►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-1-20
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-1-20
A
A
A
A
A
Excellent
good
morning,
the
city
of
boston,
zoning
vote
of
appeal
hearing
for
december
1st
2020
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
the
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
A
A
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
will
be
limited
by
the
chair
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
the
project.
That
is
those
individuals
who
live,
live
closest
to
the
project.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application
by
the
webex
event
platform
to
raise
your
hand.
First
click,
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised,
virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connecting
to
the
hearing
via
telephone.
A
Please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand,
so
once
again,
for
those
on
the
phone
press,
star
3,
to
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
The
address
into
the
record
before
we
get
started.
I'd
like
to
as
usual,
make
take
see
who's
on
is
mark
fortune
here.
A
A
A
B
F
F
I
appeared
before
you
last
year
to
seek
another
to
seek
an
extension
at
that
time
until
this
point
in
time,
if
you
will
and
because
of
you
know,
not
only
cold
they've
got
other
issues
causing
them
to
be
unable
to
get
this
hca
agreement.
Here
we
are
back
in
front
of
you,
so
it
literally
keeps
the
project
alive.
It's
gone
through
the
neighborhood
association
and
back
the
architectural.
A
F
A
A
B
H
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
haskell,
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
singing
an
extension.
This
morning,
we
unfortunately
were
delayed
in
the
submission
of
our
construction
documents
to
isd
and
we're
advised
by
the
plans
examiner
to
seek
an
ex
extension
by
the
board
due
to
coven
19.
So
we
are
performing
today
seeking
a
extension.
We
have
submitted
all
of
our
construction
documents
so
we're
actively
in
the
permitting
process
to
pull
our
permit.
B
I
I
It
was
extended
until
two
years
from
the
date
of
the
permit
of
when
it
should
have
been
issued
rather
than
two
years
from
the
date
of
the
end
of
litigation,
and
I
think
counsel
for
the
board
agrees
with
this.
However,
since
we
didn't
discuss
this
on
the
record,
as
I
just
did
just
now
at
our
first
initial
meeting,
I
wanted
to
both
correct
that
initial
issue,
and
then
you
know,
since
since
it
would
have
expired
in
may
of
next
year.
Based
on
our
previous
extension,
I
would
be
here
for
the
for
the
second
extension.
I
I
I
was
previously
extended
for
may
26
2021,
which
would
have
expired.
You
know
in
next
year
in
may,
the
re
may
was
the
end
of
the
the
actual
hearing
date
as
opposed
to
the
actual
litigation
date.
The
litigation
anniversary
was
september
27th,
so
it
would
have
been
september.
27Th
2020
would
have
been
the
the
end
of
it
really.
Just
a
couple
months
ago
I
came
before
you
early
this
year
to
extend
it.
You
extended
it
by
two
years,
so
you
would
have
extended
that
at
that
point
to
september
22,
2022.
I
B
K
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
linds
245
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
madam
chair,
the
board
granted
relief
about
two
years
ago
for
the
project
at
three
3g
wally
for
an
eight
unit,
townhouse
development.
We
have
been
making
progress
on
finalizing
plans.
Obviously,
as
is
the
case
with
many
projects,
cova
has
delayed
things
a
bit.
We
are
in
the
process
of
finalizing
that
and
require
brief
extension
so
requesting
one
year
from
date
of
expiration.
Thank.
B
B
L
L
A
N
This
matter
was
approved
by
the
board
in
august
of
2016,
and
a
building
permit
was
issued
in
october
of
2017
and
construction
thereafter
commenced.
On
this
new
three
unit
dwelling
structure,
a
subsequent
amendment
permit
application
was
filed,
making
design
changes
to
the
exterior
envelope
of
the
building,
and
that
was
the
subject
of
bpda
design
review,
which
was
a
proviso
of
your
original
decision,
and
the
bpda
design
review
was
approved
on
october
16
of
2019
by
staff,
architect,
michael
canizzo,
and
the
amendment
permit
on
those
design.
Changes
was
issued
in
november
of
2019.
N
All
of
the
construction
has
been
completed
and
in
connection
with
the
certificate
of
occupancy
process
and
the
final
sign
off
our
plans,
examiner
recommended
that
we
seek
board
final
arbiter
for
one
particular
design
change,
and
that
is
that
the
original
plans
that
this
board
approved
showed
a
rear
staircase
that
was
open
air
and,
as
a
result
of
the
design
changes.
The
staircase
is
now
enclosed.
N
B
O
Yes,
tanner
payne,
with
a
business
address
of
eight
alton
place
in
brookline.
I
am
the
good
morning
good
morning,
madam
fairy
members
of
the
board,
I'm
the
property
owner
of
this
particular
address.
We
we
submitted
a
permit
application
that
requested
to
change
the
use
and
occupancy
of
the
property
from
a
one
family
dwelling
with
a
store
to
a
two
family
dwelling,
as
well
as
add
living
space
to
the
basement
and
add
a
roof
deck
to
the
top
of
the
building.
O
The
decision
granted
the
necessary
variances,
which
also
included
a
proviso
making
issuance
of
the
permit
subject
to
design
review
by
vpda,
due
to
the
fact
that
the
permit
applications
sought
to
construct
a
roof
deck.
I've
decided
not
to
move
forward
with
performing
the
basement
expansion
or
adding
the
roof
deck
due
to
financial
considerations.
O
Therefore,
the
purpose
of
this
letter
is
to
request
a
modification
of
the
decision
to
strike
all
references
to
the
roof
deck
based
network
that
continues
and
eliminate
the
design
review
proviso,
so
that
a
permit
may
issue
for
the
sole
purpose
of
confirming
the
use
and
occupancy
of
the
property.
As
a
two
two
family
dwelling.
A
O
O
We
have
we,
we
submitted
the
existing
conditions
plans
last
week
over
to
stephanie
haynes,
and
so
that's
that
that's
what
we
submitted,
I
think
to
for
you
guys
to
just
look
at
today,
which
was
part
of
my
which
was
part
of
my
original
application
set.
It
just
didn't,
have
the
unit
square
footages,
of
course
we're
going
to
submit
much.
You
know
more
in-depth
plans
to
the
plan
examiner
as
we
you
know,
go
for
the
building
permit.
Okay,.
B
B
Q
B
Q
B
K
B
R
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantz,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
west
broadway
in
south
boston,
madam
chair
members,
requesting
an
extension
in
this
matter.
The
reason
for
the
extension
is
that
there
have
been
revisions
to
the
plans
that
were
just
presented
to
the
community
last
night.
Additionally,
the
plans
examiner
has
not
had
enough
time
to
review
those
plans
and
stamp
them
so
that
they
could
be
seen
by
the
board
of
today's
hearing.
S
T
B
V
W
B
Hearing
none
madam
chair
call
the
first
case
into
the
record
calling
voa
104
0938
231
saratoga
street.
This
is
a
change
of
oxygen
from
a
three
family
dwelling
to
a
four
family
dwelling
and
renovate
the
structure.
The
violations,
article
53
section
8,
the
mfr-
is
a
forbidden
use
in
a
3f
2000
sub
district
article
53
section
56
off
street
parking
loading
is
insufficient.
B
H
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
on
behalf
of
231
saratoga
street
with
me
on.
The
call
this
morning
is
alba
madrigal,
the
owner
of
231
saratoga
street
and
david
choi,
the
project
architect,
as
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
of
the
existing
three-family
residential
dwelling
to
a
four-family
residential
dwelling
and
to
renovate
the
structure.
H
A
Level,
let
me
just
jump
to
the
to
the
chase
and
go
directly
to
the
chase.
Tell
us
about
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
in
the
basement.
Tell
us
if,
because
you
know
that
we
are
not
really
interested
in
increasing
occupancy
in
basement
dwellings,
so
tell
us
why
this
should
happen.
What's
the
floor
to
ceiling
height,
what's
this
square
footage
of
that
unit,
it
appears
that
you
already
have.
As
far
as
the
use
is
concerned,
you've
maximized
use
of
the
building.
It's
a
three
f
in
the
three
f
district.
H
Absolutely
madam
chair,
so
just
make
sure
I
hit
all
your
questions,
but
the
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot.
Six.
The
proposed
fourth
unit
would
have
three
means
of
egress:
I'm
coming
up
the
existing
stair
to
the
first
floor
and
then
out
the
front
out
the
rear,
where
there's
also
a
common
egress
with
a
common
mechanical
room
and
then
there's
an
existing
side
door
already
on
the
right
side.
So
there's
three
means
of
egress
plus
egress
windows
and
the
floor
to
ceiling
is
seven.
Six.
H
The
proposed
size
of
the
unit
is
740
square
feet.
We
are
proposing
a
one
bedroom,
one
bath
unit
rationalization.
This
is
all
existing
space,
we're
seeking
to
really
clean
up
the
whole
building
right
now.
This
is
just
all
kind
of
dead
storage
and
utility
space.
So
in
part
of
rehabbing,
the
building
we
thought
it'd
be
a
good
opportunity
to
create
a
fourth
unit
here
and
and
comply
with
all
building
code
requirements.
H
The
existing
units
are,
as
I
mentioned,
all
on
floors,
one
two
and
three
one
unit
per
floor
in
terms
of
the
violations
that
were
added
to
the
record.
We
are
seeking
a
use
variance
for
that
fourth
unit.
It
is
a
free,
f2000
subdistrict.
We
are
500
square
feet
short
for
the
additional
lot
per
additional
unit
requirement.
H
It's
far
allowed
as
1.0
we're
proposing
a
1.78
again,
this
space
is
all
existing.
We
would
just
be
converting,
obviously,
the
lower
level
into
living
space,
but
no
additions
or
increase
to
the
height
open
space,
we're
short
by
about
13
square
feet
per
dwelling
and
then
finally
parking.
We
would
be
required
to
create
one
more
parking
space
for
this
property
based
on
the
existing
conditions
and
the
fact
that
it
is
an
existing
structure.
There's
no
way
to
add
any
parking,
so
we'd
be
seeking
a
parking
variance.
A
H
So,
madam
sure,
there
is
an
egress
window
in
the
bedroom,
where
it's
shaded
kind
of
a
very
light
or
whatever
color,
that
is,
there's
also
a
existing
egress
window
in
the
rear,
where
it's
labeled,
laundry
and
storage,
as
well
as.
If
you
look
at
the
the
rendering
of
the
existing
conditions,
pictures
which
are
previous
in
the
slideshow,
there
is
an
existing
front
window.
I
believe
two
windows
actually
as
well
there's
a
window
right
in
that
bay
and
then
to
the
left
of
the
bed.
H
A
G
A
H
A
H
That
front
window
would
be
the
living
space
with
windows
on
the
front
as
well,
and
then
that
middle
window
and
the
door
are
essentially
right
where
the
bedroom
are.
So
that's
where
it
really
becomes
fully
agreed
overall
70
above
grade.
But,
as
you
mentioned,
mr
ehrlich
does
slopes
significantly
from
the
front
to
the
back.
H
X
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
lina
trameli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
the
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support.
The
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
on
a
bar
is
meeting
on
january
30,
where
the
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
of
via
buyer.
We
also
received
layers
of
support
from
our
virus,
including
five
from
direct
about
us.
Thank
you.
