►
Description
This is a recording of the Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Subcommittee Hearing held on November 17, 2022. The Zoning Board will hold a vote on whether to approve or reject the subcommittee recommendations at its next full-Board hearing.
B
All
right
good
good
evening,
this
is
Sherry
dong,
I,
don't
know
if
I
should
be
introducing
myself,
but
thank
you.
Thank
you
good
evening.
The
city
of
Boston
zoning
Board
of
appeal
hearing
for
November
17
2022,
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
Provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature.
Regarding
virtual
hearings,
the
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
through
March
2023..
B
This
hearing
of
the
board
is
being
held
remotely
via
the
zoom
webinar
event
platform.
This
hearing
is
also
being
recorded
in
order
to
in
order
to
ensure
this
hearing
of
the
board
is
open
to
the
public
members
of
the
public
May
access
this
hearing
through
a
telephone
and
video
conferencing.
This
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
Public
Notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
B
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment
board
members,
applicants
and
their
attorneys
or
Representatives
will
participate
in
the
hearing
as
panelists
and
they
will
appear
alongside
the
presentation
materials
when
speaking
panelists
are
strongly
encouraged
to
keep
video
on
while
presenting
to
the
board
foreign.
B
As
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
The
order
of
comments
is
as
follows:
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public,
the
chair,
May
limit.
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
as
time
constraint
requires.
B
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raised
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
When
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
the
request
from
the
host.
B
Those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
State
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comments,
foreign
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
Mr
Fortune
reads
the
address
into
the
record
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
host
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
These
instructions
will
be
repeated
throughout
the
hearing.
Now
I
will
take
a
roll
call
and
Mr
Mr
Fortune,
we'll
call
on
the
list
all
right.
Thank.
C
F
C
Gonna
call
the
first
order
is
the:
are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
the
five
o'clock
cases?
If
you
can
give
you
the
address
for
us,
please.
C
E
Eileen
Rosa
from
Rosa
design
and
construction,
we're
located
286
Blue
Hill
Avenue
in
Milton.
B
C
G
Thank
you,
Attorney
John
Barry,
representing
John
Drago.
My
law
office
is
located
at
1156
Dorchester
Ave
Boston
Mass
zero.
Two
one,
two
five.
We
are
respectfully
requesting
a
deferral.
There
was
an
issue
with
the
revision
that
was
sent
in
and
it
has
not
been
approved
by
the
examiner
and
sent
along
to
the
board
at
this
time.
B
C
Too,
are
there
any
other
deferrals
or
withdrawals
to
the
five
o'clock
cases
naming
none
I'll
call
the
first
case
going
VOA
137-1369,
14,
Cook
Street.
This
is
to
confirm,
occupies
as
a
single-family
residence
and
at
a
two-story
kitchen
office,
Edition
renovation
to
the
basement
and
first
floor
of
an
existing
home
scoping
close,
removing
the
existing
back
condition
and
exterior
stairs
the
violations.
Article
62,
Section
8,
the
ray
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
H
Can
you
walk
us
through
I'm,
the
architect
so
I?
My
address
is
23
millmont
Street
in
Boston
zero,
two
one,
one
nine!
So
to
walk
it
through
this.
This
Edition
that
we're
proposing
is,
is
actually
the
replacement
of
an
existing
structure
that
does
not
have
a
legal
fire
separation
with
the
adjacent
home
it
is.
It
also
has
extremely
low
ceiling
Heights
that
actually
don't
meet
code
as
well.
The
second
floor
has
a
ceiling
head
of
six
foot.
H
Five
in
in
this
design
we're
removing
the
very
back
of
the
existing
structure,
giving
an
additional
seven
feet
that
will
not
be
reconstructed
and,
and
then
the
the
main
block
of
the
building
is,
is
going
to
be
reconstructed
with
a
firewall
and,
with
you
know,
appropriate
ceiling
Heights
that
are,
you,
know,
kind
of
matching
the
the
main
house.
H
So
it
also
is
giving
a
lot
of
attention
to
daylighting,
noting
that
that's
kind
of
a
green
sort
of
architecture
and
gives
more
connection
to
the
outdoor
space
for
the
for
the
owner.
