►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 6-22-21
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
The
city
of
boston's
zoning
vote
of
appeal
hearing
for
june
22
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
provisions
of
an
act
extending
certain
covert
19
measures
adopted
during
the
state
of
emergency
that
was
signed
by
governor
baker
on
june
16
2021.
A
A
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
A
A
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand
again
if
you're
connected
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
A
The
address
in
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
host
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
These
instructions
will
be
repeated
throughout
the
hearing.
I'm
not
going
to
take
a
roll
call
attendance
of
board
members
and
just
a
reminder
to
both
board
members.
When
you
make
a
motion
or
a
second,
please
state
your
name,
because
we
recognize
your
voices,
but
sometimes
it's
a
little
difficult.
C
A
Good
morning
miss
good
morning,
madam
chair
good
morning,
miss
dong
is
running
a
little
late,
but
she
will
be
on
shortly,
so
just
as
an
acknowledgement.
This
is
a
six-member
board.
Mr
hampton
bpda.
B
E
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kevin.
Clutier
from
the
clutter,
your
law
firm
at
1990
center
street
in
west
roxbury,
I
represent
the
owner,
jeremiah
realty
trust,
as
well
as
the
builder
stephen
connelly,
it's
more
or
less
the
same
entity,
and
I
I
do.
I
do
understand
that
we're
asking
this
board
for
some
considerate
relief
here
by
this
third
extension.
A
Just
mr
cleveland,
I'm
just
going
to
interrupt
you.
May
I
have
a
motion
for
an
extension,
but
I
need
you
to
know
that
this
is
the
last
extension
we
are
likely
to
give,
because
I
understand
the
impacts
of
covet
are
still
being
felt
and
but
just
recognize.
This
is
the
last
extension
and
please
let
your
client
know
that.
B
H
For
the
record,
please
good
morning,
madam
chairman
was
the
board
richard
lynn's
245
summit
street
east
boston.
On
behalf
of
the
petitioner.
As
the
secretary
indicated,
there
was
a
one-year
extension
granted
from
the
original
decision
in
2019
and
again
extending
it
out
to
june
30th
of
2021..
Madam
chair.
The
reason
for
this
extension
is
this
involves
a
relatively
complicated
site
in
oregon
heights.
It
is
at
two
different
elevations
with
a
good
deal
of
site
engineering
that
is
ongoing.
H
All
the
plans
have
been
approved
through
the
bpda
design
review
process.
They
are
with
isd
for
current
issuance
and
I
believe
the.
H
J
H
Sure
so
I
believe
that
the
we're
just
waiting
for
a
consultant
to
review
a
couple
of
the
code
issues
on
the
design
with
isd,
but
permanent
issuance
is
imminent.
B
L
Patrick
mahoney,
with
the
business
address
of
160
federal
street
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
developer.
B
I
Tim
johnson,
architect,
599,
east
broadway,
south
boston.
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
permitting
of
the
project,
has
been
hampered
by
the
pandemic
and
related
delays
at
city
government.
We
respectfully
request
an
extension,
madam
chair.
A
So,
mr
johnson,
why
is
this
late?
This
was
scheduled
was
expired
march
15th
and
we
we
will
grant
this
extension,
but
please
let
the
owner
know
that
this
that
that
we're
not
going
to
be
looking
any
kind.
Kindly
on
these
requests
that
are
late,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
N
Morning,
madam
chair,
I'm
members
of
the
board
good
morning.
My
name
is,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
and
I
am
requesting
an
extension
due
to
some
financial
issues
that
arose
and
and
the
cover
19
pandemic.
I
wasn't
able
to
you,
know
finish
project.
Hopefully
the
board
will
grant
me
a
an
extension.
A
A
A
G
B
A
Okay,
before
we
get
to
this,
I
just
need
to
tell
you
that
this
will
be
a
five
member
board.
Miss
dong
has
not
been
able
to
join
us
yet
so
no
I
destroyed
him
on
the
record.
Oh,
you
did
sherry.
Okay,
sorry!
So
now
we
are
a
six
member
board.
Yes,
go
ahead.
P
P
Q
R
B
B
Very
good,
then
they
call
the
first
case
calling
doa
one
one:
nine
three,
seven,
five
one:
twenty
eight
falcon
stream.
This
is
to
convert
an
existing
two
family
to
a
three
family,
the
violation
article
53
section,
eight,
a
three
family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section
9.
The
lot
area
for
new
unit
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
B
Article
53,
section
9,
the
height
requirement,
is
excessive.
Two
and
a
half
stories.
Article
53
section
9.
The
side
guard
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
56
off-street
blocking,
is
insufficient
in
article
2017-5.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
You
ma'am
chair
good
morning
richard
lynch
245
sumner
street
east
boss,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner,
and
we
are
before
the
board
with
respect
to
the
with
the
secretary
of
state
record.
This
is
a
pre-existing
two-family
dwelling
located
in
the
eagle
hill
section
of
east
boston.
We
are
proposing
to
change
the
use
of
occupancy
from
two
family
to
three
family,
which
would
involve
an
addition
on
the
top
of
the
building.
The
unit
sizes
are
all
going
to
be
two
bedroom
two
bath.
H
They
range
in
size
from
about
886
square
feet
up
to
about
a
thousand
fifty
square
feet.
Of
course,
the
building
would
be
fully
gutted
and
rehabbed
with
upgrades
to
life
safety
with
respect
to
the
relief
that
is
necessary.
This
is
located
in
the
2000
zoning
subdistrict.
A
three
family
is
forbidden
use.
However,
there
are,
there
are
certainly
a
number
of
multi-families
in
the
immediate
facility.
This
would
not
be
an
unusual
use
for
this
section
of
the
eagle
hill.
We
were
cited
for
additional
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units.
H
I
would
point
out
to
the
board
that
is
not
applicable
for
any
other
use
other
than
a
two
family.
So
in
this
particular
case,
we
don't
necessarily
require
the
relief
for
that
we
do
require
relief
for
the
floor-to-area
ratio,
which
would
be
a
proposed
1.25,
which
would
be
in
excess
of
the
0.8
that
is
permitted.
H
We
are
requesting
relief,
even
though
we
are
within
the
height
limit
at
34
feet
total.
We
are
required
required
to
request
relief,
because
this
will
be
a
three-story
building.
Once
the
project
is
completed
with
respect
to
sideyard,
there
are
existing
conditions
that
are
already
non-conforming.
H
We
don't
propose
to
exacerbate
that
condition
any
further.
Any
addition
would
be
in
line
with
the
existing
setback
that
is
existing
on
the
right
side
of
the
building.
That
is
non-conforming,
respect
to
the
rear
yard.
We
are
proposing
a
condition
that
is
about
18.7
feet.
If
you
measure
to
the
rear
property
line,
this
is
considered
a
shallow
lot
under
article
53
and
therefore
30
feet
would
be
required
under
the
code.
H
We
are
entitled
to
take
the
exception
and
reduce
that
setback
to
22
and
a
half,
so
the
relief
is
about
4
feet,
total
last
but
not
least,
is
parking
again.
This
is
a
pre-existing
two-family
dwelling
that
has
no
parking.
Article
53
permits
us
to
make
a
change
and
add
units
provided,
however,
that
we're
only
required
to
provide
parking
for
the
additional
unit
that's
being
proposed.
In
this
case,
the
zoning
code
would
require
only
one
parking
space,
even
if
it
were
feasible.
H
My
understanding
is
the
city's
policy
is
not
to
permit
curb
cuts
anyhow,
if
the
requirement
is
only
to
have
one
parking
space,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
board.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
newport
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
the
proposal.
We
do
believe
it's
just
a
modest
addition.
The
parking
concern
did
come
up
in
discussion
with
neighbors,
but
they
also
have
the
support
of
the
eagle
hills,
civic
association.
Thank
you.
X
S
U
C
B
Thank
you
very
much
calling
our
next
case
calling
voa
118
4800
25
claremont
park.
This
is
to
construct
a
four
level:
wood
frame,
rear
extension
on
a
concrete
footing
and
three
side
decks.
The
violations,
article
32.
This
is
in
the
g
cut
applicability
in
article
64,
section,
9.,
townhouse
row
house
extension
into
the
rear
yard
is
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lacasse,
lacasse
law,
75
arlington
street,
in
boston
attorney
for
the
proponent
and
with
me,
is
sean
griffin.
The
project
manager
for
the
developer
before
you
are
two
conditional
use
permits,
madam
chair,
one
for
a
groundwater,
recharge
system
and
the
other
for
extension,
into
a
rear
yard
in
the
south
end
where
the
extension
exceeds
50
square
feet.
J
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
please
go
ahead
and
talk
to
us
about
the
decks,
we're
interested
to
know
whether
they're
brackets
supported
and
how
does
this
it
works.
K
Yes,
so,
madam
chair
on
the
screen
before
you
is
a
rear
elevation,
and
what
is
shown
is
that
the
entire
rear
of
the
building
is
being
bumped
out
by
approximately
four
feet:
six
inches
from
the
existing
rear
facade
the
full
width
of
the
rear
of
the
building.
As
you
can
see,
there
are
three
small
decks
that
are
part
of
that
rear
bump
out,
not
in
addition
to
so
the
rear,
decks
bump
out
four
feet:
six
inches
from
the
rear
facade
as
part
of
that
rear
extension,
which
also
adds
approximately
631
square
feet
of
living
space.
K
M
U
Well,
I
it
appears
that
the
comet
is
really
for
extension
of
deck,
but
this
seems
like
it's
a
full
building
extension.
It's
not
one,
it's
cantilever,
so
it
doesn't
really
apply
to
the
design.
But
I
do
have
a
question
from
mark.
Have
you
had
south
landmark
district
review
the
proposal
and
what
was
their
feedback.
K
We
have
to
get
zone
relief
first
before
we
can
go
to
landmarks.
They
don't
have
jurisdiction
until
the
zoning
relief
is
granted,
but
this
is
at
the
rear
of
the
building.
So
I
suspect
that
they'll
make
a
determination
that
there's
no
jurisdiction
to
review,
so
it
will
be
subject
to
bpda
design
review.
Okay,
great
thank
you.
V
B
K
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lucas,
the
castle
75
arlington
street
in
boston
attorney
for
the
owner
of
the
proposed
fitness
center
stacy
d
martini,
who
is
also
on
this
hearing
members
of
the
board.
This
is
a
new
building
on
west
2nd
street
in
south
boston
that
consists
of
29
residential
units
and
an
1100
square
foot
commercial
space.
At
the
ground
floor,
which
was
previously
approved
by
the
bpda
and
this
board
in
2014,
there
was
litigation,
it
was
settled
and
then
this
board
approved
the
final
iteration
of
the
building
in
2018.
K
Construction
is
fully
completed.
The
residential
units
are
occupied
to
some
extent,
and
the
proposal
in
commercial
space
is
for
a
private
training
studio
to
be
run
by
stacey
d
martini
and
a
couple
of
other
trainer
employees.
So
it's
not
it's
not
a
full-size
gym.
It's
a
private
training
studio
where
the
trainers
work
one-on-one
in
this
board's
decision
approving
the
building
it
approved
that
space
as
commercial
use,
but
not
a
specific
commercial
use,
and
because
this
is
in
the
mfr
sub-district,
essentially
any
commercial
use
requires
zoning
relief.
So
we
are
seeking.
A
K
Stacy
d
martini
is
on
stacey.
Can
you
unmute
yourself
and
answer
the
question
about
ours.
Y
A
Any
zumba
classes
or
music,
or
anything
like
that
that
might
affect
the
residences
above.
Y
No
group
fitness
classes,
music
on
the
minimum,
no
group
training
going
on
excellent.
How.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
at
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
also
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this.
There
is
no
impact
to
the
community
considering
this
is
already
built
and
we're
excited
to
see
a
woman-owned
business
come
to
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
Z
X
A
Before
we
have
a
motion,
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
the
record
indicates
that
this
will
be
a
personal
strength,
training
studio
so
that
down
the
road.
There
is
no
assumption
that
this
is
a
larger
fitness
center
or
gym
a
larger
concept,
fitness
center
or
gym.
So
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
U
B
S
AB
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
117
6804
15
rocky
nuke
terrace.
This
is
a
third
floor.
Dormer
edition
the
violations,
article
55
section
9,
48
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55
69
the
bill
ahead
is
excessive
in
stories
and
article
55,
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AC
Hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
jeff
pfeiffer.
I
live
at
15,
rockingham,
terrace
unit
3
and
I'm
the
homeowner.
AC
Sure
we
just
are
looking
to
add
dormers
to
an
existing
living
space
in
the
attic
to
give
us
about
300
more
square
feet
for
our
family
with
two
children.
All
of
the
zoning
violations
are
all
pre-existing.
AC
This
was
originally
a
two
family,
this
converted
to
a
three
family
well
before
we
bought
it
and
that
pushed
us
over
far
side
yards
not
affected,
and
the
height
of
the
building
is
also
not
affected.
So
we're
just
dormering
the
two
sides
just
to
add
about
300
square
feet
and
then
also
bringing
the
roof
and
all
that
up
to
code.
So.
AC
It's
a
master
bedroom,
there's
already
a
bathroom
up
there,
so
we're
just
improving
the
bathroom
there'll,
be
a
laundry
which
is
also
already
up
there
and
then
us
a
flexible
living
space
where
we
can
send
our
children
upstairs
to
stop
them
annoying.
Our
downstairs
neighbors.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
his
proposal.
It's
a
modest
proposal.
There
were
no
issues
that
were
raised
during
the
butters
meeting
and
they
do
have
support
from
the
jp
council
and
non-opposition
from
the
brewery,
newport
association.
Thank
you.
X
M
B
Thank
you
all
on
the
next
case,
calling
voa
116
657360
crawford
street.
This
is
a
change
of
awkwardness
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family:
new
exterior
egress,
three
r
street
parking
spaces,
the
violations,
article
50,
section,
29,
insufficient
side,
job,
article
50,
section,
28,
additional
lot
area,
article
50,
section,
43,
off-street
parking
and
loading
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AF
Hi,
my
name
is
steven
pedopas,
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project
stephanie
stimpson
street,
in
boston.
