►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 6-30-20
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 6-30-20
B
B
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
B
B
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
virtually
raised,
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
let
me
repeat
that
if
you
are
connected
by
telephone,
please
press
start
three
to
raise
your
head.
B
B
B
C
B
E
E
F
B
B
B
B
E
B
G
B
B
C
Okay,
madam
chair
the
first
case
calling
boa
105
0441
120
buttonwood
street.
This
is
to
erect
an
addition
and
the
rear
of
the
house
of
15
by
20.
the
violations-
article
65
section
9,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
section
9,
the
minimum
side
guard
requirement
is
insufficient
in
article
65,
section
9,
the
minimum
rare
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
J
B
K
K
Okay-
and
I
mean
in
general,
the
architect
should
be-
the
architect's
name
should
be
on
the
drawings
themselves.
So,
given
that
we're
operating
in
this
in
a
slightly
altered
environment,
it's
it's
not
not.
The
drawings
are
fine,
but
I
would
suggest
you
speak
to
the
architect
and
make
sure
that
in
the
future
he
puts
his
name
and
address
on
the
drawings
themselves.
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
patrick
sandel,
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
there
was
a
full
community
process
for
this
project,
including
an
on-site
of
voters
meeting
on
march
11
that
was
attended
by
members
of
the
mccormick
civic
association.
We
would
like
to
unwrapped
and
support
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
M
E
B
D
M
K
N
J
C
B
B
G
Okay,
so
nothing
into
the
basement
and
it
yes,
it
is
going
to
remain
a
two
family
and
we're
keeping
the
existing
footprints
of
our
property
itself
and
then
the
only
addition
is
we.
We
currently
have
a
second
floor
that
we
are
increasing
the
living
space,
so
we're
just
increasing
the
angle
of
the
roof
and
then
and
then
adding
a
couple
on
top.
K
G
K
M
G
K
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
patrick
sandel,
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
for
this
proposal.
As
the
applicant
said,
it
did
go
through
an
extensive
community
process,
including
an
onslaught
of
voters
meeting
on
february
27th,
and
they
also
met
with
the
columbia
7
el
civic
association
planning
committee
several
times,
and
the
association
voted
to
support.
So
we'd
like
to
go
on
our
support
as
well.
B
K
N
C
C
E
E
E
B
K
R
A
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
105
7713
176
to
178
dana
avenue.
This
is
a
change
of
arcing
from
a
one
family
dwelling
to
a
two
family
dwelling
close
a
wall
at
the
bottom
of
both
stairwell
and
install
a
kitchen.
On
the
second
floor,
the
violations-
article
69
section
8
use
of
a
two-family
dwelling-
is
forbidden.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
lottery
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
S
T
T
This
was
a
multi-family
back
in
1992,
and
the
previous
owner
has
just
changed
it
for
tax
purposes.
So
what
I,
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
just
close
up
the
two
opening
at
the
bottom
of
the
stairs
and
then
install
the
kitchen
back
on
the
second
floor.
Everything
is
already
there
importantly,
I
I
have
two
front
doors,
two,
two:
where
exit
I
have
two
staircase
on
both
sides
and
that's
my
proposal.
T
T
T
T
K
T
B
R
B
B
B
C
Madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
call
the
next
case
into
the
into
the
into
the
today
case:
boa
103,
5817
150,
chestnut
avenue.
This
is
to
install
a
driveway
and
curb
for
one
parking
space.
The
violations,
article
10
section,
one
r
street
parking
not
located
more
than
five
feet
from
the
side
lot
line
and
article
55
section
41.
The
side
yard
shall
not
be
less
than
10
feet
when
providing
access
to
our
street
parking
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
B
B
A
A
E
U
K
C
On
your
next
case,
calling
boa
103
3903
101
to
103
green
street,
this
is
a
renovation,
an
existing
finished
basement
to
change
laundry
room
storage
area
into
a
new
laundry
room,
full
bathroom
utility
connections
in
a
common
area
of
the
basement
shared
by
101
and
103
green
street.
