►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 2-23-21 - PART 1
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 2-23-21 - PART 1
B
B
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
will
be
limited
by
the
chair
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
the
project.
That
is
those
who
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
B
B
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand,
and
just
let
me
repeat
that
again,
if
you
are
connected
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
B
B
C
C
J
B
C
K
Good
morning,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston,
madam
chair
members,
here
requesting
an
extension
for
these
matters.
534R
dorchester
avenue
is
an
application
approved
by
this
board
for
new
seven
unit
building.
My
client
needs
additional
time
going
to
issues
with
the
fire
department
and,
of
course,
with
kovid.
B
Oh
excellent,
thank
you.
So
we
have
a
full
a
full
board
today,
and
I
would
also
like
to
acknowledge
that
we
have
a
new
board
member
and
an
alternate
who
are
observing
today,
so
just
to
put
that
on
the
record
that
we
will
expect
that
they
will
enjoy
the
day
today
before
they
get
put
on
the
hot
seat
in
the
future.
C
The
first
board
final
arbiter
calling
voa
102
9694
35
brooklyn
road.
This
is
a
request
and
appear
before
the
board,
the
relative
to
abort
proviso
on
its
prior
decision,
subject
to
design
review
by
the
bpda,
with
the
attention
to
reducing
density
and
for
the
compliance
of
the
radiograd
setback
requirement.
C
C
B
I
Absolutely
thank
you,
madam
chair
sensa.
Here
we've
had
extensive
discussions
with
bpda
staff
and
have
provided
the
board
with
a
letter
from
michael
konizzo,
deputy
director
of
urban
design
at
the
bpda,
which,
in
summary
states
that
we
have
reviewed
the
plans
and
heard
the
proviso.
They
believe
that
the
proposal
meets
the
recommendations
of
jp
rocks.
We
are
here
this
morning,
request
respectfully
requesting
that
this
board
finds
that
we
have
complied
with
the
terms
of
their
proviso.
B
I
So
when
the
motion
was
made,
there
was
like
most
of
the
motions.
Now
there
was
a
proviso.
That
said,
you
know
a
detailed
bpda
design
review
addressing
those
different
issues.
We
did
sit
down
with
the
bpda
zone,
obviously
because
of
the
time
and
went
through
the
plans,
and
they
felt
that
this
was
exactly
the
kind
of
project
they
envisioned.
I
I
Match
I
think
there
may
have
been
one
misstatement
made
back
in
july
21st
with
respect
to
a
rare
yard.
We
had
a
zero
lot
line
on
the
rare
yard,
but
it's
actually
a
seven
foot
lot
line
and
together
with
the
seven
foot
on
the
of
10
stoney,
which
is
a
building
directly
behind
us
we're
creating
again.
This
is
a
requirement
or
suggested
of
g
plan.
B
H
I
If
it's
presenting
to
a
residential
neighborhood,
it
is
a
20-foot,
and
if
it's
presented
to
a
commercial
structure,
it
would
be
10
feet,
and
so
what
we've
done?
What
we've
done,
mr
ellis,
not
to
interrupt
you
at
all
is
working
directly
with
your
butter,
who
has
an
existing
building,
is
collectively
taking
14
feet
and
making
that
the
mid
block
passageway,
which
is
what
jp
rox
envisioned.
H
I
You
know
I
went
back
and
looked
at
my
notes,
mr
ehrlich,
and
that's
a
really
good
question
I
had
written
in
my
notes.
We
had
a
zero
rearray
outside
that,
but
actually
that
is
incorrect.
It
is
a
seven
foot,
radar
setback
and
then
collective
group
to
seven
foot.
On
the
other
side,
a
14
year,
14
foot
wide
passageway.
I
I
think
so
I
I
believe
they
did.
I
mean,
as
I
stated
madam
chair,
this
went
through
a
15-month
review
process
with
community
groups
and
you
know
countless
meetings
with
individuals
as
well
as
civic,
so
I
do
believe
that
they
did.
There
was
some
concern
about
whether
it
was
a
safe
passageway
between
these
two
buildings
and
I
could
state
that
we
have
enlisted
a
landscape
architect
who
will
beautify
this
area
and
make
it.
I
H
B
A
Chair
just
briefly
kevin
o'connor
here
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
we
did
notice
this
request
for
board
final
arbiter,
because
the
request
essentially
asks
to
be
granted
relief
from
a
zoning
code
violation
that
was
not
previously
granted
relief,
so
the
neighborhood
was
notified
and
and
that's
what
that's
the
reason
for
the
emails
that
that
came
in,
and
there
are
probably
people
that
are
standing
by
willing
to
offer
testimony
if
you
were
so
desired
to
hear
from
them.
But
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
B
I
I
This
does,
as
mr
kenizzo
stated
in
his
letter,
comply
with
the
plan,
jp
rocks
and-
and
it's
it's
a
unique
thing,
because
this
will
be
a
passageway,
that's
open
to
the
public,
whereas
most
rear
yards
that
we
see
or
spaces
in
between
buildings,
their
private
property.
This
would
not
be.
This
would
allow
people
circulation
from
their
neighborhood
to
washington
street.
So
again,
that
is
exactly
what
plan
jp
rocks,
requested
and.
I
There
has
not,
we
went
again
to
bpda.
I
think
there
probably
should
be
some
folks
on
the
bp
from
the
bpda
who
may
be
on
this
call,
and
I
know
it's
untraditional-
to
take
testimony
during
the
board
final
labrador,
but
per
the
proviso
we
went
back
and
it
was
attention
to
detail
with
respect
to
the
issues
that
you
just
raised
and
we
did
go
through
them
with
them
and
that
generated
the
lab
that
mr
canizzo
had
folded.
H
I
One
thing
that
I
think
is
important
on
this
project
too,
is
there's
no
open
space
violation,
so
we
do
have
as
big
as
the
building
is
and
when
you're
addressing
massive
massing
and
density,
we
are
complying
with
the
underlying
zoning
with
respect
to
open
space
and
again
by
providing
the
neighbors
access
through
this
mid-block.
It
is
not
it's
not
really
unique
to
our
property.
It
is
for
the
benefit
of
the
entire
community.
I
And
we
went
to
the
we
went
to
the
super
year
instruction,
madam
chair.
We
went
to
the
bpda
and
sat
down
and
went
through
these
plans,
and
they
felt
that
this
was
something
to
in
in
the
in
the
plan.
Jp
rocks
the
density
bonus,
which
you'll
find,
as
I
stated
it's
over
22
affordability,
which
is
almost
double
the
amount
required.
I
C
F
This
is
eric
robinson.
Can
I
just
ask
a
question
of
the
council.
I
was
not
here
for
the
previous
hearing
seated
on
the
board,
but
just
so
I
make
sure
I
understand,
as
I
review
this
for
the
first
time
the
rear
yard
setback.
Is
it's
a
little
odd
because
of
the
shape
of
the
lock,
because
it's
a
rectangular
lot,
so
the
rear
yard
setback
is
the
short
side
on
the.
E
O
O
B
P
P
This
board's
original
approval
in
july.
We
also
engaged
extensively
throughout
the
article
80
process.
There
was
a
removal.
There
were
a
floor.
There
were
additional
setbacks.
There
was
a
reduction
of
units
all
through
the
article
80
process.
The
bpda
remained
supportive
of
this
project
and
feels
very
strongly
that
it's
by
and
large,
compatible
and
compliant
with
the
recommendations
of
planned
jp
rocks.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
opposition
the
board
has
heard
has
come
from
people
in
the
neighborhood
who
continue
to
struggle
with
the
notion
of
playing
jp
rocks.
P
Broadly,
the
bpda
has
been
gauging
what
we
did
a
couple
weeks
ago,
we
hosted
a
plan,
jp
rocks,
neighborhood
update,
so
I
think
the
concerns
you're
hearing
from
from
the
neighborhood,
in
my
opinion,
come
from
plan.
Jp
rock's
concerns.
I
don't
think
they're
relative
to
this
project.
The
bpda
who's
tasked
with
policy
planning
density
considerations
and
review
in
the
city
again
remains
remains
comfortable
with
all
of
those
aspects
of
this
project.
The
density,
the
planning
everything
there.
I
think,
as
attorney
general
gene,
has
noted
too.
P
Obviously,
the
original
approval
in
july
of
this
board
did
note
that
additional
bpda
design
review
we,
we
sat
down
several
times
with
attorney
for
genie
and
the
development
team
and
worked
through
these
plans.
But
again
the
bpda
is
comfortable
with,
what's
being
shown
here.
It
functions
very
well
with
what
else
is
happening
in
this
area.
This
is
a
pocket
of
the
clan
jp
rock
study
area,
which
is
undergoing
a
large
amount
of
development.
It
was
formerly
all
industrial
lots,
so
obviously
a
really
important
part
of
that
plan
area.
B
So
I
have
a
question
for
the
bpda,
so
this
is
still
just
the
plan.
Why
hasn't
it
been
memorialized
in
zoning?
Why
is
it
still
that
this
is
a
local
industrial
zone
and
and-
and
I
will
also
clarify
it-
looks
like
what
we
heard
from
are
abutters
and
not
distant
distant
people,
so
I
would
like
to
ask
of
the
pda.
Why
isn't
this
yet
memorialized
in
gaming.
P
Unfortunately,
madam
chair,
I
don't
have
a
specific
answer
for
you
on
that.
One
again,
I
think
there
are
challenges
to
the
plans
the
ap
rocks
plan.
Obviously
the
affordability
is
massive.
This
project
is
meeting
that
affordability,
which
was
the
key
takeaway
from
plan
g
through
rocks.
This
is
actually
one
of
the
only
scene.
That's
been
able
to
do
that.
So
I
apologize
madam
chair
I'll,
get
to
your
question
now.
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
trying
to
engage
the
neighborhood
right.
B
H
Yeah
I'm
of
two
minds:
on
the
one
hand,
if
we,
if
we
send
something
for
design
of
you
to
the
vpda,
with
a
specific
request,
I
actually
don't
appreciate
with
the
bpa
coming
back
without
having
changed
and
respected
those.
On
the
other
hand,
if
there
was
a
some
confusion
about
the
rear
yard
setback,
and
that
was
one
of
the
specific
things
we
made,
I
am
based
on
the
importance
of
the
affordability,
I'm
willing
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
applicant's
request.
B
B
C
Calling
your
next
few
cases
calling
doa
897,
172,
509,
east
5th
street,
there's
a
containing
case:
boa
896,
586,
509,
rare
easter
street.
This
is
the
request.
That's
been
made
to
the
board
to
prove
the
zoning
compliant
underground
connection
between
the
two
residential
structures
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
K
Very
briefly,
I
there's
an
existing
three-family
dwelling
that
had
been
situated
to
the
rear
of
a
commercial
building
on
the
front
of
the
lot
at
509
east
5th
street.
The
application
approved
in
2019
allowed
for
the
subdivision
of
the
lots
and
the
demolition
of
the
commercial
building
in
the
erection
of
a
new
four
unit.
Building
this,
as
I
say,
was
all
approved.
K
This
would
cause
issues
with
the
fire
department,
because
there
is
no
immediate
access
to
that
building
from
east
5th
street.
The
suggestion
was
made
working
with
the
inspectional
services
department
that
a
way
to
administratively
cure
this
would
be
to
abandon
the
ert
application
for
the
front
building
make
this
all
a
single
alt,
a
single
building
with
the
connection
that
would
eliminate
the
rear
address.
There
would
be
one
building
with
the
509
east
fifth
string
address,
hold.
K
The
only
plan
submitted
is
the
one
that's
shown
on
screen,
which
is
the
site
plan,
because
there's
no
change
to
either
building
but
for
an
underground
utility
corridor
connecting
the
two
buildings
which
isd
accepts
as
a
sufficient
connection
between
the
buildings.
For
this
to
be
again
regarded
as
a
single
structure
for
addressing
purposes.
B
F
C
You
calling
the
next
three
cases
for
g
card,
madam
chair,
and
I
call
all
of
them
into
the
record
and
the
violations
and
then
we're
going
to
go
from
there
calling
boa
one
one:
five:
zero,
nine,
eight,
two
one:
thirty
four
arlington
street.
This
is
a
new
construction
of
a
seventeen
hundred
thirty
single
family
attached
residence.
A
three-story
structure
with
rare
patio.
C
C
This
is
for
one
five:
zero,
nine,
eight
zero
one,
thirty
to
one
thirty,
two
arlington
street:
this
is
new
construction
of
a
two
unit.
Dwelling
condominium
controlling
three
thousand
two
hundred.
Seventy
eight
square
feet:
three-story
structure
with
rare
patio.
The
existing
park
parcel
will
be
subdivided
into
two
lots
lot
to
be
known
as
130
to
132
arlington
street
and
will
be
1
640
square
feet,
violations
article
32,
section
4:
this
is
in
the
g
card.
C
This
is
for
the
third
case,
calling
boa
one
one:
five:
zero,
nine,
eight
three
ten
edgely
place.
This
is
new
construction
of
an
attached,
two
family
totaling,
two
thousand
seven
hundred
square
feet,
three-story
structure
with
deck
and
patio;
the
violations,
article
32,
section
4..
This
is
in
the
g
card
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please.
Madam.
B
S
Christian
emily
boston,
groundwater
trust,
229,
berkeley,
street
boston
mass,
we
have
both
the
no
harm
and
water
and
sewer
approval
letter
for
10
anjalee
road.
However,
I
am
requesting
a
hole
for
signature
on
the
arlington
street
addresses,
since
we
only
have
the
no
harm
letter
for
those
and
master
water
and
sewer
is
currently
reviewing
the
plans.
The
site
plans
for
those
two
addresses
I
did
hear
from
water
and
store
this
morning,
and
we
should
have
the
letters
by
the
end
of
the
day
today.
B
C
C
The
violations,
the
ninth
edition,
780
cmr
1006,
the
number
of
exits
and
exit
access
doorway,
the
violation
is
1006.1.
The
number
of
exits
are
exit
access,
doorways
required
within
the
means
of
egress
they'll
comply
with
the
provisions
of
one
zero;
zero.
Six
point:
two
for
spaces
in
section
of
one:
zero:
zero:
six
point:
three
for
stories
name
and
address
fully
record.
C
B
T
Thank
you,
madam
chair
doug,
anderson
c
cubed
address
working,
addresses
313
congress
street
in
boston.
I
am
the
code
consultant
for
this
particular
issue.
This
is
exactly
the
plan.
We
need
to
see
the
original
planned
development
redevelopment
of
this
building
on
beacon
hill
was
to
where
you
can
see
the
roof
terrace
in
the
top
rear
in
the
little
piece
of
roof
below
that
the
original
intent
was
to
physically
connect.
T
This
introduced
an
egress
issue.
I
came
in
at
this
point
to
try
to
resolve
this
and
we
could
not
inc.
We
had
to
keep
that
rear
stair
as
common
stairway,
because
it
was
needed
for
use
by
unit
4,
which
is
the
next
floor
down,
so
as
a
form
of
compliance
alternative.
We
proposed
as
a
second
means
of
egress.
T
F
C
C
U
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
haskell,
with
regal
toscano
business,
address
of
11
beacon
street,
requesting
a
deferral
on
this
matter
based
on
the
community
process.
There
are
final
changes
that
need
to
be
made
to
the
plans
and,
unfortunately,
our
client
had
to
hire
a
new
architect,
and
these
plans
will
take
a
few
months
to
finalize
and
resubmit.
V
K
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantz,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston,
requesting
a
deferral
to
allow
for
additional
community
process,
as
is
as
in
the
previous
case.
Madam
chair,
I
think
a
may
date
here
would
be
more
appropriate
than
an
april
date.
C
C
Hearing
none
somebody
out
there
calling
the
first
case
for
9
30
calling
voa
114
5521
35
utah
street.
This
is
a
change
of
luxury
from
a
legal
two
family
to
a
three
family.
The
violations,
article
27
g.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
52,
section
8.
The
use
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section,
9,
the
floor
of
the
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
56
most
insufficient
in
article
53,
section
9,
open
space
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
W
B
W
Yes,
the
this
is
a
three-story
three-four
building
with
a
full,
with
a
full
basement
that
has
strictly
always
been
used
for
for
storage,
there'd,
be
no
living
accommodations
in
the
basement.
At
all
this,
this
structure
was
suffered,
severe
fire
damage
a
couple
of
years
ago,
where
the
interior
of
the
building
was
was
heavily
damaged
and
the
rear
decks
were
were
damaged.
W
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
let
go
record
support
of
this
proposal.
The
butters
meeting
was
held
on
december
11th.
The
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
raised
by
abutters
and
they
received
strong
support
from
the
eagle
hill
civic
association.
Thank
you.
Y
Z
AB
R
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
113-5699-25
atlantic
avenue.
This
is
a
proposed
new
construction
of
a
five-story
six-unit
residential
building
project
includes
four
single-story
flat
units
and
two
duplex
style
units
all
units
a
three-bedroom
unit.
There
will
be
a
common
roof
deck
for
all
tenants
the
violations,
article
32,
section
4.
This
is
g
card,
nautical
54,
section,
18,
roof,
roof
structure,
restrictions
down
here.
