►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 1-29-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
Henry,
twenty
nine
twenty
nineteen
it's
now
in
session,
just
to
remind
of
please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
if
you
need
to
have
any
conversations,
please
state
them
outside
of
the
room,
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law
I'm,
informing
you
that
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed
when
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
the
project.
Please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
give
us
new
information.
A
B
C
A
There
a
second
second,
all,
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries
before
before
we
go
any
further
I
just
like
to
inform
you
that
today
we
are,
we
are
a
six-member
team
and,
as
a
result,
you
need
to
have
all
six
of
us
in
support
of
your
project.
If,
if
you
think
that's
gonna
be
a
problem
for
you,
then
I
would
suggest
that
or
you
have
the
option
to
defer
to
a
later
date.
Okay,
so
now
that
we
have
that
on
the
record
again
mr.
fortune,
thank.
B
B
B
E
E
A
B
B
B
The
last
case
for
extension,
and
calling
boa
four
six:
five:
nine
zero,
eight
180
for
the
190
sultry
Madame's
yeah.
This
was
we
approved
this
back
in
2015,
and
the
decision
was
entered
in
825
for
2015
I'm.
Looking
to
see
if
there
are
any
other
I
do
not
see
any
difference
in
the
IR
ggest
of
2015.
So
this
is
four
years
so.
B
Two
seconds
yeah:
this
is
a
renovating
existing
egress
des
based
on
sub-basement
levels,
adding
interconnecting
convenience
day
between
the
two
level
and
related
structural
work,
build
a
common
climbing
corridor
walls
base
building
kornshell
basement
sub
levels.
The
violations
article
32
section
floor.
This
is
in
the
ground,
ground,
water
conservation,
overlay,
district
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
G
G
Having
an
address
at
39
right,
Navin
ooh,
this
case
is
before
the
board
this
morning,
because
it
seeks
a
variance
from
the
requirements
of
article
32
of
the
Boston
zoning
code,
which
will
require
the
installation
of
a
groundwater
recharge
system.
The
subject
property
consists
of
an
existing
three
to
seven
storey,
masonry
mixed-use,
building
located
at
the
corner
of
oil
since
treatment,
Hemenway
Street,
the
Fenway
neighborhood
of
Boston,
in
order
to
complete
a
commercial
tenant
fit
out,
an
elevator
is
required
to
be
installed
in
the
basement
levels
of
building
which
trigger
the
requirements
of
article
32.
G
What's
the
level
of
excavation,
but
for
the
excavation
for
the
elevator,
which
is
being
installed
for
accessibility
reasons,
the
requirements
of
article
32
would
not
be
triggered.
The
proposed
project
will
not
result
in
any
negative
impact
on
groundwater
levels,
either
at
the
subject.
Property
or
at
adjacent
properties
have.
I
I
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Boyd
Christian
Simonelli
bus
and
growing
a
trust
we
do
have
the
no
harm
letter
from
the
applicant,
and
we
also
have
the
letter,
which
makes
the
case
and
we
support
a
seat
for
variance
in
this
case.
In
the
past,
the
board
is
granted
variances
prayer
request,
just
like
this,
where
the
installation
of
a
recharge
system
would
basically
flood
and
negatively
impact
their
neighbor
off.
I
There
was
to
install
it
in
addition,
because
the
building
so
close
to
the
lot
line,
the
installation
of
a
system
would
be
well
below
the
ground
water
table.
So
you'd
essentially
just
be
filling
up
the
groundwater
table
and
again
you
would
flood
adjacent
structures,
so
I
do
support
the
applicants
request
for
a
variance
for
G
Kyle.
I
J
A
J
B
These
in
for
the
record
and
then
I'll,
let
you
well
the
record,
calling
VOA
eight
nine,
sixty
five
to
seventeen
to
nineteen
Myrick
Street
companion
case
on
building
code,
boa
nineteen,
ninety
six,
eight
five,
one,
seventeen
to
nineteen
Myrick,
Street
and
boa
eight,
nine,
six,
p50,
55,
east
and
street
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
E
B
B
B
K
B
A
L
L
B
This
is
a
change
of
Archie
to
a
daycare
center
at
bathroom
sink
two
classrooms
when
we
configure
na
instructional
walls
to
add
a
daycare
classroom,
the
violations,
article
51
section
17,
excessive
FA,
our
article
51
section,
53
screening
and
buffering
the
quiet
particle
51
section
56
our
street
parking
loading
requirements.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
M
To
satisfy
federal,
Head,
Start
regulations,
ABCD
needs
to
build
out
the
currently
unused
basement
and
install
a
playground
in
the
outdoor
area
presently
occupied
by
a
small
page
parking
area.
This
project
will
not
change
the
footprint
or
height
projects.
Location
on
Western
Avenue
will
be
beneficial
to
the
Brighton
community,
due
in
part
to
its
close
proximity
to
the
health
center
right
across
the
street.
Belle
River
Community
Health,
which
serves
the
same
populations
project,
is
required
because
the
building
housing
ABCD
is
existing.
Head
Start
site
in
Franklin
has
been
sold
and
ABCD
has
been
displaced.
N
A
M
O
M
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
corner
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
so
we're
here
to
support
the
applicant
we
held
in
butters
meeting
the
received
support
from
director
butters.
They
also
went
to
the
Austin
Civic
Association
received
support
there
as
well.
We
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
keep
families
and
retain
them
in
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
R
S
Chair
members
of
the
board
Toni
to
the
door
representing
the
Austin
Civic
Association,
this
move
that
ABCD
is
making
to
North
Brighton
is
necessitated
by
development.
That's
taking
place
up
in
Washington,
Street
and
Brighton,
so
we
are
welcoming
them
to
our
community.
They
provide
vital
human
services
to
families
in
need,
and
some
of
the
issues
that
were
brought
up
regarding
parking
and
public
safety
are
in
western
half
being
looked
at
and
addressed.
So
we
strongly
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank.
J
A
B
This
is
a
two-family
home.
However,
it's
listed
as
a
single-family
change
to
an
existing
family
dwelling,
no
work
to
be
done.
The
violation
is
article
51,
section
9,
the
location
of
the
dwelling
entrance
shall
face
the
front
lot
line.
Article
51,
section,
9
and
excessive
FA
are
article
51,
section
9
in
insufficient
useable,
open
space
for
dwelling
unit
in
Article,
51,
section
56,
insufficient
off
street
parking
for
the
new
unit
name,
an
address
from
the
record.
Please
good.
T
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
corner
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
we
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Us
was
the
first
of
others
meeting
ever
held.
There
was
no
opposition
raised
there,
and
then
they
went
on
to
the
Brighton
Alston
Improvement
Association
received
their
support
as
well.
So
we're
going
record
and
support
it's
a
pre-existing
condition.
Q
B
Bo,
a
9
0
1
3
5
7
77
C,
Warren
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
architecture,
25,
residential
US
veterans
units
interior
renovations
of
an
existing
steel
masonry.
Building
number
nine
work
to
include
new
four-star
elevator
interior
wild
windows,
the
violation
article
51
section
40,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
in
Article
51,
section
56
off
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
an
address
of
the
record.
Please.
U
A
V
V
A
H
V
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
Neighborhood
Services,
we
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
serve
a
high
needs
population
we
conducted
in
butters
meeting
no
opposition
was
raised.
They
went
to
the
Brighton
Alston
Improvement
Association
received
a
glowing
review
for
the
work
that
they
do
in
the
community.
So
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support.
B
B
Call
the
next
case
calling
boa
92
93
244
North,
Beacon
Street.
This
is
demolish
an
existing
one-story
commercial
building,
the
erect
a
new
five-story
mixed-use
building
with
30
residential
apartments,
one
ground-floor
commercial
space
and
at-grade
parking.
The
violations,
article
51
section
17,
the
Floyd
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
17,
the
height
requirement
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
16,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
a
conditional
use
and
article
51
section
56
off
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Their
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
O
We
have
the
architects,
frankly,
friendship
here
as
well,
so
the
project
actually
started
out
as
an
article
eighty
large
project
review,
and
it
was
we
do
through
many
many
in
size
and
scope
through
many
many
meetings.
The
aging
process
also
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
input
from
the
community,
including
director
butters
pleased
to
present
19
letters
of
supporting.
O
O
X
X
X
A
O
O
Y
O
Would
know
for
the
board
just
finally
that
there
are
no
violations
for
the
setbacks.
That's
intentional!
So
the
rear
yard
setback
is
actually
47
feet
where
40
would
be
required
in
the
side
yard.
Setbacks
are
12
feet
and
10
feet,
which
would
be
I'm
sorry
12
feet
at
12
and
12,
where
a
10
would
only
be
required
and.
J
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
Politico
and
record
a
support
of
this
project.
They
went
through
extensive
community
process
with
the
BPD
a
and
also
my
office's
well-conducted
and
butters
meeting.
They
met
with
the
Civic's,
they
heard
and
got
feedback
and
they
drastically
scaled
back
the
project
and
made
concessions.
So
we
like
to
go
right
to
support.
S
Z
Now,
chairman
Annabel
combs
to
the
right
and
Alston
Improvement
Association,
though
this
project
is
scaled
back,
it
used
to
be
a
large
project
review,
it's
half
the
size,
it's
still
a
very
large
project
with
no
community
benefits
and
it
has
trash
outside
in
a
very
area
with
large
rat
problems.
The
parking
is
above
ground
I,
don't
know
where
they're
gonna
put
the
snow
without
Louise
losing
parking
spaces.
