►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 08-29-17
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Good
morning,
the
board
of
Appeal
Court
Tuesday
August
29th,
is
in
session
just
a
reminder.
Please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
if
you
have
need
to
have
conversations,
please
take
them
outside
of
the
room.
It's
very
difficult
for
us
to
hear
the
applicants
with
with
the
acoustics
in
this
room
also,
if
you
are
here
to
speak,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project.
Please
know
that
we
accept
your
comments
and
those
of
the
BR
raised
as
Boston
planning
and
and
Development
Agency
as
advisory,
and
we
will.
A
A
B
A
D
A
F
E
E
This
is
a
affordable
housing
project
that,
in
the
worst
since
2015
address
on
the
kitchen
in
the
elevator
and
says
I
Drive
by
there
worth
you
in
front
of
us
a
long
time
ago
and
we've
laughed
so
we
have
to
be
continued,
so
we
can
get
going
in
the
new
year.
In
addition,
when
we
were
here
in
2015,
the
plans
presented
show
9
foot
1,
but
the
appeal
listed
11
feet
for
a
front
yard
setback
and
just
want
to
clarify
that
as
well
and
we've
been
involved
by
staff
to
the
board.
E
C
E
H
E
G
C
I
get
it
to
call
in
it
for
the
record
mr.
Zakaria,
so
for
the
record
calling
boa
seven:
three:
five:
nine
zero
six
one
thirty-two
Chestnut
Avenue!
This
is
erect
a
new
six
storey
steel
wood
frame.
Building
with
a
new
driveway
associated
with
sited
provost.
There
will
be
retail
commercial
space
on
the
ground
level.
There
will
be
61,
one-bedroom,
affordable
apartments
built
above
violations,
Article
51,
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
51
section
9
riyadh
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
E
Lawrence
s
Takara
Nixon,
Peabody,
102nd
Street
joining
me
is
David.
Ison
from
abacus
was
the
architect
that
rose
light
from
Jewish
community
housing
for
the
elderly.
This
is
the
culmination
of
a
very
lengthy
process.
The
building
has
been
redesigned
as
a
result
of
the
redesign
and
the
acknowledgment
of
what
used
to
be
known,
as
that
would
grow
we're
before
this
board
to
seek
relief
for
side.
I
E
J
E
E
It's
a
smaller
building
is
in
between
the
fire
station
and
the
Carroll
apartments
and
the
properties
that
we
are
all
owned
by
entities
which
are
Jewish
community
housing
for
the
elderly,
the
Housing
Authority,
which
is,
in
fact
the
immediate
of
butter
in
which
side
you
have
the
lead
facade,
has
sent
a
letter
of
support
and
executive
board.
There's
also
letters
of
support
from
representative
Koenen,
representing
Moran,
senator
Browns,
burger,
now
the
breaking
main
streets
and
other
civic
leaders.
J
G
E
E
L
O
P
Q
R
S
U
Good
morning,
Kate
Bennett
with
the
Boston
Housing
Authority,
the
immediate
butter
to
the
project
in
support
of
the
project.
We've
been
working
closely
with
the
owner
to
work
on
the
improvements
that
define
the
edge
between
our
properties.
They
will
be
making
some
improvements
to
our
properties
as
part
of
the
project.
We
love
the
idea
of
expanding
the
low
income
elder
use
in
the
neighborhood,
which
is
our
mission
as
well.
Thank
you.
V
Hi
good
morning,
I'm
Emily
sham
the
commissioner
for
the
Commission
on
affairs
of
the
elderly
at
the
city
of
Boston,
I'd
like
to
testify
in
favor
of
this
project.
We
older
adults,
are
our
fastest-growing
age
group
in
the
city.
In
2010
we
had
88,000
people
over
60
by
2030,
we're
expected
at
close
to
130,000.
So
housing
like
this
is
critical
in
the
city
and
JCH.
E
is
one
of
the
premier
senior
housing
providers
in
Boston,
so
we
would
love
to
see
them
expand
what
they're
doing
in
the
city.
Thank
you.
W
W
W
X
That
was
probably
the
most
important
testimony.
My
name
is
Lila
Bernstein
I
am
advisor
to
the
mayor
for
the
initiative
to
end
chronic
homelessness
for
the
city
of
Boston
and
I'm
here
to
testify
in
support
of
this
project.
As
you
know,
the
the
mayor
has
set
a
goal
to
end
chronic
homelessness
by
the
end
of
2018,
and
to
do
so
we
need
units
with
support
services
attached
to
them
and
a
pipeline
of
those
units
into
the
future.
Chronic
homelessness
is
defined
as
long-term
homelessness
among
people
with
disabilities
and
of
the
500
or
so
chronically
homeless.
X
Elders
at
a
point
in
time
in
the
city
of
Boston,
over
50
of
them
are
50
years
old
or
older,
and
their
clinical
age
tends
to
be
10
to
20
years
beyond
their
born
age,
given
given
the
stress
of
homelessness
on
people's
health,
so
we're
very
much
in
support
of
this
project,
because
7
of
the
units
are
going
to
be
set
aside
for
chronically
homeless.
Elders
who
have
been
long-term
homeless,
have
a
disabling
condition
and
will
be
getting
the
support
services
necessary
to
get
them
housed
and
keep
them
housed
and
healthy.
X
Y
Y
Y
My
name
is
Mike
Ross,
an
attorney
with
Prince
LaBelle,
representing
29
hexagon
sandy
edge
Willie,
the
principal
we
have
we
are
in
August.
We
have
been
in
community
discussions
about
the
conversion
of
a
prep
to
a
private
club
on
29
Commonwealth
Avenue
from
a
mixed
office,
I
mean
from
an
office
building,
and
we
just
need
some
more
time
to
go
through
the
community
process.
We've
been
working
through
NAB
and
with
our
butters,
and
we
therefore
are
requesting
a
deferral
there.
A
Y
Being
addressed,
I
think
as
as
early
as
today,
we
have
a
letter,
but
the
other
matter
that's
associated
with
this
no
chair,
is
that
it's
a
conditional
use
as
a
private
club
and
I
think
it
might
have
been
Mis
arranged
on
the
agenda.
Doing
it
was
just
put
in
the
G
Cod
section
and
I
think
it
should
have
been
in
than
just
the
930
block
and.
Z
Z
C
Okay,
calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
seven
two
three
five
one:
three,
twenty
six
Lawrence
Street.
This
is
the
confirm.
Rt
is
a
single-family
dwelling,
renovate
all
flaws
of
the
single
family,
including
the
basement,
the
violations,
article
32
section
6g,
cod
brown,
water
conservation,
overlay,
district
applicability,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
Z
A
C
Z
A
AD
C
C
C
17Th,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
deferral
withdrawals?
Madam
chair?
We
do
have
one
as
withdrawn
and
I'm.
Gonna
call
it
in
for
the
Reckitt
calling
vo
a
6
8
7
9
6
8
3
33
71
23375
Washington
Street.
We
have
a
letter
from
the
lawyer
withdrawing
so
I'll
make
a
motion
for
denial
without
prejudice.
Second,.
A
A
A
C
This
is
the
change
our
currency
of
an
existing
garage
to
include
a
single-family
dwelling
above
and
located
in
the
rear
of
the
existing
to
family
dwelling,
the
violations
out
of
Oakland
56,
section
forty
point
to
one
to
two
or
more
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot,
article
56
section,
eight
Reyat,
is
insufficient.
Article
56
section,
eight
point
two
lot:
frontage
in
article
56,
section
eight
side
yacht.
Is
it
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please
good.
N
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
James
Christopher,
with
the
business
of
odd
address
at
4:15,
Neponset
have
RC
LLC
with
the
project:
architects,
we're
going
by
the
property
owner
Frank
Tebow,
with
an
address
of
131
Maple
Street
in
West
Roxbury.
This
project
is
to
change
the
occupancy
of
an
existing
second
level
in
the
rear
garage
to
a
dwelling
unit.
N
AF
N
N
I
don't
have
my
zoning
shot,
but
the
the
existing
footprint
madam
chair
is
for
the
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
property
is
four
feet
from
the
desaad
yard:
five
foot,
four
from
the
rear
and
nine
foot,
one
from
the
to
the
left
side
of
the
property.
If
you're
facing
the
structure
and
there's
no
change
to
that.
K
K
AG
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Jack
Duggan
neighbor'ood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
So
last
week
the
notices
were
sent
out
for
this
hearing
today
and
I
was
at
that
time.
I
received
about
20-plus
calls
from
the
neighbors
saying
they
were
unaware
of
any
of
butter's
meeting
or
neighbor
council
meeting
which
were
held
back
in
April.
AG
H
A
Just
for
the
record,
you
know
we've
never
been
completely
supportive
of
having
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot,
especially.
We
are
concerned
about
the
conversions
of
garages
into
dwelling
units
which
just
changes,
the
the
scope
and
the
feeling
of
a
company
bahut.
So
just
so
that
that's
that's
put
out
there.
A
C
This
is
change
of
use
from
a
single-family
dwelling
to
an
office
use.
