►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 06-27-17
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
If
you
are
here
to
speak,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project.
Please
give
us
new
information
that
somebody
else
has
already
stated
a
concern
or
are
anything
else.
Please
try
not
to
repeat.
We
just
have
a
limited
amount
of
time,
as
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
as
much
information
as
possible.
The
VRS
recommendation
and
those
are
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
and
the
community
are
all
advisory
to
this
board.
We
listened
to
the
testimony
and
then
make
a
decision,
in
conformance
with
the
open
meeting
rod.
B
C
D
E
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Matthew
Cole
from
Dragoon
Toscano,
the
business
address
of
15
Broad
Street
here
in
Boston
I'm
here
this
morning,
seeking
a
one-year
extension
on
the
project
approved
two
years
ago
for
191
Paris
Street.
The
project
was
32
units.
All
32
are
going
to
be
affordable.
So
at
this
point,
we're
just
speaking
to
finalize
the
financially
I'll.
B
F
A
H
F
F
B
J
B
L
Name
is
my
name:
is
rocky
mongolic
917
Bennington
Street?
My
client
is
this
on
his
way.
I
can
continue
if
you
would
like
to
go
ahead.
Okay,
so
we're
here
on
a
extension
for
the
variance
at
9
to
17,
Bennington
Street,
the
clients
Nicholas.
We
love
my
Constitution
apartments
LLC.
They
bought
the
premises
in
October
2014
and
have
been
working
to
finalize
financing
and
prepare
for
construction.
B
A
B
M
M
We
just
purchased
the
land
and
the
time
on
the
board
of
Appeals
decision
expires,
July
7th
and
we
haven't
gotten
our
permits
issued
yet
so
I.
You
know,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
have
enough
time
to
you
know
fulfill
the
project.
I
make
a
motion
for
a.
P
Q
R
B
Chair
call
the
next
two
cases:
boa
six:
three,
three:
two:
eight
six
11th
West
Sorrento
street
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
six,
three
three
to
nine
836
Hopedale
Street
the
applicant
says:
okay,
this
is
411
West
Sorrento.
This
is
erect
a
new
single-family
dwelling
on
the
same
lot
of
an
existing
single-family
dwelling
with
the
address
of
36
Hopedale
Street
violations,
article
51,
section,
8,
single-family
dwelling
unit
and
one
single
family
zone
is
the
forbidden.
B
You,
article
51
section
9
lot
size
director
new
building
is
insufficient
article
51
section
9
watt,
which
is
insufficient
article
51
section
I
a
lot
frontages
insufficient
article
51
section
9
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section,
9,
minimum
front
yard
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9,
minimum
side
yard
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
51
69,
minimum
rea
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
23
osprey
parking
requirement
is
insufficient
article
51
6
week,
51
57
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot,
article
51
section
51
57
two
buildings
on
one
lock.
B
B
B
51
section
8,
multiple
drawing
you,
the
single-family
zone
is
forbidden.
Article
51
for
the
a
ratio
is
excessive
article
51
year
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
51,
riad
setback,
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
40,
5
r
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient
and
article
51,
section
51
57
dwellings
on
the
same
wat
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
morning.
A
S
S
A
T
S
T
A
Any
other
questions
on
the
board.
Does
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal?
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
opposition
hold
on
what
one
minute
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support?
Are
you
are
you
speaking
in
support?
Yes,
so
please
come
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record.
Please
and
tell
us
the
state
that
you're
in
support.
D
U
R
V
A
D
W
A
W
X
A
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
Warren
O'reilly
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition.
Our
office
as
well
as
I,
believe
counselor's
office
did
ask
the
applicant
to
defer,
so
he
could
return
to
the
ACA
for
a
vote,
sir,
since
that
hasn't
been
done,
we
have
to
go
and
record
in
opposition
what.
Q
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Daniel
Polanco
marathon
Council
mark
CMO,
would
like
to
go
regular
in
opposition.
We
this
case
went
before
the
ACA
a
couple
of
months
ago
back
in
October,
and
they
did
not
take
a
full
vote
on
the
project
and
when
we
spoke
to
Paul
Berkley,
he
said
that
he
would
like
them
to
come
back
just
to
review
the
plans
and
making
sure
that
people
on
the
same
page
around
that
area.
So
we
spoke
last
night.
Q
Q
There
were,
however,
and
I
know
that
Paul
Berkley,
the
president
of
the
ACA,
wanted
to
come
back
and
want
them
to
come
back,
and
you
know
have
some
other
thoughts
on
the
project
and
that
wasn't
there
wasn't
a
full
vote
taken
at
the
time.
So
that's
why
we
requested
them
to
set
up
a
meeting
with
the
ACA
to
make
sure
that
everybody
on
is
on
with
the
plans
there.
Q
A
B
This
is
the
change
of
auctions
from
a
single
family
to
a
two
family
residential,
remove
real
print,
constructing
one
and
a
half
story
addition
construct
a
new
rear
deck
and
exterior
stairs,
and
we
relocate
the
retaining
wall
propose
additional
of
one
off
street
parking
violations.
Equal
sixty
section
section,
32
insufficient
on
street
parking,
Article
67,
section,
32
location
of
our
three
parking
shall
not
be
located
in
any
part
of
the
front
yard.
B
Article
67,
section,
I,
insufficient
edition
a
lot
area
for
each
additional
dwelling
unit,
Article
67,
section,
nine
access
the
floor,
the
a
ratio,
Article
67,
section,
I,
insufficient
side,
yet
setback
Article,
67,
section
9.3
within
the
residential
sub
districts.
The
main
entrance
of
the
dwelling
shall
face
the
front
lot
line
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
I'm.
AA
AA
I
know
you
hear
many
unusual
circumstances,
but
actually
this
is
somewhat
of
an
unusual
circumstance.
We
have
a
single
family
ranch
house
that
was
built
in
a
neighborhood
of
two
families
in
1964
and
two
lifelong
residents
of
Roslindale,
one
of
which,
twenty
years
ago
brought
the
home,
has
a
family
member
that,
with
a
growing
family
that
wants
to
live
in
the
home
with
them,
as
he's
also
lifelong
resident
of
Rosendale.
So.
A
A
AA
AA
It's
on
the
side,
unfortunately,
because
it's
a
split-level
ranch
we
would
take
apart,
so
the
elderly
residents
that
live
on
the
first
floor,
which
is
the
arts
of
the
person
that
wants
to
build
the
second
floor,
Bianco
the
way
that
it's
designed
on
the
first
row,
we'd
have
to
take
away
almost
20
feet
of
the
first
floor
to
make
a
hallway
and
a
stairway
up.
So
we
made
there's
already
an
existing
side
entrance
for
the
first
floor.
We
made
a
second
floor
entrance
to
go
up
on
the
same
setback
as
the
stairs
on
the
side.
AA
AA
A
AB
A
B
K
A
K
A
K
K
P
V
K
A
K
B
Is
directly
two
and
a
half
story:
twelve
unit
residential
tunnels
there
will
be
there
will
be
exterior
off
street
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article
69
section
11
residential
uses
on
the
first
story
in
it
was
forbidden.
Article
69,
section,
29
Austria
parking
is
insufficient
in
article
69,
section
30
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
moy.
AE
AE
Project,
madam
chair
is
the
erection
of
eight
townhouses
and
in
a
corner
of
each
townhouse.
There's
two
flats
totaling
12
units,
there's
12
parking
spaces.
There
has
been
one
violation,
I
guess
it
hasn't
been
eliminated.
It
was
cited
in
era
the
the
parking
requirement
for
this
area.
According
to
the
table,
F
footnote
3
in
the
Clarisse
Square
area
of
neighborhood
shopping
too,
requires
one
space
per
unit
for
residential
dwellings.
The
additional
violation
existing
building
alignment
is
a
violation,
rather
it's
requirements
that
reduces
the
front
yard.
AE
AE
The
eight
townhouses
are
approximately
1,200
square
feet
and
they
each
have
one
parking
space
meeting
the
parking
requirement.
The
two
in
the
corner
is,
you
can
see.
The
building
is
positioned
in
similar
to
a
C
in
each
of
the
corners
there's
two
two-bedroom
flats.
All
the
bedrooms
here
are
two
bedrooms
with
a
again
a
floor,
three
den
on
the
top
floor,
and
there
is
two
of
to
be
one
in
a
fractional
amount
towards
the
IDP
for
affordable,
as
it
does
exceed
the
nine
nine
units
we
are
seeking.
Zoning
relief.
P
AC
AG
AH
AI
A
AJ
A
B
We're
going
to
skip
a
few
cases
because
of
the
short
time
that
we
have
here
and
those
cases
will
probably
prolonged
going
for
a
period
of
time,
so
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
next
case.
Would
you
be
down
as
Bismarck
street
is
Bismarck
Street
here
so
case?
Boa
694
598
21
D
235
K,
Bismarck
Street?
This
is
a
change
oxy
from
office,
light
manufacturer
food
processing,
dance
studio,
restaurant
with
live
entertainment
before
10:30
p.m.
B
AK
Nelsons
hope
I've
said
284
at
a
Murray
Street
butter.
That's
our
mailing
address
Rick
Bismarck's
me
to
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
I'm
proposing
a
conditional
use
to
allow
for
a
preschool
in
our
current
commercial
space.
I've
been
a
tenant
of
the
brewery
complex
since
2009
and
I
just
like
to
add
preschool
within
my
fate
and
how.
AK
P
A
B
Going
to
jump
back
up
to
Grampian
way,
calling
boa
six,
nine
six,
nine
five,
seven
one,
forty
seven
Grampian
way.
This
is
a
combined
147,
Grampian
way.
15,000
square
foot
line
alpine
way,
also
13
of
9100
to
square
feet
for
a
total
of
20
4111
squares,
be
change
locksmith
from
two
dwelling
units
to
seven
dwelling
units,
move
the
main
structure
forward
and
restore
the
facade
and
historic
details
of
the
ronda
demolished.
B
Three
rare
addition
to
replace
with
a
two-story
addition
containing
three
new
dwelling
units
and
connect
the
main
structure
to
the
existing
carriage
house
reconstruct
and
their
lives
of
stable
to
two
dwelling
units
and
attach
a
2-story
dwelling
addition
in
a
portion
of
the
nine
thousand
one
hundred
two
square
foot
laws
with
twelve
garage
parking
spaces
and
two-putt,
twelve
twelve
garage
parking
spaces
and
two
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
65
section
42
point
to
conformity
with
existing
building
alignment.
Article
65,
section,
8
use
of
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
AM
Moran
147
Grampian
way
applicant.
This
is
my
home,
which
I
have
lived
in
for
approximately
forty
years.
I
have
submitted
a
document.
The
first
page
is
the
proposed
restoration
of
the
house.
Tab.
One
is
the
existing
setbacks
of
the
house
and,
if
I
could
direct
the
board
to
tab
three,
the
scope
of
zoning
relief.
What
is
three
variances?
The
property
is
a
one
F
7,000
district
I
am
one
seeking
a
change
of
occupancy
from
two
to
seven
units.
AN
AM
Third
relief
is
existing
building
alignment.
Looking
at
the
existing
building
from
L
find
way
to
Savin
Hill
Avenue,
the
predominant
setback
is
approximately
fifteen
feet.
This
house
in
the
adjoining
house
has
setback.
This
house
currently
is
set
back
a
hundred
feet
from
the
street,
we're
proposing
moving
it
forward
because
the
foundation
and
water
issues
approximately
28
feet
so
would
be
maintaining
the
historic
front.
