►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 8-31-21 (Part 2 of 2)
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 8-31-21 (Part 2 of 2)
View Part 1 Here:
https://youtu.be/HYIAGIn8EAU
A
Peel
for
august
31st
is
back
in
session.
A
Please
may
I
ask
that
if
you
please
raise
your
hand
when
the
case
that
you're
interested
in
is
called
and
once
you've
put
your
comments
on
the
record,
please
unraise
your
hand,
so
that
we
know
that
we
do
not
need
to
call
on
you
as
we
proceed
with
this.
With
this
hearing
before
we
get
started.
Let
me
just
take
a
roll
call,
mr
fortune.
A
I'm
glad
thank
you.
Miss
dong
present
miss
well
I'm
here,
madam
chair,
so
I
thank
you
miss
walsh.
A
A
Excellent,
so
let's
get
started
with
the
11
o'clocks.
B
B
This
is
the
project,
consists
of
a
change
of
occupy
and
residential
addition
to
an
existing
building.
The
proposed
edition
additional,
approximately
23
630
square
feet
and
will
be
comprised
of
nine
residential
units.
The
first
floor
of
the
proposed
building
includes
a
three
level:
three
space:
nine
o'clock,
nine
car
garage
with
elevator
violation,
article
62,
section,
14,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
article
62,
section
29,
our
street
parking
design
and
maneuverability
article
62
section
29.
B
A
Okay
sullivan,
if
you
could
speak
up
a
little
bit.
A
E
Sure
we
are
proposing
a
nine
unit
residential
building
attached
to
one
thompson
square
in
charlestown.
There
will
also
be
one
retail
space
included
with
this.
I
think
so.
Nine
residents,
nine
residential
and
one
retail
building
it
is
attached
to
a
1876
building
at
one
thompson
square,
as
I
mentioned
before,.
E
It
is
a
part
infield
project
and
with
a
large,
you
know
addition
in
the
in
the
back
of
the
building.
E
So
the
the
the
initial
build
the
existing
building
is
office,
space
and
retail.
It
is
not
residential
so
and
I
don't
have
the
exact
numbers
of
how
many
units
are
on
each
floor.
It
varies
a
little
bit,
but
there's
probably
about
three
or
four
probably
about
three
or
four
small
offices
on
on
each
building
floors
and
the
upper
floors
have
just
like
one
or
two
large
offices.
E
Sure
yeah
I'm
going
to
actually
pass
the
square
footage.
On
the
I
mean,
I
think
the
average
square
footage
is
somewhere
around
1300
square
feet.
I
don't
have
that
figure
in
front
of
me.
E
We
are
actually
losing
two
parking
spots
with
this
building
and
we
are
adding
three.
So
it's
a
gain
of
one
parking
space.
E
Well,
on
the
on
the
first
floor,
we
have
retail
second,
third
and
fourth
units
we
have.
If
you
go
to
those
to
the
plans
there,
you
can
see
them,
they
slide
to
the
plan.
Page,
it
should
be
backwards
should
be
back.
E
Okay,
I
want
to
just
go
all
the
way
back
to
the
first
one
there
if
we
can
go
just
a
little
bit
there,
okay,
so
there
we
have
the
first
floor,
which
has
the
retail
and
and
then
we
have
this
little
plaza-
that
we're
attaching
outside
of
the
retail
area
that's
connected
directly
to
the
starbucks,
which
is
which
is
an
existing
tenant
in
the
existing
building
there
on
the
corner.
E
So
that's
what
we
have
on
the
first
floor.
If
you
go
to
this
and
then
we
have
parking,
we
have
what
we
originally
proposed:
nine
spaces
there,
but
we
are
proposing
now
proposing
three
which
I'll
get
to
in
a
minute.
E
This
is
the
second
and
third
floor
where
you
can
see
three
units
on
on
each
of
these
units
on
each
of
these
floors.
So
there's
three
residential
units
on
these
floors.
I
think
two,
two
or
three
bedrooms
on
each
of
these.
E
Right
until
we
get
to
the
fourth
floor,
and
then
we
have
some
community
space,
we
have
some
outdoor
community
space
there,
as
well
as
some
communal.
I
was
showing
a
fitness
room
there,
but
if
you,
if
you
look
at
those
tables
there
in
the
lower
left
there
that's
the
inside,
but
then
if
you
go
you're
actually
on
an
outside
plaza
on
the
on
the
lower
left,
there.
A
G
A
In
the
meantime,
let
me
ask
mr
kandel:
how
are
the
plants.
E
G
H
H
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
from
the
board.
E
Sure
so
what
we're
the
you
know?
This
is
an
infill
housing,
so
we're
proposing
you
know.
A
big
part
of
this
is
replacing
where
a
building
was
originally
years
ago
before
it
was
torn
down
and
were
basically
replaced
in
infill
housing.
In
that
respect,
the
only
open
area-
and
that
is
the
plaza
out
front,
which
is
the
space
between
one
thompson
square
and.
E
The
adjacent
building,
so
when
you
come
out
of
the
new
addition,
you're
walking
into
a
plaza
there
will
yes.
A
How
big
is
that
space,
so
we
get
a
sense
of
what
a
plaza
means,
because
then
I
think
you
can
then
respond
to
miss
benata's
question.
E
Yeah,
it's
525
square
feet,
okay,
that
space
between
there
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
you,
if
you
go
back,
you
have,
we
have
the
rendering
on
the
front
page
of
this,
the
middle
it
might
give
a
good
good
indication
of
what's
going
there.
I
just
want
to
see
if
we
have
that
on
that
on
that
front,
it
may
not
be
part
of
this
presentation.
E
We
did
present
it
to
the
bpda
and
we
had
you
know
for
rendering,
showing
the
showing
the
outdoor
space
this
this
drawing,
which
was
our
initial,
the
middle,
which
is
what
we
submitted,
is
what
we're
showing
here,
and
it
doesn't
show
that
that
space
in
any
detail.
If
you
go
to
the
first
floor,
you'll
see
it.
E
The
first
floor
plan
right
right
here,
yeah.
So
if
you
scroll
down
to
the
lower
left
there,
you
zoom
in
there
a
little
bit
up
a
bit.
A
E
E
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
bring
up
the
level
of
that
outdoor
plaza.
If
you
will
actually
create
a
plaza
right
now,
it's
just
a
little
outdoor
space,
and
so
you
have
those
two
doors
that
go
into
the
starbucks.
You
come
out
what
you're
looking
on
those
l-shaped
things
are
planter
boxes
in
which
they
would
have
plants
and
flowers
growing
in
there,
and
then
you
would
have
the
room,
for
you
know
three
or
four
tables
with
umbrellas
in
in
that
outdoor
space
and
then.
A
I
think
what
we
need
to
understand
is
how
this
meets
the
needs
of
the
residents
versus
the
needs
of
starbucks
people,
because
you
know
is
there
to
miss
monado's
point:
you
know:
is
there
a
shade
tree?
Is
there
something
else
that
that
that
will
be
an
amenity
to
this
addition.
E
Yeah,
okay!
Well,
that's
a
great
point-
and
I
guess
at
this
point
I
should
add
our
discussions
with
mbta
and
we
which
we
discussed
moving
the
bus
stop
to
in
front
of
this
building,
widening
the
sidewalk
out
front,
which
is
only
about
four
or
five
feet
right
now:
whiting,
that
out
significantly,
and
that
goes
in
front
of
the
existing
building
and
the
new
building.
All
that
is,
you
know,
has
been
part
of
the
discussions
we've
had
with
mbta
so
that
we
can
move
the
bus
stop
to
this
location.
E
So,
yes,
the
immediate,
that's
the
area!
That's
part
of
you
know
the
property
that's
owned
by
by
the
developer.
Is
this
plaza
out
here,
but
outside
of
that?
Just
to
the
bottom
of
your
page
right
here,
you're
going
to
have
you
know
an
8
to
10
foot
sidewalk
that
also
serves
as
a
bus
stop.
E
There
is
an
existing
tree
to
the
left
which
we're
going
to
keep
and
we're
going
to
be
adding
plants
here.
So
this
is
an
open
public
closet,
it's
not
starbucks
territory,
obviously
there's
both
of
the
buildings
and,
if
you're
anybody's
familiar
with
the
area.
You'll
know
this
is
already
a,
I
don't
say,
a
public
hangout,
but
a
place
where
a
lot
of
people
gather
in
in
the
area.
A
B
Is
one
to
two
thompson
street
all
the
nice
space
proposed
are
too
small.
The
elevator
should
be
able
to
accommodate
vehicles,
eight
and
a
half
by
twenty.
J
That's
right,
I'm
sure
yeah
yeah,
I
was
gonna,
say
if
I
may
interject
this
is
rich
lemanski.
I
am
a
managing
director
at
thompson,
square
partners,
the
building
owner
and
the
proposer
of
the
of
the
project.
I
just
want
to
make
a
point
that
the
initial
application
showed
a
request
to
put
an
indoor
nine
spot
parking
structure
which
would
have
a
hydraulic
lift
as
a
component
of
it.
J
The
managing
partner
of
thompson
square
intends
to
occupy
the
top
floor
of
this
building
personally
and
that
garage
space
will
be
used
most
likely
for
his
personal
vehicle
and
for
access
to
have
trash
removal
and
and
things
of
that
sort
to
service
the
rest
of
the
occupants
in
the
building
exclusively.
Madam.
K
A
Mr
lemanski,
since
I
have
you
on
the
line,
you
are
asking
variances
of
us
to
build
something
above
and
beyond
what
you
would
be
allowed
to
provide
as
a
fright
and
I'm
sure
that
you
know,
you
know
that
the
income
from
this
proposal
will
will
be
will
be
good.
A
So
my
question
to
you
is:
why
have
you
reduced
the
spaces
because,
ultimately,
the
problem
becomes
is
that
we
understand,
of
course,
that
one,
maybe
two
of
the
spaces
will
be
used
by
the
owner
of
top
unit.