The
project
site
will
also
include
certain
accessory
cultural
uses,
such
as
educational
displays
and
programs
and
house
tours
at
the
project
site
the
violations
article
55
section,
fifty
five,
forty,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient
for
office
use.
Nautical
fifty-five
section
eight
office
uses
forbidden
in
a
two
F
5,000
sub
district
in
article
55
section,
eight
accessory
cultural
uses
is
a
forbidden
use
to
have
five
thousand
sub
district
name
in
the
address
for
the
record,
please
Marvis.
F
You
attorney
with
Gulen
stores
here
on
behalf
of
the
Emerald
Necklace
Conservancy
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
James
Michael
Curley
house,
is
owned
by
the
George
Robert
white
fund,
with
the
City
of
Austin.
Acting
as
trustee
the
building
was
constructed
in
1915
as
a
primary
residence
of
James
Michael
Curley.
It
was
designated
as
a
landmark
building
in
1989.
The
appellant
was
chosen
by
the
city
through
an
RFP
process,
to
least
a
portion
of
the
building
which
is
currently
under
utilized,
consisting
of
the
second
floor
and
a
person.
F
F
Interior
work
to
accommodate
the
office
use
and
there
will
be
no
exterior
work
to
the
building.
As
you
may
know,
the
appellant
is
a
nonprofit
organization
whose
mission
is
to
protect
and
promote
the
landscape,
waterways
and
parkways
of
the
Emerald
Necklace
park
system.
It's
consistent
with
the
goals
of
the
city's
RFP,
the
penile.
It's
uniquely
positioned
to
partner
with
the
city
of
Boston,
to
reserve
the
aesthetic
and
historical
value
of
the
building.
We
believe
that
reactivation
of
the
property
will
serve
the
community
very
well
and
create
social
benefits,
cultural
amenities
and
as
also
educational
opportunities.
A
AH
AH
That
that
aim,
that
comes
through
through
the
city
took
this
property
with
the
George
Robert
white
fund.
Money
Curley
was
mayor
and
caused
Joy's
Robert
by
fun
to
leave
is
a
state
to
the
city,
so
there's
that
connection
from
the
very
beginning,
but
what's
more
important,
now
is
what
is
being
offered
by
the
Emerald
Necklace
outstanding
organization,
things
that
pull
Curley
and
this
organization
together
at
earlier
times,
they
were
both
named
at
the
same
time
as
important
antique
historic
organizations.
The
entities
were
the
same.
AH
Also
the
major
portion
of
the
Emerald
Necklace
is
across
the
street.
You
go
out
the
front
door
of
this
building
of
this
house
and
walk
across
the
street
you're
in
one
of
the
major
parts
of
the
Emerald
Necklace,
including
Jamaica
pond
I
used
to
ride
horseback
on
that
land,
and
he
is
one
that
was
a
trail
going
right
across
right
along
this
street
across
from
the
house.
I
used
to
take
James,
Michael,
Curley
and
I
would
roll
for
him
upon
while
he
went
fishing.
AH
These
are
the
connections
that
are
there
I'll,
even
go
so
far
to
tell
you
that
I
could
see
the
pond
other.
My
bedroom
window-
this
is
a
coming
together
of
the
Emerald
Necklace
and
the
change
Michael
Curley
house
in
the
history
of
that
gentleman,
my
stepfather
and
it's
like
a
marriage.
It's
forever
I
urge
you
to
vote
in
favor
of
what's
proposed.
Thank
you.
A
AH
AI
J
AM
A
C
AE
Certainly,
the
existing
zoning
here
is
2.
F
6000
is
a
currently
large
commercial
building
occupying
the
site.
It
was
used
as
a
contract
contractors
warehouse
to
this,
the
it's
not
showing
well
on
the
plans
that
have
been
distributed
with
the
handouts,
but
but
just
just
to
set
the
forefront.
That
is
the
existing
news,
that
building
will
be
demolished
and
it
will
be
erected
to
two
family
buildings.
AE
One
position
in
the
front
of
the
log
with
one
entrance
on
chicken
table
and
one
entrance
on
Bowman
and
the
other
one
10
feet
away
between
the
two
two
families
and
both
entrance
manages
are
on
Bowman
Street.
It
is
a
corner
lot,
as
you
can
see
in
the
handout
and
the
violations
that
we're
seeking
the
front
yard
is
Chicot
Ovid
Street
there
we're
safer
frontpoint.
AE
The
front
lot
line
here-
one
main
entrance-
does
free
phase
chicken
tobot,
but
the
other
townhouses
positioned
on
bowman
street.
So
that
would
explain
that
violation.
This
the
two
buildings
on
a
lot
or
side
yard
violation
in
Dorchester
article
65,
in
the
application
of
dimensional
requirements
section
it
allows
two
buildings
on
a
lot
as
long
as
you
double
the
side
yard.
AE
Here
we
have
a
10
foot,
10
inch
side
yard
in
a
10
foot
side
yard
requirement,
therefore,
because
it's
not
doubled
that
that
is
the
reason
for
that
violation,
although
we
are
cited
for
FA,
are
here
and
correctly,
because
it's
an
erection
permit
as
opposed
to
an
alteration
as
I
mentioned.
At
the
beginning,
the
floor
area
ratio
is
actually
being
substantially
reduced
from
the
existing
floor
area
gross
floor.
J
AE
AE
A
AE
AD
AE
AN
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
David
Carter
from
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We've
had
a
very
long
community
process
for
this
project,
and
the
development
team
has
been
very
responsive
to
the
comments
we've
received
from
the
community.
They've
increased
offsite
parking
and
reduce
the
bedroom
count
in
the
units,
as
requested
at
these
meetings
and
the
abutters
are
now
in
support,
and
we
would
also
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you
for
them.
Madam.
A
C
Next
case,
calling
VOA
727
377
34
Arcadia
Street.
This
is
to
extend
living
space
to
the
basement.
In
connection
with
the
first
floor
unit,
the
violations,
article
9
section
1,
the
building
is
an
existing
three
family
and
a
two
family
zone.
The
proposed
work
creates
an
extension
of
an
existing
non-conforming
use,
the
violation
article
69
section
9,
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basin
worsens
the
existing
FAI
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
hi.
AP
AP
A
AP
A
AP
AQ
A
C
You
calling
boa
seven
one:
five,
zero
six
one,
eighty
nine
seven
Hill
Avenue,
there's
also
a
companion
case
with
Building
Code,
boa
seven,
one:
five:
zero,
six,
zero.
Eighty,
nine
Savin
Hill
Avenue.
This
is
to
add
a
new
bathroom
laundry
playroom
in
a
home
office
in
the
basement.
As
per
as
part
of
unit
one,
the
violations,
article
65
section,
nine,
the
fluid
ei
ratio
is
excessive.
C
AR
AR
AR
L
C
A
AR
AR
A
AN
One
mountain
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name
is
David
Carter
from
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
request
a
deferral.
There
was
some
miscommunication.
We
haven't
had
a
chance
to
hold
and
abutters
meeting
in
the
appropriate
community
meetings.
We
were
requesting
a
deferral
until
those
meetings
can
happen.
Thank
you.
A
C
C
J
C
Next
case,
following
VOA
six,
three
one:
five,
six
375
Sydney
Street:
this
is
erect
a
new
three
family
house.
Roof
deck
violation
is
article
65
section.
Eight
three
family
is
forbidden,
use
in
this
location,
article
65,
section:
nine,
it's
fish
a
lot
with
article
65
insufficient
lot.
Frontage,
article
65,
excessive
FA
are
article
65,
excessive
number
of
stories.
Article
65,
insufficient
front
yard
setback,
article
65,
section,
nine,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
an
article
65
section,
nine,
insufficient
rear
yard
setback;
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
Mahoney.
AE
AE
AE
I'm
sure
he
just
handed
out
a
handout
just
giving
a
synopsis
of
the
proposed
building,
as
well
as
a
full
set
to
the
board
to
the
architects
of
the
board.
Mr.
Pazhani,
what
we
have
on
the
site
is:
is
a
single-family
home
in
horrible
disrepair,
they'll
be
demolished
in
a
we're
proposing
to
erect
a
new
two
family
building
with
two
parking
spaces.
Where
previously
there
was
none.
The
parking
is
located
in
the
rear
yard.
One
full-size
space
as
requiring
half
feet
by
20
in
one
compact
space
again,
as
required
7
feet
by
18
feet.
AE
The
side
yard
requirement
here
is
10
feet.
It's
met
on
the
right
side.
It
is
not
met
on
the
left
side,
which
is
consistent
with
the
existing
condition.
Additionally,
the
building
height
is
a
violation.
It's
a
three
storey
building.
This
zoning
sub-district
rule
allows
for
a
two
and
a
half
story
in
35
feet,
so
it
is
below
the
35
feet,
but
is
three
full
stories.
The
front
yard
is
a
15
foot,
front
yard
or
existing
building
alignment,
and
we
have
proposed
four
feet:
11
inches,
which
is
consistent
with
some
of
the
buildings
on
this.
AE
Rear
yard
requirement
is
31
feet,
five
inches
and
we're
proposing
28
feet,
10
inches,
so
we're
seeking
the
slightly
less
than
3
feet
or
2
foot
5
inch
variance
for
that
and
largely
because
of
parking
maneuverability,
the
justly
there's
a
use
file.
