►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 9-11-18
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
B
G
H
H
Subsequently,
there
was
a
lawsuit
filed
in
something
Superior
Court
challenging
the
zoning
relief
that
was
ultimately
settled
and
resolved
dismissed
by
the
court
on
September
27
2016,
at
which
point
the
decision
became
final.
All
of
the
BPD,
a
article
eighty
process
has
been
completed,
except
for
a
few
items
which
remain,
which
precipitates
the
request
for
an
extension.
We
need
to
complete
the
execution
of
the
IEP
agreement
and
attain
our
final
certification
of
completion
under
Article
80,
but
otherwise.
A
G
I
I
K
I
In
above
the
same
space,
actually
moving
less
space,
be
able
to
twenty
two
fields
rather
than
eighteen
originally
approved.
Inspectional
Services
Department
insists
that
number
of
parking
spaces
as
recited,
either
in
the
regional
application
or
in
any
decision
that
this
board
match
be
issued
significant
occupancy
if
occupancy
needs
to
match
the
fuel
storage
permit
from
the
committee
licenses.
I
I
It's
the
matrix
system,
so
I
really
only
have
a
garage
in
front
of
you,
but
it's
two
levels
so
they're
eight.
Actually
there
are
three
levels:
I
guess
there
are
there's
always
one
empty
spot.
So
there's
always
an
open
opening
of
the
bottom
drive
in
and
then
the
system
actually
moves
the
cars
around
it's
the
system
that's
been
described
after
this
board
before
it's
fought
back
activated.
That
actually
is
an
intelligent
system
so
that
each
car
isn't
ridiculous
lot.
It
begins
to
learn
driving
paddocks
as
ready
in
the
morning
in
the
order
that
they
typically.
A
G
A
next
two
cases
for
jihad
I'll
do
a
eight
six
zero
one,
seven
nine
three
sixty
two
Morrow
Street.
There
is
a
companion
case.
I
believes
through
fifty
to
VOA
eight
six
zero
one,
eight
three
three,
fifty
two
mob
Royal
Street.
This
is
for
362.
This
is
a
change
of
octave
to
a
single-family
dwelling
directory
edition
with
deck
the
top.
In
addition,
the
roof
deck
with
access,
hatch,
repair,
brick,
complete
interior
innovation
of
all
floors,
replacing
all
new
mechanicals
and
raising
of
the
brick
garden
wall
violations.
Article
32
section
9g,
cod
enforcement.
G
This
is
for
352
Marlborough
Street.
This
is
exterior
renovations
in
addition
of
a
pentile
structure,
repair
exterior
brick
and
stone
windows,
underground
utilities
and
ground
water,
recharge
system
and
change
of
arching
from
a
one
family
and
a
lodging
house
to
a
one
family.
The
violations,
article
32
section
90,
Claude
enforcement
name,
a
name,
an
address
for
the
record
player,
Mark.
M
A
A
G
The
930
hands
for
deferrals
or
withdrawals
only
deferrals
or
withdrawals
only
are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
930
hearing.
None
we'll
call
the
first
case
calling
boa
eight
four
nine
two:
two
five
ten
Trenton
Street
this
trenton
street
here:
okay,
this
to
build
a
new
third
floor.
Addition,
the
violations,
article
9
section
1,
its
reconstruction
of
extension,
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
62,
section,
25,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
62,
section,
8
the
floor
to
a
rate:
their
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
62,
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address.
N
Non-Conformance
of
the
existing
building,
the
only
new
violation
that
we're
adding
is
by
doing
the
change
of
roof
structure
in
essentially,
what
we're
doing
is
adding
a
dormer
to
both
sides,
the
building
in
order
the
existing
bedroom
and
existing
bathroom
to
actually
have
a
better
usable
space.
What's.
O
N
P
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Quinn.
The
log
I'm
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
full
support
of
this
project
and
about
whose
meeting
was
held
directive.
Others
were
attending
and
there
were
no
issues
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
Q
G
G
Violations,
article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
ancillary
parking
at
478,
Medford
Street
in
29,
Austria
parking
access,
maneuverability
location,
design,
article
62,
section,
30,
traffic
visibility
across
Arcana
by
a
motor
vehicles,
2.5
feet,
article
62,
section,
7
ancillary
parking
to
the
main
use
of
478
Midford
Street,
didn't
article
62,
section,
7,
3
family
use,
it's
forbidden
article
62,
section
8,
the
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
2
and
a
half
is
the
max
article.
62
section
8,
insufficient
side
setback
5
feet
is
required.
G
Article
62,
section,
8,
insufficient,
open
space,
450
square
feet
unit
is
required
in
article
62
section.
A
reduction
is
usable
in
open
space,
ancillary
parking
at
478,
Medford
Street,
nickel,
62,
section
29,
our
street
parking
loading
in
requirements,
name
in
the
address
for
the
record.
Please
mark.
A
You've
been
here
before,
can
you
speak
both
walk
to
the
violations
and
I'm
specifically
concerned
and
interested
in
the
ancillary
parking
at
478
Medford
Street
after
you've
gone
through
the
rest
of
the
violations,
because,
if
there's
ancillary
parking
470
should
be
here
as
a
companion
case,
because
that
creates
a
violation
on
that
parcel.
But
in
the
meantime,
just
go
through
the
violations.
S
Just
arenas
talked
evaluation,
also
sensitive,
freestanding
building.
We
should
have
four
spots
1.5
for
unit,
but
we
actually
round
down
the
floor,
but
we
only
have
room
for
two
spots.
The
interesting
thing
about
Friday,
the
next
one
that
you
mentioned
is
best
family
as
well.
So
right
now,
I
think
the
problem
was
before
70
that
spot
your
tongue,
landscaping.
A
A
U
A
F
A
G
Next
week,
case
of
calling
VOA
8
2
8
5
3
4
19
to
21
Lancaster,
Street
to
companion
cases,
boa
8,
2,
8,
5,
3,
7,
31
to
39
Lancaster,
Street,
boa
8,
2,
8,
5,
3,
8
73
to
75
causeway
street,
but
this
is
for
19
to
21
Lancaster's,
a
different
purpose,
but
same
violation.
The
applicant
seeks
to
continue
the
use
premises
for
public
parking
lot
furry
feet:
a
capacity
of
17
spaces
beyond
existing
expiration
date
of
December
31st
2018.
