►
Description
The November 15, 2017 Public Facilities Commission Meeting was recorded live at the Winter Chambers, 26 Court Street in Downtown Boston.
A
B
Morning,
commissioners,
the
first
item
on
our
agenda
today,
our
meeting
minutes
from
the
meeting
of
October
26
2017
at
that
meeting,
both
the
public
facilities
Department
in
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development,
presented
separate
agendas.
I
asked
if
there
would
be
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
for
the
public
facilities
Department
in
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development
dated
October
26
2017
I
make.
A
B
You,
the
minutes,
are
so
approved,
beginning
this
morning
with
the
public
facilities
Department
our
votes,
one
and
two
votes.
One
and
two
are
similar
concern
the
same
matter
and
presenting
these
votes
today.
Armoire
is
Maureen
Anderson
who's,
a
senior
project
manager
with
the
public
facilities
department
and
with
her
is
Patricia
Lyons,
the
director
of
the
department,
if
it's
agreeable
with
the
Commission
I
request
that
I'm
able
to
read
votes,
one
and
vote
two
out
loud
have
miss
Anderson.
Give
her
presentation
on
both
into
a
separate
roll
call
for
vote.
One
and
vote.
B
You
beginning
with
vote
one.
This
concerns
a
transfer
of
the
care
custody
management,
control
of
a
portion
of
land
located
at
338,
East,
Eagle
Street
and
condor
Street
and
limited
property
interests
located
at
condor
Street
in
East
Boston
from
the
public
facilities
Commission
to
the
public
facilities
Department
again.
The
first
address
concerns
a
portion
of
land
in
Ward
1.
The
total
square
footage
is
twenty.
Six
thousand
eight
hundred
and
eighty
nine
feet
as
an
approximate.
The
limited
property
interests
otherwise
known
as
easements
are
also
in
Ward
one.
B
The
square
footage
is
two
thousand
six
hundred
and
one
square
feet
for
the
first
easement
in
three
eighty-eight
square
feet
for
the
second
easement.
The
total
square
footage
is
approximately
two
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
nine
square
feet
enclosed
with
the
project
background
memorandum
is
a
copy
of
a
site
plan
identifying
both
the
portion
of
land
and
the
two
easements
and
before
us
on.
The
screen
today
is
also
a
copy
of
the
site
plan
prepared
by
Lear's
wines,
Apple
Associate
architects.
B
Vote
number
two
is
a
tentative
designation
and
intent
to
sell
to
a
nominee.
This
is
a
portion
of
land
in
fee
located
at
338,
east
Eagle,
Street
and
condor
Street
in
East
Boston
and
the
limited
property
interests
as
easements
located
specifically
on
condor
Street
in
East
Boston.
The
information
remains
the
same
as
noted
in
vote,
one
concerning
the
square
footage
and
as
well.
B
There
is
a
current
appraisal
performed
and
the
value
for
the
portion
of
land
is
identified
as
five
hundred
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
and
the
easements
total
and
appraised
value
of
twenty
nine
thousand
seven
hundred
dollars.
Maureen
I'm
going
to
ask
that
you
present
both
vote
requests
to
the
commissioners
at
this
time.
D
For
you
this
morning,
the
first
public
facilities,
Department
requests
that
the
public
facilities
vote
and
approved
to
transfer
the
surplus
properties
for
the
care,
custody,
management
and
control
of
the
public
facilities
Commission
to
the
care,
custody,
management
and
control
of
public
facilities
department.
And
it's
the
to
the
parcels
identified
on
the
screen,
as
you
can
see
over
to
the
right
and
in
your
handout.
D
D
It's
a
request,
through
a
separate
vote
for
tenant,
designation
and
intent
to
sell
to
a
nominee
selected
by
the
public
facilities
department,
director,
Patricia
Lyons,
the
properties
through
a
publicly
request
for
a
proposal
process
for
a
land
disposition.
The
public
property
disposition
process
will
comply
with
all
aspects
of
the
Mass
General
Laws
chapter
30b,
section
16
of
the
the
city
charter
of
importance.
D
This
information
will
be
provided
in
the
request
for
proposals.