Y
B
G
C
A
B
Article
53
section
I,
the
fourier
ratio,
is
excessive
article
53
section
9,
the
building
happens,
excessive
article
53,
section
9
of
the
bone
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
the
side
yet
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
56
authority
tracking
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
56
off
street
parking
design
and
maneuverability
article
9
section
2
a
change
in
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
G
AA
M
B
AC
Good
morning,
chairman
and
the
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is,
and
next
to
me
and
behind
us
are
our
parents.
The
address
is
154
feyer
avenue
and
we
are
here
to
ask
for
your
review
and
approval
on
the
driveway
and
parking
space
extension
project.
So
we
can
utilize
a
space
that
we
have
not
been
able
for
many
years.
G
AC
G
Okay,
so
here
is,
is
our
concern
as
a
board.
We
are,
we
do
not
approve
front
yard
parking
and
so
the
expansion
of
front
yard
parking
is.
I
mean
this
is
an
existing
condition,
so
there
isn't
really
anything
we
can
do
about
it,
but
in
terms
of
the
expansion
of
front
yard
parking
well,
I
understand
your
concern
that
it
would
make
it
more
functional,
and
that
is
not
something
that
we
are
inclined
to
do.
Mr.
C
G
U
G
X
G
G
B
H
As
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
for
unit
one,
the
project
would
convert
approximately
356
square
feet
that
are
already
existing
of
basements
into
living
space
dedicated
to
unit
one
which
would
allow
for
a
family
room
and
a
laundry
room.
The
zoning
district's
three
to
two
thousand
and
the
lot
size
is
two
thousand
one
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet.
This
the
plan
itself
is
is
fairly
simple.
The
distinctive,
as
I
mentioned.
H
Just
storage
this
unit,
this
structure
was
renovated
a
few
years
back.
So
there's
really
not
extensive
work
to
be
done,
but
there
was
never
legalized
space
in
the
basement.
Now
you
can
see,
there's
separate
right
now,
storage
and
utility
areas
and
then
that
front
part.
The
bottom
left
of
your
screen
right
now
would
be
the
livable
space
for
unit
one.
No
bedrooms
proposed
not
a
separate
unit,
just
a
family
room,
as
mentioned
the
two
violations
are
far.
H
Where
allowed
is
1.0
we're
currently
at
a
1.1.
This
356
additional
square
feet
would
bring
us
to
a
1.34,
so
it's
already
a
pre-existing
violation
and
also
mentioned
with
the
number
of
habitable
stories.
This
is
a
three-story
building
right
now,
so
the
356
square
feet
in
the
basement
would
technically
make
it
a
four-story
of
habitable
living
space,
but
it
wouldn't
be
a
separate
union,
as
mentioned
so
with
that
I'll
pause
and
take
any
questions
or
comments
on
the
board.
G
H
Absolutely,
mr
chair,
so
the
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot.
Six,
that's
existing!
It's
already
an
existing
space,
the
egress
there's
a
direct
staircase
that
goes
up
to
unit
one.
On
the
first
floor,
as
mentioned,
this
is
already
dedicated
space
to
this
unit.
So
it's
an
interior
connection
there.
You
also
have
an
egress
store
going
towards
the
kind
of
the
middle
of
the
building
there.
G
G
X
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
mr
chairs
are
members
of
the
world
in
a
tamil
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
hold
the
recurring
support
for
this
proposal.
The
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
of
the
barriers
during
the
community
process
and
jeffrey's
point
neighborhood
association
voted
in
support
of
this
proposed
facebook.
G
AG
B
This
is
this
is
for
150
swift
to
confirm
the
existing
four
bay
flat
roof
storage
structure,
legalized
land
use
for
commercial
construction
equipment
and
materials,
the
violations,
article
53,
section,
36,
the
storage
of
construction
equipment
and
materials
forbidden
in
a
ce
district
and
article
53,
section
37.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AH
Okay,
this
is
a
article
5336,
storage
of
construction
equipment
and
materials
forbidden
in
the
cp
district
and
dimensional
regulations.
Rear
yacht
is
insufficient.
These
properties,
madam
chairwoman,
about
the
wood
island
train
station,
so
with
regard
to
the
rear
yard
problem
the
tracks
kind
of
lined
in
behind
this
home.
At
some
points
there
is
a
six
foot
backdrop
and
then
it
lowers
to
four
feet
with
regard
to
the
construction
equipment.
AH
AH
A
A
A
AH
AH
AH
We
did
receive
the
requested
variances,
but
unfortunately
they
lapsed
so
we're
in
court
today,
with
the
isd
they've
been
very
helpful
to
us
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
make
sure
that
we
get
the
proper
variances
that
we
work
with
the
community.
I
think
mark
you
have
a
number
of
letters
in
support
of
this
proposal
from.
A
AE
A
B
B
AF
X
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
nina
trammelling
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recurring
support
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
on
a
virus
meeting
on
july
28,
where
the
applicant
addressed
the
concerns
of
via
barriers
and
received
their
support.
This
proposal
received
strong
support
from
harborview
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
Y
A
X
B
Pretty
much
what
I
just
mentioned,
madam
chair,
the
applicant
is
btd
btd
installed
no
parking
sites
on
one
side
of
swift
terrace
to
allow
safe
access,
and
then,
as
mr
d'amico
spoke,
he
would
always
strongly
support
a
denial
strongly
suggested
aisle
and
the
case
also
recommend
remove
the
fencing
on
city-owned
property
and
we
try
to
also
remove
any
material
on
the
city
property
as
well
as
hazardous
material
on
the
property,
and
that
echoes
the
other
five
concerns
that
that
we
have
from
the
butters.
I
believe.
AH
A
AI
Yes,
hi
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
this
is
gail
miller
and
I'm
speaking
as
a
proxy
for
brian
berglund,
an
owner
at
455,
frankfurt
and
the
butters
to
the
property.
He
was
never
notified
of
these
requests
at
the
outset
and
did
not
have
ample
time
to
fully
engage.
He
has
been
recently
hospitalized,
I'm
speaking
for
him.
AI
At
the
outset,
this
commercial
business
has
been
operating
illegally
for
many
years
in
a
corridor
enhancement
zone.
Making
these
requests
a
moot
point.
They
should
be
denied
and
prohibited
activities
ceased
for
the
past
20
years
or
more.
This
commercial
business
has
created
a
nuisance
on
the
street,
with
heavy
truck
traffic
noise
and
illegal
parking
parking
on
the
narrow
street
it
it
is
degrading
the
residential
nature
of
the
area.
AI
The
four-bay
structure
is
referred
to
is
now,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
attached
to
city-owned
property,
with
no
side
yard
variants
and
was
built
as
legally
on
city-owned
property
before
he
managed
to
buy
the
parcel.
This
neighborhood
is
residential
and
for
years
it's
had
to
tolerate
this
commercial
business
operating
as
a
de
facto
junkyard,
and
it
should
not
be
allowed
to
continue
operating
in
violation
of
the
zoning
codes.
Google
photos
can
be
provided
which
illustrate
the
conditions.
AJ
AJ
We
believe
our
neighbors
should
be
allowed
to
continue
their
business,
which
is
their
livelihood
along
with
living
on
their
property,
which
they've
done
for
many
many
years
we're
strongly
in
support,
because
we
believe
it
would
be
unfair
to
have
them
tear
down
their
business,
which
they've
had
for
many
years,
we're
not
concerned
about
the
trucks
or
what
they're
doing
it's
not
next
to
any
residential
building,
except
for
their
own,
because
it's
between
a
cemetery
and
their
house.
So
again
we
strongly
support
the
approval
of
the
variances.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
A
You
know,
regardless
of
whether
it
was
pre-existing
it
sounds
like
the
uses,
are
not
in
support
of
the
residential
properties
and
I'm
looking
at
google
maps
and
across
the
street.
There
are
some,
you
know
some
well-kept
homes,
so
I
just
need
to
make
sure,
and
it
looks
like
there
is
storage
of
materials
on
the
residential
property
too.
A
M
A
A
P
A
G
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
zero,
eight
or
110
pauline
street.
This
is
repairs
to
a
roof
attached
garage
and
a
solid
roof
deck
on
the
garage,
the
violation,
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
nine
section,
one,
a
five
unit
dwelling
and
a
three
family
sub
district.
The
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
name,
an
address
for
the
record.
AL
AL
What
we're
looking
to
do
is
to
make
it
reusable
again
because
we
don't
want
to
damage
the
the
rubberized
repair
by
put
installing
a
deck
in
the
front.
Third
of
that
area,
representing
about
400
square
feet,
the.
If
there's
a
there's
another
picture
under
there
about
the
fencing,
there's,
there's
a
picture
of
the
the
fence,
a
new
fence.
AL
We
installed
around
that
garage
area,
it's
consistent
with
the
use
that
that's
been
there
for,
since
the
1960s,
where
you
know
my
parents
have
used
that
as
a
patio
area,
and
now
we
just
don't
want
to
go
ahead
and
damage
the
the
roof
repair
that
we
just
made.
That
seems
to
have
solved
the
problems
of
the
water
leakage
that
we've
had.
G
AL
J
G
G
Right
there,
okay,
yes,
I
mean
there
is
there's
a
sort
of
hand
sketch
if
that's
what
you're
referring
to
yeah
yeah.
Well,
I
mean
madam
chair
this
is
this:
is
a
pretty
simple
proposal
to
put
a
roof
deck
on
an
existing
structure
that
that
already
is
fenced
off
and
has
has
been
used
in
the
patio.
So
I
suppose
the
drawings
are
adequate
for
that.
AL
G
AL
A
X
Good
morning,
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board
lina
trembelli,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
under
my.
They
were
not
concerned
expressed
by
via
buyers
during
the
community
process,
and
this
proposal
received
support
from
members
of
the
gulf
street
citizens
association.
Thank
you.
Y
C
A
AM
B
Q
A
A
Honestly,
when
I
had
my
deck
done
before
the
permit
was
issued
by
isd,
they
made
sure
my
railing
height
was
high
enough.
So
I
think
that
there
is
a
second
level
of
of
checks
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
up
to
code.
So
so
the
motion
is
for
approval.
May
I
have
a
second
second
all
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries.
B
Calling
your
next
two
cases
calling
doa
109,
0,
1,
87,
999
trenton
street
companion
case
boa
one
109,
eight,
ninety
nine
trenton
street.
This
is
this-
is
replacing
the
existing
decks
the
inaudible
code
and
making
them
larger,
adding
dormers
to
an
existing
turret
floor,
building
a
new
staircase
and
the
full
height
door
out
the
basement.
The
violations
article
27g.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section,
52,
room
structure,
restriction,
article
53,
section
9,
the
flight,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
bill
and
head
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
B
B
AN
A
AN
Absolutely
so,
if
you
go
to
the
plan
for
the
third
floor,
the
entire
reason
for
this
proposal
is,
I
am
on
the
second
and
third
floor
and
we
need
the
head
height
to
relocate
the
stairs.
The
existing
stairs
are
extremely
steep
and
I
have
a
two-year-old
it's
unsafe,
and
so
we
are
proposing
it's
a
freestanding
building,
it's
not
attached,
and
so,
if
you
look
yep
right
here,
so
we
need
to
put
dormers
on
the
sides.
I
am
proposing
very
historic
nature.
I've
already
renovated.
A
AN
I
can
switch
the
floor
plan
so
that,
where
the
bedroom
two
is
would
not
be
a
bedroom,
it
could
be
a
study
and
move
the
study
where
the
loft
is
now
and
then
it
would
have
the
appropriate
egress.
