►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 3-30-21
Description
The Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing held on 3-30-21
A
The
board
of
appeal,
the
city
of
boston,
zoning
board
of
appeal
for
march
30th
2021,
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
the
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
A
A
A
A
B
C
B
E
F
We
so
when
you
guys
gave
us
a
decision
before
we
changed
our
plans
to
go
back
12
feet
like
you
asked,
and
we
we
added
the
deck
just
like
798
c
has,
and
that
goes
back.
Another
seven
feet
the
deck
and
we
have
a
steer
and
that's
what
the
we're
asked
to
come
back
for
that,
because
the
original
plans,
our
deck,
was
only
three
feet
back
because
of
the
the
rear
setbacks
20
feet.
We
would
have
been
right
at
20
feet
with
the
with
just
the
stair
coming
out
the
back.
B
B
G
B
H
B
B
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
33,
section
56,
insufficient
parking
article,
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
additional
lot
area,
article
53,
section
9,
excessive
far
article
53
section,
9,
the
maximum
allowed
height
has
been
exceeded,
53
section
9,
the
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded
and
article
53
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
job
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
I
As
was
mentioned,
the
proposal
is
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
erect
a
new
four-story
residential
condominium.
Building
with
three
condominium
units
on
site.
The
particular
district
is
a
3f
2000
and
our
lot
size
is
2438
square
feet.
The
floor
plans
and
you
can
see
in
this
rendering
our
building
is
on
the
left.
The
newer
looking
building
next
to
the
tree,
the
floor
plans
are
three
units.
All
of
the
mechanicals
would
be
contained
in
each
unit
at
the
ground
level.
There
would
be
no
basement
on
this
building
so
at
ground
level.
I
Unit
one
is
a
accessible
unit.
It's
a
thousand.
Seventy
two
square
foot
two
bedroom
two
bath
unit
as
we
go
up
to
the
second
level,
that's
unit
two,
and
that
has
an
1144
square
foot,
two
bedroom
two
bath.
It
has
a
rear
deck
of
front
porch
and
egress
stairs
as
we
go
up
to
the
third
floor.
This
would
be
our
bi-level
duplex
unit.
I
I
can
go
over
the
zoning
violations
for
the
that
were
mentioned,
so
we
would
be
required
to
have
additional
lot
area.
It
would
be
an
additional
thousand
square
feet
and
we
have
438
square
feet.
Far
allowable
is
1.0.
We're
proposing
two
height
for
the
air.
Here
is
three
stories:
35
feet.
We're
proposing
four
stories
at
39
feet,
front
yard
would
be
required,
would
be
five
would
be
modal,
we're
at
two
and
a
half
side
yard.
I
A
I
A
C
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
linda
ramelli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
vote
for
opening
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
receives
strong
support
from
jeffrey's
point
neighborhood
association,
and
we
also
received
32
letters
of
support
from
aparris.
Thank
you.
L
E
A
C
C
B
M
C
B
You,
madam
chair,
mr
candela,
is
now
on.
Thank
you
call
your
next
case
calling
voa
115-5218-2222
wordsworth
street.
This
is
a
confirmed
auckland
as
a
two
family
extend
the
living
space
to
the
basement,
renovate
and
direct
a
half
story
edition
with
roof
deck,
the
violation
article
2017.
This
is
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure
restriction,
article
53,
section
9,
the
florida
air
ratio
is
accessible,
article
53,
section,
9
front
yard's
insufficient
and
article
53,
section,
9
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
N
N
We
are
proposing
to
maintain
this
as
a
two-family
dwelling
and
make
renovations
throughout
the
entire
building,
with
the
proposal
to
add
a
half-story
addition,
above
as
well
as
extend
the
living
space
into
the
lower
level,
which
would
be
a
pertinent
to
unit
one.
The
board
may
recall
this
was
before
the
board
recently.
As
a
proposed
three
family
dwelling,
there
was
opposition
to
the
proposal.
N
N
N
The
addition
that's
being
proposed
is
consistent
with
two
and
a
half
story,
dwellings
in
and
around
that
neighborhood
we
do
show
the
elevation
for
the
basement
level.
There
is
a
great
difference
between
wadsworth
street,
the
back
of
the
property,
the
clear
ceiling
height
in
the
basement
levels.
Eight
feet
six
inches,
as
shown
here
in
the
elevation
next
slide.
N
N
A
N
O
N
Through
the
chair,
my
understanding,
it's
building
code
compliant,
but
I
can
confirm
that
we're
not
looking
for
any
relief
on
that,
so
we
do
have
sufficient
room.
If
you
go
to
the
side
elevation
showing
the
showing
the
exposure
of
the
rear
portion
of
the
foundation,
there's
sufficient
room
to
comply,
I
believe
it's
is
it
40
or
42.
Inches
44
is
cool,
shows
the
side
elevation.
C
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
lena
tamely
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
committee
process.
The
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
three
aboriginal
needs
for
this
project
with
the
applicant
address
several
of
the
concerns
of
the
community
and
modify
the
proposal
based
on
their
feedback.
Thank
you.
P
A
A
B
Q
Q
A
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
lila
tramelli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
During
the
community
process,
there
were
no
consensus
expressed
by
diabetes,
and
this
proposal
received
strong
supreme
from
maverick
central
neighborhood
association
and
from
esports
on
main
streets.
Thank
you.
K
L
L
E
M
A
A
B
R
A
R
A
R
S
Oh
yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kim
crucioli
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
There
isn't
a
butters
meeting
held
on
january
28th,
where
a
support
was
shown
by
the
abutters
and
the
applicant
also
received
a
letter
of
support
from
the
east
berkeley,
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
H
E
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
116
1589
55-59
causeway
street.
This
is
to
erect
a
rooftop
digital
outdoor
advertising
device
on
the
roof
of
an
existing
two-story
commercial
structure.
The
digital
sign
would
be
25
feet
in
width
and
15
feet
in
height.
The
total
height
of
sign
will
be
from
46
feet
to
nine
and
a
half
feet
above
the
grade
of
causeway
street.
The
violations-
article
11
section
7
electronic
signs,
article
11,
section,
2,
premises,
signs
in
non-residential
districts,
article
11,
section,
66,
signed
subject
to
other
regulations,
billboards
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
N
Barney
madame
chair
members
of
the
board
richard
linz
on
behalf
of
media
vision,
incorporated
with
me,
is
jonathan
dominic.
Sarah
for
mediavision
also
with
me,
is
bob
messier
who's,
our
digital
outdoor
advertising
consultant
manager.
This
is
a
proposal
to
erect
an
outdoor
advertising
device,
digital
format
located
at
the
corner
of
lancaster
and
causeway
street.
This
is
located.
N
N
N
This
is
the
existing
commercial
structure
two-story.
The
billboard
will
be
proposed
on
top
of
that
building
there
on
the
corner.
It's
intended
to
be
directed
away
from
the
nearest
residential
area,
which
is
located
across
diagonally
across
on
the
other
side,
and
this
is
also
intended
to
be
in
full
compliance
with
the
regulations
set
forth
by
the
office
of
outdoor
advertising,
based
with
the
department
of
transportation
and
the
commonwealth
of
massachusetts.
N
With
respect
to
the
issues
that
typically
arise
relative
to
a
digital
format
board,
we
do
have
our
consultant,
who
has
done
the
analysis
with
respect
to
compliance
for
digital
regulations,
the
intent
here
or
at
least
the
requirements.
The
regulations
is
that
the
brightness
of
this
sign
is
strictly
regulated,
so
that
does
not
have
any
more
impact
on
the
ambient
light
that
is
in
and
around
the
area.
A
And
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions
because
we
know
we
know
about
all
the
state
and
the
city
rights,
but
can
you
please
tell
us
how
close
is
it
to
the
abutting
building,
because
that
building
today
might
be
commercial
or
office
or
some
kind
of
use
like
that?
But
it
could
very
well
become
residential,
so
kind
of
just
speak
to
us
what
the
view
would
be
from
any
of
those
windows
back
there.
N
So
by
the
design
of
this
structure,
madam
chair
includes
louvers,
which
would
prevent
any
of
the
light
that
is
emanated
from
the
board
from
affecting
any
of
those
windows
or
any
of
those
levels
that
are
located
that
building
directly
behind
it.
If
we
go
back
to
the
site
plan,
we
can
show
the
specific
distance
between
the
board
and
that
structure
right
there.
So
we
are
proposing
to
locate
this
closest
to
the
corner
of
the
building
at
lancaster
and
causeway.
N
N
N
A
No,
I
just
I
mean
what
what
I'm
thinking
is
that
you
know
the
the
positive
element
of
this
is
that
it's
essentially
a
commercial
district
offices.
You
know
well
things
like
that,
so
there
is,
you
know
very
little
traffic.
I
assume
in
the
at
two
in
the
morning.
