►
Description
This is a recording of the Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Subcommittee Hearing held on September 15, 2022. The Zoning Board will hold a vote on whether to approve or reject the subcommittee recommendations at its next full-Board hearing.
A
A
The
city
of
Boston
Zoning
Board
of
appeal
hearing
a
subcommittee
hearing
for
September
15
2022,
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
openly
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
Provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature
last
year.
The
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
until
March
31st
2023.
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
Public
Notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment
board
members,
applicants
and
their
attorneys
are
Representatives
will
participate
in
the
hearing
as
panelists
and
they
will
appear
alongside
the
presentation
materials
when
speaking
panelists
are
strongly
encouraged
to
keep
video
on
while
presenting
to
the
board.
A
As
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
The
order
of
comments
is
as
follows:
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public,
the
chair,
May
limit.
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
as
time
constraints
require.
A
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
a
project
that
is
those
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
You
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal.
Please
click
the
raise
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform;
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
A
When
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
the
requests
from
The
Host,
again
press
star
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand
star
six
to
unmute
yourself.
A
A
Do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called.
Are
the
meeting
hosts
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time
just
to
take
a
quick
roll
call,
Mr
Fortune.
A
Mr
Ehrlich
yeah
excellent,
Mr
Fortune.
It's
all
yours.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'm.
Sorry,
we
can't
see
your
beautiful
face
on
the
screen,
but
we
would
let
you
in
your
voice.
B
B
Naming
none
I'll
call
the
first
case
calling
DOA
one:
three:
zero:
zero:
eight,
nine
zero,
six
rootsman
Street.
This
is
a
rear,
porch
extension
expansion
to
include
new
footings,
new
column,
support
by
4x6
pressure,
treated,
all
structure,
new
five
quarter,
decking
and
new
handrails.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29,
the
use
of
local
space
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section,
21,
2029,
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
50
section
29.
The
real
yacht
is
insufficient.
Payment
address
for
the
record.
B
A
A
C
E
Just
it
just
is
the
second
floor
that
I
wanted
to
spend.
D
G
J
A
May
I
have
a
motion.
Please
I'll.
B
I
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
134-1439,
34
Halsey
Road,
just
to
build
a
second
floor
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
house,
a
new
kitchen,
the
violations,
article
69,
section,
9,
The,
Floridian
ratio
is
excessive:
article
69
69,
the
side,
jobs
insufficient
and
article
69,
section
9.
The
real
yet
is
insufficient.
They
even
add.
C
B
We
can
go
to
the
next
one
Jessica.
A
K
Sure
so
there
is
a
existing
paved
driveway
on
the
side
of
our
house
and
a
curb
cut
was
never
done
and
the
driveway
was
paved
prior
to
our
ownership,
starting
in
2019
and
so
we'd
just
be
looking
for
a
curb
cut
in
order
to
be
able
to
access
the
parking
on
the
side
of
the
house.
A
Okay,
Mr
Olek:
how
are
the
plans.
I
K
Don't
we
try
to
keep
on
the
on
the
right
side
of
things.
I
L
I
There's
room
to
get
two
cars
tandem
without
involving
front
yard
parking,
so
a
curb
cut
would
be
helpful.
Madam.
B
A
Yes,
I
am
very,
you
are,
oh
sorry,
go
ahead,
Bob,
okay,.
E
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Bob
the
Mico
PTP
I-
have
no
opposition
to
this.
I
would
just
like
to
see
the
curb
cut,
a
line
better
with
the
proposed
packing
locations
in
a
monthly
Direction,
because,
right
now
it
doesn't
align
as
well
as
it
should,
because
it
would
involve
a
turn
to
get
to
the
actual
parking
location.
So
I'd
like
to
see
the
the
curb
cut
move
to
align
it
better,
so
there'll
be
no
turning
to
gain
access
to
the
parking.
A
M
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board,
some
back
our
information
on
the
community
process,
our
office
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
July
25th,
Noah,
Butters,
attended
and
subsequently
none
reached
out
to
our
office
to
express
any
concerns.
