►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 6-23-20
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
good
morning,
City
of
Boston
building
board
of
appeal
hearings
for
for
June
23rd.
It's
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
Open
Meeting
Law,
and
the
executive
order,
governor
Baker
suspending
certain
provisions.
There
are
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
This
hearing
of
the
board
is
anyhow
remotely
via
the
WebEx
event.
A
The
order
of
comments
is
as
followed
elected
officials,
representative
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public.
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
also
comment,
and
the
time
for
commenting
will
be
limited
by
the
chair
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
the
project.
That
is
those
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
appeal
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand,
icon
and
I.
Think
you
can
see
that
on
the
graphic
in
the
application
via
the
web
x
event,
platform
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click.
A
The
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised,
virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star
3
to
raise
your
hand,
because
I
noticed
there
are
a
couple
of
people
on
by
telephone.
So
please
once
again
press
star
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
in
name
and
address
bus
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
A
B
B
E
E
A
Opposed
motion
carries
may
I,
ask
the
board
members
please
when
you
make
a
motion
or
you
second,
please
follow
up
with
your
name
and
then,
if
you
are
in
opposition,
follow
up
with
your
name?
Okay,
so
that
at
least
because
it's
sometimes
difficult
to
me
to
discern
people's
voices
I'm
sorry
miss
support
can
go
ahead.
Thank.
F
A
A
A
H
A
B
A
C
A
B
I
A
I
Result
of
that
area
being
included,
the
floor
area
went
up
to
point
nine,
four
three,
so
we're
taking
a
variance
for
the
excessive
floor
area.
Mr.
Whitacre
can
can
go
ahead
and
use
the
basement
level
for
non
sleeping
purposes.
It's
not
built
out
in
a
manner
which
somebody
could
sleep
down
there
due
to
egress,
but
as
far
as
I
tell
it
is
your
room.
Was
something
of
that
nature
that
that's?
What
he's
seeking
to
do.
I
I
guess
for
the
last
one
he
puts
the
bottom
floor.
Has
a
storage
area
for
the
second
unit
in
the
rear
of
it.
I
had
sent
over
the
plan
of
the
bottom
floor.
I
don't
know
if
that
on
the
screen
and
not
having
trouble
clicking
into
the
screen
here
so
that,
yes,
there
is
a
small
portion
there.
It's
connected
directly
the.
G
H
H
D
K
B
The
next
case,
following
boa
one,
zero
four,
seven
one,
eight
three
thirty
Concord
Street.
This
is
a
new
kitchen
addition
to
the
rear
of
an
existing
home,
the
new
kitchen
in
half
bath
on
the
first
level,
a
new
bath.
On
the
second
level,
the
new
air
conditioning
and
associated
work,
the
violations,
article
62
section
8,
the
ring
adds
a
yard
setback
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
L
M
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
Quinn
Locke,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
and
Obama's
meeting
when
styled
in
February
11
lightly,
attended
by
neighbors
and
support
was
heard
at
that
time,
and
we've
also
sent
a
couple
of
waters
to
the
board
and
support
us.
The
proposal
as
well
thank.
N
B
Your
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero:
four,
seven:
nine
zero
zero
one
Trenton
Street.
This
is
the
constructing
new
roof
dormers
to
create
living
space
at
an
existing
third
floor
and
new
exterior
deck
at
third
floor
level.
Above
an
existing
two-story
rail,
the
new
front
door
MA
facing
the
street
new
red
DOMA
facing
the
rear
of
the
lot
Dorman
speed,
108
square
feet
of
new
living
space
for
the
master
bath
in
bedroom.
The
violation
is
article
20,
section
1,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
F
O
O
A
O
A
M
F
P
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
VOA
one
zero,
four,
three,
nine
four,
six,
four.
Ninety
three
Walnut
Avenue
this
is
to
construct
a
new
garage
addition
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
19
section,
one,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient,
an
article
20
section
one.
The
rail
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
S
S
A
S
So
by
code,
we're
required
to
have
ten
feet
on
the
side,
yard
and
I
believe
it's
sixteen
on
the
side
where
we're
violating
we're
a
corner
lot,
so
I
believe
that
the
front
and
Greer's
are
a
little
bit
confusing.
What
we're
proposing
is
three
feet
for
the
side
yard
and
six
feet
or
the
the
rear.
The
current
house
already
violates
the
current
codes,
so
we
would
be
increasing
the
violation
both
waters
would
be
directly
affected,
have
been
involved
in
the
design
process
are
in
and
are
in
favor
in
the
process
of
project.
S
J
A
T
Great
yes,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Lindsey
Santana
from
the
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
The
applicant
worked
with
the
butters
to
address
the
concerns
that
they
had.
They'll
also
receive
support
from
eggless
Lou
Square
neighborhood
association
and
Jamaica
Plain
Neighborhood
Council.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
started.
U
A
V
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero.
Four,
four,
two:
seven,
eight
two,
forty
two
Neponset
Avenue:
this
is
an
interior
and
exterior
renovation,
including
new
windows,
new
shingles,
new
new
kitchen
and
bathrooms,
new
walls
and
ceilings,
new
MEP
systems
and
construction
of
a
one-story
addition
with
full
basement
and
deck
at
the
rear
of
the
home.
