►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 4-30-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
A
the
meeting
of
the
board
isn't
regular
meeting
of
the
Board
of
Appeals
for
Tuesday
April
30th.
We
are
waiting
on
through
speakers
staffs
another
board
member
who
is
late,
but
we
are
going
to
be
short
and
we
even
with
Bruce's,
Brucie
or
five
is
a
minimum
quorum,
which
means
a
motion.
I'll
have
to
vote
until
Bruce
arrives,
but
even
with
Bruce
we'll
have
six
so
I
want
any
applicant
to
be
aware
of
the
fact
that
they
have
the
right
to
defer
any
action
on
their
proposal
until
such
time
as
the
full
board.
A
A
C
D
D
D
C
C
C
A
E
So
this
mana
concerns
a
project
that
was
put
before
this
board
on
September
11
2008
een.
It
was
the
proposed
construction
of
three
three
family
units
at
463,
467,
Washington,
Street
Roslindale.
That
matter
was
approved
subsequent
to
the
approval.
The
variances
were
challenged
in
court
by
one
of
the
abutters
eleven
Shubert
street
and
request
was
made
that
we
shift
the
location
of
the
driveway
from
shubra
street
to
list
plans
to
do
just
that,
and
we
met
with
the
neighbors
on
this
street
in
the
packet
of
materials
going
back
to
front
I.
E
E
A
B
B
H
Morning
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
Lacasse
Lacasse,
los
75
Arlington,
Street,
Boston,
Mass
attorney
for
the
applicant.
This
is
a
G
Cod
only
zoning
case.
The
proposal
is
to
convert
a
Bay
State
College,
building
on
Commonwealth
Avenue
into
three
residential
units
and
the
sole
issue
before
the
board.
Today
is
article
32
compliance.
We
have
a
letter
approval
from
the
Boston
Water
and
Sewer
Commission,
which
I'd
like
to
submit
to
the
record
approving
the
groundwater
recharge
plan.
I
B
Gonna
call
the
9:30
hearings:
are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdrawal
rolls
for
9:30?
This
is
deferrals
or
withdrawals
only
for
9:30
hearing,
none
call
the
first
case
filing
boa
9
1
1
4,
94
91,
a
Baker
Street.
This
is
directly
single-family
dwelling
containing
four
bedrooms
and
two
and
a
half
baths.
The
violations,
article
56
section
8
Rayanne,
step
back,
is
insufficient
name
and
address.
J
Morning
attorney
jonquil
Jeanie,
10,
Forbes,
Road
gray
tree
with
me,
is
Tony
Ferraro
who's.
The
general
contractor
on
this
job
proposal
here
is
to
build
a
four
bedroom:
two
and
a
half
baths.
2,400
square
foot
home
a
new
home
on
a
six
thousand
one
hundred
ninety-four
square
foot
lot.
The
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
single-family.
Six
thousand.
The
only
violations
you
can
see
from
the
refusal
letter
is
a
radio
ad
setback.
Zoning
requires
30
feet.
J
The
proposed
ranges
from
eighteen
point:
1
to
14
point
7
5,
as
you
recall,
initially
approved
as
of
right
by
ISD,
and
a
rear
rebuttal
requested
an
interpretation
of
the
shallow,
a
lot
ruled
by
this
board.
The
board
sent
this
matter
back
to
ISD
for
further
clarification,
and
it
was
determined
that
shallow
lot
rule
did
not
apply,
as
the
Lots
were
not
in
common
ownership
is
at
the
time
of
the
zoning
change.
J
Since
that
time,
we
have
lowered
the
roofline
by
five
and
a
half
feet.
We've
moved
the
patio
from
the
rear
of
the
house
to
the
left
side
of
the
house
and
added
Gables
to
the
house
for
aesthetic
reasons
we
appeared
before
the
West
Roxbury
neighborhood
Zoning
Council,
and
the
abutters
who
raised
questions
before
supported
the
project
at
West,
Roxbury,
neighborhood,
Zoning
Council
as
well.
A
letter
of
support
from
the
West
Roxbury
Neighborhood
Council,
okay,.
A
J
K
L
20
members
of
boys,
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office
in
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
As
John
was
saying,
there
was
issues
at
the
beginning
of
the
process
with
it
being
approved,
and
then
you
know
then
officially
being
refused.
So
we
go
through
community
process.
At
the
first
abutters
meeting
there
was
a
lot
of
opposition,
but
mr.
Ferrara
worked
with
the
neighbors,
especially
the
two
neighbors
that
directly
about
it.
They've
come
to
a
mutual
compromise,
so
we'd
like
to
go
on
so
forth.
Thank
you.
C
M
N
A
B
P
A
P
Here,
seeking
relief
from
article
55
section
9
of
the
code
lot
with
insufficient.
Our
engineer
has
always
respectfully
disagreed,
with
the
variance
that
we
were
hit
with.
We
always
thought
it
met
the
spirit
and
intent
of
the
code.
We
believed
a
lot
with
is
sufficient,
but
out
in
an
abundance
of
caution.
We
went
through
a
robust
process
and
we're
here
respectfully
seeking
relief
from
the
code,
but
my
engineer
can
explain
that
in
further
detail.
If
the
board
would
like.
A
P
Says
to
continue
to
go
forward.
It
is
a
single
family,
home
on
a
separately
assessed,
parcel
of
over
9,000
square
feet,
we're
proposing
a
four-bedroom
two-car
attached
garage
home.
We
engage
in
a
robust
process
with
the
community.
We
help
for
community
meetings.
On
this
proposal
we
made
a
number
of
concessions
based
on
neighborhood
concerns,
even
though
the
dimensions
and
the
size
were
always
complying
with
the
code.
We
worked
with
the
neighbors
in
in
Mitte
sincere
effort
to
make
concessions
when
it
when
they
had
concessions
that
they
requested
testimonial
and.
P
After
we
receive
relief,
we
have
actually
kept
Michael
cañazo
of
the
BPD,
a
abreast
of
the
entire
process
that
we've
gone
through,
and
he
knows
we
are
here,
but
the
original
concern
they
had
was
the
height
we
came
down
in
the
height.
Then
they
had
concerns
about
the
roof,
saying
it
was
too
boxy
and
obtrusive.
We
changed
the
design
of
the
roof
to
meet
that
concern.
They
had
concerns
about
the
bay
window,
which
we
pushed
back.
They
had
concerns
about
the
rear
of
the
home
and
the
number
of.
P
P
P
Essentially,
as
you
can
see,
you
know,
as
as
the
as
the
neighbors
you
know,
met
with
us
and
told
us
they
had
concerns
on
the
massing
we
came
down
on
that
height.
As
you
can
see,
we
came
down
and
sort
of
tried
to
shrink
that
roof
and
make
it
less
boxy
and
obtrusive.
We
changed
it
to
a
hip
style
roof
based
directly
on
the
neighborhood
concerns.
You
know
we
tried
to
achieve
harmony
with
with
the
folks,
but
we
felt
like
it
was
just
a
moving
target.
Some
wanted
us
to
defer
today,
but
we.
A
S
Good
morning,
members
of
the
board
Mario
Lanza
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
my
colleague,
Enrique
FFN,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
This
project
went
through
a
full
community
process
consisting
of
abutters
meetings
and
meeting
with
the
neighborhood
groups.
There
were
some
design
issues,
so
we
would
like
to
ask
that
this
goes
through
a
full
BPD,
a
design
review,
but
at
this
time
we
would
like
to
support
the
very.
T
A
M
N
K
N
W
A
T
T
Don't
need
to
instruct
the
board
that
there
are
three
items,
all
of
which
must
be
found
to
be
present
in
order
to
approve
a
variance,
and
they
are
special
circumstances
or
conditions
of
the
land,
practical
difficulty
and
demonstrable
hardship
and
harmony
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
would
add
that
we
agree
that
there
were
four
meetings
conducted
in
the
community.
There
were
slight
facade
changes
that
were
adapted
by
the
appellant.
T
However,
they
refused
to
give
the
community
groups
that
traditionally
review
and
support
projects
they
they
refused
to
give
those
groups
the
opportunity
to
digest
the
information
and
proceed
there
are
about
ten
neighbors
here.
I
think
there
is
one
representative
who
will
be
speaking.
We
respectfully
request
this
variance
be
denied.
Thank.
T
A
A
AA
I
have
some
hearing
problems
on
these
microphones.
Don't
work
there
also
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
what
the
attorney
said
or
what
they
said.
So,
if
I'm
repeating
I
apologize,
my
name
is
Alvaro.
I'm
live
on
14
connery,
Crescent
I'm,
not
in
the
butter
I'm
one
of
the
few
neighbors
in
the
neighborhood.
That's
had
a
new
house
built
next
to
me,
so
I'm
not
automatically
opposed
to
new
housing
and
I'm,
not
opposed
to
a
housing
on
that
particular
lawn
or
rock
or
terrace.
It's
clear,
as
the
speaker
said,
they
use
the
term
concessions.
AA
AA
Rocks
what
to
call
that?
Thank
you,
ledge
and
they've
been
unwilling
to
simply
engage
in
the
process
of
finding
out.
If
there's
ledge
there,
it's
a
simple
matter:
I
realize
it
costs
money.
This
is
a
major
project
where
they're
planning
to
earn
quite
a
bit
of
money
on
the
completed
house.
They've
also
bought
another
house
and
they
have
sold
that.
So
there
should
be
money
to
conduct
the
ledge
examination
they
refused
to
do
it
and
it's
been
the
consent,
Continuum's
process
that
I've
observed
with
them.
Thank.
X
AB
A
AB
Where
I
met
299
Pond,
Street
I
am
an
abettor
of
the
property
and
I've
been
at
every
single
meeting
and
I
just
want
to
say.
We've
continually
asked
for
the
size
of
the
project
to
come
down
and
to
see
the
building
plan
that,
as
it
pertains
to
water
and
blasting
that
legend
we
have.
We
have
not
seen
relief
on
and
on
any
of
those
points.
AC
Okay,
thank
you.
I'm
Geoffrey
Stevens
I'm
at
295,
pawn
Street
I'm
on
the
same
block
as
the
proposed
new
building.
Our
concern,
as
has
been
stated,
has
been
in
developmental
issues
as
far
as
drilling
or
any
kind
of
excavation
on
this
particular
kind
of
rock.
We
haven't
been
assured
that
our
houses
won't
be
damaged
on.
Another
point
is
that
the
house
is,
in
our
view,
completely
out
of
character
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods.
AE
We
are
10
rock
with
terrorists.
I
just
want
to
also
say
that
we've
all
tried
to
repeatedly
in
front
of
the
JK
Hill
Association,
as
well
as
the
zoning
can
be
able
to
make
a
plain
to
say
that
well,
we're
concerned
is
the
sizing
and
within
the
neighborhood.
If
this
is
a
community,
it's
a
tight
community
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
hope
you'll
listen
to
it.
Thank.
AE
A
A
First
of
all,
it
seems
the
zoning
issues
here
appear
to
be
relatively
de
minimis,
but
you
seem
to
have
a
hornet's
nest
here,
and
that
seems
to
be
something
you
need
to
address
if
Van
rain
may
not
be
outside
of
the
purview
of
this
board,
but
that
seems
to
be
a
problem
second
issue
with
respect
to
ledge.
That's
a
major
issue,
and
it
would
ask
you
to
address
that
absolutely.
