►
Description
This is a recording of the Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Subcommittee Hearing held on December 9, 2021. The Zoning Board will hold a vote on whether to approve or reject the subcommittee recommendations at its next full-Board hearing.
B
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
B
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application
via
the
webex
event
platform.
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side.
You
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click,
that
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised.
Virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
B
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand
again
for
those
who
are
calling
in
please
press
star
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
the
comments
in
the
interests
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
B
B
It's
it's
to
you
now.
C
E
Sure
33
bartlett
street
in
charlestown
this
is
tim
sheen.
C
E
My
name
is
tim
sheen,
I'm
the
architect,
I'm
at
9
wall
street
in
charlestown.
We
were
before
the
board
in
november.
We
were
looking
for
a
later
date
like
march
or
april,
but
you
couldn't
do
it
on
the
system
at
the
time.
So
you
told
me
to
come
on
this
time
and
ask
for
a
deferral.
E
It's
going
wrong
with
the
neighbors
we're
90
of
the
way
there.
It's
just
tough
to
get
anybody
together.
You
know
around
the
holidays.
C
We'll
make
a
motion
for
deferral.
Mr
c,
do
you
think
you'd
be
able
to
meet
in
january
or
february.
E
Can
we
just
to
be
safe?
Could
we
do
march
just
to
give
isd
time.
C
B
E
C
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
five
o'clock
hearing
none
I'll
go
to
the
first
case.
First,
two
cases
case
boa
one:
two,
five,
three,
two,
two
eight
fifty
five
del
avenue
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
one,
two,
five,
three,
two
three
two,
fifty
seven
dell
avenue
this
is
for
55
dell
avenue
you
change
of
arc
from
a
single
family
to
a
two
family
dwelling.
It's
a
complete
renovation
of
the
whole
building
construct.
A
new
sun
room
head
house,
roof
deck,
an
existing
roof
level
in
rare
edition.
C
The
violations,
article
59
section
37
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
59,
section
8,
the
floyd
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
59,
section
8
the
building
has
excess
of
its
stories.
Article
59
section
8
the
building
has
excessive
in
feet
and
article
59
section
8,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
C
C
B
Mr
markey,
can
you
speak
up?
Please
I'm
just
a
little
bit
hard
of
hearing.
Can
you
please
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do
and
tell
us
about
that
roof
deck
and
how
you're
proposing
to
access
that
roof
deck.
F
Yes,
madam
chair,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
anthony
mackey,
I'm
representing
liam
comerford
and
william
comfort,
owners
of
55
and
57
dell
avenue
all
the
items
I
discussed
tonight
will
apply
to
both
buildings.
They
are
the
same,
and
both
proposals
are
the
same
way
back.
It
was
determined
I
contacted
the
zba
and
they
expressed
at
the
time
that
it
made
sense
to
go
for
both
applications
at
the
same
time
as
they
are
similar.
B
To
to
be
to
be
cognizant
of
the
other
applicants
who
are
waiting,
can
you
go
directly
and
tell
us
what's
being
proposed
and
again
answer
my
question
about
the
roof
deck
and
the
roof
and
access
to
that
roof?
Deck.
F
Yes,
ma'am
sure
both
buildings
are
existing
single
families,
we're
proposing
to
split
them
into
two
units.
Each
access
to
the
upper
level
office,
roof
deck
area
will
be
through
unit
two
of
both
buildings
by
stair.
B
I'm
sorry,
so
what
will
so?
Let's
see,
can
you
please
scroll
back
one
one,
one
page
back.
Thank
you
so
so
this
is
the
second
unit.
B
And
and
tell
us
what
what
page
we
should
be
looking
at
to
look
at
the
roof
deck.
F
That
is
the
roof
level,
with
the
new
head
house
office
space
that
we're
proposing
with
decks
on
either
side.
F
F
Correct
right
there,
the
structure
off
the
rear
of
the
building
only
goes
from
the
garden
level
to
level
two
to
level
three.
F
B
So
if
my,
if
I'm
reading
this
right,
the
bedrooms
in
the
the
bedroom
and
the
in
the
garden
level
would
be
for
the
most
part
underground,
is
that
what
I'm
reading.
F
F
F
B
D
The
the
plans
are
good.
I
think
you
hit
on
the
the
general
concerns
on
the
on
the
front,
lower
level
garden
level
bedroom.
You
know,
I
think
we
we
sort
of
tried
to
steer
away
from
this
condition.
Obviously-
and
it's
not,
you
know
a
little
step
up,
it's
it's
at
least
a
foot.
