►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 10/25/2022 Part 1
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
Watch Part 2: https://youtu.be/1X1gZHS2JcM
A
Deals
up,
Committee
hearing
for
October
25th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
Provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature.
Regarding
virtual
hearings,
the
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
through
March
2023.
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
Public
Notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment
board
members,
applicants
and
their
attorneys
are
Representatives
participating
in
the
hearing
as
panelists,
and
they
will
appear
alongside
the
presentation
materials.
A
When
speaking,
analysts
are
strongly
encouraged
to
keep
video
on
while
presenting
to
the
board,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
The
order
of
comments
is
as
follows:
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public
chairman
limit,
the
number
of
people
call
the
phone
to
offer
comment
and
it's
time
for
commenting
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
refers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
a
project
that
is
those
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
When
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes,
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk.
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
nine
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
the
request
from
the
hosts
that
was
called
upon.
A
The
comment
will
be
asked
to
State
their
name
and
address
first
before
they
provide
the
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
Mr
Fortune
reads.
The
address
into
the
record:
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
host
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
A
These
instructions
may
be
repeated
throughout
the
hearing.
Today's
board
consists
of
a
full
board,
but
we're
not
sure
if
everyone
is
here
yet
so
as
a
result,
if
any
African
would
like
to
wait
until
a
seven-member
board
is
seated,
you
can
seek
an
administrative
deferral,
but
let
me
take
a
roll
call
to
determine
how
many
men
today
so.
A
C
A
Good
morning,
Mr
Robinson
good
morning,
Mr
chair,
Miss
pinata
good.
A
A
Mr
chair
good
morning,
okay,
Mr,
Mr
Fortune.
Take
it
away.
B
A
E
A
Robinson,
yes,
Miss
pinata,
yes,
Ms
Logue,.
D
A
Thanks
Kelly
thank.
F
For
the
record,
please
good
morning,
Mr
secretary
Mr,
chair
attorney,
Nix
Azula,
McDermott
quality
and
Miller
28th
State
Street
in
Boston
here
on
behalf
of
34
LLC.
Thank.
B
You
thank
you
councilman
regards
to
30
Thorn
Street
the
board
originally
granted
this
release
on
November
6th
of
2018
and
has
since
granted
two
extensions
of
that
relief.
However,
both
extensions
were
necessary
because
covert
tolling
applied
for
this
relief
with
calling
this
relief
did
not
expire
until
February
23rd
of
2022.
However,
the
board's
most
recent
extension
until
November
6th
of
2022
covered
the
full
Towing
carrier,
I
recommended
the
board's
confirmness
for
the
wreckage.
The
applicant
now
request
an
additional
extension
until
November
6th
of
2023
I
recommended
the
board
grantus
extension
appropriate
under
the
circumstances.
B
G
A
G
B
B
Thank
you
good
morning,
councilor
in
regards
to
178
Brighton
Avenue,
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
November
6th
of
2020
so
covert
only
does
not
apply
to
this
relief.
The
applicant
is
now
seeking
their
first
one-year
extension.
I
recommend
the
board
grant
that
extension
to
find
it
appropriate
under
the
circumstances,
Mr
chair,
I'm,
going
to
make
a
motion
that
we
do
a
one-year
extension
from
today's
date
of
October
25th
2023..
B
A
B
G
B
B
Thank
you,
sir.
In
regards
to
820
William
T
Morrissey
Boulevard
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
November
13th
of
2020.,
so
Culvert
covet
tolling,
does
not
apply
to
this
release.
The
applicant
is
now
seeking
their
first
one-year
extension.
I
recommend
the
board
grants
that
expansion
is
to
find
it
appropriate.
Under
those
circumstances,
yeah
I
will
again
make
a
motion
to
approve
a
one-year
extension
from
today's
date
of
October
25th.
A
G
B
D
Okay,
this
is
Diana
powder,
Ryan
Thurman.
We
were,
we
filed
to
be
able
to
pass
the
ownership
of
this
permit.
To
my
name
and
for
my
company.
I
B
Okay
hold
on
two
seconds
in
regards
to
295
Kittredge
Street.
The
board,
originally
Francis
relief
on
November
13th
of
2020.,
so
covet
Towing
does
not
apply
to
this
relief.
The
applicant
is
now
seeking
their
first
one-year
extension
and
I
recommended
the
board
grant
that
extension
under
the
appropriate.
Under
the
circumstances,
the
chair
I'll
make
a
motion
for
a
one-year
extension
from
today's
date
of
October
25th.
G
A
Lowe,
yes,
motion
passes.
B
B
K
B
This
relief
did
not
expire
until
March
7th
2022.
However,
the
boy's
most
recent
extension
until
November
30th
of
2022,
that
was
the
full
Towing
carrier,
I,
recommended
the
board
for
the
record.
The
applicant
now
requests
an
additional
extension
of
November
30th
of
2023.
I
recommended
the
board
Francis
extension.
If
it's
appropriate
under
the
circumstances,
keep
it
in
mind,
it
will
be
the
only
applicant
second
necessary
extension.
I
There
is
a
race
stand
here.
Darrell
is
that
you.
B
Thank
you,
sir.
Regarding
28
Monument
Street,
the
board,
originally
Francis
relief
on
December,
11th
2020.,
so
kova
Towing
does
not
apply
to
this
relief.
The
applicant
is
now
seeking
their
first
one-year
extension.
I
recommend
that
the
boy
grant
that
extension,
if
it
finds
it
appropriate
under
the
circumstances
Mr
chair
I'll,
make
a
motion
for
a
one-year
extension
from
today's
date
of
October
25th.
G
A
B
You
Mr
Moran
regarding
Ted
McBride
Street
the
board
originally
granted
this
release
on
November
3rd
of
2017..
The
board
has
since
granted
three
extensions
of
this
relief.