G
This
is
also
in
conjunction
with
adjoining
premises
at
73
and
75
Causeway
Street
in
3139
Lancaster
Street,
the
violations,
article
6
section,
3a
additional
condition
to
restricted
parking
district
again.
This
is
the
this
is
for
3139
Lancaster.
It's
the
same
violation,
so
I
won't
read
out,
but
the
applicant
seeks
to
continue
supremacist
for
public
parking
for
a
fee
capacity
of
31
spaces
beyond
the
existing
expiration
date
of
the
31st
2018,
and
this
is
for
73
to
75
causeway
street.
G
V
19
to
21
Lancaster
Street
I,
presented
before
the
downtown
north
Association
meeting
on
May
31
2018
regarding
the
current
use
and
our
filing
an
application
to
request
an
extension
for
this
use
for
three
years.
The
meeting
was
positive
in
downtown
North
Association
agreed
to
support
our
application.
I
also
spoke
over
the
phone
with
Susan
Benoit,
chair
of
the
zoning
and
planning
at
the
West
End
Civic
Association.
F
A
A
V
Wasn't
and
as
I
am
going
to
introduce
some
photos,
I
would
like
you
to
take
a
look
at
some
photos.
I'd
also
like
to
have
you
look
at
the
most
recent
plan.
We
went
through
a
Boston
Planning
and
Development
Agency
design
review
the
last
time
we
were
at
the
boy
that
was
a
rigorous
review.
As
a
result
of
that
review,
we
had
to
install
new
planting
on
Lancaster's
tree
at
the
property
at
31
to
39
Lancaster
Street,
you're
gonna
see
flowers
installed
in
a
concrete
enclosure
surrounding
it.
That
should
be
one
that
should
be
photo.
V
A
V
There
are
at
the
property
at
7375,
Causeway
Street.
If
you
also
look
at
the
photos,
photo
and
photo
number
four
you're
going
to
see
two
trees
planted
there,
two
fairly
prominent
large
trees.
They
border
both
sides
of
the
existing
building,
there's
an
existing
building
on
Causeway
and
Lancaster,
and
there's
an
existing
building
further
down
causeway
street
two
fairly
large
prominent
trees
there.
V
F
V
V
A
V
A
V
G
V
K
V
W
X
A
A
G
Boa
4
1
3
8
156
a
256
Berkeley
Street.
This
is
a
convert.
The
basement
fitness
room
and
most
of
the
first
floor
front
office
space
into
guest
rooms,
thereby
increasing
the
total
unit,
count
from
12
to
14
the
interior,
fit
out
with
no
expansion
of
existing
building
envelope
and
no
scope
of
existing
2nd
3rd
or
4th
floors.
The
violation
is
article
9,
section
1,
adding
two
rooms
for
existing
is
forbidding
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Y
28
State
Street,
Suite
8:02
in
Boston
with
me
to
my
immediate
right,
is
Morgan
Pierson
from
the
appellant
and
my
far
right,
stare
through
burn
off.
Who
is
the
architect
in
the
project?
This
is
a
pretty
simple
one.
The
property
is
located
in
the
south
end.
It's
on
Berkeley
Street,
between
Appleton
Street
and
Lawrence
Street,
it's
about
six
to
eight
minutes
from
Back
Bay
station.
This
is
an
existing
hotel.
It's
been
there
since
2009
2010,
it's
under
new
ownership
by
the
appellant
who's
before
you
today.
Y
They
bought
it
earlier
this
year
and
what
they're
looking
to
do
is
they're
proposing
to
convert
an
existing
basement
fitness
room
in
part
of
a
first-floor
management
office
into
two
new
hotel
rooms,
and
this
is
an
interior
fit
out.
There's
no
expansion
of
the
existing
building,
there's
no
exterior
changes
to
the
building
the
total
guest
rooms.
That's
near
now
is
12,
and
this
would
add
to
making
it
14.
Y
Y
Will
be
much
smaller,
they'll
be
a
much
smaller
management
office.
Also,
the
appellant
owns
forty
Berkeley,
which
is
a
few
doors
down
where
they
have
much
larger
management
office
that
they'll
have
staff
there
as
well.
Basically,
the
management
office
in
the
fitness
room
just
were
very
lightly
used
and
the
use
could
be
better
served
for
two
additional
rooms
in
the
city.
A
Y
The
owner
is
56
56,
a
Berkeley
Street
LLC,
that's
the
entity
that
owns
the
property,
but
it's
owned
by
Mount
Vernon
company,
it's
thrown,
it
is
the
ultimate
owner
and
they
own
40
Berkeley
as
well
yeah.
We
did
it
hold
in
a
butter
meeting
on
July
10th
that
was
lightly
attended.
I
did
submit
a
letter
of
non
opposition
from
the
Ellis
health
and
Neighborhood
Association
as
well.
We
have
a
who
found
no
foul
no
issue
with
the
application
of
the.
T
AA
AB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
fazer
Sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
and
record
support
for
this
proposal.
We
did
hold
an
abutters
meeting.
They
also
met
with
the
Civic
Association.
There
aren't
any
impacts
of
concern
for
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
X
A
G
You
very
much
calling
BOE
four
six,
three
five,
three:
six:
seven
Arlington
Street.
This
is
a
bill
that
balcony
a
lofty
air
in
the
existing
living
room,
Cathedral
sailin,
reworked
the
existing
stairs,
keeping
existing
steel
stringers
the
violations,
article
15
section,
1,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AC
Albert
from
Albert
writer
and
architects
at
262,
Washington
Street,
a
block
from
here
and
I,
can
show
you
what
the
proposal
is.
I
think
you
have
a
copy
of
this
drawing
which
shows
the
unit.
The
unit
is
two
floors
and
part
of
it
is
a
double
height
living
room.
The
proposal
is
to
add
a
balcony.
In
one
end
of
the
double-height
living
room,
the
balcony
would
be
a
hundred
and
six
square
feet.
The
total
size
of
the
unit
is
two
thousand
eighty
two
square
feet.
AC
Thank
you.
Second.
Drawing
shows
it
in
context.
The
whole
building
the
building
is
over
45,000
square
feet,
so
our
addition
of
the
balcony
would
add
0.23%
to
that
area
or
2.3.
One
thousandth
of
the
building
and
the
work
proposed
is
entirely
inside
the
building
and
has
no
results
and
no
change.