So
that
means
that
leaves
one
space
available
for
the
other
eight
units,
and
we
know
that
without
this
adequate
parking,
ultimately
with
these
incremental
relief
that
people
are
requesting
and
that
their
expectation
is
that
this
board
grants
that,
in
fact,
the
neighborhood
in
the
long
run
suffers
because
people
are
constantly
jocking
for
spaces
and
having
issues.
A
So
can
you
explain
to
me
again
why,
beyond
the
cost
proposal,
cost
benefit
analysis?
Why
there
isn't
enough
parking
being
provided
when
this
is
a
new
addition.
J
Yes,
madam
chair
I'd,
be
happy
to.
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
the
building
owns
and
maintains
a
parking
lot
behind
it
that
is
private
to
our
tenants
and
our
proposed
owners
inside
of
this
new
building.
So,
as
jerry
mentioned
earlier,
we
have
laid
out
the
building
to
have
absolute
minimal
effect
on
the
existing
parking
lot.
A
And
so
I
think
the
next
question
is:
what
happens
when
that
parking
lot
is
it
becomes
a
development
site.
A
Okay,
good,
okay,
thank
you
is
anybody
here
to
speak,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
L
L
M
You
you
have
a
raised
hand.
A
couple
raised:
hands
start
with
you,
mark
you've
been
anita.
Can
you
stitch
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please
mark.
N
Hi,
my
name
is
mark
swabar
and
I
live
at
14
quarter
street
in
charlestown
as
a
direct,
a
butter
to
the
property,
I'm
concerned
with
the
height
of
the
addition,
especially
at
the
rear
of
the
property,
the
the
property
we're
talking
about
and
the
neighboring
are
zoned
for
35
feet
and
the
developer
seeks
not
just
to
exceed
that
height,
but
to
nearly
double
it
at.
I
believe
it's
67
or
68
feet,
which
seems
a
bit
excessive.
N
M
Thank
you,
emily
you've
been
unmuted.
Can
you
say
to
me,
you
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
O
O
There
are
a
lot
of
young
families
and
really
concerned
that
potential.
For
you
know,
eight
to
16
new
cars
in
the
neighborhood
would
significantly
impact
parking
already.
M
P
Thank
you,
amanda
zettle,
41
monument
avenue,
I'm
the
president
of
the
charlestown
preservation
society,
I'm
speaking
in
opposition
of
the
variances
sought
for
this
building.
It
is
charlestown's
only
landmark
building
the
charlestown
savings
bank.
First,
the
building
zone
use,
is
neighborhood
shopping
as
a
result
of
urban
renewal
in
charlestown.
P
P
The
process
so
far
has
shown
that
residents
of
charlestown
regard
this
area
as
historic
and
that
it
should
not
be
changed
significantly.
Also
that
the
neighborhood
needs
family,
sized
housing.
Three
and
four
bedroom
units.
A
Thank
you,
sorry.
So
the
next
person
please
give
us
new
information.
M
Hopefully,
oh,
could
you
have
a
caller
call,
it
21
you've
been
unmuted,
that's
617-620,
can
you
state
your
name
and
add
it
to
the
record?
Please.
Q
Good
morning
my
name
is
richard
mezo
and
I
am
the
butter,
the
closest
of
butter
to
the
project
at
2
dexter
row
in
charlestown,
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
parking
I
think
it's
very
inadequate
at
the
present
time,
given
the
fact
of
all
of
the
retail
offices
in
the
one
thompson
square
as
well
as
the
starbucks
and
I'm.
Q
I
think
this
can
only
add
additional
problems
with
respect
to
parking.
I
am
concerned
about
the
damage
to
my
building
during
construction.
It's
going
to
be
like
a
foot
or
so
away
from
two
depths
in
a
row.
I'm
concerned
about
the
disruption
to
my
tenants
and
possibly
they
might
have
to
leave
as
a
result
of
all
of
the
ongoing
construction
that
I
anticipate
this
project
going
on,
and
I
believe
that,
as
a
the
closest
the
butter,
I've
had
very
little
contact
with
the
developer
of
this
project.
Q
A
Okay,
and
did
I
notice
something
in
chat.
A
Okay,
so
this
was
from
amanda
settle.
Everybody
can
read
that,
because
it's
out
to
everybody
can
we
just
have
that
in
the
record.
So,
given
all
that
information
is,
do
you
have
any
rebuttal
comments
to
make.
E
I
think
I
think
I
can
rich
just
to
respond
to
some
of
those
some
of
those
issues,
because,
first
of
all,
there
are
five
items
here
and
we're
actually
trying
to
withdraw
three
of
the
variance
requests
and
and
only
deal
with
two
of
them,
the
the
to
deal
with
the
parking
issue
in
the
back.
You
know,
there's
a
pretty
good
sized
parking
lot
which
is
allocated
to
office
space.
Now
you
know
as
a
the
architect,
but
also
a
tenant
of
this
building.
E
E
Okay,
I'm
just
saying
is
that
I
don't
think
that
there's
going
to
be
an
increase
in
the
number
of
parking
sp
in
the
area,
because
the
people
parking
there
need
to
park
there
all
day
and
they
can't
park
in
charlestown
all
day.
So
there's
going
to
be
other
if
some
of
these
parking
spots
go
to
residential
they're,
going
to
end
up
having
to
find
other
means
to
get
to
work.
That's
that's
what
I'm
getting
at
there.
Okay.
E
E
A
So
board
members,
given
the
information
on
the
project,
given
the
voice
of
the
abutters,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
B
B
Follow
your
next
two
cases
calling
doa
one
two
one,
one:
nine
one:
seven,
sixty
nine
montgomery
street
there's
a
companion
case,
the
building
code
boa
one
two
one:
two:
one:
zero:
zero,
sixty
nine
montgomery
street.
This
is
a
change
of
auction
from
2f
to
2
family,
to
a
5,
larger
283
family
violations.
Article
64.94,
townhouse
rojo,
extension
balcony
edition
article
32,
section
32-44.
B
This
is
groundwater
conservation,
overlay,
district,
article
64,
section
34.,
the
proposed
roof
deck
structure,
regulations,
article
6469,
usable,
open
space,
is
insufficient
for
building
code.
It's
a
ninth
edition,
780
cmr
1011
stairways
1011.11.12.2
roof
access
through
a
penthouse,
9th
edition,
780
cmr
1021,
egress
balconies,
the
fire
escape
down
to
the
garage
roof
is
eliminated
instead
of
ladder
is
proposed,
name
and
address
for
the.
F
A
Let's
go
in
the
let's
go
to
the
building
code
relief
and
my
question
to
you:
are
you
still
requesting
that.
K
A
Okay,
so,
mr
candel,
I
know
that
that
we
in
in
certain
districts,
have
been
approving
access
through.
Oh,
this
is
through
a
penthouse
okay,
you
know
what
I'd
want
to
do
is
mr
candel,
are
you?
Are
you
comfortable
with
this
building
code
issue,
or
should
we
postpone
this
case
to
a
date
when
we
have
the
architects
on
board.
A
F
Madam
chair,
if
I
maybe
heard
this
is
a
proposal
for
a
hatch
which
the
board
customarily
approves,
it
is
a
compliant
alternative
under
the
code.
Okay,.
A
So
yes,
because
the
this
doesn't
actually
tell
us
that
there's
a
hatch
in
here-
that's
just
all
awkward,
because
it
doesn't
tell
us
it's
it's.
It's
access
through
a
hatch.
A
Case
I
know
that,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
the
text
does
not
refer
to
a
hatch
okay.
So,
given
the
fact
that
the
applicant
has
presented
the
fact
that
this
is
through
a
hatch-
and
we
have
been
approving
these,
may
I
have
a
motion
for
approval.
S
This
is
tom,
I
believe
the
building
code
violation
is
also
for
a
redesign
of
the
fire
escapes.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
let's
go
back
then
to
our
motion
for
deferral.
B
B
113-1584-362-364
west
broadway
this
is
to
install
a
new
roof
deck
in
the
rear
of
the
fourth
floor.
Existing
roof
exclusive
used
for
unit
6.,
the
violation
of
article
9,
section
1
reconstructs,
an
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
68,
section
29,
the
roof
structure
restriction,
article
68,
section,
8,
dimensional
regulations,
insufficient
side,
job
setback,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
T
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I
come
before
you
to
see
relief
for
a
back
deck
here
on
the
top
of
the
fourth
floor
of
this
new
construction.
Let
me
just
start
by
saying
that
this
project
was
before
the
board
back
in
june
21st
2016..
T
This
is
a
new
construction
six
unit
building.
At
that
time
there
was
no
mention
in
the
decision
of
this
deck,
nor
were
there
any
provisos
listed
other
than
a
bra
design
review.
T
So
I
just
want
to
start
with
that.
Andre
would
like
has
purchased
and
does
live
at
this
address.
He
has
a
bi-level
unit,
so
his
unit
is
both
on
the
fourth
and
fifth,
which
faces
broadway
the
building
steps
down
on
the
back
facing
athens
street.
So
the
front
cover
you
see
the
actual
deck
itself.
T
T
A
No
I'm
just
trying,
I
mean
that's
okay,
so,
let's
just
see
and
it
talks
about
a
canopy-
it's
not
just
for
it's,
not
an
attached.
Canopy.
A
Okay,
cool,
okay,
and
is
it
visible
from
the
street.
T
U
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board,
haley
dillon,
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services
like
to
american
opposition
of
this
project,
based
on
the
opposing
director,
butters
and
the
civic
association
in
opposition
as
well.
It's
our
understanding
that
during
the
community
process
for
this
build
that
no
roof
deck
was
discussed.
I
know
they
mentioned.
There
was
no
proviso,
but
that
is
our
understanding
from
the
civic
association,
as
well
as
the
director
letters
who
are
part
of
this
process.
Thank
you.
B
M
W
Oh
hi,
my
name
is
andrea
nochenko.
I
live
at
362
west.
F
X
A
U
Madam
chair
anna
from
council
flynn's
office,
just
called
she
got,
kicked
off
webex
but
she's
on.
So
you
just
want
to
know
if
she
could
speak
again.
M
Y
Good
afternoon
they
share
members
of
the
war.
Thank
you.
