►
Description
Public Facilities Commission Meeting: Department of Neighborhood Development 8-14-19
This meeting starts at 2:14
B
Morning,
commissioners,
first
order
of
business
today
concerns
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development
before
us
this
morning
for
vote
number
one
presenting
is
bernard
mayo,
he's
a
project
manager
with
the
real
estate
management
and
sales
division
of
DND
vote
number
one
concerns
the
transfer
of
the
care,
custody
management
and
control
from
the
Boston
Transportation
Department
to
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development.
This
concerns
vacant
land
located
at
six
Epping
Street
in
Dorchester.
This
is
a
property
transfer
Bernard.
If
you'd
present,
your
vote
replies,
please
good.
C
Morning,
this
is
a
housekeeping
vote,
I'm
requesting
PFC
approval
for
the
transfer
of
six
Epping
Street
from
the
Boston
Transportation,
Department
or
BTD
to
D
and
D.
The
process
will
consist
of
two
thousand
six
hundred
sixty-three
square
feet
and
is
located
near
the
corner
of
Washington
and
Epping
streets
in
the
cotton
squares
section
of
Dorchester,
almost
half
the
parcel
1316
square
feet
is
currently
used
by
the
carbon
square
health
center
and
consists
of
the
area
leading
to
the
side.
Entrance
of
the
building.
C
The
remaining
1349
square
feet
is
partly
municipal
parking
lot,
which
is
under
the
care
of
bt
d.
If
this
voters
approve
the
property,
be
subdivided
in
order
to
separate
the
municipal
parking
spaces
from
the
walkway
of
a
carven
square
health
center,
the
parking
portion
of
the
park,
the
parking
portion
of
the
processor
will
be
transferred
back
to
Beatty
D,
D
and
E
will
return
to
PFC
after
the
subdivision
request
an
intent
to
sell
vote
to
Qadri
Square
Health
Center
for
the
remaining
portion
of
the
parcel
I
provided
for
handouts.
D
A
B
Vote
number
two
is
being
presented
by
Joseph
backer
he's
a
housing
development
officer
with
the
Neighborhood
Housing
Development
Division
of
D
and
D
vote
number
two
concerns
the
transfer
of
the
care,
custody
management
and
control
from
the
Boston
Transportation
Department
to
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development.
This
concerns
vacant
land
located
at
forty
to
fifty
Warren,
Street
and
Roxbury.
This
is
a
property
transfer
between
one
city
department
to
another
Joseph.
If
you
present
your
vote,
please
thank.
E
You
good
morning,
I'm
here
requesting
PFC
approval
for
the
transfer
of
the
parcel
identified
in
the
vote
package
in
the
W
Square
neighborhood
of
Boston
from
the
Boston
Transportation
Department
to
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development.
This
request
follows
a
comprehensive
planning
initiative,
known
as
plan
Dudley,
which
included
this
and
other
city
owned
parcels
in
the
area.
The
vote
package
includes
a
comprehensive
memo
about
the
transfer
and
PFC
vote
request.
I've
provided
a
site
map
related
to
this
vote,
request,
which
is
displayed
on
the
screen
and
a
photo
of
the
parcel.
F
E
B
B
B
Vote
number
three
is
being
presented
by
an
arrow
Li's
Janice
she's,
a
project
manager
with
the
real
estate
management
and
sales
division
of
D
and
D
vote
number
three:
concerns
of
conveyance
224
WC
Property
Management
LLC
vacant
land
located
at
26,
West
Cottage
Street
in
Roxbury.
The
purchase
price
is
thirty-five
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
now
release.
If
you
present
your
vote
request
please
good
morning.
G
F
Here,
requesting
PFC
approval
for
the
conveyance
of
24w
C
Property
Management
LLC,
for
the
parcels
identified
in
the
vote
package
in
the
Roxbury
neighborhood
of
Boston
DND
conducted
a
public
process
that
resulted
in
the
developer,
designation
and
the
following
conveyance
vote
request
to
refresh
the
Commission
memories.
A
community
notification
was
mailed
to
February
of
2018
to
inform
of
Dandy's
intent
to
issue
an
RFP
for
the
parcel.