P
P
A
AF
B
A
I'm
sure
you
did
that
for
the
for
the
sake
of
saving
money
and
I
have
to
say
that's
Pennywise
and
pound-foolish.
If
you've
got
ledge,
I
mean
anywhere
in
the
city
there's
led
to
all
over
the
city
and
and
that's
a
huge
issue
of
construction
and
and
neighbors
have
absolute
right
to
know
whether
there's
going
to
be
any
potential
disruption
on
their
foundations,
depending
on
the
removal
of
light.
So
I
mean
I.
A
A
B
B
This
is
an
awkward
see
as
a
as
a
four
family,
remodeling,
all
four
kitchen
bathroom
construct,
a
new
two-story
addition
at
the
corner
of
the
house
and
construct
new
doors
on
the
third
floor
level,
expand
living
space
to
the
third
floor.
Structural
work
of
the
basement
violation
is
article
69,
section
29
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
large
areas
insufficient
article
60
1969,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
AG
Is
an
existing
four
unit
building
or
pre-existing
for
you
in
a
building
that
my
clients
purchased
last
year.
This
seems
to
be
a
number
of
violations
cited,
but
all
of
them
are
existing
conditions
related
to
the
legalization
or
the
confirmation
of
the
legal
status
of
the
building
as
a
four
unit
building
the
modest
addition
or
enlargement
of
the
property
that's
proposed
involves
no
change
in
the
footprint
instead
involves
enclosing
two
small
first
floor,
porches
that
are
existing
and
enlarging
the
existing
dormers.
On
the
second
floor
to
improve
the
living
space
of
the
four
existing
units.
AG
AG
And
so
so,
the
application
here
primarily
is
to
legalize
an
existing
condition.
The
building
had
decades
of
deferred
maintenance,
including
the
roof,
was
leaking
into
one
of
the
units
and
the
ceiling
was
down,
and
so,
when
my
clients
bought
it
and
undertook
to
do
the
renovations
to
put
this
back
into
service
as
a
as
a
is
for
units,
they
wanted
to
do
some
minor
upgrades
and
the
things
that
their
architect
determined
we're.
A
pretty
petite
enclosed.
AG
The
two
first
floor,
porches
in
the
rear
of
the
building,
would
be
seen
from
the
street
and
also
to
enlarge
the
dormers
to
improve
the
existing
third
floor
space.
So
the
layout
of
the
building,
as
it
has
been
since
at
least
1985
and
probably
longer
than
that
is
there
are
two
units
on
the
first
floor
that
have
two
bedroom
units
and
there
are
two
units
on
the
second
and
third
floors
and
the
second
and
third
floor
units
have
one
the
size.
A
AG
A
AG
Correct,
and
so
the
idea
here
is
to
renovate
it
and
in
the
process
of
renovating
it,
to
enlarge
the
third
floor,
dormers
to
improve
the
existing
third
floor
space,
so
the
operating
units
on
the
second
and
third
floors,
the
access
to
the
attic
area.
If
you
want
to
call
it
that
was
already
existing,
it
was
already
used
as
a
third
floor
bedroom.
Okay,.
AG
A
AG
A
S
Morning,
I'm
Ford
Murray,
Atlanta
man's
office
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
my
colleague,
Brian
Flynn.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
There
was
a
community
meeting
held
to
this
project
on
March
6th
and
it
received
full
support
from
it's
about
us
and
the
community
at
large.
Thank
you.
O
A
B
C
A
AJ
AJ
AK
A
A
A
C
X
A
A
B
AL
B
B
Find
the
next
case
calling
boa
nine
two
six
one,
six
one:
nineteen
seventy
Dorchester
Avenue.
This
is
erecting
new
five-story
building
for
56
residential
units
with
to
retail
spaces
on
grade
by
parking
spaces,
with
the
back
of
the
building
off
of
Beale
Street,
a
common
roof
deck
and
head
out
on
the
roof.
The
violations,
article
65,
section,
41
wall
street
parking-
is
insufficient
article
65
section
and
additional
lot
areas.
Insufficient
article
65,
section,
9,
the
floatie.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
area,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
B
AN
Good
morning,
mr.
secretary
mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
boy
Joseph
Feaster
from
ferma
Mackenzie
and
associates
183
State
Street
Suite
6
Boston
0
2
1
0
9
to
my
left,
as
my
colleague,
Timothy
Fraser,
for
the
law
firm.
Who
actually
will
do
the
presentation
this
morning
to
my
right
is
James
Christopher
from
the
architectural
firm
of
Rose
Christopher
architects
to
his
right
is
Mike
O'hearn
as
one
of
the
principles
of
the
of
the
development
and
also
Tim
long
to
his
right.
AO
AO
The
project
also
consists
of
56
bicycle
storage,
spaces
and
five
garage
and
apartment
spaces.
As
part
of
this
process,
the
applicant
has
completed
an
extensive
community
process.
We've
met
with
the
National
Civic
Association
we've
met
with
the
Asheville
on
Main
Street
Association,
as
well
as
the
others
on
Beale,
Street
and
other
neighborhood
associations
in
January
24th.
This
PDA
held
their
public
hearing
and
as
part
of
that,
the
applicant
is
going
to
be
donating
thirty,
five
thousand
dollars
to
the
BPA
for
improvements
planned
in
that
area.
AO
A
AQ
AR
A
AP
C
AL
Good
morning,
chairman
members,
the
board
Patrick
friend
L
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
to
the
applicants
statement.
They
did
meet
with
multiple
civic
associations
in
the
area,
including
Ashmont
Hill
ash,
while
Adams
Peabody
sloped
to
the
extent
those
Civic
Center's
of
support,
I'm,
not
sure,
but
they
did
have
multiple
meetings
with
them
and
received
extensive
support
from
abutters,
specifically
on
Beale
Street,
where
they
held
several
informal
of
butter's
meetings
to
deal
with
many
of
their
concerns,
which
were
met.
AL
N
AS
AT
Mr.
chairman,
members
of
board,
gen
cart,
eighth
grader
Ashmont
main
street.
This
project
fits
well
within
our
vision
for
transit,
oriented,
Dorchester
of
and
increasing
density
without
displacement.
I
would
also
highlight
their
use
of
the
city
resident
sticker
program,
the
requirement
the
residents
not
be
allowed
to
get
a
residential
sticker,
so
transit
oriented
renters
in
this
program
and
the
kind
of
housing
that's
really
desperately
needed
in
the
crisis.
We're
in
right
now.
AU
X
C
AV
Name
is
Christian:
Lee
I
was
21
karu
the
street
in
Dorchester
I'm.
Also
representing
Trinity
Financial,
we
developed
the
tread
mark
billion
couth.
Building
directly
adjacent
to
this
project
were
in
support
of
this
project.
We
think
it's
a
great
idea
for
this
area.
We
think,
over
in
a
lot
more
vitality
to
PB
square
we'd,
encourage
the
applicants
to
include
high
quality
materials
like
our
buildings
on
the
Georgian
Strava
new,
as
well
as
looking
up
lighting
the
project.
The
way
we
have
our
projects.
Thank
you.
A
AW
A
O
X
B
AX
AX
A
A
AY
AZ
A
B
You
calling
boa
nine
zero
four
nine
four
five
eleven
sixty
seven
Dorchester
Avenue.
This
is
the
change
aloft
included,
takeout
coffee
and
an
existing
pharmacy
violation
is
article
65
section.
Eight
takeout
coffee
is
a
forbidden
news,
article
9
section
to
change
in
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
BA
We
say
OTC
product
for
the
pharmacy
and
the
Bessie
empty,
so
we
tried
to
create
a
foot
traffic
for
the
pharmacy
and
also
our
customer.
They
want
to
stop
by
and
do
thing
coffee
and
then
that
pick
up
prescriptions
so.
A
BA
A
AL
B
Next
two
cases
calling
911
Beale
I'm,
sorry
boa
nine
one,
eight
seven
one,
eight.
Ninety
three
Ellington
Street
companion
case
boa
the
91-87
0
95,
Ellington
Street.
This
is
493
Ellington.
This
is
subdivide
93
with
6866
square
feet,
Lots
consisting
of
93
Ellington
with
2841
square
feet
and
95
Ellington.
The
new
lot
with
4,000
25
square
feet,
the
violations,
article
60,
section,
9,
audition,
a
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
60
section
on
the
floor
day
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9,
a
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
BB
B
BC
BB
The
situation
is
currently
mr.:
Ryan
owns
a
three
family
at
93
Ellington.
Next
to
it
is
a
vacant
lot.
That's
Carly
part
of
the
same
lot,
I'd
like
to
build
a
new
three
family
in
that
vacant,
lot
that
he
proposed
by
doing
so,
of
course,
by
subdividing
he's
kind
of
put
93
into
violation,
as
well
as
far
as
some
of
the
dimensional
requirements.
BB
BB
It
is
it
both
of
them
are
they're,
not
sort
of
triple-decker.
Traditional
Georgia
crippled
anchors,
they're,
more
boxy,
looking
brick
style,
the
Monday
system
wears
a
brick
one.
This
will
not
be
brick
but
similar
box,
three-story
style.
Each
unit
will
have
a
parking
space
as
well
mister
the
intended
to
keep
met,
remember
in
an
air
corrected
or
on
the
side,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
we
potentially
could
have
squeezed
this
in
dimensionally.
But
then
we
wouldn't
been
able
to
have
those
driveway
to
go
to
the
back.
To
have
the
three
parking
spaces.
BB
We
met
three
times
with
Erie
Ellington,
Neighborhood
Association,
in
fact
before
we
even
design
the
property
to
see
if
they
wanted
parking
versus
green
space,
because,
obviously
that's
a
discussion,
the
city
right
now
they
felt
strongly
about
having
at
least
one
parking
space
per
unit.
Now,
we've
done
three
times,
they've
approved
the
project
had
nut
butters
meeting.
Just
a
few
folks
showed
up
a
couple
of
support.
A
F
A
A
AY
AZ
A
B
Do
a
nine
three
one:
nine
six,
seven
101
Howard
Avenue!
This
is
a
new
three
family
construction
on
an
empty
lot
with
three
on-site
parking
spaces
in
the
wrath.
The
violation
is
article
50,
section
29,
the
required
lot.
Width
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29
of
the
LA
frontage,
is
insufficient.
Article
15
section
29
lot
size
directory
family
dwelling
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29.
The
lot
area
for
additional
units
is
insufficient.
B
Article
50,
section
29
the
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive,
we're
having
50
section
phone
and
the
usable
open
spaces
and
sufficient
medical
50,
section
20,
and
the
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
That
article
50
section
29,
the
side
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient,
may
even
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BD
BD
A
S
Maria
Lanza
mez
officer,
Neighborhood
Services,
on
behalf
of
my
colleague,
Jessica
Thomas.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
This
project
did
complete
a
full
community
process
and
neighbors
did
express
concerns
with
the
upkeep
of
the
empty
lot,
but
I
looking
forward
to
seeing
some
housing
stop
there.
Thank
you.
A
BD
B
This
is
arrays
a
single
single
story,
building
a
directed
three
story:
building
on
the
same
footprint
foundation
during
main
first
level,
restaurant
with
36,
takeout
and
second
and
third
floor,
two
units.
Each
the
violations,
article
65
section
15
restaurant-
would
take
out
as
conditional
an
article
65
section
15.
A
multi-family
dwelling
is
conditional
article
65,
section,
16
employed
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section,
16,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
65,
section
16,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
41
on
street
parking
is
insufficient.