In
order
to
make
this
project
work,
it
does
need
side
dormers,
because
I
need
the
head
height
to
relate
location,
okay,
hold
on
hold
on.
A
M
X
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
support
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
receives
strong
support
from
eagle
civic
association
and
from
viabatics.
We
also
received
20
layers
of
supreme.
Thank
you.
Y
A
B
For
the
next
case,
calling
voa
999,
856
527
east
7th
street,
this
is
to
demolish
an
existing
building
erected.
Four-Story
eight
unit
residential
with
12
r
street
parking
spaces
front
and
rear
roof
decks.
The
violations
article
27s,
section
5.
This
is
in
the
south,
boston,
ipod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AO
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
please
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
tim,
johnson,
architect,
599
east
broadway,
south
boston.
My
client,
jim
pascal,
is
proposing
to
demolish
the
existing
buildings
and
combine
two
lots
to
erect
a
four-story
eight-unit
residential
building
with
12
parking
spaces.
AO
A
AO
Yes,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
four-story
building.
The
top
floor
is
set
back
nine
feet
to
give
a
a
nicer
den,
a
nicer
elevation
at
the
street,
the
units
one
and
two
are
duplex
units,
the
two
bedroom
three
bath
at
two
thousand
square
feet
and
then
the
upper
floors
at
the
second
third
and
floor
fourth
floor
are
two
bedroom
two
bath
units
they're
all
flats
at
1275
square
feet.
The
parking
is
in
the
rear
of
the
building.
AO
G
The
drawings
are
okay,
I
mean
once
again
we
have
a
basement
unit
and
if
you
look
at
the
elevations
are
the
sections.
Unfortunately,
the
living
space
is
in
the
front
and
that's
where
it
is
most
below
grade.
It's
a
it's
a
sloping
lot
in
the
in
the
back
of
the
building
where
they
it
is
at
or
above
grade,
but
the
the
unit
one
living
space
that
is
in
the
in
the
basement
is
mostly
low
grade.
AO
Yes,
mr
ehrlich,
we
do
have
the
required
seven
foot,
six
ceiling
height
in
the
lower
level.
There
are
we
have
our
required
egress
windows
at
the
front
of
the
building,
and
this
is
not
in
a
flood
plain.
We
do
have
an
interior,
primitive
perimeter
drainage,
so
I
think
we'll
have
some
good
quality
space
living
space
at
the
lower
level.
G
G
AO
AQ
In
support
of
this
proposal,
hi
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
haley
dillon,
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
political
method
and
support,
we
held
two
abutters
meetings
and
jim
the
owner
met
personally
or
virtually
with
the
opposed
abutters
and
got
their
support
and
we
have
their
letters
of
support
on
record.
So
thank.
AQ
AP
Manager,
members
of
the
war-
and
I
can't
let
him
from
councillor
fling's
office,
the
councilor,
would
like
to
go
on,
recording
a
position
based
on
feedback
from
about
us
and
neighbors.
They
specifically
call
attention
to
the
high
and
the
fourth
story
being
out
of
character
with
their
surrounding
neighborhood
as
well
as
density.
AP
AD
E
AD
AF
AD
E
AR
Good
morning
we
are
pegging
tom
o'hearn
at
535
east
7th
street,
with
the
director
of
others
of
this
project.
The
owner
has
reached
out
to
all
about
us
and
is
very
concerned
with
our
concerns.
We
have
met
with
him
in
person
on
numerous
occasions
and
he
is
diligently
working
to
mitigate
all
of
our
concerns.
AR
A
E
D
A
D
A
AO
Yes,
I
was
unmuted,
yes
ma'am.
There
have
been
several
amendments
to
article
68,
beginning
in
june
of
2017..
This
appeal
was
filed
in
september
of
2019
and
is
compliant
with
article
68.
At
that
time,
however,
the
south
boston
ipod
was
in
effect
amendments
subsequent
subsequent
amendments
to
article
68
happened
in
october,
the
following
month
of
2019..
AO
A
A
D
A
B
You,
okay,
I'm
gonna,
go
back
to
case
boa
107,
one
three,
one:
two,
two:
twenty
six
to
two
twenty
eight
princeton
street,
I'm
gonna
read
it
back
into
the
record
because
it's
been
a
while
change
the
blocks
to
an
existing
building
from
five
families
to
a
seven
family
and
renovate
all
floors
and
basement
investing
buildings
violations.
Article
2017:
this
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section,
8
accessory
parking
is
forbidden.
B
A
G
AA
AA
AA
This
project
has
changed,
so
all
the
violations
have
changed
as
well,
and
the
plans
that
mr
ehrlich
has
that
the
new
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
an
existing
five-family
residential
dwelling
to
a
seven-family
residential
dwelling
with
five
parking
spaces
in
the
rear,
to
also
include
a
full
renovation
and
historic
renovation.
But
there
is
no
longer
a
fourth
floor
on
this
building,
so
that
completely
was
taken
off,
and
I
just
wanted
that
to
be
reflected,
as
it
was
mentioned
in
the
description.
AA
AA
AA
Sure
so,
as
part
of
the
proposal
we
are
seeking
a
basement
unit.
Although
this
would
be
a
975
square
foot
unit,
seven
foot
seven
inch
height
floor
to
ceiling.
It
would
have
two
egress
windows
in
the
front
of
the
building,
so
one
would
be
for
the
living
room.
One
would
be
for
the
bedroom
and
we
have
also
added,
if
you
go
down
a
few
more
slides,
an
egress
door.
AA
As
we
go
up
upstairs
so
there's
unit
two
and
three
would
be
housed.
On
the
first
floor.
Those
are
one
bedroom,
one
bath
unit,
835
square
feet.
The
second
floor
is
units
four
and
five.
Those
are
two
bedroom
one
bath,
900
square
foot
units
and
then,
as
we
go
up
to
the
third
floor,
it's
units
six
and
seven.
Those
are
two
bed,
one
910
square
foot
units
right
now.
This
has
been
used
as
a
rental
building
and
we're
proposing
condos
for
all
of
these
units
with
an
historic.
J
AA
The
use
in
this
area
is
a
3f,
so
we
are
proposing
seven
units.
It's
existing
five.
This
area
is
a
three
f
two
thousand,
so
we've
got
five
thousand
square
feet
additional
lot
area.
We
would
need
three
thousand
far.
What's
existing
now
is
1.13
and
with
the
addition
of
the
basement,
it
would
bring
us
up
to
1.32,
which
has
been
reduced.
A
D
I
apologize
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
Here
it
is
so
this
we
made
a
recommendation
of
deferral
that
adequate
plans
be
delivered
to
the
agency
for
planning
review.
We
have
it
as
of
changing
it
from
a
five
to
an
eight.
I
know
that's
been
changed
according
to
mr
drago,
so,
but
our
recommendation
was
for
deferral.
G
AA
G
Miss
it,
mr
drago,
is
correct
that
the
that
the
living
portion
of
the
basement
unit
is
is
in
the
set
with
the
topography
of
the
of
the
plot.
It
is
in
the
section
where
it
is
above
grade.
Most
of
it
is
above
grade.
So
again,
you
know
this.
We
keep
having
the
same
thing
come
before
us
and
at
least
two
of
the
plans
that
have
come
before
us
have
designed
it
in
such
a
way
that
the
living
space
is
where
there
is
most
light
in
there
and
an
adequate
ceiling
height.
A
X
Good
morning,
I'm
chairman
members
of
the
board,
linda
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
directly
and
support
during
the
community
process.
The
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
of
the
avarice
rules,
the
four-story
addition
to
tear
the
building
down
and
reduce
the
numbers
of
units.
They
also
receive
25
letters
of
support
from
about
us
and
residents
of
eagle
hill.
Thank
you.
Y
E
A
U
Madam
muted
charlotte
71
utah
street
community
member
calling
on
support
of
the
project
the
community
did
push
forward
for
us
to
actually
push
living
spaces
in
basements.
These
houses
are
well
above
grade
and
it
makes
a
great
use
for
space,
specifically
in
the
historic
district
of
eagle
hill.
This
is
definitely
a
request
of
the
community
that
we
do
expand
spaces
into
the
air,
especially
when
they're
happy.
Thank
you.
A
A
Board
or
take
a
break
until
and
will
resume
at
12
30.
in
the
meantime,
please
everybody
who's
requesting
a
deferral.
Please
let
madame
ambassador
know
of
your
intentions,
both
for
people
scheduled
for
12
30
and
for
people
scheduled
for
one
o'clock,
make
sure
you're
in
conversation
with
miss
ambassador.
Thank
you.
We
are
now
adjourned
until
12.
A
AT
M
B
AT
Thank
you
again,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
This
is
john
barry
from
the
office
of
john
d
barry
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner.
Here
we
have
met
with
we've
done
this
meeting
and
we've
met
with
the
e-board
for
the
lower
middles
group.
They've
asked
us
to
come
back
on
december
3rd
and
after
that,
to
make
a
presentation
to
the
board.
I
think
the
this
this
project
being
requested
for
a
hearing,
I
think,
was
a
mistake
at
this
point
in
our
community.
B
AV
B
AF
B
All
right,
madam
chair,
I
just
want
the
council-
wants
me
to
remind
everybody
on
the
board
here
and
the
open
meeting
law
that
there
are
two
projects
that
were
scheduled
for
9
30,
but
they
were
going
to
be
heard
at
12
30
and
I'm
going
to
call
them
an
order
in
succession.
So
the
first
one
is
going
to
be:
glen
rose,
doa,
113704,
42-44,
glenn
rose
road
name
and
address
I'm
sorry.
This
is
extended
living
space
of
an
existing
attic,
an
addition
of
a
new
dormer,
the
violated
article
65
section
9..
B
AW
AW
AW
A
AF
AD
B
The
applicant
proposes
a
change
of
auction,
including
cannabis
establishment.
The
applicant
also
proposes
to
modify
the
existing
layout
and
conditions
of
the
interior
of
the
building
violation.
Article
56
section
15,
the
use
of
regulations
of
cannabis
establishment
is
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
There
are
no
buffer
issues
with
this
application
as
well
the
building
itself
for
the
I'm
sorry,
the
you
can
stay
on
that
first
side,
if
you
don't
mind
we'll
actually
be
in
the
basement
area,
a
lift
will
be
added
where
you
see
the
square
or
the
red,
the
red
outline,
and
it
will
be
in
the
lower
levels,
it
will
be.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
If
you
don't
mind,
it
will
be
approximately
4
200
square
feet
again
at
the
basement
of
this
building.
There
are
five
tenant
spaces.
I
However,
only
three
tenants
are
in
this
this
building
at
1524
vfw
and
together
they
share
26
parking
spaces
that
are
all
on
site.
There
is
a
separate
building
or
attached
to
this
building,
but
under
a
separate
ownership,
there
is
a
building
to
the
right
and
there
is
a
driveway
that
allows
for
access
to
the
rear
of
the
building
where
deliveries
will
occur.
I
I
So
this
is
actually
the
floor
plan,
and
what
you
have
here
is
vfw
is
to
your
left
essentially,
and
so
the
way
it
will
work
is
that
you
can
either
walk
down
either
side
either
flight
of
stairs
or,
if
you
are
handicapped,
a
lift
will
be
installed
that
you'll
have
access
to
to
go
into
the
front
of
the
of
the
dispensary
where
you'll
be
checked
in
this
is
a
medical
dispensary.