They
made
no
concessions
to
the
neighborhood
in
order
to
build
something.
Z
AA
A
J
A
AB
X
X
A
X
J
AC
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
nine
nine
six
one,
one
ten
to
twelve
Heathcoat
Street,
an
existing
vacant
parcel
containing
a
total
of
nine
thousand
three
and
six
square
feet.
4121
square
feet,
combined
with
five
thousand
one
eight
hundred
eighty
five
square
feet.
They
wrecked
a
two-family
dwelling
in
a
detached
garage.
The
violation
is
article
55,
section
9.
The
minimum
lot
width
is
insufficient.
55,
section
9,
the
minimum
lot
frontage
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
K
B
K
A
K
J
A
AD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
choke
operator
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
conducted
two
community
meetings
for
this
project.
There
was
a
number
of
people
opposed
to
this
project,
but
after
just
discussing
it
with
my
superiors
in
the
amount
appearances
that
it
needs,
one
of
them
being
pre-existing,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
their
support
of
this
project.
AE
AD
AF
AE
AG
Even
said,
sixteen
Heathcoat
Street,
what
are
the
directive
butters
I
guess?
The
first
thing
I
want
to
say
is
that
the
reason
that
the
lot
is
is
the
grandfather
notion
of
a
lot
like
there's
one
lot
and
there's
another
lot:
that's
been
slapped
on
the
back
of
it,
and
so
there
would
be
a
square
footage
relative
to
size,
variance
if
this
other
lock
wasn't
put
in.
So
it's
not
as
if
you
know
you're
putting
a
house
that
used
to
be
on
the
old
lot
on
that
lot.
That
love
life
is
fundamental.
AG
AG
AG
The
other
issue
is
you've,
got
light
pollution
now,
so
you've
got
now
lights
like
completely
traversing
the
entire
length
of
our
lot,
and
so
you
know
in
our
house
and
the
neighbors
houses,
and
then
I've
got
four
kids
and
now
I've
got
a
driveway.
That's
gonna
have
four
cars
going
up
and
down
my
lot
line
and
that
just
doesn't
feel
safe
to
me.
So
you
know-
and
the
other
thing
is
like
you
know:
it's
not
like
it's
affordable
housing,
which
is,
which
is
this
neighborhood
doesn't
need
heat.
AH
My
name
is
Jean
Dubois
I
live
at
fifteen
Heathcote
Street
and
our
main
objection
is
the
size
of
these
buildings.
They're
way
too
big.
It's
a
tiny
lot,
it's
undersized
at
the
front
and
even
though
the
square
footage
total
is
big,
it
just
doesn't
work,
it's
like
an
ill,
so
the
the
extra
land
is
the
bottom
of
the
ill
and
the
skinny
part
is
facing
our
street
and
that's
the
primary
objection
is
these
are
just
these
are
condos
market
rate.
We
would
be
happy
with
a
single-family
home
or
something
smaller,
but
not
like
this.
K
A
A
B
You
next
two
cases
calling
VOA
eight
nine,
two
eight
eight
four
thirty
Arlington
Street.
There
was
a
companion
case:
boa
892,
893,
32
Arlington
Street
assist
430,
Eiling,
ten
disability,
three
family
dwelling
violations,
article
69,
section
27
screening
in
Bufferin,
article
69,
section
29,
insufficient,
packing
off
street
parking
loading.
Article,
69,
section,
8,
fail
point:
three
families
forbidden
article
69,
69,
insufficient,
lock
size,
article
69
69.
They
said
it
in
sufficient
additional
lobby
area
per
unit
equals
69
section
and
excessive
FA.
Our
article
69
section,
9
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
B
Article
69,
section,
9
insufficient,
open
space.
This
is
for
32
arlington,
combining
parcels
to
become
one
parcel,
then
subdivided
into
lattes.
We
know
in
the
sturdy
Arlington
Street
with
six
thousand
37
square
feet
and
life
be
to
be
known
as
dirty.
Arlington
Street,
with
5729
square
feet,
violation,
article
69,
section,
29.4
off
street
parking
location,
equal
69,
section,
9
existing
family
shall
result
in
the
insufficient
additional
lotta
area
per
unit
of
8,000
square
feet
required
article
69,
section
9
excessive.
B
AI
A
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
get
concerned
about
is
when
we
have
a
building
that
meets
the
zoning
requirements
and
then
with
the
subdivision.
Both
parcels
do
not
meet
the
zoning
requirements,
so
tell
us
about
32,
which
has
the
existing
building
on
it.
Well,
because
that
that
there
is
a
whole
number
of
violations
that
are
triggered,
but
tell
me
about
the
parking
so.
A
AI
A
A
A
J
AJ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faces
Sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
On
behalf
of
my
colleague,
Brian
Flynn,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
There
was
a
community
process
that
was
held
and
neighbors
were
generally
favorable
to
those.
Oh
thank
you.
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
seven,
four,
two
six
nine
82-88
wells
Avenue.
This
is
a
demolish
and
old
single
story.
Building
and
putting
up
a
new
three-story
building
or
hairdresser
convenience
store
a
real
estate
office
on
the
first
floor
and
9
residue
residential
units,
above
violation,
article
10,
section
1
accessory
parking
25%
of
the
rear
of
the
yard.
Article
65
section
15,
the
MFI
uses
conditional
1965,
section
16
excessive
fai
1.0
is
the
max
article.
65
section,
16,
insufficient,
open
space,
50
square
feet
unit
is
required.
A
AL
Being
proposed
today
is
a
replacement
for
a
commercial
building
that
was
burned
out
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
on
the
same
lot,
will
demolish
that
building
and
construct
realm
of
building
up
three
stories:
ground
floor;
commercial
with
two
stories
of
residents,
all
about
we're,
proposing
three
commercial
units
at
the
ground
floor
and
the
one
studio
residential
unit
and
the
two
floors
above
each
have
four
units.
Two
two
four
two
bedroom
units
on
each
floor
for
total
of
nine
residential
units.
We're
also
proposing
that
eight
off-street
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
building
which.
AB
AL
A
A
AL
AM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
van
del
mayor's
office
in
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
There
was
an
extensive
community
project
process,
including
an
initial
abutters
meeting,
because
the
abutters
of
this
project
live
within
two
civic
associations.
The
applicant
reached
out
to
two
civic
associations
in
the
greater
astronaut
Main
Street,
which
the
commercial
spaces
would
fall
under
receiving
the
support
of
the
Ashmont,
Hill
Association
and
greater
Ashmont
Main
streets.
AM
AN
AO
AO
Proposal
can't
afford
the
same
out,
Civic
Association
meeting
in
November
and
over
80%
to
the
members
voted
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
They
were
important
present
at
the
meeting
that
couldn't
fold
because
there
were
not
members
and
they
were
also
in
opposition
to
this.
The
main
concern
is
that
there
are
too
many
units
in
such
a
smaller
number
too
many
units,
you
have
trash
violation
and
you
have
parking
violations,
so
we're
not
against
developing
the
size,
but
we
want
less
units.
Thank.
AP
AP
Mr.
birdie,
who
was
the
older
Ironwood
Gautama,
stated
by
the
individual
sale
auxin,
as
has
already
been
noted
by
mrs.
back
hat
as
well
as
the
representatives
would
have,
is
also
making
services
and
counsel
and
Draya
camel,
has
been
expensive
any
process
that
has
been
done.
The
applicant
has
this
property?
Had
a
fire
to
this
properties,
be
a
restored.
It's
going
to
have
residue
community
well
as
commercial
units,
one
of
which
my
client
occupied
his
real
estate
office,
the
the
association
of
the
astronaut
Association,
supported
it,
as
well
as
the
main
streets.
AP
B
This
is
a
construct,
a
three-story
addition
on
existing
dwelling
create
five
unit
residential
building
on
an
existing
ten
thousand
four
and
sixty
three
square
foot
Laden
each
dwelling
unit
will
have
access
to
an
individual
open
deck
will
be
off
street
parking
for
eleven
vehicles
located
in
the
rear
yard.
The
violation
is
article
65
section,
eight
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
65
section,
eight
accessory
parking
is
forbidding
article
65
section,
nine,
the
Floridian
ratios
excessive
article
65
section.
Nine.
AR
The
property
tim
johnson,
architect,
190
old
colony,
out
of
boston.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
The
original
building
program
for
this
quarter
acre
site
was
to
demolish
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
and
build
a
four-story
seven
unit,
building
with
17
parking
spaces
through
the
community
process.
The
building
program
has
been
to
a
three-story
rear
addition
to
the
existing
one
and
a
half
story:
single-family
dwelling
to
create
five
dwelling
units.
This
is
what.
A
AR
We
initially
proposed
seventeen
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
We
are
now
reduced
that
to
eleven
parking
spaces.
This
is
freedom
32%
of
the
site
of
the
quarter
acre
site
for
landscaping,
which
the
neighbors
are
very
happy
about.
The
rear
building
the
exterior
areas
include
rear
balconies
patios,
but
no
roof
decks.
And,
finally,
the
unit
breakdown
of
the
five
units
were,
which
are
reflected
in
the
revised
architectural
drawings
dated
ten
twenty
three
eighteen
and
revised
Zoning
Board
rosy
is
only
refused
eleven
dated
one
nine
nineteen
unit,
one.
These
are
all
duplex
units
unit.
AR
AR
H
H
AR
Initially,
we
needed,
we
did
need
relief
for
a
tandem
parking
with
the
17
spaces.
