►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 3-9-21
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 3-9-21
B
C
A
Good
morning,
the
city
of
boston,
zoning
board
of
appealing
appeal
hearing
for
march
9th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
the
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
public
health
crisis.
A
A
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application,
via
the
webex
platform.
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
virtually
raised.
A
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connecting
to
the
hearing
by
telephone.
Please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand.
Once
again,
let
me
repeat
that
for
people
who
are
on
the
phone,
please
press
star
3,
to
raise
your
hand
when,
when
their
case
is
called,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
A
A
Good
morning
I'm
miss
better.
I
see
I've
seen
you
here,
mr
mr
divorce.
Good
morning,
madam
chair
good
morning,
bpda
jeff
hampton
are
you
on.
A
Morning,
miss
fortune
go
ahead.
B
Thank
you
man,
good
morning
to
everyone
for
business.
The
extensions
calling
the
first
case
calling
voa
77
38586
evelyn
street
madam
chair.
This
did
expire
on
february,
2nd
2021.
It
would
be
their
second
if
we
do
do
another
extension,
but
they
are
good
because
under
the
governor
baker's
orders
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
paul:
ruffo,
I'm
an
attorney
in
boston
with
smith,
doug
and
buell,
and
ruffo
101
art
street
in
boston,
and
this
is
an
epic
application
for
an
extension
of
the
science
we
have
recently
before
the
aberdeen
historic
commission
within
the
last
month,
and
they
have
granted
us
an
extension.
F
We
have
a
a
minor
project
or
shouldn't
say
mine.
We
have
a
modification
notice
of
project
change
pending
before
isd
tom
white.
Is
the
plan
examiner
and
we're
working
with
him
to
you
know
getting
a
refusal
letter
or
whatever
needs
to
be
done.
The
project
obviously
has
been
delayed
by
not
obviously
but
it's
been
delayed
by
covid
and
and
various
other.
You
know
factors
related
to
that,
but
very
much
wants
to
go
forward
so.
F
So
it's
it's
keeping
the
same
building
envelope
in
the
but
making
the
units
which
are
right
now.
It's
approved
for
20
for
16
units
and
adding
10
units
by
subdividing
the
units
in
the
historic
building
from
three
to
six
and
making
the
the
larger
you
know
units
in
the
in
the
addition
adding
seven
there
so
an
addition
of
10
10
units
that
will
likely
for
this
board
because
it
will
likely
trip
a
you
know:
zoning
relief
because
of
the
lot
size
etc.
F
So
that
those
are
the
that's
the
request
that
is
presently
pending
before
the
isd
plan.
Examiner
tom
white.
G
Motion
to
extend
for
a
year
from
termination
day
exactly.
A
All
those
in
favor
aye
aye
any
opposed,
and
this
is
just
a
note
that
we
do
want
to
see
this.
This
increase
in
density
on
this
project.
A
B
H
Man,
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
george
morancy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
kobit
related
extension
request.
My
client
has
been
financially
impacted
by
the
pandemic.
She's
been
unable
to
get
the
the
project
started.
As
for
the
erection
of
a
new
two-family
dwelling
on
a
vacant
lot
in
south
boston,
she
is
requesting
an
extension
in
order
to
allow
her
to
obtain
her
permit
and
complete
the
complete
the
building.
A
Thank
you,
mr
morenzie.
I
would
you
have
enough
a
number
of
cases
coming
up
if
these
are
the
requests
for
first
extensions,
we
completely
understand
that.
So
may
I
have
a
motion
on
this
one
motion.
B
H
H
B
I
For
the
record,
please
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lucas,
the
castle
75
arlington
street
in
boston
attorney
for
the
applicant.
This
project
will
involve
relocation
of
the
existing
business
at
this
building
at
120
west
4th
street
in
dresano
studios,
which
is
a
video
and
production
photography,
studio
and
due
to
the
pandemic.
I
In
the
past
year,
those
plans
have
been
put
on
hold,
but
the
applicant
wants
the
board
to
know
that
he
has
substantially
advanced
full
sets
of
construction
drawings
with
his
architects
embark
studio
and
has
fully
advanced
his
construction
financing
and
is
presently
just
looking
to
relocate
the
business
so
that
he
can
get
the
project
started
this
year.
A
G
Motion
to
extend
for
you're
beyond
termination,
yep.
B
Following
your
next
week,
cases
calling
voa
904-0529
webster
avenue.
There
are
two
companion
cases:
voa
904
046,
11,
11,
webster
avenue
and
ksboa
9040
11
to
15
webster
avenue.
Madam
chair.
These
are
all
due
to
expire
on
march
21st
2021.
If
we
granted
them
to
be
their
first
extension
name
and
address
for
the
records.
B
B
Calling
case
boa
661026
236
to
256
dorchester
street
valencia-
that's
expired
on
march,
2nd
2021.
If
we
grant
this
to
this
applicant
it'd
be
their
second
extension
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
Good
morning,
man,
I'm
sharing
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
george
mourins,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
west
broadway
in
south
boston
and
share
members.
This
is
a
32
unit
project
that
was
approved
by
the
board
approximately
three
years
ago.
At
that
time,
construction
had
commenced
for
a
major
rehabilitation
of
the
boston
housing
authority.
Development
that
surrounds
the
project
on
two
sides
that
construction
ongoing
construction
has
made
it
impractical
to
begin
this
project.
H
A
Mr
morenzie,
just
for
the
record
is
this
dorchester
iowa
dorchester
street.
G
Motion
to
extend
for
a
year
beyond
expiration,
exactly
good
job.
B
B
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
here
this
morning,
seeking
a
deferral
for
254
paris
street.
Now
we
have
many
minor
changes
to
the
plans
based
on
some
late
up
butter
feedback,
and
we
need
to
resubmit
those
plans
to
inspectional
services
to
have
them
re-review.
K
The
record
I'm
going
to
recuse
myself
on
this
vote.
A
Okay,
I'm
just
so
I'm
I'm
hoping
that
that's
in
the
record.
Thank
you.
B
B
What
was
the
address?
I'm
sorry.
I
I
75
arlington
street
in
boston.
We
are
seeking
deferral,
as
this
matter
submitted
revised
plans.
Following
the
community
review
process,
a
revised
refusal
letter
has
been
issued
and
the
board
the
secretary
has
advised
that
we
need
to
seek
a
deferral
so
that
the
matter
can
be
re-advertised
with
the
correct,
revised
citations.
C
Madam
chair
35,
gentlemen,
is
also
different.
Pamela
is
on
pamela,
go
ahead.
N
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
I
am
requesting
a
deferral
because
we
got
some
neighborhood
feedback
based
on
my
project
and
I
just
like
to
make
those
changes
resubmit
to
isd
and
be
able
to
represent
to
to
the
neighborhood
and
and
come
back
to
you
with
something
solid.
So
thank.
A
B
H
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
morancy,
an
attorney
with
the
business
artist
at
350,
west,
broadway
and
south
boston.
This
too
was
a
case
where
a
change
in
the
project
from
five
units
to
four
units
has
resulted
in
the
fact
that
inspirational
services
department
has
to
re-examine
the
plans
before
they
may
be
presented
here
for
the
board,
but
therefore
had
to
request
this
deferral.
B
B
L
Yes,
we're
requesting
a
deferral
because
we've
been
working
with
the
city,
point
neighborhood
association
and
have
amended
the
proposal
in
response
to
their
feedback.
We've
submitted
those
plans
to
isd
and
the
plans.
Examiners
reviewed
those,
but
we're
just
asking
for
the
deferral
to
allow
the
association
the
opportunity
to
vote
on
the
amendment
as
an
association.
L
It
is
the
the
size
of
the
unit
remains
the
same.
Yes,
they
the
property
owners
scaled
back,
the
deck
and
removed
the
roof
deck.
On
the
third
floor.
B
B
P
Timothy,
shannon
I'm
the
architect
at
9
wall
street
in
charlestown,
we've
reduced
the
scale
of
the
project
and
just
through
the
wood
process,
I've
got
to
revise
this
letter,
but
they
have
to
re-advertise,
because
it's
too
close
to
this
hearing.
B
L
Sorry,
madam
chair,
I
I
stepped
away
from
my
desk,
but
I
I
heard
you
I
apologize
alex
moving
forward
on
the
deferral
for
eaton
street.
I
believe
we're
going
to
be
seeking
a
vote
today.
L
R
B
This
is
to
confirm
archery
as
a
single
family,
residential
change
largely
to
a
fourth
family
residential
dwelling,
also
to
erect
a
fourth
story
edition
and
rare
editions
in
renovation
the
violations
article
2017.
This
is
in
the
east
boston
ipod,
article
53,
section
8
uses
for
article
53,
section
9
insufficient
of
this
additional
lot
area.
Article
53
section
9
excessive
far
article
53,
section,
9,
the
maximum
allowed
height
is
exceeded.
R
A
T
Address
11
beacon
street
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
We
also
have
adam
glassman
the
architect
on
the
project.
I
just
want
to
clarify,
so
the
description
is
not
accurate,
it's
been
changed,
so
the
new
proposal
and
the
plans
that
miss
better
have
reflect.
This
is
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
one
family
to
a
three
family
dwelling.
T
Removal
of
the
fourth
story
and
fourth
unit
was
taken
off.
We
also
the
proposal
includes
direct,
a
two-story
rare
edition
and
completely
renovate
the
building.
A
How
does
this
change
your
violations.
T
T
Our
rear
yard
violation
was
removed,
as
well
as
our
open
space
violate
the
violations
that
do
still
exist.
Additional
law
area
we've
got
500,
a
thousand
would
be
required
far
we're
at
1.41
and
1.0
is
allowed
and
then
our
side
yard.
Since
we
are
keeping
the
building.
This
is
not
to
be
raised.
T
It's
a
pre-existing
violation
at
one
foot,
three
one
and
two
and
a
half
feet
would
be
required
and
then
parking
because
we're
pooping
the
car
we're
keeping
the
building
we're
not
able
to
create
any
parking
and
two
spaces
would
be
required.
It
also
falls
in
the
ipod
district
as
well.
A
Okay,
so
how
would
the
plans
miss
better.
G
So,
mr
mr
drago,
the
height,
is
not.
I
was
looking
at
the
google
map
and
almost
all
the
buildings
that
seem
to
be
roughly
the
same
height
and
is
now
consistent
with
the
other
buildings
in
the
neighborhoods.
T
Correct
so
all
we
did
was
square
off
the
top
floor
with
the
mansard
to
pull
up
the
front,
rendering
so
there's
about
two
feet,
but
it'll
be
square
with
the
buildings
on
that
side
of
the
street,
mr
ehrlich,
but
everything
to
the
right
and
across
is
a
little
bit
higher,
but
we're
in
line
with
most
of
them.
T
That's
what
our
new
proposal
would
look
like,
so
right
now
sort
of
a
pitch
in
working
with
the
community.
They
wanted
a
man's
side
so.
U
A
On
hold
on
just
hold
on
for
a
little
while,
okay,
miss
better.
Can
you
tell
us
about
the
the
bedroom
count
and
the
square
footage
of
ichi.
V
T
Thank
you
ma'am
chair,
so
the
first
unit
is
a
duplex
unit.
It
would
go
into
the
basement
level
that
would
have
an
office
a
half
bath,
two
main
egress
one
through
the
front
door
and
down
the
stairs
out
the
side
of
the
building,
seven
foot
six
inch
ceiling
and
all
of
the
mechanicals
are
in
the
units
as
we
go
up
to
the
first
floor.
T
The
total
square
footage
of
that
unit
with
the
basement
would
be
sixteen
hundred
and
thirty
square
feet,
and
that
would
be
a
two
bed
one
and
a
half
bath
as
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
the
990
square
foot
three
bed
two
bath
and
then
on
the
third
floor,
970
square
foot,
three
bed,
two
baths.
W
Good
morning,
members
of
the
board
ricardo
patron
from
the
office
of
city
council,
lydia
edwards.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support.
X
Z
Thank
you.
Thank
you
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
a
little
late,
but
karen
foley
from
council
wasabi
george's
office
would
like
to
work
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
Yep
pierre
new,
are
you
looking
to
speak
on
this
project?
You've
been
unmuted.
X
Yes,
good
morning,
I'm
in
support
of
this
project.
AB
A
All
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries.
B
Well,
in
the
next
case,
calling
voa
108-5219-40
kelsey
street,
this
has
changed
archives
from
an
existing
three-family
dwelling
to
a
six-family
residential
dwelling
and
also
erected
four-story
edition
the
violations
of
article
2017-5.
This
is
in
the
east
boston
ipod,
article
53,
section
56,
off-street
parking
is
insufficient.
None
is
provided
article
53,
section
8
mfr
in
the
forbidden
use
in
the
3f2000
sub-district
article
53,
section
9,
the
additional
odd
earrings
insufficient
radical
53
section
9,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
bill
in
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
T
T
As
was
mentioned,
the
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy
of
an
existing
three-family
residential
building
to
six
residential
condominium
units
to
erect
a
recessed
fourth-story
edition
and
to
completely
renovate
the
building.
T
The
particular
zoning
sub-district
is
a
3f
2000.
Our
breakdown
of
units.
Right
now
there
is
a
building,
was
in
structural
disrepair,
there's
basically
open
floor
plan.
The
building
is
completely
taken.
The
building.
What
we're
proposing
on
the
first
floor
is
two
studio
units
with
one
baths
at
450
square
feet,
510
square
feet.
The
second
floor
would
house
units
three
and
four
both
studio
units
with
one
bath
at
515
and
570
square
feet
respectively.
T
T
Passing
on
the
building
as
well,
the
building
will
remain
so
we
have
a
structurally
client
we'll
store
it
up
and
can
build
within
the
contours
of
the
existing
structure.
The
violations
that
were
mentioned-
I
can
go
over
those.
It
isn't.
A
three
f
district,
we're
proposing
mfr
with
six
units,
additional
body
area
of
a
thousand
square
feet
would
be
required.
T
Our
far
is
3.70,
that's
a
pre-existing
violation,
we're
somewhere
in
the
twos
right
now.
The
height
of
the
building
proposed
is
four
stories
at
42
feet
and
what's
allowed
is
three
stories
at
35
we
aren't
able
to
create
any
additional
open
space.
We
are
keeping
the
building.
Well,
our
rear
yard
is
point
two.
The
building
remains,
that's
pre-existing
and
our
parking
violation
is
pre-existing
as
well.
A
So,
mr
counselor,
can
you
tell
us
how
this
works?
Contextually?
Is
this
essentially
three-story
district.
T
It's
mixed,
so
if
we
pull
up
the
site
pictures
there's
a
number
of
fours
and
threes
in
the
area,
I
don't
know
if
madame
ambassador
would
could
pull
up.
I
think
we
included
some
sight
pictures
two
skype
pictures.
U
A
Okay,
how
will
the
plans
miss
better?
The
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this.
AD
Proposal
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
unfamiliar
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
subsidies,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
receives
support
from
the
mavericks
neighborhood
association
and
we
also
receive
19
years
of
support
from
residents
of
chelsea
street.
Thank
you.
B
B
Article
15,
section,
8,
art
gallery,
uses
forbidden
article
53,
section
8,
local
retail
uses
forbidden
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden,
article
53,
section
9.
The
additional
word
area
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
I
in
the
florida
ratio
is
successful.
Article
53
section:
I
am
the
bill.
That
is
excessive
stories.
Article
53
section
9,
the
buildup
is
excessive
and
feat:
article
53
section
9
the
use
of
open
spaces,
insufficient
53,
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
53
section
9.
AF
R
AF
We're
here
before
you
this
morning
on
282
308,
bremen
street,
a
proposed
139
unit,
four
and
five-story
residential
building
with
community
retail
and
affordable
artist
units
and
workspace
located
at
the
corner
of
freeman
and
brooks
streets
in
east
boston.
Roadie,
architects
is
the
project
architect.
The
project
has
been
reduced
in
size
since
our
last
appearance
before
this
board
and
has
been
modified
to
add
three.
So
excuse
me,
five
three
bedroom
family
units,
all
of
which
will
be
idp
income,
restricted
units.
A
Hold
on
hold
on
so
this
is
combining,
let's
see,
four
lots.
Three
lots
into
one
lot.
So
what's
the
total
lot
area,
then.
AG
A
Okay,
so
so
this
is
34
160
square
feet,
breakdown
of
the
residential
units,
square
footage,
numbers
of
studios,
ones,
twos
and
threes.
AF
Thanks
ma'am
ruthie
coolman
from
roadie
architects
is
here
to
respond
to
that.
AH
A
No,
I
I
noticed
that
so
to
please
counselor
go
through
the
violations
what's
required
and
what
are
you
proposing.
AG
Yes,
ma'am,
thank
you.
So
this
is
a
3f2000
zone
as
indicated
sort
of
at
the
it's
an
edge
condition.
AG
As
we
mentioned
an
oversized
lot
of
34
160
square
feet
which
runs
between
brooks
and
at
the
intersection
of
brooks
and
bremen.
Existing
non-conforming
uses
and
structures
between
his
auto
body
was
the
long
time
occupant,
and
so
the
relief
that's
required
are
the
uses.
The
multi-family
use
medium
chair,
the
artist
live,
work,
use
artist
gallery
and
the
local
community,
retail
on
the
ground
floor
front
and
rear
yard,
which
varies
a
little
bit.
AG
The
front
yard
requirement
is
five
and
we
are
between
two
and
two
feet
and
upwards
to
ten
feet
in
excess
of
what's
required,
which
you'll
see
on
the
plan.
So
it's
not
just
a
straight
line
of
a
building
front.
The
rear
is
ten
feet
and
the
requirement
is
thirty
and
the
building
has
been
set
back
towards
the
rear
as
well.
The
farmer
is
3.2
and
a
requirement
of
one.
The
height
is
65
feet
at.
AG
Yep-
and
I
would
also
note,
madam
we're
in
a
fema
flood
zone
which
relates
to
the
height
there's
no
full
basement
here
in
this
building.
As
a
result,
the
open
space
we're
providing
12
000
square
feet,
which
is
86
per
unit.
A
lot
of
it
is
usable
new
public
realm.
If
you
will,
the
requirement
is
300
per
square
feet
and
the
lot
area
in
a
3f
would
require
one
per
unit.
A
AG
So
you
know
that
would
be
a
series
of
subdivisions.