However,
the
second
extension
was
unnecessary
with
kova
Towing.
The
first
extension
remained
valid
until
February
8
2022.
However,
the
board's
most
recent
extension
until
November
3rd
of
2022,
that
was
the
full
Towing
period,
I
recommend
the
board
confirmness
to
the
record.
The
applicant
now
requested
additional
extension
until
November
3rd
of
2023
I
recommended
the
board
grant
us
extension.
B
If
it's
an
appropriate
under
the
circumstances,
keeping
in
mind
there
will
be
the
only
applicants-
third
necessary
extension
rather
for
Mr
Moran.
Are
we
going
to
be
able
to
get
this
project
done
or
are
we
still
on
a
holding
period?
I
know.
I
know
the
board
looks
at
these
things
little
extensions
a
little
bit
longer
than
normal.
L
The
the
current
status
is
that
all
the
necessary
construction,
drawings,
Water
and
Sewer
approvals
utility
approvals
pic
approvals
on
the
plan
examiner's
desk.
He
requires
that
there
is
slight
variations
in
the
plan
that
what
final
operator
be
sought
to
stamp
the
construction
drawings.
That
matter
is
on
today's
agenda.
Okay,
if
the
board
approves
the
Perpetual
issue,
yeah.
B
Thank
you.
Mr
Moran
I'll
make
a
motion
to
the
extension
for
one
year
to
November
3rd
of
2023.
A
I
B
M
B
You
councilor
regarding
Clover
Street,
the
board
of
originally
Grant.
This
relief
on
November
6th
of
2020,
so
covert
only
does
not
apply
for
this
relief.
The
applicant
is
now
sinking
their
first
one-year
extension.
I
recommended
the
fourth
Grant
second
extension,
if
it's
appropriate
under
the
circumstances,
Mr
chair
I'm,
going
to
make
a
motion
for
a
one-year
extension
for
today's
date
of
October
25th.
B
E
K
B
B
Thank
you,
sir.
Regarding
16
Glendale
Street,
the
board
original
granted.
This
relief
on
October,
11
2019,
so
Cole
was
covered.
Trolling
does
not
apply,
doesn't
fly
I'm.
Sorry,
it
doesn't
fly
withholding.
This
relief
remains
valid
through
January
16th
of
2023..
The
applehead
is
now
seeking
their
first
one-year
extension
I
reckon
of
the
board
Grant.
The
extension
for
January
16
2024,
find
it
appropriate
under
the
circumstances.
N
Yes,
however,
the
planning
examiner
apparently
didn't
have
that
information
and
informed
us
that
we.
B
Mr
chair,
we
could
probably
do
a
six-month
instead
of
12
years.
That
sounds
fun.
Okay,
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
do
a
six-month
extension
on
January,
16th,
2023.
A
Miss
Tom
yes,
Mr
Robinson,
yes,
Mr
pinata;
yes,
there's
loam,
yes
and
I'm
in
favor
the
motion
passes.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
B
L
The
construction
drawings
vary
from
the
zoning
drawings.
I
suggest
the
slight
variations,
the
size
of
the
three
units,
a
slightly
reduced
by
The
Architects,
the
current
Architects
measurement
briefly
stated.
The
original
architect
did
not
complete
the
construction,
drawing
CEO
retired
and
died.
This
is
the
third
architecture
who
was
able
to
provide
the
construction
drawings
remaining
within
the
building
footprint.
L
The
plan
examiner
wanted
the
board
to
stamp
these
construction
drawings
and,
if
the
board
so
stamped
the
construction
drawings,
he
would
issue
the
permit
due
to
concerns
about
administrator
approval.
I
had
sought
the
one-year
extension,
and
hopefully
the
board
will
approve
these
changes
and
that
the
permit
would
issue.
A
L
Note
the
measurements
of
of
the
architect
in
slight
reductions
in
the
three
units.
Oh.
A
It's
simply
the
accuracy
of
the
the
measurements
on
okay,
so
with
so,
the
only
changes
are
reduced
elevation
by
31
inches
and
going
from
two
entryways
to
one.
That's.
A
All
right,
Mr
Robinson,
have
you
had
a
chance
to
review
these
updated
drawings,
I.
O
A
G
A
Lowe,
yes,
and
I
too,
am
in
favor
good
luck,
Mr
Moran!
Thank
you
very
much.
A
Absolutely
issues
just
repeating
what
Mr
broom
said:
if
you
were
having
problems
connecting
jump
off
and
then
jump
on,
and
hopefully
that
will
correct
it,
it's
that's.
We
have
quite
an
abstract
drawing
in
our
screen
there,
your
system,
Modern,
Art,
I,
guess
all
right.
I'm.
B
Gonna
I'm
going
right
to
the
groundwater
conservation,
then,
if
maybe
the
final
auditor
still
not
there,
yeah
I'll
do
the
groundwater
and
then
I'll
come
back
to
the
boys,
all
right,
fine.
That
was
good
calling
the
first
occasion
she
caught
he's
boa
one:
three,
six,
seven,
three,
two
six,
three,
two
five
Street:
this
is
a
substantial
rehabilitate.
The
single
family
dwelling
instruct
an
addition
of
the
rare
and
install
a
groundwater
reside
system.
The
violations
out
of
the
32
section.
P
B
Okay,
we
also
have
them
Mr
chair
as
well
secretary,
okay,.
A
D
A
Logue,
yes,
and
I
too,
in
favor
of
the
motion
passes.
B
Following
the
next
case
to
G
Clyde
calling
DOA
one,
three,
nine
one,
three
six
one
twelve
Marlboro
street,
so
you're
moving
and
replacing
asphalt
parking
space
got
all
the
new
herringbone
pattern:
heated
bricks
with
three
parking
spaces;
the
violations,
article
32,
section
4.
This
is
g-cod
applicability,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please,
yes,.