The
violations
article
55
section
9
48
ratio-
is
excess.
Excessive,
converting
storage
space,
as
it
add,
exceeds
allowed
floor-to-ear
ratio
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
Yeah,
I
would
have
to
double
check,
but
I
know
that
it's.
This
was
one
of
the
questions
that
one
of
our
prior
meetings
and
with
the
the
height
of
everything
is
okay
and
the
windows
were
okay.
I
would
have
to.
I
would
have
to
double
check
through
the
floor
plans
here.
I'm
sorry
that
I
just
don't
have
that
information
off
hand,
seven
feet.
Eight
inches.
U
Yeah
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lindsey
santana
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
we
held
in
a
butters
meeting
on
january
22nd
that
was
lately
attended.
The
applicant
worked
with
his
abutters
to
address
concerns.
They
received
the
approval
of
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
B
B
E
K
V
C
Calling
the
next
case
you're
calling
voa
106
0
1
72
24
hollywood
road.
This
is
an
alteration
in
addition
to
a
single
family
residence
wood
frame
addition
to
the
rare
to
include
a
living
kitchen
area
of
ground
floor
and
master
suite.
On
the
second
floor,
the
violations-
article
56
section
8,
the
florida
ratio-
is
excessive
and
article
56,
section
8,
the
rare
yard,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
M
S
Yes,
we
proposed,
in
addition
to
the
via
the
residence
and
it's
a
small
colonial
and
due
to
the
size
of
the
family,
the
two
small
kids.
They
need
additional
space,
so
we're
proposing
a
family
room
with
a
kitchen
on
the
first
floor
in
a
master
suite
on
the
second
floor,
the
real
violation,
the
that
zone
district
requires
30
feet,
we
have
27
foot
six
inches
and
the
far
is
required.
B
F
Board
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayors
of
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on,
recruit
support.
We
had
in
a
butters
meeting
on
december
12th
a
couple
neighbors
came
and
were
supportive,
then
went
before
the
west
rockstar
neighborhood
council
on
tuesday
january
21st
and
received
their
support
as
well.
Thank
you.
D
C
B
E
W
W
I'm
sorry
so
that's
where
ivan,
if
he
could
make
it
on
to
be
able
to
speak
more
to
this,
he's
our
architect
into
the
drawings
it
does
extend
across
the
entire
front
of
the
house.
I
believe
the
issue
here
is
that
we
would
need
to
have
20
foot
frontage
to
the
to
clearance
to
the
curb
and
we're
only
at
18.2.
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
just
like
you're
going
back
for
support,
as
ryan
mentioned,
they
completed
a
full
community
process.
We
had
the
butters
meeting
on
march
5th
when
no
neighbors
were
in
attendance
and
then
it
went
before
the
west
racksville
neighborhood
council
on
june
16th
and
received
their
full
support
as
well.
Thank
you.
X
H
B
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
104
6028
67
pearl
street.
This
is
to
remodel
existing
two-family
home
drop
floor
of
basement
the
violations.
Article
15
section,
one,
the
floyd
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
17,
section
1,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
50,
section,
18,
brew,
structure,
building
height
restrictions,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
E
O
Y
Y
B
Y
Yes,
we
are,
this
is
going
to
be
after
consulting
with
the
neighbors.
They
ask
that
we
construct
instead
of
two
apartments.
They
wanted
to
see
two
condos,
and
so
we've
agreed
to
that,
and
so
the
first
condo
will
be
some
living
space
in
the
basement
and
the
first
floor,
and
the
second
condo
will
be
the
second
and
third
floor
and
it
will
be
owner.
B
B
Y
Y
Y
Y
K
The
plans
are
fine,
they
meet
all
the
requirements
that
you
have
been
asking
about
in
terms
of
interior
access
to
the
basement,
exterior
access
to
the
utilities
and
the
drawings
do
show.
As
mr
mohan
said,
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot.
This
is
a
on
one
or
two
families.