B
We
will
we
can
take
testimony
from
the
public.
Is
there
anyone
any
public
officials
who
wish
to
speak
in
favor.
I
Good
evening
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Natalia
Benitez,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
circulated
flyer
city
of
Butters
in
the
neighborhood.
No
concerns
were
expressed
at
our
office,
so
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
the
third
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion.
F
B
Ms,
better
Braza,
yes,
chair,
also
says
yes,
motion
carries.
C
Calling
the
next
case
calling
DOA
one
three:
zero:
seven,
six,
five,
four:
thirty,
three
Russell
Street:
this
is
a
conversion
of
a
single
family
into
a
two
Family
Residence.
It's
an
interior
innovation.
Exterior
changes
will
be
limited
to
the
egress,
stair
and
roof
deck.
The
existing
red
deck
will
be
rebuilt.
C
K
Hello,
my
name
is
Timothy
Sheehan
I
live
at
nine
Wall
Street
I'm
in
the
architect
for
the
project
representing
the
clients
yeah.
This
is
this
is
right
behind
my
house
actually,
but
this
is
a
single
family.
Wood
frame,
three-story
residence
I
am
Mike
and
Catherine.
K
You
know
son
in
in
in
mother
and
essentially
they're
living
in
the
house
now
as
a
two
family,
but
it's
not
obviously
zoned
that
way
or
built
that
way.
So
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
change.
K
You
know
renovate
the
building
needs
to
be
renovated
anyway,
so
renovate
the
building
and
create
a
two
Family
Residence
would
like
to
add
a
roof
deck
for
Mike
on
the
third
floor
and
he
would
have
a
one
bedroom,
575
square
foot
in
a
one-bedroom
apartment
and
his
mom
Captain
would
have
the
bomb
two
floors
and
should
have
a
two-bedroom
actually
three
bath,
two
bedroom
unit.
K
Currently
now
there's
a
deck.
If
you
look
at
the
A3
the
buildings
in
the
side
of
a
hill,
so
you
know
the
second
floor.
Essentially
is
the
first
floor.
You
know
it
has
a
walk
straight
out
to
grade.
So
what
we'll
do
is
put
a
deck
build
a
new
deck
for
Captain
for
his
mom
at
the
yard
level,
then
there's
an
existing
deck
up
on
that
third
floor,
which
would
rebuild
and
and
actually
put
a
spiral,
sticks
on
for
Mike's,
second
egress
and
then
the
roof
deck
would
be.
K
B
I
Yes,
good
evening,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Natalia
Benitez,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
Madam
chair.
Our
office
has
seen
a
lot
of
personal
turnover
lately,
so
we
don't
have
much
information
on
this
proposal
at
this
time,
though,
we
are
unaware
of
any
neighborhood
concerns
with
that
with
different
judgments
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
K
F
C
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
135-9438-22
Hanover
Avenue:
this
is
a
renovation
of
a
single
family.
Townhouse
opportunity
remained
a
single
family,
a
new
stair
and
head
housed
and
additional
two
floors
over
the
lower
portion
of
the
existing
building,
the
violation
article
54
section
10,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
54,
section
18,
roof
structure,
restriction,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
M
This
is
Park
McDowell
I'm,
the
architect.
I
live
at
7,
Unity,
Street
number,
nine
in
the
North
End
I'm,
a
I'm,
a
neighbor
and
friend
of
the
owner.
Our
children
are
about
same
age,
so
Stephen
and
Jenny
here
are
looking
to
do
a
renovation
to
their
primary
residence
or
it
will
be
their
primary
residence
after
the
renovation.
It
includes
a
two-story
addition
over
an
existing
one-story
portion
of
the
building
note
that
the
entire
project
will
remain
under
the
allowable
Building
height
of
55.
feet
in
total.
M
The
three
four
three
story
structure
is
going
to
be
31
feet,
three
inches
above
grade
to
the
roof
pair
a
bit,
and
then
the
proposal
also
cause
calls
for
a
stair
head
house
set
back
from
the
street
facing
parapet
and
the
top
of
that
head
house
will
be
40
feet
above
the
street.
