Yes,
some
people
might
never
use
that
service,
but
everyone
benefits
from
it.
Some
people
might
only
use
it.
Sometimes
some
people
might
be
more
expensive
in
the
system
because
they
use
late
night.
It's
the
same
as
having
a
a
person
who
has
pre-existing
conditions.
We
all
pay
into
the
health
care
systems
to
support
that
individual,
because
it's
better
for
all
of
us,
so
we're
seeing
that
in
other
communities
as
well
and
we're
happy
to
send
you
more
details
on
that.
I
B
Yeah,
I'm
just
curious
how
the
administration
is
working
alongside
low-income
communities
and
communities
of
color
to
advocate
for
better
public
transit
and
I'm
just
curious
how
they're
utilizing
their
voice
on
the
city
level
to
really
push
like
for
an
agreement
between
the
council
and
the
administration
to
do
something
more
like
what
role
are
you
all
playing
to
be
more
inclusive
and
collaborative
with
the
council
and
the
state
around
this
issue?
Yeah.
J
Thank
you
consummation.
I'm
happy
to
address
that
and
I'm
happy
to
also,
if
you
give
me
some
time
to
add
to
some
of
the
issues
that
anna
and
stacy
brought
up.
J
So,
as
you
all
know,
the
mayor
understanding
the
importance
of
public
transportation
for
our
residents
established
the
city's
first
transit
team
and
which
matt
moran
who's
on
this
and
his
his
team
is
working
day
in
and
day
out
with
the
neighborhoods
throughout
the
city,
whether
it's
doing
extensive
community
meetings
and
in
person.
J
Outreach
socially
distanced,
of
course,
along
blue
hill
avenue
to
get
better
public
transportation
on
blue
hill
avenue
that
public
process
has
been
going
on
for
a
year
or
whether
it's
working
with
the
residents
of
roxbury
to
look
at
warren's
creek
and
the
new
blind
square
area,
whether
it's
working
with
and
coughlin
flynn,
most
as
well
with
the
residents
of
south
boston
and
anna
knows
that
matt
has
been
very,
very
engaged
with
with
austin
brighton,
including
the
installation
of
bus
lanes.
J
We
are
very
active
in
jamaica
play.
There's
a
box
lane
in
steady
on
the
on
the
border
there,
but
between
jamaica,
plain
and
roxbury.
But
we
are
there's
a
bus
lane
in
construction
right
at
columbus
avenue
connecting
ecclestone
and
jackson
squares.
We
are
very
active
throughout
the
neighborhoods
we've
also
engaged
programs
such
as
making
tea
passes
available
in
all
our
public
libraries
to
allow
residents
to
understand
that
they
can
make
substantial
savings
if
they
use
a
pass
rather
than
buy
one-off
tickets,
and
we
are
doing
educational
outreach
throughout
the
city.
J
So
I
am
saying
all
of
this
merely
as
an
ambassador,
matt
moran
and
his
team
do
all
the
work,
but
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
we
are
in
fact
this
is
to
anna's
points
working
with
with
developers
where
we
are
formalizing
programs
of
how
they
contribute
to
public
transportation,
how
they
will
be
required
to
have
their
tenants
and
future
kind
of
people
who
occupy
their
buildings.
Employers
they'll
be
required
to
offer
t-pass
subsidies.
J
So
that's
a
very
formal
process.
That's
been
actually
going
on
for
some
time
and
to
some
success.
We've
also
started
to
work
at
a
kind
of
corridor
wide
or
line-wise.
You
know
whether
it's
a
bus
route
or
an
important
transit
corridor,
where
we
are
in
fact
kind
of
combining
what
contributions
developers
make
to
do.
Analyses
of
these
corridors
to
improve
public
service.
How
to
improve
public
transportation
include
improved
bus
stops.
A
good
example,
of
course,
for
a
specific
improvement.