Seven
feet
is
the
minimum,
so
while
he
has
suggested
that
he
might
be
willing
to
move
eight
feet,
which
might
be
more
comfort,
the
truth
is
from
a
code
point
of
view.
B
B
C
M
AA
B
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
103,
0849
171
west
brookline
street,
just
to
install
a
new
red
deck
on
the
first
floor
violations,
article
64.9.4,
townhouse,
rowhouse
extensions
into
the
rear,
the
balcony
above
the
first
floor,
article
32,
section,
32-4,
groundwater
conservation,
overlay,
district
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Q
Q
R
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
did
hold
a
butters
meeting
for
this
back
in
early
february
of
this
year
and
they
did
receive
support
from
their
neighbors
once
they
were
willing
to
compromise
on.
You
know
how
far
out
the
sorry
the
deck
went
out
to
just
pulling
it
in
from
the
property
line.
So
at
this
time
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support,
it's
consistent
with
other
decks
in
the
south
end.
B
Z
C
C
This
is
the
second
case
for
6769,
an
existing
two
family
construct,
a
rare
edition
on
the
side
of
number
67
to
match
number
69
to
include
a
dormer,
add
a
one
and
a
half
bath
to
each
unit,
replace
roof,
siding
windows,
the
violations,
article,
nine
section,
one,
a
two
family
and
a
one
family
sub
district
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use,
article
65,
section,
nine,
insufficient
front
yard
setback,
stairway,
roof,
overhanging,
canopy,
article
65,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded,
a
third
full
third
story,
full
dormer
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
K
Well,
the
plans
are
okay,
there's
one.
I
one
concern
which
is
the
plot
plan
shows
a
proposed
two-story
family
dwelling
at
71.,
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out.
If
that
is
it's,
my
understanding
that
that
came
before
us,
maybe
a
couple
years
ago,
and
I
think
we
denied
it-
I
don't
know
why
that
would
still
be
in
the
plot
plan.
AC
AC
AC
B
K
Yeah
the
proposal
for
67
69-
it's
relatively
minor,
as
you
said,
there's
a
matching
roof
lines
with
the
shed
and
then
there's
a
the
two
additional
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
67
69.
But
the
reason
I
raise
this
is
because
it's
between
67,
69
and
71
and
the
plot
plan
says
proposed
now.
Maybe
that
plot
plan
is
out
of
date
because
I
am
not
100
sure,
but
I
I
recall
this
coming
71
coming
before
us
and
we
did
that
we
denied
it.
That's
my
that's
my
memory,
I'm
not
100
sure.
B
K
B
C
A
B
B
B
AD
C
C
AE
B
AE
AE
B
AF
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
patrick
fandale,
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
worked
with
isd
to
get
an
initial
permit
for
this,
and
it
was
flagged
subsequently
for
some
issues
that
needed
to
go
through
zba.
So
our
office
worked
with
the
applicant
and
it
has
the
butters
to
correct
that
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
full
support.
He
worked
with
as
a
butters
and
contacted
all
of
them
know
the
change.
X
V
C
You
calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
104
3021
40
to
42
prince
street.
This
is
a
change
of
arc
from
office
space
to
a
psychic
reading
office,
no
work
to
be
done.
Offices
existing
just
changing
your
office
use
the
violations,
article
43
section
19.
The
use
is
forbidden
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
AH
B
C
X
B
C
E
AI
AI
The
it
was,
it
was
living
space.
I
was
told
when
I
purchased
it
and
then
it
was
later
on.
I
was
told
it
wasn't,
so
I'm
trying
to
use
living
space
that
was
sold
as
living
space,
and
so
I've
contacted
the
isd
on
what
else
needs
to
be
done,
and
I
contacted
more
architects
about
what
else
needs
to
be
done
and
everything
is
up
to
code.
AI
So
I'm
not
when
I
came
in
last
time.
I
asked
what
I
needed
to
change
and
I
wasn't
given
any
direction
and
I
I've
made
it
seven
foot
ceiling.