I
just
had
some
difficulties
and
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
record
in
a
position
based
on
feedback
from
neighbors
and
buyers
doing
a
number
of
meetings
throughout
I'm.
So
sorry,
I
was
reading
the
wrong
the
wrong
one,
but
they
share
members
of
the
guarana
cathedral
from
councillor
fling's
office.
The
council
would
like
to
go
and
record
an
opposition
based
on
feedback
from
abortions
in
the
same
basin's,
lower
end
neighborhood
association,
who
opposed
to
that
rook
as
well.
Y
Neighbors
have
concerns
about
the
potential
issues.
Another
group
that
will
bring
in
terms
of
the
already
existing
love,
noise
and
quality
of
life
issues
that
many
neighbors
are
experiencing
in
the
neighborhood.
That
was
accelerated
with
the
pandemic
in
the
form
of
bodies
and
trash
removal.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
Z
Z
As
I
understand
it,
I
actually
was
involved
when
the
original
building
was
built
and,
unfortunately,
several
of
the
owners,
I
don't
believe
brian
anton
who's,
also
the
owner
on
the
top
floor
at
the
building
next
door.
Both
of
those
would
overlook
this
area
and
this
deck
at
the
time
that
the
building
was
built.
It
was
promised
actually
in
three
three
different
times
in
three
different
places
that
no
roof
decks
would
be
built
on
that
building.
Z
A
Z
There
would
still
be
a
concern,
there's
actually
a
huge
picture
window
in
the
unit,
the
units,
seven
that
I
represent,
that
actually
directly
overlooks
where
this
deck
area
is
so
the
concern
and
that's
to
the
living
space
for
the
unit.
There's
also
two
additional
windows
in
that
hallway,
which
are
next
to
the
bedrooms,
which
also
have
reluctant.
A
So
I
get
it
okay.
Thank
you.
Let's
see
miss
ambassador
anybody
else.
Let's
keep
it
short,
give
us
new
information.
If
you
have
any
comments,
please
don't
believe
I
have
additional.
M
Right
now
sorry,
barbara
you've
been
admitted.
Are
you
here
to
give?
I
thought
she
just
needed
herself.
Sorry,
oh,
go.
A
Ahead,
where
else
that
no,
I
think
amanda,
were
you
here
for
the
project
in
charlestown?
Yes,
I
think
she
was.
A
A
B
B
G
We
believe
the
eastman
is
likely
extinguished
or
no
longer
in
effect,
but
we
want
to
obviously
address
that
in
our
plans
before
we
proceed
with
the
hearing
so
requesting
a
brief
deferral
on
this.
B
We
have
the
last
date
of
we
can
get
you
in
on
september
28th.
I
believe
double
check
that.
G
B
AB
A
A
Please
kind
of
figure
out
how
to
make
sure
that
you
get
on
the
agenda
once
everything
is
sorted
out.
Okay,
so
here's
yes-
and
this
is
to
anybody
out
there
who's
watching
so
there's
a
motion
was
there
did.
B
This
is
erected
a
new
three-story
apartment
building
with
four
units,
including
options
for
oscar
parking
and
extend
an
existing
curb
car
on
a
vacant
lot.
The
violation,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
parking
areas,
article
60,
section,
40,
off-street
parking
loading,
article,
60,
section,
9,
insufficient
lot
side,
article
60,
section,
9
and
sufficient
additional
lot
area.
B
M
I
don't
see
that
name
on
yeah,
okay,
okay,
you've
been
a
muted
daniel
go
ahead.
Thank.
AC
You
daniel
mcdevitt
attorney
to
granite
avenue
in
milton
and
peter
bryson,
is
the
owner
of
the
property
at
28
wildwood,
and
he
is
also
on
what
we're
proposing
here
is
to
take.
This
is
a
vacant
lot
of
land.
A
Mr
mcdevitt,
we
know
the
history
of
these
dnd
parcels.
Can
you
go
right
to
the
proposal
and
write
to
the
zoning
and
the
violations.
AC
Certainly
so
the
proposal
was
to
construct
a
three-story
four-unit
building
taking
the
first
floor
and
splitting
it
into
a
two-bedroom
unit
of
741
square
feet
and
a
one-bedroom
unit
of
548
square
feet,
the
second
and
third
floor
being
three
bedroom
units
each
of
1288
square
feet.
This
is
a
corner
lot!
It's
on!
It's
on
the
corner
of
hildreth
street.
AC
It's
peter
also
owns
the
house
next
door
to
it,
which
is
30
wildwood,
where
he
lives
he's
owned
this
since
2017,
and
he's
been
working
with
dmd
for
a
few
years.
Now
there
formerly
was
a
three
family
house
on
this
lot
and
it
was
right
out
to
the
line
of
the
street
which
every
house
on
the
street
is
about
four
feet
off
of
they
line
up
about
four
feet
off
the
sidewalk.
AC
AC
Okay,
so
the
parking
is
designed,
there's
a
necessity
of
about
a
one
foot
move
of
occur
of
one
side
of
the
curb
cut,
because
hildreth
takes
a
little
bit
of
a
bend.
It
would
be
safer
if
the
curb
cut
will
move
back.
One
foot
up
the
street
on
hildreth
street,
and
that
would
help
with
the
swing
it's
and
it
wouldn't
affect
any
parking
on
the
street,
because
it's
such
an
insignificant
amount
of
difference,
peter
accesses
parking
and
he's
right.
A
AC
Excellent
okay!
So
if
you
look
at
this
plan-
and
you
see
where
it
says-
proposed-
driveway
easement
in
the
rare
yard,
that
is
to
access
the
rear
of
peter's
house
at
number
30
wildwood
street,
the
design
of
the
parking
is
only
shown
on
this
plan.
But
the
intended
and
completed
design
would
be
that
the
parking
spaces
number
one
and
number
two
would
be
able
to
back
onto
peter's
property
at
number
20,
where
he
accesses
his
parking
spaces
so
that
they
could
pull
into
their
space
and
then
back
around
onto
the
portion
of
the
driveway
easement.
AC
Well,
because
peter
owns
both
watts
right
now
in
his
own
name.
Technically,
he
can't
give
himself
an
easement,
but
yes,
that
is
the
intention,
would
be
to
convey
one
lot
into
a
different
entity
and
then
have
cross
lot
easements
for
the
purposes
of
the
vehicles
behind
number
28
swinging
around
and
and
going
out.
So
that
is
the
intended
plan.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss?
I'm
sorry,
mr
candel.
B
B
AD
Hello,
yes,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
dr
people's
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
industrial
reported
the
proposal
the
app's
connected
to
community
process
where
on
july
15th,
there
was
a.
AD
So
there
was
an
abundance
meeting
held
on
july
15
and
running
by
the
number
of
neighborhood
services,
where
that
became,
address,
concerns
of
parking
and
design
building
design
on
the
call.
The
applicant
has
also
met
with
the
brothers
on
the
street,
as
well
as
the
wildwood
street
neighborhood
association
and
gotten
that
support,
and
with
those
concerns
on
the
building
design
to
various
offices
again
in
support,
we
would
ask
that
there
be
dpda
design
review.
Thank
you.
B
Chair
secretary
here
we
do
have
we
have
a
signature
page
of
about
40
individuals
and
one
support
letter.
M
And
if
you
have
a
raised
hand,
madam
chair
jordan,
go
ahead.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion.
I
B
Thank
you
on
the
next
case,
calling
doa
one
two
zero,
two,
five,
two
nine
fifty
five
bowdoin
avenue.
This
is
a
renovation
of
an
existing
two
family
into
a
three
family.
One
car
garage,
along
with
the
lost
space,
will
be
part
of
the
adjacent
unit.
The
existing
lower
unit,
one
duplex,
will
be
converted
into
two
units.
The
violations
article
65
section,
eight
three
family
dwelling
has
forbidden
use
in
the
zoning
sub-district
article
65
6-8,
the
drawing
unit
located
in
the
basement
is
forbidden
in
article
65
6-9.
A
AG
It's
loading,
so
we
have
a
two
family
right
now.
We
want
to
add
a
garage
to
the
side,
because
we
have
a
large
side
yard
and
we
want
to
make
the
bottom
unit.
It
is
currently
a
single
unit.
We
want
to
split
it
into
two
units.
It's
the
same
number
of
bedrooms.
AG
The
basement
level
unit
would
be
brought
up
to
compliance
with
like
building
codes
for
safety
and
we're
adding
the
required
fire
suppression
unit
and
then
underneath
the
garage,
because
it's
we're
on
a
hill,
so
walk
out
in
the
back
would
be
like
a
small
lounge
area
to
or
landscaping
the
backyard
to
make
it
so
that
when
you're
in
the
backyard,
you
don't
have
to
go
four
flights
of
stairs
to
go
to
the
bathroom
because
we're
owner-occupied.
Let
me
just.
AG
A
We
need
to
kind
of
talk
all
this
through
sure
about
what
the
floor
to
ceiling
height,
because
we
don't
know
if
that
was
a
legal
basement
unit
or
if
a
predecessor
owner
of
that
building
just
put
a
unit
in
so
we
cannot
just
take
it
for
granted.
Has
this?
Has
this
been
taxed
as
a
as
a
has
that
unit
been
taxed
in
the
basement,
so
the
unit.
A
A
So,
okay,
I'm
let
me
just
so:
let's
just
talk
this
through
okay.
So
what
is
the
flow
to
ceiling
height
in
that
bedroom?
In
that
basement
unit.
AG
I
believe
it's
84
inches,
but
that
is
not
something
we
realized
we
needed
to
ask.
The
architect
did
do
all
the
measurements
and
assured
us
that
our
plans
would
leave
us
in
compliance
for
that.
A
A
A
You
know,
let's
see
where
the
where
the
utilities
are
and
how
the
utilities
are
separate.
You
know,
so
we
really
need
to
have
a
robust
understanding.
What
is
the
second
means
of
egress
sure
look
at
all
those
details,
because
we
need
to
understand
that
this
is
going
to
be
safe
for
our
potential
for
potential
residents.
Okay,
so
making
a
promotion
for
deferral.
Can
I
ask
a
quick
question
before
you.