They
would
address
to
the
record.
Please.
BE
My
name
is
joy,
granting
the
strange
business
address
of
350,
West,
Broadway
and
South
Boston.
Mr.
chairman,
this
is
memories.
This
was
an
application
for
a
priest
during
building
of
1078
nad
to
Dorchester
Avenue
in
cell
block
to
be
over.
My
client
is
Peter
Leeds
in
the
carrier
of
the
back.
The
building
is
known
as
the
former
site
of
Theo's
Pizza,
the
the
building
that
the
new
building
would
be
a
pre
story.
Building,
first
of
all,
we'll
still
be
commercial
space.
BE
The
proposal
is
to
bring
back
a
pizza
restaurant
with
takeout,
so
there
is
a
request
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
that
takeout.
The
reason
why
that
simply
doesn't
continue
is
because
the
dawn
use
of
the
existing
conditional
use
permit
to
take
out
Theo's
pizza
has
been
closed
for
some
time
that
commercial
space
would
be
approximately
1403
square
feet
during
community
process.
BE
Neighbors
expressed
profound
interest
in
making
sure
that
there's
an
adequate
trash
room
in
the
first
floor
of
the
building,
local,
commercial
and
residential
crash,
and
for
this
matter
to
be
approved
by
the
board,
we
would
make
sure
us.
We
are
a
design
review
process
that
adequate
storage
for
trash
and
also
for
bicycles,
for
that
matter
will
be
provided
in
the
first
floor.
The
second
and
third
floors
are
very
similar
there
to
one-bedroom
units
on
each
floor.
BE
BE
BE
From
the
site,
building
height
is
not
violently
is
only
is
36
feet,
you
have
a
violation
cited
for
excessive
FA
are
the
FAS
district,
which
is
an
LC
local
convenience
district
under
article
65
before
just
enable
the
district.
The
resulting
that
they
are
here
would
be
two
point:
six,
the
Maxima
there's
one
point:
zero
with
the
floor
units.
This
constitutes
a
multi-family
dwelling,
which
is
also
a
conditional
use
like
the
restaurant
we
take
out
in
this
healthy
district.
BE
BE
So
to
underscore
what
roof
deck
could
provide
useful
space,
but
they,
as
we
know
as
the
fact
residential
neighborhoods
group
decks,
come
with
their
own
issues
and
regarding
subdivision
see,
this
is
the
same
insufficiency
that
the
existing
building
has,
which
would
be
replicated
two
different
three-story
building
I
mentioned
the
Austrian
parking
insufficiency.
That's
that's
a
summary
of
the
project
and
the
zone
of
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
BF
A
BF
BE
BF
BE
BF
A
BE
Yeah
I
have
to
say
I,
don't
know
why
that's
the
case.
The
floor
plans
do
have
to
be
further
west
no
I
mean,
as
I
said,
the
first
floor
plan
is
going
to
change
because
of
the
need
for
trash
room,
so
location
and
mechanicals.
It
again
is
where
the
approve
will
make
sure
that
the
PvdA
will
make
sure
that
the
in
terms
of
utility
volcanic.
BE
A
BE
A
BE
Yeah
that
that's
something
that
we'll
be
in
will
have
an
updated
set
of
drawings,
so
the
board
can
hold
signature
until
those
are
sent
out.
How
long
will
it
take
to
get
that
I
would
have
to
speak
with
the
architect,
but
I
will
say
nothing
gets
done
in
less
than
two
weeks,
so
I
would
hope
you
have
it
by
the
time
the
board.
A
AL
Good
morning,
mr.
chairman
members,
the
board
Patrick
Mendel
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
This
went
through
a
robust
community
process,
including
two
of
butter's
meetings
and
several
meetings
with
Columbia
7ho
Civic
Association.
The
applicant
did
meet
many
of
the
concerns,
including
the
option
for
an
internal
trash
holding
area
and
didn't
meet
many
of
the
design
concerns.
We
would
request
continued
BPD,
a
design
review,
but
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
at
this
time.
Mr.
AM
N
A
B
BH
Drago
with
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
Broad
Street
we're
seeking
a
deferral
today
from
the
board,
we
were
prepared
to
move
forward
on
advice
of
the
mayor's
office
and
some
abutters
they're
asking
us
to
continue
to
work
with
your
letter.
Some
additional
changes
to
be
able
to
do
that
relatively
quickly.
Do.
BH
A
Secretary
is
requesting
the
throws.
Withdrawals
for
10:30
I
will
make
the
same
announcement
that
I
made
ninth
beginning
of
9:30
hearings,
which
is
we
are
not
a
full
board
and
if
anybody
with
the
10:30
case
chooses
to
defer,
you
have
the
right
to
do
so
until
such
time
that
there
is
a
full
court
to
hear
the
case.
I'm.
B
Going
to
call
the
last
case
for
the
tenth
9:30
SBO,
a
nine
zero
nine
seven,
two
four
105
West
Springfield
Street:
this
is
to
construct
an
exterior
deck
on
the
rear
of
the
first
floor.
The
violations
article
64
section
9,
the
Ray
got-
is
insufficient.
An
article
64
section,
nine
point:
four
townhouse
row
house
extension
good.
BI
Proposal
is
to
install
a
deck
on
the
first
floor
and
the
reason
we're
here
is
because
the
rear
yard
setback
is
not
adequate.
The
graveyard
is,
in
fact,
very
small,
approximately
20
feet
deep,
the
ax
butter
at
the
rear
as
their
yard,
extending
entirely
out
toward
Doolin
Street,
which
is
one
of
the
streets
that
a
bucks
one
of
like
West
Springfield
Street.
BI
BI
BI
S
Members
of
the
Ford
Maria
Lanza
mez
office,
Neighborhood
Services,
on
behalf
of
my
colleague,
face
of
Sherif.
We
would
like
to
go
and
in
record
and
support.
This
is
a
modest
act
proposal.
The
building
owner
is
a
longtime
south
on
resident
and
we
held
in
a
Buddist
meeting
for
this
project
and
they
did
receive
support
from
their
director
butters.
Thank
you.
A
B
B
A
C
B
H
Morning
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
luke
catholic
house
law,
75
Arlington,
Street,
Boston,
Mass
I'm,
actually
covering
this
case
this
morning
for
attorney
Kristen
Scanlon,
who
is
not
feeling
well
and
asked
me
to
cover
this
for
her
to
my
right.
Are
the
owners
of
this
proposed
restaurant
and
Aoife
deuce
and
Matthew
Thayer,
who
are
the
proprietors
of
American
provisions
right
next
door
at
the
corner
of
East
Broadway
&,
High
Street,
where
they've
operated
that
store
for
the
past
eight
years?
H
The
proposal
before
you
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
from
stores
and
nail
and
tanning
to
stores
and
restaurant.
The
two
zoning
issues
are
one
is
an
iPod
permit,
because
this
is
article
68
in
South
Boston.
The
second
is
a
conditional
use
permit
under
article
68
thousand
seven
as
a
restaurant
as
a
conditional
use.
There
is
no
takeout
proposed
for
this.
H
Restaurant
concept
is
a
small
neighborhood
restaurant
wine
bar
with
28
seats,
no
TVs
quiet
different
than
the
other
kinds
of
larger
loud
restaurants
in
the
neighborhood,
and
they
will
draw
upon
American
provisions
store
for
food
locally
sourced
items
on
the
menus
of
something
decidedly
very
different.
For
South
Boston
and
it's
a
1,900
square
foot,
restaurant
and
the
hours
of
operation
we
4:00
p.m.
to
midnight.
So
it's
dinner
only
and
they've
demonstrated
great
success
in
the
neighborhood,
and
this
proposal
has
received
significant
support
through
the
community
review
process.
A
A
BJ
BK
N
AQ
A
O
B
Boa
8
8
2
2
1
5
111,
B
Street.
This
is
the
frame
out
a
new
roof
deck
violation,
tatical
68,
section
8,
adding
a
roof
deck
worsens
the
existing
existing
building
height
article
68,
section
29,
the
roof
deck
not
properly
setback
and
exceeds
the
maximum
building
height
allowed
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please
Jolla.
A
AH
AH
BL
AH
A
A
B
Voa,
seven,
eight
seven
one
four:
seventy
two
dresser
Street:
this
is
the
combined
parcels
into
a
new
single
out
to
be
five
thousand
forty
nine
square
feet:
erecting
new
five-story
multi-family
dwelling
great
units,
wood,
roof
deck,
proposing
a
hospital
parking
violations;
article
27
s,
section:
five:
it's
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
33,
our
street
parking
lordy
requires
it's
insufficient
article
68
section,
eight
the
floor
day
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68
section,
eight,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
feet.
B
AK
I'm,
a
members
aboard
the
one,
my
name
is
Daniel
Tosh
Gatto
from
turbulence
Escada
located
at
15,
Broad,
Street,
Suite,
6,
10,
Boston
national,
oh
nine,
over
here,
requesting
the
retrieval
tool
support
an
eight
family
residential
dwelling
to
my
immediate
right.
The
architect
is
James
Christopher
RCA
to
my
far
right
is
property
located
at
72
pressure
speak
for
possibly
50
years
property.
So
what
we're
proposing
is
right
now
is
empty
lot.
AK
The
other
four
units
will
be
with
feet
so
good-size
residential
units.
What
we're
proposing
on
the
basement
level
puts
storage,
but
each
of
the
residential
needs,
the
full
storage
units
in
the
basement,
with
mechanicals,
more
storage
and
on
the
ground
level
than
have
a
residential
parking
spots.
Whenever
one
parking
spot
for
a
unit
out
of
two
three
four
and
five,
we
have
two
units
per
floor
and
on
the
we
have
a
small
would
spend
approximately
314
square
feet
full
of
the
residents.
AK
By
applying
for
the
building
cards,
we
have
become
at
some
some
zoning
code
violations
and
I'll
go
through
them.
One
is
the
chair
secretary
mentioned
it's
an
iPod
District,
so
we
were
working
with
BGA's
of
design.
Gives
you
the
off
street
parking.
The
code
requires
us
to
have
1.5
pocket
spots
per
unit,
which
would
be
12
pocket
spots
for
the
for
the
newest
new
building.
We
holding
a
parking
spot
for
shy
of
four
parking
spots.
Eleven
one
caucus
bought
four
unit.
The
floor
area
ratio
is
two.
We
are
ready
with
their
proposal.
AK
AK
Dress
the
street
that
it
all
up
on
the
sidewalk,
so
we
would
mean
blacks,
Lee,
said
it
backward
by
omission
of
the
motor
as
well
so
and
then
the
rear
yard
sufficient.
We
are
requiring
15
feet
but
by
a
coach
but
we're
setting
it
back
10
feet.
So
a
shy
of
five
feet
of
the
setbacks
that
was
set
in
the
back
potential.
Happily
answer
any
questions
into
Gaza
diamond
okay,.
AK
Although
the
property
has
been
some
development
on
West,
first
Street,
that
is
consistent
with
the
properties
on
West
first
Street
across
street
undresses
Street.
Most
of
them
are
slightly
smaller,
probably
book.
Four
story,
though
than
a
little
bit
less,
but
the
ones
on
West,
first
Street
consistent
expected
than
once
behind
them
and
face
accessory
to
the
right
of
us
and.
AR
BK
Members
of
the
war
on
a
column
from
councillor
Flint's
office
that
councillor
would
like
to
go
on
record
opposition
to
this
project
to
to
concerns
from
neighbors
have
a
community
process.