J
J
These
are
non-profits
that
are
made
up
of
employers,
whether
it's,
the
seaport,
tma
or
a
currency
tma,
which
is
in
downtown,
and
we've
done
some
surveys
with
them
to
see
what
travel
behavior
might
be
in
the
the
current
months
and
in
the
post-pandemic
world
together
get
a
better
understanding
of
what
is
it
that
we
need
to
focus
on
to
make
it
easier
for
our
employees
to
come
to
work
in
boston,
so
sorry
for
taking
up
so
much
time.
But
I
thought
I'd
give
a
quick
summary
of
everything
in
one
shot.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
had
neglected
earlier
to
read
a
letter
from
our
colleague,
counselor
campbell,
that
I
want
to
make
sure
to
get
in
the
record.
A
A
I
think
I
think
alpha
is
so
sorry
everyone,
I
think,
counselors,
mickey
and
wolf
are
sponsoring
this
important
conversation,
especially
in
the
midst
of
proposed
cuts
from
the
mbta
while
ridership
may
be
down
due
to
the
pandemic.
Accessible
public
transit
is
still
essential,
especially
to
the
thousands
of
essential
and
front
line
workers
who
have
no
other
option.
C
Thank
thank
you,
council.
Well,
I
enjoyed
listening
to
ana's
comments
about
working
with
developers
and
when
a
development
project
goes
up,
what
type
of
impact
that
has
on
pedestrian
safety,
what
type
of
impact
it
has
on
public
transportation?
Those
are
the
first
questions
I
usually
ask
when
a
development
team
wants
to
develop
in
my
district
is:
how
is
it,
how
will
it
impact
pedestrian
safety?
C
So
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
anna
and
then
I
had
a
good
conversation
last
week
with
stacey,
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
ask
you
stacey,
with
with
potential
cuts
to
the
mbta.
C
What
are
other
cities
across
the
country
doing
in
terms
of
public
transportation?
Are
they
doing
similar
cuts
or,
if
they're
not
doing
similar
cuts?
What
other
options
are
they
thinking
about
that
may
address?
You
know
making
sure
we
get
our
low-wage
workers
and
people
in
need
into
into
their
jobs
at
night
or
home
home
from
employment.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
ask
that
question
to
you.
If
you
had
any
any
any
feedback,
stacey.
I
Yeah,
so
a
couple
of
things
that
I
think
are
important
for
the
council
to
note
or
be
aware
of
one.
Basically,
every
transit
system
across
the
country
is
facing
this
right
now
and
we
are
all
sort
of
desperately
hoping
for
federal
stimulus
because
it
is
a
like
a
countrywide
issue
about
a
thousand
transit
systems
are
facing
cuts
or
extinction,
and
the
federal
house
did
pass
a
package
that
had
stimulus
for
transit,
but
the
senate
doesn't
want
to
include
it.
There's
a
ton
of
background
on
that.
So
it
is.
I
It
is
a
crisis
across
the
country.
However,
boston
is
unique
not
exclusively
but
unique
in
that
the
mbta
is
trying
to
make
decisions
much
earlier
than
other
transit
systems
across
the
country.
I
So
the
mbta
is
saying
we're
going
to
make
this
decision
in
early
december
because
we
need
this
runway
and
we're
going
to
start
we're
going
to
start
staving
off
these
cuts
or
work
doing
some
of
this
as
early
as
january,
most
other
transit
systems
are
trying
to
wait
as
long
as
humanly
possible,
holding
out
for
other
state
legislatures
and
the
federal
government
before
they
make
those
decisions.
So
that's
been
a
key
ask.
I
I
It's
tough,
I
mean
you
know
it's
sort
of
like
saying.
Well,
if
we
get
rid
of
the
education
system,
how
are
how
are
we
going
to
educate
children?
It's
like
by
reinstituting
the
the
thing
that
will
keep
people
safe?
I
think
you
know
I
I
think
this
actually
gets
to
your
core
issue.
