►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-19-17
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
The
book
the
board
of
Appeal
for
December
19th
is
is
in
session
last
meeting
for
this
year,
so
we
hope
to
see
you
again
in
the
next
and
next
year,
just
to
remind
to
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
if
you
have
any
conversations,
please
state
them
outside
of
the
room,
if
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
the
project.
Please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
what
your
support
or
opposition
is
based
on.
A
We
are
interested
in
hearing
the
case
on
a
stoning
basis,
so
if
you're
an
attorney,
if
you're,
representing
yourself
or
you're
speaking,
please
speak
to
the
zoning
issues,
because
that
is
what
we
are
interested
in
and
and
we're
also
interested
in
everybody,
giving
us
new
information.
So
if
somebody
has
already
stated
what
your
concern
is
just
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record,
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law,
this
is
just
a
reminder
that
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed
just
a
fortune.
Thank.
B
C
B
B
Gonna
call
the
9:30
hearings:
are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdraw
roles
for
9:30?
Madam
chair,
we
do
have
one
case
case,
boa
seven:
seven,
eight,
nine,
seven,
eight
88
to
94
Lincoln
Street.
We
have
a
letter
from
counsel
within
8
withdrawing
so
I'll
make
a
motion
for
denial
without
prejudice.
Second,.
E
B
E
B
Be
with
me,
this
is
a
change
from
one
family
dwelling
to
a
two-family
dwelling,
no
work
to
be
done
in
the
existing,
no
work
to
be
done
in
the
existing
condition
from
any
is
violation.
Article
51,
section,
9
a
to
family
is
forbidden,
use
in
a
1
F
5000
sub
district
article
51,
section
56,
ma
street
parking,
no
off
street
parking
provided
for
the
proposed
second
unit.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
acting.
A
F
A
F
F
C
F
C
F
C
C
F
A
C
G
F
H
I
J
K
A
B
Case
calling
boa
7
77065
64
Lincoln
Street.
This
is
to
amend
plans
to
add
a
mesh
screen
to
a
billboard
to
shield
to
shield
the
visibility
of
a
structural
elements,
there's
no
change
in
height,
dimension,
orientation
of
the
approved
structure.
The
violation
is
article
9,
section,
91
extension,
reconstruction,
non-conforming
use,
building,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
L
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
lanes,
245
Sumner,
Street,
East
boss,
on
behalf
the
petitioner
with
mieze
Jonathan
Sarah
for
Boston
outdoor
ventures,
I'm
Madame,
chair,
we're
gonna,
request
deferral
of
this
matter.
We
were
not
anticipated
being
here
today.
This
meeting
was
put
up
actually
relatively
quick.
We
know
it's
relatively
minor
relief
that
were
requesting.
However,
we
do
understand
the
VP
DA
is
working
on
some
regulations
concerning
billboards,
although
this
doesn't
involve
the
construction
of
a
new
billboard,
there
was
already
an
existing
permit.
A
B
B
This
is
an
addition
of
two
residential
units
and
renovation
of
existing
family
unit
convert
from
2
units
to
4
units,
the
violation,
Article
51,
section,
8,
multi-family
residential,
it's
forbidden
use
in
the
family,
sub
district
article
51,
section
9,
the
entrance
to
the
new
units
and
the
addition
does
not
face
the
front
lot
line.
Article
51,
section,
9,
the
location
of
the
addition
of
the
lot
lines
do
not
meet
the
middle
walk
with
article
51,
section
9,
excessive
FA,
our
article
51
section
9
excessive
number
of
stories.
Only
two
and
a
half
stories
are
allowed.
B
The
area
of
the
third
floor
exceeds
50%
of
the
area
and
the
floor
immediately
below
creating
a
third
story:
article
51
section,
9,
insufficient
front
yard
setback.
The
changes
to
convert
the
front
porch
create
a
front
yard
violation.
Article
51,
section,
9,
insufficient,
a
side
yard
setback.
The
new
addition
in
dormer
creates
a
side
yard
violation,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
my.
A
M
A
M
M
M
C
I
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Warner
Reilly
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
the
updated
plans.
The
second
abutters
meeting
responded
very
well
to
the
concerns
of
the
first
meeting
and
the
two
family.
The
current
proposals
in
front
of
you
we're
very
much
in
support.
There
were
12
members
of
the
director
butters
and
they
were
in
support
and
appreciated
the
work
that
they
did
what's
up.
Thank
you
morning.
J
K
O
P
C
C
M
A
Q
B
A
R
Off
street
parking
for
one
car,
residential
I've
handed
out
photographs
and
I
think
the
first
photograph
on
the
first
page
at
the
top
of
the
page
is
probably
the
best
picture
shows
you.
The
house
shows
you
an
existing
driveway
of
the
abutters
next
door
and
the
driveway
the
proposed
driveway
would
go
in
right
here.
The
violations
are,
this
is
in
West
Roxbury,
which
does
allow
off
street
parking
in
a
side
yard,
and
most
of
this
driveway
is
in
the
side
yard.
R
A
very
small
portion
of
it
happens
to
be
in
the
front
yard,
but
I
believe
you're
allowed
up
to
ten
feet
in
the
front
yard.
It's
only
about
one
foot
in
the
front
yard
and
the
other
violation
is
the
five
is
supposed
to
have
five
feet
of
buffer
here
and
there's
about
I.
Think
three
and
a
half
feet,
but
it'll
be
screened
with
shrubbery.
There
are
also
three
other
good
reasons
for
allowing
this
number
one
I'm
informed
that
either
everyone
or
almost
everyone
else
on
the
street
has
a
driveway.
So
there's
a
matter
of
fairness.
R
R
Do
not
believe
so
I
mean
backing
a
car
out
of
any
driveway.
Of
course
there's
some
issues,
but
it's
certainly
better
than
having
it
out
in
the
street
all
night
and
and
during
the
day.
And
the
third
problem
is
that
the
plot
the
snowplows
come
around
here
and
the
neighbors
would
like
to
see
the
Sun
inform.
The
neighbors
would
like
to
see
the
car
off
the
street
to
facilitate
the
plowing.
S
James
from
waffle,
an
88
lorry
Avenue,
two
houses
down
I'm
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
granting
this
appeal,
because
each
of
us
in
turn
has
had
to
do
this.