However,
with
the
redesign
we
that
violation
was
removed
from
the
project
and
we
have
a
standard
double
loaded
corridor
parking
parking
layout.
We
also
have
a
support
letter
from
hopes.
He'll
commute
hopes,
he'll,
civic
associations
supporting
this
current
redesigned.
AM
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
and
L
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
of
this
project.
We
had
two
abutters
meetings
for
this
project
and
they
did
receive
the
support
of
the
pope's
whole
neighborhood
association.
The
African
has
continued
many
community
conversations
outside
of
the
official
process
and
met
many
of
the
concerns
of
the
abutters,
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
at
large,
again
we'd
like
to
honor
and
support.
Thank.
J
B
AT
AT
A
A
AT
A
AM
A
B
B
B
AR
A
B
A
A
B
B
Calling
boa
nine
zero
zero,
this
724
90
topless
Street.
This
is
off
street
parking.
Two
vehicles
widening
an
existing
curve
and
paved
the
back
yard
violations.
Article
65,
section,
41,
location
of
on-street
parking
loading
in
parking
and
climates
article
65
section
for
the
1rst
parking
design
and
maneuverability
in
article
9,
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming.
You.
A
AV
A
AW
A
A
AW
AW
A
B
Your
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
six,
eight
zero,
two
six
seven
Pelin
Street.
This
is
the
ad
a
crib
cut
her
off
street
parking
for
for
vehicles,
violations,
article
60,
section,
8
parking
lot
is
a
forbidden
news.
Article
60
section
40
host
handle
spots
located
in
front
of
each
other,
create
a
manoeuvrability
issue,
name
an
address
for
the
record
place.
AX
A
AX
AX
A
A
AW
AM
AB
C
A
B
B
This
is
four
to
four
to
six
pages
erect
a
new
three
family
with
three
parking
big
three
parking
spots:
the
violations,
article
60
section
41,
special
provisions
for
clonal
art
setbacks
to
front-to-front
yards
of
15
feet
as
a
minimum
article
66,
a
nine.
The
lot
with
minimum
sufficient
50
is
50.
Feet
is
required.
An
article
60
section
I
and
the
lot
frontage
minimum
is
insufficient.
50
feet
is
required.
Article
60,
section
9
excessive.
If
a
0.5
is
the
max
article,
60
section
9,
maximum
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded
two
and
a
half
stories.
B
As
the
max
article
60,
section,
I
installation,
front
yard.
Setback
15
feet
is
the
minimum
equal
60
section,
9
insufficient
Raigad
setback
dirty
feet.
His
minimum
office,
curry
Tech's,
are
encroaching.
This
is
for
two-page
terrace.
This
erecting
new
three
family
with
three
austria
parking
violation,
article
66
and
I
on
the
rail
insufficient
article
60
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
44,
40.4
RC
parking,
no
parking
is
allowed
in
the
front
yard.
B
A
AY
So
currently,
there's
an
existing
2
family
with
offense
to
any
areas
of
other
yards,
so
the
existing
2
family
sits
on
a
3200
square
foot
lot.
The
zoning
in
that
neighborhood
is
3
F
5,000.
The
proposal
is
to
build
a
3
family
house
on
a
4920
that
will
be
four
to
six
page
Street
and
also
another
3
family
on
another
lot
that
will
be
5,000
341
square
feet,
which
is
2,
page
terrace,
which
comes
down
now
page
Terrace.
AY
If
you
look
at
the
your
tablet
or
you
look
at
the
prison
sleep
package
that
has
been
given
to
you,
it's
basically
paper
Street,
so
that
will
be
through
work
with
btv
and
Public
Works.
That
will
be
made
into
a
streets
of
this
access
down
there
and
also
alleviate
some
of
the
pressure
of
parking
in
the
neighborhood
and
other
people
there.
The
each
unit
of
these
new
three
bedrooms
will
be
one
and
a
half
baths:
three
three
bedrooms:
one
and
a
half
baths
and
the
approximately
1,300
square
feet.
AY
We
went
to
a
pretty
long
community
process.
The
real
issue
was,
a
lot
of
the
neighbors
was
a
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
something
was
done
with
this
land.
It
was
it's
fenced
in,
but
it
was
people
were
dumping
stuff.
There
was
kind
of
not
great
situation,
it
was
overgrown
and
the
other
was
parking
and
you
know
I
was
just
outside
and
probably
why
I
was
late
being
called
in
here.
AY
Speaking
to
somebody
who
has
a
business
in
the
neighborhood
in
explaining
that,
because
to
page
terrorists
will
be
tired,
asphalted
it
made
it
to
a
street
that
will
alleviate
some
of
the
pressure
for
her
business,
which
is
outside
the
blues,
new
butter
zone.
But
still
it's
a
concern
because
some
of
the
residents
parking
from.
A
AY
So
it's
obviously
it's
a
three
family,
even
though
it's
a
three
family
zone,
this
zone
in
Stillman
a
when
it's
2.5.
So
with
that
with
respect
to
the
height.
As
you
know,
madam
chair,
it's
35
feet
two
and
a
half
stories.
This
is
actually
three
stories
at
32
feet,
so
the
height
is
not
the
violation.
It's
just
the
number
story
and.
A
AY
An
irregular
shape
lot,
it's
5300
41
square
feet
in
the
3f
5000
zone.
Again,
it's
the
rare
yard
is
30
we're
at
34.
But,
as
you
can
tell
madam
chair,
it's
it's
just
an
irregular
size,
rear
lot
side,
yard
violation
is
10,
we're
at
nine
point.
Seven
five
and
rear
yard
is
front.
Yard
is
ten
we're
at
model
at
9.75
and.
AZ
AM
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
van
Daele
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
speaking
on
behalf
of
Christy
and
Brenda,
the
liaison
for
this
area,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
She
conducted
a
community
process
for
this
project,
including
in
a
butters
meeting.
The
Alpha
Team
has
met
many
of
the
neighborhood
concerns,
including
the
maintenance
and
cleaning
of
the
property.
Thank
you.
A
N
BA
BA
J
AM
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
van
Daele
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
There
is
butters
meeting
held
through
this
project
and
received
full
support
from
the
Columbia
Savin
Hill
Civic
Association
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
local
business
as
a
great
addition
to
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you,
madam.
R
A
B
AY
On
five
Spring
Garden
Street
this.
Actually,
if
you
guys
may
remember,
this
came
before
the
board
back
in
2016
at
the
time
it
was
denied,
it
was
a
concern
about
whether
the
applicant
had
done
the
proper
in
the
process
and
also
there
was
a
concern
regarding
what
kind
of
tenants
specifically
if
they
were
undergraduate
tenants
living
in
the
building.
This
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
to
have
five
thousand
the
lot
sizes,
two
thousand
two
hundred
seventy
five
square
feet
and
it's
always
been
a
three
family,
the
violations.
AY
So
obviously
it's
an
extension
of
non-conforming
use
of
a
three
F
in
the
2f
zone,
excessive
F
they
are
and
what
happened
when
he
purchased.
When
mr.
Bloomberg
purchased
this
house
several
years
ago,
we
were,
we
are
porches
that
were
boxed
in
and
through
ISDN
and
I've,
been
working
with
ISD
on
that
they
had
asked
us
to
go
forward.
O
AY
That's
correct,
so
there
was
some
concern
about
the
community
process.
As
I
stated,
we
had
gone
through
a
pretty
robust
community
process.
I
had
given
I
think
you
guys
have
six
letters
of
support
as
well
as
went
before
the
Columbia
Savin
Hill
Civic
Association
presented
to
them,
and
they
also
unanimously
supported
as
fraud.
This
legalization
of
this
unit
as
well.
A
AY
AY
A
AY
Did
come
before
the
board
before
the
issue
really?
Was
you
know
community
process
as
well,
as
did
they?
Who
are
the
renters?
You
have
letters
of
support
of
director
butters,
all
the
director
butters,
who
verify
that
he
does
not
rent
out
to
students
and
that
he's
a
good
landlord,
and
you
know
they
requested
the
approval
for.
A
AJ
AS
C
AB
B
A
next
case
calling
VOA
eight,
eight,
nine,
three,
nine
eight
eighteen,
a
Rockville
Park.
This
is
a
change.
I
can
make
three
to
a
four
family
and
also
add
donors
and
extend
rest.
A
case
of
the
fourth
floor
violation,
article
50,
section
43
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
An
article
50
section
28
for
apartments
is
a
conditional
use
in
a
three
a
four
thousand
submissions.
B
Lotta
areas,
insufficient
the
article
50
section,
twenty
nine,
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive,
equal,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
fifty
section,
twenty
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
Equal
fifty
section,
twenty
nine
usable
open
spaces
insufficient
an
article,
fifty
section
29,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Equal,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine
side
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
50.
Section
29
of
the
Riyadh
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
C
A
A
B
The
next
case
calling
BOA
nine
zero
four
four
six,
five
six
Gannett
Street.
This
is
erect
a
two-family
dwelling
on
the
vacant
law
to
propose
one
off
street
parking
violations.
Article
10
section
one
last
few
parking
shall
be
no
more
than
five
feet
from
the
side.
Log
line,
article
50,
section
29
lawn
areas,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29
of
the
flow
ratio,
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
20
of
then
usable
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29
of
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29
of
the
rear
yard,
is
insufficient.
B
E
E
J
BB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
in
strong
support
of
the
project.
There
was
a
nut,
butters
meeting
and
a
neighborhood
association
meeting,
and
they
are
in
full
support
of
the
project.
E
B
Nine
to
nine
one
127
Dudley
Street.