This
is
an
existing
two-family
home
with
a
fully
finished
attic
area,
we're
adding
420
square
feet
to
the
third
explorer
to
create
a
third
unit
and
because
the
existing
egress
within
the
building
does
not
conform.
We're
adding
an
additional
eager
stair
out
the
back
for
that
particular
unit.
AF
No,
I
don't
believe
so.
The
owners
they
almost
families
lived
here
for
80
years
and
I
don't
believe
they've
ever
been
in
front
of
the
board
of
appeal.
AF
Well,
yes,
the
currently
there
are
parking
spaces
for
four
cars.
Isd
is
the
width
to
be
not
sufficient
for
the
number
of
cars
that
are
there,
so
what
we've
done
is
because
we
have
a
handicapped
member
of
the
family
living
here.
We've
created
the
handicapped
parking
space
at
the
rear,
eliminating
the
two
to
the
existing
parking
spaces
to
create
the
minimum
of
three
parking
spaces
required
for
a
three
unit
building.
J
A
Okay,
how
would
the
plans.
B
Board
here,
madam
chair
secretary
here,
mr
d'amico
has
spoken
this
regarding
60
prophet
street.
He
says
okay
for
three
spaces,
one
of
which
is
the
handicapped
pocket.
A
Okay
and
miss
better
everything
is
fine
on
the
floor
to
ceiling
height.
Yes,
okay
is
anybody
here
just
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
this.
B
B
This
would
be
one
dwelling
of
two
on
the
same
line:
the
violation
article
65
section
41.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
42
conforming
with
an
existing
building
alignment
of
the
bar
article
65
section
42,
two
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot:
article
80e
section:
two:
the
small
project
review
applicability,
article
65,
section
15.,
multi-family
dwelling
32
units
is
conditional
used
in
the
zoning
sub
district
article
65
section
16,
the
employee
ratio
is
excessive.
B
Article
65,
section
16,
the
height
is
excessive
article
65
16,
the
side
job
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
6-39
screening
environment
required
brick,
screening
and
buffering.
This
is
for
100
to
104
vote
avenue.
This
is
one
building
with
three
attached
three-story
townhouses
violations,
article
65
section
41..
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
42
dwellings,
article
65,
section
15
tom
house
dwelling
units,
there's
a
conditional
use
in
the
sub
district
article
65
section
16,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
B
D
A
So
so
I
I
just
want
to
put
it
on
the
record
that
this
is
a
six-member
board,
so
you
will
need
five
members
in
support
for
this
to
carry
okay.
D
Understood,
thank
you
so
noted.
This
was
the
first
of
two
back-to-back
hearings
on
a
two-building
project
at
the
intersection
of
bowdoin
street
and
bowdoin
avenue
in
dorchester.
The
project
might
actually
look
familiar
to
some
of
you
since
it
appeared
before
the
board
in
2015
and
for
subsequent
extensions.
D
This
current
project
is
very
similar,
but
there
have
been
a
few
adjustments
over
the
years,
for
example,
adding
some
residential
units
to
the
ground
floor.
We've
discussed
the
zoning
and
the
site
with
isd,
and
we
all
agree
to
sort
of
respect
the
zoning
process
that
we
basically
start
over
and
submit
new
applications
and
new
appeals
and
request
new
toning
relief.
So
this
first
part
focuses
on
the
larger
of
the
two
buildings.
It's
a
32
unit,
residential
building
with
approximately
4
000
square,
feet
of
ground
floor,
retail
space
and
34
parking
spaces
just
fyi.
D
AG
Requested,
thank
you.
Alberto
cardenas,
dhk,
architects.
As
adam
mentioned,
this
is
a
mixed-use
building
with
affordable
units
of
the
three
stories
of
residential
above
containing
smaller
units
efficiency,
one
and
two
bedrooms.
The
first
floor
contains
retail
and
and
three
units,
including
one
three
bedroom
unit.
AG
The
lower
level
under
the
building
in
the
parking
garage
contains
parking
for
both
the
retail
and
the
residential
uses,
and
there
is
a
substantial
rear
yard,
with
amenities
for
the
residents.
AG
The
townhouse
building
facing
oregon
avenue
is
a
holds
of
three
three
bedroom
units
in
response
to
the
need
for
larger
family
type
units
and
they
each
have
their
own
private
entrances,
their
roll
houses.
They
have
a
small
private
patio
in
the
rear
and
they're
connected
to
the
amenities
of
the
major
green
space
in
the
rear.
A
And
what's
the
average
unit
size
in
these
townhouses.
A
Okay
and
then
going
back
to
bowdoin
street,
can
you
give
us
the
breakdown
of
the
studios,
one
twos
and
threes
and
the
average
square
foot
of
footage
of
each.
AG
AI
Oh,
maybe
I
would
speak
madam
chair,
hi
and
good
morning
to
the
board.
We
have
about
five
studios:
seven,
one
bedroom,
nineteen,
two
bedroom
and
one
three
bedroom
in
the
in
the
mid-rise
building,
and
they
ranges
from
500
square
feet
up
to
a
thousand
square
feet
in
range.
AI
About
500
500
square
feet
and
the
ones
the
ones
are
roughly
are
off
a
little
over
750.
AI
J
A
Okay,
so
let
me
just
see
any
roof.
Decks
proposed,
no,
no,
okay,
underground
parking!
Okay.
How
would
the
plans
mr
alec.
M
AG
The
design
has
been
has
gone
through
both
dnd
and
bpda,
and
a
number
of
neighborhood
meetings.
That's
edited
the
project
and
it
evolved
through
those
meetings
to
the
current
design.
It's
it
is
somewhat
more
contemporary.
It
picks
up
on
some
traditional
elements
of
construction,
including
the
the
projecting
bays
and
the
town
houses,
the
clapboard
with
signing,
etc
so
and
it
scaled
it
scaled
to
coordinate
with
the
triple
deckers
in
the
neighborhood.
A
And
it
looks
like
there
might
be
opportunity
for
decks
individual
decks,
because
I
don't
know
what
your
open
space
requirement
is
and
how
you're
meeting
that.
AG
AI
A
AG
AI
We
are
currently
seeking
tenants
for
the
retail
space.
A
Okay,
okay,.
B
Out
of
chair,
we
have,
we
have
letters
of
support.
V
X
S
A
You
sorry
any
anybody,
no
no
race
hands.
AM
D
B
AN
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
josh
zaikum,
257
commonwealth
avenue
for
the
applicant
and
owner
shane
cranmore,
who
is
here
other
team
members,
including
architect,
arthur
chu,
are
present
to
answer
any
questions.
I'd
like
to
turn
this
over
to
mr
kram
or
the
the
owner
of
this
facility
and
future
dispensary.
Thank
you
so
much.
AO
Thank
you
josh
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
the
board.
We
also
have.
I
also
have
my
father
who's,
my
alert
in
the
room
with
me,
and
we
have
our
building
consultant
at
wadras
phoenix,
but
thank
you.
I'm
the
owner
of
100
owner
of
sophomore
state
llc,
doing
business
with
green
bay,
which
is
located
at
879
blue
hill
lab
in
dorchester
in
a
commercially
zoned
area.
AP
A
So
can
you
get
back
right
to
your
proposal
because
we
do
like
to
understand
from
the
applicants
about
what
their
plans
are,
their
hours
of
operation,
how
loading
and
unloading
occurs
and
how
and
what
the
different
checks
are
for
somebody
to
get
into
the
building.
Okay,.
AO
Great
great
so
yeah
our
operation
will
be
from
10
to
8
pm
monday
to
sunday
we'll
be
hiring
a
minimum
of
six
security
personnel,
including
our
director
of
security,
we'll
have
over
38
cameras
on
location
and
with
another
six
cameras
outside
covering
our
two
parking
lots.
I've
been
lucky
that
my
father
has
given
me
full
sight.
Control
of
the
two
points.
A
How
many
sales
spots
do
you
have.
AO
There's
25,
we
have
a,
we
have
an
employee
parking
lot
of
18.
and
we
also
want
to
allow
the
the
angel
street
residents,
which
are
my
closest
to
butters,
access
to
that
during
snow
emergencies.
That
was
a
major
issue
on
our
street
that
we
came
together
and
talked
about,
and
we
saw
that
that
could
be
a
solution,
but
that's
just
for
employees.
Employees
will
only
be
allowed
to
come
in
once
per
day
and
leave
once
per
day.
A
Okay,
let's
see,
can
you
now
that
we
have
this
plan
up?
Can
you
talk
through
how
this
is
going
to
work.
AO
Yeah,
so
when
you,
when
you
pull
in
through
angel
street
through
our
private
parking
lot,
you'll
be
greeted
by
security
that
will
walk
you
into
the
front
door.
AO
Once
you
walk
into
the
front,
entryway
you'll
see,
you'll
have
500
square
feet
right
around
500
square
feet
of
waiting
area
where
you'll
have
to
go
through
another
security
check
and
through
our
host
once
you
wash
your
all,
your
ids
checked
out,
you'll
be
granted
through
a
secure
door
with
a
card
reader
and
you'll
be
created
by
either
a
a
bud
tender
or
a
host
in
the
lobby.
That
will
walk
you
down
into
our
sales
area.
Our
sales
area
is
around
3
000
square
feet
and
our
lobby's
about
375
square
feet.
AO
So
we
have
enough
more
than
enough
room
to
to
adequately
get
people
in
and
out.
We
have
500
square
feet
of
bathroom
space
as
well.
AO
Oh
great
yeah,
so
deliveries
so
they'll
they'll
be
off
hours.
We
want
to
be
able
to
do
them
either
early
in
the
morning
or
late
at
night,
just
to
kind
of
keep
the
track
off,
but
you'll
be
able
to
pull
into.
AO
We
have
a
gated
lot
so
we'll
be
able
to
pull
into
the
gated
lot
and
it's
at
the
top
northeast
part
of
our
building,
which
is
the
safest
part
of
our
parking
lot,
and
once
you
pull
in
there,
you'll
have
no
adobe
cameras
and
they'll
be
greeted
with
a
security
personnel,
unloading,
unloading.
Everything
and
if
you
notice
that
part
of
our
that
section
of
the
building
is
closed
off
to
customers,
it's
just
for
storage
and
back
of
the
house.
Employees.
A
And
so
let
me
ask
you:
are
you
at
all
in
proximity
of
schools.
AO
We
cleared
all
the
buffers
we
have,
the
the
boys
and
girls
club
and
the
tennis
center,
which
is
across
the
street.
I've
had
communication
with
them,
but
it's
it's
more
than
more
than
enough
room
to
clear
the
buffers.
A
So
let
me
just
ask
you,
though,
you
know
optics
are
important.
How
are
you
going
to
control
for
potential
lines
in
front
of
your
building,
especially
with
the
kids
across
the
street.
AO
Well,
very
good,
so
we
have
because
I've
been
given
100
the
site
control
the
parking
lots.
Those
parking
lots
are
right
are
just
for
my
business,
so
we'll
have
it
we'll
have
a
security
maintained
out
there,
24
7,
when
the
business
is
open
and
in
order
to
get
in
it's
gated,
so
you'll
have
to
have
car
drive
in
you'll,
be
greeted
from
security.
AO
So
we'll
know-
and
it's
in
the
back
of
of
angel
street,
which
is
away
from
blue
hill
ave
and
where
the
schools
and
the
tennis
center
is
it's.
It's
pretty
much
sits
in
itself
and
pretty
private.
AN
And
and
might
add,
madam
chair,
that
there's
also
as
shane
mentioned
in
the
lobby
area,
where
there's
another
entry
and
another
security
checkpoint,
several
hundred
square
feet
as
well,
there's
no
anticipation
that
there'll
be
much
queuing
at
all
outside,
but
even
if
so,
would
be
limited
to
the
parking
lot,
which
is
to
the
rear
of
the
building.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss.
M
Yeah
I
have
yeah,
you
talked
about
you're
right
near
franklin
field
and
the
the
sportsman
tennis
center.
How
far
are
you
from
the
cannabis
location
in
grove
hall.
AO
It's
pure
oasis,
yeah.
Yes,
point
point:
six:
nine!
I
think
it's
believed
point
six,
five
to
point:
seven
miles
away:
okay,
so
you're
over
half
a
mile
yeah
we
clear
the
buffer
as
well
yeah,
okay,.
AO
I've
reached
out
to
mr
harry
thompson:
twice
I
reached
out
to
him
on
the
21st
through
representative
russell
holmes.
Who's
been
a
great
support
to
me
throughout
this
whole
journey.
He's
that
I
reach
out
I'm
trying
to
start
some
dialogue
there,
just
letting
them
know
that
my
business
would
be
coming.
AO
I
sent
out
my
presentation
from
on
the
january
21st
and
introduced
myself,
and
I
also
sent
them
some
more
communication
on
june
12th
of
2021
to
the
boys
and
girls
club
talking
about
some
of
my
aspirations
that
I'd
like
to
do.
I
know
that
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
help
out
through
my
company
that
I'd
like
to
help
out
through
personally
I'm
I'm.
I
was
born
and
raised
in
sports,
so
something
I
connect
to
a
lot
so
kind
of
very
excited
to
be
able
to
help
out
the
tennis.
AO
I
went
to
the
tennis
camp
for
five
years
of
my
life
growing
up
too.
Across
there
I've
seen
my
we've
owned
this
building
for
30
years
I
used
to
get
up
camp
and
run
over
to
my
building,
but
my
brothers
and
dad
working
in
there.
So
you.
A
Know
so,
but,
but
I
think
the
point
is
you
know
that
you
know
we
have
a
new
generation
growing
up
here
and
how
do
we
make
sure
that
that
this
this
kind
of
use
is
contained
on
site?
Because
you
know,
I
think,
the
the
we
still
see
the
model
and
brookline
as
not
being
completely
and
and
it's
in
brookline.
So
it's
none
of
our
business
in
a
certain
way.
But
you
know
you
have
a
lot
of
youngsters
going
to
school
in
proximity
walking
by
even
though
they
might
clear
the
buffer.
AO
Yeah,
so
we
and
we
hired
prevention
of
diversion
youth
officer
that
will
on
on
our
company
stephen
grace
and
he's
worked
with
the
boston
city
public
school
systems
before
as
well,
and
we
also
know
that
we
will
have
because
of
the
amount
of
area
we
have
in
there.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
dedicated
officer
that
officer
secretary
on
the
outside
of
the
premises,
making
sure
people
go
right
to
their
car
that
lot.