New
construction
exceeds
the
prior
height
of
the
existing
building
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
AC
Thank
you
very
much,
dennis
quilty
attorney
at
mcdonald,
filthy
and
miller,
representing
the
project
before
you
this
morning
with
me,
is
richard
walsh:
who's,
the
property
owner,
the
project,
architect,
matt
frankie
of
mgf,
architects
and
as
well.
Our
engineer
consultant
howard
marshall,
from
vanessa
in
brooklyn,
who
will
be
saying
a
few
words
for
you,
so
I
want
to
just
first,
if
I
may.
Of
course,
this
is
a
gcod
matter
as
well.
I
want
to
our
belief
is
that
the
documentation
is
is
on
file
hold.
S
B
AC
AC
Thank
you
man.
This
is
the
proposal
to
create
a
residential,
five-story
six-unit,
building
in
place
of
a
current
vacant
lot,
which
previously
housed
a
very
unusual
series
of
small
structures,
a
laundry
facility,
a
gasoline
station
and
has
been
was
dilapidated
and
really,
and
I
saw
in
the
community
for
many
years
it
was
finally
removed.
The
application
before
you
today
is
to
create
a
new
five-story
six-unit
residential
building.
AC
AC
AC
B
AC
Thank
you
ma'am.
I
I
know
mr
walsh
would
like
to
be
heard
on
the
on
the
particulars
of
the
units
themselves.
I
can
tell
you
that
the
ground
floor
of
the
building
is
for
parking
and
mechanicals,
and
things
of
that
nature
will
not
be
used
for
living
space
as
suggested.
There
are
four
floor
throughs
and
two
duplexes
making
the
six
units.
AC
AD
B
Can
you
please
tell
us
where
we
have
a
long
agenda
ahead
of
us
we'd
like
to
more
immediately
understand
the
project
that
you're
proposing?
We
just
don't
want
to
be
put
in
a
position
where
chapter
91
requires
you
to
provide
public
accommodation
and
you're,
not
providing
public
accommodation
and
be
caught
up
in
in
that
in
that,
in
that
roundabout.
AC
Go
ahead,
the
chat
the
we
are
subject
to
chapter
91.
We
cannot
proceed
with
chapter
91
without
going
through
your
process.
The
chapter
91
process
will
allow
us
to
utilize
portions
of
the
city
sidewalk
for
our
open
space.
This
is
something
which
we
will
do
in
conjunction
with
the
bpda
and
the
public
improvement
commission.
We've
had
preliminary
meetings
with
both
which
have
indicated
a
a
willingness
to
work
with
us
in
this
regard.
AC
AD
F
The
plans
are
fine,
there
is
a
large
common
roof
deck
with
head
houses
for
the
stairs
and
the
elevator,
and
I
just
have
one
question
for
the
team.
So
the
project
is
about
18
000
square
feet
plus
or
minus
is
my
understanding,
so
that's
below
the
bpda
small
project
so
have
you
had
any
interaction
with
the
bpa
on
this
project
and
partly
is
because
you
know
the
aesthetics
of
the
the
project
in
relationship
to
its
context,
where
it's
conceived
of
as
a
modern
mansur
building
against
some
very
old
traditional
buildings.
F
AC
Indeed,
indeed,
we
have
we've
had
multiple
meetings
with
mr
canizzo
bpa
staff,
very
positive
meetings
with
them.
We
have
been
asked
to
come
back.
You
know,
on
a
continuing
basis,
on
design
review.
Interestingly,
the
building
we
have
discovered
is
very,
very
similar
to
probably
at
least
a
half
a
dozen
other
buildings
of
its
exact,
almost
size
and
design
in
the
north
end
neighborhood
this.
You
know
the
the
I'm
losing
the
terminology
flat
iron
flat
iron
exactly
but
we've
had
very
positive
meetings
with
the
bpda
on
design.
AE
AF
AA
Madame
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
for
city
councilor,
at-large,
michael
flaherty,
the
council
acknowledges
that
the
product
has
gone
through
an
extensive
community
process.
The
northern
waterfront
council
board
unanimous
to
support
and
the
north
end
waterfront
association
of
voting
asked
me
to
to
oppose
thus
the
council
before
the
first
of
the
boys,
understanding
of
the
zoning
laws
as
it
pertains
to
these
hardships.
If
the
product
is
to
be
approved,
the
council
asks
the
proponent
with
the
neighborhood
at
every
step
of
the
project.
Thank
you.
Z
I
I
was
just
waiting
for
the
ons
or
the
district
counselor
to
speak,
but
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
counselor
sabi
george's
office,
and
we
are
in
opposition
to
this
project.
I
attend
the
meetings,
the
newer
meetings
every
month
and
they
support
opposed
it
and
that's
it.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
Z
Y
Let's,
let's
chair
madam
chair,
this
is
michael
benetti
from
boston
city,
council,
lady
edward's
office.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
of
this
project.
The
council
recognizes
that
the
development
team
did
go
through
a
substantial
community
process
and
the
neighborhood
council
did
support.
While
the
residents
association
did
a
pose.
AH
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
this
is
john
romano
from
the
mayor's
office
in
neighborhood
services,
so
the
project
did
go
through
an
extensive
community
process
with
both
the
north
end
waterfront
neighborhood
council
voting
in
unanimous
support,
along
with
over
200
plus
letters
of
support
with
80
into
the
director
budding
radius.
Alternatively,
we
had
the
north
end,
waterfront
neighborhood
residents,
association
and
opposition,
along
with
over
60
letters
in
opposition
and
direct
abutting
radius,
and
so
due
to
this,
we
defer
to
the
board
for
your
judgment
on
this
project.
AI
AJ
B
AB
AK
AL
Good
morning,
madam
chairman
and
members
of
the
board,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
daniel,
pasic
and
tilly.
I
live
at
145
commercial
street
and
I'm
direct
about
it
to
this
project.
I'm
here
to
voice
my
support
for
the
project.
I
have
lived
in
nasa.
Nearly
my
entire
life
raising
three
children
on
hanover
street.
B
AM
V
AN
B
AO
Good
morning
brian
kaplan,
I'm
an
attorney
my
office
is
at
1237th
street.
My
clients
are
homeowners
and
the
condo
associations
in
the
two
buildings
that
will
be
most
impacted
by
this
project.
Those
buildings
are
the
how
and
bainbridge
building
at
220
and
230
commercial
street,
which
is
directly
across
the
street
from
the
project
site
and
the
price
building
at
63
atlantic
which
directly
abuts
the
profits.
AO
The
biggest
objection
by
far
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
allen
adrian
building,
is
that
the
project
will
completely
eliminate
views
and
severely
reduce
light.
Currently,
the
howard
baindridge
buildings,
windows
and
balconies
have
views
of
boston,
harbor
and
lewis
wharf
and
commercial
wharf.
They
also
have.
AO
The
views
is
the
biggest
and
I
submitted
over
the
weekend
before
and
after
images
created
by
our
architect,
showing
how
the
views
will
be
completely
eliminated.
The
the
views
from
the
alarm
bandwidth,
building
of
the
now
of
the
ocean
and
the
wharfs
will
be
gone
and
instead
the
homeowners
will
be
staring
directly
at
a
wall,
and
this
is
exactly.
B
B
AQ
B
C
C
937
968
1112
1116
boylston
street.
This
is
a
change
of
oxford
to
include
a
cannabis
establishment,
an
associated
renovation,
the
violations,
article
66
section,
14,
have
a
cannabis
established
use
as
conditional
in
article
66,
section
14
location
is
within
one
half
mile
of
another
cannabis
establishment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
AT
B
AT
AS
This
is
victor
chang,
so
this
the
view
you're
saying
here,
boylston
street,
is
on
your
right.
People
would
enter
into
the
space
and
be
seen
with
security
validating
their
id
before
they
can
enter
the
space.
The
large
area
in
the
middle
of
this
floor
plan
on
the
first
floor
would
be
used
for
indoor
queueing,
so
we
would
take
all
we
would
not
have
anyone
outside
of
the
street
we'd
have
outdoor
security.
If
the
inside
occupancy
was
met,
we
would
ask
customers
to
come
back
at
a
later
time.
AS
Primary
retail
will
happen
on
the
second
floor
in
the
next
slide,
which
would
be
where
we
will
most
of
the
retail
transactions
will
happen.
On
the
second
floor,
the
lower
level,
which
is
the
basement
level
of
the
building,
is
for
back
of
house
or
employee
use.
Only
the
lower
level
is
accessible
from
the
back
alleyway,
where
the
back
alleyway
grades
down.
So
that's
actually
street
level.
So
all
of
our
deliveries
will
come
through
the
back,
so
we
will
have
no
impact
on
boylston
street
for
deliveries.
AS
AS
So
there's
a
security
desk
at
the
on
the
first
floor
right
at
the
entranceway
where
ids
are
checked,
we'll
also
have
outdoor
security
planned
for
higher
traffic
times
or
during
events
at
fenway,
and
then
we
will
also
have
security
that
patrol
sort
of
the
immediate
area,
particularly
in
the
back
alleyway.
When
we
do
deliveries.
B
AS
B
F
N
AR
B
Okay,
you
know,
I
think
I'm
still
trying
to
pick
up
on.
Mr
ligaris's
concern
is
that
you
know
we've
all
been
at
fenway
when
there
are
crowds
of
young
people
and
crowds
of
people
there.
How
are
you
and
and
police,
are
you
know,
looking
at
other
activities
going
on
there?
How
are
you
concretely
going
to
manage
people
who
want
to
get
into
your
store
and
also
answer?
What
is
the
capacity
within
your
store.
AS
From
the
code
review
that
we
had
done
previously,
it
was
107
would
be
occupancy.
Obviously
that
would
be
subject
to
covert
regulations
now
or
again
with
security
personnel.
You
cannot
enter
the
store
without
passing
security,
so
it's,
I
think,
it's
very
simple
for
our
security
to
let
customers
know
that
we're
at
occupancy
and
that
they
can
simply
need
to
come
back
in
another
time.
You
know
there
are
other
approved
dispensaries
in
the
neighborhood,
so
we
don't
think
that
all
of
the
fenway
traffic
is
simply
coming
to
our
site.
N
AR
Thank
you,
mr
ligris.
I
appreciate
the
question
yeah.
Absolutely.
As
many
of
you
know,
I
was
formerly
on
the
boston
city
council
and
participated
in
the
drafting
and
passing
of
the
buffer
zone,
and
you
know
the
intent
of
that
rule
was
to
make
sure
that
there
was
not
a
clustering
sort
of
a
cannabis
district
in
the
city.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
opportunities
and
the
impacts
were
spread.
AR
This
applicant
has
been
working
at
this
site
for
quite
a
long
time
now
and
when
they
chose
and
locked
up
this
site
and
began
the
process,
there
was
no
other
location
in
the
area.
The
closest
location
is
about
0.3
miles
away
and
as
you
as
I'm
sure
you
all
know,
you're
very
familiar
with
this
area
is
separated
by
one
of
the
most
heavily
trafficked
streets.
Even
during
the
coca-19
pandemic,
there
has
been
significant
foot
traffic
on
business
activity
in
this
area.
AR
We
believe
there's
quite
enough
market
there
to
support
these,
and,
quite
frankly,
there
have
been
nearly
100
letters
of
support,
as
well
as
from
local
business
associations,
elected
officials
and
residents
in
the
nearby
area.
Agreeing
that
this
is
a
good
operator,
they
have
made
specific
commitments
and
coordination
with
district
councilor
box
office
to
fund
in
the
first
year.
Seventy
five
thousand
dollars
in
going
forward
150
thousand
dollars
a
year
to
make
sure
there
are
no
negative
impacts
and,
as
we've
talked
about,
they
are
significant
emphasis
on
security.
AR
No
outdoor
consumption
will
be
allowed.
Folks
will
be
added
to
a
list
where
they
will
not
be
able
to
access
any
of
this
applicant's
dispensaries
around
the
state
if
they
violate
these
rules
and
they've
also
committed
to
quarterly
meetings
with
interested
neighbors
moving
forward.
To
make
sure
all
these
concerns
are
being
addressed.
I
personally
live
quite
close
to
this
location
and
hearing
from
my
neighbors,
and
I'm
sure
you
have
many
of
those
letters
feel
this
is
an
appropriate
use.
AR
It
meets
the
standard
for
the
variance
in
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
spirit
of
the
zoning
regulation
and
obviously
these
are
local
majority
minority
applicants.
As
you
looked
at
the
boston
cannabis
board
memo
and
in
support
of
this,
they
considered
specifically
the
buffer
zone
issues
around
their
own
regulation
and
unanimously
supporting
this
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
additional
questions
around
this
issue.
Thank
you.
Oh.
N
AR
I
understand
that
mr
libras
and
obviously
given
the
half-mile
buffer.
This
is
point
three
miles
into
your
issues
of
traffic.
As
we
see
it
in
this
neighborhood,
there
are
multiple
t-stops
bus
stops
blue
bikes,
a
lot
of
foot
traffic.
Even
recently,
the
applicants
are
in
active
discussions
with
the
transportation
department
around
rideshare
locations.
Their
outdoor
security
again
is
committed
to
enforcing
no
double
parking
and
are
they're
also
willing
to
increase
the
security
presence
as
needed.
I
think.
B
AT
Josh,
thank
you
absolutely.
I
think
we
definitely
would
close
early
if
we
found
that
it
was
overly
congested
or
during
those
events,
our
security
and
with
the
additional
security
I
weren't
able
to
control
the
crowd.
We
definitely
would
meet
and
close
early.
That's
that's
not
even
something
we
would
think
about
twice
and.
AU
AS
So
the
107
would
include
employees,
so
that's
total
occupancy.
We
anticipate
the
staff
count
to
be
somewhere
between
20
and
25,
I'm
not
including
the
security
personnel.
So
security
would
add
an
initial
three
to
five
but
primarily
outdoors
floor.
I
believe
the
occupancy
would
be
in
the
40s
48.
I
believe
it
was.
F
B
AV
I'm
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
of
chinese
commented
mayors
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
did
a
project
at
the
fiscal
court,
the
reason
being
the
letters
of
opposition
from
fenway
civic
association,
berkeley
college
and
st
st
clements
church.
The
community
feels
that
this
location
is
not
appropriate,
given
concentration
and
demographic.
On
the
other
hand,
it
is
important
to
note
that
there
are
many
neighbors
that
do
support
the
proposal
and
the
mayor's
office
does
not
have
any
direct
concerns
with
the
proposal
itself
for
the
mayor's
office.
At
this
time,.
B
R
Can
you
hear
me
yes
hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board?
My
name
is
lauren
brody.
I
am
the
chief
of
staff
for
city
councilor,
kenzie
bach.
The
counselor
wanted
to
be
here
herself
today,
but
had
to
attend
the
va.
Topping
off
ceremony
happening
right
now
in
her
district.
So
she
asked
the
board's
indulgence
for
me
to
read
a
statement.
R
Counselor
bach
is
non-opposition
to
cypress
tree
cypress.
Tree's
ownership
team
is
local
and
majority
minority.
Although
this
team
doesn't
qualify
as
an
equity
applicant.
The
council
is
confident
that
carlos
testilo's,
deep
background
in
boston
communities
of
color
will
help
recruit
a
diverse
local
workforce
for
the
site.
The
location
is
easily
accessible
on
public
transportation.
R
There
are
concerns
from
members
of
the
frenway
neighborhood
improvement
committee,
including
spendway,
civic
association
and
berkeley
school
of
music
about
addiction,
mental
health
and
homelessness.
Around
the
intersection
of
boylston
and
massachusetts
avenue,
community
members
have
expressed
their
fears
that
putting
this
use
into
the
clock
could
undo
their
prior
good
work
to
remove
liquor,
store
uses
and
make
it
a
safer
place
to
dine
and
spend
time
at
the
heart
of
berkeley's.
R
Campus
cypress
tree
has
responded
by
making
a
significant
long-term
financial
commitment
to
helping
meet
the
mental
health,
homelessness
and
addiction
challenges
that
people
in
the
area
are
wrestling
with
every
day.
By
increasing
the
direct
resource
resources
available,
they
have
also
committed
to
front
parking
management
at
no
sale
of
single
joints
with
the
ownership's
office
is
literally
down
boylston
street.
The
counselor
expects
an
open
line
of
communication
regarding
any
issues
at
the
site.
R
Counselor
bach
feels
that
cyprus,
trees
commitments
represent
meaningful
good-faith
efforts
to
address
neighborhood
concerns
about
the
location
and
that
as
local
ownership
group,
they
are
willing
to
work
with
the
community
to
have
a
positive
economic
and
social
impact.
The
counselor
does
believe
that
the
board
should
apply
a
very
high
standard
of
scrutiny
to
every
application
for
a
variance
from
the
buffer
zone
rule,
but
she
accepts
that
one
exception
to
the
buffer
zone
is
likely
within
denser
areas.
Therefore,
the
counselor
is
in
non-opposition
to
cyprus,
tree's
application
for
a
variance.
AB
Yes
at
large,
are
we
good
for
that?
Put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record?
Yes,
so
this
is
at
large
city
councilor,
julia
mejia,
and
I
am
just
really
excited
to
fully
support
this
initiative,
and
I
also
want
to
make
note,
especially
to
you
class,
that
I'm
not
sure
if
you're
still
here.