It
looks
like
a
foot
and
some
change
to
get
up,
so
it's
quite
an
encumbrance.
I
think
to
get
out
of
that
front
bedroom.
I
don't
have
any
other
issues
with
the
rear
edition
or
even
the
rooftop
edition.
D
I
mean,
I
think,
the
head
house,
it's
not
called
out
as
a
program,
but
it's
it's
large
enough
as
a
room.
So
it
seems
that
it's
actually
will
be
a
usable
additional
far
and
I
think
it's
it's
large
enough
to
be
used.
It's
not
just
sort
of
an
access
point
which
I
think
is
probably
better
in
some
ways
or
some
additional
space
up
there
and
it
is
flagged
as
the
additional
floor
height
for
the
zoning.
So,
okay.
B
G
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time.
Let
go
on
record
in
deferring
to
the
board's
judgment
on
this
matter.
By
way
of
some
background
information
on
the
community
process
conducted
by
my
colleague
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
october
13th.
The
applicant
responded
to
questions
brought
up
by
the
neighbors.
They
received
support
from
direct
butters
and
they
received
a
letter
of
support
from
the
mission
hill
neighborhood
housing
services.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design
review,
as
well
as
no
building
code
relief
associated
with
the
lower
level
bedroom.
I
think
there's
an
issue
with
the
utility
room,
also
opening
off
the
bedroom,
so
I
think
there's
some
some.
There
might
be
some
reconfiguration
going
to
happen
in
this
in
the
ultimate
plan.
B
D
I
mean
I
do
think,
there's
the
potential
for
reconfiguring
this,
that
the
the
rear
is
a
full
walkout.
So
I
think
there
is
potential,
so
I
can
I
I
can
adjust
the
proviso
to
remove
the
front
bedroom
so
approve
with
bpd
design,
review,
no
building
code
relief
and
remove
the
front
bedroom
of
the
garden
level
unit.
C
H
A
A
Hi
yeah
I've,
I
I've
talked
to
many
neighbors
and
I
don't
know
if
I
can.
B
Mr
malcolm,
please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record,
and
can
you
just
start
off
explaining
to
us
what
you're
planning
on
doing.
A
B
It
is
a
two
family,
okay
and
then
tell
us
what
that
b
and
h
stands
for.
That's
it's!
That's
a
bulkhead.
B
B
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
D
A
That's
I'm
starting.
That's
a
mistake
on
the
arc,
the
the
engineer
I
was
trying
to
get
a
hold
of
him,
it's
hard
for
me
to
get
ahold
of
him
to
even
try
to
change
the
plans.
A
B
D
Two
cars-
two
cars,
I
think,
would
fit
on
the
side,
no
problem
with
the
width.
Obviously
we're
we're
not
you're
not
allowed
to
park
in
the
front
yard,
so
I
think
it's
adequate
in
terms
of
managing
two
cars
sort
of
in
tandem.
I
guess
okay
seems
to
meet
the
requirement
of
the
10
foot
wide,
curb
cut.
G
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
board.
By
way
of
some
background
information
from
the
community
process
conducted
by
my
colleague,
the
butters
meeting
was
held
on
september
21st.
G
C
B
Okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
proviso
for
only
two
cars
and
no
front
yard
parking
I'll.
C
C
241
chestnut
avenue
this
install
new
decking
and
railings
on
existing
deck
framing
to
remain
and
extend
deck
as
shown
install
the
new
hot
tub,
the
violations,
article
9
section,
1,
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
55,
section
9,
insufficient
radar
setback
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
J
My
name
is
timothy
burke.
I
have
a
business
address
of
142
berkeley
street
in
boston,
I'm
the
architect
and
representing
the
owners
of
this
condominium
unit
in
jamaica,
plain,
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
present
the
project.
This
is
a
an
existing
deck
that
is
non-conforming
the.
If
we
can
go
to
the
site
plan,
though
it's
an
interesting
site
and
that
there
is
a
large
piece
of
land
behind
this
house
that
actually
belongs
to
our
the
owners.
It's
just
deeded
to
be
left,
wild
and
open.
J
So
it's
that
area
you
see
in
the
middle,
there
called
the
city
of
boston.
This
land
was
sold
off
to
all
the
butters.
So
even
though
it
looks
like
it's
right
on
the
rear
lot
line
the
when
you're
there,
you
perceive
it
as
a
large
yard
out
in
the
back
and
people
use
it
to
walk
dogs
and
be
outside.
So
we
didn't
feel
like
it
was
a
a
real
imposition
on
the
rear
yard
setback.
In
this
case.