Obviously
you
know
we
would
have
to
figure
out
whether
we
had
the
appropriate
access
and
frontage
to
park
it
right.
This
has
never
been
a
2f3f2000
condition
and
it's
obviously
a
very
long
site.
But
if
you,
if
you
look
at
that,
you
know
you
would
be
able
to
accommodate.
Essentially
you
know
at
34.
AG
You
know
16,
three
families.
A
Can
everybody
please
mute?
Yes,
can
you
tell
us
how
parking
and
circulation
is
going
to
be
working
on
the
site.
AH
Yes,
I
would
be
happy
to
madam
ambassador
if
you
could
go
to
slide
number
nine
perfect,
so
the
site
is
arranged
to
have
a
pedestrian
focus
along
freeman
and
brook
street,
taking
what
is
currently
185
feet
of
curb
cuts
and
reducing
to
32.
AH
In
addition
to
the
parking
in
the
garage,
we
are
also
including
two
electric
vehicle
car
shares,
dedicated
for
resident
usage
and
then
on
street.
As
part
of
the
closed,
curb
cuts,
we're
providing
a
off
street,
it's
going
to
be
an
off
street
drop
off
for
both
ride,
share
and
smaller
deliveries
directly
in
front
of
the
residential
entry.
A
Okay,
and
given
that
this
is
in
a
fema
flood
zone,
is
that
where
the
artist's
workshop
space
and
the
commercial
space
is
going,
then.
AH
So,
due
to
the
flood
zone,
all
residential
units
have
been
raised
up
to
the
second
floor.
All
occupied
spaces
on
the
first
floor
have
been
raised
up
as
well,
madam
ambassador,
if
you
can
go
to
slide
number
six,
which
I
believe
is
three
slides
before
this,
you
can
see
some
of
the
sidewalk
improvements
that
include
connections
both
stairs
and
accessible
connections
from
the
sidewalk
up
to
all
of
these
occupied
spaces
on
level.
One.
A
And
a
couple
more
questions:
are
there
roof
decks
proposed
on
this.
AH
Project
so
the
building
steps
between
four
and
five
stories
along
greenman
street,
and
we
are
utilizing
some
of
those
steps
to
create
resident
terraces
connected
directly
to
amenity
spaces.
If
you
go
to
slide
number
10,
we
have
some
imagery
of
that
breaking
it
down
into
the
smaller
scale
spaces
to
be
part
of
the
extensions
of
the
dwelling
units.
AI
A
No
okay,
okay,
okay
and
tell
us
about
the
artist's
live
workspace.
I
we
had
approved
a
project
two
projects
actually
on
terrace
street
in
mission
hill
for
artists
live
workspace,
and
I
noticed
that
the
advertisement
for
that
space
said
artists
preferred
it
doesn't
feel
like
it's
dedicated
to
artists.
So
how
is
this
going
to
be
dedicated
to
artists.
AF
Madam
chair,
it's
peter
spellios.
We
worked
with
the
mayor's
office
of
arts
and
culture.
These
will
be
designated
for
artist
space.
The
artist
units
are
located,
residential
units
are
located
directly
above
the
studio
space
and
we'll
have
direct
connectivity
to
the
studio
space.
AF
Had
conversations
with
the
mayor's
office
of
arts
and
culture
and
because
we
are
incorporating
the
studio
space
together
with
the
units,
the
preference
that
was
received
through
that
conversation
was
doing
studio
units,
but
certainly
we've
added
three.
Essentially
five,
three
bedroom
idp
units-
and
we
would
have
no
objection
to
including
those
in
the
art
of
mix
as
well.
AH
A
And
will
the
the
the
studio
space
allow.
R
A
AH
The
intention
in
the
design
is
that
each
artist
has
a
dedicated
workspace
that
they
can
customize
within
the
artist
studio,
but
in
addition,
we're
providing
what
we're
calling
the
dirty
work
area,
which
will
be
more
ventilated
and
able
to
be
used
for
activities
that
wouldn't
be
appropriate
to
do
in
an
open
space
adjacent
to
other
artists.
So.
A
Excellent:
okay:
how
are
the
plans
miss
better.
V
Yeah
yeah,
I
have
a
question.
I
get
a
joke,
so
you
mentioned
a
pickup
drop-off
in
front
of
the
residential.
Where
is
that.
AH
Thank
you.
So
if
you
see
at
the
plan
in
the
bottom,
the
main
residential
lobby
is
called
out
in
kind
of
a
red
color
and
the
off
stream
drop
off
would
be
directly
in
front
of
that.
V
AH
V
AJ
AK
B
Madam
chair
matter
of
fact,
secretary
and
bob
domingo
wanted
to
speak
on
this
one,
so
I'm
going
to
read
it
into
the
record
in
regards
to
282
308
bremen
street.
Since
there
will
be
several
curb
cuts
closed
in
front
of
the
building
on
greenman
street,
it
will
actually
be
actually
a
parking
benefit
in
the
final
number
of
spaces
upon
the
completion
of
the
project.
B
B
G
Thank
you.
I
I'm
sure
I
have
a
couple
questions
one
of
the
slides
show
and
have
the
reference
to
enhanced
public
activity.
I
I
believe
that
was
a
phrase.
It's
not
the
gallery
for
the
studio.
It
seems
like
there's
a
number
of
common
spaces.
What
what
are
they
and
what's
their
function?.
AH
Sure
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
that,
so
the
way
that
the
building
is
set
up,
we
have
the
community
commercial
space
at
the
corner,
which
is
being
filed
for
local
retail,
local
brochure
or
daycare.
We
have
the
main
residential
lobby
adjacent
to
it,
which
has
an
amenity
lounge
within
it
at
the
window.
This
is
directly
connected
to
the
artist's
workspace,
which
is
then
connected
to
the
second
residential
lobby.
AH
So
the
intention
is
that
the
residential
lobbies
could
be
used
as
part
of
a
gallery
space
that
lounge
area
as
part
of
a
gallery
space
to
complement
the
artist
studios
as
needed,
depending
on
the
different
needs
of
the
program.
G
Okay
and
and
I
see,
there's
20
of
the
of
all
the
units
dedicated
to
yes.
AL
G
Okay,
that's
nice
and
and
sort
of
following
up
the
chairman's
question.
Is
there
a
restriction
in
the
contracts
and
subcontracts
that
would,
over
time
consistently
ensure
that
they
they
remain
artist
units
or
how?
How
is
that
being
handled.
AF
Just
to
further
clarify
that
it's
20
of
the
projects
affordable
at
60
percent
of
ami
so
actually
below
the
city
required
70
of
ami.
The
restrictions
as
to
artists
will
be
contained
in
our
affordable
housing.
Agreements
with
the
city
of
boston
so
therefore,
will
be
bindings.
A
So
counselor
this
is
a
six
unit
decrease
from
the
previous
proposal.
How
did
how
did
this?
How
is
this
different
from
the
last
one.
AF
Sure
happy
too,
madam
cherry,
the
some
significant
public
realm
improvements,
we've
incorporated
and
changed
the
floor
plans
to
accommodate
five
three-bedroom
family
units
within
the
building,
which
resulted
in
the
removal
of
numerous
smaller
units
to
accommodate
the
new
family
size
units.
A
Okay,
but
but
the
basic
framework
has
stayed
the
same.
It's
just
the
movement
of
the
of
the
space
inside
that
has
changed.
AG
The
programming
programming
of
the
affordability,
which
we're
still
part
of
the
article
80
process
right
and
the
fact
that
the
city
had
adopted
the
affirmatively
fair
housing
ordinance,
which
we
are
working
as
part
of
so
through
the
article
80
process.
We
enhanced
the
housing
program
with
greater
affordability,
for
you
know
a
less
lower
income
level,
and
then
we
took
to
heart
your
input,
madam
chair,
with
respect
to
the
need
for
family
sized
housing,
which
we
also
heard
from
the
community,
especially
making
them
all
affordable.
A
Okay,
any
of
these
he's.
U
From
the
board
I
met,
I'm
sure
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
in
terms
of
your
court,
your
double
loaded
corridor.
What's
the
length
of
the
run.
AH
So
the
site
itself
is
427
feet.
Long.
The
length
of
the
run
is
probably
around
375..
We
thought
of
it
as
breaking
it
up
into
thirds
with
the
main
elevator
entering
one
third
of
the
way
down
freeman
street,
with
two
access,
elevators
and
then
a
second
elevator
and
entry
kind
of
two-thirds
of
the
way
down
the
street.
U
In
terms
of
your
of
your
ground
floor,
I
like
how
you're
activating
the
pedestrian
street,
but
I'm
also
wondering
if
you
considered,
I
know
it's
in
a
flood
zone.
Did
you
consider
underground
parking?
I'm
I'm
looking,
particularly
at
those
eight
parking
spaces
adjacent
to
the
lobby
of
the
workshop
spaces.
U
You
know
to
activate
to
really
activate
that
street
right
across
the
park.
It
would
be
advantageous
to
have,
you
know,
exhibit
space
or
commercial
space
or
additional
artist
space
just
on
those
dedicated
eight
parking
space.
So
those
are
just
my
concerns
which
deal
with
the
ground
floor
like
if
you
were
to
really
activate
it.
U
U
AH
So
I
can
address
those
quickly.
I
agree
with
with
your
points.
I
think
you
know
the
water
levels
and
the
flood
zone
on
the
site
did
not
enable
us
to
put
the
parking
in
the
basement
and
we've
been
balancing.
You
know
the
amount
of
parking
for
this
project
with
the
intention
to
activate
the
street.
So
what
we
did
on
those
spaces
is
we
pushed
back
the
ground
floor
of
the
building
and
that
ambassador,
if
you
can
scroll
back
to
slide
number
seven,
we've
incorporated
some
pocket
parts
that
push
the
ground
floor
back.
AH
AH
Okay,
so
that's
that
rendering,
on
the
bottom
there,
where
we're
kind
of
creating
this
pocket
park
in
front
of
that
parking
zone,
and
then,
if
you
can
scroll
back
two
more
slides
to
slide
number
five,
so
we
are
proposing
a
fully
planted
landscape
buffer
along
the
back
of
the
rear
yard
of
the
building,
we're
also
utilizing
the
units
and
how
they
kind
of
the
depths
of
them
to
relate
to
the
surrounding
context
and
create
varied
relief
along
the
rear
yard
at
the
residential
floors
to
create
more
of
a
backyard.
AH
AD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lena
tremeli,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recurring
support
for
this
proposal.
We
recognize
the
still
concerns
regarding
the
number
of
stories
and
the
density
and
lack
of
parking,
but
this
project
went
to
the
vpda
articulating
process
and
there
was
a
reduction
in
number
of
units
and
as
well
an
increase
of
numbers
of
affordability
to
a
20
at
this
time.
We
consider
this
is
a
good
project
and
we
would
like
to
run
the
recording
support.
Thank
you.
W
Some
of
these
units
will
be
family-sized,
three-bedroom
units
which
the
project
did
not
include
before,
and
the
developer
has
also
committed
to
try
to
secure
a
much
needed
daycare
tenant
in
the
commercial
space.
Our
office
has
heard
from
many
people
in
the
community,
both
in
support
and
in
opposition
to
the
project.
While
we
understand
the
concerns
of
those
in
opposition,
the
victories
and
affordable
housing
will
provide
essential
housing
for
families
and
middle
class
residents
and
continue
to
establish
a
standard
for
affordability
that
development
projects
should
meet.
A
Ricardo,
I
have
a
question
for
you.
I
I
still
struggle
sometimes
with
with
these
affordable
units,
because
I
know
that
they
really
need
to
go
through
the
city's
affordable
list.
A
So
how
are
we
ensuring
that
east
boston
residents-
because
60
percent
you
know-
is
likely
more
more
in
more
reflective
of
the
income
of
east
boston
residents?
But
who
will
be
ensuring
that
east
boston
residents
with
the
history
and
community
are
living
in
these
units?.
W
Yeah,
so
this
is
something
that
we
work
with
the
development
team
on
as
well
so
of
the
20
14
are
going
to
be
traditional
idp
units,
subject
to
you,
know
the
standard
lottery
and
then
six
percent
of
those
units
are
going
to
be
affirmatively
marketed
to
through
dnd
and
bha
to
housing.
Voucher
holders
so
they'll
be
able
to
you
know
ideally
still
be
able
to
firmly
market
to
and
select
tenants,
like
you
mentioned,
with
the
history
and
connections
to
the
east,
boston
community,.
A
W
AM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
raul
diverge
senior
project
manager
with
the
boston
planning
and
development
agency.
The
project
before
you
went
through
an
extensive
article,
80
process,
which
culminated
at
bpd
board
approval
in
february
of
2020..
AM
Since
that
time,
the
proponent
has
added
additional
affordability
on
site,
as
well
as
reduce
the
overall
unit
count
as
such
bpa
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
project.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
Thank
you.
Anybody
any
raised
hands.
Madame
ambassador,
I
would
like
to
hear
from
the
two
collin
people
and
two
people
from
the
community.
Okay,.
C
Yeah
so
let's
see
okay
user
50,
calling
news
at
15
you've
been
admitted.
AN
A
Any
just
three
people,
hopefully
the
the
people,
are
from
about
our
butters
to
the
project,
all
right.
C
AO
And
address
yes,
my
name
is
mary
ellen
dalton.
My
address
is
165
trenton
street
east
boston.
I've
been
part
of
this
process
since
the
very
beginning,
and
time
and
time
again
they
have
listened
to
the
community
and
come
back
with
a
plan
that
incorporates
most
of
what
they
wish
for.
I
am
very
strongly
in.
AO
C
You,
okay
and
elizabeth
elizabeth
weisner.
Can
you
hear
us.
AP
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
elizabeth
wiesner
and
I
live
at
310
bremen
street.
I
will
admit
that
I
was
initially
skeptical
when
I
heard
a
building
would
be
going
in
next
door
to
us,
but
have
been
so
impressed
by
the
transom
team
in
their
community
outreach
over
the
last
couple
of
years.
They
have
really
listened
to
our
concerns
and
responded
thoughtfully.
AP
I
think
this
land
presents
a
really
unique
opportunity
to
build
something
beautiful
and
useful,
and
I'd
hesitate
to
miss
this
opportunity
to
do
something
that
really
serves
this
community
and
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
AQ
Okay,
yeah
david
schulman,
150
liverpool
street
in
east
boston.
I
am
also
currently
the
president
of
the
maverick
central
neighborhood
association
and
I
came
to
communicate
my
personal
support
as
well
as
community
support.
We
voted
on
this
project
and,
basically
to
speak
the
people
that
you
just
heard
from
the
abutters
and
the
neighbors
who
really
like
the
project.
A
Thank
you,
miss
ambassador.
Can
you
come
to
my
call
and
use
the
number
17
again.
AJ
B
Thank
you
next
case
calling
voa
108.0213
175
wordsworth
street.
This
is
a
full
gut
rehab
extended
living
space
to
the
basement
violation,
article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
article
2017.
This
is
in
the
east:
boston,
ipod
in
article
53,
section,
9,
front
yard,
setbacks
and
corner
lock,
reviews
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AS
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
derek
small,
listen
to
jessica,
one
dollar's
progression
and
chair.
We
are
here
today
seeking
relief
for
the
renovation
of
existing
family
dweller
and
to
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
and
to
rebuild
the
rear
stairs.
The
zoning
sub
district
is
a
2
f,
4
000.
Our
lot
size
is
6
290
square
feet.
AS
Zoning
violations
are
sensitive,
non-conforming
use,
which
is
pre-existing
because
it's
existing
three
family
and
it's
represented
east
boston,
ipod,
front
yard.
The
requirement
is
ten
feet.
We
have
nine
and
the
rear
yard,
which
requirement
is
40,
and
I
think
we
have
25.
A
Hold
on
hold
on,
mr,
mr,
mr
small,
so
this
is
because
it's
an
existing
structure,
you're
not.
AS
A
AS
Yes,
there's
a
rear
egress
through
the
back
of
the
to
the
decks
and
then
is
comes
up
from
the
basement
out
to
the
direct
elite
into
the
backyard
and
the
frontiers
is
in
the
hallway
of
the
stair
of
the
stairwell.
In
the
hallway.
AS
A
Okay,
any
how?
How
are
the
plans
miss
better?
AD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
lina
tramelin
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal.
The
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
an
empire's
meetings
of
september
february
17,
where
the
applicant
addressed
several
of
the
concerns
expressed
during
the
community
process,
and
we
also
received
eight
letters
of
support
for
from
residents
of
harvard.
Thank
you.
A
W
Yes,
thank
you,
man
of
chair
good
morning,
members
of
the
board
ricardo
patron
from
the
office
of
city
councilor,
lydia
edwards.
The
council
would
also
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support.
Z
G
Okay,
well,
it
would
make
a
difference
having
a
basement
unit.
AS
Yeah,
we
weren't
excited
for
being
in
the
flood
zone,
and
I
had
numerous
conversations
with
the
plans
examined
and
it
never
came
up.
Okay,.
AT
Oh
man,
I'm
sure
this
is
the
one
where
there
was
some
confusion
earlier
about
whether
or
not
the
applicant
was
seeking
a
deferral.
There
were
revised
plans
that
were
submitted
to
the
board
and
which
were
then
presented
to
the
plans
examiner
for
review.
My
understanding
is
the
plans
examiner
completed
the
review
and
stamped
those
plans
today,
and
I
don't
know
20
30
minutes
ago,
the
board
emailed
them
to
just
better,
but
I
don't
know
if
she
you
know.
Obviously
she
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
review
them.
As
the
hearing's
been
ongoing.
AT
A
B
It's
quite
all
right:
ksboa,
115,
28829,
eden
street.
B
Have
a
date
of
april
27th
at
12,
30.
B
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
zoning
code
refusal
letter
from
isd
to
order
file
an
application
with
the
board
of
appeal
to
extend
the
existing
long-standing
zoning
relief
for
the
use
of
property
for
parking.
The
violations-
article
6
section
4
applicant,
seeks
relief
from
conditional
use
provisions
to
expire
on
1218
of
2020
and
article
7
section.
4
applicants
seeks
relief
from
forbidden
news
provision
which
expired
on
12,
18,
2020.
AU
Back
here,
this
is
william
dillon
from
law,
firm
of
coulson
and
stores,
400
atlantic
avenue,
representing
samuels
and
associates
the
applicant
members
of
the
board.