Well,
maybe
three
in
the
morning
after
the
bars
close
or
whatever
it
is,
and
so
that's
why
I
was
wondering
if
there
was
any
off
time
proposed
on
this
billboard.
C
N
O
N
Through
the
chair,
my
experience
and
I'll,
let
mr
hampton
speak
to
this.
My
experiences
with
bpda
doesn't
necessarily
design
a
review
outdoor
advertising
devices.
There's
not
much.
We
can
do
by
way
of
the
structure
itself
but
happy
to
submit
to
that
with
respect
to
any
design,
questions
that
come
up.
O
My
understanding
is
that
electric
electronic
signs
are
not
permitted
in
a
city
other
than
by
a
conditional
use
granted
by
the
zoning
board
and
I'm.
I
know
that
I'm
familiar
with
electric
signs
being
used
in
the
theater
district
or
the
seaport,
district
or
lansdowne,
and
so
this
electronic
sign
would
need
to
be
reviewed
by
bpda.
C
N
No,
there
are.
There
are
residential
units,
mr
ehrlich,
that
are
further
up
causeway
street.
However,
they
are
votes,
they
are
outside
of
the
minimum
distance
based
upon
the
regulations
for
for
which
this
may
have
impact.
And
again
I
do
have
bob
messier
here
from
daktronics
who
can
speak
to
the,
I
guess,
the
relative
intensity
of
the
sign
and
then
its
proximity
to
residential
areas.
We've
done
all
the
measurements
and
calculations
to
ensure
that
the
impact
is
fractional
of
what
the
actual
regulations
permit.
N
Q
U
U
While
we
don't,
while
our
office
doesn't
believe
that
this
is
a
bad
location
for
a
board
to
become
a
billboard
to
be
put
up
due
to
the
proximity
of
residents
and
other
other
existing
structures,
we
do
believe
when
we
do.
Due
to
this,
we
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board
for
their
judgment
on
this
matter.
V
Bay
village,
neighborhood
association
neighbors,
have
called
attention
to
preserving
the
historic
nature
of
our
downtown
neighborhoods
concerned
about
distracted
driving
pedestrian
safety
that
this
electronic
billboard
will
bring
contrary
to
the
city's
vision,
theory
of
road
safety
initiative
and
other
quality
of
life
of
life
issues
like
light
pollution.
Thank
you.
W
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
samantha
bennett
and
speaking
today,
on
behalf
of
city
councilor,
michael
flaherty's
office,
our
office
has
heard
both
opposition
and
support
for
this
project.
However,
the
council
would
like
to
note
that
we
have
received
letters
of
support
for
the
billboard
from
residential
director
butters,
as
well
as
many
non-profits
in
the
area
such
as
the
west
end
house,
old,
west,
end
housing
corporation,
the
italian
american
museum
and
others.
This
product
will
bring
community
benefits,
such
as
guaranteed
advertising
space
that
these
nonprofits
would
otherwise
not
have
access
to.
W
L
Y
X
So
much
I
wanted
to
appear
today
strongly
in
opposition
to
this
to
hansi's
point
I
think.
As
many
members
of
the
board
know,
there
are
three
places
in
the
city
where
you
can
have
electronic
billboards
as
a
conditional
use
and
that's
the
process
which
generates
bpda,
licensure
and
kind
of
a
back
and
forth
process.
What
it
will
look
like
this
is
outside
of
that.
X
It's
a
forbidden
use
here
and
the
board
is
being
asked
to
give
a
hardship-
and
I
want
to
just
express
strongly
on
my
own
behalf
and
on
behalf
of
adco
and
many
downtown
neighborhood
associations,
that
we
really
feel
it's
incredibly
important
for
the
board
not
to
sort
of
set
a
precedent
of
granting
hardships
for
electronic
billboards,
when
the
only
hardship
we
can
see
is
the
opportunity
to
to
not
make
economic
I'm
very
concerned.
This
is
a
major
intersection.
It's
a
major
kind
of
vision,
zero
traffic
problem.
X
X
And
we
really
worry
about
about
sort
of
the
tax
on
people's
attention
whenever
they
step
out
into
the
public
realm.
So
from
both
the
vision,
zero
perspective
and
and
the
precedent
and
and
sort
of
the
issue
that,
frankly,
because
it's
a
variance
there
will
not
be
a
requirement
to
go
to
the
bpda
for
licensure.
I
would
strongly
strongly
ask
the
board
to
reject
this
application.
On
behalf.
Z
X
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jeff
hampton
bpda.
In
keeping
with
our
policy
the
bpda,
I
recommend
straight
denial
of
this
proposal.
Echoing
councillor
box
comments
about
any
sort
of
limitation
or
licensing
that
the
bpda
would
require
under
article
six
of
the
code
for
conditional
uses.
We
actually,
I
actually
testified
that
counselor
box
hearing
before
the
city
council,
and
we
had
also
mentioned
to
council
bach
and
councillor
flynn,
that
we
have
a
proposed
text
amendment
to
the
boston
zoning
code.
D
D
So
under
11
7
of
the
code,
it
would
be
design
review,
it's
limited
to
an
eight
year
time
period,
and
then
the
board
may
review
this
proposal
again
after
eight
years.
Make
sure
that
the
sign
is
in
compliance
but
the
hours
right
now
for
any
of
those
billboards
that
are
in
the
three
areas
where
there
are
conditional
use,
they're
limited
in
operations
between
7
a.m
and
2
a.m,
so
they
would
be
in
sleep
mode
or
shut
off
completely
after
two
in
between
2
a.m
and
7
a.m.
D
A
D
A
AA
AA
150
stanford
street,
it's
in
the
corner
of
causeway
and
and
lamazny
way.
Okay,
I'm
in
support
of
this
billboard.
We
feel
it's
an
appropriate
commercial
area.
There
are
electronic
billboards
at
the
boston
garden
that
provide
no
community
benefit
where
75
000
people
a
day,
see
these
billboards,
and
we
feel
that
the
proposal
by
media
vision
is
going
to
provide
significant
public
service
announcements
as
well
as
community
messaging.
AB
AB
E
AC
Madam
chair
and
madam
secretary,
my
name
is
linda
c.
My
address
is
210
south
street
in
chinatown
leather
district.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
very
quickly
that
this
is
the
same.
Applicant
who's
been
trying
to
put
a
billboard
in
front
of
my
building
at
42
b
street
in
chinatown
after
being
deferred
four
times
last
year,
in
the
face
of
strong
opposition
from
local
residence
community
leaders.
This
applicant
is
trying
to
put
that
bill
that
billboard
in
front
of
my
residential
building
and
clay,
and
here
they're
saying
that
it
won't
affect
them.
A
AD
Sure
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jay
walsh,
15
gilmore
terrorists
and
in
west
roxbury,
but
on
behalf
of
the
downtown
north
association,
we'd
like
to
be
reported
in
opposition
to
the
application.
Our
board,
which
represents
property
owners
and
businesses
in
the
area,
met
with
the
applicants,
and
we
voted
unanimously
to
oppose
it
and
just
to
touch
on
ms
thomas's
comments
about
the
level
of
planning
that
went
in.
AD
I
believe
that
when
the
hub
on
causeway
project
was
being
permitted,
electronic
signage
was
included
in
their
approvals
for
their
planned
development
area,
but
also
at
the
time
that
north
station
was
considered
as
possible.
Fourth
location
for
electronic
signages
to
be
allowed
by
by
wright
and
in
the
code.
But
I
think
it
was
contemplated
that
the
most
appropriate
location
for
that
would
be
the
havon
causeway
and
that's
why
it
was
determined
to
include
that
in
their
pda
and
not
included
as
one
of
the
areas
for
an
allowed
use.
H
B
AF
AF
AF
AG
S
Hi
yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kim
crucioli
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
and
a
butter's
meeting
was
held
on
february
11th,
where
no
opposition
was
shown
by
brothers
and
they
received
a
letter
of
support
from
the
butters.
Thank
you.
V
L
D
A
AF
O
B
AF
AF
AF
AF
A
A
No,
no
we're
not
we're
done
with
52
dwight.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everything
stays
clear,
that
we're
hearing
information
for
your
applicant
at
143
145
war.
Now,
okay,
miss
miss
better.
How
are
the
plans,
because
I
know
you're
missing
the
roof
roof
cap-
tell
us
about
what
you're
seeing
what
the.
O
AF
S
Hi,
yes,
good
morning,
madam
train
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kim
crucioli
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
and
a
brother's
meeting
was
held
on
february
11,
where
no
opposition
was
jumped
by
butters.
Thank
you.
V
L
AH
D
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
115,
6954
29
m
street,
this
will
install
a
new
roof
deck
and
spiral
steer
access
from
the
existing
rail
porch.