F
F
20
foot
WC
Property
Management
LLC,
proposed
to
use
a
personal
as
parking
for
there,
but
at
home
in
summary,
of
PFC
approves
the
Volt
request
that
will
result
in
the
following
public
benefits.
Return
return,
one
vacant
parcel
and
Andy's
inventory
for
about
two
years
back
to
put
up
the
views
and
the
tax
rolls
the
sale
would
generate.
Thirty,
five
thousand
one
hundred
and
initial
revenues
from
the
sale
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
thanks.
B
F
Here,
requesting
PFC
approval
for
the
conveyance
to
call
Dino
be
Korea
for
the
parcels
identified
in
the
vote
package
in
the
Dorchester
neighborhood
of
Boston
DND
conducted
a
public
process
that
resulted
in
the
developer
designation
in
the
following
conveyance
vote:
request
to
refresh
the
Commission's
memory.
A
community
notification
was
mailed
out
in
February
of
2019,
and
a
request
for
proposal
was
issued
in
February
of
2019,
and
one
proposal
was
received
in
response
to
the
RFP
in
March
of
2019
and
was
determined
to
meet
the
eligibility
criteria.
F
F
F
Mr.
Korea
proposed
no
change
to
this
to
the
use
of
property,
which
is
currently
a
garage
that
he
utilizes
and
is
only
accessible
by
him.
In
summary,
if
PFC
approves
the
vote
request,
they
will
result
in
the
public
benefits
returned
one
vacant,
personal
Indian,
DS
inventory
for
25
years
back
to
productive
use
and
the
tax
rolls.
This
sale
will
also
generate
16,500,
an
initial
initial
revenues
from
the
sale
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
B
Before
I
read,
vote
number
five
I
make
a
disclosure
for
the
record
for
a
vote
number
five.
We
have
the
rule
of
necessity,
that's
applying
for
the
public
facilities
Commission
there.
In
order
for
there
to
be
a
quorum,
there
needs
to
be
two
commissioners
voting
chair,
Craven
is
absent
today
and
with
us
is
Commissioner
Irish
and
commissioner
Momo
Lee.
Commissioner
Irish
is
disclosed
for
the
record
of
residence
on
Angel
Street
in
Dorchester
and
concerning
vote
number
five.
There
has
been
no
discussion
with
Commissioner
Irish.
B
There
has
been
no
communication
with
him
outside
of
this
PFC
meeting
as
legal
counsel
for
the
public
facilities.
Commission
I
find
that
there
are
no
conflicts
of
interest
and
that
he's
able
to
partake
in
this
vote
out
of
the
rule
of
necessity
and
he's
able
to
engage
in
discussion
and
voting
thereon.
Now,
I'll
begin
to
read:
vote
number.
Five
phone
number
five
is
being
presented
by
Ryan
lundergan
he's
a
housing
development
officer
with
the
Neighborhood
Housing
Development
Division
of
D&D
phone
number.
B
Five
concerns
a
rescission
of
the
tentative
develop
our
designation
vote
of
December
13
2017
and
a
conveyance
vote
of
May
16
2008
een.
Two
Oxbow
urban
LLC.
This
concerns
vacant
land
located
at
twenty
one,
twenty
two,
twenty
eight
and
thirty,
seven
angel
Street
and
twelve
and
fourteen
Lawrence
Street
and
Dorchester.
The
purchase
price
had
been
proposed
at
six
hundred
dollars.
Again
this
is
a
rescission
vote
Ryan
if
you'd
present
the
vote
request.
Please
thank.
H
You,
my
name
is
Ryan
lender
again,
I'm
a
development
officer
for
the
development
requesting
to
rescind
the
tentative
developer,
designation
and
conveyance
votes
for
Oxbow
urban
at
the
parcels
located
on
angel
street
22,
28:37
angel
street
and
twelve
and
fourteen
Lauren
Street.
The
memo
before
you
includes
comprehensive
details
for
the
reasoning
of
pulling
the
tentative
developer,
designation
and
conveyance
of
these
for
this
developer.