What
we
know
is
that
when
transit
is
cut,
more
people
will
drive
and
more
people
will
walk
and
bike
and
I
think
we'll
see
an
uptick
in
in
traffic,
serious
crashes
and
fatalities
in
the
city.
I
So
I
think
one
area
you
know
we
have
to
be
fighting
to
keep
to
keep
this
trend
system
moving.
Obviously,
but
I
think
it's
an
area
that
we
need
to
watch
out
for
we've
already
seen
an
increase
in
in
traffic
fatalities,
but
we
know
from
other
you
know,
sort
of
systems
and
other
examples
in
the
past
that
it
could.
Our
roadways
will
become
more
dangerous
if
we
lose
transit,
and
so
I
think
it's
an
area
to
watch
out
for
in
an
area
where
the
city
has
a
little
more
control.
C
Thank
you
stacy.
I
don't
have
any
further
comments.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
panelists
to
my
colleagues,
the
sponsors.
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
matt
for
being
here
and
my
friend
vinit,
who
I
always
enjoy
working
with
especially
doing
walking
tours
of
my
district,
he's
very
knowledgeable
and
knows
the
city
as
well
as
anyone.
Thank
you
veneer
for
your
dedication
to
the
residents
of
boston.
A
D
You
know
I
I
want
to
echo
anna's
frustration
with
the
issue,
we're
seeing
a
huge
level
of
of
development
out
in
austin,
brighton
and
many
of,
if
they're,
if
they're
businesses
or
or
biotech
companies,
or
whatever
they're,
building
like
five
six
hundred
eight
hundred
parking
spaces,
so
that
people
can
commute
in
from
the
sub
I'm
assuming
they
won't
be
commuting
from
around
the
corner,
but
they'll
be
commuting
from
from
the
suburbs.
D
I
really
feel
that
we're
missing
an
opportunity
to
leverage
some
more
some
more
revenue
or
some
more
financial
support
for
our
public
transit
system
from
developers.
The
cost
of
a
parking
spot
is
anywhere
from
35
to
100
000,
so
there's
obviously
saving
on
the
on
the
residential
side,
they're
saving
a
lot
of
money
by
not
building
parking
and
then
on
the
on
the
business
side.
D
They're
spent
they're
expending
a
lot
of
money
to
to
encourage
people
to
use
cars
and
and
they're
not
thinking
about
people
living
locally
in
the
neighborhoods
and
getting
to
those
workplaces
by
transit
or
bicycle
or
out
or
walking.
So
I
I
really
feel
that
we're
missing
an
opportunity
to
look
at
that
as
an
alternative
source
of
support
for
our
mass
transit
public
transit
system.
D
E
Thank
you
so
much,
madam
chair,
and
thanks
to
all
the
panelists
here
today
and
I
yeah,
I
feel
I
feel
sort
of
aware
of
this
being
a
friendly
panel
in
a
very
unfriendly
situation,
because
I
think
we're
all.
On
the
same
page,
I
I
know
the
chief
of
streets
was
out
with
us
in
our
protest
against
the
cuts
yesterday.
I
think
that
you
know,
I
think,
in
boston.
E
We
see
on
the
ground
what
the
impact
is
and
and-
and
I
and
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
the
fact
that,
to
stacy's
point
about
the
timing
and
this
kind
of
this,
this
sense
of
artificial
urgency.
I
think
in
a
lot
of
ways.
What
disappoints
me
is
it
just
has
to
do
with
what
strikes
me
as
a
as
a
thinking
mistake
at
the
administration
level
that
we
saw
precisely
in
the
late
night
service
thing,
which
is,
if
an
hour
doesn't
pay
for
itself.
E
We
should
cancel
it
right
and
it's
this
and
it's
besides
the
fact,
there's
sort
of
two
arguments
right.
One
is
like
the
people
who
need
that
hour
really
need
it
and
that's
true
for
our
essential
workers.