No
one
from
the
community
attended
a
second
ibadis
meeting
that
was
held
at
the
condom
and
a
butter
sock
for
another
meeting
upon
hearing
about
the
CBA
and
the
government.
It
was
not
Thank
You.
Mr.
K
N
A
BM
A
dresser,
Street
I
can
tell
you
that,
on
behalf
of
the
butters
that
we're
at
the
first
meeting,
none
of
us
agreed
with
any
of
this.
This
is
not
consistent
with
the
rest.
This
Street,
you
proposed
one
building
that
you
allow
be
built
out
to
the
property
line.
Do
any
of
you
know
how
big
dresser
Street
is
13
feet
across
how
big
a
fire
truck?
Is
it's
10
feet
across
literally
they
have
to
get
out
the
same
side
of
the
truck
to
fight
a
fire
and
there's
one
on
this.
BM
What's
the
point
of
the
setbacks?
There's
people
walking
down
the
middle
of
the
street
because
there's
no
sidewalks,
so
none
of
us
none
of
us,
are
in
support
of
this
you're
building
10
feet
above
the
rest
of
us
on
this
street
where
the
street
and
you
built,
we
did
a
zoning
plan,
so
people
wouldn't
have
some
kind
of
idea
of
what's
coming
in
there.
What's
the
point
of
spending
the
money
to
have
someone
develop
the
zoning
plan,
if
you
guys
never
follow
it,
none
of
us
can
support
this.
What's.
AK
We
had
to
about
his
meetings
that
will
probably
fly
by
our
office
first
about
his
meeting
done
to
folks
attended
one
young
woman
with
the
frustrated.
Maid
has
some
concerns
about
the
far2
points
that,
in
the
project
that
was
considered
by
the
project,
Nair
store
the
second
of
item
meeting,
which
was
properly
advertised
and
fly
by
our
autism.
Unfortunately,
no
one.
AK
B
BE
Directly
above
there's
a
fairly
small
moniker,
essentially
skylight,
one
of
the
mezzanine
better
level
of
the
unit.
The
proposal
here
is
to
raise
the
height
of
the
roof
to
the
level
that
is
approximately
the
maximum
height
of
the
peak
of
that
existing
monitor
to
create
more
volume.
Certainly,
the
the
entirety
of
that
portion
of
the
roof
would
go
up,
but
again,
essentially
built
higher
than
the
maximum.
BE
That
is
the
work
that
is
puncturing
that
65
foot
maximum
height,
even
though
it
is
in
fact
lower
than
the
ice,
but
also
part
of
the
scope
of
work
is
a
new
stairway
to
the
deck.
This
unit
has
exclusive
group
rights,
so
the
new
stairway
to
the
deck
from
the
lower
roof,
the
lower
up
to
the
upper
roof,
where
there's
a
deck.
The
new
access
to
the
lolu
from
a
new
interior
stair,
there's
currently
a
fairly
dangerous
means
of
addressing
the
unit
and
going
up
to
the
roof
level.
BE
This
would
be
replaced
by
a
sliding
door,
penthouse
stuff-
it's
sometimes
referred
to
as
a
hack,
but
it
actually
provides
building
code
compliant
access
because
of
its
head
height.
The
fact
that
there
are
stairs
up
and
it's
a
sliding
door
rather
than
a
I,
actually
hope,
that's
directly
palpable
and,
as
I
said,
raising
the.
BE
8
inches
allow
14
fenestration,
it
doesn't
eat
level,
but
the
this
is
subjective.
Force
of
things
are
located
that
many
will
be
constrained
to
the
deacon
bill
is
part
of
the
vegan
military
history
subject
to
review
by
the
Beacon
Hill
architectural
Commission,
the
architects
exterior
fall
of
2018,
two
hearings
before
being
a
male
architectural
and
it
receive
approval,
respect
where
that
is
visible
from
the
public
area.
The
existing
warmer
and
exemption.
BN
Before
just
auger
at
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
did
host
in
a
butters
meeting,
the
residents
came
out,
but
the
applicant
was
willing
to
work
with
them
and
make
changes
necessary
to
make
the
project
appeasing.
So
at
this
point
we
have
no
questions
or
concerns.
Thank
you.
C
BO
Address
for
the
record
please
good
morning,
mr.
chairman,
ladies
down
with
the
board,
my
name
is
brynjar
McCord
84,
Peterborough
Street
in
Boston,
so
we've
actually
done
all
the
work
and
have
been
open
since
June
of
2017.
So
nearly
two
years,
essentially
there
was
a
one
restaurant
that
had
separated
into
two.
We
were
the
first
to
sign
a
lease
in
February
of
2017,
received
all
the
approvals
everything
that's
said
from
the
city
to
being
good
operation.
You've
been
a
great
member
to
the
neighborhood
six
months
after
we
opened
in
2017
another.
BO
BP
BN
Members
of
the
board,
just
over
at
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
I,
remember
working
with
the
applicant
earlier
on
where
he
was
trying
to
get
everything
permitted.
The
community
has
been
super
excited
to
have
him
around
so
we're
just
here
for
a
formality.
We
have
no
questions
or
concerns
and
wish
to
have
him
back
in
operating
as
soon
as
possible.
O
AI
A
B
This
is
Dale,
eliminate
a
kitchen
and
installed
a
new
bathroom
and
kitchen
at
kitchen
place.
Remove
no
structure,
install
the
new
frames,
new
bedroom
change,
doctor
from
a
three
family
to
a
two
family;
the
violations,
article
9
section,
2,
non-conforming,
use
change;
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
F
Application
he
found
me
a
present.
We
want
to
convert
it
to
a
two-family,
so
he
take
over
the
department.
Remove
a
wall
that
kind
of
brings
the
house
back
close
to
one
of
our
meeting
for
nineteen
seventies.
We
do
put
a
temporary
wall
at
the
bottom
of
the
stairs.
Without
a
tape,
field
is
converting
a
kitchen
to
back
to
its
bathroom
and
removing
a
bathroom
back
to
a
hallway.
A
F
P
F
S
BK
A
BL
A
Mr.
secretary,
before
you
do
that
for
those
of
you
who
are
watching
the
agenda
or
looking
general
notice
that
and
a
couple
cases
from
now,
there's
a
mention
of
a
lunch
break
for
45
minutes
we're
not
going
to
take
a
45
minute
lunch
break.
We
will
take
a
break,
but
this
case
we
have
a
chair
of
discretion
and
whatever
the
board
anyway.
A
BL
B
BG
BG
S
BK
O
A
H
Morning
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
Marc
Lucas
Lucas
law,
75,
Arlington,
Street,
Boston,
Mass
attorney
for
the
applicant,
which
is
Dave
Schwartz,
the
owner
of
the
property
and
the
developer.
Who
is
sitting
to
my
right?
This
application
before
you
is
an
amendment
to
an
existing
building
permit
for
a
project
which
is
already
well
underway
to
include
a
roof
deck
on
the
top
floor
for
the
top
level
unit
of
the
building
it
is
in
the
safe
at
all.
H
Protection
district
and
rooftop
additions
require
conditional
use
permit
for
a
roof
check,
and
that
is
the
sole
issue
before
this
board.
We,
it
is
also
in
the
same
Fatah
historic
Commission.
District
we've
had
several
reviews
of
the
entire
project.
Already
with
the
historic
Commission
and
they've
already
had
an
opportunity
to
review
and
see
this
roof
deck,
but
we
do
need
to
go
back
to
them
for
final
approval.
Once
this
board
has
acted
on
the
conditional
use
permit
request
before
you,
the
project
has
proceeded
favorably
and
we've
had
community
process
every
step
of
the
way.
A
A
H
The
Jillian
balconies
are
not
an
item
for
zoning
relief.
They
have
been
approved
by
the
historic
Commission
at
the
at
their
last
hearing
last
month
of
it
and
prior
to
that.
The
historic
Commission
approved
enlarged
enlargement
of
the
window,
openings
at
the
rear
to
create
the
windows
so
that
the
Juliet
balconies
made
sense.
A
BN
A
A
Okay,
like
to
call
the
meeting
back
at
the
back
door
nor
mr.
secretary
to
want
to
just
remind
them
again
one
more
time,
I
will
say
for
those
who
were
here
here.
We
are
short
one
board
member
we're.
Normally
seven
member
board
takes
five
votes
to
pass
there.
Six
of
us,
you
have
the
option
of
deferring
until
there
is
a
full
board,
if
you
so
choose
so
hard
to
say
that
what
he
wants
to
take
advantage
of
that
they
can.
If
not,
we
will
proceed.
B
BE
Name
is
George
Moran
C
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West,
Broadway
and
South
Boston,
chairman
members.
This
is
at
least
third
deferral
for
which
I
apologize.
This
is
a
somewhat
complicated
matter
as
I
related
before
to
the
board.
This
is
a
site
comprised
of
two
parcels,
one
of
which
has
a
DND
feed
restriction.
The
proposal
is
to
put
it
through
a
three-unit
addition
to
an
existing
through
in
a
building.
We
have
gone
through
community
process
and
been
working
with
D
and
D
for
the
better
part
of
a
year.
BE
I
just
met
with
D
and
E
officials
in
the
hallway
ISD
is
asking
us
to
defer
this
to
no
earlier
than
June
11th.
The
reason
being
is
that,
with
the
changes
in
the
plans
over
the
past
several
months,
there's
a
new,
a
violation
that
was
not
advertised
initially
for
insufficient
usable
open
space.
Isd
is
in
the
process
of
generating
an
updated,
refused
a
letter,
but
it
will
have
to
be
advertised.
We
do
have
to
allow
sufficient
time
for
had
to
appear
so.
I
would
therefore
request
a
final
deferral
to
no
earlier
than
June
11th.
A
BL
B
All
right
so
we're
gonna
go
back
to
the
10:30
s,
calling
BOA
nine
nine
three
five:
three
five:
three
64
to
70
Broad
Street.
This
project
is
exchanged
use
of
Archie
from
a
building
or
a
restaurant
office.
Retail
retail
bank
branch
office
violations
article
49
85
in
the
green
green
way
overlay
the
use
of
regulations
they
even
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
BR
BR
Another
claim
states
to
Boston
with
me
are
Nick
Jacobi,
Peter,
Jacobs,
TPG
construction
and
Rebecca
eventually
supports
in
design
architecture.
Here
representing
Carver
one
bank,
they
are
applying
for
a
conditional
use
permit
that
the
premises
and
their
first
bank
rent
in
the
city.
They
are
long
operating
well-respected
bank
they're,
looking
to
move
into
the
address
into
a
landmark
building
at
at
that
property
in
the
underlying
district
that
Bank
ranch
uses.
Allow.
However,
it's
in
the
Greenway
overlay
district,
which
makes
this
conditional
use,
which
is
why
we're
here
before
you.
BR
BR
A
C
S
BK
A
B
B
This
is
demolish
an
existing
structure
and
construct
a
new
14-story
250
unit
residential
building.
The
new
building
will
be.
It
will
be
constructed
on
a
lot
consisting
of
30
6070
square
feet
to
be
created
by
subdividing
a
portion
to
300,
Harrison
Ave
and
combining
with
the
existing
law
of
217
Albany
Street
subdivision,
lock,
combination
the
violations,
article
32,
section
4.
This
is
in
the
g-code
applicability
in
article
64,
section
16.