S
Thank
you,
Jesse
Aguilar,
with
high
point
engineering
business
address
is
980
Washington
Street
in
Dedham
Massachusetts.
B
K
G
A
D
S
B
Chair
before
I
call
into
9,
30s
I,
don't
think
Mr
stefanov
is
in
on
the
call,
but
I'll
make
a
motion
to
defer
until
the
November
15th
meeting
at
9,
30.
okay,
makes
sense.
A
A
G
J
A
B
All
right,
thank
you,
Mr
Chad,
thank
you,
Bill,
so
I'm
going
to
call
the
9
30
hearings
for
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
if
you're
going
to
defer
or
withdraw
your
9
30
project.
Give
me
the
address.
First,
please.
B
Okay,
on
the
first
case,
calling
boa
136-7321
438
Washington
Street.
This
is
to
build
an
addition
onto
the
existing
dental
office
on
the
first
floor
and
re
relocate
a
wheelchair
ramp,
but
the
violation
article
51
section
17,
the
rayon
is
insufficient
and
article
51
section
17.
The
floodier
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record
service.
T
Good
morning,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board
Attorney
John
pulgini
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
Dr
Maria
vasilakis,
so
438
Washington
Street
in
Brighton.
The
zoning
here
is
neighborhood
shopping
Five.
The
lot
size
is
3641
square
feet.
The
Proposal
is
to
add
a
single
story,
rare
edition
of
approximately
250
square
feet
since
existing
dental
practice.
It
was
a
relocation
of
a
handicap
ramp
inside
the
garage
Bay.
The
dimensions
of
addition
is
approximately
7
by
34
feet
with
me
is
Dr.
Vasilakis
Who
is
the
owner
of
this
dental
practice.
T
Dos
of
axolakis
has
been
practicing
her
dental
practice
from
this
location
for
nine
years.
Prior
to
that,
this
location
has
been
a
neighborhood
dental
practice
for
over
50
years.
This
out
of
space
will
allow
the
office
to
have
an
additional
interior
office
for
the
busy
Neighborhood
Dental
practice.
We
have
two
violations
that
Mr
collection.
Just
read:
we
have
a
rear
yard.
A
lot
of
is
20
feet.
We
have
an
existing
violation
of
11
feet
that
was
just
triggered
by
the
addition
in
the
back.
T
Far
0.5
is
allowed
current
FBI's
1.06,
and
this
small
increase
will
only
raise
that
to
1.12.
We
went
through
a
great
Community
process,
no
objections.
We
have
the
support
of
the
bright
and
also
Improvement
associations,
and
we've
also
submitted
nine
letters
of
support
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have:
okay,.
A
Mr
puji,
thank
you.
So
this
is
what
a
three-story
building
and
the
dental
office
is
on
the
first
floor.
That
is
correct.
It
was
residential
above
what
what's
what?
Yes,
it's
residential
it
does:
okay
and
the
the
rear
yard
violation.
What
is
it
and
what's
required.
T
So,
under
under
the
code
20
feet
is
alive,
we're
at
11
feet.
If
you
look
at
the
plans,
you
can
see
that
we
have
a
structure
of
a
fixed
garage
that
is
there
now.
So
the
the
addition
of
the
batch
has
triggered
the
violation
because
we're
doing
work
previous
violated
zone.
T
Because
if
you
look
at
the
plan
that
we
have
up
right
here,
you'll
see
that
the
to
the
rear
of
the
building,
the
addition
is
going
to
go
to
the
right
of
the
garage.
What
you're
looking
at
there
so
Annex
to
the
the
main
structure
that
the
garage
is
affixed
to
the
main
structure.
Good.
A
Okay,
all
right,
it
seems
pretty
straightforward.
How
are
the
drawings
of
Sir
Robinson.
O
Drawings
are
good,
just
one
question
just
to
make
sure
we
understand
so
the
garage
it
doesn't
look
like
an
actual
two-car
garage
anyway,
so
I
assume
there's
no
real
change
in
the
parking
there's
one
car
showing
and
seems
like
it
only
can
handle
one
car
anyways,
so
the
new
ramp
doesn't
seem
to
be
taken
away
from
anything,
it
seems.
Is
that
correct.
A
Me,
thank
you
all
right,
thanks,
Mr,
poldini,
I
assume
this
is
just
the
goal
here
is
just
to
expand
the
the
the
practice
and
to
be
able
to
take
in
more
patients.
Is
that
exactly.
T
Yes,
we
would,
hopefully
you
know,
hygienist
or
something
like
that,
but
also
a
dentist
who
work
in
that
area.
It's
a
growing,
it's
a
neighborhood
practice,
so
this
is
not
obviously
a
big
place.
It's
it's
very
much
in
a
college
area
and
it
has
been
in
a
use
at
the
dental
practice.
For
you
know,
over
60
years,
oh
okay,.
A
U
Good
morning,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Frank
Mendoza
Alston
Brighton
liaison
here
for
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
as
always
referring
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board,
but
in
this
case
we're
unaware
of
any
of
any
opposition
from
the
community.
At
this
time,
we've
only
heard
things
of
support
from
the
community,
including
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association,
as
well
as
probably
a
Butters
meeting
again
deferring
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
K
T
O
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
I
think
with
BPA
design
review
just
to
ensure
the
ramp
and
the
addition
fit
in
there.
Okay,.
C
A
B
Voa134-4067-62-64
Waverly
Street:
this
is
66
Waverly
on
Apostle
637,
when
existing
detached
to
family
dwelling
erect
a
new
detached
three
story:
two
family
dwelling
with
balconies
and
roof
access
and
on-grade
parking.
This
will
be
one
of
two
dwellings
located
on
the
same
lot.
The
violations,
article
51
section
9.
The
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9
front
yard,
is
insufficient
article
51
section
57
two
or
more
dwelling
on
the
same
lot.