The
exterior
of
the
building.
A
AD
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support,
there's
absolutely
no
opposition
or
questions
to
this
case.
They
have
unanimous
support
from
the
community,
and
people
are
excited
to
see
this
floor
completed.
Thank
you.
A
G
A
to
zero
four
six,
four
out
137
Penn
Street-
this
is
a
confer
market,
says
a
three
family
remodeling,
the
existing
house
on
all
four
floors:
new
roof
deck
install
a
sprinkler
system
violations,
27
article
27
s,
section
five:
this
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
applicability,
an
article
68
section
8,
the
FA
are
is
excessive.
The
basement
extension
name
an
address
for
the
record
player.
I
AE
I
I
I
AF
AB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
fisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
John
Allison,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
However,
we
do
want
to
note
that
director
butters
did
have
concerns
about
the
roof
deck
specifically
about
the
size
of
it,
and
we
would
like
the
Apple
kids
to
continue
working
with
their
our
butters
regarding
the
size
of
that
and
consider
scaling
down
a
bit.
Thank
you.
X
Z
AG
We
are
opposed
to
the
increase
in
FA
are
we
are
opposed
to
the
existence
of
the
roof
deck
at
all,
and
we
are
also
opposed
to
how
the
hand
the
project
has
been
handled.
It
has
been
completely
developed
without
proper
permits.
This
developer
proceeded
to
do
all
of
the
work
in
the
basement,
including
the
excavation
for
the
additional
FA
are
based
on
his
short
form
permit,
and
it's
just
it's.
It's
been
a
disaster.
There
is
currently
a
stop
board,
stop
work
order
issued
on
the
project.
AG
In
addition,
we
are
also
opposed
to
the
development
of
three
units
in
this
tiny
building.
They
are
conducive
only
to
single
people,
not
families,
and
that's
not
the
type
of
development
we
want
to
see
on
this
block
in
the
roof
deck
as
any
roof
deck
in
this
city,
Point
area.
Lately
that
has
been
approved.
It
causes
problems.
We
as
the
butter's
really
suffer
from
these
roof
decks.
It's
a
little
bit
like
living
in
a
neighborhood
that
feels
like
Mardi.
A
AG
I
L
A
G
Age
calling
boa
eight
three,
eight
five,
five,
two
four
four:
twenty
two
East
history:
this
is
a
change
of
are
coming
to
family,
to
a
single
family,
legalizing
the
existing
existing,
remove
the
existing
roof
to
construct
a
new
third
floor
addition
with
front
deck
to
extend
living
space
to
an
existing
building.
The
violations,
article
68
section,
twenty
nine
roof
structure,
restrictions
in
article
68,
section
eight
side
yacht-
is
insufficient.
G
A
A
AH
A
AB
X
Z
A
A
A
G
This
is
to
combine
laws
to
contain
approximately
9,000
58
square
feet
and
add
27
residential
surface
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
68
section
7,
the
parking
lot
uses
to
the
bidding
use
in
article
27
27
s,
section
5.
This
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
applicability,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
I
F
AA
I
I
I
T
AB
X
Z
AI
Madam
chair
good
morning
attorney
Christopher
Harrington
21
McGrath
Highway
Quincy
Massachusetts,
oh
two,
one,
six,
nine
I
represent
John
and
Arlene
Evans
and
James
and
Barbara
Evans,
who
are
the
owners
of
the
two
family
of
529
East
six
three
they
had
directed
buttons
to
this
property
I
want
to
be
very
clear
with
you
that
we're
here
speaking,
not
so
much
in
opposition.
We
are
neutral
on
this
application
at
this
time.
AI
My
clients
do
have
some
concerns
about
the
project
which
we
believe
can
be
addressed
in
the
final
design
plans
that
will
be
approved
by
B
PTA
and
also
the
Boston
Water
and
Sewer
Commission.
This
property
is
presently
an
undeveloped
lot,
we're
concerned
about
stormwater
management
and
drainage
on
the
site,
also
appropriate
landscaping
and
fencing
and
lighting.
That
does
not
illuminate
the
back
yards
and
the
bedrooms
of
all
the
people
who
live
around
this
parking
lot.
AI
We
also
have
concerns
about
headlights
for
vehicles,
noise
from
vehicles,
noise
from
patrons
and
a
general
loss
of
privacy
when
this
development
is
built,
however,
we
have
had
discussions
with
the
developer
and
his
attorney.
We
think
that
we
can
work
all
of
these
issues
out,
and
so
at
this
moment
our
positions
went
neutral
on
this
project,
pending
the
final
design
plans.
Thank
you.
AJ
AK
AK
And
what
my
concern
is:
is
this
an
existing
driveway
there
that
afforded
six
cars
used
on
a
weekly
basis,
the
they're
going
to
be
engineering
I
assume
a
new
driveway
at
the
522
addresses
and
I
was
hoping
that
they
could
also
consider
having
all
of
the
27
Parker's
go
in
and
out
of
that
driveway,
as
that
driveway
will
be
geared
up
for
the
traffic
we
have.
The
existing
driveway
on
solar
no
place
is
an
antique
situation
and
going
in
and
out
of
the
the
houses
there
have
been
dinged
and
banged
up
a
little
bit.
AL
My
name
is
Enrico
LaFrieda
I'm,
the
owner
of
524
East,
7th
Street,
which
is
the
other
line,
property
along
side
520
so
and,
like
Chris,
said
I'm
right
now,
neither
for
or
against
I've
had
discussions
with
some
of
the
attorneys
as
well
and
I.
Think
as
Chris
stated,
we'll
work
together,
I
think
you'll
probably
come
to
a
solution.
Thank.
A
AM
Hi,
my
name
is
Lauren
Ron,
which
I
live
at
526
East,
7th,
Street
I'm,
also
a
director
butter
directly
behind
our
house
on
the
ground
level,
which
is
where
our
basement
doors
are.
As
soon
as
you
walk
outside,
there's
a
probably
about
a
four
or
five
foot
retaining
wall.
It's
pretty
old
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
the
way
that
the
cars
are
lined
up
there
and
the
the
weight
of
those
cars
on
that
retaining
wall.
It
has
not
been
addressed
so
far
to
me
anyway,
how
they're
gonna
remedy
that
situation?
AM
AM
AN
I
A
AJ
A
By
at
the
room
again
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law,
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed.