These
features
are
consistent
with
the
neighborhood
character
and
the
scale
there
are
larger
buildings
immediately
adjacent
to
the
rear,
at
four
Powers
Court
and
across
the
street
at
35
North
Street,
to
the
second
point
that
about
the
rear
yard
being
insufficient.
M
So
you
see
here
on
the
screen,
the
existing
structure.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
it
will
be
the
the
proposed
new
structure.
This
shows
the
increased
height
from
the
the
single
story,
lower
section
of
the
building
to
have
that
be
three
stories
like
the
other
and
also
some
updates
to
the
exterior
fenestration
next
slide.
M
Here
you
see
the
plans
and
on
the
next
slide,
the
stairway
continues
all
the
way
to
the
roof.
In
a
highlighted
on
this
slide,
you
see
the
location
of
the
project.
I
indicated
the
taller
building
to
the
rear
at
four
Powers
Court
and
then
the
much
taller
building
across
the
street
at
35
North
Street.
This
just
gives
you
an
idea
about
the
scale
of
the
neighborhood
next
slide.
M
I
also
want
to
speak
to
the
other
violation,
that's
about
the
rear
yard
being
insufficient
due
to
the
narrow
depth
of
the
site.
The
existing
building
is
right
on
the
lot
line.
It's
not
set
back
for
the
rear
lot
line
specifically
and
that
required
12-foot
setback
is
not
feasible
due
to
the
shape
of
the
property.
The
proposed
renovation
maintains
the
current
building
footprint,
so
I
hope
that
you
will
agree
with
me
on
these
requests.
Resulted
in
relief
are
reasonable.
We've
done
our
community
process
Guided
by
Sierra.
B
Thank
you,
Ms,
better
Baraza.
Have
you
reviewed
the
plans.
D
Madam,
chair
I,
have
reviewed
the
plans
and
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions.
Please
so
I
believe
this
isn't
a
g-con
and.
M
D
Okay,
in
terms,
can
you
describe
the
existing
head
house
in
regards
to
dimensions
and
then
your
new
replacement.
M
Sure
the
existing
head
house
is
basically
a
hatch,
an
attic
hatch
to
crawl
up.
It
has
a
kind
of
ship's
ladder
to
the
top
we're
proposing
a
code
compliance
stair,
which
includes
a
code
compliant
head
house
set
back
from
the
street
foreign
you
can
see
in
the
in
the
maybe
the
elevations
would
be
helpful
to
understand
those
two
geometrically.
M
You
have
to
duck
your
head
to
get
out,
it's
not
quite
a
hatch,
but
it
is
not
a
full
height
space.
It's
up
a
ship's
ladder.
Okay,
you
can
see
that.
Actually,
if
you
go
up
one
more
slide,
you'll
see
the
existing.
You
know
it's,
it's
that
shape
behind
the
fence,
so
it.
D
D
D
M
That's
connected
to
the
building
structure.
Basically,
that's
the
way
that
the
joists
are
running,
so
those
are
extensions
of
the
primary
structural
Joys
coming
out.
Okay,.
F
D
F
D
Might
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
typically
to
me
this
seems
like
a
large
durscope
project
that
I
think
it
needs
full
board.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
I
can
recommend.
Maybe
Tom's
online
I
can't
recall
if
there's
if
there
needs
to
be
a
motion
to
propose
a.
C
Hi
Angie:
this
is
Tom
hi.
If
you
think
that
to
defer
to
the
full
board
that
would
be
December,
6th
I
think
would
be
our
next
one.
If
you
guys
all
agree
that
that's
the
right
right
choice:
okay,
yeah.
B
D
M
D
C
Along
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
one
three
one:
zero
four,
seven,
two
seven
o
two
East
Fifth
Street.
This
is
to
replace
the
existing
roof
deck
with
a
new
roof
deck.