B
This
is
for
62
64
way:
building
existing
two-family
dwelling
located
at
6264
to
share
a
lot
of
proposed
two
family
dwelling
located
at
66,
Waverly
and
Fort
Abbey
Road.
This
will
be
one
of
two
dwellings
located
in
the
same
lot.
The
violations,
article
51
section
57,
two
or
more
dwellings,
located
on
the
same
line
name
and
address
for
the
record.
X
Good
morning
Mr
Tim,
Johnson
architect,
599
East,
Broadway
South
Boston
I'll
wait
for
the
drawings
to
come
up.
X
Okay,
all
right,
this
existing
7
500
square
foot
corner
lot
is
in
the
3F
4000
zoning
sub-district.
The
lot
is
500
feet
shy
of
a
double
lot.
The
life
contains
an
existing
two
family
with
on-grade
parking
and
existing
trees
to
remain
we're
proposing
a
second
two
family
with
on
great
parking
and
additional
trees.
X
A
Okay,
I
did
a
drawing
show.
Are
there
any
further
details?
Elevations
renderings,
okay,
good
all
right,
so
this
yo
just
walk
us
through
the
drawings.
X
Yes,
this
is
the
architectural
site
plan.
You
see
the
proposed
footprint
in
the
Shaded
area
on
the
corner
of
Abby
and
Waverly
the
entrances
for
each
unit,
one
off
Abby,
one
off
Waverly
the
entrance
to
the
parking
areas
off
Abby.
As
I
explained
earlier,
you
can
see
the
existing
trees,
which
are
very
nice
and
healthy
and
we're
adding
some
additional
Boston
Parks
approved
trees.
X
X
This
is
a
view
from
Abbey
toward
Waverly,
showing
the
rear
of
the
proposed
to
family.
We
have
balconies
outside
space
for
each
unit.
The
roof
will
have
access
to
proposed
solar
panels
and
I
can
go
through
the
green
aspects
of
the
project.
If
you'd
like
next
slide,
please
foreign
level
showing
an
unfinished
space
next
slide.
Please.
X
X
This
shows
the
proposed
to
family
with
the
entrances
off
each
Road
next
slide,
please
second
floor.
The
master
suite
with
an
office
area
as
we
all
offices
are
very
coveted
in
these
days
next
slide.
Please
I'm,
sorry
that
was
the
two
bed
that
was
one
that
master
suites.
On
the
top
floor
with
the
balcony,
my
apologies,
the
balcave
depth,
was
increased
per
the
about
his
comments.
What.
A
X
X
Building
sections
showing
our
height
of
33
feet
to
the
roof
plate.
The
maximum
height
here
is
33
feet
next
35
feet
next
slide.
Please
sorry!
X
A
So
the
violations,
first
of
all,
what
are
the
unit
sizes.
X
These
are
two
bedroom
units
with
an
average
unit
size
of
1500
square
foot.
Mr
chairman.
A
Okay
and
the
violations
I
have
to
do
with
a
lot
area
and
two
or
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot.
X
A
X
If
we
could
scroll
down
scroll
up
to
the
site
plan
exist,
there's
existing
fencing.
There
is
a
chain
link
fence
between
the
Abbey
between
the
Waverly,
a
butter
property
and
then
a
stockade
fence
between
the
property
and
the
Abbey
Street.
Okay,.
A
O
Drawings
are
good,
no,
actually,
no
questions
very
straightforward.
I
think
it
fits
in
the
context
as
well.
So
you,
you
sort
of
address
most
of
my
other
questions.
I,
do
think
we
need
to
put
a
Proviso
on
if
we
approve
for
site
plan
review
and
just
make
sure
the
parking
is
buffered
and
screened
properly
and
some
other
things,
but
no
questions
on
the
proposal.
O
I
guess
we
actually
one
question,
so
you
do
have
full
stairs
to
the
roof
with
hatches,
which
is
kind
of
alludes
to
roof
decks,
were
they
there
before
and
then
removed?
Is
that
what
happened
or.
X
No,
these
these
these
would
be
bulkheads
with
roof
doors.
Okay,
so.
X
Correct
the
existing
two
family
are
rental
units,
okay,
rental
units.
So
my
client,
we
are
not
no
just
access
to
the
future
solar
panels,
which
is
part
of
the
green
aspects
of
the
project.
Great.
O
A
On
the
board,
is
anyone
here
to
testify
with
respect
to
the
project
good.
U
Morning,
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Frank
Mendoza
here
again
also
in
Brighton
liaison
to
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
to
bring
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board,
but
here
to
report
that,
as
far
as
Community
engagement
process
went,
the
applicant
received
the
letter
of
support
from
the
Austin
civic
association,
which
Lord
should
have
on
file
as
well
as
approval
from
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association,
with
the
Proviso
that
the
applicant
get
bpda
design
review
as
always
to
bring
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
Y
W
W
It
is
on
a
corner,
so
we'd
like
it
to
have
a
little
bit
more
architectural
and
not
just
being
you
know,
a
box
free
family
and
attention
to
Landscaping
on
the
corner,
especially
on
the
Abbey
Road
side,
to
make
sure
that
there
is
some
Greenery
there,
not
just
a
fact
about
little
space
between
the
house
and
the
sidewalk.
Thank
you.
Tony.
Z
Good
morning,
Mr
good
morning,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
boy
Tony
desidora,
representing
the
Austin
civic
association.
We
had
a
slight
majority
of
members
that
went
on
record
to
approve
this
project,
citing
the
need
for
housing
in
the
community.
Those
who
did
oppose
the
project
were
concerned
about
density.
The
fact
that
this
is
it
will
be
investor
owned
and
the
concerns
about
the
precedent
setting
of
putting
more
than
one
detached
dwelling
on
the
same
lot.
But
as
I
said,
a
slight
majority
of
members
did
a
vote
to
approve
this
project.