AG
A
So
that
we
can
come
out
mostly
mostly
that
is
when
we
see
a
unit
like
that.
That
is
what
concerns
us
and
then,
let's
see,
and
no
that
I
mean.
R
C
Access
to
this
princess
should
have
been
accessed
from
from
the
outside.
R
Rooms
throughout
the
building
called
out.
So
if
there's
gonna,
I
don't
know
if
there's
one
mechanical
space
in
the
basement
or
if
they're
gonna
be
in
each
unit
but
yeah,
something
to
look
to
look
at
before
you
come
back.
A
I
appreciate
that,
thank
you
and
do
you
have
a
rooftop,
no
okay,
so
this
is
really
to
add
a
garage.
Okay.
So
may
I
have
a
motion
for
deferral.
A
A
B
AH
B
B
AI
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
kevin
joyce's
daughter
of
our
offices
for
the
petitioner
on
the
call
with
me,
are
jack,
kelly
and
dodd
joyce,
the
owners
dan
linsky
from
call
security,
our
security
consultant
ralph
dynasco
from
steamtech
our
traffic
consultant
and
ryan
corner
our
architect.
The
proposal
is
for
a
retail
cannabis
establishment.
AI
A
Yes,
counselor
joyce
you've
been
before
us
in
the
past
on
specifically
these
cases.
So
can
you
please
tell
us
exactly
how
the
facility
is
going
to
work
for
and
how
the
facility
is
going
to
work
hours
of
operation
just
a
general
sense
of
the
security
and
how
delivery
is
going
to
work
and,
of
course
it
looks
like
this
project
might
be
cited,
closer,
close
close
to
another
cannabis
establishment,
so
speak
to
that
too.
AI
Basics,
operational
post
operation
hours
on
monday
to
sunday
11
a.m
to
8
p.m.
The
space
is
100
134
square
feet
of
retail
space
on
the
first
floor
and
we're
going
to
have
1134
space
of
basement
a
basement
space
or
a
storage
office
at
a
vault,
actually
the
actual
operations.
AI
I
would
ask
jack
kelly
to
as
he's
the
manager
of
the
store.
I
have
him
present
how
the
operation
is
going
to
work
on
a
on
a
day-to-day
basis.
A
All
right
and,
let's
see
jack,
were
you
in
the
mayor's
office
a.
AJ
A
AJ
A
Excellent
so-
and
I
see
doc,
joyce
is
on
so
good,
so
here's
the
entire
team,
so
please
go
in
and
fill
in
the
details
of
of
this
project.
AJ
So
when
we
first
opened
this,
I
approached
my
team
about
doing
this
project.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
was
going
to
be
in
character
for
my
neighborhood
of
charleston,
which
I
have
grown
up
in
and
I
live
in
in
my
work.
Go
professionally
and
personally
has
been
dedicated
to
that
community.
So
when
we
propose
this
facility,
we
make
sure
that
it's
small.
N
A
So
council
joyce
gave
us,
I
mean
sorry,
yes,
council
joyce
gave
us
the
high
level.
So
can
you
get
into
how
many
staff
can
you
get
into
the
security?
Can
you
just
get
into
how
many
company
people
you
expect
in
the
space?
AJ
I'd
be
happy
to
so
we
will
be
appointment
only
to
begin
and
we
are
a
boutique
shop
to
be
small
within
the
so
it
fits
within
the
fabric
community.
We
will
have
four
points
of
sale
and
within
that
sale
we
expect
customers
to
last
about
10
minutes
or
so
so
you
know
you
do
the
math
on
that.
It
will
be
a
pretty
you
know,
flowing
thing,
that'll
make
easy
for
the
community
and
our
hours
are
from
8
to
11.
AK
We'll
have
about
12
employees,
including
our
security
personnel,
dan
linsky
from
kroll
security
is
on.
This
call
as
well
he'll
be
designing
our
systems
to
be
exceeding
the
state
standards,
we'll
be
engaging
in
entrance
at
the
rear
of
the
building
and
coming
in
through
the
rear,
where
we
have
an
easement
and
we'll
have
the
like
jack
said
four
points
of
sale.
AK
AK
AK
There
are
1700
parking
spaces
within
a
five-minute
walk
of
the
facility,
and
we
intend
to
use
those
ralph
denisko
from
stantec
is
on,
who
could
sort
of
walk
through
some
of
that?
If
you
me
further
clear.
A
So
there's
12
employees,
1
000
square
feet,
approximately
four
points
of
sale,
10
minutes
per
interaction.
Let's
see
so
you
have
the
security.
The
open
office
vault
is
this
and
this
is
handicapped
accessible.
Yes,.
AL
A
Okay
and
then
tell
us
about
proximity
to
the
other
cannabis
establishment.
AK
We
are
a
completely
different
concept
than
the
one.
Yes.
AK
We
are
within
a
half
mile
of
116
cambridge
street
when
we
filed
our
application
with
the
board.
We
were
not
in
conflict
of
the
half-mile
rule,
but
in
moving
through
the
process,
we
did
not
get
to
the
board
prior
to
the
other
applicant
and
therefore
there
is
another
applicant
that
was
approved
prior
to
us.
AK
We
again
are
a
different
concept.
The
other
applicant
has
not
been
approved
by
the
cannabis
control
commission
at
the
state
level.
At
this
point,
so
there's
no
telling
whether
or
not
they
will
be,
and
we
believe
our
location
actually
will
help
give
choice
to
the
community
so
that
if
people
were
considering
using
the
train
system,
we're
much
more
convenient
location
and
perhaps
will
not
drive
the
other
facility
and
reduce
traffic
going
through
that
neighborhood.
AI
A
Okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plans
mr
candel.
A
L
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
memphis
of
the
board,
my
name
is
caitlin
stapleton
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
support
of
this
proposal.
So
the
proportion
has
completed
the
community
process
and
held
a
public
meeting
on
october
22nd
2020..
Our
office
has
heard
support
from
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
M
Very
much
members
of
the
board.
I
go
on
record
in
full
support
of
this
applicant
I've
in
the
time
that
I've
had
several
applicants
for
cannabis
establishments.
This
is
the
most
supported
I've
ever
seen
throughout
my
entire
district
of
people
coming
out
with
hundreds
of
letters
of
support
for
this
local
establishment.
I
also
feel
it's
right
size.
M
It
is
especially
important
to
me,
because
I
think,
as
this
industry
is
growing,
it
is
hard
for
neighborhoods
to
adjust
to
it
and
to
see
them
start
off.
Small
is
very
important.
Finally,
I
would
like
to
note
go
on
record.
He
is
a
social
equity
applicant
and
to
I
do,
support
and
hope
that
social
equity
applicants
who
have
the
support
of
the
city.
B
Thank
you
sorry
jessica,
madam
chair,
we
do
have
letters
of
support
and
we
do
have
a
few
letters
of
opposition
as
well.
A
M
You
all
right
so
for
the
raised
hands
I'll
start
with
you,
sarah
you've
been
a
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please
hi.
My
name
is
sarah.
P
Coughlin
I'm
representing
the
charlestown
coalition.
AL
Hi,
robin
reed
46
adams,
street
dorchester,
I'm
speaking
for
myself
as
a
physician,
and
even
though
I
am
the
safety
advisor
for
the
heritage
club
at
116,
cambridge,
I
am
not
representing
them.
I'm
opposed
to
this
for
four
very
specific
reasons
that
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
owners
of
the
candidates
themselves,
but
with
the
location.
AL
First
of
all,
the
traffic
study
that
they
submitted
after
the
bcb
hearing
in
may
was
never
presented
to
the
community
for
discussion,
and
there
are
some
findings
on
that
specific
study
that
shows
that
the
intersection
of
mock
away
and
cambridge
gets
an
f
score.
So
it
is
the
worst
intersection
ma'am.
A
Can
you
can
you,
please
bullet
point
your
concerns,
so
we
can.
We
can
hear
them,
but
but
then
also
move
on
to
the
other
people
who
want
who
are
wanting
to
make
comments.
AL
AL
And
that's
the
most
largest
complaint
the
community
had
was
traffic.
The
second
thing
is
safety.
Accidents
occur
at
that
intersection.
A
child
was
killed
there
and
recently
there
was
a
bike
accident.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
safety
issues
around
traffic
and
with
no
parking
there's
going
to
be
more
congestion.
AL
The
third
point
is
there
were
building
issues.
I
won't
get
go
into
them
because
you'll
have
a
design
review,
but
the
bcb
really
skirted
both
the
security
issues
and
the
fire
safeties
for
that
lower
office.
The
fourth
thing
is
the
buffer
zone
and
the
buffer
zone
was
intended
to
protect
the
community.
They
have
been
very
clear
that
they
do
not
want
to
within
their
neighborhood.
AL
AG
M
Y
AA
Hi
is
speaking,
yes,
thank
you.
My
name
is
maggie
supreet
and
I
am
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
residents
at
341
bunker
hill
street.
I
am
in
opposition
of
this
project
and
I
ask
that
the
board
deny
it
for
a
few
reasons,
and
if
you
just
give
me
a
quick
second
to
articulate,
I
will
be
fast.
AA
AA
If
you
look
they're
intending
to
use
the
rear
of
the
building
as
the
entrance
to
facilitate
customer
weight
lines
and
delivery
trucks,
but
if
you
look
at
that
building,
there's
not
an
adequate
amount
of
space
back
there
to
do
that
without
blocking
the
residential
unit
occupants
who
live
on
the
second
and
third
floor
without
blocking
their
fire
escape
and
their
second
means
of
egress.
Second,
that
they
are
two
in
their
basement
floor
plans.
They
claim
to
have
excuse
exclusive
use
of
the
entire
basement.
AA
But
if
you
look
on
their
plans,
the
water
meters
for
the
entire
building
are
located
down
there
and,
according
to
the
state
sanitary
codes
residential
occupants
cannot
be
denied
access
to
that
area.
However,
that
conflicts
with
ccc
security
regulations
that
say
unauthorized
parties
aren't
allowed
in
those
areas
of
the
dispensary.
So
I
think
that
conflict
needs
to
address
needs
to
be
addressed.