The
walk
was
originally
designed
with
an
easement
driveway
behind
it
in
hard
spots
in
our
back
yards
to
park
in
and
I'm
sure
the
first
residents
found
out.
That
was
a
bad
idea,
the
first
time
it
snowed.
So
over
the
years
we've
all
put
the
men
I
think
out
of
fairness.
Miss
Nolan
ought
to
be
allowed
to
do
the
same.
S
T
U
A
Q
E
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
seven
one,
six,
two
nine
seven
1403
two
1405
Dorchester
Avenue-
this
is
a
demolish.
An
existing
building
erect
a
new
three-story
mixed-use.
Building
on
the
ground
floor
will
be
retail
and
commercial
uses
on
the
upper
floors
will
be
six
residential
units.
There
will
be
a
common
room.
The
violations,
article
65
section
41
ba
street
parking-
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
nine
lardy
area.
Traditional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section,
nine,
a
floatie,
a
ratio
of
successive
article
65
section
on
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
V
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Derek
small,
addressing
15
Broad
Street
Worcester
Mass,
with
109
with
you
today,
as
mr.
Tam
million
who's,
the
owner
of
the
property
today,
we're
here
seeking
relief
to
demolish
the
existing
structure
and
erect
a
three-story
mixed-use
building
with
retail,
on
the
first
floor
and
six
residential
units.
Above
with
six
parking
spaces,
the
zoning
sub
district
is
multi-family
residential,
like
local
shopping
and
the
zoning
violations
are
as
follows.
Off
street
off
street
parking
required
is
nine.
We
are
proposing.
V
6F
AR
is
one.
We
are
proposing,
1.75
open
spaces.
400,
we
have
zero
front
yard
requirement,
is
5
feet,
we're
building
right
up
to
the
lot
line
on
Dorchester
Avenue,
along
with
the
other
properties
that
exist
radon
is
10.
We
have
zero
because
the
parking
is
locate
in
the
rear
and
the
side,
the
artist
10
and
we
have
zero.
V
A
A
W
Madam
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
who
are
fan
from
neighbors
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
did
have
the
Bertus
meeting,
we
have
one
or
two
concern
from
the
director
butters,
but
overall,
the
consensus
pretty
supportive
for
this
project
and
we
also
have
the
support
from
the
local
subgroup.
Thank
you,
madam.
A
Y
Good
morning
my
name
is
name
I'm,
one
of
the
four
owner
of
1401
notice.
The
app
which
is
a
murder
to
this
project
and
I
have
a
four
point
for
the
opposition
for
this
project.
We
need
the
for
Nia
and
Sonia
set
map.
This
will
avoid
blocking
the
view
of
our
house
from
the
Rochester
app
and
at
the
Adam
and
Freeport
associates
meeting.
They
concern
about
the
site
setback.
We
play
a
small
part
of
the
area,
so
that
may
create
location
for
the
map.
People
to
hiding
us
something
like
that.
Y
Z
A
Z
Is
we
keep
talking
about
how
you
can
make
this
with
Main
Street
and
don't
settle?
Look,
that's
always
say
like
that,
but
these
folks
are
hearing
too
much
too
many
units.
I,
don't
see
any
Levin
rice
I
have
two
Elio
unit
and
say:
I
can
plawer
have
three
units
I,
don't
see
that
from
column
B
roll
up
to
a
cement
station,
this
watch
is
not
gonna
match
remains
good.
Z
Z
G
V
I
was
going
to
respond
to
a
couple
of
things
that
came
up.
I,
don't
know,
I
know
mr.
fortune
and
mr.
Galvin
are
looking
at
it
online.
If
you
look
at
the
property
as
it
stands,
setback
probably
about
15
to
20
feet
it's
at
an
awkward
angle.
What
we're
proposing
to
do
was
demand
it's
a
site,
unsightly
site
on
the
verge
of
seven.
It
was
something
with
simply
trying
to
demolish
that
structure,
bring
it
up
to
the
floor
right
up
to
the
property
line
in
the
front
with
the
other
businesses
and
residents
on
Dorchester
Avenue.
V
V
V
Think
so
I
think
you
know
obviously
we're
gonna
have
security
cameras
in
the
back
and
and
things
like
that
around
the
parking
and
we've
pledged
to
do
that
as
well.
And
you
know,
looking
at
the
BR
raised
recommendation,
we
can
work
with
the
B
PDA
with
regard
to
working
on
the
setbacks,
both
the
front
and
the
rear
to
do
what
makes
best.
You
know
what
works
best
for
the
city.
AA
On
the
side,
there
was
on
the
plans
that
we
reviewed
upstairs
the
one
side
of
the
building
I
think
it's
maybe
the
right-hand
side.
If
you
were
to
be
looking
at
the
proposal,
its
solid
wall,
there
are
no
windows
and
when
you
look
at
the
internal
I'm,
not
sure
if
these
are
new
plans
that
are
submitted
by
there's
no
windows
at
all.
On
that
right-hand
side.
AA
I
would
imagine
so
because
you
couldn't
have
window
on
there,
so
I
mean
we
could
set
back
they.
Honestly.
We
had
an
issue
whether
it
was
almost
50/50
with
denial,
without
prejudice
or
aggressive
design
review.
The
thinking
was,
we
didn't
want
to
get
to
an
impasse.
We
were.
We
came
back
to
here
for
the
FA
yeah.
You
know,
I
think
it's
just
one
of
those.
If,
if
the
board,
you
know,
looks.
G
V
Was
one
of
the
issues
that
came
up
at
the
community
meeting
was
that
the
windows
on
that
side?
People
were
worried
about
privacy,
for
the
properties
that
sent
to
the
bat
and
the
future
proposal
that
may
come
or
may
not
come
on
the
parking
lot
site
as
well.
So
that
was
one
of
those
issues,
but
we're
open
to
working
with
BPD
a
with
regard
to
design
review
and
things
of
that
nature.
To.
A
AB
V
H
We
do
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
busy
traffic
at
store,
24
or
7-eleven
or
whatever
it
is
now
right.
So
I
do
think
that
people
have
made
some
suggestions
that
can
be
helpful.
