►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-3-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Thank
you
for
trudging
through
the
snow
and
making
it
today.
So
we
hope
that
we'll
have
a
smooth
meeting
this
morning,
if
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project.
When
you
have
a
turn
at
the
mic,
please
give
us
new
information
because
we
are
fact-finding
and
we
need
you
to
help
us
get
new
information.
If
somebody
has
already
stated
your
concern
or
your
reason
for
support,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
right
on
the
record,
so
we
register
that
you're
here.
B
C
D
E
A
D
B
F
B
B
So
I'll
call
it
into
the
record
one
more
time:
boa
one:
zero
one:
six,
seven:
seven:
zero
one:
twenty
one:
st.
Stephen
Street:
this
is
a
foundation:
structural
repairs
for
a
structural
engineer,
pointing
repairs,
exterior
masonry
new
roof
upgrade
violations;
article
32
section,
four
G
caught
applicability,.
A
I
B
This
is
illegal
action
from
a
store
to
retail
stores,
restaurant
and
beauty
salon
the
violations,
the
9th
edition
780
CMR,
an
automatic
sprinkler
system.
Shell
tell
me
installed
throughout
all
stories,
including
basements
of
all
buildings,
where
the
floor
area
exceeds
1500
square
feet
and
where
there
is
not
provided
no,
not
fewer
than
one
of
the
following
types
of
exterior
wall.
B
Openings
1.1,
openings
below
great
that
lead
directly
to
the
ground
level
by
an
exterior
stay
away,
complying
with
section,
10,
11
or
outside
ramp,
complying
with
section
1012
opening
shall
be
located
in
each
50,
linear
feet
or
a
fraction
thereof.
An
exterior
wall
in
the
story
of
at
least
one
at
least
one
side.
The
required
opening
shall
be
distributed
such
that
the
lineal
distance
between
the
adjacent
openings
does
not
exceed
50
feet.
D
J
A
A
G
I
B
Calling
a
next
building
code
KACE
boa
one
zero
one,
five,
four,
two:
two
four
eleven
Shawmut
Avenue:
this
is
at
a
new
roof
deck
a
spiral
staircase
ranger
skylight
opening
could
place
roof
and
renovated
bathroom
the
violation,
ninth
edition
780
CMR,
10,
11
and
stairways
roof
access,
where
Stevens
provided
to
a
roof.
Access
to
the
roof
shall
be
provided
to
a
penthouse
complying
with
section
1510
point
to
access
through
the
roof.
Hatch
is
not
permitted.
A
K
Short
in
a
long
story
as
much
as
I,
possibly
can
I'm
distributing
handouts
right
now
that
include
photos,
plans
and
elevations
of
the
project
proposing
this
roof
deck.
We
ran
into
trouble.
During
permitting
we
received
a
zoning
denial
due
to
article
64,
section,
32,
South,
End,
roof
deck
restrictions
highlighted
a
relevant
passage
that
we
got
tonight
for
would
shake
up
a
little
bit.
Yes,.
L
K
Are
denied
specifically
on
zoning
basis
for
the
the
following
passage,
which
reads:
access
is
by
roof
hatch
or
bulkhead,
no
more
than
30
inches
in
height
above
such
deck.
This
is
a
peculiar
situation
in
which
were
accessing
this
roof
from
a
spiral
stair
from
an
exterior
deck
below.
So
the
interpretation
by
ISDN
was
that,
because
we
have
neither
hatch
nor
bulkhead
than
we
do
not
qualify,
our
solution
was
to
put
a
hatch
at
the
top
of
this
spiral,
stair
that
we're
proposing,
which
led
to
a
head
height
violation
from
the
Building
Code.
K
We're
appealing
that,
due
to
the
fact
that
this
hatch
is
not
watertight,
it
will
not
lock.
It's
very
I
mean
to
be
fair.
It's
it's
to
comply
with
the
hatch
restriction.
I.
Think
it's
clear
in
the
zoning
code
that
the
intent
of
this
passage
item
C
is
to
say
that
it's
the
limit,
the
height
of
a
hatch
or
bulkhead,
not
to
mandate
that
there
is
a
hatch
or
a
bulkhead.
So
we're
trying
to
provide
this
solution
and
appeal.
The
building
code.
B
K
D
D
A
C
B
N
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Daniel
Costigan
Oakland
dragwon
Toscano,
is
at
15
Broad
Street
Boston
Mass
we're
respectfully
seeking
a
deferral
in
this
matter.
We
made
a
last
recent
change
to
the
architectural
plans
to
address
one
of
the
neighbors
concerns.
I
think
it's
gonna
have
an
effect
on
the
zoning
code.
Plans
were
filed,
so
we're
just
waiting
for
a
new
refused
refused
a
letter
so
seeking
a
quick
deferral
motion.
B
O
B
A
A
B
Of
a
date
of
February
25th
as
well
at
the
11:30.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
of
with
Charles
for
9:30
hearing,
none
we'll
call
the
first
case,
calling
VOA
nine
six
one,
one
four,
seven,
two
four
to
ten
Bremen
Street
this
is
to
amend
and
to
include
a
route
act
violations.
Article
2075.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod,
an
article
53
section
I,
the
really
isn't
sufficient
name.
P
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's
to
45-7
treating
spots
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
with
me
here
is
the
architect
for
the
project,
a
very
straightforward
proposal
here.
This
is
a
pre-existing
three
family
dwelling
that
has
undergone
a
complete
renovation
of
the
interior,
the
exterior
of
the
building
that
was
done
as
a
matter
of
right
under
a
long
form
that
issued
part
of
that
project
also
included
and
contemplated
the
addition
of
a
roof
deck
that
roof
deck
would
be
exclusive
to
the
upper
unit.
Q
Q
A
Q
A
S
U
B
Is
to
raise
the
existing
building
combined
los
pasa.
Would
you
create
one
law
consisting
of
seven
thousand
two
hundred
sixty
eight
square
feet
directing
nine
unit
residential
dwelling
with
parking
for
fourteen
vehicles,
the
violation
article
2070
section
nine?
This
is
the
East
Boston
iPod
applicability,
article
33
section,
eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
nautical
fifty-three
section
I
on
Floyd
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Nautical
fifty-three
section
I
on
the
bill,
the
height
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
I
on
the
building
height
is
excessive
number
of
stories.
B
P
A
P
You,
madam
chair,
the
secretary
indicated
this
involves
the
demolition
of
existing
three
family
dwelling.
I've,
provided
the
board
with
a
packet
of
information
that
shows
existing
current
conditions.
The
three
family
dwelling
is
in
very,
very
tough
shape.
It
would
require
a
substantial
amount
of
investment.
There
is
adjoining.
There
are
joining
Lots
with
respect
to
this
site
that
can
be
combined
to
create
a
larger
lot.
P
We've
worked
very
closely
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
including
the
director
butters,
on
coming
up
with
a
proposal
that
we
feel
fits
with
the
Harborview
neighborhood,
which
is
where
this
property
is
located.
Chief
among
those
concerns
was
the
height
of
the
building,
as
well
as
the
amount
of
parking
spaces
that
would
be
associated.
This
is
intended
to
be
a
home
ownership
project,
with
nine
condominiums
upon
completion
with
respect
to
the
layout
in
the
program
of
the
building.
As
you
can
see
from
the
plan,
we
do
have
access
off
of
horror.
P
Street
that
would
allow
for
nine
parking
is
to
be
located
under
the
building.
Each
one
of
those
parking
space
would
be
assigned
to
one
individual.
Mr.
Qiu
Kela
does
own
nearby
property
as
well.
We
have
shown
the
neighborhood
the
possibility
of
adding
additional
parking.
There
was
mixed
reviews
on
that.
However,
we
do
feel
that,
if
that
opportunity
to
present
itself,
we
will
pursue
adding
additional
parking
space
with
respect
to
this
proposal.
Nine
of
the
parking
spaces
would
be
associated
with
the
condominium,
as
I
mentioned.
P
The
other
chief
concern
amongst
the
neighborhood
was
the
height
of
the
building.
There
has
been
a
lot
of
development
as
of
late
in
the
Harborview
neighborhood,
and
maintaining
a
three-story
dwelling
was
something
that
was
indicated
very
early
on
in
this
process.
I
think
embarked
has
done
a
superb
job
of
designing
a
building
that
fits
contextually
with
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
I.
P
Think
that's
reflected
in
the
number
of
letters
of
support
that
we
have
submitted
from
director
butters,
as
well
as
neighborhood
residents,
who
originally
were
compared
concerns
about
this
project
with
respect
to
the
unit
count,
as
I
said
it's.
This
is
a
nine
unit
project.
It's
a
mix
of
one
two
and
three
bedrooms,
three
bedrooms
being
included
again
based
upon
commentary
that
we
heard
through
the
community
process.
The
range
in
size
of
the
units
go
for
about
720
square
feet
from
the
smallest
one-bedroom
up
to
about
1,300
or
1,400
square
feet
for
the
larger
three-bedroom.
P
There
are
three
roof
decks
associated
with
this.
Those
are
exclusive
to
each
of
the
units
that
are
located
on
the
upper
level.
We
did
have
the
exits
had
the
opportunity
to
present
this
to
the
neighborhood
in
depth.
This
went
before
the
Harborview
Neighborhood
Association,
as
well
as
a
number
of
abutters
meetings,
where
the
concerns
were
continuously
tweaked,
with
respect
to
the
project
and
again,
I
think
that's
reflected
in
a
number
of
support
letters
that
we
have
submitted
to
the
board
with
respect
to
the
relief
that's
necessary.
This
isn't
a
2f
mm
zoning
district.
P
However,
combining
these
Lots
would
provide
a
lot
that
is
firing
excess
of
what
the
minimum
lot
sizes
for
that
neighbourhood
multifamily
would
not
be
allowed
in
the
2f
district.
However,
there
is
significant
precedent
throughout
this
particular
area
for
multifamily
use,
especially
where
there's
associated
parking
at
at
least
a
1
to
1
ratio.
So
we
are
requesting
a
variance
for
that.
We
do
meet
the
minimum
lot
size.
The
minimum
lot
width,
the
front
yard
and
the
side
yard
requirements.
Our
rear
yard
would
be
depending
upon
how
we
view
the
front
of
this
building
would
require
relief.
P
30
feet
is
required
in
the
2f
district.
We
are
at
20
feet
if
we
front
the
building
along
Neptune
Circle.
However,
there
was
a
preference
to
see
the
building
have
a
front
entranceway
along
hora
Street,
so
we
are
requesting
relief
for
the
rear
yard.
Our
floor
day
ratio
has
been
reduced
throughout
the
community
process.
We
are
down
a
1.2
which
is
consistent
with
the
surrounding
densities
of
homes
in
this
area
and
again,
something
that
the
neighborhood
felt
was
an
important
step
towards
making
this
project
viable.
So
we
are
requesting
a
variance
for
that
as
well.
P
Although
the
height
limit
is
35
foot
maximum,
we
were
slightly
above
that
at
36
feet.
There
is
a
2.5
storey
limit.
However,
the
adjoining
property
is
located
immediately
adjacent
on
our
street.
Our
three
families
in
the
existing
structure-
that's
on
the
property,
is
a
triple-decker
now,
so
we
feel
that
that
is
consistent
with
the
context.
Last
but
not
least,
is
parking
if
this
were
proposed.
New
nine
units
there
would
be
a
requirement
to
have
a
total
of
13
parking
spaces.
As
we
said,
this
is
a
proposed
at
9
spaces.
V
V
V
P
If
I
could
just
clarify
that
there
is
a
lot,
if
you
look
at
the
VPD,
a
abstract,
showing
the
lots
that
are
involved
with
the
proposal,
there
is
a
miscellaneous
lot
located
to
the
rear
of
the
property
on
North
Street,
that
is
vacant
and
will
remain
open.
We've
come
to
an
agreement
with
the
owner
of
the
property
on
bore
Street,
to
create
a
landscape
easement
for
that
site.
F
P
Now
for
the
butter,
but
it's
not
contiguous
to
our
particular
site,
but
it
is,
it
was
included
in
the
acquisition.
It
doesn't
make
necessary
a
lot
of
sense
for
us
to
have
it
because
of
the
lack
of
contiguity,
but
we
were
requested
during
the
process
to
consider
making
that
open
space
for
the
neighbor
and
we've
agreed
to
that
and
we'll
do
so.
A
A
S
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Berlin
and
family
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
community
process.
The
applicant
were
close
with
dear
brothers
and
address
most
of
the
concerns.
Also,
there
was
a
strong
support
from
the
director
Paris
and
some
members
of
the
Harborview
community.
There
was
appreciation
of
bringing
three
three
family
units
to
the
community
because
they
will
bring
families
and
also
receive
27
years
of
support
from
the
abarnes.
Thank
you.
P
B
This
is
to
raise
the
existing
building
erected
for
unit
residential
dwelling
with
red
text,
parking
ribs
violation,
how
the
complaint
17
this
is
in
the
East
Boston
I
bought
out
equal
53,
section
57
side
dad
with
driveway
should
be
not
less
than
15.
Article
53
section,
8
MFR
is
forbidden
in
the
to
F
sub
district
article
53,
section
56,
the
poles
lacking
is
insufficient.
