►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 5-4-21
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing held on 5-4-21
A
Morning,
the
city
of
boston's
zoning
board
of
appeal
hearing
for
may
4th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
the
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
A
A
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
interests
and
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
A
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
a
please
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application,
via
the
webex
event
platform.
To
raise
your
hand.
First
click,
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised,
virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand
again.
A
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
asked,
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads
the
address
into
the
record.
A
I
would
like
to
request
that
everybody
put
their
speaker
on
mute
so
that
we
have
no
feedback
board,
of
course
unmute
yourself,
but
anybody
in
the
audience.
Anybody
in
here
as
a
panelist,
please
meet
yourself,
so
we
do
not
get
the
feedback
before
we
start
I'd
just
like
to
take
a
roll
call.
Mr
fortune.
D
E
A
C
G
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
daniel,
toscano,
an
attorney
at
law,
one
state
street
boston,
mass
and
we're
respectfully
requesting
an
extension
to
this
matter.
We
conducted
the
bpda
design
review
and,
unfortunately,
covert
hit
in
the
middle
of
proceedings,
so
hoping
that
we
can
get
an
extension,
so
we
can
move
forward
with
this
project.
C
A
C
C
C
A
C
Calling
your
next
case
the
building
code,
hboa
116,
4272-119,
west
newt.
This
is
a
roof
deck
to
be
constructed
at
119,
west
newton
violations
of
9th
edition
780
cmr
1011
stairways,
10,
11.1
2.2.
All
steel
waste
used
for
the
roof.
Access
to
an
occupied
roof
shall
be
a
penthouse,
not
a
hatch
amy.
Now,
just
for
the
record,
please.
J
J
Isd
came
back
to
us
with
a
code
citing
a
code
violation
noting
that
the
roof
access
should
be
through
a
penthouse,
but
that's
in
conflict
with
the
south
end
zoning
bylaws,
which
do
not
allow
penthouses
and
we're
proposing
an
accessible
hatch,
skylight
hatch,
to
reach
the
roof
deck,
and
we've
also
sent
this
information
to
the
pilot
block,
neighborhood
association
and
they've.
They
had
no
opposition
to
that
when
we
said.
E
C
Q
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lin's
245
sumner
street
east
boss,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
imam
here,
I'm
well
aware
of
the
board's
admonitions
previously
on
deferrals.
This
project
was
started
some
time
back.
It
does
involve
basement
units.
I
understand
that
the
bpda's
recommendation
on
this
is
for
approval
subject
to
a
proviso
that
there
are
no
basement
units
that
will
require
us
to
go
back
and
look
at
the
programming
for
this
building.
I
also
understand
the
mayor's
office.
C
R
R
Q
C
C
C
Article
53,
section
9
lottery
is
insufficient
article
53
section
9,
the
additional
lottery
reason
sufficient
article
53,
section
9.
The
building
kite
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53,
section,
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
53,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
and
article
53,
section
9,
the
rare
yacht,
is
insufficient
named
address
to
the
rex.
Please.
S
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
ryan
spitz
of
council
to
adams
and
marantzy
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway,
south
boston
with
me
today
is
james
rissling,
who
is
the
architect
as
well
as
karen
o'sullivan,
who
is
the
owner?
Madam
chair,
this
is
a
an
application
for
a
change
of
occupancy
from
a
three-family
dwelling
to
a
four-family
dwelling,
with
no
work
to
be
performed
to
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building.
Previously,
this
building
was
a
while.
Currently,
the
building
is
a
three
family
with
an
in-law
suite.
S
That
is
that
that
is
within
the
partial
part
of
the
third
floor,
as
well
as
the
fourth
floor.
So
again
this
is
there's.
This
is
all
the
existing
violations
were
pre-existing
here
there
was
one
violation
that
you
will
notice
that
was
picked
up,
which
is
the
building
height
excessive
in
the
building
height
between
stories
and
feet.
Those
two
violations
were
picked
up
due
to
a
an
erection
of
a
structure
on
the
roof
that
you'll
notice
that
erect.
S
That
structure
was
put
in
place
for
a
second
means
of
egress
for
the
safety
and
the
well-being
of
the
tenants.
That
was
done
without
the
the
knowledge
of
a
contractor
pulling
any
sort
of
the
proper
permit.
So
we're
also
here
today
to
legalize
that
again,
just
for
the
safety
and
the
well-being
of
those
tenants
to
have
a
second
means
of
being.
A
S
A
S
S
Okay,
so
we
scroll
so
the
unit
area
is
unit.
1
right
here
is
you'll
notice.
That
unit
1
is
549
square
feet.
Unit
2
is
602
square
feet.
Unit,
3
is
530
square
feet
and
the
proposed
unit
number
four
would
be
it
would
be
618
square
feet
all
of
these
units
already
having
separate
utilities
to
the
units
as
well.
That's
why
I
refer
to
it
as
an
in-law
suite.
S
U
V
S
Well,
that's
what
we're
that's!
The
change
of
occupancy
now
is
to
a
four
family
previously,
so
the
owner
purchased
this
building.
It
was
the
way
it
currently
lied
back
in
2013
and
that's
how
it
was
always
referred
to
and
separated.
Yes,
as
you
can
see
now
I
mean
giving
the
close
proximity
to
maverick
train
station.
You
know
the
size
of
that
unit.
Number
three
wouldn't
need
to
be
double
that
size
of
splitting.
The
units
would
be
a
perfectly
fit
for
this
neighborhood.
V
S
V
W
E
Y
Good
morning,
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board
lena
tramelling,
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
will
have
to
go
on
the
regular
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
received
strong
support
from
the
apparent
and
from
jeffrey's
point
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
AA
C
AB
Yes,
so
the
deck
will
only
be
I
personally
reside
in
unit
number
three.
The
deck
will
solely
be
for
the
responsibility
of
unit
3..
This
is
just
a
brand
new
redone
building
and
turned
from
a
single
family
into
a
three
family
within
the
building
itself.
Within
my
unit
itself,
the
way
we're
going
to
access
the
roof
deck
is
through
a
staircase
that
resides
in
our
living
room
through
a
head
house
and
which
you
can
see
right
there
at
the
top
of
the
of
the
screen.
AB
A
T
So
this
is
there
just
to
confirm.
Also
the
access
to
this
is
actually
through
a
hatch,
not
the
head
house,
correct.
Yes,
just
for
the
board.
So
it's
there's.
There
is
an
existing
head
house
there,
but
it's
a
mechanical
head
house,
but
this
access
is
going
to
be
through
the
hatch,
as
you
can
see
it
on
the
plan.
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lena
tramelli,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
learn
the
recurring
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
receives
strong
support
from
jeffrey's
point
neighborhood
association
and
from
abarth.
Thank
you.
AA
D
C
Thank
you
follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
117,
319
665
falcon
streets.
Let's
direct
a
four
unit
residential
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
53
section
56
rp
parking-
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
minute
building
53
section
9,
the
fourier
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
C
Q
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lin's,
245,
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
pasquale
gorchino,
also
with
me,
is
adam
gibbons,
who
is
the
project
architect?
I'm
chair.
This
is
a
proposed
infill
development
in
the
eagle
hill
section
of
east
boston.
It
is
on
the
what
I
consider
to
be
relatively
the
first
major
block
of
falcon
street
as
you
come
up
from
the
main
street
at
meridian
street.
The
general
character
of
this
area
is
a
mix
of
multi-family
and
triple
decker
style
dwellings.
Q
Our
proposal
is
for
a
four-unit
four-story
structure
on
the
vacant
lot,
which
you're
seeing
here
in
the
in
the
photo.
I
would
point
out
that
this
lot
is
separately
assessed
and
separately
titled.
This
is
not,
although
there
is
parking
on
it,
there's
parking
for
area
vehicles
in
the
neighborhood,
but
it
is
not.
It
is
not
permitted
to
be
used
for
open-air
parking
under
the
under
the
inspectional
services
guidelines.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please.
Q
So
what
we're
showing
we
can
jump
back
to
the
rendering
again
so
we're
showing
you
the
rendering
of
the
proposed
structure.
As
you
can
see
here,
the
relationship
to
the
existing
triple
deckers,
a
couple
of
things
to
point
out
is
that
the
structures
on
either
side
certainly
have
the
raised
elevat
raised
basements
based
upon
when
they
were
constructed.
Q
A
Q
We
are
actually
not
showing
a
roof
deck
during
the
community
process.
We
eliminated
the
roof
deck
at
the
request
of
one
of
the
butters
along
the
street
at
west
eagle
street.
So
at
this
time
we
are
not
proposing
a
roof
deck,
but
that's
something
that
certainly
they
would
revisit
with
the
community
if
they
decide
to
do
that.
To
do
that.
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
lena
tremeling
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
run
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal.
We
recognized
there
were
some
and
concerns
regarding
parking
and
height
of
the
building
during
the
community
process,
but
the
applicant
addressed
several
of
the
concerns
of
their
buyers
and
we
received
eight
letters
of
support,
including
from
a
virus
including
two
directories.
Thank
you.
C
Q
Z
D
C
W
C
C
Article
53
section
9
excessive
far
article
53
section
9,
the
number
of
stories
has
been
exceeded.
Article
53
section,
9
of
the
maximum
law
of
height,
have
been
exceeded.
Radical
53,
section
9
exhibition
universal,
open
space,
article
53,
section,
9,
side
setback,
article
53,
section
9-
is
insufficient
additional
lottery
per
unit.
So
everybody
hear
me
that
typically
had
a
little
audio.
Did
you
hear
the
beginning
and
violation.
AD
AC
A
AC
A
AC
AC
We
have
2483
square
feet
in
lot
size
our
floor
plans
just
to
go
over
them
are
lower
level,
so
there'd
be
nothing
in
the
basement
except
mechanical
common
mechanical
room.
Our
first
floor
would
host
our
main
entrance
and
our
first
unit
would
be
ada
accessible
by
way
of
lift.
Once
you
get
into
the
foyer
the
unit.
One
is
a
725
square
foot
one
bedroom
one
bath
as
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor.