Yeah
I
do
have
a
concern
if
I
look
at
the
last
page
of
these
plans,
counselor
that
looks
like
a
head
house
to
me.
So
I
bring
question
to
spiral
staircase
or
a.
C
A
H
I
would
I
would
like
to
add
you
know
just
to
make
sure
that
they
work
closely
with
the
neighbors
they're,
very,
very
tight
in
that
area.
As
you
can
see,
this
there's
not
much
space
between
the
way.
You
guys
talk
about
the
building
being
twisted
and
turned
so
we're
going
to
take
special
consideration
to
work
with
these
people
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
impacting
them
negatively.
S
B
B
Next
case,
calling
boa
74
0
7
0
1
5
Alva,
Kitteridge
Park.
This
is
a
change
Archie
back
to
its
original
use
of
a
three
family
dwelling
still
living
space
into
the
basement
violations.
Article
50,
section
29
insufficient,
existing
lot
size
for
change
of
occupancy
to
three
units.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement
creates
an
excessive
fa.
Our
article
50
section
29
is
sufficient
usable
open
space
for
dwelling
unit
in
article
50,
section
43
insufficient
off
street
parking
for
the
additional
unit.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
AC
AD
A
AE
AC
AD
A
AC
E
AD
A
C
C
C
AC
AF
AC
AD
G
AG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
boy
Joshua
McFadden
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
like
the
Gloam
record,
in
support
of
this
project.
At
this
time
we
had
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
and
which
majority
of
the
abutters
and
neighbors
expressed
their
concerns.
I
know
there
was
wine
nut
butter
who
had
some
apprehension
here,
but
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
its
a
project
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
H
AD
Door
to
me,
I'm,
5,
directly
next
door
is
number
6
to
my
right.
That's
a
three
family,
then
next
door
to
that
is
number
seven,
that's
a
two
family
and
then
next
to
that
is
number
eight,
which
is
a
two
family
and
then
behind
me
is
one
family
and
then
next
to
that
is
three
condos
and
those
are
my
immediate
and
then
there's
two
three
family
homes
to
the.
AH
My
name
is
Sandra
Molloy
I'm
the
director,
but
our
two
number
Five's
of
home
alba
Katraj.
My
property
is
number
six
alba
Kittredge
I've
owned
it
for
almost
40
years
and
I
was
the
first
to
renovate
these
buildings,
as
I
told
mr.
McFadden
I'm,
not
in
opposition
to
Joe
to
him
Jonathan
putting
our
apartment
in
the
basement
if
this
board
deems
that
it's
appropriate.
AH
My
concerns
are
of
health
and
safety
and
I
also
wasn't
informed
of
the
meeting
that
took
place
on
October
the
26th
until
I
received
the
text
message
that
afternoon
from
Jonathan
that
said,
hi
Sandra.
This
is
Jonathan
at
5a,
Kittredge
I'm,
having
Anna
butters
meeting
today
at
6:00
in
front
of
the
house
for
work.
I
want
to
do
to
my
house
back
to
a
three-unit
building
from
a
to
building
a
new
apartment
in
the
basement.
In
case
you
can't
make
it
today.
No
worries,
if
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
call
me
so.
S
AH
AH
AH
It's
90%
a
little
brown,
it's
very
it's
very
deep,
so
you're
gonna
have
to
dig
very
deep
down
and
put
those
windows
in
and
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
fronted
front
gonna
look
like,
because
these
row
houses
were
built
in
1875
and
they
are
historic,
they're
142
years
old,
so
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
But
I
know
that
we
were
held
to
very
strict
guidelines
in
terms
of
not
changing
the
outside
the
side
of
the
building.
AH
Jonathan
is
gonna
affect
me,
that
is
true,
and
the
other
thing
for
the
past
50
odd
years
that
those
brown
floors
and
Jonathan's
building
they
were
used
as
a
dry.
Cleaner
I
grew
up
in
that
area.
I
used
to
play
in
those
buildings.
Mr.
Crockett
was
a
dry
cleaner
for
years
and
I
know
that
you
know
the
building
I'm,
not
just
not
sure
about
the
soil
down
there
and
I
don't
want
things
to
be
stirred
up,
and
suddenly
we
have
environmental
issues.
AH
AC
Only
three
feet
below
grade
can
be
young,
be
righteous
here,
that's
just
a
myth.
That's
just
in
the
way
yeah!
It's
not
it's!
Not
this!
Many!
It's
not
that
many
steps.
This
was
already
here
these
windows.
These
windows
are
existing.
These
windows
in
the
back
Jonathan's,
not
putting
new
windows
and
the
windows
in
the
front.
AC
Are
there
we're
just
showing
that
we're
gonna
brick
the
patio
and
make
it
a
make
it
a
solid,
a
solid
patty
on
the
back
and
a
solid
patio
in
the
front
so
that
when,
if
you
have
to
get
out
of
those
an
emergency
you
stepping
on
something
a
solid
ground,
this
steps,
these
steps
here.
This
is
not
five
steps,
there's
only
like,
maybe
maybe
four
steps
in
the
back.
It's
not
it's
not!
It's.
AC
AH
Yes,
I
didn't
realize
it
was
gonna,
be
a
patio
in
the
back.
Okay,
the
windows
in
the
area
in
the
back
is
good
as
deep
as
the
area
in
the
front.
I
just
don't
understand
it,
but
whatever
as
long
as
we
have
a
four
foot
egress
in
the
back
to
go
across
those
buildings,
because
it's
necessary
from
the.
AH
A
AD
A
AD
AD
E
C
E
AD
Z
B
This
is
tremolo
Street
developmental
LLC,
bones
bones:
both
1008
1012,
Tremont,
Street
and
1002
to
1006
tremon
street
owner
is
proposing
to
combine
and
subdivide
the
two
lots
commonly
1008
1012,
come
on
in
Mission
Hill
as
to
2003
at
a
97
square
feet
of
land.
Currently
2010
Oh
to
the
1006
crema,
the
Mission
Hill
has
2340
square
feet.
B
Owner
is
proposing,
has
shown
the
subdivision
plan
of
15,000
1554
square
feet
of
land
from
1002
to
1006
and
grant
1008
to
1012
trim
on
street
the
proposed
new
square
footage
of
1000
two
1000
six
Tremmel
of
786
square
feet.
