►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 09-25-18
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 09-25-18
A
A
B
C
A
A
B
C
E
A
G
B
H
H
A
B
H
I
B
G
B
A
L
K
K
K
A
A
A
M
F
O
D
B
Deferrals
or
with
Charles
for
9:30,
they
remember
call
the
first
case
calling
VOA
eight
one:
four,
six,
six,
seven:
nine
Glencoe
Street.
This
is
demolish
an
existing
one.
Family's
dwelling
in
wrecked
a
three-story
nine
unit,
residential
Villa
violations,
article
10
section
1,
a
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses,
article
51,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden,
Article,
51,
section
9,
a
lotta
areas,
insufficient
article
51,
section
I
in
the
floor
to
a
ratio.
B
P
P
P
District
is
at
three
out
of
four
thousand.
The
proposed
building
would
be
a
three-story
building
nine
residential
units.
There
would
be
seven
three-bedroom
units
into
two
bedroom
units
of
the
interest
range
from
a
minimum
of
about
eight
meant
of
24
square
feet
to
be
the
smallest
two-bedroom
up
to
about
1,100
square
feet
for
the
largest
three-bedroom
on
average,
there
are
about
a
thousand
square
feet.
The
violation
cited
for
the
multifamily
use
in
the
three
of
districts
for
insufficient
block
size.
Again,
ten
thousand
square
over
10,000
square
feet
is
provided.
P
P
Of
the
site,
but
the
notion
here
was
beginning
to
much
parking
is
possible
to
units
to
parking
spaces
per
unit.
I
think
was
a
satisfactory
to
the
community
and
it
still
leaves
room
for
some
green
space
on
the
site.
There's
a
violation
cited
more
obsessive
FA
are
the
maximum
that
they
are.
The
district
was
point
eight.
This
comes
in
at
just
about
1.0
1.0
402
be
precise.
P
There
is
a
usable
open
space
and
as
efficiency
as
I
said,
this
was
a
trade-off
in
terms
of
getting
more
parking
under
the
site,
but
there
is
still
packages
of
green
on
the
site,
as
is
evident
on
the
plans.
There's
a
rear
yard
sufficiency
sighted,
it's
essentially
a
modal
setback.
The
setback
is
not
right
to
the
front
lot
light.
It
is,
doesn't
leave
room
for
some
green
landscaping
along
the
front
lot
line.
There
is
a
citation
here
for
institution,
Austrian,
parking,
wired
off
street
parking
facility,
district
in
1.75
spaces
per
unit
or
one
banana
units.
S
A
A
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
three
one:
zero
six,
four,
seventeen
madeleine
street.
This
would
propose
one
story:
rare
edition
in
dec
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
51
section,
nine,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient,
an
article
51
section,
nine.
The
rail
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
from
the
record.
Please
battlin.
W
A
R
T
X
A
A
B
A
Y
It's
this
is
my
my
family
home.
Over
the
last
53
years,
my
wife
and
I
moved
back.
This
ports
predates
the
purchase
of
the
property
by
my
family
back
in
1965.
All
we're
asking
to
do
is
to
I
think
it's
a
few
inches
wider.
It's
just
a
very
bad
week
here.
My
wife
has
multiple
sclerosis.
She
doesn't
use
a
wheelchair.
She
walks,
but
she's
fallen
several
times
on
the
step.
A
R
X
A
B
A
G
AA
Name's
limas
mr.
main
singing
change
the
order
some
here
representing
the
order
pose
building
64
Bob
Street
East
Boston,
which
is
in
the
flood
zone
as
a
result
of
satisfying
the
Boston
conservation
commission's
numerous
requests.
Eric
post
moments,
including
the
architects
and
engineers
response
time,
submitting
all
required
documentation
cost
has
to
go
past
the
old
extension
time
period.
Our
next
hearing
with
the
positive
Conservation
Commission,
is
on
October
3rd
to
get
the
final
approvals
on
all
required
connotation
presented.
Thus
far.
A
AA
B
A
B
Back
to
the
9:30
hearings,
calling
this
case
calling
VOA
eight
five:
six:
four:
zero:
nine
thirty
Penniman
Road.
This
is
an
erect
e,
seven
story,
building
with
44
residential
units.
Two
artists
live
work,
unit
of
work
units
and
forty
two
sparking
spaces
demolition
of
an
existing
building
violations.
Article
51
six
to
nineteen,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden,
Article,
51
section.
Twenty
fourteen
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51
section,
twenty,
the
bill
and
height,
is
excessive
article
51
section.
Twenty,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
Article
51
section.
Twenty
Reyat
is
insufficient
article
51
section
56.
B
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
A
AC
AD
AC
A
AE
W
A
A
AC
AG
AG
AG
AE
AC
AE
AH
AC
O
AC
S
U
Mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
Annabel
Gomes
to
the
right
and
also
Improvement
Association,
actually
would
like
a
correction.
One
of
the
things
that
we
voted
against
was
that
there
wasn't
a
commitment
to
home
ownership
and
he
did
say
right
now
that
there
is
a
hundred
percent
home
ownership.
Is
that
something
that's
going
to
be
written
into
the
condo
documents.
AC
Y
AC
G
AJ
AJ
So,
therefore,
we
had
to
formally
express
to
the
board
he
deferral
in
order
for
the
proponents
to
formally
respond
to
the
executive
board
into
the
membership
each
of
the
items
to
us.
This
is
a
precedent-setting
project.
Seven
stories
is
unique
in
that
neighborhood.
We
just
thought
we
just
had
a
meeting
of
a
prospective
proposal
at
the
corner
of
Linden
Street
in
Cambridge
Street,
and
one
of
the
buildings
being
proposed
is
a
14
story.
Building.
This
is
what
it
is
happening.
AJ
These
developers
are
getting
in
Bolden,
but
based
on
the
envelope
continually
being
pushed
the
question
that
was
just
brought
up
earlier.
The
question
is
this:
also
in
terms
of
owner
occupancy,
who
are
we
building
these
condominiums
for?
Are
we
building
them
for
investors?
Are
we
building
them
for
residents
of
the
community
and
I
appreciate
the
proponents
increasing
their
percentage
to
60%,
but
they
oh,
they
did
so
under
pressure.
They
they
they
would
have
went
with
the
51%.
AJ
If
they
didn't
our
position,
we
have
serious
issues
about
the
FA
are
at
4.1
the
height
at
80
feet.
We
have
a
problem
that
this
building
is
directly
across
the
street,
from
Penniman,
Park
and
and
and
the
negative
impacts
that
this
potential
building
could
have.
Yes,
Alston
wants
more
condominiums,
but
they
are
not
going
to
write
a
blank
check
to
people
just
because
they
want
to
build
condominiums,
so
other
issues
as
well.
This
is
a
26
for
wide
street.
AJ
That's
what
Penniman
Road
is,
and
you
want
to
put
up
a
seven
story,
building
to
the
lot
line
on
a
26
foot
wide
street
to
us.
That
is
completely
unacceptable.
So
we'll
stick
to
our
original
position.
We
would
like
to
have
this
deferred
and
have
the
proponents
step
up
to
the
plate
and
combat
and
formally
respond
to
the
issues
that
we
brought
up
in
that
evaluation
sheet.
But
if
that's
not
the
case,
then
we
will
formally
oppose
this
project.
A
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AF
Q
A
AF
AC
AH
AF
AC
AC
AC
We
are
building,
doesn't
necessarily
not
a
single
abutting
resident
in
the
area
has
any
issues
with
this
one
because
there
really
are
and
because
they
recognize
that
the
site
and
with
homeownership
most
of
them
so
then
correct.
We
were
asked
to
do
more.
I
continue
to
try
to
make
things
better,
and
we
said
what,
if
we
go
to
60%.
AC
Voluntarily,
that's
five
more
units,
and
so
this
team
is
asking
the
neighborhood
and
this
board
to
allow
us
to
work
together.
It's
not
it's
not
a
leg
up.
We
can't
just
fall
materially,
it's
not
a
luxury
location,
it's
not
a
luxury
product
and
we
can't
perform.
It
simply
doesn't
work
right,
there's
a
reason
why
we
have
13%
if
I
get
out
more
I
would
but
it
doesn't
work
and
so
we're.
AK
AC
O
AH
AC
AE
AE
W
AC
A
AL
G
AL
AL
A
N
F
W
B
AM
For
the
record
place
attorney
John
Cugini,
10-4,
zero
grain
tree
on
46,
Murray,
Hill
Road.
This.
The
reason
for
this
referral
is
this:
property
is
located
directly
across
from
Chou's
Sumner
School
in
Roslindale,
and
want
to
continue
to
work
with
the
community.
We
are
any
parking
issues
in
traffic
flow,
so
we
worked
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
service
as
well
as
council
McCarthy's
office,
and
they
suggested
that
we
allow
additional
more
time
to
go
back
out
to
the
community.
For
that
most.
B
Of
1113
11:30
thank
you
are
there
any
other.
Deferrals
are
with
Charles
for
a
move
forward
deferrals,
but
the
nofa
9:30,
the
9:30
call
the
next
case.
Calling
boa
8:35
I
will
take
this
one
half
eight
three:
five:
zero:
two:
five:
four:
seventy
six
Beach
Street
there's
a
companion
case.