We
understand
that
the
applicant
also
reached
out
to
the
closest
neighborhood
association
Lana.
At
this
time
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
C
A
Okay
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please
let.
I
K
The
the
the
the
surveyor
suggested
that
we
move
the
curb
cut
slightly
off
of
the
property
line
and
right
now
the
driveway,
the
paved
driveway
sort
of
goes
straight
to
the
along
the
side
of
the
house,
but
there's
a
little
grass,
maybe
a
two
or
three
foot
wide
grassy
area
that
would
better
align
with
the
10
foot,
curb
cut
that
that's
being
proposed
so
that
that
grassy
area
we
would.
We
would
expand
the
the
driveway
there
and
then
you
know
be
able
to
access
it.
That
way.
A
K
I
A
B
N
A
N
Ma'am,
my
name
is
Anthony
balls
I'm,
one
of
the
contractors
working
on
the
at
this
property.
My
you
need
my
address
as
well.
L
N
Okay,
my
address
is
1709
Dorchester,
Avenue,
Dorchester
02124.
N
A
Okay,
so
hold
on
hold
on
a
second
okay.
How
are
the
plans.
I
J
A
B
You
very
much
ma'am
calling
your
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three,
four,
five,
two
seven,
four,
eleven
Tappan
Street
this
is
a
partial
change-
is
used
to
create
flexible
family
space
in
the
existing
garage
bond
by
removing
two
and
three
parking
spaces.
One
parking
space
will
remain
violation:
article
67
section
33
application
of
a
dimensional
requirement
payment
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
L
P
And
garage,
that's
behind
a
single-family
dwelling,
that's
correct!
So.
A
It
is
a
single
family
dwelling,
okay,
and
so
so
yeah
tell
us
about
what
the
re
proposed
reuse
of
the
garage.
One
is
supposed
to
be
sure.
P
So
right
now,
there's
three
parking
spaces:
we're
proposing
to
keep
one
inside
the
barn
they're
still
parking
outside
of
the
barn
inside
the
barn.
This
is
a
flexible
family
space
there'll
be
there'll,
be
a
home
office
space,
a
home,
gym
space
and
a
bathroom
as
well
as
a
first
floor,
open
open
area.
P
A
Let
me
just
let
me
just
ask
you
so
you
see
so
it's
a
home
office,
a
gym
and
just
general
flexible
space.
So
you
are
extending
water
and
heating
into
that
Barn
yeah.
P
There's
going
to
be
a
heat
pump
for
for
heating
and
cooling
and
and
we're
proposing
to
connect
to
the
Sewer
in
the
in
the
existing
house.
We
of
course
have
to
go
through
approvals
for
that
as
well.
A
P
I
The
the
characterization
is
accurate.
This
is,
this
is
not
a
separate
unit,
a
separate
domicile.
This
is
a
expanded
space.
The
plans
are
okay,.
M
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
some
background
information,
the
community
process,
our
office
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
August
3rd,
where
several
of
Butters
were
in
attendance.
After
that
meeting,
our
office
received
six
letters
of
support
for
the
project
and
the
applicant
reached
out
to
the
local
civic
association.
With
that
we
deferred
to
before
reporting
Madam.
A
I
Well,
it's
can't
really
tell
from
no
no
no
they'll
be
in
the
rear
of
the
house
in
front
in
front
of
that.
Barn.
A
F
B
You
calling
the
next
case
calling
doa-134
at
990-3144
Alma
Road.
This
is
the
closing
the
porch
in
the
back
of
the
house,
install
new
footing,
install
new
stairs,
install
eight
Windows,
install
a
new
siding,
install
new
sheetrock
violations,
article
65
section
9,
the
48
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
65
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
payment
address
for
the
record.
B
I
will
come
back
to
that
one
calling
your
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three:
five:
zero
one:
eight
zero
108
Laurie
Avenue.