Six
cases
provided
article
53
section
56.5,
our
street
parking
maneuverability
article
53,
section
9,
the
ploidy.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
I,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
P
P
Here
this
project
is
located
in
the
Eagle
Hill
section
of
East
Boston.
It
involves
the
existing
an
existing
single-family
dwelling
that
we
are
proposing
to
demolish
and
erect
a
four-story
four
unit
dwelling
with
parking
for
total
three
vehicles.
This
will
contain
all
two
bedrooms.
The
unit
sizes
are
just
over
a
thousand
square
feet
for
each
unit.
P
We
are
also
proposing
to
provide
three
off-street
parking
spaces
with
respect
to
the
project,
because
this
is
located
in
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood
and
I,
provided
the
board
with
a
packet
of
information
showing
the
design
that
has
been
worked
with
very
well
with
the
with
the
Eagle
Hill
community.
Part
of
their
concern
is
the
appearance
of
buildings
that
get
construct,
especially
when
a
building
is
being
demolished
in
place
of
a
new
development.
P
We
feel
that
Eric's
design
and
rendering
here
is
exactly
what
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood
requests
when
they
see
projects
being
proposed,
and
we
feel
that
this
works
very
well
with
the
historic
character
in
nature
of
the
Eagle
Hill
community.
We
did
have
an
opportunity
to
present
this
several
times.
The
Eagle
Civic
Association,
who
did
vote
in
support
of
this
I,
do
have
a
letter
of
support
from
Eagle
Hill,
as
well
as
a
number
of
letters
from
directive,
letters
and
neighbors
who
also
support
this
project
with
respect
to
the
relief
that's
necessary.
P
This
is
also
located
at
two
f2000
district.
A
variance
would
be
required
for
multifamily
use,
as
you
can
see
from
the
context
photos
that
we've
provided.
There
are
numerous
multi
families
in
this
section
of
of
Eagle
Hill.
This
is
this
borders
along
the
MFR
district,
which
is
located
about
100
yards
away
at
the
Meridian
street,
so
we
do
request
relief
for
the
multi-family
at
four
units.
Our
lot
size
is
sufficient.
We
do
have
2,500
square
feet,
the
minimum
is
2,000
and
our
lot
width
is
also
sufficient
at
25
feet,
which
is
the
minimum
amount
required.
P
We
do
require
relief
for
the
side
yard.
On
the
left
side
yard.
There
is
an
existing
condition
where
there's
almost
no
setback,
we're
going
to
maintain
that
plane.
We've
worked
closely
with
the
ax
butter
to
the
left,
to
ensure
that
that
is
something
that
was
acceptable
and
no
issue
and
I
believe
they're,
actually
written
a
letter
of
support
for
this
project
based
upon
how
we've
worked
with
them.
In
addition,
we
do
require
reread
setback.
We
are
set
at
twenty
four
point
three
feet
for
this
particular
neighborhood.
A
30-foot
setback
would
be
necessary.
P
We
feel
that
the
use
of
the
space
for
parking
was
something
that
the
neighborhood
felt
was
critical.
We
always
when
it
comes
to
Eagle
Hill,
offer
the
opportunity
to
either
have
open
space
or
parking
and
ask
them
what
is
more
preferable
and,
in
this
particular
case,
parking
seemed
to
be
more
important
to
that
neighborhood.
Our
flirting
ratio
is
2.25
with
a
maximum
of
0.8,
so
we
are
requesting
a
variance
for
that.
However,
I
would
point
out
the
density
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
as
shown
in
the
context.
P
Photos,
including
the
satellite
photo
of
the
size
of
the
buildings
in
that
area,
is
very
consistent
with
the
type
of
fer
that
we
are
proposing.
We
are
at
42
feet
and
four
storeys
that
would
be
in
excess
of
what
the
article
53
would
allow
for
height.
The
maximum
is
three
stories
35
feet,
however,
referring
back
to
the
design
as
well
as
what
presently
exists
in
the
neighborhood,
we
feel
this
works
very
contextually
with
that
side
of
the
street.
P
In
fact,
the
existing
single-family
that
is
probably
somewhat
out
of
character
out
of
place
with
what
what
presently
exists.
We
are
proposing
a
total
of
three
parking
spaces.
As
indicated
we
would
require
4.25
technically
with
the
news
new
construction.
However,
because
we
are
are
close
to
public
transportation
line.
The
Eagle
Oil
Civic
Association
also
felt
that
three
was
an
appropriate
number
of
parking
spaces
for
the
site.
With
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
of
the
board.
A
A
A
A
A
P
A
S
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
berlin
at
ramela
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
community
process.
The
developer
address
most
of
the
concerns
of
their
parties
and
as
well
Eagle
Hill,
Civic
Association
voted
in
support
of
this
proposal
and
we
received
20
letters
of
support
from
director
butters
and
from
members
of
the
Eagle
Hill
community.
Thank
you.
T
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Ricardo
patron
from
the
office
of
city
council,
lady
Edwards,
the
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
She'd
also
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
a
thorough
review
by
the
Landmarks
Commission
prior
to
the
demolition
of
the
existing
structure.
Good.
AC
B
AD
Good
morning
my
name
is
Dan:
Bailey
I
live
at
73,
Utah,
Street
and
Eagle
Hill.
Setting
aside
the
fact
that
there's
no
evidence
of
hardship
in
this
case,
this
is
a
destructive
proposal.
Inherently
involves
demolition
of
a
historic
house
that
was
built
in
the
1840s.
It's
a
modest
workers
cottage,
but
it's
also
worth
preserving.
It's
served
as
a
home
for
East
Boston
families
for
a
hundred
and
seventy-five
years,
and
there's
no
reason
that
it
couldn't
continue
to
serve
as
a
home
for
East
Boston
families
in
the
future.
AD
This
building
connects
us
to
the
neighborhood's
past
is
one
of
the
last
vestiges
of
historic
architecture
on
this
block
and
contributes
to
the
unique
sense
of
place
in
East
Boston
I'd.
Ask
that
you
please
don't
kick
this
can
on
this
and
leave
it
to
landmarks
to
decide.
Limerick
does
not
have
the
authority
to
prevent
demolition
of
this
building,
but
this
board
does.
AD
The
proposal
should
also
conform
to
the
intend
purpose
of
the
code
and
the
historic
nature
of
this
building
is
relevant
to
the
code.
The
code
is
really
couldn't
be
more
clear
about
its
intent
in
terms
of
preserving
historic
structures
and
our
local
53
section
51
point
2,
subsection,
D,
wreath
removal
or
alteration
of
any
historic
architectural
features
should
be
held
to
a
minimum.
Presumably
that
would
include
the
removal
of
an
entire
historic
house.
AD
Subsection
Q
design
features
of
a
proposed
project
should
enhance
and
reinforce
any
historic
qualities
of
existing
structures,
which
presumably
precludes
demolishing
historic
structures.
We
also
need
to
consider
the
context
here,
so
this
East
Boston
has
had
the
highest
number
of
demo
demolition
applications
in
the
city.
It's
tied
with
Dorchester,
despite
being
half
the
size
and
most
of
the
homes
target
for
demolition
are
three
Decker's
and
single
families
which
have
traditionally
served
as
family
housing
in
the
neighborhood.
AD
Of
course,
these
are
all
big
issues:
preserving
stored
resources
and
reducing
the
environmental
impact,
and
this
is
a
relatively
small
project,
but
it's
one
of
hundreds
like
it
and
we
need
to
begin
taking
a
stand
against
this
kind
of
destructive
development.
So
I
hope
you
will
reject
his
proposal.
Thank
you.
P
A
P
Any
building,
just
as
a
general
rule,
any
building,
that's
over
50
years
old
in
the
city
of
Boston,
requires
approval
under
article
85.
So,
although
he's
encouraging
this
board
to
exercise
restraint,
it's
the
Landmarks
Commission
itself
that
does
have
the
actual
jurisdiction
under
the
zoning
code
to
determine
whether
whether
or
not
a
building
is
significant.
That
is
a
process
that
we
will
be
required
to
undertake,
regardless
of.
P
Do
not
until
such
time
as
the
zoning
approval
has
occurred,
because
we
do
need
to
present
to
the
Landmarks
Commission
what
the
plan
is
for
for
for
the
site.
It
makes
no
sense
to
submit
something
for
demolition
delay
before
any
approval
is,
is
even
granted,
because
that
presents
a
situation
where
a
developer
simply
could
go
into
the
Landmarks
Commission
and
start
talking
about
demolishing
buildings
for
no
other
reason
than
just
for
the
sake
of
demolishing
them.
The
little
Mark's
Commission
would
like
to
see
a
plan
of
what
you
proposed.
P
In
fact,
we
have
to
show
alternatives.
The
demolition,
if
there's
a
determination
that
there
is
significance,
but
we've
not
even
reached
that
threshold.
Yet
and
at
some
point
we
go
through
this
process
as
anybody
would.
That
is
demolishing
a
building
in
the
city.
The
difference
in
the
distinction
is
important.
If
this
were
a
designated
landmark,
this
would
be
an
entirely
different
process
and
the
Board
of
Appeals
would
have
different
jurisdiction.
A
AE
A
AE
Not
administratively,
but
council
councilors,
correct
landmarks
does
not
entertain
applications
for
demolition,
just
purely
for
the
sake
of
demolishing
a
building.
They
want
to
see
what's
going
to
happen,
and
he
is
right.
He
wants
to
see
alternatives.
Demolition
to
the
Landmarks
Commission
is
the
last
resort.
AE
P
And
if
I
could
add
one
thing,
madam
chair,
just
to
comment
on
mr.
Bailey's
point
about
you
know
this
board
needs
to
be
the
serve
gatekeeper
of
these
items.
The
Civic
Association
is
extremely
vigilant
when
it
comes
to
the
demolition
of
structures
in
the
neighborhood
I've
presented
cases
to
them,
where
I've
been
informed,
that
buildings
do
have
significance
beyond
what
you
know
a
developer
might
believe,
and
in
this
particular
case
that
was
not
identified
by
the
yellow,
Civic,
Association
and
I.
Think
is
also
representative.
P
The
fact
that
we
do
have
a
number
of
letters
of
support
from
residents
of
Eagle
Hill,
who
otherwise
have
spoken
up
previously
when
buildings
were
put
forward
and
I,
know,
there's
other
examples
of
that.
I.
Don't
necessarily
pin
here
where
buildings,
the
preference
from
the
neighborhood
was
for
preservation
that
does
not
exist
with
respect
to
this
proposal
and
I
think
that's
an
important
distinction.
U
U
A
B
Page
calling
vo
a
1
0
1
3
4
70
to
150
for
lexington
trees.
This
is
the
modified
deck.
On
the
second
floor,
constructing
new
roof
deck
construct
special
edition
to
align
the
exterior
wall.
The
violation
is
article
2070
5.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
52,
roof
structure
restrictions,
article
53
section,
are
in
the
40.
A
ratio
of
success
of
an
article
53
section
9
in
the
rear
yard,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
from
the
record.
Please
morning.
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
Lin's
245
Sumner,
Street,
East,
Boston
behalf
of
the
petitioner
and
homeowner
at
154,
Lexington
Street
with
me,
Scott
Cheniere.
He
is
the
architect
for
the
project
from
chewing
company
I'm
sure
this
is
a
preexisting
non-conforming
structure
located
also
locate
in
the
Eagle
Hill
section
of
East
Boston.
This
building
had
undergone
a
complete
renovation
which
was
intended
to
convert
the
building,
upgrade
the
building
and
converted
to
condos.
P
There
is
a
proposal
to
square
off
the
building
towards
the
rear,
as
well
as
add
a
roof
deck
they'll
be
accessed
by
spiral
staircase.
The
relatively
straightforward
proposal
that
did
not
have
significant
opposition
at
all
from
the
neighborhood
and
the
variances
that
are
being
requested
are
more
or
less
because
of
the
nature
of
the
pre-existing
non-conformities
that
exists
presently
with
the
building.
So.
P
Q
The
the
rear
yard-
currently
the
first
unit,
is
a
walk
up
and
you
come
out
at
grade
in
the
back
of
the
building.
You're
gonna
to
is
has
access
to
an
existing
deck
in
the
rear.
The
building
which
walks
walks
out
and
stairs
down
to
the
rear
yard.
With
three
community
give
me
the
reconfiguration
of
the
two
units.
Q
We
would
have
a
bedroom
in
the
back
of
the
building,
so
loss
of
access
to
the
rear
yard
from
Unit
two
would
occur
because
of
access
to
that
deck
would
have
to
through
the
bedroom
without
the
modification
of
the
the
deck.
So
what
we're
doing
is
we're
trying
to
just
retain
access
to
the
open
space
for
the
unit
one
unit
two,
and
it's
primarily
just
for
access
to
the
rear
yard.
There
is
no
egress
off
the
back
Santee
other
building,
it's
fully
sprinkled
and
we
have
the
one
means
of
egress
and
it.
A
Q
The
actual
addition
is
quite
small,
this
a
little
45
degree
jog
between
the
main
portion
of
the
building
on
the
front
and
the
smaller
addition.