This
is
a
property
at
the
intersection
of
boylston
street
and
jersey
street
in
the
fenway
there's
a
tasty
burger
restaurant
on
it.
This
parking
area
has
been
used
for
parking
for
many
many
years.
Every.
A
Dylan,
may
I
just
ask
you:
why
has
it
taken
you
so
long
to
file
this?
This
appeal
when
the
when
the
when
the
use
the
allow
allowance
for
this
use
expired
in
december
of
last
year?
When
did
you
file
your
paperwork
for
this.
AU
A
AU
I'm
sure
no
we're
not
proposing
any
any
changes
to
it
to
the
lot
as
it's
currently
operated.
It's
been,
it's
been
essentially
operating
on
change
for
the
past
six
or
seven
years.
A
Yeah
we
know
that
so
how
many
spaces,
let's
just
clarify
that
for
the
record.
A
Okay
and
okay,
any:
how
are
the
plans
miss
better
plans,
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AV
A
Okay,
as
as
is
our
usual,
we
need
to
consider
and
jeff
did,
did
the
bpa
weigh
in
on
this?
Yes,.
E
Madam
chair,
we
sent
our
recommendation
over
to
you.
We've
asked
for
a
three-year
sunset,
as
our
usual
mo,
also
we're
hoping
to
get
a
little
improvement
of
the
screening
and
buffering
along
jersey
street
there's
some.
You
know
decorative
fencing
and
trees
along
boylston,
we're
kind
of
hoping
that
the
same
thing
beat
down
along
jersey
street.
A
V
Have
them
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
for
a
three-year
extension,
with
bpda
design,
review
for
screening
and
buffering
and
also
btd
design,
review
design
of
the
signage
if
they
can
look
at
and
make
sure
that
they
have
the
adequate
signage
or
open
air.
A
Hold
on,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
got
that
three-year
extension
in
that
in
that
motion,
excellent
sorry
go
ahead.
B
This
is
a
first
floor
extension
to
attic
floor
with
dormers,
both
number
of
units.
You
remain
the
same
and
and
and
six
new
austrian
parking
spaces
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
Three
for
71
roofing
and
three
for
10
rupen
park
violation.
Article
9,
section,
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
is
conditional
article
50
section
29,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
5629,
the
height
requirement,
is
excessive.
Its
stories,
article
50
section
29,
the
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
B
Article
50
section
29,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
due
to
the
six
parking
space
article
50
section,
29,
the
side
yard
would
access
drive.
Driveway
cannot
be
less
than
10
feet,
wide,
no
side
yard
to
access
the
parking
except
the
easement
driveway
and
article
50
section
44,
the
application
for
dimensional
regulations.
The
side
yard
with
access
driveway
cannot
be
less
than
10
feet
wide
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
Mr
small,
mr
small,
may
I
ask
you
immediately
because
it
looks
like
we've
just
received
some
letters
from
project
white
and
miss
tote
that
that
actually
seems
to
suggest
that
there
are
issues
with
that
easement
and
that
still
need
to
be
resolved.
AS
Madam
chair,
I
don't
know
if
sami
nagoski
is
on.
He
could
probably
speak
to
that
because
there
is
litigation
pending
with
regard
to
the
property
at
ten
fought.
A
AS
AS
AS
AS
That's
correct,
and
and
with
regard
to
the
eastman
mission,
okay,
but
what
we
are
here
for
today
is
a
reconfiguration
of
that
parking.
As
I
said
by
this
board,
may
7th
of
2019
and
71
rupen
street
was
approved
by
the
sport
on
october,
the
6th
and
in
2020.
AS
AS
It
was
suggested
that
we
take
a
look
at
the
parking
in
the
rear
of
those
properties
which
we
have
done
and
since
this
was
the
configuration
that
we
came
up
with,
which
still
provides
three
parking
spaces
for
three
four
ten
rutherman
park
and
it
creates
four
parking
spaces
for
71
ruthen
street.
As
you
can
see
on,
that's
that's
pulled
up
call
that
has
pulled
up.
AS
There
are
three
parking
spaces:
four
steps
apart;
three
four,
seven
one
route
from
street;
and
then
there's
one
that
is
indicated
as
being
partly
on
the
ease.
A
Collette,
can
you
please
zoom
in
so
we
can
get
a
sense,
and
mr
small
tell
us
which
of
those
parking
spaces
go
with
with
71.
A
How
is
this
affecting
their
access
to
the
building
with
parking
spot
number
one
and
their
open
space.
AS
We
are
being
cited
for
ancillary
parking
on
for
10
roofman
park
and
it
doesn't
affect
it
because
there
is
no
enter
entry
or
ingress
on
where
that
park.
Space
is.
A
So
you
think
it's
it's
it's!
It's
opening
up
onto
the
right
of
way,
then
or
not
onto
its
own
rare
yard,.
A
I'm
just
going
to
say
I'm
a
little
bit
busy
about
this.
This
is
just
my
opinion,
because
first,
the
issue
of
that
right
of
way
has
not
been
resolved
and
then
I
I
worry
about
the
health
and
safety
of
the
residents
at
71
ruthen,
but
yes,
go
ahead.
I.
B
Just
maybe
it
might
help
mr
d'amico
from
btd
has
spoke
on
this
one.
Okay,
I'd
like
to
read
it
into
the
record,
maybe
and
clarify
a
little
bit
in
regards
to
10
ruthman
park
and
71
ruthman
street.
He
will
not
comment
on
the
issue
regarding
zoning
on
the
above
product
pod
project,
but
from
the
parking
point
of
view
he
suggests
that
the
handicapped
space
is
that.
Is
there
a
handicap
space
yeah?
That's
the
space,
that's
partially
on
the
easement
okay.
B
A
Four
yeah
it
so
this
kind
of
all
means
that
it's
this.
The
synergy
is
just
not
working
on
this,
mr
small,
but
but
let's
since
you've
started
the
process,
I
need
to
ask
you:
do
you
want
to
continue
with
the
process,
or
does
it
make
sense
for
you
to
defer?
So
you
have
some
of
these
issues
resolved
before
you
come
to
this
board
or
you
could
withdraw
and
come
in
at
a
later
point
with
all
these
issues,
squared
away.
AS
I
mean
we
offer,
we
are,
you
know,
seeking
the
three
parking
spaces
for
10
which
were
approved
and
then
the
additional
three
spaces
for
for
our
71
roof
bed,
and
if
it
also
pleases
the
board,
we
could
take
the
handicapped
space
out
of
the
out
of
the
easement
and
that
way
that
would
eliminate
the
easement
issue
altogether.
A
Well,
okay,
so
I'm
just
going
to
recommend,
mr
mr
small,
that
we
go
through
a
deferral
so
that
you
know
we're
not
designing
spaces,
especially
handicapped
spaces,
on
the
fly
that
we
give
it
some
some
attention,
especially
if
it's
in
the
right
of
way.
Okay,
so
may
I
have
a
motion
for
tomorrow.
AS
Why
don't
we
get
the
we'll
have
a.
B
Date,
we'll
give
you
the
last
date
in
may
may
20,
I'm
sorry
may
18th
will
be
the
next
board
meeting
for
football
may
4th
of
may
18th,
so
you'll
do
the
18th
at
12
30.!
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
in
the
meantime,
I
would
like
to
see
if
there's
a
couple
of
board
members
who
can
just
go
out
and
do
a
site
visit,
because
this
does
seem
that
it
might
need
a
site
visit.
A
Okay,
so
mr
alec
and
mr
mr
rogeria
will
do
site
visits
and
you
guys
will
coordinate.
Thank
you.
AS
G
A
And
if
there's
somebody
from
the
community
who
should
be
there,
we
should
make
sure
that
that
that
their
voice
is
heard
too.
U
AS
Yes-
and
that
was
after
the
redesign
of
it,
we
were
triggered
for
open
space
because
we
had
heard
from
the
community
that
parking
was
an
issue,
which
is
why
we
tried
to
create
the
additional
pocket
hit.
The
red.
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
boa
one
one,
three
one:
five,
one:
zero
thirty
five
cushion
avenue.
This
is
a
whole
super
extension
to
an
existing
dormer.
The
violations,
article,
nine
section,
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use-
is
conditional.
Article
65
section
in
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
height
requirement,
is
excessive.
Two
and
a
half
stories
is
the
max
article.
65
69,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AW
Yes
hi,
my
name
is
david,
fried
I'm
an
architect
located
at
23
salcombe
street
in
dorchester
massachusetts.
AW
A
How
are
the
plants
miss
better?
The
plants
are
sufficient.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
Good.
X
Morning
out
of
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal,
it's
a
modest
dormer
edition
with
the
butter
support,
so
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
support.
Thank
you.
C
X
Z
Good
morning
to
you,
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
council,
recep
george's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
B
You
very
much
follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
113-7459
handbook
screen.
This
is
a
curb
cut,
a
sidewalk
curve
cut
to
access
the
driveway
violation,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
our
street
parking
area.
Five
foot
buffer
requirement
is
a
requirement
on
side
yard
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AJ
AX
Sorry,
we're
just
making
sure
that
anthony
and
william
can
speak
anthony
and
william
can.
Can
you
guys
speak
if
not
we'll.
AX
All
right
well,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jason.
I'm
the
son
of
hope,
white
at
19
hansborough
street.
The
propose
the
proposal
is.
AX
Is
just
the
use
of
premises
permit
so
we're
seeking
relief
from
the
board,
as
our
driveway
is
10
feet
wide,
not
the
13.5
feet
that
are
required,
and
so
what
we're?
As
you
can
see,
from
the
picture,
as
well
as
additional
photos
that
have
been
sent
to
the
members
of
the
board,
we're
not
able
to
extend
the
width
of
the
driveway
due
to
the
property
already
in
place,
as
well
as
the
property
lines
not
being
able
to
be
extended
further.
However,
we
are.
AX
We
would
like
to
seek
relief
as
the
residents
of
the
home,
including
my
mother,
and
so
this
driveway
is
not
just
a
driveway.
It's
really
to
reduce
the
walking
burden
for
health
issues.
A
So
let
me
just
ask
you
a
couple
of
questions.
Okay,
absolutely
this
picture
looks
like
this
parking
on
that
side
of
the
street.
How
many
parking
pieces
are
you
proposing
to
get
off
the
street?
We
usually
do
not
look
for
one
to
one
and
the
second
is.
It
looks
like
there's
almost
impossible
impossible
for
somebody
to
get
out
of
the
car
comfortably
I
mean
I
have.
I
have
a
driveway,
that's
a
little
bit
wider
than
this,
and
I
know
that
it's
very
hard
for
us
to
get
in
and
out
of
the
car.
AX
Madam
chair,
I
thank
you
for
that
question.
Two
answers:
one:
we
sent
the
board
pictures
of
two
cars
parked
in
the
driveway
and
able
to
easily
get
out
of
it,
and
the
other
answer
to
your
question
is
the
fact
that
the
driveway
does
hold
two
cars,
so
it
will
reduce
the
the
burden
for
parking
on
the
street,
as
many
members
of
the
community
have
stated
that
doing
new
construction
on
the
street
there's
really
no
parking,
especially
in
the
evening.
We
also
have
letters
of
support
from
our
local
community.
B
A
Okay,
can
you
go
please
to
the
fourth
fourth
photo
for
the
fourth
page.
A
Okay,
so
you
heard
what
the
the
technical
review
by
the
boston
transportation
department
came
up
with
about
this
about
this
proposed
parking,
so
miss
miss
better.
How
are
the
plans
plans
are
adequate,
any
further
questions
from
the
board.
G
A
It
looks
like
there's
already
a
handicapped
spot
right
in
front
of
the
house
from
from
the
first
photo.
AX
So
we
sent
additional
documentation
and
this
is
not
the
final
documentation.
We've
sent
it
to
the
email,
no.
A
X
C
AR
Yeah
we're
having
we're
having
we're.
We
represent
hello,
yeah,
we're
having
difficulty
participating
right
now.
We
have
no
video
anything.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
I
think
the
applicant
has
represented
themselves
very
well:
we've
had
technical
expertise.
May
I
have
a
motion
please.
L
AP
B
Archery
from
three
to
four
dwelling
units
build
a
new
front,
rear
porch
extend
living
area
to
the
basement
for
a
new
unit.
The
violations
article
64
section
9,
the
floydia
ratio-
is
excessive.
Article
65
section
65-41
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
8
a
whole
family
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
laudery
for
dwelling
units
insufficient
article
65,
section
9.
The
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
B
Q
Q
A
You
can
you
do
me
a
favor
please
and
walk
through
and
walk
through
the
units.
It
looks
like
you
have
unit
one
as
a
three
bedroom.
How
many
square
footages,
how
many
square
feet
feet
is
that.
Q
The
this
is
the
this
is
the
proposed
unit
in
the
basement.
A
A
Q
The
the
the
section
here
is
where
the
the
are
you
seeing
the
arrow.
This
area
is
where
the
the
utility
building
is.
Q
This
is
where
the
the
boilers
and
everything
is
gonna,
be:
there's
gonna,
be
a
sprinkler
system
to
service
the
entire
building
and
both.
What's
in
syria,
boxing
water
and
civil
commission
will
pipe
in
the
water.
M
A
Okay,
how
would
the
plants
miss
better.
U
The
plants
are
okay,
I'm
missing
a
survey
plot
plan;
okay,.
Q
I
will
I
will
send
that,
but
I
have
one
that
was
done
a
while
back
2003..
I
can
yeah.
G
Are
there
elevations
that
show
the
relationship
to
gray.
U
Yeah,
so
you
know
what
I'm
seeing
I'm
just
seeing
elevation,
but
the
majority
of
the
living
unit
underneath
is
below
grade.
It's
like
a
dungeon.
Q
The
the
three
apartment,
the
three
units
upstairs
33
units
yeah.
BA
AJ
AJ
X
Good
afternoon
or
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
blue
chill
conference
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
of
this
proposal
due
to
a
lack
of
transparency
and
communication
from
the
applicant
with
the
neighbors
and
civic
routes.
The
greater
boat
in
geneva,
neighborhood,
especially,
which
is
what
is,
do
not
support
this
proposal
to
add
a
basement
unit
at
this
property.
There
are
also
ongoing
issues
related
to
some
construction
that
may
have
started
without
the
appropriate
permits.
Z
B
On
the
next
case,
calling
boa
109
9645
31
camera
tree.
This
is
the
proposed
six
off
street
parking
with
proposed,
curb
cut
for
an
existing
three
family
dwelling
located
at
27
cameron,
street
the
village
article
65,
section
41,
offspring,
parking,
loader
requirements,
location,
article
65,
section,
a
and
celery
parking
uses,
condition,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AJ
B
From
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
create
a
third
dwelling
unit,
an
existing
two
family
by
renovating
and
expanding
into
the
attic
full
floor.
Abdomen
extend
up
with
the
existing
bay
window
violations.
Article
65
section,
eight
three
family
dwelling
is
forbidden:
article
65
6-9.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories
article
65,
section,
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
B
BB
AY
Mind
unmuting,
derek
rubinoff.
AY
BC
BC
Yes,
it's
a
very
simple
project
to
change
a
an
existing
two
family
house
in
dorchester
to
a
three
family,
there's
already
an
attic
space-
that's
partly
finished
up
there,
but
we'd
like
to
finish
the
rest
of
it
and
make
that
a
separate
unit,
there's
a
a
little
bit
of
an
addition
to
the
side,
and
here,
on
top
of
the
on
top
of
the
house,
basically
being
accomplished
by
extending
dormers,
and
this
would
not
impact
the
front
of
the
house.
BC
The
the
main
thing
that
we
need
relief
for
here
is
to
change
it
to
a
three
family,
which
is,
I
believe,
forbidden
use.
However,
this
is
a
block
where
directly
around
us.
We
have
six
other
three
family
houses
which
are
including
the
the
house
directly
to
our
right
and
the
house
across
the
street.
A
Hold
on
hold
on
a
second,
can
you
tell
us
please
what
the
the
unit,
the
bedroom
count
and
the
unit
sizes
are
unique
from
the
public.
BC
Yeah
certainly
other
two
existing
two
bedroom
units,
one
on
the
first
one,
there's
not
really
any
scope
of
work
to
those
at
all.
BC
Are
let's
see
the
first
floor
unit
is
about
a
thousand
and
thirty
six
square
feet.
The
second
floor
unit
is
about
a
thousand
square
feet
as
well,
and
the
proposed
third
floor
unit
would
be
about
947
square
feet.
A
And
let
me
ask
you:
what's
the
total
square
footage
of
the
edition.
BC
BC
BC
Yes,
in
the
rear
of
the
building,
we're
proposing
to
have
three
stacked
decks,
those
will
be
shielded
by
the
building,
so
they
won't
be
visible
directly
from
the
street.
We
have
very
minor
side
and
rear
yard
and
fractions
of,
I
believe,
under
our
foot,
for
each
of
those.
A
BD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
patrick
chandler,
neighborhood
services,
this
completed
a
community
process
within
a
butters
me
thing,
hosted
online
and
outreached
to
the
lower
middle
civic
association.
BD
There
are
no
concerns
raised
at
either
meeting
and
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank.
AO
Z
U
Can
I
just
make
a
comment
and
put
forth
the
motion
sure
in
terms
of
the
typology
derek
it
would
be
good
for
you
to
look
at
whether
there
are
both
fronts
that
intersect
dormers.
So
I
I
would
like
to
put
a
motion
forward
for
approval
with
vpda
design
provisional
to
look
at
that
bold
front
intersection
of
the
dormer
you
might
need
you
might
need
to
consider
just
removing
the
dormer
extension,
the
bow
front
extension
on
the
third
floor.
I
think
a
a
dormer
expansion
should
be
sufficient.
BC
G
B
Or
is
kevin
campbell
on
for
cambridge
street?
I'm
sorry
yeah
cameron,
street.
B
All
right
well
we'll
go
to
the
next
case,
then
calling
voa
three
eight
two
canterbury
street:
this
is
a
change
arc
from
a
one
family
to
a
two
family,
extend
living
space
to
the
basement,
construct
new
rare
edition
and
stairway
and
propose
for
our
street
parking
violence.
Article
67
section,
eight
two
family
uses
forbidden
radical
67
section
9
in
the
florida
area,
is
excessive.