AA
Just
got
this
notification
on
Saturday
I
haven't
had
even
a
chance
to
look
at
the
plants
and
how
this
situates
my
property
I,
would
like
what
time
look
at
it
to
kind
of
would
come
up
with
a
decision.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
Mr
Johnson,
just
these
both
buildings
will
be
rentals.
Is
that
correct?
Oh,
that
is
correct.
Mr,
chairman,
okay,
there's
is
there
any?
Was
there
any
discussion,
I
I
know
in
the
neighborhood,
in
particular
the
issue
of
student
housing
versus
sort
of
more
long-term
family
housing.
Any
discussion
about
that.
X
No,
there
was
notice
of
Mr
chairman.
There
was
no
discussion
on
whether
student
housing
was
liked
or
disliked
in
the
neighborhood
I.
Don't
know
the
existing
rental
units
if
their
students
are
not,
but
they
are
rentals
and
my
client
has
taken
care
of
this
property
over
the
years.
Shoveling
the
sidewalk
Etc,
taking
good
care
of
the
property.
That's
what
I
do
now.
A
Okay,
all
right
well,
I
guess
it
would
have
come
up
as
at
either
the
community
organization.
So
all
right
can
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
O
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design,
review
for
site
plan
and
parking
and
buffering,
and
also
the
landscape
plan,
as
it
relates
to
the
connection
to
the
adjacent
parcel
and
property
and
the
corner.
Thank.
G
A
Lowe
yes,
or
to
him
in
favor
and
can
Mr
Johnson
can
someone
reach
out
to
that
about
her?
Who
is
just
learning
about
this
and
just
make
that
connection?
Please?
Yes,.
X
B
Right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
call
the
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three,
eight
one:
six:
nine
zero
290
Cornell
Street.
This
is
the
Dormer
and
Gamel
and
added
to
the
third
floor.
Walk-Up
bedroom
reconfigure,
the
bathroom
in
the
closet.
On
the
third
floor,
the
violations,
article
67
section,
9
side
yard-
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
9,
the
flood.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
67,
section
9,
the
building
has
excessive
story.
Article
6769
the
front
yard
insufficient
article
67,
69,
Ray
God,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Q
Q
The
the
client
is
also
on
here
as
well.
Andy
Rosen.
Q
I'll
walk
you
through
the
plans.
The
the
project
is
a
two
Dormers
on
the
North
and
and
south
of
that
existing
house
on
the
third
floor
to
give
more
living
space
to
the
project.
It
results
in
about
306,
more
square
feet
to
the
project,
we're
not
changing
the
footprint
and
otherwise
we're
being
cited
for
some
pre-existing
non-conformities
and
in
terms
of
front
yard,
rear
yard,
side
yard
and
a
floor
area.
A
Okay,
so
all
of
the
evening,
citations,
as
you
said,
are
pre-existing
conditions
right,
that's
rear,
front
side.
What
about
the
height?
Are
you
pushing
the
roof
up
or
is
it
we.
Q
Are
reframing
the
roof
to
give
code
code
head
height,
the
average
that
we're
bringing
the
peak
of
the
roof
to
34.3
the
average
grade
in
the
area
and
from
from
this
average
grade
of
the
property
line
at
Cornell
Street
to
the
the
highest
range?
Is
33
and
a
half
feet
or
33.6
feet.
Q
A
All
right
and
it's
additional
300
square
feet.
You
said
yeah
306.,
okay,
all
right.
How
are
the?
How
are
the
drawings,
Mr
Robinson.
O
Plans
are
good,
I
think
this
is
really
straightforward.
It
fits
within
the
context
there's
other
dormers
on
the
other
houses.
It's
still
below
the
zoning
height
really
see
no
issue
with
this,
and
this.
A
Right
any
questions
on
the
board
is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
on
behalf
or
an
opposition?
The
project.
G
G
A
A
O
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
no
design
review
necessary
I,
don't
think
so.
This
is
fairly
straightforward.
Okay,.
G
B
B
N
So
the
current
house
is
a
a
two-story
with
a
single
story:
l
in
the
back
with
a
detached
two-car
garage.
We
are
proposing
to
add
a
story
on
the
two-story
section:
A
Story
over
the
Second
Story
one
single
story
section
and
make
a
connector
to
make
an
attached
two-car
garage
in
last
week.
Above.
N
Still
a
single
family
house,
the
the
the
owners
are
originally
from
California.
The
the
in-law
suite
is
to
allow
for
Extended
Stay
by
families.
So
it's
not
for
rental,
it's
not
detached.
It's
not.
You
know,
I'm.
N
A
A
A
pretty
big
big
unit,
big
help,
big
home
yeah.
O
The
drawings
are
good,
no
question,
I
mean
I,
think
the
it
is
enlarging
the
house
quite
a
bit,
but
I
think
if
it
fits
within
the
context
still
in
terms
of
the
sizes
of
the
houses-
and
you
know
the
side
yard
issue
is
existing
on
sort
of
the
right
hand
side
and
on
the
left-hand
side
where
the
garage
is
going
and
the
new
Resident
above
is
on
a
small
sort
of
looks
like
a
really
an
access
Alleyway
of
some
sort
called
Dresden
Street.
O
So
I
actually
think
this
is
a
a
an
okay
Edition
and
expansion.
AB
A
Me,
okay,
thank
you.
Can
we
scroll
back
up
to
the
one
of
the
elevations
of
what
is
the
exterior
finish
on
the
mudroom
connectors,
we're.
A
Yeah
I'm
looking
at
that
that's
interesting
yeah.
What.
O
Yeah
they're
from
California
right,
yeah,
there's
something
a
little
different,
but
I
think
you
know
it'll
be
interesting
to
see
I
think
the
bpda
will
we'll
have
a
design
review
on
this,
but
I
think
I.
Think
a
contemporary
connection
can
be
interesting
between
the
two
traditional.