Asian.
As
I
mentioned,
it's
a
one,
f3000
district
we're
proposing
a
two-family.
Initially
we
started
as
a
three
family,
but
through
the
neighborhood
process
it
was
suggested
that
we
reduced
it
to
a
two
family.
AE
AE
A
AE
A
roof
deck,
that's
its,
it
meets
the
existing
excuse
me,
the
restricted
roof
structure
requirements.
It's
a
slope
of
less
than
five
feet.
The
deck
boards
would
be
less
than
a
foot
above
the
roof,
it's
less
than
10
percent
of
the
roof
area
or
330
square
feet,
whichever
is
greater,
but
it
is
17
feet
by
12
feet.
Access
by
hatch
and.
AE
AN
Madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name,
is
David
Carter
from
the
mayor's
office.
A
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
held
in
a
butters
meeting,
and
the
opponents
have
met
with
the
Columbia
Seven
Hills
Civic
achievement,
Civic
Association
at
least
three
times
and
they've
been
very
responsive
to
the
comments
we've
received.
As
was
mentioned
it.
This
project
originally
started
out
as
a
three
family,
and
it
has
been
reduced
to
a
two
family.
They've
also
increased
the
setback
and
added
a
significant
amount
of
green
space.
AN
AO
J
C
Is
one
hundred
and
twelve
units
of
mixed
income
rental
housing,
first
floor
retail
space
in
fifteen
close
parking
spaces,
the
violations,
article
55
section
16,
multi-family
dwelling
first
floor
is
forbidden.
Article
55,
section,
16
ancillary
parking
is
conditional,
use
article
55,
section
17
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
17,
the
height
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
17
usable
space
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
17
front
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
29,
section
8,
gpiod
enforcement
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AS
A
J
AU
C
L
AU
AV
AT
L
AV
A
AX
Well,
actually,
we've
been
having
discussions
with
various
city
departments
on
the
size.
You
know.
I
know
this
board
is
aware
of
the
minimums
that
we
have
given
you
in
a
written
memo.
However,
it
is
a
discussion
we've
had
for
probably
over
a
year
now
to
come
up
with
what
may
be
a
new
adjustment
in
sizes.
I
know
the
BPD
a
has
our
requirement
of
450
I
know.
Dmd
has
the
requirement
for
them,
which
are
sometimes
smaller
than
ours.
So
right
now,
what
we
are
trying
to
do
is
find
out
what
that
better
number
is.
G
AX
G
AX
AT
Yes
ma'am,
so
our
parking
requirements
are
based
on
knowledge
of
other
properties.
We
want
to
manage
in
the
area
and
also
market
studies
that
we've
completed.
So
our
our
intention
is
to
provide
adequate
parking
without
burdening
the
street
parking
in
the
neighborhood
for
the
residents
who
would
live
at
the
property
and.
A
AV
AT
G
AI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Alexander
all
des
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
to
support,
but
with
the
revisitation
of
assuring
that
is,
it
is
a
public
way
and
not
a
private
way.
I
know
the
discussion
has
been
going
back
and
forth
with
the
BPD
a
as
well
as
the
other
partners
from
the
other
name
of
the
project,
so
reassuring
that
it
stays
as
a
public
way,
not
a
private
way.
AJ
AY
Y
AY
Y
The
applicant
knows
well
about
this.
We
were
concerned
to
hear
the
words
pedestrian
roadway
when
in
fact,
the
BPD,
a
and
B
TD
and
others
have
consistently
agreed
that
that
perpendicular
portion
minimum
should
be
a
public
roadway,
and
so
we
would
ask
for
a
proviso
that
says
that
that
roadway
remain
public.
This
was
the
the
subject
that
we
had
outside
which
it
appeared
that
the
applicant
was
an
agreement
to
that
proviso.
Hopefully
that
can
happen.
Thank
you.
BA
AZ
Here
to
speak
in
support
of
the
project,
with
the
caveat
that
the
north-south
road,
the
first
segment
connecting
to
a
Murray
Street,
is
a
public
way.
This
has
been
the
subject
of
months
of
conversations
with
this
development
team
and
the
abutting
development
teams
to
assure
that
the
area
network
of
roads,
support
growth
in
the
area
and
support
the
both
this
project
and
the
planned
projects
that
are
in
the
area.
A
quick.
BA
Been
looking
at
the
parking
as
each
individual
project
has
come
in
we're
looking
holistically
at
the
whole
area.
Also,
there
is
a
mobility
action
plan
that
will
be
taken
place
is
starting.
This
fall
through
the
Boston
transportation
department.
They
will
be
definitely
be
looking
at
this
area.
So
that's
forthcoming
because.
A
We
know
this
is
underway.
The
rink
is
being
proposed
diagonally
across
the
street
and
then
there's
been
from
attorney
Ross,
unclear
and
understanding.
There's
a
new
proposed
project
and
a
couple
months
ago,
I
suppose
we
approved
another
project
on
further
down
the
street,
so
I'm
hoping
that's
all
involved
in
your
analysis.
Yes,.
AS
AW
BC
AS
AU
F
AU
L
AU
AU
This
was
approved
through
article
any
large
project
review
as
a
private
way.
There
was
language
in
the
article,
a
approval
directing
the
the
proponent
to
enter
negotiations
with
the
ax
butter
about
converting
that
into
a
public
way.
It
was
submitted
and
approved
through
article
ad
as
a
private
way.
We
have
been
in
negotiations
and
good-faith
negotiations
on
both
sides.
It's
a
it's
a
very
difficult
process.
There's
there's
cost-sharing.
A
AZ
Has
been
our
expectation
that
the
this
development
team,
as
well
as
the
abutting
teams,
would
work
out
a
public
way
solution
and
the
BPD
a
planning
staff
as
well
as
BTD,
as
well
as
the
public
Improvement
Commission,
have
been
spending
literally,
you
know
a
year
working
out
scenarios
for
this
to
become
a
public
way.
It's
pretty
critical
to
the
successful
growth
of
the
area,
and
we
would
certainly
welcome
a
proviso.
Let
this
be
a
public
way
as
part
of
your
approval.
A
C
The
next
case,
finally,
boa
7:04,
9601
26,
ria
calumet
street
there's
a
companion
case
of
building
code,
boa
7:04,
962,
126,
ria
calumet
street.
This
is
a
renovating,
an
existing
carriage
house
into
a
single
family.
This
is
one
of
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot.
The
violations
article
59
section
37-
would
cry
it
required
off.
Street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
59,
section
7
5
dwelling
unit
is
a
forbidden
news.
Article
59
section
8
the
floor.
Ta
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
59
section
8,
the
required
front
yard
is
excessive.
C
Article
59
section
8
in
a
residential
zoning
district.
The
main
entrance
of
the
dwelling
unit
shall
face
the
front
lot
line.
Article
59
section
8,
the
required
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
59
section
8,
the
required
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
59,
section
8
to
usable,
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
59,
section
38
to
dwellings
on
the
same
line.
This
is
for
Building
Code
section.
The
8th
edition,
780
CMR
705
point
for
materials
of
exterior
wall
materials.
Exterior
wall
shall
be
constructed
and
permitted
by
the
villain
type
of
construction.
C
AQ
A
BD
M
It's
been
an
existing
carriage
house
ever
since
met
the
savage
property's
intention
is
to
renovate
the
existing
building
into
a
three-bedroom
two-bath
residence.
They
currently
own
the
property
at
the
front
of
the
property
which
they've
owned
for
14
years.
They've
done
a
complete
renovation
of
that
property
as
well.
The
building,
though
not
historic,
has
significance
to
that.
The
neighborhood
there's
a
number
of
people
that
signed
the
letters
of
support.
M
BF
BD
BD
BD
A
BD
A
BD
L
BE
Kind
of
could
it's
it's
it's
similar
to
next
door.
Well,
many
don't
have
any
parking,
but
the
one
next
door
at
122
and
124
Calumet
Street
people
are
parking.
It
looks
like
on
the
122
Calumet
Street
parcel
to
provide
parking
for
the
rear
building
at
124,
Calumet
Street
parcel
and
they
have
three
cars
parking
on
that
driveway
tandem,
so
you'd
had
to
move
cars
for
that
scenario
as
well.
BG
BG
A
BD
BD
A
BD
BE
M
M
My
my
mother-in-law
grew
up
she's
one
of
the
powers
that
grew
up
on
the
on
Mission
Hill
and
she
remembers
playing
in
there
as
well,
and
it's
amazing
listening
to
some
of
the
older
people,
this
this
building
has
been
there
for
a
while,
it's
been
in
disrepair
and
when
Jason
bought
the
property
14
years
ago.
The
intention
was
were
to
do
something
with
it
and
now
it's
it's.
It's
come
to
our
attention.
J
BG
BE
AR
AC
AP
M
AU
L
L
BH
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Richard
rouse
and
the
executive
director
of
Mission
Hill
main
streets,
and
we
would
like
to
be
recorded
as
very
supportive
of
this
project,
because
mr.
savage
and
doing
the
Tobin
house
has
probably
done
probably
one
of
the
best
restorations
in
in
this
city.