So
it's
a
little
bit
different
than
the
adult
dispensaries,
but
I
know
you've
seen
you've
seen
these
before
as
well.
I
You'll
you'll
have
to
be
checked
in
at
the
front
and
then
once
verified
that
you
are
indeed
a
patient
with
a
valid
id
you'll
be
able
to
enter
the
facility
and
it's
4
300
square
feet.
It
has
pretty
good
room
to
handle
numbers,
although
we
do
not
anticipate
a
huge
set
of
numbers,
given
the
fact
that
it
is,
it
is
medical.
I
The
hours
of
operation
proposed
here
would
be
9
a.m
to
8
p.m.
Seven
days
a
week
on
the
inbound
side
of
the
vfw
parkway,
so
at
nine
at
nine
a.m.
You
know
you
kind
of
miss
the
the
commute.
The
only
way
to
get
there
is
through
the
vfw
parkway,
there's
no
other
cut-throughs
through
the
actual
neighborhood.
I
We
were
approved
by
the
boston
cannabis
board
in
september,
and
we
entered
into
a
host
community
agreement
with
the
with
the
city
of
boston
in
october.
This
is
a
leased
building.
We
would
continue
to
lease
it.
We
have
a
10-year
lease
with
the
option
to
extend
for
multiple
extensions.
Maybe
I'll
pause
there.
If
that's,
okay,.
A
I
Yeah
this
one
will
not
be
appointment
only
at
all.
This
is
medical
only.
You
know
if
we
ever
come
back
here,
for
when
we
come
back
for
adult
use,
we're
going
to
have
to
go
through
that
that
whole
process,
that's
where
you're
seeing
numbers
of
maybe
around,
I
don't
know
300
a
day.
The
medical
facilities
are
seeing
numbers
closer
to
30,
40,
50,
very
low
numbers
at
at
the
moment.
So
none
of
the
medical
are
doing
any
any
kind
of
appointment.
Only.
I
There
is
some
topography
on
the
site:
that's
good.
There
is
a
site
plan
that
shows
a
little
bit
of
topography
there.
However,
there
is
access
to
the
rear
of
the
building
for
vehicles,
and
once
there
you'll
go
into
the
you
can
go
and
we'll
go
into
a
secure
area.
That's
not
available
to
the
public
at
the
rear
of
the
building
on
the
right
side
of
your
screen.
I
G
I
I'm
looking
at
yeah
what
they
did
here,
it's
a
little
unclear.
Is
they
kind
of
removed
the
ground
for
you,
so
you
could
see
what's
there
so
the
upper
is
the
proposed
is
the
proposed
condition.
Is
the
existing
condition
and
the
lower
is
the
proposed
condition
with
the
with
the
with
the
kind
of
the
the
earth
removed?
So
you
can
see
that
there's
access
on
the
ground
floor,
so
they've
removed.
I
The
lift
is
on
the
right,
I
believe,
there's
a
shot
of
the
lift.
Maybe
if
you
go
up
one
I
I
apologize,
the
lift
is
on
the
right
hand,
side
we
can
keep
so
maybe
we'll
go
down.
It's
probably
the
lift
will
be
installed
there
on
that,
on
that
right,
hand,
side
and
there's
an
actual
drawing
of
the
lift.
If
you
go
further.
I
I
Yeah,
so
what
you
have
there
is
you
have
a
closed
yoga
studio?
You
have
a
liquor
store.
I
think
it's
called
town
line
liquors.
It's
on
the
upper
left
of
you
can
actually
right
there.
You
can
stay
right
where
we
are
on
the
right.
You
have
an
adult
services
store
of
of
sorts.
It's
called
amazing,
I
believe,
and
then
and
that's
it.
There
used
to
be
a
mattress
store
in
this
location
and
that's
no
longer
there.
C
I
Yeah
we
we're
here
for
medical
and
that's
all
we
are
here
for
and
I'm
not
trying
to
be
cute
here,
I'm
just
there.
There
is
no
application
pending
for
adult
use,
but
there
was
no,
you
know
forever
ban
promised
either
what
we
promised
to
do
to
the
community,
to
the
counselor
and
and
to
anyone
who
asked-
and
we
have
tremendous
support
for
this
application
is
to
apply
for
medical
like
we
initially
did
back
in
way
back.
M
I
Yeah
I
mean
I
appreciate
the
question
I
I
guess
the
you
know.
This
thing
was
supported
by
the
neighborhood
associations,
I
think
in
part,
because
it
didn't
scream
out.
You
know
cannabis
dispensary,
and
I
think
there
was
some
some
value
in
that
about
putting
it
subterranean.
You
know
it's
a
perfectly
good
space.
The
heights
of
the
of
the
of
the
fluorites
are
attic
are
more
than
adequate,
they're
full
heights,
but
I
think
now
putting
it
really
front
and
center
has
some
appeal
for
some
people,
not
all
the
neighbors
are
on
board
with
cannabis.
Q
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
The
applicants
have
been
in
this
process
for
about
four
years
and
they've
met
with
the
community
groups
countless
times
they
do
have
letters
of
non-opposition
from
the
boston
trailer
park,
association,
the
west
roxbury
neighborhood
council
and
the
charles
river
spring
valley
association.
You
know
with
the
stipulation
that
it
does
remain
medicinal,
and
that's
it
right
now.
Thank
you.
AY
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
peter
favreto
from
city
councilor,
matt
o'malley's
office.
I'm
just
talking
about
jack
said
you
know.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
application.
They've
gone
on.
You
know,
they've
gone
through
an
extensive
community
process
and
has
received
support
for
medical
marijuana
dispensary.
So
yes,
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
support.
Thank.
AY
A
A
I
I
D
A
B
AU
Bran
alpine
advisory
services
alpine
way,
we
are
here
today
seeking
a
change
of
use
from
a
three
unit
dwelling
to
a
four
unit
dwelling
expansion
into
the
basement,
which
requires
a
variance
there's
two
additional
dimensional
violations
far
is
excessive.
The
code
allows
for
0.8,
the
existing
far
is
0.98
and
the
proposed
far
would
be
1.25
and
open
space
isn't
sufficient.
AU
AU
What
is
proposed
is
a
fourth
unit
which
will
contain
three
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms
with
access
from
the
front
entryway
and
egress
to
the
rear.
The
existing
three
units,
the
first
floor
level,
has
two
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms.
The
second
and
third
floor
levels
have
three
bedrooms
in
two
bathrooms.
AU
A
AU
G
I
was
all
I
was
given.
Maybe
there
are
more
plans
in
this
is
a
floor
plan.
There's
no
elevation,
it
doesn't
show
what
this
florida
ceiling
height
is.
It
doesn't
show
what
the
relationship
is
degrade
and,
as
I
look
at
the
google
maps
it
looks
to
be
like
it
is.
The
majority
of
the
unit
is
below
grade,
but
I
can't
tell
because
there
are
no
elevations.
AU
AU
The
plans
for
the
original
alt
application
did
not
follow
with
the
change
and
filing
of
the
this
alt.
The
plans
are
being
screened
and
show.
The
existing
condition
there
will
require
will
be
required
for
the
bedrooms
facing
the
street
that
there
would
be
a
dig
out
similar
to
the
adjoining
building
at
80.
G
AU
G
G
P
P
G
AU
A
BA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jessica,
thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
we
held
in
a
butters
meeting
on
august
11
2020.
during
the
meeting
neighbors
expressed
concerns
about
increased
parking
issues
and
the
fact
that
adding
a
fourth
unit
will
set
a
negative
precedence.
Inversely.
BA
A
BA
BB
Yes,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
samuel.
Rutado,
I'm
from
the
office
of
city
council,
president
kim
janey.
We
have
received
only
letters
in
opposition
and
also
concerns
about
this
applicant,
who
owns
all
the
properties
in
the
area
and
they
think
he's
kind
of
an
absentee
landlord.
So
presidential
would
like
to
go
in
a
position
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
AD
BC
AB
Hi,
this
is
lorraine,
payne
wheeler
and
I'm
calling
on
behalf
of
the
neighborhood
association.
My
address
is
85
moreland
street
and
the
neighborhood
association
is
roxbury
path
forward
and
we
attended
the
butters
meeting
and
we
also
they
were
kind
enough
to
attend
a
neighborhood
association
meeting,
and
there
was
no
support
for
this
project
now.
I
would
say
that
he
does
own
other
properties
in
the
neighborhood.
AB
Perhaps
his
tenant
signed
something,
but
we
submitted
to
the
board
and
you
can
look
at
the
you
can
see
the
addresses
the
people
who
live
close,
the
people
who
live
next
door
at
80
winthrop
street,
the
person
that
owns
another
one
of
those
brownstones
in
that
row
at
88
winter
street.
They
are
opposed
and
they're
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
impacted.
A
AB
All
of
the
brownstones
in
that
row
are
three
families,
and
so
he
is
asking
to
put
three
bedrooms
in
the
basement
and
already
in
terms
of
renovating
the
floors.
Above
somehow
he's
managed
to
get
three
bedrooms
because
that's
what
the
renovation
is.
They
oftentimes
change
a
dining
room
into
a
bedroom,
for
example,
and
that's
fine.
AB
AB
Just
yesterday,
it's
a
mess
back
there,
and
so
when
we
express
that
there
are
some
concerns
about
this
owner,
we
are
giving
you
sort
of
a
view
of,
and
so
we
just
respectfully
he's
a
part
of
the
neighborhood,
he
can
run
his
apartment
building,
but
I
really
think
that
we
must
ask
for
him
not
to
add
those
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
Thank
you
thank
you.
AB
AV
AV
I
currently
have
the
other
driveway
that
I
am
deeded
to
that
all
the
buildings
between
88
to
80
utilize
for
access.
There
have
been
a
number
of
construction
vehicles
and
dumpsters
accessing
80
and
82
winthrop
street
across
my
property,
which
is
private
and
I've
had
some
damage
done
to
a
banister
on
my
stairwell.
AV
A
A
BD
BD
Our
property
does
have
a
history
of
break-ins
thefts,
abandoned
vehicles,
squatters,
drug
use
and
narrow
access
with
vehicles,
units
being
leased,
as
opposed
to
them
being
occupied,
might
lead
to
increased
density
and
throughout
this
project,
my
wife
and
myself
have
seen
firsthand
a
lot
of
neglect
into
the
management
of
this
project.
That's
led
to
tremendous
amount
of
waste.
It's
led
to
rats
has
led
to
an
uneasy
feeling
of
someone
being
able
to
manage
a
property
of
renters,
as
opposed
to.
BE
BE
Support
or
opposition
I
am
in
opposition,
and
all
of
the
reasons
that
the
other
butters
have
stated
is
exactly
the
reason
or
are
the
reasons
that
I
oppose
this
variant
density
sharking
and
you
know
really
disturbs
me
that,
rather
than
selling
the
units
we
have
tenants
coming
in,
I
mean
it's,
I'm
just
I'm
really
emotional
about
this.
Okay!
Okay,
thank
you
so
much.
It's
very
disturbing
that,
rather
than
there
being
more
homeowners
in
this
community,
it's
all
about
money
for
the
developers.
BE
A
AU
I
think
if
I
so
hold
on
go
ahead.