The
height
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
morning.
H
H
One
two
and
three
are
residential
apartment
buildings.
Building
to
contains
the
Whole
Foods
grocery
store
with
a
parking
deck
building
number
four
on
the
corner
of
travelers
Street
is
the
sepia
condominium
building
number
five
as
sienna
condominiums
building
number
six
is
the
AC
hotel.
And
finally,
this
is
building
number
seven
of
seven
to
complete
the
inkblot
complex,
217
Albany
Street,
which
is
proposed
to
be
a
180
unit.
Building
the
initial
application
submitted
called
for
280
units,
but
that
has
been
since
I'm
sorry
250
now
down
to
180.
H
The
planning
context
for
this
building
proposal
is
related
to
the
Harrison
Albany
strategic
plan,
which
was
a
two
and
a
half
year
planning
study
conducted
by
the
BPD,
a
which
resulted
in
numerous
amendments
to
the
South
End
zoning
code,
specifically
designed
to
spur
development
in
four
discreet
sub
districts
in
the
Harrison
Albany
quarter.
This
particular
sub
district
at
the
north
end
of
the
corridor
is
called
the
New
York
streets,
sub
district
and
the
plan
has
been
an
enormous
success.
H
H
The
Haight
and
FA
are
diagram,
for
the
strategic
plan
shows
that
there
was
a
distinct
planning
effort
and
contemplation
that
the
area
along
Albany
Street
abutting,
the
expressway,
would
be
a
zone
for
more
height.
The
height
limit
was
extended
to
200
feet
for
projects
that
were
done
under
PDAs
and
a
6.5
that
they
are
closer
to
the
South
End
district.
H
The
Troy
apartment
building
at
the
corner
of
traveller
Street
and
Albany
is
at
200
feet.
345
Harrison,
Ave
across
from
the
Inc
block,
is
150
feet.
321
Harrison
Ave,
which
was
approved
by
this
board
to
be
a
new
office
building,
is
150
feet
and
370
380
Harrison
Ave
project,
currently
under
construction
by
a
related
Beal,
is
at
150
feet.
The
217
Albany
proposal
is
156
feet
to
the
main
roof
and
170
feet
on
the
upper
portion
of
the
roofline.
H
A
couple
of
other
diagrams
show
how
the
pedestrian
experience
will
change
at
the
corner
of
Albany,
Street
and
Pearl
Street,
which
is
currently
essentially
the
backside
of
foods
grocery
store.
It's
the
loading
dock,
there's
a
small
building
that
exists
on
high
on
the
on
the
site
that
transit
insurance
agency
building
that
comes
down
in
order
to
construct
the
new
building.
The
loading
dock
for
Whole
Foods
remains
the
same
in
this
building
on
the
next
slide.
H
You'll
see
is
a
long
rectangle
set
along
Albany
Street,
with
the
loading
dock
area
of
Whole
Foods
behind
it
and
there's
an
opening
on
Albany
Street.
That
will
continue
the
current
flow
of
the
truck
traffic
into
the
site
behind
Whole,
Foods
and
and
exiting
the
site,
and
also
access
to
the
building
as
well.
A
couple
elevations
to
show
the
context
of
the
proposed
building
in
relation
to
the
existing
Inc
rock
buildings
and
the
Troy
apartment
building
next
slide
shows
a
narrow
view.
H
Looking
north
toward
the
financial
district,
the
building
is
shown
there
sort
of
highlighted
in
white
to
grab
your
attention
on
the
edge
of
the
expressway
and
again
similar
on
the
next
slide,
a
proposed
building
at
the
corner
and
a
traffic
circulation
showing
Herald
Street
and
Albany
Street
in
relation
to
the
building
on
the
corner
and
on
the
second
to
the
last
or
third,
to
the
last
slide.
There's
a
there's,
a
black
B
at
the
corner
of
Harold
and
Albany
Street.
That
shows
the
location
of
the
billboard
in
relation
to
where
it
currently
stands.
A
H
A
I
A
Okay
to
the
meat
of
it
so
before
mr.
Miller
speaks
in
the
zoning
history
of
the
Billboard,
let
me
ask
some
questions
about
to
go
for
the
is:
is
this
the
rendering
that
shows
the
location
of
the
new
billboard?
So
it's
become
sort
of
vertically
oriented
rather
than
horizontally
oriented
but
yes
same
size?.
A
G
G
We
obtained
approval
from
this
board
to
remove
one
of
the
billboards
and
convert
the
other
billboard
to
digital
and
now
to
not
stand
in.
The
way
of
this
project
was
seeking
approval
to
be
able
to
move
this
billboard
through
that
corner,
which
would
actually
be
a
better
site
not
only
for
the
billboard
but
for
the
people
in
the
area,
because
it
doesn't
doesn't
block
anybody's
views
in
this.
G
D
G
H
V
A
H
BS
Good
afternoon
and
mr.
chair
members
of
board,
my
name
is
Fay
Street
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
of
this
proposal,
just
confirming
that
it
did
already
go
through
significant
community
process
under
the
PPD
8
article
80
process,
but
we
also
held
several
abutters
meetings
related
to
the
billboard,
because
it
is
very
sensitive
in
nature
to
the
community
and
everybody
is
behind
the
relocation
because
it
actually
solves
some
current
issues
of
you
know
some
of
the
light
pollution
and
just
shining
in
the
new
residences
windows.
BS
BK
Chairman
members
of
the
board
on
a
kaliram
from
councillor
Flinx
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
support
of
this
proposal.
We
would
like
to
point
out
that
the
is
Berkeley
Neighborhood
Association
is
not
an
opposition
to
this
project,
but
they
do
have
concerns
from
the
parking
and
the
traffic
that
it
will
bring
into
the
neighborhood
today
to
us,
the
development
team,
but
we
have
reached
out
to
the
betterment
team
and
they
have
indicated
that
they
will
be
working
closely
with
the
neighborhood
of
this
quality
of
life
issues.
Thank
you.
BT
Questions
there
are
positions,
oh
you
aren't
speaking
out
yes
chair
good
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Patrick
Dolan
I'm,
an
attorney
with
Cornell
Dolan,
one
international
place
in
Boston
by
the
way
I
represent
Robert
Mary
vincent
woon
unit
610
at
the
Siena
condominium
and
I
have
presented
to
the
board
an
affidavit
of
mr.
mrs.
Vincent,
along
with
six
other
statements
and
affidavits
from
unit
owners
at
the
Siena
condominium,
all
on
the
basis
that
it's
excessive,
the
basis
of
it,
says
piked.
BT
Near
the
Whole
Foods
in
connection
with
the
delivery
area
for
the
Whole
Foods
you'll
see
it's
a
very
congested
area
and
what
the
proposal
is
is
to
add
approximately
300
bedrooms
in
the
new
building,
with
no
new
parking
whatsoever,
under
the
assumption
that
the
unit
owners
are
not
going
to
own
cars.
I
think
that's
an
interesting
assumptions
but
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
facts
that
would
support
it.
There's
been
ocean,
we
by
National
Development
that
it
satisfies
a
legal
standard
to
get
the
berries.
It
has
requested.
BT
No
suggestion
that
there's
something
peculiar
about
the
lot,
no
suggestion
that,
without
this
variance,
there's
no
reasonable
use
for
the
lot
and
with
respect
to
the
movement
of
the
sign,
I
think
the
zoning
code
is
quite
clear.
It
simply
says
it's
forbidden
and
that's
a
word
that
doesn't
allow
for
any
interpretation,
so
I
would
respectfully
request
support,
deny
the
request.
BT
A
AI
H
A
H
O
Do
you
are
you
restricting
any
of
the
ownership
to
not
be
allowed
to
get
Boston
City
of
Boston
parking
permits
that.
G
O
B
On
the
next
two
cases,
calling
boa
nine
zero
three
six
three
five:
two
thirty-five
Layton
Street
bo
a
companion
case-
boa
nine
zero,
three,
six,
three
six,
two
thirty
seven
late
in
the
street.
This
is
for
235.
This
is
a
subdivide,
an
existing
law
to
create
two
separate
law.
It's
235
to
have
three
thousand
275
square
feet:
237
tab,
1772
square
feet,
erect
a
two-family
dwelling
with
parking
violations;
article
53
section,
nine
lot
to
its
efficient
lot
size,
so
subdivision
is
2,000
square
feet
required
article
53,
section
9.
B
The
lot
1
insufficient
lot
size,
article,
53,
section,
9
law
to
insufficient
log
web
article
53
section
9.
A
lot
is
insufficient
side.
You
had
set
back.
Seven
feet
is
required.
This
is
for
237
latent.
This
is
subdivided
existing
lot
to
create
two
large
235
3275
square
feet:
237
to
have
1772
Swift.
He
can
erect
a
two-family
dwelling
residential
dwelling
with
biking
the
violations.
Article
53
section
9
is
fission
lot
size
for
a
two-family
4000
square
feet
is
required.
Article
53
section,
9
is
fishing.
A
lot
width
for
a
two-family
40
feet
is
required.
B
Radical
53
section
9
insufficient
lot
of
frontage
40
feet
is
required.
Article
53,
section,
I,
insufficient
side
yard
setback.
7
feet
is
required.
Article
53,
section,
9
and
excessive
FA
are
0.8.
Is
the
max
article
53
section
9
an
insufficient
open
space,
750
square
for
the
unit
is
required.
Article
53,
section
9,
insufficient
Riyadh
setback,
21
and
6
foot
5,
20
1.65
is
required
in
article
33,
section
I,
and
the
number
of
a
lot
of
stories
has
been
exceeded,
2
in
out
two
and
a
half
stories
as
the
backs
name
an
address
for
the
record.
B
BU
Attorney
Laureen
Schettino,
245,
Sumner,
Street
Suite
110
in
East
Boston
with
me,
is
the
owner
of
the
property
Dana
Antonucci
and
Shannon
gent
rest
from
joy,
Street
design.
It
was
the
architect
on
the
project.
So,
as
mentioned,
these
are
companion
cases.
We
are
seeking
to
subdivide
the
existing
lot
to
create
two
new
Lots,
the
one
consisting
of
1772
square
feet,
the
other
consisting
of
three
thousand
275
square
feet,
and
we
would
be
constructing
a
two
unit,
residential
dwelling
intended
for
home
ownership
with
parking
for
two
vehicles.
BU
C
A
BV
Members
of
the
board,
I
am
Leyna
primarily
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
our
office
posted
an
average
meeting
on
May
21st,
where
the
apart
is
expressed
a
strong
support
about
this
proposal
and
as
well
the
Orion
Heights
neighborhood
association
board
in
support
Thank
You.
BW
A
B
F
C
B
Yeah
Tom
so
I'm
just
calling
here
as
a
reconsideration.
H
Morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
look
how
slick
house
law,
75,
Arlington,
Street
Boston
Mass
here,
representing
the
owners
of
306
K
Street
in
South
Boston,
on
a
motion
for
reconsideration
of
a
board's
prior
decision.
However,
today
we
are
requesting
at
furless
there's
one
further
issue
which
needs
to
be
resolved
with
is
Dee
and
I
actually
am
going
to
ask
you
to
meet
with
their
counsel
at
1:00
p.m.
today,
so
I
request
a
deferral
to
the
next
available
date.
H
A
B
Have
a
date
of
five
21
at
11:30,
I'm,
sorry
at
12:00!
Thank
you!
So
much.