This
is
a
creative
gabled
edition,
with
ground-level
parking
at
living
space
with
existing
building
and
create
exterior
decks
to
change
doctormick
to
family,
to
an
eighth
residential
unit
violation.
Article
50
section
28,
the
MFI
uses
of
a
bidden
article
at
50,
section
29,
additional,
an
insufficient
additional
la
tierra
per
unit.
2,000
square
foot
unit,
article
50,
section
29,
excessive
FAI
0.8-
is
the
max
article
50
section
29
insufficient,
open
space
per
unit,
article
50,
section,
29,
insufficient
Reyat
setback
dirty
feet
is
required.
B
Medical
50,
section,
29,
insufficient
side
yard
setback.
10
feet
is
required.
Local
50,
section,
41
screening
in
buffering
required.
None
is
proposed.
Article
50,
section,
43
Marcie,
packing
loading
requirement
design
in
article
50,
section
44,
the
coil
art
provision
is
an
existing
building
alignment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BC
BC
B
BC
BC
BC
BC
BC
A
BC
BC
BC
BB
BD
My
name
is
Alena
Stenson,
one
of
the
neighboring
neighbors
to
this
building.
I
just
wanted
to
express
concern
for
the
congestion
and
noise
that
some
of
the
neighbors
said
sorry
expressed
some
concern
for
the
congestion
and
noise
that
this
project
would
create
for
this
particular
street,
and
also
acid,
if
this
project
moves
forward
that
they
consider
at
least
one
affordable
housing
and
maybe
one
affordable
unit
for
a
artists
student
in
lieu
of
the
history
of
this
historic
history
of
this
building,
Murray
start
new
kids
on
the
block.
Thank.
B
Boa
9
0
4
0
9
5
14
23
to
14
25
trim
on
Street
mr.
wrecking
a
four-story
retail
residential
structure,
the
structured
up
to
a
house,
a
retail
on
the
ground
floor
and
three
storied
above
housing.
92
bedroom
residential
units
violations.
Article
13
section
4
dwelling,
is
in
a
non
residential
district
article
59
section
38
traffic
visibility
across
the
corners
article
59
section
37.
Our
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
59,
section
16,
the
height
is
excessive
article
59
section
16
of
Florida
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
AY
So
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
ns-two.
The
lot
size
is
three
thousand
five
hundred
eleven
square
feet.
The
proposal
is
to
build
a
four-story
building,
there'll
be
nine
apartments,
which
will
be
three
three
apartments
per
unit
per
floor
and
commercial
space
on
the
first
floor,
together
with
five
parking
spaces
interior
to
the
building.
The
violations
that
mr.
mr.
fortune
just
read
out
ns-two
that's
an
incorrect
violation.
AY
Residential
housing
is
in
fact
allowed
in
traffic
visibility.
We
had
actually
will
work
with
btv
as
part
of
the
construction
management
plan
to
work
with
them.
On
that
free
parking
in
the
neighborhood
one
is
required,
we're
proposing
0.55
height
is
45,
feet
is
allowed
under
the
ns2.
The
proposed
is
48.
AY
On
the
first
floor
of
945
square
feet,
we
went
through
an
extensive
community
process
with
the
butters
and
civic
groups,
and
last
week
presented
this
proposal
through
the
Community
Alliance
of
Mission
Hill.
It
was
well
it
very
well
attended
meeting
and
we
received
a
tie
vote,
so
they
would
not
write
a
letter
opposed
or
write
a
letter
of
support
for
the
benefit,
the
family,
his
property,
a
longtime,
Mission,
Hill
owners.
They
own
this
property
I
sit
in
their
family
for
over
22
years.
AY
AY
H
BE
Don't
share
members
of
the
board
to
saw
her
at
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
they've
been
before
the
community
committee
Alliance
of
Mission
Hill,
twice
now
receiving
full
support
for
this
proposal.
We
also
held
in
a
butters
meeting
where
more
of
the
concerns
had
to
do
with
where
the
trash
is
going
to
be
stored
and
they've
resolved
that
issue
by
having
trash
stored
indoors,
where
there
is
space
in
the
garage.
BE
A
C
C
BF
B
AC
B
This
is
directly
fourth
story
and
one
half
story:
commercial
structure
containing
thirty
nine
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
nine
square
feet
to
be
used
as
a
cannabis
establishment,
as
defined
in
the
text.
Amendment
of
479
of
the
Boston
zoning
code,
Boston
zoning
code.
The
violations
article
50
section
32
cannabis
established-
is
conditional
on
article
50,
section
43.
Our
feet
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
place.
BG
245
Summer
Street,
East,
Boston
2002
Tichenor
to
my
right,
is
enumerate
the
president
of
Green
Line
Boston,
because
right
they're,
too
small,
our
local
zoning
Council,
as
well
as
San
Andres
who's.
The
project
architect
we'd
also
have
with
us
our
urban
doer
many
who's.
Our
director
of
security
he's
present
to
answer
address
any
questions
concerning
operation
plan
period.
Madam
chair,
this
proposal
is
to
constructed
open
a
state-of-the-art
cannabis
cultivation
of
processes
Center
in
the
new
market
business
district
and
be
located
at
102
114
Hammond
Street.
BG
This
project
be
the
first
of
its
kind
in
the
city
of
Boston
that
we're
aware
of
in
green
lines.
Goal
here
is
to
create
a
brand
that
will
be
unique
to
Boston
and
they
become
Keith
with
a
large,
publicly
traded,
out-of-state
companies
that
are
likely
to
get
involved
in
this
emerging
industry.
Here
in
the
Commonwealth
of
Massachusetts.
With
this
proposal,
Green
Line
proposes
that
created
least
its
30
full-time
jobs
for
Boston
residents
and
generate
revenue
for
the
surrounding
community.
This.
AB
BG
Characteristics,
madam
chair,
this
proposed
project
be
located
on
about
a
25,000
square
foot
lot,
that's
essentially
vacant
and
used
for
vehicle
and
material
school.
The
site
is
surrounded
by
a
number
of
industrial
manufacturing
uses
includes,
including
a
trash
transfer
facility
storage.
Now
the
white
industrial
uses
that
we've
provided
information
to
the
to
the
board
show
this
proposed
facility
would
be
in
excess.
I'm,
sorry
excuse.
BG
Now
Jimmy
provides
to
this
board
information
demonstrated
this
site
and
that
proposed
project
would
be
an
excess
of
five
feet
from
the
nearest
educational
facility,
which
would
be
the
orchard
gardens
K
through
8.
There
is
a
certification
from
our
engineer,
showing
the
distance
being
in
excess
of
500
feet,
which
I
know
is
a
requirement
of
a
zoning
code,
as
well
as
the
state
regulations
concerning
familis
establishments.
BG
We
are
not
aware
of
any
facility
that's
been
approved
by
this
port,
then
we'll
do
within
a
half-mile
radius
of
this
light
again
something
that's
required
in
a
zoning
code.
The
purposes
of
location,
madam
chair,
just
respect
to
what
was
provided
into
the
record,
and
while
this
project
is
originally
submitted,
intend
to
be
of
a
larger
building.
Throughout
this
process,
we
have
worked
to
downsize
the
size
of
this
building
to
below
20,000
square
feet.
BG
As
a
result,
one
of
the
things
that
jumps
off
the
page
based
upon
the
Secretary's
reading
into
the
record
is
the
violation
for
off
street
parking.
Our
goal
was
to
design
a
building
that
met
the
spirit
intent
of
the
code,
as
well
as
all
the
dimensional
parking
and
loading
requirements
of
the
new
market.
Industrial
district
and
therefore
this
project,
by
being
reduced
below
20,000
square
feet,
would
be
dimensionally
by
right
as
well
as
comply
with
the
parking
and
loading
requirements.
So.
BG
BK
BG
BG
By
way
of
operations,
this
would
be
strictly
for
cultivation
and
manufacturing.
Only
there
is
no
retail
component
being
proposed
here.
So
one
of
the
I
think
key
elements
throughout
the
conversation
in
the
community
process,
as
well
as
the
various
stakeholders
is
that
the
public
would
not
have
accessed
this
facility
to
purchase
any
cannabis
product.
It
would
strictly
be
manufactured
and
cultivated
there
and
sold
at
other
licensed
dispensaries
that
would
be
licensed
under
Canada's
control
condition.
BG
BL
24
hours,
security
presence
for
the
building
the
the
operation
is
gonna,
have
basically
every
single
door
gate.
Room
hallway
will
help
we
monitored,
live,
monitored
and
will
always
have
at
least
one
security
personnel
on
site
24
hours
a
day
and
hurt
not
only
is
Herbie
more
than
qualified
his
company,
but
he's
also
a
local
business
he's
within
a
couple
hundred
feet
of
our
location.
BL
It's
strictly
cultivation
manufacturing,
we
won't
have
any
retail
on
the
location.
Majority
of
the
personnel
will
be
there.
Just
during
working
hours,
banking
hours
from
about
8:30
9
a.m.
till
6
p.m.
there
will
be
a
few
people
on
location,
including
security
24
hours
a
day
because
it'll
always
be
working.
BL
There
will
be
people
tending
to
the
rooms,
the
plants,
security
monitoring
the
facility,
but
for
the
most
part
majority
the
personnel
will
just
be
there
during
the
day
during
painting
hours,
number
of
jobs,
we're
expecting
to
employ
upwards
of
30
people
plus
people,
everything
for
administration,
security,
maintenance,
HVAC
systems,
monitoring
tagging,
trimming,
shipping
processing
packaging.