The
violations,
article
9
section,
one
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
the
roof
deck
article,
68,
Section,
8,
side,
job
side,
job
for
the
roof
deck
and
article
68,
Section
8,
the
real
Yacht
for
the
roof
deck
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
So
I'm,
the
owner
occupant,
and
what
we're
proposing
here
is
an
update
to
the
existing
roof
deck.
Currently,
there
is
no
decking
on
the
on
the
roof
of
the
ceiling,
I
mean
of
the
house
and
we're
proposing
to
put
new
railings
and
new
decking
down.
There
is
a
slight
modification
to
the
area
as
we're
hoping
to
move
the
air
conditioner
units
out
just
to
the
left
there.
If
you
see
there
in
the
proposed
roof
deck
there,
the
equipment
area
would
be
moved
outside
of
the
existing
roof
deck.
B
Okay,
may
I
hear
a
testimony
in
support.
N
Good
good
evening,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
Anna
white,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
ons,
hosted
an
abutters
meeting
for
702
East
5th
Street
on
August
23rd.
There
is
no
opposition
at
the
abutters
meeting
or
when
they
presented
at
the
city,
Point
neighborhood
association
meeting
on
September
13th.
At
this
point,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you
so
much.
Thank.
O
J
There
any
other
race
camps,
the
caller
617-840
sent
a
request
to
unmute
you
once
and
you
did
you,
okay
go
ahead.
Yep.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
P
Hi,
this
is
Luanne
O'connor,
president
of
the
city,
Point
neighborhood
association,
and
we
want
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project,
the
proponent
presented
before
cpna
and
based
on
the
photos
that
he
showed
of
titles
on
the
roof
and
no
checking
on
those.
We
find
that
in
this
particular
case,
we
will,
in
tech,
support
the
roof
deck.
Thank.
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Fortune,
yes,
Miss,
better
Braza,
yes,
chair,
says
yes,
motion
carries
thank.
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
VOA
134-3962-690
East,
8th
Street,
this
is
to
install
a
new
curb
cut
it'll
allow
for
two
cars
off
street
parking:
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
osprey
parking
and
article
68,
section,
31,
screening
and
buffering
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Q
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Ryan
Spitz,
with
Adams
and
moranti
business
address
of
168,
8th
Street
South
Boston
with
me
today
is
the
owner.
Mary
Walsh,
as
we
are
here
today,
seeking
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
for
two
off-street
parking
spaces
that
will
be
accessed
to
the
right
of
the
property.
Q
Q
What
I
think
is
well
well
to
be
noted
is
the
fact
that
there
are
other
parking
scenarios
that
are
very
similar
to
this
in
the
South
Boston
Neighborhood
I
do
respectfully
understand
the
board's
stance
on
of
allowing
front
yard
parking
on
this
street
here
about
two
properties,
down
from
the
left,
further
down
on
8th
Street
you'll
notice
that
there's
actual
garage
that
the
the
garage
butts
the
entire
Street
itself
to
facing
the
street
and
there's
actually
a
few
other
garages
and
such
on
on
8th
Street
too.
Q
So
again,
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
open
it
up
for
any
questions
or
comments.
B
Thank
you,
you
answered
my
question
about
front
or
not
Ms,
better
Braza.
D
Madam,
chair
I,
review
the
drawings
and
they're
adequate.
The
only
question
I
have
is:
did
we
receive
any
feedback
from
BTD.
C
Yes,
we
did
hanzi,
so
Madam,
chair,
I'm,
going
to
put
Bob
D'amico's
commenting
for
the
record
regarding
690
East,
8th
Street,
Ward
7
has
front
yard
parking,
as
well
as
lack
of
dimensional
requirements.
N
Good
evening
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
Anna
white,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
ons,
hosted
an
abutters
meeting
for
690
East
8th
Street
on
September
21st
2022
10
Butters
attended
the
meeting
three
directed
Butters
expressed
their
support
for
the
proposal.
We
received
one
letter
from
a
direct
debutter
who
opposes
the
proposal
because
of
the
curb
cut
removing
street
parking
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
O
Good
evening
from
Council
presidents
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
recording
support.