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
get
back
to
the
10:30
calling
the
next
couple
of
cases
calling
VOA
nine
one.
Nine
six
one
zero
one!
Twenty
gov
Street
is
their
companion,
a
Frankfort
as
well.
Yes,
okay,
calling
VOA,
nine
one,
nine,
six,
zero,
nine
twenty
five
to
thirty
seven
Frankfort
are.
B
Combined
parcels
form
a
new
lot
with
sixteen
thousand
seven
hundred
thirty-five
square
feet.
The
change
marketed
from
a
church
fourteen
residential
units
renovate
the
entire
building
and
create
dwelling
units,
but
the
violations
article
2017
section
9s,
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
56
on
street
parking
is
insufficient
ethical,
fifty-three,
section
56,
R
Street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
I
on
the
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section,
nine
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
53
section.
Nine
in
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section,
nine,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
B
This
is
twenty
five
to
thirty
seven
Frankfurt.
This
is
the
combined
parcels
to
form
a
new
thirty.
Two
thousand
three
hundred
and
ninety
square
foot
lot
erect
a
new
six
storey
residential
building.
With
ninety
eight
Welling
units.
There
will
be
71
parking
under
garage,
the
violations,
article,
twenty,
seventy
six
and
nine.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
57,
this
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment,
an
article
53
section
9,
the
Lord
area
for
additional
Twala
units
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
BH
The
project
before
you
known
as
the
Frankfort
Gould
Street
development
in
East
Boston.
This
is
formally
part
of
the
archdiocese
property,
the
Mount
Carmel
church
rectory
space,
which
includes
four
Lots
that
we're
looking
to
combine
into
two
new
Lots
to
raise
the
convent
and
rectory
buildings
renovate
the
church,
building,
keeping
that
building,
and
this
will
include
108
condominium
units,
14
of
which
are
going
to
be
affordable,
IDP
on
site
with
an
84
associated
parking
spaces.
Those
parking
spaces
will
involve
71,
below-grade
underground
parking,
as
well
as
13
spaces.
That
would
be
above
ground.
BH
This
particular
development
we've
been
working
on
for
over
two
years
with
the
community
we're
very
sensitive,
because
the
community
fought
long
and
hard
to
keep
this
church
alive
and
open.
One
of
the
first
commitments
we
made
was
to
retain
the
church
building
that
you
see
from
the
front
of
the
packet
that
I
provided
that
will
now
become
a
14
unit,
interior
development,
but
everything
when
the
building
will
remain
intact.
BH
The
second
commitment
we
had
made
was
to
make
this
project
all
condominium,
which
is
something
that
the
community
want
wanted
and
then
finally,
to
remove
the
six
storey
on
a
portion
of
the
Frankfort
building
itself.
So
this
project
now
in
different
places,
would
be
from
a
four
to
A
six
story.
Building
the
total
lot
size
is
49
thousand
one
hundred
and
forty
square
feet
and
we
do
fall
within
an
M
F,
our
multi-family
residential
area.
We
also
31
bike
spaces
on
site
as
well,
108
of
which
are
interior.
As
I
have
mentioned.
BH
The
highest
point
is
55
feet.
We
all
also
have
sections
that
are
46
in
gross
square.
Footage
is
114
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty-five
square
feet
which
put
this
in
the
article
80
large
project
review,
which
is
approved
by
the
board.
Back
in
March
of
this
year
we
have
sort
of
a
mix
of
unit
sizes
in
talent.
We
have
79
one-bedroom
units,
yes
and
29
to
bedroom
units.
We
also
wanted
to
make
great
detail
of
the
amount
of
open
space
that
we
provided
on
this
project,
so
we
actually
have
a
reflection
garden.
BH
That's
going
to
be
part
of
community
give
back
space
for
folks
to
use.
We
also
have
the
above-ground
parking
area
is
lined
with
landscape
and
trees,
which
you
can
see
if
you
take
a
look
in
the
actual
packet
that
I
had
given
you,
we
work
diligently
with
the
community
to
get
to
this
point,
we're
really
proud
of
this
project,
and
we
can
not
a
pause
to
entertain
any
questions
that
the
board
may
have.
A
BH
BV
BY
Good
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Ronald
divergency,
a
project
manager
with
the
Boston
Planning
and
Development
Agency
with
respects.
His
proposal
of
BPA
conducted
an
extensive
article
ad,
be
large
project
where
he
process,
which
results
in
a
number
of
revisions
and
changes
to
the
project
to
address
community
concerns.
More
specifically,
this
project
on
the
ones
they
underwent
a
five-month
review
process,
during
which
we
had
five
community
meetings
to
review
the
proposal,
its
impacts
and
discuss
appropriate
mitigation.
BY
In
addition
to
the
formal
review
process,
the
development
team
also
conducted
community
extensive
community
outreach
efforts
and
participate
in
a
series
of
meetings
before
and
during
our
review
process,
with
the
butters
elected
officials
in
the
local
Civic
Association
to
solicit
feedback
and
refine.
The
proposal
on
March
14
2019,
the
BPD
Board
of
Directors
voted
to
approve
the
project.
As
such,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
R
Good
morning
my
name's
Jax
Kelsey
Oni
I'm,
the
chairperson
of
the
go
Street
Citizens
Association.
This
is
the
Association
that
monitors
projects
in
the
area
of
which
Malcom
Oh
Lady
of
Mount
Carmel
is
located.
I
also
happen
to
be
a
direct
of
butter
across
the
street
from
Frankfort
Street.
We
have
worked
for
several
years
with
the
with
the
developers
even
before
they
made
the
formal
presentations
to
the
city.
The
design
is
very
unique.
R
They've
worked
very
hard
for
us
to
make
changes,
they're
very
compatible
with
us,
and
we
appreciate
what
they
have
done
over
the
years.
We
appreciate
the
design
we
appreciate
that
they
saved
the
the
building,
which
was
in
the
early
19th
century
20th
century
Italian,
heritage
building
and
and
they've
kept
it
complete,
and
so
we
appreciate
that
too.
So
we're
in
we're
in
accordance
with
the
design
as
it
is
now.
Thank
you.
O
Maybe
a
design
review,
and
also
you
know
this
is
us.
It
looks
just
so.
You
guys
have
worked
odd.
So
congratulations
on
that,
but
continue
that
moving
forward,
because
I
do
know
that
this
is
wasn't
it
instrumental
that
I
know
I
appreciate
the
hard-working
them
so
just
continued
work
and
that
you
work
with
the
PDA.
B
Okay
want
to
make
sure
yeah
following
next
two
cases
calling
boa
eighty
eight
one,
eight
zero
three
one:
thirty
one
condo
history,
there's
also
companion
cage.
Boa
eight,
eight
one,
eight
zero,
four
one
forty-one
to
151
Condor
Street.
This
is
for
131.
This
is
to
combine
fossils
and
subdivide
newly
created
into
two
separate
Lots
131
Condor,
to
have
3937
square
feet,
also
directly
four-story
residential
building
with
seven
units.
The
violations,
article
53
section,
eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden
news.
Article
53,
section,
56,
Austria
parking
loader
requirement.
B
B
This
is
for
141
to
151
condos,
combined
fossils
and
subdivides
newly
created
a
lot
from
two
separate
laws:
141
to
150.
They
have
twenty
two
thousand
three
hundred
thirteen
square
feet,
also
to
erect
a
five-story
mixed-use
building
containing
ground
floor
work
by
galleries,
shared
studios
and
workshops,
17
out
of
Studios
33
residential
units
and
35
parking
spaces.
The
violation
is
article
53,
section.
8
a
work
by
gallery
is
forbidden
news.
B
Article
53,
section
8
out
of
studios
we've
been
used,
nautical
53
section
8
a
multi-family
dwelling
into
the
bid
news,
article
53
section
8
a
workshop
is
a
forbidden
use.
Article
53,
section
8,
the
community
studio
is
a
forbidden
news.
Article
53
1656
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
53
section
9,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
villain
has
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53
section
9,
the
building
has
is
excessive
and
scene.
53
section
9
in
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
B
BH
You
mr.
chair
members
aboard
jeff
dragon
with
drago
in
Toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
Broad
Street
from
the
neighborhood
of
affordable
housing,
as
well
as
challenge
agendas
from
joy,
Street
design,
who's,
the
architect
on
the
project.
As
was
mentioned,
the
addresses
before
you
being
as
a
development
being
proposed
by
the
neighborhood
of
affordable
housing.
It's
40
units
of
housings,
with
17
private
artist,
studios
shared
community
space
for
artists
and
a
gallery
in
work
bar
along
with
community
space,
35
associated
parking
spaces.
BH
This
project
was
part
of
city-owned
land
by
DMD
and
sort
of
a
desolate
park
on
door
street.
A
neighborhood,
affordable
housing
was
prepared
before
the
sporty
form
has
developed
a
number
of
projects
in
East,
Boston
horrible
housing
applied
in
one.
That
RFP
process
is
very
particular
about
the
kind
of
housing
that
they
wanted
to
see
here.
So
the
development
before
you
is
mixed
use
mixed
income
project
with
both
rental
unit
component
home
ownership,
units,
artists,
paste
and
community
space.
The
total
lots
of
three
parcels
for
total
combined
twenty
six
thousand
two
hundred
and
fifty
square.
BC
BH
Height
ranges
because
it
is
two
buildings
that
are
separate
from
44
feet
to
51
feet,
gross
square
footage
of
the
project,
sporting
them
in
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
square
feet.
We
were
approved
as
part
of
the
article
80
small
project
review
process
back
in
March
of
2019
work
diligently
with
the
community,
have
a
letter
of
support
and
civic
association
as
well
just
to
go
over
some
of
the
breakdown
of
this
project.
BH
So,
as
was
mentioned,
it
some
40
units
with
35
parking
spaces
in
the
main
building
total
human
count
in
the
water
first
building
at
141,
151
condor
Street.
There
will
be
33
rental
units,
nine
of
which
are
proposed
market
rate
24
which
be
affordable
housing
in
the
condo
building.
There
also
be
condos
in
the
building,
seven
condos
free
market
and
for
affordable.
It
would
also
have
an
artist
preference
for
space
in
this
building,
which
was
the
heart
of
the
RFP.
BH
The
second
building,
one
third
one
condo
street-
would
be
the
seven
total
condo
units,
four
of
which
would
be
two
dead
and
three
would
be
three
beds.
Those
would
have
for
market
rate,
three
all
units
on
that
building
as
well,
and
so
as
part
of
our
amenity
and
design
feature.
We
also
include
studio
space
opportunities
for
artists
to
rent
in
this
building.
U
That's
a
question:
I
would
ask
our
friends
the
PRA
to
help
us
on.
We
would
certainly
be
consulting
with
them
as
they've
reviewed
it
and
use
Boston
CDC
is
our
property
manager,
so
we're
not
going
to
flip
it
from
artists
to
regular
I,
think
they'd
be
maintained
over
time
and
that's
the
goal,
that's
what
we
would
tend
to
keep.
We
know
the
neighborhood
wanted
that
I,
remember
being
at
the
first
meeting
when
they
expressed
that
preference
for
artists
women's
work
space,
and
so
that's
what
we've
developed.
A
AI
A
AI
U
U
As
much
as
I'm
glad
that
our
friends
didn't
know
because
I
didn't
know
but
I
know,
but
we
would
work
with
them
and
they've
got
criteria
if
I
wish
to
do
it.