AC
It's
a
975
square
foot,
three
bedroom,
two
bath
third
floor,
950
square
foot,
three
bedroom,
two
bath
and
finally,
our
fourth
floor
unit
is
a
thousand
square
foot
three
bedroom
two
bath,
the
violations
that
were
mentioned,
the
use,
although
it's
mixed,
there
are
some
of
the
fours
in
the
area.
It
is
a
3f
zone
and
we're
proposing
four
units
a
lot
area.
So
we
would.
We
have
483
square
feet
of
additional
space.
We
would
need
a
thousand
for
our
additional
unit.
AC
AC
Sure
so
there
is
a
existing
passageway
five
feet
on
each
side
of
buildings,
us
in
the
building
next
door
to
75..
You
would
enter
a
10-foot
passageway.
You
would
go
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
I
believe
we
also
in
our
plan,
show
the
parking
spaces
laid
out
and
back,
and
there
are
three
parking
spaces:
they're,
eight
by
16
foot
spaces,
so
they're
compact
spaces,
but
there
there's
currently
no
spaces
on
the
site.
Now,
that's
the
picture
right.
There.
Sorry.
C
AC
AC
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
lena
tramelli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
want
the
recurring
support
for
this
report
during
the
community
process.
The
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
of
diabetes
and
this
proposal
received
support
from
maverick
central
neighborhood
association,
with
the
proviso
of
adina
street
iii
near
the
property
and
providing
at
least
three
parking
spaces.
We
also
received
10
letters
of
support
for
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
A
AA
C
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jeff
hanson
senior
zoning
planner
at
the
bpda.
We
recommended
denial
without
prejudice
based
on
the
height
of
the
structure
and
also
with
the
influence
that
landmarks
hasn't
received
in
the
article
88
85
application.
Yet,
and
we
were
in
agreement
with
mr
d'amico
from
btd
about
the
number
of
spaces
either
they
should
be
reduced
or
eliminated.
A
And
then
so,
if
we
pair
that,
with
the
the
notice
from
maverick
that
it's
their
approval
is
contingent
on
the
three
parking
spaces
and-
and
we
understand
that
those
three
spaces
cannot
be
provided
from
the
technical
expertise
from
mr
d'amico,
that
you
know
that's
what
we
should
take
into
consideration.
As
we
proceed
with
our
decision.
D
C
Thank
you
call
your
next
case
calling
voa
112
8243
14
murray
court.
This
is
a
spiral
stairway
on
falcon,
including
to
the
roof,
deck
and
construction
of
a
roof
deck.
The
violations,
article
9
section,
1,
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building,
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restrictions
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AE
AF
Y
AA
A
F
A
AE
A
AE
F
A
Q
So,
mr
hampton
is
correct:
there
was
originally
a
proposal
in
2012
that
was
abandoned.
The
board
heard
this
case
for
the
construction
of
the
current
building
in
january
of
2016,
at
which
time
was
approved,
the
only
proviso
were
bpda
design,
review
and
no
relief
in
the
building
code,
respect
to
521
cmr.
Q
A
Q
C
C
All
right
for
the
record
calling
voa
116
3168
18r
union
park.
This
is
a
construct,
a
new
two-car
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
existing
single
family
home
at
18
union
park,
the
entrance
to
the
garage
from
public
alley
701
at
the
rear
of
18
union
dog,
the
violations,
article
32,
section
4.
This
is
gcod
applicability,
article
64
section
9,
the
dimensional
regulations
accessory
building
article
64
section
36,
our
street
parking,
lowering
design
size
and
article
64
section
37.4,
the
rear
yard
setback,
a
four
foot
minimum
name
and
address
for
the
record
place.
AG
AG
AG
AG
AG
So
the
upper
left
left-hand
corner
shows
it's
a
two-car
garage.
The
mouth
of
the
garage
door
is
18
feet.
The
design
requirements
for
parking
spaces
are
eight
and
a
half
by
twenty.
So
for
two
spaces
we
need
seventeen
feet
of
space
and
we
have
18
proposed.
We
need
20
feet
in
depth
and
we
have
22
proposed.
So
the
parking
spaces
meet
the
design
requirements
of
article
64..
AG
A
AG
So
if
we
could
scroll
down
a
couple
of
slides,
I
took
photos
of
the
existing
context
of
public
alley.
701
starting
right
here
on
shaman
at
the
entrance
to
ali.
Is
this
structure
here
next
slide?
Please,
as
you
go
from
sham
down
public
alley,
701
you'll
see
on
the
right
hand,
side,
starting
with
the
cinder
block,
building
on
shaman,
there's
a
succession
of
six
existing
garages
that
have
already
been
constructed,
and
this
would
be
number
seven
on
this
particular
stretch.
AG
AH
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
christian
seminole,
boston,
groundwater
trust,
and
we
have
both
the
aosc
approval
and
no
harm
letters
from
the
applicant.
There
is
an
updated
set
of
revised
plans
to
account
for
the
additional
footage
for
the
garage
which
water
and
sewer
has
approved.
I
just
haven't
issued
the
approval
letter
yet,
but
the
current
letter
that
we
have
does
meet
the
one-inch
capture
requirement
for
the
g
cut.
So
I'm
comfortable
with
with
proceeding
with
the
existing
letter.
C
Yes,
madam
chair,
mr
d'amico
has
spoken
this
one
as
well
from
btd.
Don't
put
that
into
the
record
regarding
18r
union
park.
He
believes
that
design
can
work.
However,
due
to
the
proximity
to
the
public
way,
he
would
suggest
that
video
and
audio
alarm
can
be
included
to
warn
a
pedestrian
of
oncoming
vehicles.
T
AG
Yep,
so
the
material
proposed,
mr
robinson,
is
a
board-formed
concrete
wall,
which
is
a
decided
design,
design
choice
by
my
clients,
working
with
the
architect,
and,
as
you
are
aware,
the
finished
look
of
board
formed
concrete
wall.
Is
that
it?
It
reads
like
wood
plank.
So
it's
not
red
brick,
but
this
stretch
of
alley
has
a
variety
of
design
styles
for
the
existing
garages.
Some
are
brick.
Some
are
clad
and
copper.
AG
AI
Hi
yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kim
crucioli
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
on
march
3rd
and
support
was
given
by
their
director
voters
and
any
concerns
were
appropriately
addressed
by
the
applicant.
Thank
you
thank.
AJ
AA
F
C
On
your
next
case,
calling
voa
114
four
three
two:
fifty
one
hill
learn
street.
This
is
to
operate
a
supporting
outdoor
sale
of
used
car
business.
There's
no
work
on
site
will
be
contracts
with
the
service
company.
The
parking
lot
holds
more
than
30
vehicles,
but
would
leave
parking
for
the
office
staff
and
visitors.
The
violations,
article
6
section,
3a,
additional
condition
in
the
restricted
parking
district
article
65,
section,
15
outdoor
seal
of
used
motor
vehicles
is
forbidden,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
M
Good
morning,
man
and
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
actress
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
my
client
is
joseph
karenti,
who
is
the
owner
of
fleet
corps
a
fleet
management
services
business
that
he
founded
in
2002.
M
M
Mr
currently,
as
I
said,
has
been
operating
the
business
for
since
2002.
At
this
location
he
has
been
providing
shuttle
vans
that
would
be
parked
on
site
and
that
would
leave
the
site
and
shuttle
passengers
between
logan
international
airport
predominantly
and
various
locations
in
the
greater
boston
area.
As
can
be
imagined,
his
business
was
decimated
during
the
pandemic.
M
What
he
would
like
to
do
now
is
change
the
operations
of
the
business
from
storing
these
vans
on
site
and
and
running
the
shuttle
business
from
the
site
to
selling
shuttle
bands
to
to
end-use
end-user
buyers,
so
changing
it
from
providing
fleet
shuttle
services
to
actually
selling
the
vans.
Nothing
would
change
in
terms
of
the
site.
There
are
parking
spaces
on
site
for
30
vehicles,
plus
10
spaces
for
visitors
in
employee
parking.
Nothing
would
change
with
that
with
the
number
of
spaces.
M
As
I
said,
it
would
just
be
the
nature
of
the
operation.
The
violations
under
the
applicable
li
zoning
are
the
outdoor
sale
of
motor
vehicles,
which
is
a
forbidden
use.
As
I
say,
the
vehicles
are
already
stored
on
site
outside
and
additional
conditions
in
a
restricted
parking
district,
which
is
a
conditional
use
standard
under
article
six.
With
that
I'll
pause
I'll.
Take
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
M
It's
actually
a
total
40,
so
there
are
30
vehicles
right
now
that
are
in
the
fleet,
services
that
are
currently
going.
You
know
that
would
that
you
know
would
have
been
available
into
the
previous
model
of
going
out
as
shuttle
buses.
There
are
10
additional
parking
spaces
on
site.
Six
of
those
are
employee
spaces
for
a
visitor
spaces,
so
it's
30
spaces.
You
know,
would
change
in
terms
of
from
being
vehicles
being
stored
there
for
shuttle
services
to
being
sold
from
there.
No
screening
and
buffering
is
proposed.
M
I
had
actually
submitted
photos
of
the
site.
Aerial
photos
with
the
presentation,
but
apparently
I
didn't
didn't
make
it
in
terms
of
oh
there
we
go
so
there's
a
good
view
of
the
site.
I
mean
I,
I
understand
that
typically
or
outdoor
motor
vehicles,
whether
it's
sales
or
storage,
screening
and
buffering
is
required.
This
is
most
likely
a
fairly
short-term
use,
but
of
course
you
know
whatever
whatever
the
board
desires
were
to
see
fit
to
approve
this
in
terms
of
provides
those.
My
client
would
of
course
comply
with
that.
M
M
C
D
D
M
Yeah,
mr
ruggiero
george,
francis
speaking,
sorry
to
interrupt,
but
we
actually
discussed
this
during
community
process
and-
and
I
suggested
it
because
I
I
anticipated
that
it
would
be
a
proviso
of
the
board.
With
respect
to
the
plans,
I
mean
I
not
to
not
to
advise
the
board
of
the
job,
but
I'd
be
happy
to
get
a
better
site
plan.
If
the
board
did
wish
c
to
approve
this
and
wish
to
hold
signatures,
you
know
the
site
plan
is
what
it
is.
It's
rather
crude.