Boa
eight
three:
five:
zero,
three,
four:
four:
seventy
eight
peach
tree
this
is
for
76,
constructed
one
family
residential
and
proposed
a
lot
to
be
subdivided
from
the
large
a
lot
of
an
existing
two
family
on
it.
B
A
violation,
Article
67
section
32,
are
steep
parking,
is
insufficient.
Article,
67,
section
I
lot,
frontages
insufficient
Article,
67,
sex
and
I
lotta
areas,
insufficient
Article,
67,
section
9.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient
on
Article
67,
section
I
and
the
Reyat
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
478
Beach
Street
subdivide
the
existing
line
into
two
Lots
want
to
keep
the
existing
bill
and
the
other
allowed
new
construction
on
one
family
residential
violations.
Article
67,
section
9.
The
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article,
67
69.
B
Why
the
area's
insufficient
Article
67
69
the
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
Article,
67,
section
9.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
I
and
the
flirty
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
67,
section
I
on
the
usable
when
space
is
insufficient
in
Article
67
section
on
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
A
AN
For
76
478
Beach
Street
is
a
subdivision.
Currently,
the
existing
lot
has
nine
thousand
one
hundred
ninety
nine
square
feet.
Two
family
dwelling.
We
propose
divide
the
lot
in
half
in
equal
parts.
478
B
Street
would
remain
as
a
two
family
and
the
new
proposed
lot
would
be
a
single-family
dwelling.
Currently,
the
owner
occupies
one
of
the
units
in
his
property.
AN
AN
AN
Floor
area
ratio
excessive
for
the
new
proposed
building
were
actually
below
the
maximum
that
the
existing
structure
would
actually
be
increased
because
of
the
reduction
in
the
lot
so
we're
actually
not
making
any
changes
to
the
existing
building
and
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
I
think
that's
in
regards
to
the
existing
to
family,
because
it's
5,000
minimum
we
don't
have
the
extra
space
for
or
the
second
unit,
but
again
on
the
proposed
lot.
We
do
have
sufficient
opening
sufficient
open
space,
because
it's
only
a
one
family,
side,
yard
and
sufficiency.
AN
AN
AO
AN
AO
AN
AO
AO
AN
K
A
A
AN
A
B
B
A
B
B
AQ
Johnson
architect,
one
ninety
all
colony
of
Boston.
Mr.
chairman
member,
the
members
of
the
board,
we
had
no
butters
meeting
July
twelfth
sent
out
an
invitation
to
the
local
Civic
Association.
They
did
not
respond.
We
just
heard
from
them
yesterday
they'd
like
us
in
the
October
meeting,
so
we
spectrally
requested
a
furrow.
A
AQ
AR
G
B
AE
AL
W
B
AM
A
B
Have
a
date
of
1113
at
11:30.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
different
withdrawals
for
10:30
hearing?
None
we'll
go
back
to
the
930
cases,
calling
VOA
eight
one,
six,
six,
seven
621
49
to
21:51
Dorchester
Avenue!
This
is
a
build
in
addition
to
an
existing
building
front
yard
for
unit
occupancy
to
remain
the
same
violations.
Article
65
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
and
article
65
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
They've
been
addressed
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AS
AT
AT
A
AS
Two
violations
are,
first,
violation
is
multi-family
dwelling
forbidden.
We
are
not
changing
the
occupancy,
it
was
an
existing
floor
family,
it
is
staying
a
floor
family
and
the
second
violation
is
the
front
yard
violation.
The
front
yard
that
is
in
the
plans
right
now
is
set
further
back
than
the
setback
that's
allowed
in
this
area,
which
is
five
feet,
but
what
the
violation
that
was
listed
for
is
for
Seba,
which
is
basically
the
average
of
the
modal
along
that
streak
and
the
plans
that
are
provided
to
the
board.
AS
A
AT
O
AT
Yes,
yes,
there'll
be
a
so.
If
you
look
at
sheet
a1,
you
can
see
in
the
floor
plan
patently
on
the
photographs.
It
shows
that
the
front
porch
and
there's
a
handicapped
accessible
ramp
at
the
front
of
the
property,
with
the
parking
that
extends
beyond
that,
so
that
ramp
and
porch
will
be
enclosed.
It'll
come
out
a
little
close
that
further
to
the
street
will
still
have
the
handicapped,
accessible
ramp,
but
now
being
closed
in
the
building
and
from
a
design
element.
AK
M
B
3:09
for
128
dick
street
pistol,
legalized
unit
3
on
the
third
floor
and
renovate
and
change
Varkey
from
a
two-family
to
a
3
family
dwelling
and
proposed
3
off
street
parking
violations.
Article
65
section
9,
the
Flutie.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
An
article
65
section
I,
the
villain
height,
is
excessive.
It
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
attorney.
AM
For
you,
the
zoning
in
this
area
is
3
F
5,000.
This
is
an
existing
3
family
house.
The
the
issue
is
it's
five
thousand
for
the
first
two
units
and
it
would
be
2500
for
the
third
unit
under
the
zoning
code
and
they're
basically
36
feet
short
on
this.
It's
been
through
15
years
has
been
a
reef
Amalie
home
I,
provided
you
today
with
that
you'll
see
that
there's
a
letter
of
support
from
Saint
Mark,
Civic
Association,
so
in
essence
we're
just
looking
to
legalize
the
three
family
use
and,
additionally
to
the
community
process.
AM
A
A
A
AK
M
A
B
Boa
seven:
nine
eight
eight
six,
three
eleven
in
wood
Street:
this
is
a
proposed
refit.
New
three
family
would
Frank
construction
on
existing
vacant
lot.
The
violations,
article
65,
section,
65,
eighth,
floor
area
ratio,
success
of
article
65,
65
8.
The
lot
of
the
areas
insufficient
article
65,
section,
65,
eight
front
front
yard-
is
insufficient
article
65,
section,
nine
additional
lotta
areas,
it's
insufficient
article,
65
section
I
and
a
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9.
A
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
AU
My
name
is
Stuart
Schreyer.
My
offices
have
one
zero
zero
five
Dorchester
Avenue
in
Dorchester,
with
his
name
win
who's,
one
of
the
owners
of
the
property.
This
is
a
proposal
to
build
a
new
three
family
house.
Blah,
admittedly,
is
a
little
small,
but
that's
what
the
average
lot
on
that
street
is
the
Lots
two
thousand
nine
hundred
and
sixty
plus.
G
AU
AU
Well,
it's
simple
they're,
all
we're
all
very
similar.
They
might
be
2,800
2,900
3,000
behind
it
might
be
a
little
bigger
on
North
Street.
It
might
be
3,500
the
way
they're
going
to
make
this
lot
work
is
the
first-floor
apartment
is
going
to
be
a
little
smaller
than
the
other
apartments.
It's
going
to
be
a
900,
approximately
square
foot
apartment.
AU
On
the
first
floor,
what
that
will
allow
them
to
do
is
have
the
turning
radius
to
put
the
parking
spaces
behind,
because
there'll
be
a
porch
on
the
second
of
the
unfortunately
W,
just
two
beams
coming
out
to
support
the
second
full
sticks
out
to
the
rear,
and
what
that
will
do
is
get
to
the
turning
radius
walk,
three
cause
behind
the
house
and
left
sufficient
parking.
The
second
flow
will
be
a
little
larger
closer
to
maybe
12
1,250
square
feet.
There
will
be
1,250
square
feet.
AU
AU
AU
V
AV
AW
Z
Name
is
Peter
gray
I'm
here
representing
my
brother
Jemaine
degre,
who
owns
19
Wood
Street,
which
is
a
property
in
via
that
abuts,
this
property
in
Dorchester.
We're
very
concerned
that
the
setbacks,
the
side
yard
setbacks
in
the
front
yard
setbacks
will
not
destroy
the
character
of
the
property.
My
brother's
property,
yes,
tenants
living
in
that
property,
low
income
and
housing,
tenants
in
that
property,
whether
the
light
will
be
deprived.
These
tenants
of
light,
whether
the
side
yard
will
give
them
adequate,
breathing
room
with
the
properties.
My
brother
cleaned
out
that
lot.
Z
AY
The
germane
Dougray
133
Bay,
Road,
Duxbury
chairman
and
the
board
when
I
first
purchased
the
property
it
was
completely
dilapidated
and
the
actually
the
task
force
had
targeted
this
property
as
a
as
a
property
that
was
owned
by
a
run
by
drug
dealers
and
I,
went
in
cleaned
out
the
entire
property
cleaned
it
up.
That's
why
the
mayor
had
asked
to
do
a
press
conference
on
this
vacant
lot
where
they
want
to
build
this
house.
AY
We
had
that
press
comments
a
few
years
ago
and
I
was
very
happy
with
the
property
when
I
purchased
it,
because
it's
one
of
the
few
places
on
that
street
and
other
streets
that
has
a
little
bit
of
green
space
to
the
left
of
it.
It
allows
some
of
some
Sun
right
and
it's
not
most
of
the
houses
are
right
on
top
of
each
other
and
there's
only
like
a
couple
of
spots
on
the
street,
where
you
can
have
a
little
bit
of
space.
There's
the
density
and
even
though
they're
gonna
have
off
street
parking.