This
is
adding
a
driveway
in
the
front
of
the
house.
The
two
parking
spots
violation,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Q
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Ryan
Spitz,
with
Adams
and
moranti
address
business
address
of
168
8th
Street
first
floor
South
Boston
with
me
today
is
the
owner,
John
McManus.
This
is
a
proposal,
for
this
is
a
proposal
to
add
off
street
parking
as
an
accessory
used
to
an
existing
single-family
home
that
is
owned
or
occupied.
As
you
can
see
here,
we've
been
cited
for
limitation
of
of
the
area.
This
is
in
line
with
what
is
existing
in
the
neighborhood
for
others.
Even
so.
Q
This
is
going
to
be
in
the
side
yard,
but
you'll
see
that
there
is
a
driveway
to
access
on
the
front
yard
right
in
line,
even
more
so
towards
the
a
budding
property
on
the
right
hand,
side.
They
do
have
an
off
street
parking
spot,
that
is
in
the
front
yard
of
their
property.
I
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
R
R
We
also
received
one
letter
of
support
from
a
Butters
at
1
30
Lori
Ave.
Our
office
has
also
not
received
any
letters
of
opposition,
and
at
this
time
we
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
C
O
E
I
Is
yeah?
Look
yes,.
E
Madam,
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
Bob
damico,
BTD
and
I
was
just
wondering
to
be
redundant
if
the
could
be
more
in
line
with
the
parking
areas,
because
it's
pretty
tight
yeah
and
to
make
a
turn
into
those
parking
spaces
might
be
a
little
difficult,
and
my
second
point
is:
can
the
marketing
spaces
be
pushed
further
in
the
rear
of
the
property?
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
what
your
opposition
is
based
on.
S
S
On
the
plan
would
encroach
on
the
five
foot
buffer
required
by
section
10
10-1
of
the
zoning
code,
and
we
have
three
issues.
One
is
that
the
parking
spaces
appear
to
directly
touch
the
lot
line
between
the
properties
in
in
some
instances
and
certainly
will
be
well
within
the
five
foot
buffer.
If
the
boring
steens
were
to
put
a
fence
along
that
property
alignment
appears
that
the
podcast
could
not
open
their
doors,
it's
much
too
close
to
their
property.
In
addition,
the
African
States
in
his
application
I
don't
have
any
Austrian
parking.
S
In
fact,
the
applicant
has
a
right-of-way
in
the
back
of
his
property,
which
crosses
over
a
portion
of
Michael
client's
property,
and
he
uses
the
right-of-way
to
drive
to
the
back
of
his
property.
We
have
spoke
with
the
applicant
and
its
Council
they're,
not
willing
to
give
up
that
a
right-of-way
access
if
he
would
granted
a
variance
for
driveway
purposes
and
parking
and
now,
most
importantly,
I,
don't
believe
the
applicant
has
met
the
statutory
requirements
for
variance.
A
A
No
no
I
I
want
I
want
to
hear
from
the
butter.
A
Okay,
Mr
Olek
hold
on
I
just
need
to
find
out.
Is
there
anybody
else
to
speak
either
in
support
or
an
opposition?
I.
A
Mr
Olek:
what
does
what
do
the
plans
show?
Well.
I
They
do
show
up
right
away
in
the
back.
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
we
can
ask
the
applicant
to
explain
how
that's
used
for
parking
currently
or
if
it
is.
I
It
would
if
it
were
ten
feet
wide,
it
would
be
better.
Mr.
D'amico
is
also
suggesting
that
asking
if
it
can
be,
the
spaces
can
be
moved
back
a
little
further,
which
would
certainly
help
but
I
guess
I'd
like
to
know
from
the
applicant.
What's
the
possibility
of
using
the
right-of-way
for
parking
and
accessing
the
rear
of
the
property.
I
Q
Let's
go
ahead
yeah,
so
there
is
a.