God
of
approximately
70
feet
from
the
street
I
have
listed.
The
seven
units
proposed
specifying
the
square
footage.
The
smallest
is
one
thousand
four.
Eighty
two
and
the
largest
is
2005.
AM
AM
The
problem
with
the
current
foundation
is
the
house
is
built
on
a
real
pudding.
Stone
slanted
ledge
in
the
front
of
the
house
on
the
right-hand
side
is
another
outcropping
and
in
between
which
is
putting
stone.
Rubble
significant
amount
of
water
comes
down
from
and
back
of
the
property.
I
would
like
to
note
that
I
have
the
support
of
the
Sabadell
Civic
Association.
The
rector
bodies,
who
are
most
visually
affected
I,
would
like
to
submit
30
letters
of
support,
plus
a
petition
signed
by
seventy
17
people.
AM
It
would
like
to
affect
those
neighbors
who
have
spent
the
time
to
come
in
today
to
support
this
proposal.
I
also
have
the
enthusiastic
support
endorsement.
I
should
say
of
the
gotchas,
the
Historical
Society
in
reference
to
the
preservation
of
the
house
in
tab
2,
there
is
a
photograph
illustrating
the
front
yard.
The
line
of
the
15-foot
setback,
which
I
am
seeking
relief.
AM
I
would
note
that
the
adjoining
property,
which
is
up
in
the
upper
right-hand
section
1,
it
is
189
Grampian
way
it
is
built
on
top
of
the
footing
stone
and
it's
dead
densely
screened.
It
will
be
minimally
affected
by
the
proposed
developing
the
property
at
191
Grampian
way,
which
is
the
red
house,
will
retain
the
the
open
space
Vista
and
again,
most
of
the
development
is
to
the
right
side
to
the
rear
in
the
right
side
of
the
law.
The
next.
A
Photo
so
please
just
jump
a
little
bit.
Can
you
explain
as
we
look
at
that
diagram,
a
0.1?
If
it's
looking
at
the
front
of
the
buildings,
can
you
the
printer
just
says
call
I
cannot
see
it?
Can
you
just
tell
us
what's
happening
on
the
loop
as
you
as
you
look
at
the
building
on
the
left
side?
I,
don't
that's!
What
are
they.
AM
AM
Elevations
that
shows
the
photograph
the
existing
condition
and
the
proposed
restoration.
The
next
tab,
a
dash
to
dash
through
is
the
side
view.
The
dark
line
shows
the
the
cut
ends
of
the
elevations
between
alpine
way
going
down
to
Grampian
way
in
the
proposed
additions.
I
would
ask
the
board
to
note
that
the
project
proposed
is
5
feet
lower
than
the
existing
condition
of
the
main
house
and
that
the
garages
are
cut
into
the
slope,
so
they
were
basically
talking
above
it
in
the
rear,
a
two-story
addition
structure
as
viewed
from
the
pocket.
AM
AM
AM
Conventional
foundation
and
also
addressing
something
unique
to
this
property
when
it
was
being
constructed
in
1850
they're,
also
building
the
Old
Colony
railroad,
incorporated
into
the
structures,
narrow
gauge
railroad,
track,
Eyebeam
swamp
cedar
and
brick
I.
Had
the
engineer
come
in
to
look
at
it,
he
said.
The
best
thing
you
could
do
is
tear
it
down.
That's
not
my
objective
of
moving
it
to
preserve
and
restore
and
to
age
in
place.
A
F
AM
AM
If
I
may,
madam
chair
on
in
reference
on
tab
5
there,
his
historic
abuse
that
a
takes
place
in
the
area
of
a
park
called
the
cave
directly
in
back
of
this
property,
the
photograph
here
shows
the
police
using
alpine
way
responding
I
wish
they
would
use
it
more
often,
but
a
part
of
the
support
by
the
immediate
neighbors
who
are
affected
by
the
drinking
gardening
and
prostitution
that
it
grows
up
in
this
area
of
the
park
is
we
are
creating
more
eyes
on
the
on
this
area
of
the
park
on
tab.
Six
does.
A
AO
AM
AM
Of
eminent
before
the
Planning
Board
Planning
Board
made
a
recommendation
of
five
units.
I
said
economically
I
could
not
do
this
project
would
not
take
the
risk
appeared
before
the
Columbia
Civic
Association.
They
voted
to
support.
The
seven
units
in
the
last
meeting
was
by
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
AM
AJ
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Frank
Baker
I'm,
the
district
3
City
Council
I'm
here
to
voice
my
support
for
this
John's
lived
in
this
building
for
40
years
here
now.
So
we're
doing
a
couple
things
here:
John
will
be
able
to
age
in
place.
We're
also
going
to
retain
the
historic
character
of
the
of
the
of
the
house.
I
think
the
units
they're
going
back
will
be
low-impact.
He
won't
even
see
them
from
the
street.
My
one
concerned
is
the
alpine
way.
I.
AJ
AQ
AR
AS
Every
Latterman
at
two
to
five
thousand
Hill
Avenue
this
project
will
enhance
the
neighborhood.
There
are
no
detrimental
effects.
Most
importantly,
the
this
thing
house
structure
will
be
very
pain
which
will
help
maintain
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
he's
providing
parking
spaces
to
accommodate
the
potential
new
residence.
Thank.
AT
Peter
McNamara
20
Grampian
way,
Ottoman
support
very
much
so
just
recently
we
got
a
24
and
18
Grampian.
We
just
got
a
letter
from
the
developer,
asked
us
to
sell
for
a
very
good
amount,
more
money
than
the
house
is
worth.
Is
they
want
to
tear
down
on
our
house
and
a
three
family
next
to
us
and
do
a
project
similar
to
what
they
did
at
24
Grampian
group
Grampian,
which
I
live
next
door
24
grandpa
is
aware
of
this
is
much
smaller
law
and
they
have
eight
eight
houses.
AU
Good
morning
my
name
is
Larry:
McCarthy
I
live
at
1:35,
Grampian
Wayne
I'm
at
a
butter
of
John's
on
Grandview
Lane
I'm,
also,
a
butter
of
John's
on
Alpine
way.
I've
been
a
neighbor
of
John's
of
26
years.
One
of
the
things
that
I
find
very
attractive
about
this
project
is
that
John
wants
to
remain
on
the
property.
AU
AV
Madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name,
is
David
Carter
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
Let's
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
project.
This
has
been
a
lengthy
community
process.
John
met
with
he.
His
first
meeting
was
an
on-site
meeting.
He
had
organized
on
his
own.
It
had
no
involvement
or
representation
from
the
mayor's
office.
He
then
went
through
the
Columbia
700
civic
associations
process,
after
which
they
voted
to
support
the
project
and
I
held
an
on-site
of
letters
meeting
following
that.
AV
In
addition
to
the
letters
of
support
John
has
included,
which
he
has
given
to
the
board.
My
office
has
received
52
letters
of
opposition
from
abutters
and
neighbors.
This
is
definitely
a
project
in
which
the
neighborhood
is
split.
There's
support
and
opposition
on
both
sides.
However,
our
office
has
heard
more
opposition
and
support
and
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition.
Thank
you.
U
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name,
is
Bryan
Caplan
I'm,
an
attorney
and
I
represent
eight
homeowners
who
lived
right
near
the
proposed
project.
Those
eight
home
homeowners
are
John,
Lydon
and
Lydon.
Nicole
Tolkowsky
Kevin's
got
all
of
Caspian
way.
Caffeine
grace
also
of
Caspian
way.
Paul
Jimenez
of
Savin
Hill
Avenue
married
flower
from
Grampian
way,
two
doors
down
from
the
proposed
project
and
Fulk
VIN
who
lives
on
Caspian,
ray
rate
at
the
corner
of
Caspian
and
Alpine
way.
All
of
my
clients
strongly
oppose
this
project.
U
U
Right
the
concerns
a
liberal
acquiesce
number
one.
The
applicant
has
to
show
substantial
hardship.
The
only
thing
he's
talked
about
is
financial
concerns
with
trying
to
maintain
the
existing
to
family
structure.
Financial
concerns
are
not
a
proper
basis
for
a
barrier
to
this
project
is
far
too
dense
for
the
neighborhood.
The
the
sub
district
only
allows
one
dwelling
unit
in
a
single
building.
He
wants
to
put
seven
in
a
single
building.
U
To
get
a
variance
he's
gotta
show
that
his
property
is
peculiar
or
unique
in
some
way.
He
points
to
two
things:
ledge
and
water
issues.
That's
true
of
every
property
on
Savin
Hill
I've
got
to
have
a
stream
running
through
their
basement.
Moreover,
he's
gotta
show
that
the
project
could
be
injurious
not
being
curious
to
the
neighborhood
or
detrimental
for
Public
Welfare.
It
will
be
there's
going
to
be
a
sea
problems
with
what
he
wants
to
do:
an
Alpine
Way
and
traffic
nightmares
and
parking
nightmares
on
campus.
Thank
you.
AW
Concerns
are
alpine
way,
which
is
park,
property
john's
plans,
as
submitted
to
you,
show
that
he
wants
to
pave
alpine
way,
and
he
has
spoke
to
the
numbering,
commissioner,
has
been
special
services
to
assign
house
numbers
to
the
for
condominiums
on
alpine
way.
Also,
he
needs
to
prove
that
he
has
at
least
30
foot
width
on
Alpine
Way,
which
he
has
not
proved.
AW
He
submitted
one
documents,
which
was
a
site
plan
generated
by
the
company
that
did
his
survey
for
the
project
and
that
site
plan
that
said,
Alpine
Way
was
30
feet
only
referenced,
one
document
from
the
past,
which
he
described
as
a
LAN
plan
of
land,
which
he
himself
paid
for
in
1988.
There
is
no
documentary
evidence
for.
AW
AY
A
AZ
Ramsey
remembers
the
boy
lambs
John
Lydon,
and
this
is
my
wife
and
life
together.
We
live
in
five
tasking
away
unit
number
one
originally
I
had
three
reasons
that
reiterate
what
you've
already
heard
today.
The
only
thing
I
want
to
mention
that
hasn't
been
said
already
is
that
we
are
not
in
opposition
to
any
development
there.
We
are
in
opposition
for
this
project.
We
first
learned
the
project
on
February
22nd.
Since
then,
there
has
been
a
lot
of
feedback.
I've
listened
to
the
presentation
for
mr.
Moran,
a
thousand
times
he's
given
up
giving
feedback.
AZ
AI
A
AZ
A
AM
AM
Also,
if
I
may,
madam
chair
I
am
doing
nothing
to
help
my
way,
it
clearly
is
shown
as
a
public
weighed
30
feet
wide,
as
when
the
park
Department
made
a
taking
of
property
that
abutted
the
other
side
of
Alpine
way
that
taking
clearly
lays
out
L
highway.
Its
narrowest
point
is
30
feet.
The
code
does
not
require
that
it
be
paved.
I
have
no
intention
of
saving
it
with
it
would
negate
the
bucolic
atmosphere
that
this
hotel
proposed.
Okay,.
AU
B
The
next
cases
calling
B
la
7,
0
0
0
5
0
36
90
Washington
Street.
There
are
three
companion
cases:
boa
seven:
zero,
seven,
nine,
two,
seven
thirty
six.
Ninety
Washington
Street
boa
seven:
zero,
zero,
zero;
four,
six;
thirty
six.
Eighty
six
to
thirty
six.
Eighty,
eight
Washington,
Street
and
couch
boa
seven;
zero,
seven,
nine
one,
eight
thirty,
six.