This
this
particular
property
was
in
substantial
disrepair
due
to
covet
the
rehabilitation
has
been
delayed.
There
are
abandoned
cars
in
a
one
abandoned
car
to
the
rear.
When
the
property
was
acquired,
the
owner
was
identified
there,
the
landscaping
in
rear
will
be
leveled
and
cleaned
access
is
by
the
right-of-way
curb
cut
at
80..
A
Okay
hold
on
mr
moran,
so
what
I
do
want
to
do
is
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
abutters
about
the
life
on
the
ground,
and
it
feels
to
me,
like
the
applicant
needs
to
to
prove
prove
his
intent
about
maintaining
and
upgrading
the
quality
before
anything
else
happens,
and
that's
that's
what
it
sounds
like
to
me.
So
can
I
have
a
motion,
please
I'm
going
to
make
a
quick.
B
AA
AA
AU
AA
Oh
hello,
jeff,
okay,
I'm
sorry!
We
did
seek
a
deferral
back
in
september
and
in
that
time
we've
taken
a
floor
off
the
structure
and
reduced
our
unit
count
from
24
to
19..
However,
we're
just
waiting
for
a
public
meeting
and
due
to
covid
things
were
backed
up
and
delayed,
but
we
have
a
tentative
date
december
and
then
we'll
be
ready
to
move
forward
to
the
board.
U
AT
Please
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
john
barry.
With
the
law
office
of
john
d,
barry
at
400
grand
adam
in
milton
massachusetts,
this
particular
project
did
defer.
In
september
we've
received
today's
date.
We
have
been
working
with
haley
dylan
from
ons
on
the
the
need
for
some
changes
to
the
drawings.
In
order
to
schedule
into
a
butters
meeting.
There
was
change.
There
was
a
meeting
with
the
with
that
had
some
concerns
about
the
project.
AT
AI
B
B
BC
A
BC
BC
A
A
AK
R
Please
good
afternoon
manager,
members,
my
name
is
george
marancy,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350,
west
broadway
and
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
you
may
recall
that
this
matter
was
deferred.
Several
weeks
ago
there
was
a
question
as
to
whether
two
existing
head
houses
had
been
a
approved
by
this
board,
be
approved
by
the
bpda
in
design,
review
and
c,
ultimately
approved
by
the
inspectional
services
department.
I'm
withdrawing
both
of
these
matters
today
and,
unfortunately
I
have
to
report
that
that
the
head
houses
were
not
approved.
R
They
were
constructed
four
to
five
years
ago
on
each
of
these
two
buildings
and
my
clients
make
no
excuses
again.
Their
subcontractors
did
the
work,
but
they
take
full
responsibility
for
this.
This
error,
in
this
oversight,
my
clients
are
not
going
to
seek
to
get
try
to
obtain
relief
to
approve
these.
They
are
in
fact,
already
hired
a
subcontractor
to
remove
both
head
houses.
R
The
reason
why
they
haven't
been
done
yet
is
because
obviously
they
need
the
correct
hatch
in
each
instance
to
to
replace
the
the
gap
in
each
of
the
roofs
and
those
hatches
are
back,
ordered
they're,
going
to
take
approximately
two
weeks
to
come
in,
so
I'm
going
to
withdraw
both
applications,
and
you
know
we
will
follow.
I
will
follow
up
diligently
with
isd
and
let
them
know
in
fact
provide
the
proof
once
both
of
these
head
houses
have
been
removed.
E
B
E
AY
BF
B
All
right
going
back
to
hampton
street,
I'm
going
to
call
case
boa
one:
zero,
seven,
one,
four,
four,
five
one.
Fifty
two
hampden
street
there
is
a
companion
case,
boa
one
zero,
seven
one,
four
one,
eight
one,
fifty
two
hammond
street:
this
is
a
minor
renovation
and
increase
the
occupancy
of
the
building
to
the
lower
level
bar
and
tap
room
from
120
to
180
persons.
B
The
violations
article
50
section
32,
the
bar
use-
is
conditional
article
50,
section
32,
including
of
section
50-301
performance
standards,
proposed
outdoor
seating,
mrs4,
152
hampden,
the
change
of
archer
to
include
live
entertainment
operating
before
and
after
10,
30
p.m.
To
an
existing
brewery
bar
tap
room,
no
work
to
be
done.
The
violations,
article
50
section
32
use
of
a
brewer
with
bar
bar
and
live
entertainment
operating
at
10,
30
p.m,
is
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AG
As
what
is
aware
from
previous
hearings,
the
michael
feltman
is
also
available
as
a
panelist
on
this.
As
the
board
is
aware,
mr
feldman
has
his
offices
has
totally
renovated
this
building
and
has
brought
in
a
brewery
tenant
the
first
tenant,
even
pre-culvert,
was
unable
to
make
it
at
this
location
and
they
have
a
new
tenant
that
is
seeking
to
expand
the
occupancy
and
also
provide
live
entertainment
as
part
of
this
process.
AG
A
AG
Well,
the
the
there's
a
hundred
seats
outdoors,
the
there's,
there's
one
area
on
the
floor
plan.
You
can
see
that
the
only
place
that
they
could
have
outdoor
seating
because
there
is
seating
along
the
building
and
seating
on
the
other
side.
So
there
would
be
outdoor
seating,
they'd
probably
have
to
take
at
least
one
of
the
tables
out.
So
it
would
be
approximately
48
seats
where
there
could
be
a
live,
entertainment.
AG
AG
But,
madam
chair,
if
they
was
going
to
get
to
that
beard,
you
have
you
have
the
head
of
the
orchard
garden
residents
association
waiting
to
testify
in
support
of
this
and
the
not
only
orchard
park
residents,
association,
but
the
new
market
association
and
the
arctic
pilot
school.
If,
if
I
could
finish
madam
chair,
I
want
a
neighborhood
location
that
provides
these
types
of
place,
a
place
to
go
and
they're
overwhelmingly
in
support.
AG
We
anticipate
that
a
large
majority
of
the
people
that
would
come
here
are
going
to
be
from
the
area
and
we
anticipate
that
most
of
them
would
be
walking
the
as
part
of
the
process.
There
was
never
an
issue
brought
up
by
any
whether
it's
new
market
or
the
pilot
school
or
the
residents
association
of
the
parking.
A
AG
Well
before
mr
feldman,
madam
chair,
the,
we
would
anticipate
that
a
large
portion
of
the
people
that
would
be
coming
there
would
be
coming
there
after
after
people
are
out
of
work
and
also
on
the
weekends,
and
there
is
significant
on
street
parking
in
that
area.
So
and
mr
feldman
can
address
the
parking
better
than
I
can
for
that.
Square's
offices.
T
T
T
A
BA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jessica,
thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
the
butters
meeting
was
held
on
october
14
2020..
This
project
was
heavily
supported
by
a
butters,
as
well
as
the
orchard
gardens
united
neighborhood
association,
believe
the
proposal
will
bring
positive
foot
traffic
to
the
area.
Mr
feldman
has
also
been
an
excellent
community
partner
to
residents,
so
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
projects.
BA
AG
AG
BG
A
BG
BH
Yes,
just
sue
sullivan,
executive
director
of
new
market
business
association.
We
are
in
full
support
of
this.
As
mr
feldman
said,
we
are.
We
are
comfortable
with
the
parking,
the
on-street
parking
after
hours
and
the
and
the
20
20
spaces
or
so
on.
On-Site
and
mr
feldman
has
proven
to
be
a
good
community
partner
and
we're
pleased
that
he's
trying
to
reinvigorate
that
area,
along
with
the
retail
establishment.
W
A
AK
My
name
is
valerie
shelley,
I'm
the
president
of
the
orchard
guidance
resident
association,
I'm
also
a
resident
at
the
orchard,
gardens
development
and
we
are
in
support
of
this
project.
Michael
feldman
has
been
supportive
to
our
residents
and
our
community.
Since
he's
come
on
board.
He
also
has
lightened
up
camden
street,
so
it's
visible
for
our
residents
to
walk.
A
AM
J
T
A
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
108
7759
541
massachusetts
avenue.
This
is
a
change
of
option
from
a
lodging
house
and
church
to
five
residential
units
and
renovate
the
violations.
Article
56-26
establish
a
residential
sub-districts.
The
maximum
number
of
dwelling
units
in
a
row
with
townhall
shall
be
four
article
50
section
29.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section,
29,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
section
29.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient.
H
Good
afternoon,
once
again,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
echol,
with
drago
and
stanno,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
here
on
behalf
of
541
mass
app
sponsors
is
john
burns,
the
owner
of
the
property
and
arthur
chu.
The
project
architect.
One
point
of
clarification
from
what
was
written
for
the
record.
We're
now
seeking
documentary
to
five
condominium
units,
not
seven
we're
still
looking
to
renovate
the
building
and
install
a
full
sprinkler
system,
but
only
proposing
five
units.
H
H
The
church
has
been
used
more
recently
with
the
lower
levels
operating
as
a
kitchen
church
function,
hall
and
service
area,
and
then
the
upper
floors
have
been
residences
for
the
family
with
the
church
and
also
the
additional
lodgers
when
it
was
applicable,
so
we're
seeking
to
change
that
to
five
condominium
units.
Each
of
the
levels
would
contain
one
unit
with
one
three
bedroom
unit
and
four
two
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
1289
square
feet.
H
The
zoning
violations,
as
mentioned
this
is
a
row
house
district,
so
mfr
is
allowed
up
to
four
units.
We
are
seeking
five
units,
so
we
need
to
use
variance,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
picture
on
the
screen.
This
is
in
the
middle
of
a
section
of
row.
Houses
along
and
most
of
these
buildings
contain
anywhere
between
three
and
ten
residential
units,
so
we
are
seeking
that
one
extra
fifth
unit,
although
we
think
it
is
consistent
and
worked
with
the
community
to
come
up
with
that
number,
whereas
we
started
seven.
H
H
H
We're
proposing
16.
again,
this
is
pre-existing,
we're
just
building
a
rear
deck
which
goes
up
and
covers
an
existing
right
now
on
the
second
story,
so
that's
not
changing
anymore,
we're
just
making
that
more
functional,
rather
than
dead
space
and,
finally,
parking
you're
required
to
have
one
space
for
dwelling
unit.
Obviously
this
served,
as
I
mentioned,
as
a
church.
So
there
were
cars
coming
going
on
certain
days,
but
no
place
for
parking,
so
we'd
require
five
spaces
and
we
have
zero.
H
H
Madam
chair,
yes,
there'll
be
one
unit
per
floor,
so
the
lower
level,
as
you
can
see,
maybe
in
the
initial
photos,
where
there's
kind
of
that
traditional
dig
out
in
the
front.
So
there's
steps
down
so
there's
a
full
walkout
in
the
front
and
the
rear
in
the
rear.
There's
that
kind
of
courtyard
patio
area
in
the
front
is
in
that
dugout
already
existing
area.
So
there
are
steps
down
and
then
a
direct
entrance,
a
full
walk,
walk
in
on
the
front
as
well
as
a
walk
out
on
the
back.
H
This
would
be
our
largest
unit.
It
is
three
bedrooms
with
an
office
and
a
den,
so
this
is
almost
2
000
square
feet
and
then,
as
you
move
up,
the
first
floor
is
similar,
although
slightly
smaller,
it's
a
1700
square
foot,
two
bedroom
with
an
office
and
then
floors
two
three
and
four
are
all
essentially
identical
at
907
square
feet
for
units
three
and
four
and
eight
fifty
per
unit
five.