I
think
I
see
you
here.
AB
And
so
I'm
in
here
110
in
support
of
carlos's
project,
and
I
hope
that
the
board
recognizes
that
one
of
the
ways
that
we're
really
going
to
ensure
that
people
feel
like
government
is
representing
them
is
if
we
really
look
at
how
we
vote
on
things
that
support
or
hinder
people
from
economic
prosperity.
So
I
am
in
full
support
of
this
project
and
hope
that
the
board
recognizes
how
important
it
is
for,
for
you
all
to
pay
attention
to
how
we
show
up
in
these
spaces.
Thank
you.
AW
Good
afternoon,
oh
sorry,
good
morning,
madam
chair,
thank
you
so
much
for
having
me.
This
is
representative
china,
tyler,
representing
the
seventh
southwest
district
here
in
boston.
I'm
also
too
one
of
the
second
counselor.
He
is
commentary
and
come
on
and
support
this
project
just
off
the
simple
fact,
many
factors,
but
one
in
particular
that
I
heard
the
committee
actually
asked
questions
around
was
around
ability
to
be
able
to
manage
security,
rising
public
safety,
wise,
and
I
know
carlos
really
well.
B
R
AX
B
B
C
AY
B
H
AR
D
B
D
D
BA
B
C
Going
to
the
next
case,
calling
voa
927
849
48-62
brookline
avenue.
This
is
a
change
of
occurs
from
a
restaurant,
restaurant,
lounge,
octopus,
health
club
to
restaurant
restaurant,
lunch
out
supplies
and
a
repeal
cannabis
sales.
The
violations,
article
66
section
11,
the
cannabis,
establishes
conditional
use
in
the
fenway
triangle,
the
nba
sub
district
and
article
66
section
11
table
a
location
is
one
one:
half
mile
of
the
cannabis
establishment
of
another
candidate
establishment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AC
Good
morning
again,
dennis
quilty
attorney,
mcdermott,
quilty
and
miller,
representing
the
applicant
media
with
us
this
morning
is
the
proponent
ross
bradshaw,
the
property
owner
dana
van
fleet
and
our
architectural
firm
sousa.
I
do
want
to
state
at
the
very
outset
that
this
applicant
is
a
certified
equity
applicant.
AC
B
AC
No,
it
is
this,
is
the
the
site
is
the
building
which
houses
the
caskin
flagon
restaurant
at
the
corner
of
brookline,
ave
and
lansdowne
street.
We
are
not
subject
to
any
requirement
physical
requirements.
We've
been
through
an
entire
community
process.
In
this
regard,
the
space
is
below
the
existing
restaurant.
It's
a
very,
very
large
space.
We
can
provide
you
all
the
details
in
terms
of
ability
for
queuing
inside
which
we.
AC
B
AC
Like
you
just
take
it
quickly,
ross
to
say
with
regard
to
security
and
the
red
sox
were
immediately
across
the
street,
we
have
had
a
specific
series
of
engagements
with
the
red
sox
ownership.
With
regard
to
our
security
we
have
made
given
them
assurances
in
writing
as
well
as
assurances
as
recently
as
the
last
48
hours
of
a
continuing
series
of
meetings
with
the
ownership
of
the
red
sox
to
address
concerns.
Our
security
company
is
the
edward
davis
llc
former
police,
commissioner
of
the
city,.
B
BB
Well,
in
regards
to
security,
one
of
our
guarantees
is
that
we're
not
we
don't
have
to
have
the
ability
of
having
any
consumers
on
lansdowne
street
or
brooklyn
ave,
given
the
size
of
the
facility
3200
square
feet
for
internal
queuing.
That
will
give
us
a
capacity
of
280
patrons
to
have
within
our
doors
and
that's
important
to
us
to
ensure
that
we
are
not
of
disruption
at
all
to
any
of
the
events
or
games.
BB
That
might
happen
within
that
community
and
one
of
the
other
important
elements
that
dennis
was
mentioning
is
that
we've
hired
security
consultant
at
davis
security
company.
They
are
well
aware
and
have
experience
in
working
game
days
and
working
events
in
that
area
and
in
addition
to
that,
dana
vane
fleet,
who
was
the
owner
of
the
cast
and
flagging,
has
been
present
there
for,
I
believe,
over
30
years.
So
he
has
significant
experience
with
this
particular
area
and
dealing
with
some
of
the
patrons
and
some
of
the
unique
aspects
of
this
game.
BB
Yep,
so
we
all
will
always
have
you
know,
uniformed
security
officers
that
will
be
outside
of
our
facility,
ensuring
that
there
is
no
clustering
that
there
is
no
patrons
consuming
outside.
In
addition
to
that,
we'll
constantly
be
monitoring
through
security
and
surveillance,
to
ensure
that
that's
not
happening
on
our
property.
In
addition
to
that,
that's
something
that
currently
right
now
that
dana
and
his
establishment
they
do
on
daily
basis
well,
when
they
are
operating.
F
The
plans
are
adequate.
Can
you
just
explain
to
me
a
little
bit?
It
seems
to
be
yes,
it's
below
there's
some
accessibility
sort
of
challenges.
I
would
say
with
respect
because
it
looks
like
the
actual
waiting
room
is
two
floors
below
the
street
entrance.
Can
you
just
explain
that
a
little
bit
to
me.
BB
BC
Hi
this
is
danny
van
fleet
from
the
casket
flag
and
also
the
landlord
to
answer
your
question.
Looking
at
the
building
from
the
street,
it
is
a
little
confusing
the
stairway
kind
of
goes
down
into
the
sidewalk
so
that
you
can
enter
a
mezzanine
level,
that's
below
the
cask
and
from
that
mezzanine
level,
there's
enough
yet
another
level
below
that
that
is
the
the
basement
level.
AC
No,
we
there's
no
citation
for
accessibility.
It's
you
know
most
an
existing
structure
and
facility.
This
space
has
been
occupiable
for
many
years.
Mr
evan
fleet
has
had
numerous
tenants
in
there.
It's
just
replacing
one,
basically
retail
use
with
another,
and
we
were
not
cited
for
any
variance
requirements
at
the
maab.
F
It's
I
mean
I,
I
measured
it
on
google
maps,
so
forgive
me
and
I
went
straight
line.
It
was
it's
820
feet,
but
I
just
don't
know
how
how
that
how
that
dimension
is
typically,
you
know
assessed
if
it's
by
down
the
road
or,
if
it's
so
it.
You
know
there
is
a
new
facility
going
up
on
the
sort
of
the
back
side
on.
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
being
necessary
back
there
and
I
just
didn't
know
what
that
dimension
regulation
was.
AC
That
that
facility
I
mean,
has
you
know
previously
existed
at
the
same
site
and
again
we
were
not
cited.
I
believe
you
know
the
the
statutory
restrictions
on
elementary
et
cetera,
and
that
was
a
high
school
yeah.
We
were
not
saying
again,
there
was
there
was
no
school
within
our
area
of
concern
that
we
were
cited
for.
Thank
you.
N
You
elaborate
on
some
of
the
assurances
regarding
security
that
you've,
given
the
red
sox
ownership
only
specifically
because
I
suspect
that
that
was
the
concerns
that
they've
brought
up
or
some
of
some
of
the
concerns
we
have
regarding
security
and
consumption
outside.
I
am
not
convinced
that
consumption
can
be
patrolled
and
monitored
outside
similar
alcoholic
beverages
where
you
can
see
a
container.
So
I
I'd
like
some
more
granularity
around
that
attorney.
Quilty.
AC
AC
AC
We
addressed
specifically
street
activity,
observing
people
patrons
coming
and
going
we,
mr
evan
fleet,
engaged
with
us
as
well
as
the
property
owner.
His
businesses,
of
course,
will
be
under
undergoing
business
at
the
same
time
as
we
will
and
at
the
same
time
as
the
red
sox
will,
so
our
building
will
have
two
complete
sets
of
security,
eyes
and
ears.
In
addition,
that
is
the
cast
of
facilitate
security
and
media
security.
AC
In
addition,
I
I
think
we
went
a
long
way
towards
answering
many
of
the
questions
the
red
sox
had.
They
did
communicate
with
us
in
the
last
couple
of
days
that
they
were
very
interested
in
an
ongoing
continuing
discussion
on
these
issues
and
we
immediately
responded
that
were,
of
course,
willing
to
do
that
and
we'll
set
up
meetings
with
them
continuously,
as
we
as
we
go
along.
I
I
believe
mr
friedman
from
the
red
sox
is
here
this
morning
and
he
can
certainly
elaborate,
but
we
intend
to
work
completely
cooperatively
with
them.
N
BB
Yeah,
I
can
speak
to
that
as
well.
Well,
to
begin
one
of
the
things
that
we'll
be
doing
on
game
days
is
we
understand
that
it's
not
guaranteed
but
we'll
be
working
with
the
city
of
boston
to
get
police
details
if
available
for
those
games
and
those
events
outside
of
that
we'll
also
be
working,
as
we
mentioned
with
that
data
security,
company
and
and
we'll
have
a
minimum
of
six
to
seven
security
personnel
for
those
high
high
volume
days
total
or
outside
outside.
BC
BC
AC
And
just
for
further
clarification,
I
just
received
a
message.
The
architect
is
with
us
and
can
provide
all
the
information
on
square
footage
numbers
of
people
able
to
queue
inside.
We
again,
as
I
think
ross
indicated,
we
would
be
the
largest
waiting
area
inside
of
any
cannabis
establishment
in
the
commonwealth,
again
giving
us
opportunity
house
most
of
our
people,
customers,
etc
inside
and
not
out
on
the
street.
BB
N
AC
AC
It's
a
similar
situation,
we'll
be
jointly
keeping
an
eye
out
people
trying
to
utilize
the
cannabis
outside,
which
you
know
we
will
strongly
discourage,
which,
of
course
is
is
illegal,
and
we
will
have
staff
to
make
sure
that
we
do
everything
possible
that
people
are
not
outside
smoking.
We
don't
want
them
outside
smoking
and
we'll
do
everything
we
can
cooperatively
with
the
cask
and
the
red
sox
and
the
boston
police
to
do
our
part
in
ensuring
that
that
doesn't
happen.
Thank.
N
You
I'm
sorry
to
push
on
this,
but
the
specific
question
I
asked
is:
will
the
security
that's
working
for
the
cast
and
flag
and
also
be
policing
consumption?
I
understand
that
everyone
wants
to
discourage
illegal
behavior,
but
it
was.
It
was
represented
that
that
security
force
was
in
addition
to
I'll
get
to
you
in
a
second.
Mr
president,
I
was
in
addition
to
that,
and
so
I
just
want
some
clarity.
It's
it's
really
a
yes
or
no
question.
BC
BB
And
one
other
element
to
that
I
should
have
mentioned
is
one
a
number
of
the
conversations
that
we
had
were
with
city
councilor
bach,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
agreed
to
is
that
on
game
days,
we
will
not
be
single
selling
single
single,
serving
pre-roll
joints,
which
is
the
most
popular
when
it
comes
to
consuming.
So
in
terms
of
those
consumption
and
smoking,
we
can
deter
that
by
not
selling
those
types
of
products
on
those
game
days
or
events.
B
BB
This
is
actually
something
that
I've
had
a
number
of
conversations
with
dana
in
the
castle
flag
and
making
sure
that
we're
we're.
We,
we
educate
our
staff
and
our
security
in
regards
to
individuals
that
might
be
under
the
influence
of
the
substance
and
making
sure
that
they
get
the
proper
assistance
that
they
might
need.
BB
But
one
of
the
key
elements
that
we're
going
to
do
from
the
moment
they
open
our
doors
is
educating
folks
on
the
fact
that
it
is
illegal
to
consume
publicly,
whether
that's
in
form
of
an
edible
tincture
lotion
and
continuously
hammering
that
message
to
our
customers
and
to
individuals
that
are
visiting
establishments.
That
that
is
an
illegal
aspect.
And
they
cannot
do
that.
O
BD
B
I
feel
that,
on
the
on
the
on
the
half
mile,
just
like
as
in
east
boston
in
the
past,
we
we
approve
both,
but
only
one
of
them
matured.
You
know,
and
we
approved
the
you
know
them
two
years
ago.
I
think
by
now,
and
we
have
not
gotten
a
request
for
an
extension,
so
I'm
assuming
that
only
one
is
actually
in
place.
D
B
AV
AV
R
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
lauren
brody
from
city
council
kenzie
box
office.
Councillor
bach
is
in
support
of
nudia's
application
for
ovarian
a
host
community
agreement
for
a
nearby
non-equity
applicant
was
already
approved
prior
to
the
creation
of
the
boston
cannabis
board.
Counselor
bach
agrees
with
the
cannabis
board
that
is
desirable
and
consistent
with
our
municipal
policy
goals.
R
R
New
diaz
entrance
would
be
off
lansdowne
street
neighbors
have
mentioned
to
the
counselor
that
they
are
particularly
reassured
by
the
very
large
capacity
nudia
will
have
for
indoor
queuing,
creating
no
outdoor
queue
on
lansdowne
street
on
game
days
or
regular
dates.
The
team
in
mudia
has
also
committed
not
to
sell
single-serve
one-half
gram
joints
on
game
days
in
order
to
decrease
the
chances
of
illicit
smoking
in
the
immediate
vicinity
of
families
going
to
the
gate.
R
In
light
of
new
dia
ownership
teams,
equity
application
status,
strong
support
throughout
the
neighborhood
for
this
entertainment,
district
location,
logistical
details
of
their
proposal
and
their
commitment
to
investing
in
the
fenway
neighborhood
councilor
box
strongly
supports
the
board
granting
a
variance
for
this
location.
Thank
you.
BE
BE
BE
Our
discussions
about
game
day
was
about
security
and
the
fact
that
all
the
lines
and
queuing
would
be
interior
to
it
and
that
the
red
sox
were
a
big
part
of
the
conversation
and
had
a
comfort
level,
as
well
as
the
community,
about
the
responsibility
of
the
landlord
and
the
applicants
and
all
the
work
they
put
in
to
keep
the
area
safe
and
the
constant
communication
that
we'll
have
throughout
their
time
and
business.
So
wow.
Thank.
B
E
Madam
chair,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
testify
members
of
the
board
for
the
record.
My
name
is
richard:
giordano
representing
fenway
community
development
corporation
at
7th
burbank
street
in
fenway,
we've
been
working
with
the
applicant
and
down
event
for
some
almost
two
years
now
and
fully
in
support
of
their
application
for
variants.
E
Aside
from
everything
that
everyone
else
has
talked
about,
we've
gotten
assurances
and
commitments
from
the
operator
that
they
will
be
hiring
75
percent
of
staff
from
impacted
communities
of
mission
hill
roxbury
dorchester,
and
they
will
also
be
working
with
the
fenway
cdc
walk
for
work
program
to
hire
local
people.
They
will
be
definitely
prioritizing
individuals
with
predictions
stemming
from
the
historic
prohibition
of
cannabis.
E
BF
Yes
hi,
my
name
is
terry:
north,
I'm
at
466
commonwealth
avenue
in
kenmore
square.
I've
been
a
resident
of
kenmore
square
for
48
years,
have
known
dana
for
a
lot
of
those
and
I'm
fully
supportive
of
this
project.
This
has
gone
under
so
many
reviews.
We've
been
to
community
meetings.
We've
talked
to
the
owners,
the
developers,
the
and
dana,
with
whom
we
have
utmost
trust,
and
we
are
very
comfortable
we're
happy
with
the
with
the
diversity
involved
in
this
project.
BF
BG
Good
morning,
david
friedman
on
behalf
of
fenway
sports
group,
real
estate
and
the
boston,
red,
sox
or
jersey
street
appreciate
the
chance
quickly
I'll
say
at
the
outset
that
the
red
sox
organization
does
support
equity
applicants
and
for
expanded
opportunity
for
businesses
owned
and
operated
by
persons
of
color.
We
recognize,
of
course,
that
retail
cannabis
is
now
legal
in
massachusetts.
BG
Mr
bradshaw
and
nudia
have
made
commitments
for
all
security
issues.
We
don't
doubt
his
intentions.
I'd
say
that
at
this
stage
we
have
a
numerous
length
of
questions
and
some
concerns
that
we're
continuing
to
discuss
with
them
and
still
working
out
relating
to
the
specifics
of
how
this
unique
operation
would
be.
As
you
know,
it's
right
on
the
doorstep,
defensive
part.
So
with
respect
to
large
events,
both
games
but
also
concerts
and
other
things.
BG
BG
H
Of
chair
just
a
point
of
information
from
mr
robinson's
question,
I'm
looking,
I
was
looking
it
up.
The
the
the
commission's
criteria.
Are
the
cannabis
establishment
not
be
located
within
500
feet
of
school
grades,
one
through
twelve?
So
it's
not
just
elementary,
and
it
is
measured
in
a
straight
line
for
the
nearest
point
of
property
line
in
questions
and
there's
point
a
property
line.
AC
B
B
C
Following
your
next
case,
calling
doa
one
zero,
six,
six,
four,
three,
eight
one
to
fifty
nine
st
james
avenue.