AA
Lastly,
I
reiterate
what
robin
reed
said
about
the
area,
cambridge
and
mafia
street,
being
great
f
with
respect
to
traffic
and
that
never
being
presented
to
the
community,
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
I
hope.
M
Okay,
jack
you've
been
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
M
AM
Z
AN
My
name
is
elaine
donovan.
I
live
at
85
russell
street
in
charlestown
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
am
a
strong
supporter
of
r2.
I
think
jack
kelly
is
a
wonderful
upstanding
citizen
in
our
neighborhood,
where
he's
been
a
lifelong
resident
and
he's
one
of
four
generations
currently
living
here.
The
other
two
callers
that
were
opposed.
A
AN
AK
A
Okay,
can
I
ask
everybody:
who's
already
commented
to
please
lower
your
hands
because
it
makes
it
difficult
for
us
to
know.
If
there's
anybody
here
who
still
wants
to
comment.
Okay,
anybody
who's
already
commented.
Please
lower
your
hands,
I
have
amanda
amanda.
Did
we
get.
P
To
you,
no
I'm
here
for
this
one.
I
just
wanted
to
show
my
full
support
for
this
project
in
this
location,
because
it
is
close
to
the
majority
of
where
people
live
in
charlestown
and
it's
accessible
by
foot
and
bike
and
means
other
than
cars.
Thank
you
yeah.
Can
we
give
your
address
as
well?
Your.
M
Sarah
sarah,
you
want
to
do
we
get
to
yes,
I
wasn't
able
to
testify.
It
was
cut
off
after
I
gave
the
address
I'll
go
ahead,
all
right,
so
the
charlestown
coalition
I
just
wanted
people
to
understand-
is
a
community
coalition.
So
it's
representative
of
75
different
organizations
and
people
within
the
community.
M
On
october
22nd,
we
went
to
the
hearing
for
the
city
of
boston
and
then
on
the
27th.
We
had
a
steering
committee
meeting
and
the
entire
steering
committee
voted
unanimously
to
support
this
proposal.
Jack
is
not
new
to
supporting
the
community.
He
has
has
a
track
record
that
is
not
unique
to
just
this
building.
He
has
hired
our
youth
consistently,
and
so
I
have
no
doubt
that
he
will
do
that
again.
He
has
participated
in
all
of
our
prevention
curriculums
for
the
last
10
years
at
all
the
local
middle
schools.
A
Thank
you
for
putting
his
history
on
the
record,
you
know,
but
we
need
to
just
move
to
the
next
column.
Okay,
thank
you.
M
Okay,
carla
23
go
ahead.
Sorry
did
I
get
to
6
1
7
7
8
0.
you've
been
on
muted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
really
record?
Please.
AM
Yes,
well,
my
name
is
mary
supreme,
I'm
a
former
resident
of
brighton
street
in
downtown
I'm
opposed
to
this
project.
Somebody
has,
I
submitted
a
packet
with
pitches
in
regards
to
the
plan
that
was
submitted
to
the
cannabis
control
commission
in
regards
to
the
obstruct
you
know,
the
fire
escapes
obstructed.
I'm
sure
you
have
that
in
front
of
you
deliveries
no
turnaround
space
in
the
back.
They
say
they
have
parking.
That's
skate
parking
behind
them.
AM
The
traffic
study,
which
shows
an
f
the
shut
ups
in
the
basement
and
the
fact
that
it's
a
buffer
zone
and
the
other
person
is
also
an
equity
applicant.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You,
okay,
so
may
I
ask
the
team
it
sounds
like.
Should
this
be
approved?
You
have
a
bunch
of
work
to
do,
because
if
there
are
in
fact
issues
with
the
building
code,
if
there
are
issues
with
access
to
meters
by
residential
owners
that
absolutely
needs
to
be
addressed.
A
AO
Volunteers
from
kroll
we
have
cited
several
clients
in
the
boston
area
and
others
they
had
several
issues
come
up.
There
are
ways
to
work
with
our
design
team
to
build
limited
access
where
we
can
control
who
goes
in
where
they
go
in
and
and
definitely
give
residents
their
ability
to
access
their
systems,
the
fire
department
ability
to
come
in
and
access
systems.
One
client,
I
have
has
a
cell
phone
tower
that
they
need
to
access
the
system.
So
we
can
do
that
and
control
it
and
comply
with
the
cannabis
regulations.
A
A
Okay,
excellent
and
then
I
think
the
other
question
is
again:
can
you
respond
to
that
rear
parking
and
the
rear
access?
Because
you
know
that
that
may
be
of
concern
and
how.
AK
Sure
I
will
introduce
ryan
connor
for
a
little
bit
of
background
on
that
ryan
is
our
architect.
AK
We
do
not
intend
to
use
parking
in
the
rear
of
our
building,
even
though
we
have
access
to
it
great
how
about
delivery
delivering
in
the
rear
of
our
building
and
have
the
absolute
right
to
do
that
through
our
our
contract,
lease
which
I
have
for
the
next
five
years,
and
so
we
absolutely
can
deliver
through
the
rear
of
the
building,
and
we
will
be.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
so
we've
heard
from
everybody
we've
had
clarification.
May
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
And
again,
I
you
know
mr
ehrlich
is
not
here,
but
at
the
last
meeting
it
you
know
these
variant
these
this
this
lack
of
clarity
in
the
regulations.
A
I
think
what
continues
to
put
the
zoning
board
of
appeal
in
an
awkward
position
having
to,
in
fact,
you
know,
approve
against
every
regulation,
these
two,
these
two
facilities
in
proximity
of
each
other.
He
is
far
more
articulate
articulate
on
this,
but
this
continues
to
be
our
concern.
So,
given
that,
may
I
have
a
motion,
please.
B
Yeah,
madam
secretary,
here
to
your
your
concerns
and
my
concerns
and
our
board's
concerns,
I
agree
with
mr
ehrlich,
but
I
will
make
a
motion
to
approve,
but
with
bpda
design
review
into
this
applicant
only.
Q
A
B
Madam
chair
going
to
go
to
the
12
30
rediscussions
call
my
first
case
calling
doa
118
1104
29
andrew
road.
This
is
to
build
a
new
back
porch
make
wider
stairs
from
the
first
to
the
second
floor,
the
finished
basement
the
violations
article
27g.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
M
They
said
one
ryan
hunt,
one
second.
AB
M
Mark
okay,
I'm
gonna
make
him
a
panelist
anyway.
That
person
didn't
check
in
for
saint
andrew
wrote,
so.
B
B
AB
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lacasse
75
arlington
street,
in
boston
attorney
for
the
project
proponents,
sun
property
group
we
could
hold
yeah.
The
site
plan
is
great
to
help
you.
Oh
sorry,
can
we
stand
the
same
plan?
Thank
you
at
this
location.
Currently
is
a
series
of
single
story,
cinder
block
and
brick
garages
and
surface
parking,
so
it
is
largely
an
unutilized
and
underutilized
lot
in
a
typical
multi-family
residential
neighborhood
in
south
boston,
on
the
corner
of
p
street
and
east
6th.
A
AB
So
depicted
on
the
site
plan
before
you
is
the
proposed
structure,
which
is
set
back
approximately
46
feet
from
the
front
on
east,
sixth
and
p
street
runs
along
the
side
of
the
building.
Each
of
the
five
townhouse
front
doors
are
shown
in
the
little
slots
there
and
face
east
6th
street.
The
large
front
area
of
the
setback
is
a
large
open
space
that
has
been
created
that
also
provides
access
for
the
ramp
that
leads
down
to
the
lower
level
parking
garages.
AB
The
proposal
is
for
five
townhouse
units
of
three
bedroom
or
two
bedroom
and
home
office
combination
depending
on,
however,
the
space
wishes
to
be
used
and
the
units
range
in
size.
Well,
the
units
are
all
approximately
the
same
size,
2
900
to
3
000
square
feet,
so
they're
large
family
size
units
with
two
car
parking
garage
at
the
lower
level
of
each
of
the
units
and
three
floors
of
living
up
above.
A
Miss
edwards,
can
you
show
us
what
a
street
view
of
this?
Oh
there,
what
a
street
view
would
look
like?
Can
you
tell
us
what
she
we
should
be
looking
at
go.
AB
To
the
very
end
of
this
series
of
documents
and
there's
renderings
of
the
proposed
street
view,
no
no
keep
going.
That's
just
a
computer
generated
there's
much
better,
rendering
a
little
further.
AB
No
okay,
I
guess
the
rendering
that
we
had
was
presented
at
the
community
meeting.
There
are
five
front
doors
and
very
small
porches
on
the
front
of
each
of
the
units.
AB
No,
the
front
area
is,
is
largely
landscaped,
with
just
the
ramp
going
down
to
the
garage
area.
A
AB
Getting
into
the
the
specific
zoning
issues
madam
chair,
the
use
is
multi-family
residential,
which
is
an
allowed
use.
We
were
able
to
comply
on
many
of
the
larger
dimensional
issues
which
relate
to
density.
We
have
sufficient
lot
area
sufficient
additional
lot
area
per
dwelling
unit.
The
far
is
1.3
as
against
a
maximum
of
2.0.
AB
AB
Okay,
so
there
are
two
conditional
use
permits
that
are
required.
One
is
a
g
pod,
since
we
are
in
the
g-pod
the
overall
design,
including
if
we
could
stop
this
slide,
the
common
green
space
in
the
front,
which
is
the
buffer
zone
that
has
been
created,
the
conditionally
used
for
g-pod,
because
there
are
existing
one-story
garages
on
the
lot,
there's
a
requirement
that
this
board
take
into
consideration
as
a
conditional
use
permit
the
proposed
height
of
the
new
building
after
demolition
of
the
existing
structures.
A
Let
me
just
jump
ahead
a
little
bit.
Can
you
talk
about
the
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner,
yeah
and
and
just
confirm
for
us
that
there
are
no
roof
decks.
AB
Yes,
madam
chair,
I
believe
the
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner
was
a
leftover
item
from
a
prior
refusal
letter
that
does
no
longer
apply
because
of
the
significant
setback
of
the
building
from
east
6th
street.