Please
give
us
new
information
when
you're
at
the
at
the
podium
speaking
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project.
We
are
here
to
fact
find
so
the
more
information
you
give
us,
the
better
mr.
fortune
think.
AL
A
A
M
A
G
U
G
AQ
AQ
A
AB
A
G
Deal
calling
BOA
8
5
7
0
7
7,
77,
Rumsey
Street.
This
is
a
renovation
of
an
existing
three
family
bill
and
to
include
a
new
shed-dormer
and
increase
the
living
space
violations.
Article
65
section
I
on
the
floor.
The
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
section
9
the
required
height
a
success
of
three
stories:
the
max
ethical
65-69,
the
required
height.
A
success
of
forty
feet
is
the
max
article
65
section
I,
and
the
required
side
to
setback
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
The
proposal
is
to
add
to
chef
dilemmas
with
an
increase
of
about
897
square
feet.
The
upper
level
will
be
a
bi-level,
so
the
third
and
a
half
story
will
be
one
unit
corner
occupied.
The
lower
two
levels
has
not
much
changed.
The
footprint
and
setbacks
do
not
change
as
a
good
violation
to
treat.
This
is
not
performing.
We
met
with
the
butters
it
was
well
received.
They
were
happy
to
see
the
building
renovated
and
member
to
Columbia
South.
A
AR
AS
AT
A
G
It's
erect
Inu
two
family
house
on
a
vacant
lot
the
violations
article,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine,
the
Riyadh
is
insufficient.
Well
for
Chamblin.
Do
you
guys
want
to
handle
it
this
way
we
can
go
to
each
one
after
okay
now
for
Chambliss.
This
is
to
erect
a
new
one
family
house
on
a
vacant
lot
at
the
violations
article,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine.
The
lot
area
is
insufficient.
G
G
This
is
for
8
in
Woodford.
This
is
an
erect,
a
new
semi-attached
one
family
house.
The
violation
is
the
same
grill
yacht
is
insufficient.
This
is
423
Magnolia.
This
is
a
wrecked,
a
new
two
family
house
on
a
vacant
lot,
the
violation
of
the
article
50
section
29,
the
lardy
areas,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
A
lot
width
is
insufficient
ethical,
50,
section
20
and
a
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
An
article
50
section
29,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
162
Magnolia.
This
is
direct.
G
A
new
semi-attached
one
family
house,
the
violations,
article
50
section
29,
the
real
yacht
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
164
Magnolia.
This
is
directing
new
semi-attached
one
family
house.
The
violations-
article
10
section
1
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses
in
article
50,
section
29,
the
Reyat-
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
170
Magnolia
direct,
a
new
one
family
house
violations,
article
50,
section
29,
the
lotta
areas,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
A
lot
width
is
insufficient,
not
equal,
50,
section
29.
The
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
Nautical
50
section
29.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
G
Cessful
100
Magnolia.
This
is
erecting
new
to
family
house.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29,
the
side
yard-
is
insufficient.
This
is
498
Magnolia
erect
a
new
two
family
house
on
the
vacant
lot.
The
violation
is
article
56
and
29.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
My.
A
AU
Project
we
answer
to
our
team
here
answer
to
request
for
proposals
from
the
city
of
Boston
nhi
program.
Without
Dede
oversight,
we
responded
in
June
and
we
were
designated
as
the
preferred
developer
for
these
projects.
In
September,
we
submitted
the
programs
architectural
designs
to
ISD,
with
the
placement
thereof,
and
we
come
up
with
some
variances
that
were
needed
to
make
sure
that
these
homes
that
were
already
pre-approved
by
the
city
fit
on
these
Lots.
A
AU
A
AU
AV
AV
R
F
AV
AV
T
AV
A
AW
Madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name
is
David
Cotter
today,
testifying
on
behalf
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development.
So
this
the
nhi
program
we
have
is
what
we
basically
do.
Is
we
take
vacant
city-owned
lots,
RP
them
out
for
development
for
affordable
housing,
and
we
have
design
guidelines
where
we
essentially
have
templates
of
houses
pre-approved
by
the
BPD
a
that
we
make
minor
tweaks
to
to
fit
the
lot
and
to
to
fit
the
various
neighborhoods.
AW
AX
AW
L
AU
L
AU
And
the
Dudley
neighborhood
initiative,
who
is
our
partner?
They
will
be
the
stewards
of
the
ground
lease
that'll,
be
for
99
years,
there'll,
be
a
program
that
those
properties
will
be
entered
into
to
secure
and
ensure
the
affordability
for
a
very
long
time,
and
also
the
market
units
will
also
be
Deidre
stricted
that
they
will
be
owner
occupied
for
15
years.
F
AA
A
AO
Madam
chair,
the
board,
my
name
is
Tony
Hernandez,
I,
Service
Director
for
Dudley
neighbours
incorporated
the
Community
Land
Trust,
and
a
number
of
these
units,
when
they
are
built,
will
become
a
part
of
our
land
trust
portfolio
and
will
strike
a
99-year
ground
lease
with
the
owners
that
end
up
in
these
homes
to
preserve
the
affordability
in
perpetuity
for
the
lifetime
of
the
of
the
house.
So
come
here
in
support
of
the
project.
Thanks.
E
Good
morning,
Christine
okie
from
the
city
of
Boston
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development,
as
the
person
who
conducted
the
community
process
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
working
with
Dudley
Street
Neighborhood
Inc,
we
met
with
the
community.
On
numerous
occasions.
We
actually
identified
several
city
on
post
parcels
on
Magnolia
Clifton
Woodward.
We
went
from
Dudley
always
up
to
I,
can't
think
in
the
street
Quincy
Street,
and
we
looked
at
all
of
the
city
owned
parcels
along
that
site,
and
we
literally
went
and
said
what
type
of
house
what
style
of
house
fits
on
each
one.
E
Not
only
did
we
get
housing
on
out
of
the
project,
but
we
also
got
a
farm
and
community
garden
as
well,
so
we
did
have
an
extensive
community
process
and
we
did
tweak
the
designs
to
make
sure
that
they
fit
exactly
what
the
community
wanted
to
see
in
that
neighborhood.
The
farm
is
the
food
project
know
the
farm
has
been.
It's
been
installed
a
little
bit:
it's
not
the
food
project,
it's
at
the
corner
of
ceylon
and
it's
a
sale
on
and
Magnolia
it's
actually
on
hold
at
the
moment.