This
is
31
st
james
ab,
suite
123
bay,
state
college
renovations,
the
violation
article
8,
section,
7
uses
conditional
a
college
or
university
classroom
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BH
B
I'm
sorry,
can
you
please
collect?
Can
you
please
move
to
the
layout,
so
we
can
see
exactly
how
much
space
it
is.
Can
you
please,
on
behalf
of
the
applicant,
go
directly
and
tell
us
how
many,
how
many,
what
square
footage
it
is,
what
floor
it
is,
and
I
just
need
to
ask:
is
bay
state
subject
to
an
institutional
master
plan.
AJ
BH
AV
AJ
B
C
C
February
11th
at
10
10
massive:
these
are
the
recommendations
case.
Boa
970-452-1
brigham
street
was
deferred
to
the
513-21
subcommittee
case.
Eight,
two
boa
five
to
five.
Eight
franklin:
this
was
the
extension
of
an
adding
a
roof
deck.
An
access
stair
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
112,
907218
fahren
street
just
construct
a
second
floor,
rear
white
closet
edition.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
1112,
8906
32
pleasant
street.
C
It
was
an
addition.
It
was
a
conversion
of
an
ignition
basement
into
a
habitable
space
that
was
approved
case.
Boa
113-2953-25
greenbriar
was
denied
without
prejudice.
Http
3815
133
florence
street
was
a
allowance
of
the
bathroom.
On
the
first
floor
it
was
approved
with
vpda
case
boa
one
one,
one,
nine
five,
two
four
fifteen
to
seventeen
alvaro
street
was
denied
without
prejudice
hboa
one
one,
four,
three:
two:
two:
zero
34
to
36
guernsey
street.
It
was
a
big
family
with
two
units.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
106,
5948,
44,
worley
street.
C
C
B
B
B
C
Amex
case
calling
boa
one
one:
four,
six
one:
nine
eight
four,
oh
seven,
eight
seventh
street:
this
will
rebuild
an
existing
two
family
construct,
a
new
rare
edition
deck
for
egress.
Both
units
will
be
bi-level
units
unit,
one
basement,
first
floor
unit,
two
second
third
floor:
a
new
curb
cut
one
for
two
tandem
parking
spaces.
Unleashing
article
10
section
one
parking
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side
lot
line:
article
68,
section,
33
off
street
parking
loan
requirement;
article
68,
section,
eight
side
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BI
Thank
you,
madam
sheriff,
and
our
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
chris,
drew
with
a
business
act
with
the
business
address
of
1154
ave
with
my
office
of
project
architects
along
representing
the
owner,
mr
stefan
and
his
family.
The
proposal
itself
is
to
rebuild
the
existing
tube
family
due
to
a
fire.
As
part
of
the
rebuild,
I
will
be
building
a
about
a
20-foot
radio
edition
for
additional
living
space
kind
of
reconfiguring
the
building
so
that
we
can
fit
in
some.
B
BI
Sure
so
the
existing
building
had
some
existing
living
space
in
it
and
that's
what
we're
doing
as
well.
We're
we're
continuing
the
living
space
into
the
basement
to
so
unit.
One
will
be
the
base
consists
of
the
basement
in
the
first
floor
and
then
the
second
and
third
floor
will
be
unit
two.
There
is
a
zero
line,
your
pre-existing
zero,
zero
watt
line
on
the
left
side
of
the
building
where
it
attaches
to
the
existing
one
that
actually
caused
the
fire.
BI
B
BI
The
nice
thing
about
this
lot
is
that
at
the
back
of
the
lot
we
are
where
the
two
bedrooms
are
located
because
of
the
decrease
in
the
grain.
It
actually
is
a
full
walkout,
so
the
front
part
of
the
basement,
which
is
where
the
family
room
is
kind
of.
On
the
east
southern
side,
then
we've
got
a
common
laundry
room
for
the
unit,
a
full
bath
and
then
the
two
bedrooms
in
the
back,
but
as
you'll
see
on
the
elevation.
BI
F
The
plans
are
good.
I
I
did
want
to
clarify
that
mr
drew
you're
correct,
so
is
that
the
natural
grade
going
back,
because
I
can
see
in
your
site
plan
on
l1
right
at
the
front
of
the
parking
there's
some
steps,
so
that's
actually
decreasing
down,
so
the
bedroom
bedrooms
appear
to
be
both
will
be
at
grade.
I
mean
accessible
straight
out.
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Yes,.
F
BI
BI
You
know,
but
we
kind
of
we
know
it's
not
an
ideal
situation,
but
we
kind
of
with
the
rebuild
and
the
fire
we
kind
of
started
as
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
bring
some
parking
where
the
occupancy
isn't
changing.
You
know
it's
kind
of
we're
rebuilding
from
the
ground
up
anyway,
so
why
not?
Try
to
you
know
improve
the
property
at
the
same
time,
you
know
as
well
as
for
the
neighbors
thank.
BC
BJ
Hi
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
haley
dillon
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
would
like
to
home
record
in
support
of
this
project.
As
you
know,
they
lost
everything
in
the
fire,
so
we're
really
excited
to
have
them
stay
in
the
community
and
rebuild
and
keep
living
in
the
community.
Thank
you.
BK
AP
R
C
Good
luck,
yeah
well
giveaway,
114.3458,
3371
to
3375
washington
street.
This
is
a
constructed
new
five-story
mixed-use
building
production
will
consist
of
39
residential
senior
rental
unit.
Elderly
housing,
720
square
feet
of
commercial
space,
restaurant
no
parking
spaces
or
loading
area
will
be
provided
chair.
This
is
eric
robinson.
C
Building
will
be
constructed
on
apostles
created
by
combining
fossils
violations.
Article
55,
section
19,
elderly
housing
use
is
forbidden,
article
55,
section
20,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
20,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
Article
55
6020,
the
ray
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
55
section
40,
our
street
parking
restaurant
is
insufficient.
C
BL
BL
Ma'am
we
are
proposing,
after
a
kind
of
long
community
process,
to
acquire
this
site
that
dates
back.
You
know
back
into
2019
a
39
unit,
100,
affordable
senior
housing
project
on
the
sites
that
were
really
acquired,
primarily
for
eviction
prevention
of
the
small
businesses
who
were
at
risk
here
with
a
rally
of
community
support
that
that
saw
that
the
jpmdc
and
the
previous
owner.
B
BL
BL
So
in
our
affordable
housing
portfolio,
we
we
manage
quite
a
number
of
senior
properties.
Many
of
them
do
not
have
vehicles,
and
so
we,
the
original
kind
of
2019
proposal,
saw
us
taking
advantage
of
the
rectangular,
the
most
rectangular
portion
of
the
site,
with
a
small
parking
pad
at
the
rear
of
the
site.
BL
This
site
has
some
unique
constraints
around
shared
use
on
a
common
way
that
site
and
that
common
use
is
kind
of
flanked
and
restricted
by
something
called
over
burdening,
and
we
were
not
able
to
reach
an
agreement
with
the
collective
owners
responsible
with
that
space
in
order
to
access
that
that
space
for
parking
and
so
from
2019
to
roughly
2020,
we
really
worked
in
partnership
and
hope
that
we
could
offer
that
that
was
not
something
that
we
could
achieve.
The
bpda
worked
with
us
in
collaboration
with
the
scientists.
B
B
BL
H
BL
BL
H
BL
Okay,
I'll
just
remind
the
proximity
here
for
all
of
our
seniors,
is
pretty
congruent
to
both
green
streets
d
station
and
some
of
our
larger
senior
properties,
where
we
will
have
an
opportunity
to
kind
of
build
and
broaden
the
senior
community
here.
So
we
have
three
adjacent
sites
along
the
southwest
corridor,
probably
within
three
quarters
of
a
mile
of
this
site
that
we'll
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
in
terms
of
community
building
activities
for
the
seniors.
N
BL
BL
Certainly
the
rear
access
for
emergency
use
is
available
on
the
common
way,
and
that
is
you
know,
that's
something
that
is
available
to
the
building
for
the
level
of
activity
that
may
need
to
you
know
as
as
seniors
age.
You
know
we
will
need
to
have
that
level
of
access
for
emergency
vehicles
and
that
will
be
available.
BM
Yes,
madame
chair
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lindsay
santana
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
applicant
has
had
an
extensive
community
process.
They
had
their
public
meeting
on
december
8
2020,
they
also
engage
with
above
butters.
Outside
of
this
meeting,
lincoln
has
received
support
at
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council,
but
we
understand
that
there
are
still
concerns
regarding
design,
so
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
with
design
review.
Thank
you.
AM
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
justin
mcclary
from
city
councilor,
matt
o'malley's
office
council,
would
also
recommend
support
due
to
the
abundant
support
from
the
neighborhood.
We
would
also
just
ask
that
there
be
pda
design
review,
keeping
in
mind,
ideally
some
buffering
for
the
union
ave
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
Z
AY
R
BN
BN
I
think,
if
you
go
back
to
the
renderings,
you
can
actually
see
see
that
in
front
of
you,
members
of
the
board-
and
you
know
this-
is
we
strongly
agree
that
jamaica
plain
does
need
affordable
senior
housing,
but
being
the
business
most
impacted
by
this,
we
feel
very
strongly.
This
goal
must
be
balanced
with
the
goal
of
protecting
existing
small
businesses
such
as
ours,
who
have
created
15
local
jobs
for
jamaica,
plain
residents,
and
these
are
good
manufacturing
jobs
and
so
to
be
clear.
BN
I
don't
think
it's
really
realistic
to
think
that
that
that
parking
is
cannot
simply
be
ignored.
The
developer
also
doesn't
hold
any
rights
of
access
or
air
rights
over
our
property
and
turtle
swamp
brewing
to
continue
operating,
not
only
during
construction
will
not
be
able
to
provide
these
rights
and
remain
operational.
You
know,
there's
also
really
no
legal
basis
for
the
variances
there's
nothing
about
this
lot.
BN
That
is
special
or
different
from
other
lots,
and
the
developers
simply
chosen
to
pursue
an
unrealistic
design,
and
so
you
know
to
just
be
be
frank,
with
an
outdoor
seating
patio
with
publix
on
with
the
tap
room
here
with
an
operating
brewery
seven
days
a
week.
It
seems
the
plan
as
it
is
along
the
lot
line
without
any
setback
or
really
in
any
consideration.
For
us,
it
does
create
a
dangerous
situation.
BN
BO
Yeah,
my
name
is
lisa
thompson.
I
live
in
jamaica,
plain
at
10
forest
hill
street,
so
I'm
blocks
away
from
this
project.
I
support
the
jpmdc
project
at
3317.,
3371
washington
street,
and
hope
that
the
jp
dc
and
developers
continue
to
work
with
residents
to
keep
all
the
affordable
units
deep
in
the
affordability
and
lift
up
good
design.
I
think
this
is
a
great
project,
there's
widespread
community
support
and
we
need
to
move
forward
with
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
BP
Kathy
brown
10
view
south
avenue,
jamaica
plain,
and
you
know
long-time
affordable
housing,
supporter
and
work
on
this
issue
and
and
long
time,
jp
resident
and
this
project
is
so
important.
The
need
for
senior
housing
is
there's
such
huge
need
also
in
terms
of
business.
Small
business
ellen
is
going
to
be
able
to
stay
there,
and
that
is
a
long
time.
Community
business.
I
was
just
there
on
saturday
lots
of
families
using
long
time,
business
that
needs
to
stay
there,
and
this
project
will
allow
them
to
stay
there.
B
Is
that
the
the
challenge
that
we
face
as
board
members
is
that
the
relief
goes
with
the
property,
and
I,
I
think
in
planning
terms,
there's
been
a
lot
of
history
and
documentation
about
how
uses
go
in
next.
To,
for
example,
I
mean
the
most
extreme
is
uses
residential
uses
go
into
up
next
to
a
big
farm.
You
know
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
the
big
form
becomes
the
nuisance.
B
You
know,
and
so
the
question
I
think
for
the
two
of
you
as
you
look
at
this
site,
is
that
there
is
a
functional
business
adjacent
to
you.
The
question
is:
how
do
your
residents
or
how
will
your
residents
as
they
turn
over?
You
know
acknowledge
the
fact
that
this
is
a
use
that
runs
late
into
the
night.
It
is
a
use
that
you
know
requires
you
know
these
18
wheelers
or
whatever
they
are
to
drop
off
supplies.
You
know
how.
B
BL
BL
You
know,
50
businesses
operating
with
multiple
constituencies,
and
you
know
trolley
tours,
and
you
know
18
wheeler
deliveries,
and
you
know
many
many
you
know
hundreds
of
thousands
of
individuals,
kind
of
walking
through
the
campus
and
and
that
that
kind
of
flavor
and
organism
is
something
that
we
are
very
well
versed
in
handling
in
partnership
with
our
residents
and
or
our
business
owners.
And
we
don't
see
this
as
any
different.
Our
goal
is
always
about
the
spirit
of
community
partnership.
BL
We
sat
with
the
owners
of
this
business
a
year
before
we
purchased
a
property
just
because
we
are,
you
know
we're
so
accustomed
to
extending
our
hand
in
that
way
to
say
that
these
are
the
things
that
we
are
considering.
We
always
we
had
over
12
community
meetings
before
we
purchased
the
property
and
20
after.
B
BL
I
would
love
to
just
say
about
the
residents
and
the
numbers
of
residents
that
we
have
living
in
the
city
adjacent
to
very
high
impact,
high
activity
properties.
You
know
our
senior
properties
are
adjacent
to
sites
like
the
mildred
haley
site
right.
On
top
of
the
you
know
the
train
station
at
various
intersections,
and
you
know
these
relation.
It
really
boils
down
to
relationship.
BL
Our
residents
understand
that
they're
living
in
the
city
you
know
seniors,
are
very
vocal,
but
they're
also
very
reasonable,
and
I
would
say
that
you
know
I
wouldn't
imagine
that
there
would
be
conflicts,
that
we
couldn't
sit
down
and
have
meetings
about
and
social
activities
that
we
wouldn't
want
to
participate
in
in
support
of
the
business
itself.
We
we
already
have
an
existing
small
business
that
we
are
preserving
for
the
very
reason
of
community
partnership
and
spirit.
We
don't
see
the
turtle
swamp
being
a
site
as
an
outlier.
To
that.
BL
BL
BQ
Was
going
to
say
I'd
also
add
from
a
technical
standpoint.
We
are
targeting
a
very,
very
high
level
of
energy
efficiency,
retarding,
passive
health,
compliance
and
certification
for
this
building,
which
also
has
the
added
benefit
of
very,
very
thick,
well
insulated
walls
and
triple
pane
windows
that
also
bring
great
sound
isolation.
So
as
it
might.
B
And
will
there
be
something
in
the
leases
that
will
that
will
acknowledge
that
there
is
a
small
business
there,
and
you
know
that
the
residents
need
to
respect
that
because
we,
this
is
an
affordable
unit
development.
But
I
know
in
other
places
we
have
talked
about
that
being
an
element
of
the
proposal.
BL
So
I
would
say
that
from
a
fair
housing
standpoint,
madam
chair,
you
know
we
have
to
rely
on
both
the
zoning
code
and
fair
housing
obligations
on
both
sides
right.
This
is
a
two-way
street,
and
certainly
we
have,
as
I
said,
senior
housing
a
budding
pretty.
You
know
heavy
and
populist
uses,
and
we
do
not
have
issues
of
contention
in
that
in
those
sites
that
I
I
have
been
aware
of
in
the
last
15
years.
BL
Certainly
when
there
are
conversations
to
be
had
our
seniors
are
happy
to
sit
down
and
talk
with
anyone.
You
know
as
members
of
the
community
who
have
been
long-standing
members
of
the
community,
and
they
see
that
as
a
richness
of
the
the
community
process.
So
you
know
we
want
to
be
neighbors,
we're
typically
good
neighbors
with
our
abutters
and
our
businesses,
because
most
of
the
work
that
we
do
outside
of
our
housing
development
is
small
business,
development
and
support,
and
so
I
this
is
something
that's
very
familiar
to
us.
B
B
All
those
in
favor
aye,
any
opposed
motion
carries.
May
I
encourage
mr
lin
linsom
and
miss
ellis
to
continue
your
conversation,
because
I
think
I
think
there's
a
way
forward.
I
know
as
a
property
owner,
we
have
been
concerned,
mr
lindsey,
about
other
developments
that
have
gone
up
and
down
the
street.
Have
that
have
happened
and
been
approved
up
and
down
the
street,
so
I
know
that
you
will
continue
working
with
with
ms
ellis
to
make
this
project
successful.
AF
C
BR
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
leah:
janey,
31,
regent
street,
roxbury
mass.
We
are
here
today
to
revisit
a
change
of
occupancy
request
from
a
one
family
to
a
two
family.
It's
important
to
note
that
the
structural
components
of
the
two
families
were
approved
over
20
years
ago
and
were
approved
by
the
city.
The
final
stages
was
denied
due
to
what
was
quoted
as
insufficient
insufficient
parking.
So
we
have
submitted
letters
of
support
so
before.