Article
67,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
AP
B
BE
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
kevin
cloutier
from
the
clutier
law
firm
located
at
1990
center
street
in
west
roxbury,
and
I'm
the
representing
the
owner
who
joins
me.
His
name
is
edwin
solano,
I'm
also
joined
by
the
project,
architects,
gavin,
driscoll
and
ed
roach.
What
we
are
asking
this
board's
permission
for
would
be
to
convert
an
existing
single
family
home,
which
is
a
cape
style
home
into
a
two
family
home.
BE
The
second
half
the
right
half
of
the
existing
first
floor
would
be
for
unit
2
and
we'd,
be
extending
living
space
for
unit
2
into
the
existing
basement.
So
we're
really
working
within
the
entire
existing
envelope
of
the
building.
The
only
exterior
addition
would
be
a
small
rear
addition
to
allow
for
covered
ingress
and
egress
to
the
rear
unit.
BE
Very
brief
history.
This
project
came
before
the
board
at
the
end
of
2019,
where
we
proposed
that
the
second
unit
exists
entirely
as
a
standalone
unit
in
the
basement.
A
So
so,
really
just
to
let
you
know
the
buck
stops
with
us.
So
it's
it's
great
that
you've
worked
with
your
neighbors,
but
you
know
you
need
to
explain
to
us.
This
is
so,
if
I'm
looking
at
the
this,
the
violations
that
this
is
really
a
one
family
zone
right.
BE
So
the
fir
unit
number
one,
madam
chair
is
a
total
of
1
392
square
feet.
The
first
floor
portion
of
unit,
one
includes
a
dining
room
and
kitchen
and
a
half
bathroom
and
washer
and
dryer
the
second
story
for
unit
one
again
unit.
One
is
the
whole
second
story
includes
four
bedrooms
and
one
full
bathroom
unit
number
two.
Your
honor
is
a
total
of
one
thousand
two
hundred
and
thirty
square
feet.
BE
The
first
floor
per
portion
contains
the
dining
room
kitchen,
a
small
living
room
and
a
half
bathroom,
whereas
the
the
basement
area
would
contain
two
bedrooms:
one
full
bathroom
and
the
utility
room
accessible
independent
for
both
units.
A
BE
A
Okay,
then
so
because
you
did
say
that
you
were
proposing
a
small
rear
addition
for
access
to
the
to
the
basement.
What
what
is
that.
BE
I
would
essentially
it's
just
a
covered
entrance
area
that,
if
you're
looking
at
this
the
slide
in
front
of
you
there's
an
existing
access
down
to
that
basement.
What
we're
essentially
building
right
there
would
be
reconstructing
that
stairway
and
adding
sort
of
a
covered
area
and
a
door
to
access
that
basement
space.
Madam
chair.
AL
All
right,
hello,
madam
chair,
my
name
is
gavin
driscoll
mark
with
kevin
claudia
here.
The
ceiling
head
in
the
basement
is
eight
foot
two
and
we
did
put
bigger
size
windows
down
there
that
are
30
inches
off
the
floor
that
meet
all
the
light
and
air
requirements.
We
actually
did
the
window
wells
four
feet
by
three
feet,
which
would
actually
give
those
bedrooms
in
the
basement
additional
light
so
that
they
wouldn't
be
so
dark
down
there.
How
tall.
AN
Well,
it's
open!
Oh,
the
glass
is
completely
unimpeded
from
the
light.
BE
It's
not
it's
not
in
any
type
of
a
flood
zone.
Madam
chair
designated
as
such.
BE
G
A
B
X
This
project
did
go
through
an
extensive
community
process
over
the
last
couple
years,
where
the
applicants
were
able
to
work
with
the
butters
and
the
mount
holt
canterbury
neighborhood
association,
to
make
this
second
second
unit
a
more
livable
situation,
so
we
commend
them
for
that.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
support.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
given
the
information
given
the
fact
that
this
is
essentially
a
submerged
unit,
this
submerged
unit,
may
I
have
a
motion.
C
C
A
A
A
A
Miss
ambassador:
are
we
ready
to
go
yes?
Okay,
the
board
meeting
for
march
9th
is
back
in
session.
Mr
fortune,
yes,.
C
Hey
on
to
me:
okay,
okay,
kevin.
Can
you
hear
us
kevin
campbell.
AA
B
Okay
hold
on
two
seconds.
Let
me
call
this
into
the
record:
calling
voa
109,
964
531
cameron
street.
There's
a
proposed
six
r
street
blocking
a
proposed
curb
cut
for
an
existing
three
family
dwelling
located
at
27
cameron,
street
the
violence,
article
65,
section,
41
law,
street
parking
loading
location,
article,
65,
section,
8,
ancillary
parking
uses
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AA
Sorry
for
the
mishaps
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kevin
campbell.
I
live
at
27,
camron
street.
AA
I
am
proposing
a
curb
cut
and
often
parking
at
31
kimron
street,
a
lot
adjacent
to
27
cabin
street
that
I
own,
which
will
house
six
parking
spaces
for
off
street
parking.
For
my
tenants
and
and
myself.
A
B
X
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
and
reckon
in
opposition
to
this
proposal
as
neighbors,
are
opposed
to
a
lot
for
six
vehicles
and
would
prefer
that
the
app
can
amend
the
plans
to
include
more
green
space
and
approval
for
three
vehicles.
Only.
Thank
you.
BH
A
Okay,
miss
ambassador
anybody
else
with
raised
hands.
A
Okay,
so
it
sounds
like
this
could
be
doable
with
design
review
for
screening
and
buffering
and
btd
review
to
look
at
the
curb
cuts.
So
may
I
have
a
motion
to
that
effect.
G
Yeah
I'll
make
that
motion.
I
I
mean
if
you
look
at
the
google
maps
it's
already
in
place.
The
only
question
is
whether
there's
a
curb
cut
or
not,
but
the
parking
is
already
happening
there.
So,
okay.
G
With
vpda
design
review
for
squeaking
above
the
btd
review
for
efficient
parking,
I.
BJ
B
Telling
boa
1120471
739
cummins
highway.
This
is
a
change
of
market
from
two
family
to
a
three
family
construct.
A
new
edition
third
floor
unit
violations,
article
60
section,
eight,
the
three
family
uses
forbidden
article
60,
section,
9
fluid
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
669
the
villain,
has
accessibility
stories.
Article
669,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
BK
Good
morning,
stuart
schreier
from
1005
dorchester
avenue
in
dorchester,
representing
the
owner
of
the
property,
and
what
I'd
like
to
say
about
this
is
that
this
is
a
very
narrow
or
long
lot.
It's
120
plus
feet
long
in
on
one
side,
118
feet
long
on
the
other
side,
because
it
fronts
on
two
streets.
It's
got
access
on
cummings
highway
and
it
has
access
on
richmere
road.
BK
This
project
could
make
some
sense.
There's
an
existing
two-family
house.
The
two-family
house
has
finished
rooms
in
the
basement,
but
they're,
not
bedrooms,
they're,
simply
a
rec
room
and
a
game
room
and
something
they
call
a
man
cave
which
I'm
not
sure
what
that
is.
They
proposing
to
put
an
addition
on
the
back
of
the
house
and
the
additional
unit
will
be
a
triplex
containing
three
bedrooms.
BK
The
master
bedroom
will
be
up
on
the
top
floor.
There'll
be
two
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor,
kitchen
living
room
on
the
first
floor
and
again
somewhat
finished
space
in
the
basement,
but
not
a
bedroom,
a
rec
room
or
something
of
that
nature,
a
dent
or
a
family
room
they
can
provide
on
on-site
parking.
This
is
a
2f
zone.
It's
a
2f
4000.
BK
BK
So
this
is
not
something
that's
going
to
cause
a
wave
of
converting
twos
to
threes
in
the
neighborhood,
a
lot
of
the
objections
from
the
building
department,
while
they're
correct
they
they
really
apply
because
which
is
the
rear
yard.
Is
it
off
the
richmere
road
and
and
the
side
yard
is
10
feet,
but
if
it's
rear
yard,
then
it
should
be
30..
So
if
you
look
at
it
from
richmond
road,
it's
got
insufficient
rear
yard.
If
you
look
at
it
from
cummings
highway,
it
has
sufficient
radiod
the
other.
So
mrs.
A
Dryer,
can
you
just
kind
of
talk
us
through
this
a
little
bit
so
so
it's
an
existing
two
family
tell
us
how
large
the
units
are
and
how
many
bedrooms
they
are.
BK
Okay,
the
the
units
are
rather
nice
size
units,
that's
one
of
the
things
that's
existing
and
the
first
floor
unit
has
living
space
in
the
basement
and
that
living
space
again
is
designated
as
a
rec
room,
a
family
room
or
a
man
cave
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
BK
A
So
so
the
first,
the
first
unit
has
a
rec
room
in
the
basement
and
it's
a
three-bedroom
unit.
No.
BK
Second
unit
is
also
two
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor.
The
back
two
bedrooms
are
part
of
the
addition.
Those
would
be
the
triplex
back
unit.
You
know
it's
not
going
to
be
a
decker
style,
three
unit,
it's
going
to
be
the
first
floor
and
the
basement
is
one
unit
the
second
floor
and
the
attic
is
is
a
unit.
The
back
of
the
building
will
be
a
triplex
and
that's
what
leads
to
the
question.
BK
It's
it's
richmear,
it's
I'm
sorry
richmear!
It's
11.5
to
the
building!
That's
there!
Now
the
addition
will
be
10.5.
BK
A
10.5
feet:
okay
and
then
the
let's
see
so
the
the
proposed
front
yard
is
going
to
be
an
extension.
Where
is
parking
going
to
be
accommodated.
BK
Thank
you
for
searching
for
that
z1.
Maybe
the
last
the
last
plan
you
look
at
always
right.
I
apologize,
I
don't
know
where
z1
is
it's
z1
shows
the
parking
and
the
parking
is
at
the
back
of
the
house,
and
the
entrance
to
the
parking
will
be
off
of
richmere
road.
BK
I'm
not
sure
what
order
your
plans
are
in,
but
if
maybe,
if
you
go
back
up
before
1514,
there
should
be
a
site
plan
in
there.
AC
BK
There
is
the
parking
now
I
apologize,
it
says
z1
you
see
how
how.
BK
R
U
Okay,
the
drawings
are
not
the
drawings
are
not
great.
I
have
a
question
for
you
in
terms
of
on
google.
It
shows
there's
a
garage.
Is
that
no
longer
the
case.
BK
U
BK
The
attic
floor
is
also
seven
feet:
six
inches,
okay,.
U
U
A
Okay,
so
it's
not
adequate
at
all
to
help
make
a
decision.
U
A
Okay,
okay,
and
if
we
approve
this,
I'm
not
sure
we
will
is,
except
is
it
possible
for
them
that
that
them
to
then
submit
more
detailed
plans.
U
A
E
Yeah,
madam
chair,
it's
jeff
at
the
btva
mm-hmm
we've
recommended
denial
without
prejudice
based
solely
on
the
the
rear
edition.
It's
just
it's
an
appropriate
scale
and
massing.
It
takes
up
all
the
open
space
out
in
the
back.
So
you
know
going
on
what
ms
better
is
looking
at
and
the
lack
of
adequate
plans,
I'm
not
sure
it
would
change
our
recommendation.
A
X
C
AC
AC
AC
Thank
you.
Thirty-Four
burmese
street
manapia,
the
butters
most
recently
wrote
to
the
gmc,
and
they
let
us
know
their
opposition
proposition,
reflects
exactly
what
board
member
better
mentioned
about
the
doors
on
the
first
floor,
and
also
that
at
our
original
zoning
community
meeting,
they
told
us
that
the
basement
was
strictly
going
to
be
a
mechanical
world
and
that
it
would
not
be
used
for
any
personal
usage.
AC
AC
AC
B
Your
next
case
calling
boa
114
6926
134
poplar
street
mr
constructed
new
two
family
house,
new
foundation,
framing
violation,
article
67,
section
9.
A
lot
width
is
insufficient
article
67,
six
and
nine.
The
building
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
67,
section,
9,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
67,
section,
9
side
yards
insufficient
in
article
67,
section
9,
the
law
of
frontage
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BL
Good
morning
my
name
is
timothy
burke,
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project,
and
I
have
a
business
address
of
142
berkeley
street
in
boston.
I'm
representing
and
the
the
owner
is
with
me
today,
elias
awad.
He
has
lived
in
the
existing
house
on
this
property
for
26
years
and
owned
it
for
longer,
and
he's
looking
to
the
existing
house
is
not
in
great
conditions,
we're
looking
to
replace
it
with
a
new
two-family
structure.
BL
The
a
lot
of
the
variances
are
due
to
the
very
narrow
width
of
the
slot.
It's
190
feet
long,
but
only
43
feet
wide.
BL
BL
We
had
a
a
very
good,
a
butters
meeting
on
january
19.
A
I
missed
the
book,
can
you
tell
us
this
is
an
interesting
street?
Can
you
tell
us
how
parking
will
be
accommodated.
BL
Yes,
there
is
an
existing
curb
cut
and
driveway
on
the
east
side
of
the
property.
So
we
will
we're
going
to
maintain
that
and
there
will
be
a
new
driveway
along
the
house
and
then
the
garage
is
at
the
back.
BL
We
are
in
a,
I
believe
it
is
a
three.
A
And
so
one
of
your
violations
is
the
height.
What
are
you
proposing.
BL
A
Excellent
okay:
how
would
the
plans
miss
better
plans.
X
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
It
was
well
received
by
the
abutters
in
the
local
neighborhood
association.
The
only
concern
is
that
the
parking
the
access
to
the
driveway
remains
from
poplar
street
and
does
not
get
changed
to
wilkins
place.
Thank
you.
AC
AK
Chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
for
city
council
at
large
aquarius
council,
we
don't
reckon
support.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
G
Chair
just
just
an
observation
on
the
google
maps,
there
is
front
yard
parking
taking
place,
which
is
not
a
reason
either
to
approve
or
support,
but
the
applicant
should
know
that
they
that
should
not
be
there's
a
picture
of
the
car
in.
BL
The
front
yard-
yes,
I've
explained
that
that's
going
to
be
yes,.
U
You
yes
to
take
a
look
at
the
front
yard
just
just
given
that
the
the
context
has
a
very
kind
of
regulated
setback
from
the
front,
and
this
would
be
an
anomaly
if
it's
pushed
back.
V
B
Change
from
the
family
to
a
full
family,
just
the
new
three-story
edition,
the
violation,
article
51
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
largest
traditional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
56
off
street
markings
information
and
article
51,
section
56,
austrian
parking,
design
and
maneuverability
name
and
address
cool
directly.
Please.
AZ
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
vilgenie
10
folks,
road
braintree
with
me
today,
I'm
joined
by
tanya
carrera,
who
is
the
team
architect.
AZ
So,
madam
chair
30
dayton
street
in
brighton
zoning
is
three
family
4
000
the
lot
size
is
8
161
square
feet.
The
current
use
is
a
three
family
with
two
parking
spaces.
The
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
three
to
a
four
unit,
building
with
a
three-story
front
addition
and
fully
sprinkle
the
building.
AZ
This
is
was
initially
a
five
unit
building
and
with
the
reduction.
Obviously,
the
violations
have
been
decreased
I'll
go
through
those
just
quickly
use.
We
have
a
four
unit
in
a
three
family
district
main
door
facing
the
front
has
been
reload
relocated
to
comply
with
zoning.
That
was
a
previous
violation.
AZ
A
lot
of
area
for
addition
unit
is
not
a
violation.
Zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
four
thousand
for
one
or
two
units,
two
thousand
each
additional
unit,
so
four
units
would
require
eight
thousand
square
feet.
Currently
8
161
square
feet,
front
yard.
Insufficient
is
existing
it's
being
shortened
by
three
feet:
nine
inches,
because
what
we've
done
is
put
a
porch
on
the
front
of
the
building
and
with
that
porch
it
has
a
roofs
of
counts
away,
so
they
lost
about
three
foot:
nine
inches
on
that
off
street
parking.
AZ
Seven
spaces
is
required
in
the
zoning,
which
is
a
1.75
ratio,
we're
proposing
six
spaces
for
four
units
and,
as
we
stated
currently
there's
two
spaces
for
you
three
units,
all
the
changes
will
result
in
the
community
input.
A
Hold
on,
can
you
show
us
the
rendering,
because
this
looks
like
a
lot
of
little
things
pasted
together
and
we
just
kind
of
need
to
understand
how
this
works
go
ahead.
Counselor.
AZ
Sure
I'm
just
gonna
go
into
the
unit
sizes.
Madam
chair,
okay
unit,
one
is
a
three
bed
one
and
a
half
bath
1628
square
feet.
It's
located
on
the
first
floor
in
the
basement,
and
now
we
just
want
to
point
out.
The
basement
is
only
for
a
family
room,
there's
no
bedrooms
or
anything
in
the
basement.
It's
a.
I
think
it's
a
315
square
foot,
family
room
and
other
than
that.
There's
storage
in
the
basement
unit
two
is
a
three
bed
two
and
a
half
bath
and
that's
1399
square
feet.
AZ
That's
located
on
the
first
and
second
floor,
and
that
also
has
storage
in
the
basement
unit.
Three
is
a
three
bed
two
bath
1255
square
feet
located
on
the
second
floor
and
unit.
Four
is
a
four
bed:
three
bath
2018
square
feet.
The
unit
programming
of
three
and
four
bedrooms
was
a
result
of
the
community.
They
wanted
family
units
and
as
a
condition
of
this,
we
also
have
put
a
a
proviso
that
there
would
be
no
rentals
to
undergraduate
students
and
we
have
gone
through
a
process.
AZ
We
have
supported
the
baia
as
well
as
support
from
the
inviters
as
well,
but
I
know
facebook's
a
big
concern.
I
just
want
to
point
out:
it's
eight
foot
ceiling
heights.
There
are
no
bedrooms,
it's
literally
a
small
family
room
that
your
children
go
down
and
watch
tv.
A
Hold
on
can
I
understand
how
those
handicapped
parking
spaces
are
supposed
to
walk.
I
did
see
them
on
the
on
the
on
the
layout,
but
I
can't
you
show
us
a
rendering
what
what
page
would
that
be.
AZ
Sure
tanya
carrera
is
the
team
architect
she's
on
this
call
tanya.
Could
you
address
those.