AL
Z
A
M
M
A
F
A
W
A
T
AJ
M
I
think,
just
last
year,
so
you
know
I
don't
have
any
long-term
experience
with
this
as
a
site,
as
I
said,
my
belief
is
that
the
billboard
is
on
the
land,
that's
owned
by
my
client,
on
which,
mr
currently
you
know
his
business
exists
where
he
rents
for
my
client,
but
I
don't
have
any
information
on
the
billboard
except.
I
just
know
from
experience
that
it's
been
there
for
a
very
long
time.
A
M
A
M
A
C
C
D
Z
C
Following
your
next
case,
calling
boa
1144288
150
to
152
state
street,
this
is
a
change
of
occupancy
to
cannabis,
establishment
and
modify
existing
layout
and
conditions
of
the
building
interior.
The
violation
article
45
section,
14
cannabis
establishment
use
is
conditional
in
article
45,
section
14,
the
cannabis
established
location
shall
be
cited
at
least
one
half
mile
or
2
640
feet
from
another
existing
cannabis
establishment.
AN
Philip
silverman
vicente
cedarburg
to
seaport
lane
in
boston
here
for
verdiant,
which
is
the
proposed
operator
of
the
marijuana
business,
and
I'm
here
with
the
company's
ceo,
tito
jackson
and
the
architect
david
freed,
showing
you
slides
for
for
a
retail
marijuana
establishment
in
a
marijuana
product
manufacturing
business
at
150
to
152
state
street
hours
of
operation
will
be
10
a.m
to
9,
00
p.m.
Okay,.
A
AN
So
if
you
take
a
look
on
this
slide
on
the
first
floor,
it's
the
second
picture
over
from
the
left.
That's
the
entry!
There's
an
entry
vestibule
that
you're,
probably
used
to
seeing
you
show
id
customer
shows
id
outside
that
vestibule
is
buzzed
in
shows
it
a
second
time
in
that
vestibule
to
the
security
people
behind
a
partition
and
is
then
buzzed
in
further
to
one
of
three
sales
areas.
The
first
floor
sales
area
is
really
queuing,
but
also,
if
you've
made
an
online
order,
you
can
receive
it
there
on.
AN
The
left
is
an
online
order
desk.
Other
customers
that
aren't
haven't
made
an
online
order
will
be
directed
up
the
stairs
or
via
elevator
to
the
second
and
third
floor,
where
we
have
additional
retail
spaces.
So
it's
really
an
interior
cueing
process
of
moving
the
customers
in
and
up
to
the
various
floors.
So
we
have
a
lot
of
room
to
sort
of
not
have
to
have
any
exterior
cueing.
A
AN
AN
We
have
all
the
standard
we
have
exterior
security
to
make
sure
nobody's
using
the
the
product
outside
or
around
the
premises.
We
do
quite
a
bit
of
patient
education,
sign
a
community
customer
norms,
agreement,
interior
security
as
well
and,
of
course,
all
of
the
exterior
cameras,
interior
cameras
on
every
door,
every
window,
every
room
where
marijuana
is
handled
or
stored.
AN
Third
floor
as
well:
yeah
we
use
the
fourth
floor
as
administrative
offices
fifth
floor
is
a
a
staff
room.
You
know
where
they
eat
lunch
meet
sixth
floor.
Has
a
conference
room
there's
also
a
a
fulfillment
area
up
on
that
floor,
where
we
get
the
orders,
fill
them
and
then
walk
them
down
the
back
staircase,
which
is
separated
from
the
rest
of
the
building,
so
no
customers
can
get
there.
AN
Manufacturing
occurs
in
the
basement
of
the
building.
You
can
it's
all
of
the
types
of
products,
edibles,
vaporizer
pens.
We
do
extraction
of
the
product
in
the
basement
and
we
also
do
you
know
turning
it
into
some
products.
Edible
products
and
such
there's
also
a
dedicated
vault
down
on
that
floor.
So,
at
the
end
of
every
day,
any
of
those
products
go
into
the
vault
and
they
come
out
the
next
morning
again,
if
we
they
need
further
work
but
generally
they're
stored
down.
There.
AN
A
T
AO
T
A
AJ
AJ
AJ
AA
AQ
My
name
is
tito
jackson.
I
live
at
37
schuyler
street
dorchester
mass
zero,
two
one,
two
one.
It
is
our
objective
and
we
actually
named
this
company
verdict
reparative
to
actually
use
our
hiring
practices
as
a
reparative
measure
for
the
failed
war
on
drugs.
We
are
setting
aside
20
of
our
jobs
for
individuals
who
are
prior
offenders
or
re-entering
citizens.
V
A
A
Good
morning,
the
city
of
boston's
zoning
board
of
appeal
hearing
for
may
4th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
these
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
A
A
Just
let
me
repeat
that
please
raise
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand
as
the
ambassador
was
saying
it,
it
does
not
hurt
for
you
to
also
send
us
written
testimony
or
written
information
for
the
record,
as
as
we
do
at
the
beginning
of
the
day,
I
will
take
attendance
so
that
we
and
and
and
everybody
in
the
audience
is
aware
of
who
the
board
members
are.
Mr
fortune
still.
D
AR
C
C
117-6325-270-272,
paris
street:
this
is
a
proposed
three-story
addition
above
an
existing
garage
for
eight
new
residential
units
and
rooftech
the
violations
article
27g.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
56
bar
street
parking
and
loading
article
53,
section
9.
The
lot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
flooding
air
ratio
is
successor,
article
53,
section
9,
the
building
heads
excessive
and
stories
article
53,
section,
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
An
article
53
section
is
insufficient
damon
address
for
the
records.
Please.
R
AC
AC
As
was
mentioned,
the
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy,
which
is
an
existing
garage
facility.
It's
an
automotive
garage
to
an
eight
unit,
residential
dwelling
and
that
would
have
13
parking
spaces,
and
this
would
also
include
that's
a
front
picture
of
the
existing
conditions,
also
to
erect
a
three-story
addition.
We
are
keeping
the
existing
structure
and
building
on
top
and
refurbishing
it
and
to
renovate
the
building.
AC
The
zoning
sub-district
in
this
area
is
3f
2000.
Our
lot
size
is
one
of
the
larger
at
6
426
square
feet.
We
are
proposing,
as
we
go
through
the
project
if
we
can
pull
up
the
plans
just
to
go
over
the
layout,
the
first
or
lower
level,
because
there's
a
below
level
grade
and
that
is
entered
that
would
be
for
parking
and
storage
that
is
entered
through
an
existing
curb
cut
on
the
right-hand
side
of
the
building
that
would
have
unit
storage
for
units
one
through
three.
AC
That
would
house
our
elevator
shaft
sprinkle,
a
room
bike
storage
and
would
have
seven
parking
spaces
and
that
would
be
accessed
again
through
the
side.
Curb
cut.
That's
existing
the
first
floor
would
have
our
main
entrance
to
the
building
the
residential
entrance
and
would
have
unit
storage
for
units
four
through
eight.
That
is
also
an
existing
curb
cut
that
would
be
accessed
through
a
garage
door.
That
would
bring
you
right
at
grade
and
that
would
also
house
an
additional
six
parking
spaces.
AC
As
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor
unit,
one
is
a
one
bedroom.
One
bath,
761
square
foot
unit
would
also
house
unit
two,
which
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
with
a
deck
at
a
thousand
1
149
square
feet
would
hose
unit
3,
which
is
a
one
bed,
one
bath
with
a
deck
at
780
square
feet
and
then
unit
four,
which
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
with
a
deck
at
twelve
hundred
and
three
square
feet.
AC
As
we
go
up
to
the
third
floor,
we
recessed
that
third
floor
back
we're
pulled
12
feet
from
paris
street
and
that
houses
units
five
six
and
seven.
Those
are
two
bed
two
bath
all
of
them
unit
three
would
have
a
green
roof
and
that's
a
thousand,
a
green
roof
deck
a
front
deck.
That's
a
thousand
nine
square
foot
unit.
The
other
two
units
on
that
floor
are
a
thousand
one
hundred
and
forty
nine
and
a
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
eight
and
then
finally
our
fourth
floor
unit.
AC
AC
A
AC
A
Y
Proposal
good
morning,
madam
chair
of
members
of
the
book
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
work
with
the
recurring
support
for
this
show.
The
official
neighborhood
services
have
an
apartment
meeting
on
november
4
2020,
where
the
applicant
addressed
several
of
the
concerns
of
the
virus,
and
this
proposal
received
support
from
maverick
central
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
AA
C
Z
Z
Z
E
E
A
AC
C
For
calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
113-3492
putnam
street,
there
is
a
companion
case
of
building
code,
boa
1133542,
putnam
street.
This
is
the
change
of
auctioning
with
three
family
to
a
floor.
Family
constructing
a
new
third
story
edition
for
the
fourth
unit
and
proposed
roof
tech
proportion
for
the
high
street
parking,
the
violation,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
off-street
parking
should
not
be
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side.
C
Lot
line:
article
2017-5
to
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53
section
8
are
multi-family
dwelling
uses
forbidden
article
53,
section,
52
group
structure,
restriction,
article
53,
section
56:
our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53
section,
9
ability
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
53,
section,
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
side
yard
is
insufficient.
C
Article
53
section
9
of
the
rare
yards
insufficient
and
article
9
section
2
changing
the
non-conforming
use.
This
is
for
building
code.
This
is
the
change
of
option
of
3
family
to
a
4
family.
Constructing
new
third
story
edition
for
unit
proposed
roof
tech
and
one
off
street
parking
the
violations,
the
9th
edition
780
cmr
705,
exterior
walls,
705.8.1
allowable
areas,
openings,
the
maximum
area
of
an
unprotected
and
protected
openings
permitted
in
an
exterior
wall
and
any
story
of
the
building
shall
not
be
exceeded.
The
percentage
is
specified
in
the
table.
A
AT
It
is
my
interpretation
on
the
building
code
that
the
additional
third
floor
on
top
we're
not
being
putting
any
windows
along
the
side
of
the
building.
That
is
less
than
three
feet
which,
on
this
plant
is
the
upper
part
of
the
floor
plan.
So
we're
not
putting
in
any
new
windows
on
the
side
that
is
adjacent
to
an
existing
building.