Eighty
six
to
thirty
six.
Eighty
eight
Washington
Street!
This
is
for
thirty
six.
B
Ninety
Washington
Street
this
is
to
construct
a
new
43140,
two
square
foot,
six
story:
building
with
commercial
retail
on
ground-floor
and
fortified
residential
units
on
floors.
Two
to
six.
The
violation
is
article
29
section
for
Greenbelt
protection,
overlay
district,
article
55,
section,
16
and
celery
parking
is
forbidding
article
55,
section,
17,
fluid
a
ratio;
successive
article
55
section
17,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
55,
section
17
usable
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
55,
section
17
Reyat
is
insufficient
article
55,
section
41,
55
21.1
to
two
or
more
buildings.
B
B
The
violation
is
article
29,
section,
4
green
belt
protection,
overlay
district,
article
55,
section,
955,
nine
point:
three:
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
article
55
section,
eight
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidding
55,
section,
8
retail,
a
service
uses
forbidden
article
55,
section,
8
and
accessory
parking
to
a
multi-family
is
forbidden.
Article
55,
section,
8
and
ciliary
parking
is
forbidden,
article
55,
section
40,
one
two
or
more
buildings.
B
On
the
same
lot,
article
55
section,
nine,
the
front
yard,
isn't
sufficient
article
55
section
nine
55,
90
point
to
the
Rivlin
does
not
front
on
a
street
article
55
section:
nine,
the
ploidy
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
55
section
nine
Reyat
is
insufficient.
B
C
My
name
is
James
green
I'm,
an
attorney
with
ruin
of
urban
at
fifty
Rose
law
here,
in
behalf
of
criterion
property
company,
to
develop
over
the
site,
with
the
let
Jack
Englert
of
criterion,
property
company
and
Nancy
Ludwig
like
on
architecture
as
this
is
for
two
indicators.
There
are
four
matters
before
the
board.
There
are
two
Lots
here
and
each
lot
has
basically
the
same
violations.
Three.
A
C
A
C
This
lauded
is
located
across
from
the
Park
Hills
railway
train
station,
the
MBTA
station,
and
the
shown
of
this
plan
is
showing
the
plant
side
with
ISD.
A
lot
is
bisected
by
the
Boston
Water
and
Sewer
Commission
land
within
which
is
the
Stony
for
Condon.
This
area
is
approximately
25,000
square
feet,
600
feet
in
length
and
stuffed
with
40
feet
and
width.
What
it
is
is
a
conduit
which
is
three
feet
by
four
feet
below
grade
plus
the
sewer
which
is
about
I,
think
to
buy
coal.
A
C
Building's
front
on
this
area,
the
fire
separation
distance
cannot
be
measured,
because
this
is
not
a
public
street
under
seven.
Oh
five
point:
eight,
we
need
protective
zon
every
single
window
which
we
don't
have,
but
the
buildings
of
fully
clothed
compliance,
the
sprinklers.
We
have
submitted
the
coat
report
by
our
coach
insell,
which
verifies
that
and
says.
The
only
issue
we
have
is
the
fire
separation
distance.
Our
argument
is
that
the
Boston,
Water
and
Sewer
Commission
land
will
not
be
built
upon.
C
It
has
the
Stonybrook
conduit,
which
goes
from
rosin
nail
all
the
way
through
to
make
a
plain:
it's
Underground.
We
will
enter
into
an
easement
agreement
with
the
BW
SD
to
maintain
a
surface
to
allow
them
access
to
the
conduit
and
the
sewer,
and
also
to
improve
it
with
site
amenities,
and
therefore
this
will
function
as
a
public
open
space
applauding
beep
and
with
so
we're
the
building
fronts
on
the
corner.
In
one
side,
there
will
be
a
separation
distance,
in
effect
not
on
the
street,
but
of
a
public
owned
land,
and
so
that's
reasons.
C
O
B
B
D
BA
C
C
On
Washington
Street
in
front
of
the
other
way
and
one
screens
may
play
in
the
Forest
Hills
area,
it
is
consist
of
two
parcels
parcel.
A
and
parcel
B
project
is
to
develop
both
parcels
by
constructing
a
building
on
each
one.
The
solo
project
area
is
approximately
2
acres,
88,000
square
feet,
and
we
proposed
and
construct
250
dwelling
units
a
rendering
shown
here
the
other
way
view
of
the
250
dwelling
units.
We
proposed
that
20%
of
the
dwelling
units
will
be
affordable.
That.
BB
C
C
For
the
budget,
Washington
Street
for
free
or
the
other
way,
it
seems
to
be
the
case,
the
overpass,
which
has
come
down
in
the
now
being
landscapes
and
rear
islands,
and
so
forth
of
the
six
months.
Perhaps
we
basically
three
buildings
muscle
building
building
one
will
be
six
storey.
One
water
people
have
retail
space
in
the
crucible,
no
basement
no
parking
under
and
high
levels
of
units.
25
Union
Building
to
to
aid
to
these
destroy
deliberate
by
podium,
garage,
120,
121
space
buildings
will
be
the
next
appeal
over
a,
but
a
grade
will
be
separate.
C
C
C
The
site
itself
plans
to
a
and,
as
you
can
see
it
on
this
button,
some
of
the
renderings,
the
elevations
of
watch
in
Hill
world
Maggie's
apartment.
Fifty
fifty
feet
above
the
surface
of
the
party,
whether
it
was
teach
the
building
down,
is
such
perfection,
which
shows
the
elevation
of
this
building
versus
building
someone
else's
no
ropes,
and
they
conceal
the.
C
C
The
first
the
carboxyl
he
was
aghast
eighty
years
this
used
to
be
the
old
Forest,
Hill
Hospital
site
was
never
developed
by
housing
and
it
was
vacant
became
a
parking
lot.
Presently.
The
zoning.
The
first
parcel
here
is
neighborhood
shopping
district,
because,
if
you
have
retail
uses
along
Washington,
we
like
to
extend
the
refill
use.
The.
C
These
believe
possible
of
nation
of
the
buildings
in
the
back
of
the
front
building
and
there's
no
three
here:
you're
building
to
the
rear
of
another
building,
but
under
state
motto
being
site
you
will
of
this
technique,
violations
there,
so
very
violation
that
is
excited
by
by
plan
camera.
We
have.
We
have
request
that
belief
that
set
forth
appeal.
C
The
light
that
indicate
is
that
with
Jack
Englert
started
this
process
back
in
2015-2016
and
actually
not
going
towards
in
the
neighborhood
winter
abutters
talk
to
everybody
back
to
the
retail
owners
and
receive
a
number
of
indications
of
support.
We
also
met
with
the
West
Roxbury
courthouse
Neighborhood
Association,
the
condominiums.
Next
to
the
courthouse
residents
on
avoided
Hill
Road.
We
appear
before
the
Jamaica
for
Neighborhood
Council
Halloween
committee
and
got
their
acceptance
of
the
proposal.
C
And
a
formal
presentation
and
receive
this,
we
were
gratified
that
we
had
the
support
but
I
think
it's
because
of
the
languages
in
doing
the
doors
or
foot
traffic
and
talking
today
it
made
the
project
better
right,
so
the
height
down
moves
buildings
back.
We
have
extra
pocket
on
one
on
the
lot
here
which
we're
going
to
allow
to
be
used
by
the
funeral
home
director
who's
on
the
corner
of
kata
street,
who
parks
in
the
back
would
not
be
able
to
have
an
apartment,
so
we
could
limit
that
avail.
T
BC
D
BD
Question
from
the
beginning
that
we've
tried
to
deal
with
actually
300
people
parked
there
every
day,
15,000
people
get
on
the
train
at
Forest
Hills
every
morning
as
well.
So
it
is
a
small
percentage
overall,
for
those
300
is
going
to
be
an
issue.
We
we
first
met
with
the
MBTA
to
see
if
there
could
be
some
relief
across
the
way
on
their
big
parcel.
They
weren't
they
were
receptive
to
it.
The
neighborhood
is
planning
for
bigger
and
better
things
there
than
the
parking
lot.
BD
So
we
kind
of
shut
that
down
we're
trying
to
work
with
the
neighbors
in
terms
of
resident
parking
stickers
to
ensure
that
these
people
don't
die
in
the
neighborhood
and
we'll
start
that
process
with
the
neighbors
as
we
go
forward.
There
are
other
locations
that
we've
researched,
not
so
much
on
the
orange
line,
obviously
because
that's
the
first
stop,
but
also
the
commuter
line
that
starts.
You
know,
as
far
back
as
West
Roxbury
and
Rose
Brothers
in
West
Roxbury,
trying
to
figure
out
how
many
spots
there
are
it's
going
to
be
a
learning
process.
BD
BD
Yes,
the
250
units
is
approximately
146
parking.
Spaces
is
0.6
our
development
at
hub
at
the
parcels,
train,
AB
circuit,
but
JFK
train
station.
We
have
a
parking
ratio
of
0.5
there
we're
actually
seeing
a
usage
of
about
0.4.
So
we
do
think
we
have
some
additional
parking
necessary
whether
or
not
it's
available
to
the
public
of
the.
BD
That
so
one
of
the
first
things
we
did
when
we
met
with
a
funeral
home
because
they
do
have
a
number
of
large
funerals
and
we
didn't
want
to
put
them
as
a
disadvantage.
By
taking
the
parking,
we
asked
what
they
thought
they
needed.
You
know,
could
they
survive
as
well,
as
we
were
able
to
give
this
particular
lot,
so
there
will
talk
to
them
about
possibility
of
a
shared
situation
with
some
of
the
retail
abutters.
BD
We
haven't
spoken
with
every
retailer,
but
er
I've
made
an
effort
to
talk
to
as
many
people
as
I
possibly
can,
and
there
will
be
a
possibility
of
some
sharing.
You
know
on
difficult
days
with
snow
and
things
like
that,
but
the
funeral
home
has
been
very
perceptive,
but
I
have
made
a
commitment
to
him
that
I
would
not
hurt
his
business
and
provide
this
important
I
tell.
C
Circulation
is
off
Washington
Street
through
here
we
did
have
circulation
off
Orchard
Hill
Road.
Initially
what
we
see
terminated
that
there
was
a
curb
cut
on
Morgan
Street.
We
terminated
Zach
as
the
demesne
they
have
to
use
the
pipeline.
The
circulation
is
through
here
that
surrounds
out
here,
circulation
into
the
garage
here.
Underneath
circulation
will
be
down
to
this
right
here
or
from
the
nursing
home
mobile
have
visited
in
an
easement
agreement
with
blossom
water
sewer,
which
will
allow
us
to
use
this
for
site
access
across
it
do
planting
and
paving
no
trees.
C
What
we'll
have
is
the
ability,
water
sewer
to
relocate
or
change
the
manhole
covers,
and
so
forth
they'll
be
able
to
get
onto
the
site
to
do
construction
of
the
conduit.
If
need
be,
they
have
no
responsibilities
replacing
what
they
deserve.
We
have
to
do
it
since
this
will
be
off
specialty
paper,
but.
C
Pocket
pocket,
we
said
six
thousand
square
feet.
This
is
all
DC.
Our
lands
taken
the
DCI
taking
goes
up
to
about
here.
So
this
is
all
DC
our
land,
which
they
were
just
going
to
slow
and
plant
grass.
So
Nancy
and
Jack
went
disease.
The
irises!
Would
you
let
us
do
a
park
here
and
do
some
landscaping
do
some
elements
that
people
could
sit
here
could
use
this
as
a
way
to
get
to
Forest
Hills.