Originally,
as
proposed
when
we
got
our
initial
refusal
letter,
the
building
was
fronting
right
to
the
edge
of
6th
street
in
alignment
with
other.
A
Let
me
just
ask
you,
because
this
is
a
you
know,
having
moved
the
buildings
this
far
back
from
the
front
yard.
Is
this?
Is
this
still
a
legitimate
refusal
letter?
Did
you
get
a
revised
refuse
a
letter
when
you
moved
everything
so
far
to
the
back
of
the
site.
AB
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
you
have
that,
mr
fortune,
right,
yes,
okay,
that's.
A
And
how
are
the
plans,
mr
candel
and
they're.
AQ
U
Y
Y
V
V
M
AR
Hi,
my
name
is:
barry
holland.
I
live
at
139
p
street
directly
across
from
the
project
and
I'd
like
to
speak
and
support.
I
think
they
made
some
nice
changes.
I
think
it's
a
lot
better
from
where
we
started
and
the
lot's
gonna
look
nice
the
way
they're
proposing
it
right
now.
So
I
support.
A
A
Let's
see
yes,
I
know
what
my
question
was
jeff,
mr
hampton:
what
was
the
bpda's
recommendation
on
this.
D
AE
B
Madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
saint
andrews,
how
they're
on
so
I'm
going
to
call
it
back
up
for
the
record
following
bmw,
118
1104,
29
sing
andrew
wrote
this
to
build
a
new
back
four
make
wider
stairs
from
the
first
to
second
floor
and
finish
the
basement.
The
violation
was
article
27
gs
and
the
east
boston,
icon
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AP
AP
Yes,
so
the
we're
proposing
to
finish
the
basement,
which
is
currently
unfinished
at
a
six
six
foot
ten,
so
we're
planning
to
dig
it
down
additional
couple
inches
to
make
it
a
legal
livable
space
at
seven
feet,
and
I
in
the
past
zoning
hearing.
I
I
believe
that
the
it's
not
quite
favorable
for
the
the
owner
to
to
do
the
bedroom
and
the
lower
space.
So
we
in
this
revised
plan,
we
showed
the
basement
finish
with
just
a
playroom
and
family
room
and
a
half
bathroom.
AP
This
is
a
two
family,
so
the
basement
will
be
connected
to
the
first
level.
AP
Yes,
the
second
floor
utility
is
is
up
at
the
top
floor.
This
unit
is
in
the
basement
on
the
top
top
middle
area,
where
it
sets
a
utility
room.
A
And
so
you'll
get
to
floor
to
ceiling
height
by
by
excavating.
What's
the
floor
to
sell
height
there.
AP
Load
cell
is
approximately
42
inch.
A
AP
AP
If
you
go
back
yeah,
so
second
means
of
egress
first
is
through
the
first
floor
and
the
second
means
is
through
the
back
going
through
the
hallway
and
then
back
out
to
the
rear
attack
to
the
rear
yard.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I'm
having
a
hard
time
seeing
that
second
means,
but
oh
yes,
okay,
I
see
it
okay,
excellent.
How
are
the
plans
mr
candel.
A
M
A
AS
Yeah,
I
could.
I
could
speak
on
her
behalf
good
afternoon,
madam
chairman
of
the
board
jack
duggan,
mayor's
office
and
average
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
I've
been
in
touch
with
lena
and
the
applicant
has
just
the
support
of
the
orion
heights
neighborhood
council.
Thank
you.
Q
B
You
follow
your
next
two
cases
calling
doa
116
1109
46
end
street.
There
is
a
companion
case,
voa
116,
1110,
48
n
street.
This
is
for
46n
erecting
third
story,
addition
to
an
existing
structure
with
front
and
rear
decks
on
the
roof
of
the
second
story:
violation:
article
68,
section,
29,
food
structure,
restrictions,
article
68,
section,
8,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
68,
section
8
excessive
far.
B
This
is
for
48
industry,
it's
the
same
purpose
and
it's
the
same
violation,
but
it's
only
a
few
I'll
read
it
in
directly
third
story
edition
for
the
existing
structure
with
front
rear
decks
on
the
roof.
On
the
second
story,
the
violations
are
the
same
as
the
previous
name
and
address
for
the
records.
Please.
AH
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
morancy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
russell
and
linda
castagna,
who
own
and
reside
at
48
n
street
and
greg,
and
karen
donovan,
who
own
and
reside
at
46th
and
street.
These
are
two
separate
but
related
applications
for
two
addresses
with
two
owners,
but
they
may
be
hurt
together
because
the
proposals
are
substantively
the
same,
a
vertical
addition
to
each
property.
AH
The
buildings
are
essentially
mirror
images
of
each
other,
and
both
my
clients
would
seek
to
add
a
third
story.
Edition
partial
third
story
edition
to
provide
approximately
1200
square
feet
of
additional
living
space
for
their
families.
48
n
street
is
a
two
family
dwelling
and
46
end
street
is
a
two-family
with
an
adu
an
additional
dwelling
unit.
The
zoning
sub-district
is
mfr
multi-family
residential
each
edition
would
constitute
a
partial
third
story,
as
each
would
be
set
back
approximately
14
feet
from
the
front
of
the
buildings
and
16
feet
from
the
rear
of
the
buildings.
AH
AH
The
addition
to
48
n
street
would
consist
of
an
entertainment
room
and
a
home
office
that
is
owned
by
the
castagnas
at
the
donovan's
building
46
n
street.
There
are
currently
three
rather
small
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor.
These
would
be
combined
into
two
bedrooms
for
the
donovan's
children
and
the
addition
would
consist
of
a
new
master
suite.
A
A
AH
AH
Nothing
has
changed.
This
has
been.
This
was
denied.
I
have
to
go
back,
this
was
originally
at
a
subcommittee
and
then
it
was
put
off
until
a
regular
board.
Meeting
and
I'd
be
perfectly
honest-
I
don't
I
don't
really
recall.
As
you
say,
it
was
sometime
in
the
spring,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
why
that
was
deferred
at
the
time.
I
believe
I
requested
a
deferral
and
it
may
have
been
unavailability
by
clients,
but
I
I
honestly
don't
remember.
Oh
yeah.
A
AH
So
as
to
the
zoning,
the
zoning
refusal
here
for
each
application
cites
a
root
structure,
violation,
and
you
know
these
really
aren't
root
structures,
they're,
they're,
partial
third
story,
additions
that
are
compliant
with
maximum
building
height
under
the
code.
There's
a
side
united
setback
violations
cited
for
each
for
46
entry
that
relates
to
the
existing
left
side.
Setback,
which
has
not
been
increased,
simply
goes
to
the
vertical
extension
of
that
existing
setback.
AH
For
this
as
the
side
violation
48
end
street
on
the
left
side,
that
building
is
connected
to
46,
so
it
is
impossible
to
have
a
side
yard
setback
and
on
the
right
side,
the
setback
is
more
than
double
of
what
is
required
by
the
code.
There
is
a
paved
driveway
to
the
right.
Each
application
was
cited
for
an
far
violation.
The
maximum,
if
they
are
in
the
district,
is
two.
AH
I
honestly
believe
that
at
least
one
of
these
violations
cited
is
incorrect.
Just
pointing
out
that
46
end
street
is
a
3
429
square
foot
lot,
so
the
maximum
fbi,
that's
allowable,
would
be
6858
square
feet.
Given
the
dimensions
of
the
building.
It
is
physically
impossible
for
the
gross
floor
area
to
be
more
than
70
350,
which
would
produce
an
far
2.1
and
again
2.0
is
allowed.
The
48th.
A
AQ
Y
Good
afternoon
one
of
the
chair
members
of
the
war
anna
calderon
from
councillor
flink's
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
based
on
the
majority
of
feedback
and
support
letters
from
about
us
and
neighbors
in
the
area.
Previously,
we
had
hoped
that
a
good
faith
compromise
would
have
also
been
worked
out
among
other
neighbors.
Unfortunately,
that
did
not
occur.
However,
the
majority
of
neighbors
provided
support
letters
and
already
additional
top
floors
and
leaving
a
space
will
remain
owner
occupied
for
these
families.
Y
V
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan,
I'm
the
opposite
of
council
michael
flaherty,
article
68,
went
through
an
extensive
community
process.
The
council's
approach
has
been
consistent
without
supporting
variances
council
likes
to
note
that
the
proponents
have
worked
to
secure
the
approval
of
many
direct
abutas,
although
not
all
director
buddies
are
in
support
of
this
proposal.
Therefore,
the
consulate
for
defers
to
the
board's
interpretation
understanding
of
souling
laws
as
it
pertains
to
unnecessary
and
unintentional
hardships.
V
M
AT
Dr
madam
chair,
members
of
the
board,
catholics
40
n
street.
I'm
an
office
position
this
project,
I'm
about
50
feet
away
from
the
project.
I
just
want
to
cite
1982
boston,
landmarks
committee,
1981,
south
boston
preservation,
study
that
specifically
called
out
these
two
addresses
as
colonial
revival.
Double
two
families.
We
face
independence
square,
which
is
now
medal
of
honor
park,
and
it
would
be
a
shame
to
to
ruin
the
idyllic
medal
of
honor
park
facing
properties.
AU
M
AV
My
name
is
bob
mcconnelly
and
I
live
at
56
n
street
for
the
past
34
years.
I
live
two
doors
down
from
the
castanya
in
donovan
homes
and
I've
known
both
families
for
years
and
watched
their
families
grow
up
I'll
make
it
very
brief.
The
plans
have
been
reviewed
and
they
are
meticulous
and
well
thought
out,
and
I
think
that
it
would
only
enhance
the
neighborhood.
There
are
six
homes
on
this
block.
All
of
them
are
well
maintained
and
I
fully
support
it
and
I
hope
you
do
too.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
B
A
Anybody
who
has
already
spoken,
please
put
your
hands
down
so
that
we
know.
If
there's
anybody,
we
need
to
hear
from.
M
AW
That's
okay,
mary
ellen
wallace,
40
n
street.
I
have
been
born
and
raised
in
that
home
as
well
as
my
dad.