The
proposed
new
square
footage
of
1008
no.12
trim
on
will
be
3951
square
feet.
The
violation
article
9
section
1,
present
structure
on
a
lot
is
non-conforming
mixed
use
of
2f
in
restaurant
and
MF
sub-district,
either
equal
50,
section
26
insufficient
remaining
a
lot
with
article
50,
section,
26
insufficient
remaining
lot.
B
The
existing
structure
of
4,000
square
feet
required
article
50,
section
26
insufficient
additional
lot
area
for
dwelling
unit
remaining
article
50,
section
26
insufficient
a
lot
frontage
with
article
50,
section
26
excessive
FA,
our
article
50
section
26,
insufficient,
open
space,
200
square
feet
unit
is
required
in
article
50
section
29,
insufficient
aside,
yet
setback
10
to
10
feet
is
the
minimum.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
I.
AI
AI
Yes,
the
rejection
I
submitted
a
alt
permit
for
both
premises,
and
the
rejection
letter
was
issued
on
just
one
of
the
permits
for
one
part
of
it,
as
only
one
I'm
subdividing
and
combining
the
Lots.
My
client
owns
both
Lots
and
there's
two
exists:
there's
an
existing
building
on
one
zero,
two,
two
one:
zero
for
Tremont
Street,
a
building
terms
with
the
occupancy
of
that
building
is
currently
there
is.
AI
It
is
a
commercial
pizza
shop
on
the
bottom
and
there
are
tenants
above
the
pizza
shop,
how
many
units
I
believe
there
is
two
additional
units
above
the
pizza
shop.
Okay,
I
am
right.
Now
there
is
already
a
building
permit
that
was
approved
for
the
construction
of
the
rear
of
the
lot.
There
was
an
erect
permit
already
given
at
that
time,
a
subdivision
of
the
land
was
not
requested,
I'm
merely
cleaning
the
title
and
moving
the
property
line
over
so
I'm,
not
affecting
any
buildings
plans
or
anything
whatsoever,
I'm
merely
moving
the
property
line
over.
AI
A
AI
About
the
new
building
is
that
virtual,
yes,
1012
Tremont
Street.
There
is
a
current
a
requirement
it
is.
It
will
have
to
commercial
units
on
the
bottom,
and
then
there
is
six
residential
units
up
top
there
two-bedroom
units
that's
four
floors
and
is
that
it
as
a
bribe
construction
as
of
right
now
it's
being
currently
built
and-
and
there
is
a
permit
I-
do
have
a
permit
number
of
humid,
like
the
permit
number,
for
that
was
it
built
as
a
brighter.
Did
it
come
to
this
port?
It
came
to
this
board
in
2013.
The
up.
AI
C
AI
AJ
E
A
AI
AI
AI
In
getting
the
construction
on
financing
the
the
bank
wanted
to
make
sure
right
now
the
new
construction
is
going
to
be
built
on
Lots
and
so
we're
merely
moving
the
property
line
over.
So
that
way
that
if
my
client
were
to
sell
one
building
or
the
other,
he
wouldn't
be
having
to
have
that
legal
issue
at
the
time.
So
it's
more
for
legal
title,
it's
not
to
actually
effectuate
any
difference
or
change
in
either
one
of
the
buildings.
N
A
But
this
is
this
street
there's
a
whole
number
of
violations
and
we
are
responsible
for
understanding
what
this
is
and
you
are
responsible
for
telling
us
what
the
details
on
this.
We
can't
work
blank.
We
need
drawings
to
understand.
What's
going
on
with
the
existing
lot,
what's
the
proposed
lot
and
where
how
the
submission
subdivision
absolutely.
AI
AI
Tech
Tara
tech,
construction,
company.
AF
AJ
L
G
AG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Joshua
McFadden
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services,
vital
American
in
support.
So
a
while
ago,
the
applicant
actually
presented
before
the
abutters
and
got
the
support
of
the
abutters
we're
supporting
based
on
that
contingent
and
that's
what
we
are
at
this
point.
Thank.
AK
AI
Right
next
to
each
other,
so
that
plan
has
both
properties
on
on
that
plan.
So
they're
literally
neighbors
they're
102
to
104
is
the
existing
building.
It
is
proposed
as
lot
to
on
the
plan
in
front
of
you
and
then
right.
Next
to
it
is
it's
not
one,
and
that
is
the
new
proposed,
and
that
is
where
the
new
constructions.
A
B
AL
Sure,
good
morning,
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
Rashi
Mamluk,
as
I
stated.
We
are
here
to
apply
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
live
entertainment
to
be
offered
at
southern
proper.
It
would
be
offered
at
you
know
in
the
evenings,
as
well
as
during
brunch
on
weekends.
The
operators
experience
he
has
experience
in
the
industry
running
restaurants
at
select
oyster
on
Newbury,
as
well
as
a
new
restaurant
in
downtown
Boston,
and
we
do
have
support
from
the
community
I've
just
provided
letters
from
Union
Park
Neighborhood
Association,
showing
support.
AL
AD
A
AM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
effaces
sharif
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicants
did
go
through
a
community
process
when
they
were
looking
to
permit
the
business
originally
and
live.
Entertainment
was
one
of
the
things
that
did
come
up.
It
happened
during
the
spring
they
did
meet
with
and
get
the
approval
from
the
Union
Park
Neighborhood
Association
we'd
like
to
go
on
a
trip.
A
AM
B
This
is
a
bill
driveway
for
two
four
two
vehicles
violations:
article
fifty
section
43
the
proposed
area
space
is
not
large
enough
to
accommodate
two
spaces
and
meet
the
minimum
required
parking
space
dimensions.
Article
fifty
section
43
the
spot
that
we
partially
in
the
side
yard
no
parking
is
permitted
within
five
feet
of
the
sidewalk
line.
Name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AN
All
I
have
to
do
is
have
four
feet
of
my
existing:
have
a
deck
in
the
back
on
the
side
and
they've
taken
away
for
field
the
deck
to
make
these
mountains
driveway
the
length
would
be
nineteen
point.
Five
and
the
width
would
be
twenty
point
five,
and
there
is
a
fence
between
my
land
and
my
butters
land.
AN
AN
AN
AG
B
AG
B
Gonna
move
forward
you
with
your
project.