BM
Yes,
so
if
you
go
to
sheet
a020,
you
can
see
the
parking
layout.
We
are
not
required
a
full
handicap
space
with
access,
aisle,
etc,
because
we
only
have
five
spaces,
but
we
have
designated
that
one
to
be
for
the
adaptable
unit,
because
it
would
be
next
to
its
handicapped
entrance.
BM
The
ground
floor
unit
would
be
the
adaptable
unit
and
has
three
bedrooms.
Two
baths
on
the
left
side
next
to
the
parking
would
be
its
accessible
entrance.
Okay,.
A
B
To
speak
and
chair
sorry,
I
was
on
mute.
Mr
d'amico
has
also
spoken
on
this
one,
so
I'm
going
to
read
it
in
for
the
record
regards
to
30
dayton
street,
he
said:
remove
space,
4
and
redesign
the
parking
area
to
reflect
angle
parking.
This
will
result
in
a
safer
and
more
independent
parking
environment.
A
Thank
you
any
questions
from
the
board,
mr
counselor.
Is
this
going
to
be
for
sale
or
rentals.
AZ
AZ
A
I
understand
I'm
just
trying
to
think
this
through.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?
Yes,.
AB
What's
going
on
record
supporters
proposal,
the
mayor's
office
conducted
two
abutters
meetings,
the
first
on
july
21st
and
second
on
november
24th
of
2020
after
the
first
butters
meeting,
the
applicant's
team
worked
closely
with
a
number
of
neighbors
to
address
concerns
regarding
reduction
in
density,
changing
of
the
number
of
bedrooms
in
each
of
the
units
and
also
shifting
the
driveway
over
where
the
entrance
would
not
be
on
argus
place,
but
on
diet
instead,
which
titan
is
the
public
road
versus
argus
private.
AB
So
we
think
you
know
showing
the
character
that
they've
worked
closely
with
neighbors.
They
achieved
support
from
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association.
I
think
this
has
been
a
productive
process.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
Okay
and
madam
chair,
I
do
have
two
raised
hands
one
for
for
fatima,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
she
wants
to
talk
speak
on
this,
but
there
are
two
other
things.
Let's.
BA
Hi
guys,
my
name
is
benjamin
brassell.
I
am
we're
currently
residing
at
50
chestnut
hill
ave,
which
is
right
around
the
corner
from
this
project.
Right
next
to
the
courthouse,
I
just
want
to
say
that
these
city
realty,
has
always
done
amazing
projects
in
my
area.
I'm
always
happy
with
the
look
of
the
projects,
I'm
always
happy
with
the
way
they
take
care
of
the
projects.
BA
A
Can
you
find
annabelle,
please
ambassador
annabel
gomes.
AE
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
gomes
from
the
brighton
austin
improvement
association,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
the
proponent,
had
worked
very
closely
with
the
neighbors
for
quite
some
time.
It
could
get
to
a
point
where
everybody's
very
happy
and
they
are
all
in
support
and
the
bia
voted
to
support
to
support
it.
Thank
you.
B
B
BO
BO
My
law
firm
is
prince
lopel,
I'm
here
with
the
applicant
cleon,
byron
and
members
of
his
team,
as
well
as
dan
linsky,
our
security
consultant
and
matt
scalia.
Our
engineer
this
is
an
equity
applicant.
That's
before
the
board.
Today,
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board,
cleon
byron,
grew
up
blocks
from
this
location,
and
the
plan
here,
as
the
secretary
mentioned,
is
to
seek
a
conditional
use
permit
in
this
neighborhood
shopping
sub
district
of
the
matapan
neighborhood.
There
are
no
buffer
issues
with
this
issue.
BO
With
this
property
and
this
plan
you
on
this
survey,
you
can
see
that
it's
half
a
mile
from
it's
more
than
half
a
mile
from
the
nearest
operator
and
there's
no
schools
within
500
feet
of
this
application.
BO
The
site
plan
on
the
next
page
shows
you
kind
of
a
good
overview
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here.
It's
basically
a
just
over
5
000
square
foot
dispensary
and
at
the
rear
of
the
building
there
are
14
parking
spaces
that
would
serve
the
use.
There's
also
indoor
loading
for
deliveries
of
product
as
well
as
pickups
of
cash,
and
that
isn't
a
secure
garage
that
the
door
rolls
up
and
rolls
down
to.
So
it's
really
the
most
optimal
for
security
purposes.
BO
The
next
slide
shows
you
a
floor
plan
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
of
what
the
what
it
looks
like
here
where
blue
hill
avenue
is,
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
screen,
and
that
is
the
main
entrance
for
the
dispensary
there's
a
man-trap
door,
meaning
that
one
door
won't
open
until
the
other
door
is
closed
in
order
to
optimize
security.
BO
We
predict
about
12
to
15
employees
at
this
site
and
we
are
encouraging
both
our
employees
and
our
customers
to
use
transit
demand
management
to
get
to
the
site
in
order
to
minimize
the
number
of
cars,
but,
like
I
said,
we
do
have
14
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
BO
Yeah
sure
so
so
one
would
one
would
drive
down
the
side
street
and
pull
ashton
yeah
yeah.
Let
me
see
if
we
can
go
up
there.
Ansel
road,
so
ansel
road
is
a
is
a
two-way
street.
We
actually
have
our
traffic
engineer
on
the
on
the
call.
So
that's
one
way
to
get
to
ashton.
There
are
other
ways
and
you
would
once
on
ashton,
you
would
enter
I'm
sorry.
You
would
enter
the
parking
lot
on
the
ansel
through
an
existing
curb
cut
that
will
probably
make
smaller.
BO
The
back
is
a
little
bit
needs
to
be
cleaned
up.
Quite
frankly,
there
might
be
some
good
existing
photos
further
into
the
deck
and
it
needs
to
be
appropriately
lined
and
striped,
and
that's
what
the
team
at
fusson
o'neil
will
do
for
this,
and
then
you
will
walk
around
the
only.
There
is
no
entry
to
the
facility
from
the
rear,
you'll
walk
down
the
sidewalk
and
you'll
come
in
through
the
front
and
then
you'll
come
back
and
you'll
go
into
the
parking
lot.
A
And
so
is
there
parking
on
and
on
ansel
street
on
street
parking.
BO
There's
also
on
street
parking
throughout
the
throughout
the
area.
A
Okay,
how
would
the
plans
miss
better
plans
are
adequate?
Any
questions
from
the
board.
BD
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
patrick
fandell
from
the
office
neighborhood
services.
This
application
has
gone
through
a
full
community
process
through
our
office,
including
the
cannabis
control
commission's
required
community
outreach
meeting
and
a
hearing
in
front
of
the
boston
cannabis
board.
The
applicant
has
secured
the
support
of
the
greater
matapan
neighborhood
council
and
has
continued
outreach
to
local
community
groups
and
organizations
and
other
community
stakeholders.
BD
C
D
Motion
to
approve
do
we
need
to
be
pda's
design,
review.
R
BO
A
A
B
Right,
madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
call
it
the
12
30
hearings.
Are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
12
30?
Could
you
please
give
me
the
address
before
you
speak?
14
million
street?
Well
iraqi,
calling
doa
one
zero,
five
one
three
one
three
fourteen
main
street
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
BH
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
daniel.
Toscano,
I'm
located
at
one
state
street,
sweet,
1500,
boston,
mass
and
I
represent
the
owner
at
14
million.
I'm
especially
requesting
a
deferral
in
this
matter.
The
reason
for
the
deferral
is
that
the
advertisement
has
three
parking
spots
in
our
plans.
We
are
requesting
four
parking
spots,
so
it
has
to
be
re-advertised,
so
I'm
hoping
for
the
earliest
date
possible.
Thank
you.
A
BA
B
BL
The
secretary
of
the
board
would
like
to
re-advertise
the
project
due
to
some
changes
we've
made
for
the
community
and
that's
the
the
reason
for
the
request
for
the
deferral
which
we
hope
to
obtain
today.
K
B
BB
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
john
barry
lobster
john
d
barry
located
at
400
granite
ave
in
milton
massachusetts.
Due
to
community
requests
that
haven't
changed
in
the
proposal,
there
was
a
butters
meeting
held
last
night.
It
seems
like
some
of
the
abutters
are
becoming
supportive
of
the
project,
but
are
requesting
a
deferral
to
have
more
time.
A
BB
Thank
you
and
the
second
one
is
2149
2151
dorchester,
ave,
okay,.
B
BB
John
barry
law
offices
of
john
d
barry
four
hundred
granite
ave
milton
mass
zero,
two
one,
eight
six
again,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
There
was
a
there's
been
several
meetings
with
the
community.
There
was
a
vote
by
the
lower
middle
civic
association
that
ended
in
a
deadlock,
tie
they're,
requesting
that
the
proposal
be
deferred
to
give
some
more
time
to
meet
with
them
and
have
a
vote
in
one
direction
or
the
other.
BB
This
is
the
second
one
on
this
project.
Madam
chair.
This
project
actually
was
selected
for
a
zva
date.
An
error
before
meetings
with
the
lower
middle
civic
association
actually
started
to
begin
okay,
but
we
have
held,
I
believe,
one
of
butter's
meeting
and
we've
had
six
meetings
with
lower
mills
with
their
e-board
or
five
meetings
with
their
e-board
in
with
their
full
civic
and,
like
I
said
at
their
march
meeting,
there
was
a
vote
that
ended
in
a
deadlock
tie
on.
There
was
to
be
support
or
not.
May.
A
Mr
fortune
did
I
understand.
Lambert
was
with.
B
This
is
applicant,
proposes
a
change
of
oxygen
to
include
a
cannabis
establishment
violation.
Article
69,
section
14
candidates
used
to
the
conditional
use
in
article
69
section
14.,
article
69,
section,
14.,
a
footnote
further
states
that
the
canvas
establishment
shall
be
cited.
Half
a
mile
2640
feet
from
the
existing
cannabis
establishment
at
500
feet
from
an
elementary
school
first
to
12th
grade
measuring
from
the
lot
line.
Naming
the
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BO
Good
afternoon,
this
is
mike
ross
attorney
at
prince
lobel,
with
the
business
address
of
one
international
place
good
afternoon.
Members
of
the
board,
madam
chair
relief,
that
we're
speaking
as
the
secretary
mentioned
has
to
do
with
both
the
use,
the
conditional
and
a
local
industrial
district,
and
as
it
relates
to
this
is
a
good
slide
to
sum
for
a
second,
as
relates
to
the
proximity
to
another
operator,
and
that
would
be
the
half-mile
rule
there.
BO
The
the
plan
on
this
particular,
so
we
are
that
that
center
there
a
corner
lot
with
access
through
the
side
and
then
the
83
hyde
park.
Ave
is,
is
that
small,
phil
mid-block
building
you
see
there.
We
can
continue
from
this
slide.
A
A
BO
Yeah
we're
1200
from
the
nearest
school,
so
we
clear
that,
but
we
could
advance
here.
I
think
you
know
I've
said
in
the
past
that
to
do
about
this
might
be
a
good
thing.
To
sum,
for
one
second,
to
do
a
a
buffer,
you
need
to
have
a
real
compelling
reason.
This
is
a
first
of
its
kind
in
boston.
It's
the
first
of
its
kind
before
this
board.
BO
What
we
are
proposing
in
this
this
is
the
old
cerrinos
pasta,
building
on
hyde
park,
ave
where
they,
where
they
made
pasta
and
they
also
sold
it
out
the
front,
and
what
we're
proposing
to
do
here
is
manufacture
a
cannabis.
It
would
put
dozens
of
people
to
work
up
to
100
people
to
work.
We
would
also
have
medical
at
this
facility
there's
fewer
and
fewer
medical
coming
before
the
board.
I
don't
know
if
you've
noticed
that
it's
it's
medical
requires
the
applicant
to
also
cultivate
their
own
product.
BO
They
can't
just
be
medical,
they
also
have
to
cultivate.
They
also
have
to
grow.
So.
For
that
reason,
it's
there's
a
hurdle.
There's
a
big
hurdle
there.
This
operator
would
do
manufacturing
in
the
rear,
medical
and
as
well
as
retail,
the
retail
would
occur
so
so
all
the
cannabis
uses
would
be
to
towards
the
rear
of
the
building
that
front
portion
of
the
building
right
there
along
hyde
park
avenue
would
essentially
be
community
use
space.
We
would
be
donating
that
space
for
community
use
that
job
fairs
other
things
that
would
go
over
there.
BO
A
BO
Yeah-
and
I
also
I
failed
to
mention-
I
jumped
right
into
it-
we
we
have
larry
mays
from
the
company
who's
on
the
phone
call
with
us
dan
linsky,
our
security
consultant
and
then
the
architect
keith
bettencourt,
my
apologies
for
not
mentioning
them.
So
let
me
just
lay
out
the
numbers
that
you
asked
for
the
retail
facility
is
the
smallest
component
of
this
entire
thing.
It's
3
200
square
feet.
BO
That's
that
gray
area
right
there.
I
have
better
detail
plans,
but
this
is
a
good
good
plan
to
just
hover
on
for
a
second
3
200
square
feet
is
that's
that,
for
example,.
BO
Than
the
one
you
just
approved,
which
is
over
5
000.,
the
rear
of
the
building
will
have
15
500
square
foot
of
manufacturing.
That's
a
sizable
area
where
we'll
be
able
to
put
people
to
work
and
and
the
front
area
is
about
3
000
square
feet.
That's
going
to
be
our
community
use
that
we
that
we
give
away
the
reason
why
we
also
need
to
sell
and
have
retail
as
well
as
manufacturing,
is
that
it
all
works
together.
BO
BO
We've
had
a
partnership
with
ufcw,
and
so
I
would
say
finally,
the
parking
in
the
back
of
the
building
the
34
dedicated
parking
spaces
dedicated
loading
allow
all
of
this
to
work
as
it
once
did
in
in
2003
when
it,
when
it
actually
appeared
before
this
board
and
became,
asked
to
manufacture
and
sell
pasta
and
was
granted
variances
to
do
the
same.
BO
A
A
BO
Yeah
yeah,
so
in
order
for
all
of
this
to
work,
it's
like
a
three-legged
stool.
If
you
were
to
take
away
retail
but
just
say,
you're
going
to
keep
manufacturing
medical,
it
would
be
severely
limiting
the
possibility
of
this.
This
project
getting
off
the
ground,
just
monetarily,
wise,
financially
it
just
they
could
not
do
it.
This
is
a
multi-million
dollar
investment.
It's
it's
one
of
the
more
significant
ones
in
the
city.
It
has
direct
access.
It's
a
perfect
location.
BO
BO
The
retail
is
open,
the
manufacturing
area
opens
at
8am,
and
workers
will
get
right
in
and
begin
working.
So
it's
not
that
the
retail
is
the
main
show
I'll
grant
you
that,
but
at
the
same
time
this
can't
work
without
having
all
three
elements
in
place
financially
speaking
for
the
applicant,
the
applicant
harvard
medical,
harvard
health
and
recreation
is
a
national
company.
They
are,
they
have
dozens
of
of
locations
throughout
the
country,
they're
in
seven
seven
different
states
and
they're
very
good
at
what
they
do.
BO
This
was
a
site
that
they
cited
four
years
ago.
I
believe,
if
I
could
scroll
through
there's
some
some
additional
context
photos.
I
think
that
will
kind
of
help
kind
of
make
this
full
picture
come
to
fruition.
BO
Yeah,
so
the
front
portion
of
that
building-
and
you
can
see
some
photos
of
it
at
the
next
slide-
is-
is
perfect
for
job
training.
What
our
relationship
with
ufcw
we
want
to
hire
people
directly
from
the
community.
We
want
to
train
them,
to
have
jobs,
not
just
to
sell
cannabis
but
to
cultivate,
to
produce
and
to
grow
cannabis.
We
won't
be
growing
here.
BO
Let
me
be
clear,
but
we
will
be
growing
in
deerfield
massachusetts.
We
will
have
jobs
and
pipelines
to
get
people
into
this
career
more
than
just
get
them
behind
a
cash
register
to
get
them
through
the
entire
industry.
So
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
use
it,
for
we
also
would
make
it
available
to
the
hyde
park
community.
We
would
make
it
available
to
anyone
who
wanted
to
use
it.
What
it
will
not
be
used
for
is
for
cannabis.
BO
A
So
so,
as
far
as
the
use
of
that
space,
it's
specifically
related
to
job
training
in
relation
to
cultivation.
It's
not
anticipated
as
other
kinds
of
job
training.
It's
not
anticipated,
as
you
know,
place
where
kids
can
come
and
hang
out
or
things
like
that.
Yeah.
BO
BO
We
also
have
commitments
to
hire
60
people
of
color
from
from
this
community
and
to
hit
other
goals
that
are
laid
out
in
the
in
the
boston,
cannabis
boards
memo,
and
I
I
will
know
that
the
boston
cannabis
board
chair
kathleen
joyce
specifically
said
that
the
reason
why
they
like
this
and
they
voted
unanimously
to
prove
it
is
because
of
the
fact
that
this
is.
This
is
just
a
different
proposal
altogether
and
it
allows
us
to
to
do
something
we're
currently
not
doing
in
the
city.
A
BO
Yeah,
madam
chair,
we
we
both
went
at
it
separately,
so
in
the
the
only
efforts
to
to
cooperate
have
occurred
really
over
these
last
I'd,
say
six
months
when
we
knew
that
there
were
going
to
be
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
conflict
and
I've
reached
out
to
the
other
side
repeatedly
and
what
harvest
has
offered
the
other
side
is
is
robust.
They
said
that
they
would
work
with
them
on
parking.
They
don't
have
direct
parking.
They
may
have
a
few
spaces
in
the
back
of
their
building.
BO
There's
nothing
direct
they're
sandwiched.
In
between
it's
a
tough,
tough
location.
We
would
be
willing
to
provide
them
with
parking
from
our
building
when
these
retailers
open
there's,
there's
this
notion
that
everyone's
going
to
have
cannabis.
In
fact,
that's
not
the
case.
There's
a
lot
of
empty
shelves
the
first
couple
years
during
the
industry.
We
would
be
willing
to
provide
them
with
wholesale
product.
Should
they
want
that
and
we
entered
into
those
conversations.
BO
But
unfortunately
you
know
if,
on
the
other
side
do
I
do
I
have
those
conversations
or
do
I
wait
it
out
and
hope
that
we
get
denied?