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
of
this
project.
I
know
back
at
the
city
point
neighborhood
association
meeting
back
in
march.
It
was
brought
up
by
the
neighborhood
association
with
all
the
opposition
that
potentially
the
clients
would
come
back
to
the
neighbors
and
talk
about
some
sort
of
compromise,
and
that
hasn't
happened
from
march
until
now,
which
is
august
31st.
A
B
Thank
you
following
the
next
case
calling
poa
1130507
120
hancock
street.
This
is
a
wreck.
15
dwelling
units,
the
violations,
article
65
section
41..
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
41,
austria,
barking
design
and
maneuverability
article
65,
section
41
off-street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
8
accessory
parking
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section
9.
The
latter
for
additional
drawing
units
is
insufficient.
B
Article
65
section
9,
the
floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
bill
in
height
is
excessive
article
65,
section
9.
The
bill
in
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
65
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
X
Yes,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
joseph
feaster
from
the
law
firm
of
mckenzie
and
associates
183
state
street
in
boston.
I
want
sorry
to
have
to
make
mr
fortune
be
tired,
reading
all
those
violations,
but
I
can
assure
you
that
this
is
a
good
project
which
we
will
have
the
architect
mr
ben
thomann
present.
X
So
if
miss
thomas,
the
ambassador
could
have
unmute
mr
tullman.
That
would
be
great.
This
is
a
project
I'll
just
start
by
saying
this
is
a
project
which
my
client
urbaneker
went
through
a
disposition
by
the
department
of
neighborhood
development.
The
this
is
a
totally
affordable,
affordable
development.
There
are
15
units,
eight
units
will
be
at
eighty
percent
of
ami.
Seven
units
will
be
at
one
hundred
percent
of
pmi.
X
The
parking
that's
perro
proposed
here
are
nine
spaces.
The
required
is
22.5,
there
will
be
covered
parking
spaces,
a
roof
garden
and
a
plaza.
There
is
significant
mwbe
participation
in
the
development
of
this
project,
including
an
estimated
by
the
developer
for
wealth
creation,
but
I
know
miss
matters
here.
You
want
mr
tolman
to
talk
about
the
development,
so
I
would
definitely
I'm.
A
Looking
at
google,
google
maps
or
google
street
view-
and
it
looks
like
this-
is
a
very
you
know
on
this
side
of
the
street-
it
looks
like
it's
pretty
much
triple
deckers,
maybe
six
families
and
then
on
the
other
side
of
the
street,
looks
like
it's
a
combination
just
just
to
put
that
on
the
record
and
it
looked
like
so
so
can
we
have
the
architect?
Please
talk
this
through,
because
it
also
looks
like
you're
having
a
challenge
with
the
steep
slope.
AX
All
right,
I'm
here
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
thanks
for
hearing
us
for
the
record.
My
name
is
ben
tallman,
I'm
a
project
architect
with
studio
who's,
architects
at
business
address
67
poplar
street
in
roslindale,
and
this
project,
as
mr
feaster
said,
is
a
four-story,
affordable,
housing
development
with
a
below
grade
parking
level.
It
will
utilize
passive
house
design
practices
and
will
meet
the
city's
zero
carbon
emissions
standards.
AX
A
Please
ben,
can
you
tell
us.
AE
A
Okay
and
then,
given
the
site,
the
site
constraints,
just
can
you
tell
us
how
everything
is
going
to
work.
AX
Sure
so
we
have
this
garage
parking
garage
level
accessed
by
the
street
on
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
There
there
will
be
nine
parking
spaces
provided
below
grade
and
then
there's
an
access,
an
accessible
lobby
to
the
right
of
the
screen
with
a
stairway
and
an
elevator
going
up
to
the
residential
units.
AX
So
you
see
that
the
two
means
of
egress
are
this
stairwell
stair
one
at
the
top
of
the
screen
leading
out
to
the
rear
access
way
in
the
back
around
the
side
of
the
building.
And
then,
if
you
scroll
down
slightly
the
the
second
means,
if
he
dresses
through
that
stairway
down
into
the
garage
level.
A
Okay
and
do
so
the
two-bedroom
accessible
unit,
so
in
the
event
of
fire,
for
example,
how
does
somebody
exit
what
is
the
second
means
of
egress
for
such
a
unit?.
AX
So
this
is
a
patio
space.
AX
X
Mavericks
here
I
would
think
that
I'm
not
sure
the
developer
has
really
spoken
to
that
particular
issue
is
to
the
utilization
of
that
particular
space,
but
it
will
be
obviously
for
the
residents
of
the
building
if
there,
if,
if
by
chance
it
becomes
something
that
can
be
used
from
by
a
community
space.
I'm
not
sure
that
that's
been
determined
at
this
time,
but
it
will
be
at
least
be
available
for
programmatic
aspects
for
the
residents
of
the
building.
A
Yes
got
it,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
kendall.
B
Yes,
madam
chair
secretary,
here,
mr
fisa,
what
has
changed
since
the
last
time
you
hear
that
the
parking
change.
X
No,
we
were
not.
I
was
not
here.
This
matter
hasn't
come
before
you
before,
mr
fortune.
The
this
is
the
first
time
that
we're
before
this
board,
the
through
my
knowledge
unless
there's
something
that
I'm
unaware,
but
someone
else
this
is
not.
This
is
the
first
time
we
saw
it.
A
deferral
was
around
the
extension,
but
we
have
not
presented
this
project
before
before
this
board.
B
No
okay,
because
mr
d'amico
spoke
in
regards
to
this
on
in
regards
to
on
august
26th,
that
yeah
and
business
four
and
five.
X
On
august
25,
I'm
sorry,
mr
fortune
august
26th
of
this
year,
yeah
that
would
have
been
around
the
extension
just
an
extension
of
the
time,
because
this
project
was
delayed
because
of
both
wanting
currency
programming,
as
well
as
trying
to
get
the
financing.
So
those
extensions
were
were
granted
and
so
had
to
come
forward
on
the
proposal
on
the
project
itself.
At
this
particular
point
in
time,.
B
So
my
point
is
mr
feaster
that
on
june
24th
mr
d'amico
spoke
on
it
saying
that
120
hancock
street
was
fine,
but
then
on
august
26th
just
I'm
going.
Madam
chad
is
going
to
put
at
the
record
120
hancock
street.
He
says
we
remove
spaces
four
and
five
and
the
design
the
spaces
to
be
placed
on
a
60
degree
angle
for
appropriate
maneuverability,
and
that
was
dated
august
26th
of
this
year.
A
Thank
you
miss
any
other.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
X
The
I'm
much.
Z
I
mean
the
urbanic
costume
is
here
and
we
can't
help
to
answer
that
question.
But
we're
going
to
do
the
construction
stage.
X
W
Yes,
this
camera
is
a
hitting
as
far
as
the
construction
goes.
Most
of
this
field
was
brought
up
on
this
land
at
later
date.
So
the
idea
is
basically
break
the
ground
from
the
front
of
the
side
and
keep
moving
the
soil
and
have
a
supporting
wall
for
the
rest
of
them
and
keep
going
back
to
the
and
cut
into
the
hill.
So
it's
gonna
basically
be
done
in
different
stages
and
keep
you
know
moving.
You
know
towards
the
hill,
so
it
starts
on
the
hancock
street.
W
I
And
the
parking
level
creates
a
retaining
wall.
W
A
So
it's
net
zero
and
it's
going
to
be
lead
silver
or
gold.
That's.
W
A
X
A
AS
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jack
duggan,
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
want
to
go
on
record
support,
we've
heard
from
the
community
and
they
support
this
proposal,
as
well
as
the
local
civic
association.
Thank
you.
M
AF
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
julio
paler
housing
development
officer
with
the
department
of
debt
development,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
for
the
project.
As
the
the
development
team
has
mentioned.
This
is
a
project
that
has
gone
through
an
extensive
community
process
and
an
rfp
process,
and
it's
going
to
basically
remove
vacant
underutilized
land
from
the
city
of
the
city's
inventory
and
return
it
to
the
tax
revenue
in
addition
to
creating
affordable,
homeownership
housing.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
X
Matter
of
chair,
if
I
might
the
civic
association
referred
to
by
mr
dugan,
what
is
the
hancock
civic
association?
I
believe
the
file
should
reflect
the
letter
of
support
from
the
haircut.
Thank.
A
You
counselor
just
hold
on
a
second
miss
ambassador,
all
good,
yes,
ma'am.
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
K
B
The
next
case,
calling
via
one
one
four
four
one:
two
one
405
washington
street.
This
is
a
new
13-unit
multi-family,
the
violation,
article
65
section
41
insufficient
parking
article,
65,
section
65-41
access
and
maneuvering
area;
article
65,
section
9,
excessive
far
article
65
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
AH
B
X
All
right,
I
am
sorry,
I
wasn't
paying
attention
to
the
reading
and
I
thought
birch
street
was
the
one
that
was
on
here.
So
I
apologize
mr
fortune.
I
I
must
have
dozed
off
there
for
a
moment
attorney
joseph
feaster
for
the
law,
firm
of
mckenzie.
X
I
know
this
is
what
it
is
moments
yes
well
in
charge
of.
I'm
glad
that
you
recognize
that,
and
are
you
are
indulgent
of
me,
madam
chair,
for
sure
joseph
fisa
from
the
law
firm
of
mackenzie
and
associates,
183
state
street
in
boston
is
either
mr
jason
ching
is
going
to
be
the
architect
who
will
be
speaking
about
this
project,
but
before
he
does
once
again,
my
client
urbaneker
is,
does
quite
a
number
of
projects
with
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
very
committed
to
providing
affordable
housing.
X
K
Hi
joe
it's
it's
stephen.
K
The
architect
of
the
project
also
happens
to
be
with
cameron
zahede
the
developer
in
his
office.
So
we
can,
I
think,
together,
answer
questions
you
might
have.
I
always
like
to
explain
beyond
what
you
just
what
you've
just.
A
So
stephen,
can
you
speak
up
a
little
bit,
so
I
I
just
generally
have
a
hard
time
hearing.