B
BR
Q
BR
BD
F
BD
BD
B
F
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
uncle
wreck,
will
support
this
proposal
on
a
butters
meeting
was
conducted
on
december
3rd
of
2020.
As
you
heard
from
the
applicant's
existing
conditions,
we
feel
that
there'll
be
no
detriments
to
the
community.
If
this
is
approved,
we
strongly
suggest
that
you
support
it.
Thank
you.
R
BT
B
BD
Chuck
are
you
on
at
all
so
two
things,
one
I'm
a
member
of
tommy's
rock
as
a
founding
member,
in
fact,
as
is
probably
two
of
the
members
of
31
region
street,
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
my
brother,
who
was
on
the
line
but
reached
out
to
the
association
to
get
some
input
and,
as
I
understand
it,
had
no
response
there
do.
You
have
any
record
of
that.
BR
BU
You
guys
hear
me:
oh
here
we
go
yeah.
We
did
have
to
hear
him
just
to
grab
what
my
sister
said
and
tommy
rock
was
on
online
with
that,
since
then,
we
have
gotten
community
support
letters
as
the
board
member
had
mentioned
at
least
25
or
so,
and
photographs
of
the
neighborhood
just
to
illustrate
some
of
what
we're
talking
about
in
terms
of
parking
situation.
BU
R
BT
B
BD
B
C
C
Building
level
1
is
concrete,
podium
consists
of
open
air
parking
and
common
area
levels.
Two
to
five
is
a
wood
frame
construction
consisting
of
residential
units.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29
additional
law
area
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29
on
the
floor
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50
section
29
the
building
has
excess
of
its
stories.
Article
56-29
the
building,
has
accessibility,
article
50,
section
29
front
yards
insufficient
and
article
50
section
43.
Our
street
loading
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BV
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
nick
cizula
mcdermott,
quilting
miller,
28
state
street
3802
in
boston
with
me
today.
It's
kevin
mcguire
from
oxfail
urban
llc
who's,
the
developer
of
the
project
and
lara
homage
from
pca
architects.
Who
is
the
architect
on
the
project?
Madam
chair,
I
know
it's
been
a
long
morning
already,
I'm
happy
to
go
through
the
project
or
jump
right
into
q,
a
if
you
prefer,
whatever
you
like.
BV
Sure,
absolutely,
madam
chair,
so
this
property
is
it's
about
a
little
almost
37
000
square
foot
vacant
lot
as
you're.
Seeing
from
the
images
in
front
of
you
right
now,
it's
a
unique
site
with
challenging
topography.
They've
got
some
significant
grade
changes
of
about
8
to
12
feet
from
the
sidewalk
elevation.
BV
It's
located
on
fountain
street,
it's
in
roxbury's,
tommy's
rock
neighborhood,
and
it
does
have
frontage
on
both
fountain
street
and
region
street.
So
it
is
a
free
lot
and
I'll
also
state
that
this
is
a
long
vacant
urban
renewal
property
in
the
washington
park,
urban
renewal
plan
area.
So
what
you're,
seeing
before
you
and
the
project?
That's
in
front
of
the
board
today
is
really
quite
impressive.
It
was
a
result
of
an
extensive
and
cooperative
outreach
process
with
the
neighborhood
really
of
over
18
months.
It
was
created
in
partnership
with
the
department
of
neighborhood
development.
BV
It
is
an
article
80,
small
project
review
project
and
throughout
that
process
there
was
a
lot
of
project,
modifications
and
reductions
to
get
this
project
where
it
is
today,
and
you
can
see,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
those
it's
on
slide.
13
of
the
presentation,
but
specifically
what
we're
proposing
is
about
a
40,
almost
41,
000
square
foot
four-story
residential
building.
BV
B
BV
Yes,
ma'am,
if
you
haven't
actually
looks
like
it's
in
front
of
you
right
now
on
slide
seven,
I
figured
you'd
ask
that
question.
So
we
wanted
to
have
it
in
plan
form
for
you,
there
would
be
13
studios
about
610
square
feet.
Average
19,
one
beds,
775
square
foot,
average
six,
two
beds
a
little
over
a
thousand
square
feet
and
two
three
beds
at
1375
square
feet.
So
there
is
a
mix
of
units
and
they
are
all
amply
sized
in
terms
of
the
minimum
units
thought
they
are
a
larger
size
unit.
BV
BV
B
BV
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services
clinton
records
supporters
proposal
went
through
an
intensive
bpda
process.
They
also
secured
support
from
tommy's
rock
neighborhood
association
and
the
roxbury
path
forward,
neighborhood
association,
and
they
were
in
support.
We
think
this
is
a
critical
project.
That's
going
to
bring
affordable,
homeownership
opportunities
to
the
neighborhood,
and
we
think
this
could
be
a
great
addition.
Thank
you.
AE
Z
R
V
D
AE
C
Thank
you,
kate's
calling
voa
112
0246
655
morton
street.
This
is
a
renovation
of
a
basement
into
an
apartment
and
a
change
of
occupy
occupancy
to
a
boarding
house.
The
violations,
article
60
section,
60-9,
a
lot
of
additional
units,
insufficient
article
60,
section
8.
The
dwelling
unit
is
forbidden
in
the
basement.
Article
60
section
8,
the
lodging
house
uses
forbidden,
use
article
60,
section
9.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
C
R
BX
Please,
oh
yes,
okay,
my
name
is
alfonso's
here,
I'm
the
architect,
I'm
with
seoul
and
associates
and
and
my
client
is
looking
to
propose
having
a
basement
unit.
In
addition
to
converting
the
use
to
a
boarding
house.
The
lot
is
a
non-conforming
lot.
It's
about
20,
2500
square
feet
and
the
existing
area
of
the
fleet
family
is
about
3
200
square
feet.
B
BX
BX
BS
BX
BX
The
basement,
it's
basically,
she
was
trying
to
convert
it
into
an
adu,
but
because
she
doesn't
live
in
the
unit,
that's
not
possible.
So
what
what
we
are
proposing
is
to
have
common
space
the
unit
and
then
we're
going
to
have
egress
windows.
Two
window
wells
proposed
so
everything's
going
to
be
per
code
and
per
the
isd
requirements
and
the
building
code
of
massachusetts
and
basically
two
bedrooms.
B
BX
B
BX
BX
BX
Clear
what
you
need
to
know
about
the
windows?
I'm
sorry,
the!
If
I
can
answer
the
first,
the
plans
we
we
did
submit.
We
were
trying
to
submit
a
revision
for
the
bedrooms,
but
the
goal
is
to
have
three
bedrooms
per
level.
So
that's
one
thing
and
then
the
windows
will
be
changed
to
a
seal
that
is
below
the
they
require
44
inches
of
such
so
that's
going
to
change.
I
mean
we're
proposing
new
windows
in
the
bedroom.
B
BY
My
name
is
jian,
who
knew
I
live
in
the
dorchester
one.
One
two
howling
twitter
about
the
department
of
formal
landlords
have
already
the
whole
apartment
available.
That
is
the
basement,
the
two
bedroom.
They
have
living
room,
they
have
a
bathroom,
they
have
a
kitchen,
they
have
everything
all
we
need
only
follow
the
stand.
BY
BY
C
H
F
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
Let's
go
record
supporters
proposal.
As
I
mentioned,
the
app
convention
is
legalizing
existing
conditions.
They've
worked
closely
with
a
number
of
neighbors
on
this
and
a
number
of
support.
Letters
they've
also
worked
with
the
boston,
public,
health
and
commission
who
issued
a
letter
of
support
on
the
past.
They've
helped
settle
individuals
experiencing
homelessness
at
that
site,
and
those
individuals
reported
that
they
had
no
issues
with
the
landlord
and
that
the
conditions
were
good.
X
This
going
back
to
2018,
I
believe
the
greater
madapan
neighborhood
council
did
vote
to
oppose,
but
there
was
a
number
of
other
organizations
that
were
on
record
and
support.
We
think
that
there
is
a
high
need
in
this
particular
neighborhood
for
people
who
are
in
transition
and
as
a
result,
we
want
to
support
this.
BZ
Also
douglas
mass
landlords,
we
provide
management
consultation
services
to
the
owner
to
move
new,
we're
trying
to
prevent
displacement
of
existing
residents.
We
believe
that
there
are
fair
housing
act,
concerns
and
also
cdc
eviction.
Moratorium
concerns
with
not
permitting
relief,
so
we're
in
support
of
this
proposal.
B
BS
AP
This
is
a
london
michelle
and
I'm
in
a
butter
in
regards
to
655.
I
don't
think
you're
ready
for
me.
Are
you?
Yes,
I
am
okay,
wonderful,
thank
you,
madam
chairman,
and
thank
you
everyone
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
will
try
to
be
brief,
but
there
is
much
to
cover.
My
name
is
alensa
michelle
and
I'm
an
urban
planner
and
a
housing
advocate
a
long
time,
madison
resident
actually
lifelong
and
I
live
at
639
morton
street,
which
is
two
property
units
away
from
655
morton
street.
AP
Yes,
my
my
position
is
opposition,
and
I
have
many
bullet
points
which
I'd
like
to
to
to
get
through.
The
first
of
the
matter
is
that
this
property
has
had
a
series
of
incidences,
and,
while
the
mass
association
of
landlord
associations
have
not
found
any
crew
support,
I
can
tell
you
as
a
person
who
lives
and
walks
on
this
street
frequently.
I
have
seen
a
number
of
issues
where
tenants
occupying
the
basement
floor
have
engaged
in
open
subsidies
such
as
public
drinking.
AP
There
have
also
been
a
number
of
cases
where
myself
and
other
residents
who
have
stood
at
the
mbta
bus,
stop,
which
is
directly
adjacent
to
the
property,
have
been
harassed
by
tenants,
sexually
harassed
by
tenants
and
the
problem.
The
greatest
problem
at
the
end
here
is
that,
as
a
director
butter,
I
and
many
of
my
neighbors,
including
the
members
in
this
in
my
building,
whom
I
have
asked,
were
not
engaged
in
this
process
whatsoever.
AP
BW
B
CA
CA
B
BX
CB
R
R
C
CC
B
C
A
C
Sorry
on
a
second,
my
chair,
trying
to
get
my
paperwork
back
in
order,
yeah
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
115
1935
20
glenway
street.
This
is
directly
a
four
unit.
Multi-Family
dwelling,
including
four
parking
spaces
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
first
and
second
floor
is
the
two
virtually
identical
units
of
three
bedrooms:
two
baths.
The
third
and
fourth
floors
are
two
townhouse
style
units
are
three
bedrooms:
two
baths,
two
bedrooms:
one
and
a
half
baths.
The
violations,
article
60
section
9
usable
open
space-
is
insufficient.
C
Article
60,
section
9,
the
rare
yacht
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
16
section
40,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
80,
the
multi-family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden.
Article
669
the
lot
size
to
rented
building
is
insufficient.
C
Article
669.
The
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9,
the
floyd
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
60,
section
9,
the
height
is
it's.
If
it
is
excessive
name
and
address,
fill
the
record.
BW
AG
Good
morning,
can
you
hear
me
yes
good
morning,
madam
chairperson
members
of
the
board
elected
officials
and
their
representatives
support
staff
and
members
of
the
community?
My
name
is
tyrus
cartwright
and
I'm
the
co-owner,
along
with
my
wife,
at
residing
at
16
glenway
street
in
boston,
I'm
also
serving
as
a
developer
of
this
project
at
20
glenway
street,
which
is
adjacent
to
my
home,
I'm
here
to
seek
relief
from
the
board
in
constructing
a
four
unit.
AG
Multi-Family
dwelling,
including
three
units
of
three
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms,
and
the
fourth
unit
has
a
two
bedroom
one
and
a
half
bath
unit
to
accommodate
single-parent
households
for
very
limited
options
in
boston,
with
mostly
three
and
four
bedroom
units.
As
inventory,
there
are
four
offshore
parking
spaces
provided
for
at
the
rear
of
the
property
and
usable
open
space
is
provided
at
the
rear
of
16
glenway
street.
B
AG
On
the
the
square
footage
for
each
unit,
is
they
they
range
from
from
1775
square
feet
for
the
three
bedroom
units
to
about
1100
and
1300
respectively
for
the
for
the
the
top
side
split
units,
so
the
bedrooms
are
are
considerable
size.
The
specific
dimensions
are
described
on
the
plants,
but
regarding
the
the
side
offset,
this
property
is
in
alignment
with
the
the
is
consistent
with
the
neighborhood.
AG
AG
No,
there
is
no
proposed
occupancy
in
the
basement.
The
16th
glenwood
street
basement
has
flooding
issues
because
the
the
street
is
on
a
slope
coming
from
franklin
park,
so
we
wanted
to
avoid
having
a
basement
for
at
least
for
that
reason,
and
also
you
know,
to
reduce
costs
from
excavating
deep
down
into
the
the
ground
at
that
site.
F
AG
AG
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
Let's
go
and
record
support
this
proposal
during
the
ons
run
community
process.
I
feel
the
applicants
worked
well
with
neighbors
in
addressing
concerns
and
also
secured
the
support
of
the
local
neighborhood
civic,
which
is
the
erie
and
elliston
and
brainsley
partnership.
AQ
CE
C
C
B
CF
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayors
of
stanford
services,
lincoln
records
supporters
proposal.
When
owners
conducted
the
community
process,
they
received
support
from
the
butters,
as
well
as
the
greater
bowdoin
geneva
neighborhood
association.
We
think
this
is
a
popular
decision
to
add
more
housing
opportunities
for
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
AQ
Z
B
CB
CB
C
K
R
R
CG
CG
B
B
B
CG
CG
CH
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
danielle
fonseca
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal
in
addition
to
completing
the
community
process
and
notifying
all
of
butters.
The
applicants
also
attended
the
high
park,
neighborhood
association
monthly
meeting
on
thursday
december
3rd,
where
they
presented
their
proposal
and
they
got
support
from
the
association.
CH
CH
B
H
AU
H
B
C
My
pleasure
calling
in
that
case
calling
boa
113-9021
76
pawndale
road.
This
is
a
combined
fossils
buying
total
of
2908
square
feet
to
erecting
new
single
family
homes.
The
violations
article
67
section
9,
the
lot
size
to
erected
dwelling
billing
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
section
9,
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
C
B
CI
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
ryan
spitz
of
counsel
to
adams
and
morancy
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
south
boston
with
me
today
is
the
architect
devin
reilly,
mourinho
from
truman
company.
This
proposal
is
a
highly
rare
case
before
the
board,
due
to
the
unique
shape
of
combining
three
vacant
parcels.
CI
The
only
economic
use
of
this
land
is
to
construct
a
single
family
dwelling
with
minimal
reasonable
relief
that
would
allow
for
relief
of
insufficient
part
size.
This
is
a
three
f
4
000
zoning
subject:
sub
district
proposed
combined
square
footage
is
2
908
square
feet,
a
front
yard
setback.
The
zoning
code
requires
20
feet.
This
project
proposes
10
inches,
there's
a
side
yard
setback
code
requires
10
feet,
hold.
B
CI
CI
CI
So
the
trees
are
not
on
our
property,
so
they
will
be
maintained
they're
on
the
neighboring
property,
which
is
the
housing
development
in
the
rear.
So
the
only
thing
that
may
be
done
to
the
trees
they
may
have
to
be
trimmed,
but
that
that's
about
the
the
extent
of
anything
having
to
do
with
the
trees.
CI
Yes,
so
there
is
a
sidewall
access
to
it,
so
they
have
like
a
metal
gate.
That's
up
there
and
typically
it's
it's
locked
every
single
day
because
on
the
adjoining
street
that
runs
parallel
is
what
they
use
for
the
entrance
and
exit
the
only
time
they
actually
use
that
existence
because
we
spoke
to
the
neighbors
is
when
they're
putting
out
their
trash
pickup
on
farmdale
street,
otherwise
it's
locked
and
that
neighbor
did
show
up
to
the
abutters
meeting,
and
you
know
he
did
speak.
CI
F
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
Let
go
record
support
this
proposal.
Owens
conducted
an
abutters
meeting
on
december
16th
of
2020
residents
in
attendance,
were
supportive
of
the
project
and
we're
excited
for
a
single
family.
Thank
you.
AI
B
AU
C
CL
C
R
C
C
C
For
the
12
30
is
a
rediscussion.
I
have
two
cases
that
are
being
deferred
to
march
23rd,
so
I'm
going
to
call
in
for
the
record
case:
voa
106,
6047,
546,
east
4th
street
there's
a
companion
case
via
106
60505,
48
east
4th
street.
They
are
being
deferred
to
march
23rd
due
to
administrative
deferral
at
12,
30.
CM
C
C
Call
in
case
bla
one
one:
two,
six,
eight,
eight
four,
seven
779
blue
avenue,
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
one
one,
two,
six,
eight,
eight
six,
eighty
one
baloo
avenue
this
does
79.
This
is
a
subdivide
lot.
The
violations,
article
60
section,
nine.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9
deployed
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
669.
C
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Mississippi
81,
balloon
avenue
is
erecting
new
instruction
for
family
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
60,
section
40
off
street
packing
and
loading
article
60,
section
8.
The
use
is
forbidden
in
the
three
f
5
000
sub
district
article
60
section
9.