There's
a
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
jobs
in
this
facility.
BL
There's
a
under
the
regulations
in
Massachusetts
waste
management
is
very
strict
with
our
facility
we'll
be
using
a
granular
machine
that
grinds
it
up
and
any
type
most
just
for
the
record
most
of
the
plant.
Almost
all
of
it
will
be
used
in
some
form.
There's
a
root
ball
that
usually
needs
to
be
wasted.
That'll
be
ground
up
and
deemed
unusable.
There's.
BM
BG
BL
BL
To
begin
we'll
start
with
seeds
and
then
we're
gonna
have
what's
called
a
mothering
and
a
clone
room.
Where
we'll
grow
the
plants
it
will
take
clones
and
clippings
from
that
plant.
Then
they'll
go
into
a
vegetation
room
and
then,
when
they're
ready,
we'll
take
them
to
a
flower
room
was
a
process
but
it'll
all
be
created
on-site
in
a
secure
facility.
J
L
A
BL
BG
A
part
of
this
and
I
think
you'll,
hear
from
some
of
the
people
were
going
to
speak
today
in
support
Madame
chair.
The
goal
for
Mario
has
been
to
work
very
closely
with
the
local
community
to
draw
from
the
community
for
both
job
training
workforce
development
and
to
ensure
that
jobs
are
accessible
to
the.
A
C
C
BG
H
BL
BG
BH
BN
BG
Attempt
with
the
campus
Control
Commission
so
obviously,
even
though,
if
this
board
were
to
grant
the
conditional
use
permit,
there
are
several
layers
that
remain
in
order
for
this
facility
to
move
forward.
Obviously,
we've
had
an
opportunity
based
upon
the
original
size
of
the
project,
to
meet
with
the
BPD
a
her
designs
staff.
Even
though
we
are
dropping
this
building
down
below
the
threshold
for
small
project
review,
we
do
intend
to
continue
with
the
design
review
and
certainly
listen
the
input
as
I
staff
at
the
PTA
for
the
Science
Building.
AJ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faces
Sherif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
based
on
significant
community
outreach.
That's
been
done
related
to
this
proposal
and
specifically
because
it's
a
cannabis
proposal.
We
want
to
make
sure
all
the
stakeholders
are
involved
in
understanding
the
impact
that
this
would
happen
on
the
area.
It
will
stimulate
a
lot
of
positive
economic
activity
in
this
area,
specifically
related
to
job
training
and
workforce
development.
AJ
We're
also
particularly
concerned
around
security
and
monitoring
around
the
Newmarket
area.
In
general,
we
have
significant
challenges
around
the
mask
ass
area
and
we
do
believe
having
more
eyes
and
ears
on
the
streets
specifically
related
to
positive
economic
development
will
help
with
other
challenges.
Thank
you.
H
BO
Morning,
madam
chairman
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Shawn
Fonts,
I'm,
a
local
label,
a
labor
attorney
and
I'm.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
project,
the
company
has
made
a
commitment
to
work
with
myself
any
the
bill:
Moran
&
Associates
community
mentoring
program,
which
is
a
workforce
development
program
which
is
designed
to
work
with
local
unions
to
help
people
of
color
and
Boston
residents
get
into
building
trades
apprenticeship
programs.
In
fact,
we
were
successful
enough
to
get
26
people
of
color
into
the
electric,
the
electrician's
Prentis
ship
last
year.
C
BN
AH
BN
BN
So
I
have
been
talking
back
and
forth
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
the
partnership
when
he
comes
to
the
community
for
us
to
work
together.
I
have
products
that
me
and
I'm
gonna
talk
about
developing
together
for
the
kids
and
showing
them
how
to
do
the
projects.
So
that's
what
I'm
here
for
it
to
help
them
support.
Thank.
BD
BP
Good
afternoon
Madame,
chair
and
forth,
my
name
is
Marc
Emery
I'm,
the
CEO
of
West
Cohn,
personal
protection,
I'm,
a
former
police
officer
for
20
years,
former
chairman
of
the
parole
board,
so
I'm
standing
behind
this
project,
mario,
has
talked
about
workforce
development
for
my
security
company.
That's
really
important.
We're
the
first
security
company
in
this
state
that
has
workforce
development
and
so
Mario
and
is
in
is
this
particular
project,
and
it
is
really
connected
to
some
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
in
our
project.
Thank.
A
BQ
Good
afternoon
I'm
Rob
Lewis
jr.
I
support
this
project
me
and
Mario
built
a
very
strong
relationship
in
a
short
period
of
time,
and
he
was
been
a
supporter
since
day.
One
I
have
a
television
show
the
after
hour,
where
we
highlight
local
and
young
entrepreneurs
from
Boston.
He
has
been
a
supporter
of
that
and
also
my
program
devoted
dynasty
entertainment,
where
we
showcase
and
illustrate
storytelling
and
also
with
special
events
and
he's
been
a
day
one
supporter
of
a
health
and
wellness
event
that
we
do
every
other
month
for
the
community.
BQ
BR
Good
morning
I'm
Mike
Bivins,
born
and
raised
in
Orchard
Park,
where
this
facility
would
be
talking
to
Mario
and
hearing
his
plans.
I
came
today
to
support
it.
He
said
he's
gonna,
make
sure
the
people
from
my
hood
get
jobs,
he's
gonna,
make
sure
they
get
trained.
We're
gonna
make
sure
that
it's
secure,
there's
already
enough
stuff.
That's
been
on
in
that
area
me
being
in
the
community.
I
do
a
lot
of
stuff
for
our
community.
BR
BR
AB
BS
A
BS
She
had
another
meeting
she
had
to
run
to
the
state,
but
we
are
speaking
in
support
of
this
proposal,
despite
our
general
ongoing
opposition
to
cannabis
uses
in
our
area.
We
believe
that
this
one
will
be
very
beneficial
for
a
number
of
reasons.
We've
met
with
Mario
and
his
team
several
times
over
the
past
few
months,
and
we
are
very
excited
about
the
prospect
for
his
proposal
to
employ
several
dozen
local
residents
and
the
business.
BS
We
also
believe
that,
as
a
manufacturing
facility,
it
is
inherently
appropriate
for
our
industrial
area,
especially
as
there
is
no
retail
component,
and
we
believe
that
overall,
it
will
help
to
improve
the
area
by
cleaning
up
an
unused
site
that
is
currently
a
sore
spot
for
the
neighborhood
and
blocking
vision
to
some
of
the
waste
facilities
in
the
area.
Thank
you.
BT
Good
morning
my
name
is
Stan.
Walczak
I
represent
our
Energy
Holdings,
located
at
101
Gerrard
Street,
a
direct
abut
up
to
the
proposal.
Mr.
sinew
I
came
over
roughly
a
year
ago,
explained
to
us
what
he
was
going
to
do.
We
are
totally
in
favor
of
his
project,
actually
we're
looking
forward
to
it.
Due
to
the
fact
we
believe
it's
good
increase
security,
the
aesthetics
of
the
area
will
be
much
better
and
we're
totally
behind
it.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
AZ
L
B
L
A
B
L
L
A
A
B
A
B
BF
AF
BF
George
Moran
seaman
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston.
Madam
chair
members.
This
is
a
lot
that
has
a
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development
deed
restriction.
I
defer
this
the
first
time
indicated
to
the
board
at
that
time
that
we
were
working
with
DMD
on
an
agreement
whereby
an
affordable
unit
could
be
created
here
as
part
of
the
project.
I
spoke
with
D
and
D
officials
as
a
little
thirty
minutes
ago,
and
we
have
an
agreement
in
principle.
We
need
to
go
back
out
into
a
community
process.
BF
A
BU
A
B
BV
BI
BI
A
A
AC
A
A
A
A
Let
me
just
see
what
what
I
should
say.
First,
please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
out.
Second,
if
you
have
conversations,
please
take
them
outside
of
the
room,
as
you
know
the
acoustics
of
pour
here,
so
we
are
having
a
hard
time
hearing
applicants
and,
if
you're
here,
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
on
the
record
and
tell
us
why
you're
in
support
or
in
opposition,
give
us
new
information.
A
B
You,
madam
chair,
calling
the
next
case
for
10:30
calling
VOA
eight
seven,
eight
nine
seven
one
sixty
Humphrey
Street
Humphrey
Street
tale.
Okay.
This
is
a
change,
their
life
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
and
had
an
extended
first
floor
living
space
into
the
basement.
The
violation
is
article
65,
section,
41
they're
dead,
coming
they're
coming
in
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
I
in
additional
lot
areas
insufficient
and
article
65,
section.
Nine
for
the
a
ratio
is
excessive
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
AU
AU
J
AM
AO
BT
B
You
going
boa
8
3
3
8,
3,
5,
6,
general
wing
divine
way.
This
is
Ana,
renovating
existing
one-story
garage
and
erect
a
four-story
3
unit,
residential
building,
a
roof
deck
and
a
4
car
garage.
The
violations,
article
13
section
1,
the
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
13,
section,
1,
additional
law
areas,
insufficient
article
13,
section
1
of
the
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
13
section
1
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
13,
section
1,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Radical
13,
sectional
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
B
AN
BC
BC
J
J
BC
The
there
are
two
needs
and
egress
because
it
is
a
four-story
building
and
it's
a
2-bedroom
2-bath
configuration
approximately
1,100
square
feet
on
the
top
floor.
It's
a
slightly
smaller
unit
of
usable
space,
but
it
is
1,200
square
feet.