There
is
a
passageway
in
the
rear
of
the
property
that
seems
to
be
under
dispute
between
the
neighbors
for
the
actual
deeded
passive
10-foot
passageway
seems
to
be
obstructed
from
the
neighbors,
so
there
was
some
sort
of
old
handshake
deal
that
allows
some
other
passageway
in
the
property,
but
I'm
not
even
quite
sure
the
intent
and
the
scope,
because
again,
that's
not
recorded,
but
also
just
to
address
attorney
Claremont
statements
regarding
the
actual
five-foot
buffer.
Q
A
We
just
we
want
to
make
sure
that
okay,
I,
don't
know.
What
do
you
think
Mr,
oh,
like
Mr
Fortune?
Is
this
ready
for
for
action,
or
should
there
be
further
conversations?
I
I
I
think
we
should
move
forward.
I
mean
I
think
this
is
similar
to
many
other
cases
that
have
come
before
us.
It's
not
ideal.
It
sounds
like
there's
some
dispute
between
the
Neighbors,
which
I
don't
think
we
need
to
get
involved
with.
We
should
just
make
a
judgment
based
on
whether
it's
satisfactory
from
the
perspective
of
the
usual
criteria.
We
use.
B
But
I
have
a
quick
question.
Obviously,
I
live
in
West
Roxbury
I
know
why
we
have
pretty
well
I'm
just
I'm
looking
on
Google
Maps.
How
are
they
getting
a
vehicle
in
the
back
of
the
house?
There's
no
driveway
to
get
in
the
back
and
I
see
a
vehicle
parked
on
the
backside.
Oh
Mr
Spitz.
Could
you
maybe
explain
that.
Q
So
again,
I'm
not
quite
sure
with
the
access
or
passageway
and
the
intent
is
of
it.
I
do
have
the
homeowner
here
present.
He
could
probably
answer
that
personally
himself.
If
you
prefer.
B
Q
I
think
there's
a
cut
off
on
the
other
street
that
they
have
writes
this
I
believe
there's
three
or
four
properties
that
have
right
to
the
temple.
Passageway
and
again,
that's
you
know,
there's
a
legal
I
think
that's
a
legal
dispute,
because
I
think
the
actual
passageway
that's
been
deeded
out
has
been
has
been
obstructive.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
A
A
Is
this?
Is
this
a
new
person
or
is
this
the.
S
L
S
This
is
attorney
Claremont
I'd,
just
like
to
conclude
my
opposition
with
the
points,
one
one
that
was
right
yeah.
This
is
an
accessory
use
not
within
the
not
required
to
be
buffered,
but
section
10.1
appears
to
me
to.
S
A
Thank
you
hold
on
Miss
Ambassador.
Can
you
please
make
sure
that
everybody's
needed
much
for
the
board,
so
Mr
Olek
Mr
Fortune?
Are
you
ready
for
a
motion
I.
I
A
I
L
A
F
A
Like
aye
around
Joe's
awesome
in
support,
some
motion
carries
for
approval.
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment,
because
we
often
see
these
these
little
spots
that
come
to
this
board,
that,
in
fact,
if
there's
something
you
guys
can
walk
out
so
that
your
you
know
everybody's
comfortable.
Please
do
so
because
we've
seen
these
before,
where
actually
good
conversations
have
occurred,
subsequent
to
our
decisions
and
everybody
ends
up
happy.
So
we
urge
you
to
continue
that
conversation
between
the
two
of
you.
B
B
T
Myself,
hi
everyone,
my
name
is
Andy
juska.
What
we're
trying
to
achieve
is
pretty
much
create
another
bedroom.
On
the
third
floor,
my
family,
let.
T
A
M
I
Motion
to
approve
I'll
suggest
BPD
and
design
review
because
it's
a
change.
The
exterior
I'll.
A
A
B
U
A
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
DOA
one
three:
six:
zero,
seven
zero
one
53
Cedar
Grove
Street
just
to
demo
in
existing
deck
and
add
a
new
addition
to
an
existing
single
family
home
and
relocating
the
existing
bulkhead.