The
blood
area
is
insufficient
article
60
section
9.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient.
C
Article
60
section
9
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60
section
9
on
the
usual
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
60,
section
9
on
the
front
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
side
yard
isn't
sufficient,
and
article
60
section
on
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CN
B
CN
W
B
CN
CN
CN
B
F
The
plans
look
good.
I
just
had
one
question:
it
does.
Is
this
the
natural
grade?
Are
you
excavating
the
backyard
it's
a
little
hard
to
tell
as
it
slopes
down,
because
the
drawings
do
show
it's
sloping
down,
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
bedroom
number
one
in
the
basement
level
is
indeed
will
meet.
You
know
be
above
grade
in
terms
of
its
location.
It
looks
close
in
the
section,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure.
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
with
go
and
record
support
of
this
proposal.
We
conducted
a
butters
meeting
on
november
18th.
There
were
no
serious
concerns
raised
by
butters
in
attendance.
The
applicant
went
on
to
receive
collect
22
signatures
from
neighbors
in
the
area
in
support
of
the
proposal
and
also
received
support
from
the
woodrow
avenue,
neighborhood
association,
which
is
the
local
neighborhood
group.
I
think
it
demonstrates
cleaner
community
support
I'll
blink
home
record.
Thank
you.
AQ
V
CO
B
C
G
B
B
C
CP
B
CP
AU
CP
So
it
did,
however,
provide
us
an
opportunity
to
listen
to
the
comments
and
actually
try
to
work
on
some
of
those
issues
between
both
hearings.
So
we
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
be
back
in
front
of
the
board
just
to
refresh
everyone's
recollection.
This
is
for
a
cannabis
establishment
at
533
washington
street.
This
is
in
the
codman
square
section
of
the
dorchester
neighborhood.
This
is
a
site,
as
I
had
mentioned
previously,
has
on-site
parking
to
the
rear
of
the
project.
CP
It
is,
however,
within
a
buffer
zone
of
approximately
600
feet
from
another
competitor.
I
noticed
that
what
we're
looking
at
here
is
we
go.
Yeah
are
the
revised
plans.
We
kind
of
just
did
a
little
more
work
on
them.
If
you
go
to
the
last
page,
I
wanted
to
just
make
sure
I
got
this
in
here
because
it
came
up.
I
think
it
was
member
erla
who
raised
some
questions
about
the
buffer
zone.
CP
We
took
a
look
at
other,
maybe
the
last
page,
if
you
could,
if
you
could
go
there
well,
that
is
the
last
page.
I
think
what
we
have
here
is
the
older,
the
old
set
well
I'll.
Just
tell
you
we
did
take
a
look
at
other
somewhere
situated.
Well,
maybe
you
do
have
it
in
there
cannabis
establishments
in
massachusetts
and
found
that
there
were
quite
a
number
that
are
in
fact
within
oh
good,
yeah,
the
last
page
on
this.
On
this
slide.
CP
I
just
thought
this
might
be
interesting
to
show
the
board,
because
it's
a
new
industry
and
there's
so
much
happening
in
it
and
there's
a,
but
there
are
a
bunch
that
were
within
half
a
mile
of
each
other
and
we
just
pulled
those
out
that
we
could
find
there
are
others
coming
online
and
they
I
looked
at
them
and
they
do
seem
to
be
functioning.
They
do
seem
to
be
doing
good
business
and
they
do
seem
to
be
operating.
CP
The
buffer
zone
requirement
is
a
is
a
city
requirement.
It
did
not
come
from
the
state.
The
state
does
have
the
500
foot
school
requirement,
but
not
the
proximity
to
other
locations.
So
I
wanted
to
include
that
just
for
really
for
your
information,
there's
also
a
drawing
here
that
gives
you
a
better
sense
of
how
the
building
will
fit
in
the
neighborhood.
It's
a
couple.
Slides
previous
to
this
one,
I
believe.
H
Yeah
one
or
two,
madam
chair,
if
I
could
just
make
quick
comment
to
respond
to
mr
ross-
yes,
sir,
you
know
as
a
board,
we
try
to
be
respectful
of
city
policy
and
conform
to
it.
So
when
the
buffer
zone
was
originally
passed,
it
sort
of
seemed
like
okay,
then
this
board
should
comply
with
it.
It
now
seems
like
the
city
council
has
a
different
attitude
about
it,
and
so,
if
that,
if
city
policy
is
changing
on
that,
then
I
suppose
that
we
need
to
be
open-minded
about
that.
That
approach
as
well.
CP
CP
CP
When
we're
in
front
of
you,
there
was
a
neighbor
next
to
us
that
raised
a
concern
since
then
the
operator
has
reached
out
to
that
individual
and
has
agreed
to
put
a
fence
between
the
two
properties,
which
I
think
is
going
to
go
a
long
way
to
addressing
the
concerns
that
that
neighbor
had
a
nice
fence
in
between
both
properties.
If
you
go
up
one
more,
I
think
there's
a
better
middle
of
what
we're
talking
about
here,
but
in
the
end
this
is-
and
you
know,
our
security
consultant
dan
linsky's
on
the
call
here.
CP
In
the
end,
this
is
a
very
busy
section
of
the
city.
It's
in
a
very
commercial
area.
The
the
previous
use
of
this
property
has
been
a
nursery
school.
Interestingly
enough
of
a
nursery
schools,
no
longer
operating
as
a
nursery
school
that
operated
on
that
first
floor
of
that
building,
and
it's
something
that
served
the
immediate
community.
A
lot
of
the
people
were
coming
immediately
from
that
community.
CP
CP
No,
they
will
not.
The
the
upper
floors
are
commercial
only
office
space
they're,
not
even
part
of
they're,
certainly
not
part
of
the
cannabis.
We're
only
presenting
to
you
on
the
previous
slides
floors,
one
and
basement,
and
to
refresh
your
recollection
floor.
One
is
in
1800,
you
can
go
up
if
you
could
madame
ambassador
or
one
is
an
1800
square
foot
sales
area,
maybe
one
more
slide
down
if
you
could
and
then
the
basement
is
completely
it's
just
the
secure
delivery.
CP
So
that's
where
the
vault
is
that
the
access
to
the
bay
to
the
basement
is
off
of
the
side
street
off
of
a
separate
entrance.
It's
not
accessible,
you
know
to
the
public,
and
so
our
security
team
will
come
right
in
on
that
side,
street
rose
dale
street
enter,
which
on
this
is
good.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
just
gonna
need
to
can't
see
anymore.
CP
Here
we
go
so
the
basement
is
your
right
is
the
plane
on
the
right?
Thank
you
and
you
can
see
that
on
the
top
of
that
plan,
where
the
arrow?
It's
that's,
that's
the
entrance.
That's
a
dedicated
entrance
off
of
rosedale
street
and
that's
where
security
will
will
come
right
into
right
to
just
put
the
product
directly
in
the
vault
and
likewise,
if
there's
any
cash
pickups
they'll
handle
that
right
from
that
area
inside
the
building
securely
and
and
efficiently
the
last
flag.
B
CP
Yes,
I
believe
boy
I
just
had
that
the
average
operations,
I
believe,
are
nine
to
eight
I'm
gonna.
I'm
gonna
pull
that
up
just
to
confirm
that
seven
days
a
week,
the
security
team
dan
linsky
is
from
crowell's
associates.
He's
our
consultant
he's
on
the
call
here.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
hear
a
little
bit
about
how
he's
gonna
run
the
operation.
He
is
not
your
average,
you
know
paid
security.
You
know
private
security.
The
kroll
is
a
very,
very,
very
good
at
what
they
do
and
yeah.
CP
CK
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
hi
dan
linsky
from
kroll.
We've
worked
with
the
client
to
make
sure
that
we
are
securing
the
product,
the
facility
and
our
clients,
as
well
as
making
sure
the
immediate
surrounding
area
has
an
improved
sense
of
safety
and
security
as
well.
So
we've
got,
I
believe,
nine
external
cameras,
45
cameras,
total
in
the
project.
CK
We
will
have
security
that
will
greet
people
outside
of
the
facility
as
they
come
to
the
front.
They
will
have
their
identification
checked,
we'll
scan
it
with
our
system
to
make
sure
that
they
are
in
the
system.
As
someone
who
has
not
previously
violated
our
good
neighbor
policy,
we
when
you
the
first
time
you
come
to
the
facility.
We
give
you
the
law
of
what
you
can
and
can't
do
with
cannabis,
can't
use
it
in
public
can't
give
it
to
miners.
I
can't
use
it
while
operating
a
vehicle.
CK
Obviously,
if
there's
been
bad
situations
that
neighbors
have
reported
you
coming
to
our
facility
and
engaging
in
bad
behavior,
we
will
trespass
you
from
the
facility.
So
we
check
your
id
get.
You
checked
in
the
system
make
sure
you're,
21
and
eligible.
You
will
go
into
the
facility.
Your
id
will
be
checked
again,
verified
one
more
time
and
then
you'll
go
and
place
your
order.
Look
at
your
displays,
look
what
you
want
to
do,
go
up
and
make
your
purchase.
The
idea
is
checked
a
third
time
then.
CK
So
we
have
a
combination
we
believe
of
both
in-house
security
and
private
outside
security
professionals.
That
will
supplement
our
team,
making
sure
that
there's
no
disorder
around
the
streets,
no
gathering,
no
loitering,
no
use
of
product
that
we
are
not
having
people
double
park
in
coming
in
our
facility
and
making
sure
that
we
are
keeping
the
neighborhood
safe
as
well.
F
CP
Yeah
there's
a
site
plan
there.
That
gives
you
a
better
view,
maybe
maybe
even
the
first
one
or
something
yeah
yeah
you,
you
spotted
it,
certainly
that
it's
it's
not
it's
not
perfect.
We
do
have
five
tandem
locations
of
parking,
but
the
plan,
I
think,
would
be
to
put
two
employees
into
the
blocked
spaces
and
then
allow
at
least
three
people
to
come
and
go.
You
know
using
using
the
parking.
This
doesn't
give
you
the
best
view
of
it.
CP
Actually,
the
last
plan
actually
had
a
better
view
of
it,
but
what
it
will
allow
is
for
direct
access
for
our
handicap
patients,
there's
a
ramp
on
either
side
coming
off
of
washington
street,
but
also
coming
off
of
the
garage.
So
my
thought
is
is
to
make
that
available
for
people
who
you
know
for
certainly
for
handicapped
and
allow
for
for
the
parking
there.
It's
good
to
have
any
numbers
of
spaces.
You
know
five
in
boston
is
is
in
this
neighborhood
is,
is
great.
CP
A
lot
of
the
spaces
places
don't
have
any
parking,
so
we're
glad
that
we
have
some,
but
it
you
know
it's
more
to
allow
for
some
of
those
maneuverabilities
the
deliveries,
the
security
deliveries,
those
types
of
things
we
can
reserve
a
space.
The
turnover
is
extremely
quick
and
there
are
going
to
be
a
lot
of
neighborhood
purchases.
So
we
do
anticipate
that
if
people
are
you
know
if
people
are
really
going
to
drive
into
this
area,
you
know
it's
not
that
it's
an
1800
square
foot
facility.
CP
X
Members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
we'd
like
to
go
and
write
in
support
of
this
proposal,
we're
in
support
of
an
equity
applicant
in
this
location.
We
also
think
that
it's
appropriate
that
it's
in
a
business
district
and
that
will
create
more
jobs
for
the
neighborhood.
B
CE
Trevor
mckenzie
83
center
street
right
right
around
the
corner.
I
just
fully
support
this
project.
I
think
it's
something
that'll
be
good
in
the
community.
That's
a
busy
street!
I
don't
think
there'd
be
an
issue
with
you
know.
Having
two
within
such
a
close
distance,
I
mean
there's
multiple
liquor
stores
on
the
street:
multiple
restaurants,
multiple
you
know
of
pretty
much
everything
you
know
right
across
from
each
other.
CE
CJ
BM
BS
BS
BS
BS
So
there's
a
whole
lot
of
stuff
that
is
going
on.
We
got
rid
of
a
drug
dealer
on
dunlop
street
and
it
was
horrible.
Black
kids
were
going
to
school
and
people
were
getting
high,
while
kids
were
going
to
school
and
we
put
they're
putting
us
back
into
that
same
situation
again,
and
I
don't
understand
it.
CQ
H
N
B
C
Call
in
the
next
case
calling
voa
109
1923
1877
center
street.
This
is
an
interior
build-up.
New
tenant
change
of
use
to
include
a
24-hour
fitness
center.
The
viabilities
article
2a
section
2a-1
entertainment
uses,
including
fitness
centers,
shall
not
operate
past
10
30
p.m.
Article
56,
section
39
off-street
blocking
loading
our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
63
is
required,
25
is
proposed
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CR
My
name
is
william,
christopher,
I'm,
the
owner's
representative,
my
business
address
is
1154
dorchester
avenue
good
afternoon.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
The
proposal
before
you
is
to
add
a
fitness
center
to
the
community
and
presently
what
is
an
abandoned
building?
The
operation
is
planet
fitness.
CR
We
feel
that
this
would
be
a
very
much
added
amenity
to
center
street
it'll,
also
liven
up
the
areas
so
that
there
would
be
people
who
would
be
moving
around
in
and
around
the
facility.
That
would
add
some
life
in
in
context
to
to
the
community,
and
there
is,
I
guess
there
was
some
question
about
the
limitation
of
the
10
30
hours.
CR
Article
2a
clearly
defines
the
limitations
of
10th
per
the
definition
limiting
to
restaurants
with
or
without
entertainment,
not
specifically
fitness
centers.
But
that's
that's
an
issue
to
be
discussed,
but
planet,
fitness
is
a
is
a
well-known
entity.
Well-Organized,
you
know
throughout
the
country,
but
primarily
in
in
this
area.
CR
There
are
other
planet
fitnesses
that
do
operate
24
hours.
There
is
it's.
There's
one
that
I
I
quote
here
is
17
winter
street,
that
that
is
a
gymnasium
that
operates
24
hours
and
there's
also
fifth,
choice,
which
is
at
4170
washington
street
in
roslindale
that
operates
24
hours
a
day.
Their
facility
would
hire
between
18
and
24
local
residents
to
work
and
manage
within
the
facility.
CR
CR
CS
CS
CS
B
CS
Our
staff
is
overnight:
we
have
between
five
to
six
staff
members
on
per
shift.
In
addition
to
that,
we
also
have
21
security
cameras,
which
are
backed
up
for
90
days
on
a
dvr
system,
that's
located
inside
of
the
facility,
and
we
also,
of
course,
train
our
staff
to
operate
24
hours.
We
have
2
000
clubs
nationwide
and
it's
imperative
for
us
quite
frankly,
to
be
able
to
operate
24
hours
predominantly
to
be
able
to
provide
fitness
experience
to
everyone.
You
know.
CS
No,
I
mean
the
neighborhood
feedback
that
we've
gotten
if
they
want
the
24
hours.
I
mean
that's
evident
in
the
letter
that
we
received
from
the
neighborhood
council
and
we
went
and
we
met
with
them
as
well.
You
know
for
us,
you
know
the
biggest.
The
biggest
thing
is
is
be
a
being
able
to
provide
fitness
for
everyone.
CS
C
C
I
mean
I
would
hope,
to
see
something
actually
come
in
there,
but
I
do
support
my
neighbors,
obviously
that
that
live
very
close
to
it
in
proximity-
and
I
know
you
mentioned
pawn
said
I
know
you
mentioned
you-
make
a
plane
not
as
dense
as
where
west
roxbury
is
right
now,
but
there
are
lettuce
of
a
lot
of
letters
of
not
support
for
the
24
hours.
I
don't
think
they're
opposed
to
the
project
in
general,
but
they
haven't
close
to
the
24
hour
operation.
AU
D
CA
CA
They
did
go
through
a
full
community
process.
The
west
roxbury
neighborhood
council
did
support
it
and
you
guys
should
all
have
a
copy
of
that
letter
that
larry
costello
the
president
sent
over,
but
there
are
many
residents
in
the
neighborhood
that
are
against
the
proposal
and
immediate
of
butter.
Immediate
residential
butters
that
do
have
concerns
about
the
24
aspect
of
this
proposal.
CA
L
CT
Yes,
patricia
stanton
44
quarry
street
directly
adjacent
to
the
parking
lot.
One
record
in
opposition
due
to
safety
and
noise
concerns,
there's
about
20
families
that
run
adjacent
or
are
adjacent
to
that
parking
lot,
which
spent
about
15
letters
of
our
position
in
we
strongly
believe
planet.
Fitness
cannot
control
unruly
members
who
come
in
at
night
into
the
parking
lot,
with
radios
on,
etc,
44
quarter
street.
We
have
bedrooms
that
are
literally
within
seven
feet
of
the
parking
lot
so
strongly
opposed
and
I've
looked
at
a
lot
of
the
planets
planet.
CU
CU
This
is
the
portion
that
will
be
used
as
parking
and
it
will
increase
noise
and
light
pollution
in
the
neighborhood
in
the
late
evening
and
early
morning
hours
additionally,
similar
to
what
patricia
mentioned
many
of
the
other
planet.