Is
the
unit
square
footage
would
begin
a
third
floor
with
a
small
deck
in
the
front
and
a
small
fold
by
14
roof
deck
to
get
access
by
a
hatch.
It's.
BC
H
BM
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellis
and
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
we'd,
like
to
one
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
We
did
hold
several
meetings
on
it.
The
applicant
actually
changed
the
proposal
to
address
community
feedback
and
they
did
receive
support
from
the
interest
where
Civic
Association.
Thank
you.
BW
Chair
members
of
the
board
and
I
can't
let
on
from
Council
of
links
office,
the
counselor
will
also
like
to
long
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
They
did
meet
with
the
underscore
Civic
Association
and
direct
director
butters,
and
they
came
up
with
a
good
plan
that
works
for
everyone,
so
we're
here
to
support.
Thank
you.
BD
R
B
The
next
two
cases
calling
VOA
784
986
534
rare
Dorchester,
Avenue
companion
case
BOE
97316
534
to
538
tour
Chester
Avenue.
This
is
for
534
rare.
This
is
erect
a
new
seven
unit,
residential
building
eleven
garage
parking
spaces.
This
is
one
of
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot.
The
violations,
article
68
section
8,
lock,
frontages
insufficient
article
68,
section
33
la
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
34,
two
dwellings
on
the
same
lot,
article
68
section,
8
height,
is
excessive.
In
article
68
section,
a
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
In
article
68,
section
8
location
of
the
main
entrance
shall
face
the
front
blood
line:
article
68,
section,
8,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
68,
section
8,
the
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
An
article
68
section
8,
the
rear
yard
setback
with
climate
is
insufficient.
Article
68,
section
82
buildings
on
the
same
lot:
article
27
s,
section
5,
it's
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
equals
68,
section
33
raw
Street
parking
design,
be
quiet,
maneuvering
areas
and
a
lot
of
appropriate
access
to
a
public
street.
B
This
is
for
534
538,
Dorchester
Avenue.
This
is
an
existing
building.
On
lot,
the
second
phase
of
an
existing
condominium
building
at
this
address-
this
is
one
of
two
buildings
on
the
same
walk:
the
violation
of
article
12,
section
1
Lots,
into
districts;
article
13,
section,
4
dwelling
in
a
non
residential
district
article
12,
article
14,
section,
6,
two
dwellings
on
one
a
lot:
article
14
section
1.
The
lot
area
for
additional
units
is
insufficient.
Article
15
section
1
the
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive.
B
BF
West
Broadway
joined
by
my
clients
in
members.
This
is
two
applications,
the
purpose
of
which
would
be
to
erect
a
new
building
which
would
constitute
Phase.
Two
lower
court
condominium
level
or
condominium
is
located
at
5:38
Dorchester
Avenue
about
34
538
I,
which
is
also
the
subject
of
an
alt
application
and
there's
a
fortune
already
greater.
There's.
BM
BF
Of
being
closed,
it
simply
had
to
be
included
in
the
application
package,
since
it
constitutes
the
single
lot
under
that
address,
on
which
the
second
building
was
directly
to
the
rear
of
the
existing
condominium.
Building
that
the
second
building
would
actually
front
on
Glover
Court
access
to
the
second
building,
I
just
want
to
address
the
the
parking
violation
where
it
was
mentioned
that
there
was
no
direct
access
to
public
way,
there's
an
easement
in
place
which
can
be
seen
on
she
date.
BF
BF
No,
there
are
two
easements
there
across
easements
there,
and
these
were
the
easements
that
were
put
in
place
among
in
between
534
538,
to
adjust
our
condominium
building,
as
well
as
the
abutting
property
on
go.
Chester
Avenue
with
528
532
and
the
easements
were
set
up
to
facilitate
parking
to
the
other
building
on
Dorchester
Avenue
528
532
en
was
actually
put
in
place
at
the
time
that
the
Rutherford
condominium
was
created
with
the
anticipation
that
would
provide
access,
always
plan
for
the
triangular-shaped
parcel
portion
in
the
rear.
AI
BF
Provide
some
breathing
space
above
the
garage
level
for
budding
residences
on
the
rice.
So
what
happened
is
that
the
building
grew
in
height
from
40
feet
to
46
feet.
Eight
inches
as
it
was
essentially
squeezed
and
extended
vertically,
to
provide
for
some
more
room
on
the
with
respect
to
other
buildings.
Very
pertinent
are
adjacent
to
the
site.
BK
BF
It
then
goes
in
even
more
to
provide
more
opening
opening
area
from
light
in
the
air
on
that
side
of
the
building
and
then
obviously,
as
we
get
up
to
the
fourth
level,
where
a
single
unit
would
be
located
a
single
three-bedroom
unit,
there
are
setbacks
around
that
use
it
along
the
entire
area
of
the
roof.
So.
BF
Above
the
garage
level
on
the
first
three
residential
floors,
six
units
and
then
the
seventh
unit,
situated
as
a
setback
unit.
On
the
fourth
floor,
the
units
mixes
there
are
two
or
three
bedrooms
in
three
bedrooms.
So
on
floors,
one
two
and
three
there's
a
two-bedroom
on
the
left,
a
one-bedroom
on
the
right.
The
unit
sizes
are
650,
so
square
feet
to
the
three
is
1550
something
for
the
two
and
then
the
top
floor
unit
is
a
1756
square-foot
three-bedroom
unit
unit
number,
seven.
BF
Eight
one:
there
are
two
compact
spaces
next
to
three
of
the
little
parking
area.
Five
spaces,
then
at
the
lower
portion
closer
to
globert.
Fourth,
is
a
parking
space
next
to
the
three
lifts
to
the
left
of
that,
as
you
come
in
the
garage
there's
a
compact
space
in
the
HP
space,
and
there
is
one
exterior
serving
surface
parking
space
at
the
very
end
of
lower
court.
That's
parking
space
number
18.
BF
Farr
2.0:
this
comes
in
a
two
point,
one
one,
five
or
again,
if
this
site
were
taken
as
its
own
parcel
and
that's
why
there
are
dimensional
violations,
including
FA,
are
that
are
recited
on
the
538
Dorchester
Avenue
application,
even
though
mill
work
is
being
done
there.
It's
simply
because
that
existing
building
ads,
obviously
just
were
square
footage
in
the
FA,
are
for
the
combined
site.
So
those
violations
again.
BM
BF
BM
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Allison
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
This
is
a
case
that
is
on
an
unusually
shaped
lot.
However,
the
developer
has
worked
with
the
neighbors
and
the
Civic
Association
to
arrive
at
a
plan
that
works
for
everyone,
so
here
in
support.
Thank
you.
BW
R
BX
Good
morning,
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
Kathleen,
allow
skits
and
I'm.
Here
with
my
husband
Joe,
we
are
the
most
immediate
direct
abutters,
we
own
seven
glover
court.
We
have
been
in
constant
contact
and
involved
in
all
of
the
meetings
that
have
been
taking
place
now
for
10
months,
and
we
are
here
in
support
of
the
project.
They
have
been
working
with
us
all
the
way
along
to
make
sure
that
that
property
came
off
of
our
property,
as
George
Moran
si
stated
and
we
are
in
support
of
it
as
the
project
stands
now.
A
J
C
A
C
B
L
J
BM
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
have
held
a
couple
of
meetings
on
this
project.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
if
people
are
generally
supportive
and
the
one
thing
they
would
like
to
see
is
parking
which
I
think
the
proponent
is
also
working
on.
Thank
you.
BW
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
The
director
waters
were
concerned
about
the
parking
and
all
the
cars
that
they
will
bring
into
the
community
and
into
guy
Street
specifically,
and
they
have
agree
that
they
work
work,
work,
work,
work
on
it
in
the
future
and
try
way
to
getting
parking
into
the
into
the
existing
building.
Thank
you,
madam.
R
Chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley,
comes
from
savvy
george's
office
and
we
want
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
also
echo
honest
concerns
regarding
the
parking,
it's
a
very
narrow
street
and
it's
a
tight
corner
and
there's
a
lot
of
parking,
and
this
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
cars
there
and
also
there's
a
concern
about
the
cleanliness
of
the
area
and
they
have
agreed
to
keep
that
clean.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AC
J
L
J
AC
B
Voa
9
0
1
3,
4,
1,
3
14
to
330
West.
Second
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
Walker's
from
retail
in
large
amount
to
nine
residential
units.
Demolish
the
existing
related
system.
Indirectly,
new
petitions
create
residential
units,
the
violations
article
27
s,
section
5,
it's
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
20,
article
c3
party
parties,
inspiration
article
68,
section
8,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
section,
8,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
They
have
an
address
to
the
record.
Please.
BF
Myranda
tournament
business
addresses
350,
west
broadway
and
south
boston.
I'm
joined
with
joseph
well,
who
has
been
working
with
me
with
our
client
community
process.
Part
of
this
application,
which
is
to
convert
existing
commercial
space
at
twenty
forty
West
Broadway,
the
foundry
building,
convert
that
commercial
space
into
nine
dwelling,
notes,
appliance
right,
Connelly
owns
the
commercial
space
vertical
space
and
has
never
been.
BY
BF
It
would
be
a
mix
of
studios,
one
two,
three
bedroom
one
thing
to
bedroom
units
and
studios
I
will
point
out
so
I
know
we'll
ask
that
there
is
an
outlier
a
studio
unit.
Is
our
programs
at
343
square
feet?