E
A
G
The
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
five:
seven
zero,
seven,
zero,
twelve
davit
Street.
This
is
to
construct
a
new
rare
third
storey
addition
to
create
additional
living
space
and
no
change
of
the
existing
in
occupied
se
violations.
Article
65
section
nine,
the
floor.
Dia
ratios
excessive
article
65
section:
nine.
The
height
is
excessive.
Two
and
a
half
stories
at
maximum
allowed
article
65
section,
nine,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Damon
had
erected
a.
AR
T
AS
A
G
The
next
four
cases
calling
VOA
eight
three
one:
six:
four,
seven,
ten
to
twelve
Ashton
Street
VOA,
eight
five,
two
seven,
four,
two,
forty
nine
Stratton
Street
VOA,
eight,
three
one,
six,
four,
six,
one:
oh
eight
to
one
ten
Lucerne
Street
and
boa
eight
three
one,
six,
four,
eight
one:
thirty
three
to
135
Cal
industry:
this
is
for
ten
to
twelve
Ashton.
This
erect
a
new
to
family
residential
dwelling
proposed
to
off
street
parking
violations.
Article
66
a
nine,
a
lot
of
areas,
insufficient
article
66,
a
nine
in
the
front
yard,
isn't
sufficient.
G
This
is
for
forty
nine
Stratton,
this
erect
a
new
three-story
single-family
dwelling
on
an
existing
four
thousand
eight
hundred
and
sixty-three
square
foot
lot,
and
this
is
part
of
the
neighborhood
homes
initiative
program.
The
violations,
article
60,
section,
nine
body
areas
insufficient.
This
is
for
108
to
110
Lucerne
Street.
This
is
erect
a
new
to
family
residential
dwelling
proposed
to
are
three
parking
violations:
article
60
section:
nine
lot
areas
insufficient
article
60
lot;
frontages
insufficient
article
60
lot;
winters
insufficient
in
article
60,
section,
nine
front
yard.
G
Last
one,
this
is
for
133
to
135
calendar
Street
direct,
a
new
to
family
residential
dwelling
proposed
to
our
street
parking
violations.
Article
10
section
1
wall
street
parking
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side
lot
line
in
article
60,
section,
40,
Austria,
Park
and
maneuvering
area
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
lauder
is
insufficient.
Article
66
and
I
on
the
floor
area
ratio.
Success
of
article
60
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
60
side
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
60
section
9.
The
Reyat
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Rashmi.
AZ
AZ
AZ
So
if
you
look
at
this
site
plan,
that's
a
very
tight
lot,
so
we're
so.
This
has
a
two-family,
it's
a
narrow
lot
and
most
of
most
of
the
items
requiring
variances
are
because
the
lot
is
small.
So,
first
of
all,
the
lot
itself
is
only
3804
square
feet,
and
so,
when
you
put
a
building
on
that
lot,
the
fer
is
exceeded.
AZ
A
AZ
So
we
have
the
it's
going
to
be
tandem
parking
along
the
driveway,
so
you
can
look
to
the
west
of
the
building
itself
and
there's
gonna
be
a
the
two.
Cars
will
have
to
park
there
in
tandem.
So
some
of
this
was
negotiated
with
D
and
E.
You
know
it's
also
gone
through
BPD
approval
and
abettors
meetings,
and
so
on.
So
because
this
was
a
small
lot,
we
had
to
kind
of
go
a
couple
of
rounds
with
D.
My.
A
A
AZ
AZ
AZ
I'm
with
Rudy,
so
first
of
all,
thank
you.
The
the
developers
flight
is
delayed
because
of
the
storm
and
the
expediter
is
having
a
baby.
So
I'm
here
representing
everybody,
the
developer
had
a
prior
relationship
with
rody
and
we've.
You
know
worked
with
them
before,
so
they
thought
it
was
better
to
you
know,
go
with
us
rather
than
try
to
do
it
on
their
own.
L
AZ
AZ
AZ
AB
AE
L
AE
L
L
A
So
so,
just
I
think
the
rest
of
your
team
has
left.
So
please
I
think
the
message
that
that
should
be
conveyed
to
the
rest
of
the
team
is
that,
oh,
are
you
gonna
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record?
A
A
You
missed
the
part
of
our
conversation
a
little
bit
earlier
about
the
the
sense
from
us
is
that
it's,
it
can
be
very
useful
to
have
an
architect
on
board
to
be
tweaked
and
relook
at
the
projects
and
look
at
the
boiler
plates
so
that
they're
more
responsive
to
neighborhood
form
and
neighborhood
needs,
so
we
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
as
other
projects
make
their
wage
through
the
pipeline.
Okay,
thank
you.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
opposition.
G
Boa
seven:
three:
six,
two
one:
five:
ninety
three
King
Street
back
decking
for
a
second
floor
with
the
same
size
of
an
existing
first
floor.
Eighteen
by
eight
foot
floor
violates
article
9
section
one.
The
proposed
deck
addition
is
an
extension
of
an
extension
of
non-conforming
use,
article
65,
609,
insufficient
side,
Dad
setback,
an
article
65
609,
insufficient
rail
yard
setback
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
hi.
A
T
AT
G
G
BA
It's
a
three
family
building
and
A
to
F
thousand
family
area,
so
that
trigger
is
the
variance
number
one.
Another
problem
is
the
previous
owner.
This
used
to
be
outdoor
porches
previous
owner
and
closed
it
up.
Mr
Sanders
brought
the
property
two
years
ago
and
it's
a
large
building.
We
have
about
four
bedrooms
on
each
one
of
the
floors.
We
also
have
a
the
buyer,
is
gonna,
be
family
ain't
which
is
going
to
put
family
housing.
So
you
know
large
families
work
for
federal
units,
I
could
walk
the.
BA
A
F
A
BA
BA
B
A
BB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Brittany
Celestin,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I've
held
in
the
butters
meeting
for
this
project,
I've
also
put
them
through
the
den
Association
neighborhood
meeting.
We
oppose
this
project
while
the
home
was
purchased
with
the
porch
is
closed.
The
community
strongly
prefers
the
porches,
be
open
to
keep
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
with
a
triple-decker
feel.
That's
why
I
oppose
this
project.
Thank
you.