AT
There
was
an
unclarity
as
to
if
the
building
code
applies
to
the
existing
windows
on
the
second
third
and
the
lower
unit.
It
wasn't.
It
wasn't
very
clear
as
to
whether
whether
the
decision
to
interpret
that
on
on
you
know
from
the
isd
was
because
there
are
existing
windows
on
that
side.
There
are
existing
windows,
not
on
the
street
side,
but
on
the
side.
That's
adjacent
to
the
building
on
condor
street.
AT
A
T
AT
AT
Two
levels:
a
first
floor
second
floor
and
then
a
lower
level
basement
unit.
So
the
building
comprises
of
three
units.
The
proposed
area,
total,
would
be
4.
600
is
54
square
feet,
adding
a
third
floor,
and
the
existing
far
currently
is
2.2
and
we're
we're
going
to
propose
for
netflix
r
of
2.5
in
terms
of
the
height
when
the
height
out
of
the
building
is
measured
from
the
highest
point
of
the
grade.
AT
AT
AT
We
went
to
the
board
of
appeals
to
ask
for
relief
to
legalize
the
basement
unit,
and
that
was
the
case
back
in
2016-2017,
but
here
the
owner
would
like
to
add
a
third
floor
with
a
roof
deck
and
it's
the
impetus
for
that
was
the
four-story
building
to
the
west
of
this
project
across
the
street
on
putnam
street
blocking
his
view.
The
owner
currently
lives
on.
The
second
floor
would
like
to
go
up
to
the
third
floor
and
have
a
roof
booster
access.
A
AT
T
T
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lena
tremelin,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal
in
the
community
process.
The
applicant
will
close
with
the
advisors
and
address
their
concerns,
and
this
proposal
receives
support
from
eagle
hill
city
association.
Thank
you.
AA
Z
AU
C
AU
AU
T
A
D
A
C
Following
your
next
case,
calling
voa
116
1114
116
london
street,
this
is
a
change
of
arcs
from
two
family
dwelling
office
to
a
poor
family
dwelling
also
directed
four-story
addition
onto
an
existing
building
and
renovate
constructing
new
exterior
egress
stairs
article
25,
section
5..
This
is
in
the
flood
hat
flood
hazard
district
article
2017-5,
it's
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
article
53
section.
I
am
the
lord
here
for
edition
dwelling
units
insufficient
article
53,
section
9.
The
floyd
area
issue
is
excessive.
C
Article
53
section
9
the
bill
denied
a
successor,
article
53
section
9.
The
bill
in
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
israel
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
rare
yacht
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
52,
restructure
restriction
and
article
53
section
56.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AC
AC
The
proposal,
as
was
mentioned,
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
and
an
office
on
the
first
floor
to
a
four-family
residential
dwelling,
just
to
point
out
that
had
before
my
client
purchased
it
it
had
been
used,
as
residential
just
was
never
properly
changed.
We
are
also
proposing
to
erect
a
fourth
story
edition
and,
as
you
can
see
in
that
picture,
if
you
go
one
up
well,
it
matches
the
buildings
all
along
the
right
in
height.
AC
AC
This
particular
zoning
sub
district
is
a
3f
2000.
Our
lot
size
is
1800
square
feet.
As
we
go
through
the
floor
plans,
the
basement,
it
isn't
a
flood
district.
We
are
not
proposing
anything
in
the
basement,
a
livable
space.
It
would
be
used
for
storage,
utility
and
mechanical
space.
First
floor
would
house
unit
one,
and
that
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
at
a
thousand
seventy
square
feet:
deck
in
the
floor
with
house
unit,
two,
just
a
three
bedroom
two
bath
at
a
thousand
twenty
eight
square
feet.
AC
That
is
a
pre-existing
unit
and
then,
as
we
go
up
to
the
third
and
the
fourth
floor,
those
would
be
duplex
units,
both
of
them
at
1120
square
feet.
Those
are
both
two-bedroom
two-bath,
as,
as
was
mentioned,
the
violations.
This
is
a
three-f
district,
we're
proposing
four
units,
but
we
are
matching
the
buildings
to
the
right
of
us
additional
lot
area.
We
have
800,
so
we
are
under
the
thousand
square
feet
requirement
per
unit.
AC
Our
far
we're
proposing
2.55.
That
is
a
pre-existing
violation.
Our
height
35
feet
is,
what's
allowed
to
wrap
44
feet
and
in
stories.
Four
and
three
is
what's
allowed:
we're
not
changing
the
contours
of
the
building,
we're
not
taking
it
down
or
raising
it.
So
our
open
space
remains
at
493
square
feet,
total
and
300
square
feet.
Per
dwelling
is
required.
Our
rear
yard
is
pre-existing
so.
AC
Y
Good
morning,
members
of
the
board
lina
kamali
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
run
the
recurring
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
abarth
meeting
held
by
the
office
of
the
services
on
september,
22nd
2020,
the
applicant
addressed
the
concerns
of
via
virus,
and
this
proposal
received
support
from
maverick
central
neighborhood
association,
with
the
proviso
of
adidas
street
street
iii
and
nearby
the
property.
Thank
you.
AA
AK
A
C
Madam
chair,
the
next
case
I'm
going
to
recuse
myself,
but
I'm
going
to
call
it
into
the
record
telling
your
next
case
calling
doa
116,
4514
44
west
7th
street.
This
is
a
6
000
square
foot,
pre-engineered,
single-story
storage,
building
to
be
used
by
the
boston
housing
authority
for
dha
central
stores
facility,
the
violations,
article
8
section,
4
forbidden
use,
storage,
buildings,
forbidden
use
and
an
h1
sub
district.
Madam
chair,
I
am
stepping
away
thank
you.
AV
Yes,
my
name
is
john
harding
with
the
community
builders.
Dana
dilworth,
representing
the
boston
housing
authority,
is
also
here,
but
he
has
been
having
trouble
getting
onto
the
webex
platform.
This
is
a
storage
building.
We
are
partnering
with
the
boston
housing
authority
to
work
on
this.
It
is
a
replacement
storage
building
of
another
existing
storage
building.
That's
at
125
emory
street
in
jamaica
plain.
Currently,
this
transition
allows
us
to
open
up
one
two:
five
aim
for
a
digital
element
that
I
believe
went
before
the
board.
AS
A
AS
No
map-
this
is
permanent
storage
for
the
boston
housing
authority
has
used
the
warehouse
building
at
125
amory
street
for
many
years
as
their
sort
of
central
storage
to
to
take
care
of
all
the
properties
across
the
city
and
by
relocating
it,
then
we
are
able
to
create
the
the
land
area
to
build
up
to
350
new
units.
Yes,.
A
AS
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
so
we
we
looked
at
a
number
of
sites,
I
know
dana,
dana
and
and
the
team
we
all
looked
at
a
number
of
sites
around
the
city.
We
settled
on
this
one
for
a
few
reasons.
It
is
on
west
7th
street.
There
will
be.
There
is
an
easy
in
and
out
for
that
it
is
on
the
perimeter
of
the
residential
west
broadway
bha
site.
It's
currently
a
parking
lot.
I
don't
remember
how
many
parking
spaces
there
are
not
too
many,
and
there
has.
AW
AS
AS
A
AL
AJ
AA
A
T
F
AS
C
C
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
104,
6789
ewing
street,
let's
direct
a
new
four
unit
residential
dwelling
and
propose
four
r
street
parking,
the
violation
article
10
section
one-
our
street
parking
should
not
be
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side
lot
line:
article
60
section
40,
our
street
parking
loading
requirement,
article
60
section
8,
multi-family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden.
Article
60,
section,
9,
additional
liabilities,
insufficient
article
60,
section
9,
the
floyd
ratio
is
excessive.
A
AX
Yes,
madam
chair,
so
what's
being
proposed,
is
the
construction
of
four
residential
condominium
units.
Each
will
have
parking
so
there's
a
the
one
to
one
parking
ratio
is
being
achieved,
but
that
is
triggering
the
violation
of
the
front
yard
parking
spot.
One
of
the
spots
is
just
slightly
in
the
front
yard,
which
triggers
that
that
violation,
as
well
as
of
the
second
violation
for
the
up
for
the
off-street
parking,
so
the
first
two
violations
are
both
related
to
that
one
parking
space
that
allows
us
to
achieve
that
one-to-one
ratio.
AX
The
other
violations
are
truly
dimensional,
primarily
to
keep
the
streetscape
the
character
of
the
homes
and
as
well
as
the
floor
area
ratio
that
allows
us
to
keep
the
density,
to
keep
the
project
feasible
and
to
allow
these
for
homeownership
opportunities
and,
as
far
as
the
specific
dimensions
of
each
unit,
I
can
give
you
that
roughly,
but
david
freed
from
arthur
chu
and
associates
is
on
the
line.
I
think
david
could
give
more
specifics
on
the
actual
dimensions.
A
AO
AO
So
the
parking
we
we
really
wanted
to
provide
a
a
10
foot
side
yard
setback
on
the
left
side
adjacent
to
the
the
home.
At
I'm.
Sorry
forget
the
number,
but
maybe
it's
it's
number
15
humans
on
the
right
side.
What
is
directly
abutting
our
property
is
a
garage.
This
is
there
a
lot
line
condition,
so
we
we
made
a
design
decision
to
to
provide
a
compliant
sideyard
setback
on
one
side,
but
yet
have
the
parking
violation
on
the
right
side.
AO
I
T
C
V
AP
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
house
and
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal
as
they
received
support
from
foreign
media
butters,
as
well
as
the
erie
ellington
and
brimsley
partnership,
neighborhood
association
throughout
their
community
process.
Thank
you.
AR
A
A
C
Calling
the
next
case
calling
doa
11609371
westinghouse
plaza.
This
is
to
renovate
building
f
at
the
site
to
include
a
recreational
fitness
facility.
Boss
sports
facility
will
include
indoor
basketball
courts
and
tennis
courts
the
violations
article
69
section
29.
Now
our
street
parking
loan,
the
project
has
insufficient
parking
and
loading
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good
morning.
AY
AY
AY
This
is
going
to
be
a
training
facility
with
three
basketball
courts
and
three
turf
fields.
It's
going
to
be
located
at
one
westinghouse
plaza
in
hyde
park,
which
is
a
industrial
park.