Okay,
this
is
a
real
wolf,
revised
Oh
from
the
previous
and
grant
supervisor
for
the
new
take
out
for
take
out
for
the
new
owner.
The
violation,
article
6
section
for
other
protection
additions
are
required.
Name
and
address
will
directed
please
name
an
address
to
the
record.
Please.
AO
AO
A
AO
AE
A
H
AO
H
E
A
A
B
You,
madam
chair
I'm,
gonna,
call
deferrals
and
withdrawls
for
10:30
again
in
case
someone
was
outside.
Are
there
any
deferral
with
jor-el's
for
1030
hearing?
None
we'll
call
the
first
case
calling
VOA
seven
six,
four,
four:
nine:
three:
five:
forty
five,
two
five,
forty
seven
East
8th,
Street
East
a
street
here.
Ok,
this
is
a
change
from
a
store
and
to
family
to
a
three
family.
We
renovate
all
flaws
the
violations,
article
27s
section
five
to
the
south
cross
and
ipod
applicability,
article
68
section,
eight
deployed
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
A
A
A
A
T
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Allison
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
we'd,
like
to
on
record
in
support.
We
did
have
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
on
this
project
and
there
were
no
objections
raised
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
the
proponent
had
tried
to
keep
this
a
commercial
space
by
putting
a
diner
there
and
that
was
met
with
a
lot
of
opposition,
so
the
residential
unit
is
a
welcome
change.
Thank
you.
G
B
This
is
interior
renovation
of
all
three
units
and
had
three
baths:
remodel
kitchens
remove
load-bearing
wall
on
the
33
floors
and
add
a
living
an
lvl
for
support.
This
is
also
to
construct
a
new
roof
deck
violations
out
of
article
68
27
s
dash
five.
It's
in
the
iPod
applicability
article
68,
section,
29,
roof
structure
restriction.
B
This
is
Building
Code,
section
878,
EC,
Emma,
1021,
number
of
exits
and
continuty
section
2010
21.1
exits
from
stories
all
spaces
with
each
story
shall
have
access
to
the
minimum
number
of
approved
independent
exits
based
on
the
occupant
Lord
of
the
story.
Automatic
sprinkler
systems
shall
be
provided
in
all
work
areas
when
required
by
section
704
point
two
of
this
section:
fire
alarm
and
detection
systems,
fire
alarm
detection
systems
complying
with
section
704,
0.4,
0.1
in
seven
or
4.4.3,
shall
be
provided
throughout
the
building
in
accordance
with
the
International
Building
Code.
AP
A
A
AP
G
AQ
T
B
This
is
to
add
two
parking
spaces
on
the
rear
of
the
lot
using
an
agreed
easement
with
the
ax
butter
at
four
twenty
seven
East
Third
Street
and
five
thirty
East
Broadway.
The
violation
is
article
68,
section,
a
usable,
open
spaces
insufficient
in
article
68,
six
to
thirty
three
sixty
eight
point:
thirty
3.5
oz
be
parking
design
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AB
AB
T
AR
A
AQ
AS
A
AS
A
Okay-
and
this
is
for
renewal,
how
many
times
has
it
I.
B
AQ
AQ
AQ
AQ
T
A
AT
B
This
is
change
of
our
country
from
a
five
residential
units,
threating
spa
and
takeout
restaurant
for
four
residential
units
and
restaurant
god,
loma
on
the
first
floor,
construct
two-story
rare
edition
with
roof
deck,
constructing
new
front
patio
with
12
outdoor
seating.
The
violation
is
article
13,
section,
1
flirty,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Due
to
the
proposed
rare
addition.
Article
13
section
1
really
got
is
insufficient.
B
Due
to
the
proposed
rare
edition,
article
32,
section
4G
card
applicability
to
the
extension
of
the
structure,
more
than
50
square
feet
of
the
lot
area
in
article
8,
section
7
outdoor
seating
is
a
forbidding
use
article
8,
section,
7
restaurant
is
a
conditional
used
in
article
9,
section
1,
it's
an
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Thomas.
M
A
N
AU
AD
AV
A
AV
AW
Chair
members
of
the
board,
you
saw
her
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support,
as
mentioned
above.
He
does
have
another
location
right
around
the
corner
and
it
is
a
neighborhood,
favorite
or
I
would
say
so.
This
is
also
there
just
excited
to
have
another
location
here
and
Newbury
Street,
and
there
has
been
opposition
for
minority
of
butters
or
anyone
coming
to
my
presence.
I
know
that
the
Civic
Association
Neighborhood
Association
back
beta
standing
behind
me
in
support
as
well.
AX
Members,
the
board
Elliot
laughs
of
Neighborhood
Association,
Back
Bay.
They
came
to
our
licensing
building
user
committee
and
described
their
use.
They
agreed
to
have
a
refrigerated
indoor
storage
of
trash
which
was
important
to
us,
and
we
were
talking
just
about
the
use
not
about
the
fer
and
on
that
issue
we
are
not
opposed.
Thank.
C
E
AV
A
B
B
A
AY
July,
my
client
purchased
an
existing
restaurant
coffee
shop
on
the
corner
of
Appleton
Street
and
Dartmouth
Street
as
part
of
it.
We
applied
for
a
common
vitual
license
and
a
Health
Department
inspection
as
part
of
that
I
went
to
inspectional
services
and
they
discovered
that
there
was
a
variance
given
to
the
prior
owner
allowing
for
9
outdoor
seats.
We
are,
we
are
here
we
applied
and
were
denied
pending
going
before
you,
a
transfer
of
those
9,
a
transfer
of
that
authority
to
maintain
9
outdoor
seats
in
in
the
name
of
the
new
buyer.
AY
A
AY
AY
AM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faith
sharif,
neighborhoods
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
did
reach
out
to
the
Neighborhood
Association
regarding
the
removal
of
the
proviso.
The
applicants
are
not
looking
to
change
the
business
in
any
way.
This
is
a
neighborhood
coffee
shop,
they're,
just
looking
to
keep
the
same
patio
chairs
outside,
and
the
neighborhood
would
like
to
keep
the
businesses
same
way.
Thank
you.