The
violations,
article
65,
section,
9
institution
side,
job
setback
on
the
right
side,
article
65
section
9
is
sufficient
usable
open
space
and
article
65
section
9
insufficient,
really
odd
setback,
name
and
addressable
directly.
V
Football
I
am
it's
a
single
family.
This
is
a
single
story,
addition
to
create
space
for
my
family
that
has
just
expanded.
I
Well,
the
plans
are
pretty
straightforward:
it's
removing
an
existing
deck
and
and
putting
an
addition
in
its
place.
The
addition
is
slightly
larger
footprint
than
the
than
the
deck
was,
but
you
know
it's
a
It's
relatively.
A
Okay,
and
so
let's
see
it
says
that
the
projected
proposed
projection
of
the
addition
is
within
eight
feet,
of
a
nearby
accessory
structure.
Is
that
accessory
structure
on
this
property
or
is
it
on
somebody
else's
property.
A
Okay,
okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?
Yes,.
M
A
Yeah
must
have
to
do
with
that.
With
that
eight
feet.
O
We
actually
did
revise
the
plan
to
bring
the
the
addition
a41
off
of
the
the
rear
garage.
You
know
that
that
violation
is
no
more.
O
The
record
Gavin
Drisco
180
th
Street
Braintree
Mass.
Could
you
repeat:
okay,
we
were.
We
were
about
five
feet
away
from
the
existing
garage,
but
we
did
pull
that
back
to
me
so
we're
at
FIFA
one
two:
the
building
right.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
F
B
Thank
you
calling
the
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three:
six,
one:
zero:
seven,
six,
eighty
one
Tyndale
Street,
let's
construct
new
shed
dormers
on
both
sides,
the
existing
gable
roof
finish
the
attic
space
and
create
two
new
bedrooms
and
bathroom
violations.
Article
67,
section
9:
the
lottery
is
insufficient
article
67,
section
9,
the
building
height
excessive
and
fee,
and
article
67,
section
9
in
the
side
yard,
is
insufficient
payment
address
for
the
record.
Please.
W
Good
evening
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Ivan
Hernandez
111,
Baker,
Street,
West,
Roxbury,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
homeowners
who
are
also
with
us
here
this
evening,
the
we're
proposing,
as
you
said
earlier,
sorry.
A
Okay,
so
go
ahead.
Tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
W
We're
proposing
shed
domer's
on
both
sides
of
the
third
floor
level
to
create
two
bedrooms
and
a
bathroom,
as
shown
there
on
the
plans
right
now.
The
there
are
two
rooms
up
there.
It
is
a
finished,
static,
finished
third
level
and
again,
as
as
the
plans
show,
we
would
be
creating
a
more
comfortable
Space
by
creating
a
shed
Domer
on
either
side
of
the
existing
roof,
but
we're
keeping
the
existing
Ridge
height.
We're
not
increasing
the
height
of
the
building,
we're
maintaining
the
current
height.
A
W
There
is
a
a
rear
deck,
but
yeah
there's
no,
not
nothing's
being
touched
on
the
lower
levels.
The
front
porch.
I
Just
as
the
applicant
describes
straightforward
shed,
dorm
is
on
either
side
it
doesn't.
The
height
of
the
building
has
not
changed.
M
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services,
our
office
Helena
Butters,
meeting
on
June
6th
one
direct
about
her
was
in
attendance.
No
concerns
were
expressed
to
our
office,
we're
unaware
of
any
other
concerns
with
that
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
I
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
bpda
design
review,
to
make
sure
that
the
Dormers
you
know
work
with
the
overall
design
of
the
building
I'm.
F
A
B
For
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa-136-467-1729
brooksdale
Road,
this
is
Dad
two
shadomas
on
the
third
floor
violations.
Article
51
section
9,
The,
Floridian
race
was
excessive
article
51,
section
9.
The
building
has
accessible
stories.