A
BD
Done
on
the
sizes
and
our
studios
range
from
the
smallest
of
410
square
feet
to
the
largest
about
621
square
feet.
The
one
bedrooms
range
from
about
600
feet
to
900
to
the
some
of
our
one
bedrooms
in
one
bedroom
plus
unit.
So
they
have
a
little
den
and
that's
why
they're
a
little
larger.
The
two
bedroom
units
are
935
to
about
eleven
hundred
and
twenty-eight
square
feet,
and
the
three
bedrooms
run
from
1200
to
almost
1,300
square
feet.
We
have
given,
as
Jim
mentioned,
20%
affordable,
but
we
have
skews
the
affordability
to
larger
units.
BD
BD
Separate
space
with
bathroom
and
a
small
kitchen
as
well
and
Nancy
has
worked
on
an
artist
law
as
kind
of
an
artist
in
that
as
well
in
that
building
to
create
some
sort
of
a
variety
of
units
or
the
neighbors.
So
the
innovation
units
could
be
the
way
they
are
shaped.
The
way
they
we
put
them
together.
The
fact
that
they
are
a
little
bit
smaller
in
that
building
most
of
the
studios
are.
BD
A
C
BF
Their
smaller
units
that
we've
located
in
that
building
closest
to
Forest
Hills
stations,
because
we
really
think
there's
a
need
for
a
lower
price
point
that
people
would
be
very
interested
to
live
right
on
top
of
transit
and
I.
Think
down
the
line
were
hopeful
that
whoever
the
retailer
is,
there's
no
one
who
sleeps
in
space
yet
might
be
supportive
of
you
know
those
smaller
units
as
well.
V
BD
You
know
I
went
to
the
neighborhood
and
asked
what
they
would
like
to
see,
and
everyone
said
a
neighborhood
grocery
store
would
be
the
a
number
one
thing:
the
problem
is
the
4,000
feet.
I
have
to
have
a
little
luck
in
attracting
something,
although
I
am
going
to
talk
to
city
feed
because
there's
possible
solution,
other
things
where
day
care
were
mentioned,
and
you
know
it's
four
thousand
feet.
BG
AD
BH
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Phil
going
from
the
BPD
a
speaking
here
in
support
one
of
the
major
issues
in
this
community's
affordability
to
the
BPD,
a
board
especially
recognizes
and
appreciates
the
20%
affordability,
the
50
units
of
a
collision
air
development
policy
units.
So
we
really
appreciate
that
and
support
this
project.
Thank
you.
Reality.
A
BJ
BJ
We
have
been
in
really
good
conversations
with
our
contractor
partner
Demio,
taking
a
labor
management
approach
to
this
one
and
Jack,
and
the
team
and
criterion
have
done
a
fantastic
job
of
reaching
out
to
every
stakeholder
in
the
community
and
they've
been
involved
in
conversations
last
a
long
time
to
to
move
the
help
out
on
this
budget.
So
thank
you.
We
speak
on
behalf
and
we
speak
in
favor
and
thank
you.
Presenter
Brian.
BK
BL
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Barry
Katie
I'm,
a
business
age
of
plumbers,
local
12,
the
members,
the
local
12.
We
live
in
the
city
of
Boston
unanimously
and
without
exception,
support
this
project.
Even
a
few
letters
were
very
close.
Four
members
of
us.
We
support
this
project.
We
think
it's
a
good
project
and
good
for
the
community.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
BM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
boards,
my
name
is
Edwin
Foley
and
the
business
representative
for
the
sheetmetal
workers,
local
17,
at
11:57,
Adams,
Street
da
Chester,
and
we
rise
in
support
of
this
project.
One
portion
of
the
project
that
is
particularly
attacted,
attractive
to
me
and
my
younger
members,
is
that
there
are
affordable
units
in
this
project
and
we
need
those,
my
young
folks,
having
a
hard
time
meeting
rents
and
buying
properties
in
Boston.
So
we
support
this
project.
It's
it's
good
for
the
community.
We
like
the
affordable
part
of
it.
BM
B
Your
next
case
calling
vo
a
six
six
six,
seven,
three,
three
1065
Tremont
Street.
This
is
a
constructing
new
six
storey
type
3
over
type.
One
building
in
the
rear
of
the
existing
building,
1065
chemistry
proposed
addition
consists
of
28
new
residential
units.
The
proposed
addition
also
includes
expansion
of
the
first
floor
unit.
An
existing
building
into
the
basement.
The
main
entry
of
the
building
would
be
really
relocated
to
st.
Cyprian
Street
and
from
Freemont
Street.
The
other
violations,
article
50
section
11,
the
ploidy,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
11
Reyat
is
insufficient.
B
AH
AG
AH
The
addition
is
known
as
phase
two
of
the
1065
Tremont's
tree
project
phase
two
will
be
located
at
the
rear
of
1065
10
months
trees
in
the
Roxbury
neighborhood
of
Boston.
The
applicant
previously
constructed
a
16
unit,
building
known
as
phase
one
of
ten
sixty
five
time
on
street
phase,
one
received
BPD
a
approval
in
2014
and
was
constructed
in
2016
phase.
1
is
fully
rented
and
well
received
by
the
community.
AH
Phase
2
again
will
be
built
at
the
rear
of
1065
tram
on
Street,
which
currently
contains
an
underutilized
surface
parking
lot
phase
to
receive
BPD
a
small
project
review
approval
on
April
13
2017
stays
to
like
phase
1
will
be
six
storeys
in
height
and
approximately
64
feet.
Nine.
The
gross
floor
area
will
be
thirty,
one
thousand
five
hundred
and
square
feet
phase
two
is
highly
transit
orientated
and
it's
located
within
walking
distance.
AH
The
MBTA's
Orange
Line
ruggle
station,
as
well
as
multiple
bus
lines,
they'll
also
be
bicycle
storage
within
the
ground
floor
of
the
building
properties
located
within
the
Greater
Roxbury
economic,
an
area
under
article
50
of
the
code,
while
the
multifamily
used
in
height
are
allowed
as
a
right.
The
project
does
require
five
variances
for
floor
area
ratio,
rear
yards,
open
space
screening
and
buffering
and
parking
and
loading
in
terms
of
benefits
from
the
project.
The
applicant
is
committed
to
help
prepare
a
budding
property.
AH
A
AG
AG
A
AH
I
can
give
you
the
ranges:
the
one-bedroom
units
that
range
for
approximately
400
square
feet
to
750
square
feet.
The
two
bedrooms
range
from
800
square
feet
to
a
thousand
square
feet.
The
three
bedrooms
range
from
a
thousand
square
feet
to
1100
square
feet
in
me
to
four
bedroom
units
or
approximately
1,700
square
feet.
D
C
O
AG
We,
as
far
as
the
parking
is
concerned,
we
have
16
units
in
phase
1
with
16
parking
spaces
for
those
16
units.
We
have
not
over
the
course
of
two
years
of
occupying
that
building
been
able
to
lease
a
single
parking
space
in
the
back,
it
is
building,
is
almost
exclusively
young
professionals
that
that
just
they
do
not
come
with
cars.
The.
AG
O
AG
A
AG
A
AG
AG
The
layout
of
the
four
bedrooms,
actually
with
the
separation
from
the
floors
above,
could
accommodate
salmon's
it
is,
it
is:
we've
been
open
with
the
neighborhood
from
the
beginning,
and
the
neighborhood
has
asked
us
from
the
beginning
to
engage
in
talks
with
Northeastern
about
during
the
mass
release.
This
property
shows
up
in
northeastern
master
plan
as
the
property
of
interest,
and
we
have
engaged
in
those
talks
there's
nothing
time,
but
it
is
we're
very
open
to
that
ultimate
outcome.
V
AP
A
A
Z
Z
AG
Our
our
understanding
and
from
our
reading
of
what
it
has
been
available
to
the
public
from
northeastern
is
this
specific
address
has
been
called
out
as
a
as
a
potential
building
of
interest.
If
and
when
it
was
developed
in
their
master
plan.
You
speak
up
a
little
bit,
maybe
speaking
to
us
that
this
address
has
for
I.
Think
the
last
two
master
plans
been
called
out
as
a
specific
address
of
interest.
If
and
when
the
building
was
built
upon
or
that
the
land
was
built
upon.
AG
AG
A
AG
Absolutely
as
part
of
as
part
of
our
phase,
one
development,
much
of
the
neighborhood
feedback
was
guys.
We
want
local
minority
businesses
to
be
part
of
that.
The
development
of
1065
phase,
one
historically
hick
on
it
averaged
six
or
seven
percent
minority,
as
we
built
phase
one
that
that
percentage
has
gone
to
thirty
five
percent,
both
in
contracts
awarded,
as
well
as
people
on
site
or
ours,
on
site
and
we've
endeavored
to
reach
50%
on
Phase.
Two,
then,
on
prevailing
wages.
V
AG
AG
BK
D
BM
Money
again,
madam
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
Edward
Foley
with
the
sheetmetal
workers,
local
17
and
digesta,
and
we
weren't
on
phase
one
either.
But
it
is
jobs
and
it
is
housing
which
we
need.
So
we
hope
to
establish
a
relationship
with
the
developer
and
put
some
folks
to
work.
Thank,
You
manager.
BL
Y
Okay-
and
my
concern
is
that
that
is
promoting
social
segregation.
I,
don't
know
how
that
can
be
done,
but
it
worries
me
that
there
is
that
possibility
that
a
developer
can
build
only
market
rate
units
and
then
place
the
non,
affordable,
affordable,
housing,
someplace
else,
justice.
A
concern
for
you.
Thank
you.
BE
BO
My
name
is
Jill
McCarthy
I'm,
with
arch
development,
limited
partnership.
We
have
75
affordable
units
on
the
block
between
1035
and
1055,
Rahman
Street
and
we're
very
concerned
about
the
lack
of
parking
and
with
density
that
this
type
of
construction
is
going
to
bring.
We
are
now
dealing
with
on
the
next
block
over
on
canard
Street,
the
development
of
a
twenty
two
storey
building
by
northeastern
of
student
housing
with
no
parking.
There
is
a
bicycle
room,
but
there's
no
parking.
BO
AH
K
B
You
next
two
cases
calling
boa
seven
zero
one:
zero,
eight
zero.
Sixteen
East
Cottage
Street
containing
case
boa
seven
zero,
one,
zero,
seven,
two,
sixteen
East
Cottage
Street.
This
is
for
sixteen
east
college
degree.
We
build
a
rare
section
of
the
structure
by
adding
one
floor
of
new
construction
to
the
third
floor
3rd
floor
interior,
consists
of
new
framing
electrical
plumbing,
so
on,
etc.
B
The
violations
article
fifty
section
29
Riyadh,
isn't
sufficient
article
fifty
section
twenty
nine,
a
lot
of
the
areas
insufficient
article,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine
lot
width
is
insufficient
article.
Fifty
section
twenty
nine,
the
Fourier
ratio
is
excessive
article,
fifty
section
twenty
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29
side
yacht
is
insufficient
article.
Fifty
section
twenty
nine
front
yard
is
insufficient.
B
AN
Fold
is
this
house
used
to
be
a
vacant
building
profit
property
on
Cottage
Street
caught
on
fire
a
couple
years
ago,
top
section
of
the
building
got
a
little
burnt
up
there.
So,
basically,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
creating
free
parking
spaces
and
we
have
three
residential
units
which
is
about
their
treatment
of
square
feet
they're.