I
I'm
not
sure
that's
that's
going
to
be
their
calculus,
but
we've
spent
the
last
few
months
reaching
out
to
them
repeatedly
to
try
to
work
with
them.
We're
both
members
of
the
ufcw
union.
That's
rare!
Now,
because
not
a
lot
of
people
have
signed
up
with
them.
We
have
a
a
labor
p
screen
with
them.
BO
There's
no
reason
why
we
can't
work
together,
sereno
used
to
own
this
building
and
I
believe
the
other
building
was
a
cerino's
restaurant
too.
So
you
know
it
is
possible
to
have
kind
of
a
different
feel
and
style
for
what
they're
doing
and
what
we're
doing
and,
like
I
said
our
main
show,
is
it's
a
combination
of
all
three
things:
it's
not
just
you
know
we're
not
there
we're
not
there
to
to
price
gouge.
You
know
there
was.
There
was
a
discussion
to
talk
about.
How
can
we
make
sure
that
that
doesn't
happen?
BO
BO
D
Madam
chair,
I'm
struggling
so
counselor,
I'm
struggling
because
our
chair
has
asked
the
same
question
really
twice
and
I
guess
maybe
third
time's
a
charm,
but
aside
from
the
economics
of
the
business
and
I,
by
the
way,
I
appreciate
all
all
of
the
the
comments
made
and
the
community
outreach
and
the
training
of
you
know
facility
opportunity,
but
specifically,
as
it
relates
to
the
proximity
to
this
other
low
retail
location.
D
I
have
not
heard
a
single
reason
why
we
would
make
an
exception
from
a
land
use
case
perspective.
I'm
concerned
that
you
know
we're
setting
this
sort
of
notion
that,
well,
you
know,
there's
gonna
come
a
time
when
they're
gonna
fall
within
within
this
district
within
the
the
radius
restriction.
Well,
that
time
has
not
yet
come
and
we're
being
asked
to
do
that
in
advance
and
I'm
sorry,
but
with
all
due
respect,
you
can't
compare
a
pasta
manufacturing
location
to
a
cannabis
facility.
D
Just
like
you
can't
compare
a
pizza
shop
and
a
nail
salon
to
it.
There's
a
reason
that
we
have
some
regulatory
framework
around
this.
So
I'd
like
to
specifically
have
have
the
chair,
the
chairwoman's
question
answered,
which
was,
why
is
an
exception,
need
to
be
made?
And
if
you,
if
the
answer
is
the
economics
of
this
space,
you
are
giving
a
portion
of
this
property
again
not
to
get
into
the
granularity
of
the
detail.
D
BO
Right
right,
okay
and
I'm
not
trying
to
evade
the
the
question
at
all,
I
thought
I
thought
I
answered
it
by
by
saying
that
the
boston-
and
I
know
the
boston
kansas
board-
is
a
different
body,
but
in
so
distinguishing
this
project
as
a
manufacturing
project,
the
cannabis
board
said
that
it
goes
beyond
the
criteria.
BO
This
would
not
let
us
let
us
move
next
to
some
existing
operator.
These
things
happened
simultaneously.
They
just
happened
to
get
in
the
door
before
we
did
and-
and
there
was
a
dispute
about
that-
we
don't
need
to
get
into
it
at
the
board
here.
What
what
we're
offering
is
something
different
and
that's
what
I
think
that
the
purpose
of
the
buffer
is.
I
would
agree
with
you
if
these
were
two
standalone
companies
standing
right
next
to
each
other.
We
would
have
to
answer
that
question.
G
Mr
ross
can
can
I
follow
up
on
that.
I
think
the
whole
issue
with
the
buffer
zone
is
that
this
board
is
trying
to
adhere
to
city
policy.
So
when
the
city
council
passed
the
buffer
zone
ordinance,
but
it
was
a
couple
years
ago
by
now,
I
don't
even
know
how
long
anyway,
we
had
cases
that
came
before
us,
where
they
were
within
that
and
we
felt
like
we
needed
to
respect
that
and
and
made
decisions
based
on
that
basis.
G
Then
the
boston
cannabis
board
got
created,
which
is
another
city
creation
and
they
seem
to
be
approving
projects
or
supporting
projects
regardless
of
the
buffer
zone.
So
I
don't
even
know
what
city
policy
is
anymore.
That's
item
number
one
item
number
two
is
this:
you
know,
god
bless
you
and
ufcw
for
doing
job
training
community
space,
given
the
high
cost
of
real
estate
in
this
city.
To
just
give
I
mean,
on
the
one
hand,
you're
talking
about
the
economics
requiring
that
you
have
a
retail
space.
G
G
Without
really
I
mean
how
job
training
will
take
a
few
hours
a
week.
You
know
for
a
few
months
and
that's
it
just
see
the
whole
I'm
just
sort
of
baffled
by
the
whole
proposal.
I
don't
understand
why
why
not
if,
if
you're
going
to
argue
against
the
buffer
zone,
why
not
use
the
whole
space
for
some?
This
is
a
profit
making
operation
for
some
pro
it
just
I
I
I
don't
want
to
be
cynical,
but
it
just
seemed.
There
seems
too
many
pieces
that
don't
make
any
sense
to
me.
BO
Okay,
I
think
let
me
try
on
both,
I
think,
there's
a
good
answer
for
both
if
we
went
back
to
the
site
plan.
I'll.
Take
your
second
question.
First,
the
front,
the
other
reason
why
the
front
doesn't
work
for
us.
BO
We
can
any
one
of
those
actually,
oh
actually,
if
we
could
go
one
more
up,
please,
madam
ambassador,
or
two
more
or
three
more
one.
More,
I'm
sorry,
one
more
last
time!
Yes,
this
one
right
here
that
that
is
this
is
a
case
of
a
building
straddling
two
different
zoning
districts.
One
is
a
two
f
5000
and
one
is
a
local
industrial
one.
The
front
portion
of
this
building
is
within
a
2f
5000.,
so
by
definition
we
cannot
use
cannabis
so
that
so
that
answers
that
question.
Okay,
thank
you!
BO
BO
Yeah
we
could,
and
and
and
sereno's
did
but
but
as
as
mr
ligras
said,
you
know
when
there's
a
difference
between
pasta
and
cannabis
and
the
other
reason,
frankly
that
we
did
that
buffer.
If
you
will
is
because
it
was
out
of
respect
to
this
community
that
if
they're
driving
down
hyde
park
avenue,
you
don't
necessarily
need
to
see
a
cannabis
store
screaming
out
at
that
corner
lot
and
they
won't.
BO
We
are
going
to
be
entered
at
willow
street
and
it's
not
saying
it's
not
putting
that
right
on
the
front
door
of
hyde
park
and
we
think
given
now
and
where
we
are
in
the
times,
even
though
they
voted
for
it
in
hyde
park.
There
are
some
people
who
don't
prove
it.
The
other
thing
I
would
I
would
agree
with
you,
mr
ehrlich,
is
that
you
had.
You
were
on
your
own
for
a
good
year
year
and
a
half
on
this
item,
with
only
the
zoning
that
was
put
in
place.
BO
Since
then,
the
board
was
created
and
the
board
did
put
into
their
regulatory
framework
specific
language
around
the
buffer
and
how
they
can
get
around
it
in
their
own
right
and
they
don't
pass
every
buffer.
They
certainly
have
not.
I
know
that
the
attorney
for
the
board
leslie
hawkins,
is
on
the
call
too
and
probably
could
speak
to
what
they're
doing
much
better
than
I
could,
but
now
that
this
board
is
in
place,
you
have
a
different
regime,
an
additional
regime.
BO
He
raised
it
not
me,
but
that
could
be
another
reason
why
someone
might
consider
going
to
that
variant.
So
those
are.
D
Those
reasons
just
to
be
clear,
because
this
this
has
you
you've,
pointed
this
out
counselor.
This
is
not
a
precedent
setting
board,
so
what
has
occurred
in
the
past
is
is
relevant.
I
would
say,
though,
that
when
you
look
at
the
buffer
zone
definition,
it
sounds.
It
sounds
to
me
like
the
the
the
narrative
around
the
exception.
D
That's
being
requested
here
is
the
fact
that
this
is
a
manufacturing
facility,
in
addition
to
a
retail
facility,
as
opposed
to
a
standalone
retail
facility
up
the
street,
but
the
the
the
bc,
the
bcb
definition
of
an
existing
cannabis
establishment-
and
this
is
out
of
the
out
of
the
regis-
includes
a
license
to
operate
a
retail
facility,
a
product
manufacturer
facility,
a
cultivation
facility,
an
independent
facility
or
any
other
type
of
cannabis,
establishment
approved
and
regulated
by
the
vcb
et
cetera.
So
you
know
it
is
addressed
in
the
regulation.
D
It
is
not
a
unique,
a
unique
issue
that
this
is
a
a
manufacturing
facility
that
was
not
regarded
or
addressed
by
the
regulatory
framework.
BO
Well,
I
mean
just
with
respect:
I'm
not
trying
to
you
know
be
argumentative
here,
but
but
by
that
definition
a
cannabis
establishment
is
the
only
item
you
have
in
the
zoning.
BO
You
don't
have
retail,
you
don't
have
manufacturing
those
aren't
separate
uses.
The
only
use
that's
in
the
zoning
is
the
use
of
cannabis
establishment,
so
manufacturing
would
be
cannabis.
Establishment
retail
would
be
cancelled,
medical
would
be
cannabis
establishment,
so
we
are
really
just
applying
for
a
canvas
establishment.
So
the
question
of
well,
why
retail,
why
medical?
Why
manufacturing?
AC
V
Questions,
yes,
thank
you
can,
because
when
can
you
just
explain
what
manufacturing
is
yeah.
BO
This
is
where
the
leaf
the
loose
leaf
product
itself
is
extracted
and
and
the
oils
and
the
essential
oils
and
the
cannabinoids
and
the
the
items
within
are
extracted
and
put
into
some
sort
of
concentrate
and
then
made
into
whether
it's
a
lobster
or
an
edible
type
like
a
gummy,
a
gummy
or
something
that
is
all
within
the
manufacturing.
BO
It's
where
packaging
will
occur.
It's
where
child
proof,
tamper,
proof,
packaging
will
occur,
of
both
loose
leaf
and
some
of
those
edible
type
of
items.
It
will
not
include
the
growing,
so
it's
basically
it
can.
It
can
mean
everything
up
into
the
the
growing.
The
reason
I
mean
it,
they're
they're
very
these
are
very
technical.
BO
There's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
interaction
with
the
you
know,
fire
department
and
the
special
services
and
construction
documents
to
really
make
sure
it's
done
correctly
and
safely,
and
so
it's
it's
right
now,
it's
kind
of
depicted
just
as
an
open
space,
but
but
clearly,
if
we're
approved,
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
work
to
get
into
to
get
to
construction
document
level.
A
BO
Yeah
I
mean
the
architect
is
on
the
line.
He
can
go
into
extensive
detail
as
to
the
mechanicals
and
the
equipments
that
are
put
into
this
to
make
sure
that
there
is
zero
smell
that
emanates
from
the
facility
in
terms
of
delivery.
That
will
be
coordinated.
You
know
by
dan
linsky
and
his
team
and
they're
both
on
the
phone
and
I'd
be
happy
to
have
them
weigh
in
on
this,
but
I
mean
typically
typically
that
typically
the
number
of
I
mean.
BO
We
say
that
a
retail
store
is
going
to
have
three
deliveries
a
week.
This
is
someone
that's
actually
going
to
be
producing,
so
it
would
probably
be
more
like
five
deliveries
going
out
of
the
facility
a
week,
our
manufacturing
we're
intending
to
have
up
to
100
workers
in
here.
You
know
I'd
say
about
two-thirds
of
those
might
be
within
the
manufacturing
area.
BO
A
So
we
need
to
just
make
sure
that
our
our
lines
and
our
perspectives
are
kept.
That
way.
One
last
question:
anybody
else
from
the
board
have
any
additional
questions.
A
Okay,
so
now
I'd
like
to
hear
from
people
in
support
and
in
opposition
I'd
like
to
hear
from
all
the
calling
users
first,
please
miss
ambassador
after
we
hear
from
elected
officials
hear
from
the
calling
users
and
then
from
three
additional
people
who
may
have
raised
their
hand.
Thank
you.
BD
This
has
been
heard
by
the
boston,
cannabis
board
and
appropriately
vetted
for
operational
concerns
in
the
context
of
the
area.
Although
there
is
a
buffer
zone
conflict,
the
addition
of
this
establishment
will
be
a
vibrant
addition
to
an
existing
and
growing
commercial
area.
In
addition,
this
application
would
mark
a
new
license
type
in
business
to
this
part
of
the
neighborhood.
This
cannabis
establishment
creating
the
buffer
zone,
is
a
retail
only
establishment.
This
application
is
for
retail
medical
manufacturing
and
cultivation
facility
of
cannabis
and
fills
a
need.
A
currently
continuously
approved
establishment.
BD
This
also
bring
much-needed
jobs
and
career
pipelines
to
the
community.
While
we
understand
there
are
ongoing
concerns
from
some
residents
in
the
local
civic
association,
we'd
like
to
build
a
record
in
support
of
this
application,
we
just
asked
that
the
apple
can
continue
to
engage
with
the
community
as
they
move
forward
through
their
process.
But
again,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank.
BD
AK
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
speaking
on
behalf
of
city
council
at
large,
michael
flaherty,
the
council
looked
to
stand
with
the
neighborhood
and
speak
in
opposition
to
this
petition
for
getting
relief
from
the
the
buffer
zone.
Council
understands
that
this
party
has
granted
relief
for
buffalo
zone
in
the
past,
but
understands
the
industry
is
going
to
continue
to
grow.
The
prophet
zone
was
written
to
ensure
that
we
are
that
we
are
sitting
cannabis,
established
establishments
in
an
equitable,
predictable
and
transparent
way.
So
no
one
neighborhood
becomes
inundated
with
locations.
AK
C
Madam
chair,
jordan,
freyas
is
on
the
comments
and
attendee,
but
go
ahead
guys.
R
Z
Oh
yeah,
jessica,
sorry,
karen
foley
comes
with
sabi
georgie's
office
and
would
like
to
echo
the
sentiments
of
council
flaherty
and
oppose
this
project.
Thank
you.
Paul.
P
D
Madam
chair
point
of
clarification,
counselor
ross
indicated
there
would
be
no
cultivation
or
growing.
The
mayor's
office
indicated
that
cultivation
was
included.
A
Yes,
we
can
we
can.
We
can
clear
that
up
later,
just
for
now,
let's
get
testimony.
Okay,
can
I
hear
from
all
the
go
ahead?
Miss
ambassador
all
the
collins.
C
C
C
A
In
the
meantime,
anybody
who
has
their
hands
raised
and
has
can
send
us
comments
in
the
chat
will
take
care
of
it
because
I
see
gabriel
camacho
you
would
like
to
sp.
You
are
in
favor.
You
can
take
down
your
hand,
please,
because
you've
been
registered
anybody
else.
Who
would
like
to
put
a
comment
in
the
chat?
Please
do
so.
A
BM
A
You
in
the
meantime,
if
people
who
are
on
this
call
can
hear
me,
please
put
your
comments
and
support
are
in
opposition
in
the
chat
and
please
have
it
to
go
to
all
all
panelists.
A
That
way
he
can
record
you
in
the
event
that
we
continue
to
have
issues.
So
are
you.
AT
AJ
BI
Okay,
just
want
to
make
sure
so.
Yes,
my
name
is
armani
white.
Thank
you
for
taking
a
moment
to
care.
For
me,
I
owner
of
evergreen
farms,
evg
farms,
which
you
approved
back
in
november
83
high
park
ave
about
six
months
away
and
as
you've
been
made
aware
through
other
presentations
to
you
on
the
candidate
public
cases.
BI
The
boston
canvas
board
has
indicated
that,
when
the
buffer
be
permeated
that
generally
that
be
done
in
favor
of
an
equity
applicant
rather
than
against
one
and
I'm
here
to
let
you
know
that
if
we
are
not
like
anti-competition
or
business,
we
actually
want
to
see
the
industry
grow.
I'm,
however,
sitting
a
large
multi-state
company
with
deep
pockets,
essentially
next
door
to
our
small
equity-owned.
Local
startup
will
kill
us
before
we
even
open.
A
BI
Yes,
so
we
actually
just
were
approved
by
you
all
not
too
long
ago
and
we're
moving
towards
finalizing
our
plans
to
go
through
vpda
design,
review
and
toscano
can
who's.
Who,
I
think
is
here,
is
also
on.
Our
team
can
maybe
talk
more
about
that
or
sean
who's.
Also
on
the
team.
No.
A
BI
A
And
tell
us
what
efforts
have
been
made
by
by
this
applicant
to
combine
forces
so
that
in
fact
it's
you
know
a
more
overall
equitable
project.
A
BI
I
hear
you
okay,
yes,
we
so
we
are
unable
to
survive
with
a
giant.
You
know
business
right
next
to
us
we're
under
2
000
square
feet.
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
we're
you
know
he's.
I
think
that
was
mentioned
for
5,
000
or
600
square
feet.
That's
not
true!
We're
smaller
than
the
retail
store
that
that
the
the
big
you
know
chain
company
is
bringing
in
and
so
yeah
we
just
can't
survive
together,
I'm
not
sure
what
yeah?
BI
AC
BQ
Thank
you,
jim
kirker.
Here
president
hyde
park,
neighborhood
association,
the
high
park
neighborhood
association
to
convert.
It
was
unanimous
that
we
are
opposed
to
granting
the
variances
for
many
reasons,
for
one
thing
that
the
neighborhood
is
really
against
it.
There
was
a
member
of
hpna
that
did
do
a
a
petition.
BQ
I
believe
it's
over
200
signatories
on
that
at
this
point,
so
we're
in
an
area,
that's
not
a
real
touristy
area,
and
we
just
don't
feel
that
having
two
retail
pot
distribution
places
right
next
to
each
other
in
this
kind
of
small
area
is
good
for
the
good
for
the
neighborhood.
There
is
an
area
down
the
street
that
I
did.
Try
to.
You
know,
negotiate
something
with
harvest
to
get
them
to
move
and
they
rejected
it.
BQ
So,
but
this
is
this
is
we
we
would
like
to
have
the
buffer
upheld
the
buffer
zone
upheld
and
again
it
was
unanimous.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
thank
you.