Article
51
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient:
article
51,
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
51
section
9,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
So
is
this
a
one
or
two
family
and
is
it
owner
occupied?
Yes,.
A
Okay-
and
this
is-
is
this
Allston
or.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do
sure.
G
We'd
we'd
like
to
add
to
shed
Dormers
to
the
attic
level
to
increase
space
for
our
three
little
girls.
We're
gonna,
put
their
bedrooms
up.
There
remain
owner
occupied.
A
Okay
and
the
garage
next
to
you
is
that
yours.
G
A
No
okay,
okay,
okay!
So
let's
see
this
is
a
single
family
owner
octopus.
A
Sorry,
two
I'm,
sorry,
it's
a
two
family:
okay,
how
was
Appliance
Mr
Olek.
I
Yeah
very
similar
to
the
last
last
proposal
just
to
Dorman's
on
either
side
don't
affect
the
height
they're,
fine.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
an
opposition
to.
D
This
proposal
good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Frank
Mendoza,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
Here
at
this
time,
you'd
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board,
the
applicant
did
notify
Butters
and
we
haven't
heard
any
Community
opposition.
Our
office
is
unaware
of
any
concerns
at
this
time
and
again,
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
Is
there
a
motion?
Oh.
A
B
Your
next
case
of
rediscussion
calling
DOA
one,
two,
six,
five
one,
five,
two
ten
Carson
Street.
This
is
asphalt,
cave
driveway,
which
can
pack
three
big
three
vehicles
paved
driveway
is
the
front
of
the
house.
They
can
let
the
outside
car
move
easier.
This
paved
driveway
is
not
for
blocking
purposes
the
violations,
article
65
section,
41,
Osprey
parking
and
loading
and
article
65,
section
9,
the
side
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
B
C
Yeah
put
go
ahead:
okay,
so
my
parents,
they
own
this
house
and
then
it's
a
single
family
and
it's
unoccupied.
C
A
C
They're
proposing
to
do
so.
Actually,
this
is
the
old
plot
plan.
I
send
a
new
plot
plan
through
email
to
ISD
bottle
of
appeal
before,
but
nobody
nobody
respond
to
my
email,
because
the
initial
hearing
date
is
last
month.
C
Madam,
chair
said,
the
system
needs
like
needs,
the
new
plot
plan,
so
this
is
the
old
one,
and
the
description
of
the
work
is
also
the
old
one.
So
I
sent
all
the
new
stuff
through
email
to
ISD
field,
a
through
email
on
September,
2nd
and
I
didn't
receive
any
response.
So
I
I
cannot
change
anything
on
the
ISD
portal
too.
A
I
Original
one
but
I've
got
but
I
was
sent
the
same
plan
as
what's
on
the
screen.
So
I
have
not
seen
the
new
plan.
A
Because
this
on
Google
Map
on
Google-
and
it
looks
like
it
was-
it
has
all
appearances
of
a
one
family,
but
there
is
a
fence
that
goes
down
the
middle
of
the
property
that
one
already
so
the
the
fence
has
been
removed.
Okay,
Mr
Olek:
what
do
you
think
do
we
need
to
defer
it
one
more
time
until
we
have
the
appropriate
plans,
yeah.
I
I
can't
quite
understand
what
they're
proposing
based
on
this
plan.
It
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
It.
A
Yeah
and
I'm,
looking
at
Google,
Maps
Mr,
oh
look
and
it
looks
like
there
is
a
pretty
wide,
a
pretty
wide
asphalt
area
Okay.
So
there's
a
most
I
may
have
a
motion
for
deferral
motion.
F
A
Okay-
and
this
is
a
note
to
the
applicant-
please
make
sure
that
you
talk
to
the
staff
to
get
that
revised
site
plan
in
and
also
when
you
are
here
at
the
subcommittee.
The
next
time
be
I
hope
that
you
will
be
able
to
describe
to
us
what
is
being
proposed.
So
we
can
clearly
understand
it
to
make
a
decision.