The
violation
of
article
68,
section,
29,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
the
route
structure,
restricted
district
access
to
the
deck
must
be
through
a
roof,
half
root,
hatch
only
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
T
A
A
AI
V
B
Follow
your
next
two
cases
calling
boa
one
one.
Two,
three,
two
five,
eight
one:
ten
button:
wood
street,
that's
a
companion
case,
boa
one
one,
six,
four,
four,
two
one
118
buttonwood
street:
this
is
for
110.
This
is
combined
110,
buttonwood
and
114
buttonwood
into
a
newly
created
single
lot
to
be
7
600
square
feet;
a
change
of
arc
from
a
three
family
dwelling
to
a
multi-family
dwelling.
Eight
units
construct
a
new
addition
to
an
existing
structure
and
roof
deck
proposed
nine
off-street
parking
and
two
additional
ancillary
parking
from
118
buttonwood
street.
B
The
violations,
article
65
section
8,
the
multi-family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden,
article
65,
section
9,
and
the
floyd
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
69
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section,
9,
on
the
bill
and
height,
is
excessive
and
deep.
Article
65
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section,
9
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
9
section
2
a
change
in
non-conforming
use.
B
AJ
Yes,
so
peter
van
gogh,
vancouver
studio,
architects,
407
dudley
street.
We
are
proposing
an
eight
unit
development
here
that
utilizes,
it's
actually
via
the
combination
of
two
lots
there,
one
of
which
is
currently
a
three
family
dwelling
and
another
single
family
dwelling
utilization
of
the
two
lots:
let's
quickly
jump
to.
A
AJ
Excellent,
thank
you
so
to
the
far
left
on
this
site
plan
is
110
buttonwood,
114,
buttonwood
they're
in
the
middle
there's,
a
single
family
dwelling
and
we're
combining
these
two
lots
into
one
and
118
buttonwood,
which
is
also
owned
by
my
clients,
is
also
utilized
in
this.
For
the
sake
of
parking
alone,
and
it's
all
connected.
AJ
A
AJ
This
is
a
good
diagram.
It
just
shows
leftmost
diagram.
The
white
building
in
the
middle
is
ours.
The
black
lines
and
outlines
are
basically
we're
intending
to
mirror
that
structure
to
the
far
left
in
that
image
is
an
existing,
larger
multi-family
building.
There
are
many
projects
in
this
district
that
would
qualify
as
being
mfrs.
A
AJ
AJ
AJ
Any
dwelling
space
actually
colette.
If
you
can
go
to
the
last
slide
in
this
deck,
it's
a
building
section
the
building
appears
on
the
outside
as
a
three-story
building
as
a
it's
common
in
this
district
and
specifically
the
larger
building
that
is
to
our
left.
That
is
a
walk-up,
so
you
basically
have
four
or
five
steps
to
get
up
to
the
first
floor.
AJ
AJ
AJ
Chair
that
is
going
to
be
exactly
10.
It's
going
to
be
10
feet
floor
to
floor,
so
it'll
probably
have
ceilings
that
are
eight
six
or
eight
eight.
You
will
certainly
be
met
with
adequate
light
and
air
required
by
code,
and
they
will
have
full
height
windows.
All
of
those
things
so
they're
very
regular.
A
B
Mr
vancouver,
could
you
hold
on
two
seconds
all
right?
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
mr
d'amico
was
hurt
on
this
one,
so
you're
talking
about
parking,
so
I
think
that
might
be
helpful
in
regards
to
110
buttonwood
street
should
have
at
least
six
bases,
eight
and
a
half
by
20.,
two
spaces,
10
and
11
should
be
removed,
and
all
spaces
should
be
on
the
angle
to
improve
access
and
egress.
That's
mr
d'amico
from
btd.
A
AJ
Yes,
118
bunnywood
currently
is
without
without
parking
the
a
formal
parking
in
the
rear
of
the
building.
There's
no
formalized
parking
associated
with
that
building.
There's
it's
paved,
but
there's
no
striping,
there's
really
not
anything.
That's
formal,
so
working
closely
with
the
neighborhood
and
you'll
see
a
support
letter,
of
course,
from
the
civic
association.
AJ
O
C
AJ
A
A
B
AK
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
patrick
fandell,
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
an
opposition
of
this
proposal.
This
did
go
through
a
full
community
process
with
a
butters
meeting
being
held
last
november
and
they
did
meet
with
and
so
received
the
support
from
the
mccormick
civic
association.
AK
There
were
just
some
outstanding
concerns
from
direct
abutters
who
reached
out
to
our
office
concerned
about
the
unit
count
and
overall
density
of
the
proposal,
the
basement
living
space,
any
just
existing
concerns
with
operations
with
current
tenants.
But
with
that,
if
the
board
does
approve
this
proposal,
we
would
just
ask
for
continued
bpda
design
review.
Thank
you.
C
B
104-4720-3326-3328
washington
street
this
is
direct.
A
multi-family
dwelling
43
units,
the
violations,
article
55
section
19,
a
multi-family
dwelling
use
to
bid
article
55
section
20,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
20,
the
bill
in
height
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
20,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
B
E
AL
Yes,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
43-unit
multi-family
residential
building.
If
folks
are
familiar
with
the
area
around
the
green
street
t-stop
in
jamaica
plain,
this
is
the
old
jp,
auto
glass
site.
There's
an
industrial
corridor
here
that
runs
between
amy
and
washington,
centered
on
the
the
t.
Stop
there,
it's
been
rapidly
converting
to
multi-family
residential.
AL
This
area
is
also
within
the
zone
studied
by
the
jp
rocks
planning
process.
That
plan
was
adopted
by
the
bpa
board.
It
was
not
enacted
into
zoning,
so
the
project
before
you
was
consistent
with
the
jp
rocks
guidelines,
but
we're
here
seeking
zone
relief
because
it
does
not
comply
with
the
old
local
industrial
stuff
district
zone.
A
AL
Sure
so
two
interesting
features
to
this
building.
On
the
one
hand,
it's
compliant
with
the
jp
rocks
size
massing,
use
an
affordable
housing
mix,
it's
over
20,
affordable
for
those
guidelines,
the
developers
primary
development
are
relatively
young
and
they
are
design
school
graduates
and
they've
tried
to
create
a
building.
That
looks
a
little
bit
different
than
the
standard
project
that
we
see
in
boston.
It's
got
a
step
to
tear
us
along
the
right
side.
As
you
face.
The
building
has
outdoor
spaces.
AL
That
was
always
part
of
the
proposal,
but
with
the
covet
pandemic,
the
idea
of
giving
people
the
ability
to
work
at
home
be
able
to
walk
out
to
outdoor
spaces,
and
maybe
units
took
on
even
more
appeal.
So
that's
part
of
the
design
has
been
enhanced.
The
project,
as
I
mentioned,
although
it
it's
been
blessed
through
the
jp
rocks
review
of
the
bpda,
it's
been
approved
by
the
bpda.
AL
A
AL
The
zoning,
because
this
is
a
local
industrial
subdistrict-
that
dates
from
several
decades
ago,
that
zone
contemplates
a
an
far
1.0
in
the
building
of
35
feet.
We
have
an
far
just
under
three
to
2.99.
We
have
a
building
height
of
60
feet.
We
also
don't
meet
the
fairly
restrictive,
open
space
for
dwelling
unit
guidelines.
The
rear
yard
is
a
little
smaller
than
what
is
allowed.
It's
just
under
seven
feet
rather
than
20
feet
and
again,
there's
no
parking
and
no
loading
here.
AL
A
A
AL
Sure
so
the
project
has
two
studio
units:
it
has
17
one-bedroom
units
and
because
of
community
feedback.
Looking
for
more
flexible
types
of
units,
it
has
12
one
bedroom
with
dens.
It
has
two
excuse
me:
it
has
12
2
bedroom
units,
and
that
is
the
breakdown
I
can
tell
you.
We
ended
up
with.
It
was
originally
designed
to
fit
with
the
the
dpda's
compact
living
guidelines
proposal,
but
we've
ended
up
making
the
unit
slightly
larger
than
that.
A
AN
AN
Is
so
if
you're
able
to
oh-
actually,
you
can
see
it
here,
so
the
site
slopes
about
half
a
story
from
the
from
one
end
to
the
other
of
the
street
facade
and
then
almost
a
full
story
from
front
to
back.
So
there
you
see
the
bike
room
entrance
to
the
right.
It's
going
to
be
about
a
4
foot,
graduated
ramp
down
to
a
semi-varied
basement
which
will
contain
the
bike
room
storage
for
the
residents
and
to
see
mechanical
uses.
AN
A
AN
Oh,
I
see
okay,
we
so
we
do.
We
don't
have
the
neighbor
in
this
plan,
but
so
you
see
that
the
facade
has
a
small
kink
in
it.
So
the
tightest
dimension
is
about
seven
feet
and
the
largest
is
over
11
feet.