Can
I
hear
just
now
from
a
couple
of
pollen
users
jessica,
miss
ambassador.
BJ
I'm
here
to
speak
on
first
seven
wordsworth
project,
which
is
the
next
one.
Please
lower
your
hands.
R
AN
AT
AN
Sorry,
no
I'm
here
for
your
next
case
at
7,
00.
A
BR
A
Okay-
okay,
let's
just
see
because
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
getting
a
good.
Let's
just
see,
if
there
is
anybody
else,
no,
let's
we,
oh
so
I
think
we
have
enough
information
did
did
somebody.
R
BO
Okay,
so
I
think
that
was
a
misstatement
on
the
part
of
the
mayor's
office.
There
will
be
no
cultivation
at
the
site
and
madam
chair,
may
I
just
point
out
for
the
record
that
over
500
hyde
park
residents
have
written
letters
and
have
been
in
support
and
have
attended
meetings
for
the
project.
We
understand
that.
BO
A
AI
BA
A
Opposed
so
the
motion
doesn't
carry,
it's
been
denied.
BO
And
chair,
I
know
that
you're
still
I
use,
I
don't
know
if
you're
still
looking
for
motions,
I
I
could,
I
could
offer
a
reviser
that
might
help
the
situation
if
you're
willing
to
hear
it.
Thank.
A
No,
it's
it's!
It's
it's
at
this
point.
It's
just
been
straight
denied
because
that
motion
didn't
carry
okay.
BO
A
U
In
terms
of
community
programming
is
a
substantial
project
in
a
community
if
there
was
to
be
a
revision
to
come
before
us.
I
would
like
a
huge
amount
of
effort
to
be
applied
to
what
community
programming
can
exist
with
the
establishment.
A
You
could
come
back
with
something
else,
but
you
know
it's
just
been
denied.
I
don't
want
to
make
exceptions
to
our
rules
because
that's
where
we
go
down
a
dark
path.
So
may
I
move
on
to
the
next
case
and
thank
you
council
for
trying
your
very
best.
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
bla1024093
seven
wordsworth
stream.
This
is
proposing
the
demolition
of
an
existing
two
family
and
erect
a
new
three-story
six-unit
structure
with
six
r
street
parking
and
roof
decks.
The
violations-
article
53
section,
nine,
the
floyd
air
maximum
ratio-
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
sufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
rare
yard,
is
sufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
height
requirement
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
Article
53
section
9
the
height
requirements
excessive
and
feet
article
53,
section,
56
off
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
8
are
multi-family
dwelling
units.
6
units
is
forbidden,
used
article
53,
section,
zero,
nine
point:
three:
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
article
2017-5
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
D
Cheers
good
afternoon
sergeant
interrupt
to
recuse
myself
on
this
matter.
T
Business
address
of
11
beacon
street
here
on
behalf
of
slava
men
on
labrador,
realty,
the
developer
and
an
owner,
and
mr
philip
sema
from
balanced
architects,
the
architect
on
the
project.
A
T
T
Okay,
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
man,
I'm
sure
we're
gonna
move
forward.
So
the
the
proposal
is
we're
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
direct
the
new
six
unit
residential
condominium
building
in
its
place
with
six
parking
spaces.
This
particular
lot
size
is
one
of
the
larger
ones,
5145
square
foot.
Lot
the
we
have
a
mix
of
one
two
and
three
bedroom
units,
the
one
bedrooms.
T
There
are
two
of
them:
the
average
size
of
672
square
feet,
two
two
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
895
square
feet
and
two
three
bedroom
units,
an
average
size
of
1290
square
feet.
The
floor
plan
has
the
first
floor,
has
one
handicap
accessible
unit
on
the
ground
level.
That's
unit
one.
It
can
be
accessed
two
ways
through
the
front
door
entrance
on
the
wordsworth
street
side
of
the
building
or
on
the
pope
hillside.
T
There
is
a
handicap
accessible
ring
that
allows
for
entrance
that
way,
also
hoes
our
parking,
a
garage
door
along
the
pope
hillside
where
there's
no
housing.
It
you
enter
through
that
garage,
there's
three
interior
spaces
and
then
three
exterior
spaces
in
the
back
of
the
building.
T
We
then
go
up
to
our
third
floor,
our
top
floor
and
we
have
units
five
and
unit
six
and
those
are
both
three
bed
two
bath
units
with
balcony
and
they
both
have
two
exclusive
roof
decks
that
are
accessed
by
hatch.
Those
roof
decks
are
200
square
feet
approximately.
A
Yes,
because,
like
I
do
want
to
understand
that,
because
these
are
a
lot
of
violations
and
to
me
it
appears
that
this
might
be
given
that
you're,
you
have
side
weir,
you
know,
inadequacies
and
hide
excessive.
It
feels
like
unique
that
your
butters
might
end
up
feeling
boxed
in
by
this
proposed
development.
T
Sure
so,
just
to,
if
we
do
have
the
side
pictures,
you
will
see
every
building
on
our
side
matching
our
height,
so
it
is
common.
As
you
go
down
the
street,
the
use,
it
is
a
2f
district,
although
every
building
in
our
side
is
a
three
family
as
you
go
down,
the
streetscape
and
the
buildings
next
to
us
on
the
smaller
lot
actually
have
a
six.
That
was
subdivided
a
few
years
back.
So
mfr
is
a
violation.
T
What's
allowable
is
0.8
we're
at
1.19
our
height,
we
meet
the
height
in
feet,
so
we
are
below
the
35
foot
requirement,
but
we
do
have
a
three-story
building
and
two
and
a
half
is
what's
allowed.
Our
front
yard
is
total,
but
we're
at
around
three
to
five
feet.
As
you
go
sort
of
down
the
streetscape,
our
side
yard
violation,
we,
what
would
be
required
is
seven.
We
are
at
five
and
five
and
you
can
see
just
as
we
go
off
part
of
that
is
because
of
the
overhang.
We
are
fortunate.
T
We
do
not
have
a
rare
butter,
a
side
of
butter,
we're
on
a
corner
lot
and
the
building
directly.
Next
to
us,
that's
attached
is
is
higher
than
ours,
and
we
designed
this
purposely
our
parking
nine
would
be
required,
but
we
do
have
one
for
ones:
we've
got
six
spaces
on
site,
our
minimum
rear
yard.
35
is
what's
required
and
we
do
have
30..
T
But
I
will
note
that,
as
you
go
back
to
byron
street
there's
a
large
grade
change
as
you
go
back
and
you
can
see
that
in
some
of
the
side
pictures-
and
we
did-
we
did
put
green
space
in
the
rear
for
our
rare
butters.
T
A
And
collide,
can
you
please
show
us
so
this
is
the
best
picture.
You
have
tell
us
how
the
parking
is
proposed
to
work.
T
So
if
you
can
nope
sorry,
if
you
go
back,
there
was
a
rendering
that
showed
the
garage
door.
If
we
go
back
a
slide
or
two,
you
can
see
right
there
on
the
top
corner,
there's
a
garage
door
on
the
pope,
hillside
so
away
straight
away
from
the
residential
buildings
that
you
would
enter.
That
would
also
have
a
unit
on
the
ground
level,
but
then
three
interior
spaces.
You
would
then
come
out
the
back
to
have
three
additional
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
So.
A
AD
Proposal
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lena
tramelin,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
fund
the
recurring
support.
The
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
triabarra's
meeting
for
this
project,
where
the
applicant
were
closed
with
the
abundance
and
access
most
of
the
concerns,
the
increase,
the
average,
the
parking
ratio
also
reduced
number
of
stories
and
number
of
units
harbour
view,
neighborhood
association,
avoiding
support
on
this
proposal,
and
we
also
received
32
letters
of
support
from
direct
tavares
and
from
residents
of
harborview.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah
please
kevin
or
a
miss
ambassador.
Whoever
has
the
has
the
mic.
Please
can
we
hear
from
the
collins
and
then
just
randomly
anybody
else.
Four
other
people
who've
called
in
or
who
have
their
hands
raised.
AN
Good
afternoon
my
lunch
here,
members
of
the
board
of
minor
prize
with
the
carpenter
senior
on
behalf
of
all
our
members
for
residents.
So
we
supposed
to
want
to
go
and
graduate
support.
BS
BJ
Yes,
my
name
is
roberto.
Jose
is
the
neighbor
next
door
knight
works
for
the
right
world,
sportsville
avenue
and
she's
in
support
of
the
project.
He
just
specifically
asked
us
to
mention
that
he
appreciates
the
fact
that
there
are
parking
spots
within
the
six
spots
within
the
building
and
for
the
record
he
he
probably
sits
five
feet
away
from
this
proposed
project.
Thank.
BM
U
BN
A
Thank
you
go
ahead,
mrs
ambassador.
C
BS
Yeah,
I
just
I'm
a
buffer,
I'm
right
behind
them.
In
fact,
I'm
in
my
kitchen,
looking
at
the
building
right
now,
the
building
is
not
in
good
shape.
BS
Slovic
men
he's
just
trying
to
up
the
neighborhood
to
make
this
neighborhood
better
he's
changed
everything
to
try
to
accommodate
everybody
around.
Here
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
building.
In
fact,
I
really
wish
they
would
let
him
what
they
would
let
him
through,
and
I'm
also
talking
about
my
next
door
neighbor,
which
is
anna
pavluka
she's
all
for
it
too
she's
not
feeling
very
well
today,
I'm
all
for
it.
I
am
a
buffer.
I
can
see
the
whole
building
what
I'm
looking
at
and.
C
All
right,
leonard.
AC
BT
A
Did
we
hear
from
city
councilor
the
east,
boston,
city,
councilor,.
W
Yes,
man,
I'm
sure
hi.
This
is
ricardo
from
edward's
office.
The
counselor
is
in
support
of
this
project.
We
worked
with
the
development
team
to
ensure
that
they
would
be
making
a
contribution
to
the
east
boston
housing
stabilization
fund,
as
well
as
setting
aside
one
of
the
units
as
as
an
affordable
unit
for
sale.
A
Yeah,
you
know
what
I
I
kind
of
don't
want
to
know
that
that
relief
is
can
be
bought.
So
you
know
that's
nothing
that
that's
not
something
we
can
pay
attention
to.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
can
I
have
a
motion
given
the
information
that
we
have.
U
BP
U
Recommend
I
would
recommend
a
motion
to
approve,
with
a
proviso
for
bpda,
to
look
at
the
exterior
and
specifically
look
at
the
accessible
access.
My
recommendation
would
be
to
inset
it
and
to
do
a
lift
versus
it.
Projecting
onto
this,
the
street
way.
K
Man,
I'm
sure,
if
I
could,
I
know,
there's
no
way
to
to
obligate
the
proponent
from
doing
it,
but
if
this
were
to
pass,
I
would
ask
that
they
take
a
look,
particularly
at
the
pope
hill
section.
It's
just
a
little
beat
up
in
that
area
and
could
use
some
streetscape,
and
you
know
I
would
just
ask
that
they
work
with
the
city
to
to
see
if
we
can
clean
up
that
area
a
bit
yeah.
B
fire
escape
and
a
new
three-story
port
system,
egress
stairs
to
the
ground,
an
extension
to
the
living
space
into
the
basement.
The
violations,
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
side.
You
had
setback
article
53
section
on
excessive
far
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
radio
setback
and
article
53,
section
52,
roof
access,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
50
minutes.
BU
Proposed
so
this
is
an
existing
three
family
is
being
fully
renovated
and
fully
sprinkled,
and
the
current
building
has
a
fire
escape
as
a
mean
of
egress
that
will
be
replaced
with
a
porch.
As
for
indications
from
our
plan
reviewer,
he
asked
me
to
do
my
real
purchase
in
metal,
as
opposed
to
pt
wood,
to
incorporate
the
abutters,
which
is
53
jeffries
street
fire
escape
into
our
career
porch.
Also.
A
AJ
BU
A
BU
A
So
we
just
need
to
know,
then
what
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
is
and
the
floor
to
sell
height.
So
we
want
to
know
that
anybody
in
that
basement
would
not
be
if,
in
the
in
the
event
of
a
fire,
could
exit
without
any
problems,
so
swipe
ceiling
height
please
and
float
to
window
cell
height.
BU
BU
Second
and
third
floor
unit
are
one
bathroom
one
bathroom
475
square
feet.
It's
a
pretty
open
concept
and
the
first
floor
unit,
which
includes
the
basement.
Space,
is
787.
A
AD
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board
lina
trammelling
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
received
strong
support
from
apparent
and
from
jefferson's
point
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
W
Z
C
AL
C
No
sorry
I
didn't
realize
my
mic
was
on.
I
apologize.
Okay,
no,
it's
my!
Can
you
just
lower
your
hand?
Thank
you
doreen's
here
for
another
okay.
V
B
On
the
next
case,
calling
voa
106
7375
28
geneva
street,
this
is
to
combine
two
lots
to
create
one
new
parcel
with
a
total
area
of
8
240
square
feet
also
to
rate
the
existing
structure
and
are
at
the
new
residential
building
with
26
units
and
19
parking
spaces,
but
combining
lots,
an
address
to
be
known
as
2830
geneva
avenue
the
violation
article
2017.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
56,
insufficient
parking
article,
53,
section
56.5,
a
maneuvering
area
and
access
design.
B
Article
53,
section
8
car,
lift
barking.
Article
53
section,
9
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
height
has
been
exceeded:
article
53
section,
9,
insufficient,
open
space
per
unit;
article
53,
section,
9,
front
yard,
requirement
article
53,
section
9,
insufficient
rare
yacht
article
53,
section
9,
insufficient
additional
lot
area
per
unit
and
article
53
section
nine,
excessive,
far
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
T
Street
are
with
me:
I
have
bill
mensinger,
the
architect
from
arc
and
the
owner
of
joel
deluca
of
the
property
at
28-30
geneva.
Just
a
point
of
clarification,
so
the
plans
that
ms
better
have
have
been
changed
and
reviewed
at
isd,
so
the
description
of
the
project
has
changed.
This
project
is
now
proposed
which
you're
looking
at
to
demolish
the
existing
commercial
structure,
which
is
a
map
which
is
a
airport
related
limo
company
and
to
erect
a
four-story
residential
building
with
19
condominium
units
and
19
interior
parking
spaces.
A
On
miss
miss
better.
U
I
I
have
the
revisions
I
I've
had
the
chance
to
review
them.
Okay,.
A
Excellent
go
ahead.
Counselor
thank.
A
So
so
tell
us,
can
you
talk
through
the
project?
We
noticed
that
it's
in
a
flood
zone.
How
are
you
accommodating
for
that?.
T
There's
no
living
space,
there's
just
slab
and
then
parking
on
the
first
level.
So
just
as
we
get
into
the
project
to
the
front
entrance,
you
would
come
in
garage
entrance
along
geneva,
there's
19
interior
parking
spaces,
a
trash
area,
utility
lobby
and
bike
parking
room
all
on
the
ground
level,
so
there's
no
livable
space
on
the
ground
level.
Madam
chair.
T
So
you
mean
the
actual
housing
as
we
go
through
the
okay.
So
as
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
there's
seven
condominium
units.
When
we
go
to
the
third
floor,
there's
six
and
we
go
to
the
fourth
floor.
There's
six
11
of
the
19
units
have
private
balconies,
there's
no
roof
deck
on
this
building.
There
are
15
one
bedroom
units
at
an
average
range
of
680
square
feet
and
four
two
bedroom
units
at
980
square
feet
and
it
is
zoned
multi-family
residential
in
this
area.
A
Okay
and
again,
let's
see
tell
us
about
your
rear
yard,
because
we
just
want
to
make
sure
you're
not
too
close
to
your
rear,
butters.
T
T
T
A
How
are
the
plans
miss
better
adequate?
Any
questions
from
the
board
is.
AD
We
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
of
this
proposal
during
the
community
we
have
taken
were
with
the
community
and
address
several
of
the
concerns,
reduce
the
number
of
stories
too
far
and
the
proposed
height
of
the
building
matches
the
building
next
door
also
reduce
the
number
of
units
to
19
and
increase
the
calculation
51..
Thank
you.
W
C
C
C
C
BV
Hi,
thank
you.
Thanks
jessica,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
nick
pundit
from
14h
geneva
street
down
the
street.
We
like
the
fact
that
they've
gone
down
to
four
stories
and
have
19
parking
spots.
Now
we
still
reiterate
our
concerns
with
this
this
street,
as
as
residents
that
it's
every
product
is
so
dense.
The
density
of
this
project
is
pretty
substantial
and
right
now
you're
not
supposed
to
park
on
geneva
street
in
front
of
the
massport,
a
lot
etc,
but
people
do
they're
typically
about
65
cars
per
day
that
are
parked
there.
BV
So,
as
development
comes
in
those
cars,
gonna
be
displaced,
plus
people
that
are
buying
you
know,
two
bedroom
units
at
over
a
half
million
dollars
are
likely
to
have
multiple
cars,
so
we
just
fear
for
the
parking
situation
in
an
already
crowded
neighborhood
as
well
as
like.
We
talked
about
the
density,
so
we
appreciate
the
improvements
here.
We
just
would
like
to
echo
those
concerns
on
this
project.
C
A
U
B
Well,
I'm
calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
one
zero:
five,
six,
seven,
two
nine
one:
seventy
one
newbury
street.
This
is
changing
from
a
retail
store
to
a
tattoo
file.
The
violations,
article,
eight
six
section:
seven
right
use-
item,
43a
body
yard
establishment
is
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
B
Okay,
yeah
matter
of
fact,
I'm
going
to
call
lambit
is
lambda
on
the
on
the
phone
on
the
on
the
call.
C
B
All
right,
I'm
going
to
call
the
next
go
ahead,
probably
next
case
calling
boa
105
337
64
clockwood
street.
This
is
construction
of
four
new
townhouses.
The
violations,
article
66
9
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
11,
the
use
is
forbidden
and
article
60
section
9
in
the
lot
area
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for.
B
BK
Hello,
this
is
stuart
schreier
and
I'm
from
1005
dorchester
avenue.
I
represent
the
owner
of
the
property.
There's
one
little
thing:
we
have
to
go
over
first,
which
is
this
was
originally
a
proposal
for
four
town
houses,
but
this
is
a
rediscussion,
because
after
the
last
meeting
it
was
reduced
to
three
units.