AO
If
you
see
that
a
lot
it's
it's
gated,
it
will
be
gated,
so
you
won't
have
the
ability
for
kids
just
to
walk
in
there
there'll
be
cameras
on
all
sides
of
our
the
front
and
field
light
right.
There
is
great
cameras
right
there,
but
on
angel
street
we'll
have
all
that
covered.
We
have
three
cameras
on
the
south
side
of
angel
street
and
on
the
east
side
of
angel
street
covered,
so
there
will
be
none,
no
loitering
or
any
type
of
kids
hang
around
that
that
area.
M
The
building
currently
is
unoccupied
right.
AQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair,
one
of
my
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
donald,
a
people
from
the
mayor's
office
in
the
employee
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
support
of
this
wrong
proposal.
We
would
ask
the
applicant
to
please
continue
outreach
with
our
community
stakeholders.
Thank
you
very
much.
S
And
I'm
sure
I
have
five
raised
hands
start
with
denise
you've
been
a
media.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
AS
Hi
good
morning,
madam
you're,
not
chair
members,
my
name
is
our
kenny
garcia.
My
address
is
112
american
legion
highway.
I'm
just
calling
in
support
for
the
situation
myself
there.
My
family
have
met
with
shane
about
the
building
and
it's
whereabouts
and
it's
location,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
know
everybody
in
my
neighborhood
is
100
ready
for
and
willing
to
receive
them
in
the
neighborhood.
A
AS
Yes,
madame
112.
S
AT
Charlie
shillingford,
I
am
the
director
of
the
matapan
food
pantry,
I've
been
doing
it
for
29
years
and
I
knew
shane
planned
more
from.
He
was
a
little
boy
growing
up
and
what
he
has
become
today.
I
am
so
proud
of
him
to
know
that
a
young
man
who
was
brought
up
in
the
neighborhood
can
just
strive
for
achievement
and
success,
and
I
do
want
to
support
him.
I
believe
him
because
I've
watched
him
grow.
AT
S
AU
Yes,
I
do.
My
name
is
jose
de
jesus,
I'm
living
at
16
former
heights,
and
I
just
like
to
go
on
record
supporting
this
project.
I've
I've
met
the
guy
shane
cranmore
a
few
times.
He
came
up
and
talked
to
me
recently
about
the
project.
AU
Everyone
in
my
building
is
excited
to
hit
us
and
see,
see
this
place.
Open
up,
people
had
neat
jobs
and
from
what
I
heard
from
him,
he's
saying
that
he's
one
of
the
higher
people
from
the
community,
and
that
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
everybody
here
and
he
seemed
like
a
great
guy
college.
Graduate
seemed
like
a
great
guy
met
him
a
few
times,
so
I'm
definitely
in
support
with
it.
S
AV
Hi
good
morning
my
name
is
sheenam
invisible
and
I
am.
I
live
in
30
angel
street.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
have
met
with
shane
and
he
has
talked
to
me
about
his
project
and
I
feel
he's
a
very
nice
person.
AV
S
S
Their
hands
as
well,
once
we
call
and
mata
chai
have
no
way
no
additional
raised
cans.
A
Mr
applicant
just
one
more
question
that
was
kind
of
triggered
by
by
the
comments.
So
what
is
your
plan
to
hire
employees?
AO
So
my
seven
of
my
first
major
contracts
have
all
gone
out
to
minority-owned
businesses
and
women-owned
businesses,
something
that
I
I
truly
hold
to
my
heart.
I
don't
try
not
to
just
say
words
that
I
don't
mean
and
I'm
kind
of
proving
it.
We
have
between
15
and
30
jobs
for
people
living
here,
as
the
vast
majority
of
our
employees
will
come
from
dorchester
angel
street
franklin,
hill,
tabernav,
blue
hill
lab
and.
A
AW
A
Okay,
so
you
are
okay,
so
so
you'll
have
15
to
30
jobs
and
and
tell
us
specifically
how
you
propose
to
to
hire
people
from
the
community.
Are
you
using
community
groups
what
what
is?
What
is
your?
What
is
your
strategy.
AO
Yeah,
so
I
we
will
have
a
diversity
officer.
I
want
to
hire
a
diversity
officer
that
would
be
able
to
take
part
and
help
with
that
I've
owned
a
business
already
in
lowell
and
a
lot
of
my
at
the
time.
A
lot
of
my
employees
did
come
from
that
area.
I'm
someone
that
just
from
growing
up
here
in
for
30
years,
I
hold
it
very,
dare
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
good
people
over
there.
AN
A
Okay,
okay
may-
and
this
is
purely
this
kind
of
medical
somebody
with
a
medical
car-
come
shop
in
your
facility.
M
AN
B
Much
follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
116
5117
1744
to
1750
center
street.
This
is
to
demolish
an
existing
gas
station
and
construct
a
new
bank
building
and
drive
through
atm
the
violation
article
56
section
15.
The
drive-in
bank
is
conditional
article
56
section
40.1
conforming
with
an
existing
building
alignment
of
the
block
name
and
address
for
the.
B
AX
Yes,
hello,
yes
hi,
my
name
is
salim
akaram
and
I
am.
I
live
on
75
ashcraft
street
daram
and
I
commute
a
lot
in
west
roxbury
and
lots
of
my
co-workers
are
females
and
I
oppose.
B
A
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
boa
982
948
4843
washington
street,
this
is
a
change
of
art
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
by
legalizing.
The
existing
third
floor
unit
expand
the
third
floor
unit
by
extending
an
existing
domer
and
legalize
the
third
floor
unit,
a
violation
of
article
56,
section
39
offstreet,
article
56,
section
7,
a
three
family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden,
article
56,
section
8,
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories
and
article
56,
section,
8
side
yard
isn't
sufficient,
even
as
best
for
the.
E
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kevin
clutier,
with
the
business
address
of
1990
center
street,
at
the
clutter
lock
from
rockberry,
and
we
are
seeking
it
to
change
the
occupancy
of
an
existing
home.
That
does
have
a
third
story
unit
that
is
currently
non-legal
and
was
so
when
my
clients
purchased
this
property
in
2018.
E
The
violations
include
use
this
isn't
a
two-family
zone,
but
by
way
of
mitigation,
there
are
a
number
of
three
plus
family
homes
in
this
area,
including
six
along
this
more
immediate
stretch
of
washington
street,
with
respect
to
the
height
we're
actually
not
raising
the
height
of
the
building.
It's
existing
at
36.1
feet,
but
by
by
legalizing
that
third
floor
unit
into
habitable
living
space,
it
increases
the
actual
storage
from
2.5
to
3,
and
it
is
a
2.5
zone,
but
again
we're
not
actually
adding
any
height
to
the
building.
E
Thank
you.
Well,
the
proposed
unit
third
floor
unit
will
be
989
square
feet
will
include
two
bedrooms,
a
full
bathroom,
a
kitchen
and
the
living
room.
It
will
be
slightly
smaller
than
the
first,
the
first
floor
and
second
story
unit
that
are
both
1268
square
feet.
J
E
The
project
architect
mr
driscoll
or
roach,
can
handle
any
specific
design
questions.
AY
All
right,
gavin
driscoll,
the
height
of
the
new
drummer,
will
be
eight
foot
two
and
then
in
the
existing
bedrooms.
There's
a
four
foot
knee
wall
and
it
goes
up
to
ten
foot
two
because
of
the
the
pitch
of
the
roof.
A
Okay,
it's
kind
of
a
handsome
building.
I
wonder
what
these
domers
will
do
to
it
is,
and
we
we
did
see
that
project.
That's
just
down
the
street
at
this
board,
so
very
familiar
with
this
miss
miss
better.
How?
How
are
the
plans.
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
member
of
the
board,
jack
duggan,
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
want
to
go
on
wrecking
support.
The
applicant
completed
a
full
communication
process
and
more
recently
went
before
the
western
auction
neighborhood
council
on
april
27th
and
received
their
full
support.
Thank
you.
S
Sure
we
do
have
two
great
plans
for
the
previous
proposal,
so
we
can
go
additionally.
U
A
Q
B
You
following
your
next
case,
calling
voa
117017910
grove
street.
This
is
the
swap
one
add
one
equipment
cabinet
at
three
hybrid
cables
swap
three
and
six
radio
units
and
swap
nine
antennas.
The
violation
article
56
section
11,
the
height,
is
excessive
article
961.
This
is
an
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
for
the
record.
Please.
T
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
the
board,
this
progress
bomber
from
transplant
wireless,
on
behalf
of
t-mobile,
proposing
that
we
make
some
modifications
to
this
existing
tower
at
the
west,
roxbury
crushed,
stone
business
and,
as
was
stated,
we're
swapping
one
and
we've
gotten
it
we're
not
adding
any
height
to
the
existing
structure,
we're
just
swapping
out
equipment.
That
is
there
for
the
groundwork.
Just
five
and
five
people.
Let's
go
look
in
here.
A
So,
let's
see
miss
edmonds.
Can
you
please
get
us
a
plan
that
shows
it
where
it
is
on
the
site
and,
oh,
mr
palmer,
can
you
explain
how
that
is
supposed
to
work.
T
Yeah,
so
if
you
look
yeah,
you
can
see
the
picture
there.
It's
basically
in
the
middle
of
the
the
crushed
stone
plant
or
I
don't
know
what
you
want
to
call
it
there.
But
again
it
has
been
existing
since
04,
and
we
received
approvals
in
2012
and
2015
to
do
similar
work
to
this.
A
Did
you
get
okay,
so
so
you're
just
changing
the
equipment
cabinet?
So
how
does
that
change?
Is
it
guess?
Does
it
get
smaller
where
and
where
is
the
equipment
cabinet?
Is
it
visible
from
any
place.
T
Well,
it
probably
would
be
visible.
I
think
the
tower
itself
is
visible,
but
I
believe
the
cabinets
themselves
just
look
like
part
of
the
tower
they
are.
The
cabinets
are
located
on
the
one
of
the
levels
of
the
tower,
so
the
ones
that
will
be
swapped
out.
You
know
they
may
be
a
little
bit
heavier,
but
we've
received
a
structural
analysis
for
this
path
and
you
know
we're
not
adding
any
further
antennas
we're
just
swapping
out
what
was
there.
So
there
should
be
no
real
change
to
the
tower
itself.
A
Questions
from
the
board,
mr
fortune,
any
any
any
thoughts
about
about
what
the
what
these
antennas
look
like.
F
B
A
AP
X
U
Madam
chair
would
like
to
put
a
motion
forward
for
approval,
with
bpda
design
review
on
the
exterior
to
ensure
that
there's
adequate,
buffering
and
coverage
on
the
base
of
the
tower
is
there
a
second.
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
118
3368
4415
washington
street.
This
is
an
addition
existing
one
story,
a
two-bay
repair
garage,
72,
foot
in
length
by
15,
feet,
width
and
having
three
days
the
violations,
article
9
section,
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
news,
article
67
section
11..
We
could
repair
guard
repair
garages
forbidden
article
67,
section
33,
the
special
provisions
of
the
corner,
lots
and
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
section
30
screening
in
buffering
for
the
record.
Please.
F
Hello,
my
name
is
dermott
doyne,
I'm
here
today
on
behalf
of
george
mccall,
the
proponent.
We
are
proposing
basically
extending
the
service
bay
area.
Previous
to
this
it
was
there
was
a
gas
station
and
had
gas,
long,
owls
and
and
gas
service.
F
These
gas
pumps
have
been
removed,
the
canopy
has
been
taken
away
and
the
focus
now
is
to
simply
add
two
workplace
to
the
to
the
to
the
to
the
existing
constru
existing
building
and
the
the
the
proposal
will
changes
will
diminish
traffic
and
impose
the
aesthetics
greatly
on
this
site.
In
addition,
there's
there's
there's
gonna
be
sufficient
off
street
parking,
whereas,
prior
to
this,
there
was
transit
used
in
a
lot
of.
A
Streetcars,
so
let
me
just
ask
you,
so
your
base
would
essentially,
if,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
looking
at
this
right,
go
out
to
where
the
old
gas
station
was
right
and
and
where
is
your
proposed
parking.
F
The
proposed
parking
is
going
to
be
on-site,
there's
going
to
be
minimal
parking
on
the
site
itself.
My
client
lives
directly
adjacent
to
it,
which
he
has
a
park
strip
there,
but
for
the
most
part,
this
is
going
to
be
a
very
eight
to
six
garage
with
minimal
parking
use
minimal.
Everything
is
going
to
be
serviced
on
the
lot.
F
We
are
not
looking
at
taking
away.
In
fact,
right
now
we
have
curb
cuts
existing
from
the
bdd,
which
would
everything's
going
to
stay
in
place,
we're
just
basically
cleaning
up
what
what
has
what
is
a
dilapidated
kind
of
building,
which
goes
back
50
years.
The
existing
news
has
gone
back
50
years
and.
A
Wendy
parking
because
I
know
there's
a
parking
garage,
not
so
far
down
the
street
and
they
park
their
damaged
vehicles
on
the
street,
so
just
to
make
sure
that
you
have
enough
capacity.
Let's
see,
how
would
the
plans
miss
better
medicare.
V
A
V
Members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
believe
that
there
are
support
letters
on
file
with
the
board
and
the
applicant's
been
working
diligently
with
their
neighbors
to
minimize
impact
to
the
community
and
also
work
on
the
overall
level
number
of
cars
that
are
on
the
law.
So
we
encourage
him
to
continue
that
work,
and
at
this
time
we
have
no
concerns.
Thank
you.
B
F
We
can,
we
can
actually
speak
to
that.
A
No
hold
up,
let
me
just
see
if
there
are
any
other
comments,
either
in
support
or
are
in
opposition.
A
No,
no
please
hold
on
this
is
we
are
conducting
a
hearing
here.
A
So
now
now
I
need
you
to
respond
to
the
parking
for
the
tow
trucks
and
you're
screening
and
buffering.
Are
you
proposing
any.
AZ
F
A
Good
to
have
a
face
to
the
name,
thank
you
and
okay.
I
think
we've
covered
everything.
May
I
have
a
motion
please.