AY
That's
still
going
to
add
several
cars
to
this
street.
If
you
ever
drove
down
Norton
to
Inwood,
which
is
a
one-way
street
in
the
winter,
even
when
it's
not
winter,
you
have
to
pretty
much
stop
to
get
through
Norton
Street
to
wait
to
get
around
cars
to
for
children
for
everything
you
have
to
go
very
slow
and
I,
don't
think
the
density
and
the
traffic
is
going
to
help
us
at
all
and
pretty
much
it's
just
that
we
enjoy
the
sunlight
that
comes
in
to
our
property.
AY
From
that
side,
one
of
the
main
reasons
I
purchased,
the
property
I
did
a
little
bit
of
investigation
on
this
lot
when
I
purchased
my
property
and
and
at
that
time
the
Planning
Board
did
told
me
in
their
opinion,
it
wasn't
buildable
I
understand
that
everybody
has
a
right
to
apply
for
a
variance,
but
I
am
totally
opposed
to
development.
On
this
lot,.
A
AY
B
V
AY
AU
G
A
G
A
B
The
next
case
calling
boa
eight
one:
eight
three
zero
seven,
eleven
browning
Avenue.
This
is
a
proposed
reef
family.
The
violation
violation
is
article
60,
section,
nine
additional
lot.
Air
for
additional
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
nine
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
radical
sixty
section
I
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
66
and
I
on
the
side.
Yeah
this
insufficient
article
60
section
I
on
the
Reyat,
is
insufficient.
In
article
60
section,
nine,
the
floating
a
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AU
This
is
11
browning
Ave,
it's
a
little
bigger
a
lot
it's
about
3,900
square
feet,
although
it
is
also
at
three
at
5,000
zone.
There
are
a
number
of
other
three
family
houses
in
the
neighborhood,
including
15
browning
and
21
browning
on
three
family
houses.
Also
in
the
neighborhood.
There
are
other
uses
that
are
consistent
with
with
this.
Seventeen
to
nineteen
is
a
project
called
hope
in
Dorchester,
which
is
really
a
multi-use
family
dwelling,
so
it
really
should
be
suitable
for
the
neighborhood.
AU
AV
AW
A
A
B
Calling
VOA
eight
one,
nine
seven,
two
nine
one:
seven
Brunswick
Street,
there's
also
a
building
code
at
Brunswick,
Street
vo,
a
8
1
9,
7,
3,
zero,
107,
Brunswick
Street.
This
is
to
extend
living
space
to
the
basement
for
unit
1
on
an
existing
3
family
dwelling
in
an
interior
of
innovation
to
unit
1.
The
violations
article
56
229,
flaw
in
a
ratio
is
excessive.
This
is
for
Building
Code,
section
110,
16.2,
exit
access
means
of
egress
from
dwelling
units
or
sleeping
areas
shall
not
lead
to
other
sleeping
areas.
B
AZ
A
AZ
A
A
A
A
AZ
AZ
AB
A
AO
AD
Acting
champions
of
the
boy
Joshua
man,
fat,
man's
officer,
neighborhood
services,
we
had
a
nut
butters
meeting
a
couple
of
months
ago
for
the
site,
but
after
hearing
designees
wisdom
on
this,
we
definitely
support
as
well
we're
supporting
the
gentleman
I
know.
There
was
an
incident
with
the
fence
on
the
side
that
we
were
trying
to
get
resolved
with
some
of
the
neighbors
and
individuals
who
lived
on
the
site.
Rather
than
that.
We
definitely
support
the
wisdom
of
a
mr.
Pazhani.
AW
A
N
G
A
B
The
case
calling
seven
three
four
one:
five:
three:
seventy
nine
Devon
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
art
from
three
to
four
apartments.
By
legalizing
existing
situation,
basement
apartment
and
reconfiguration
of
stairs
violation,
Article
II,
Section,
seven,
the
use
is
forbidden,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
parking
areas,
article
50,
section
29,
excessive
fai,
article
50,
section
29.
The
number
of
a
lot
of
habitable
stories
has
been
exceeded
in
article
13,
section:
29,
insufficient,
open
space
name;
an
address
for
the
record,
please:
okay,
name
an
address
for
the
record
player,
Brendan.
A
AH
BB
BB
BB
AO
AO
A
AO
A
A
AO
B
On
the
last
case
of
930
collie,
boa
8
1
0
8
8
661,
Hollander
Street.
This
is
an
erect.
A
new
3
family
with
off
street
parking.
The
violations,
article
50
section
43
off
street
parking,
aquariums
access,
article
53,
section
29,
the
law
tiaras
insufficient
article
50,
section
29
additional
la
tierra
per
unit
is
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Atika
50,
section
29
in
excess
of
fai
article
50,
section
20
and
a
height
is
excessive.
B
AM
John
Jeanne
10
Forbes
Road
in
Braintree
with
me
today
is
Dave
Anderson
representing
the
development
team
said
this
is
61
Hollander
Street
in
Dorchester.
It's
a
zoning.
It's
3
at
4,000.
The
lot
size
is
three
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet.
The
proposals
to
build
a
new
tree
unit
apartment
building
each
unit
would
have
three
bedrooms
two
baths.
There
would
be
one
parking
space
per
unit.
The
unit
sizes
are
all
the
same:
there'd
be
twelve
hundred
and
fifty-six
square
feet.
AM
It's
a
an
existing
vacant
lot,
that's
currently
in
size
and
shape
with
the
other
existing
three
families
that
are
in
this
neighborhood.
It
was
some
concerns
with
the
abutters
in
Civic,
regarding
height
in
FA,
R
and
height
has
been
brought
down
to
31
feet.
F
AR
complies
at
point
8.
It
has
gone
through
a
lengthy
community
process
and,
as
I
stated,
the
changes
were
made
in
the
resulted
changes.
There's
the
changes
that
were
made
for
result
of
the
input
that
we
received
from
the
community.
A
AM
A
AD
Acting
chair
members
of
the
board,
Joshua
McFadden
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
like
to
go
record
in
support.
Another
applicant
didn't
meet
with
the
garrison
Charter
Neighborhood
Association,
which
DIF
definitely
had
some.
A
branch
is
about
the
height
which
I
think
were
addressed,
but
after
Tom
at
this
time.
Excuse
me
electrical
reckon
support.
A
BC
Name
is
Eliza
Williams
I
live
at
56,
Hollander,
Street
I'm,
actually
on
the
housing
board
of
the
Ariston
Trotter
Neighborhood
Association
and
I
actually
took
a
lot
of
umbrage
with
different
things.
In
this
request,
they
were
double
counting
space
areas
between
the
current
existing
property.
You
know
when
they
were
trying
to
build
on,
in
addition
to
that,
they
also
completely
disregard
the
fact
that
it
does
not
follow
suit
with
other
houses
there.
We
have
that
areas
way
to
set
forward
on
the
lot
and
so
setting
it
back.
BC
They
also
I
took
umbrage
with
the
fact
that
we
have
an
excessive
amount
of
parking
issues
and
again
there
were
double
counting
spaces
from
behind
other
property
they
owned.
In
addition
to
this
one,
they
also
just
disregarded
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
we
had.
They
were
not
forthcoming
when
they
actually
made
the
presentation
to
the
neighborhood
committee.
Their
representative
actually
said
there
were
a
lesser
amount
of
variances
and
upon
further
investigation,
and
we
were
able
to
learn.
There
were
more
than
they
initially
gave
us.
Overall,
it
just
doesn't
meet
the
variances.
BC
A
BC
BE
BC
BA
BA
G
W
G
BF
Morning,
chairman
and
board,
my
name
is
Charlotte
Williams
and
I
live
across
the
street
from
said
lot
at
number,
56
I'm
also
a
board
member
of
the
garrison
Trotter
Neighborhood
Association,
as
as
a
neighbor
as
a
person
across
the
street
I
do
not
want
those
variances
accepted.
The
lot
is
too
small.
It's
obvious
that
the
lot
is
too
small,
it's
as
big
as
my
driveway,
which
is
a
double
driveway,
but
there
is
not
enough
space
there,
and
this
this
has
come
to
the
board
on
more
than
one
occasion.
BF
Maybe
this
is
the
third
at
the
fourth
time,
I
think
they're
wasting
the
time
of
this
board.
The
lot
is
too
small:
there's
not
enough
room
to
the
front,
there's
not
enough
room
to
the
side.
There's
not
enough
room
to
the
back.
I
haven't
even
gotten
into
the
height
issue.
That's
not
what
concerns
me.
I
do
not
want
three
families
crammed
over
there
and
it's
very,
very
tiny
lot
and
I.
Don't
know
where
three
cars
would
go
behind
that
building.
It's
a
very
small
lot,
I
think.
Maybe
there
were
garages
there.
Originally.
BF
AM
So
I
think
initially
we
get
to
the
Civic
Association.
The
initial
concern
was
density
and
height.
They
were
the
two
major
concerns
the
height
has
been
lowered
and
the
density
complies
with
the
FAS
what's
been
brought
in
to
in
compliance
and
with
respect
to
Indian,
if
they
are
so
it
has.
So
when
people
are
talking
about
a
structure,
that's
too
large
for
a
lot
its
complying
with
that
they
are
under.