The
proposal
receive
support
from
her
neighbors
due
to
the
proponents,
through
Community
engagement
process,
the
Council
on
human
support
of
The
Proposal,
due
to
concerns
on
the
safety
of
our
seniors
and
accessibility
to
her
vehicle
and
home,
especially
during
winter
months,
with
difficult
conditions
of
snow
and
ice,
as
well
as
positive
feedback
from
our
neighbors.
Thank
you,
madam.
C
B
F
D
F
C
Report
this
is
a
proposed
driveway
curb
cut
for
Osprey
parking
for
two
vehicles:
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
air
accessory
uses,
article
56
and
43
Austria
loading
and
pogging
location
of
the
r
street
blocking
is
not
permitted
in
the
front
yard.
Article
50,
section,
43,
Osprey
parking
and
loading
r
street
parking,
design
and
maneuverability
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
S
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
great
good
evening,
everyone,
members
of
the
boy,
my
name
is
Rufus.
Falk
I
live
at
sixth
Swing
Street
I
am
the
home
owner,
I
am
proposing
off
street
parking,
it
would
accommodate
up
to
two
vehicles
and
I
I.
The
best
expression
is
the
street
is
a
cul-de-sac.
Street,
and
you
know,
I've
lived
in
this
location
for
27
years
and
both
my
wife
and
I.
S
We
work
every
day
and
we
come
home
and
we
cannot
park
in
front
of
our
house
or
you're
parking
off
Street.
Most
of
the
houses
are
single
family
and
you
know
we're
just
asking
that
foreign
park
in
front
of
your
house.
It's
just
we're
we're
living
in
Roxbury
in
the
Fort
Hill
area.
S
It's
just
an
increasing
amount
of
non-resident
parking
on
the
street,
mostly
single
family,
and
so
what
we're
experiencing
is
homes
that
are
on
the
Main
Street
that
intersects
the
wing
individuals
are
parking
under
the
street
and
it's
just
creating
a
real
tough
time
for
us.
B
Are
there
any
residential,
you
know
permit
requirements
on
your
street.
S
No,
there
are
not
any
any
sort
of
indications
that
I
I
believe
it's
been
proposed
several
times,
but
it
just
hasn't
happened.
S
I
I,
don't
know
that's
the
case,
but
I
am
it's
been
over
a
decade
since
that's
happened,
it
could
possibly
change.
The
scenario
certainly
would
reduce
the
number
of
cars
on
the
street,
especially
overnight
parking.
B
Thank
you,
Miss
benaporazzo,.
D
The
the
drawings
are
somewhat
adequate.
I,
don't
really
have
a
good
kind
of
view
of
the
depth
of
the
driveway,
but
what
I
do
know
is
that
it's
still
very
narrow.
It
doesn't
really
meet
btd's
driveway
Dimensions,
but
I
would
like
to
hear
from
I
would
like
to
hear
from
BTD.
If
Mark
has
it
on
the.
C
Record
yeah
I
do
I,
do
math
Karen
Hans.
They
do
have
it.
Regarding
sixth
Wing
Street
Ward
11.
It
does
have
front
yard
parking
in
Bob
D'amico
from
BTD
request,
denial,
people.
J
Okay,
Madame
I'm,
sorry
this
is
a
zba
Ambassador
can
I
just
jump
in,
as
as
that
was
the
rocks
by
liaison.
I
could
just
speak
to
the
the
process
of
trying
to
get
resident
parking
on
that
street.
When
I
was
a
liaison
yeah
between
2018
it
was,
it's
been
really
tricky.
It's
something
that
they've
been
advocating
for
for
a
few
years.
It
has
been
really
tough.
A
lot
of
people
seem
to
be
in
support
of
off
street
parking
on
the
street,
based
on
some
of
the
feedback.
J
I
got
as
a
liaison,
but
just
wanted
to
throw
that
in
there.
It
is
a
small,
Street
and
I
believe
some
people
do
have
Front
Street
confront
parkings
in
the
front
yard,
from
not
mistaken
Mr
Paul.
You
can
mention.