So
can
you
please
just
describe
how
the
building
will
function?
A
A
You
have
opportunities
and
restrictions
looks
like
you.
Have
a
bus,
stop
right
in
front
of
the
building.
K
Okay,
yeah,
that's
fine,
so
the
the
site,
the
site,
actually
has
a
bit
of
a
slope
to
it.
So,
on
the
lower
part
of
the
screen,
you
have
washington
street
and,
as
you
go
up
up
the
hill,
it
actually
is
about
one
story
different.
So
really
what
you're
looking
at
here
is
the
ground
floor.
Where
you
have
the
car
on
the
left,
that's
a
little
driveway
private
driveway
that
turns
into
the
into
a
parking
garage
or
a
garage
and
entry.
Pedestrian
entry
is
right
on
washington
street.
K
K
Okay,
so
the
upper
part
of
the
lot
has
a
driveway
that
driveway's
an
easement
that
allows
access
for
a
neighbor
and
a
butter
to
get
to
their
parking
lot.
So
we
maintain
that
easement
that
also
provides
entry
for
two
of
our
units
on
the
upper
floors,
which
we
call
the
live
work
units,
something
that
community
was
interested
in
having
having
us
have
so
there's
direct
asset
access
off
of
that
off
of
that
you
can.
K
They're,
handicapped,
accessible
ramps,
and
if
it's
an
office,
people
can
come
right
off
the
street
face
our
driveway
into
these
two
units
or
they
can
use
the
main
entrance.
That's
on
one
level
below
that
we
just
looked
at
so
really.
The
building
is,
is
imagine
the
kind
of
four
quadrants
with
sort
of
circulation
in
the
middle
and
there's
basically
almost
four
units
per
floor,
but
basically
that's
kind
of
how
it's
oriented.
K
K
The
material
palette
and
working
through
the
with
the
community
trying
to
develop
an
architectural
language
was
which
is
consistent
and
and
respectful
of
what
was
there
previously,
and
so
that
would
sort
of
explain
the
the
massing
the
root
profile
material
palette.
I
wouldn't
call
it
traditional,
but
I
would
just
say
that
it
does.
K
A
Okay,
and
is
this
an
elevator
building.
A
Okay,
and
are
there
any
roof
ducts.
AS
AX
M
I
do
have
another
word
julio.
Are
you
looking
to
give.
AF
AF
Yes,
please,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
we
are
clearly
a
housing
development
officer
with
dnd.
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
project
as
well.
I
mean
this
is
similar
to
120
hancock,
where
it
went
through
an
extensive
community
process
and
rfp
process,
and
our
brannica
was
designated
to
develop
the
land.
We
also
do
have
some
renderings
that
we
used
for
a
community
meeting
earlier
this
year.
I'm
sure
that
we
can
make
those
available
to
the
board
if
needed,.
M
Now
additional
raised
hands
manager.
Thank
you.
X
X
K
X
We
do
not
have
that.
I
will
make
sure
that
that
is
provided
to
the
record
I'll,
send
it
to
miss
hank.
E
B
Is
erect
a
new
unit
building
the
violation,
article
51
section
56
part
3
parking
is
insufficient:
article
51,
section
8
mfr
in
a
forbidden
use
and
a
1
f
3
000
sub
district
article
51
section
9,
the
floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
building
head
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
51
section,
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
9
of
the
side
guided
suspicion
and
article
5169.
AY
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
palgini
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
10
forbes
road
and
braintree,
I'm
joined
with
the
architect
mark
sangiolo,
as
well
as
jay
walsh,
who's
part
of
the
development
team.
AY
So,
as
mr
fortune
stated,
this
is
80
north
beacon
street
in
allston.
The
project
has
changed.
It
is
six
units,
madam
chair,
not
eight
units,
so
it's
six
units
with
six
parking
spaces.
Zoning
is
one
f.
Three
thousand
the
lot
size
is.
Seventy
five
hundred,
I
know
madam
chair,
you
know
a
lot
about
this
neighborhood,
it's
a
very
diverse
street,
mixed
use.
We
have
significant
commercial
and
institutional
buildings
there
right
across
the
street
from
this
project.
Our
proposed
project
is
boston,
volvo,
maintenance
and
service.
AY
AY
As
mr
earl
excuse
me,
mr
fortune
read
was
far
we're
at
a
1.56,
because
it's
between
multi-family
residential,
that
is
a
forbidden
use.
Parking
is
1.75
we're
providing
one
per
unit
height.
As
mr
fortune
stated,
we
are
compliant
with
feet.
We
are
a
violation
on
number
of
stories
being
three
stories
in
a
two
and
a
half
zone,
front
yard
setback
required
is
fifteen.
We're
at
seven
rear
yard
is
thirty.
A
Sorry,
I'm
sorry,
can
you
tell
me,
because
I'm
kind
of
having
trying
to
understand
is
this
new
construction,
or
is
it
adjusting
that
building?
That
was
on
the
site.
AY
AY
Right
at
the
top
of
that,
I
think,
will
you
see
that,
but
there's
a
color
elevation
drawing,
I
think,
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
plan.
AY
Q
AY
So,
on
on
the
three
beds
there,
you're
averaging
about
17
50
and
on
the
one
bet
it's
1970
1967.
Sorry,
mr.
AY
AY
Only
one
two-bedroom,
so
the
first
floor
goes
down.
They
do
have
lower
level
media
room.
If
you
look
at
the
plan,
you'll
see
that
there's
there's
no
bedrooms
or
anything
down
there.
We
have
an
eight
foot,
four
ceiling
height
and
it's
a
small
bath
in
a
media
room.
You
can
see
on
that.
Everything
else
is
utilities.
A
Okay,
let's
see,
looks
like
you
have
window
wells.
Can
you
show
us
how
the
miss
edwards?
Can
you
tell
miss
edwards
what
plan
the
parking
plan
is
is
on.
AZ
Yes,
hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
I
think
the
best
plan
to
look
at
is
really
a3
that
one
right
there
that
shows
the
parking.
So
you
you
come
in
the
driveway
on
the
left.
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
They
don't
have
a,
I
don't
believe
in
the
zoning
table.
They
have
an
open
space
requirement,
but
we
we
tried
to
give
through
the
community
process.
We
did
try
to
give
some
open
space
in
the
the
left
corner
up
there,
the
14
by
20,
open
space
and
then
there's
some
on
the
top
side
of
the
building
too.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
kendall.
AS
AS
A
AS
Madam,
I
don't
have
conor
newman
here
and
to
expand
on
that,
but
perhaps
john
would
provide
some
of
that
information.
If
he's
heard
something
throughout
the
community
process.
A
Okay,
so
let's
go
ahead,
yes
and
anybody
miss
ambassador.
Can
we
hear
from
other
people
please.
A
Q
AY
A
Yes,
and
is
annabelle
gomes
on.
A
A
Now
I
I
I'm
just
having
a
bit
of
a
hard
time,
because
I
like
the
work
that
you
do
counselor,
but
you
know
when
you
start
off
very
dense.
Anything
coming
down
appears
sweet.
But
if
we
look
at
the
zoning,
it's
one
of
three
thousand
so
kind
of
like
torn
on
this
project.
AY
And
I
agree,
I
think
you
just
have
to
get
into
your
statement
earlier.
If
you
look
at
north
beacon
street
itself
and
where
this
is
located,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
your
tablets
available
and
you
can
just
look
at
what's
what's
surrounding
this
building,
it
is,
you
know,
dense
commercial
retail,
liquor
stores
you.
A
Know
it's
true,
that's
true
across
the
street,
but
on
this
side
of
the
street
it
tends
to
be
residential,
and
I
know
that
there
was
that
current
development-
I
guess
their
condos,
but
denser
development-
that
went
in
at
some
point,
but
the
parts
of
it
are
single
family,
so
watching
family.
So
I
just
I'm
torn
with
the
with
the
density
question.
AY
AZ
This
is
mark
sanjol,
the
arctic.
One
thing:
yes,
we
are,
we
are
next
to
the
residential
area,
but
we
are
right
at
the
very
corner
of
that
residential
area
right
on
beacon
street
too,
so
it
is
kind
of
a
transition
area.
It's
not
like
we're
in
the
middle
of
the
residential
district
and
on
one
side
of
us
is
the
spalding
rehab.
It's
a
fairly
large
building
that
allows
a
lot
of
open
space
air
light
on
that
side.
A
Is
mr
hampton
still
on
jeff?
What
did
the
bpd
recommend.
D
On
august
19th,
we
reviewed
it
as
a
an
eight
unit
building
and
we
recommended
approval
with
proviso
that
permeable
materials
be
used
in
the
driveway,
and
we
do
design
review
to
increase
the
open
space
where
possible.
D
But
we
recommended
originally
approval
with
proviso,
and
I
believe
one
of
the
reasons
I
mean
it
really
is
right
on
that
subject:
line
with
the
cps
next
to
mount.
A
Yeah
and
I've
noticed
so
just
to
go
on
an
aside
jeff.
Can
you
make
sure
that
when
cps
projects
come
to
come
to
the
bpda
that,
given
this
this
time
of
climate
change,
et
cetera
et
cetera
that,
in
fact
the
cpts
projects
don't
do
what
they
did
in
west
roxbury
on
the
bird
streets
and
chunk
it
up
into
lots,
but
do
a
cluster
development?
D
With
that
I
mean
you
know,
the
amounting
property
is
still
owned
by
the
mount
or
st
joseph.
I
got.
A
It
no
I'm,
I'm
I'm
perfectly
fine
with
cluster.
The
goal
was
to
keep
as
much
green,
open
space
when
you,
you
know
actively
subdivided
like
on
the
bird
streets
in
in
west
roxbury.
That
goes
totally
against
any
any
thought
behind.
Cps
yeah.
D
If
that
ever
comes
with
the
mount
property,
I
will
absolutely
take
a
look
at
that.
I
know
spalding
has
a
master
plan
in
place.
That
was
a
nursing
home
at
the
time,
but
they
went
through
the
master
plan
process.
A
Excellent
okay,
so,
let's
let's
see,
may
I
have
a
motion?
Please.