The
other
concern
that
was
raised
by
this
other
woman
was
the
size
of
life.
When
I
do
this,
it's
all
of
you
guys.
AM
Do
you
look
at
the
other
lots
of
it
consistently
me?
But
if
you
look
at
the
other
lots
of
scientists
they're
all
similar,
some
are
smaller,
so
the
zoning
in
the
neighborhood
has
changed.
So
it's
three
or
four
thousand
with
the
existing
structures
in
the
house,
many
of
which
sit
on
a
lot
and
said
I'm
exactly
the
same
size.
Three
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
square
feet.
A
A
AL
A
B
I'm
gonna
call
one
more
time
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
1030
hearing.
None
we'll
go
right
to
that
first
case,
calling
VOA
eight
five,
zero,
five,
four
six,
four,
fifty
one
D
Street.
This
is
the
seeking
the
ability
to
build
out
and
use
the
space
within
the
building
for
the
purpose
of
the
research
and
development
laboratory.
Use
no
work
to
be
done
at
this
time.
B
BG
Morning,
chairman
Erlich
and
secretaries
of
the
board
of
the
field,
my
name
is
Mary
Marshall,
155,
seaport
Boulevard
with
me,
a
Steve
favor
from
related
field,
177,
milk,
Street
and
David
Vitale
who's,
our
consultant
for
EH&S
matters.
The
matter
before
you
is
to
seek
permission
to
authorize.
The
use
of
laboratory
are
indeed
within
the
building
at
located
at
1420
Street.
It's
an
existing
building,
it
was
formerly
warehouse,
was
converted
to
office
space,
there's
a
mix
of
uses
within
the
building,
including
some
lab,
but
I
owned.
It
reacquired.
BG
It
recently
paid
a
lot
more
money
when
it
reacquired
it
and
would
like
to
implement
for
R&D
use,
which
is
consistent
with
the
zoning
in
South
Boston
for
this
area.
That
requires
a
conditional
use.
Permit
ISD
also
noted
that
we
needed
an
iPod
permit
from
South
Boston
iPod
I,
don't
know
if
it's
from
my
looking
at
bizarre
maps,
it's
not
currently
within
the
iPod
area,
but
we
saw
we
appealed
to
seek
that
relief
to
the
extent
required
as
well.
BG
So
there's
adequate
we've
addressed,
we
had
a
community
meeting
with
the
abutters
sponsored
by
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
We
asked
unanswered
questions
in
terms
of
the
laboratory
operations
and
that's
why
mr.
Vitale
is
here
today.
We
provided
them
with
a
follow-up
sort
of
statement
as
to
what
greens
abuses
would
go
there.
BH
Yes,
Stephen
paper,
vice-president
with
related
Beall
at
177
milk
Street
in
Boston.
We
anticipate
that
we
would
have
up
to
approximately
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
feet
that
might
be
leased
as
R&D
space.
Of
that
typically,
the
proportion
that's
actually
for
research
area
is
normally
between
50
to
60
percent
of
that
with
the
other
space
being
ancillary
office.
So
in
essence,
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
75
to
85
thousand
feet
of
actual
research
space.
BH
That
300,000
is
it.
For
example,
we
have
some
very
long
term
leases
with
tenants
such
as
JP
Morgan,
Chase
they'll
remain
there
existing.
In
addition,
the
building
was
at
one
point,
going
to
be
used
as
a
telco
hotel,
so
there
is
a
significant
amount
of
infrastructure
associated
with
that.
Those
are
also
long
term
tenants,
they'll
also
be
remaining
so.
BH
AR
AE
BH
Work
to
increase
HVAC
capacity,
we
already
have
power
there
because
of
the
telco
use.
We're
gonna
redistribute
that
power
today,
it's
all
in
the
basement
because
it
was
never
fully
distributed,
but
we
don't
have
to
bring
any
additional
power
we're
going
to
then
just
bring
a
bus
duct
up
into
the
building.
So
there
are
some
and
there'll
be
some
we've
already
identified
additional
drainage
because
of
the
you
know,
wet
lab
conditions
and
where
that
would
be
located
through
through
the
building
and
those
permits
will
be
pulled
as
we
obtain
the
designs
and
so
on.
AO
BH
BH
AO
BH
We
will
not
allow
any
level
above
Beale
to
in
the
building
period.
The
leases
will
strictly
prohibit
anything
above
BL
to
the
monitoring
of
that
activity
is
to
go
to
another
level.
Bo3
would
require
a
serious
building
permit
than
a
serious
adjustment
in
their
in
their
facility
plan
because
of
the
requirement
for
containment
in
those
areas.
Otherwise,
there
you
know
they
wouldn't
be
operating
so.
BH
BD
BH
Absolutely,
for
example,
one
of
the
bigger
issues
is
just
chemical
storage,
and
so
we
actually
maintain
and
keep
because
the
City
of
Boston
the
fire
department
is
concerned
about
the
amount
of
chemicals
on
each
floor.
So
when
you
have
a
multi-tenant
condition,
they
will
come
in
at
least
annually
to
our
facility
and
ask
us
for
our
for
our
records
that
we
maintain
of
all
of
the
tenants
to
ensure
that
the
amount
the
volume
of
chemicals
is
within
a
prescribed
allowed
limits.
O
BG
BD
BD
AK
BI
BI
BI
They
come
in
clean
they're
required
to
leave
clean
as
well,
so
that
would
require
a
decommissioning
of
leaving
of
taking
all
of
the
materials
taking
all
of
the
waste
and
then
determine
by
sampling
that
the
space
is
clean.
At
that
point,
they
then
would
cancel
their
permits,
so
they
cancel
the
Fire
Department
permit
they'd
cancel
our
transfer
of
the
MWRA
permit
and
that
basically
puts
that
tenant
out
of
that
building
by
the
fact
that
they
have
canceled
or
rescinded
their
permits.
BH
I
AP
Mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
board
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
As
the
proponent
noted,
we
did
have
an
abutters
meeting
on
site
a
number
of
residents
attended
from
the
adjoining
buildings.
The
only
concern
that
came
up
was
people
were
concerned
about
what
level
of
lab
it
would
be
once
they
understood
that
it
would
be
a
low
level
lab
and
the
proponent
would
need
many
more
approvals
if
they
wanted
to
go
to
a
higher
level.
People
were
very
comfortable
with
the
use
Thank
You.
Mr.
D
B
BJ
A
B
Volume
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
three,
two,
eight
five,
four
six,
fifty
East
seventh
Street.
This
is
create
additional
living
space
in
the
existing
basement
of
eight
hundred
and
seventy
four
square
feet.
Violations
are
equal.
Sixty
eight
section
29
through
structure
e
six
district,
article
68
section,
seven,
the
dwelling
unit
is
forbidden
in
the
basement.
Article
27
s,
section;
five
sin:
the
iPod
applicability
in
South
Boston,
article
68,
section
33.
Our
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
David
address
for
the
record.
Please
Doug.
BK
Chairman
members
of
the
board,
I
just
want
to
make
one
little
correction
on
the
zoning
code.
Refusal
letter
I'm,
actually
not
requesting
roof
structure,
restriction
relief,
nor
Austrey
parking
relief,
I
actually
have
those
there's
no
roof
work.
The
work
is
purely
internal.
The
project
is
to
renovate
the
lower
level
and
create
a
fourth
living
space,
which
would
be
sprinkled
with
providing
two
means.
V
grass
create
a
tenant
for
family.
A
AO
A
A
BK
If
you
look
on
your
second
and
third
page
we're
providing
parking
in
the
back
of
the
building,
there's
an
easement
between
this
property
and
the
adjacent,
what
provides
a
vehicle
er
access
to
the
back
and
there's
actually
more
parking,
but
the
adjacent
building
to
the
right.
So
the
new
there's
more
than
enough
parking
for
the
tenants
and
owners.
AP
Mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Allison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
look
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
did
hold
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
in
several
of
letters
came
and
were
supportive
of
the
project.
This
is
a
project
that
will
keep
a
longtime
family
in
South,
Boston,
Thank,
You.
BL
A
B
BM
Morning
I'm
mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
board
Richard
Lin's
at
2:45,
Sumner,
Street,
East
Boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
requests
for
a
further
different
being,
is
that
we
are
still
in
the
process
of
having
conversations
with
the
director
butter.
We're
tweaking
the
plans
a
bit
more
to
hopefully
address
some
of
their
outstanding
concerns.
BM
A
B
BM
B
Love
the
same
date
of
twelve
seventeen.
Thank
you
for
over
thirty.
Are
there
any
other
to
perform
eleven
I'm?
Sorry,
twelve,
eleven
on
both
of
those
getting
ahead
of
myself
Christmas
time?
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
or
withdrawals?
I
do
have
one
just
for
the
board's
information.
Boa
the
last
case
on
eleven
thirty
boa
eight
four,
eight
six,
four
seven
82
glencliff
road
is
gonna,
be
deferred
till
10:30.
The
2018
at
11:30
supports
information.
B
Okay,
get
back
to
the
10:30
s,
calling
boa
eight
five,
three
five,
four,
four,
four:
twenty
eight
to
four
thirty
West
Broadway:
this
is
an
interior
innovation
of
existing
branch
office
includes
demolition
of
existing
walls,
floors
the
ceilings,
construction
of
new
walls
of
floors
and
ceilings
and
replace
canopy
and
exterior
stay
away.