Well,
the
small
portion
of
the
building,
the
back
basically
just
squares
off
that
that
little
45
chamfer
that
just
to
make
the
door
access
a
little
bit
cleaner
to
the
rear
yard,
and
that's
really
where
the
violation
is
coming
from,
because
we
have
a
preexisting
non-conforming.
Excessive
FA
are.
A
F
Q
S
T
AC
W
C
A
B
A
next
case,
following
vo,
a
1
0
0
3,
9
0
8
to
24
prints.
Midstream
is
a
four
story
with
a
four
unit
building
one
unit
on
each
story:
no
parking,
mysterious,
tear
and
RAIR
buildings,
private
roof,
deck
violation,
article
53,
section
9,
the
law
Darija
for
additional
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
I
on
the
ploidy,
a
ratio.
Success
of
article
53,
section,
9
height
requirement,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53,
section
I
and
the
height
requirements
excessive
and
feet
article
53,
section,
9,
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
B
Article
53,
section,
9,
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
I
on
the
rail
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
36.
Our
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
8,
a
multi-family
12
units
four
units
is
forbidden,
use
an
article
2017
5.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
P
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lenz
245
Sumner,
Street,
East
Boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
with
me
Ryan
Oconee.
He
is
the
property
owner
and
proponent.
Also
with
me,
our
exact
ris'n,
the
project
architect.
Madam
chair,
this
project
is
also
located
in
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood,
located
on
Princeton
Street
in
a
three
f2000
district.
It's
a
pre-existing
single-family
dwelling,
surrounded
by
numerous
multifamily
dwellings
in
and
around
that
section
of
Princeton
Street.
P
Our
proposal
would
be
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
provide
a
four-story
four
unit
dwelling
with
no
parking
and
I
can
explain
a
little
bit
of
how
we
arrived
at
that.
This
is
intended
upon
completion
to
be
for
home
ownership
and
part
of
this
process
included
a
robust
conversation
with
the
director
butters,
many
of
whom
who
have
written
letters
of
support
based
upon
our
changes
to
this
project.
From
where
we
originally
started.
As
I
indicated,
this
project
does
not
include
parking
and
there's
a
reason
for
that.
We
first
proposed
this
project.
P
We
proposed
it
at
five
units
with
parking
below
the
building
parking
would
be
accessed
from
Princeton
Street
would
require
additional
curb
cut.
There
are
a
number
of
curb
cuts
on
this
side
of
Princeton
Street
and
the
on-street
parking
seems
to
be
somewhat
of
a
concern
and
the
elimination
of
that
was
not
preferential
part
of
the
suggestion
that
we
heard
from
director
butters
involve
reducing
the
building
from
a
total
of
five
units,
and
sometimes
it
works.
Sometimes
it
doesn't
and
to
eliminate
parking
as
a
compromise
that
was
indicated
by
director
butters
to
this
project.
P
When
we
had
a
final
abutters
means
in
October,
they
were
satisfied
that
we
had
made
that
change
and
we're
happy
to
proceed
in
that
regard.
Well,
with
respect
to
the
unit
sizes,
these
are
all
roughly
around
1,200
square
feet.
The
lower
level
would
have
a
duplex
tile
with
some
additional
square
footage
and,
as
I
said,
this
is
located
at
3.
P
F2000
district,
therefore
multifamily
use
would
not
be
a
lot
of
the
variance
would
be
necessary
to
point
out
the
building
immediately
adjacent
to
this
building
as
a
six
unit
building,
and
there
are
a
number
of
four
unit
buildings
along
this
block
of
Princeton
Street,
so
very,
very
consistent
with
the
context,
because
this
is
in
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood.
We
do
show
a
rendering
which
attempts
to
capture
some
of
the
architectural
details
that
are
typical,
that
an
expected
in
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood.
P
We
understand
that
there's
probably
a
little
bit
more
tweaking
that
will
occur
through
Design
Review.
This
board
approve
it.
However,
we
we
are
committed
to
working
with
the
Eagle
Hill
design,
standards
and
I
believe
the
BP
da
is
very
familiar
with
that
we
do
meet
the
minimum
lot
size
requirement.
This
is
a
2,500
square
foot
lot
with
25
feet
of
frontage,
so
no
variance
is
necessary
for
that
we
do
require
a
side
yard
and
a
side
yard
variance
on
the
left
side.
There
is
an
existing
condition
of
almost
era
setback.
We
are
maintaining
that
condition.
A
A
P
P
Building
the
structure
itself
is
located
30
feet
from
the
rear.
However,
the
stairs
which
are
located
in
the
rear
do
encroach
somewhat
into
the
Ceph
at
the
rail
yard
setback,
but
the
building
itself
has
a
30
foot
setback,
which
is
something
the
neighborhood
have
requested
our
floor
day
ratios
2.08
the
Maximas
1.0
in
the
neighborhood
once
again
in
analyzing
the
design
of
this
building.
We
had
eric
analyze
and
look
at
the
surrounding
context
to
ensure
that
we
are
consistent
with
the
FAA
hours
of
surrounding
buildings
and
that's
something
that
we
were
able
to
establish.
A
P
We
are
showing
a
roof
deck
with
a
head
house
with
a
hat
house,
because
this
is
a
four-story
building.
The
building
code
would
require
access
to
be
by
head
house
not
by
ash,
if
we're
capable
of
adjusting
that,
we
certainly
will
do
that
by
as
part
of
design
review.
But
this
is
the
initial
rendering
that
was
prepared
based
upon
the
roof.
The
roof
deck
is
exclusive
only
to
unit
3,
because
it
is
a
condominium
we
would
not
make
that
accessible
to
the
entire
building.
P
Overall,
our
building
height
is
thirty,
nine
and
a
half
feet
that
allows
for
accessibility
at
the
lower
level.
We
are
at
four
storeys,
but
I
would
point
out
that
the
building
immediately
to
the
right
was
our
context
for
purposes
of
the
height
of
our
building.
That
is
a
exposed
foundation
triple-decker.
So
it's
almost
a
four
story
immediately
to
the
right,
and
by
keeping
this
a
thirty
nine
a
half
feet,
we
feel
that
will
be
contextual.
P
With
that
side
of
Princeton
Street,
we
do
have
about
950
square
feet
of
open
space
1200
square
feet
proposed
by
eliminating
the
parking
we
were
able
to
as
I
mentioned.
Sometimes
the
preferences
for
open
space
sometimes
to
parking
in
this
case.
We
did
here
strong
desire
for
open
space
and
we
have
preserved
that
for
the
rear
yard
that
will
be
accessible
to
the
entire
building
as
a
courtyard
and
then
last
but
not
least,
is
the
parking.
We
would
be
required
to
provide
a
total
of
4.5
spaces
and
we're
proposing
zero
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
P
Yes,
mr.
vikon,
when
we
started
this
project,
we
did
start
at
five
units
with
parking
that
would
be
access
under
the
building
and
we
moved
out
to
the
rear
portion
and
doing
so
we'd
be
eliminating
any
possibility
of
a
courtyard
to
the
back
portion
of
the
yard.
Eagle
Hill
was
somewhat
indifferent
towards
parking
versus
open
space.
It
seemed
to
be
a
mix
when
we
did
have
the
first
of
butters
meeting.
The
abutters
were
very
concerned
about
adding
a
curb
cut
to
the
street
because
they
felt
that
that
that
would
exacerbate
an
already
existing
issue.
P
A
I'm
wondering
since,
since
you
know,
you're
involved
with
a
number
of
these
projects,
if
there's
a
way
that
you
can
help
push
the
design
as
you
work
with,
to
give
the
best
quality
on
all
their
projects,
because
you
know
the
last
two
have
gone.
The
extra
step
and
I
understand
why
to
really
render
some
some
really
nice
buildings
I.
A
However,
there's
one
thinking
of
Horace
speak
more
directly.
You
know
where,
where
it
it
feels
like
it's
just
any
other
building.
So
that's
just
a
note
to
you
to
see
if
there's
any
way
that
you
know
through
your
relationships
with
these
architects
that
we
see
improve
design
before
they
come
to
us
and
not
really
depend
on
be
a
design.
S
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
world,
in
eternally
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
community
process,
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
three
apartment
where
the
developer
were
close
with
the
ibadis
and
address.
Most
of
the
concerns
also
will
receive
15
letters
of
support
from
director
Paris
and
members
of
the
Eagle
Hill
community.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
V
B
Zero
62
66
Cambridge
Street.
This
is
the
existing
open-air
parking
lot
from
one
hundred
ninety
three
vehicles
to
four
hundred
and
thirty
one
vehicles
and
demo.
The
existing
warehouse
buildings
violations,
article
62
section
17
parking
lot-
is
traditionally
used
in
an
l1
sub
district
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
G
Seeking
your
approval,
madam
chair
members,
for
an
expansion
of
an
existing
additional
use
for
an
open-air
parking
lot,
which
is
currently
licensed
for
193
vehicles
to
431
vehicles.
The
lot
is
currently
under
lease
to
Boston
Public
Schools
and
has
been
used
for
a
number
of
years
for
school
buses.
So
for
an
extensive
period,
there
are
well
over
a
hundred
buses
that
were
parked
at
this
site
that
came
and
went
on
multiple
times
a
day.
G
The
Boston
Public
Schools
has
found
other
use
and
has
requested
that
we
that
we
could
terminate
the
lease
we've
been
able
to
locate
another
corporate
tenant,
one
that
doesn't
own
a
business
in
Everett
in
a
corporate
tenant
that
could
use
the
spot
for
their
employees
and
run
shuttle
buses.
We've
had
extensive
meetings
with
the
community
I'd
like
to
point
out.
G
Both
the
neighborhood
services
in
councillor
Edwards
office
was
outstanding
in
bringing
the
community
together
to
discuss
the
use
of
this
site
and,
as
part
of
those
discussions,
the
community,
the
removing
the
school
buses
which,
at
this
point,
the
mechanics
and
the
cleaners
of
whatever
arrived
at
those
premises
at
4:00
a.m.
and
a
lot
of
nights.
The
buses
get
back
late,
so
removing
the
school
buses
is
a
significant
benefit
to
the
community.
A
G
Well,
a
little
bit
earlier,
Marley,
you
know
7:30
to
8:00
o'clock
and
then
five
o'clock
to
5:30
free
on
the
weekends.
So
as
as
part
of
the
process
and
of
the
community
process
and
dealing
with
neighborhood
services
in
in
the
community,
there
would
be
the
building.
That's
on
the
site
would
be
demolished.
There
would
be
new
fencing,
new
lighting,
full
security
cameras,
landscaping
be
fully
paved.
There
was
brought
out
as
part
of
the
meetings.
There
was
an
issue
that
has
arisen
on
drainage
that
would
be
addressed.
G
He
was
a
request
for
an
installation
of
bike
racks,
so
a
few
of
the
few
of
the
parking
spaces
on
the
plan
would
would
be
taken
out
for
bike
racks.
Also,
the
community
requested
to
zip
cars
on
the
space,
and
it
would
be
a
gated
system
with
full
security,
so
the
only
access
would
be
the
people
that
were
working
for
the
for
the
company.
Also,
what
was
requested
is
during
inclement
weather,
which
we've
agreed
to
that.
We
would
open
the
space
the
parking
space
for
during
snow
removal
or,
whatever
overnight,
parking.
G
A
C
G
G
Z
Z
U
G
Z
Z
G
Would
be
a
bus
there,
I
guess
waiting
that
handle
it.
They
do
have
you'll,
be
open
on
the
weekends.
There'll
be
no
parking
on
the
weekends,
because
the
few
people
that
work
on
the
weekends
they
have
parking
on
site
in
their
building.
So
it
would
be
totally
open
the
the
size
of
the
buses
they
anticipate
would
either
be
12
or
24.
So
I
would
gather
in
the
in
the
really
peak
periods
that
24
person
bus
would
go
back
and
forth
as
many
times
as
is
necessary
to
move
the
people
back
and
forth.
A
A
AH
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Quinlan
Locke
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
and
a
Bardot's
meeting
was
held
back
in
September
and
was
lightly
attended.
There
were
no
major
issues
at
that
time,
as
they
said
before,
there
was
a
previous
proposal
for
a
billboard
on
this
site
and
that
proposal
was
withdrawn
through
the
community
process
to
what
you
have
before
you
today.
We
also
submitted
a
letter
of
support
from
state
representative
Dan
Ryan
as
well.
Thank
you.
T
A
F
A
AG
D
B
Renovation,
an
extension
of
living
space
to
the
basement
had
a
rooftop
deck
and
we
placed
exterior,
siding
and
trim
the
violations.
Article
62
section
25,
the
deck
exceeds
the
allowed
building.
Height
access
is
not
through
a
hatch
or
bulkhead,
and
article
62
section
8,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
my.
Y
A
Y
Are
this
is
an
existing
two
family
in
Charlestown?
We
are
proposing
to
keep
it
as
a
two
unit.
We
are
keeping
the
number
of
bedrooms
also
at
five,
and
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
to
put
livable
space
in
the
lower
level,
and
once
we
put
livable
space
in
the
lower
level,
we
go
over
the
allowed
area.
That's
not
first
thing.
The
second
thing
is:
we
would
also
like
to
put
a
roof
deck.
We
are
no
longer
having
the
access
hatch.