Those
three
would
be
two
bed
two
bath
as
well.
H
You
are
madam
chair:
there's
a
existing
rear,
deck
on
kind
of
a
lower
level
and
then
there'd
be
one
larger
deck
coming
off
unit.
Three
the
upper
levels
of
floor
three
and
four
will
not
have
any
decks.
They
have
existing
fire
escapes
and
and
part
of
our
work
with
the
community
was
all
the
way
up
because
they
wanted
to
keep
it
consistent
with
some
of
the
other
structures
that
we're,
along
with.
H
H
That
deck
would
be
21
feet,
9
inches
by
25
feet,
2
inches
and
again
that
that's
kind
of
all
existing
roof
space
over
the
lower
level.
The
existing
conditions
plan
shows
that
it's
kind
of
dead
space
now,
so
that
would
be
proposed
to
be
a
deck
and
kind
of
just
infill
that
roof
space
as
is
but
not
really
change.
The
structure.
H
G
H
That's
correct,
mr
the
best
way,
maybe
to
conceptualize
the
the
front
elevation
would
actually
be
the
site
pictures
you
can
see
how
it
has
that
kind
of
traditional
walk
down
and
then
a
separate
entrance
to
the
left,
and
you
can
kind
of
see
the
windows
in
relation
to
it.
Madame
ambassador,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
go
back
up
to
one
of
the
first
couple
site
pictures,
but
that
might
be
a
better
illustration
just
to
kind
of
get
an
idea
of
the
grade.
H
There's
that
I'm
sorry
yeah,
sorry
a
little
further
back
up,
there's
more
of
an
aerial
view.
That
shows
you
well
one
more,
perhaps
yeah.
So
it's
not
the
best
picture
here,
but
you
can
see
how
there's
that
that
gate
to
the
right
of
the
steps
with
a
couple
steps
down,
you
can
see
the
existing
would
be
direct
asset
access
from
the
front.
There's
a
little
kind
of
it's,
not
quite
a
courtyard.
It's
not
that
big,
but
there's
some
planters
and
kind
of
a
landing
down.
There
represents
the
front
elevation.
G
AZ
AZ
On
august
26
2020
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
what
a
neighbors
heard
from
applicants
related
to
seven
residential
units
in
general.
There
were
no
major
concerns
for
the
applicants
had
several
meetings
with
the
chester
square,
civic
association,
where
the
number
of
units
was
raised,
the
applicants
offended
their
proposal
to
five
units,
which
is
in
love
with
specific
support.
We've
received
layers
of
support
from
chester
square
and
director
benedict
for
the
five
unit
project.
A
Q
BG
E
G
A
B
Much
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
109,
6278
220
west
springfield
street.
This
is
remove
the
existing
wood
deck
at
the
second
floor
and
install
new
metal
deck
install
a
new
metal
deck
at
the
first
floor,
install
a
metal
spiral
staircase
on
the
ground
to
the
second
floor
violations.
Article
64.9.4
powerhouse
rojo,
extensions
into
the
raft
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BI
BI
BI
I
mean
this:
is
I'm
not
I'm
not
an
architect
by
by
trade
at
all,
but
it's
this
is
the
typical
metal
deck
that
you
see
throughout
the
south
end
it's
on
the
back
of
the
building.
One
of
the
kind
of
misconceptions
that
we
have
right
now
is
on
our
first
level
floor,
framing
plan,
which
is
the
top
page
of
the
presentation
that
you're
looking
at
it's
kind
of
a
top-down
view.
BI
We
have
that
we
have
a
platform
on
that,
it's
being
called
the
deck,
and
I
understand
why
it's
being
called
the
deck.
So
it's
it's
that
figure.
On
the
left
hand
side.
I
understand
why
it's
being
called
deck,
we're
not
we're
not
proposing
that
it
be
used
as
a
deck,
we're
being
recall,
we're
proposing
that
it
be
used
simply
as
egress
to
access
the
ground
in
case
of
emergency
in
case
of
a
fire.
A
AZ
Yes,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kim
cruzioli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
of
this
proposal,
with
the
proviso
that
approval
is
only
granted
for
a
fire
escape
and
not
real
back
balcony
support
deck.
On
october
5th
2020
applicants
met
with
the
cameraman
civic
association,
no
major
concerns.
AZ
A
A
B
BF
BF
We
will
have
an
egress
window
and
a
a
walkout
with
and
you'd
walk
out,
the
building
with
stairs
a
retaining
wall
and
stairs
up
to
to
access
the
outside
and
there's
also
another
entrance
means
of
egress
through
the
corner
of
the
of
the
basement
and,
let's
see
and
so
we're
as
part
of
the
project.
We
plan
to
sprinkle
the
entire
building
as
required
and
and
that's
that's
the
gist
of
it.
AZ
BF
BF
Effective
looking
great
house,
we've
done
a
lot
of
renovation
to
to
the
home.
We
bought
it
in
2010
and
put
a
lot
of
money
in
and
we
currently
rent
those
units
out
we're
not
owner
occupants
we,
but
we
try
to
keep
our
our.
We
just
try
to
keep
very
invested
in
the
neighborhood
and
our
rents
reasonable.
I
am
proud
to
say
that
three
of
the
of
our
occupants
former
resident
tenants
have
moved
on
to
homeownership
because
of
the
way
we've
structured
things.
So
you
know
we're
we're
we're
responsible
landlords.
G
BA
Good
afternoon
man
of
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jessica,
thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
held
our
letters
meeting
on
september,
29
2020
and
did
hear
from
residents
who
supported
the
owner,
who
has
been
a
long-term
member
of
the
community.
However,
I
did
receive
one
letter
of
opposition
from
a
neighbor
who
believed
who
believes
the
additional
unit
will
not
fit
with
the
existing
homes
on
the
street.
Given
the
fact
that
there
is
a
mix
of
multi-family
units
in
the
area,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
the
project.
C
B
B
R
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marancy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address,
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
harry
on
carbonara,
who
is
the
owner
of
the
property.
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
an
existing
three-family
dwelling
in
a
three
f-four
thousand
zoning
sub-district
in
the
roxbury
neighborhood
district.
R
Madam
chair,
my
client
was
proceeding
with
what
he
believed
to
be
a
zoning
compliant
full
interior
renovation
of
the
building,
as
well
as
the
addition
of
a
three-story
rear
edition,
an
infill
edition
of
dimensions
of
approximately
seven
feet
by
16
feet.
He
was
issued
a
refusal
letter
in
march
for
a
violation
attributable
to
excessive
story
height.
I
believe,
honestly,
that
the
the
zoning
refusal
letter
is
an
error.
However,
my
client
elected
to
appeal
the
refusal
and
to
seek
seek
the
required
variance
from
the
board
manager
members
there.
R
This
is
a
building.
There
was
three
dwelling
units.
It's
remaining
three
dwelling
units.
There
was
a
living
space
in
the
basement
of
the
building
at
the
time
my
client
purchased
it.
At
that
time
there
was
a
bedroom,
a
laundry
utility
room
and
a
bathroom
under
under
the
proposed
renovation.
There
would
again
remain
three
units.
The
first
unit
would
remain,
as
is
200
750
square
foot.
Approximately
two-bedroom
unit
two
would
be
approximately
seven
hundred
square
foot
one
bedroom,
and
then
that
would
be
units
two
and
three.
R
I'm
sorry
and
then
unit
one,
which
is
the
bi-level
unit,
would
be
a
one-bedroom
plus
it's
approximately
twelve
1200
square
feet.
The
building
is
a
three-story
building.
I
believe
that,
because
of
the
three-story
vertical
addition
in
the
partially
exposed
basement
that
the
examiner
elected
to
construe
this
as
a
four-story
building,
that's
what
the
violation
is
for
exceeding
the
maximum
number
of
stories,
but
it's
clearly
a
three-story
building
to
answer
some
questions
that
I
know
may
be
coming.
R
The
ceiling
height
in
the
basement
is
eight
feet
in
the
basement
would
be
under
the
proposed
plan.
There's
currently
one
bedroom
there
there
would
be
two
bedrooms
in
the
basement,
one
with
an
ensuite
bath.
I
have
a
and
with
escape
windows
from
the
bedrooms
that
would
be
to
dug
out
what
what
the
board
has
been
seeing
described
as
an
area
way.
R
A
R
R
Not
to
my
knowledge,
madam
chair,
my
client
purchased
the
building
in
you
know
when
it
was
in
a
pronounced
state
of
disrepair
fairly.
This
honestly,
I
I
have
to
say
this.
I
don't
want
to
use
the
expression
landed
in
my
lap,
but
I
really
had
nothing
to
do
with
this
until
about
a
week
ago.
This
is
a
client
I've
represented
in
the
past,
and
he
asked
me
to
represent
him
at
the
hearing
after
he
explained
what
happened.
R
So
I
don't
know
much
about
the
history,
but
my
my
understanding
and
belief
is
that
he
purchased
the
building.
I
think,
if
you're
looking
at
the
google
street
view,
it
was
in
a
pronounced
state
of
disrepair
and
he's
been
proceeding,
as
I
said,
was
what
he
believed
to
be
a
zoning
compliant
renovation,
but
for
the
issuance
of
this
refusal
letter.
A
R
Yeah,
it's
a
three-story
edition
and
it
says
the
plan
that's
showing
now
on
on
the
screen.
That's
the
existing.
It
shows
the
the
outdated
fire
escape
system.
I
forgot
to
mention
there
would
be
a
new
rear,
egress
system
as
part
of
this
again,
that's
zoning
compliant,
which
is
why
the
plans
of
the
board
sees
now
say.
R
You'll
see
and
you'll
see
if
we
keep
that's
the
demo
plan.
If
we
go
down
one
more,
maybe
colette
and
I
should
show
the
proposed
there
we
go
so
you
can
see
there's
up
in
the
top
right.
You
can
see
where
the
where
the
building
edition
is
it's
not
even
quite
actually
squared
off
it's
it's
smaller
because
of
the
radio
side,
yard
setback
requirements.
A
G
R
Yep,
that
is
correct,
so
there's
there's
no
necessary
common
access
to
that.
What
you're
seeing
there
in
the
basement
plan-
and
I
agree
with
you-
the
plans
on
the
screen
are
better
even
than
I
the
plans
I
have.
I
think
mr
eric
and
I
have
the
same
plans
and
I'm
happy
to
see
the
greater
detail
on
the
screen.
G
Yeah,
no,
then,
because
there
was
no
none
of
the
functions
of
the
rooms
that
were
outlined
where
one
of
the
plans
I'm
looking
at
anyway,
I
mean
I'm
a
little
sounding
like
a
broken
record.
There's
no
elevation!
So
it's
all
again
it's
hard
to
tell
what
the
what
the
quality
of
the
living
space
would
be
in
the
basement
relative
to
great,
because
there
are
no
elevations.
Madam
chair,
I.
BG
BG
R
G
BA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jessica,
thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
we
held
in
a
butters
meeting
on
september.
29Th
2020.
during
a
meeting
residents
did
express
concerns
about
parking,
would
seem
to
be
overall
supportive
of
the
owner,
correcting
the
changes
needed
to
be
made
to
update
the
building.