But
you
know
you
want
there's
a
growing
artists
community.
There
always
has
been
in
the
neighborhood
I've
been
there
for
a
long
time,
and
certainly
you'd
want
people
to
come
and
sign
up
and
do
the
marketing.
So
we
continue
to
encourage
people
to
sign
up
worst
case.
U
BV
BW
BY
Good
afternoon,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board
are
all
diverging
a
project
manager
with
the
Boston
playing
the
Roman
agency.
This
proposal
underwent
article,
a
de
small
project
review
so
very
well
received
in
the
community
development
team
work
collaboratively
with
our
staff
to
enhance
the
accessibility
and
work
on
the
design
overall,
we're
very
pleased
with
the
the
project
includes
both
73
percent
73
percent
of
the
units
of
the
building,
our
income
restricted,
and
this
was
approved
by
our
board
in
March
of
this
year.
We
would
like
to
be
in
record
of
support.
Thank
you.
BZ
A
B
Boa
nine
one,
eight
two
three
two
one:
ninety
seven
Condor
Street:
this
is
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
their
active
four
story.
Building
with
six
residential
units
and
six
parking
spaces
violation.
Article
53
section,
eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit
is
a
forbidden
use,
article
53
section
on
the
floor:
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
a
height
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
53,
section,
9
a
height,
is
excessive
and
feet.
High
15
3,
section
9
in
the
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
side
yard
setback
requirements.
B
BH
BH
BH
Effectively
thousand
twelve
to
bed
one
bath,
the
other,
a
2-bed
2bath
with
rare
balcony.
The
third
and
fourth
floors
of
the
an
identical
third
and
fifth
unit
would
be
a
thousand
forty
six
square
feet:
two
bed
two
bath
and
the
fourth
and
sixty
one
thousand
twelve
square
foot
two
beds.
You've
got
just
to
go
over
some
of
the
violations
that
were
mentioned,
the
use,
although
it
says
to
family,
there
are
three
and
commercial
up
and
down
this
corridor.
BH
So
the
proposing
six,
the
FA
are
loudest
point
eight
rent,
one
point:
nine
three
height
is
to
have
stories
of
thirty
five
feet.
Four
four
stories:
39
feet:
eight
inches
open
space,
354
well
front
yard,
is
five
to
five
dollars.
Five
runs
one
foot,
one
inch,
rear
yard
24
feet,
we're
at
7
feet,
2
inches
on
rear
of
butters
are
set
pretty
far
back
and
elevated
on
Falcon,
Street
and
parking
would
be
required.
BP
A
BV
C
BW
B
Nine
zero
three
five,
four
one
307
maverick
Street:
this
is
a
permit
for
three
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article
10
section
one's
the
proposed
off
street
parking
is
within
five
feet
of
the
side.
Lot
line:
article
53,
section,
56,
point:
five:
the
parking
maneuverability
in
article
53,
section,
nine
use
of
open
spaces,
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CA
CA
BC
Yeah
D'amico
Boston
transportation
department.
Mr.
chairman
members
of
the
board,
it
is
in
my
opinion
and
in
the
opinion
of
the
BTD,
that
the
parking
spaces
be
reduced
to
two
and
the
curb
cut
be
reduced
from
24
to
a
maximum
of
12
feet.
That's
the
maximum
for
residential
use.
So
it's
two
spaces
in
a
12
foot
curb
cut
maximum.
Ok,.
A
BC
CA
CA
C
BV
BW
A
B
CB
A
CB
BV
BW
A
O
B
C
CA
A
Q
A
B
Case
calling
BOA
eight
five,
three
two:
nine
five
31
Dell
Avenue.
This
is
install
the
retaining
walls
and
driveway
of
the
front
right
of
the
house,
the
violation
article
9
section,
one
extension
of
an
existing
non-conforming
to
family
in
a
one
family,
sub
district
in
article
69,
section,
twenty
nine
point:
four
nope
I
can
fit
within
the
front
yard
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
CC
What
this
is
senator
Sanchez
is
trying
to
do
is
simply
part
two
cars
in
her
existing
two
family
lot.
Currently
there,
the
existing
condition
is
and
in
front
of
the
her
house
is
a
to
two
foot
retaining
wall
which
runs
from
the
total
frontage
of
our
house.
There's
also
an
existing
asphalt,
sidewalk
and
not
a
concrete
sidewalk,
and
there
is
a
no
granite
curb
then
there's
a
granite
curb
there
is
a
the
curb
consists
of
cobblestone,
which
is
at
the
same
as
a
sidewalk,
so
you
can
actually
there's
no
structural.
CC
These
these
height
difference
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
street,
which
she
still
try
to
do,
is
install
a
to
found
a
two-car
parking
space
which
approximately
17
feet
wide
and
also
possibly
25
feet
deep.
That
space
has
to
be
retained
by
a
a
retaining
wall
which
the
lowest
point
of
the
parking
is
about
zero
feet.
The
back
end
of
the
parking
space
is
approximately
about
six
feet.
High,
the
parking
space,
at
least
the
right
retaining
wall
is
going
to
be
five
foot
from
the
this
could
be
from
the
side
lot.
CC
At
that
point,
there
is
an
existing
tree.
That's
going
to
be
removed
at
the
front
to
the
back
end
of
the
car
as
it
parks
into
the
space,
because
at
least
five
feet
from
the
from
the
sidewalk.
This
opportunity
presents
a
well
Leeson
situation,
presents
an
opportunity
for
the
sentence,
because
the
existing
retaining
walls
are
in
disrepair
and
probably
anoint
you
there
are
deteriorating
or
have
been
for
the
last
few
years.
CC
So
what
were
able
to
do
two
things,
install
two
parking
spaces
and
also
address
the
problem
of
getting
rid
of
the
the
demonstrate
aning
wall
and
install
the
new
retaining
walls
as
as
well.
Currently,
she
parks
approximately
where
that
17
foot
width
is,
which
means
she
is
taking
one
parking
space
off
the
street,
but
she's
also
adding
two
sparking
spaces,
which
is
a
net
gain
of
one
one
parking
space.
CC
Now
this
situation
seems
odd,
but
on
that
Street
daredevil
is
a
really
interesting
Street,
because
the
situation
exists
that
that
is
similar
to
what
she's
trying
to
do
because
of
the
parking
fee
of
the
land,
which
is
from
sidewalk
as
it
enters
some
of
the
properties
the
it
slopes
up.
So
there
are
situations
where
at
least
four
or
five
situations
where
the
situation,
what
she's
trying
to
do
actually
is
fairly
comment
on
her
Street
these
photographs,
the
condition
at
least
existing
editions
of
a
street.
CC
So
what
she's
trying
to
do
is
really
not
different
than
what
other
folks
have
have
done
over
the
past
the
past
few
years.
So
Dell
is
a
really
interesting
street
from
her
property
line
from
her
house
to
blue
Avenue.
No
parking
is
allowed,
except
there's
one
house
between
a
blue
Avenue,
I'm,
sorry,
the
Hyde
Park
Avenue,
and
it
houses
one
house
that
house
actually
parks
they
have
their
own
driveway
parking.
A
CC
CC
C
CC
BC
BS
Good
afternoon
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Faye
street
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal
due
to
lack
of
community
support
and
I
also
know
that
the
board
historically
has
had
issues
related
to
front
yard
parking.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
single
family
to
a
single
family
in
office
space,
the
violations,
article
69
69,
before
the
a
ratio,
excessive,
the
attic
living
space-
is
not
proven
to
be
legal
and
no
record
on
file
by
local
69,
section
29
off-street
bottom
employment
is
insufficient
in
article
69,
section
8,
the
office
uses
the
vid
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AX
Morning
again,
my
name
is
césar
de
Silva
here
representing
my
client,
Domingo
smarties,
and
here
we
are
before
you
for
asking
for
relief
on
the
article
sixty
nine
point:
zero,
nine,
which
is
the
F
AR,
and
the
article
69
section
29
of
street
parking
and
article
sixty
nine
point.
Eight,
which
is
the
forbidding
use.
AX
Michael
I
enter
not
too
long
ago,
bought
this
property
and
the
property
has
already
two
floors
showing
the.
If
you
see
the
plans,
the
first
floor
has
already
a
kitchen
and
bathroom
us.
Then,
when
you
realize
it's
only
a
family,
but
it
would
like
to
use
upstairs
as
a
residence
and
an
office
on
the
first
floor
and
this
actually
it's
right
very
close
to
Bowden
Street
in
a
commercial
right
across
way
used
to
be
a
nurse's
office.
B
A
AX
A
AX
A
AX
O
AX
O
AX
A
A
AX
A
AY
A
AM
AX
Current
business,
he
didn't
that's
why
we,
when
you
put
it
there,
he
didn't
know,
that's
why
he
hired
me
then
to
come
in
correct,
because
he
didn't
know
that
particular
process
and
that's
why
I'm
before?
Yes,
your
proposals
and
when
I
explained
to
him,
he
said
oh,
he
would
have
taken,
he
didn't
realize
it
has
design.
Actually,
this
type
of
business
is
more
real
calls.
People
make
appointment
for
tax
the
people
they
already
knows.
That
sign
doesn't
help
him
as
much
it's
not,
which.
O
A
AX
B
This
is
a
change
of
Arc's
from
a
tree
to
a
four
family,
also
at
Dulles,
and
extend
rift
staircase
to
the
fourth
floor.
The
violation
article
50
section
43
off
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
50,
section
28
for
apartments.
It's
a
condition
of
the
youths
in
the
3f
for
thousands
of
distant
article,
50,
section
29
edition
a
lot
areas:
insufficient
radical
50,
section
29,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
building
height
of
success
of
in
stories,
article
50,
section
29,
the
villain
height
is
excessive
and
feet.
B
BX
Drago
Moscato,
mrs.
Anderson
15
frustrating
here
in
Boston
with
me
today,
is
Tanya
terrier,
the
architect
for
this
project
and
Oleg
Alisa
on
behalf
of
TTA
Rockville
Clark.
As
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
change
the
legal,
often
see
from
a
free
family
to
a
four
family
dwelling
renovate
the
building,
including
dormers,
and
extend
the
rear
staircase
to
the
fourth
floor.
Apparently,
all
four
units
are
in
existing
condition.
We're
seeking
to
keep
the
bedroom
count
the
same,
and
essentially
all
the
living
space
is
staying.
BX
The
same
we're
just
adding
on
the
doorman
to
give
a
little
more
head
height,
become
the
living
space,
a
lot
of
times,
2005
45
square
feet
in
a
3f
4,000
in
terms
of
the
violations,
the
height
and
all
setbacks
are
pre-existing
conditions.
So
the
violations
of
note
are
use,
allows
the
3f
we're
proposing
a
four
family
fa
our
queen.
It's
allowed
weird
about
2.0
right
now,
going
up
to
two
point
one,
but
that
slight
increase
in
living
space
and
we're
required
to
have
one
additional
off
street
parking
space,
which
we
do
not
have
again.
BX
The
fourth
unit
that
we're
trying
to
legalize
would
be
a
two-bedroom
unit.
In
previous
renditions
and
the
plans
it
was
shown
as
a
three
a
through
community
process,
we've
agreed
to
make
that
a
two
bedroom
units,
so
the
units
of
better
accommodates
the
same.
We've
also
agreed
to
how
to
minimize
the
building
which
the
neighborhood
was
happy
to
hear,
and
I've
also
submitted
a
letter
support
from
the
roxbury
path.