We
are
actually
making
the
roof
deck
only
accessible
from
the
second
floor
unit.
Y
A
Y
A
Y
A
F
Y
AH
T
Y
Doing
the
owners
meeting
if
they
spoke
I
believe
Quinlan
Locke
was
there
I
believe
they
spoke
with
James
about
that
and
they
were
making.
They
were
going
to
fix
that
it
occurred
during
the
remediation
for
the
foundation
under
and
that
he
was
going
to
be
fixing
that
and
adding
soundproofing
because
they're
also
using
their
lower
level
as
a
living
space.
A
AH
A
A
A
B
AA
Name
is
John
Lydon
no
address,
sir
Oh
address
is
9-11
Catherine
Street
and
13-15
Catherine
Street
Roseville,
okay,.
B
AA
Morning
my
name
is
John.
Lydon
addresses
5
casting
away
in
Dorchester
Massachusetts,
Oh
25,
and
this
morning,
I'd
like
to
request
a
deferral
for
these
two
cases
most
immediately,
because
our
architect
is
unable
to
attend
and
then
more
down
the
line.
A
lot
we'd
like
to
continue
to
work
with
the
neighbors
to
significantly
adjust
this
project.
B
L
AA
AI
AJ
AI
A
AI
B
You
are
there
any
other
deferrals
or
with
Charles
the
10:30
hearing.
None
go
back
to
the
next
case
for
9:30
s,
calling
boa
nine
seven
one,
one,
seven,
nine
eight
to
12
battery
street.
This
is
construct
a
roof
deck.
The
violation,
article
54
section
10,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
and
be
an
article
54
section,
18,
roof
structure,
restriction,
name
and
address
on
the
record.
Please
good.
AK
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Lauren
null
Meyer
of
Greylock
roofing
60
Johnson,
Road
Wilmington.
We
are
seeking
a
variance
to
construct
a
roof
deck
in
an
area
that
previously
unpermitted
Greylock
roofing
was
hired
by
the
board
of
trustees
at
a
12th
battery
street
to
replace
the
roof
in
September
of
2018.
In
the
process
of
doing
so,
we
had
to
we
had
to
remove
an
existing
roof
deck
that
was
not
permitted.
The
roof
has
since
been
replaced.
We
are
at
the
stage
of
construction
where
we'd
like
to
reinstall
a
roof
deck.
AK
AK
A
AL
Members
that
the
board
Maria
Lanza
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
There
wasn't
a
Buddist
meeting
held
for
this
project
on
August
21st
and
they
also
have
the
support
of
the
north
on
waterfront
residents
association
as
well
as
the
north,
on
waterfront
neighborhood
council.
Thank
you.
AC
AM
Chuck
Roselli
excuse
me
unit
owner
and
a
trustee
of
the
building,
also
in
support.
AN
B
N
Chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Daniel
Tosh
Cano
from
Drago
incense
candles
attorney-at-law
located
at
15
Broad
Street,
Boston
Mass
close
to
109.
Today,
I
stand
before
you
representing
Douglas
array.
Apologizes,
not
being
here
got
a
call
this
morning
due
to
the
weather
and
school
closings
once
unable
to
be
here
today
to
join
me,
he
owns
his
three
family
residential
dwelling
located
in
the
North
End
of
Boston
is
located
in
the
multi-family
residential
sub
district.
In
the
back
of
this
unit,
wand
is
a
opens
patio.
N
What
we
like
to
do
expand
the
living
space
for
unit
one
only
in
a
construct
on
one
floor.
Addition
approximately
180
square
feet
by
filing
the
application,
with
seeking
relief
from
the
FAI,
which
is
of
the
floor
area
ratio
in
the
North
End
of
Boston
and
the
multi-family
residential
sub
district.
It's
3.0
the
existing
effect.
N
N
We
are
already
in
violation
we're
at
3
we're
at
a
ten
point,
two
we're
just
going
back
to
our
property
line
to
probably
about
two
inches
so
seeking
the
take
over
the
entire
property
line
to
the
back
back
to
you're,
not
gonna,
be
able
to
see
this
from
the
street.
That's
in
the
back
of
the
property.
They
just
something.
A
N
The
right,
if
you're
facing
23
unity
Street
to
our
right,
there
is
a
wall.
That's
about
a
10
foot
wall.
It's
the
Illinois
Church.
We
have
support
from
the
old
non
church.
We
met
with
the
Reverend
over
there.
They
support
it
as
long
as
we're
in
agreement
that
will
maintain
that
wall
to
the
left
of
us
will
be
the
back
of
Towson
Street
properties.
We've
had
for
four
meetings
and
there's
been
no
opposition
to
this
proposal.
A
N
About
it,
they
really
hasn't
weighed
in,
but
we
had
an
about
his
meeting
Lee
and
we
met
with
the
Monica
and
waterfront
resident
Association
there.
Two
meetings
we
met
with
the
not
then
waterfront
non
naval
council
there's
been
nothing
but
support
every
resident
in
the
area
part
of
the
requirements
for
the
not
then
we
mail
a
letter
with
advertising.
All
the
meetings
and
I
haven't
heard
any
opposition
from
the
from
the
abutters
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
rare
residences
was
concerning
some
access,
but
they
do
have
access
out
the
back
of
their
property.
AL
Board
Maria
Lanza
MS,
often
even
but
Sarah,
says
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
we
held
in
a
but
is
meeting
for
this
project
on
October
10th
and
there
were
no
concerns
from
the
abutters.
They
also
have
the
support
of
the
north
on
waterfront
Neighborhood
Council,
as
well
as
the
north,
on
waterfront
residents
association.
Thank
you.
T
AC
B
The
next
case
calling
boa
9
9
0
9
4
2
1
31
Appleton
Street.
This
is
original
two
apartments
of
two
stores
on
the
ground
floor.
The
ground
floor
was
previously
to
commercial
uses.
The
ground
floor
was
altered
prior
to
the
purchase
to
accommodate
three
commercial
uses.
The
uses
are
hair
salon
attorney
office
and
art
gallery.
No
changes
to
the
exterior
elevation
change
box
were
to
including
third
commercial
space.
The
violation
is
article
64,
section
8,
the
hair
salon
forbidden
is
forbidden,
use,
article
64,
section,
8
and
attorney's
office
professional
office.
B
AF
F
AF
A
You
please
speak
up
we're
having
a
hard
time
hearing
today
and
that's
taping.
It's
not
amplified,
so
we
will
need
you
to
speak
up
so
tell
us
about
the
square
footage
for
each
one
of
these
uses,
because
this
is
a
residential
sub
district,
and
this
is
just
increasing.
The
the
number
of
uses
that
are
forbidden
so
tell
us
tell
us
about
the
the
square
footage
which
one
of
these
uses
and
they're
all
I
assume
on
the
ground
floor.
Yes,.
AF
A
AF
A
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
phases
Sherif
at
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
strong
support
of
this
proposal.
This
is
a
new
owner
of
that
property.
These
are
existing
conditions
and
they
are
legalizing
basically
the
use
that
is
already
there.
Thank
you.
AQ
A
B
Case
calling
POA
on
zero
zero.
Three
eight
one,
seven
thirty,
two
Appleton
Street.
This
is
a
rehab
balcony
and
roof
deck
violation.
Article
64
section,
nine,
insufficient,
Raigad
setback,
ten
foot
to
the
lot
line:
nautical
sixty-four
section:
nine
townhouse,
Rojas
extensions
into
the
riad
second-story
deck,
the
fifty
square
feet
in
article
64,
section,
34,
restricted,
roof
structure,
regulations,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
A
AR
AR
A
F
AP
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faces
Sherif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
I
held
an
abutters
meeting
and
neighbors
did
not
have
any
concerns
about
this
project.
We
would
like
to
see
Eric
and
his
growing
family
be
able
to
move
into
their
new
home.
Thank
you
was.
AP
Didn't
come
up
and
then
also
we
haven't
had
anyone
reach
out
since
then,
and
I
know
that
they've
also
met
with
the
reached
out
to
the
Civic
Association
in
that
area.
Usually
people
tend
to
reach
out
when
there's
a
major
concern,
but
they've
been
in
communication
with
their
director
butters
Thank
You.
AQ
A
A
B
A
lot
case,
the
nine
thirty
calling
boa
one
zero
one:
four:
two:
zero
nine.
Eighty,
seven
Oh
Street
pole
Street
here
this
is
an
addition
of
a
third
floor
in
basement
renovation
violations,
article
27
s:
this
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section,
29,
brew,
structure,
restricted
district
article
68,
section,
eight
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient
and
article
68
section
eight,
the
side.
Yet
setback
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AS
A
AS
A
A
AS
So
it's
a
single-family
house,
there
are
currently
three
bedrooms
upstairs
and
this
would
be
the
addition
of
one
bedroom
in
the
basement.
The
addition
on
the
third
floor
would
be
the
master
suite.
The
basement
addition
would
be
a
full
footprint
of
the
building,
while
the
addition
to
the
top
floor
would
be
only
a
portion
of
that
footprint.
A
A
F
AE
AT
AQ
A
A
A
We
are
here
to
fact
find
so
use
your
opportunity
at
the
mic
either
when
you
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project
to
give
us
some
new
information.
If
somebody
has
already
stated
your
thing
that
you
are
dying
to
talk
about,
if
somebody's
already
put
it
on
the
record,
please
help
us
and
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
you
know,
support
our
opposition.
You
know
just
so
that
we
know
that
we,
you
know,
we
we
kind
of
know
where
you
stand
so
help
us
in
that
way.
Mr.
B
You,
madam
chair
I'm,
gonna,
call
the
10:30
hearing
so
first
two
cases
calling
VOA
nine
eight
two
eight
zero
zero
74
Brookley
Road.
There
is
a
companion
case,
VOA
nine,
eight,
two,
eight
zero
to
74
Berkeley
Road.
This
is
the
existing
basement
and
took
additional
living
space
with
bathroom
bedroom
office,
family
room
and
workshop.
The
violation
is
article
55,
section:
nine,
the
forty
a
ratio
is
excessive
and
there's
also
Building
Code.
B
This
is
the
ninth
edition,
780
CMR
chapter
2,
section
202,
dwelling
unit
definition,
a
single
unit
providing
complete
independent
living
facilities
for
one
or
more
persons,
including
a
person
permanent
provision
for
living,
sleeping
eating,
cooking
and
sanitation.
Note
the
proposed
living
space
extension
into
the
basement
of
unit
1
is
a
violation
of
the
section
of
the
building
code,
since
it
provides
no
independent
or
common
access
to
the
utility
equipment
in
their
shadows,
HVAC,
water
etc,
located
in
the
basement,
while
the
occupants
of
all
the
building
name
and
address.
For
the
record,
please
my.
AV
The
owners
of
unit
1
we've
lived
there
too,
since
2017
and
we're
interested
in
doing
this
renovation
for
our
growing
family.
We
have
a
three-year-old
and
a
six-month-old
at
home.
We
currently
live
in
a
two-bedroom
on
the
first
floor
and
have
seeing
they
access
to
the
basement.
Is
ours
so
I'm
going
to
walk
you
through
the
existing
condition
and
then
yep
go
ahead.
A
AK
AT
A
AX
AV
AW
It's
a
triple-decker
and
the
basement
is
only
accessible
through
our
unit
and
the
basement
is
completely
open
right
now,
there's
there's
no
walls
in
the
middle,
so
each
unit
has
its
own
HVAC,
so
the
only
HVAC
in
the
basement
is
for
us.
Each
unit
does
have
a
water
shut-off,
which
is
illustrated
here.
The
upstairs
everyone
has
a
little
blue
knob
that
shuts
off
the
water,
but
the
house,
water
shut-off,
is
only
accessible
in
the
basement
and
the
other
thing
that's
in
the
basement.
A
AW
A
way
to
shut
off
the
water
to
adjust
your
unit,
but
the
main
water
shut-off
is
on
shown
on
the
bottom
of
this
illustration
in
it's
only
in
the
basement,
so
it's
only
accessible
through
our
unit,
and
this
is
the
way
it
is
currently
and
also
in
the
basement.
Next
to
that,
if
you
turn
this
over,
is
the
the
sprinkler
tower
here
so
that
the
sprinkler
shutoff
is
only
accessible
through
the
basement,
and
this
is
the
way
it
was
when
we
bought
it
in
2017.
AW
A
A
AW
So
currently
the
stairway
continues
to
the
basement,
but
you
can
only
get
into
that
stairway
through
our
units,
so
we
proposed
making
the
stairway
a
limited
common
area
where
we
add
another
door
so
that,
with
the
front
door
key
you
could
get
into
the
stairway
and
get
to
the
sprinkler,
which
is
right
at
the
bottom
of
the
stairway.
And
then
we
add
another
door
at
the
bottom
of
the
stairs.
That's
a
unit,
one
key
door,
but.
AV
AW
A
AW
The
other
solution,
which
we
think
would
be
really
hard
to
do
and
expensive,
is
to
move
this
sprinkler
pipe
into
the
front
common
area.
It's
it
would
be
very
hard
to
get
3
feet
of
clearance,
I
think
on
either
side.
Our
understanding
is
that
you
need
3
feet
of
clearance
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
room
in
this
area.