A
A
little
unusual,
it's
nice
all
right
any
questions
on
the
board.
A
Okay,
is
anyone
here
in
this
testify
for
against
the
project.
G
N
J
Ahead
calling
him
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time,
marisoft's
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
our
office
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
August
10th,
where
our
Butters
and
attendance
expressed
non-opposition
to
the
proposal
at
the
Jamaica
Plain
neighborhood
Council
wrote
a
letter
recommending
approval
for
the
proposal
at
this
time.
Thank
you,
foreign.
P
And
I'm
just
going
to
support
that
the
building
of
the
publishing
of
the
foreign
there
it
doesn't
seem
to
mean
that
came
in
the
Philippines
of,
what's
going
to
happen,
there
they're
just
trying
to
expand
this
baseball
additional
housing
for
family
members,
they're
not
looking
to
rent
the
space
and
they're,
not
even
looking
to
expand
the
state
beyond
the
current
capacity,
so
I
think
there's
a
reasonable
request
that
should
be
affirmed
by
the
by
the
industry
before.
Thank
you,
foreign.
P
O
I'll
make
a
motion
through
with
BPA
design,
review.
G
A
Lowe,
yes,
two
women
support
motion
passes.
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
one
three,
four,
four,
two,
eight
three
one
Rodney
Road:
it's
an
addition
of
living
space
and
change:
a
lock
from
a
single
family
to
a
two
family,
the
violations,
article
69
630.1,
the
building
alignment,
Conformity
article
69,
6
and
8
building
a
two
failing
and
a
one
F
9000
is
preventing
article
69
69
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
6969
the
building
had
success
of
its
stories.
Article
6969
usable
spaces,
insufficient
canonical
69
69,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
good.
Y
Morning,
Mr,
chairman
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Eileen
Rosa
from
Rosa
design
and
construction.
I
am
representing
the
owner
of
Mrs
Vanessa
prince,
who
is
the
owner
of
this
property.
She
has
lived
in
this
property
since
1966
for
about
56
years
and
owned
this
property
since
1987.
Y
it's
about
35
years,
the
existing
well.
Her
intention
is
to
provide
additional
living
space
to
one
of
her
family
members
that
are
living
with
her
in
this
moment
and
basically,
we
exist
in
lot.
Size
is
4882
square
feet
and
it
contains
a
existing
two
bathrooms
two
bathrooms
single
family
home
of
about
1
347
square
feet.
The
intention
is
to
make
a
13
feet
by
33
feet
addition
with
a
total
of
1
279
square
feet,
three
bedrooms
and
2.5
bathrooms
to
convert
this
property
into
a
two-family
dwelling.
Y
The
floor
area
rake
show
what's
allowed
in
the
air
is
0.3.
The
existing
is
0.3.
What
we
are
proposing
is
0.3,
so
we're
increasing
the
habitable
limited
space
from
three
1347
to
2626
total
square
feet.
The
building
height
is
excessive,
where
the
intention
here
is
to
blend
it
in
with
the
existing
building.
We're
proposing
three
stories
in
total,
as
it
currently
is,
and
the
open
usable
space
allowed
in
the
area.
It's
1800
square
feet.
The
existence
is
2781
and
what
we
are
proposing
is
1
390
square
feet.
Y
So
there's
a
difference
of
about
410
square
feet.
The
rear
yard
allowed
is
40
feet,
the
exists
and
it's
nine
feet
on
the
left
side
and
what
we're
proposing
with
the
new
addition
is
going
to
be,
is
25
feet,
I'm
open
to
any
questions.
Yeah.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
so
the
the
homeowner
will
continue
to
live
in
in
the
one
unit
and
we'll
ramp.
The
second
unit
is
that
the
plan.
Y
A
And
some
of
these
violations
appear
to
be
pre-existing
from
the
I
mean.
The
hype,
for
example,
is
simply
matching
the
the
existing.
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Okay?
Can
we
scroll
back
to
the
site
plan?
Please
I'm
a
little
yeah
right
there?
Where
is
the?
Where
is
the
curb
cut?
I
see
it
says
existing
driveway.
Y
Right,
it's
right
from
Stone
Hill
Road!
If
you
scroll
up
on
the
platform
right
above
Master,
if
you'll
be
able
to
see
it,
but
it's
right
on
on
Stone,
Hill
Road,
so
you'll
be
able
to
come
in
from
this
Road
Stone
Hill.
Y
A
Okay-
okay,
all
right!
So,
okay,
so.
A
B
O
It
looks
like
because
it
faced
the
front
door,
does
space
Stone,
Hill
Road,
and
that
is
where
the
curb
cut
is
even
though
seems
like
it
could
face
the
other
Road
as
well
so,
but
it
is
currently
facing
Stone
Hill,
with
a
very
large
Corner,
curb
cut
too,
not
all
the
way
around
the
corner,
but
right
at
a
crosswalk
corner,
so
I
think
I.
Guess
if
we're
talking
a
little
bit,
I
think
that
there's
maybe
this
should
be
looked
at
with
BTD.
Just
to
make
sure
you.
AB
O
A
Yeah,
okay!
Well,
you
know
you
spoke
exactly
my
concerns,
so
so
thank
you
anything
else
about
the
drawings
that
you
wanted
to.
O
Come
no
I
think
I
think
in
general,
like
proposed
addition,
I
I,
don't
really
have
an
issue
with
I
think
you
know,
the
existing
house
is
is
a
little
bit
mix
match
anyways
in
terms
of
it,
so
I
think
maybe
some
design
review
just
to
pull
the
whole
thing
together
and
make
sure
it
feels
as
a
consistent
hole.
I
think
would
be
good,
but
really
no
questions
on
the
proposal.
It's
pretty
straightforward
in
terms
of
the
square
footage
and
the
unit,
the
additional
units
of.