Community
group,
as
we
have
robust
community
process
going
through
multiple
of
butter
and
Roxbury
path.
Meetings
at
this
point
on
pause
and
take
any
questions.
A
BX
BX
A
BX
CD
You
could
have
to
do
the
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Jessica
Thomas,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood,
Services
and
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
to
support.
They
have
met
with
the
butters
and
also
the
Neighborhood
Association.
Some
of
the
abutters
had
concerns
about
density
and
parking,
but
by
adding
the
4th
unit
it
will
require,
did
trigger
a
need
for
the
sprinkler
system,
which
they
felt
would
be
safer.
BX
A
A
CF
You
justifying
in
favor
or
opposing
maybe
super
MacLean
butters
to
the
property.
Initially
they
was
a
buttered
meeting
everyone.
There
opposed
the
project
due
to
density
and
also
arm
reduce
availability
of
parking,
the
streets
of
small
little
dead-end
street,
who
already
maxed
out
when
it
comes
to
housing.
Adding
this
unit
I
think
income
is
a
straw,
I'll
break
the
camel's
back.
CF
CF
Smart,
this
building
is
already
built
out
to
the
max.
The
fourth
unit
was
in
the
legal
unit.
The
owner
prior
owner
tried
to
turn
into
a
4,
but
he
was
never
successful.
I
don't
understand
where
they
say
this
was
a
unit
was
never
a
unit,
always
illegal
and
the
butters
were
totally
against.
This.
Is
this
project
y
path
agreed
to
it
I'm,
not
sure,
but
I
we
was
in
contact
with
them.
CF
A
CG
My
name
is
my
name,
is
Jose
Sanchez
and
just
coming
to
a
pause
about
the
project
going
on
on
18,
a
rug,
Deer
Park,
the
reason
being
is
up,
the
property
is
gonna
be
or
it
is
a
tree
family
by
adding
another
unit.
On
the
on
the
fourth
floor,
which
is
the
attic
that's
going
to
be
super
orbit
crowded
each
unit
right
now,
it's
a
three
to
four
bedroom
apartments,
so
you
are
another
unit,
since
it's
going
to
be
super
public,
crowded,
plus
the
other
thing.
CG
The
major
problem
that
we're
going
to
be
facing
on
the
neighborhood
is
the
parking
as
I
saw
I
said
now.
We
are
okay,
even
though,
when
it
comes
to
the
street
our
cleaning
he
gets.
He
gets
a
lot
of
problem,
so
you
know
by,
but
you
allowing
these.
You
know,
permits
to
add
another
another
apartment
and
Antoinette.
Listen
to
condominium,
there's
going
to
be
a
major
discomfort
like
deviations
to
the
neighborhood.
So
are
you
opposed
to
this?
Thank
you
put.
A
AJ
AE
BX
Bedroom
third
unit
or
bipod
minimizing
it
we're
hoping
to
promote
home
ownership.
You
know
families
that
come
in
knowing
this
hasn't
got
to
be
a
rental
building
that
has
three
and
four
cars,
so
we
actually
defend
that
by
turning
into
condos
and
legalizing
this
fourth
unit.
That
should
alleviate
some
of
those
concerns.
I
really.
A
B
The
last
case
for
11:33
discussions
calling
VOA
891,
497
271,
West
fifth
Street
companion
cases,
Building
Code,
boa
nine
one:
five,
zero,
eight
271
West
fifth
Street.
This
is
the
change
of
oxygen
from
a
one-family
to
a
two
family,
legalized
living
space
to
the
basement,
and
full
interior
innovation
proposed
new,
exterior
egress
stairs
the
violations.
Article
27
s
section
5s,
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPhones
article
68
section
33
Osprey
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section
8,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
6
and
8
useable,
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
G
G
G
We
also
agreed
to
as
one
of
the
neighbor
across
the
street
was
an
absentee
plane,
one
that
has
a
two
family
project.
It
was
concerned
about
students
because
there
was
an
issue
not
at
this
building
put
in
the
budding
filmmaker
they'd
agreed
to
not
only
put
decision,
every
friends
to
students
or
let
students
occupy
the
premises.
G
G
B
BP
A
BP
BP
Is
an
internal
state
he's
correct
from
the
first
floor
to
the
basement
in
wako,
we
also
have
the
sprinkler
rope
through
pump
through
that
common
access.
In
the
front,
then,
once
you
bypass
the
sprinkler
room
is
also
accessed
off
the
street
direct
down
to
the
lower
level
as
well.
So
you
go
through.
The
comment
is
a
comment:
Canty
room.
BP
A
C
D
C
BQ
BJ
Dillan
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
McCamey
exists
a
little
bit
late.
They
already
had
the
community
process.
I
met
with
Victor
enjoys
the
director
butters
personally
last
Friday,
big
dude,
he's
been
very
helpful,
working
with
George
and
his
wife.
Sorry
Joe
don't
work.
They
work
both
each
other
I
haven't
heard
any
other
complaints.
So
we'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
talk.
Support
of
this
project.
CH
Name
is
Joe
power.
I
lived
with
two
six
nine
West
v,
my
wife
and
I
lived
there
and
owned
the
property
since
1981
for
quite
a
while.
Now
the
building's
been
vacant
has
been
a
very
sir.
It's
been
a
source
of
concern
for
both
of
us
before
moving
to
this
area
was
volunteer,
firefighter
EMT
fire
safety
and
security
are
extremely
important.
CH
After
talking
with
the
contractor,
I
find
that
the
fire
prevention
alarm
suppression
systems
will
be
introduced.
This
pleases
me
a
great
deal,
I'm
sure
that
in
the
course
of
the
work,
attention
will
be
given,
especially
to
appliances
these
systems
that
involve
natural
gas,
electricity
I
have
confidence
that
Mike
me
and
his
associates
do
their
due
diligence
in
both
rush
and
final
inspections
and
as
I
understand
it.
The
owner
of
the
building
will
be
hiring
maintenance
people
to
make
sure
that
the
environment
stays
safe.
CH
CH
Support
moving
forward
with
this
proposal
because
of
the
fire
safety
features
and
because
to
us
by
the
way
the
contractor
will
also
be
taking
care
of
some
271
issues
that
relented
to
us
in
the
pan,
giving
us
all
the
ice
we're
down
hill
ranch
in
the
back
flooding
the
backyard.
It
will
also
clean
up
the
backyard
and
remove
an
offensive
tree.
Oh
I
see
some
pluses
for
my
wife
and
myself
I,
don't
see
a
downside
for
us
on
moving
forward.
AE
A
Zoning
request
is
only
really
can
also
Building
Code
issue.
Building
Code
issue
is
section
9
7
80
cm
tents
when
he
exited
discharge,
section,
10,
28.5,
access
to
public
way.
The
exit
discharge
shall
provide
a
direct
and
unobstructed
access
to
a
public
way.
Are
we
do?
We
need
to
provide
relief
from
that.
BQ
BQ
Neighborhoods
in
the
city
they
built
such
that
the
arts
connect
in
the
back
there,
roll
houses
to
the
front
street
typically,
for
example,
myself,
that
they
have
alleyways
back
there.
But
in
this
particular
case
from
the
plan
that
I
see
on
a
morning
inspection
plan,
the
back
of
271
would
release
into
the
back
yard
and
then
I
guess
much
like
a
fire
escape
on
upper
levels.
You'd
have
to
or
someone
else's
property.
BQ
G
A
BK
Chairman
members
of
the
board
Anika
Lyon
from
councillor
Fink's
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
project.
We
oppose
this
project
for
reason
of
community
process.
The
city
Sai
Neighborhood
Association
in
form
of
the
development
team
committed
to
come
committed
to
coming
to
the
civic
group
and
present
to
them
in
their
borders,
but
in
everyday
may
worsen.
Our
voters
are
concerned.
This
is
a
bad
precedent
to
set
thank
you.
G
BL
CI
My
name
is
Michael,
Tobin
I
represent
the
owner
across
the
street
Theresa
O'sullivan,
and
the
board
has
my
letter
that
I
submitted
stated
February,
6
2019
and
mrs.
mrs.
o
Sullivan's
concerned
center
around
complaints
that
she's
got
from
people
who
occupy
her
house
that
there
are
parties,
and
you
know,
students,
etc
and
I.
Just
don't
see
how
one
would
enforce
a
no
student
lease
situation.
The
performance
are
not
living
in
the
unit
they're
going
to
they
are
developers
and
there's
no
nothing
to
prevent
them
from
selling
the
building
and
the
next
owner
doing
something
else.
CI
A
G
O
B
B
A
B
B
C
N
B
N
AX
B
Already
been
approved
at
the
last
subcommittee,
you
guys
were
there
at
the
last
subcommittee.
You
didn't
need
to
come
here.
No
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
call
him
into
a
subcommittee
which
was
heard
on
Thursday
April
25th
down
to
ten
ten
massive.
The
first
case,
boa
eight
five,
three
five
five
to
146
to
146,
a
bunkie
Hill
Street,
was
approved
that
was
to
legalize
aqua,
see
reflect
the
real
estate
bill
change
from
one
family
to
a
to
two
cases.
Boa
is
nine:
zero.
Three
six,
two
three
four
Melrose
Street,
boa
nine
zero.
B
Three
six
three
gay
Melrose
Street
was
to
construct
a
new
dorm
in
the
rear
of
the
house.
It
was
approved
case
BL,
a
nine
one,
one,
five,
three
five
five,
forty
six
East
Broadway
was
a
change
of
oxygen,
include
body
out
establishment.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
eight
zero,
three,
six,
seven,
seven,
sixty
five
silver
Street
was
denied
prejudice
for
a
no-show
articles
case,
boa
8,
9,
2,
5,
4,
3,
6,
16
to
6
18
East,
8th
Street
was
deferred
to
6:20
2019
to
the
subcommittee
case.
B
Boa
9
0
9
5
8
9
143
to
153
Washington
Street,
which
was
a
change
of
action
for
bakery
to
a
restaurant.
It
was
approved
with
beef,
EDA
and
takeout
case
boa
9
to
5
1
1
764
Radcliffe,
Radcliffe
Road.
It
was
a
new
2nd
floor
addition
with
3
bedrooms.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
nine
to
seven
six.
Nine
seven
12
Scribner
Road
was
to
confirm
Oxley
as
a
single
family
in
constructing
a
second-floor
addition
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case,
boa
nine
one.
B
Seven,
two,
six
zero
16
Hawthorn
Street
was
a
built-in
addition
on
the
top
side
of
the
house.
Build
deck
behind.
The
house
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case.
Boa
92078
147
Cummins
highway
was
heard
today
case.
Boa
9,
0,
9,
3,
6,
3
48
Murray
Hill
Road
was
was
a
single-family
dwelling
installing
parking
space
it
was
denied
without
prejudice
case
PLA,
nine
one,
eight,
six,
three
zero
1100
VFW
Parkway
was
a
use
of
land
for
an
exclusive
easement
agreement.
B
It
was
approved
case
POA,
9,
2,
3,
2,
9,
7,
24
mm
E
Street
was
to
clarify
an
existing
billing
as
a
two-family.
No
work
to
be
done
was
approved
for
the
hearing
we
discussion
case,
boa
8
9,
3,
0,
8,
6,
8,
71
Grampian
way
it
was
erected
detached
one
car
garage
with
storage.
It
was
approved.
That
concludes
the
subcommittee
need
a
motion
for.