This
violation
is
article
27,
SX,
section
5s
in
the
south
loss
and
applicability
name
and
address
for
the
record.
P
AP
A
A
B
BN
G
A
T
BO
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
eight
five:
zero:
three,
seven:
nine:
ninety
nine
High
Street.
This
is
a
citizens
first
floor
attendant
interior
construction.
This
is
change
of
our
control
offices,
restaurant,
the
garage
doors,
car
rental
and
bank,
two
offices,
restaurant
at
36,
837,
Garage,
parental
and
bank,
with
ATM
violations,
article
49,
a
five:
this
is
Greenway
bank
machines
are
conditional,
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BO
A
BP
G
BP
BQ
Mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
tension.
She
from
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
I,
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
The
proponent
actually
went
through
community
outreach
process,
informed
a
dirac
abutting
buildings
and
the
neighborhood's
associations
and
received
no
opposition.
Thank
you.
BL
O
B
Next,
two
cases
calling
VOA
eight
three,
three,
eight
four,
two
sixty
State
Street,
this
building
code,
boa
eight
four,
two
one
7660
State
Street.
This
is
an
interior
renovation
of
existing
restaurant
and
new
build.
In
addition,
the
violations
article
45
section,
five-
the
flow
ratio
is
excessive.
This
is
for
Building
Code.
This
is
the
Maab
chapter,
7
section,
seven
or
five
on
openings
openings
are
not
permitted
with
a
fire
separation.
Distance
is
less
than
three
feet
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
BR
Morning,
mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
board,
Ruth
Suleman
with
Nixon
Peabody
here
on
behalf
of
American
craft
brewery,
which
is
Boston
Beer,
Company,
Sam,
Adams
brand
and
others
with
me-
are
representatives
from
burgmaier
the
architect
C
cubed,
which
is
the
code
consultant
representative
development
consultant
Ryan
Smith
from
the
company
and
Molly
McGlinn
from
Salomon
McCown
who's
dealt
with
community
outreach.
We
also
have
representatives
from
the
landlord
Oxford
I'm
sitting
in
the
audience
as
well.
BR
If
there
are
any
questions,
Boston
Beer
proposes
to
lease
what
was
the
former
Houston's
or
Hill
stones
restaurant,
just
on
the
backside
of
60
State
Street
right
on
Fanueil
Hall
and
a
very
exciting
tap
room
is
proposed.
A
new
two-story
structure
going
up
onto
the
plaza
we're
here
for
both
building
code
and
zoning.
So
I
don't
know
what
the
pleasure
of
the
board
is.
L
You
thank
you.
Mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
Doug
Anderson,
C
cubed,
part
of
the
project,
includes
extension
of
the
existing
facade
that
faces
the
Sam
Adams
statue
to
within
3
feet
of
the
property
line
and
part
of
the
design
of
the
project
is
vocalising
on
that
facade
and
also
a
little
bit
on
the
side
where
it
actually
faces.
Fanueil
Hall
market
itself.
L
L
In
this
case,
it's
an
interior
lot
line,
and
so
that
is
the
building
code
violation,
and
that
is
the
relief
which
we
seek
to
have
unlimited
percentage
of
openings
on
those
facades
and
August
2.
If
we
face
the
street
we'd
be
fine
and
we
don't
propose
putting
sprinklers
at
six
foot
spacing
on
those
windows,
because
the
odds
of
anything
being
constructed
on
that
Park
are
pretty
remote.
So
that's
the
building
code
relief
that
we
request.
BS
BP
AO
A
BR
The
zoning
is
just
a
little
bit
of
a
math
puzzle,
so
math
is
not
my
strong
suit,
but
bear
with
me
for
just
a
moment.
The
land
area
for
this
lot
is
actually
two
parcels.
There
is
a
main
parcel
which
is
very
large,
and
then
there
is
a
sliver
parcel
in
2007
when
a
zoning
variance
was
granted
by
this
board.
The
land
area
that
was
used
was
only
the
main
parcel.
A
A
BR
BR
The
60
State
Street
building
was
built
on
both
parcels,
but
for
some
reason,
when
the
relief
was
written
up
and
granted
by
this
board,
only
the
land
area
for
the
larger
parcel
for
the
large
parcel
was
included.
Okay,
just
to
back
up
Boston
beer
is
proposing
a
square
footage
edition
of
3923
square
feet.
Okay,
that
sliver
parcel
is
2276
square
feet
in
2007
the
zoning
relief
that
was
granted
granted
a
maximum
fer
of
14.3.
BR
So
if
we
did,
if
we
weren't,
including
this
other
sliver
parcel
as
part
of
the
land
area,
we
would
be
asking
you
to
go
up
in
fer
a
little
bit
to
add
that
3923
square
feet
to
an
FA
are
otherwise
of
14.3.
But
when
we
add
the
land
area
and
we
increase
the
denominator
and
then
we
add
the
little
bit
the
3923
square
feet
of
building
new
building
addition,
we
actually
bring
the
square.
The
FA
are
down
to
thirteen
point,
seven
eight.
BR
So
we
would
like
approval
from
the
board
just
to
rectify
and
correct
kind
of
the
record
here,
and
we
want
it
to
be
transparent.
We
are
adding
square
footage
and
we
think
the
intent
of
the
board
in
2007
was
a
maximum
number
of
gross
of
square
feet
of
gross
floor
area
and
because
we're
adding
some
gross
floor
area.
We
wanted
to
come
before
you
and
make
sure
that
we
got
the
relief,
even
though
as
a
math
problem
or
decreasing
the
FA.
Our
overall.
BT
BR
L
L
AO
AO
AO
AF
L
AO
BR
BE
BL
BU
Mr.
chairman
and
members,
my
name
is
Linda
DeMarco
I
live
in
284,
a
mystery
Jamaica,
Plain
and
I
own
Boston,
pretzel
and
I'm.
Also
the
president
of
the
Merchants
Association
at
Fanueil
Hall
and
on
behalf
of
all
the
members.
We
support
this
taproom
and
we
welcome
tourists
and
residents
to
activate
the
area
I'm
also
here
on
behalf
of
the
general
manager,
Joe
O'malley,
who
was
unable
to
attend,
and
he
also
supports
this
member
I,
also
like
to
have
on
record
that
I've
owned
Boston
pretzel
for
20-some
odd
years
in
Jamaica,
Plain
and
Boston.
BU
Beer
has
been
my
neighbor
for
that
whole
time
and
they
have
been
the
consummate
neighbor
in
Jamaica
Plain.
They
support
us
where
I'm,
a
small
business
they've
always
been
tremendously
supportive
and
I
actually
welcome
them
to
this
area,
so
they
can
help
some
of
the
small
business
in
this
area.
So
I.
Thank
you
for
letting
me
speak.
G
B
AF
A
AF
AM
AX
A
I
BW
Chairman
and
members
of
the
board
I'm,
a
member
of
this
kind
of
Association
at
79,
Pearl
Street
I,
have
no
opposition
to
the
X
Elizabeth
Clifford
79
Pearl
Street
condo
association.
I
want
to
just
note
that
I
have
no
opposition
to
the
excavation.
But
this
is
a
architectural.
A
historical
house
and
I
do
have
opposition
to
the
sliding
door
on
the
plans.
They
are
doing
some
renovations
the
first
floor
unit
and
it
has
a
sliding
door
on
the
plan
and
I
am
opposed
to
this
configuration
of
the
exit.
A
AF
AF
A
AO
A
B
P
P
Alignment,
the
sole
violation
here
he
is
big,
beautiful,
open
space
access
to
the
rear
yard
is
provided
by
hips,
which
place,
which
is
private
way
open
to
the
public
crowd.
It's
a
10-foot,
wide
public
private
way
with
the
standard,
driveway
ability
area
between
the
hosting
of
the
parking
spaces.
So
the
paramedics.
AB
P
G
BX
A
B
B
This
is
478
horror
Street.
This
is
the
subdivide
apostle
that
the
two
lot
lot
a
to
remain
at
78
Horace
and
a
lot
be
to
have
to
point
500
square
feet
to
be
known
as
76
horror,
Street.
They
also
confirmed
me
aquas.
He
has
a
two-family
dwelling
or
existing
condition.
For
many
years.
The
violation,
article
53
section,
56
austie
parking
loading
requirements.
Existing
parking
is
eliminated,
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
debt
setback,
two
and
a
half
feet
is
required.
B
BY
BY
7,600
spree,
the
two
family
house
will
be
owner
occupied
as
I
mentioned
by
mr.
Staub,
or
what
bedroom
apartment
and
a
tree
bed
in
Survivor.
We
are
also
proposing
to
put
a
common
passageway
between
the
two
lots,
so
it's
to
provide
access
to
the
rear
of
the
both
structures
for
rubbish
removal
and
bringing
the
rubbish
out
to
the
street
and
putting
it
in
the
back
yeah.
We
are
also
proposing
to
provide
two
parking
spaces
tandem
parking
spaces.