C
Good
morning
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
Danielle
Fonseca,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
there's
no
civic
association
in
this
area
of
coverage
in
Hyde
Park.
So
the
applicants
completed
the
community
process
and
they
notified
all
our
Butters
and
I
hosted
a
community
meeting
that
was
held
on
August
9th
we've
received
no
letters
of
opposition
or
support
for
this
proposal
and
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
Mr.
I
A
K
H
Chair
Mr,
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Paul
Sullivan,
you
see
cows
that
logical
Clarity.
The
council
just
like
to
throw
a
ranked
in
opposition,
I
I
believe
it
might
be
the
same
neighbor,
that's
opposed.
We
received
opposition
just
based
upon
the
beside
the
scope
of
the
addition
that
was
like.
Okay
thank.
A
I
Oh
Lucy,
okay,
yep
Cindy,
one
second.
I
O
I'll
make
a
motion
to
prove
I
think
with
the
bpda
design
review
of
the
parking
and
curb
cut
to
see
if
we
can
tighten
that
up.
I
also
think
some
design
review
of
the
addition
and
the
existing
house
to
ensure
that
is
kind
of
pulled
together
as
a
single
I
think,
especially
maybe
looking
at
the
entries,
the
new
entry
and
the
existing
second
two
family
entry
I
think
need
some
a
little
bit
of
work
to
make
sure
they
kind
of
work
together
as
well.
So
that.
A
Y
B
B
E
Hi,
how
are
you
I
just
spoke
with
with
the
applicant,
and
they
wish
to
defer
I
found
out
that
at
what
was
supposed
to
be
the
butters
meetings,
there
was
no
Butters
at
the
meeting.
They
never
came
before
the
council
and
there
wasn't
one
my
neighborhood
Council
and
nothing
was
requested.
B
Mr
chair,
actually,
it's
10
36
I'm,
going
to
call
the
10
30
hearings
for
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals.
So
this
is
10
30
only
for
any
deferrals,
oh
withdrawals.
You
can
give
me
the
address
first,
if
you're
going
to
defer.
AE
B
Two
companion
cases
just
so
you
know,
okay,
thank
you
very
much,
calling
at
10
30
hearing
case
for
deferral,
phboa.
B
AE
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago,
with
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street,
seeking
a
deferral
and
working
with
both
the
council
Braden's
office,
as
well
as
many
of
the
butters
we're
seeking
a
deferral
to
make
additional
changes
and
reduce
the
size
of
the
project.
A
B
Said
Mr
Dragon
just
so
you
know
we
have
I,
don't
know
how
long
it's
going
to
take
it
but
we're
into
2023..
We
do
have
two
Open
dates
for
December,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
longer
than
that.
I.
AE
I
think
if,
if
I
think
we
could
and
that's
fine
if
we
could
get
a
December
date,
that
would
work
all
right
all.
A
B
B
AD
AC
AC
A
B
Mr
Smalls,
you
have
the
last
date
of
2022,
we'll
give
you
a
12
13.
11,
30.
I
went
to
2023..
Okay.
Thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
withdrawals
to
the
10
30
cases.
B
V
K
V
Olene
Griffin
and
my
dad
John
Mitchell,
the
address
is
76
more
Street.
V
My
dad
owns
the
199
Fuller
Street
and
he
also
owns
the
76
morris
state,
but
he
we're
having
a
little
bit
of
problem
with
parking
over
here.
So
he
decided
to
do
some
off
street
parking
the
plan.
So
he
wanted
to
use
the
99
the
Polish
Street
side
as
parking
for
the
tenants
here
at
76
and
his
chance
pretty
much.
P
Probably,
since
78
and
it's
every
year,
it
looks
like
it's
getting
worse
and
worse
for
a
pocket.
A
Okay,
so
what's
what's
on
the?
What
is
the
the
plot
used
for
now?
A
There's
nothing
on
it,
there's
nothing
on
it,
but
there's
no
Paving
and
what
is
it
grass
or
dirt?
What
what
is
it?
It's
paining?
Yes,
what
do
you
think,
but
it's
not
used
for
parking
now.
No
okay!
So
there's
no
curb
cut
so
you're,
proposing
a
curb,
cut
right,
correct,
okay
and
I
can't
quite
tell
Sandra
how
wide
is
the
curb
cut,
10.
A
Okay
and
whatever,
and
what
will
the
rest
so
I
see
you've
got
you
got
one
two
three
four
five
spaces
proposed.
What's
the
rest
of
this
is
the
entire
lot
babe.
No
most.
V
Of
it's
The
Wider
part
is
grass.
A
Okay,
so
the
idea
would
be
that
you
would
come
in
the
curb
cut
and
go
to
the
this
existing
paved
area
and
then
turn
to
the
left
and
park
have
five
parking
spaces
and
the
upper
left
hand.
Corner
of
the
lot
would
continue
to
be
grass
correct,
okay,
all
right
all
right,
Mr
Robinson.
Any
thoughts
on
these
plans.
Y
O
Of
the
building,
which
is
an
existing,
looks
like
an
existing,
curb
cut
and
drive
lane
I
guess
past
the
three
family
or
whatever
number
of
units
is
so
okay,
I
think
the
only
only
thing
we
should
probably
do
is
is
see.
If
we
can,
we
need
a
screen
and
buffer,
obviously
parking,
so
that
will
be
a
requirement
and
provide
sort
of
that
aspect
of
it.
So
I
think
there's
no.
A
Okay,
so
YouTube
for
the
Griffins
you're
aware
that
that
you
know
that
means
the
Landscaping
bushes
should
freeze
whatever
some
some
form
of
making
the
the
lot
not
look
just
like
an
empty
paper:
okay,
okay,
all
right,
very.
B
Good
yeah
I,
don't
think
Mr
D'amico
is
on,
but
he
did
comment
on
this
one.