One
of
the
precepts
of
Main
streets
is
preservation,
and
it
would
be
shame
if
this
carriage
house
would
be
lost
to
the
community.
BI
BI
The
project
is
definitely
a
something
that's
worth
doing,
because
it's
presently
it's
suffered
some
urban
decay
over
the
years
and
and
from
what
I
you
know.
If,
when
I
talk
to
the
seniors,
especially
Teresa
parks,
a
activist
in
the
area,
she
she
had
very
fond.
Memories
of
plein
air
as
a
child
and
unfortunate
in
hospital
and
I
was
Shanta
a
yes,
then
I
said
I'd
come
along
and
support
so
now
I
hardly
support
his
project.
J
BJ
Chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
at
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
at
the
moment,
just
based
on
the
response
that
I've
received
from
the
community.
As
of
late,
we
had
one
person
that
did
come
out
to
the
to
the
abutters
meeting
formally
and
after
that
we
have
received
a
petition
from
residents
direct
ly,
abutting
the
property
all
on
Pontiacs
tree,
which
is
Street
right
behind
it.
BJ
Residents
going
back
as
as
many
as
a
hundred
years
living
in
Mission
Hill
all
concerned
about
the
parcel
and
just
the
community
outreach
that
was
done,
claiming
that
there
just
wasn't
enough
communication.
We
also
have
support
from
the
community
lights
of
Mission
Hill,
but
it
just
seems
very
evenly
split
and
I
was
just
hoping
that
the
community
that
they
would
come
back
and
just
have
one
more
meeting
with
the
community
to
see
if
we
can
sort
it
out.
BK
AF
Secondly,
totally
broadly,
there
is
an
enormous
deck
in
the
back
of
this
property,
which
takes
about
probably
12
feet
by
8
feet
in
diameter,
and
it's
just
blocking
everything,
and
there
is
not
enough
egress
as
it
is
this
property,
as
it
is
already
have
a
basement
level
occupied
by
people
occupying
the
Attic
I
mean
they're,
trying
to
put
people
everywhere.
They
might
as
well
just
built
something
in
the
front,
also
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
and
it's
just
trying
to
throw
more
people
in
this
place.
AF
We
are
neighbors,
we
are
people
the
living
in
Mission
Hill.
We
don't
we're
not
renting.
We've
live
in
there
with
the
neighbors
and
we're
maintaining
our
property
and
trying
to
preserve
a
neighborhood.
This
is
training
our
excess.
Our
house
sits
back
behind
this
house
and
it's
just
gonna
create
more
problems.
BL
Right,
my
name
is
Mary
Curran
I
live
at
63,
Pontiac
Street
I've
been
there
for
43
years,
I'm
gonna
direct
the
butter
I
did
pass
a
letter
that
I
might
be
able
to
read
and
it
has
the
signatures
of
everyone
on
Pontiac
Street
that
our
butters
director
butters
residents,
longtime
people,
this
tolling
carriage
house
that
has
been
nothing's
been
done
to
it
in
42
years.
That
I've
seen
now
all
of
a
sudden,
that's
a
historical
preservation.
BL
BL
A
BL
On
behalf
of
the
residents
of
Pontiac
Street
Roxbury
Mass
we're
ready
to
express
our
strong
opposition
to
own
and
Jason
Savage
proposed
renovation
to
one
since
26,
are
Calumet
Street
and
urge
the
Board
of
Appeals
to
stop
the
process
and
reverse
any
prior
approvals
regarding
this
property.
Mr.
Jason
Savage
did
not,
as
he
stated
in
his
letter,
place,
leaflets
on
all
the
buddist
property.
Nobody
on
Pontiac
Street
was
notified,
we're
all
direct
the,
but
it's
no
owner
resident
products
received
any
letters.
BL
Are
any
meetings
to
be
held
by
the
Mission
Hill
Community
Alliance
had
any
of
us
been
lethal
in
it.
We
would
have
informed
all
neighbors
and
attended
the
meeting
in
opposition.
There
was
no
notice
our
opportunity
to
be
heard,
as
he
claims
renovations
would
negatively
affect
our
properties
as
the
wall
abuts
many
properties
on
connieyc
street,
and
that
structural
integrity
would
be
composed
and
compromised
and
dangerous.
BL
These
abutting
properties
may
have
that
we
have
many
children
who
play
in
the
odds
and
it
would
impact
neighborhood
children
as
their
safety
would
be
an
issue,
and
these
are
grandchildren
of
the
kids
that
grew
up
in
many
of
these
properties.
These
renovations
proposed
a
completely
I
character
for
this
puzzle.
Mr.
savage
has
owned
espousal
for
more
than
eight
years
now
we
have
14
and
has
done
nothing
to
better
on
maintain
the
current
carriage
home
structure.
BL
He
claims
these
renovations
are
making
that
making
it
to
a
single-family
home.
We've
preserved
the
carriage
houses,
historical
identity,
when,
in
fact
it
would
change
it
from
a
carriage
house
to
a
simple
single
family,
with
many
bedrooms
sitting
right
now,
backyards
occupied
by
numerous
students,
the
area
is
already
too
dense.
Mr.
savage
has
already
turned
the
one-family.
126
qaida
meant
Tobin's
homes
into
three
units
with
numerous
bedrooms.
A
three-bedroom
two
four
bedroom
unit
in
the
carriage
house
is
an
unacceptable
burden
on
this
area.
BL
This
is
another
example
of
a
developer,
turning
Mission
Hill
into
nothing,
but
a
student
daunted
commentary
for
the
both
of
their
own
breeding
game.
It's
happened
time
again:
longtime
residents,
people
whose
families
grew
up.
We
stayed
in
the
hill.
We
dug
our
roots
in.
We
stayed
Mission
Hill,
Little
League,
the
church,
the
schools.
We
did
everything
we
could
to
do
our
best
to
keep
Mission
Hill
on
its
feet.
Everything
that
we've
been
through.
Thank
you
thank
you.
AK
A
J
BE
BE
M
AQ
A
AC
C
C
Go
ahead
and
go
back
to
the
930
cases,
calling
VOA
seven
two:
three:
five:
one:
zero
14:55
to
1459
Tremont's
tree:
this
is
demolition
of
an
existing
building
erect
a
new
five-story
mixed-use.
Building
on
the
ground
floor
will
be
for
indoor
parking
spaces,
one
professional
office,
one
private
club
meeting
rooms
and
one
restaurant
on
floors.
Two
to
five
will
be
40
residential
units.
There
will
be
a
common
roof
deck
for
all
building
tenants.
The
violation
is
article
59,
section
15.
C
The
accessory
parking
on
the
first
floor
is
conditional
article
59,
6
and
16
the
floating
a
ratio,
his
excessive
article,
59,
section
16,
the
building
height
of
success
of
article
59,
section
16
riyaad
is
insufficient
article
59,
section
37.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BC
BC
We
went
to
become
to
my
right,
his
wife
Susie,
and
to
my
left,
Mike
Anderson
from
the
architectural
firm
of
I'm,
sorry
Danny,
Anderson
from
the
architectural
firm
of
Anderson
and
Porter.
What
is
before
you
today
is
a
proposed
five-story,
mixed-use
department
building
to
be
constructed
on
the
corner
of
tremon
and
Parker
Street
in
the
Mission
Hill
area
we
are
seeking
variances,
for
if
they
are
ICRISAT
back
and
parking,
there
is
an
existing
building
on
the
site,
Knights
of
Columbus
building,
which
will
be
demolished.
BC
The
Mission
Hill
flats,
as
the
project
is
referred
to,
has
completed
article
80,
small
project
review
and
a
certificate
of
compliance
has
been
issued.
The
developer
has
engaged
the
Mission
Hill
neighborhood
housing
service
association
with
a
memorandum
of
agreement
and
understanding
that
will
limit
the
number
of
undergraduate
students
to
25%
of
the
tenants
in
the
building.
There
are
other
concessions
that
are
part
of
this
Memorandum
of
Understanding,
which
is
available
to
all
the
board
members,
if
you
like,
or
any
questions
I,
would
ask
direct
them
to
to
be
an
innocent
or
to
mr.
BC
A
BN
So
taking
them
one
at
a
time
the
the
floor
area
ratio
is
allowable
at
2.0
and
we're
asking
for
relief
at
the
level
of
5.0.
The
height
is
at
45
feet
and
we're
asking
for
55
feet.
So
it's
a
five-story
building
and
the
rear
yard
setback
would
be
typically
20
feet
and
we're
asking
for
relief
to
to
encroach
to
the
rear
yard
line.
BN
BN
G
BN
Can't
least
approximately
so
there's
ten
units
per
floor,
there
are
4-1
bedrooms
per
floor
and
six
studio
apartments
per
floor.
They,
the
studios
average
450
to
500
square
feet
and
the
one
bedrooms
are
five,
are
550
to
650.
So
the
total
square
footage
for
the
units
believe
is
just
under
30,000
square
feet.