AN
A
AN
AN
AN
AN
O
O
BP
A
B
B
BQ
B
BQ
BQ
A
BE
A
B
Following
the
first
case
of
10:30,
calling
boa
six,
eight
seven,
six
zero
six,
four,
ninety
seven
East
Fourth
Street:
this
is
a
poke
at
interior,
exterior
renovation
of
an
existing
three
family,
residential
and
legalize
the
living
space
to
the
basement
of
the
unit.
One
proposed
a
new
rear
addition
on
first
fluid
second
floor,
new
side,
decks
on
three
levels
and
new
roof
deck
with
spiral
staircase
from
the
side
deck
the
violations,
article
15
section,
one
deployed
a
ratio
is
excessive
article
20
section,
one
gray:
yes,
setback
is
insufficient.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
AE
O
AE
Ma'am
charity.
The
proposal
today
is
an
existing
tree.
Family
dwelling
with
existing
non
conforming
living
space
in
the
basement,
proposing
a
first
floor,
be
a
bi-level
unit,
three-bedroom
unit
if
the
building
does
all
go,
extend
all
the
way
to
the
rear.
Although
we're
in
filling
part
of
the,
if
you
look
at
the
the
demo
draw,
you
can
see
that
we're
in
filling
part
of
that
to
Ana's
decks
being
proposed.
The
proposed
unit
is
approximately
1400
square
feet
for
unit
2
and
3,
and
approximately
1,800
square
feet
for
unit
1.
AE
AE
D
AE
AA
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Alice
and
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
on
record
and
support,
we
did
hold
an
abutters
meeting
for
this
project.
The
one
concern
that
was
raised
was
the
roof
deck,
so
we
would
like
to
support
it
with
the
proviso
there
be
no
roof
deck.
Thank
you.
BS
O
B
V
LA
70802,
seven,
zero,
zero,
seven,
zero,
seven,
four,
forty
nine
eighty,
four,
forty
nine
West
Broadway.
This
is
a
raise.
The
existing
one-story
commercial
structure
erect
a
new
four-story
structure
with
commercial
restaurants.
You
said
you
said
basement
and
ground
level
and
residential
use
from
second
third.
Fourth
level:
total
of
two
residential
units,
the
violations,
article,
68
section,
seven
restaurant
uses
a
conditional
use
article
68
section:
33
are
three:
five
and
requirements
is
insufficient.
Article
68,
section
34,
Michelle
Rodriguez
setback
cannot
be
less
than
15
feet.
B
BT
BT
If
you
were
to
build
the
building
to
the
left
or
the
right
today,
you
would
need
much
of
the
same
zoning
relief.
So
we
believe
that,
what's
out
of
context
is
not
our
proposal
that
in
fact
the
underlying
zoning
we've
done
some
historic
research
back
in
the
1950s.
There
was
a
four-story
building
on
our
site
by
the
mid
and
it
restored
the
residential
above
commercial
by
the
1970s.
It
had
collapsed
and
had
burned
down.
The
city
was
threatening
the
owner
to
remove
the
remnants
of
the
building
that
was
once
there.
BT
BT
BT
BT
But
house
right
it
is
the
ridge
in
the
existing
roof.
So
if
you
look
at
this,
you
can
see
there's
the
sloping
roots,
so
our
building
and
is
highest
essentially
connects
the
ridges
of
the
existing
buildings.
So
it's
not
exactly
the
same
as
the
existing
buildings
were
built
over
time.
They
reset
back
about
eight
and
a
half
feet,
they
were
row
houses
and
then
they
would
get
out
into
the
street
with
a
kind
of
hodgepodge.
My.
V
BT
P
Well,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Allison
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we've
held
a
few
meetings
on
this
project
at
the
most
recent
meeting.
The
main
concerns
raised
were
the
deck
for
the
restaurant
in
the
back,
which
the
developers
in
grade
2
it
enclosed.
So
there
will
be
no
exterior
space
in
the
back
of
the
restaurant
and
ensuring
that
the
parking
goes
of
the
units
other
than
that.
This
does
seem
to
be
consistent
with
the
rest
of
the
streets
who
would
like
to
run
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
BS
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Lauren
Miller
City,
Council,
Gill
winning
hands
office
just
to
echo
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
neighbors
main
concerns
with
a
back
fat
deck
which
has
been
eliminated
in
the
parking
which
they
have
agreed
to
attach
to
the
two
units
so
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
sports.
Thank
you.
A
C
BV
B
This
proposal
is
to
combine
two
are
two
to
seventy:
two:
seventy
six
Dorchester
Avenue,
eighty
four
Dorchester
out
to
be
known
as
two:
seventy
tour
Chester
AB
used
to
be
a
mixed-use
multifamily
and
six
thousand
five
hundred
ninety
square
feet
of
Louisville
commercial
space
with
underground
parking,
420
vehicles
to
include
114
residential
units
and
a
six
story,
74th
building
the
demolished
and
existing
structure
on
both
Watts
and
erecting
obstruction.
The
violations
article
13
section
for
dwellings
ending
on
residential
district
article
14
section
14
to
rot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
B
BW
A
BW
But
all
of
this
projects
dimension
and
use
and
other
requirements
have
been
built
to
the
plan
and
in
fact
the
proposal
has
been
undergoing
community
review
for
approximately
two
years
and
coincided
with
the
adoption
and
approval
of
the
plan
for
Dorchester
Ave.
It
was
the
first
project
reviewed
by
the
BPD,
a
since
the
adoption
of
plan
for
Dorchester
al,
but
they
approved
in
December.
BW
The
requirement
was
18
percent
of
the
street
level.
Community
space
be
affordable
and
it's
approximately
40
percent.
So
we've
exceeded
both
of
the
articulated
community
benefits
required
by
the
plan
in
order
to
take
advantage
of
the
70
foot
bonus
density
height.
Also
under
the
new
plan
for
South
Boston
Dorchester
Ave
they're,
not
controlling
density
with
an
FA
are
rather
they're
using
Lots
coverage
and
height
as
the
density
control
mechanism
and
on
both
those
scores.
Again,
we
comply
with
the
new
plan.
BW
Parking
garage
entrance
will
be
on
West,
West,
Sixth
Street
off
B
Street,
which
dead
ends
on
the
haul
road.
There
used
to
be
a
bridge
there,
but
it
was
removed.
There
is
a
building
directly
across
on
West
Sixth
Street
at
the
corner
of
B.
That
is
also
using
that
side.
Nub
of
West
six
as
the
entrance
to
the
parking
garage.
BW
There
are
a
number
of
curb
cuts
along
B
Street
that
are
currently
existing
that
are
being
filled
in
so
we're
going
to
increase
the
on
street
parking
capacity
by
eliminating
several
of
the
curb
cuts
that
currently
exist.
There's
also
a
large
public
plaza
that
we've
worked
extensively
with
B
CDC
and
the
BPD,
a
staff
members
that
is
available
and
open
to
the
public.
BW
A
A
P
BS
BK
A
BG
AJ
H
BW
B
B
Hearing
none
go
to
the
next
case,
calling
VOA,
seven
zero,
five,
four
zero,
eight
14
David
Moog
our
way.
This
is
a
construct:
approximately
eleven
thousand
seven
hundred
square
foot
addition
to
an
existing
hotel
and
install
a
new
elevator
in
the
existing
hotel.
The
violation
of
article
8,
section,
seven
use
of
item
number.
Fifteen
Hotel
is
conditional
article
32,
section
nine
G
card
enforcement,
article
9,
section
nine
one
extension:
reconstruction
non-conforming
use
building
for
the
record.
Please
good.
BX
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name,
is
Mike
Ross
I'm,
an
attorney
of
prints,
low
bail
I'm
joined
here
with
my
co-counsel,
our
co-counsel
Patrick
Mahoney
from
Adams
and
Morrissey,
and
our
client
related
bill
represented
by
the
project
manager,
Andrew
Hayes
and
our
architect,
Rob
Walker,
who
is
with
15
&
Associates.
We
presented
you
with
some
plans.
This
is
a
12,000
square
foot
approximate
addition
to
an
existing
building,
the
John
Jeffries
house
and
Beacon
Hill
at
14
David
Moog.
Our
way
the
existing
building
is
a
hotel
of
40
units
46
units.
BX
Rather
this
will
bring
the
total
hotel
to
66
units.
The
relief
that
we're
seeking
our
three
conditional
use
permits
the
first
one
relays.
The
extension
in
that
it's
sitting
in
an
L
to
65
district
is
the
use
of
a
hotel
conditional
use.
The
second
is
the
expansion
of
the
existing
structure,
which
sits
in
h.265
district
and
that
expansion
of
a
non-conforming
use
is
a
conditional
use
under
91
and
then
finding
the
the
G
code
under
32
9
is
the
third
conditional
use
we've
had
since
January
substantial
community
process.
BX
Is
the
first
time
under
this
ownership?
Previously,
this
project
came
before
you
when
it
was
owned
by
the
mass
eye
and
ear
infirmary
for
the
change
of
use
from
what
it
was,
which
was
a
kind
of
undeclared
hotel
into
a
proper
hotel.
An
agreement
with
the
community
and
the
board
at
the
time
was
that
any
changes
they're
out
would
require
a
trip
back
to
the
board,
which
is
what
we're
doing.
J
BY
BZ
BK
AO
Madam
chairman
members,
the
board
Tom
Clements
be
convulsive
of
associations
on
a
licensing
committee.
We
appreciate
the
extensive
outreach
the
applicant
is
made
to
the
community.
We
are
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
them
on
a
few
remaining
issues
relating
to
the
courtyard
in
the
rear
which
of
us
residences
will
be
used
in
connection
with
the
restaurant
and
also
the
parking
and
loading
situation.
But
we
think
that
everything's
moving
in
a
very
good
direct
and
we
urge
you
to
grab
the
relief
requested
and
give
the.
BI
B
Boa
six:
nine
four
one:
nine
two:
six
twenty
Newbury
Street
the
applicant-
seeks
to
continue
the
use
premises
of
a
fee
paid
public
parking
lot
capacity
of
twenty
two
vehicles.
The
permit
expires
on
August
31st
of
2017
violations.
Article
6
section
four
changed
in
the
previous
decision
from
the
CBA
name.
An
address
already,
please.
CA
CA
The
applicant
seeks
to
continue
to
use
the
premises
as
a
fee
paid
public
parking
lot
with
a
capacity
of
22
vehicles
under
permit
you
for
nine
six,
eight,
seven,
five,
five
four,
which
expires
August
31
2017
under
a
Pheo,
a
decision,
three
three
six
one
for
the
property
is
owned
by
the
Massachusetts
Department
of
Transportation.
The
premises
have
been
operated
and
permitted
as
a
fee
paid
public
parking
lot.
CA
CA
CA
CA
A
BY
T
B
He's
calling
boa
seven
zero,
two
five
nine
one
1252
the
1268
Boylston
Street
is
Boylston
Street.
Here
this
is
to
add
section
36
a
to
an
existing
use.
Permit
the
violation
is
article
64,
14
rods,
take
out
as
a
conditional
use.
Relief
in
the
Board
of
Appeals
is
required,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
K
This
franchise
was
owned
by
wake
on
Pizza
enterprises
from
Athena
Georgia.
They
filed
the
long
form
to
do
some
renovation
got
approved
for
36,
a
and
37
the
owners
in
Georgia
asked
what's
36
a
they
were
told.
This
is
a
takeout
said.
Well,
we
don't
have
much
takeout
and
they
would
tell
well
if
you
don't
have
30.
If
you
don't
have
10%
of
your
business's
takeout,
you
don't
need
36
a
so.