He
says:
199
pull
the
street
is
fine.
Okay,
good.
A
All
right
any
other
questions
on
the
board,
one
want
to
testify
or
against
the
proposal.
AF
Mr
chair
members
of
the
board,
Eric
James
of
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
for
199
Fuller
Street,
had
an
abutters
meeting
on
August
24
2022,
and
they
also
met
with
the
Dorchester
unified,
neighborhood
association,
which
ultimately
decided
to
oppose
this
project.
AF
They
decided
opposition
in
regards
to
current
lack
of
on-street
parking
spaces
and
the
impositions
and
difficulties
it
will
place
on
polish
Street
residents.
In
total,
we
haven't
received
any
letters
of
support
for
this
or
any
letters
of
opposition
besides
that
one
for
this
property.
So
at
this
time
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
depress
the
Judgment
of
the
board
on
this
matter.
Thank
you.
A
Concern
about
it,
it
reducing
parking.
AF
AF
I
D
Yes,
are
you
able
to
hear
me
now,
yes,
hi
sorry,
my
name
is
Celia
Cuevas
I
live
at
1382,
River,
Street
and
I
wanted
to
testify
that
I'm
the
support
of
the
project.
This
being
because
I
live
about
a
block
away.
O
O
O
Yes,
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
bpna
design,
review
for
screening,
screening
and
buffering
of
the
off
street
parking
area.
Second,
Mr.
A
G
A
B
Holding
the
next
case,
calling
boa
120-8535-265
to
265c
Mino
Street
Mr
Ricky,
new
four-story
with
private
roof,
decks
five
unit,
townhouse
residential
building
with
Osprey
parking,
the
violation,
article
65
section
8.,
some
house
used
forbidden
article
65
69.
The
48
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
69
the
building
has
accessible
stories.
Article
65
69
the
bill
had
excessive
B
article
65
69,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
65
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
from
the
record.
Please.
T
Morning,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Attorney
John,
pogini
10-4,
Corona
Braintree
with
me
this
morning,
is
James
Christopher
on
the
architectural
team,
together
with
Martin
Kerr
and
John
Doherty,
who
are
the
owners
and
developers
of
this
proposal?
So
excuse
me
265,
minus
Street
in
Dorchester.
The
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
two
f-6000.
This
lot
size
is
7478
square
feet,
the
closest
to
build
a
new
three-story
residential
building
with
five
condominium
units
and
six
parking
spaces
totally
contained
in
the
building.
T
The
internal
packing
excess
on
the
left
side
of
the
building
to
a
shared
driving
with
269
271
Minot
Street.
The
violation
is
multi-family
and
2s.
Zone
Fai
is
a
0.4
is
allowed
where
0.86
Building
height
is
35
feet.
We
are
at
39
feet.
Building
stories
is
two
and
a
half
we're
at
three
front
yard
is
15.
T
We
were
at
10
side
yard
is
10
we're
at
four
six
on
the
right
and
one
zero
110
on
the
left,
and
that
is
the
area
that
focuses
with
the
share
driveway
other
than
that
we
comply
with
all
dimensional
requirements,
including
parking
in
open
space.
The
building
program
I'll
just
go
through
that
quickly.
Unit
1
is
1238
square
feet.
It
is
two
bedrooms
unit.
Two
is
1210
square
feet.
That
is
also
two
bedrooms
unit.
T
3
is
841
square
feet,
two
beds
unit,
4
841
square
feet,
two
beds
and
unit
five
and
it's
12
48
square
foot.
That
is
four
beds
unit.
One
and
four
are
five
level
units
and
unit.
Five
is
a
flat
unit.
S
three
four
and
five
shall
have
small
roof
decks,
which
is
step
back
and
are
specific
to
those
units
access
to
a
hatch,
and
in
closing
we
went
to
a
lengthy
Community
process
and
based
upon
that,
we
had
reduced
the
type
we
were
originally
at
townhouses.
The
neighborhood
didn't
want
that.
T
A
T
A
T
A
Okay,
yeah,
okay
and
and
and
tell
us
about
the
parking
again.
T
O
I
think
the
drawings
are
fine,
you
know
I
do
it
does
feel
tight.
I'll
be
honest.
It's
tight
I
mean
it
is
tight
on
the
shared
side,
but
the
lot
is
obviously
irregularly
shaped.
So
you
know
I
think
it's
tight
again
on
257
side,
which
is
the
right
hand
side
but
I.
You
know
it
feels
a
little
tight
I'll
be
honest,
but
I'm,
not
sure.
O
If
there's
much
we
can
do
and
due
to
the
shape
of
the
lot
I
mean
I
think
it
seems
like
they're
trying
to
step
the
building
as
it
moves
back
to
sort
of
keep
some
sort
of
relief
on
the
right
hand,
side
I'm
not
as
worried
about
the
left
hand
with
the
drive
the
share
Drive,
which
will
remain
then.
So
you
know
I
think
it's
it's
a
little
tight,
but
other
than
that
I
think
the
program's
fine
and.
O
You
know
the
the
houses
seem
a
little
bit
like
all
over
the
place,
one,
the
one
next
to
its
turned
against
the
street,
so
it
is
a
little
bit
pulled
forward
as
well
in
terms
of
the
Aesthetics
I.
Think
that
you
know
it
sort
of
matches
some
of
the
stuff
around,
but
it's
all
kind
of
a
mismatch
anyways,
but
so
I'm
not
sure
if
I
have
a
strong
opinion
either
way.
I
do
have
one
question
on
the
roof:
deck
access,
you're
showing
spiral
stairs.
O
AB
X
AB
And
Mr
Robinson
we
certainly
have
room
to
recite
the
building
to
the
rear
in
an
earlier
iteration.
We
had
it
move
forward
and
we
have
plenty
of
room
with
the
retaining
walls.
The
rate
does
increase
dramatically
at
the
rear.