Q
BX
Mr.
chairman
and
members
of
the
board
has
Garcia
with
the
officer
Navarro
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
for
the
project
this
the
applicant
actually
complete
the
community
process
through
three
hours
meeting
and
presenting
in
front
of
the
neighborhood
association
for
three
times,
even
though
the
Association
vote
against
the
proposal,
but
they
a
work
out
with
the
community
and
the
developers
about
the
concerns
of
parking.
They
therefore
would
like
to
in
support.
Thank
you.
A
B
You
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
one:
eight
four,
nine
four,
two
twenty
three
Saratoga
Street
just
to
combine
two
Lots,
also
demolish
the
existing
building
in
the
wreck,
four
story:
building
with
nine
units
and
nine
interior
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
53
section
56.5
market
maneuverability,
article
53
section
8
proposed
use-
is
forbidden.
Article
53
section
9
an
insufficient
of
the
additional
lot
area,
article
53
section
I
in
excess
of
FAI
article
53,
six
and
nine.
The
number
of
wild
stories
has
been
exceeded.
Article
53,
section
I,
the
maximum
height
is
been
exceeded.
B
Article
53
section,
nine
insufficient,
open
space
proposed
article
53,
section
I,
insufficient
rail
yard,
setback
in
article
53,
section,
nine,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
53,
section,
54,
screening
in
buffer
and
none
is
proposed.
Article
53,
section,
56
insufficient,
proposed
parking
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BJ
BJ
BJ
BJ
BJ
Outside
we've
met,
he
heard
some
concern
from
our
butters
hands,
sided
for
property
and
asked
us
to
also
pull
in
in
the
rare
edition
on
the
back
of
the
building
that
goes
out
further
and
they're
building
two
and
a
half
feet
off
their
property.
We
were
able
to
do
that
with
some
new
plans,
both
creating
a
new
file
Asian's.
Well,
that
would
plan
will
reflect
that
to
neighbors
in
the
back.
BJ
BJ
V
BX
Mr.
chairman
and
members
of
orchestras
Garcia
with
the
mayor's
office
and
abajo
services,
a
this
project
completed
community
process
and
the
concerns
were
about
the
number
of
units
parking
spaces
a.
However,
they
work
out
the
community
and
there
it
is
initial
proposal,
and
they
received
also
the
support
from
a
local
civic
association.
Do
therefore,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
BV
BS
Hi
so
I'm
James
Broomfield
director,
but
er
I'd
like
to
thank
the
development.
For
you
know,
working
with
me,
you
know,
they've
been
we've
been
working
back
and
forth,
and
a
lot
of
the
issues
I
think
we're
not
quite
there
yet
we're
getting
closer
I
would
just
like
to
ask
to
defer
this
decision
until
we
have
more
time
to
discuss
some
of
my
issues,
such
as
the
rear
setback,
not
meeting
the
30
feet.
BS
You
know
required
by
law.
If
you
go
to
the
property
and
you
go
into
the
back,
there's
nothing
on
the
entire
street
that
goes
back
more
than
I'd,
say
40
feet
then
yeah.
This
is.
This
would
be
just
in
stark
contrast
to
everything
in
the
neighborhood.
It
would
actually
be
detrimental
to
my
property
and
my
ability
to
just
get
any
sunlight
in
the
back
of
my
house.
You
know
my
building
was
recently
renovated
just
a
year
ago.
These
are
three
row
houses
built
together.
BS
At
the
same
time,
you
know
my
place
was
renovated
in
accordance
with
everything
that
was
around
it.
It
took
the
same
footprint
of
what
was
there
before
and
I
know.
That's
not
going
to
be
possible
with
this
development,
but
I'm
just
asking
us
to
try
to
rein
in
it
a
little
bit.
There's
nothing
on
the
street.
That's
four
storeys,
there's
nothing
that
goes
back
as
far
as
they're
requesting.
BJ
BJ
BJ
BS
They've
definitely
been
open
to
working
with
me,
which
is
great.
That's
that's.
Why
I'm
just
asking
for
a
little
more
time
to
kind
of
finalize
this
and
yeah
it's
true.
A
lot
of
the
buildings
go
further
back
than
where
they're
at
now,
but
they're,
probably
at
about
50
feet
from
the
rear
fence
and
looking
to
go.
16
is
a
stark
contrast
to
everything
in
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
A
BS
N
AA
B
G
F
B
Put
on
my
pack
just
also
calling
boa
192
796
words
what
street
this
is
subdivided
existing.
Two
thousand
nine
hundred
eighty
six
square
feet
lauded
to
create
a
new
lot
consisting
of
two
thousand
ten
to
ten
square
feet.
The
ninety-six
warrant
worth
no
work
other
than
to
be
done
of
the
single-family
to
remain
the
remaining
portion
of
976
square
feet.
BM
BM
Originally
proposed
the
contemporary
building
for
units
based
upon
the
comments
that
we
burn,
the
neighborhood
we've
modified
the
design
that
specific
input
from
the
directive
letter
in
the
design
field
to
make
this
building
a
little
more
traditional,
more
consistent
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
Based
upon
that,
we
understand
the
neighbours
are
much
more
supportive.
The
proposal
what
was
originally
proposed
I
would
point
out
that
we
have
been
commitment
with
the
directive,
but
earnest
about
the
record
based
upon
the
long
existence
of
the
existing,
which
has
been
somewhat
problematic.
BM
BM
BX
AI
My
name
is
Gillian
Anderson
I'm
at
8,
10
Saratoga,
Street
I,
was
in
opposition
of
this
building.
The
the
owners
have
repeatedly
shown
themselves
to
be
disrespectful
to
the
regulations
of
the
city
of
Boston
and
I.
Consider
myself
a
desperate
neighbor
at
this
point,
because
there
is
a
rat
infestation
in
that
abandoned
building,
which
has
repeatedly
been
called
attention
to
the
owner,
and
she
has
done
nothing
about
it.
AI
So
I
would
like
to
urge
the
I
would
have
liked
to
have
urged
the
board
to
hold
off
postpone
the
approval
of
the
variances
until
these
problems
were
taken
care
of,
because
that's
seems
to
be
the
only
leverage
we
have.
However,
in
discussions
with
attorney
Lin's
beforehand,
he
committed
to
taking
care
of
the
rodent
problem
and
the
water
problems
before
the
filing
of
this
variance
is
done
and
if
that
happens
and
I
would
remove
my
opposition.
F
BM
B
This
is
directly
single-family
home.
The
violates
article
53
section
57
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
lobby
area-
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
floaty.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height
number
of
storeys
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
53.
Section
9
of
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient
in
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BN
G
BX
N
A
G
B
AO
AE
AC
AL
AC
AL
AC
AC
This
addition,
1909,
extends
to
within
25
feet
of
the
rear
yard
property
line,
so
we're
proposing
to
expand
this
addition
to
the
west
by
4
feet
so
building
this
out
here
and
this
new
area.
So
we're
not
going
any
further
back
into
the
rear
yard
in
the
existing
addition
already
is,
but
this
is
new
area.
AC
AC
AO
A
BX
BV
A
A
B
The
first
case
for
11:30
and
read
discussions
VOA
six
171,
three
173
Humboldt
Avenue.
This
is
a
increased
lodging
from
ten
to
twenty
persons,
no
work
to
be
done,
changing
beds
from
one
bed
to
two
per
room:
the
violation,
article
50
section
28,
lodging
house
and
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record
player.
A
CA
Thank
you.
We
have
a
petition
to
increase
occupancy
at
the
facility
located
at
173
Humboldt
Avenue
from
10
to
20.
By
way
of
background,
the
Boston
rescue
mission
has
been
a
social
service
agency
here
in
the
Boston
community
since
1899
and
back
in
2010.
They
purchased
the
property
at
173
Humboldt.
At
that
time
it
was
an
abandoned
building.
It
was
a
blight
on
the
neighborhood
drug
dealers
were
using
the
home;
they
renovated
fully
renovated
this
10
bedrooms,
six
baths
old,
Victorian
home
and
in
2011
contracted
with
the
Veterans
Administration
to
operate
the
safe
haven
program.
CA
CA
2016
we
had
a
community
meeting
in
December
and
since
then
we
have
received
the
support
which
you
have
in
front
of
you
of
10
of
our
abutters,
including
our
long-term
time
neighbors
at
175
Humboldt.
We
share
a
fence
with
them.
This
is
a
multi-family
community
of
multi-family
homes.
Back
in
2017,
this
board
approved
a
condo
luxury
condo
development
at
directly
across
the
street,
from
173
Humboldt
Avenue.
CA
That
complex
is
now
complete
and
selling
one
two
three
bedroom
units
at
442,
475
dollars
a
square
foot,
the
least
expensive
condo
unit
in
that
building
is
four
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
for
a
one
bedroom.
This
is
a
neighborhood
that
is
changing,
but
during
the
past
seven
years
that
the
Boston
rescue
mission
has
been
running
a
safe
haven
program,
it
has
become
and
is
a
community
partner.
CA
They
work
with
the
Trotters
school,
which
is
a
neighborhood
school,
providing
food
for
their
food
pantry
and
for
the
past,
six
or
so
Thanksgivings
have
given
out
over
200
turkey
dinners
to
the
families
that
have
children
in
that
school.
The
men
of
the
veterans,
who
mostly
men-
but
there
is
a
woman
who's
staying
there
now
spend
most
of
their
time
working
on
their
health
issues
and
finding
permanent
housing.