Coming
back
from
last
shift
yesterday,
we
were
talking
about
how
that's
true
for
veterans
getting
in
the
va,
but
there's
that
argument
and
then
there's
also
the
argument
that
it's
just
like
transparently
obvious
that
you're
going
to
trap
yourself
in
a
vicious
cycle.
E
If
you
do
that,
because
as
soon
as
as
soon
as
you
like
decrease
the
the
capacity
then
like
and
especially
in
a
moment
where,
in
theory,
we're
trying
to
increase
capacity
to
have
more
space,
it's
just
to
me
it's.
It
is
intentionally,
or
at
least
inevitably,
if
not
intentionally,
inevitably
leading
us
in
the
direction
of
a
death
spiral
for
the
t
and-
and
it's
so
frustrating
that
not
only
not
only
is
it
wrong
and
does
it
hit
all
the
wrong
people.
E
This
thing,
but
it's
just
so
short-sighted,
like
the
the
sort
of
like
impact
on
our
like
our
economy,
our
like
ability
to
be
in
relationship
like
the
whole,
like
the
the
sort
of
lived
geography
of
our
region,
the
the
the
sort
of
negative
externalities
just
seem
legion
to
me
here
and-
and
I
think,
a
lot
about
the
fact
that
when
we've
got
a
bunch
of
people
have
been
pushed
out
of
the
city
who
live
in
brockton
now
who
come
in
and
take
the
commuter
rail
into
work?
E
And,
oh,
if
you
don't,
if
you
happen
to
work
saturdays
and
sundays,
you're
going
to
be
out
of
a
out
of
a
job
or
else
in
a
car
right,
and
I
just
think
about
how
we
would
never.
I
don't
think
in
the
state
we
would
ever
say.
Oh,
you
know
we're
trying
to
we're
having
budget
challenges
so
we're
trying
to
decrease
the
frequency
with
which
we
resurface,
the
highways
so
we'd
like
to
decrease
utilization,
so
we're
just
going
to
close
the
pike
in
93
on
weekends.
E
Right
I
mean
it's
just
like
it's,
it's
it's
just
a
joke.
It's
never
gonna
happen
and
I
think
I
think
we're
coming
up
really
strongly
against
the
lived
reality
of
like
people
actually
being
on
the
t
and
people
who
aren't
and
I'm
just
so
frustrated.
I
realized
that
much
like
counselor
braden.
E
This
is
turning
into
more
of
a
statement
than
a
question,
but
but
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
really,
I
really
appreciate
vinnie
what
your
team
is
doing
specifically
around
the
transit
orientation,
and
I
saw
it
firsthand
having
the
conversation
with
matt
about
you
know
what
our
city
agenda
is
along,
actually
precisely
that
corridor
on
huntington
ave,
as
as
he
was
doing
some
work
there
this
summer,
and
I
think
you
know
us
looking
at
how
to
how
to
take
those
opportunities
as
a
city
whenever
we
can
in
partnership
with
the
tea,
is
great.
E
E
I
also
just
think
that
we
all
know
its
necessity
so
much
that
we
should
be
able
those
of
us
who
know
that
should
be
able
to
get
together
and
raise
revenue
to
support
it
in
times
like
these
and
it's
frustrating
not
to
not
to
be
there
right
now,
but
mainly
just
want
to
say,
certainly
that
to
you
know,
to
stacy
and
anna
and
to
vinit's
team
like
I
think
we're
we're
all
gonna
need
to
be
strong
allies
against
these
service
cuts
this
month
and
possibly
in
the
months
to
come
and
and
definitely
am
on
board
for
all
all
fronts
in
that
battle.
A
I
Yeah
now
one
other
thing
that
I
think
is
helpful
to
flag.
So
I
I
and
I
I
appreciate
you
know
we.
We
know
the
council
has
our
back.