B
J
J
This
is
a
2f7000.
J
J
The
overall
size
of
the
deck-
if
I
can
go
to
the
plan-
I
don't
remember
it
right
off,
but
it
is
right
on
the
plan
view.
It's
back
one
slide
please
here
it
is
here
the
it's
19
feet,
long
and
16
feet
deep
and
then.
J
On
that
hot
tub
that
you
see
on
the
left
that
it
butts
a
giant
piece
of
pudding,
stone
that
sits
on
the
property.
So
it's
kind
of
well
concealed
there.
D
Plans
are
good,
no
question
and
I
agree
with
mr
burke.
You
know
the
rear
yard
is
is
sort
of
the
urban
wild
back
there.
So
no
questions
on
the
proposal.
G
I'm
adam
chair
members
of
the
board
connor
with
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment.
I'm
afraid
I
don't
have
notes
on
this
regarding
the
community
process.
Our
liaison
is
not
in
the
country
right
now,
so
my
apologies.
C
J
C
Much
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
125,
4317
293
stratford
street.
This
is
a
proposed
edition,
consists
of
a
front
doma
deep
and
rare,
shed,
dormer
and
new
third
level
master
suite
violation.
Article
56
section
8
far
is
excessive
article
56,
section
8.
The
building
has
excess
of
its
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
All
right,
jeremy.
H
L
Yeah
we're
looking
for
relief
on
two
zoning
violations
one's
in
far,
which
is
excessive.
The
maximum
allow
is
0.4
we're
looking
for
0.43
and
there's
a
second
one
for
excessive
stories,
which
really
it
says,
maximum
layer,
2.5
we're
actually
staying
at
2.5
and
the
height
is
not
changing
at
all.
So.
L
It's
a
one
family
and
basically
they're
there.
My
clients
are
putting
a
a
rear
door
which,
which
is
not
gonna,
be
from
road
view.
It's
gonna
be
at
the
back
of
the
house
and
a
small
dormer
coming
at
out
to
the
front.
They've
they've
recently
moved
when
last
year
or
two,
and
they
they
really
just
want
a
little
bit
more
space
on
that
third
level.
They've
done
some
extensive
outreach,
they've
they've
got.
If
I
could
show
a
picture,
they
got
everybody's
a
letter
from
everybody.
They
got
15.
D
M
Good
evening,
madam
chair
of
members
of
the
board,
jack
doug
and
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
board.
The
applicant
did
complete
a
full
community
process.
They
went
before
the
westeros
neighborhood
council
back
on
october
26
2021
and
received
their
full
support.
In
addition,
as
dermott
mentioned,
they
have
15
letters
of
support
that
have
been
submitted
to
the
zba.
Thank
you.
M
C
C
K
I
do
not
live
in
the
property.
I
live
right
behind
it.
Our
backyards
are
the
same.
Okay,
so
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do.
We
are
proposing
to
add
two
bedrooms
in
the
attic
on
one
side
in
a
bathroom
on
the
other
side,.
D
G
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment
by
way
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
The
applicant
met
with
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association
and
received
their
full
support.
Also,
during
the
community
process,
the
mayor's
office
received
one
letter
of
support
and
state
rep
kevin
honan's
office
also
indicated
they
were
in
support
of
this
proposal
as
well.
Thank
you.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
approved.
C
On
the
next
case,
calling
boa
one
two
three
five,
four
five:
eight
eleven
atlantic
street.
This
is
to
confirm
oxygen
to
the
one
family
and
change
to
a
two
family
basement
and
roof
structural
work
violations.
Article
68,
section,
29,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
68,
section,
8,
front
yards,
insufficient
article
68,
section,
8,
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
68
section.
Eight.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
attorney
patrick
mahoney,
with
the
business
address
of
160
federal
street
and
represent
the
homeowner
frank
bridgman,
madam
chair.
What
we
have
before
us
is
an
existing
single
family,
11
atlantic
street.
My
clients
seeking
to
add
space
to
the
rear,
as
well
as
change
to
use
to
from
a
single
family,
to
a
two
family
and
also
in
it
in
the
rear
on
the
first
floor,
will
be
a
garage
space
added
unit.
One
is
a
one
bedroom
unit
a
floor
through
on
the
first
floor.
N
It's
997
square
feet,
noticeably
removed
from
the
basement
is
any
bedrooms
and
living
space
as
the
last
hearing
that
we
deferred
and
we
did
remove
a
roof
deck
as
well
as
a
portion
to
the
rear
of
the
building
and
the
bedrooms
in
the
basement
unit.