C
A
As
well
hold
on
before
everybody
jumps
in
so
miss
better,
the
design
review
is
for
the
exterior
is
on
the
building
on
screening
and
buffering
correct
and
on
signage.
Should
there
be
signage,
correct,
okay
and
btd
review,
because
the
goal
is
to
reduce
the
curb
cuts.
A
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
119
305
196
park
street
just
to
construct
a
two
and
a
half
story
edition
on
the
rear
of
the
dwelling
violation,
violation,
article
56
section:
eight,
the
fourier
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
56
section
a
side,
guidance
picture
name
and
address
pull
the
record.
Please.
BA
Hi
good
afternoon,
good
morning,
good
day,
this
is
beth
and
jimmy.
I
my
husband,
are
here
john
gangemi.
We
are
the
owners
of
196
parks.
BA
Proposing
to
extend
the
back
of
our
house
in
a
non-conforming
existing
setback
to
make
it
accessible
to
our
handicapped
daughter,
who's
in
a
wheelchair.
A
So,
let's
just
see
so
we're
looking
at
the
plans.
Okay,
so
the
access
would
be
through
the
okay.
How
are
the
plans
miss
better?
The
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
in
the
urban
services
just
want
to
go
in
record
support.
The
applicants
completed
a
full
community
process,
went
before
the
west
rockstar
neighborhood
council
on
may
25th
and
received
their
full
support.
In
addition,
they
have
support
letters
from
a
bunch
of
their
directed
butters.
Thank
you.
X
AR
X
M
A
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
doa
one
one,
eight
three
zero
four
three:
two
thirty
washington
street.
This
is
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
erecting
nine
unit
residential
dwelling
with
fifteen
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article,
fifty
one
section,
eight
nine
dwelling
units
is
forbidden.
B
Article
51,
section
56
of
three
parkings
insufficient
article
51,
section
57.2,
confirmed
me
with
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
51
section
9,
the
additional
library
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
9,
the
floyd
array
ratio
was
excessive.
Article
51
section
9,
the
villain
had
a
successor
and
beat
article
51
section
9
the
side
judgment
sufficient
article
51,
section
9.
The
reagan
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
please.
BC
Thank
you
with
drago
and
toscano
with
a
business
address,
11,
beacon
street
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
with
me.
I
also
have
tanya
carrier
from
khalsa
who
is
the
architect
on
the
proposal.
As
was
mentioned,
this
project,
we
are
proposing
to
raise
two
existing
structures.
BC
Currently,
that
is
what
you're
looking
at
now
is
a
the
new
building
proposed.
There
are
two
buildings
on
one
lot,
so
it's
currently
a
pork
chop
lot
and
we.
A
BC
BC
Both
it's
front
to
back,
madam
chair,
you
see
if
you
look
at
the
existing
red
mark
where
it
says
230,
there's
a
smaller
structure
in
the
back
behind
it.
That's
about
three
feet
off
the
property
line
in
the
rear.
C
BC
We're
proposing
to
erect
nine
residential
units
with
15
parking
spaces
below
grade
they
would
be
accessed
along
washington
street
through
a
curb
cut
with
a
ramp
that
would
go
under
the
property.
The
lot
size
in
total
is
10
175
square
feet
and
just
to
give
you
the
unit
breakdown.
BC
These
are
all
family
style
units.
There
would
be
three
two
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
1015
square
feet
and
then
six
three
bedroom
units
with
an
average
size
of
1496
square
feet.
The
floor
plan
would
work
as
such
one,
the
basement
level
or
submerged
level
would
house
the
15
parking
spaces.
It
would
house
bike
racks,
a
trash
room,
mechanical
and
elevator.
BC
The
first
floor
would
have
ada
accessible
handicap
ramp
in
the
front
building
making
the
building
accessible.
It
would
also
house
units
one
two
and
three.
Those
are
three
bedroom
units
with
two
bath
and
they
also
have
outside
elevated
patios
off
to
the
side.
The
second
floor
of
the
building
would
house
units
four
five
and
six.
BC
BC
We
also
have
third
floor,
which
would
house
units
five,
six
and
seven,
and
those
are
those
would
be
three
that
would
be
a
three
bed
two
bath
two
bed,
two
bath
and
a
three
bed
two
bath
and
those
would
all
have
balconies
as
well
the
violations.
As
was
mentioned,
this
is
a
2f
district.
Even
though
we
have
the
two
buildings
on
one
lot
now,
nine
would
require
a
variance
for
mfr.
BC
BC
Our
side
yard
is
two
foot
seven
and
a
half
and
five
feet
and
what's
required,
is
ten,
the
minimum
rare
yard
so
right
now,
there's
only
three
feet
on
the
existing
building.
By
raising
that
building
our
rear
yard
would
be
17
feet.
2
inches
40
is
what's
required,
a
20
is
what's
required
and
then
for
parking.
We
tried
to
go
with
a
high
parking
ratio
with
15
spaces,
but
16
would
be
required.
So
we
would
be
one
short
of
the
requirement.
A
Okay
and
let's
just
see
okay,
so
access
is
from
washington
street
below
grade.
What's
the
distance
between
your
side,
neighbor
on
washington
street.
BC
So
that's
two
of
the,
so
we
have
the
it's
a
corner
lot,
so
it
would
be
the
the
street
across
the
street
on
shannon
street
on
one
side.
BC
But
then,
on
the
other
side,
where
the
where
the
house
is,
we
would
have
there's
five
feet:
two
feet:
seven
and
a
half
on
one
side
and
five
feet
on
the
other.
A
So
would
be
five
feet
with
your
neighbor
on
washington
street
correct
any
roof
decks
proposed.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plants.
BC
So,
thank
you
for
the
question.
The
in
working
with
the
community,
the
the
push
was
for
family
size
units.
So
again,
parking
was
a
very
big
issue,
so
we
were
cognizant
about
balancing
the
process,
went
on
for
two
years
about
unit
sizes
having
the
larger
bedrooms,
but
not
sort
of
putting
too
much
parking
in
the
neighborhood
as
well.
So
that
was
the
balance
and
that's
why
we
and
also
with
the
height.
So
that's
why
we
support
everything
underneath
the
property
as
well,
so.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
commend
the
applicant
for
working
diligently
with
their
direct
to
butter,
specifically
on
transportation
concerns,
and
they
have
agreed
to
provide
both
bike
facilities
and
also
those
15
parking
spaces
that
you
see
attached
to
the
main
units.
Thank
you.
BD
Good
morning
this
is
laura
mccrae
from
councillor
breen's
office.
I'd
like
to
go.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
as
being
in
opposition
to
this
project.
We've
seen
a
significant
number
of
projects
in
this
district
that
are
proposed
to
be
at
exactly
nine
units
so
that
they
are
not
required
to
be
to
include
income
restricted
units,
and
that
includes
this
project
and
many
projects
from
this
proponent.
BD
This
project
may
include
family
size
units,
but
no
families
most
families
will
not
be
able
to
afford
to
live
in
these
units.
We
are
also
concerned
about
the
number
of
parking
spots
included
in
this
project.
We
appreciate
that
the
proponent
is
responding
to
the
butter's
concerns,
but
this
project
is
located
very
close
to
transit,
so
we
would
like
to
request
that
stacker
that
all
parking
be
unbundled
from
rent
and
that
the
stockers
only
be
installed
if
there
is
demand
for
increased
parking.
Thank
you
thank.
J
B
X
BE
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
gomes
from
the
brighton
austin
improvement
association,
the
proponent
had
worked
very
closely
with
the
abutters
and
the
neighborhood
at
first.
They
were
very
much
against
the
project.
They
really
worked
hard
in
reaching
a
design
that
they're
very
happy
with
and
cleaning
up
that
lot
to
make
it
a
prominent
corner
a
lot.
The
parking
was
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
to
them
it.
You
know
right
in
that
little
area.
BE
The
parking
is
very,
very
tight
and
they
really
insisted
on
having
that
amount
of
parking,
not
less
because
of
the
current
situation
there,
even
though
it
is
close
to
transportation.
That
was
a
very
big
concern
of
the
neighbors
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
they
support
the
project
and
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
S
BF
I'm
sorry
I
accidentally
did
that
sorry.
C
M
A
AE
B
B
O
Clock,
my
name
is
david,
troy,
411,.
AW
B
O
AW
AA
B
A
A
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please
I'm.
AB
AB
A
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
up
in
opposition.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application
via
the
webex
event
platform.
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised,
virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
A
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
are
called
upon
to
be
just
to
comment-
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address.
First
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
information
is
called
or
the
meeting
host
will
not
know
the
calling
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
B
Thank
you,
madam
champ
calling
the
first
case
for
11
o'clock,
calling
voa
118
5696
106
to
108
bunker
hill
bunker
hill
street.
This
is
a
change
of
auction
from
a
restaurant
to
six
residential
units,
construct
a
two-story
addition
and
a
rare
addition
to
an
existing
one-story
builder.
The
violations,
article
62
section,
25,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
62,
section,
29
heart
street
blocking
is
insufficient.
B
Article
62,
section
29,
austria
parking
and
loading
required
inappropriate
maneuvering
area
article
62,
section
7,
the
multi-family
dwelling
uses
forbid
article
62
section
8
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
62,
section
8,
the
floyd
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
62,
section
8,
the
build
height
is
excessive
in
feet:
article
62,
section
8
usable
open,
sufficient
article
62,
section
8,
the
rare
yards
insufficient
and
article
9
section
2..
This
is
the
change
in
the
non-conforming
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
morancy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
vahid
nick
bohr
in
this
matter.
The
project
architect
is
tim
sheehan,
the
location
is
106-108
bunker
hill
street,
which
is
at
the
corner
of
farron
street.
In
charlestown,
madam
chair,
the
original
application
had
a
roof
deck.
BG
That
is
no
longer
the
case,
so
the
violation
for
restricted
roof
structure
has
been
eliminated,
with
the
current
set
that
the
board
can
see
on
on
screen
now.
BG
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
an
application
to
construct
a
two-story
edition,
including
a
two-story
edition
in
the
rear
on
the
second
and
third
floors,
only
to
an
existing
single
story,
building
which
is
currently
a
restaurant,
and
it
changed
the
occupancy
to
six
dwelling
units
while
eliminating
the
restaurant.
There
will
be
four
off
street
parking.
Spaces
are
five
on
grade
in
the
rear
of
the
building.
BG
The
resulting
three-story
building
would
be
where
it
would
have
a
common
basement
with
storage
and
mechanical
space.
Only
so
no
living
space
in
the
basement
each
floor
would
contain
two
dwelling
units.
The
first
excuse.
A
Me
miss
morenzie
is
this:
the
only
set
that
we
have
is
this
this
one
pager.
BG
No,
that
was
there,
should
be
a
full
set
of
plans
that
single
page
there.
These
are
the
players.
BG
And
so
the
the
the
first
floor
contained
two
two
bedroom
units,
so
739
and
1012
square
feet.
The
second
and
third
floors
would
have
each
would
have
two
three
bedroom
units,
ranging
from
1175
to
1325
square
feet
on
the
second
and
third
floor
levels.
The
rear
units
would
each
have
a
rear
deck
of
23
or
a
balcony
of
23
by
5
feet.
There
are
no
roof
decks
being
proposed.
BG
That
was,
as
I
said,
originally
proposed,
but
the
community
was
supposed
to
any
roof
decks.
The
relevant
zoning
sub
district.
Here
this
is
an
rh
1500
row
house,
sub
district
with
a
minimum
required
lot
size
of
1500
square
feet
for
two
dwelling
units.
Six
units
are
being
proposed
in
this
traditional
three
decker,
which
is
just
over
36
feet
in
height,
which
is
consistent
with
virtually
all
the
surrounding
buildings.
BG
BG
BG
But
if
you
look
looking
closely
at
the
plans
that
are
now
on
screen
that
36
feet,
two
inches
is
actually
to
the
top
of
the
parapet
rather
than
to
the
roof
line.
So
I
believe
that
the
building's
height
to
the
roof
line,
which
is
how
I
was
the
only
height,
is
measured,
is
actually
in
compliance
with
the
code.
BG
The
code
requires
150
square
feet
of
usable,
open
space
per
dwelling
unit.
As
I
mentioned,
two
of
the
units
in
the
rear
have
balconies
of
115
square
feet
and
originally
proposed
roof
deck
open
space
was
eliminated,
the
required
rare
yard
setback
for
this
lot's
25
feet,
but
the
the
actual
setback
on
the
second
and
third
floor
levels
only
is
about
15
feet.
BG
BG
There's
no
parking
whatsoever
allowed
on
farron
street
and
the
other
side
of
fern
street
beyond
this
site
is
really
just
one:
entire
curb
cut
for
parking
for
the
six
story,
building
across
the
street
and
in
the
rear.
Where
that
perpendicular
car
is
located
for
a
perpendicular
space,
that's
a
private
way
and
there's
also
access
from
that
private
way,
with
no
curb
being
present.
BG
BG
He
is
prepaying
for
a
year
parking
as
these
would-be
rental
units,
but
again
the
five
are
being
provided,
and
I
also
point
out
that
the
site
is
within
about
500
feet
from
blue
bikes
and
zip
car
locations
in
hays
square
and
is
also
very
approximate
to
to
four
mbta
bus
stops
with
that
I'll
pause
and
I'll.
Take
any
questions
that
the
members
may
have.
A
Hey
so
I
think
you've
covered
everything.
How
are
the
plans
miss
better.
A
BH
W
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
ricardo
patron
from
the
office
of
city
councilor,
lydia
edwards,
the
applicant
made
several
changes
to
this
proposal
at
the
request
of
the
community,
including
removing
the
roof
deck
and
the
trash
compactors.
As
attorney
moran
stated,
councilor
edwards
would
also
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support.
X
S
Hey
madam,
try
to
have
day
raised
hands
robert
you've
been
a
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
BI
I
just
think
this
whole
thing
is
kind
of
excessive,
with
the
the
units
there's
definitely
no
parking
there.
They
addressed
it
that
they're
going
to
rent
a
spot
for
a
year
down
in
terminal
street,
which
is
about
a
half
mile
away.
BI
I
asked
the
question:
what
happens
after
a
year-
and
I
was
told,
well
people,
don't
you
have
cars
in
charleston?
They
have
the
buses.