So
it's
it's
actually
because
we
are
facing
washington
street
and
the
rest
of
the
neighbors
are
facing
glen
road.
AN
They're
not
underground,
so
there
is
a
grade
change
on
level,
one
where
the
lobby
is
slightly
lower
than
the
residential
units
and
that
will
meet
the
elevation
of
the
street,
the
rest
of
level.
One
will
be
built
several
feet
higher
so
that
the
level
one
units
have
windows
of
the
same
size
as
all
of
the
units
above
okay.
O
H
J
A
H
AO
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lindsay
santana
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
applicant
has
had
an
extensive
community
process.
They
had
their
public
meeting
on
october
26
2020
and
received
the
support
from
the
jamaica
plain
neighborhood
council.
So
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
justin
mccleary
from
city
council
matt
o'malley's
office.
The
council
would
also
like
to
go
on
record
support
and
note
that
at
the
project's
article
80
public
meeting,
they
received
very
strong
support
from
neighbors,
including
a
number
of
abutters
direct
butters.
L
E
AQ
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
six
voa
two
eight
ten
rockland
street.
This
is
a
two-story
building
with
four
residential
units,
six
parking
spaces
at
ground
level
and
the
building
would
protect
it.
The
violation
is
article
50,
section,
43
austrian
parking
requirements,
article
50
section
29
insufficient
lot
size,
article
50,
section,
29,
insufficient
lot
area
per
unit.
B
Article
50
section
29,
is
sufficient
a
lot
with
article
50
section,
29
insufficient
a
lot
of
article
15,
section
29
excessive
far:
article
50
section,
29,
insufficient
usable,
open
space
per
unit,
article
50,
section,
29,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
50,
section
29,
it's
fish
and
ray
yet
setback
article
50,
section
44.2
conforming
with
an
existing
building
alignment
and
article
50
section,
28
mfr,
is
forbidden
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
Yes,
10
rockman
street
is
currently
a
fire
damage,
2
family
on
the
corner
of
sherman
and
rocking
street,
we're
proposing
four
units
raising
the
existing
structure.
Four
units.
There
will
be
three
two
bedroom
units,
one
three
bedroom
unit,
six
parking
spots
as
the
property
slopes
down,
so
the
below
grade
will
be
the
parking
there'll,
be
a
lift
to
get
up
to
the
first
floor
and
the
building
will
be
two
stories.
AR
A
AR
AR
A
AS
Members
of
the
board
jason
gantt
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
project
has
went
through
complete
community
process
and
have
been
working
with
the
director
butters
to
alleviate
their
concerns,
and
we
urge
them
to
continue
to
do
so.
E
AP
AR
B
You
calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
115
6135
14
rocklin
street.
This
is
a
change
existing
two
family
operating
to
a
fourth
family
and
a
roof
deck
on
the
third
story
to
include
parking
in
the
rear.
The
violations,
article
10
section,
1
parking
located
less
than
5
feet
from
the
side
lot
line.
Article
50
section
28
uses
conditional
four
four
feet
into
three
f:
three
f:
four
f
in
a
three
f
district
article
50
section
43,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
B
AH
AH
Sure
so,
for
the
unit
information
for
unit
number,
one
that
would
be
a
lower
level
unit
with
a
walkout.
It's
on
the
downward
slope.
That
unit
consists
of
hundred
and
fifteen
square
feet.
That's
a
two
bedroom
with
one
bathroom
the
floor.
The
ceiling
height
is
eight
feet,
two
inches
the
floor.
The
seal
height
on
five
windows
is
36
inches.
One
of
the
windows
is
46
inches
the
floor
to
grade
height
is
4
feet.
7
inches
unit
2
would
be
on
the
first
floor.
That
unit
is
also
1250
15
square
feet.
The
ceiling
height
is
10.
AH
Feet
consists
of
two
bedrooms.
One
bathroom
unit
three
is
on
the
second
floor.
That's
also
twelve
hundred
and
fifteen
square
feet,
ten
feet.
High
ceilings,
two
bedrooms,
two
bathrooms
and
unit
four-
is
on
the
third
floor.
That
is
800
square
feet.
Nine
and
a
half
feet
is
the
ceiling
height
that
consists
of
one
bedroom
and
one
bathroom.
AH
A
AH
So
we're
proposing
three
parking
spaces.
The
two
parking
spaces
that
are
side
by
side
are
pretty
sufficient.
They
both
have
five
feet
from
the
sideline
lots.
The
third
parking
spot,
which
is
closest
to
the
house-
that
one
is
four
feet
away
from
the
property
line
and
it
requires
five
feet.
So
there
was
the
limitation
of
the
street
parking
area
and
also
the
maneuvering
area
from
that
one
particular
parking
spot
that
was
created
after
we
got
feedback
from
the
neighbors.
B
Sorry,
mr
d'amico
has
spoken
on
this.
Maybe
you
can
clarify
a
little
bit
for
you
in
regards
to
14
rocklin,
he
said
reduce
the
number
of
spaces
from
three
to
two.
He
said:
remove
the
parking
space
nearest
to
the
building,
reducing
the
number
of
spaces
at
rockland
street
to
two
spaces,
the
paint,
the
spaces
to
be
removed
and
one
to
tucked
into
the
corner
side
of
the
home.
A
O
AH
AH
C
O
O
AH
AS
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
for
this
project.
Json
get
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
They
have
completed
the
community
process
and
also
work
to
alleviate
some
of
the
concerns
of
the
direct
abutters,
but
we
urge
them
to
continue
meeting
with
the
mill
street
cooperative
incorporated
to
work
on
parking
issues.
M
B
You
along
the
next
case,
calling
boa
one
one:
three,
four,
seven,
five
one:
forty
five
magnolia
street.
This
is
a
change
of
archery
from
a
convent
boarding
house
with
twenty
person
daycare
center
32
children,
the
boarding
house,
49
percent
in
daycare
center
32
children
create
four
additional
boarding
rooms
on
the
first
floor,
work
to
include
selective
demo,
the
violations,
article
50
section
29,
additional
lawyers,
insufficient
article
50,
section,
29,
usable
open
spaces,
insufficient
and
article
9,
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
H
A
E
E
AM
AM
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
as
I
mentioned,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
project
hope,
which
provides
housing
and
related
services
to
the
low-income,
single
mothers
and
their
children
at
the
building
and
they've
been
operating
at
this
location
for
approximately
40
years,
just
a
little
bit
about
the
existing
building.
It's
located
in
the
3f
5000
district.
The
total
lot
area
is
16
297
square
feet.
Existing
building
is
approximately
thirteen
thousand
seven
hundred
square
feet
and
has
three
schools
three
stories
plus
a
basement.
AM
The
building
currently
uses
11
bedrooms,
and
these
bedrooms
are
used
to
house
anywhere
from
one
individual
to
one
mother
and
potentially
up
to
two
children.
This
building
has
existing
shared
common
facilities,
including
bathrooms
showers
and
common
areas,
on
the
second
and
third
floor,
as
well
as
a
kitchen,
dining
room,
living
room
and
other
common
areas.
On
the
first
floor,
there
are
also
office
spaces
in
relation
to
the
operation
of
the
shelter
and
a
few
storage
areas
and
open
common
areas.
Okay,.
A
Y
A
AM
AM
AM
AM
AU
AU
The
car
and
space
is
for
11
families,
they're
they're
mothers
and
children
as
we
expand
this
space
to
add
four
additional
rooms:
they'll
be
ada,
accessible,
they'll,
be
larger
spaces
and
can
actually
take
families
that
have
mothers
and
fathers,
and
that
are
that.
Are
that
have
mobility
issues,
and
these
are
these
are
real
needs
in
the
family,
shelter
system.
A
AU
AU
AS
AM
A
Y
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
116-0540-128
hamilton
street.
This
is
erected
four
unit,
new
construction
building,
the
violations,
article
65
section
41..
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
8.
The
four
unit
dwelling
units
have
been
used,
article
65
section
9
the
lot
size
to
erect
the
building
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
69,
the
height
requirement,
is
excessive.
Two
and
a
half
stories
of
the
max
article
65
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
B
AV
Hi
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
fellow
members,
my
name
is
anthony.
Baptiste
residence
is
191
franklin
street
in
quincy
want
to
say.
Thank
you.
In
regards
to
the
plan,
I'm
gonna
defer
to
my
architect.
His
name
is
eric
and
he
will
go
over
the
proposed
plans
and
if
you
guys
have
any
questions
you
can
ask
them
directly
in
regards
to
the
plans.
Thank
you.
A
AX
AW
The
the
ground
level
would
have
one
ada,
accessible,
barrier-free
unit,
that
you
see
in
front
of
you
there
and
then
four
parking
spaces
and
then
up
above
and-
and
I
mentioned
the
barrier-free,
because
that
was
a
request
of
the
neighborhood.
That
it'd
be
not
just
group
one
but
but
be
a
legitimately
accessible
unit.