Furthermore,
if
such
delegation
of
authority
is
granted
to
PFDs
director,
it
will
enable
the
public
facilities
department
to
return
to
the
public
facilities
Commission
with
the
briefing
of
the
properties,
public
disposition
process,
proposals
received
recommendations
for
contract
award
advertising
nominee
in
the
city
record
and
a
request
for
the
public
facilities
commission
for
a
specific
boat
of
conveyance
for
the
properties
to
be
named
to
a
nominate.
A
I
just
know
the
history
of
this
is
a
long
lot
of
work
on
this
site
and
it's
actually
good
to
see
it
hopefully
coming
to
an
end.
I
also
know
the
site
has
a
lot
of
restrictions,
that
most
people
don't
understand
being
in
the
designated
port
area
and
so
forth.
So
there's
uses
that
people
would
like
to
see
out
there
kind
of
loud.
A
C
C
A
B
Remaining
on
the
agenda,
our
votes,
three
and
votes
for
both
of
these
votes
have
similarities
to
them.
They
both
concern,
what's
known
as
house
doctor,
consulting
services
contracts,
the
procurement
manager
for
the
public
facilities
department
and
for
the
planning
and
management
division.
Kellie
Winston
is
prepared
to
present
the
vote
request
to
the
commissioners,
as
we
just
saw
earlier
today,
I
would
requested,
at
miss
wisdom,
be
able
to
present
these
votes
together
and
that
we
do
a
separate
roll
call
for
vote
three
and
four
vote
for.
Would
that
be
agreeable
with
the
Commission?
Yes,.
A
B
You
I
will
now
read
out
the
vote.
Vote
number
three
concerns
an
amendment
to
the
vote
of
August
20th
2015
regarding
contracts
to
various
designers
and
consultants,
to
provide
house
doctor
consulting
services
for
various
city
facilities
projects,
and/or
sites
design
consulting
services
were
to
be
performed
on
an
as-needed
basis
from
July
1st
2016
through
June
30th
of
2018.
B
B
Three
also
concerns
an
amendment
to
a
vote
of
August
20th
2015
as
well
concerns
of
contracts
to
various
designers
and
consultants
to
provide
house
doctor
consulting
services
for
various
city
facilities,
projects
and/or
sites,
the
design
consulting
services
will
be
performed
on
an
as-needed
basis
from
July
1
2016
through
June
30th
of
2018,
specifically
for
vote
for
the
request
concerns
an
increase
of
1.5
million
dollars
to
the
contracts
not
to
exceed
amount
and
a
24
month,
time
extension
to
the
contracts
expiration
date.
The
differences
between
votes,
3
and
votes.
Four
is
at
vote.
B
Three
concerns
a
design
contract
with
Lear's
wines,
Apple
Associates,
Architects
Inc
for
general
architecture.
Services
vote
for
concerns;
a
contract
with
Feingold
Alexander
architects
Inc
in
that
as
well
concerns
general
architecture,
services,
Kelly.
If
you
would
present
your
vote
request
to
the
commissioners
and
feel
free
to
go
in
order
of
vote
three
and
vote
for
concerning
the
specific
projects
that
concern
your
request
today,.
E
E
B
Just
make
a
note
for
the
record
that
the
agenda
identifies
the
request
to
delete
words
and
figures
for
vote
three.
The
request
is
to
delete
the
words
and
figures
that
state
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
a
maximum
of
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
per
contract
award
for
the
designated
three
year
period
and
replace
those
words
with
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
a
maximum
contract
amount
of
three
point:
four
million
dollars
through
June
30th
2020.
B
What
I
note
for
the
record
is
that
when
you
add
nine
hundred
thousand
to
the
2.5
million
dollar
request,
it
would
result
in
a
total
request
of
three
point.
Four
million
dollars
as
being
the
ceiling
for
a
not
to
exceed
contract
amount
for
vote,
for
the
request
is
to
delete
the
words
and
figures
that
state
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
a
maximum
of
nine
hundred
thousand
per
contract
for
the
designated
three
year
period.
B
That
request
also
includes
the
replacement
of
the
words
and
figures
that
read
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
a
maximum
contract
amount
of
2.4
million
dollars
through
June
30th
2020.
Again,
the
agenda
reflects
adding
nine
hundred
thousand
to
the
two
point:
four
I'm,
sorry,
adding
nine
hundred
thousand
to
the
one
point.
Five
million
dollars
would
result
in
a
not
to
exceed
fee
limit
of
2.4
million
dollars.