Okay,
I.
C
Went
to
massf
like
two
weeks.
A
A
They
gave
me
the
email
hold
on
hold
on
so
I.
Make
sure
that
you
stay
on
the
line.
Will
somebody
please
help
her?
You
know,
while
she's
here,
so
that
we
can
just
bring
closure
to
it.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much
and
we'll
see
you
at
10
on
October
13th
at
five
o'clock.
Thank.
A
Or
send
the
plans
in
it's
just
that
I'm
Sorry
Miss
Miss,
Mr
Bloom,
let's
you
know
deal
with
it
later:
let's
just
go
back
to
Halsey
Road.
If
we
can
Mr
Fortune.
B
B
L
F
L
I
F
B
Right,
let's
see
if
we
have
a
baby,
that's
quieted
down
calling
the
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three,
five,
three:
five,
seven,
six,
thirty
three
Augustus
Avenue!
This
is
the
legalize
the
existing
living
space
in
the
basement,
install
bathroom
and
flooring.
We
got
violation
with
article
67,
section
9.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
U
A
So
the
the
sense
from
the
bpda
is
that
this
building
was
recently
constructed.
U
Yes,
Madam
chair,
there
was
a
pre-existing
structure
that
was
raised
in
the
favor
of
a
subdivision
into
two
Parcels,
of
which
there
are
two
ground
up:
new
construction,
single-family
homes.
This
being
one
of
the
two.
A
Okay
and
tell
us
what
the
applicant
anticipates
using
that
basement
space
for.
U
So,
currently
it's
just
rough
raw
space.
The
intent
is
to
install
the
bath
as
noted
and
just
make
it
essentially
finished
open
spillover
area
for
the
family.
So
it's
not
divided,
it
is
open,
for
you
know.
General
household
use.
A
Okay
and
what's
the
the
square
footage
of
I'm
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
the
square
footage
of
this
space
and
the
square
footage
of
the
entire
33
Augustus.
U
Got
it
so
Madam
chair
the
the
rough
open
area,
as
noted
on
the
floor,
plans
is
839
square
feet.
We
have
about
39
square
feet
for
the
bathroom
and
then
the
aggregate
current
square
footage
for
the
second
third
and
fourth
fourth
floors
or
sorry.
Second
and
third
floors
are
about
to
2
700
square
feet
in
total.
So
the
aggregate
area,
including
the
to
be
renovated,
finished
basement,
would
be
shy
of
4
390,
sorry
395
square
feet.
H
Yeah,
technically
it's
a
four
bedroom,
but
it
the
the
fourth
area
is.
I
Well,
I'm
a
little
confused
if
it's
an
open
room
and
just
a
bathroom
in
the
laundry
room.
What
why
does
it
need
legalization.
U
Our
current
aggregate
square
footage
for
far
purposes
is
approximately
about
0.5,
with
the
additional
added
square
footage
we
do
exceed
then
the
far
which
puts
at
approximately
about
0.6
and
8.5
allowable
sub-districtions.
I
Solely
yes,
sir
yeah,
okay
yeah,
so
because
you're
not
proposing
any
change
in
in
this
space,
which
is
a
good
thing
because,
according
to
the
drawings,
it's
you
know
for
almost
four
and
a
half
feet
below
grade.
So
it's
a
it's
a
kind
of
an
underground
space
and
we
would
not
look
kindly
on
living
space
being
there.
So
it's
just
gonna
remain
open
room,
laundry,
room,
bathroom
and
you're,
just
looking
to
get
variance
on
the
far
for
the
for
the
whole
structure.
U
F
I
A
Let's
is
there
a
motion
in
the
making.
H
A
To
be
no
hold
on
hold
on
Sir
hold
on
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
M
Phantom
chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services,
our
office
Helen,
the
butters
meeting
on
June
15th.
There
were
no
con,
no
serious
concerns
expressed
at
that
meeting.
We've
not
received
any
letters
of
opposition
with
that
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.