I
have
the
plans
last
time
I
came
in
the
plans
I
had
dropped
off
were
not
in
the
meeting
and
I
brought
them
in
the
next
day,
but
they
were
already
had
them.
So
there
was
a
communication
issue
last
time,
so
the
plans
that
you're
seeing
were
not
there
last
time.
AI
B
AI
No,
the
only
rooms
that
could
be
a
bedroom
would
be
room
one
and
room
two.
The
room.
Five
is
a
kitchen
that
was
already
there.
When
we
moved
in
I've,
just
cleaned
it
up,
room
three
does
not
have
a
window,
so
it
cannot
be
a
room
and
room.
Four
is
just
living
area
and
work
area.
My
wife
and
I
both
work
from
home
and
we'd
like
to
use
this
space
as
best
as
we
can.
B
B
AI
B
AI
AI
AI
K
It
is
look
it's
it's
whatever
your
intentions
may
be
when
we
approve
something
it's
it's
for
the
property
and
not
for
the
particular
owner,
so
that
if
another
owner
would
have
come
along
and
try
to
use
this
as
a
second
unit,
you've
got
two.
I
I'm
really
having
trouble
looking
at
it.
Seeing
from
this
just
this
floor
plan,
there's
no
elevation.
What
is
this
all
above
ground.
AI
K
AI
K
So
I
mean
that's
our
concern
here
is
that
is
that
you've
got
a
kitchen.
You've
got
a
bathroom,
you
have
two
means
of
egress,
and
it
could
someone
could
make
the
case
that
this
could
be
the
separate
unit,
all
right
or
treat
treated
or
actually,
whether
they,
whether
it's
legal
or
not,
it
could
be
used
that
way.
You
got
two
bedrooms
and
you
have
kitchen
bathroom
and
two
exits.
AI
When
I
have
since
talked
to
neighbors,
who
were
here,
who've
lived
here
for
20
35
years,
and
they
told
me
it
was
a
fully
used
basement
for
years
and
so
that
when
I
brought
that
up
originally
at
isd,
you
know
multiple
years
ago,
they
said
it's
just
a
repair
and
that
it
was
a
used
basement.
So
I
was
under
the
understanding
for
years
about
that.
AI
The
move
of
for
anyone
to
do
to
officially
make
it
a
two-family
they'd
have
to
have
a
second
entrance
for
the
utility
or
the
heating
system,
and
that
would
be
drilling
through
bedrock
and
making
it
very.
That
would
be
quite
difficult
and
when
I
brought
the
plans
to
I
these
plans
back
in
november
to
isd
that
I
was
told
this
was
sufficient.
If
I
should
have
had
other
plans,
then
I
would
have
paid
someone
for
that.
AI
B
AI
AJ
Greetings
madame
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
chantal
lima
barbosa.
With
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
I
conducted
on
a
buddhist
meeting
on
march
18
and
the
applicant
received
support
from
the
director
putters
and
the
album's
website,
neighborhood
association.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
B
H
That
that's
what
I'm
struggling
with
on
this!
It's
it's
a
big
house
to
begin
with,
with
a
lot
of
living
space
and
putting
giving
approval
for
this
does
set
up
for
the
fact
that,
while
this
owner
might
have
the
greatest
intentions
in
the
world
with
it,
future
owners
may
not,
and
it
could
be
very
problematic.
H
B
B
K
V
AI
B
M
C
I
I
I
B
So
we
know
about
that
piece,
and
now
this
looks
like
an
incremental
expansion
in
some
way.
That
does
not.
You
know,
look
to
expand
that
existing
entrance
way.
It's
creating
a
something
something
else
in
there
and
then
the
question
that
I
have
is:
are
these
entrance
ways
handicapped
accessible
or
not?
B
I
I
So
this
is
essentially
to
sort
of
allow
the
flow
of
the
customers
and
to
keep
that
safety,
and
the
general
purpose
is
for
the
public
good
to
keep
them
in
a
separate
area.