So
we'd
like
to
ground
record,
to
support
the
front.
BA
A
BG
A
D
Q
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
859
866
39.95
to
39.97
washington
street.
This
is
a
change
of
occupation,
cannabis,
dispensary,
retail,
the
violation,
article
67,
section,
11.,
use
of
regulation
of
the
canismus
establishment
as
conditionally,
used
in
an
lc
sub-district
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
hello,.
I
Ma'am
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
mike
ross
attorney
mike
ross
with
the
business
address
at
one
international
place
here
today
with
the
aforementioned
address.
What
we
have
here
is
a
former
convenience
store
in
the
roslindale
section
of
boston,
which
we
would
be
making
into
proposing
into
a
conditional
use
required
adult
use
cannabis
dispensary.
I
What
you
see
in
front
of
you
is
a
siteman
that
has
on-site
parking
on-site
delivery
and,
if
you
scroll
down,
there's
some
additional
photos
that
are
worth
looking
at.
This
is
a
1320
square
foot
square
foot,
retail
there's
also
some
space
in
the
basement
for
storage
downstairs.
There's
some
plans.
If
you
go
a
little
bit
further
down.
I
There's
here's
a
like
an
elevation
and
some
renderings
as
well
that
what
you're
seeing
there
is
this
is
the
washington
street
at
the
top.
That's
the
archdale
from
the
side
red
the
customers
will
enter
through
the
rear
right
there.
You
see,
there's
a
fence
that
encloses
the
parking
area
they'll
enter
from
the
rear
and
they'll
actually
leave
and
exit
the
building
from
the
corner
of
archdale
and
washington.
I
There's
a
floor
plan.
That
kind
of
shows
that
better,
I
think
next
here.
Let
me
just
quickly
walk
you
through
right
here.
So
again,
I've
got
large
tails
along
the
left
side
of
the
of
the
floor
plan
and
washington
streets
along
the
right-hand
side.
I
mean
along
the
bottom
sorry
of
your
screen
and
you
see
that
the
entry
is
in
the
rear,
where
there
are
at
least
four
parking
spaces.
I
The
customer.
This
is
an
adult
use
facility,
so
the
customer,
21
and
older,
with
appropriate
id,
would
walk
in
through
that
initial
entry
lobby
would
be
checked
in
terms
of
checked
in
and
then
they
would.
They
would
be
able
to
walk
through
the
facility
itself,
they'd
be
allowed
in,
and
then
they
would
leave
through
that
that
corner
where
you
see
the
exit,
the
downstairs
there's
some
additional
storage
there's
also
a
room
for
safe
bathroom.
I
You
know
awnings
and
there's
a
pretty
busy
bus,
stop
there
on
the
on
washington
street.
So
if
there's
rain,
you
know
people
can
kind
of
stand
underneath
that
that
came
up
during
the
community
process,
a
couple
more
renderings
just
down
below
just
to
give
you
a
feel
for
how
it
would
be
looking
built
out
again
that
you'd
be
entering
through
that
rear.
That's
a
piece
of
the
the
fence
that
would
that
would
be
kind
of
containing
the
entire
area.
That's
how
people
will
go
in.
I
A
I
Yeah
I
mean
the
the
intent
was
to
put
the
entrance
to
the
rear,
so
that
the
extent
there
is
any
queueing
which
we
wouldn't
want
to
encourage,
we
want
to
try
to
limit.
You
can
do
that
through
technology.
You
can,
you
can
stagger
people.
A
lot
of
people
are
ordering
online,
not
just
for
covid,
but
in
general,
just
seems
to
be
how
how
it
works,
because
sometimes
certain
products
aren't
in
place.
I
People
want
to
secure
their
products
and
then
they
want
to
come
in
and
pick
it
up,
and
the
technology
will
allow
us
to
push
people
out
of
high
demand
areas,
but
as
more
and
more
of
these
appear
in
boston,
they're
supposed
to
be
52
eventually,
I
believe
these
neighborhood
shops
might
start
to
function
more
like
a
neighborhood
store
liquor
store,
perhaps
where
you're
not
getting
a
lot
of
people
from
outside
the
neighborhood
there's
not
a
lot
of
transients
through
this
particular
neighborhood.
You
have
a
lot
of
people
who
live
in
this
community.
I
I
A
Okay
and
so
you're
proposing
to
do
most
of
your
business
online
by
appointments
and
things
like
that,
I'm
not
worried
about
it
long
term.
I
am
worried
about
it
short
term
because
you're
right,
that's
a
very
busy
bus.
Stop
the
crossing
guards
across
the
street.
There's
all
kinds
of
you
know
activity
there,
and
so
that's
that's
what
I
was
primarily
concerned
about.
I
I
We
start
with
lots
of
supervision
and
lots
of
engagement
with
the
with
whether
it's
the
local
police,
or
you
know
the
boston,
police
or
or
what
have
you,
but
within
a
very
short
period
of
time,
we're
going
to
have
a
feel
for
the
volumes
and
the
type
of
activity
we're
going
to
see
there.
The
people
who
are
involved
in
this
shop
had
actually
come
before
this
board
before
they
have
good
experience,
they're
on
the
line
with
us.
I
I
Brian
chavez,
who's,
the
100
owner
and
his
brother
jason
chavez
who
are
on
the
call
with
us
today,
they've
pointed
out
in
meetings
that
there
are
actually
four
bodegas
in
this
immediate
area,
they're
all
kind
of
fighting
over
the
same
set
of
customers
and
it's
a
lot
of
competition.
So
in
a
way
this
will
help
the
other
bodegas
having
not
as
much
competition
and
allow
them
to
do
a
little
bit
more
business.
AM
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
joe
carpenter
from
the
base
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
applicants
went
through
a
thorough
community
process
and,
more
recently,
approved
by
the
boston
cannabis
board.
I
believe
the
cannabis
more
should
have
submitted
a
letter
to
the
zoning
board
with
the
support
they
received
from
the
community.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
BJ
Z
A
BD
B
Of
a
one
family,
construction
of
a
new
building
consisting
of
two
residential
dwelling
units
on
the
same
lot,
the
violations,
article
51
section,
56,
off-street
parking
design,
a
five-foot
buffer
article
51-69,
excessive
f.a.r
article
51,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded:
nautical
51
section,
9
exhibition
rate
yard
setback,
article
51,
section,
56
and
insufficient
parking
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BK
As
the
secretary
mentioned,
we
are
seeking
some
forms
of
release,
specifically
floor
area
ratio,
the
proposed
floor
area
ratio
in
this
zoning
2f
zoning
subdistrict
is
0.6.
We
are
seeking
relief
at
with
a
proposal
of
0.93.
Additionally,
the
number
of
stories
2.5
stories
are
allowed
in
in
the
2f
5000
zoning
sub
district.
In
the
proposal,
although
the
top
floor
is
stepped
back,
does
not
qualify
as
a
half
story,
so
it
is
a
three-story
building,
as
well
as
a
rear
yard
setback.
BK
Parking
is
located
on
entirely
in
the
side
yard
of
either
side
yard
access
from
one
central
curb
cup
in
the
front
of
the
property,
because
parking
is
within
five
feet
of
a
law
line
in
article
51
that
seeks
zoning
release
as
well
as
1.75
parking
spaces
per
unit
are
required
here,
which,
for
the
rule
of
rounding
numbers,
would
be
four
and
we
have
two
spaces
as
tandem
spaces.
Do
not
count
as
parking
spaces.
BK
BK
A
Y
BK
The
front
elevation
on
grade
has
a
first
story,
which
consists
primarily
of
a
living
room
and
floor
through
kitchen
and
a
half
bath.
The
second
floor
consists
of
a
play
room
and
a
bedroom
and
a
full
bath,
and
the
top
floor
is
a
master
bedroom
in
the
basement
is
the
utilities
and
storage
area
and
an
open
sort
of
living
room
that
would
which
would
be
access
via
the
sliders
to
the
exterior.
BK
G
If,
if
you
could
put
colleen,
if
you
could
pull
up
the
sight
plan
by
the
parking,
yep
you're
suggesting
closing
the
curb
cut
on
the
left,
to
put
one
right,
smack
dab
in
the
middle
of
the
front
facade
of
the
house
and
then
yet
the
driveway
is
on
the
right.
The
driveway
is
on
the
right,
but
you
can
only
go
about
halfway
back
because
you
run
into
the
set
of
steps
right.
BK
Not
exactly
if
you
go
to
the
end,
oh,
I
guess
we
can
see
it
on
this
side.
If
you,
you
could
see
underline
the
where
it
acts.
This
is
the
street.
If
you
zoom
out
in
this
picture,
just
a
little
bit
you
can
see.
The
existing
driveway
is
on
the
left
is
where,
as
we're
looking
at
it,
that's
the
occurrence
right.
G
A
BK
G
I
well
mean
I,
I
think
it's
a
little
problematic
in
terms
of
design
both
in
terms
of
the
appearance
and
also
in
terms
of
the
issue
that
the
chair
raised
about
the
temptation
to
to
to
use.
I
mean
in
my
neighborhood
we
have
someone
who
who
got
approval
for
a
garage
and
then
uses
the
front
of
the
garage
as
front
yard
parking,
which
was
not
what
it
was
intended
to
do.
G
BL
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
Let
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal
with
the
request
for
bpa
design
review.
We
conducted
a
butters
meeting
on
september.
9Th
there
was
a
mix
of
opinions
there.
There
were
some
residents,
including
a
director
butter
that
were
in
support
of
this
project
and
other
residents
that
had
concerns.
BL
I
believe
we
forwarded
three
letters
of
opposition
to
the
board.
Most
of
their
concerns
seemed
outlined
with
just
existing
conflicts
with
some
of
the
renters
in
the
area
who
are
students
at
one
of
the
local
universities
and
concerns
regarding
an
increase
in
density.
We
feel
you
know,
we
respect
the
opinions
of
these
abutters.
We
feel
that
those
concerns
and
the
proposal
for
the
increased
density
is
pretty
moderate
for
this
area.
BL
It's
proposal
for
a
two
family
in
an
existing
two
family
zone,
and
I
know
from
the
intention
that
was
presented
to
us
one.
The
owner
was
hoping
to
occupy
one
of
the
units
as
well,
so
we
feel
that
the
presence
of
an
owner-occupied
household
would
make
sure
that
some
potential
conflicts
were
rented
should
be
resolved.
BL
BM
Good
afternoon
this
is
maury
mcrae
from
councillor
liz
breden's
office.
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
as
being
in
opposition
to
this
project.
The
counselor
has
no
problem
with
the
construction
of
a
two
family
on
this
lot,
but
she
has
concerns
about
the
scale
of
this
this
proposal
and
is
also
concerned
about
its
future.
BM
AK
BN
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
gomes
from
the
brighton
nelson
improvement
association,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
It
is
a
two
family
in
a
two
family
zone.
The
lot
size
is
consistent
with
the
other
two
families.
We
do
request
design
review
for
the
house,
as
we
did
have
questions
on
the
parking
as
well,
so
we
do
request
bpda
design
review
to
sort
that
out.
Thank.
BJ
BK
Yes,
madam
chair
with
the
proposed
construction,
it's
28.8
feet
away
from
the
rear
lot
line,
that
building
that
she's
referencing
is
one
building
away.
It
is
not
on
the
rear
lot
line.