A
B
Boa
seven,
six
one,
two
eight
three
one
Beacon
Street
this
is
that
to
erect
a
two
single-story
additions
for
Lobby
space
and
one
additional
floor
infill
for
the
future
tenant
shell.
Only
for
restaurant
use
an
existing
1017,
900,
I'm,
sorry,
992
square
foot
legal.
Is
this
non-conforming
structure
the
addition,
the
totaling,
approximately
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet
violation:
article
45
section,
fourteen
restaurant
use
on
the
newly
proposed
upper
level.
B
AZ
Madam
chairwoman
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Rebecca
Lee
I'm,
an
attorney
with
Mintz
Levin
to
my
left
is
John
Stowe
boda
from
the
Metropolitan
Life
Insurance
Company
and
tied
at
tendon
from
Gensler
the
architect
for
this
project.
One
Beacon
Street,
as
you
know,
is
a
1970s
office
tower,
with
over
a
million
square
feet
of
office
use
with
some
ground-floor
fitness
and
restaurant
and
other
ancillary
uses.
AZ
These
owners
are
joint
venture
of
relatively
recent
vintage
of
ownership
and
are
looking
to
upgrade
the
property,
improve
the
lobby
experience
and
bring
the
building
out
to
the
street
face
on
Tremont
Street.
We
have
some
boards
that
Todd
can
show
you,
but
essentially
these
are
a
small
amount,
250
square
feet,
total
square
foot
additions
to
the
building
on
the
Tremonti
and
Beacon
Street
sides
in
order
to
provide
a
better
Lobby
experience
and
more
retail
space
on
Tremec
Street.
AZ
A
AZ
Article
45
has,
as
a
permitted
use
restaurant,
would
take
out
if
its
accessory
to
the
restaurant
use
that
it
has
a
separate
category
of
conditional
use
of
takeout
restaurant.
At
this
point,
the
leasing
team
is
out
there.
Looking
for
a
restaurant
tenant,
it's
unclear
which
category
it's
going
to
fall
into,
and
so
the
IFC
plans
examiner
recommended
that
we
get
turned
down
for
the
restaurant
with
takeout
use,
whether
takeout
restaurant
use.
Excuse
me.
AZ
E
A
AW
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
at
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
run
record
in
support.
We
had
them
go
before
the
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association,
which
is
the
closest
Civic
kind
of
in
their
area,
they're,
not
really
in
a
residential
district.
So
it
doesn't
really
about
any
residents
that
would
have
any
concerns
and
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association
has
come
forth
in
support,
so
we'd
like
to
record
support.
A
H
B
Case
calling
boa
seven
five,
nine
four
eight
two
three
points
on
Street
plays
this
is
to
confirm
the
Jakob
C
as
a
one-family
dwelling,
and
also
at
a
second-story
addition
and
renovate
the
violations.
Article
32
section
four:
this
isn't
G
card
applicability,
article
54,
section
10,
excessive
FA,
our
article
54
section
10,
insufficient
Riyadh
setback,
article
54,
section
18,
the
addition
of
two
stories
to
total
five
story
structure;
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BA
E
E
U
Come
on
in
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Mario
Lanza
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
the
applicant
held
in
a
butters
meeting
which
to
abutters,
attended
and
saw
no
issues
with
the
project.
They
also
have
the
support
of
the
north
on
waterfront
neighborhood,
council
and
the
north
on
waterfront
residents
association.
Thank
you.
O
B
E
AU
And
if
she
remembers
the
board,
we
have
a
existing
head
house
and
a
roof
deck,
that's
being
added
to
the
where
there
was
once
one
a
couple
years
ago.
Additionally,
there's
a
deck
coming
off
of
the
rear.
There's
an
int
interior
second
means
of
egress
already
the
violations
that
we're
seeking
is
restricted,
roof
structure
district
and
that's
because
you're
changing
the
existing
profile
of
the
roof
by
adding
the
roof
deck,
although
once
there
before
it's
been
removed
for
more
than
two
years.
So
that
is
one
violation.
The
other
violation
is
the
rear
yard.
AU
A
AU
AU
A
G
G
AU
AQ
G
AU
AU
G
M
AU
AU
A
AU
A
BB
A
B
Next
case,
calling
boa
seven
six,
seven,
seven,
four
four
one
34
High
Street:
this
have
built
a
new
roof
deck
with
pressure-treated
framing
composite
decking
at
42
inch,
privacy
wall
and
cable
railings,
and
a
small
new
skylight
violation
is
article
62,
section
8.
The
radius
step
back
is
insufficient.
We
also
have
a
companion
case,
boa
7,
6,
7
7
4
5
135,
134,
High
Street
for
Building
Code.
This
is
section
one:
zero,
zero,
nine
point,
one
one
three
point:
one
roof
access
where
a
stairway
is
provided
to
an
occupied
roof.
O
O
A
BB
A
B
The
next
case
calling
boa
77590
71
to
68
Bremen
Street.
This
is
demolishing
existing
single-family
and
erect
a
three
family
dwelling
with
curb,
cut
and
garage
parking
violations.
Article
53
section
56
Austrey
parking
is
insufficient,
while
equal
53
section
56
insufficient
maneuvering
article
53,
section
9
a
lot
of
areas
insufficient
radical
53,
additional
lotta
areas,
insufficient
article
53
floaty,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section,
9,
building
height
is
excessive
article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
feet.
B
A
BC
As
the
notice
stated,
we
are
proposing
to
build
a
three
family
structure
in
a
three
family
district.
It
will
consist
of
five
floors.
It
isn't
in
a
flood
zone
making
it
impossible
to.
You
know
inhabit
that
ground
floor,
which
will
be
used
for
parking.
My
client
will
live
in
that
home
with
his
wife
and
two
children
who
are
nine
and
ten
years
old.
BC
There
will
be
parking
in
the
ground
floor
with
four
four
cars
in
a
tandem
configuration
and
I'll.
Let
our
architect
sort
of
address
that
in
a
minute,
but
what
I
wanted
to
make
sure,
though,
that
I
got
on
the
record
was
the
fact
that
I
really
believe
that
this
project
that
she's
four
major
goals,
one
of
it,
is
that
it
creates
much-needed,
upgraded
housing
in
East
Boston
with
reasonable
size
units.
Secondly,
as
a
three
family,
it
really
maintains
the
city
of
the
neighborhood.