It
is
a
zoning
sub
district
that
is
ally,
2
and
the
relief
that
we
are
looking
for
from
the
board
today
is
related
to
parking.
So,
if
possible,
whoever
is
in
control
of
the
set
that
was
provided.
The
parking
plan
may
be
the
best.
AY
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
man.
That's
a
perfect
question,
so
what
it
means
by
training
facilities.
This
is
not
an
open
gym
that
members
can
just
come
and
go
as
they
choose.
Basically,
teams
will
be
renting
floor
space
on
a
per
hour
basis
and
utilizing
the
space
as
a
team.
The
ideal
participants
or
users
of
the
facility
will
be
youths.
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
AY
Yes,
so
one
of
the
letters
of
support
actually
is
from
the
school,
the
pacific
rim,
which
is
actually
located
at
the
front
of
one
westinghouse,
plaza
it's
not
within
the
industrial
park,
but
I
think
they
the
school
itself.
It's
a
charter.
School
used,
one
of
the
buildings
and
they
are
working
with
mr
boss
to
potentially
be
using
this
space.
C
C
AY
Mr
bossie's,
on
the
call
he
might
be
best
to
address
that
I'm
not
aware
of
them
closing
related
to
the
pandemic.
I
believe
they
were
closing
with
this
venture
in
mind.
Okay
and
I
know
related
to
the
pandemic,
just
for
the
board's
information
right
now
other
than
those
using
the
facility.
No
one
else
is
allowed
into
the
facility,
so
parents
and
others
are
not
allowed
to
come
in,
and
I
did
actually
participate
in
a
call
yesterday
with
representative
consalvo,
no.
C
A
AZ
AZ
There
was
a
community
meeting
that
was
held
on
march
17th,
where
concerns
were
addressed
around
the
access
to
a
parking
lot
via
one
of
the
gates,
that's
disruptive
to
residential
abutters
at
the
lawson
on
reedville
street,
but
the
applicants
have
agreed
to
work
with
neighbors
on
this
matter
and
we
would
like
to
see
them
fulfill
that
commitment
at
this
time.
We
have
no
further
comments
or
questions.
Thank
you.
C
Members
of
the
board
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
116
49168
libby
street.
This
is
erected
a
one
family
home
on
a
vacant
lot
to
include
a
driveway
suitable
for
minimum
wage
street
parking.
The
violations,
article
10
section
1,
the
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses
article
56,
section
8,
the
blood
area
is
insufficient.
C
BA
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kevin
clutier
from
the
clutter
law
firm
located
at
1990
center
street
in
west
roxbury
and
I'm
joined
on
a
call
today
by
project
the
property
owners
dennis
and
josephine
sullivan
and
I'd.
Ask
considering
that
this
board's
decision
will
have
an
immense
impact
on
the
sullivan
family.
I'd
like
to
briefly
turn
it
over
to
them
so
that
they
can.
A
A
BA
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
I
just
want
to
point
out.
I
I
did
submit
a
packet
that
included
a
number
of
photos
that
was
confirmed
to
be
part
of
the
record.
I
expected
to
be
able
to
brief
off
of
that
presentation
this
morning
versus
just
the
plans.
I
don't
know
if
miss
thomas
has
that
in
her
possession,
I
think
it
may
add
to
the
board's
ability
to
properly
consider
this.
BA
Yeah,
so
the
sullivan
family
currently
resides
at
11
living
street.
They
own
a
vacant
lot
at
eight
libby
street,
which
is
the
only
vacant
lot
on
that
street.
They
are
proposing
a
single
family
home,
that's
a
two-story,
dormwage
style
cape
and
if
I
can
provide
just
very
briefly
historical
context,
we
did.
A
R
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mary's
office,
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
The
applicants
have
completed
a
full
community
process.
The
the
plans
did
come
before
the
board
back
in
2019.
They
have
scaled
back.
You
know
taking
concerns
from
the
neighbors
from
those
initial
plans.
Then
they
went
before
the
west.
Russia
neighborhood
council
last
week
on
april
27th
and
received
their
full
support.
Seven
votes
to
zero.
Ten
of
the
twelve
neighbors
on
libby
street
do
support
this.
R
There
are
some
direct
butters
that
do
have
concerns
next
door
with
the
other
one
on
the
other
side
being
fully
supportive.
So
I
do
ask
that
if
this
were
approved
that
it
had
bpa
design
review.
In
addition,
there's
there's
20
plus
letters
of
support
that
I
submitted
to
the
zoning
board
of
appeals.
Thank
you.
H
AA
Z
A
Z
Z
BB
Z
L
L
The
street
is
too
small
to
add
a
new
house
and
more
cars
dennis
is
currently
using
my
next-door
neighbor's
driveway,
and
that
house
currently
has
no
cars,
but
in
the
future
it
will
have
cars
too.
Many
people
from
our
neighborhood
would
have
did
not
have
a
chance
to
talk,
because
so
many
other
people
from
outside
keep
talking
in
our
zone
meeting
dennis
called
the
police
to
our
home
to
harass
us
after
the
zoning
meeting,
he
lied
to
the
police,
saying
we
went
to
his
house
to
shout.
We
did
not.
BC
So
we
just
want
to
register
our
strong
opposition
of
having
a
home
in
libya
street,
and
the
lot
is
only
4200
square
feet
and
he
wants
to
build
a
home.
That's
2400
square
feet.
It's
mentioned
for
that
small
lot.
So,
for
the
past
many
years
dennis
led
the
whole
neighborhood
to
oppose
the
previous
two
developers.
BC
A
BD
BD
A
A
Z
A
BE
Janine
devlin,
I
live
at
four
libby
street
as
you
face
the
lot,
I'm
on
the
left
hand
side.
I
have
consistently
opposed
building
on
this
lot,
as
my
mother
has
before
me.
This
is
the
third
time
we've
been
involved
in
somebody.
I've
been
involved
in
somebody
wanting
to
build
here.
I
believe,
there's
been
two
other
attempts
before
the
lot
is
only
forty
two
hundred
square
feet.
The
building
code
is
six
thousand
square
feet.
BE
BE
A
B
On
12,
the
b
street
was
rock
three
and
go
ahead:
okay
and
I'm
the
main
butter
to
the
lot
next
door
and
and
the
house
will
be
built
closer
to
my
house
than
any
other
house
on
the
property,
and
this
lot
begins
with
a
dump.
It
is
just
beautiful.
Now
I
love
the
design
of
the
sullivan's
new
home.
It
is
similar
to
my
home.
B
Z
AF
AF
A
C
Of
the
board
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
921
789
175
maple
street,
this
is
to
renovate
an
existing
single
family
dwelling
perform
exterior
interior
renovations.
The
first
existing
first
story,
a
covered
front,
porch
and
a
covered
side
rear
porch,
remove
the
existing
attic
to
replace,
with
a
second
story
of
habitable
living
space
and
a
new
attic
for
storage,
the
violet
to
remove
all
pre-existing
non-permitted
work
that
resulted
in
a
habitable
living
space.
C
BA
Of
the
board,
my
name
is
kevin
clutier
from
the
clutter
law
firm
located
at
1990
center
street
in
west
roxbury,
and
I'm
joined
on
the
call
by
the
property
owners
colleen
and
renzo
monzone,
as
well
as
the
project,
architect,
gregory
pando
and
again
I
I
would
just
if
your
madam
chair
would
allow.
I
provided
a
slide
deck
that
I
had.
Confirmation
would
be
presented
to
the
board
that
has
pictures
that,
I
think
really.
A
BA
BA
BA
What
we
are
proposing
is
to
take
that
existing
home
which,
as
you
can
see
on
the
current
slide,
it's
a
very
small
bungalow
style,
single
story
home
and
we
seek
to
add
a
second
story
of
a
living
space
as
well
as
an
attic
that
would
provide
for
a
first
floor
to
include
a
dining
room,
home
office,
kitchen
living
room
and
bathroom
and
a
second
floor
to
include
three
bedrooms:
a
two
bathrooms
and
a
laundry
with
respect
to
the
exterior.
And
if
we
can.
A
A
BA
Certainly,
the
zoning
is
for
0.4.
Far
in
this
location,
we
are
proposing
0.47,
which
I
suggest
is
a
a
small
amount
of
relief
being
requested
with
respect
to
the
front
setback.
We
are
including
a
covered
porch
as
part
of
the
design
that
setback
would
be
14
feet,
8
inches,
where
the
modal
on
that
side
of
libby
street
is
16
feet
and
with
respect
to
the
other
zoning
considerations,
the
design
was
very
mindful
to
adhere
to
the
late,
victorian
style
of
this
area
and,
as
the
design
shows
in
slide
three,
it
looks
very
good.
BA
BA
BA
27
feet
in
a
35
foot
zone:
okay,
the
side
setbacks.
We
are
also
compliant
they're
10
feet.
We
are
11.5
on
the
right
and
14.3
on
the
left
and
I
bring
that
to
your
attention
because
the
butters
on
either
side
do
oppose
this
on
issues
regarding
primarily
light
and
air,
as
they've
previously
expressed,
though
I'd
suggest
those
issues
are
objectively
moved
because
there's
no.
A
R
Good
morning
or
good
afternoon,
rather
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition,
we
have
received
several
letters
of
opposition,
including
from
some
direct
butters.
I
do
want
to
be
transparent,
though
they
didn't
go
before
the
west
rocks
for
neighborhood
council
back
in
february,
and
received
a
support
vote
of
five
to
two
and
have
received
thirty
plus
letters
of
opposition
from
both
the
butters
and
other
folks
in
the
neighborhood.
R
A
A
A
B
A
Sure
I'd
like
to
have
because
just
one
person
per
household,
because
I
do
see
duplicate
names
in
them
in
the
in
the
raised
hands.
So
I
need
one
name
per
household
and
and
only
residents
on
maple
street
miss
ambassador
use.
If
you
see
duplicate
names
by
household,
just
randomly
randomly
think
one
person
all.
BF
BF
Madam
chair,
thank
you
to
the
board
and
madam
chair
for
reviewing
our
comprehensive
letters
and
several
letters
from
abutters
who
do
not
support
this.
It's
important
to
note
that
three
of
the
four
direct
butters
are
not
supporting
this
project.