And
then.
AW
AW
A
A
AW
AG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
desantos
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
project.
The
applicant
has
met
with
the
butters
and
neighborhood
associations
on
multiple
occasions
over
the
past
year
and
has
been
attentive
to
the
neighbors
suggestions.
Thank
you.
O
AA
B
K
A
A
AG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
denise
de
santos
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
project.
The
applicant
has
met
with
the
butters
and
neighborhood
associations.
Their
only
concern
was
parking,
which
has
been
an
issue
in
this
area
for
a
while.
No
thank
you.
A
A
AY
H
A
AA
A
B
B
G
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
what
we
have
today
is
my
sean
mcgann,
my
client,
the
owner
occupant
of
two
denver
street,
purchased
a
the
building,
which
is
a
two
illegal
two
family
and
it
was
fitted
out.
It
was
built
up
prior
to
him,
purchasing
it
as
a
three
family
and
he
is
which
he
discovered
upon
a
refinance
about
nine
months
ago.
So
he's
in
the
process
of
confirming
occupancy.
We
received
a
refusal
letter
and
he's
now
repealing
appealing
the
refusal
letter
to
correct
occupancy
from
a
two
family.
G
The
proposed
unit
is
on
the
third
floor,
which
is
owed
to
the
height
violation.
It's
a
two
and
a
half
story,
height
district
in
a
article
65
2f
sub
district
and
specifically
because
the
living
space
exceeds
more
than
50
percent
of
the
floor
area
below
that
is
the
height
violation.
It's
a
story
violation,
so.
G
AK
E
A
A
A
K
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
1140176
1732
river
street.
This
is
extension
of
residential
living
space
from
two
to
four
dwelling
units
and
from
from
two
existing
stores
to
one
store,
one
hair
salon
and
fully
renovate
the
violation.
Article
67
section,
eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit
four
is
forbidden,
use
article
67,
section
32.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
B
Article
67,
section
8,
the
hair
salon
and
residential
sub
district
is
the
forbidden
use
article
67,
section
9
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
to
the
dwelling
room.
Let's
face
the
front
lot
line,
article
67,
section,
section:
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
on
the
rare
yacht
is
insufficient.
Article
6769,
the
florida
air
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
67
section
9
the
laudery
are
traditional
units
is
insufficient.
B
No,
we've
already
approved
that
one.
Sorry
about
that.
I'm
sorry!
No!
We
didn't
I'm
sorry
so
river
street.
Sorry,
I
did
call
the
right
number,
but
I'm
going
to
do
it
all
over
again
case:
boa
1140176
1732
river
street.
This
is
on
a
vacant.
Land
erected,
three-story
four
unit,
residential
building
with
garage
and
front
and
rear
roof
decks.
The
violations-
article
69
section
29
without
street
parking
loading
requiring
each
space
to
propose
five.
B
The
violations
of
article
69
section,
eight,
the
four
family
use
is
forbidden:
article
69
section
the
conformity
of
the
existing
building
alignment,
article
69
69,
the
laud
area-
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
9.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
building
has
excessive
stories.
Article
69
section,
9
news
will
open
space
is
insufficient
article
69,
section
9
the
building
has
excessive
in
feet:
article
69,
section
9,
the
side
yard's
insufficient
and
article
69
section
9.
The
real
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BC
BC
BC
A
BC
BC
BC
A
BC
BC
We
initially,
mr
ehrlich,
our
head
houses
had
a
footprint
of
six
foot
by
12
foot
for
two
spiral:
stairs
coming
up
into
pure
circulation
in
the
center
of
the
roof.
They
were
visually
minimal.
However,
the
butter
in
the
rear
felt
that
they
could
still
see
the
roof
deck,
so
they
asked
us
to
expand
it
the
length
or
the
width
of
the
head
houses.
Sir.
BC
AZ
BC
C
A
AI
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
collins,
here
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
the
applicants
were
able
to
receive
support
from
the
buttocks.
We
have
no
further
concerns
at
this
time
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
B
Y
O
D
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
114-693-13936
washington
street,
this
is
extension
of
residential
living
space
and
two
to
four
family
dwelling
unit
and
existing
two
stores
to
one
store,
one
hair
salon
and
fully
renovate
the
violations.
Article
67
section,
eight
multi-family
drawing
unit
for
is
forbidden,
use
article
67,
section
32.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
67,
section
8,
a
hair
salon
and
a
residential
subdistrict.
It's
forbidden
news,
article
67
section
9,
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
joining.
B
E
AB
BD
BD
BD
Madam
chair
there's
currently
a
structure
which
is
on
the
plans
presented
for
you.
The
current
structure
consists
of
roughly
the
same
intended
footprint
with
two
commercial
spaces.
On
the
first
floor
of
note
is
that
this
building
fronts
on
both
washington
and
also
on
claxton
street,
so
the
front
half
as
we've
defined
it
on
washington
street
is
a
commercial
unit.
The
rear
hat
is
the
subject
salon
and
there
are
two
current
residential
units
that
are
situated
on
the
front
half
of
the
parcel
closest
to
washington
street.
BD
BE
BD
A
BD
BD
As
I
understand
it,
that
has
been
an
existing
use
since
2010,
we
do
have
a
bit
of
occupancy
from
2007
evidencing
acceptability
for
commercial
use
for
a
store
which
is
arguably
for
the
market
identified
on
the
plans
before
you.
So
to
answer
your
question:
to
reiterate,
the
harris
plan
is
an
existing
use
that
has
been
in
existing
use
since
2010
as
I
understand
it
and
the
intent
is
to
have
the
current
tenants
remain.
A
Okay
and
I'm
thinking
that
this
is
going
to
okay
and
these,
both
these
commercial
spaces
have
grates
on
them
and
okay.
How
are
the
plans?
Oh
so
so
I
this
is
the
one
I
was
curious
about.
We
talked
about
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
of
the
dwelling
unit
must
face
the
front
lot
line.
Tell
us
how
that
is
supposed
to
lay
out.
BD
Entrance
that
abuts
washington,
which
is
number
one
on
the
page
that
you
are
looking
at
it,
is
then
intended
that
units
2b
and
3b,
which
will
be
the
rear
units
off
of
washington
street,
will
have
a
main
entrance
that
front
on
claston
street.
So
we
have
frontage
on
two
streets.
So
technically
our
main
entrances
are
all
on
main
streets,
but
not
on
the
front
line,
as
it
has
been
defined
by
isd.
BD
A
AI
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
We
we
held
a
community
meeting
back
on
january
25th.
We
heard
no
concerns
from
the
community
and
I
believe
this
is
a
viable
project
for
the
neighborhood.
E
A
BD
A
A
No
because
you
know,
as
as
I
look
at
the
projects
we've
we've
approved
today,
we've
approved
two
bedrooms
at
1072
square
feet.
We've
approved
two
bedrooms
at
1250
square
feet,
and
so
this
is,
this
is
woefully
short,
two
bedrooms
at
900
square
feet,
and
so
you
know
we
just
want
to
be
honest
about
what
we're
talking
about
as
two
bedrooms,
a
two-bedroom
and
on
rocklin
street
at
12
15..
BD
A
D
I
understand-
and
you
know
I
don't
know
really
what
to
say.
This
was
one
of
those
cases,
madam
chair,
where
we
didn't
even
get
a
refusal
letter
from
isd
or
any
sort
of
plans.
So
this
is
my
first
time
seeing
this,
so
I
I'd
be
hesitant
to
answer
anything
in
terms
of
the
size
of
this
right
now
without
having
anything
from
the
city
to
base
any
judgment
on.
E
C
A
A
BF
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
sorry
one
one:
two:
five:
six:
five:
seven:
forty:
nine,
a
walk
hill
street
just
directed
three
unit
dwelling
with
three
off-street
parking
spaces,
the
violations,
article
55
section,
eight,
a
three
f
and
a
one
f
zone
use
is
forbidden.
Article
55,
section,
40.5
d,
parking,
spaces
sizes,
article
55,
section,
9,
block
width
is
insufficient.
Article
5569
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
B
BG
The
record
please
john
moran
alpine
advisory
services
with
the
mailing
address
of
130
beach
road
orleans
mass
good
afternoon.
What
we
are
proposing
is
to
erect
in
a
one
f,
4
000
zone
district,
a
three
unit
dwelling
which
we
would
suggest
complements
the
existing
neighborhood
fabric
in
the
immediate
area
consisting
of
three
and
two
unit
dwellings.
BG
So
the
issue,
if
I
may
first
describe
the
proposed
building,
which
would
have
no
habitation
in
the
basement,
the
units,
one
and
two-
would
be
two
beds,
two
baths
with
each
size
at
1186
square
feet.
The
third
unit
also
would
be
a
two
bed,
two
bath
with
1101
square
feet.
Again,
only
storage,
no
habitation
in
the
basement.