AF
Madam
chair
members,
board
Dustin
Gardner
on
behalf
of
council
president
Andrea
Campbell's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
of
this.
To
add
to
what
the
mayor's
office
said.
We
believe
that
the
homes
been
used
for
an
illegal
boardinghouse
and
in
opposition
to
what
they
said.
Family
Inc
actually
backed
out
of
buying
this
property
because
of
other
issues
that
they
saw
with
the
building.
So
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition.
C
BC
My
name
is
Jessica
Stevens
I'm,
a
resident,
a
resident
of
the
community
I
am
opposed
your
address,
28
Selden,
Street
I
live
right
around
the
corner
from
it.
I
oppose
it
opposed
to
that.
There
are
also
other
illegal
issues
going
on
at
that
building
and
like
they
said
the
previous
owner
did
back
out
of
buying
the
property
because
of
the
other
issues
that
were
is
also
going
on.
So.
A
AY
AK
AY
Madam
chair,
in
the
mr.
Boyd,
my
name
is
Johanna
sit
I'm
a
member
of
done.I
living
30
cities
Matapan
by
at
ten.
Ninety
percent
of
nuns
meeting
and
well
affiliated
with
well
well
knowledgeable
about
this
project.
Here
at
the
meetings,
the
present
owner
really
hasn't
been
clear
about.
What's
going
on
with
this
project?
Oh
it's
my
understand.
They
were
trying
to
clean
it
up
to
sell
as
an
attorney
we
spoke.
I
spoke
to
the
attorney
with
other
attorneys
there.
A
AY
BD
You,
my
name,
is
dawn
Barrett
and
I
reside
at
73,
Stockton
Street,
the
rare
of
96
Milton
Ave
abuts,
my
driveway
I
have
three
little
boys
and
I
have
tenants.
On
the
first
floor,
we
strongly
oppose
Calvin
Sanders
legalizing
enclosed
porches.
We
want
to
opened
up
as
a
community
and
also
as
a
president
of
our
Neighborhood
Association
Dorchester,
unified
neighborhood
association.
We
strongly
oppose
him
doing
this
having
Sanders
and
has
news.
BD
A
BD
BE
Good
morning,
madam
chairman
and
board,
my
name
is
Barbara
critchlow
I'm
I
live
at
140,
West,
Selden,
Street
and
I
am
representing
the
west
south
and
street
and
vicinity
Neighborhood
Association,
and
we
are
definitely
in
opposition
for
this
project.
There's
just
too
many
variables
and
the
understanding
is,
has
not
been
clear.
AJ
A
B
B
BA
A
G
Our
next
three
projects-
boa
837,
788,
46:23,
Washington,
Street,
Washington,
Street,
here
boah,
3,
778,
I'm,
sorry,
VOA,
837,
793,
4625,
Washington,
Street
and
boa
83,
77089
46:27,
Washington
Street.
The
purpose
and
the
violations
are
all
the
same,
so
I'm
just
going
to
read
it
off
once
for
all
three
properties.
This
is
construction.
A
three
unit
residential
structure.
Each
unit
2
consists
of
three
bedrooms:
two
baths:
a
kitchen
and
living
room
and
front
porch
underlying
lots
to
be
combined
the
parking
to
be
provided
by
828
unit
auxilary
parking
lot.
G
The
violations
Article
67
section
33
more
than
one
building
on
the
same
lot:
Article
67,
section,
8
multi-family
is
forbidden
and
a
two
half
5000
sub-district
Article
67
section
9
a
lot
areas,
insufficient
Article
67
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
Floria
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
67,
building
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
67,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
radical
67
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
section
9
side
got
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
section
9.
The
Reyat
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
K
K
Designed
to
be
when
the
projects
completed
my
goal,
our
goal
was
to
have
the
look
and
feel
as
if
it
at
all,
it
had
always
been
there.
It's
designed
to
fit
comprehensively
in
with
the
neighbors
of
the
neighborhood
we've
been
working
on
this
with
with
the
neighbors
since
February
of
2017,
almost
I,
think
seven
or
eight
informally
process
made
with
these.
In
conjunction
with
the
Council
of
McCarthy's
office
and
under
their
guidance,
we
also
did
our
neighborhood
our
official
voters
meeting,
of
course,
I
believe.
A
A
S
K
A
K
A
A
A
K
K
K
L
K
AV
BF
BG
Walter
Applewhite,
on
behalf
of
Council
McCarthy's
office,
we'd,
like
to
warm
record
and
support
our
chief
of
staff,
be
Blasi
was
very
involved
in
the
community
process.
She
said
that
they
satisfied
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors,
who
have
been
sort
of
overseeing
this
for
like
20
years
and
that
he
met
their
needs
and
they're
more
than
satisfied
with
it.
So
we
would
like
to
support
the
project.
C
BH
Madam
chairman
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Stuart
Schreyer
I'm,
an
attorney
with
an
office
at
1005,
Dorchester
Avenue
in
Dorchester
I
represent
West
Parkway
LLC,
which
owns
a
property
at
eleven
Shoebridge
Street.
The
problem
here
is
my
client.
Doesn't
so
much
oppose
the
project
three
three
decades
and
not
really
excessive?
It's
a
two
F
zone
I
mean
it's
gonna,
be
four
six
units
or
it's
gonna
be
nine
units.
That's
not
the
problem.
For
my
client,
the
problem
is
list
street.
Is
a
40
foot
wide
public
way?
BH
There
was
already
a
driveway
on
list.
Street
Shubert
Street
is
a
25
foot
wide
private
way.
I've
checked
all
of
that
with
the
street
guide
that
the
city
no
longer
publishes,
but
but
it's
absolutely
a
private
way
and
the
problem
you
have
is
only
locked
for
six
to
seven.
That
is
the
only
lock
that
has
any
right
to
use
the
private
way.
It's
an
appurtenant
right
and
you
cannot
overload
a
private
way
and
you
cannot
add
land
and
then
say
we
consolidated
the
Lots
and
then
these
Lots
can
also
use
Sherman
Street.
BH
So
you
have
legal
issues,
one
overloading
land,
overloading
the
the
private
way
to
an
overly
intensive
use,
28
parking
spaces
at
least
56
trips
in
and
out.
My
client
has
a
solution
for
that
more
than
willing
to
not
oppose
this
project.
If
they
entered
off
a
list
street,
so
half
the
traffic
would
come
in
off
a
list.