The
reason
for
this
is
that,
in
the
conversations
with
the
building
trustees,
my
clients,
it
was
a
desire
to
to
approximate
the
the
unit
mix
in
terms
of
bedrooms
and
unit
sizes
of
the
current
52
units
that
are
in
the
building.
BF
BF
Go
so
there
is
some
turnover
in
the
parking
spaces
within
the
building,
but
again
the
notion
is
that
this
is
a
residential
building
that
is
six
tenths
of
a
mile
from
Broadway
station
and
would
be
to
one
who
wants
to
do
a
shoot
right
at
the
motor
vehicle
ownership
and
take
alternate
trip
modes
of
transportation.
Okay,.
J
H
BM
Chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
one
record
in
support.
We
did
hold
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
and
there
were
no
objections.
This
is
somewhat
underutilized
commercial
space,
so
people
didn't
see
an
issue
with
turning
it
into
units.
Thank
you.
BW
R
A
B
Makes
calling
BOE
96-83
for
246
Athens
Street?
This
is
erected
to
family
home
in
a
parking
on
the
ground
floor
violations.
Article
27
s,
section
5
of
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
33
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
8,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
section
8,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
68,
section
8
the
front
yard.
Is
it
sufficient
athol
68,
section
8
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Anti-Vehicle
68,
section
8,
the
riyadh
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BF
Before
my
name
is
George
Moran
see
I'm
an
attorney
with
ruthless
address
at
350,
West,
Broadway
and
self
Boston
volunteer
members.
This
is
a
simple
matter
in
Phil's
family
construction.
On
a
third
Street
itself.
Often
the
law
in
question
is
1261
square
feet
is
are
lightly
brawl
and
foam
proposal
is
to
erect
a
full
story.
BF
BC
BF
J
BM
BW
A
B
Your
next
case,
Kali
BOA,
eight,
eight,
nine,
nine,
three,
nine
three
ten
to
three
twenty
Cambridge
Street.
This
is
a
change
Larkin
from
restaurant
to
restaurant
Jim
fitness
to
build
out
at
316,
Cambridge
Street.
Second
flaw:
vitaly's
nautical:
a
section
7
gym
fitness
centers
of
the
venue's
name,
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BZ
CA
H
BE
Chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
a
girl
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
they've
received
unwavering
support
from
the
community
and
numerous
abutters.
There
have
been
no
questions
or
concerns
at
this
time,
so
we
would
like
to
see
them
open
up
this.
AV
BZ
BJ
B
AB
A
BP
BI
J
BE
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
are
in
support
of
this
proposal.
They
have
had
an
extensive
hearing
process
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
of
the
Back
Bay,
and
also
their
neighbors
I
believe
that
Elliot
Laffer
is
behind
meet
also
testify
in
support,
so
we
are
actually
in
support
as
much.
CC
Association
of
the
Back
Bay-
and
we
are
not
posed
for
three
reasons:
it's
just
it's
just
a
deck
that
serves
oats
there's
one
unit,
and
it
is
fully
in
compliance
with
the
the
guidelines
that
the
architectural
Commission
has
for
roof
decks
and
it
is
accessed
by
a
hatch.
Now
I,
don't
know
if
that
creates
the
building
code
thing,
but
it
is
a
hatch
access,
not
a
not
a
that's.
Why
that's?
Why.
A
B
BK
Sleeping
area
was
existing
when
I
plan
to
purchase
the
property.
It
is
unusable
for
a
number
of
reasons,
as
a
bedroom
lacks
proper
sealing
clearance
to
get
to
the
egress
stair.
That
is
to
it.
It
also
has
City
Heights
that
our
code,
and
so
our
proposal
is
to
expand
the
rear
dormer
only
which
gives
us
an
overall.
BK
BE
Chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
at
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
are
and
so
forth.
Under
this
proposal
as
well,
we
had
extensive
committee
process,
they
have
support
or
non
opposition
from
the
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association.
We
also
host
a
nut
butters
meeting
where
no
one
seemed
to
share
any
questions.
Our
concerns
about
the
project
so
we're
alga.
A
B
Boa
nine
nine
seven,
five,
four
two
sixty
Newbury
Street:
this
is
a
change
of
our
key
to
mercantile
retail
use
on
the
ground
floor,
first
laws
and
transient
used
for
dwelling
17
units
on
the
floors
above
rows.
Five
that
also
includes
construction
of
new
penthouse
addition,
roof
deck
and
rare
edition
with
roof
tact.
In
addition,
a
new
recessed
entry
and
terrorists
and
in
the
proposals
on
Newbury
Street
violations,
article
eight
section
three
restaurant
third-
is
a
conditional
use.
B
CD
A
AR
I
L
AB
B
Calling
boa
eight
eight
one,
five
one,
one:
eight
Rutland
square,
the
companion
case,
boa
eight
eight
one:
five,
one:
zero,
eight
Rutland
square
rubble
square
hip.
Sorry,
this
is
a
constructive
one,
rear
deck
off
the
pollen
level
and
roof
deck
with
hatch
access.
The
violation
is
article
64,
section,
nine
point:
four:
a
townhouse
row
house
extension:
we
also
have
Building
Code,
section:
ninth
edition
780
CMR,
roof
access,
roof,
hatch
proposed
name,
an
address
to
the
record
place,
W.
J
J
AI
CE
A
A
AJ
Our
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
faces
shriek,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
full
support
of
this
proposal.
It's
modest
roof
deck
and
also
a
rear
deck,
and
the
neighbors
are
particularly
in
support.
The
fact
that
it's
going
to
be
accessed
by
hatch.
Thank
you.
CF
B
The
proposal
submitted
it
with
seeks
to
demolish
the
existing
carriage
house
to
build
a
free-standing
single
family
structure
and
conformity
with
a
footprint
of
the
existing
carriage
house
yeah
by
increasing
the
total
dwellings
of
the
subject
parcel
to
three
families
violations.
Article
10
section
1
proposed
parking
is
within
5
feet
of
the
side.
Lot
line
an
article
62
section,
62,
3,
0
12.
A
dwelling
shall
not
be
built
to
the
rear
of
another
dwelling
in
article
62
section
8.
The
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
B
Article
62
section
8
users
will
open
spaces
insufficient
article
62,
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
62
section
8,
the
Reyat
isn't
sufficient
equals
62
section
8
the
dimensional
regulate
regulations.
The
main
entrance
faces
the
side
yard.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Madam.
CG
CG
Currently,
on
site,
we
have
a
two-family.
There
is
a
pre-existing
carriage
house
in
your
packet.
You'll
see
a
we
have
a
refusal
letter.
We
also
have
an
existing
and
then
proposed
site
plans
for
existing
carriage
house,
which
is
to
be
raised,
and
then
a
single
family
structure
to
be
erected
largely
over.
These
is
the
footprint
we
have
the
architectural
plans
for
you.
We
also
have
had
on
site
mr.
Lam,
who
issued
the
letter
of
support
from
the
Charlestown
Preservation
Society
and
then
also
submitted
for
the
record.
We
also
have
letters
of
support
as
well.
CG
A
CG
Sure
so
the
rear
lot
line.
What
is
required
is
20
feet.
What
is
required
for
this
side?
The
artists
two
and
a
half
feet?
What
is
the
only
one
that
we
are
kind
of
intentionally
creating
is
the
main
entrance
facing
towards
the
interior
of
the
lot.
It
was
by
designed
to
give
deference
and
privacy
to
the
most
immediate
of
butter
to
have
the
main
entrance
to
the
structure
facing
inward
to
the
lot.
So
it's
kind
of
a
self-created
violation.
A
A
CG
A
CG
CG
X
A
AF
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
putting
the
lock
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services.
Our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project
to
about
his
meetings
were
held
lightly,
attended
and
support,
and
the
project
was
supported
by
a
partisan
area
like
to
thank
them
for
their
attention
of
the
privacy
in
this
matter.
That
was
a
big
thing
with
director
Park.
So.
A
AY
B
BY
A
A
A
A
BY
J
CI
Hello,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
cases
Garcia
with
the
mayor's
office
networker
services.
We
would
like
to
go
in
record
in
support
the
applicant
completed
community
process
back
in
October
and
during
the
meeting
no
concerns
were
expressed
by
then.
Actually,
he
received
a
strong
support
from
the
director
Boris.
CH
J
C
B
In
the
last
case
of
10:30,
Colin,
BOA,
eight,
seven,
four,
nine
five,
four
three:
oh
three:
two
three:
oh
five:
Bennington
Street
they're
seeking
to
demolish
an
existing
building,
directly
four-story
mixed-use
building
with
fire
residential
units
and
one
retail
space
devoted
ammo,
including
by
a
staircase
handing
full
sprinkled
system.
The
violation
article
53
section
12
before
the
and
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section
12,
the
height
is
excessive
article
53,
section
12
to
use
them
all
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
12,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
An
article
53
section
56.
B
F
You
Madame
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago,
with
an
address
of
15
Broad
Street
from
Drago
and
Toscano.
It's
Steve
Stojko,
the
owner
of
the
property
at
three,
oh
three,
oh
three,
three,
oh
five,
Bennington
Street
as
well
as
Leo
Hannigan
from
LF
eh,
drafted
the
plans,
as
was
mentioned,
we're
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
two-story
structure
and
doing
so
would
be
creating
a
new
first
floor
retail
space
and
then
for
additional
I'm.
Sorry,
five
additional
units,
this
particular
area,
is
a
neighborhood
shopping
district.
F
The
lot
size
is
one
thousand
seven
hundred
and
thirty
six
square
feet.