To
put
this
thing
in
it's,
it's
not
small,
it's
a
it's
a
tall
pipe
and
it
has
some
to
it.
So
we
think
that
that's
not
a
feasible
solution
either.
A
AV
AO
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lundi
Santana
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services.
My
predecessor
conducted
a
community
process
for
this
proposal.
The
applicant
worked
closely
to
address
abutters
concerns.
The
office
also
has
a
letter
of
support
from
the
Stony
Brook
Neighborhood
Association.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
A
B
You
call
the
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero,
zero,
four,
three:
five:
seven
71
to
73
Humboldt
Avenue:
this
is
a
change
of
use
occupancy
existing
used
at
day
school,
tomorrow's,
the
existing
day
school
renovate
the
existing
space
to
construct
two
new
dwelling
units.
All
new
systems
existing
building
is
current,
currently
multifamily
non
sprinkled
the
violations,
article
50
section,
29,
the
law,
a
or
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
B
AZ
AZ
A
A
AZ
Don't
know
Wow
madam
chair
I
was
just
informed
of
this
about
a
week
ago
and
conversations
with
BP
GA,
and
they
indicated
it
at
that
time
and
reiterated
again
to
me
in
a
telephone
conversation
this
morning
that
they
did
not
feel
that
there
were
any
implications
that
would
prevent
us
from
requesting
the
board
to
make
the
change
of
occupancy
to
allow
us
to
do
away
with
the
day
school,
which
has
been,
incidentally,
defunct
in
the
building
for
the
past
five
years.
It
is
not
operated
and
my
client
mr.
AZ
AZ
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chairwoman.
This
I
believe
I
forget
which
urban
renewal
area
it
is.
But,
as
you
know,
urban
renewal
plans
are
designated.
You
know
the
parcels
are
designated
for
certain
uses
and
certain
Heights
and
certain
FA
ours.
So
you
know,
even
though
our
recommendation
is
denial
without
prejudice
to
be
honest,
I
think
a
short
deferral
would
be
great,
because
if
a
minor
modification
does
have
to
happen
to
the
LDA,
it
does
have
to
go
to
our
board
and
it's
not
going
to
go
next
week,
so
it
would
have
to
be
at
least
one
month.
AE
Maybe
two
months,
I,
don't
know
the
extent
of
the
modification
and
I
know
it.
This
seems
very
minor
in
terms
of
a
change
of
occupancy
and
I.
Don't
want
it
to
be
construed
that
we're
completely
against
it,
but
because
there
is
an
Lda,
because
it's
in
an
urban
renewal
area
and
those
urban
renewal
areas
are
still
in
effect
and
Chris.
Breen
is
in
charge
of
urban
renewal
for
the
BPD,
a
I
think
it
might
be
premature
to
approve
it.
AE
AE
A
A
A
AE
BA
B
BB
BB
BB
A
BB
A
BB
BD
BB
BE
Here,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we
conducted
a
abutters
meeting
on
September
17th
and
they
also
met
with
the
Roxbury
path
forward.
Neighborhood
Association
during
both
meetings,
concerns
around
density
and
parking
were
raised.
We'd
like
to
go
on
record
to
suppose
a
project
based
on
community
process.
A
BE
BF
BG
BH
Spence
I
live
with
33
Montrose
Street
unit
number
three
Roxbury
mass
Oh,
2
1,
1,
9
I'm
opposed
to
this
project
because
of
the
excessive
FA
RA
and
the
non-conforming
use.
It's
basically
gonna
be
a
transient
housing
for
like
a
dormitory
style
living.
That's
that's
what
we've
seen
in
other
properties
that
she
owns
on
10,
more
Lynch,
Street,
there's
no
10
Moreland
Street,
also
I,
just
like
to
say
there
there's
no
demonstratable
and
substantial
hardship
that
makes
a
variance
necessary
for
the
reasonable
use
of
the
building.
BI
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Sophia
trance.
Tomorrow,
I
am
the
owner
of
19
Winthrop
Street,
which
is
diagonal
across
the
street
from
21
3rd
Street
I
had
the
opportunity
to
walk
through
the
space
on
August
17th
with
the
owner,
as
well
as
two
of
my
neighbors
at
15
and
17
month
of
street.
The
current
out
lay
out
layout
of
the
property,
as
it
exists.
Right
now
is
being
presented
as
if
it
is
being
used
as
11
bedrooms,
but
in
reality
it's
being
used
as
15
bedrooms.
BI
If
you
look
at
the
plans
which
I
do
not
have
in
front
of
me,
there
are
multiple
bathrooms
within
you:
floors,
2,
3,
&,
4
and
currently,
as
residents
of
the
new
building,
we're
moving
in
Friday
August
30th
through
the
end
of
September
I've
introduced
myself
to
them,
and
there
are
two
current
residents
who
have
expressed
that
they
are
looking
for
three
additional
roommates
to
reside
and
floors,
2
3
and
floor.
Thank
you.
BJ
My
name
is
Diane
dickerson
and
I
own,
the
building
at
20
wintered
Street,
which
is
attached
to
I'm
sorry
22
Winthrop
Street,
it's
attached
in
the
rear,
220
Winthrop.
So
we
share
an
emergency
exit
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
current
overcrowding.
Adding
additional
rooms
in
the
basement
will
make
it
even
worse.
I
did
provide
a
letter
in
opposition,
as
did
two
of
my
nieces,
who
each
occupy
one
of
the
units.
BJ
The
the
units
were
designed
to
be
two
bedrooms
in
one
bathroom
and
that's
what
ours
are
they've
made
it
into
ostensibly
four
bedrooms:
one
they're
calling
a
living
room,
but
it's
basically
four
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms.
The
bedrooms
themselves
are
the
size
of
small
closets,
which
would
I
think
appeal
only
to
college
students
and
people
with
a
short
term
very
short-term
interest
in
living
in
there.
BJ
As
I
said
in
my
letter,
my
father
bought
the
house
in
the
90s
when
we're
trying
to
change
the
neighborhood
around
and
I
think
that
this
interferes
with
the
integrity
of
the
neighborhood
I.
Don't
think
it's
good
for
the
neighbors
and
it's
certainly
not
good
for
my
family
that
lives
in
the
building
and
is
concerned
about
trash
overcrowding
and
safety.
Thank
you.
BD
A
BB
A
B
92
94
Alexander
Street.
The
new
lot
needs
to
be
4673
square
feet
to
change
archer
from
a
single-family
dwelling
to
a
four
family
dwelling
construct
a
new
three-story
addition
onto
the
existing
three-story
building.
There
will
be
aa
Street
parking
located
at
great
at
the
rear
of
the
dwelling,
fully
sprinkled
the
violations.
Article
65
section
41,
our
new
parking
design,
manoeuvrability
tandem,
parking
article
65,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section,
8
accessory
parking.
This
forbidden
article
65
section
9,
the
lardy
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
B
A
A
BK
A
A
A
D
F
A
A
BK
A
A
BL
BE
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we
conducted
in
a
butters
meeting
on
November
13th.
They
also
met
with
a
Dudley
Square
neighborhood
initiative,
a
neighborhood
group
the
owner
has
been
in
the
community
for
20-plus
years
and
has
agreed
to
keep
one
of
the
unit's
affordable
and
is
working
with
D
and
D.
During
the
meeting
we
also
observed
that
there's
a
similar
four
unit
building
directly
across
the
street
within
the
renderings,
are
very
similar
there.
BE
BF
D
BM
Laurine
Schettino
from
richard
lines'
office,
245
Sumner
Street
in
East
Boston
we're
requesting
extremely
short
deferral.
The
mayor's
office
has
asked
if
we
would
hold
another
abutters
meeting
to
speak
to
a
few
of
the
neighbors
that
has
already
been
scheduled
for
next
week.
So
again
we
just
asked
him
for
short
deferrals
that
we'll
have
the
chance
to
do
that.
A
D
BN
B
BN
So
we
got
a
letter
out
of
the
blue
last
Friday
from
landmarks
at
the
11th
hour
that
there's
now
going
to
be
a
preliminary
hearing
a
week
from
today
to
present
to
make
this
property
land
pardon
me,
we've
done
it
all.
Yes,
the
Civic
Association
and
the
abutters,
and
all
of
that
this
is
just
a
letter
that
came
so
we
have
the
architects
said
we
should
just
defer
since
there's
an
open
hearing
for
next
Tuesday
on
this.
B
A
A
B
B
To
family
on
vacant
land,
the
violations,
article
60
section
six
at
37,
our
street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
I
in
the
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
60,
section,
9
deployed
a
ratio
of
successive
article
60,
section
9
usable,
but
space
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
I
on
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
I
on
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
60
section
I
on
the
rail
yard,
is
insufficient.
B
BO
BO
W
BO
BO
BO
BO
M
A
AQ
BP
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Whitney
Celestin
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
held
an
abutters
meeting
for
this
project
and
we've
also
gone
through
the
lucerne
association
with
this
project
and
we'd
like
to
go
and
record
in
support,
and
we
also
like
the
fact
that
they
work
with
the
community
and
change
from
two
curb
cuts
to
one
to
minimize
impact
on
the
parking.
Thank
you.
B
All
the
tree
in
the
existing
retail
buildings,
stockroom
office,
employee
area,
two
accessible,
restrooms
drinking
fountain
and
mop
sink
the
violations,
article
65
section,
fifteen
general
retail
uses
conditions
and
this
zoning
sub
district.
In
article
65
section,
forty
one
off
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
AB
AB
AB
Historically,
this
was
a
retail
space
in
2016
mr.
dive,
through
an
LLC
that
he
organized
purchased
a
building
from
a
full
life
gospel
center.
They
stayed
there
and
through
July
of
17
and
the
building's
been
vacant
since
so
in.
In
april
of
nineteen,
the
ISD
issued
a
use
permit
alt
nine
three
five,
seven,
seven,
nine
dollar
tree
designated
general
contractor
then
filed
building,
permit
applications
in
May
and
in
July
on
July
24th.
The
ISD
informed
that
person
that
there
was
a
non-conforming
use.
A
AE
AB
Who's
on
the
refusal
from
ISD
one
is
the
parking
I'd
like
to
address
that
as
succinctly
as
I
can
a
typical
to
a
lot
of
their
commercial
real
estate
in
the
in
the
neighborhood.
This
building
does
have
a
small
parking
area.
It's
about
thirteen
hundred
and
seventy
two
square
feet.
I
believe
I,
believe
you
can
fit
somewhere
between
six
and
seven
spaces
and
when
I
say
it's
1372,
that's
not
the
entire
space.
A
A
A
AB
X
AB
X
AB
It
is
I,
I
am
I,
am
familiar
with
it.
The
it
will
be
challenged,
there's
no
doubt
about
it.
I
can
I
can
tell
you
that
Dollar
Tree
has
other
locations
within
the
greater
area
of
Greater,
Boston,
specifically
Boston,
Proper
and
then
outside
of
Boston.
In
my
conversations
with
the
Dollar
Tree
representatives,
who
were
going
to
be
here
today
but
couldn't
get
here
with
the
snow
last
night,
unfortunately,
they
were
coming
from
out
of
state
their
real
estate
division.
AB
A
A
J
U
AN
Name
is
Daniel,
Bartlet
I
also
live
at
21,
Bicknell
Street.
That
was
my
daughter
and
I'm
here
in
support
of
the
Dawa
tree
I'm
here
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
The
first
reason
is
is
that
my
mother
would
kill
me
if
I
didn't
come
in
because
she's,
probably
the
biggest
Dollar
Tree
store
supporter
in
the
country.
Last
time,
I
was
down
with
her
in
Florida.
She
comes
up
and
she
stays
with
me
during
the
summer
and
when
I
was
down
this.
AN
Yet
when
I
told
her
that
there
was
one
that
was
going
in
near
me,
she
went
crazy
happy
about
this
and
she
made
me
actually
go
to
the
Dollar
Tree
stores
down
in
Florida
to
show
me
what
they
had
in
there.
The
second
thing
is:
is
that
I'm,
just
a
few
blocks
away
from
this
location
and
I
rarely
ever
go
shopping
in
the
cotton
Square
area,
one
of
the
biggest
reasons
for
that
is,
except
for
the
Walgreens
parking
lot,
which
is
always
filled
with
other
cars.
Is
this
really
no
place
to
park?
AN
So
what
it
attracted
me
about
this
proposal
was
the
fact
that
they'll
actually
have
dedicated
parking
for
the
store,
and
that
would
be
really
important
to
me,
because
the
types
of
things
that
I
would
want
to
get
I'm
a
landlord
would
be
things
that
I'd
actually
require
in
my
car,
my
truck
to
get
if
I
would
go,
get
cleaning
supplies
and
things
like
that.
I'm
not
I'm,
not
gonna,
schlep
them
all
the
way
back
over.
So
I
am
a
thank.
A
AF
BT
AJ
BU
BV
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Dustin
Gardner
behalf
of
City
Council
President
Andre
Campbell's
office.
We
also
heard
the
opposition
from
the
neighborhood
council,
as
well
as
members
of
the
other
neighboring
Civic
smell
park
while
coalition,
and
believe
that
there
is
a
lot
of
opposition
to
this
business,
opening
up
at
this
location
due
to
traffic
and
the
reasons
that
were
presented
as
well
as
the
fact
that
there
was
a
Dollar
Tree
recently
opened
on
Talbot
and
Kahneman
square
across
the
Lim
Boys
and
Girls
Club,
not
too
far
away.