Street
and
half
the
traffic
would
exit
off
a
sugared
street.
The
problem
is,
there
were
three
driveways
here
for
this
land
there
was
an
existing
curb
cut.
BH
According
to
the
plans
on
Washington
Street,
there
was
a
curb
cut
on
list
Street
and
a
curb
cut
on
Shubin.
They
want
to
close
two
sharp
cuts
and
dump
all
of
this
traffic
onto
the
private
way.
It's
an
unreasonable
solution
and
in
fact
it
violates
the
law.
It's
an
overloading
and
overly
intensive
use
of
a
private
way,
and
my
client
opposes
for
that
reason
alone.
The
project
itself
looks
nice.
The
buildings
are
acceptable,
the
scale
the
projects
is
reasonable.
BH
A
A
K
K
In
my
attempts
to
satisfy
the
abutters
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
I
agreed
to
close
the
existing
curb
cuts
there
specifically
to
divert
parking
away
from
history.
90S
creates
additional
traffic
and
they
didn't
want
that.
So
I
agreed
that
it
was.
It
was
a
particularly
easy
to
agree
to
that
because
there
was
no.
There
was
no.
There
was
nothing
telling
me
and.
A
So,
okay,
so
that's
going
to
be
something
you're
going
to
need
to
address.
T
T
K
A
G
This
is
4
to
14
Lincoln.
This
is
renovations
to
an
existing
five-story
building
for
the
Church
of
Scientology
renovations,
to
include
offices
below
grade
talking,
adult
education,
reception,
public
information
cafe
and
small
gym
the
violations,
article
11
section
1,
the
sign
in
residential
districts,
51
55,
sign
regulations
applicable
to
residential
districts.
Article
51,
section,
56
hospi
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
56,
51
56.5
our
street
parking
design.
G
This
is
for
226
Lincoln
Street.
This
is
renovations
to
the
Church
of
Scientology
one-story
building
to
include
new
offices
auditorium
childcare,
classroom
warming,
kitchen
violates
article
11,
section
151
55,
sign
regulations
applicable
to
residential
districts.
Article
51,
section
56
off
street
parking
in
Article
51
section
56,
51
56.5
ought
to
be
biking,
design
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BI
AT
BJ
Is
the
other
building?
This
is
a
formerly
owned
by
Phillip
to
Normandy
was,
it
was,
and
still
is,
to
a
limited
extent,
an
office
building
a
five-story
office
building,
and
that
there
are
a
couple
of
small
warehouse
buildings.
Four
Lots
altogether
provides
the
project
to
lots
are
at
issue
for
the,
so
the
site
was
selected
because
it's
a
good
location
close
to
the
Mass
Pike
most
of
the
traffic
into
the
church.
BJ
Lincoln
Street,
without
creating
any
traffic
or
overcrowding
issues,
there's
a
lot
of
parking
on
site,
although
we
don't
quite
meet
the
zoning
requirement,
so
we're
seeking
a
variance
as
to
a
number
of
off
street
parking
spaces
as
well
as
ISDN
flags.
The
design
of
the
park
and
the
spaces
are
slightly
smaller
than
standard,
but
we
believe
there
will
be
ample
parking
and
are
not
concerned
in
to
the
extent
that
we
need
to
park
off
site
we'll
just
Park
park
off
site.
There
won't
be
any
parking.
BJ
The
church
has
acquired
these
properties
and
they
are
proposing
to
essentially
do
interior
renovations
to
the
office,
building
and
interior
renovations
to
one
of
the
warehouse
buildings
and
the
other
warehouse
building
is
going
to
be
demolished
and
there's
going
to
be
a
courtyard
outdoor
area
for
seating.
So
there's
no
changes
to
any
footprints
of
any
of
the
buildings,
no
increase
in
F,
they
are
being
reduced
and
it's
gonna
be
a
single
user.
It's
gonna
be
the
Church
of
Scientology's
New.
BJ
A
A
A
BJ
BJ
BJ
The
the
church
will
use
the
property
between
roughly
the
hours
of
8
a.m.
and
10
p.m.
and
they
have
two
shifts
that
come
in
and
out
where
the
services
are
provided,
the
counseling
and
the
education.
And
then
there
is
a
weekend
one
weekend
service,
there's
only
about
currently
about
90
members
in
the
church
in
the
New
England
area
that
attend
peak
time
really
will
be.
The
occasional
special
event
have
a
special
event.
You
might
bring
in
more
than
80
people
or
so
and
in
those
cases,
because
it's
a
single
usually
that
will
carefully
coordinate
who's.
A
AF
F
BJ
The
church
has
a
symbol,
reflective
of
the
you
know
the
religious
connotation,
which
is
at
the
core
of
the
building
and
the
mesh
screen,
and
then
they're
also
requesting
the
name.
Scientology
we've
met
with
David
Carlson
and
other
staff
from
the
BPD
a
and
have
worked
through
a
number
of
meetings
to
have
the
signage
developed.
We
do
understand
that
the
BPD
a
will
take
further
design
review
project,
so
we're
asking
that
essentially,
that
the
board
grant
the
variance
is
around
signage
as
to
a
number
of
signs,
illumination
and.
Y
BJ
F
A
BK
O
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Tony
does
adoro
representing
the
Austin
Civic
Association.
The
concerns
that
was
suppressed
expressed
by
the
membership
included,
signage
included
special
events
planning
to
make
sure
that
they
had
a
concrete
plan
on
how
to
handle
any
overflow
traffic
and
people
and
ongoing
community
benefits
they
did
reach
out
to
us
and
to
the
Executive
Board
provided
the
information
on
signage.
O
We
feel
that
they
have
a
pretty
good
plan
to
handle
special
events,
and
we
were
just
told
and
hoping
that
they
will
continue
to
maintain
the
open
space
on
Everett
Street
across
the
street
by
the
Everett
Street
Bridge.
They
get
a
nice
job
initially
to
clean
that
up
and
we
hope
that's
an
ongoing
process.
So,
therefore,
the
association
is
in
support.
A
B
Strenuous
attention,
if
that's
such
a
word,
who
the
signage
it's
obvious,
that
the
site
where
the
sign
goes
is
an
issue
and
I
want
to
make
it
very
clear
that
BPD
a
is
gonna,
be
you
know,
involved
in
this
and
they're
gonna,
be
the
ones
guiding
you
on
this
and
that
we're
gonna
support
them
on
that.