Two
is
a
two
bedroom
unit.
Approximately
seventeen
hundred
seven
seventy
three
square
feet
and
at
this
one
bedroom
located
on
the
second
floor,
adjacent
to
the
floor
through
living
room
kitchen,
as
well
as
the
master
bedroom
on
the
top
floor
with
a
small
area
that
walks
into
a
deck.
B
O
D
D
B
Okay
is
so
looking
at
this
slide
here.
Mr
mahoney.
Is
that
a
garage
door
then
at
the
rear
of
the
building?
That's
proposed.
I
Chair
members
of
the
board,
haley
dillon
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
the
vote
to
the
board.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
we
had
a
thorough
community
process
and
all
questions
were
answered
by
butters.
Thank
you.
P
P
B
C
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
proviso
of
no
bedroom
in
the
basement
and
no
roof
deck.
Just
because
I
don't
have
the
plans
in
front
of
me.
B
B
By
two
I'm
in
support,
so
motion
motion
carries
you
know
since,
since
it
looks
like
the
staff
has
it,
mr
robinson,
maybe
that
could
be
stamped
on
your
behalf.
C
B
C
B
C
Ahead,
please
call
my
next
case
calling
voa
124
4821
16
courtney
road.
This
is
proposed
to
construct
a
two
and
a
half
story.
Addition
at
the
rear
of
the
existing
structure
with
full
basement
kitchen
family
room
first
floor,
master,
bathroom,
full
bath
on
second
floor.
The
violations,
article
56
section
8,
the
four
day
ratio
is
excessive
on
article
56,
section,
8
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
O
O
Yes,
good
good
to
see
you
again
have
been
a
while.
The
proposed
will
be
one
two
and
a
half
story.
Addition
right
at
the
rear
of
the
existing
property.
The
house
is,
the
existing
house
is
really
small.
It's
only
21
by
31
feet,
which
is
about
600
square
feet
each
floor,
and
the
proposed
edition
will
be
20
by
26.5
feet
with
the
bathroom
with
the
kitchen
and
family
room
on
the
first
floor,
master
bedroom
in
the
second
floor
with
the
full
bath,
okay,
violation.
O
B
O
Ahead
and
go
ahead,
the
violation
is
really
minute
minimum
with
this
seven
ten
feet:
side
er
in
the
right
hand,
side,
but
we
have
seven
foot
six,
which
is
we
propose
a
addition.
It
will
be
aligned
with
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
and
the
far
was
only
230
feet
square
feet
over
the
requirement,
which
is
point
four
and
the
proposed
will
be
point
four.
Five.
B
Okay,
so,
okay-
and
I
know-
and
I
do
know
how
tiny
those
houses
are
on
courtney,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
D
Plan
plans
are
good,
no
questions,
no
scope
in
the
basement.
Is
that
correct?
That
is
correct.
It's
the
full
basement.
That's
a
storage
basement,
but
you're
not
no
bedrooms,
nothing!
No!
No!
No!
No!
Nothing
like.
O
I
M
Good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jack
duggan,
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
at
this
time,
the
mayor's
I
was
elected
before
defer
to
the
board
for
their
judgment.
The
applicant
did
go
through
the
community
process.
They
went
to
the
west
auction
neighborhood
council
back
in
october
on
the
26th
and
received
a
support
vote
of
seven
in
support
one
in
opposition.
In
addition,
I
have
received
a
few
letters
about
positions
two
from
direct
of
butters,
and
I've
also
received
several
letters
of
support
that
have
all
been
submitted
to
the
zba.
S
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
My
name
is
dan
robinson
and
I
live
with
my
wife,
patricia
connors
at
20
courtney
road
and
we
are
direct
the
butters
to
the
property
in
question.
S
S
The
new
enlarged
house
would
be
2236
square
feet
in
area,
that's
substantially
larger
than
the
size
of
the
director
butters
homes
on
courtney,
road.
In
fact,
our
house,
at
only
950
square
feet,
will
be
overwhelmed
by
such
a
looming
structure
just
15
feet
away
because
of
its
height
and
projection
well
into
the
backyard.
S
New
large
shadows
will
be
created
in
all
directions.
Throughout
the
day,
these
shadows
will
greatly
diminish
the
amount
of
sunlight
we
receive
in
our
home
and
backyard,
and
the
mass
of
the
building
itself
will
almost
completely
block
our
view
of
open
green
space
and
the
western
sky
from
our
sun,
porch
and
patio.
B
The
homes
so
so,
can
you
beside
other
than
precedent?