Thirdly,
it
supports
the
retention
of
a
long
term.
BC
East
Boston
resident
David
grew
up
on
this
street.
He
will
do
living
next
to
his
mother,
his
sister
and
his
brother,
it
it
obviously
provides
a
stable
environment
for
those
children
and
father
for
the
family
and
really
offers
that
kind
of
housing
that
we're
looking
to
mix
in
with
other
types
of
housing
that
we
are
seeing
created
in
Boston.
And
lastly,
there
was
a
hope
with
the
development
of
the
Bremen
Street
corridor,
the
Bremen
Street
Park,
that
it
would
foster
the
growth
of
new
housing
and
renovated
housing.
BC
If
you
walk
down
that
street,
you
will
see
this
most
beautiful
park,
almost
a
mile
long,
which
is
anchored
on
one
end
by
the
YMCA
on
the
up
in
the
middle
by
the
airport
T
station,
which
is
a
new
station
and,
on
the
other
end
by
the
award-winning
East
Boston
library
and
the
brand
new
Charter
School
Excel
charter
school
David
will
be
in
the
midst
of
all
of
that
right
across
the
street.
So
the
resources
available
to
him
and
his
children
are
really
significant.
BC
So
we
believe
that
this
project
really
achieves
many
and
many
many
goals
that
in
the
interest
of
the
neighborhood
in
the
city.
Lastly,
we
engaged
in
a
significant
community
process
over
the
course
of
three
months.
We
had
four
meetings,
one
with
the
abutters
and
three
with
the
eternal
Civic
Association.
We
received
support
from
the
Eagle
Hall
Civic,
Association
and
I
have
filed
with
you
today
letters
of
support
from
the
closest
abutters,
and
we
have
heard
of
no
opposition
to
this
project.
So
we
really
urge
the
board
to
look
carefully
at
this
and
improve
it.
A
A
O
A
O
AH
C
C
M
E
O
Obviously,
under
underutilize
ffar
and
to
the
right
we
have
a
three
and
a
half
story
with
a
three
story
with
the
basement
have
above
ground
to
the
right.
There
are
yes
and
then
there
are
a
couple
down
the
street,
so
70
Bremen
Street
is
actually
a
six
story
very
large
building
and
we
have
a
number
of.
A
A
L
BC
Is
a
business
I
might
add
that
you
know,
while
you
know,
as
you
know,
the
the
the
flood
zone
imposes
restrictions
in
terms
of
the
design
and
height
of
a
building,
and
it
is
really
a
question
of
trade-offs.
In
many
of
these
cases,
as
I
have
appeared
before
you
previously,
you
know
we
could
have.
Basically
just
you
know,
we
had
no
choice
but
to
put
it
above
that
ground
level
above
the
BF
e,
so
we
using
that
for
parking.
A
BC
A
BC
I
might
Madame
Chia
the
violations
might
seem
substantial,
but
when
you
look
at
each
one
of
them,
you
know
basically
I
think
there's
a
reasonable
explanation
for
each
one.
As
you
know,
though,
the
first
two
units
are
covered
by
the
size
of
the
Lord.
It's
the
additional
unit
that
really
requires
another
thousand
square
feet,
so
we're
looking
at
two
thousand
versus
three
thousand
square
feet.
You
know
on
the
matter
of
the
height
again,
I
mentioned
the
the
AES
on
that
they're
in
the
fact
is
that
the
FA
are
two
point.
BC
Six
is
probably
no
greater
than
many
other
projects
that
have
come
before
you
in
order
to
maintain
reasonable
size
units
the
park
across
the
street,
the
Bremen
Street
Park
I
mean
it's
almost.
You
know
a
mile
long
I
mean
there's
more
than
adequate
recreation
space
for
people
in
rest,
rest
space
and
we've
got
decks
on
the
building
as
well.
A
BD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
Garcia
from
the
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
in
background.
Support
of
this
project
run
the
community
process.
There
was
no
many
concerns
about
this
proposal
from
the
borders
in
Eagle,
Hill
Civic
Association
also
bought
in
support
for
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
C
C
V
D
D
G
X
B
BE
BE
Proposing
a
388
foot
roof
deck
mr.
Harris
and
his
wife
Megan
who's
also
present
here
have
exclusive
right
and
use
of
the
top
of
the
through
the
roof
of
this
building.
That
exclusivity
is
in
your
packet,
we're
hoping
to
seek
your
pool
today
for
this
roof
deck.
The
configuration
of
the
deck
itself
shows
the
railings
going
into
the
support
of
the
deck
going
into
the
actual
brick
itself,
so
there'd
be
no
load,
no
infiltration
of
the
roof
of
rubber
roof
itself.
The
existing
head
house,
that
is
there
now,
is
also
the
exclusive
right
of
mr.
BE
BE
A
BE
BD
Madam
chairman
sort
of-
or
this
was
Garcia
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
a
during
the
borders
meeting
on
October
3rd,
a
the
bars
who
shot
through
the
meeting.
They
were
in
a
strong
support
for
this
proposal
and
also
a
gahbage
Street
Neighborhood
Association
vote
in
support
for
this
project.
So
we
would
like
to
be
in
red
color
on
support.
Thank
you.
A
B
AE
A
B
A
A
B
AY
E
B
AY
AD
B
A
B
AG
B
B
I'm
gonna
call
it
up
for
the
record.
She
already
did
you
pot
calling
boa
six
171
three
173
Humboldt
Avenue,
so
we
got
it
defer,
make
a
motion
for
deferral.
A
AG
A
B
A
B
Call
the
next
case
for
10:30
calling
vo
a
7
5
2
3
1
4
2
29
East
Eagle
Street
directly
for
unit
residential
dwelling.
This
violation
fit
article
53,
section
56
cross
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
insufficient
additional
bloody
area
and
unit
article
33,
section
9,
excessive
fer
article
53,
section
9
excessive
height,
to
include
the
number
of
storeys
article
53
section,
a
useless
forbidden
name
and
address
for
the.
L
Right
trailer,
brea
who's,
the
architect
with
George
V's
design,
I'm
a
sure.