The
VA
is,
and
staff
from
Boston
rescue
mission
are
there
24/7.
This
is
a
super
supervised
program
and
it
is
monitored
very
closely
by
the
Veterans
Administration.
CA
It
is
the
staff
of
the
Boston
rescue
mission.
Are
there
as
I
said,
24/7
the
men
transition
out
successfully
to
permanent
housing?
This
is
a
model
program
that
was
started
by
the
Veterans
Administration
about
seven
years
ago
and
the
safe
haven
initiative
here
that
the
Boston
rescue
mission
runs.
It
is
one
of
the
highly
ranked
programs
in
the
country,
meaning
that
more
veterans
have
transitioned
successfully
to
permanent
housing.
A
CA
CB
1022
in
a
room
instead
of
one
in
a
room
right
now,
the
rooms
are
spacious
and
is
DF
approved
X.
When
there's
no
innovation
necessary.
The
facility
is
in
very
good
condition:
Turner
Construction,
the
just
came
in
our
innovated,
the
whole
basement
for
free
for
us.
They
spent
over
$200,000
in
relation
to
turn
the
basement
as
an
activity
room.
It's
very
difficult
for
us
as
an
agency
to
run
the
facility.
24
hours
provides
full
meals
and
two
full
24-hour
staff.
CB
AL
CB
And
the
VA
does
for
inspections
a
year,
the
we
do
for
every
every
quarter,
a
full
fire
inspection
and
facility.
We
have
never
had
a
violation.
There
was
never
a
violation
in
the
neighborhood.
We
had
been
a
model
citizen,
we
have
been
in
operation
for
hundred
and
twenty
years
as
an
agency,
I
have
been
a
president
of
the
mission
for
26
years.
We
have
a
very
stable
staff
there.
We
just
need
an
expansion
to
be
able
to
continue
to
operate.
A
CB
CA
Although
those
two
criticisms
have
been
corrected
and
those
are
no
longer
a
problem,
we
have
been
open
to
meeting
with
these
groups
to
find
out
specifically
why
it
is
that
they
oppose
this,
and
all
we
hear
is
that,
while
there
are
too
many
rooming
houses
in
this
area,
this
is
not
a
rooming
house.
This
isn't
is
a
supervised
program
for
veterans,
it
is
staffed
24/7
and
it
is
supervised
dwell.
The
supervisor
is
here:
Tim
Smith,
who
can
answer
any
specific
questions
you
might
have.
CA
A
BT
My
name
is
Tim
Smith
I've
been
the
program
manager
since
its
open
in
2011.
Just
to
add
to
what
these
folks
said,
we
have
upwards
of
10
veterans
all
the
time
in
of
the
245
or
so
of
served.
None
of
them
have
had
vehicles
I
think
too,
and
so
we
don't
take
up
any
parking
in
the
neighborhood.
We
rarely
try
to
be
good
neighbors.
We
do
snow
blowing
in
Chapel
in
front
next-door
neighbor.
We
have
a
funeral
home
right
next
door,
who
veterans
help
out
clean
their
cars.
BT
They
get,
they
get
a
stipend
for
it,
and
but
every
year
he
hires
them
to
help
cleanest
cars
and
shovel
snow.
So
we
really
do
try
to
be
good
neighbors.
We
have
within
three
four
hundred
yards
I,
think
we
have
five
there's
three
markets:
a
barber
shop
and
a
pizza
place
not
once
in
seven
years.
If
we
have
a
complaint
from
any
of
them,
I
don't
believe
in
the
seven
years
that
any
of
my
neighbors
that
I
would
call
the
police
on
any
of
our
veterans.
BT
So
we
really
have
a
focus
on
being
a
good
neighbor.
We
have
some
people
sign
documentation
for
us
myself
and
the
vice
president.
Mr.
weh
we've
actually
walked
the
neighborhood
to
talk
to
neighbors,
to
see,
if
there's
anything,
we
can
help
to
improve
station,
and
they
put
so
we
really.
We
were
really
proactive,
not
trying
good
neighbors.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
AD
So
many
that
the
applicant
name
but
I
know
right
off
hand.
I
was
just
told
to
make
sure
that
say
with
the
opposition,
but
also
because
of
the
expansion
of
hundred
percent
beds.
At
this
time,
I
think
the
neighborhood
doesn't
want
to
see
expansion,
one
hundred
percent
and
that's
why
we're
in
opposition.
A
BD
CB
We
will
have
a
supervisor
and
staff
in
the
facility
when
we
do
that
when
we
ignore
the
expansion,
so
there
will
be
two
people,
especially
through
the
the
active
time
through
the
morning
through
the
afternoon
and
evening
we
will
have
because
people
sleeping
at
nighttime.
The
plan
is
to
continue
to
have
one
staff.
A
A
A
CA
AI
A
CA
BD
BU
B
Go
off
to
the
next
two
cases,
calling
boa
six
nine
four
zero:
three
one:
thirty
one
woodlawn
stream.
There
is
a
companion
case,
boa
694
zero
to
833
would
launch
Drake.
This
is
431
to
demolish
an
existing
attic
roof
constructing
new
dirt
floor,
constructed
new
exterior
decks.
An
array
had
changed
Audrey
from
family
to
family
dwelling.
Three
family
drawing
off
street
parking
for
this
building
will
be
located
at
33
Woodlawn
particle
that
violates
article
55,
section
40,
austrie
parkings,
insufficient
article
55,
section
I,
and
a
lot
of
traditional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
B
Article
55
section
9,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Equal
55,
section
I,
the
building
height
number
of
storeys
in
successive
article
55,
section
9,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
55
section
on
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9
the
ring
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
33
Woodlawn,
the
erecting
new
three-story
through
feelings
wall.
There
will
be
six
vehicle
parking
garage
located
beneath
the
building.
Parking
garage
will
also
be
used
by
31
Woodlawn,
as
constructing
new
exterior
decks
on
the
rear
yard
filled
violations.
Article
55,
section
40,
ma
street
parking
is
insufficient.
B
Article
55
section,
8
and
ciliary
parking
is
consistent
and
additional
article
55
section
9
a
lot
areas
insufficient
article
55,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive,
I
think'll
55.
The
building
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
55
usable
with
spaces
insufficient
the
55
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
55,
section
I
on
the
Reyat.
Is
it
sufficient
name
and
address.
BM
With
me
is
Peter
keen
he's
the
owner,
the
property
of
31
stories
would
Longstreet
as
a
secretary
to
get.
This
involves
two
parcels
of
land
Jamaica,
one
neighborhood.
First
31
localized
proposes
to
change
the
occupancy
from
the
two
families
with
three
family
dwelling,
and
that
would
involve
the
renovation.
The
interior
of
the
building
each
unit
would
be
3-bedroom
2bath
for
this
particular
site
and
about.
BM
At
three
at
five
thousand
district
in
three
families,
although
it
would
be
allowed
as
a
matter
of
right,
there
are
a
number
of
dimensional
energy
requirements
with
respect
to
a
lot
areas
in
a
locker
is
3,000
square
feet.
There
is
a
requirement
2,000
square
feet
for
each
additional
proposed
minute,
so
we'd
request
the
variance.
BM
Through
typical
for
this
section
of
Jamaica
Plain
and
for
all
the
Lots
on
that
Street,
the
floor,
Eurasian
we're
proposing
for
this
is
one
point.
Two
eight
decrease
from
the
current
point.
Eight
three,
the
allowable
limit
is
0.16
and
therefore
usable,
open
spaces,
750
square
feet
for
each
for
the
first
12
unit
and
firing
square
feet
with
each
additional
volume
unit
proposed
we're
slightly
below
that
at
the
1400
square
feet
over
the
side,
air
that
required
the
seven
feet,
and
this
in
this
particular
district
provided.
AF
BM
You
have
at
least
10
feet
from
adjoining
building
a
total
aggregator
17
feet
is
required.
While
we,
the
right
side
condition
of
the
existing
property,
would
be
an
existing
condition
that
it's
not
being
altered.
The
left
side,
where
the
proposed
new
building
would
be
less
than
a
17
foot
requirement
and
therefore
require
secondary
variants.
The.
BM
20
feet
the
district.
However,
there
is
a
shallow
lot
exception.
87
a
half
feet
is
the
depth
of
this
lot,
therefore,
would
be
entitled
to
subtract
about
six
inches
to
look
at
requirements
owning
moment,
provided
that
we're
not
below
15
to
be
the
building
itself
beyond
20
feet
from
the
real
property
line.
However,
the
decks
do
protrude
slightly
for
the
radii,
but
we
believe
that's
a
feature
that
is
not
catchable.
BM
BM
AB
BM
Structure
that
we're
proposing
at
33
Woodlawn
each
of
these
would
be
two
beds.
Two
baths
about
12
minutes
square
feet
per
unit.
The
total
gross
blur
is
all
4060
square
feet
for
this
building
and
again
because
we're
in
the
3f
5000
district
that
three
family
would
be
allowed
by
right.
There
are
a
number
of
dimensional
areas
where
there's
high
relief
under
Article
five.
First
again,
the
lot
area
being
3,500
square
feet
requires
additional
2,000
square
feet,
bhp
to
propose
so
bearings
processes.