A
BN
Going
through
the
BPD
process,
we
had
initially
come
forward
with
with
a
larger
number
of
parking,
and
it
was
a
recommendation
that
the
project
go
forward
as
a
transit,
oriented
development
with
no
parking
and
what
we
requested
to
come
back
with
was
some
accessory
parking,
in
particular
to
handicapped
parking
spaces
to
serve
the
two
handicapped
accessible
units.
There
is
a
intention
to
do
two
tandem
parked
smart
cars
for
the
use
of
the
building
tenants
and
then
one
accessory
space
for
building
management.
A
The
this
relief
goes
with
the
building,
not
the
ownership
or
the
management
company,
or
anything
like
that.
How
are
you
going
to
ensure
that
this
this
really
goes
into
perpetuity
for
as
long
as
that,
building
is
up
that
there
there
are
going
to
be
the
equivalent
of
the
next
generation
of
smart
cars.
A
BN
BO
Think
it
was
our
innovative
approach
and
from
talking
with
the
community
and
dealing
with
the
congestion
a
long
time
on
Street
and
it
speaks
directly
to
the
type
of
project
that
we're
doing
this
green
type
of
project.
So
we're
trying
to
encourage
reduce
car
ownership,
and
this
was
a
an
innovative
solution
that
we
came
up
with
and
that
the
DPD
am
and
the
community
as
well
supports.
A
AC
AC
AC
BO
If
I
make,
if
I
made
sure
I
guess
the
the
the
the
additional
smart
car
parking
was
just
an
add-on
to
the
transit-oriented
development
of
parking
spaces
for
each
unit
and
the
easy
accessibility
to
the
to
the
buses
and
train.
So
that
was
just
an
additional
add-on
that
we
decided
to
provide
for
tenant
use
for
the
building
to
to
be
attractive.
But
I
think
that
the
transit
oriented
development
in
the
situation
of
our
location
of
the
property
is
really
how
we're
going
to
guarantee
that
you
know
we
can
reduce.
BO
BJ
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
They
did
go
through
an
extensive
community
outreach
process
where
the
neighbors
are
all
seem
to
be
in
favor
and
its
support
and
welcoming
of
this
new
concept
coming
to
Mission
Hill.
So
we
would
like
to
and
record
and
support.
J
O
Morning
my
name
is
matt
perkins,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
roxbury
council,
knights
of
columbus
building
association,
along
with
mr.
nawaki
from
the
association,
and
we
are
in
support
of
the
application.
Specifically
after
the
association.
It
will
give
them
a
meeting
room,
so
they
can
continue
to
provide
services
to
the
committee.
So.
O
AX
BI
BH
A
C
Lost
case
for
nine
30s
following
VOA,
six,
nine,
eight,
four,
six
one,
two,
ninety
three
Northampton
Street
this
is
this-
is
a
use
of
premises
as
a
public
parking
lot
for
a
fee.
The
capacity
is
nineteen
vehicles
with
one
handicap
parking
space
and
eighteen
regular
parking
spaces
beyond
the
expect
expiration
date
of
November
30th
of
2017
violations,
article
6
section,
four
current
conditions
permit
expires
on
November,
30th,
2017
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
attorney.
BP
David,
a
godly
Law
Offices
of
Edward,
a
Gottlieb
309,
Washington,
Street
and
bright,
and
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
This
office
represents
applicant
Northampton
parking
LLC,
the
owner
of
293
Northampton
street
and
Stanhope
Garage
Inc,
the
operator
of
the
parking
lot
at
2,
93
Northampton
Street.
The
applicant
seeks
to
continue
to
use
the
premises
as
a
fee
paid
public
parking
lot
for
a
capacity
of
19
vehicles
beyond
the
expiration
date
of
November
30
2017.
BP
The
property
is
professionally
managed,
pay
fence
and
there
are
plants
placed
near
the
fence
of
the
parking
lot
on
Northampton
Street.
There
was
an
iron
fence
which
has
been
built
on
the
Northampton
Street
side
of
the
property.
I
contacted
the
Claremont
Neighborhood
Association
to
set
up
a
neighborhood
meeting
with
the
group.
The
Claremont
Neighborhood
Association
did
not
see
an
need
to
meet
with
me
and
sent
me
a
letter
of
support
address
to
the
board
of
appeal.
I
asked
that
that
letter
be
entered
into
the
record
if
the
proposed
use
is
allowed
to
be
continued.
BP
The
the
useful
in
fact
benefit
the
neighborhood
by
aiding
and
reducing
unnecessary
traffic
in
the
area
from
events
at
Matthews,
Arena
and
Boston
Symphony
Hall.
In
the
many
new
restaurants,
no
nuisance
will
be
created
by
the
proposed
use
in
its
2014
decision.
The
Board
found
that
the
parking
area
provided
much-needed,
off-street
public
parking
and
it
properly
maintained
and
professionally
managed
ostry
parking
facility.
We
respectfully
request
that
the
board
grant
our
appeal
and
that
we
are
able
to
continue
to
use
the
premises
for
parking
19
vehicles
until
November
30,
2020,
Thank
You
councillor.
BP
G
BQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Sam
chambers
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
with
the
proviso
that
the
applicant
continue
to
work
with
neighborhood
in
terms
of
beautification
of
that
lot.
But,
as
the
applicant
has
stated,
they
do
have
a
letter
of
non
opposition
from
the
Clermont
Neighborhood
Association,
as
long
as
they
continue
the
upkeep
of
their
property.
Thank
you.
A
A
BP
Attorney
David
Gottlieb
Law,
Offices
of
Edward,
a
Gottlieb
309,
Washington,
Street
and
Brighton.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
This
office
represents
beth
beck,
Southend
carriage
LLC,
the
owner
of
332
to
340
Summer
Street
and
Stanhope
Garage
Inc,
the
operator
of
the
parking
lot
at
332
to
340
Summer
Street.
The
applicant
seeks
to
continue
to
use
the
premises
for
a
public
parking
lot
for
a
fee
capacity.
40
vehicles,
the
use
permit,
expires
December
31
2017
under
the
Bo.
BP
A
decision
dated
March
8th
2016,
the
City
of
Austin
last
approved
the
parking
use
after
a
hearing
on
February
9
2016
and
the
permit
issued
after
earlier
design
review
of
plans
by
the
VRA
in
the
Fort
Point
District
Landmarks
Commission.
We
recently
submitted
an
application
to
the
Boston
Transportation
Department
for
Stanhope
garage
and
renew
their
open-air
parking
lot
license
from
July
1
2017
to
the
June
30th
2018
for
the
property.
BP
The
property
is
professionally
managed
paved
and
there
are
planters
placed
on
the
side
of
the
property
which
borders
West
service
road.
The
site
is
appropriate
for
such
use
and
the
use
will
not
adversely
affect
the
neighborhood.
There
will
be
no
serious
had
a
hazard
to
vehicles
or
pedestrians,
no
nuisance
will
be
created,
appropriate
facilities
are
provided
and
it
will
serve
a
parking
demand
not
adequately
provided
for
by
public
transportation,
and
the
use
of
the
premises
will
not
significantly
contribute
to
traffic
flow.
BP
I
contacted
the
Fort
Point
Neighborhood
Association
and
I,
presented
before
the
group
on
Tuesday
May
3rd
23rd
2017
at
factories
63
located
on
Melcher's
Street.
The
members
asked
questions
of
me
and
I
answered
those
questions
in
detail.
I
asked
that
the
group
submit
a
letter
of
support
on
my
behalf
to
the
board
of
Appeal.
I
would
like
to
enter
a
copy
of
that
letter
into
the
record.
BP
The
little
Hut
is
where
the
person
stands,
the
attendant
that's
on
west
service
Road,
and
that
gives
the
information
of
the
license
how
many
cars
can
park
there.
You
also
see
that
West
Service
Road
we
go
out,
we
plow
it
and
we
sweep
it.
That's
where
the
planter
is
a
place.
There
see
there's
six
planters
reaching
from
the
from
that
bridge.
The
Summer
Street
Bridge,
where
West's
service
road
goes
under
to
the
restaurant
on
that
plane
of
West's
service
road.
A
AQ
BS
R
A
A
A
C
Boa
7
192
329
a
street.
This
erect
a
new
six
storey
residential
building
containing
nine
dwelling
units.
A
nine
parking
space
is
one
handicap.
An
8
mechanical
stack
as
the
violation
to
article
8
section
7
multi-family
dwelling
units
is
a
conditional
use
in
this
zoning
sub-district
article
13
section
4
dwelling
in
a
non
residential
district
article
14
section
14,
one
minimum
lot
size
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
14,
section,
14
large
area
required
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
14
section
14
3
the
floor.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
C
Article
15,
section
1,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
23,
section
9,
our
street
parking
design
and
access
with
manoeuvrability.
Article
16
section
1,
building
height
requirement
is
excessive.
Article
17,
section
1
they
require
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
18
section
1,
the
minimum
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
18
section
1,
the
minimum
front
yard
requirement
on
West
4th
Street
is
insufficient.
An
article
20
section
1.
The
minimum
Riyadh
requirement
is
insufficient
even
address
for
the
record.
Please
Patrick.
AE
Chair
proposing
the
demolition
of
an
existing
scrap
metal,
business
and
the
erection
of
a
nine
unit,
residential
dwelling
building
with
nine
parking
spaces,
eight
of
which
are
automated
parking
spaces
and
one
is
a
handicapped
space.