F
C
C
O
A
B
Calling
the
next
case
for
your
time
calling
VOA
nine
four
one:
six:
seven:
three:
seven:
seventeen
217
721
American
Legion
hiawatha
correct
at
7:17
to
721
American
Legion
highway.
This
is
a
change
of
our
currency
and
renovation
of
an
existing
commercial
greenhouse
nursery
to
become
a
connect
cannabis
establishment.
B
The
applicant
also
proposes
partial
demolition
of
the
existing
greenhouse
structure
and
add
a
new
building
entrance
waiting
area
and
modify
existing
layout
and
conditions
of
the
interior
of
the
building.
Pursuant
to
the
plans,
the
violations
Article
67,
section
11
Canada
cannabis
establishment-
is
a
conditional
use
in
AC,
ste,
1
sub
district
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
BC
My
name
is
Mike
Ross
I'm,
an
attorney
at
the
law,
firm
of
Prince,
low
bail,
I'm
here
representing
the
client
silver
therapeutics,
who
seeks
to
open
a
cannabis
establishment
at
7:17,
721,
American
Legion
highway.
Connect
to
my
right
is
our
architect.
David
Lee
to
his
right
is
Leah
samara,
who's,
a
partner,
I'm,
sorry
SIA,
some
more
I'm,
sorry,
his
wife
Leah
is
in
the
audience.
Both
are
partners
to
the
project.
BC
Next
Asiya
is
the
principal
Josh
silver
of
silver
therapeutics,
and
then
we
have
our
security
consultant.
Joe
Harris
he's
a
former
superintendent
in
Boston
Police,
Department,
Brenda
McKee
is
next
to
him,
he's
a
principal
on
the
project
and
then
Andrew
McClure
is
somewhere
around
here.
Who
is
our
traffic
engineer
on
the
project
available
if
needed?
The
project
is
we're
in
a
sub
district
of
a
community
commercial
one
which
is
a
conditional
use
allowed
for
cannabis
establishment
at
this
location.
A
BC
BC
Yes,
yes,
thank
you
and
what
we're
proposing
to
do
here,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
is
to
just
renovate
the
structure
so
that
one,
in
addition
to
the
interior
of
the
building,
one
small
green
house
will
remain,
and
the
green
house
will
be
only
1600
square
feet
and
the
purpose
of
that
green
house-
and
this
is
a
very
unique
proposal
which
I
think
helps
the
project
immensely,
is
that
it
will
be
a
demonstration
green
house.
So
we
will
see.
BC
Cultivation
occur
at
that
green
house
on-site
for
the
purpose
of
teaching
people
from
this
community
from
Boston
to
how
to
enter
the
industry,
how
to
get
lucrative
careers
within
the
industry
as
cultivators,
and
that's
really
the
work
that
SIA
and
Lea
will
do
who
live
within
one
mile
of
the
facility
and
who
are
experts
in
the
field.
In
addition
to
the
green
house,
we'll
also
have,
of
course,
the
dispensary
the
dispensary
be
available
for
both
adult
use
and
for
medical
use.
It's
approximately
3,600
square
feet
of
the
entire
sales
floor
area.
BC
A
BC
In
common
ownership,
so
yeah
it's
it's
all
under
the
sand,
it's
all
under
a
lease
from
the
property,
so
it
would
be
in
a
total
of
22,
even
though
no
parking
is
technically
required.
The
only
violation
we
have
is
the
is
the
use.
We
thought
it
was
very
important
to
to
create
parking,
so
we
did
create
again
15
on
site
and
then
seven
right
next
to
us.
So
for
a
total
of
22
parking
spaces,
the
the
hours
of
operations
were
negotiated
with
the
community,
the
Mount
Hope
Neighborhood
Association,
and
they
came
out
to
11:00
a.m.
BC
so
totally
missing
the
morning,
commute
completely
until
8
p.m.
Monday
through
Saturday
and
then
on.
Sundays
will
close
at
6
p.m.
so
11
a.m.
to
6
p.m.
the
host
community
agreement
was
entered
into
with
the
city
of
Boston
October
17th
2019
I
have
that
if
you'd
like
that,
we
also
have
a
good
neighbor
agreement
entered
into
with
the
Mount
Hope
Neighborhood
Association,
which
was
entered
into
September,
30th
and
I.
Understand
a
member
of
the
Mount
Hope
Neighborhood
Association
is
here,
and
we
also
have
a
lot
of
support
from
state
representative
Russell
Holmes.
BC
Yeah
I'm
thinking
the
best,
maybe
the
best
slide
to
to
use
okay,
sure
yeah,
so
eight
is
the
before
and
after
that,
you're.
Looking
at
your
the
kind
of
an
image
that
we
added
to
the
back
of
our
of
our
deck
and
above
is
what
you
see
today
and
then
below
is
what
will
it
will
look
like,
which
is
essentially
just
bringing
this
barn
like
building
back
to
life,
but
in
terms
of
showing
you
really
how
it
works.
I
think
it
might.
A
BC
Be
co-located
is
how
its
referred
to
and
then
once
you're
cleared
and
that's
where
our
security
team,
if
we
have
anyone,
that's
for
some
reason,
they've
been
banned
from
the
you
know.
That's
you
have
to
get
through
that,
but
once
you're
cleared
you're
in
you're
in
the
the
retail
environment,
that's
all
the
blue
area.
BC
You
see
on
this
plan
and
for
now
we
have
kind
of
this
jewelry
case
layout,
which
we
think
is
an
effective
means
of
of
doing
both
the
point
of
sales
and
sale
and
and
and
delivering
of
the
of
the
product
without
with
keeping
customers
and
patients
away
from
anything
that
they
could
otherwise
touch.
Really,
it's
just
will
be
controlled
completely
by
the
employees
of
the
dispensary.
A
BW
A
BW
BW
Will
come
in
through
they'll
come
in
through
the
same
way
that
customers
come
through.
We
have
a
dedicated
parking
spot,
the
glove
we
can
make
dedicated
for
deliveries.
They
come
in
through
the
front
entrance.
We
have
an
operating
dispensary
right
now
in
Williamstown
Massachusetts,
the
deliveries
take
about
well,
they
come
through
the
door
and
that
takes
about
you
know
two
three
minutes
and
once
they
come
in
to
the
limited
access
area
in
the
office,
everything
gets
counted,
but
that's
all
that
all
happens
kind
of
in
the
back
air,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
delivery.
A
A
A
BW
BW
BW
A
BC
Not
we
didn't,
you
know,
we
have
the
ability
through
technology,
if
you're
looking
at
a
long
weekend
and
and
it's
it's
like
a
Columbus
Day
weekend
and
you
have
a
Friday
and
and
we
we
had
a
crush.
We
would
have
the
ability,
through
technology,
to
switch
into
some
form
of
that.
But
it's
not
something
that
we
anticipate
will
be
required
for
most
99%
of
the
rest
of
the
time.
A
BW
We
do
that
right
now,
actually
at
our
Williamstown
location
and
it
results
actually
in
a
very
quick
transaction.
People
are
in
and
out
they've
already
gone
through
our
entire
menu,
which
is
available
online.
They
made
their
selection
come
in.
We
check
their
IDs,
obviously
at
two
points
of
contact
both
right
before
they
come
into
the
building
and
then
at
the
point
of
sale
and
then
they're
out
in
much
less
time
than
a
typical
retail
customer.
A
BC
This
is
not
an
economic
empowerment
or
a
social
equity
applicant.
It's
unique
in
that
there
is
some
equity
for
local
Boston
residents,
who
are
also
people
of
color.
In
the
case
of
Lea
and
SIA
Samora.
They
have
a
program
that
they're
running,
which
will
which
will
be
funded
through
equity
from
the
project,
which
will
train
people
in
the
space.
I,
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
do.
A
BX
So
my
wife
and
I
have
some
my
name's
SIA,
some
more
and
with
I
live
at
111
wellington,
Hill
Street
in
Mattapan
Mass,
my
wife,
Leah
and
I
early
participants
in
the
local
cannabis
business,
and
we
have
a
product
in
a
range
of
adult
youth
stores.
Already
we
look
to
help
others
get
into
the
emerging
business
too,
and
so
will
be
running
programs
right
there
at
City
Farm,
with
the
fantastic
training
facility
there
to
encourage
exactly
what
the
cannabis
Control
Commission
and
the
rest
of
us
are
trying
to
do
here.
BY
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Djokovic,
if
from
the
mayor's
office
and
Neighborhood
Services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
They
completed
the
community
process
on
July
1st
to
2019
their
side.
The
host
community
agree
with
the
city
and
in
that
time
they've
worked
with
the
Neighborhood
Association,
as
well
as
other
neighbors
in
the
area
in
issues
regarding
parking
traffic
design.
BZ
CA
B
Following
the
next
three
cases,
calling
VOA
1
0
1
2
2,
5,
2,
2,
85,
companion
cases,
VOA
1,
0,
1,
2,
2,
8,
6,
boa
1,
0,
1,
2,
2,
8,
7
8.
This
was
child
pack,
road
Gardiner
Street,
and
this
is
for
1731
child's
Park
Road.
This
is
to
combine
to
create
a
new
lot
with
26,000
219
square
feet
for
the
construction
of
eight
new
attached
town,
townhouses
number
17,
231,
fronting
child's
Park
Road,
each
foot,
1
1
garage
parking
space
and
one
surface
parking
space.
B
B
This
is
the
combination
that
could
create
twenty
six
thousand
2019
square
feet
for
the
construction
of
10
new
attached,
townhomes
numbers,
8,
182,
198,
front
godness
street,
with
one
car
garage
and
space
in
one
surface
parking
space.
The
article
violations,
article
56
section
15,
townhouse
miller
with
ten
units,
is
conditional.
Article
56,
section
16,
the
Reyat
is
insufficient
in
article
56
section,
forty
point,
one
to
two
more
drawings
for
the
same
watt.
B
This
is
for
199
Gardner
Street.
This
was
the
combination.
Combine
lots
of
sixteen
thousand
eighty
eight
square
feet
in
ten
thousand
eight
hundred
eighty
eight
square
feet
to
create
a
new
lot
of
36
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty-three
square
feet
for
construction
of
a
new
four-story
building,
comprised
of
70
units
and
forty
four
parking
spaces
in
twenty
six
surface
parking
spaces
with
a
total
of
70
parking
spaces.
The
violation
is
article
56,
section
15.
A
multi-family
dwelling
is
conditional
good.
CB
CB
CB
At
12:35
VFW
Parkway,
which
is
this
same
area,
same
zoning
in
the
commercial
community,
commercial
and
the
same
type
of
relief.
So
what
we're
proposing
now
really
is
the
second
phase
to
introduce
much-needed
residential
housing
at
this
transitional
edge.
Section
of
the
neighborhood
in
back
of
the
Oprah
apartments
is
an
industrial
site
along
Gardiner
Street,
and
that
is
the
site
which
you'll
see
on
the
the
materials
that
I
handed
out
where
the
proposed
apartment
building
would
be.
CB
The
second
component
of
these
three
cases
is
home:
ownership,
townhouses
on
the
opposite
of
Gardner
Street
that
also
front
on
Charles
Park
Road
and
those
are
a
total
of
eighteen,
townhomes,
all
three-bedroom
units
home
ownership.
What
it's
necessary
is
the
conditional
use
for
the
residential
and
also
a
variance
which
is
supported
for
the
rear
yard,
which
is
supported
by
the
unique
aspects
of
the
property
which
both
fronts
on
Gardner,
Street
and
fronts.
On
Charles,
Park,
Grove,
there's
no
front
yard
requirement,
but
there
is
a
rare
yard
requirement.
A
CB
Correct
yep,
and
so
four
storeys
70
residential
units,
70
apartment
units
and
70
parking
spaces
inside
the
building
and
across
the
street
again
fronting
on
Gardner
Charles
Park
Road
is
the
are
the
eighteen
townhomes
nine
on
one
side?
No,
no,
the
other
parking
and
open
space
in
the
middle.
Each
of
these
each
of
these
townhomes
have
their
own
driveway
and
garage.
CB
So
it's
two
parking
spaces
each,
and
we
would
suggest
that,
as
part
of
the
article
80
process,
we
had
extensive
city
agency,
scoping
and
public
review
to
support
the
conditional
use
for
residential
in
an
area
that's
starting
to
transition
or
into
residential.
We
have
some
important
abutters.
One
is
the
introduction
of.
A
A
CB
Eighteen
townhomes
36
parking
spaces
and
so
way
that
operates.
Is
you
have
one
garage?
These
are
attached
townhomes
and,
as
you
pull
into
the
back,
you
have
a
driveway
with
a
garage.
So
these
are
all
three-bedroom
units
for
homeownership
and
I'm
sure
you
hear
a
lot
about.
You
know
the
mayor's
2030
plan
and
the
need
for
housing.
It's
not
just
housing
or
housing
sake,
but
it's
a
variety.