It
would
be
unlikely
that
there
would
be
any
construction
debris
from
a
three-story
home
that
would
reach
30
feet
to
the
rear.
I
will
alert
my
client
and
his
contractor
to
be
complete
with
all
osha
rules
and
build
within
the
international
residential
code.
2015.
A
A
B
You
calling
your
next
two
cases
calling
voa
921,
545
176
glaston
street,
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
921,
544
170
gladstone
street.
This
is
for
176..
This
would
be
one
of
two
dwellings
on
the
same
lot.
No
work
to
be
done.
The
violations-
article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use-
is
conditional
article
53
section
9
the
lot
size
for
a
dwelling
unit.
Bishop
article
53
section
9,
the
four
day
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section,
9.
side
job
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
56
austrian
parking
is
insufficient.
B
This
is
for
170
gladstone.
This
is
seeking
to
erect
a
residential
building
with
eight
units
and
four
parking
spaces.
This
will
be
one
of
two
dwellings
on
one
lot:
the
violation
article
53
section
8,
the
multi-family
drilling
unit
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
lot
size
direct
new
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient.
B
Article
53
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53
section,
9,
the
height
is
excessive
and
feet
50
degrees,
section
9,
the
required
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
On
gladstone
street
article
53
section
island
required
front
yard.
Setback
is
insufficient
on
breed
street
article
53
section
9,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
56
mastery
parking
is
insufficient.
B
AA
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscana,
with
an
address
of
11
beacon
street
representing
the
petitioner
joe
fagoni,
and
they
also
have
james
crystal
from
the
heart
with
us
today.
What
you're?
Just
a
point
of
clarification,
this
project,
since
we
had
deferred
last,
has
been
modified,
so
the
description
has
changed
and
the
plans
will
reflect
that
that
mr
erlick
has.
We
are
sneaking
now
to
erect
a
three-story
building
with
four
residential
units
and
four
parking
spaces.
AA
What
you're,
looking
at
in
the
front,
is
the
picture
of
the
dilapidated
garages
that
aren't
functional
now,
we're
proposing
to
replace
those
garages
and
to
erect
the
three-story
building
where
those
garages
stand.
Now,
there's
also
that
companion
case,
because
there
is
a
four
unit
building
on
that
same
law,
that's
existing.
All
of
this
would
be
proposed,
condos
and
renovated
when
completed.
A
AD
AA
So
we
have
in
the
elevations
pull
those
up.
We
have
the
front
of
the
building
would
be
on
the
gladstone
street
side
with
the
parking
you
can
see
here
in
adam
share
coming
along
the
greed
street
entrance,
so
there'd
be
a
curb
cut
with
a
breed
street
and
where
breed
street
is
now
that
would
lead
you
to
the
ground
level
that
parking
level
and
that
would
house
our
mechanical
room
and
sprinkle
a
room.
AA
A
AA
Okay,
so
that,
as
was
mentioned,
the
level
would
be
garage
or
the
basement
level
garage,
trash
room,
mechanical
room,
sprinkler,
room
access
off
of
breed
street.
As
we
go
up
to
the
first
floor,
we
would
have
unit
one
in
unit
two.
Those
are
one
bedroom,
one
bath
units
at
763
square
feet
with
rare
balcony.
AA
AA
AA
We
we
re,
do
we
took
away
the
height
violation
so
that
no
longer
exists
in
feet,
but
there
is
in
stories.
Two
stories
is
what's
allowed.
We're
proposing
three
our
front
yard
is,
is
one
it's
modals
on
the
corner,
but
15
would
be
required.
Side
yard
is
four
foot
four
and
three
foot
two
on
either
side.
Seven
would
be
required.
We
do
not
have
a
rear
yard
on
this,
just
because
it's
zero,
but
just
the
way
this
building
lines
up.
AA
G
A
X
During
the
community
process,
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
for
a
various
meeting
where
the
applicant
addressed
several
of
the
concerns
of
expressed
by
diabetes,
remove
the
full
story.
Addition
reduce
the
number
of
units
and
increase
the
particular
ratio.
Also,
we
receive
22
letters
of
support
from
our
parents
and
residents
or
oring
heights.
Thank
you.
Y
B
BO
You're,
a
muted,
yes
hi,
I'm
elizabeth
bagley,
I
have
known
joe
for
over
20
years,
he's
a
good
friend
but,
more
importantly,
for
today's
purposes,
a
good
neighbor
moved
off
my
street
the
last
few
years,
but
it's
been
continued
to
be
a
frequent
visitors
and
it's
still
entrenched
in
the
neighborhood
and
the
community
who
he
grew
up
in
and
he
remained
strongly
tied
to.
Thank
you.
BP
Ahead,
yes,
my
name
is
emma
bielicki.
I
am
director
battery
across
the
street
on
gladstone
street.
In
my
concern,
this
proposed
construction
is
asking
to
override
at
least
10
sensible
residential
zoning
restrictions,
and
I
would
like
to
bring
your
attention
that
surface
area
listed
5
330
square
feet
of
the
lot
of
170
76
blood
stroke
street
is
incorrect.
The
actual
area
is
3760
square
feet
area,
as
shown
on
the
boston
parcel
view,
map
load
size
equation
has
triangular
shape.
BP
The
bigger
measurement
is
probably
obtained
by
erroneously
using
the
formula
to
measure
triangular
block
applied,
rectangle
shape
formula.
My
husband
was
former
real
estate
appraiser
and
he
measured
the
slot
and
obtained
obtained
3764
square
feet.
The
developers
proposing
to
arrest
on
3764
scale
sleep
a
lot
what's
three
story
building
this
for
you
in
your
next
next.
BP
A
AA
B
Call
me
your
last
case
of
the
day
calling
boa
one
zero
two
zero
two
zero
four
one,
twelve
myrtle
street.
This
is
a
confirmed
market,
has
10
residential
apartments,
a
full
gut
interior
renovation
of
the
entire
building,
building
a
roof
deck
there'll
be
no
change
of
occupancy.
The
violations,
article
15
section
1,
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
B
AU
AU
AU
The
building
is
consists
of
10
units.
The
garden
level
is
814
square
feet.
Two
bedroom
unit.
The
first
floor
has
two
small
units:
338
square
feet,
a
one
bedroom
and
362
square
feet
a
one
bedroom.
The
floors
two
through
four,
have
a
small
unit,
one
bedroom
of
370
square
feet
and
a
two
bedroom
larger
unit
of
five
551
square
feet.
The
fifth
floor
is
a
single
unit.
Two
bedrooms
977
square
feet
with
exclusive
use
of
the
roof
deck.
AU
Butter
spoke
and
said
he
was
unaware
of
the
community
process
and
the
motion.
The
suggestion
was
to
do
extensive
to
reach
out
to
that
butter
which
we
have
ken
lyons
can
address
the
amount
of
reach
out,
but
I
might
add,
he
said
that
there
was
he
felt
there
was
no
community
process.
There
was
robust
community
okay.
A
AU
A
BQ
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
chinese
friendship
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
did
hold
anna
butters
meeting
prior
to
the
pandemic
and
it
was
generally
supported
by
a
butters.
They
did,
as
mentioned,
received
the
vote
of
non-opposition
from
the
beacon
hell,
civic
association,
john,
and
I
I
believe
we
spoke
or
ken.
BQ
We
spoke
about
a
couple
of
butters
out
of
outstanding
concerns,
but
the
applicant
did,
as,
as
I
said,
speak
with
me
and
forwarded
me:
multiple
attempts
to
communicate
and
collaborate,
but
the
application
was
unable
and
successful
to
get
in
contact
with
these
veterans.
So
we
do
not
feel
that
this
should
delay
the
proposal,
as
there
is
substantial
support
on
record
at
this
time.
So
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
A
E
B
AB
P
P
AS
AS
That's
correct,
madam
chairwoman:
they
are
for
12-month
leases.
We
inherited
a
building
that
was
very
poorly
managed
and
fell
into
disrepair.
We're
going
to
manage
it
very
well.
We
are
going
to
have
enforceable
lease
provisions
for
the
penthouse
occupants
that
they
respect
their
neighbors
and
there
will
be
legally
enforceable
terms
that
require
them
not
to
have
noise
violations
or
interfere
with
neighbors
in
any
way,
there
was
no
roof
deck
previously.
A
B
Madam
chair,
the
last
things
of
the
day
are
the
hearings
from
the
subcommittee
right
at
1010.
Massive
boa
1110114,
799
putnam
street
was
working
unit
9
and
renovate
the
entire
home,
including
it
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
111
2796
43
cook
street
was
installed
at
dorm
in
the
rear
patio
deck
in
the
rear
yard.
B
It
was
approved
at
bpda
case
boat,
one
one,
one,
five
zero
one,
five
seven
claremont
park
was
he
was
the
approval
of
16
by
three
steel
balconies
increased
to
16
by
five
on
the
fourth
level,
it
was
approved
case,
boa
7582,
11
hf
claim
on
five.
It
was
a
constructed
area,
deck
a
second
story.
Above
grade
it
was
approved,
ksboa
one,
zero,
seven,
zero,
eight,
three,
four
five,
thirty
seven,
eight
first
street
was
the
change
of
argument
for
a
beauty
shop,
no
work
to
be
done.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
111,
7419,
28,
woodwood
street.
B
B
Ksboa
one
one,
two,
three,
nine
three,
six,
thirteen
fox
point
road:
let's
construct
a
new
constructed,
two
kind
garage
with
accessory.
Second
lot:
it
was
approved
with
bpda
hbo
one
one.
Two,
two
four
four
three
eleven
harford
street
was
was
denied
without
prejudice
case
b;
okay,
one
zero,
five,
five
one,
two
seven
one
654
washington
street
was
a
change
of
oxford
beauty
salon.
B
B
Facebook
one
one
one,
one:
two:
five,
eight
six,
sixty
six
alvin
street
was
a
change
of
marksman
one
family
to
a
two
feeling.
It
was
approved
with
dpda
hboa
one
one,
one:
zero,
eight,
eight,
seven,
five
crandall
street
secretary
march
is
a
single
paneling
and
extend
living
space
in
the
attic.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
101
6610
22
hopewell
road.
It
was
an
off-street
pocket
of
two
vehicles.
It
was
denied
case
voa,
one
one:
two:
zero,
nine,
eight
seven,
sixteen
faraday
street
to
remove
the
existing
roof
extracting
new
floor
new
roof.
B
B
It
was
an
existing
first
floor,
room
demo
and
renovate
the
existing
kitchen.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
facebook,
one
one
zero
one,
seven,
eight,
seven,
thirty,
four
castrate,
let's
construct
the
numerator.
An
existing
single
failure
is
approved
with
bpda
here's
doa
one
one.
One:
zero
zero
five:
three:
twenty
nine
rare
meredith
street.
It
was
a
constructive
portion
of
exterior
deck.
B
B
Case
boa
109
3721-78
washington
street.
It
was
withdrawn,
fiat
105,
7679,
18,
birchcroft
road.
This
was
deferred
to
211
21
to
the
subcommittee
case,
boa
one:
zero,
nine,
five,
zero.
Four
nine
two
twenty
three
to
227
bowdoin
street
was
to
change
the
purpose,
install
carpet,
paint
walls
and
sign
change
market
from
a
dry
cleaner
to
a
retail
store.
It
was
approved
with
bpda.