This
proposal
is
not
modest,
as
mr
clutier
suggests.
This
is
a
very
large
house
on
a
tiny
lot
renzo
and
colleen
have
1500
square
feet
right
now,
not
the
1056
that
they
claim
they've
benefited
from
having
living
space.
BF
Z
BG
Yes,
my
name
is
mark
cohen
and
I
live
at
177
maple
street
and
I'm
a
director
butter.
I
have
lived
at
that
property
for
20
years.
I've
lived
in
west
roxbury
for
40
years.
I
am
a
retired
city
worker
worked
for
the
boston
police
department
for
34
years.
I
raised
my
family
in
this
neighborhood.
I
have
strong
ties
to
the
neighborhood
and
to
my
neighbors.
A
AD
Good
morning
midnight
and
I
live
next
door
as
well,
and
I
really
try
to
demonstrate
in
my
rudimentary
form
the
impact
that
this
will
have
on
our
home.
It
really
does
strike
at
the
heart
of
why
we
bought
our
home
in
the
first
place
and
with
all
due
respect
to
mr
cloudier,
this
will
directly
block
off
all
direct
sun
coming
into
our
home.
I
try
to
provide
to
you
so.
O
BH
Z
BI
H
R
A
BA
A
There
is,
there
is
a
a
zoning
requirement,
but
you
have
heard
from
your
abutters
and
you
know
the
question:
is
there
will
be
storage
space
in
the
basement
as
it's
proposed?
It
is
a
three-bedroom
with
two
stories
and
atlantic,
and
I
think
your
your
you
and
your
clients,
your
clients,
have
to
decide
what
it
is
that
would
work
in
this
space
in
this
loft
in
this
neighborhood.
A
D
T
A
A
BA
C
C
BJ
A
BJ
So
the
zoning
in
this
area,
it's
a
greenbelt
zoning
district.
This
is
a
conditional
use
in
that
area
and
has
been
used
currently
on
a
temporary
basis
by
the
commonwealth
of
mass
for
construction
vehicles
on
all
the
road
working
in
that's
being
done
in
that
area.
So
it's
the
request
is
for
a
conditional
use
for
the
for
the
the
parking
and
then
the
there
are
two
other
issues
which
is
well.
A
F
BJ
A
BJ
So
the
we're
proposing
69
vehicles
we're
required
by
our
contracts,
three
separate
contracts,
two
with
the
city.
We
also
do
the
towing
for
street
cleaning
we're
required
to
have
at
least
60
vehicles
by
our
contracts,
we're
proposing
69
vehicles
we've
as
part
of
the
proposal.
The
lighting
would
be
a.
BJ
Dark
sky
compliant,
the
backup
sensors
have
been
turned
off
on
all
the
vehicles.
The
10-foot
security
fence
will
have
a
back
fabric.
Screening
attached
and,
and
we've
talked
with
the
community
about
significant
plantings
on
the
exterior.
We
think
that
the
smartest
way
to
do
that,
and
and
this
isn't
a
great
belt
overlay,
so
this
would
be
subject
to
bpda
review
regardless,
but
I
I
know.
A
BK
C
A
T
BJ
BL
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services-
let's
go
on
record
support
this
proposal.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
retain
a
displaced
business
and
keep
them
in
austin
brighton
that
provides
the
service
for
the
community.
We
conducted
a
butters
meeting
on
february
22nd
in
light
of
some
some
concerns
from
neighbors.
BL
BM
Good
afternoon
this
is
maura
mcrae
from
councillor
green's
office.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
of
being
in
opposition
to
this
project.
We're
just
concerned
about
the
maneuverability
of
this
site
this
this
intersection
and
this
wire
location
is
pretty
dangerous
for,
as
it
currently
exists
for
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
BM
This
site
is
really
difficult
to
locate
unless
you
go
down
residential
streets,
it's
also
there's
a
bus
stop
located
immediately
in
front
of
the
site,
so
we're
concerned
about
that.
Also.
In
addition,
the
dc-dr
is
currently
undertaking
a
feasibility
study
to
totally
realign
this
road
and
bring
much-needed
pedestrian
and
cyclists
cycling
improvements
to
the
area
and
also
reconstruct
the
pool
that
was
reconstruct
the
pool
on
this
site,
so
we're
hoping
that
many
more
pedestrians
will
eventually
be
able
to
access
the
river
using
these
intersections.
C
BN
BN
That
area
is
going
to
be
cleaned
up
and
it
needs
not
to
be
an
eyesore
which
it
is
right
now
by
the
current
tenant.
That's
there
and
so
bpda
design
review
and
no
to
a
chain
link
fence
with
a
temporary
fence
covering
that's,
not
acceptable.
That's
what's
there
now
and
it's
falling
apart,
and
it
looks
really
bad.
F
We
are
on
record
to
support
with
significant
design
review
in
terms
of
screening
and
buffering,
and
you
know
we
agree
with
annabella
and
the
baia
about
the
chain-link
fence,
and
I
think
we
can
accommodate
a
better
solution
through
design
review.
Another
proviso
that
I
might
want
to
throw
out
is
that
there'll
be
a
sunset
clause
on
this
that
we
do.
F
I
know
it's
a
tow
lot,
not
commercial
parking,
but
if
we,
if
the
board
was
inclined
to
add
a
sunset
provision,
I
know
there
is
going
to
be
work
going
on
in
that
area
in
terms
of
dcr,
the
rebuilding
of
the
pool
that
council
paintings
office.
But
if
we
were
to
put
say
a
three-year
sunset
clause,
they
come
back
to
you
to
extend
that
use
because
you
know
it
is
such
a
visible
location
that
might
be
that
might
help.
Z
X
X
X
X
BJ
I'll
make
it
short
the
letters
of
opposition
that
the
secretary
mentioned
were
another
tunnel
lot.
The
one
toll
was
on
parson
street
and
there
they've
lost
their
contracts
with
the
city,
so
they
no
longer
exist
that
we
are
moving
from
emery
road.
So
it's
not
an
additional
the
ability
to
have
a
something.
AJ
A
D
D
A
A
I
two
women.
I
two
am
opposed,
but
the
motion
carries
because
it
has
five
positive
votes.
May
I
have
jeff?
Can
you
make
sure
that
the
bpda
does
significant
design
review
on
screening
and
buffering?
No
eight
foot?
Remember
the
zoning
requirement
is
six
feet
because
there
was
no
request
for
an
eight
foot
fence.
A
AC
C
AC
AG
AG
F
Make
a
motion
mark
how
significant
are
these
changes,
because
if
this
is
a
different
project
than
the
one
that
we
have
reviewed,
you
know
we'd
like
to
get
we'd
like
to
see
it,
because
we
only
clarify
magnification
on
the
same
project.
So
if
it's
significantly
different
and
you're
getting
a
new
refusal
letter
from
isd
to
us,
this
might
be
a
new
project.
P
AR
C
C
Gonna
call
the
first
case
call
the
next
case
going
boa
one
one:
zero,
two
one,
four
five,
forty
three
union
box.
There
is
a
companion
case
for
building
code,
boa
one
one,
zero,
two
one,
four
six
party
three
unit,
five:
this
is
a
gut
renovation
of
existing
duplex
condominium,
the
new
private
roof
deck
accessed
via
a
steer
and
a
hatch
two
front.
Existing
doors
will
be
attached.
Existing
a
rear
drill
will
be
enlarged.
C
BO
BO
Yes,
okay,
because
this
is
a
five-story
building
whenever
you're
over
three
storeys,
it
has
to
be
a
penthouse
and
you
know
no,
we
know
we
won't
get
a
penthouse.
So
instead
of
doing
the
penthouse,
we
have
proposed
a
hatch.
You
know
a
hatch
on
a
which
I
know
the
board
prefers.
So
that's
that's!
That's
the
only
building
code
issue.
Okay,.
A
BO
Okay,
so
what
we're
asking
for
is
a
17
by
14
roof
deck,
which
obviously
is
trigger
zoning
because
of
the
restricted
roof
district.
You
know
our
neighborhood
process
was
done,
last
fall
and
everything
was
fine.
We've
reduced
some
things
on
the
project,
we're
not
connecting
the
dormers
anymore.
We're
not
going
to
do
a
fourth
floor
balcony
to
keep
the
neighbors
downstairs
happy.
So,
essentially,
all
we're
asking
for
is
the
roof
deck
and
if
you
guys,
approve
we'll
still
have
to
go
through
the
south
end
landmarks
commission
to
get
approved
on
the
roof
deck.
AI
AJ
AA
A
C
Everybody
calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
one
one:
five:
zero
five,
eight
four,
two
sixty
seven
eight
to
two
sixty
nine
dorchester
street.
This
is
erecting
new
three
family
townhouse
style.
Building
the
violations,
article
23
section
one
up
street
barking
is
insufficient
articles,
13,
section
1.,
the
lottery
is
insufficient
article
13
section
1.
The
additional
lot
here
is
insufficient
article
13
section
1
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
13
section
1,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
13,
section
1,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
and
article
13
section
one.
D
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
item
was
before
you
a
few
months
ago.
It
was
denied
without
prejudice
on
the
specific
basis
on
comments
from
mr
ehrlich
regarding
the
standard
metro
unit
sizes,
specifically
the
unit
size,
2
and
3
were
listed
at
approximately
500
square
feet
and
just
below
600
square
feet.
It
was
suggested
during
the
presentation
that
we
can
make
that
change,
and
mr
earl
suggested
that
it
was
more
appropriate
to
refile
and
rather
than
make
the
change
through
design
review.
P
P
The
the
other
two
units
unit,
two
and
unit
three,
are
studios
and
they're
floor
through
units,
and
they
are
are
four
eighty
seven
square
feet
for
the
second
floor
and
the
top
floor
is
597
square
feet
and,
in
addition,
at
the
latter
part
of
the
presentation
we
we
show
the
building
in
context
as
well
as
a
copy
of
the
the
initial
bp
or
rather
bra
standard
metro
unit
sizes,
which
has
been
reaffirmed
by
michael
canizzo
in
recent
years
and
then
more
recently
by
matt
martin.
Through
the
micro
unit
metro
policy,
the
building
is
essentially
unchanged.