CB
We
think
there's
a
big
need
in
the
West
Roxbury
community
for
family
homeownership,
like
this
that's
new
construction,
and
so
all
of
those
eighteen
townhomes,
two
of
which
will
be
affordable
and
seven
sorry.
Nine
affordable
in
the
apartment
building
are
all
3-bedroom
2bath
units
with
two
parking
spaces
and
with
the
outdoor
space
like
and
at
the
foot
of,
probably
one
of
the
most
popular
parks
in
West,
Roxbury.
A
A
CB
So
VFW
VFW
is
at
the
front
right.
Gardner
Street
becomes
a
one-way
street
that
was
had
some
mix
of
industrial
uses
and
a
happy
day,
children
school
that
is
next
to
us
on
the
opposite
side
of
that
parallel
as
Charles
Park
Road.
That
also
goes
out
towards
the
VFW
Parkway,
so
Gardner
Street
on
one
side
of
Gardner
Street,
is
the
apartment
building,
which
will
be
directly
in
back
of
the
oak
row:
apartment
building,
its
rear
yard
abuts
the
home
depot.
This
is
at
the
intersection
sort
on
the
Dedham
line.
O
CC
A
A
A
CB
Things
so
the
back
of
that
site
on
Gardner
Street
is
talked
about
the
rear
yard.
We
do
not.
You
know,
rear
yard,
Viet
variance
on
that
side,
we're
more
than
40
feet
off.
That's
that
that
buffer
and
they're
also
some
topographical
sort
of
changes
there
and
then
the
parking
lot
for
home
depot
until
you
get
to
the
building
so
but
through
the
BPD,
a
process
will
have
further
design
with
you.
W
A
AE
AU
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office
in
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
or
support.
Mr.
Dallas
and
his
team
completed
an
extensive
community
process.
They
met
with
all
the
director
butters.
They
completed
the
article
80
BPA
received
their
approval
in
October
and,
as
mr.
Hanley
mentioned,
they
had
support
from
the
western
neighborhood
council
and
Parkway
little
leak,
and
we
just
like
to
reiterate
that
support.
Thank
you.
CD
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Gianna
Murphy
from
City
Councilor
Matt
O'malley's
office.
The
council
would
like
to
also
go
and
Rec
and
support
this
project.
But
while
the
council
appreciates
the
efforts
that
the
developer
is
making
to
have
a
more
energy-efficient
building,
the
councillor
is
hopeful
that
the
project
will
get
closer
to
Net
Zero
Carbon
during
VP
das
I'm,
a
design
review.
AC
B
Following
a
next
case,
calling
VOA
nine
eight
zero
zero,
seven,
five
thirty-seven
Kohlberg
Avenue:
this
is
a
change
in
use
for
a
two
family
residential
to
a
three
family
violated
Article
67,
section
32,
Austria
parkings
insufficient,
not
equal
67,
section,
eight
three
units
and
a
two
half
five
thousand
is
forbidden:
Article
67,
section
I
in
the
LA
area
for
business
Article,
67,
section,
nine,
the
ploidy
ratio
is
excessive
in
Article,
67,
section,
nine
usable
open
spaces
since
official
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
Madam.
BA
A
BA
A
BA
As
a
to
I'm,
sorry
is
it
yep
and
unfortunately,
apologize
for
I
apologize.
Our
printer
was
broken
this
morning,
but
this
is
his.
This
is
his
house
here
and
all
of
the
other
houses
on
the
street
of
the
same
architectural
style.
These
were
all
have
done
the
same
conversion
over
time
as
three
family,
and
this
is
the
sole
one.
BA
These
are,
these
are
all
have
been
with
all
the
others
have
legally
been
converted.
Okay,
but
I
understand
that
it
is
instructive
and
not
dispositive.
What
I?
What
I
do
wanted
to
just
convey
is
that
the
architectural
style
has
has
been
one
that
is
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
as
a
three
family.
There
are
other
properties
that
are
look
different,
that
are
smaller
to
family
and
single
family.
BA
BA
C
BA
BA
A
BA
BA
BA
BY
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Joe
carpenter
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We've
completed
the
community
process.
They
did
receive
a
number
of
support
from
director
butters
with
that
being
said,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you
good.
U
U
B
Calling
boa
one
zero
one:
four
one:
four
five
eleven
tapped,
Hill
Terrace:
this
is
erect
a
new
16
unit,
residential
building
the
violations,
Article
67
section
32,
Austria
parking,
isn't
sufficient
Article
67,
section
8,
the
MFR
forbidden
use
and
the
to
f5
thousands
of
district
Article
67,
section
940,
a
ratio,
success
of
Article
67,
section
9
the
villain
had
his
acceptance
stories.
Article
67,
section
9:
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
feet.
Article
67
69
that
usable
space
is
insufficient.
Article
67
69,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient,
67,
section
9
the
side
yard.
B
AX
A
AX
16
bicycle
spaces.
Madam
chair,
the
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
2
F
5000
a
lot
size
is
9,000
780
square
feet,
as
you
can
tell
from
the
handout
there.
This
proposal
went
through
an
article
80
process
with
the
BB
da
was
approved
at
the
September
board,
BPD
a
meeting
the
zoning
violations.
We
have
parking,
as
you
know,
in
Rosendale.
It's
2
per
unit,
we're
doing
14
for.
CF
AX
Use
it
is
zone
to
family
and
it's
multi-family
residential
FA
are
0.5,
is
allowed.
We're
at
2.1
height
is
35
feet
two
and
a
half
stories.
We
are
43
feet
at
four
stories:
open
States
space
is
17
hundred
and
fifty
per
dwelling
unit,
we're
about
2,700
square
feet,
collective
front
yard
setback
is
20
feet,
we're
6
feet,
8,
inches
side
yard
10
with
3
feet
on
one
side,
10
feet.
AX
AX
AX
AX
A
AX
BY
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Joe
coughing
chuckling,
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
this
project
completed
the
community
process
on
July
24
2009
teen
was
approved
at
the
BPD
a
board
in
September
of
2019.
They
received
numerous
support
from
the
community,
including
a
local
neighborhood
group,
walk
up
Rosendale
with
that
being
said,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you
good.
CE
BA
BA
28
ash
field,
Street
the
Adam,
Rogoff
and
I-
am
on
the
steering
committee
of
walk
up,
Rosendale
and
I
wanted
to
reinforce
that
walk
up.
Roscoe
is
highly
supportive
of
this
project
because
we
see
it
as
something
that
is
going
to
increase
the
walkability
and
the
the
number
of
people
who
live
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
who
will
have
access
to
both
housing
and
services.
A
C
B
New
mix
case
calling
vo
8
9
5
4
1
54,
48,
Alston
Street,
this
erecting
new
9
unit
residential
building
was
biking.
The
ground-level
violation,
Otakon
51
section
8
among
family
residences
dwelling
unit,
is
a
forbidden
news.
Article
51
section
9
Claudia
ratios
excessive
article
51
section
I,
and
the
hi-dee-hi
requirement
is
accessible
stories.
Article
51,
section
I
and
the
high
requirements
excessive
and
feet
nautical
51.
Second
I
in
the
front.
Yeah
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
on
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
9,
the
rail
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
B
CG
A
CG
AA
A
CF
CG
Around
it
is
other
multi-family
homes
as
in
for
the
FA
are.
The
FA
are
for
this
proposed
building
is
one
point
four
which
actually
fits
in
the
middle
of
what
is
in
the
neighborhood
around
the
neighborhood.
They
mostly
run
between
0.5
and
2.0,
so
we
fit
right
in
the
the
middle
of
that,
as
for
some
of
the
other,
variances
were
requested.
As
for
multi
multifamily
use
the
original
proposed
that
we
went
to
the
neighborhood,
we
had
four
separate
meetings
with
the
abutters.
CH
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Daniel
Polanco
and
behalf
of
councilor
mark
co-moh,
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Madam
chair
just
want
to
mention
a
few
things
in
the
area
of
the
property:
there's
a
mix
of
apartment
buildings
and
multi-family
homes,
in
addition
to
that,
in
terms
of
the
design
they've
been
able
to
modify
it
from
the
beginning,
so
that
in
the
current
proposal
it
fits
the
neighborhood
and
I
mean.
CH
CI
CI
A
CI
Problem
is
going
to
bring
to
the
neighborhood,
which
is
already
a
big
problem,
is
rat
problem,
pest
and
trash,
and
mostly
units
on
houses,
aren't
even
owner-occupied
anymore.
There's
very
few
I
looked
at
my
property
almost
40
years
and
there's
it's
almost
all
students
now
and
then
it's
just
the
neighborhood
discarding
right
down
the
tubes
and
with
this
project
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
worse.
CI
With
all
these
things,
that's
going
on
and
just
and
I've
been
to
most
of
these
units
in
awesome,
binary
gotama
license
license
the
exterminator
I,
see
rat
problems.
I
see,
bedbugs
I
see
all
these
problems,
because
the
owners
do
not
live
in
these
buildings
and
they
just
manage
my
property
management
people
and
they
don't
take
care
of
these
properties
at
all.
A
B
A
AC
A
AG
CG
It
was
actually
I'd
like
to
that's
actually
gonna,
be
able
to
how
I'm
gonna
answer.
One
of
the
complaints
is
because
there's
a
market
in
this
community
for
professional
homeownership
Alston
only
has
11
percent
homeownership
and
there's
people
that
want
to
buy
and
invest
in
the
community.
So
as
in
for
having
people
coming
in
there
they're
gonna,
be
you
know,
tenants,
they're,
gonna
come
and
go.
These
are
people
that
are
gonna,
buy
the
place,
stay
there
and
take
care
of
the
property
one
of
the
quotes.
Actually,
our
brothers
meeting
was.
CG
A
A
A
CG
CJ
CF
CJ
CG
A
C
A
D
U
A
So,
just
to
clarify
for
the
new
members
of
the
board,
a
denial
without
prejudice
means
that
we
can
see
a
project
within
a
year
and
it
could
be
it's.
The
same
project
could
be
something
else.
A
denial
means
we
cannot
seed
for
a
year,
but
it
gives
the
applicant
an
opportunity
to
come
in
with
a
fewer
number
of
units
within
that
year.
Time,
okay,
so
so,
based
on
that
clarification
who
made
the
motion?
A
O
U
B
The
next
case
calling
POA
one
zero
one.
Two
eight
eight
three,
five
OH
six,
two
five
12
a
balk
drive.
This
is
a
change
of
artist
from
convenience
store
to
restaurant
with
takeout
Domino's
Pizza.
The
violation
is
article
8
section,
one
section:
seven
takeout
restaurant
is
conditional
name
and
address
from
the
record.
Please.
CK
A
CK
A
CK
AP
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
phases
Sharif,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
my
colleague,
Shanice
Pimentel
did
do
a
community
process
related
to
the
storefront.
We
see
no
issues
at
this
time
and
they
ought
to
have
the
support
of
BU,
along
with
the
neighboring
Civic
institution.
Thank
you.
CL
CM
You,
my
name,
is
Dolores
McDaniel
I
live
at
4:52
Park
Drive
in
Boston.
I
am
here
as
an
individual
and
also
as
president
of
the
Audubon
Circle
Neighborhood
Association.
It's
a
501,
C,
3,
non-profit
organization
active
since
1979
and
registered
with
the
Secretary
of
State's
office
as
a
nonprofit
organization.
I
did
not
want
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this.
CM
I
was
simply
going
to
ask
the
board
to
approve
the
conditional
use
limited
to
this
particular
applicant,
so
that
no
future
occupant
of
the
premises
would
be
entitled
to
or
have
the
benefit
of,
a
take
out
conditional
use
permit.
But
I
am
concerned
about
whether
this
board
is
also
approving
the
hours
of
operation.
Is
that
the
case?
Or
is
this
a
matter
for
the
licensing
board?.
A
CM
In
that
case,
then,
we
do
speak
in
opposition.
We
met
with
the
applicant
in
November
and
we
being
the
board
of
the
Neighborhood
Association.
We
talked
about
our
concerns
about
the
hours
of
operation
and
the
owner
was
very
understanding
and,
in
fact
said
that
that
they
would
close
at
midnight
on
weekdays
and
lobby
lobby
clothes
lobby
would
close
on
weekdays
at
midnight
on
front
on
weekends,
until
1:00
a.m.
at
1:00
a.m.
and
that
with
delivery.
However,
until
3:00
a.m.
CM
and
we
I
have
that
in
writing
from
the
applicant
I
learned
this
morning,
however,
that
the
plan
was
in
fact
to
seek
the
hours
they
currently
have,
which
is
a
3:00
a.m.
and
4:00
a.m.
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
that,
even
though
current
of
the
location,
that
of
which
they're
speaking
is
in
fact
very
close
to
what
are
now
be
used,
student
residences,
it
was
also
was
at
one
time
historically
part
of
our
neighborhood
and,
of
course,
it's
still
physically
connected
the
Audubon
Circle
neighborhood
is
very
close
to
Kenmore
Square
Lansdowne,
Street,
Fenway
Park.
A
CM
CM
Even
though
we
live
in
the
city,
every
human
being
on
earth
needs
to
sleep
needs,
uninterrupted
sleep
I
am
sure
the
applicant
here
is
every
intention
to
be
a
very
good
business
operator
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
cooperative
relationship
with
them.