He
proceeded
to
write
a
letter
in
January
of
2006
to
Zoning
Board,
asking
to
take
out
36
a
well.
You
know
what
happened.
K
K
O
BY
CB
A
AZ
AZ
B
You,
spelling
do
a
seven
zero
six,
two
six
one
thirty
six
River
Street.
This
is
the
remover,
replaced
a
greenhouse
structure
on
the
fifth
floor
of
the
existing
five
unit
dwelling
and
modify
the
existing
greenhouse
violations.
Article
13
section
one:
the
modification,
the
greenhouse,
increased,
the
size
name
and.
CC
CC
Unfortunately,
it
was
poorly
designed
and
constructed
so
that
one
of
the
supporting
walls
is
supported
on
a
surface
beam
and
that
surface
team
has
proven
in
the
process.
The
result
is:
is
that
there's
structural
damage
to
the
entire
greenhouse
I've
had
the
architect
and
actually
two
contractors
look
at
the
structure
for
reconstruction,
and
they
all
say
that
has
to
be
taken
down
and
the
only
way
to
rebuild
the
structure
is
to
have
the
supporting
walls
span
between
the
existing
party
walls
veterans
need
to
hear
today,
because
what
it
does
is.
CC
Some
preparation
for
the
meeting
I
contacted
my
abutters,
there's
no
change
to
the
sunlight
and
actually
the
view
from
40
River
Street
will
be
improved
because
it
doesn't
look
very
good
right
now
because
of
the
deterioration
and
I
have
I've
been
able
to
work
with.
All
of
my
neighbors
I
have
full
support.
I
got
went
to
the
abutters
meeting,
I
went
to
the
Beacon
Hill,
see.
BY
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Sagar
with
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
did
hold
and
a
butters
meeting
in
which
only
Tom
and
participatory
from
the
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association
came
out.
They
seem
to
be
in
support
of
the
project
and
specific
Association
also
took
a
position
of
not
not
opposition,
a
stance
of
Ron
opposition,
so
we
are
in
support.
Thank.
CB
AO
Madam
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
Tom
Clements,
Beacon,
Hill,
Civic,
Association,
zoning
and
licensing
as
Giselle
said,
Civic
Association
is
not
opposed
to
this
application,
based
on
its
de
minimis
nature,
we
generally
concerned
about
addition
of
variants
upon
a
previous
variance,
but
in
this
case
we
think
33
years
intervening
indicates.
It
was
probably
not
a
segmented
project
slipped
something
by
and
we're
pleased
that
there's
no
a
lot
of
concern,
so
we
get
virtually
draft
relief.
Thank
you
thank.
O
B
Boa
seven:
zero,
three,
four
nine
four:
three
ninety-nine
Boylston
Street:
this
is
a
change.
Existing
building
use
from
Bank
accessory
cafeteria
offices
and
restaurant
use,
its
37:36
a
to
Bank
accessory
cafeteria,
opposite
cafe,
use
of
item
30
with
takeout
views
and
36
a
outdoor
patio
seating
for
30
patrons
violations.
Article
8
section
7
a
cafe
to
include
outdoor
patio
seating
is
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
hello,.
L
We're
here
for
399
Boylston
Street
in
the
Back
Bay
applying
for
a
change
in
the
youth,
so
he
said
from
restaurants
to
a
cafe
with
outdoor
patio
taught
a
bakery,
as
you
may
know,
is
a
respected
brand.
They
have
six
other
locations
in
the
Boston
Cambridge
area
and
they've
all
been
doing
very
well.
The
community
really
supports
this
group.
We
also
in
the
Back
Bay
met
with
the
Back
Bay
Association,
as
well
as
the
Neighborhood
Association
of
Back
Bay
health
nut
butters
meeting.
There
was
no
opposition.
A
BY
R
Hi
I'm
Jim
rooms,
the
boy
Elliot
left,
Neighborhood
Association
of
Back
Bay.
We
are
not
in
opposition
to
this.
They
came
to
us
and
a
particular
positive
which
wasn't
mentioned
by
the
the
applicant
is
that
they
they
proposed
to
us
to
include
an
air
pollution
control
device
to
control
any
odor
and
fumes
coming
out
of
the
project,
particularly
pleased
that
that
we
saw
an
applicant
coming
to
us
without
our
having
to
ask.
BK
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
once
again,
Gary
Walker,
ultra
Workers
Local
103,
like
to
speak
in
support
of
this.
This
restaurant
I
know
as
we
speak.
We
have
it's
one
of
appreciate
want
to
say,
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
owner
is,
we
started
with
some
of
our
contractors,
they're
currently
bidding
it
and
we
hope
to
get
on
this
job.
Thank
you.
Thank.
T
BW
B
Boa
six:
nine
five,
two
zero
one.
Eighty
five
to
ninety
five
Salem
Street:
this
is
a
change
oxidant
89,
89,
Salem
Street,
to
include
a
fitness
center
less
than
2,500
square
feet.
The
violation
is
article
54,
section,
12,
neighborhood
business
sub-district
Fitness
uses
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
CD
Morning,
William
thrill,
McDermott,
copia
Miller,
a
28
state
street
to
my
left,
is
in
Lena's
Apollo
who
moves
with
the
operator
of
the
fitness
center.
Our
request
before
you
is
for
a
conditional
use
permit.
The
location
is
within
the
North
End
Silver
Streak,
neighborhood
business
district
and
prior
use
had
been
a
hardware
home
supply
store
for
a
number
of
years.
That
is
being
subdivided
into
three
separate
uses.
We
will
occupy
just
over
2,000
square
feet
as
a
fitness
center.
It's
an
appropriate
both
location
and
site
to
this,
and
as
well
as
the
use.
Mr.
CD
Paulo
already
operates
a
fitness
center
in
the
moth
and
a
different
theme.
It's
a
it's
a
cycle
oriented
center.
This
one
will
be
boxing
and
other
exercise
at
this
location.
It's
been
supported
by
both
neighborhood
groups,
the
Gotham
waterfront
neighborhood
council,
and
lead
not
the
waterfront
residents
association
who
have
submitted
correspondence.
CD
CD
BG
V
CD
CE
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Maria
lands
of
madoffs
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
The
applicant
had
a
positive
about
his
meeting
on
April
27th,
and
they
also
have
the
support
of
the
not
the
waterfront
Neighborhood
Council,
as
well
as
the
north,
on
waterfront
residents.
Association
residents
in
the
area
are
excited
to
support
mr.
Paulo
and
her
new
function.
Thank
you.
Z
B
Voa:
seven
zero,
eight
nine
zero
to
sixty
five
to
seventy
one
Causeway
Street.
This
is
a
construct,
a
rooftop
bar,
an
additional
egress
on
top
of
an
existing
structure,
violations,
article
46,
section
8
Billy,
and
the
sub
district
design
review
no
structure
designed
or
use
for
you,
naka
C
access.
The
storage
shall
be
erected
Oran
lodged
on
the
roof
of
any
building
within
the
Bulfinch
Triangle
district
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please
hazard,.
AE
Ma'am
chair,
we
have
an
existing
restaurant,
which
is
the
causeway
and
also
to
my
left,
is
David
Ferrando
owner
of
West,
End,
dining
group
and
he's
the
owner.
One
of
the
owners
of
the
restaurant.
The
causeway
is
approximately
212
occupancy
with
the
proposed
roof
deck.
So
it's
two
levels
currently
and
they're:
adding
a
114
square
foot,
roof
deck
for
dining
and
it's
in
addition
to
two
means
of
egress
and
it's
a
maximum.
AE
AE
AE
D
AE
CE
B
D
CF
We're
just
looking
to
build
a
very
straightforward
back
deck
off
the
second
floor
of
the
building,
the
three
unit
townhouse.
And
if
you
take
a
look
at
the
drawings,
architectural
drawings,
the
dimensions
are
actually
only
twenty
four
by
six
and
a
half
feet,
as
opposed
to
eight
by
thirty
three
and
a
half
feet.
So
it's
actually
considerably
smaller
and
consistent
with
other
decks
in
the
neighborhood
and.
X
The
green,
the
span,
the
span
of
the
building
is,
is
higher
than
average,
so
we
need
one
in
the
middle.
That's
at
least
what
the
engineers
told
us,
so
they
would
need
a
bracket
in
the
middle
and
which
would
interfere
with
the
Headroom
of
the
deck
below,
because
that's
a
see
the
windows
on
the
lower
floor,
quite
small.
CF
And
we
also
just
want
to
do
those
there's
no
plans
in
the
building
to
build
a
deck
above
off
the
back
that
one,
so
the
posts
would
stop
at
our
unit,
which
is
on
the
second
floor.
So
it
would
it
be
like
a
continuous
all
the
way
up.
We've
spoken
to
our
neighbor
up
there.
He
has
a
roof
deck.
There's
no
plans
to
build
anything
off
the
back.
BY
CG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Sam
chambers,
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
strong
support.
Natalie
her
husband,
our
new
residents,
the
neighborhood
who
are
going
to
make
this
their
home,
and
this
is
the
exact
type
of
family
that
we
would
like
to
see
in
the
neighborhood
and
all
they're
doing
is
a
small
rear
deck
and
that
we
have
a
nut,
butters,
meaning
it
was
very
successful.
Actually,
no
one
came
and
I
have
not
heard
any
negative
feedback
about
this
application.
W
I
B
B
This
is
for
15
to
17
short
reconstruct
a
new
three-story
attached
to
family
dwelling.
On
the
newly
created
three
thousand
four
hundred
sixty
nine
square
foot
rot
line.
Each
dwelling
unit
will
have
an
access
to
a
private
roof
deck.
The
violation
is
article
62,
section
29
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
62
section
30
conforming
to
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
62
section
8
rock
frontage,
is
insufficient
article
62
section
8,
the
flow
rate
ratios
excessive
article
62,
section
8,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
62,
section,
8
Reyat
isn't
sufficient.
B
B
11:13
show
street
into
two
Lots
wat,
one
to
be
known
as
1113
Short
Street,
and
to
contain
four
thousand
seventy
five
square
feet
raw
to
to
be
known
as
fifteen
to
seventeen
short
Street
and
to
contain
three
thousand
four
hundred
and
sixty
nine
square
feet.
There
will
be
a
new
to
family
dwelling
construct
with
their
end
the
violations-
article
62
section,
29
RC
parking-
is
insufficient.
They
would
address
for
the
record.
Please
I'm.
BR
BR
BR
BV
Tim
she
and
I
designed
the
project.
Basically
17
and
15,
with
both
be
townhouses,
the
ones
quite
a
little
bit
smaller
than
the
other.
The
biggest
one
number
15
be
about
1,800
square
feet,
which
is
typical
for
Charlestown
we're
breaking
the
existing
7,000
square
foot
lot
up
into.
You
know
the
new
lot
with
the
two
houses
on
it
would
be
3,400
square
feet.
BV
So
basically,
what
we're
doing
is
the
existing
driveway
that
might
lose
is
now
we're
going
to
get
four
cars
on
that
side,
and
then
they
have
a
small
driveway
shared
with
the
neighborhood.
With
a
neighbor
up,
the
street
they'll
have
one
car
there,
so
we'll
have
five
overall
we
shooting
out
before
we
should
have
a
little
bit
more
though,
which
is
a
street.
BV
BV
A
BV
BR
A
O
A
BV
A
O
BV
D
BV
A
BV
A
A
B
This
is
the
remove
two
existing
single-family
homes
and
construct
a
five
condominium
building
the
violations,
article
53
section
8.