Fitnesses
in
the
boston
area
do
not
abut
zone
residentially,
zoned
areas
on
multiple
sides,
they're
in
more
commercial
locations.
CV
CV
No,
there
are
no
plans
to
monitor
or
to
address
late
night
noises,
and
I
know
that
there's
a
short-term
period
six
months,
I
believe,
where
planet
tennis
can
operate
to
24
hours,
but
within
that
24
hours
we
have
not
seen
any
scheduled
meetings
or
identified
metrics
to
measure
the
success
of
this
experiment
in
this
residential
neighborhood.
So
I
strongly
oppose
the
24-hour
business
operation
proposal,
but
completely
support
planet
fitness.
Thank.
CR
The
lighting
that's
going
to
be
used
on
the
poles
is
referred
to
as
a
shoebox
light,
which
directs
the
actual
light
coming
out
down
so
that
it
would
not,
you
know,
be
offensive
to
any
of
the
any
of
the
abutters,
and
I
would
ask
chase
to
speak
to,
but
I
do
know
that
planet
fitness
would
be
controlling
and
dealing
with
any
member
that
created
a
problem
in
the
yard
and
I
believe,
further,
that
planets
fitness
would
commit
to
attending.
You
know
the
monthly
community
meetings
so
that
we
don't
wait.
CR
B
So
the
the
you
know,
I
think
I
think
you've
heard
that
there
are
a
couple
of
us
who
are
very
familiar
with
that
a
lot
and
with
that
parcel
you
know
for
the
thought
that
there
are
going
to
be
parking
spaces
provided
back
there.
25
proposed
spaces.
Yes,
that
is
a
really
really
awkward
lot.
I've
split
spent
plenty
of
time
trying
to
negotiate
in
and
out
of
that
lot
and
with
a
fence
with
screening
and
buffering
that
is
going
to
further
reduce
the
actual
pathway
of
the
traffic
etc.
B
B
C
C
You
follow
me
the
next
four
cases
calling
voa
113-14427,
sunny
side
street
campaigning
case;
eight,
nine
voa,
seven
sunnyside
street
hboa,
one
one
three,
one:
four:
five:
six:
nine
sunnyside
street
and
boa
1131909
sunnyside
street.
This
is
side
street
erect
a
multi-family
dwelling
floor
unit
and
parking
on
ground
floor.
This
is
one
of
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot.
The
violations
article
69
section
29
on
street
parking
is
insufficient.
C
Article
69
section
8,
a
multi-family
uses
forbidden
article
69
section
9
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
9
billing
has
excessive
in
stories.
Article
69
section,
9
usual
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
69,
section
9
rare
yards,
insufficient
article
69,
section
9.2
lot.
Frontage,
minimum
frontage
of
the
street
shall
not
be
less
than
the
minimum
lock
width.
C
This
is
for
7,
sunny
side
building
code,
521
cmr,
10.0
public
and
common
use,
spaces,
10.1,
general
public
use
and
common
use.
Spaces
of
multiple
dwellings
and
new
construction,
consisting
of
more
of
three
or
more
units,
shall
comply
with
section
521
cmr,
another
violation,
521
cmr
9.00,
multiple
dwellings,
9.2
applicability,
no
construction.
Multiple
drilling
shall
meet
the
requirement
of
521
cmr
9.3
group.
One
of
dwelling
units-
this
is
for
nine
sunnyside
erected.
Multi-Family
dwelling
eight
unit
parking
on
ground
floor.
This
is
one
of
two
buildings
of
the
same
lot.
C
Unfortunately
different,
so
I'm
going
to
read
them
up.
Article
69
section
28.3
parking
is
insufficient
article
69
section
30.12,
a
dwelling
shall
not
be
built
to
the
rear
of
another
dwelling.
Article
69
section
8,
a
multi-family
use
is
forbidden.
Article
69,
section,
9
unlocked
quantities,
insufficient
article
69,
section
9.
The
billing
has
accessible
stories.
Article
69,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
C
B
O
B
O
B
O
So
what
we're
proposing
to
do
is
it's
a
it's
a
lot.
That's
over
19
000
square
feet,
and
currently
there
is
one
building.
It's
a
two
and
a
half
story.
Two
family
dwelling
and
what
we're
proposing
to
do
is
to
build
two
buildings.
One
would
have
eight
units
and
those
are
flats
you
would
park
on
the
first
floor.
You'd
have
a
unit
on
the
second
floor
and
unit
on
the
third
floor
and
there
are
four
of
those
verticals.
O
So
there's
eight
in
that
building
the
other
building
would
have
four
units
again
on
the
first
floor
and
you
live
on
the
second
and
third
floor
and
that
would
have
four
units
in
that
building.
So
it's
a
total
of
12
units
on
the
property
we
designed
it
as
two
buildings
so
that
we
didn't
want
to
make
like
a
a
larger
building
on
that
lot.
Now.
The
lot
is,
I
think
you
call
it
a
dog
bone
where
you
know
it
has
the.
O
B
O
So,
as
far
as
the
privacy
goes,
what
we
have
placed
if
we
could
go
to
the
site
plan
on
the
screen
you
would
drive
in
you
would
drive
into
the
lot
and
then
the
parking
is
in
the
middle
of
the
two
buildings
so
that
you
would
then
pull
into
your
parking
space
your
well,
it's
a
in
a
garage
space.
That's
underneath
both
buildings,
so
the
parking
we're
proposing
one
one
car
parking
per
unit
and
each
of
those
are
enclosed.
O
It's
inside
the
building
the
privacy
is
such
that
we
have
living
spaces
on
the
I'll
call
it
the
middle
piece
where
you
park,
the
bedrooms
are
on
the
bedrooms,
are
what
places
the
neighbors.
So
it's
not?
We
don't
have
living
space
facing
neighbors
the
living
space
faces
each
other.
You
know
across
that
driveway.
B
O
O
O
Okay,
so
the
way
we
have
it
right
now
is
we
have
so
as
you're
driving
in
there
there's
fence,
and
there
is
landscaping
and
from
the
fence
behind
the
neighbors
we
have
25
feet
to
the
first
building.
Then
you
have
the
building
and
you've
got
about
24
feet
in
between
the
two
buildings
and
then
from
the
back
of
the
building.
The
number
nine
to
the
rear.
Far
rear
of
the
lot
is
40
feet.
O
Yeah,
that's
it
right
there.
So
there's
see,
there's
25
feet,
then
you've
got
building
a
which
is
number
seven.
Then
there's
20,
oh
23,
we're
gonna,
make
it
24
or
as
much
as
we
can
and
then
you've
got
a
building
b,
which
is
number
nine
and
then
you've
got
40
feet
from
the
back
of
building
b
to
the
far
building
we
could.
We
can
move
that
building
number
nine.
We
can
move
it
up
the
page
a
little
bit.
O
We
can
reduce
the
back
of
the
the
beer
yard,
but
in
that,
because
of
the
way
it
was
filed
through
isd,
so
on
building
nine,
the
rear
yard
is
sufficient,
but
if
we
move
it
back,
then
it
becomes
insufficient.
So
it's
just
a
little
bit
of
a
juggling
act
on.
You
know
how
we
look
at
the
setbacks,
the
side
yard
setbacks
are
what's
required,
so
those
conform
for
both
buildings
and
again,
like
I
said
we
have
bedrooms
on
the
on
building
number
seven.
B
O
B
O
B
F
H
CH
Excuse
me
january
6th,
where
the
applicants
were
able
to
answer
questions
from
abutters,
mainly
regarding
the
work
being
done,
so
that
driveways
do
not
slide
together.
Our
office
did
receive
one
letter
of
opposition
regarding
the
potential
of
sunnyside
being
overcrowded
other
than
that
our
office
has
no
concerns
at
this
time.
CH
R
CW
Yes,
my
name
is
michelle:
bodus,
I'm
home
at
202,
reservation
room
and
I
well.
I
want
to
say
a
couple
of
things.
My
intent
was
to
attend
that
meeting
on
january
6th,
but
I
want
us
all
to
go
back
to
january
and
remember
what
was
going
on
that
entire
day,
and
so,
unfortunately,
my
attention
was
not
on
that
it
was
attempted.
CW
My
attention
was
was
on
the
capitol
and
the
insurgents,
so
as
what,
as
were
many
of
my
neighbors,
the
neighbors
in
this,
my
neighbor's
community
do
not
want
this
you're
going
from
a
two
family
to
a
12
family,
but
this
is
one
of
the
last
neighborhoods
that
has
not
been
gentrified.
There's
an
elementary
school
right
up.
The
street
there
are
elderly
people
have
owned
their
homes
here
for
years,
and
what
you're
proposing
is
to
expose
this
tight
small
community
to
who
knows
who's
going
to
come
in
and
live
there.
CW
B
CX
Yes,
mohan
standing
over
at
20
thompson
street
on
the
back
side
of
the
log
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
I
just
kind
of
wanted
a
voicemail
support,
but
in
large
part,
due
to
a
couple
of
units
in
that
the
city
does
need
units,
especially
in
this
neighborhood.
They
don't
pretend
to
like
one
two
family
units.
CX
B
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
115
1358
1200
soldiers
field
road.
This
is
constructed
63,
000
television,
broadcasting,
studio,
wbz,
the
violation,
article
29,
section
4.
This
is
in
the
greenbelt
overlay
in
article
51,
section
17,
the
height
is
excessive.
35
feet
is
the
max
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CY
B
CY
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Let
me
explain
that
so
we
have
two
lots
side
by
side
here,
a
lot
one
in
law
two,
so
it's
proposed
to
subdivide
lot,
one
which
is
a
the
larger
library
of
existing
eleven
seventy
six
associated
where
the
existing
tv
station
is
now
and
take
a
piece
of
that
lot,
one
which
is
now
being
called
lot.
A
and
added
to
parcel
two
parcel.
CY
Two
presently
has
a
as
a
small
office
building
that
would
be
at
1200
soldiers
field,
road
that
would
be
raised
demolished
as
part
of
this,
and
so
we've
also
at
the
same
time
filed
applications
to
create
the
new
subdivision
which
the
folks
at
isd
you
know
have
noted
when
they
get
the
plans
that
we
have
to
approve
into
a
new
subdivision.
So
we'll
have
one
buildable
lot:
a
site
plan
which
will
be
just
about
a
little
less
than
90
000
square
feet
to
build
a
63,
000
square
foot.
B
CY
So,
just
just
to
walk
you
through
that,
thank
you,
and
I
just
wanted
to
mention
before
I
forgot,
because
this
this
television
station
news
has
been
there
since,
since
before
the
zoning
code,
it
is
an
allowable
use.
You
know
in
this
area.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
the
the
way
that
the
law
will
be
accessed
primarily
through
mcdonald
avenue,
into
the
into
the
parking
area
by
you,
know,
employees
and,
and
you
know,
service
people
etc.
CY
CY
That's
correct
and
we
have
been
working
with
carrie
marsh
dixon
and
the
folks
at
the
park
department
who
asked
us
to
come.
You
know
get
through
with
the
article
80
process
and
to
come
before
you
folks,
the
cba
before
they
finalize
their
certification,
but
we've
been
working
with
them
on
the
landscaping,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,.
F
The
plans
are
good.
I
just
had
one
question
just
so
I
can
make
sure
I
understand,
so
the
building
is
obviously
taller
than
the
existing
building
you're
replacing,
but
are
you
you're
putting
parking
then
underneath?
So
it's
really
sort
of
still
two
stories
of
use
in
terms
of
your
whatever
you
do
internally,
but
then
there's
some
parking
coming
underneath.
Is
that
what's
kind
of
changing
that
from
your
existing
facility
to.
CY
This
that's
exactly
right,
mr
robinson.
There
is
parking
underneath,
and
the
idea,
too,
is
to
is
because
it's
a
television
station
and
because
of
the
world
we
live
in,
the
the
area
has
to
be
secured,
so
there'll
be
a
fair
amount
of
security.
You
know
proper
fencing
et
cetera,
and
that's
why
there
is
also
this
enclosed
park,
but
that's
that's
why
the
building
the
idea
was
to
lift
the
building
up.
If
you
will
thank
you
for
that,
thank
you.
X
Yes,
phantom
chair
members
of
the
board
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
which
go
on
records,
support
this
proposal.
The
applicant
went
through
a
robust
community
process,
overseen
by
the
ppa.
They
also
met
with
both
civic
associations
several
times
the
austin
civic
association
and
the
brighton
austin
improvement
association.
X
CZ
AA
BT
AJ
Z
CB
DA
C
Very
much,
I
feel
your
pain,
madam
chap
now
we're
getting
to
the
12
30
cases.
It's
only
2
30.
we're
doing
pretty
good
gonna
go
for
the
first
case
of
rediscussion
calling
boa
106,
7117
6
kelly
court.
This
erect
a
single
family
dwelling
in
the
rear
of
46
cook
street
and
newly
subdivided
lot.
The
violations,
article
62
section,
30.12,
two
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot.
The
dwelling
should
not
be
built
to
the
rear
of
another
dwelling.
Article
62,
section
8,
the
blood
area
is
insufficient.
Article
62
lost
frontage
is
insufficient.
C
CL
Hello,
my
name
is
timothy
sheehan,
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project.
This
is
the
single
study
house,
we're
putting
behind
an
existing
house,
my
clients
own
the
parcel
at
46
cook
street,
which
is
overly
long
for
down
it's
100
over
100
feet
long.
So
what
they
want
to
do
is
subdivide
the
site
and
build
this
single
family
house
behind
their
house
which
actually
fronts
on
kelly
course.
CL
The
house
will
be
2255
growth
square
feet
1800.
Yet
that
would
be
three
bedrooms.
Three
and
a
half
baths.
There'll
be
a
15
by
17
foot,
roof
deck
on
top
accessed
by
a
hatch
parking,
the
one
garage
parking
spot
which
we'll
have
an
angled
door.
That
kelly
court
is
tight.
Kelly
court's
only
13
14
feet
wide,
but
it's
a
little
wider
where
we
are
and
we've
worked,
we've
had
a
neighborhood
meeting.
CL
You
know
quite
some
time
ago,
back
in
august,
I
guess,
but
after
working
with
the
neighbors,
we
made
the
house
about
22
inches
lower
to
line
up
with
the
new
houses
that
are
across
the
alley
and
when
I
first
drew
it,
I
had
it
four
feet
from
the
from
the
lot
setback.
We
ended
up
both
pushing
the
house
back
another
two
feet
for
six
feet
back
and
we
made
the
house
a
little
bit
shorter.
The
house
is
23
wide
by
32
long.
CL
BA
BA
With
the
majors
office,
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
and
apart
of
this
meeting
was
held
in
august
last
year.
There
were
some
concerns
raised
about
the
the
garage
and
the
access
to
the
garage,
as
well
as
some
privacy
concerns
from
the
roof
deck
and
the
neighbor.
The
applicant
has
been
working
with
the
neighbors
to
attempt
to
address
those
concerns.
We
also
received
a
petition
to
support
from
the
owner
as
well.
BA
R
CL
H
CL
C
On
the
next
case,
calling
voa
106,
6736
121-2
church
avenue,
this
is
a
change
of
art
from
a
single
family.
Four
unit,
multi
family
dwelling,
construct
a
two
star
vertical
addition
on
an
existing
footprint
with
red
deck,
the
violation,
article
68,
section,
29,
root
structure,
restriction,
article
68,
section
33
off
street
parking
since
official
article
68
section
84
is
excessive
article
68,
section
8.
The
building
head
is
excessive
and
feet
article
68,
section,
8,
usable,
open
space.
C
BV
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
nick
sazula
mcdermott,
quilting
miller,
28
state
street
suite
zero.
Two
in
boston
here
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner
and
developer
jim
o'donohue
and
with
me
today,
is
eric
gafferson
from
context
architecture,
who's,
the
architect
in
the
project.
BV
Madam
chair,
this
property
is
located
on
church
avenue.
As
you
can
see,
this
is
the
building
right
here.
Church
avenue
is
a
dead-end
private
way
that
empties
on
to
west
broadway
near
the
corner
of
e
street,
and
it's
actually
two
existing
single-family
attached
residential
buildings
that
are
about
a
little
over
two
thousand
square
feet.
They
take
up
a
majority
of
the
lot
and,
what's
being
proposed,
is
to
convert
the
legal
use
and
occupancy
expand
the
building
with
a
two-story
vertical
addition
and
make
it
into
a
four-unit
building.
BV
So
it
would
be
going
from
an
existing
two
family
to
to
a
four
unit,
multi-family
residential
building,
by
adding
this
two-story
vertical
addition,
it's
a
classic
infill
construction.
It
would
match
the
building
height
next
to
it,
it
would
not
be.
The
construction
would
not
be
visible
from
west
broadway.
It
would
be
tucked
behind
the
building
that
is
adjacent
to
it
between
it
and
west
broadway.
BV
Yes,
ma'am
yep,
so
the
proposed
units
that
are
that
are
part
of
this
project.
Right
now,
two
single
two
one
bedroom
unit
on
the
first
and
second
floor.
They
would
be
720
square
feet
and
780
square
feet.