The
violations,
article
65,
section,
nine,
the
floor:
EA
ratio
was
excessive.
W
W
J
R
X
N
B
This
is
to
erect
a
glass
house
wood
frame
having
a
dirt
floor
for
plant
storage,
a
new
structure
to
be
attached
to
an
existing
shed,
the
violations,
article
65
69,
accessory
building
in
the
rail
yard
in
article
65,
69
accessory
building
in
the
rear
yard.
The
addition
to
the
shed
would
exceed
the
25%
of
the
riad.
Y
Y
The
situation
is
that
we
have
built
a
greenhouse
and
we're
in
the
process
of
building
a
greenhouse.
We
have
been
recited
because
the
footprint
of
the
structure
that
we
are
seeking
to
build
exceeds
the
25%
square
foot
allowance,
I
should
say
25%
allowed
or
square
foot
structures
by
6
feet,
we're
6
and
a
half
square
feet
over
the
allowance.
The
structure
allowance
is
429
square
feet,
but
a
structure
comes
in
at
435
square
feet.
A
J
A
Z
AA
Morning,
can
you
hear
me
I
can
okay!
Thank
you.
This
is
Karin
McCall
I'm,
an
attorney
who's
been
retained
by
a
butters
mark
and
Victorian
nurse.
They
reside
at
27
28
and
just
to
clarify
they
weren't
able
to
participate
in
in
the
neighborhood
meeting.
Yes,
I
got
a
postcard
invited
to
one,
but
they
were
not
participants
and
they
do
have
some
serious
reservations.
That's
why
they're
opposing
this
so
I
mailed
in
I,
emailed
in
some
supportive.
A
AA
First
of
all,
I
just
want
to
start
with.
There
is
a
youth
issue
here,
they're
describing
this
as
a
green
house.
The
reality
is
the
prior
structure,
which
is
an
accessory
structure.
You
know
a
shed,
it's
supposed
to
be
a
shed,
but
frankly,
if
you
look
at
their
their
submitted
designs,
it's
very
clear:
it's
it's
could
be
used
as
a
dwelling
space
and
they
have
concerns
for
that.
It
has
a
shower.
It
has
a
bathroom,
it
has
what
appears
to
be
a
kitchen
sink
in
a
bay
window.
AA
AA
In
addition,
a
new
little
glass
house
that
been
tacked
on
to
this
pre-existing
structure,
we're
then
double
the
impervious
surface
area
and
there
is
already
a
drainage
issue.
Now
my
clients
have
lived
directly
next
door
to
the
Dickerson's
for
25
years
they
can
attest
and
I've
seen
photographs.
It's
a
routine
habit
of
the
Dickerson's.
You
have
to
put
tarp
over
their
unpaved
driveway
area
because
of
the
storm
drainage
issue
that
exists.
Their
basement
has
some
mild
flooding.
This
is
an
issue
and
this
new
structure
is
going
to
exasperate
this
existing
issue
that
hasn't
been
addressed.
AA
AA
You
know,
friends
and
neighbors.
They
have
always
both
treated
this
border
property.
As
my
client
and
now
it
appears
as
a
direct
result
of
this
project.
A
survey
was
done
and
the
Dickerson's
have
asserted
that
approximately
foot
and
a
half
it
varies
down.
The
border
length
doesn't
belong
to
my
clients.
This
is
an
issue
obviously
needs
resolved.
I
spoke
briefly
yesterday
with
an
attorney
representing
the
Dickerson's,
we're
both
going
north
very
hard
to
avoid
land
court
if
possible.
AA
But
what
we're
asking
is
that
the
Dickerson's
not
be
permitted
to
complete
this
project
until
the
drainage
issue
is
fine.
It's
my
understanding
that
a
drywall
drainage
system
is
not
terribly
costly,
that
it's
it's
a
doable
solution
and
my
clients
really
do
deserve
the
reassurance
that
the
image
issue
isn't
going
to
be
increased,
which
in
it
inevitably
will
unless
the
different
things
are
required
to
come
up
with
this
solution.
First
I
also
think
some
language
that
ensures
that
this
dwelling,
which
really
looks
like
a
studio
apartment
that's
being
tacked
on
to
this,
is
not.
A
So
can
we
I
think
that
it's
appropriate
with
this
new
information?
Two
things
happen.
One
is
that
an
inspection
you
know
double
check
the
information
on
this
shed
b14
that
it's
not
a
second
dwelling
unit,
perhaps
even
so,
at
least
that
the
second
thing
mr.
Ehrlich,
do
you
think
that
this
requires
a
site
visit
or
are
you
comfortable
with
what
you've
seen
if
we
can
hear
you
are.
P
A
A
J
Let
me
continue
in
terms
of
the
existing
shed.
It's
correct
that
the
plan
shows
there's
a
bathroom,
but
in
terms
of
the
glasshouse
extension,
there
is
no
indication
that,
first
of
all
that
there
it's
it's
an
extension
of
the
structure,
but
it's
not
a
continuous
space
so
and
the
door
opens
to
away
from
the
shed.