I
just
think
that
I
would
ask
this
board
to
consider
the
effect
that
such
late-night
hours
would
have
on
our
neighborhood
and
I
think
that
everyone,
even
those
living
in
the
city,
deserve
and
should
be
expect
a
small
measure
of
quiet
and
peace
in
the
city's
neighborhoods,
even
if
just
for
a
few
hours.
CM
CK
A
L
L
CC
CC
I
can
just
jump
in
so
when
we
spoke
at
that
meeting,
I
had
suggested
the
hours
that
we
could
look
close
the
lobby,
and
that
was
before
I
realized
that
all
town,
where
we're
going
into
is
open,
24/7
and
that
for
the
past
40
plus
years
there
has
been
a
pizza
place
in
this
building.
My
brother's
piece
and
I
think
Gigi's
that's
been
open,
till
3:00
a.m.
A
CC
You
all
understood
and
I
guess
the
only
thing
I
would
mention
is
that
I
am
the
franchisee.
Yes,
I
have
30
stores,
but
I
am
very
involved
in
my
operation.
Day-To-Day
and
I
have
the
same
concerns
that
any
of
you
would
have
and
I've
dealt
with
situations
like
this
in
other
cities
and
we
have,
after
the
fact,
reduced
our
hours
when
we
found
out
that,
for
instance,
we
had
homeless
people
coming
in
to
our
so
just
one
example:.
B
The
last
and
only
case,
11:30
calling
boa
eight
seven,
eight
nine,
eight
eight
eight
twenty
two
Canterbury
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
art
from
a
single-family
dwelling
to
Avengers
2
family
dwelling
at
a
new
basement
unit,
the
violations
article
67th
section,
a
the
two
family-
is
at
the
bid
news.
Article
sixty-seven
section:
a
basement
units
up
have
been
for
this
location:
Article,
67,
section,
nine,
insufficient,
usable,
open
space
in
Article,
67,
69,
excessive
FAI.
CN
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Luna
here
from
the
law
firm
located
at
1990,
Center
Street
in
West
Roxbury.
My
immediate
right
is
the
owner
and
applicant
headed
in
Solano.
His
right
is
the
prospect
of
architecture,
Edie
wrote,
but
we
are
opposing
here
to
Cheney
off
and
see
of
an
existing
single-family
home
to
a
family
of
home,
in
doing
so
by
taking
the
existing
basement
space
and
renovating
that
into
a
standalone,
well,
I
suppose
I'd.
CN
CN
A
CN
CN
A
A
CN
We
do
Madame
chair
and
in
fact,
as
you'll
hear
from
mr.
Yoder,
the
local
resident
this
juice
there's
no
essential
objection
to
the
tooth
family.
There's
nuts
part
of
hydrogen,
no
objection
to
actually
live
in
a
space
in
the
basement.
The
primary
point
of
opposition
is
really
a
design
and
layout
just
disagreement
where
he's
okay
with
living
space
in
the
basement,
but
prefer
that
it
not
be
a
standalone
Wehling
unit
that
a
portion
of
the
new
unit,
including
the
kitchen
and
primary
living
area,
be
on
the
first
floor
with
secondary
living.
E
CN
CN
Mr.
Yoder
presented
a
laundry
list
of
proposals
and
recommendations
about
the
project.
We
addressed
every
single
one
of
those
and
incorporates
those
designs.
In
fact,
mr.
Solano
went
out
and
hired
a
new
architect
mr.
Roche,
in
order
to
change
the
plans
and
to
come
up
with
a
better
plan
and
to
address
many
of
the
community
points.
So
the
only
point
that
remains
outstanding
is
really
the
one
regarding
the
interior
layout,
so
I'd
suggest
to
this
board
that
it
focus
on
the
intent
of
the
code
and
answer
these
questions.
CN
BC
CN
Terms
of
density
in
terms
of
housing
like
the
design,
is
it
an
appropriate
this
new
environment
I
confess
the
answer
to
that
is
yes,
but
this
area
is
surrounded
by
family
three
families,
their
family,
put
a
bucks
of
two
family,
a
very
large
two
family
zone,
and
also
whether
this
prevents
over
debugging
and
I
can
say.
The
answer
to
that
is
also
yes,
invented
by
introducing
another
dwelling
unit,
without
adding
any
mass
or
density
and
in
fine.
If
the
board
would
allow
mr.
Solano
just
to
explain
why
it
is
he
wants
this.
CP
U
F
U
H
CP
BL
CP
We
started
with
this.
We
took
this
project
over
and
the
layout
it's
generous,
so
we
believe
that
there's
room
for
two
bedrooms
there,
it's
there
more
than
adequate
there,
15
by
by
10,
now
I'd
like
to
address
one
more
point:
I
believe
that
every
I
don't
believe
in
putting
people
into
an
environment
that
isn't
healthy
and
provides
air.
So
whenever
we
have
an
opportunity,
I'd
like
to
use
a
full
a
sliding
door
to
allow
sunlight
and.
U
F
AR
CN
Your
right,
an
apology
for
miss
speaking
on
this
description,
I
mean
what
we
are
proposing
is
what's
of
the
plans
and
that
does
call
for
two
bedrooms:
I.
What
I
was
thinking
studi,
always
thinking
more
of
a
basement
level
style
unit
again
and
I
know
it's
more
than
semantics
to
what
we're
proposing.
What's
what's
in
that
plan
and
certainly
amend
the
plan
quarterly
to
strike
that
studio,
designation,
advise
D
to
me
so.
F
A
A
CN
From
speaking
to
councilor
Campbell's
office
that
this
had
been
and
I've
learned
since
dealing
with
mr.
Yoder
and
other
residents,
this
was
a
problem,
property
and
dependent
foreclosure.
For
years
there
was
no
maintenance.
There
was
no
upkeep.
The
neighbors
had
no
idea
who
was
living
there
coming
and
going
that's
changed
and
I.
Don't.
CN
A
CN
So
I
understand
those
concerns
all
predate
mr.
salanas
ownership
and
he
sent
brought
into
it's
more
transparent,
he's
really
been
taking
care.
In
fact
it
on
page
five
of
the
packet
I
tried
to
show
some
graphics
of
the
investments
he's
made.
He's
done
some
very
nice
interior
things
to
the
first.
The
second
story
he
painted
the
home
and
we've
agreed
as
part
of
this
proposal,
and
these
are
the
things
he
would
likely
be
doing
anyway
and
moving
the
chain
link
fence.
Removing
the
existing
tree,
planking
two
separate
new
trees,
adding
shrubs-
and
these
are
all.
CN
BY
Afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
void
show
Coppinger
from
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
of
this
project.
Unfortunately,
they
have
not
been
able
to
receive
enough
community
of
support
for
the
mayor's
office
to
fully
support
this
project.
At
that
being
said,
they
did
receive,
like
the
attorney
said,
letter
of
support
from
a
neighbor
who
lives
on
Stella
Road.
BZ
Sorry,
yes,
Rikki
odor
from
Mount,
Hope,
Street
and
co-chair
of
the
MOCA
Canterbury
Neighborhood
Association
I
won't
read
this
whole
statement.
It's
pretty
long,
but
just
to
clarify
some
of
it.
It
is
true.
There
was
a
former
owner
who
was
very
bad
landlord
before
the
current
owner
and
he
tried
to
build
out
at
the
basement
into
apartment.
Without
any
permits
we
asked
the
asked
is
Dee
to
look
into
it.
They
shut
him
down.
BZ
There's
still
a
lot
of
work
that
was
done
in
permits
were
never
taken
out
for
boilers,
gas
boiler
or
electric
service
change,
and
then
our
new
owner
took
over
and
I
don't
have
theirs.
We
haven't
had
the
same
kind
of
complaints.
We
had
I
had
it
before
so
I
wouldn't
put
that
on
him,
though
we're
going
forward
now
and
I
also
agree.
We
don't
really.
We
don't
oppose
a
two
family
unit.
There
are
our
number
it's
a
single-family
district,
but
they're
already
a
number
of
two
and
three
family
homes.
BZ
So
it's
a
little
hard
to
oppose
it
now.
But
my
concern
is
the
basement
unit
and
and
I
wanted
to
say
a
few
of
this
in
Roslindale
basement
units
are
forbidden
by
the
zoning
code
as
in
about
half
of
Boston,
neighborhoods
and
I.
Think
the
distinction,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
them.
People
say
in
the
south
end
and
Back
Bay,
but
a
lot
most
of
those
you
can
walk
out
the
back.
It's
not
a
true
basement.
BZ
This
is
a
complete
basement,
totally
underground,
except
for
a
little
slot
windows
around
and
and
it's
our
feeling
that
no
one
should
have
to
choose
between
having
a
place
to
live,
a
place
to
live
and
no
visual
contact
with
the
outdoor
surroundings
while
at
home,
but
they
could,
by
code
by
the
zoning
code
you
could
put
to
sleeping
and
bathroom
areas
in
the
basement.
That's
acceptable
as
long
as
a
living
and
dining
areas
are
above
ground
and
I
included
in
my
handout.
A
F
BZ
BZ
It's
a
disservice
to
any
tenant
going
in
there.
If
they're,
all
dwelling,
it
has
no
windows
that
you
can
look
out
and
see
the
surrounding
neighborhood
they
are
going
to
the
the
owner
is
going
to
build
out
window
wells
that
have
the
proper
amount
of
light
coming
in.
But
that
light,
if
you
look
out
those
windows,
all
you
see
is
a
little
bit
of
sky.
A
BZ
CN
A
D
A
BM
BA
L
B
Was
the
zoning
advisory
subcommittees
that
met
on
November,
21st,
Thursday
2019?
The
first
case
bo
a
nine
eight
one,
five,
nine
five
1531
Center
Street
was
extend
the
first
law
unit
of
a
two
family
residential
into
basement.
Having
four
rooms.
It
was
approved,
HBO,
a
nine
nine
one,
five,
seven,
three
eighteen
Casper
Street
was
the
extend
living
level
into
the
attic
area,
one
living
level.
It
was
approved
case
bo,
a
nine
nine
seven
one,
eight
six.
B
Seventy
Fletcher
Street
was
to
remove
window
on
the
third
floor,
new
with
a
new
door
and
deck
and
install
a
60
inch.
Diameter
spiral
staircase
six.
It
was
sorry
it's
gonna
be
held
heard
on
February
13
2009
teen
at
the
subcommittee
case,
boa
one:
zero,
zero,
four,
eight
four
six,
two
upper
him:
it
was
a
renovate
total
home
from
fire.
In
addition,
was
approved,
approved
case
bo,
a
nine
eight
four
or
five
eight
six,
eleven
Robin
Street
was
a
renovated
kitchen,
adding
a
full
bathroom.
B
It
was
approved
case
bo,
a
nine
seven,
seven,
six
zero
two.
Fifty
six
Russett
Road
pros
have
an
addition
of
a
dormer
and
attic
level.
Extended
living
area
was
approved
case,
boa
999
four,
three
three,
forty
four
Zeller
Street
was
replacing
existing
deck
rear
of
the
two-story
addition
was
approved,
HBO
a
nine
ninety
one:
zero
zero
five
six
Martin
wood
was
constructed
carport
and
Rehab
mudroom.
It
was
approved
case
bo,
a
nine
eight,
seven,
four
zero
seven
ten
Draper
Road.
B
It
was
extended
living
space
to
the
basement
and
extended
single-family
dwelling
was
approved
case,
boa
nine,
nine
three
seven,
twenty
five
123
Glendale
Road
was
legalized
the
existing
work
and
paceman
install
new
windows.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one:
zero,
zero
one,
three
to
four
eleven
Walton
Street
to
change
of
Arc's
from
a
one-family
dwelling
to
a
two-family
dwelling
and
workshop.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
nine,
three,
four:
zero:
four
zero
33
Moultrie
Street
was
adding
a
full
bath
in
the
basement.
B
It
was
approved
piece,
boa
one:
zero,
zero,
one:
five,
nine
one,
one
1664
the
1668
Dorchester
Avenue
was
a
change
Archer
McCafe
to
deke
daycare.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
nine,
eight,
nine,
seven,
nine
to
fifteen
to
seventeen
Tovar
street.
There
was
a
driveway
curb
cut
that
was
approved,
boa
984,
3:07
302.
To
316
Bowden
Street,
the
removal
provides
know
that
the
take
out
for
this
petitioner
only
was
approved
with
the
new
provider
for
that
take
out
only
for
that
petitioner
case,
boa
nine.
Ninety
seven
zero
six,
six
thirty
four
Midland
Street
is
repeated.
B
Landings
extend
living
space
to
the
basement.
It
was
approved,
boa
nine,
seven,
nine,
four,
four
three:
seventy
eight
Harborview
Street
was
a
construct,
a
new
side
addition,
kitchen
expansion
of
existing
two
family
was
approved
case,
boa
one:
zero,
zero,
three,
nine
seven
one.
Twenty
six
Jamaica
Street
was
to
confirm
offices
of
one
family
dwelling
and
renovate
interior
bathroom
and
pump
out.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one:
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine,
three,
zero,
nine
six,
three
four
noble
Court
it
was
to
confirm
Walker,
has
a
single-family
dwelling
and
adding
rear
deck
it
was
approved
by
timeshare.