J
Years
they've
been
trying
to
get
the
resident
Park
and
it's
just
been
you
know
just
the
process
has
been
tricky
if.
I
My
if
I'm
I
may
also
add
to
this
BTD
pause
their
resident
parking
program
since
two
years
ago.
Yes-
and
it's
installed
ever
since
so
they're,
not
they're,
not
letting
any
new
requests
through
and
they
don't
know
when
they're
gonna,
because.
S
And
I
would
like
to
also
add
back
in
2012
when
I
applied,
just
as
a
reminder,
I
I
was
able
to
get
the
permit
approved
and
for
whatever
family
reasons.
I
could
not
proceed
with
the
work
and
I'm
hoping
that
the
you
know,
requirements
haven't
changed
in
that
time,
and-
and
you
know
this,
the
street
is-
is
just
continuous.
It's
just
not
getting
getting
better
I
I
I
I
entertained.
The
idea
that
permit
Park
and
for
Roxbury
would
be
certainly
helpful,
but
I.
S
My
neighbors
right
next
to
me
budding
or
right
next
to
me
has
no
issue
and
we've
had
a
conversation,
and
there
is
enough
room.
I
I,
don't
drive
a
huge
SUV,
I
drive
a
very
minimal
sized
car
and
getting
in
and
out
of
the
vehicle
is
when
be
an
issue
for
me.
Madam.
C
D
D
I
Yes,
good
evening,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
and
tell
everybody
it
says
what
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood,
Services,
ons
hosting
the
Buddies
meeting
on
September
28th
and
no
opposition
was
raced
at
this
time.
Our
office
would
like
to
put
for
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
R
Yeah,
my
name
is
Alexander
zaconino
I
live
at
20,
Swing
Street.
My
parents
live
here
as
well
and
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
on
this
or
not,
but
we
fully
support
rufus's
requests
for
this,
whether
it's
too
small
whatever
for
BTD
there
needs
to
be
more
parking.
If
people
have
space
to
park
a
car
on
their
property,
that
would
be
ideal.
R
Their
issue
of
Resident
parking
stickers
has
been
brought
up
at
you
know
different
neighborhood
and
you
know
a
Butters
meetings
and
this
and
that
and
it's
a
very
mixed
bag.
Some
people
like
the
idea
some
people,
don't
because
that
there's
no
parking
for
guests
there's
a
lot
of
of
houses
on
the
street
that
don't
have
of
private
parking
areas
at
all.
I,
don't
know
what
a
front
yard
parking
is.
Do
you
mean
street
parking
or
what
is
front
yard
parking.
D
P
D
But
that's
not
real,
that's
not
the
that's!
Not
the
concern.
That's
right!
That's
what
that's
one,
because
in
in
the
Google
images
that
I
see,
I
can
see
that
you
have
depth.
So
one
is
your
drawings
they're
not
adequate
enough.
That
shows
the
whole
lot
the
depth
of
it.
The
other
issue
is
you're.
Literally,
it's
you're
parking
between
two
house
structures
that
only
have
eight
feet
clearance.
You.
S
S
Is
not
as
incorrect
the
the
eight
foot
Dimension
you're
seeing
is
from
my
house
to
my
property
line
and
from
my
property
line
to
my
neighbor's
house
is
another
three
feet.
S
Well,
like
you
have
a,
let's
see
the
survey
drawing
by
Brewer
Construction
he
within
that
drawing
you'll.
Well,
yes,
this
drawing
here
here
we
go
yes,
so
what
you're?
Looking
at
my
house
is
on
the
right.
There's
a
property
line
and
you'll
see
that
my
neighbor's
structure,
my
my
engineering.
S
D
Isn't
like
a
foot
six
but
I
do
see
that
there's
a
line
of
brick,
that
is,
that
is
kind
of
on
your
property
line.
A.
S
The
property
line-
that's
visible
on
this,
drawing
between
that
property
line,
my
property
line
and
my
neighbor's
property
line
that
Dimension
to
his
house
is
clearly
over
three
feet.