This
is
proposal
to
erect
a
four
unit
residential
dwelling
in
the
Eagle
Hill
section,
miss
Boston,
presently,
a
30
125
square
foot
biggest
one
based
upon
a
very
involved
community
process
of
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association,
even
though
neighborhood
disagrees,
lose,
proposes
a
three
family
with
parking
underneath
based
upon
the
design
that
we
showed
to
the
Eagle
Villa
Civic
Association.
L
A
L
As
part
of
that
conversation
with
the
neighborhoods,
where
we
were
showing
lower
level
parking
but
as
you
can
see
from
the
context,
photos
in
the
neighborhood
do
have
a
number
of
triple-deckers
along
that
side
of
the
Siegel
Street,
which
have
elevated
foundations
and
stairwells
leading
up
to
the
upper
level.
The
context,
or
at
least
the
original
proposal
would
have
had
the
main
entrance
at
the
lower
level,
which
would
have
looked
out
of
context
for
the
neighborhood.
L
So
we've
gone
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
went
back
to
the
neighborhood
and
asked
them
if
they
would
consider
supporting
a
four-unit.
We
would
eliminate
the
parking
and
I
know
that
sounds
ironic
for
these
boss,
a
neighbor.
They
actually
supported
this
design
in
this
proposal
over
the
original
proposal.
One
of
the
reasons
they
looked
at
that
was
that
this
is
an
existing
driveway.
We
would
be
replacing
the
curb
cut
if
we
eliminated
the
parking
so
providing
additional
on
street
parking
that
the
available.
L
That's
correct,
okay,
so
there's
no
did
the
research
on
the
building
jackets.
There
is
no
attack
zoning
for
ancillary
parking.
So,
although
has
used
for
what
I
call
convenience
parking
in
the
neighborhood,
there
was
no
required
parking
for
any
of
the
properties
in
the
area.
So
this
would,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,.
A
L
Is
correct,
I
know
there
is
a
building
code
issue.
We
are
not
requesting
building
code
relief
in
consultation
with
the
architecture.
We
did
a
very
similar
project
at
59,
Cottage
Street
nearby.
My
understanding
is
the
area
that
is
not
accessible
as
no
amenities.
The
lower
level
unit
does
have
all
the
accessible
features
and
therefore
will
be
a
fully
accessible
unit
for
the
building.
There
was
no
roof
that
mean
proposed
building.
L
C
BF
BD
BG
A
BG
However,
if
one
of
these
four
units
are
handicapped,
one
of
those
spaces
will
then
be
handicapped,
so
I'm
looking
at
the
parking
loss,
I
also
want
to
say
there
is
an
area
in
the
front
of
my
house
adjacent
to
this
property,
where
they
have
put
up
a
cinder
block
before
under
former
owners,
a
cinder
block
wall
which
caused
more
runoff
onto
my
property
and
in
my
cellar,
so
anything
that
gets
done
there.
I
want
to
be
sure
that
no
runoff
ends
up
in
my
cellar.
A
A
L
I'm
sure,
with
respect
to
the
runoff
tritanus
boards
aware,
any
construction
on
the
site
requires
water
and
sewer,
permit,
handling
of
runoff
and
drainage.
All
has
to
be
done
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
and
regulations
of
Boston
wandering
store,
I
know.
Sometimes
people
think
this
is
ironic,
but
the
developer
watching
improve
the
condition.
That's
presently
probably
causing
a
problem
with
her
property
I
can
mr.
shakila's
an
experienced
builder
gonna,
be
in
the
neighborhood
and
is
very
familiar
with
dealing
with
suggest.
A
A
B
This
is
erect
a
new
six
unit,
multi-family
residential
dwelling
with
six
off
street
parking
and
ground-floor
garage
combined
to
Lots
into
one
lot
to
be
three
thousand
nine
hundred
and
fifteen
square
feet
violation:
article
53,
section,
eight
multi-family,
drawing
as
a
good
news
article
53
section,
56
hua
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
two
57.2
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment;
article
53
section:
nine
additional
lot
of
areas:
insufficient
article
53,
section,
nine,
the
Floyd,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section,
nine,
the
building
height
is
excessive
at
stories.
B
L
Stopstop,
architects,
the
architect
for
the
project
I'm
sure,
is
the
secretary
indicated.
This
is
a
proposal
to
erect
a
six
unit
multi-family
dwelling
on
existing
multiple
vacant,
lots
that
would
be
combined
for
a
total
3,900
square
feet.
This
is
a
four-story
structure
being
largely
in
part
due
to
the
proposed
parking
which
would
be
at
grade.
This
particular
neighborhood,
although
not
necessarily
within
the
Eagle
Civic
Association,
has
participated.
L
Directly
with
the
butters,
as
well
as
the
Civic
Association
on
multiple
occasions,
the
one
number
one
issue
they
were
concerned
with
was
ensuring
that
we
had
at
least
one
parking
space
for
dwelling
in
it,
which
is
what
we
can
propose.
The
total
unit
sizes
are
range
anywhere
from
1152
1,350
square
feet,
they're
a
mix
of
two
and
three-bedroom
units.
There
is
no
proposed
roof
deck
proposed
on
the
building
and,
as
I
indicated,
there's
a
total
of
six
parking
spaces
for
that
grade,
and.
A
A
A
AJ
BD
E
A
B
A
B
A
F
B
Discuss
ins
calling
VOA,
seven
six,
three
zero
one
to
forty
coins
in
road:
this
is
to
change
our
see
from
a
five-unit
building
to
a
six
unit
building
and
build
out
a
new
unit
in
the
basement.
Building
code
review
has
been
deferred
at
this
time.
The
violations
article
15
section
one
excessive
FA
are
three
point.
Zero
is
the
max
an
article
two
section,
two
one:
the
floor:
the
area
gross
name,
an
address
for
the
record,
please
James.
A
A
A
BH
Wasn't
deferred,
this
wasn't
deferred
this.
B
BH
BH
My
clients
occupy
the
house
with
their
two
children
and
there
are
two
parents
live
there.
Also,
there
are
no
building
code
violations.
No
other
zoning
violations,
except
we're
asking
for
a
to
increase.
The
FA
are
from
approximately
0.5
1
to
0.5,
for
the
only
exterior
changes
to
add
of
stairs
a
bulkhead
stairs
on
the
left
side
of
the
property.