You
know.
I
strongly
disagree
with
that.
We
can't
even
get
a
parking
place
now
to
put
at
least
six
more
units
and
at
least
six
cars
minimum.
They
just
don't
have
the
space.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
sir.
So,
can
I
ask
the
additional
speakers
if
you're
speaking
in
opposition
this
this
speaker
talked
about
the
density
and
the
parking?
Please
add
new
information.
B
S
BJ
Sure
my
name
is
paul
sullivan,
and
the
address
that
I
represent
is
100
fahren
street,
also
known
as
110
bunker
hill
street.
I
am
the
senior
building
right
across
the
street
from
this
property,
and
I
want
to
put
on
record
that
I'm
in
total
support
of
the
residential
only
component
of
this
property
and
taking
out
the
restaurant.
BJ
The
parking
situation
is
a
little
bit
tight,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
a
problem
here,
because
it
is
dedicated
to
our
pocket
on
the
street
that
which,
which
will
probably
be
eliminated
as
well.
O
Marie
yep
good
morning,
this
is
gerald
adler.
I
live
at
28
monument
street,
which
is
just
two
blocks
away
from
the
proposed
structure.
I
am
in
support
of
this
project.
I
agree
with
the
the
gentleman
who
just
spoke
that
I
don't
think
parking
will
be
an
issue.
I
drive
to
work
every
day
and
there's
no
issue
whatsoever
with
finding
parking
in
charlottetown.
A
B
A
Okay,
so
I
miss
miss
better.
Maybe
would
it
be
better
just
to
say
approval
with
design
review
on
btv
review,
because
that.
U
Way
so
btd
reviews
should
determine
the
adequate
amount
of
parking
spaces
that
would
fit
on
the
site
yeah.
My
theory
was
that
it
was
assuming
vehicle
access
on
hickory
app
and
it's
it's
it's
a
very
difficult
site
to
fit
five,
but
there
is
clearance
for
three,
but
I
think
we
can
leave
it
to
btd
to
determine.
B
BG
B
You
calling
the
next
case
calling
doa
112
9472
753
east
broadway.
This
is
a
change
of
use
from
office,
space
and
bagel
shop
to
bagel
shop
and
ford
dwelling
units
violations,
article
68,
section
33
off
street
parking
and
learning
requirement,
article
68,
section,
eight
use
of
open
spaces
and
suspicion,
and
article
68
section
8.
Additional
lot
area
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
plan.
BK
BK
A
I'm
sorry
so
so
counselor.
May
I
ask
you
some
details
here
so
so
there's
two
two
bedrooms,
two
one
bedrooms,
I'm
assuming
this
will
be
rental.
AU
AM
BK
So
the
plans
show
a
fire
escape
addition
to
the
front
units,
but
after
the
community
process
we
are
no
longer,
including
that
and
we've
made
the
you
can
see
in
that
elevation.
That's
currently
on
the
screen,
the
exterior
doors
on
the
front
portion
of
the
building
and
the
connecting
stairway
to
the
existing
fire
escape
have
been
removed.
We
are
not
going
forward
with
that
and
we
have
made
the
interior
staircase
compliant
with
the
fire
code,
so
that
that's
not
required
in
order
to
create
a
safe
means
regress
for
the
unit.
BK
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
visa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
There
was
extensive
community
process
conducted
by
my
colleague,
haley
dillon
they've
had
a
couple
of
waters
meetings
most
recently
in
april,
and
they
have
met
with
the
city
side
city
side,
neighborhood
association.
There
were
significant
concerns
around
trash
mitigation
that
fire
escape,
that
you've
heard
about
rogue
control.
They've
worked
diligently
with
neighbors.
V
Z
Good
morning,
martin
of
the
chair
members
of
the
war
and
I
called
him
from
councillor
flink's
office,
the
councilor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
opposition
due
to
feedback
from
neighbors
director
of
others
and
the
city
point
neighborhood
association,
who
have
all
expressed
concerns
about
the
number
of
units
proposed,
lack
of
parking
and
trash
removal
issues.
Thank
you.
X
AE
B
S
I'm
trying
to
have
my
two
raised:
hands:
eileen
you've
been
unmuted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
BL
Hi
good
morning,
eileen
at
776,
east
broadway,
south
boston
on
the
resident
and
a
butter,
and
I
am
opposed
to
the
project
because
it's
expensive,
as
far
as
the
trying
to
accommodate
the
capacity
for
potentially
sixth
commander,
there
has
been
meetings
in
the
past,
there's
all
sorts
of
issues
that
are
retaining
that
impact.
The
direct
the
butters,
the
area
that
was
designated
and
shown
to
you
for
trash
could
not
possibly
facilitate
the
trash
for
four
additional
units
and
a
commercial
bagel
store
that
exists.
BL
Currently,
I
didn't
hear
you
folks
talk
about
trash
compactors.
Thank.
A
S
BM
My
name's
richard
hayes
your
address
757
east
broadway,
which
is
the
direct
avatar.
You
share
a
common
property
line.
I
don't
want
you
again
following
the
chairs
lead,
I'm
not
going
to
reiterate
the
previously
stated
objections,
but
we've
had
really
the
the
abutters
in
the
community
have
very
great
difficulty
in
trying
to
get
any
kind
of
accommodations
from
the
developers
on
this.
It's
they
say
they
want
to
do
things,
but
they
don't
ever
do
anything.
A
So
let
me
let
me
talk
and
let
me
have
you
comment
on
the
specific
proposal.
You
know
this
is
a
change
from
office
space
to
four
dwelling
units.
So
what
what?
What
are
your
trigger
concerns
about
that.
BM
BM
Houses
all
have
driveways
each
and
every
one
of
us
have
problems
with
the
bagel
store
and
starbucks,
and
we
will
have
problems
with
the
they
are
allowed
to
build
this
unit
with
people
who
will
have
the
cars
they
block
your
driveway
or
they
pull
into
your
driveway.
BM
I
I
I'm
stating
that,
because
I
don't
want
to
reiterate
the
other
ones
that
I've
heard,
which
is
the
number
of
units
it
doesn't
support
it.
The
neighborhood
it's
a
tremendously
busy,
neighborhood
and
and
put
four
more
units
in
there
is
going
to
add
density
when
the
vast
majority
of
the
homes
are
single-family
homes.
A
S
BB
Yep
absolutely
rusty
bell
singer.
My
address
is
57
l
street,
so
I
live
very
close
to
the
proposed
property.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
am
in
favor
of
the
residential
properties
being
built.
I
think
that'll
actually
help
us
with
the
traffic
right
now
we
have
yes,
the
boston
bagel
shop
there,
but
there's
also
two
commercial
properties
that
are
there
currently
and
I've
lived
in
the
area
for
10
plus
years
commercial
property
is
going
to
draw
more
traffic,
more
log
jams
with
cars
and
more
trash
than
a
couple
small
residential
units.
BB
A
Thank
you,
miss
o'connor,
just
quickly,
just
say
whether
you're
in
support
or
an
opposition,
because
we
need
to
move
on
to
a
motion.
BN
City
point
neighborhood
association,
sleepless
neighborhoods
association
will
stand
with
the
direct
abutters
in
so
far
as
opposition
for
trash
parking
and
density.
Thank.
A
A
B
Following
the
next
two
cases,
calling
voa
119
16485y
street,
there's
a
companion
case,
voa
119
29785y
street.
This
is
to
confirm
the
legal
argument
as
a
two-family
dwelling
and
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
and
attic
large
street
parking
violation.
Article
55
section,
nine,
the
floyd
air
ratio-
is
a
contestant.
B
P
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
board
attorney
derek
small
business
address
51
dobson
road
with
me
today
is
mr
chris
parabas
who's,
the
project
architect,
and
I'm
sure
we're
here
today
seeking
to
extend
the
living
space
of
this
existing
two-family
dwelling
into
the
basement
and
into
the
attic
area.
We
are
also
creating
two
off-street
parking
spots
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
P
The
zoning
sub-district
is
a
305
000.
The
violation
on
the
first
address,
mr
fortune,
embedded
to
the
record,
is
far
the
required
far
was
0.6
and
what
they
did
with
the
extensions
they
re.
Both
fail
will
be
1.3.
P
With
regard
to
the
parking
spaces
battlefield
chair,
they
are
seeking
to
place
two
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
property,
as
was
shown
on
the
site
plan.
A
Okay,
so,
okay,
so
just
talk
me
through
this
because
I'm
having
a
bit
of
a
hard
time
understanding
this
so
you're
looking
to
confirm
the
legal
occupancy
as
a
two
family,
so
okay,
and
so
the
so
you're
you're,
claiming
that
this
origin
this
and
how
do
we
know
that
this
is
a
confirmation
of
it
off
a
two
family?
A
Is
there
anything
on
the
record
that
meters
or
anything
else
that
indicates
that
this
is
an
existing
two
family?
Yes,.
P
There
are,
there
are
two
meters
in
the
building
and
isd.
It
was
confirmed
that
it
is
already
consistent.
A
Okay,
and
so
what
is
the
occupancy
proposed
for
in
the
basement?.
AA
So
the
if
we
can
go
to
a
1.1
that'll
show
the
the
basement
level,
but
it's
essentially
it's
it's
a
it's
residential,
so
a
majority
of
the
space
is
is,
is
made
up
of
two
bedrooms:
some
mechanical
space,
a
bathroom
that
would
be
part
of
the
the
lower
lower
unit,
and
there
is
some
common
space
for
both
units.
That
is,
on
the
left
and
bottom
side
of
the
page.
AA
Okay,
so
floor
to
ceiling
height
is
it
varies,
so
there's
some
spaces
that
I
want
to
say
that
are
as
low
as
six
foot
five.
I
think
it's
in
the
mechanical
room
and
then
the
two
bedrooms
themselves
and
and
a
portion
of
the
hallway
is
at
seven
foot
three,
that's
the
existing
condition
and
we
would
be
looking
to
one
most
likely
excavate
down
to
get
the
proper
ceiling
height
in
those
spaces
and
then,
if,
if
we
go
over
to
the
exterior
elevations,
that
would
be
the
last
page,
a
2.1
it.
AA
Basically,
you
could
see
the
existing
grade
there.
So
at
the.
If
we
look
at
the
left
side
elevation,
that
probably
is
the
best
indicator
of
it.
You
know
the
the
the
rear
of
the
house
we're
looking
at
roughly
five
feet,
two
inches
below
grade.
Obviously
we're
going
to
be
going.
Excuse
me,
we'll
probably
be
once
we
excavate
the
depth
of
the
basement.
We
will
be
a
little
bit
deeper
than
this,
because
this
is
represents
the
existing
condition.
A
Okay,
so
just
tell
us
again
the
for
the
the
distance
from
the
floor
to
the
window
well
or
the
other
sill.
AA
Oh,
I
I'm
sorry,
I
got
you
so
that
that
would
be
from
floor
to
the
sill
of
the
the
window.
C
AA
Okay,
so
or
to
the
cell
would
be
by
code,
is
no
more
than
44
inches.
A
So
and
I'm
looking
at
this
this
map
here,
what's
the
distance
between
the
the
the
outside
wall
and
the
property
line
where
the
bedrooms
are
proposed.
AA
It's
3.9
feet
is
the
dimension.
A
AA
So
attic
is,
is
exclusive
would
be
exclusive
to
the
upper
unit
and
if
we
can
go
back
to
a
1.2
and
you
can
see
on
the
right
side-
that's
the
attic
level.
So
it
would
be
made
up
of
two
bedrooms
bathroom
circulation,
to
get
you
down
to
the
lower
levels.
AA
There
is
so
so
there's
a
dormer
on
the
right
hand,
side.
That
is
it's
it's
it's
more
than
50
percent
of
the
the
length
of
that
side
of
the
of
the
structure.
So
if
we
can
go
back
down
to
the
elevations,
you
can
see
the
dormer
itself
there.
It
is
right
there.
A
Okay,
so
this
looks
like
it's
a
gut
rehab,
because
the
building
looks
like
it's
in
in
bad
shape.
Yes,
it
is
okay,
so
tell
us
about
then
the
the
the
parking
talk
us
through
the
parking
is
that,
on
your
is
on
your
property,
then.
AA
It
is
so
so
if
you,
if
you
look
at
five
byways,
the
the
two
parking
spaces
that
are
part
of
of
the
of
the
of
the
building
are
actually
fronting
on
on
chestnut
street.
Z
Z
A
Okay,
so
this
looks
like
an
interesting
project.
I
just
want
to
say
off
the
bat
that
this
board
is
not
inclined
to
look
favorably
on
basement
units
or
basement
occupancy,
but
I'll
just
leave
that
out.
There.
P
Adam
chair,
if
I
could
it's
just
just,
might
add
that
those
are
existing
conditions
with
regard
to
the
space
living
space
in
the
basement.
We've
just
simply
got
rehabbing
the
building.
A
So
but
we
don't,
is
there
any
track
record
of
those
basement
spaces
being
legal
or
not,
because
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
interesting
things
that
go
on
in
this
city,
and
so
we
just
can't
be.
We
just
cannot
be
part
of
something
that
that
was
understood.
Okay,
so
thank
you
counselor.
How
are
the
plans
miss
better
man.
M
Yeah,
I
I
have
a
few
questions
and
they're
going
to
go
over
ground
that
you've
already
covered
madam
chair,
but
I
I
wasn't
quite
clear
on
all
the
answers
and
I
recognize
mr
smalls.
These
are
existing
conditions.
Nonetheless,
you're
asking
for
variance
with
these
particular
conditions.
M
I
believe
the
architect
said
that
it
was
five
foot
two
from
the
floor
to
grade
and
that
you
have
to
dig
down-
and
at
least
another
three
inches,
because
it's
seven
foot
three
ceiling
height
now
and
in
order
for
a
two
family
to
meet
code,
you
have
to
get
seven
foot
six.
So
that
means
that
by
my
calculation
it
will
be
five
foot
five
underground.
U
M
Height,
it's
only
you're
right,
you're
you're
right.
So
it's
for
three
units
that
it's
seven
foot
six,
but
but
the
architect
said
that
they
were
gonna,
dig
down
right.
M
U
M
So
I
mean
that
they're,
not
the
issue
of
natural
light.