So
there's
an
offense
there's
just
surface
there,
so
if
I
were
to
pull
into
the
driveway,
the
I
could
pull
fully
in
the
back
end
of
my
car
would
I
would
have
enough
room
to
go
into
the
driveway.
S
It's
clearly,
at
least
in
my
opinion,
it
there's
enough
room
to
get
into
the
driveway
in
the
rear
of
my
car
would
be
basically
off
street
parking.
It
would
be
beyond
the
corner
of
my
house,
where
it's
the
arrowhead,
where
it
says
parking.
B
Service,
thank
you.
Mr
folk
I
think
let's
continue
all
the
testimony
and
then
we'll
entertain
a
motion.
Okay,.
L
Hi
I
am
a
neighbor
and
I
live
on
a
street
that
intersects
Highland
Street,
like
the
winged
Street,
does.
L
Name
is
Tracy,
my
home,
my
home
address
is
39,
Fulda
Street,
okay
go
ahead,
and
what
we're
both
experiencing
is
the
Overflow
of
parking
from
Highland
Street,
with
rooming
houses
and
short-term
rentals,
and
a
lot
of
out-of-state
vehicles,
and
also
commercial
vehicles,
parking
on
folda
and
also
on
Valentine
Street
and
then
cutting
through
fold
the
street
to
get
the
Highland
and
like
the
Rings,
The
Wing
Street
as
well
or
any
of
the
streets
up
the
hill.
Because
of
the
parking
is
that
bad?
L
It's
getting
to
the
point,
but
it
is
like
South
Boston
parking.
My
street
has
several
tow
zones
because
it's
a
very
narrow
Street
as
well
and
I'm
in
support
because
it
would
alleviate
any
help.
Getting
any
Vehicles
off
the
street
off
street
parking
would
help
alleviate
the
problem
because
it
gets
worse
in
the
winter,
because
there's
nowhere
to
throw
the
snow
and
what
happens
also
is
that
people
feel
entitled
to
block
legal.
L
You
know
like
I,
have
two
driveways
and
people
block
the
driveway,
because
it's
a
winter
storm
and
there's
nowhere
to
park.
You
know
so
it's
and
I've
been
there
18
years,
but
I
lived
in
Roxbury
since
1998.
same
thing
and
it's
just
gotten
worse.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Ma'am.
B
I
pressed
the
wrong
button,
may
I
have
a
motion.
D
Madam
chair,
given
that
btd's
concern
was
Frontier
parking
and
I
didn't
have
enough
adequate
drawings
to
understand
the
depth
for
the
proposal
of
two
cars
to
park.
In
that
space,
I
would
like
to
recommend
that
the
applicant
does
a
deferral
to
give
them
enough
time
to
do
a
full
plot
plan
and
to
show
the
two
parking
spaces.
D
Better
site
survey
correct
with
Dimensions
I
would
like
to
so.
My
motion
is
for
the
applicant
to
defer
motion
for
deferral.
C
F
D
S
C
Appreciate
it
calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
137-1101
to
Carlisle
Street.
This
is
creating
a
curb
cut
and
constructing
a
new
driveway
for
two
vehicles:
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one,
the
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses,
an
article
56
and
43
r
street
parking
and
loading
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
Okay,
we
can
come
back
to
it,
we'll
do
the
last
we'll
do
the
next
case.
Thank
you.
Colin
case
boa
136
8923-37
blakeville
Street.
This
is
an
extension
of
the
second
floor
unit.
To
add
addicts
add
to
the
attic
as
one
unit
the
violations,
article
65
section
9.
The
48
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
to
the
record.
Please.
B
C
Madam,
chair
I,
guess
that
nobody's
opportunities
next
two
cases
I,
don't
see
any
racing,
anybody
raising
their
hands
I'm,
going
to
call
them
back
into
the
record
and
then
go
from
there.
Thank
you
case.
Boa
137-11012,
Carlisle
Street.
It's
now
5
43
I'm
gonna
make
a
most
of
it
in
Iowa
doll
prejudice.
B
C
D
F
B
Is
better
Baraza,
yes
share
concurs
motion
carries
I.
Think
that
concludes
our
subcommittee
hearing.
Thank.