Total
buildings
square
footage
is
4400
square
feet
when
this
is
done
right.
Now,
as
it
stands,
this
building
houses
a
retail
space
on
the
first
floor,
one
large
apartment
above
it,
the
new
plan,
would
call
for
disutilities
in
the
basement.
The
first
floor
would
also
have
a
new
retail
space,
a
thousand
fifty
square
feet.
The
second
and
third
floor
would
house
two
units
each
and
then
the
fourth
floor
would
have
the
one
larger
unit.
F
F
A
F
F
A
F
Roughly
500
square
foot
roof
deck
on
top,
so
it
isn't
a
neighborhood
shopping
district.
The
FAA
are
for
that
area
is
one
what's
allowable,
we're
at
2.5
3
the
height.
Although
we
are
at
35
feet,
we
are
a
four-story
building,
so
in
stories
will
be
sited
open
space
were
slightly
under,
it's
50
per
dwelling
unit
is
allowed
we're
at
40
per
and
a
rear
yard.
Setback.
20
is
what's
allowed
we're
at
10.
We
are
not
providing
parking,
there's
none
there.
Now,
however,.
BQ
AN
F
CI
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
workers
Garcia
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
complete
the
community
process
back
in
fall.
Last
year
we
have
an
apartment
in
September
during
the
bars
meeting.
No
concerns
were
expressed
about
this
proposal
in
also
the
project
was
presented
in
in
front
of
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association.
Thank.
A
CH
AQ
AQ
A
lot
of
them
couldn't
take
off
of
work
to
come
here
to
support,
but
we
frequent
the
square
gallons
of
milk
shop
and
retail
day
square
has,
in
our
opinion,
been
a
little
antiquated
and
anything
new
well
Thea
helps
us
even
including
some
residential
up
above
because
this
people
out
there
what
lights
on
and
I
send
an
11
year
old
over
to
get
milk,
and
if
there's
people
living
around
and
some
lights,
it
helps
us.
So
we
support
anything
in
the
thank.
J
B
B
B
A
A
B
A
B
B
AJ
A
A
A
CJ
B
A
A
So
so,
basically,
it
sounds
like
it's
more
of
a
neighborly
loony
Bolinas
is
anybody
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services?
I
know
you're
new,
but
can
you
help
this
applicant
because
this
is
not
a
big
project?
However,
you
know
it
sounds
like
there
needs
to
be
some
bridge
mending.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal?
H
BB
My
name
is
Jessica
Thomas,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
the
project.
There
wasn't
a
butters
and
a
Neighborhood
Association
meeting
on
the
Neighborhood
Association
meeting
rocks
way
path
forward.
They
said
they
typically
don't
take
stances
on
when
it's
something
like
you
know
this,
but
they
provided
their
support
either
way.
Thank
you.
BV
And
I
live
at
2222
a
Montreux
Street,
and
these
are
my
neighbors
for
since
1982,
so
I
do
support
their
project
and
I
still
need
to
see
the
new
plans,
but
I
I
would
support
the
project
because
I
saw
they
I
met
with
the
architect
and
he
run
down
which
he
will
be
showing
me
the
plans,
probably
next
week
or
sometime,
but
for
right
now.
I
would
support
it.
CJ
CK
AC
B
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
the
two
cases.
I
called
you
earlier.
Jenna
was
outside
calling
VOA,
eight
nine,
seven,
two
four
seven,
two:
ninety
six
Neponset
avenues,
companion
case,
boa
nine,
seven,
two
five
six
to
ninety
six
departs
at
Avenue.
This
is
for
two.
Ninety
six,
the
fonts
that
have
removed
porches,
build
new
edition
violations,
article
65,
section,
nine,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
65,
69,
insufficient,
Raigad
setback,
article
65,
section,
nine,
insufficient,
usable,
open
space
for
dwelling
unit,
an
article
65
section,
nine,
excessive
FA
is
also
for
two.
B
BU
J
H
BU
BU
A
A
X
AE
B
Your
next
case
calling
boa
87
87
to
167
West,
8th
Street.
This
is
accessory
parking
spaces
for
two
vehicles,
the
violation
article
10
section,
one
parking
fee
located
five
feet
from
the
side:
lot
line:
article
68,
section,
33,
Austrey
parking
and
loading
requirement;
maneuverability
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
Doug.
A
CL
CL
BM
BW
A
AW
Chilly
80
members
of
the
board
there's
an
existing
light
pole
right
in
front
of
the
driveway
that
proposed
driveway
and
I'm
still
a
little
concerned
about
the
distance
between
the
stairs
but
they're
gonna.
Remove
the
existing
brick
steps.
Yes,
they're
gonna
be
removed,
yeah,
okay,
so
that's
no
longer
an
issue,
but
the
flagpole.
The
light
pole
will
have
to
be
yes.
CB
A
B
This
is
a
change
of
octave,
a
two-family
dwelling,
full
interior
renovation
of
a
two-family
extend
living
space
to
the
basement
and
second
means
of
egress
by
extending
exterior
red
forge
a
new
roof
propose
to
Audrey
Bach
violations,
article
27
sx5,
it's
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
aged
usable.
The
space
is
insufficient
in
article
68,
section
8,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
they
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
thank.
A
A
BH
A
BY
BY
A
A
BY
BY
J
J
J
W
BM
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
did
hold
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
for
this
project.
They
are
expanding
in
the
back
and
providing
parking,
which
is
something
that
a
few
other
houses
on
this
block
have
also
done.
There
were
no
real
objections
raised
to
that
situation.
Thank
you.
W
A
B
A
A
B
I'm
gonna
go
to
the
recommendations
of
the
subcommittee,
which
met
on
Thursday
January
24th
at
five
o'clock
at
10:10
mass
M,
first
project,
boa
nine
zero
one,
two
five
three:
seventy
eight
Washington
Street
was
244
square
foot
door.
Addition
existing
to
family
to
gable.
Those
was
approved,
boa
eight,
seven,
six,
four,
seven,
six,
twenty
one
South
Russell
Street
was
replacing
existing
area.
B
Structure
proposed
seven
by
fourteen
deck
was
approved,
boa
eight
seven,
three,
seven,
eight
nine
eighteen
Yama
Street
geometry
was
to
construct
two
root:
two
decks
off
the
rail
wall
and
related
doors
that
was
approved,
boa
eight,
nine,
zero,
zero.
Two
six
753
East
Broadway,
was
to
change
our
people.
Take
a
existing
bagel
shop.
There
was:
where
was
the
denial
without
prejudice?
B
Was
an
individual
with
no
show
boa
nine
zero
to
a
to
133
to
39
South
Huntington
AB
was
a
constructed,
Dunkin
Donuts
restaurant,
an
existing
space
was
approved
with
Design
Review,
boa
eight,
nine,
six,
eight
six
zero,
two
or
six
two
two,
a
Herald
Street
was
denial
without
prejudice
for
an
show
case,
boa
eight
nine
zero.
Two
three
four
was
here
today:
boa
nine,
eight
five,
eight
nine
fourteen
Tuttle
Street
was
down
close.
The
front.
B
Porch
was
approved
with
design
review,
boa
eight
five,
eight
one,
eight
six
one:
oh
nine
Glenn
way
street
was
removed,
closet
and
open
space.
The
basement
built
the
wall
to
separate
common
area
and
extend
living
space.
The
first
law
was
approved,
boa
96,
2,
0,
0
39
Crockett
Avenue
was
a
two
and
a
story
addition
and
the
rear
side
of
the
house.
It
was
approved,
boah,
zero,
four
one,
four,
eight
twelve
Lonsdale
street
was
the
extend
first
floor
apartment.
B
The
living
space
into
the
basement
for
new
bedroom
was
approved,
boa
eight,
nine,
seven,
two
five
six
to
ninety
six
and
upon
so
there
was
Harry,
hurt
today,
boa
eight
nine
four,
two
nine
one
sixty
two
Fairmont
Street
it
was
adding
doors,
an
existing
roof
creed;
no
third
flows
deferred
to
February.
Fifth,
boa,
eight,
five,
three,
two
nine
five,
thirty
one
della
was
heard
today:
boa
nine
zero,
three
nine
zero.
B
Four
to
thirty
one
to
two
thirty
three
West
Street
was
deferred
to
February
5th,
boa
six
one,
six,
four,
four
zero
31
world
Hill
Street
was
a
partial
innovation
of
unit
2
and
had
to
normos.
It
was
approved
boa
eight,
eight,
six,
three
three
six
one.
Seventy
seven
beech
tree
was
adding
addition
that
would
extend
home
meet
parents.
Sunroom
was
approved,
boa
eight
six,
eight
six,
two
eight
one,
eleven
Bell
Avenue,
it
was
demolished
enclosed
porch
and
we
built
an
attached
addition
existing
front
and
ten
by
six
foot.
B
Deck
was
approved,
boa
eight,
eight,
seven,
two,
nine
four
five
5512
L
Street.
It
was
construct
a
new
second-story
addition
existing
first
look
footprint.
It
was
approved
boa
eight,
six,
five,
eight
nine
seven,
eleven
Swan
Street
was
to
construct
a
new
married
addition.
An
existing
single-family
was
approved
with
design
review,
and
this
will
survey
discussions
boa
eight
six
one,
five,
seven
six.
Fourteen
thirteen
fourteen
thirteen
West
Fourth
Street
was
to
change
our
active
single-family.
Drawing
to
family
dwelling,
legalized
the
two
family
was
approved
and
boa
for
third
was
community
in
case
boa.