We
know
this
is
an
area
where,
like
we're
all
on
the
same
page,
like
we're
all
singing
the
same
singing
the
same
tune,
but
one
other
thing,
that's
unique
in
boston
is
that
boston
doesn't
have
a
vote
on
the
fmcb
and
that
many
of
the
other
transit
agencies
that
are
choosing
to
delay
having
deeper
conversation.
I
It's
because
the
most
impacted
municipalities
have
a
vote,
and
so
I
just
think
it's
something
else
to
sort
of
name
around,
like
you
know
we're
going
to
be
fighting
in
the
short
term,
but
in
addition
to
regional
ballot
initiatives,
in
addition
to
long-term
balanced
revenue,
we
need
to
be
looking
at
the
composition
of
who
decides
and-
and
I
know
that
you
know
the
administration
doesn't
pushing
on
this,
but
I
think
it's
I
just
wanted
to
flag
it,
because
it's
another
area
where
you
know
for
us
to
really
fix
this
in
the
long
term,
we
need
to
have
a
boat.
J
Yeah,
just
to
add
to
that,
I
think
that
the
mayor
has
been
very
public
about
asking
the
state
that
boston
must
have
a
seat
on
the
fmcb
board.
It's
we
have
the
maximum
number
of
t
riders
in
our
our
residents.
Writing
the
team,
and
it's
just
absolutely
when
we
pay
all
of
you
know
over
90
million
dollars
in
assessments,
that's
more
than
some
of
our
departmental
capital
budgets
every
year,
and
yet
we
don't
have
a
seat.
H
Go
for
anna
if
I
could
jump
in
I'm
so
sorry,
I
need
to
jump
and
go
work
on
our
food
access
assessment,
which
is
also
directly
tied
to
transit,
but
I
just
quickly
want
to
raise
up
that.
The
austin
brighton
cdc
is
hosting
a
couple
trainings
on
how
residents
can
be
more
engaged
in
the
development
process
and
really
grounding
a
lot
of
the
language
and
to
stacy's
point
what
what
people
can
ask
for
and
what
all
of
this
technical
terminology
is.
So
I
really
do
encourage
people
to
to
join
in
that.
H
I
know
that
counselor
braden
has
has
been
a
part
of
that,
and-
and
please
do,
although
I'm
focused
in
austin
brighton
again,
these
issues
are
by
no
means
also
brighton
specific.
So
please
do
reach
out
with
questions
or
support
our
ideas.
I
think
we've
had
a
lot
of
success
in
our
neighborhood.
In
spite
of
a
lot
of
the
challenges
we
face,
so
really
really
happy
to
share
some
of
our
knowledge
and
and
the
experiences
we've
had
and
any
tips
and
tricks.
So
apologies
for
leaving.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
thank
you
for
for
just
a
quick
comment
actually,
but
thank
you
for
for
hosting
and
for
the
co-sponsors
as
well
and
I'm
on
record,
obviously
a
long
time,
particularly
as
a
former
council
president,
under
the
leadership
of
former
councillor
michael
ross,
who
led
the
effort
to
get
the
night
owl
services,
what
we
called
it
at
the
time,
and
so
recognizing
that
boston
is
a
world-class
city
and
it's
a
24-hour
city,
and
particularly
his
district,
which
is
now
our
colleague
counselor
kenzie
box
district.
L
The
hospitals
in
particular
with
those
third
shift
workers.
You
talk
about
the
downtown
and
all
of
our
hotels,
etc.
So
lots
of
activity
happens
in
boston
late
at
night.
People
need
to
get
to
and
from
to
work
in
order
to
access
other
services
like
our
hospitals.
So
I'm
on
record
of
supporting
it
long
time
supporter
and
hopefully
it
will
be
restored
because
it's
very
necessary
for
our
city,
particularly
if
we
want
to
move
forward
in
a
post-pandemic
world.