The
issue
of
sort
of
the
dank
dungeon,
like
quality
of
the
underground
unit,
seems
pretty
clear
of
this.
So
that's
one
thing.
The
other
question
is:
can
we
go
back
to
the
the
site
plan
because
the
I
mean
it's
rear
yard
parking.
You've
got
a
wide,
curb
cut,
that's
a
separate
issue,
but
it's,
but
it's
really
hard
parking
off
of
wise,
but
it's
front
yard
off
of
chestnut.
P
M
M
P
B
B
This
is
from
bob
d'amico
at
btd.
He
said
5y
street.
The
two
cars
located
on
chestnut
street
do
not
comply
with
btd
standards.
One
of
the
vehicles
actually
minimally
overhangs
the
sidewalk
on
y
street
four
cars
cannot
maneuver
safely.
I
suggest
the
number
of
cars
be
reduced
to
three
and
placed
on
a
60
degree
angle.
U
U
R
AM
R
AA
Yes,
this
is
chris,
the
the
for
bedrooms.
You
have
to
have
emergency
sorry,
particularly
bedrooms
in
basement
spaces
like
this,
you
have
to
have
emergency
egress
windows
plus
window
wells
that
meet
a
minimum
criteria
and
the
minimum
criteria
is
a
three
foot
by
three
foot
clear.
Well,
that
gets
you
out
of
that
space.
But
here
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
go
three
foot
by
a
minimum
of
four
foot,
six
to
to
kind
of
make
that
space
a
little
bit
more
passable.
BO
A
Okay:
okay,
any
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
this
proposal?.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
spacey
sharif
with
mayor's
office
of
vape
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
They
do
have
support
from
the
jp
council.
We
haven't
had
any
opposition
thus
far
through
the
community
process,
but
we
do
defer
to
the
board
regarding
considerations
around
the
parking
and
the
basement.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please,
I
think.
U
A
AK
A
B
Madam
chair,
before
we
go
to
the
next
case,
I
just
want
to
take
care
of
the
the
recommendations.
C
B
From
the
subcommittee,
but
we
also
have
a
little
work,
we
need
to
do
on
31
willa
street,
so
I
guess
the
plans
for
the
office
was
not
there.
We
did
not
have
it,
but
we
have
the
applicant
on
the
phone.
So
I'm
going
to
make
sure
that
we
call
this
in
for
the
record
before
I
go
to
the
other
recommendation,
so
I'm
going
to
call.
B
B
A
Miss
miss
better.
You
were
on
the
subcommittee
meeting
the
other
day.
Will
you
it
was,
mr
robinson?
Yes,
we
were
just
missing
the
plans.
This
is
a
proposed
200
square
foot
edition
for
the
creation
of
the
home
office,
and
so
did
you
have
a
chance
to
look
at
it.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
we'll
just
have
that
on
the
record,
mr
mr
fortune,
do
you
want
to
run
through
the
recommendations?
Please.
B
I
will
do
that
right
now,
I'm
out
of
chair
okay.
This
is
the
subcommittee
meeting
which
was
held
on
thursday
june
17th
at
10
10
minutes
out
first
case
boa
115,
3407,
177
cool
ridge
street
was
a
unit
two
at
a
private
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
casebook
117
5423
113
elm
street.
It
was
addy
schentdormer.
B
B
AJ
B
Mr
6282
to
greenwich
court,
it
was
increased.
The
size
of
usable
space
in
the
basement
was
approved,
with
the
proviso.
No
bedrooms
in
the
basement
case,
boa
113,
1987
to
copeland
park.
It
was
an
interior
exterior
renovation
of
existing
two
family
was
approved
with
vpda
boa11617927
iowa
street
was
the
correct
work
done
by
a
previous
contract.
It
was
approved
at
bpda
case
boa
five,
two
six
165
milton
avenue.
It
was
a
kitchen
renovation.
It
was
approved,
hboa
one
one,
six,
three:
nine:
four:
zero.
B
Eighteen,
twenty
five
to
eighteen,
twenty
seven
river
street:
it
was
removing
a
roof,
adding
a
third
floor,
removing
a
full
bath.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
117-13205
west
milton
street.
It
was
extended
kitchen
and
bathroom.
It
was
approved
case
voa,
zero,
114-3606,
eight
elviston
street.
It
was
a
demo
existing
garage
to
build
a
new
garage.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one,
one,
eight,
zero,
two,
eight
nine
203
chestnut
avenue.
It
was
a
creative
master
bedroom.
B
On
the
third
floor
second
floor
bump
out,
it
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
117
7169
320
cornell
street
was
it
was
the
finishing
the
existing
attic
space
and
adding
one
new
shed
dorm
was
approved
at
bpda
case
boa
one
one,
seven,
six,
two
seven
one,
seven
glen
ellen
road
was
a
raise
the
roof,
an
existing
house
adding
second
level
of
living
space.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
116.
B
Adding
a
above
the
garage
with
no
slide
that
was
approved
case
boa
115,
7796
105
corey
street
was
in
addition
to
an
existing
garage.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
four
one,
six,
thirty
one
willow
street.
We
just
just
heard
it
was
to
change.
It
was
to
add
a
pergola
and
home
office.
It
was
approved
in
the
last
case,
boa
118,
4282
67
hopedale
street
was
deferred
to
august
24
at
12
30..
B
B
The
violations,
article
50
section
29
additional
lot
area-
is
insufficient
article
15
section
29,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section,
29
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
and
article
50,
section
43,
austrian
parking
and
loading
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
G
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
bulgini,
10,
forbes,
road
and
braintree
on
behalf
of
the
owners
henry
and
henrietta
workman
9
carlisle
street.
The
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
3f
4
000..
The
lot
size
is
4
000
square
feet.
As
mr
fortune
stated,
the
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
repair:
the
roof
front,
which
is
an
interior
renovations.
G
The
property
has
always
been
used
and
assessed
as
a
three
family
assessing
records.
As
you
know,
only
go
back
to
1985
and
it's
been
used.
It's
been
assessed
as
a
three
from
at
least
then.
The
building
has
three
electrical
services:
three
gas
meters,
three
water
heaters
and
three
old
oil
tanks.
I'm
going
to
just
address
the
violations.
Additional
lottery
area
is
insufficient
and
the
three
outs.
A
So
hold
on
hold
on
mr
bulgini.
Can
you
please
talk
through
the
units
where
they
are,
how
many
bedrooms
their
square
foot
footage.
G
Sure
sure
so,
there's
three
units
there's
no
living
space
in
the
basement.
Madam
chair
unit,
one
obviously
is
on
the
first
floor.
It's
1147
square
feet.
It's
two
bed,
one
bath
unit,
two
is
eleven
hundred
and
ninety
six
square
feet.
That's
in
the
second
floor
that
is
two
beds
in
one
bath
unit.
Three
is
862
square
feet.
That
is
two
bed
in
one
bath.
A
And
can
we
please
scroll
up
to
unit
three?
Are
there
is
this?
Is
there
a
pitch
roof?
What's
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
up
there.
G
The
architects
on
the
call
david
did
you
answer
that
question:
it's
an
existing
nothing's
changing
matter.
I
understand
your
question.
I
think.
A
Eight
foot:
seven:
okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better
medicare?
The
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AR
A
Again,
jason
be
kind
to
you.
Try
again.
AR
A
B
Thank
you
have
a
nice
day.
Everyone
call
the
next
case
calling
voa
118
6391
124
to
126
foreign
street.
This
is
a
bill,
a
new
four-story
residential
building
of
wood,
steel,
concrete
on
a
vacant
lot
at
124
and
126
warren
street
and
combine
the
two
large.
It's
one
lot
to
be:
5
190
191
square
feet
to
be
known
as
124
warren
violation,
article
50
section
29
additional
light
years,
insufficient
article
50,
section
20,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
L
BP
Hello,
there
hello-
I
am
here
with
patrick
mahoney
attorney
representing
the
project.
AE
BP
And
I
was
under
the
impression
that
patrick
was
going
to
do
the
presentation,
but
I
can
do
the
presentation,
no
problem
at
all.
Thank
you
for
your
time
board
members
good
to
be
on
board
at
the
cba
in
these
times,
and
it's
a
small
project
that
replaces
what
was
the
burnt
out
building
a
number
of
years.
Back
was
located
on
the
corner
here.
A
So,
mr
roscoe,
yes.
A
A
At
least
this
might
be
the
third
possibly
the
fourth
time
in
my
memory,
so
tell
us
what
makes
this
residential
proposal
different
from
the
last
residential
proposal
that
we
saw
on
this
site,
because
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
community
concern
about
those
micro
units
that
came
before
so
give
us
some
more
detail
about,
what's
being
proposed
now.
BP
Thank
you
chairman
for
leading
me
in
the
right
direction.
Here.
The
difference
is,
I
believe,
the
other.
I
we
were
not
the
architects
for
that.
My
client
was
not
the
proponent
there.
What
on
this
proposal,
we
have
six
units,
two
units
per
floor
above
a
garage
and
lobby
space.
Are
there
so
the
difference
is
size.
I
would
say
these
are
large
two-bedroom
units
and
we
think
they
are
quite
attractive
in
terms
of
having
exposure
on
three
sides
for
bedrooms
and
living
rooms,
and
things
like
that,
so
they
are.
BP
Okay,
there
are
thousand
square
feet:
okay,
a
gen
round
number,
that's
a
good
number
to
work
with
other.
This
is
also
an
elevator
serviced
building
with
parking
inside
on
the
first
floor.
J
BP
A
And
a
roof
deck.
BP
BP
We
met
many
many
times
with
the
the
director
butters
and
neighbors,
and
came
up
with
a
solution
that
mimics
the
building
the
to
the
right
all
the
way
to
the
right
and
on
lauren,
so
we're
trying
to
pick
up
on
the
architecture
there,
which
is
what
folks
from
the
neighbor
would
thought
we
should
do
and
that's
what
we've
responded
with.
A
Okay,
so
how
are
the
plans
miss
better.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
any
any
questions
from
the
board?
I'm
sorry
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AR
X
S
Madam
chad,
you
have
one
raised
hand,
miss
lauren,
you
been
on
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
by
the
record?
Please.
BO
Hi,
this
is
lorraine,
payne
wheeler,
my
address
is
85
moreland
street.
I
live
in
the
neighborhood
and
organized
roxbury,
pass
forward,
neighborhood
association
and,
as
stated,
we
met
with
this
developer
many
many
times,
and
this
design
does
have
the
support
of
neighbors,
particularly
because
it
fits
with
the
victorian
buildings
in
the
neighborhood
and
people
were
very
concerned
about
the
putting
stone
wall
and
the
warren
house
next
door.
BO
So
he
agreed
that
he
would
spare
some
of
those
pudding
stones
and
put
them
in
a
much
more
modern
wall
space
that
sort
of
looks
it
adds
greenery
to
the
building,
and
so
then,
the
last
thing
that
we
would
ask
the
board
is
to
ensure
that
the
project
is
also
reviewed
by
the
landmarks
commission.
U
Madam
madam
chair,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
project
with
bpda
design
review,
specifically
to
to
review
the
facade
on
winthrop
street,
to
look
at
a
special
attention
on
that
facade.
U
B
Follow
your
next
case
calling
doa
116
6778
one
chester
park:
this
is
a
total
renovation,
an
additional
additional
to
living
space
by
adding
to
the
rear
of
the
building
of
the
existing
footprint
and
change
oxygen
from
one
family
to
a
two
family.
The
violations,
article
60,
section
9,
this
side
yard's
insufficient
and
article
60,
section
9.
The
ray
yacht
is
insufficient.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AW
AW
No,
that's
my
knowledge.
It
was
just
recently
purchased
in
december.
It's
a
it
was
abandoned
building
for
a
while
for
many
years,
and
so
I've
purchased
it.
My
architect
has
done
a
design
plan.
He
was
supposed
to
be,
unfortunately,
has
a
12
noon
appointment,
so
he
has
to
leave,
but
I
could
probably
answer
questions
as
best
as
possible.
AW
A
AW
No,
so
what
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
use
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
at
the
rear,
building
the
the
wooden
structural
part
of
it
is
one
level
and
so
we're
just
going
to
bring
that
up
to
to
the
roof
line,
to
create
the
second,
the
second
level.
So
we're
not
going
to
change
anything
to
the
footprint
of
the
building,
we're
not
going
to
change
the
footprint
size
is
just
going
to
go
up
and
it's
already
zoned
for
a
commercial
and
two
family
in
that
area.
AW
Yes,
so
each
unit's
going
to
have
to
propose
is
two
bedrooms:
one
bath,
I'm
still
trying
to
work.
You
know
with
architect
to
get
two
bathrooms
for
each
unit:
800
square
foot
each
unit
and
and
a
basement
we're
gonna
have
a
finished
basement
for
laundry.
AW
Yes,
so
I
exist
in
the
parking
lot
as
you
can
see
on
the
and
clan
lp
100,
if
they
can
bring
that
up,
we're
going
to
create
two
parking,
one
one
to
the
the
west
of
the
building
and
and
to
the
rear
western.
We
have
the
building
also
for
the
attention.
AW
This
is
located
in
a
private
way.
Chester
park
is
a
private
way.
It
doesn't
lead
these
into
any
other
main
street.
It
just
comes
off.
That's
the
street
park
it.
These
are
regis
road
and
it
comes
into
chester
park
and
then
there's
a
and
then
there's
a
park
where
that
goes
into
blue
avenue
and
to
the
rear
of
manchester
park
is
just
a
commercial
parking
lot.
A
sim
card
that
which
is
also
located
on
blue
avenue.
AW
A
AW
A
So,
okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better.
AQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
about
the
people
here
from
the
mayor's
office,
all
the
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
support
of
the
proposal.
A
full
community
process
was
completed
on
may
5th
of
2021.
There
was
a
budget
meeting
held
where
there
were
no
major
community
depositions
on
parade.
Thank
you
very
much.
BQ
I
know
it
was
me
michael
chavis,
the
architect
I
just
couldn't
figure
out
a
way
to
to
to
talk,
so
that
was
gonna
raise
my
hand
earlier,
but
it
sounds
like
everything's
all
set.
Thank.
S
You
what
about
the
diane
simon,
are
you
looking
at
me?
Okay,
can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for.