P
The
height
is
30
feet
and
the
there
is
no
side
yard
requirement
here.
We
are
seeking
relief
for
rear
yard.
The
rear
yard
requirement,
with
shallow
exception,
is
10
feet
and
we
are
seeking
there.
We
have
a
five
foot,
one
rear
yard,
which
does
match
the
building
continuity
on
the
buildings
right
and
left
of
this.
For
this
block.
A
T
The
plans
are
good.
I
have
one
question
for
the
counselor
just
so
I
can
make
sure
I
understand
so
in
your
section.
It
does
show
that
the
site
drops
off
to
the
rear
and
you
mentioned
egress
window,
but
it's
not
they're
not
below
grade
they're.
Just
seem
to
be
the
sills
are
closer
to
grade.
Is
that
correct?
I'm
trying.
P
A
P
Yeah,
that's
right
manchester.
So
the
reason
that
we
had
the
three
front
doors
is
through
the
community
process.
There
was
a
request
to
put
the
trash
room
in
the
front
as
opposed
to
the
rear
yard
and
the
the
door
furthest
most
to
the
left
is
for
the
trash
room.
Additionally,
the
unit
one
is
accessed
from
the
middle
door
and
unit
two
or
three
are
accessed
from
the
right
door,
and
also
worth
noting
that
we
added
a
couple
of
mock
windows
on
the
side.
P
AL
AJ
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
due
to
other
community
process
and
graduate
networks.
In
particular,
the
andrews
square
naval
association
supported
this
project
due
to
the
team's
willingness
to
work
with
them
on
trash
removal
issues
with
the
installation
of
trash
compactors,
as
well
as
safety
and
security
issues
with
lighting
and
cameras.
Counselor
fling
would
like
to
offer
his
support
by
some
team
adhering
to
disagreements
with
the
neighbors
and
the
civic
group.
Thank
you.
AA
C
Thank
you
all
well,
the
next
case
calling
vola
105
1313
14
mian
street,
mr
seeking
to
change
doctors
to
make
one
family
an
accessory
out
of
studio
and
one
car
garage
to
an
office
in
the
first
floor,
extended
to
the
portion
of
the
basement
space
and
two
residential
dwellings
also
renovate
the
building,
including
roof
deck
and
create
four
parking
spaces.
The
violations-
article
55
section
19.,
two
family
residential
uses,
have
been
used
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
G
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
daniel
toscano,
at
one
stage
street
boston
mass,
I
represent
the
owner
of
the
property
scott
dabney's
on
the
line
and
also
the
architect,
is
on
the
line
mike
bart.
As
the
secretary
just
said,
this
is
simply
a
change
of
use
of
of
the
building.
It's
an
existing
building.
G
The
first
floor
is
currently
a
one
car
garage
which
has
actually
been
used
as
an
office
for
the
owner
of
the
premises
always
been
used
as
an
office
wants
to
just
create
that
as
a
legal
use,
which
is
an
allowable
use
on
the
local
industrial
sub
district.
What
this
is
in,
so
it's
an
allowable
use
into
the
basement.
The
basement,
the
the
office
space
is
really
just
going
to
remain.
On
the
first
floor,
it
does
extend
into
the
basement,
but
it's
really
mechanicals
and
storage.
G
There's
a
bathroom
down
there
and
really
nothing
else
on
the
second
floor
is
a
an
art
studio.
This
is
really
the
the
the
crux
of
the
change:
the
oxygen
we
like
to
change
to
a
residential
unit.
It's
a
994
square
foot,
floor
plan,
it's
two
bedrooms
and
one
bath
to
sufficient
space
for
the
residential
unit.
Like
I
said
it's
994
square
feet.
G
The
third
floor
is
an
existing
residential
unit,
so
there
are
no
changes
to
the
existing
third
floor
residential
unit,
which
is
a
three
bedroom
well
over
a
thousand
square
feet
of
space.
What
we
are
doing
is
adding
a
roof
deck
which
will
be
the
exclusive
use
of
the
third
floor,
tenant
and
access
to
that
roof.
Deck
will
be
by
hatch.
Only
so
there's
really
no
chain
no
changes
to
the
use
of
that.
It's
always
been
in
a
residential
unit.
G
We
are
adding
the
four
parking
spaces
which
will
be
on
the
left
side
of
the
property
and
two
on
the
right
side
of
the
property.
It's
on
the
left
side
of
the
property,
madam
chair.
So
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
but
there's
really
interior
renovations
to
the
property
and
then
we're
gonna
add
the
parking
spaces
to
meet
the
zoning
code
requirement.
A
G
A
G
That
is
correct.
Madam
chair
we've
looked
at
other
ways
of
how
we
can
get
back
in
the
back
of
it.
I
think
it's
william
street
there's
really
no
way
of
getting
to
the
back.
So
the
only
way
to
put
this
parking
was
to
the
side
and
right
in
front
of
us
there's
some
space,
but
it's
owned
by
boston,
water
and
sewage.
So
we're
not
talking
on
that
property.
G
A
G
Well,
it
was
never
utilized
as
a
garage
in
front
of
the
property,
it's
really
a
pile
of
dirt.
That
was
the
only
way
of
getting
up
to
the
garage
door.
Since
my
client
has
owned
the
property
he's
never
never
used
it
as
a
garage
always
used
it
as
his
office,
so
it
was
never
utilized
as
a
garage,
so
really
no
intent
to
use
it.
It's
just
really
a
pile
of
dirt
to
get
up
there.
G
G
So
there
is
really
it's
really
some
some
dirt,
it's
owned
by
the
boston
water,
sewage
and
we
have
an
easement
and
really
all
the
properties
along
main
street,
on
that
side
of
main
street
has
an
easement
going
on
to
their
property.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
going
to
resold
it
add
some
grass
and
repave
that
front.
So
we
can.
We
have
an
easement
access
to
our
property.
V
G
T
V
Mean
I
yeah,
I
I
mean
in
some
ways
that
sort
of
makes
the
issue
of
front
yard
parking
kind
of
mood,
because
if
it's
roughly
20
feet
deep
and
you've
got
some
trees
there
and
stuff,
then
I
mean
frontier
parking
is
usually
when
it's
five
ten
feet
off
the
off
the
side,
the
the
the
curb
cut.
This
is
really
quite
different.
T
A
BP
Yes
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lindsay.
Santana
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
underbutters
meeting
was
held
on
august
28
2021.
The
applicant
has
also
received
the
support
of
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council,
so
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
for
court.
Thank
you.
Z
BQ
Hi,
my
name
is
paige
sparks.
I
live
at
96,
berkeley,
road
and
I'm
a
steering
committee
member
for
the
stony
brook
neighborhood
association,
the
local
civic
association.
Are
you
able
to
hear
me?
Yes,
wonderful
at
our
general
membership
meeting
on
february,
8
2021
the
s,
a
voted
to
oppose
the
variances
requested
by
this
applicant.
BQ
There
have
been,
I
understand,
a
couple
of
changes
to
the
plans,
but
there
are
some
outstanding
issues,
specifically
the
loss
of
artist
use
space.
It's
currently
zoned
as
an
artist
work
only
studio,
but
the
applicant
hasn't
pursued
options
to
become
or
to
use
this
space
as
an
artist
live
work
studio
which
we
feel
would
be
beneficial
to
the
community
of
jp,
as
well
as
the
city
of
boston.
BQ
K
G
Madam
channel
believe
it
was
since
mr
dabney
has
owned
it.
I
believe
he's
owned
it
from
at
least
four
to
six
years.
I
don't
believe
it's
come
before
this
before
it
might
have
come
in
the
past
to
change
the
third
floor
at
one
point,
the
third
floor
unit
to
a
residential
unit,
but
not
since
mr
dabney
owned
it.
A
BG
G
A
C
Me
next
week
on
voa
1156518
to
26
bradshaw
street,
this
erected
three-story
five-unit
townhouse,
building
with
parking
below
the
violations.
Article
60
section
a
multi-family
dwelling
into
the
bed,
article
60
section
9,
the
light
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
in
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9
of
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
C
M
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair,
my
client
is
brian
anderson.
This
matter
was
deferred
in
order
to
allow
for
revised
four
unit
plans
to
be
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
inspectional
services
department.
These
are
the
plans
that
are
currently
being
viewed
on
screen.
M
The
this
is
an
application
for
a
new
three-story,
four-unit,
townhouse
style
building
at
18
to
26
bradshaw
street
at
the
corner
of
gleason
street.
The
applicable
zoning
is
at
3f
5000
residential
sub
district.
A
lot
in
question
is
6267
square
feet.
The
four
units
would
be
on
average.
Thirteen
hundred
forty
square
foot,
two
bedroom
units,
there's
no
basement
in
the
building
and
no
roof
decks
are
proposed.
M
M
The
required
variances
for
the
four-family
use
and
the
required
variances
are
for
the
four
family
use
in
a
three
family
district.
The
lot
size
is
cited
is
insufficient,
based
on
calculation
that
7
500
square
feet
would
be
required
for
four
units.
While
the
lot
is
6267
square
feet,
the
maximum
far
under
the
code
is
0.8.
M
While
the
proposed
far
is
one
usable
open,
space
is
required
at
600
square
feet
per
unit,
while
just
about
510
square
feet
per
unit
would
be
provided,
10
foot,
side,
yard
setbacks
are
required,
but
the
prevailing
side
yield
setbacks
here,
average
about
15
feet.
So
that's
a
violation
that
has
effectively
been.
M
T
T
M
A
AP
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal,
as
neighbors
have
shared
their
concerns
around
this
proposal
being
too
large,
too
dense
and
the
townhouse
being
not
with
the
aesthetic
of
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
AR
M
Thank
you.
So,
if
I
may,
just
on
the
zoning,
as
I
said,
the
side
yard
setbacks
have
effectively
been
eliminated,
the
violations,
those
setbacks
are
averaging
about
15
feet
on
each
side,
where
10
feet
is
required,
also
the
required
railyard
setback.
This
is
the
shallow
lot.
The
required
rear
guard
set
back
here
is
actually
15
feet,
and
the
proposed
rear
yard
set
back
here
exceeds
this
at
just
over
18
feet
in
terms
of
density.
M
As
I
say,
this
is
a
a
6700
square
foot
lot,
which
is
obviously
much
larger
than
you
know.