Our
total
fer
is
one
point.
BM
Slightly
under
the
17
foot
requirement
between
the
proposed
building
and
the
existing
building
and
about
14
feet
between
the
building
to
the
left
of
the
proposed
new
building,
we
would
be
able
to
meet
the
7/4
requirement.
We
just
now
would
be
able
to
meet
the
requirement
of
the
separation
between
two
delays
again
regard
we're
proposing
to
keep
the
alignment
at
the
rear
of
these
buildings.
Consistent
with
that
clock,
the
20
foot
setback
would
be
reduced
to
15.
BM
BM
AG
BM
But
we
have
process
briefly.
Mr.
chairman
we've
had
a
very
extensive
community
process
and
engaged
with
directive,
letters
and
neighbors,
who
have
been
very,
very
involved
in
this
process.
For
some
time
we
have
and
I
will
submit,
for
the
board
to
be
included
with
the
building
jacket,
for
this
is
very
comprehensive
memoranda
of
understanding
concerning
construction
and
construction
mitigation.
BM
This
has
been
a
product
of
something
that's
been
negotiated
directly
with
the
apotres
and
the
neighbors
on
that
street,
and
we
feel
that
it
captures
a
lot
of
the
responsibilities
that
this
developer
is
going
to
expect
it
to
achieve.
Mr.
Kean
is
a
resident
Jamaica
Plain
he's
very
sensitive
to
construction.
Development
in
between
munity
certainly
has
no
issue
with
this
becoming
part
of
the
record.
So
I
like
to
include
this
as
well
as
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
BM
So
we
were
before
the
court
about
a
month
ago
he
provided
a
copy
of
the
memorandum.
The
neighbors
wanted
a
little
more
of
an
opportunity
to
review
it
before
agreeing
to
it.
We've
had
a
chance
to
have
some
back-and-forth
dialogue.
We've
made
some
amendments.
We've
signed
the
agreement
and
delivery
to
the
neighbors
I
know
they
are
here,
I'm,
not
sure
whether
they'll
speak,
but
they
do
have
an
agreement
which
we
understand.
AZ
BM
To
building
that
is
correct,
essentially
that
would
be
the
entire
foundation
of
33
one
of
the
new
structure
that
we're
proposing,
but
the
setback
would
begin
at
the
first
living
level,
which
would
move
the
building
over,
so
the
design
would
look
as
if
these
are
standalone
buildings.
However,
the
garage
level
fills
out
a
good
portion
of
the
width
of
a
lot
shorter.
CC
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board
of
eggs
and
Rhonda's
mayor's
office
a
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
grow
a
record
of
support,
efening,
tenth,
extensive
community
process
and
coming
to
an
agreement
with
other
neighbors
I
would
like
to
make
sure
I,
don't
record
that
IMO
you
get
splitting
that's
recorded
today
with
all
the
neighbors
who
are
here
to
speak,
making
sure
that
it
goes
on
the
file
good.
CD
Afternoon
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
well
pop
Webster
with
city
councilor,
madam
Ally's
office,
representing
Jamaica
Plain
we'd,
also
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
There's
been
a
lot
of
very
engaged
neighbors
in
this
process.
They've
done
a
lot
of
work
to
make
sure
that
the
construction
won't
negatively
impact
their
neighborhood
and
we're
glad
to
see
that
they
were
able
to
come
to
a
solution.
Thank
You.
AB
My
name's
Louise
outlaw
I
live
at
83
Woodlawn
straight
I've
been
part
of
the
group
of
neighbors
who
have
been
engaging
with
the
developer
on
this
project.
We
have
had
an
extensive
process
and
we
have
finally
come
to
an
MOU
that
we
feel
comfortable
with.
We
are
curious
about
enforcement
of
such
a
thing.
What
happens
in
the
event
that
provisions
are
not
are
not
met?
AB
Do
we
have
any
recourse
and
I'll
continue
to
work
with
the
local
officials
to
find
out
about
that,
and
and
as
a
as
a
group,
could
I
just
see
the
neighbors
hands
we
have?
There
are
four
of
us
here
today
we
were
eight,
it
are
at
the
last
meeting.
We
went
on
straight
as
a
dead-end
street
heavily
developed
lots
of
lots
of
buildings.
There
are
a
few
empty
Lots
because
of
ledge
conditions,
but
it's
it's
very
I
would
say
it's
maximally.
AB
Surprised
subscribed
for
parking
on
our
street,
and
this
is
only
one
of
a
number
of
developments
that
have
been
proposed
for
this
street
I
would
in
encourage
or
request
that
the
board
look
holistically
at
requests
for
development,
particularly
on
these
dead-end
streets,
and
to
make
a
plain,
because
each,
although
each
one
may
be
able
to
you,
know,
be
brought
forward.
It
has
an
overall
effect
on
the
street
to
have
so
many
units
added
to
an
already
full
street.
A
A
B
V
A
AF
B
The
last
case
for
11:30
calling
VOA
eight
one,
eight
four,
nine
eight
one,
a
181,
culper
Street.
This
is
erect
a
new
three-story
building
with
nine
residential
dwelling
units
and
14
parking
spaces.
A
combined
lot
of
13350
square
feet
violations,
article
10,
section,
1,
Austria
parking
still
not
be
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side
lot
line,
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
news.
Article
53,
section,
56
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
57.2
conforming
to
an
existing
building
alignment.
B
BJ
BX
The
Voorhis
cursor
with
the
mayor's
office
on
over
for
services,
a
I,
would
like
to
make
clear
that
this
one's
controversial
case
and
the
applicant
they
work
for
more
than
a
year
with
their
barriers.
They
try
to
complain.
They
address
the
concerns
about
parking
and
the
number
of
units
and
they
reduce
the
last
proposal
for
a
a
unit
supporting
parking
spaces,
therefore
like
to
call
and
record
a
support
for
this
project.
Thank
you.
A
AO
B
Mister
she
had
a
lot
of
other
businesses,
the
Dreiser
e
committee,
the
meeting
that
we
had
last
Thursday
September
20th
2018.
We
just
need
a
vote
of
approval
once
they
go
through
first
case
boa,
a
four
four
seven,
two,
eight
nine
Ludlow
Street,
which
build
a
new
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
case
BOA,
eight,
six,
one,
two,
five,
two,
eighty
six
East
second
Street
was
a
proposal,
her
slow
addition,
new
pantry
reconstruct
act.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
eight,
three,
eight,
five,
five
zero
one.
B
Fifty
six
o
Street
was
construct
a
new
private
roof
deck
at
Unit,
two
with
access
with
spiral
stairs.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
eight,
three,
three,
three:
zero.
Four,
two,
nine
two,
two
fifteen
Boston
Street
was
the
front
yard,
was
a
proposed
side
and
vertical
addition.
Expanding
the
different
garage.
It
was
approved
with
BPD
a
piece:
boa
five:
nine
one:
seven
11246
to
1250
mass
that
was
deferred
to
October
30th
2018
HBO,
a
85023
seven
to
fifteen
to
nursery
it
was
change
of
art
from
storage
of
funeral
to
storage.
B
It
was
approved
case
BOA,
eight,
four,
nine,
five,
eight
one
one
sixty
one
Blue
Hill
Avenue,
was
removed
proviso.
The
previous
owner
was
approved
case
BOA,
eight,
four,
five,
seven,
nine,
nine
one
pushing
Avenue.
It
was
a
renovating
third
floor,
an
existing
single-family
home
and
then
Elijah
Dorma.
It
was
approve
of
VPD
a
case.
Boa
eight
five
to
seven
six,
nine
fourteen
Spring
Garden
Street
was
a
usable,
was
a
change
of
occupancy
from
a
single-family
dwelling
to
a
two-family
dwelling,
it
was
approved
with
PPD
V
PDA
HBO.
B
Eighty
five,
zero,
eight,
seven
six
one,
forty
seven
Elmer
Road.
It
was
erect
a
one-story
addition
from
the
house
where
the
two-story
addition
Lorraine
was
approved
with
PPD
a
case.
Boa
eight
four:
zero:
two:
two
three
thirty
three
glide
street
with
proposed
two-story
addition
to
the
crew
with
BPD
a
piece
boa
eight,
three,
six,
eight
four
to
thirty
six
Oak
Crest
was
a
changing
garage
door.
From
thirty
to
a
36
inch
door.
I
was
approved,
HBO
a
seven
six
one:
zero,
nine
nine
4096
Rosewood
Street.
It
was
proposed
to
off
street
parking.
B
It
was
approved
boa
eight,
four
to
eight
eight
to
three
sixty
eight
Center
Street,
it
was
a
change
of
our
channel.
Do
boutique
to
a
takeout
restaurant
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case,
boa
eight
five,
two
three
six,
eight
thirty
four
Greta
Road
was
a
one-story
family
room
and
kitchen
extension
was
approved.
Boa
eight,
four,
nine
four,
eight
six
two
summer,
Street
was
a
sixteen
by
twenty
four
prebuilt
shell
shed.
It
was
approved
boa
eight,
six,
three,
three,
six,
seven
one:
twenty
eight
Brighton
Avenue
it
was
a
change,
walk
from
existing
retail
to
restaurant.