So
the
patrons
that
are
dining
will
not
be
converging
in
the
same
way
as
the
other
patrons
that
are
just
doing
the
take
out,
which
is
essential
for
their
business
right
now.
K
K
Yeah
so
so
they're
well
they're
they're
upside
down
anyway.
Yes,
so
the
the
floor,
the
the
current
the
existing
edition
out
front
does
allow
for
handicapped
access.
The
proposal
would
for
takeout,
which
I
completely
understand
in
light
of
what
is
going
on
for
some
reason.
The
way
it's
designed
the
door
is
not
18
inches
off
of
the
off
of
the
wall.
The
exterior
wall,
if
it
were,
it,
would
be
handicap
accessible.
So
that
would
solve
that
problem.
But
I
have
a
separate
question
with
respect
to
the
floor
plans.
K
K
I
Yes,
so
when
actually
these
plans
were
created,
we
actually
started
this
process
even
prior
to
the
pandemic.
Even
hitting
this
could
be
something
that
I
could
speak
with
my
client.
We
could
essentially
add
it
back
in
or
if
there
is
a
reason
that
it
was
removed
in
order
to
give
them
the
access
that
they
were
looking
for,
but
essentially
the
reason
it
is
not
there,
which
we
see.
That
now
is
because
this
start,
this
whole
process
started
even
prior
to
this,
and
now
it's
just
even
become
more
essential.
Now.
B
K
B
I
In
addition,
also
regarding
the
noise
that
had
been
voiced
in
the
past
over
the
years,
and
even
currently,
we
did
have
a
neighborhood
community
meeting
and
mr
duran
has
been
working
with
the
neighborhood
and
been
having
great
success
and
had
a
lot
of
support
in
the
community.
Even
regarding
this,
and
as
well
as
just
making
it
neighborhood
friendly
and
everybody
happy
around.
There.
K
Well,
I
would
suggest
if
there
is
a
motion
to
defer
that
mr
duran
consider
three
issues
at
a
minimum.
One
is
retaining
the
employee
bathroom
two
is
making
sure
it's
handicap
accessible
and
three
is
the
vpda
suggestion
of
a
downsizing
of
the
overall
edition,
so
those
those
should
be
part
of
what
goes
into
your
thinking
about
when
you
come
back.
If
you,
if
you
do.
B
And
I
know
the
applicants
wants
to
have
this
cake
and
eat
it
too,
but
you
know
it's
going
to
require.
I
think
a
trade-off
in
some
way,
because
it
looks
like
that
front
entrance
way
may
be
able
to
be
reworked
in
some
way
to
become
some
piece
of
a
takeout
spot,
because
it
is
rather
large,
and
so
I
think
it's
going
to
take
some
creative
thinking
on
the
applicant's
heart
to
come
up
with
something
that
might
work.
But
may
I
have
a
motion
please,
with
all
these
comments,
make
a
promotion.
H
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
105
3731
1143
to
1155
commonwealth
avenue.
This
is
to
remove
the
proviso
for
the
previous
owner
of
36a
and
37a
and
change
to
a
new
owner's
name,
no
work
to
be
done
and
existing
to
remain
the
violations,
article
6
section,
4
other
conditions,
other
conditions
necessary
as
protection
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
Yeah,
my
name
is
mohammed
shark.
I
am
the
manager
and
the
co-owner
of
the
restaurant
at
the
1147
commonwealth
avenue
we
this
this
space
has
been
a
restaurant
for
since
2011
we
just
bought
the
restaurant
and
we
just
want
to
remove
the
proviso
for
take
out
and
change
the
the
owners
change,
the
name
of
the
restaurant
to
the
new
owner
and
no,
we
are
not
changing
anything
in
the
restaurant.
It's
the
same.
P
AH
L
B
AB
AB
C
This
is
to
demolish
an
existing
three
family
residents,
construct
a
new
24
unit,
residential
building
with
first
floor
office,
space
there'll
be
a
common
roof
deck
for
the
building
tenants
built.