A
three
f
five
thousand
square
foot
lot
one
additional
unit
in
terms
of
what's
in
the
neighborhood
there's
a
multi-family
residential
located
directly
next
door,
the
brick
building
at
57
bricknell,
also
across
the
street
at
27
bradshaw
street.
That
is
a
four-family
dwelling,
that'll
I'll
pause
and
take
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
A
W
C
C
The
project.
The
new
project
will
keep
an
existing
garage
location.
Existing
curb
cuts,
the
violations,
article
56
section
40.1,
conforming
to
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
56,
section
8
log
web
is
insufficient.
Article
56
section
8,
blog
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
56
section
8
deployed
ratio
is
extensive
in
article
56,
section
8.
The
real
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BK
Absolutely
madam
chair,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
introduction,
so
one
thing
that
I
will
violation
because
I
did
submit
new
plans
after
we
met
with
the
west
roxbury
neighborhood
council
and
I
was
sent
a
new
violation
letter
by
the
plans
examiner
mr
perez,
and
he
eliminated
the
florida
area
ratio
violation
we
actually
with
the
way
that
we
did
the
new
plan.
So
essentially
there
is
an
existing
garage.
The
garage
is
in
the
same
place
as
what
it
is
right
now
and
we're
building
a
single
family
pretty
much
around
it.
A
BK
Absolutely
so,
if
we
scroll
down
a
little
bit
further,
so
that
is
the
first
floor
plan
of
the
house.
So
essentially
it
is
a
three
bedroom.
Four
bathroom
home.
It
is
the
new
square.
Footage
is
actually
3070
square
feet,
because
the
far
here
is
0.4,
which
would
be
at
30
72
maximum
square
footage
that
we
could
have.
So
we
have
the
kitchen
living
room,
dining
room,
an
office.
BK
BK
Three
bedrooms
and
three
bathrooms
upstairs
and
it's
two
and
a
half
stories,
normal
elevation,
but
that's
pretty
much
it.
But
when
we
went
in
front
of
west
roxbury,
neighborhood
council
was
actually
flip-flopped,
so
there
used
to
be
existing.
We
actually
took
out
the
full
bedroom
in
a
full
bathroom
and
then
we
also
moved
the
master
suite
into
the
left
side
of
the
property,
as
opposed
to
right
above
the
garage,
so
that
the
garage
is
left
as
existing
fl
floor
print,
pretty
much
so
that
those
were
the
changes.
BK
R
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
doug
at
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
of
support.
As
pam
mentioned,
she
scaled
back
and
took
away
a
bedroom
and
a
bathroom
one
of
the
big
issues
with
the
neighborhood
council
was
far
so
the
revised
plan
do
not
have
an
far
violation.
She
went
before
the
neighborhood
council
last
week
on
april
27th
and
received
disappointment.
Thank
you.
H
AA
Z
BR
A
C
This
is
renovating
existing
one
family
drilling
constructed
attached,
two-story
addition
to
consist
of
a
garage
at
ground
level
with
accessory
office
use
on
the
second
floor,
the
violation,
article,
nine
section,
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
dwelling,
article
51,
section
9,
insufficient
marriott
setback
and
article
51
section
51-57,
the
special
provision
for
cornell
law.
It's
a
20-foot
setback,
modal
alignment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
N
N
N
N
The
space
itself
is
an
additional
404
square
feet
and
the
garage
would
also
be
rebuilt
as
part
of
this
project,
because
it's
crumbling
right
now
it's
falling
apart,
but
the
I
don't.
I
don't
see
this
being
a
possible
other
unit,
it's
so
small,
and
would
only
have
that
one
stairway
to
it
from
the
outside.
N
A
N
A
BL
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
lincoln
records
supporting
this
proposal
in
lieu
of
an
abutters
meeting.
We
thought
these
would
qualify
for
the
subcommittee,
so
we
circulated
flyers.
It
was
a
couple
of
requests
from
residents
just
for
taking
a
look
at
the
plans,
but
there
were
no
concerns
raised
at
the
time
they
met
with
the
austin
civic
association
several
times
and
made
changes
and
worked
with
the
civic
association
to
come
up
with
this
product
that
we
had
before
us.
BL
BM
Z
BS
The
history
of
this
madam
chair,
was
that
the
initial
initial
proposals
that
were
made
there
wasn't
really
any
connectivity
between
the
the
main
house
and
in
the
garage
and,
as
mr
burke
has
stated,
it's
it's
an
interesting
corner
lot
and
we
had
to
be
very
creative,
but
I
think
the
driving
force
behind
all
of
this,
as
the
mayor's
office
has
alluded
to,
is
the
fact
that
this
is
a
young
growing
family
who
love
their
house
and
love
the
community.
They
live
in
and
need
some
desperately
needed
additional
space.
BS
The
basement
was
not
a
possibility,
and
it
also
takes
down
a
very
unsightly
garage
that
I
have
to
drive
by
every
day.
So
this
was
this
was
a
a
creative
way
of
of
addressing
the
needs
and
hopefully
keeping
this
family
in
our
community.
So
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
with
the
proviso
that
no
building
code
relief
be
granted.
C
BT
Hello,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
mike
ross
and
I'm
joined
by
the
applicant
richard
ginn
and
the
security
consultant
former
superintendent,
joe
harris.
You
may
recall
we
were
before
the
board
march
16th
and
asked
for
a
deferral
due
to
a
technical
notice
matter.
So
now
we're
back
here
now.
This
is
a
change
of
use,
as
the
secretary
mentioned,
to
take
a
existing
tobacco
store
and
barber
shop,
which
is
now
closed
and
to
take
a
portion
of
the
tobacco
store
and
create
about
a
thousand
square
feet
for
the
cannabis
establishment.
BT
BT
This
floor
plan
shows
bowdoin
street
along
the
right
hand,
side
of
it
and
you
can
see
the
door.
The
entry
is
a
dedicated
entrance
and
a
dedicated
exit
and
the
security
will
go
around
through
the
back
of
the
building
through
an
alley,
an
alley
that
we
can
see
on
the
site
plan.
We
might
want
to
go
up
one
mountain
ambassador
to
to
get
to
enter
through
the
or
sorry
down
one,
my
apologies
to
get
through
the
rear
of
the
building
and
we'll
enter
through
that
back
alley
area.
BT
BT
We
intend
to
have
two
security
guards
on
site.
One
inside
one
outside
there
would
be
around
12
cameras.
This
is
a
good
buffer
zone
slide
to
show
you
that
the
nearest
school
is
outside
the
500
square,
foot
required
buffer
and
there
is
no
other
cannabis
establishment
within
the
half
mile
of
this
facility.
A
BE
BT
T
BT
T
BT
BT
There
is
some
attempt
to
try
to
locate
off-site
parking,
but
I
think
we
see
this
as
mostly
a
destination
for
area
residents,
and
I
was
saying
at
the
end
that
this
boat
in
geneva
area
is
seeing
new
investment,
including
a
very
sizable
apartment,
building
at
the
corner
and
some
new
development.
So
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
robust
community.
The
restaurant
went
out
of
business.
BT
We're
hoping
that
most
of
them
will
come
from
the
surrounding
community,
not
all,
and
they
won't.
They
won't
have
a
place
to
park.
They're
going
to
have
to
you
know
they
could
leave
their
car
in
the
street,
but
that's
probably
not
optimal
for
them
or
for
us.
We
obviously
want
that
area
to
be
available.
V
BT
I
think
we're
800
from
the
nearest
school
and
if
you
go
to
the
buffer,
we're
you
know
we're
not
even
close
on
that
half
mile
yeah.
So
that's
the
that's.
I
believe.
That's
the
holland
up
academy
that
we're
about
800
from
instead
of
500
and
yeah.
If
you
look
at
that,
the
dark
gray
on
the
left
and
the
right
will
show
you
where
the
nearest
ones
are.
BT
E
AP
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
and
reckon
in
support
of
this
proposal.
They
went
through
an
extensive
community
process
and
ultimately
received
an
approval
from
the
boston
cannabis
board
and
would
like
to
continue
our
support
through
the
zoning
board
of
appeals.
Thank
you.
C
A
Z
BU
Chris,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
I'm
I'm
joseph
harris
good
morning
good
afternoon,
man,
I'm
and
members
of
the
board,
I'm
joseph
harris,
I'm
a
retired
superintendent
of
the
boston
police
department,
working
now
with
the
guardian
security
advisers,
and
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
and
supported
this
project.
I
A
Z
BV
Afternoon
my
name
is
anthony
richardson.
I
I
currently
own
six
eight
and
seven
blakeville
street.
I
also
have
my
neighbors
with
me
as
well,
and
I
am
totally
opposed
to
this.
I've
been
having
a
hard
problem
with
these
guys
blocking
the
driveway
leaving
trash
in
the
alley.
I
have
pictures,
I
have
photos
and
it's
been.
It's
been
a
constant
battle.
I've
been
a
resident
here
for
42
years
and
I
do
own
three
properties.
That's
directly
abutted
right
behind
this.
That
shares
the
alley
and
I'm
greatly
opposed.
BV
Absolutely
I
have
pictures
that
they
block
the
driveway
the
trash
that
overloaded
dumpsters
the
parking
is
is
I
have
a
problem
with
the
landlords,
maybe
talking
to
their
tenants
about
not
parking
in
the
alley
where
my
driveways
are
in
the
alley,
so
they
come
in,
they
block
it
or
they
block
it
on
boarding
street,
and
I
consistently
have
to
knock
on
the
store
doors
or
the
restaurants
to
get
these
their
employees
or
their
customer
customers
at
least
it's
okay.
Thank
you.
W
W
BR
A
BT
BT
A
BT
I
just
want
to
place
on
the
record
a
couple
of
things
that
one
we
do
have
a
lot
of
support
from
main
streets
and
from
the
cape
verdean
association.
The
two
we
have
been
in
touch
with
the
neighbor
who
spoke,
which
is
good.
We've
had
numerous
conversations
with
the
neighbor
we've
knocked
on
their
door.
We've
talked
to
them
out
on
the
site,
but
my
client
has
never
otherwise
been
out
at
the
site,
never
moving
trash,
never
doing
anything.