It's
on
a
corner
lot
on
a
and
silver
Street
the
proposed
building,
I.
Guess
it
actually
is
worth
mentioning
it's
in
an
m1.
It's
an
m1
sewing
zoning
sub
district,
which
is
the
underlying
base
code.
AE
However,
although
not
zoning,
yet
it's
in
the
Dorchester
Ave
planning
initiative
and
a
lot
of
the
considerations
in
terms
of
height
density
and
parking
were
designed
to
meet
or
be
consistent
with
that
Dorchester
out
of
planning
initiative,
which
again
is
not
zoning
but
design
principles
instituted
by
the
Boston
BPD.
A
the
the
building
consists
of
four
one-bedroom
units
for
two-bedroom
units
in
one
three-bedroom
unit,
the
one-bedroom
units
are
890
square
feet.
The
two-bedroom
units
are
thirteen
hundred
and
twenty-five
square
feet
in
the
three-bedroom
unit
is
1923
square
feet.
AE
AE
They're
in
again
the
reason
there
is
a
number
of
violations.
The
zoning-
that's
is
an
m1
district
and
it's
in
the
process
of
being
changed.
This
isn't
part
of
article
68.
This
is
the
underlying
the
it's
residential
dwelling
units
that
are
being
proposed,
so
we'd
use
the
H.
The
nearest
age
district,
which
would
be
an
h1,
is
the
BH
a
housing
development,
the
building
height
there
would
be
50
feet.
This
is
in
excess
of
that
at
69,
feet,
11
inches
again,
almost
half
of
what's
suggested
in
the
dorcester,
our
planning
initiative,
which
is
120
feet.
AE
The
parking
is
consistent
with
with
zoning.
We
are
cited
for
parking
maneuverability
and
the
reason
for
that
is
the
exclusive
manoeuvrability
or
lack
thereof
of
the
automated
parking.
So
we
have
nine
units
and
nine
spaces.
Point
nine
is
what
would
be
required
under
the
underlying
base
code,
but
each
space
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
pull
out
on
its
own,
because
it's
an
automated
parking
system.
AE
AE
BB
The
first
two
stalls
that
you
see
as
you
pull
into
the
driveway
there,
that's
a
two
two
spots
on
grade
and
two
above
and
one
space
is
left
blank.
So
it's
a
rotational
system
and
then
the
two
at
the
bottom
of
the
plan.
That
is
the
same
thing
where
there's
two
spaces
on
grade
two
spaces
above
in
two
spaces
below
in
a
pit.
So
there's
a
total
of
five
spaces.
There.
L
AE
G
AE
A
AE
J
BB
A
L
L
AE
L
AE
AQ
BS
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Lauren
Miller
City
Council
bill
winning
hands
office.
We
too
wish
to
go
on
record
and
support.
As
John
Ellison
stated,
we
did
hold
in
a
butters
meeting
and
there
was
the
arrow
opposition
and,
in
addition
to
that,
our
office
feels
like
this
development
would
will
fit
in
well
with
that
pot
of
soul,
Boston
Thank,
You
Man.
A
C
J
B
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Niles
Sutphin
I'm,
the
architect
for
the
project
my
address
is
197
8th
Street
in
Charlestown.
This
is
an
article
80
project.
I
am
here
to
ask
the
board
for
a
short
deferral,
since
we
have
now
allowed
the
project
to
proceed
to
the
point
where
we
will
be
making
our
presentation
to
the
BPD,
a
directors
on
the
14th
of
September.
So
we
are
asking
the
board
if
it
would
be
possible
to
schedule
us,
then
reschedule
are
coming
to
the
before
your
board
on
the
19th
of
September.
A
B
C
AE
A
A
BT
A
BT
Yes,
we've
finished:
we've
had
very
strong
support
in
the
community.
We've
been
asked
to
push
off
the
the
actual
hearing
until
the
community
process.
Around
changes
to
the
billboard
rules
has
finished
up
and
we've
been
told,
that's
not
going
to
happen
until
after
the
new
year,
our
preference
is
to
defer
until
a
February
date,
if
possible.
We.
AD
A
A
C
AD
O
BD
A
A
C
Go
right
back
to
the
10:30
hearings,
calling
bo
a
7200,
5
5
193
to
195
State
Street.
This
is
to
change
oxy
to
a
hotel.
78
guestrooms
for
tourism
horizontally,
extended
floors,
six
to
eight
so
aligned
with
the
main
front
and
rear
facade
walls.
Just
combine
this
building
with
181
191,
State
Street
and
construct
new
guestrooms
and
modify
sprinkler
system
and
mechanical
systems.
The
violations
article
25
section
5.
What
has
the
district's
article
45
section?
540?
A
ratio
is
excessive
name,
an
address
for
the
record.
BU
BU
The
request
before
you
today
is
unique
in
what
I
think
are
two
circumstances.
The
first
is
that
the
applicant
before
you
today,
mr.
Hagopian,
not
only
is
known
to
this
board
and
to
the
city
of
Boston
as
an
existing
owner
and
operator
of
a
hotel,
but
in
fact
of
the
subject
property
so
that
we
have
a
very
good
record
on
which
to
base
the
application
for
you.
Mr.
Hagopian
currently
owns
and
operates
the
harbor
side
in
which
is
the
adjacent
181
property
referenced.
BU
We
see
families
coming
in
as
well
as
business
people
and
tourists
to
the
city,
and
so
this
proposal
is
too
extend
the
existing
Harborside
in
which
currently
provides
rooms
at
a
rate
that
is
15
to
25
percent
lower
than
its
competitors
in
terms
of
price.
So
many
rooms
are
in
the
existing.
The
existing
hotels,
116
rooms-
and
this
proposed
addition
is
for
additional
78
rooms,
so
it
would
be
a
total
of
194
rooms.
A
BU
Significance
of
the
arrow
is
that
you're
on
the
second
page,
madam
Chan.
Yes,
so
the
significance
of
the
arrow
is
that
these
are
different
bays.
The
bay
that
we
are
talking
about
is
the
bay
below
the
arrow,
so
the
one
all
the
way
to
the
far
corner
continues
to
be
a
residential
condominium
and
there
will
be
no
change
to
the
upper
level
of
that,
so
that
the
line
of
sight
there
will
remain
unchanged
where
the
arrow
is
is
where
we're
proposing
to
add,
as
there
are
to
the
left
of
the
arrow,
the
additional
space.
BU
A
W
BF
BU
The
flood
hazard
district
is
a
factual
citation
and
that
the
property
is
in
fact
located
in
that
district.
However,
as
the
statutory
language
is
written,
it
is
impacted
when
there
is
drudging
or
any
work
done
to
the
bottom
of
the
premises.
There's
absolutely
no
work
being
done
to
the
bottom
of
the
premises,
those
lower
floors
of
the
premises
that
would
in
any
way
trigger
that.
A
BU
BV
Okay,
that
is
actually
the
building
code,
allows
you
to
provide
artificial
light
in
an
artificial
air
HVAC
systems.
However,
the
sanitary
code
requires
that
a
residential
building
have
natural
light,
and
in
this
case
it's
a
it's
a
sort
of
commercial.
It's
not
really
a
one
in
two
family
building,
it's
it's
a
hotel,
so
we
are
providing
the
natural
ventilation
through
the
mechanical
systems,
as
well
as
natural
light.
L
L
BV
BW
C
Y
Almost
afternoon
chair
member
support,
my
name
is
Mike
Ross
I'm,
an
attorney
with
Prince
low
bail
I'm
here
representing
my
client
Sandy
Edgerly
of
hexagon
properties,
as
well
as
with
our
architect
guy
Grassi.
We
are
here
on
an
amendment
to
a
existing
permit,
a
lodging
house,
23
lodging
house
rooms
and
what
the
amendment
will
do
is
add
a
penthouse
and
in
so
doing
sorry,
I
have
some
plans
I'm
gonna
hand
out
to
the
board.
Y
The
actual
penthouse
portion
of
the
plans
are
from
8
4
to
a
7
and
because
the
penthouse
represents
new
space,
we
were
flagged
with
the
the
use,
conditional
use
violation
and
that's
why
we're
before
the
board,
we've
had
meetings
in
the
community
and
outreach,
and
we
think
this
is
fairly
self-explanatory.
We're
happy
to
walk
you
through
the
plans,
more
detail.
A
Y
The
existing
building
prior
to
the
penthouse
was
a
22
unit,
lodging
house
building
with
the
addition
of
the
penthouse
we're
now
up
to
23
units.
The
the
penthouse
itself
is
312
square
feet,
and
it
also
has
an
outdoor
deck.
The
access
to
the
penthouse
is
just
to
anyone
who
rents
that
particular
room
and
the
access
to
the
deck
is
to
anyone
who
rents
that
particular
room.
Y
J
A
BJ
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board
just
saw
her
at
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
They
had
community.
They
had
a
committee
process
with
to
it,
which
was
both
favorable
and
support
of
this
plan
coming
into
the
neighborhood.
So
we
would
like
to
see
them
go
through.