BG
BG
BG
We
are
proposing
three
parking
spaces
for
49
a
there
is
a
fourth
parking
space
which
straddles
the
property
lines
it's
shown.
If
we
can
go
back
down,
go
back
up
to
the
prior
map
here,
please
it.
It
shows
a
fourth
parking
space
which
straddles
the
property
lines
be
between
49
and
49a,
which
would
be
utilized
by
49.
BG
In
the
event,
there
was
a
separation
of
ownership.
Appropriate
easements
would
be
granted
by
49a
for
use
of
the
driveway
and
access
249a
across
249
across
49a
in
the
use
of
the
fourth
parking
space,
which
straddles
the
property
line
to
be
used
by
49,
to
maintain
three
parking
spaces
to
the
rear
of
49.
A
AO
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lucy
santana
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
on
november
19th
2020,
where
the
neighbors
were
supportive
of
this
proposal.
The
applicant
also
received
the
support
from
the
jamaica
plain
neighborhood
council,
so
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
B
B
This
is
a
change
of
oxygen
from
from
two
to
a
three
family
dwelling
violation:
article
67,
section,
32,
off-street
parking
is
insufficient
article
67,
section,
eight,
a
three
family.
This
has
been
used
in
the
true
f
5000
sub
district
article
67
section
9,
the
required
lot
for
three
family.
Existing
lot
is
six
hundred
twenty
two,
the
violate
violations,
article
67
section,
nine,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
AX
AX
At
that
point
I
had
a
contractor
who
said
he
could
turn
it
into
a
three
family
and
after
all
the
work
was
done.
He
said
you
need
to
get
zoning
all
this
stuff.
He
didn't
explain
that
to
me
in
the
beginning,
so
I
went
down
to
the
zoning
department
and
they
said
no,
it
won't
get
approved.
So
I
I
never
I've
been
trying
to
rent
it
for
the
last
10
years
as
a
two-floor
apartment
which
has
been
really
challenging
since
it's
bigger
than
my
home
home.
AX
AX
AX
AX
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
walk
you
through
how
someone
today
there's
no
change
to
anything
really
except
for
this
one
piece.
So
when
you
enter
the
home,
there's
two
doors
in
the
front
and
there's
a
walkway
up
here
on
the
first
drawing
that
goes
up
to
the
second
floor,
landing,
which
is
on
the
second
picture.
AX
A
A
AX
AX
A
A
O
V
O
Saw
in
your
section
that
you
had
seven
foot
six
and
I
just
needed
confirmation
of
that-
and
I
so
your
bedrooms
you
have
about
half
your
bedrooms
would
be-
will
fall
within
the
seven
foot.
Six.
If
the
section
is
accurate
and
then
the
other
half
is
less
than
seven
foot
six,
which
I
think
is
okay,
but
you
need
to
confirm
that
your
ceiling
height
is
indeed
seven
foot
six
for
three
family.
A
AX
A
AI
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
the
support
of
this
proposal
at
the
butters
meeting
tom
was
able
to
receive
a
plethora
of
support
from
director
butters.
He
also
presented
in
front
of
the
longfellow
area,
neighborhood
association,
ultimately
receiving
a
letter
of
non-opposition,
which
is
the
board's
highest
level
of
support
that
they
give
out
to
proposals.
AI
P
O
A
B
Following
your
next
case,
calling
boa
115,
3496
59
hillock
street,
if
you're
buying
two
parcels,
a
total
of
five
thousand
eight
hundred
and
twenty
square
feet
construct
a
two
family
dwelling
on
the
combined
lot
violations,
article
67,
section,
thirty
teeth:
thirty,
three:
the
front
modal
alignment
of
off
the
block
of
the
block
article
66
section
9,
a
lot
of
your
traditional
units,
insufficient
article
67,
section
9..
The
lot
area
for
additional
unit
is
insufficient.
B
E
BH
BH
Apparently,
ma'am
chairman,
what
we
are
looking
at
here
is
to
create
a
lot
by
combining
two
properties
that
are
presently
vacant
to
create
a
life
total
of
fifty
eight
hundred
and
twenty
square
feet.
On
that
we
are
looking
to
construct
a
two
family
dwelling.
The
units
themselves
will
be
identical
in
terms
of
their
size,
they'll
be
sixteen
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet.
Each
they'll
contain
three
bedrooms
and
two
and
a
half
bathrooms
on
the
upper
most
level.
They
have
the
half
story.
If
you
will,
there
will
also
be
a
roof.
A
Okay,
now
I'm
having
mr
forest
bug,
I'm
I'm
having
a
little
bit
of
a
conceptual
problem
with
this,
because
I
do
know
I
happen
to
know
the
property.
It's
not
that
far
down
the
street
from
me,
and
I
do
know
that
it's
a
steep
slope,
but
I
also
do
know
that
you
know
that
part
of
the
street
on
that
side
of
the
street
tends
to
be
one
family's
one
family.
So
I
just
don't
know
how
this
kind
of
fits
in,
especially
with
that
roof
deck
added.
BH
Well
again,
the
district
is
a
2f
5000
district,
so
the
use
is
appropriate
for
the
district
in
terms
of
its
actual
occupancy.
You
are
absolutely
correct
in
terms
of
topography.
It
does
slope
from
hillock
street
down
towards
the
rear
properties.
However,
the
house
itself
they
design
itself
looking
at
the
elevations
from
hillock
street,
it
would
not
be
observed,
as
it'd
actually
be
somewhat
more
demure
in
terms
of
its
overall
height
as
compared
to
the
abundant
properties.
O
BH
So
we
can
only
presume
that
isd
felt
that
with
the
change
in
topography
and
such
that
they
made
some
sort
of
presumption
that
that,
at
some
point
the
structure
would
be
at
a
height
over
based
upon
average
grade
around
the
structure
over
the
35
feet.
Again,
we're
not
looking
to
not
be
granted
relief
because
we're
not
sure
what
their
rationale
for
citing
that
was
also.
BH
BH
They're
accessed
directly
from
the
uppermost
portion
of
the
structure
through
the
bedroom
space
themselves.
So
each
unit,
I'm
sorry
each
I'm
sorry.
Each
unit
would
have
their
own
roof
deck
respectively
and
it'll
be
accessed
through
what
we
could
term
the
uppermost
bedroom.
That's
how
it
would
be
accessed
it's
not
by
way
of
a
hatch
or
by
a
head
house,
or
anything
like
that.
It's
simply
walking
out
onto
the
what
it
would
formalize
the
second
floor:
roof
a
flat
roof,
for
instance,.
AI
AI
E
A
A
O
A
C
N
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
116-039
dustin
street,
this
is
to
confirm,
as
an
existing
two
family
construct,
a
new
three-story
addition
with
decks
and
change
box
from
a
two-family
dwelling
to
a
three-family,
drawing
the
violations.
Article
10
section
1
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses
article
51,
section
8..
The
use
of
a
three-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
fourier
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
bill
in
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
B
BJ
BJ
BJ
M
BJ
BJ
It's
not
already
there
what
we're
trying,
what
we
tried
to
do
was
endeavor
to
make.
Even
though
we're
up
three
floors,
it's
not
two
and
a
half
story.
It's
really
a
three-story
building.
We
tried
to
make
it
look
like
it
was
two
and
a
half
story,
so
we're
building
the
third
floor
into
the
roof
as
much
as
we
can
with
dormers
and
trying
to
keep
the
character
of
the
existing
neighborhood.
The
existing
existing
street
is
a
mixture
of
ones,
twos
and
threes.
BJ
B
BJ
BE
BK
BL
L
A
O
O
A
A
B
Q
A
D
B
B
Okay,
two
seconds
here
for
the
record
calling
voa
there's
two
cases
case:
boa
one
one:
two,
one:
zero:
eight,
eight
thirty
one
wave
on
street
under
the
companion
case,
boa
one
one:
three:
five,
nine
four,
eight
thirty
three
wabon
street
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
stephen
suta,
thirty,
three
wave.
BM
BM
BM
H
B
Madam
chair,
I
know
that
bunker
hill,
229
231
bunker
hill,
but
mr
mahoney
is
withdrawing,
so
I'm
going
to
call
it
into
the
record.
I
know
mr
mahoney
was
on
early.
I
don't
know
if
he's
still
on
yep
hello,
yeah,
okay,
I'm
gonna
call
in
for
the
record
calling
case
by
one
zero,
four,
eight,
nine
one:
five
229
to
231
bunker
hill
street
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
B
A
H
A
BD
Yes,
man,
I'm
sure
sorry,
I
was
just
permitted
to
unmute
and
share
screen.
So
madam
chair
once
again,
kyle
smith
with
kds
fall.
This
is
address
359
newbury
street.
Thank
you
again
for
your
time
today
for
allowing
me
to
move
in
with
the
prospective
client
just
to.