Do
you
have
anything
else
to
add
because
you've
you've
talked
about
the
size?
You've
talked
about
the
impact
on
your
project.
As
far
as
on
your
house
on
as
far
as
view
you've
talked
about,
let's
see
precedent
is
there
anything
else.
S
B
O
B
B
Okay,
okay
and
as
far
as
the
far
your
required
is
0.4
and
your
point
proposal
is
0.45.
B
Okay,
given
all
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
R
Madam
chair,
I'm
here
for
the
direct
to
butter
on
the
other
side
of
courtney,
rhode.
My
name
is
jonas
jacobson.
I
submitted
a
memorandum
in
opposition
to
this
project.
B
Sure,
thank
you
and
tell
us
if
you
are
any
points
that
you
have
to
make,
that
you
can
make
that's
different
than
the
what
the
avatar
made
at
20
courtney.
R
Sure
so,
with
respect
to
the
the
project
on
my
client's
side,
so
my
client
is
to
direct
the
butter
on
the
other
side,
they're
extending
the
back
deck
along
the
side
of
my
client's
house,
which
means
she
already
hears
them
in
the
night.
My
client
is
82
years
old,
she's
good
she's,
not
only
going
to
hear
them
sort
of
from
the
center
of
their
property,
but
it's
going
to
be
like
they're
in
her
house.
It's
only
six
feet.
Yeah.
R
R
The
shading
out
issue
referenced
by
the
other,
the
other
butter.
I
also
note
that,
in
order
to
grant
this
variance,
mr
kilgan
is
going
to
need
to
make
a
showing
of
hardship.
I'd
ask
the
court
for
written
findings
on
the
issue
of
hardship
before
you
know
issue
before
approving
the
the
motion.
R
The
other
thing
is,
the
construction
itself
is
guaranteed
to
be
lengthy
because
of
the
thin
passage
through
which
construction
vehicles
and
construction
workers
are
going
to
have
to
travel
they're
going
to
have
to
walk
right
by
my
client's
window,
she's
82
years
old.
She
doesn't
want
to
be
disturbed
or
uncertain
in
her
life
by
the
noise
of
construction
workers
passing
and
no
matter
what
you
say
about
construction
workers
are
going
to
try
to
keep
it
down.
We
all
know
that
you
know
you're
working
a
job
and
it's
it's.
B
Hold
on
mr
jacobson,
so
we're
we're.
So
your
concern
is
shading
privacy,
the
noise
due
to
not
only
construction
but
to
the
deck
okay.
So
anybody
else
miss
ambassador
to
speak
on
this
proposal.
R
B
Q
Mike
killian
and
jane
kilgan
homeowners,
okay,
I'm
coming
into
my
55th
year
of
living
in
the
house.
I've
always
been
a
a
great
supporter
of
the
community,
a
great
neighbor
I
and
it's
the
only
reason
we're
doing
this
is
to
create
some
space
where
we
can,
where
family
and
friends
can
get
together,
we're
not.
This
is
no
buy
and
flip
sort
of
situation
with
long-term
commitment
to
the
community
into
the
city,
and
so
we
appreciate
your
time
and
consideration.
T
Good
evening
my
name
is
matthew
conley.
I
live
across
the
street
at
27
courtney
road.
I
speak
to
myself
and
my
my
neighbor
mary
mullen
who
lives
next
door,
who's
also
83
years
old,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
don't
think
they're
asking
for
much.
T
If
you
look
in
context
of
how
much
because,
obviously
they
already
have
the
ability
to
do
an
addition,
but
I
don't
think
they're
asking
for
much
and
these
people
are
incredible
neighbors,
and
I
really
believe
that
throughout
this
whole
entire
process,
they
will
be
extremely
considerate,
especially
during
construction
of
other
neighbors,
because
that's
the
type
of
people
they
are
and
also
the
street
is
very,
very
quiet.
There's
plenty
of
parking
and
availability.
T
C
B
Okay,
27
and
31
courtney:
okay,
excellent,
miss
ambassador.
Anybody
else
may.
O
O
Okay,
as
the
other
person
mentioned
earlier,
that
the
addition
would
be
2236
feet.
That's
untrue,
because
the
house
right,
the
existing
house
right
now
is
500
square
feet
and
the
addition
for
both
floors
is
only
160
square
feet
that
bring
up
to
2
236
total,
not
the
200,
000
2036.
B
Okay,
so
give
given
all
that
information.
May
I
have
a
motion
please.
R
B
B
C
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
a
case.
I
called
earlier
to
see
if
they're
on
case
voa,
125,
1800
191
milton
street.