This
is
a
two
and
four
hundred
sub
district
five
units.
As
of
Ovidius
article
53,
section,
nine,
the
building
height
is
excessive
article
53,
section
nine
insufficient,
open
space,
article
53,
section,
nine,
insufficient
Riyadh
article
53,
section,
nine
floating
ratios,
excessive,
equal
53,
six
and
nine.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
53
section
56
RV
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
you.
CH
Have
to
do
madam
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's,
1216,
Madison,
Street,
East
Boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
to
my
right,
is
Eric,
a
christen
who
is
the
architect
for
the
project
to
his
right,
Brian,
a
Coney
of
principle,
developer
and
Steve
Sudha
with
him
as
well.
Its
proposal
involves
the
demolition
of
two
existing
single-family
homes
in
the
Orion
Heights
section
of
East
Boston.
CH
These
homes
require
substantial
renovation
and
it's
not
economically
feasible
to
try
to
restore
them,
and
therefore
the
proposal
is
to
demolish
both
of
them
to
construct
a
single
five-unit
building
with
parking
for
five
vehicles.
The
Lots
presently
are
non-conforming
too,
to
a
4,000
joining
sub-district.
The
proposal
would
combine
the
lots
and
create
a
conforming
a
lot
of
5,000
square
feet
at
a
proposed
structure,
with
a
mix
of
two
and
three-bedroom
units,
ranging
from
about
870
square
feet
up
to
about
1,250
square
feet.
CH
As
a
result
of
this
proposal,
a
number
of
violations
would
be
triggered
under
the
2f
4000
district,
specifically
in
the
use
being
multi-family,
as
opposed
to
a
two
family
which
is
permitted.
The
side
yard
presently
is
at
1
feet
and
3
feet.
We're
proposing
improve
that
condition,
although
not
conforming
to
the
code,
three
feet
and
four
feet
on
the
left
and
right
side.
In
addition,
the
rear
yard
would
be
a
violation
that
the
requirements
forty
feet
were
proposing.
20
the
floor
area
ratio
would
be
excessive
at
1.1,
which
is
pretty
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
CH
But
a
point
eight
is,
is
permitted.
Usable
open
space
is
not
sufficient
at
seven
or
fifty
square
feet
per
unit,
and
the
height
of
the
building
would
be
exceeded
by
three
feet,
which
is
permitted
at
35.
However,
this
is
per
being
proposed
at
38
other
sector
parking.
We
are
proposing.
Five
parking
spaces,
as
I
indicated,
is
an
existing.
These
are
existing
two
units.
Presently,
although
we
are
changing
into
a
five-unit
building,
there
is
no
parking
presently
the
net
amount
of
parking.
Technically
that
we
require
Maccoby
three
spaces.
CH
The
existing
condition
does
not
have
parking
presently
so
actually
improving
that
we
did
have
an
extensive
community
process
with
respect
that,
it's
not
only
meeting
several
meetings
with
director
butters,
we
did
appear
and
present
this
at
the
organized
labor
council
on
three
separate
occasions.
There
neighbor
council
voted
favorably
to
support
this
project.
There's
also,
the
board
may
have
a
communication
from
a
new
group.
The
harbour
of
your
neighbor
Association,
which
two
presentations
were
made
at.
CH
However,
we
did
not
return
for
a
third
present
at
which
time
that
they
wanted
to
take
a
vote
in
this
matter.
I
would
point
out
to
the
board
that,
as
East
Boston
is
transitioning
with
a
lot
of
new
different
community
groups,
it's
difficult,
sometimes
to
start
the
process
and
then
restart
the
process.
When
a
new
group
starts,
this
process
was
started
in
the
Orion
Heights
neighborhood
council
jurisdiction
and
according
the
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services
went
for
the
vote
before
that
group
and
that
group
voted
to
support
it.
A
CH
A
CH
One
of
certainly
sensitive
to
the
concern
over
having
a
garage
door
located
very
close
to
the
sidewalk
based
upon
past
experience
at
BPD,
a
Design,
Review
I
think
the
fact
that
this
is
setback,
a
good
distance
from
the
edge
of
the
sidewalk
allows
for
at
least
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
as
the
vehicles
enter
and
exit
the
garage.
So
we
think
we
can
address
it
that
way.
BA
BA
O
BA
CH
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
ELLs
and
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
Claudia
Correa
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
There
have
been
two
letters
meetings
on
this
project
at
which
the
developers
have
made
changes
to
the
proposal
to
address
concerns
and,
in
addition,
as
the
proponents
dated
the
Orion
Heights
Association
did
vote
in
support
of
the
project.
Thank
you.
AQ
CI
Members
of
the
boy,
my
name
is
and
epilogue
eeeh
right
up
there,
59
Byron,
Street
I
about
the
property,
and
my
house
is
only
860
square
feet
and
I
believe
this
is
way
too
massive
to
put
beside
my
house.
They
only
want
three
feet
on
my
side
between
a
property
line,
and
since
my
house
is
so
small,
they
want
to
go
much
further
back
then,
and
my
house
goes
so
I
feel
like
I'm
going
to
be
in
documents
and
I
do
have
39
people
that
live
on
Byron
Street.
That
strongly
oppose
this.
CI
We
are
not
in
favor
of
this,
and
my
last
thing
is
on
two
separate
meetings
that
we
had
that
I'm
Stephen
and
Ryan
with
the
air.
We
were
told
that
if
this
does
not
get
approved,
they'll
make
sure
that
they
leave
the
two
existing
houses
there
and
they'll
find
the
worst
ones
as
possible
and
see
how
Byron
Street
likes
that
and
Claudia
from
city
hall
was
there
and
she
did
speak
to
stiva
narayan
and
say
that
is
not
allowed
at
a
meeting.
So
I
strongly
oppose.
This
may
have
had
some
signatures
me.
CJ
A
BB
CH
Yet
mr.
Leone
I
believe
is
on
one
of
the
triple-deckers
across
the
street.
If
I
could
just
respond
briefly,
not
that
I
think
before
these
sets
want
to
make
sure
that
the
record
is
clear
on
the
comment
that
was
made.
This
is
intended
as
a
condo
project.
If
the
buildings
were
to
remain,
it's
very
likely
to
be
rentals,
but
not
necessarily
the
worst
renters
I
think
that's
the
editorial
ization
of
the
way
the
comment
was
made
of
the
community
meeting.
CH
The
intention
is
to
demolish
these
and
to
create
home
ownership
and
not
to
have
rental,
which
we
believe
was
a
preference
in
the
neighborhood.
With
respect
to
the
issues
that
we
did
here
at
the
community
process,
it
was
designed
more
than
anything
parking
seemed
to
be
satisfactory.
Height
was
consistent
with
other
buildings
in
a
lot
of
the
design.
CH
Tweaks
that
were
have
were
happening,
or
as
a
result
of
some
of
the
comments
that
we
heard
so
with
respect
to
design
where
you
know
fully
aware
of
the
VPD,
a
design
review
process,
and
certainly
the
issues
that
I
think
the
neighborhood
was
concerned
with.
As
to
some
of
the
contemporary
elements
that
were
being
proposed
can
be
addressed
as
part
of
BPD,
a
design
review.
CH
Think
this
process,
through
the
chair,
really
involved
a
lot
of
different
thoughts
and
ideas
of
what
the
building
should
look
like.
While
these
are
very
difficult
to
design
by
committee,
there
were
some
elements
of
architectural
details
that
were
taken
from
piracy,
which
was
a
very
mix
of
traditional,
some
different
types
of
architects
that
we
were
trying
to
incorporate.
We
did
ultimately
hear
that
the
design
and
as
rendered,
was
not
something
that
they
were
it
felt
fit,
was
compatible
and
we're
more
than
willing
to
work
that,
through
an
extensive
design,
review
process
or
PPV
a
the.
A
A
V
H
A
O
H
B
V
W
B
Other
with
drawls
or
the
not
with
the
pearls
for
at
11:30
hearing
them
over
the
last
case,
boa
seven:
zero,
eight
six,
two
five,
two
sixty
three
Webster
Street.
This
is
to
extend
living
space
into
the
basement,
change
the
floor
plan
layout
and
add
a
red
and
roof
decks.
Rare
rare
and
roof
decks
the
violations,
article
53
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
53,
section,
9,
excessive
fa,
our
article
53
section
9,
insufficient
side,
yet
setback
article
53,
section
9,
Rayette
setback,
name,
an
address
to
the
record
place
good.
CH
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's,
1216,
citation
TV
spots
and
I'll,
be
on
the
petitioner
with
me,
is
Andrews
Aaron's,
representative
of
Mg
to
the
owner
of
the
property.
This
proposal
involves
an
existing
attached.
Three
family
dwelling
in
the
Jefferies
Point
section
of
respondent.
The
property
was
purchased
for
the
purpose
of
a
full
renovation
and
Rehab
and
upgrade
to
life
safety.
The
proposal
would
maintain
the
existing
three
units,
however,
would
extend
the
living
space
into
the
basement
to
add
additional
square
footage
for
the
lower
level
unit.
CH
In
addition,
we're
proposing
two
decks
off
the
rear
of
the
building,
as
well
as
a
proposed
private
roof
deck
that
would
be
accessible
in
the
unit
three
that
roof
deck
is
accessed
by
a
spiral
staircase
off
of
the
rear
deck.
There's
no
head
house
proposed
for
that
that
additional
drew
protect
it
throughout
the
community
process.
CH
We
work
very
closely
not
only
with
the
abutters
but
would
be
directive
letters
it
has
to
us
on
the
other
side,
which
is
a
condo
association
we've
offered
to
with
the
improvements
that
we're
making
to
the
facade
of
the
building,
which
would
remove
all
of
the
vinyl
siding
from
the
building
and
add,
more
I,
guess
traditional
materials
and
improve
the
actual
architectural
affairs
of
the
building.
We've
worked
out
an
arrangement
with
the
abutters
next
door
to
do
their
side
of
the
building
as
well.
A
A
A
P
H
B
11:30
we
discussions
calling
VOA
six
seven,
two,
eight
six,
seven
549
Washington
Street.
This
is
erect
a
new
building
for
five
residential
units
and
one
retail
space
violations.
Article
51
section
16,
a
multi-family
residential
building.
It's
a
conditional
use
in
a
1
s,
1
sub
district
Article
51
section
17
Riyadh
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
17,
open
usable
space
is
insufficient.
Now
51,
section
17,
the
Florida.
A
ratio
was
excessive
name
and
address
filler
ethically
Patrick.
AE
Mahoney
of
Amazon
Moran
T
with
the
business
address
of
350
West
Broadway
on
the
outside
I,
would
like
to
make
one
change.
I
needed
miss
Hogan
a
set
of
plans,
revised
set
of
plans
for
this
project
it
towards
the
end
of
the
community
process.
It
was
decided
that
the
commercial
space
have
proposed
too
much
of
a
burden
on
the
neighborhood
with
multiple
vehicle
trips
a
day.
So
we
recently
as
recent
as
a
few
days
ago,
decides
to
do
six
units
with
the
support
of
the
neighborhood.
Instead
of
the
existing
commercial
space,
which
is
a
laundromat.
AE
550
square
feet:
one
bedroom
units,
the
the
owner
business,
is
next
door.
That
was
something
that
was
important
to
the
community
for
property
management
purposes.
So
he
is
a
director
butter
and-
and
it
was
a
mostly
most
important-
that
the
laundry
mat
be
removed
in
his
place.
Another
unit,
six
one-bedroom
units.