BR
The
record
please,
my
name
is
diane
simon.
I
represent
mr
robertson
nazir
from
three
chester
park
in
regards
to
the
plans
where
he
is
stating
that
the
parking
lot
for
the
property
would
be
right.
Now
there
is
a
dispute
in
land
court
right
now
for
that
parking.
So,
although
he
has
the
plans,
he
does
not
have
access
to
that
property
at
the
moment
also,
my
client
is
living
directly
across
on
the
pathway.
The
pathway
is
nine
feet
wide.
It
is
not
big
enough
to
do
a
u-turn
on
that
property.
BR
BR
The
property
does
not
have
space
for
the
driveway
other
than
the
the
pathway
in
front
of
the
building,
as
he
stated,
and
so
I
would
conclude
that
that
you
guys
deny
his
motion
to
make
this
a
two
family.
This
was
previously
a
one
family
home.
He
will
he
won't.
He
may
or
may
not
have
land
depending
on
what
the
judge
determines
with
the
property
boundary
line
dispute.
BR
A
Thank
you.
May
I
have
mr
chavez
on
please.
H
A
Mr
chavez,
can
you
shed
any
light
on
this.
BQ
Yes,
the
the
original
property,
as
it's
shown,
if
you
were
looking
at
lp
100
or
the
site
survey,
there's
that
extension,
the
original
extension
on
the
on
the
on
the
property
line
that
extends
towards
the
mbta
rail
track.
That's
over
there,
that's
the
original
property
boundary
from
when
the
house
was
built
back
in
1899,
but
since
that
time,
there's
been
some
encroachment
by
butters
on
that
line,
just
because
the
house
has
been
there
for
so
long
and
then
used
in
various
ways
since
prior
to
mr
martin's.
BQ
Purchase
of
the
home,
so
there's
basically
been,
I
think,
what's
happening
in
land
court
is
that
the
butter
has
used
that
that
section
of
land
for
quite
a
long
time
now
and
so
they're,
going
through
the
process
of
what
that
what
that
actually
means.
BQ
So
if
mr
martin
were
to
get
the
the
property
as
it
was
shown
on
his
deed
and
on
the
on
the
on
the
survey,
then
the
the
kind
of
corner
there
of
chester
park,
which
is
you
know,
really
old
street
very
small,
like
the
previous
person,
was
stating
that
the
person
the
people
would
have
to
park.
BQ
That
would
basically
be
pulling
in
and
out
to
you
know,
come
straight
in
and
out
to
that
area,
whether
it's
a
one
family
or
two
family,
it's
just
a
it's
a
small
little
area,
there's
an
easement
to
get
in
and
out
of
that
space.
So
that's
that's
essentially
what
they're
doing
if
he
does
not
get
that
section
in
land
court.
If
that
lamb
stays
with
the
three
chester
park
of
butter,
then
the
there,
probably
only
one
parking
spot
available
for
that
for
that.
For
that
for
that
home.
A
Now
hold
on
mr
martin,
mr
ellis,
did
you
have
a
question.
BS
BQ
BB
AW
Yes,
so
as
the
attorney
for
treacherous,
the
part
was
noted,
she's
absolutely
wrong.
A
Hold
okay,
okay,
so
let's
just
stop
right
there.
So
what
we
do
is
we
have
a
request
before
us
for
a
conversion
from
a
one
to
two
family
at
and
at
us
at
a
minimum.
We're
told
that
there
is
possibility
of
accommodating
one
parking
space,
possibly
two
if
there's
no
based
on
what
comes
out
of
of
of
the
land
court.
So
the
question
is:
are
we
comfortable
with
the
conversion
of
a
one
to
a
two
family
and
based
on
that,
may
I
please
everybody
be
quiet.
U
I
like
to
make
a
motion
I
like
to
make
a
motion
to
have
the
applicant
defer
until
there's
a
judgment,
because
my
my
concern
really
is:
how
do
you
get
construction
access
right
now,
I'm
looking
at
the
google
image
and
the
and
the
law
is
landlocked
unless
there
is
true
easement
accident
access
within
that
10
feet
of
of
the
of
the
right
away.
A
BQ
Sure
yeah,
the
easement
itself
is
there
currently
and
is,
is
able
to
be
used
the
land
that's
in
dispute
is
that
little
section,
that's
in
the
back
there,
where
we're,
showing
that
second
parking
space.
BT
BQ
It's
showing
us
that
again,
if
you're
looking
at
the
survey,
it's
the
north
west
corner
of
the
lot,
it's
just
like
a
little
extension
out
and
on
the
lp
100.
It's
just
shown
as
labeled
as
a
parking
space.
Okay,
but
the
easement
itself
is
available,
and
so
any
construction
vehicles
or
equipment
coming
in
and
out
would
be
coming
down
chester
park
and
then
be
able
to
access
that
space.
U
Okay,
great,
so,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
change
of
occupancy
from
one
family
to
two
family,
with
bpda
design
review
on
the
extra
pitch
of
the
dormer.
Is
there
a.
C
C
AA
B
Thank
you
on
the
last
case
for
eleven
o'clock.
Kpoa
118,
3399,
22
cohasset
street.
This
is
scope
of
the
work,
will
increase
the
square
footage
from
1457
to
1979
square
feet,
but
no
change
to
the
building
height.
This
will
be
an
additional
eight
feet
to
the
rear
of
the
house
and
at
a
bedroom
and
bathroom.
On
the
second
floor,
the
violation,
article
67,
section,
nine
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
67
section
nine,
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
accessible
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
BS
Hi,
thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
michael
collins.
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
distinguished
members
of
the
board,
I'm
michael
collins,
22
cohasset,
I'm
joined
today
by
my
wife,
lifica
samal.
We
recently
purchased
our
home
and
currently
live
in
the
home
and
fully
intend
to
reside
in
the
home
on
a
full-time
basis.
BU
BU
V
S
S
AJ
AJ
AJ
Mr
collins
acknowledges
in
his
application
that
the
lots
in
this
neighborhood
are
extremely
narrow.
To
begin
with,
that,
his
home
is
already
confronted
with
a
number
of
non-conforming
dimensional
requirements,
yet
he
proposes
to
expand
it
and.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
Okay.
So
the
mayor's
office
is
in
support.
A
butter
is
in
opposition,
and
this
is
for
about
a
500
square
foot,
500
square
foot.
Addition
in
the
rear
yard.
May
I
have
a
motion
please.
AM
U
Oh,
madam
chair,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
three
provisos.
B
AH
Good
afternoon
168
gold
street.
AH
AH
B
B
B
K
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lacasse
lacasse
law,
75
arlington
street,
in
boston,
we're
seeking
deferral
as
we
are
continuing
to
revise
this
proposal
for
new
construction
on
a
vacant
lot
to
make
the
project
more
zoning
compliant
and
continue
to
work
with
the
abutters
and
the
city.
Point
neighborhood
association
to
arrive
at
an
agreeable
solution.
A
J
B
B
B
Calling
case
boa
115
860-8254
paris
street.
This
is
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
and
erected
building
with
six
residential
units
and
five
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article
2017-5.
This
is
an
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section
56,
austria
parking
is
insufficient.
B
Article
53,
section
9,
the
lard
area
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
additional
allot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
floydia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section
and
the
building
has
excessive
its
stories.
Article
53
section
9,
the
villain-
has
excess
of
its
feet.
Article
53
section
9
usable,
open
spaces
hit
sufficient
article
53
section
9
in
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
B
BC
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
beth
drago,
with
dragon
toscano
with
an
address
of
11
beacon
street
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
odessa.
Capital
stan
klebner
and
we
have
the
architect
is
adam
glassman.
Today,
as
was
mentioned,
we're
seeking
to
raise
existing
to
erect
a
six-unit
residential
building
with
five
interior
parking
spaces
at
the
ground
level.
What
you're
looking
at
is
a
rendering
of
the
proposed
building.
BC
The
lot
size
is
2500
square
feet.
The
layout
of
this
building
has
the
main
entrance
on
the
first
level.
There
is
a
herb
cut
on
that
would
be
the
driveway
entrance
to
the
five
units,
the
five
parking
spaces
that
would
go
along
with
these
units.
The
ground
level
will
also
have
a
lift,
making
it
ada
accessible
to
the
first
floor.
BC
BC
We
go
up
to
the
third
floor,
it's
a
675
square
foot,
one
bed,
one
bath
with
an
office
space
and
then
unit
four
is
also
on
the
third
floor.
That's
an
860
square
foot,
two
bed,
two
bath
with
a
rear
balcony,
the
fourth
floor,
hose
units,
five
and
six;
that's
675
square
foot,
one
bed,
one
bath
off
with
an
offer
and
then
unit
six
would
be
an
860
square
foot
two
bed,
two
bath
with
a
balcony.
BC
This
building
would
also
have
a
second
means
of
egress
left
side
of
the
building
through
passageway.
So
there
would
be
two
full
means
of
egress
just
to
go
over
some
of
the
violations
that
were
mentioned.
It's
a
six
unit
building
proposed
and
a
3f
district.
So
a
use
variance
would
be
required
a
lot
area
for
each
additional
unit.
We
would
have
500
and
a
thousand
would
be
required.
BC
The
far
is
1.0
that's
allowable
we're
at
2.3,
which
is
actually
down
from
the
last
time.
The
building
height
is
four
stories
at
39
feet.
BC
We
just
worked
with
our
neighbors
and
the
civic
association
to
increase
our
rare
setbacks,
so
we
now
have
we
cut
off
square
footage.
We
reduced
our
far
down
from
2.8
to
2.3
and
increased
our
rear,
set
back
to
15
feet.
A
J
BC
B
Q
J
B
BC
So
we
actually
just
if
I
could
answer
that
we
actually
did
modify.
We
actually
have
a
turn
around
radius.
If
you
pull
up
the
ground
level,
it's
a
20
foot,
25
foot
wide
by
22
foot
6
inch
between
the
spaces
to
turn
around
the
spaces
are
seven
by
eighteen,
so
they're
slightly
compact,
but
in
working
with
the
pacific
association
they
actually
supported
that
because
it
was
able
to
get
another
space
in.
Are
these.
A
I,
like
mr
drago,
I
just
have
to
glance
off
my
window
and
everybody
seems
to
have
an
suv.
I
might
be
the
only
one
with
the
compact
up
and
down
my
street.
So
you
know
let's
get
real
here
and
just
you
know,
let's
do
the
right
thing
so
that
we
don't
on
paper.
Have
you
know
five
spaces
when
actually
you
know
usability
brings
it
down
to
three?
A
You
know
so
so,
let's,
let's
just
kind
of
make
this
work.
Okay,.
BC
Okay,
if
you
pull
up
the
parking
layout,
madam
chair,
it
might
be
easier
for
you
to
see
on
the
first
page
of
the
plans
right
now.
Can
we
go
back?
No,
no
next
slide.
BC
BS
A
V
Good
afternoon,
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
based
on
the
changes
that
they
have
made,
and
you
know
working
with
the
maverick
central
neighborhood
association
in
east
boston.
There
are
still
concerns
around
the
parking
and
the
height,
but
at
this
time
we
do
feel
comfortable
going
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
W
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
M
A
A
U
AM
A
Okay,
some
motion
carries
so
we'll
see
you
on
another
case.
Thank
you.
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
112
1608
297
newbury
street.
This
is
a
change
of
argument-
include
marijuana,
dispensary,
abolish
the
interior
and
unloading,
daring
walls,
the
violations
out
of
glade
section
7,
the
proposed
cannabis
use
location,
was
when
one
half
mile
of
another
existing
candidate.
Therefore
it's
within
radical
aid
section,
seven,
the
use
is
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BV
A
Yes
and
I-
and
I'm
hoping
that
in
your
few
words,
that
you
will
also
address
the
one-half
mile,
I
mean
because
I
do
know
that
this
board
approved
another
project
in
the
early
days
that
were
within
half
miles,
but
that
was
an
extenuating
circumstance
since
they
were
filed
within
minutes
of
each
other.
So
this
is
this
is
a
few
years
later.
So
please
tell
us,
tell
us
put
your
put
your
comments
on
the
record.
Please
sure.
BV
BV
It
certainly
is
newberry
street,
with
the
amount
of
tourist
foot,
traffic
resident,
foot,
traffic
and
folks
from
all
over
new
england
dine
and
use
the
back
bay,
especially
newberry
street.
So
we
were
unanimously
approved
by
the
bcb
in
late
winter
my
client
underwent
a
robust
process
in
which
they
gained
over
250
back
bay
residents.
BV
Signatures
of
support
and
the
written
support
of
over
700
city
of
boston
residents,
who
agreed
with
us
that
an
equity
applicant
and
this
is
a
certified
equity
applicant,
should
have
the
opportunity
to
open
a
business
in
the
heart
of
back
bay
in
in
famous
newbury
street.
A
J
BV
I
will
say,
madam
chair,
if
I
may,
we
were
proud
to
receive
mayor
walsh's
support
going
into
the
bcb,
because
we
got
that
resident
support.
We
also
made
numerous
concessions
based
on
the
community
process.
We
went
to
to
minimize
and
mitigate
as
many
impacts
as
possible
on
the
neighborhood,
and
shane
can
speak
to
a
little
more
of
that
operationally
shane.
A
BW
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I'm
shane
hyde
254
new
hill
av
in
somerset.
The
compelling
reason
is
that
we're
a
equity
local
business-
that's
in
the
as
chris
mentioned,
the
hub
of
retail,
of
all
new
england,
massachusetts
and
boston
particular
we're
a
small
business
that
is
since
equity.
BW
You
know
locally
owned
by
you,
know,
majority
boston
resident
and
for
an
opportunity
that
the
dcb
so
aptly
put
in
our
presentation
before
then
that
the
equity
businesses
should
be
allowed
a
chance
to
to
operate
and
open
and
flourish
in
this
new
industry
in
such
a
high
profile
location
like
new,
very
street.
So.
A
BW
AM
BW
BW
Just
like
there's,
multiple
businesses
like
salons
and
and
other
types
of
businesses
in
the
back
bay
newberry
boys
in
particular,
and
our
store
in
particular,
is
a
appointment
only
model
and
it's
going
to
be
a
boutique
type
setup,
which
is
is
different
from
the
other
stores
that
have
gone
before
this
board
in
the
back
bay
area.