L
People
need
to
have
access
to
opportunities
and
public
transit
is
the
conduit
to
providing
that
opportunity
for
folks
to
to
participate.
So
thank
you
for
again,
for
hosting
and
for
cheering
and
for
sponsoring
and
happy
to
sign
on
to
anything
that
comes
from
this.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
counselor
flaherty,
okay.
So
would
any
other
counselors
like
to
have
a
second
round
of
questions?
A
Okay,
I'll
just
note
again
the
the
thanks
and
gratitude
to
our
our
team
at
the
city
and
and
the
amount
of
time,
the
length
of
time
that
we've
been
working
on
this
particular
issue
and
sort
of
the
the
scale
and
depth
of
of
the
crisis
happening
at
the
t.
Now,
where
demanding
action
on
many
many
fronts,
all
that
to
say
it's
incredibly
frustrating
that
the
t
continues
to
refuse
to
show
up
at
city
council
hearings,
it's
it's
this!
A
It's
recent
ones
about
bikes
on
the
blue
line,
it's
years
at
this
point
of
refusing
to
engage
because
they
do
not
feel
accountability.
So
you
know
that
lies
with
the
governor
that
lies
with
the
fmcb
and
and
the
legislature
in
terms
of
the
laws
that
will
be
reshaping
the
fmcb.
A
B
Oh,
this
is
the
times
that
we
live
in
councillor
wu.
It
is
so
real,
but
no
I
just
I
first
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
showing
up
to
this
hearing
in
the
city
in
the
in
the
administration,
and
I
would
like
to
echo
council
wu's
sentiments
in
regards
to
who
isn't
at
the
table.
B
I
always
look
in
the
zoom
used
back
in
the
day
was
the
room,
but
now
we're
in
the
zoo
and
always
see
who
is
not
here
and
would
also
have
to
say
that
you
know
even
bringing
people
who
are
living
these
realities
into
the
space
is
something
else
that
I
also
want
to
just
highlight,
and
I
think
many
of
the
folks
that
we
are
advocating
on
behalf
of,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
opening
remarks,
are
sleeping
right
now,
because
they
work
the
third
shift,
and
so
just
because
they're,
not
here
to
speak
on
on
their
own
behalf,
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
they
don't
have
a
voice.
B
The
reason
why
we're
here
is
because
we're
advocating
for
for
them-
and
so
just
really
want
to
just
acknowledge
that,
and
also
just
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
for
their
support,
and
you
know
I
believe
that
everything
happens
for
a
reason.
B
The
fact
that
we
filed
this
back
in
I
don't
know
when
it
was
february
march
and
we're
having
it
and
then
it
was
slated
to
be
heard
today
at
the
heels
of
what
we're
dealing
with
speaks
volumes
to
just
kind
of
like
how
serendipitous
it
was,
and
it
gave
us
another
opportunity
to
push.
B
But
we
have
to
get
to
the
point
where
we
have
to
stop
just
fighting
and
people
need
to
roll
up
their
sleeves
and
actually
do
the
work,
because
we're
all
willing
participants
and
we're
and
ready-
and
I
just
think
that
on
the
state
level,
we
need
to
push
a
little
bit
harder
so
that
we
can
get
to
where
we
need
to
go,
and
I
think
accountability
is
key
and
it's
going
to
get
to
the
point
where
we're
going
to
have
to
start
doing
that.
You
know
the
public
shame
game
here.
B
A
Thank
you
would
any
other
colleagues
like
to
weigh
in
before
we
close
okay.
Thank
you
so
much
everyone
for
your
time.
Oh,
would
you
like
to
say
anything?
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
for
your
time.
This
will
conclude
our
hearing
on
docket
number
zero.
Four,
two,
four
order
for
a
hearing
discussing
the
status
of
late
night
mbta
service
in
greater
boston.
This
hearing
is
adjourned
and
look
forward
to
moving
forward,
pushing
the
t
in
general.
Thank
you,
everyone.