This
would
be
what's
there
now
in
the
existing
building
and
then
the
two-story
vertical
addition
would
be
two
two-bed
duplex
unit
that
would
be
eight
hundred
and
ten
square
feet
and
eight
hundred
and
seventy-five
square
feet
the
as
far
as
the
parking
is
concerned.
BV
Madam
chair,
this
is
a
as
you
can
see
from
the
site
plane,
which
was
up
a
few
minutes
ago.
This
is
kind
of
a
landlocked
parcel.
There's
no
there's
an
eight
eight
foot
passageway,
but
that's
really
pedestrian
passageway.
There's,
no!
There's
no
on-site
parking
now
and
there's
none
available
to
do
that.
So
we're
not
proposing
to
add
any
parking
with
the
added
units.
The
building
is
on
west
broadway
right
off
west
broadway.
It's
you
know
a
half
mile
from
the
from
the
broadway
t.
BV
No
ma'am
no
roof
deck.
There
is
a.
There
is
a
rear
deck
being
proposed,
there's
a
rear
deck.
Now
on
the
on
the
first
level,
which
you
can
see
on
slide
six,
I
believe
we're
adding
a
a
rear
deck
on
the
second
level,
but
unless
I'm
stating
something
incorrectly,
mr
zackerson
can
correct
me.
I
don't
believe
we're
proposing
a
roof
deck.
B
BV
CU
B
BV
BV
BV
DB
BJ
AJ
AJ
Z
Z
C
Thank
you
on
the
next
case
calling
voa
102
4095
11th
annual
street.
This
is
to
raise
the
existing
commercial
structure
at
the
four-story
residential
building
with
42
units
and
51
parking
garage
spaces,
constructing
new
private
roof
deck
violation,
article
51,
section
16,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
conditional.
C
AZ
Also
with
me
is
dan
artigas
from
embark,
who
are
the
architects
on
the
project?
Well,
as
was
mentioned,
the
proposal
in
front
of
you,
members
of
the
board,
is
to
raise
the
existing
structure,
which
is
a
commercial
structure.
It's
the
meineke,
a
former
meineke
location
along
11th
annual,
and
the
proposal
is
to
erect
a
four-story
residential
condominium
building
that
would
probably
42
residential
units
with
51
interior
parking
spaces
at
the
ground
level.
AZ
AZ
B
AZ
Yes,
so
just
in
terms
of
units
I'll
go
over
those
first,
madam
chair,
there
are
14
studio
units
with
an
average
size
of
560
square
feet.
There
are
14
one
bedroom
units
with
an
average
square
footage
of
705
square
feet.
There
are
three
one
bedroom
plus
study
at
860
square
feet.
There
are
eight
two
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
935
square
feet
and
there
are
three
three
bedroom
units
at
1245
square
feet.
So
the
layout
of
the
building
on
the
first
floor
would
house
the
parking.
AZ
If
you
had
asked
right
now,
there
are
a
number
of
curb
cuts,
so
this
would
fill
in
and
put
in
sidewalk.
That
is
no
not
existing.
At
this
time
there
would
be
an
entrance,
a
10-foot
driveway,
a
garage
door
that
opens
that
would
house
the
parking.
So
you
would,
it
would
be
the
ingress
and
the
egress
through
that
one
garage
door
and
that
would
be
located
on
the
first
floor
that
would
host
51
parking
spaces,
which
is
shown
here.
It's
a
stacker
system
in
the
back
of
the
property.
AZ
AZ
B
AZ
AZ
B
Okay-
let's
just
see
so
it's
and
okay,
you
know
I'm
I'm
curious
about
these
studios
because
I
have
to
say
we
haven't
been
seeing
that
many
studios.
Lately
we
are
seeing
more
two-bedrooms
more
two-bedrooms
than
studios.
Can
you
just
kind
of
talk
us
through
the
rationale
of
the
studios
and
also
tell
us
if
this
is
anticipated
to
be
rental
or
owner
occupied.
AZ
So
these
are
so
not
only
are
they
condos
and
also
we
have
an
agreement
where
60
would
be
written
into
the
condo
docks
for
home
ownership
only
so
to
prevent
rentals.
For
that
reason,
so
this
is
a
condo
strong,
condo
project.
We
did
try
to
put
a
mix
in
of
units,
I
mean
we
did
there.
There
is
a
market
for
smaller
units
as
well,
but
we
tried
to
do
a
mix,
so
we
do
have
a
number
of
two
beds
and
we
added
some
three
beds.
AZ
AZ
C
F
CE
C
B
H
H
AZ
Yeah
there
there
is
a
there
is
a
mix,
so
there's
the
scrub-a-dub
car
washes
directly
neck
doors.
The
cbs
building
is
behind
us.
There
is
a
two
unit
and
we've
been
in
trying
to
reach
absentee
landlord
to
the
left.
We
do
have
the
support
of
the
folks
beyond
that.
There
are
some
higher
buildings
diagonal
and
our
aerial
view.
If
we
could
pull
that
up
again,
it
is
a
mix
of
of
twos
and
commercial
space.
AZ
Well,
you
know
if
we
pull
up
the
or
slide
two
of
our
original
on
our
you
can
see
an
aerial
view
of
the
mix
over
there
there.
There
are
some
dense
buildings
right
off
the
side.
Probably
five
watts
down,
but
it
is.
It
is
changing
because
there
is
a
lot
of
commercial
around
here.
You
can
see
as
you
go
down
market,
but
also
the
other
direction.
AZ
H
Okay,
so
all
right!
Well,
we
what
we
all
know
that
what
a
developer
starts
with
is
not
never
what
they
expect
to
end
with.
So
we
should
probably
move
away
from
that.
Here's.
My
other
question:
you
talked
about
having
requirements
about
a
cert
60
going
for
sale
as
opposed
to
rental.
Do
you
have
deed
restrictions
in
those
for
sale
units
that
they
can't
be
sublet
for
by
speculators?
H
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
call
anyone
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
Let
go
record
supporters
proposal,
they
went.
The
applicant
went
through
a
robust
community
process,
overseen
by
the
bpa,
and
they
met
with
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association.
Several
times
I
went
back
and
forth
with
changes
and
made
concessions
to
the
community.
I
think
desperately
brighton
means
more
homeownership
opportunities,
and
these
condominiums
will
provide
that.
Thank
you.
CZ
Z
R
DC
Hi
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
edmund
alcock,
I'm
a
lawyer
practicing
with
marcus
rico
and
retroux,
and
I
represent,
b
and
d
market
street
llc
basically
owns
and
operates.
The
scrub-a-dub
car
wash
at
5th
annual
street,
which
is,
as
you
saw
from
the
depiction,
is
directly
abutting.
This
proposed
project.
DC
DC
A
couple
of
the
reasons
that
we
we
feel
that
we
would
be
actually
harmed
by
this
proposal
are
number
one.
The
height
of
the
building
being
twice
as
tall
as
as
permitted
under
applicable
zoning
is
going
to
cast
significant
shadows
on
the
car
wash
and
block
light
and
air
to
that
car
wash
and,
in
fact,
effectively
diminish
or
defeat.
DC
No,
I
understand
I
understand
I've
been
on
this
call
since
12
15..
I
appreciate
that
so
I'll
be
as
quick
as
I
can.
Quite
frankly,
one
of
the
other
issues
is
the
placement
of
a
42-unit
residential
condominium
in
such
proximity
to
our
property,
which
means
it's
five
times
the
square
footage
permitted
by
zoning
twice
the
height
effectively,
and
if
you
look
at
that
depiction
on
page
one,
including
the
roof
decks,
including
the
porches,
overlooking
the
car
wash,
you
know
it's
fair
to
say
this
is
a
commercially
zoned
property.
DC
B
DC
B
DC
Use,
we're
going
to
be
putting
42
people
that
are
overlooking
a
car
wash
car
washes
and
condominium
buildings
in
within
feet
of
each
other
are
not
necessarily
compatible,
and
one
of
the
concerns
my
client
has
is
once
and
if
this
project
is
approved
at
its
size
and
at
its
density
is
going
to
be
the
numerous
complaints
from
owners
in
that
building
based
on
the
operation,
that's
already
pre-existed.
My
last
concern.
DC
My
last
concern
is:
is
traffic
entering
and
exiting
the
entrances
for
the
garage
and
the
exit
for
the
for
the
car
wash
are
in
proximity?
It
creates
a
safety
problem.
It
creates
an
issue
for
my
clients,
business,
as
does,
as
does
the
screening
and
and
the
in
the
purported
placement
of
shrubs
and
trees
in
the
vicinity
of
the
exit
to
the
car
wash
so
so.
Those
are
our
concerns.
We've
previously
submitted
a
letter
dated
november
16th,
which
we
again
filed
with
the
board
last
evening.
Thank
you
very
much.
DA
Annabella
chair
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
gomes
from
the
brighton
nelson
improvement
association,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
do
think
that
changing
it
from
a
commercial
to
residential
is
more
beneficial
for
the
community
and
providing
condos
versus
apartment.
Rentals
is
hugely
important,
especially
in
that
area.
As
for
the
car
watch,
there
has
been
numerous
complaints
about
the
car
wash
the
noise.
DD
Address
yes,
my
name
is
john
cusack.
I
live
at
186
washington
street
in
brighton.
Madam
share
members
of
the
board,
as
proposed
this
project
will
transfer
the
current
muffler
shop
to
an
active
residential
building
with
homeownership
opportunities,
which
is
hugely
important
for
brighton,
so
in
the
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
AK
AK
CM
B
B
AZ
B
B
C
Calling
the
next
case
for
rediscussion
calling
voa
101
9220
645
river
street.
This
is
a
tear
down
of
existing
grocery
store,
building
to
construct
a
new
three-story
building
with
self-service
laundry
or
approximately
two
thousand
square
feet.
On
the
first
floor
and
four
residential
units
and
the
floors
above
and
two
units
per
per
floor,
the
violated
article
69
69
lot
size
directed
dwelling
is
insufficient
article
69
section
9
on
the
floor.
Today
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
height,
is
excessive.
In
stories.
C
Article
69,
section,
9,
the
height,
is
accessible
in
feet.
Article
69,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
69,
section
9
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
69,
section
9
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
9
rare
yards
insufficient
article
69,
section
29
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
8,
the
self-service
laundry
uses
forbidden,
use
article
69,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
a
forbidden
use,
name
an
address
for
the
record.
C
R
R
BW
M
M
This
project
basically
consists
of
the
demolition
of
an
existing
single
story:
retail
building
of
approximately
1
000
square
feet
on
a
3079
square
foot
lot
in
order
to
construct
a
three-story
building
with
a
full
basement
consisting
of
a
ground
floor,
commercial
space
and
four
residential
buildings
of
residential
units.
Above
on
the
total
square.
Footage
of
our
project
with
basement
is
roughly
8
600
square
feet
sitting
on
a
2090,
2097
square
foot
footprint,
our
basement
space
will
be
used
for
storage
for
both
the
residential
commercial
use.
M
The
commercial
space
will
be
used
as
a
commercial
laundromat
for
both
the
residents
and
the
neighborhood
as
a
whole.
There
is
no
on-site
parking
provided.
However,
there
is
a
bus,
stop
located
immediately
adjacent
to
the
property
and
within
a
mile
to
a
mile
and
a
half
are
a
green
line.
Stop
at
a
purple
line.
M
Stop
the
project
has
been
viewed
several
times
by
the
hyde
park,
neighborhood
group,
which
was
received
famously
favorably,
and
my
client
has
secured
10
letters
of
support
endorsing
the
project
with
copies
included
in
our
appeal
on
the
architecture
of
the
building
is
a
simple
contemporary
structure
with
large
windows,
various
window
bays
on
the
residential
floors
and
clad
intimate
cement,
fiberboard,
siding
and
panels.
With
contracting
contrasting
accents
rim,
we
are
seeking
multiple
variants
to
construct
the
project.
B
F
BT
F
X
Hi
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
for
this
proposal.
We
understand
there
were
some
concerns
from
neighbors
and
neighboring
church
regarding
parking,
but
we
think
that
the
density
is
pretty
much
in
line
with
the
existing
buildings
on
river
street.
We
often
think
that
the
laundromat
will
be
a
ride
of
benefit
for
the
community.
Thank
you.
DE
DE
B
C
You
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
104-3402-5
orlando
street.
This
is
a
change
of
walking
from
11
apartments
to
12
apartments,
renovate
the
existing
storage
area
and
convert
unit
3
in
accordance
with
the
plans,
and
there
are
no
structural
changes.
The
violations
article
60
section
37
on
street
pocket
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section,
8
basement
apartment
is
forbidden.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
9
section
2
a
change
in
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
DF
DF
No
testimony
was
taken
previously
and
there's
no
building
code
relief
being
saw
in
connection
with
this
project.
The
related
fire
protection
plan
was
already
approved
by
isd
and
is
attached
to
the
plans,
as
shown
the
this
unit
and
all
common
areas
will
be
sprinklered
in
connection
with
this
project.
This
is
an
existing
traditional
12
unit,
building
four
units
on
each
level,
26
feet
in
height
on
an
8
000
square
foot
lot,
but
which
was
built
in
1960
as
11
units
plus
a
manager's
office.
DF
The
proposed
unit
3,
is
on
the
first
level
and
is
located
to
the
right
rear
of
the
building.
As
you
are
facing
5
orlando
street,
there
are
three
other
existing
units
on
this
first
level.
All
of
the
other
11
units
in
this
building
are
two
bedroom
units
and
have
an
average
size
of
720
square
feet.
The
proposed
unit
3
will
be
a
single
bedroom
unit.
Having
an
area
of
475
square
feet,
the
photo
at
slide
10.
DF
The
interior
there
is
a
similar
existing
unit
directly
across
the
hall.
If
you
could
go
down
one
more,
miss
thomas.
Thank
you.
So
the
board
can
see
that
this
entry,
this
this
door
into
into
unit
number
three.
The
proposed
unit
is
directly
next
to
the
rear
egress,
which
is
four
steps
up
and
four
steps
down.
There's
a
similar
unit
directly
across
the
hall.
B
DF
DF
There
is
a
photo
that
also
shows
the
ceiling
height,
but
the
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot
six
six
inches
and
there's
no
relief
slot
there,
the
sill
height,
will
be
the
windows
will
be
enlarged.
The
sill
height
will
be
the
per
the
code
44
inches
from
from
the
floor.
When
and
if
the
there
is
an
egress
necessary
through
either
of
the
two
windows,
then
the
the
egress
will
be
at
grade
and
not
be
no
need
to
for
a
window.
DF
B
DF
DF
That
that
where
it,
the
arrow
points
to
unit
number
three,
that's
one
window
which
will
be
enlarged
and
you
can
see
that
the
grade
actually
from
the
front
to
the
back.
The
grade
goes
down
so
that
any
egress
from
that
window
or
the
window
on
to
the
side,
which
is
shown
on
slide
number
12,
will
be
at
great.
F
B
Q
DF
DF
CC
B
F
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
with
support
and
proposal.
You
know
we
want
to
note
that
the
app
can
work
with
the
butters.
We
feel
that
there's
going
to
be
little
to
no
impact
on
the
the
broader
neighborhood
and
that
you
know
the
basement
apartment
would
be
fully
sprinkled,
so
that'd
be
at
great
versus
being
significantly
below
ground
level.
We
are
comfortable
as
well.
Thank
you.
Z
CO
H
AE
CM
C
Annihilation
article
65
section
8,
5,
family
usage,
forbidden
article
65
section
of
the
maximal
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section,
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section,
nine
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
65
section
9.2
of
the
dimensional
regulations,
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CW
CD
Yes,
ma'am
unit,
one
is
located
on
the
first
floor
and
it
has
a
front
entrance
on
armadine
street
and
a
rear
entrance,
or
rather,
I
should
say,
a
side
entrance
to
the
building.
If
you're
looking
on
feet
day,
101
that
may
show
you
that
as
well
there's
a
side
entrance
to
the
building
with
that
handicap
parking,
rather,
the
handicapped
ramp
that
I
had
just
alluded
to
a
minute
ago.
B
CD
B
CD
That
is
correct,
madam
chair.
It
is
34
feet,
so
it
is
within
the
feet,
restriction
for
the
building
height,
but
it
does
exceed
the
restriction
by
half
a
story.
It
is
a
two
and
a
half
maximum
height,
and
this
is
proposed
as
three
stories.
We
do
feel
that
it
is
in
context
with
the
abundant
properties.
83
and
75
across
the
street
are
both
three
stories,
as
is
the
residence
next
door
at
78
iron
dime.
CD
X
Chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
I'd
like
to
go
wreck
supporters
proposal
proposals
before
you
has
come
along
thanks
to
the
advocacy
of
neighbors
and
the
outcomes
willingness
to
work
with
the
butters.
I
believe
the
concessions
that
have
been
made
with
the
density-
it's
something
that's
in
character
with
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
BW
Opposed
to
this
proposal
and
to
misconception,
I
have
been
governor
steve
for
33
years,
and
this
proposal
is
actually
agreed
to
a
street
is
a
community
street
standing
from
single
family
to
three
family
houses.
There
is
only
one
family
unit
on
the
street.
There
is
currently
no
parking
on
armada
state.
There
are
times
where
I
have
to
talk
either
on
washington
or
milton
avenue
and
walk
home
at
night.