I
think
correctly,
restate
your
position.
You're
looking
for
the
owner
to
either
select
to
reduce
the
number
of
overall
units
or
to
reduce
the
number
of
bedrooms
in
the
proposed
four
residential
units.
Correct.
A
A
A
B
B
The
violations,
article
29
section
four:
this
is
the
g
part
applicability
out
six
article
51
section,
8
artist
live
work.
Use
is
forbidden,
article
51,
section
9.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
9,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories
article
51
section
9,
the
building
has
accessibility.
B
AK
Z
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
stephen
davis.
I'm
a
co-president
with
the
davis
companies
we
are.
Our
address
is
125
high
street
boston,
mass
zero,
two
one
one
zero.
We
are
a
affiliate
of
the
petitioner
div
1515
commonwealth
llc
with
me
today
is
our
permanent
consultant,
paul
barrett,
as
well
as
ruthie
coleman
from
roadie
architects
and
our
attorney
rebecca
lee
from
vince
levin
over
to
whom
I'll
turn
over
the
presentation.
Now,
I'm
here
following
the
presentation
answer
any
questions.
BN
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
commission
we're
here,
as
you
can
see,
on
a
number
of
fronts,
for
variances
required
to
build
an
approximately
245
000
square
foot,
building
single
building
to
contain
253
rental
apartments
and
condominiums
in
an
mf1
district,
a
portion
of
the
site
along
the
commonwealth,
avenue
west
carriage
road
is
within
the
g
pod
and
the
variations
are
shown
on
this
chart.
If
we
could
leave
this
chart
up
there.
BN
Thank
you.
You
can
see
the
various
counts
on
which
we
are
looking
for
zoning
relief.
This
project
has
been
through
a
relatively
extensive
community
process
and
I
will
let
ruthie
kuhlman
from
roadie.
Architects
walk
you
through
the
project
design
and
we're
happy,
of
course,
to
answer
any
questions
of
the
board.
BO
Thank
you,
rebecca,
madame
cara
members
of
the
board,
ruthie
coleman
with
roadie
architects,
535
albany
street
colette.
If
you
can
scroll
to
the
next
slide,
we
have
our
overall
site
plan
and
the
site.
Design
concept
was
inspired
by
the
surrounding
developments
to
create
buildings
within
a
park
context
with
a
priority
of
providing
publicly
accessible
open
space.
BO
BO
So
for
the
rental
units
we
have
151
units
range
of
studios
to
two
beds.
I
can
give
you
the
camera.
Please
give
us
the
breakdown
sure.
So
we
have
49
studio
units
at
around
455
square
feet.
We
have
52
one
bed
units
at
650
square
feet.
We
have
15
one
bed
plus
units
at
860
square
feet,
31
two
beds
at
975
square
feet
and
four
two
bed
pluses
at
1150
square
feet.
BO
A
BO
BO
So
this
is
the
level
one
floor
plan
that
you
can
see
here
where
the
center
of
the
site
in
gray
is
above
grade,
whereas
we're
at
level
one
on
both
the
north
and
south
edges
of
the
site.
The
north
edge
drops
off
very
far
20
feet
down,
so
the
parking
access
is
at
one
of
the
points
where
the
site
connects
to
the
street
level
at
level
one.
So
you
can
see
it
with
the
condo
lobby
on
the
right
and
the
rental
lobby
on
the
left.
So
all
vehicular
access
comes
in.
BO
Through
this
entry
we
have
loading
bays
with
two
truck
spaces
for
the
rental
and
one
for
the
condo,
with
direct
connections
to
the
building
elevators,
all
concealed
immediately
within
the
entry,
and
then
we
have
all
the
resident
parking.
We
have
a
hundred
spaces
approximately
for
the
condominium
located
behind
the
condominium
lobby
and
then,
as
you
drive
up
the
parking
slopes
up
over
the
ledge
to
level
two,
where
we
have
approximately
60
spaces
for
the
rental
connected
directly
to
the
rental
lobby.
BO
Yes,
so
you
can
see
here
on
the
left
side
of
the
plan
surrounding
the
rental
lobby.
We
have
the
artist
live
units
running
along
the
edge
at
grade
at
level
one,
and
then
we
have
a
dedicated
artist
workspace,
which
is
connected
off
of
the
lobby,
which
will
have
space
for
the
eight
artist
units
to
each
have
their
own
open,
dedicated
workspace,
as
well
as
communal
sync
and
additional
ventilation
for
activities
that
need
to
be
enclosed.
Outside
of
the
artist's
open
workspace.
Z
Happy
to
do
so
so
there's
a
total
of
16
idp
across
both
components
of
this
project,
starting
first
just
with
the
apartments
we
have
17
on
site
for
25
total
units,
there's
a
range
of
amis,
starting
at
the
bottom,
at
50
percent,
ranging
up
to
120
and
then
on
the
condominium
side.
We
have
14
percent
on
site
for
14
condos
there,
those
are
split,
half
and
half
between
80
and
100
ami.
Z
A
BE
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
litecoin
record
supporters
proposal.
It's
gone
through
a
robust
community
process
overseen
by
the
bpa
they've,
also
worked
closely
with
numbers
in
the
agencies,
such
as
the
disabilities
commission.
Regarding
the
grain
change,
transportation,
department,
bpda
and
boston
housing
authority,
we
really
appreciate
their
commitment
to
increase
affordability,
to
bring
home
home
ownership
opportunities
to
the
brighton
area
as
well
as
publicly
accessible
open
spaces.
So
we
think
this
is
a
great
project
and
we
hope
you'll
consider
it.
Thank
you.
BK
Good
afternoon
this
is
maureen
mcrae
from
councillor
breeden's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
as
being
in
support
of
this
project.
We
appreciate
the
proponents
proposal
to
include
open
space
on
site
their
commitment
to
affordability,
both
on
and
off
site
and
their
inclusion
of
artist
studios
on
site.
Thank
you.
BL
L
AZ
Y
A
B
BP
A
AI
L
O
A
H
B
BB
A
AI
B
Call
your
next
two
cases.
I
think
it's,
mr
perez.
Here
we
go,
follow
the
next
two
cases
calling
boa
115
6028
119
the
poncett
avenue,
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
115,
6045
121
to
quonset
avenue.
This
is
for
119
this
erect
a
new
single
family
home
the
violations,
article
69
section
9
insufficient,
lock
with
article
69
section,
9,
insufficient
front
yard
setback,
article
69,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
job
setback,
article
69,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
B
This
is
for
121
the
ponzi
direct,
a
new
single
family,
home
violation,
article
10,
section,
1,
a
limitation
of
parking
area.
Article
69
section
9
is
fishing
lot
size.
Article
69,
section
9
insufficient,
lock
with
article
69
section,
9,
insufficient,
locked
frontage,
article
69
69,
excessive
far
article
69,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
habitable
stories
has
been
exceeded
in
article
69,
section,
9,
insufficient
front
yard.
Setback
model
may
now
just
fill
the
records.
B
AB
N
BQ
Yes,
okay,
I
some
reason
I
went
back
on
to
mute
for
some
reason
and
apologize.
Madam
chair,
as
I
had
indicated,
I
wanted
a
new
timothy,
fraser
eileen
rosa.
Is
the
person
who's
going
to
do
the
presentation
of
the
plans
and
the
owners
of
the
property
are
agupito
feliciano,
dot
two
and
their
consultant
doug
cardinale,
but
the
person's
presenting
today
were
mr
frazier
attorney
frazier
and
miss
rose.
A
BR
Yes,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
this
is
the
proposal
to
erect
the
two-family
home
on
a
two
combined
lots
back
in
2017.
This
was
one
combined
line
of
18
000
square
feet.
It
appears
that
it
was
a
permit,
was
issued
for
avid
subdivided.
So
this
proposal
actually
just
builds
a
new
single
family
home
on
utilizing
both
blocks.
BA
A
AI
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
joe
carpenter,
here
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
and
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
We
believe
that
the
direction
of
single-family
homes
is
going
to
be
good
for
the
neighborhood
throughout
the
community
process.
We
did
hear
concerns
about
the
tree
canopy
on
the
property,
so
we
just
asked
that
the
development
team
continue
to
work,
preserving
as
many
national
trees
as
possible.
Thank.
AI
BQ
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
116
3324
235
to
259
independence
drive.
This
is
a
change
of
auction
from
13
apartments
to
13
apartments,
with
real
estate
leasing
office
and
install
a
new
walkway
awning.
The
violations,
article
56
section
7
use
of
office
is
forbidden.
Article
56,
section
8.
The
front
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
BS
BS
So,
given
the
impacts
of
the
construction,
what
we
did
is
temporarily
convert
our
leasing
offices
at
300
independence
drive
into
additional
amenity
space
for
those
that
are
a
quiet
place
to
have
a
meeting
or
just
to
escape
some
of
the
construction
during
the
daytime
hours
and
in
order
to
maintain
some
leasing
offices
at
the
property
we'd
like
to
temporarily
convert
the
unit.