It's
going
to
be
a
traditional
three-decker
down
from
four
units
to
three
units.
BK
It's
a
five
thousand
six
hundred
twenty
five
square
foot
lot.
The
property
is
in
a
three
f
six
thousand
zone.
The
only
issue
is,
it
does
not
meet
lot
area.
It's
a
lot
area.
Insufficient
is
the
only
thing
it
was
cited
for
there
was
a
new
zoning
refusal
letter
in
november
for
the
three
family
and
it's
a
single
issue.
BK
The
client's
plan
is
to
build
a
traditional,
looking
three
decker
and
no
no
units
in
the
basement.
No
family
rooms
in
the
basement,
no
storage
in
the
basement.
You
know
not
no
finished
storage,
I
should
say,
and.
A
BK
A
Hold
on
mr
troyer,
how
are
the
the
the
plans
miss
better
they're,
adequate?
Any
questions
from
the
board?
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
C
I'm
trying
to
see
no
raised
hands
just
jordan,
but
well
actually,
jordan
are
you?
Would
you
like
to
speak
on
this
he's
all
set.
AC
X
Matt
I'm
cheering
joe
carpenter
with
the
mayor's
office.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
regular
opposition.
There
was
zero
abutter
support
we
held
in
a
buddhist
meeting
on
march
first
with
a
dozen
neighbors,
and
there
was
a
unanimous
opposition
due
to
lack
of
transparency
from
the
applicant
and
construction
management
concerns.
X
BK
Does
I
I
don't
know
why?
What
I
do
know
is
that
the
neighbors
asked
him
to
put
a
pitched
roof
on
top
with
an
attic
he
would.
He
would
have
done
a
flat
roof,
so
you
know
to
make
it
look
more
like
the
houses
in
the
neighborhood,
his
design
added
on
a
pitched
roof.
There's
no
living
space,
there's
no
finished
rooms
in
the
attic.
He
would
be
happy
to
take
the
attic
off
and
make
it
a
flat
roof.
Three
decker.
If
that
would
it's
everybody
there's
to
be
no
living
space
in
the
attic.
AC
Okay,
thank
you:
islam
34
burma,
street
matapan,
greater
madame
neighbor
council.
The
council
received
extensive
emails
from
all
the
butter
direct
owners.
Their
concern
came
from
for
the
last
six
months.
They
have
had
no
direct
communication
from
the
applicant.
AC
They
are
also
concerned
about
the
lack
of
space
for
adequate
space
for
parking
when
questioned
about
what
the
type
of
use
it
was
in
the
building.
It
was
only
on
march
2nd
that
they've
learned
that
two
of
the
three
units
would
actually
be
for
condominium,
sale
and
not
rental,
which
they
had
made
the
assumption,
and
overall
we
are
in
agreement
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
that
there
has
been
poor
project
management
and
lack
of
communication
overall
with
the
director,
butters
and
other
residents.
Thank
you.
C
P
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
with
the
previous.
C
That
was
jordan
from
councillor
ricardo
arroyo's
office,
jordan.
We
could
not
hear
you
we're
not
sure
what
happened.
P
C
C
Training-
all
british
parents-
oh
actually,
I'm
sorry,
there's
a
quote
on
kenneth
mills.
Are
you
looking
up.
BF
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
board,
members,
my
name
for
the
record,
is
kenneth
mills
owner
at
68
clark,
wood
street,
and
I
would
very
briefly
like
to
voice
my
strong
opposition
to
the
appeal
for
this
proposal
on
two
key
counts.
First,
communication
to
the
butters
on
the
details
of
this
project
has
been
abysmal,
unfortunately
lacking
both
timeliness
and
full
transparency.
BF
There
was
absolutely
no
mention
of
a
a
pitched
roof
being
requested
by
butters,
and
so
that's
news
to
me,
but
I
mean
to
whit.
You
know,
I'm
I'm
unclear
as
to
why
the
application
to
the
city
called
for
four
new
town
homes,
where
the
proposal
that
was
shared
with
residents
for
the
first
time
called
for
a
three
family
dwelling,
which
is
just
indicative
that
this
has
been
a
moving
target
from
the
very
start.
BF
BF
Oh,
I
was
just
gonna
say
the
other
major
concern
was
the
currently
overcrowded
on-street
parking,
which
would
be
exacerbated
by
this
project,
and
the
proposed
plan
for
six
to
eight
parking
spaces
at
the
rear
of
the
premises
is
really
unrealistic.
Unless
perhaps
the
applicant
is
going
to
have
a
parking
attendant
to
move
vehicles
in
and
out.
So
I
just
advocate
for
more
communication
on
this
matter,
to
really
enable,
via
butters,
to
have
complete
transparency
on
the
project
and
just
understand
the
pros
and
cons.
A
BK
A
Honestly,
honestly,
from
my
perspective,
you
know
you
are
the
face
of
the
applicant
and
applicants
come
before
us.
However,
you
cannot
stake
your
reputation
on
somebody
else's
lack
of
communication,
so
I
do
think
it's
important
that
the
applicant
himself
or
herself
complete
conversation
with
the
abutters
so
that
there
is
a
growing
level
of
trust
between
everybody.
A
AC
A
Will
that
give
you
enough
time,
mr
schreier.
B
A
Oh
yes,
I
thought
we
did.
B
B
I'm
gonna
call
the
next
case
calling
105
6272
19
west
trimlet
street.
This
is
a
constructed
new
structure.
Six
units
new
structure
will
have
red
decks.
Eight
parking
spaces
construction,
the
violations
out
of
article
65,
section
8.,
the
mfr
is
forbidden
in
the
three
f
6
000
sub
district
article
65,
6
and
9..
The
fourier
ratio
is
excessive.
B
BB
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
john
barry,
the
largest
john
d,
barry
at
400,
granite
ave
located
in
milton
massachusetts.
I
am
the
applicant
on
behalf
of
the
owner
here,
fernando
del
fiore.
His
company
name
is
alfior
inc
located
at
470,
west
broadway
street.
The
architect
on
this
particular
project
is
eric.
Zacherson,
his
businesses
context
workshop
located
at
one
ludlow
street
boston,
mass
zero.
Two
one,
two,
nine.
BB
The
property
here
is
19
west
tremblay
street.
It's
located
in
dorchester
massachusetts
within
a
three
f
six
thousand
district.
The
particular
lot
here
is
just
shy
of
9
000
square
feet
is
8
985
square
feet.
The
proposal
here
is
to
construct
a
six
unit
structure.
There
was
a
revision
sent
to
the
board
that
it
is
increasing
the
number
of
parking
spots
from
eight
to
ten
private
parking
spots,
and
that
was
as
a
result
of
the
community
process
and
request
for
more
parking
to
be
added,
hold.
A
On
miss
banner
of
you,
yes,.
U
I
have
yes,
I
have
them.
It's
dated
2
16,
21.,.
BB
That's
correct
so
jumping
into
the
project
the
community
process
was
intense.
There
was
three
different
abutters
meetings
that
were
held
the
first
one
was
on
july,
29th,
the
second
one
on
december
21st
and
the
third
on
february
10th.
There
were
three
civic
meetings
that
were
conducted.
There
were
two
different
associations.
The
first
one
was.
BB
BB
BB
Certainly
so
the
six
units,
the
way
that
they
break
down,
is
there's
no
basement
units.
There
are
two
units
on
the
first
floor
unit,
one
and
unit
two.
They
are
865
square
feet.
Two
bedroom
two
baths,
each
with
a
patio
in
the
rear.
BB
Moving
up
from
there,
the
second
and
third
floor
units,
three,
four,
five
and
six.
Each
unit
is
895
square
feet.
They
are
again
one
floor.
They
are
two
bed
two
baths.
Each
of
those
four
units
has
a
small
rear
deck
addressing
the
units.
The
first
is
proposing
six
units
in
a
three
f.
Six
thousand
district.
BB
BB
We
do
believe
that
the
far
is
in
line
and
actually
smaller
than
what
is
currently
located
on
that
particular
street.
The
building
height
violation
is
not
in
height,
the
height
of
the
structure
is
32
feet,
6
inches.
What
the
violation
is
for
is
that
it
will
be
three
stories
of
living
space.
The
style
of
the
structure
is
going
to
be
a
double
triple
decker
in
the
rear
yard.
In
the
front
yard,
setbacks
are
created
mainly
because
the
board
is
looking
at
the
landscape
proposal,
which
is
being
scrolled
over
right
now.
BB
The
placement
of
the
building
was
placed
where
it
was.
It's
a
it's
a
shallow
lot,
but
a
placement
of
the
building
was
placed
where
it
was
which
created
these
violations
in
order
to
allow
for
the
largest
amount
of
private
parking
off
the
street
to
address
the
community's
concerns
of
traffic
and
parking,
but
also
to
maintain
the
larger
amount
of
green
space
on
the
lot,
which
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
the
lot,
there's
some
very
mature
trees
that
exist
there
with
the
single
family
that
is
rather
dilapidated
and
needs
to
be
demolished.
BB
A
BG
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
We
believe
the
applicant
has
worked
directly
with
neighbors
and
the
civic
groups
in
this
area
regarding
parking
concerns
in
space
construction
management.
There
are
letters
of
support
that
were
forwarded
to
the
board.
That
should
be
on
record
with
you.
Thank
you.
AY
D
Motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design,
review.
G
B
B
Madam
chair
make
a
motion
for
deny:
what
upgrade
did
it
I'll.
B
A
Okay,
the
way
what
I
would
like
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
at
that
we
have,
the
representative
is
this:
sparrow
is
somebody
here
to
speak.
Is
is
miss
sparrow
here
and
does
do
you
have
an
attorney
or
anybody
representing
you,
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
have
ms
darrow
and
her
representative
available
and
the
property
owner,
whoever
owns
153
to
155,
bluewheel,
hot
blue
hill
ave
and
their
representative
also
available.
A
A
We
also
need
a
representative
from
isd
to
speak
about
the
the
basis
for
which
the
permit
was
issued.
So,
let's
start
off
with
miss
sparrow
and
her
representative
is
is:
is
she
on
or
anybody?
A
I
I
just
like
this
this
this
letter
just
cleared
from
the
screen.
Please,
yes
thank
you
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
sparrow
on
or
her.
BR
She
was
on,
and
I'm
going
to
speak
with
her
on
her
behalf.
Is
this
the
steph
rocks?
Is
that
correct.
BR
I
was
asked
to
come
on
to
present
on
to
support
this
and
I
believe
I'm
I'm.
I
came
on
as
a
participant,
so
I
don't
I'm
not
sure.
If
I'm
understanding
the
question.
A
Okay,
can
you
okay,
so
do
you
as
a
butters,
have
a
an
attorney
representing
you
or
not.
C
I
think
she's
on
the
side
of
step
rocks.
I
don't
let
me
just
I
mean
what
dorian
do
you
know?
If
do
you
have
any
information
for
loretta.
BW
So
can
you
hear
me
okay,
yes,.
AJ
BW
We
as
a
bundlers,
we
do
not
have
representation,
we
submitted
our
objection
to
the
project
and
the
method
by
which
it
was
put
forward
and
subsequently
approved.
It
was
misrepresented
so.
A
O
A
Okay,
it's
george,
not
chris,
okay,
okay,
so
at
least
we
have
the
owner
of
onr
off
record.
Do
we
have
somebody
from
isd.
A
Okay
and
then
do
we
have
kevin
any
other
names.
A
A
AC
BW
We
were
responding
to
was
the
fact
that
the
the
location
was
being
cited
as
a
community
center,
which
was
not
in
line
with
what
they
actually
do,
and
the
fact
that
they
did
not
come
to
the
community
until
after
the
approval.
When
we
were
asking
questions.
A
BW
BW
BW
BW
Here
we
go
so
what
they
they
list
themselves
as
a
health
services.
BW
Organization;
okay,
which
is
not
in
line
with
a
community
center
and
they
perform
client
services
to
a
targeted
group
with
activities
such
as
counseling
and
treatment.
R
A
Hear
from
mr
rollins,
please
tell
us
what
your
first
of
all,
what
is
the
use
of
that
space?
That's
in
question.
A
Yes,
I
did,
can
you
please
describe
what
the
use
of
the
spaces
that
is
labeled
as
community
center.
O
Yes,
this
is
a
it's
interesting
that
I
was
able
to
hear
some
of
the
hearing
before
when
the
marijuana
establishment
was
described
as
an
exciting
new
industry,
and
what
we
have
in
the
city
of
austin
is
a
very
sad
industry,
which
is
people
who
are
addicted
to
substances.
A
O
This
is
for
persons
who
are
recovering
from
substance
abuse
to
come
together
in
support,
and
we
have
programs
for
all
of
the
people
that
want
to
come
to
this
center
and
participate
in
programs
to
deal
with
their
addiction.
This
is
not
a
treatment
center.
These
are
not
clients,
and
I
can
explain
where
the
problem.
A
Was
so
let
me
just
ask
there,
is
there
medical
staff,
or
is
this
purely
like
social
workers,
and
things
like
that.
O
A
O
Well,
given
the
fact
it's
a
zoom
operation,
the
basic
operation
is
during
the
day
and
it's
five
and
a
half
days
a
week,
and
I
will
say
that,
with
regard
to
the
specifics,
I
have
the
director
of
the
program
in
attendance
loretta
leverett
for
any
particular
technical
issues
that
I
may
not
be
able
to
answer.
A
Okay,
so
may
I
hear
from
isd,
can
you
tell
me
what
what
the
what
the
zoning
district
is
and
what
the
the
application
for
the
use
stated.
M
Yes,
madam
chair,
the
the
the
alt
stated
to
change
sorry,
neil
janowitz
for
inspectional
services,
change
of
restaurant
to
a
community
center
with
three
offices.
The
zoning
district
is
mfr
local
services
district
in
the
roxbury
neighborhood
and
a
community
center
is
a
lot.
Is
it
an
allowed
use
in
this
subject?.
A
So
it
came
in
as
a
community
center
and
three
offices
correct,
okay
and
is
is
a
community
center
defined
in
the
code
as
what
is
a
community
center
defined
as.
A
Okay,
may
I
go
back
to
mrs
ward:
is
there
anything
else
you
need
to
add
to
this.
A
So
it
sounds
like
what
has
happened
here
is
that
the
isd
looked
at
it
as
a
community
center
in
the
broadest
terms
of
community
center.
As
far
as
a
social,
a
social
recreational
space,
whereas
with
the
three
offices
and
with
the
specific
services
that
are
being
provided,
the
community
sees
it
as
something
different.
BW
A
Okay,
so
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
I'd
like
if
there's
any
information
that
either
counselor
rollins
or
miss
ward,
loretta,
sparrow
and
and
and
the
rest
of
the
applicants
would
would
like
to
submit.
A
Please
submit
it
to
the
offices
off
the
of
the
board
of
appeal
by
this
friday,
and
may
I
have
a
motion
to
have
this
sent
to
the
law
department.
A
All
those
in
favor
an
exposed
motion
carries
so
please
make
sure
all
the
information
gets
to
the
board
of
appeal
office
from
mr
rollins
and
miss
ward
at
all.
Okay,
thank
you.
B
Madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
go
into
the
interpretation
and
I'm
going
to
call
them
onto
the
record
and
they're
all
the
same.
They're
all
the
same
motion.
They
have
I'm
sorry,
five
caseboa.
Four,
I'm
sorry!
That's
the
wrong
one!
Boa
one:
one:
zero:
seven:
zero!
Eight
five,
one
thousand
one
boylston
street!
A
Because
can
we
mute
everybody,
so
I
want
to
make
sure
mr
fortune,
you've
read
it
all
into
the
record:
miss
better
you're,
refusing.
A
Okay,
before
you
get
off,
can
I
ask
all
board
members
to
join
back
in
again
when
we
are
done
with
the
agenda,
because
I
do
want
to
just
have
a
checklist.
So
may
I
note
make
sure
that
I
have
somebody
from
who
brought
this
appeal
on
on
the
call.
Can
you
please
put
your
name
any
breasts
on
the
bracket.
BX
BX
Benjamin
tymon
from
time
and
davis
to
duffy
100
cambridge
street
in
boston,
and
I
represent
two
of
the
petitioners
paul
lewis
and
sean
doherty.
A
So
you've
represented
paul
lewis
and
sean
dodd
dougherty
okay
is,
is,
it
is
kensington
newberry,
alsa,
olean
and
krt
holdings
also
represented.
BX
This
is
attorney
time
and
again,
arthur
goolian,
I
believe,
is
no
longer
a
petitioner.
BX
That's
my
understanding
and
attorney
alec
pine
did
intend
to
be
on
the
call
today
for
the
other
petitioners,
though
I
do
not
know
whether
he's
presently
on.
A
AI
I'm
sure
my
name
is
kevin.
O'flaherty,
we,
I
don't
represent
the
property
owner.
The
property
owner
is
mass.
Massdot
is
the
mass
department
of
transportation,
but
we
we
are
going
to
long-term
lease.
We
are
long-term
leasing,
the
property
for
the
development,
so
I
represent
the
developer,
who
holds
the
permits.
A
Okay,
so
thank
you
for
putting
all
your
names
and
addresses
on
the
record,
so
this
particular
request
for
interpretation
came
before
this
board
on
october
27,
2020
and
basically,
this
board
was.
A
The
request
to
this
board
was
essentially
five-fold
request,
one
to
determine
that
the
height
of
the
towers
exceeded
the
height
approved
by
the
vpda
under
article
80..
The
square
footage
exceeds
what
the
bpda
approved
the
bpda
miscalculated
the
linkage
fees
owed
by
the
to
the
dip.
The
preliminary
adequacy
determination
issued
by
the
bpd
in
october
2019
is
defective
and
finally,
the
certificate
of
compliance
instead
of
a
certificate
of
occupancy
issued
by
the
bpd
director
was
invalid,
thus
all
culminating
in
the
fact
that
isd
issued
so
based
on
on
and
analysis.
A
We
have
come
to
a
conclusion.
May
I
have
a
motion,
mr
other,
can
you
help
me
out
with
this
yeah.
G
I
would
make
a
motion
that
this
board
does
not
have
jurisdiction
over
these
questions.
It
is
a
function
of
the
bpda
and
as
such,
I
will
rule
that.
I
make
a
moment
that
isd
did
not
air
on
issuing
the
permit.
Second
emoji.