H
At
the
point
of
conveyance
after
the
conveyance
vote,
there
was
an
increase
of
construction
costs
and
the
developer
in
turn
after
detailed
negotiations
and
trying
to
find
another
contractor,
unfortunately
had
to
step
away
from
the
project.
Therefore,
we're
requesting
to
pull
the
tenants
bail
for
a
destination
conveyance
vote
the,
if
approved
today,
to
pull
these
will
be
able
to
select
another
developer
on
the
project
and
to
hopefully
be
back
here
in
October,
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
H
We've
been
running
a
parallel
path
on
this
one
so
that
we
can
have
it
quickly.
We've
design
unit
to
work
with
some
of
the
designs
on
this
one
put
out
an
RFP
and
we
actually
had
a
community
meeting
last
night
that
went
really
well
to
introduce
a
preferred
developer.
So,
hopefully,
in
the
next
month,
we'll
prepare
for
our
coming
PFC
meeting.
We
anticipate
coming
back
in
in
October.
A
B
This
is
the
cart
before
the
horse
and
so
you're
coming
up
after
the
fact
and
it's
unclear
what
their
direct
questions
as
to
what
the
advertisement
dates
where
we
want
to
make
sure
that
moving
forward,
that
you've
got
compliance
with
national
law
capped
at
30,
B,
section
16,
so
that
that
had
not
been
disclosed
to
myself
as
legal
counsel
or
to
the
commissioners
before
now.
So
what
are
the
advertisement
dates
that
are
in
compliance
with
section
16,
I'm.
H
H
B
H
B
So
we
want
a
full
disclosure
to
the
Commission
as
to
what's
been
done
in
compliance
with
the
new
RFP,
and
we
want
that
reviewed
by
legal
counsel
for
D
and
D
and
through
the
law
department
as
well.
We'll
take
it
a
memo
that
will
go
to
the
PFC
secretary
and
be
submitted
to
the
commissioner.
So
it
can
become
part
of
today's
record
I'm.
G
B
Vote
number
six
is
also
being
presented
by
Ryan
lundergan.
This
concerns
a
rescission
of
the
tentative
developer,
designation
vote
of
November
15
2017
and
conveyance
vote
of
May
16
2008
teen,
2,
Oxbow
urban
LLC.
His
concerns
vacant
land
located
at
17
and
19
Helen
Street
115,
Wheatland,
Ave
242
to
244,
nor
Wall,
Street
and
unnumbered
parcel
on
nor
Wall
Street
and
78
Spencer
Street
in
Dorchester.
The
purchase
price
is
$600
Ryan.
If
you'd
present
your
vote
request.
Please
thank.
H
You
I'm
requesting
a
rescission
vote
for
the
tentative
developer,
designation
and
conveyance
vote
once
again
for
from
octavo
urban
on
the
parcels
listed
in
the
memo.
There's
a
detail
listing
here
for
the
reasons
of
pulling
the
the
tentative
developer,
designation
and
conveyance
of
this
one
again.
The
developer
was
unable
to
perform
the
tasks
here
because
of
the
price
increase
by
20%
for
construction
costs
and
the
developer
had
walked
away
from
the
project.
H
B
A
A
H
They
in
in
previous
packages,
they
had,
they
had
developed
in
the
neighborhood
homes,
initiative
close
to
20
homes,
and
they
had
a
good
track
record
and
that's
why
we
thought
if
we
were
to
work
on
these
two
packages
in
this
in
same
neighborhoods,
we
might
have
some
economy
of
scale
savings
here.
Unfortunately,
things
didn't
work
out
with
this
developer.
A
B
B
The
fact
that
were
before
the
Commission
today
with
the
public
record
of
a
disclosure
and
that
the
memorandum,
which
is
a
public
record,
indicates
that
there
is
a
walkaway
and
a
non-compliance
to
move
forward
that
this
deems
someone
in
the
future,
such
as
Oxbow
submitting
to
be
considered,
not
a
responsible
proposer
and
that's
one
of
the
elements
in
section
16.
So
that
is
what
I
hear
the
Commissioner
asking
for
for
a
thorough
review
in
compliance
with
section
16
for
any
future
recommendations
to
the
Commission
that
concerns
Oxbow
and
any
other
proposers
I'd.