AE
AE
AE
AE
Prior
to
meeting
mr.
Keegan,
he
had
proposed
a
different
project
with
the
laundromat
and
it
was
a
tougher
community
process.
He
didn't
want
to
change
his
building
and
after
meeting
with,
in
going
a
couple
of
butters
meetings
and
three
visits
to
the
VA
IA
and
also
of
joining
our
representation,
we
decided
to
eliminate
the
listen
to
the
community
and
eliminate
the
commercial
use.
That
was
a
problem
all
along
and,
as
a
result,
the
we
have
support
from
be
AIA,
believe
they're.
Here
today
and.
AE
CK
Madam
chair
members
aboard
Annabel
gongs
to
the
right,
and
also
from
Association
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
do
feel
that
the
use
of
it
being
sought
the
six
units
first
of
the
commercial
use,
is
a
much
better
use
of
the
neighborhood.
The
current
commercial
use
causes
a
lot
of
traffic
and
double
parking
on
the
street,
and
the
neighbors
would
really
like
to
see
it
on
Thank
You
fellow.
A
CK
O
O
B
Voa
six:
two
nine
five,
four
185
Linden
Street:
this
is
the
constructing
new
three-story
addition
in
the
rear
of
an
existing
single-family
dwelling
create
three
new
parking
spaces
that
grade
under
the
addition
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
single-family
dwelling
to
a
two-family
dwelling
family
dwelling
violations,
article
51,
section,
9,
the
for
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section,
I,
know
usable
open
spaces
and
sufficient
article
51,
section,
9
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
rail
yard,
isn't
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
190.
BQ
BQ
Proposal
here
is
to
construct
a
rear
addition
to
existing
single-family
house
on
Linden
Street.
It's
currently
order
occupied
and
the
Orleans
family
10
adult
children
and
their
children
are
going
to
live
in
the
new
unit.
It's
a
three-story
addition
of
the
first
door
be
an
open-air
garage
underneath
to
living
level
four
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor
and
living
space.
BQ
On
the
third
floor,
we
had
in
we
attic
to
about
of
meetings,
both
met
with
no
opposition,
and
we
presented
to
the
HCA
three
different
times
the
first
time
they
wanted
us
to
go
back
to
discuss
it
with
the
abutters
the
second
time
they
wanted
to
see
some
change
in
design,
which
we
accommodated.
The
original
addition
at
the
rear
of
the
property
was
a
more
modern,
rectangular
design.
This
the
proposed
addition
now
is
actually
174
square
feet,
square
foot
reduction
of
the
original
proposal
and
has
more
traditional
roofline.
BQ
BQ
Rear
yard
is
40.
Feet
would
proposing
three
feet
to
the
property
line.
The
original
addition
before
we
move
back
the
Austin
Civic
Association
was
actually
a
little
too
close
to
our
property
line,
but
after
we
met
with
the
building
of
us
against
a
commercial,
auto
body
shop
and
we
met
with
the
owner,
discuss
moving
out
building
back
enough
so
that
from
our
property
and
his
he
could
repair
his
masonry
work
if
necessary.
Okay,.
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellis
and
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
Warren
Riley,
based
on
the
exhaustive
community
process
and
no
opposition
to
the
density
or
parking
of
this
project.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
at
this
point.
It
has
been
to
the
APA
a
couple
of
times
and
it
seems
that
the
main
opposition
is
based
on
design
review.
So
if
the
board
does
see
fit
to
grant
relief,
we
would
just
ask
for
a
provide
go
for
design
review.
Thank
you.
Dr.
Q
H
BQ
B
This
is
directly
new
four-story
multifamily
residents
with
drawling
with
nine
12
units
and
13
off
street
parking
violations.
Article
64,
section,
8,
multi-family
residential
use
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section
41,
the
design
off
street
parking
and
loading
required
design
is
insufficient
and
means
of
a
vehicular.
Access
to
a
street
proposed
driveway
is
7
foot
6
article
65,
section
42
point
to
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
65
section
9,
the
ploidy.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
B
AE
Chair
we
have
a
the
zoning
sub
distances,
1f
5000.
It
is
an
area
of
Adam
Hills
that
has
the
mixed
use
mixed
between
commercial
industrial
use,
as
well
as
on
the
adjacent
property
next
door
and
across
the
street
larger
apartment
buildings
who
are
proposing
to
eliminate
the
commercial
building
in
erect
an
8
unit
residential
building
consisting
of
2
bedrooms
over
4
floors,
the
first
floor
of
which
was
parking.
The
parking
provided
here
is
there's
12
spaces,
which
is
approximately
40%
in
excess
of,
what's
required
for
8
units.
CL
A
AE
BR
AE
AE
Is
the
parking
requirement
here
is
met
by
the
inside
of
the
building,
but
that
was
a
concern
that
came
up
in
the
neighborhood
through
the
community
process,
so
we
did
provide
three
spaces
on
the
side
yard.
The
building
is.
The
front
yard
is
positioned
right
on
Adam
Street
that
you
enter
from
the
side
yard,
which
is
a
it,
isn't
a
private
way.
It's
a
shared
egress
with
the
local
17
Union
in
the
rear,
and
also
an
apartment
building
to
the
left.
There
will
be
some
local
1710
doctors
will
be
working
on
this
project
as
well.
AV
CM
CN
Good
afternoon
now,
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board,
ed
Mehra
Greg,
representing
the
sheetmetal
workers,
the
proponent
were
director
butter
and
one
lot
remove
opponent
as
the
norther
forthcoming
answering
any
questions
and
concerns
we
had
and
we're
actually
looking
forward
to
doing
business
with
them
and
cleaning
up
that
lot.
Thank
you.
A
CJ
A
A
CJ
Our
concern
is
that
I
keep
hearing
grandfather
clause
but
I'm,
not
sure
I,
know
Marina
Bay
and
Quincy
had
two
nightclubs
over
there
and
they're
gone
because
of
Residential's
that
moved
in
later
and
I
know
Farah
nursery
in
Milton.
They
have
a
new
neighbor
moved
in
they've,
been
different,
45
years
or
so,
and
right
now,
they've
$70,000
into
legal
fees,
because
they
don't
like
noise
and
smells
of
the
business.
O
O
AE
It's
it's
an
interesting
point.
Mr.
mazzani
I
don't
know
that
we
could
preempt
any
nuisance.
Claims
that
would
arise
in
the
future,
but
part
of
that
claim
would
be
a
newer
condition.
You
need
to
the
neighborhood
here.
This
is
something
that's
been
in
existence
for
some
time
in
much
like
a
street
and
all
the
development
in
that
area
and
part
of
the
city
around
commercial
uses,
I,
don't
know
of
any
nuisance
claims
that
have
been
brought,
certainly
not
against
any
of
my
clients.
No,
we
have
developed
most
of.
A
AE
AE
I
won't
happen
to
do
that.
Additionally,
for
the
the
gasoline
storage,
there
is
a
building
code
requirement
of
PA
one
requiring
10
feet
from
the
watt
line.
We
did
take
that
into
consideration,
although
the
our
neighbor
that
rental
is
right
on
the
lot
line
with
gasoline
storage,
our
building
is
positioned,
10
feet
away
again.
It
doesn't
correct
his
existing
building
code
violation,
but
at
least
we
are
realizing.
AE
O
Like
a
motion
to
the
project
was
to
provide
first
providers
suspended
EPB.
A
diamond
good,
for
the
second
prize,
though,
is
to
address
the
developers
to
give
assurance
that,
on
the
document
that
there
will
be
acknowledgement
of
that,
you
have
a
neighbor,
that's
been
there
forever
and
right
into
words.
O
A
B
You
calling
boa
six
zero
five,
four
five,
five
one,
seven
thirty,
forty
seven,
forty
two
Dudley
straight.
This-
is
to
raise
the
existing
structures
of
lauding
erect
a
new
five-story
20
unit,
three
stores
with
36
a
take
out
the
violations,
article
65
section,
41
loss.
Three
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
41,
our
street
loading
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
16
raid
step
back
is
insufficient
article
65
section
16,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section,
16
height,
is
excessive
35
feet.
B
CO
CO
CO
Ma'am
here
before
you
today,
currently
there's
four
stores:
that's
existed.
This
this
project
has
been
in
the
works
for
most
two
years.
We
originally
has
fattie
with
30
units
in
three
stores
to
burn
through
various
different
community
process
and
article
80
small
project
review.
It
was
decided
that
we
should
take
off
two
floors.
It
makes
a
parking
in
the
back.
Therefore,
today
is
the
final
rendering
that
we
have
throughout
this
three
years
that
we've
been
working
with
the
community
in
the
city.
Now
it's
20
units
11
parking
space
and
3
stores.
A
CO
A
P
CP
We
have
not
taken
a
one's
position
in
opposition
to
the
project,
but
we
did
the
email
a
letter
yesterday,
I
have
a
copy
of
it
here,
expressing
a
list
of
concerns
and
those
concerns
also
echo
concerns
that
were
raised
by
the
ugly
Street
Neighborhood
initiative
and
and
submitted
during
the
PvdA
article
80
process.
In
the
comments
period.
CP
So
so
I'm
going
to
abbreviate
some
rather
than
read
them
all
out
in
detail,
so
the
first
of
the
concerns
was
while
appreciating
that
the
owner
is
proposing
to
keep
rents
at
a
reasonable
rate,
and
he
has
three
of
the
housing
housing
units
designated
as
affordable.
CP
We
would
like
additional
deep,
restricted
units
to
the
process
to
the
to
the
project.
We
want
to
concern
second,
second
issue.
We
want
to
concern
the
confirm
that
a
shadow
study
has
been
preformed,
especially
as
the
building
will
impact
the
homes
directly
behind
the
site.
It's
a
five-story
building
and
directly
behind
it
are
two-story
one
family
houses
and
building
is
directly
south
of
those
one
story
or
two-story
houses.
The
third
one
is
this
came
from
the
community.
CP
We
would
like
to
know
that
the
developer
has
reached
out
to
the
director
butters
in
those
small
houses
behind
the
building,
so
that
they
fully
understand
what
is
coming
and
our
concern.
This
is
one
of
the
major
ones
we're
concerned
about
our
parking
and
traffic,
where
there
are
insufficient
parking
spaces
on
the
street
around
the
building
and
we're
concerned
about
emergency
and
service
vehicles.
CP
If
they
should
come
because
Wendover
Street
is
a
one-lane
street
with
no
parking
on
it
at
all
and
because
Dudley
Street
is
often
so
for
traffic
and
most
important
we're
concerned
about
what
the
construction
management
plan
is,
so
that
we
know
where.
In
fact,
the
construction
vehicles
will
be
parked
because
we
don't
see
how
they
could
be
carful
in
Dover
Street,
since
there's
no
parking
there
at
all
and
on
Dudley
Street.
There
is
the
danger
of
double
parking
which
can
obstruct
the
flow
of
traffic,
especially
the
MBTA
buses,
1541,
and
that
can
be
a
nightmare.
CP
CP
A
CO
But,
prior
to
that,
we
had
two
separate
dsi
meeting,
which
the
gentleman
here
was
present.
Majority
of
the
changes
to
the
building
was
actually
authored
by
him,
such
as
coming
from
because
in
the
beginning,
since
we
are
so
close
to
the
tea
station,
we
had
a
we
had
said.
We
wanted
to
build
16
two
bedrooms
and
I
believe
for
one
bedroom,
because
it's
so
close
to
the
tea.
Then
they
suggested
that
we
should
change
the
three
bedrooms,
so
we
actually
changed
it
from
now.