The
project
is
also
undergoing
a
bpda
article
80
review
the
violations,
article
69
section
11.,
the
regulations
parking
garage
located
on
the
ground
floor
is
forbidden,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
AD
B
AG
X
V
AG
V
AK
AK
AK
We
first
want
to
be
on
record
that
we
are
not
opposing
this
development.
We've
never
even
discussed
this
development.
We've
been
troubled
from
day,
one
that
there
are
violations
and
it's
not
the
voice
and
because
the
being
designated
at
the
right
that
precludes
the
developer
from
including
any
affordable
units
in
the
project,
and
that's
that's
levels
up
in.
Z
AK
AK
B
Okay,
you
know,
because
of
your
audio,
mr
harzati,
you
seem
to
have
a
better,
a
better
audio
and
you
need
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
appropriately
on
the
record,
and
it
sounds
to
me
that
your
issue
is
that
the
article-
and
I
have
your
letter
in
front
of
me-
is
that
article
69
forbid
the
parking
garage
on
the
first
floor
in
a
neighborhood
shopping.
Sub
district
is
that
is
that
the
baseline
for
your
appeals
or
your.
AK
Yes,
the
number
of
parking
spaces
they
have,
they
assert
that
they
need
one
clock
space
parking
per
unit,
so
they
have
24
parking
spaces
on
the
24
unit
and
that
matches
them
and
that
matches
them
up
on
the
garage
but
they're
not
accommodating
the
office
space
which
they
have
in
the
corner
of
the
first
floor,
which
also
in
the
article
69,
also
demands
off-space
parking
spots.
They
don't
accommodate
for
that,
so
they
have
insufficient
parking
space.
AK
Z
AK
Therefore,
and
therefore
it
is
not
privileged
with
the
same
parking
of
structures
restriction
as
the
bigger
industry,
which
requires
ones
for
unit
all
other
industries,
require
two
spaces
per
unit.
This
is
a
separate
distinction
area.
It
is
you
can
see
that
on
the
map
and
the
map
would
just
say
to
you
that
if
there
are
any
discrepancies,
you
see
you
seek
the
answer
from
the
official
zoning
map
of
ipod,
which
shows
a
distinct
nsu
district,
it's
separately,
labeled
and
it
has
the
borders,
so
it
must
have
a
higher
parking
requirement.
Two.
AG
B
B
B
S
AK
B
AD
Sure
so,
I'm
just
a
little
bit
of
background
eleven
data
ab.
It
is
located
between
the
high
park
train
station
in
high
park
avenue.
The
zoning
enabled
is
neighborhood
shopping,
2,
40,
foot,
height
2far,
one
to
one
parking
ratio,
no
side
of
front
yard
requirements,
a
10
yard,
rear
yard
setback.
A
lot
size
is
14
322
square
feet
and,
as
mr
martin
said,
it's
24
units
24
parking
spaces
and
a
28
000
square
foot.
Building.
That's
four
stories.
AD
B
AD
Sure
the
first
you
know
I
just
went
through
the
letter
that
they
had
sent
in
the
first
looks
like
the
appeal
states
table
b
of
artists,
article
69,
the
blossom
zoning
code
for
bids
parking
garage
on
the
first
floor
and
ns2
subjects
district,
which
the
property
lies.
That
is
inaccurate.
The
analysis
is
completing
two
separate
sections
of
the
zoning
code.
The
appeal
that
they
rely
upon
is
footnote
27,
which,
which
applies
to
vehicular
uses
not
accessory
or
ancillary,
uses.
AD
I've
attached,
both
the
accessory
use
table
and
vehicular
use
table.
There's
one
two
and
three
of
the
of
the
submission
that
I
sent
in
for
your
review
and,
as
you
can
see,
a
parking
garage
isn't
allowed
use.
Subject
to
foot
note
27,
however,
accessory
parking
is
an
allowed
use
that
is
not
subject
to
foot
new
27..
AD
AD
I
did
not,
I
actually
prepared
that
last
night,
because
this
came
up
so
quickly.