So.
A
G
BI
BI
G
BI
A
G
Q
G
Q
A
G
Also
have
a
date
of
1127.
Thank
you,
30.
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
of
withdrawals
for
11:30
tearing?
None
will
call
the
lost
case
for
10:30
calling
VOA
eight
four
three
four
one:
three:
twenty-six
Hichborn
Street:
this
is
the
change
Archer
from
twenty
residential
units
with
ground-floor
retail
space,
with
twenty
six
spaces.
G
223
residential
units
change
the
first
floor,
retail
space
into
three
studio
units
on
the
ground
level
and
add
ten
stacker
parking
space
in
the
first
floor,
garage
that
increased
the
parking
by
twenty
six
bases
from
26
bases
to
thirty
six
parking
spaces
violations,
article
51,
section
19,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
and
article
51,
section
56
off
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
I
BK
BL
A
G
For
11:30
calling
VOA
8
4
3
5
7
8
128
to
136
South
Street.
This
is
to
reinforce
a
column,
install
new
floors.
We
point
brick
change
ours
to
retails
for
liquor,
sales
and
takeout
restaurant.
The
violations,
article
55
section,
16,
takeout,
restaurants,
forbidden
article
55,
section
16.
The
liquor
store
is
conditional.
They
have
an
address
on
the
right
to
play.
A
BM
A
D
BM
BM
BN
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Alexandra
Valdez
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
echo
our
support
once
again.
A
lot
of
the
neighbors
have
sent
many
letters
to
support,
as
well
as
they're,
supported
to
have
happy
supermarket,
proceeded
in
our
neighborhood,
saying
that
it's
something
that's
very
needed.
I
know
that
they
have
been
working
with
that
butter
stand
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
council
to
get
to
go
to
the
point
of
the
of
the
issue
and
again
echo
our
support
from
the
mayor's
office.
BO
I
live
at
n
Boykin
Street
I
am
Anna
butter.
We
have
not
worked
with
the
MS
office
whatsoever
about
having
the
support.
I
did
go
to
a
yard
thing
that
they
had
to
understand
that
what
was
going
on
but
anyway,
the
happies
market
is
in
violation
of
excessive
noise,
and
we
this
before
right-
but
this
is
from
this-
is
when
the
person
came
out
and
did
the
excessive
noise.
BO
Is
the
official
that
was
done
after
we
spoke
and
I
tried
to
work
with
him
to
get
an
acoustic
engineer
out
there,
and
he
said
he
couldn't
get
one
out
there
because
of
the
date
so
I'm
just
explaining
that
he
was
he's
been
dragging
his
feet
since
July
19th.
After
our
thing
about
now,
we've
been
living
with
this
for
nine
months.
It's
absolutely
maddening
the
noise.
BO
So
if
I
could
could
I
give
you
a
copy
of
the
result
of
the
excessive
noise-
and
he
just
came
to
us
two
weeks
ago
to
say
that
he's
enclosing
the
refrigeration
units
we
went
and
asked
him.
My
sister
went
and
asked
him
on
Friday
because
they
need
to
have
acoustic
panels
on
it
and
it's
just
set
up
in
plywood
and
manufactured,
and
we
were
hoping
to
work
that
this
would
have
been
completely
resolved
by
the
time
we
came
here.
BO
So
we
could
be
in
support
of
his
takeout
restaurant,
which
would
add
another
exhaust
fan
and
more
noise.
So
my
my
plea
is
that
you
defer
this
until
the
construction
is
completed
with
the
side
panels
and
that
miss
Raymond
can
come
out
again
and
do
an
assessment
of
the
noise
from
the
six
refrigeration
units.
L
A
A
G
The
next
two
cases
calling
VOA
75455
to
34
to
36
Williams
Avenue.
There
is
a
companion
case,
boa
75455,
338
Williams
Avenue.
This
is
a
subdividing
of
a
lot
36
Williams
Avenue
high
pot.
The
line
will
have
a
total
of
eight
thousand
seven
hundred
and
three
square
feet.
The
new
subdivided,
a
lot
of
38
Williams
will
contain
6585
square
feet
to
accommodate
construction
violations
out
a
little
69
section.
Eight
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
a
side
yacht
is
insufficient.
G
This
is
for
38
Williams
Avenue,
its
construction
of
a
new
two
family
house
on
a
lot
next
to
existing
family
house
violations.
Article
69,
section
8,
family
dwelling
is
forbidden,
article
69,
section
9.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
9,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BP
Prose
project
consists
of
the
subdivision
of
this
parcel
and
development
about
two
family
house
of
the
unoccupied
Jason
lot
I
throw
initial
hearing
back
in
May.
We
went
back
and
revised
the
project
plan
and
remove
some
of
the
zoning
violations
that
we
had
an
additional
adjustments
to
the
proposed
parking
plan,
heiresses
and
reorganized
the
Austin
parties,
both
individual
Lots,
to
ensure
that
they
each
stand
on
their
own,
as
you
can
see
on
the
Pampas
that
I've
obtained
that
on
the
update
plan
on
exited
three
yeah,
a
new
property
line
division.
A
BP
BP
BP
BP
A
BQ
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Brian
Flynn,
with
the
Mays
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
representing
hi
PAC
I'm,
going
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
at
this
time
it
was
deferred,
and
now
we
were
just
hoping
to
see
newly
revised
plans
brought
back
to
the
neighborhood,
which
did
not
happen.
However,
so
we
have
to
oppose
at
this
time.
We
also
feel
a
two-family
is
too
dense
for
that
lot,
and
so
we
can't
support
at
this
time,
but
mr.
Baez
has
been
very
pleasant
to
work
with
throughout
the
process.
Thank
you.
A
A
BG
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
walter
white
council
McCarthy's
office
for
the
same
reasons,
the
mayor's
office,
the
community,
if
there
were
changes
made,
they
weren't
brought
back
to
the
neighborhood.
So
from
the
neighborhood
perspective,
the
same
conditions
exist,
and
so
for
that
reason
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
as
opposed.
C
A
A
BP
We
actually
received
the
plans
late
last
week
because
the
that
land
surveyor
was
delayed
with
all
the
type
of
work
that
they
were
going
on.
So
if
you
couldn't
get
back
to
us
on
time,
so
can.