With
the
appointment
set
up
and
being
able
to
control
the
customer
flow
it'll
be
a
lot
different
in
terms
of
operationally
than
the
other
applicants
that
have
come
before
within
our
half-mile
buffer.
BV
BW
BV
A
That
hold
on
hold
on
chris.
Let's
now
just
talk
through
the
the
the
layout
of
your
space
and
how
your
facility
will
work,
how
your
facility
will
work.
BW
I'm
sure
so
the
the
space
itself
is
is
a
small
space,
roughly
1300
square
feet.
In
total,
there
will
be
about
six
tails
about
nine
to
eleven
employees
on
staff,
with
nine
to
eleven
customers
max
at
any
one
time.
BW
The
the
deliveries
would
be
in
the
back
of
the
location,
and
you
can
see
from
the
diagram
for
you
installing
a
lift
in
the
compact
parking
spots
that
we
have
with
our
landlord,
we'll
be
able
to
deliver
product,
whether
non-operating
hours,
to
make
sure
that
we
do
not
disturb
any
residents,
as
well
as
any
traffic
in
terms
of
the
business
operations
and
we'll
also
not
block
the
alley
with
any
deliveries
either
as
we
will
use
a
for
transit
type
vehicle
that
can
fit
into
the
compact
space
and
then
from
operationally
is
delivery.
BW
BW
A
BX
Madam
chair
city,
councilor
kenzie
bach,
may
I
yes,
please
I'm
here
to
strongly
oppose
this
proposal.
I
appreciate
you
asking
the
question
about
a
higher
bar
for
being
within
the
half
mile.
That
was
not
a
point
push
to
the
bcb.
I
will
stress
that
this
is
not
just
within
a
half
mile
of
one,
but
actually
two
approved
locations
on
boylston
street
and
that
the
folks
I
represent
in
the
back
bay
reasonably
wonder
whether
the
half-mile
buffer
actually
has
any
meaning
like.
If
you
know
these
just
keep
getting
approved
within
a
dense
circle.
BX
I
also
just
want
to
stress
I've
personally
supported
five
cannabis
applications
in
my
district
understand
that
we're
rolling
out
this
industry.
I
still
think
that
there
is
a
time
and
place
right
before
your
board
is
saying
when
a
location
is
just
the
wrong
location,
this
one
actually
abuts
a
large
residential
building.
I
know
a
number
of
the
abutters
are
on
the
call
and
have
communicated
to
your
board
it
that
back
alley,
which
is
going
to
be
used
for
deliveries
is
completely
surrounded
by
residences.
BX
I
don't
know
of
another
cannabis
proposed
or
existing
location
in
the
city,
that
that
shares
a
wall
with
a
with
a
large
residential
development
and
is
as
surrounded
by
residences
as
this
one
is,
and
actually
you
know,
we've
got
applications
even
just
a
block
away
on
newbury
street
that
do
not
have
those
defects.
So
I
just
would
really
stress
that,
both
from
the
clearing
the
buffer
kind
of
higher
scrutiny
level,
which
I
don't
think
this
applicant
does
and
and
from
the
kind
of
specifics
of
the
site.
BX
This
is
something
that
really
the
the
residents
that
I
represent
are
strongly
opposed
to
and
that
I
definitely
want
to
express
my
strong
opposition
to.
V
BY
This
is
jay
livingstone,
a
state
representative
for
back
bay,
I'm
also
a
neighbor.
I
live
about
two
blocks
away
from
this
proposed
location,
and
I
am
strongly
opposed
to
this.
I
would
have
been
in
favor
of
the
prior
applicants
that
have
happened
in
back
day.
There
have
been
two
approved
which
are
in
a
hat
within
a
half
mile
this,
neither
of
them
share
party
walls
with
a
butters.
BY
I
would
doubt
that
dispensary
in
the
state
that's
been
approved
by
anybody
that
shares
a
party
well
with
a
butter
with
a
residential
building,
and
this
is
surrounded
by
residents
who
are
who
I've
heard
from
that
are
strongly
opposed.
I
think
it's
the
wrong
location
or
an
applicant
and
there's
another
equity
applicant.
That's
been
approved
by
the
cannabis
board
that
at
a
location
that
you've
previously
through
medical
marijuana
dispensary
at
several
years
ago,
and
it
doesn't
have
the
strong
community
opposition
that
this
has.
S
And
madam
chai
have
three
raised:
hands
elliot
you've
been
a
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
BZ
Hello,
my
name
is
elliot
laffer.
I
live
at
90
commonwealth
avenue
in
back
bay.
I'm
the
chair
of
the
neighborhood
association
of
the
back
bay.
We
have
not
opposed
other
cannabis
applications
nearby.
This
one
is
in
a
terrible
location,
directly
adjacent
to
and
sharing
a
fire
escape
with
an
old
residential
building
across
the
alley
from
the
potential
side
of
commonwealth
avenue.
It's
going
to
have
operations
in
the
alley,
including
it's
a
handicap
access.
BZ
It
is
a
a
far
worse
location
and
one
that
will
be
before
you
soon.
That
has
already
been
approved
by
the
cannabis
board.
That
is
also
an
equity
applicant
on
newbury
street,
but
we
ask
that
you
reject
this
happening.
Thank.
S
S
L
Yes
hi,
my
name
is
mark
cristo,
295,
newbury
street
director
butter
and
owner
of
the
building,
as
well
against
the
proposal,
as
are
more
than
70
people
that
have
submitted
a
petition
to
your
board,
close
to
50
of
them
being
abutters
more
signatures
still
coming
in.
I
have
a
concern
with
the
risk
for
safety
for
our
residents
on
the
backside.
We
share
a
fire
escape
which
gives
instant
access
to
our
building
their
product
line.
L
S
AK
Yes,
my
name
is
lindsey
anderson.
I
am
the
owner
of
290
newberry
street.
My
concern-
I
am
opposed
to
this
because
I
am
concerned
about
parking
and
traffic.
AK
A
Thank
you,
mr
anderson.
Miss
ambassador
one
more
person,
please
hi,.
BF
BF
BW
Thanks,
madam
chair,
I
I
believe
that
some
of
the
concerns-
and
we
have
worked
strongly
with
the
community
to
try
to
address
them
and
have
changed
multiple
aspects
of
our
operation
from
the
appointment
only
status
to
not
selling
any
single-use
items
to
working
with
some
of
the
best
traffic
engineers
in
the
city
in
terms
of
setting
up
the
back
alley
location
in
order
to
make
sure
there's
the
least
impact
of
others
possible.
BW
We
also
increased
our
security
staff
to
two
outdoors
and
make
sure
that
there's
no
double
parking
in
front
of
the
store
or
near
it,
as
well
as
circling
the
block
at
all
times
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
second
transactions
or
any
littering
of
any
type,
and
also
as
an
appointment
based
business,
we'll
be
able
to
identify
customers
that
are
bad
actors.
That
will
no
longer
be
able
to
partake
in
shop
at
our
store.
BW
A
Just
for
the
record,
can
I
just
have
the
names
of
their
equity
partners
on.
A
A
Okay,
okay,
so
let's
go
ahead:
we've
we've
had
a
lot
of
information.
A
Is
there
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
all
right?
Any
opposed
motion
carries
good
luck
on
your
next
application.
Thank
you.
B
The
violations,
article
10
section,
one:
a
limitation
of
off
off-street
parking
and
option
65,
section
65-48
loading
requirement,
location
and
design
name
and
address
for
the
record
place.
AD
CA
CA
The
last
time
I
presented
you
requested
to
get
a
an
updated
plan
which
I
have
and
I
submitted
to
you
as
you
can
see
up
there.
The
parking
space
that
I'm
requesting
is
on
the
side
of
the
house
on
the
phone,
but
on
the
side
and-
and
I
have
gone
through
the
whole
process
of
of
that
you
requested
from
me.
By
going
to
my
neighbors,
I
I
hold
I
held
a
meeting
and
I
have
14
signatures.
CA
A
So
let
me
please,
please
help
us
remember
this
project.
So
the
last
time
when
you
were
here,
did
you
have
like
two
cup
cuts?
Did
you
have
a
shed
on
the
other
side?
Tell
us
what's
different.
CA
What
is
different
is
that
my
my
blood,
my
my
my
plant
plot,
my
blood
plant,
was
not
clear
enough
to
be
able
to
to
determine,
because
what
I
had
used
was
the
flood
plan
that
I
had
when
when
I
bought
the
house,
but
I
went
and
I
got
a
surveyor
and
I
had
a
very
clear
lot
plan
now
of.
Where
is
that
I
intend
to
to
to
have
my
my
park,
my
parking
okay.
A
CA
CA
I
mean
I
make
it
at
the
time
and
then
when
I
went
to
requested
to
start
the
process
again
10
years
ago,
because
my
circumstance
is
a
little
bit
different,
I'm
getting
older
and
my
and
it's
hard
for
me
to
kind
of
try
to
have
arthritis
on
my
knee
and
then
it's
it's
very
hard
to
come
at
night
and
not
get
and
look
at
the
parking.
So
what
I
did
is
that
I
I
went
to
get
it
and
that
that
that's
when
I
was
denied.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
miss
better:
can
you
help
us
with
this?
I
know
this
is
so
so
tell
us:
what's
the
width
of
that
driveway
and
the
possibility
of
parking
two
cars
on
it.
U
So,
madam
chair,
I
do
recall
this
project.
Actually
I
was
review.
I
was
probably
the
one
that
suggested
to
submit
adequate
plot
plan
to
determine
the
width
of
the
curb
cut
and
it
was
briefly
shown
to
us
and
it
was
just
really
a
hand
sketch.
This
is
to
be
adequate
representation
of
the
scope
of
work
and
it's
she's
proposing
a
10-foot
curb
cut
and
it
it
should
fit
two
cars.
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
see
any
issues
with
that.
J
B
Yeah
sorry
check
secretary
here,
mr
d'amico
has
spoke
on
this
one.
He
said
the
plan
only
reflects
one
car.
C
A
BT
Yes,
speak
up
good
afternoon,
madam
chairs
and
members
of
the
board
denise
sanchez
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
applicant.
She
went
through
the
community
process
and
support
from
the
direct,
the
butters
and
from
the
association.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AD
B
Madam
chair
going
to
call
the
last
case
for
reconsideration
this
request
for
recon
reconsideration
the
division,
the
decision
to
deny
the
requested
relief
for
renovation
of
a
basement
into
a
bomb
and
a
change
of
market
to
a
boarding
house.
B
CB
A
Mr
eichelberg,
you
know
you've
probably
reviewed
the
tape,
but
we
we
looked
at
this
project
twice.
As
I
recall,
and
you
know,
we
definitely
have
a
strong
policy
about
residences
in
the
basement.
We
feel
that
you
know
each
time
mr
sarah
was
here
and
the
property
owner.
We
gave
them
enough
time
to
talk
through
and
explain
the
project.
A
CB
Absolutely
and
I'm
happy
too
it's
one
o'clock-
I
hopefully
109,
hopefully
I'll-
be
done
before
1
15.
I'll
try
to
make
it
short.
So
in
this
instance,
I
think
there
is
a
fundamental
change
in
circumstances
about
how
miss
new
the
property
owner
is
going
to
be
proceeding,
ideally
with
the
premises.
CB
So
initially,
she
had
petitioned
the
board
to
consider
the
modification
of
the
property
use
the
property
as
a
boarding
house,
instead
with
input
from
the
board
and
input
from
the
community
she's
returning
the
property
to
family
dwelling
units
rather
than
rooming
houses,
so
instead
of
12
rooming
houses,
12
rooms
in
four
apartments,
the
plan
going
forward,
which
I
think
is
reflected
in
the
memorandum
that
I
submitted,
is
to
go
forward
with
three
upper
apartments.
First,
four
second
board
third
floor
and
then
the
basement
street
level.
CB
It's
almost
a
garden
level
essentially
apartment
would
be
a
two
bedroom
one
bathroom
family
apartment.
So
the
memorandum
that
I
submitted
kind
of
goes
through
the
legal
basis
for
why
it's
reasonable
for
the
board
to
allow
the
permit
to
go
forward.
I
think
it
certainly
is
in
alignment
with
the
city's
plan
to
increase
housing.
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
okay,
so,
let's
hold
on
for
a
minute
tom.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
listening
to
this
in
in
the
right
way.
This
is
just
to
make
a
decision
whether
we
should
reconsider
this
k.
This
address,
given
the
change
in
the
application
tom.
Can
you
correct
me
from
if
I'm
miscon
mis
miss
speaking.
A
Yes,
so
so
so
to
the
to
counsel
to
mr
eichelbeau.
A
CB
So,
frankly,
about
the
chair,
miss
you
retained
my
firm
late
last
week
on
good
advice.
I
think
of
some
folks
that
are
in
the
city
that
she
talked
with
there
locally,
so
rather
than
withdraw
the
application
waste
the
the
board's
time
with
withdrawing
the
application
and
then
submitting
a
new
application.
A
But
there's
already
a
decision,
that's
been
made
on
the
application
so
there.
So
so,
if
we're
just
reconsidering
it,
I'm
going
to
request
that
a
motion
be
made
for
denial
of
the
reconsideration,
because
we
are
denying
reconsidering
the
lodging
houses,
there's
nothing
to
prevent
the
applicant
for
putting
a
new
application
in
for
something
else.
M
This
is
the
first
time
we
heard
this.
The
plans
were
completely
useless
and
we
asked
for
us
a
drawing
to
reflect
the
second
time
the
plans
were
in
violation
of
any
number
of
code
issues.
I
don't
see
any
reason
on
earth
why
we
should
reconsider.
They
have
the
right
to
go
back
and
and
review
and
and
come
back,
but
there's
no
there's
absolutely
no
basis
for
reconsideration.
So
I
will
make
a
motion
to
deny
the
reconsideration.
C
Is
there
a
second
I'll,
second,
that
all
those
in
favor
hi.
CB
A
Any
opposed
okay,
so,
mr
eichelberg,
we
will
see
you
when
there's
a
new
application
filed
that
that
more
fully
meets
all
the
more
of
the
requirements
of
the
zoning.
Okay.
Thank
you.
So
much
meeting
is
now
a
joke.
Thank.