I
forwarded
it
to
attorney
kevin
o'connor
as
well
as
stephanie
haynes
from
zva
and
asked
them
to
distribute
it.
I
didn't
I
and
the
reason
being
madam
chair.
My
understanding
is
that
mr
rizzotti
is
not
represented
by
council
and
I
didn't
feel
it's
appropriate
as
an
attorney
to
reach
out
to
a
a
person
who
is
not
represented
by
an
attorney.
B
A
B
B
AD
Okay,
so
you
know
I
went
to
a
I
just
looked
at
the
appeal
which
I
did
I
received.
I
subsequently
I
just
received
it
probably
within
the
last
month
that
mr
rizzotti
had
filed
with
isd
and
as
I
went
through
it,
I
just
kind
of
broke
it
out
too,
and
I
think
mr
martin
testified
that
there
were
three
issues
that
were
raised
by
mr
rosati.
AD
AD
Then
they
also
raised
another
violation:
they're,
not
nearly
as
significant
as
their
shortage
of
parking
spaces.
They
illustrate
their
drawings,
illustrate
24
spaces
for
24
units,
but
does
not
accommodate
the
four
mentioned
small
office
space
in
one
corner
of
the
building.
Again
they're
conflating
two
sections
of
the
office
of
the
zoning
code.
The
use
of
office
and
the
accessory
office
are
in
two
different
sections
of
the
zoning
code.
The
requirement
for
additional
one
or
two
parking
spaces
applies
to
office,
not
accessory
office
and
I've
attached
exhibits.
Eight,
nine
and
ten.
AD
The
zoning
map
presents
the
proponent
subdistricts
with
its
own
ns2
label
and
dark
borders
which
intentionally
separates
it
from
the
budding
ns2
subdistrict
the
clearly
clary
logan
square
ns2
subdistrict
mandates
one
parking
space
per
residential
unit,
whereas
ns2
generally
requires
two
spaces
per
unit,
thus
our
neighborhood
contents.
This
is
a
violation,
although
we
recognize
that
someone
could
conflicts
with
the
aforementioned
parking
shortage,
I
have
provided
the
board
with
tables.
AD
There
are
only
two
ns2
sub-districts
in
high
park.
The
two
sub-district
ns2
sub-districts
are
clary
logan
square
and
river
wood,
as
noted
in
article
69
for
the
neighborhood
business
sub-districts.
If
you
refer
to
exhibit
four
which
I
have
attached
there,
I
think
it's
up
to
from.
What's
currently
on
the
screen,
you
will
see
two
highlighted
areas
and
on
those
you
will
see
that
you
will
see
clary
logan
square,
I
think
that's
number
18
and
I'm
sorry,
riverwood
is
number
18,
ns2
and
clary.
Logan
square
is
the
second
ns2
district
which
our
property
is
located.
AD
AD
Otherwise
there
would
have
to
be
another
ns2
district
that
addresses
this
property.
With
respect
to
the
bold
lines
that
mr
martin
had
raised
up,
there
are
bold
lines
all
over
maps.
It
does
not
define
it.
It
does
not
define
a
separate
ns
ns2
district
on
there.
I
don't
think
anybody
who's
looking
at
or
anybody
who,
from
the
appalling
side
would
argue
that
it
does
all
they're
saying.
Is
that
there's
a
bold
black
line
that
separates
it
from
it?
However,
it
is
contiguous
to
it.
It's
clearly
located
in
clary
square.
AD
B
AD
B
AD
AD
However,
they
subsequently
isd
made
the
determination
that
that
is
not
correct,
that
that
applies
to
a
parking
garage.
Accessory
parking
is
always
allowed
in
neighborhood
shopping,
and
that's
a
position
isd
has
taken.
My
understanding
is
isd,
has
gone
out
to
the
neighborhood
several
times
and
invited
the
neighbors
into
isd.
To
discuss
this
in
further
detail,
I
think
when
they
invited
them
in,
I
don't
know
if
people
were
traveling
or
bad
timing
or
whatever,
but
nobody
replied
for
that
meeting.