J
T
A
BX
G
BX
Know
I
I
don't
know
actually
when
it's
been
historically
I
think
it's
been
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
the
records.
I'm.
Sorry
I,
don't
know
exactly
how
we
assess
the
building
about
here
two
years
ago,
operated
it
as
it
was
per
year
and
then
we've
been
closed
under
renovation,
so
upgrading
the
spaces.
BX
BX
A
A
C
On
to
the
next
one,
following
VOA,
seven
one,
eight
three:
zero
to
150
six
to
164
Bunker,
Hill
Street.
This
is
to
meet,
maintain
the
Arkin,
see
and
remove
the
revised,
though
granted
to
petitioner
previous
violations.
Article
6
section
four
will
provide,
though
name
an
address
to
the
record.
Please.
A
AD
L
AD
I
Madam
chairman
I
was
at
the
board
Christopher
Breen
from
the
mayor's
office
in
Neighborhood.
Services
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
The
applicant
has
completed
their
community
process,
which
included
a
community
meeting
back
in
July.
The
applicant
will
work
with
the
abutters
and
the
community
and
continue
to
be
a
good
neighbor.
Thank
you.
AS
A
C
Boa
seven
one,
eight
two:
five
five
six
Cook
Street
Cook
Street
here
this
is
to
increase
the
roof
line
to
maximum
allowable
height
without
exceeding
the
local
ordinance
installation
of
a
roof
deck
on
the
back
portion
of
the
house
include
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
The
violations,
article
62
section,
25,
roof
structure,
restriction,
article
62,
section,
8,
insufficient,
Riyadh
setback,
article
62,
section,
8,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
article
62,
section
8,
excessive
FAI-
may
be
the
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BZ
The
board,
my
name,
is
Alison
Silvera
I'm,
the
owner
of
the
property
at
6,
Cooke,
Street
and
I
currently
live
at
14
mystic
Street
in
Charlestown,
so
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do
sure
so
about
in
last
November.
I
should
also
say
I'm
here
today,
with
our
contractor
Jamal
Saunders
from
frame
to
finish.
BZ
We
purchased
this
home
in
November
of
last
year.
It
was
in
a
state
of
disrepair
and
as
part
of
that
purchase,
so
my
family
has
lived
in
Charlestown
for
the
last
10
years
in
a
condo,
we're
looking
like
three
small
children,
seven
five
and
one
who
go
to
Boston
Public
Schools
and
the
the
Elliot
School
in
the
north
end.
We
want
to
remain
in
the
city
and
the
only
way
for
us
to
do
that
was
to
purchase
a
home
that
we
could
renovate.
So
we
purchased
this
home
back
in
November.
BZ
In
order
to
maximize
the
use
of
the
home,
we
are
proposing
to
increase
the
roof
height
and
we
have
submitted
a
new
drawing
that
shows
the
current
roof
height.
It's
going.
The
peak
of
the
roof
is
going
up
by
three
feet.
To
make
the
third
floor,
what
was
basically
an
attic
space
where
you
could
only
walk
down
the
center
line
at
the
peak?
We
would
like
to
make
that
high
enough
so
that
it's
full
head
height
all
the
way
across
the
floor.
BZ
We
also
proposed
off
of
the
third
floor
to
add
a
roof
deck
on
the
existing
structure.
There's
a
bump
out
on
the
back
of
the
house
that
currently
has
nothing
on
top
of
it,
but
with
the
by
use
of
being
able
to
use
the
third
floor,
we'd
like
to
make
a
roof
deck
on
that
section
and
then,
as
part
of
a
structural
underpinning
amendment
to
our
current
long-form
permit,
we
were,
we
have
dug
the
basement
and
by
excavating
the
basement,
we
now
have
full
head
height
in
the
basement
space.
I
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Christopher
Breen
from
ops,
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
hosted
a
barters
meeting
back
in
July,
in
which
almost
everyone
there
was
supportive
of
the
project
and
would
like
to
see
the
project
move
forward
as
quickly
as
possible.
Thank
you.
A
C
Applications
for
construction
of
a
non-attached,
single-family
resident
lis
2735
square
feet
with
the
garage
for
a
single
car,
three
bedrooms:
two
and
a
half
baths:
a
roof
deck
ass
access
by
a
hatch
violations.
Articles,
62,
section
8,
insufficient
lot
size
of
2,000
square
feet
is
required.
Article
62,
6,
&
8,
excessive
aphaia
2.0,
is
the
max.
Will
62
section
8
insufficient,
useable,
open
space
for
unit
350
square
feet
is
required.
Article
62,
section,
8,
insufficient
side
to
add
step
back.
C
A
CA
We're
proposing
to
build
for
as
homeowners
we're
gonna
build
a
single-family
house
at
the
square
footage
mentioned
it'll,
be
three
storeys,
with
a
parking
space
covered
and
just
basically
typical
Charlestown
house.
Three
stories
with
a
cornice
20
feet.
Wide,
what's
required
on
the
site
would
be
a
15
foot
townhouse
if
we
held
in
the
30
inches
on
each
side
and
if
we
built
it
by
right,
the
vows
you
couldn't
put
anything
useful
there,
so
we're
just
trying
to
put
a
house
that
fits
in
with
everything
else.
I
think
we've
done
that
three
stories.
CA
I
C
You
thank
you
very
much
finally,
next
case
calling
VOA
seven
one.
Nine
eight
three
three
thirty-one
Essex
Street,
that's
six
Street
here,
oh
okay,
this
is
to
add
exterior
decks.
Two
floors
new
bedroom
addition
on
the
third
floor
and
roof
deck
violations.
Article
62
section,
eight
employed
a
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
62
section,
eight,
the
really
odd
setback
requirement
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
dr.
A
AE
AE
A
row
house
district
in
Charlestown
the
the
floor
area
is
to
the
in
the
proposal
is
in
just
successive
that
the
front
yard
violation.
Excuse
me,
rear
yard
violation
is
from
the
rooftop
rear
addition.
The
Linden
borough
is
the
street
behind
Essex.
This
is
a
through
lot,
so
a
front
yard
requirement
would
apply
to
both
the
front
in
the
rear
yard
and
it
does
meet
the
front
yard
requirement
so
in
essence,
I'm
just
seeking
relief
for
excessive
floor
area
ratio.
AE
I
C
This
is
to
change
oxy
from
a
three
family,
drawing
to
a
full
four
family
dwelling
and
also
erected
fourth-story
addition
rare
addition
and
extend
living
space
into
the
basement.
The
violation
is
article
53,
section
56
off
street
parking.
None
proposed
article
53,
section
8,
the
dwellings
are
forbidden
within
a
three
F
sub
district
article
53
section
I
on
excessive
8f
AR
1.0
is
to
max
article
53
section
9,
insufficient,
open
space.
1012
square
feet
is
required.
Article
53,
section
9
insufficient
additional
lot
area
for
dwelling
unit
4,000
square
feet.
Total
is
required.
C
Article
53,
section,
9
number
of
allowed
stories
exceeded
three
stories
of
maximum
allowed
article
53
section
I
in
excess
of
height
of
35
feet,
maximum
allowed
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
dad
step
back.
Two
and
a
half
feet
is
mu.
No
article
53,
section
I
insufficient
Riyad
step
back
dirty
feet.
Minimum
is
required
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CB
The
board,
my
name,
is
Matt
Eckel
from
Drago
and
Toscano.
The
business
address
of
15
Broad
Street
here
in
Boston
to
my
immediate
right,
is
James
Christopher
from
RCA
and
to
my
far
right
is
Josh
betterment
from
the
development
team.
As
mentioned
we're
here
to
further
proposal
to
change
the
agency
from
a
three
family
dwelling
to
a
four
family
dwelling
and
to
renovate
the
existing
building
also
to
build
a
rear
addition
and
a
fourth
storey
addition.
The
existing
building
is
currently
in
a
state
of
disrepair.
It
has
been
uninhabitable
for
the
last
couple
of
years.
CB
This
project
will
allow
the
building
to
be
brought
up
to
code,
allow
for
the
installation
of
a
sprinkler
system
and
also
the
renovation
and
updated
facade.
The
zoning
district
is
a
three
F
mm.
The
lot
size
is
2,000
square
feet
and
the
proposed
gross
square
footage
is
3152
square
feet
the
basic
floor
plan.
It
would
be
one
unit
per
floor.
The
first
floor
would
have
a
two-bedroom
one-bath
unit.
CB
Second,
floor
and
third
floor
would
both
have
2-bedroom
2-bath
units
and
the
fourth
floor
of
a
unit
four,
which
would
be
two
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom
in
terms
of
the
violations.
We
have
two
brand
new
violations
which
would
be
use.
It's
a
free,
app
district
and
we're
proposing
four
units,
as
well
as
height
as
mentioned
35
feet
in
3.
Storeys
is
required
and
allowed,
and
we're
proposing
four
storeys
at
39
feet.
Four
inches
pre-existing
violations,
our
FA,
our
one
point:
zero
is
required.
CB
We're
at
one
point,
five,
seven
parking
one
point:
two
five
split
spaces
is
required
per
unit.
We
have
no
parking.