That's
immediately
across
independence
drive
based
into
the
harvard
vanguard
medical
office
into
leasing
offices
on
a
temporary
basis
eating
this
awning
sign
that
you
see
before
you.
BS
Correct
one
of
the
issues,
one
of
the
issues
that
we
have
related
to
visibility
is
it's
very
easy
to
miss,
and
so
for
those
folks
that
are
coming
to
visit
the
property.
They
often
miss
the
leasing
offices
and
have
a
hard
time
identifying.
The
awning
sign
is
intended
to
address
that
issue.
In
particular,.
O
H
BS
A
BS
BF
P
L
A
D
A
D
A
D
B
Times
following
the
next
two
cases,
calling
voa
101
9225
16
cottage
street,
there
is
companion
case
boa
101,
9227
18
con
street.
This
is
for
16..
This
is
to
add
a
rare
edition,
a
full
story
edition
and
a
roof
deck.
The
violations
article
2017-5.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
maximum
allowed
height,
has
been
exceeded.
Article
53
section
9
excessive
far,
article
53
section,
9,
a
sufficient
rare
yard
setback,
article
53,
section,
52,
restructure
restrictions.
B
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
an
address
of
11
vegan
street
with
me,
I'm
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
roberto
perez
of
16
cottage
street.
I
also
have
matt
eckel
from
my
office
as
co-counsel
on
the
project
and
arthur
chu,
who
is
the
architect
just
to
point
out.
The
description
of
the
project
has
changed,
and
ms
better
has
the
reflected
plans
or
should
have
the
reflected
plans
for
both
16
and
18
cottage.
I
There
are
existing
three
unit
buildings
and
they
will
remain
as
three
unit
buildings.
The
the
top
floor
units
as
they
exist
right
now
are
about
535
square
feet,
so
we're
proposing
to
add
about
470
square
feet
on
that
fourth
floor.
So
those
would
become
duplex
units
giving
a
little
bit
of
extra
room,
and
I
can
go
through
the
floor
plan.
Madame
sharon.
A
J
Members
of
the
board,
lena
tremeling,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
proposal
went
through
an
extensive
community
process.
When
the
applicant
addressed
many
of
the
concerns
of
the
abundance,
they
eliminated
the
roof
decks
the
head
houses,
the
their
stored
real
edition
and
shipped
back
there
for
proposed
first
story.
J
We
recognize
there
are
still
concern
regarding
the
height
of
the
building
and
the
design
of
the
building.
However,
after
all
the
modification
made
based
on
the
request
of
the
avarice,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
recordings
report
with
the
pda
design
review,
and
we
will
also
recommend
the
applicant
to
continue
working
with
your
parents.
Thank
you.
E
AT
A
E
BI
My
name
is
I'm
at
1883
webster
street,
I'm
in
opposition
to
this
project.
This
new
landscape
is
going
to
ruin
a
very,
very
beautiful
section
of
cottage
street.
It's
and
it's
just
another
trend
of
slapping
a
another
fourth
floor.
On
top
of
the
traditional
three
decker,
the
the
board
voted
against
the
jp
voted
against
the
proposal.
27
to
to
20.
Excuse
me
29
to
7
voted
against
it.
BI
BT
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
please
go
ahead
good
afternoon.
My
name.
Is
sharon
daly,
I'm
a
director
butter
at
117,
webster
street
I'd
like
to
go
on
the
record
saying
that
I
oppose
these
projects.
I
reviewed
the
revised
plans
and
although
they
no
longer
include
that
third
floor
rear
extension,
which
obstructed
our
view
of
boston,
harbor
and
skyline,
I
am
still
very
concerned
about
the
overall
building
height
and
the
revised
massing
they're
too
tall
and
out
of
scale
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
a
lower
cotted
street.
BT
I
submitted
a
letter
to
the
board,
which
should
be
in
your
file
and
there
is
a
attachment
showing
a
rendering
of
the
streetscape
and
how
out
of
scale
it.
The
building
will
be
with
the
surrounding
buildings
on
cottage
street
that
mr
stoya
mentioned.
So
if
you
would
like
to
look
at
that,
I
welcome
you
to
do
that.
BT
Although
you
know
this
revision,
you
know
addresses
one
of
our
concerns
as
direct
abutters.
It
does
nothing
to
address
the
many
concerns
of
the
community
and
I
also
submitted
a
petition
with
96
signatures,
opposing
the
plans
back
in
october
on
the
grounds
that
the
building
height
and
the
revisement
are
on
the
grounds
of
the
building
height
and
the
massing
are
too
tall
and
out
of
scale
with
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood.
BT
BA
BA
I
Yes,
thank
you
chair.
So
just
a
couple
of
points.
So
when
we
started
this
process,
we
actually
worked
directly
with
the
butters
two
of
which
just
spoke
to
redesign
this
project.
They
actually
were
part
of
the
design
team
we
put
that
together.
So
we
cut
back
that
third
floor.
That
was
their
issue.
All
this
fourth
floor
does
is
give
a
little
bit
of
extra
space
to
my
client
who
lives
on
that
third
floor.
I
A
B
B
I
I
As
was
mentioned,
we
are
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
at
30-36
battery
march,
also
known
as
153
milk
street
from
commercial
space,
which
includes
restaurant
and
retail
and
26
residential
units
to
commercial
space
and
26
executive
suites,
also
to
make
one
of
those
units
unit,
5a,
accessible,
just
point
of
reference.
This
is
located
within
a
commercial
district
government
center
zoning
district.
We
are
in
the
heart
of
the
financial
district
and
surrounded
by
commercial
uses.
All
around
us.
I
Currently,
these
units,
prior
to
us,
applying
had
been
used
for
a
shorter
term
stay
before
the
ordinance.
So
we
believe
it
is
fitting
for
this
area.
If
there
was
going
to
be
allowed
for
an
executive,
suite
type
use
to
have
it
in
this
type
of
an
area.
The
executive
suite,
I'm
sorry,
man,
I'm
sure
so.
A
I
So,
on
average,
it's
a
four
day
period,
the
majority.
So
almost
35
of
these
are
business
days.
So
for
traveling
folks
for
business,
but
in
many
cases
they
also
bring
their
families
and
what
these
suites
allow,
because
they
would
be
two
bedroom.
One
bedroom
and
a
few
studios
is
to
have
that
option
to
be
able
to
work.
Have
your
family
have
a
living
room
area,
a
kitchen
room
area
and
an
area
to
cook
your
own
food
as
well.
AE
I
Yes,
we
have
full-time
24-hour
concierge,
we
have
our
boston,
gm
greg
klein
and
his
staff
that
are
on
call.
We
also
have
security
patrol
noise
monitors
of
emergency
numbers
for
them
to
reach,
so
it
is
a
24-hour
inspiration.
Saunder
is
one
of
the
largest
hospitality
companies
in
the
world.
They
are
involved
in
eight
different
countries
and
through
both
states.
A
U
Y
BT
V
Office,
I
would
like
to
speak
in
a
position.
Yes,
please
go
ahead.
Members
of
the
boy
anna
calderon
from
councillor
flint's
office.
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
opposition
as
councillor
flynn
and
councillor
doug
fallon
joined
opposition
letter
with
the
board,
as
it
is
the
position.
This
proposal
sounds
contrary
to
the
spirit
of
the
short-term
rental
ordinance.
V
Consular
flip
voted
for
the
short-term
parental
ordinance
to
corporate
investors
and
known
owner
occupy
units
to
protect
our
housing
stock
and
from
the
impact
investors
unit
had
on
the
market.
Moreover,
with
witness
for
several
years,
the
quality
of
life
issues
that
ensure
due
to
the
fact
of
regulated
hotels
with
absentee
landlords,
trash
removals
parking
issues
loud
bodies.
V
L
A
AZ
A
AE
AE
A
We
just
need
to
figure
out
mr
ligourus
how
this
is
going
to
be
monitored,
because
some
things
that
are
even
more
obvious
than
no
more
than
two
people
in
a
room
or
something
is
just
it's
hard,
so
I
just
need
to
figure
out
because
both
city
councilors
were
in
opposition,
so
we
just
need
to
figure
out
if
this
is
enough.
Protection
for
the
community.
A
I
They
actually
have
a
ert
number
if
you're
approved
for
executive
suite
separate
from
the
short-term
number
for
a
short-term
rental,
so
we
would
apply
for
an
ert
number.
That
would
be
a
record.
I
could
also
come
back
to
the
board
if
that
would
please
the
board
to
see
like
in
a
year
if
that
would
make
sense
to
see
how
some
of
these
provisos
are
working.
I
know
the
board
has
done
that.
Madam
chair,
in
the
past,
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
the
board
might
want
to
entertain,
but.