So
the
it
went
through
the
article
80
processes
and
as
of
right.
B
AG
B
V
V
Oh
great
great,
finally,
okay.
Finally,
so
first
two,
two
quick
things
that
I
want
to
say.
I
never
received
that
all
that
documentation
that
mr
paul
jeannie's,
speaking
of
and
I
do
request
that
in
writing
as
soon
as
possible,
and
the
second
thing
is.
I
would
like
to
allow
jim
kirker
to
speak
on
my
behalf,
as
in
also
from
the
neighborhood
hyde
park,
neighborhood
group,
and
I
would
like
that
to
happen
if
he
could
speak.
Please.
B
AG
B
Hold
on
mr
burkhardt,
what
I
think
is,
for
you
foster,
put
your
name
in
the
quest
on
the
record
and
this
this
was
a
submittal
by
mr
rosani.
I
need
you
to
clarify
and
put
on
the
record
anything
in
particular
that
wasn't
covered
by
either
mr
rosadi
or
mr
martin.
That
will
help
us
make
the
decision
we
are
not
interested
in
in
you
know,
you
know
going.
He
said
she
said
thing.
I
guess
no,
I'm
not
on
the
record.
Okay,.
AG
Yes,
this
is
james
kirker,
56
davison
street.
I'm
president
of
the
hyde
park
association,
mr
paul
genie,
brought
something
up,
and
I
just
want
to
read
something
from
the
zoning
code.
He's
talking
about
accessory
and
accelerate
distillery
ancillary
uses
being
allowed,
I'm
reading
from
the
zoning
code.
In
any
event,
an
accessory
used
shall
be
subject
to
the
same
restrictions,
conditions,
limitations,
provisos
and
safeguards
as
the
use
to
which
it
is
accessory.
AG
AG
AG
AG
This
is
mr
kirker
still
there's
a
mr
kirker
still
sorry,
I
know.
As
far
as
the
two
separate
ns2
zones,
I
requested
a
lot
of
stuff
from
the
bpda.
They
ended
up
sending
me
yesterday
900
emails,
but
I
would
like
to
read
something
if
I
may,
from
brian
glasscock,
who
is
the
deputy
or
assistant
director
bpda
concerning
those
two
separate
zones
where
he
clearly
speaks
of
them
as
being
two
separate
sub-districts.
B
B
AL
Our
interpretation
is
that
in
an
ns2
in
this
particular
ns2,
only
24
parking
spaces
are
required
and
this
parking
is
accessory
parking,
not
a
parking
garage.
So
therefore,
not
27
does
not
apply
in
this
case,
and
it
it
relates
to
the
office
as
an
accessory
use
does
not
qualify
for
additional
organization.
B
AL
AK
B
So,
even
even
given
the
the
situation
that
we
have
here
today,
I'm
going
to
recommend
that
this
go
to
the
law
department.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
before
it
does
by
this
friday,
there
is
a
complete
exchange
of
information
between
all
parties
and,
in
fact,
through
the
isp
office
through
the
board
of
appeals
office.
B
B
So
what
I
want
to
make
sure
now
everybody
who's
on
the
line.
Specifically
you,
mr
mr
rosati,
is
yes
so
please
send
all
the
information
that
you
received
from
mr
glasgow
you
and
on
either
mr
martin
or
mr
cook,
or
send
it
please,
mr
paul
genie,
all
right.
Absolutely
isd.
Please
send
all
the
information
that
mr
bulgini
has
submitted
to
mr
rosadi,
so
he
can
distribute
it
with
with
the
appropriate
members
of
his
team.
B
No,
no
and
then
the
last
thing
is
all
this
information
should
be
submitted
to
the
law
department
to
help
us
in
making
a
decision,
because,
given
the
fact
that
there
is
a
lot
of
emails
and
paper
going
back
and
forth
and
the
company
and
the
difficulty
with
the
audio,
I
think
we
need
their
full
attention
on
this.
To
give
us
some
some
guidance.
Okay.
So
the
meetings.