The
additional
watt
area,
4000
square
feet
is
required
in
total
and
we
have
two
thousand
square
feet
and
then
the
other,
the
side,
yard
and
front
yard
are
pre-existing
violations
that
are
not
changing
at
all.
In
terms
of
community
process,
we
had
the
butters
meeting
where
we
receive
support.
We
also
went
before
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association,
which
voted
to
support
the
project.
At
this
time,
I'll
pause
for
any
questions
from
the
floor.
L
AQ
A
A
C
A
C
CC
So
we
we,
we
have
its
to
family,
we
have
a
building.
He
has
two
houses
on
the
building
number
ten
Whitfield
number
12
number
twelve
is
a
two
family
with
a
two-bedroom
in
the
first
floor
and
the
three
bedroom
on
the
second
floor
number
ten
is
a
single
family.
With
four
bedrooms,
we
was
trying
to
extend
their
living
space
into
the
basement
for
the
four
apartment
number
one
or
number
twelve
side
to
make
it
into
a
four
bedroom.
A
CC
Said
the
weather
that
defer
or
because
because
I
didn't
get
into
the
community
about
its
meaning,
we
had.
We
had
that.
We
had
who
George's
here
and
we
had
community
support
from
all
my
neighbors,
all
the
Buddism
on
the
street.
So
we
just
would
like
to
just
get
the
approval
to
extend
the
living
space
into
the
basement.
L
A
L
CC
AQ
AT
R
C
Hold
up
calling
the
next
case:
boa
6,
5,
6,
9,
1,
0
to
59
2
to
63
Gold
Street.
This
is
a
combined
loss
and
the
erecting
new
four-story
multi-family
dwelling
with
garage
parking,
roof
deck
and
exterior
roof
deck
violations.
Article
13
section
one
additional
lot
areas:
insufficient
article
13,
section,
1,
the
bloody
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Particle
13,
section,
1,
useable,
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
20,
section
4,
grey
yards
setback
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BF
Doug
Stefan
off-93
F
Street,
South
Boston,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
I,
bring
to
you
a
proposed
new
constructions.
This
is
a
proposed
for
unit
building
on
a
series
of
vacant.
Lots
that
would
be
combined
into
one
general
layout
is
the
first
floor
is
for
tandem
parking
spaces
mechanical
and
a
lift.
That
brings
me
up
to
the
second
floor
for
handicapped
access.
Second
floors
to
930
square
foot,
two-bedroom
units.
The
third
and
fourth-
are
by
level
combined
vertically
of
approximately
1,700
square
feet.
BF
BF
BF
L
L
BF
Well,
so
Gulf
Street
is
not
a
street
that
him
of
supports
parking
on
the
side,
so
I'm
allowed
I'm
not
taking
away
any
parking
from
the
street.
Currently
it
is
a
parking
lot.
So
I'll
have
two
curb
cuts
of
approximately
fourteen
feet.
That
would
then
provide
access
to
the
two
individual
single
door
garage
bays.
So
the
idea
being
each
tandem
space
gets
dedicated
to
a
unit.
AQ
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
John
Allison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
have
held
a
few
abutters
meetings
on
this
project
and
they
have
also
gone
to
the
city
site
Neighborhood
Association.
They
have
made
changes
to
address
community
concerns,
so
you'd
like
to
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
A
A
C
C
Madam
chair,
on
the
hearings
and
recommendations
we
had
two
of
them.
There
was
gonna,
come
to
the
full
board,
so
I'm
gonna
call
them
an
order
here
before
we
go
into
the
hearing
recommendation
so
piece,
boa
seven,
twenty
four,
seven
one:
five,
seven,
seventy
two,
two
seven,
seventy
eight
Adam
Street
are
they
here?
Okay,
this
is
a
landmark
public
house
change
of
artists
to
include
live,
entertainment
operating
before
and
after
10:30
p.m.
to
an
existing
restaurant.
The
violations,
article
65
section
15
restaurant
with
live
entertainment
not
operating
after
10:30
p.m.
is
a
conditional
use.
C
BU
Commissioners,
Karen
samay,
Oh,
McDermott,
quilty
and
Miller
to
my
right
I
have
mr.
ed
Brooks
into
his
right
mr.
rusty
Mariano,
both
who
are
owners
and
operators
of
the
landmark
public
house
at
770,
778,
Adams,
Street,
the
application
and
I
think
the
subcommittee
for
its
time
and
appreciate
why
they
requested
that
this
come
to
the
full
board.
By
way
of
background,
this
location
is
formerly
Gerard's,
which
was
an
institution
in
the
neighborhood
for
decades
and
and
I
have
to
say
that
mr.
de
Mariano
having
been
born
and
raised
in
the
neighborhood.
BU
BU
The
entertainment
is
for
a
full
life
and
there
has
been.
There
have
been
several
one
days,
pull
to
date
since
the
nine
months
of
operation
that
have
been
there
and
they
are
for
both
full
bands,
including
instrumental
and
vocalists
DJ's
dancing,
trivia
nights,
all
of
which
fall
under
the
live
entertainment
category
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Consumer,
Affairs
and
licensing,
and
which
require
approval
from
the
Zoning
Board.
In
order
to
be
issued
a
more
permanent
license.
AN
Good
afternoon,
madam
chairman,
excuse
me,
madam
chairwoman,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
David
Cotter
from
the
mayor's
office
and
Neighborhood
Services
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
We
did
hold
the
nut
butters
meeting
for
this
property
only
one
of
water
attended
and
expressed
their
support.
The
proponents
have
also
met
with
several
Lee
Road
civic
associations.
Several
Civic
Association,
the
Ashmont,
a
Civic
Association.
Both
groups
have
expressed
their
support
for
the
proposal
as
well.
Thank
you,
madam.
R
A
C
Other
case
mountain
care
call
for
the
record:
VOA
six,
nine,
nine,
four
six
five
thirty-nine
Rosedale
Street.
This
was
to
extend
living
space
to
the
basement,
an
existing
single-family
residential
and
add
a
bathroom
laundry
and
wet
bar
construct,
new
exterior
stairs
and
doors
for
new
means
of
egress.
The
violation
was
article
65,
section,
nine
dimensional
regulations
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
AW
Chairman
of
the
board
we
2
years
ago,
we
bought
the
single-family
residence
in
Dorchester.
We
fell
in
love
with
it,
my
wife
and
I,
and
we
did
extensive
renovations
in
the
meantime.
So
back
to
its
old
glory,
we
just
had
a
newborn
and
we
I'm
foreigner
and
from
Belgium.
My
wife
is
from
Brazil
or
families
live
abroad,
and
they
would
like
to
visit
once
in
a
while,
however,
they're
not
very
mobile,
and
we
would
like
to
extend
the
living
space
into
the
basement
for
them
to
have
a
separate
space.
AW
I
fully
appreciate
I
actually
brought
some
that
took
some
pictures
this
morning
to
show
you
there
is
a
spares
in
the
back
of
the
house,
but
it's
really
not
safe.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
yet
kind
of
super
steep
to
basically
start
making
this
save
and
build
it
up
to
code.
We
would
have
to
do
major
works.
It's
also
only
five
foot
high,
so
we'd
have
to
cut
in
the
structure
of
the
house
which
become
very
cumbersome.
AW
AQ
R
A
C
Matt,
okay,
we're
gonna
go
into
the
hearing
that
we
had
last
week
on
Thursday
the
Subcommittee
on
the
first
case,
boa
seven,
three,
six,
two
four
to
nineteen
Wall
Street
without
free
parking
for
one
vehicle,
was
approved.
Boa
seven,
three,
six,
two
three
seven
eighteen
Wall
Street
was
off
Street
back
over
one
vehicle
was
approved
piece,
boa
seven,
two,
six
zero,
eight
six
fifteen
Walker
Street
was
the
constructing
new
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
with
VP
da
Boa,
seven
to
eight
to
seventy
six.
C
Twenty
two
Albion
Street
now
be
in
place,
was
to
install
the
curb
cut
the
rear
of
the
patio
of
a
condo
unit
provide
to
compact
parking
spaces.
It
was
deferred
to
the
full
board
on
just
I'm
sorry,
the
mini
subcommittee
board
on
921
at
five
pm,
vo
a
seventy
two
three
five,
eight
seven,
twenty
seven
Eastman
Street
was
extend
living
space
into
the
attic
for
additional
bedroom
and
closet.
It
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case
boa
seven:
three:
four:
zero
zero
one
34
West
glow
Street,
which
remark
she
is
an
existing
single-family
home.
C
It
was
approved,
he's
boa
seven
to
eight
five
one,
six,
one.
Twenty
one
Wilmington
Avenue
was
to
extend
living
area
to
the
basement
attic.
It
was
approved,
boa
seven,
three
zero.
Three
four
eight
forty
four
Maynard
Street
was
the
frame
a
six-foot
by
eight-foot
bathroom,
install
a
thirty
inch
by
30
inch
skylight.
It
was
approved
boa
seven,
two,
eight
one,
eight
five
ten
ninety
River
Street
was
to
confer
marks,
is
the
single-family
dwelling
and
close
the
rear.
Porch
was
approved
at
BPD
a
boa
seven
twenty
one,
fifty
five
120
Chapman
Avenue.