So
it
would
be
a
pretty
hard
pressed
to
the
tube
for
it
to
be
an
issue
of
occupancy
and
I
would
think.
J
If
we
were
to
approve
this,
we
could
add
a
proviso
that
it
be
limited
for
storage
and
garden
use
and
plants.
That's
on
that
issue
on
the
property
line.
There's
no
plot
plan
here
that
I
have
so
I
I
have
no
idea
whether
there
is
in
fact
a
legitimate
issue
in
terms
of
disputed
dispute
and
property
line,
so
that
would
require
that
would
require
a
surveyor
and
and
I
think
in
resolution.
Beyond
the
drawings,
I,
don't
have
a
problem
of
the
occupants.
Q
Y
AA
No
chairperson,
if
I,
could
it's
it's
very
clear
to
my
clients
that
the
way
this
has
been
packaged
and
handed
to
you
is
concerning
it's
not
necessarily
forthright
communality
is.
Is
these
folks
live
very
close
to
one
another
that
drainage
issue
that
is
pre-existing?
This
new
structure
doubles
the
existing
structure,
it's
a
real
water,
drainage
issue,
it's
visible
already,
there's
there's
no
refuting
that
and
it
has
not
been
addressed
so
while
I
understand
the
underlying
property
dispute
issue.
Is
you
know
beyond
the
scope
of
this
hearing?
A
Y
Y
Not
being
able
to
retain
Evod
driveway,
here's
a
stop
work
order
at
standing
right
now
because
of
the
complaint
and
I
will
say
this,
that
the
complaints
that
came
into
inspectional
services
by
the
attorneys
client
were
so
vindictive
and
so
frequent
that
they
are
worth.
There
were
seven
visits
from
ISD
personnel
out
here
within
a
three
period
because
of
the
mystery
be
vindictive
this.
What
was
done.
Y
Y
Okay,
so
if
we
withdraw
the
application
and
I'm
just
understanding
versus
if
we
go
forward
with
the
applications
with
conditions-
and
this
is
what
I
would
I
would
like
to
say-
if
an
inspection
of
services
representatives
can
come
out
here,
look
at
the
situation
and
tell
us
that
what
we
need
to
do
to
rectify
it,
I
would
I
would
be
more
than
willing
to
do
that.
I.
AB
Y
Don't
want
to
withdraw
the
application,
because
I
believe
that
the
the
information
provided
by
the
attorney
the
counsel
for
the
the
nurse
family
is
not
giving
you
all
of
the
accurate
information.
There
is
to
be
clear,
and
this
is
something
that
she
has
mentioned
in
her
letter.
I
should
say
in
her
conversation
today
about
driveways
being
side
by
side.
K
Y
But
you
can't
live
in
there.
This
this
is
in
the
shed
is
the
shed
is,
was
nothing
more
than
storage
and
it
did
have,
and
when
we
renovated
the
home
the
primary
structure,
there
is
a
sink
in
there
and
there
is
a
bathroom
because-
and
it
was
just
for
the
outside-
for
working
outside,
we
are
gardeners,
yeah
I
would
bite
and
I
would
invite
the
neighbors
have
misrepresented
what
this.
What
they're
telling
you
I
would
invite
and
asked
ISD
to
come
and
do
our
site
visit
before
we
agreed
to
drop
the
request.
J
My
feeling
on
this
is
the
zoning
relief
requested
only
has
to
do
with
a
six
additional
square
feet,
which
is
something
I
believe
that
we
can
handle.
As
long
as
there
is
proviso
that
the
use
we
limited
to
storage
and
gardening
use
only
I.
The
issue
of
the
the
plot
line
boundaries
is
outside
of
the
purview
of
this
hearing,
as
you
pointed
out,
and
they
can,
they
need
to
sort
that
out
separately
and,
if
there's
a
drainage
issue
its
pre-existing.
That
again
is
not
something
that
is
coming
before
us
all.
J
That's
coming
before
us
is
a
six
square,
six
additional
square
feet.
It
is
clearly
not
based
on
the
plans.
It
is
clearly
not
something
that
can
be
used
for
occupancy,
and
so
I
would
be
to
make
a
motion
to
grant
the
relief,
with
the
proviso
that
they
used
to
be
limited
for
storage
and
gardening.
You.
B
P
P
J
A
V
A
A
AB
B
Madam
chair
calling
boa
one
zero
four
four:
five:
six
zero.
Fifty
awesome
Osceola
Street.
This
is
a
demolish,
an
attic
and
build
a
full
third
floor
level
and
renovate
second
floor
and
building
plant
building
planes
provided
the
violations,
article
69
section
I
and
the
height
of
success
of
its
stories.
Article
69
section
9
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
69,
section
9,
the
Ray
had
setback
is
insufficient
name
an
address
full
directed.
Please.
AD
AD
AD
V
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Brian
Flynn
again
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
representing
Hyde
Park
and
about
his
beam,
was
held
on
Monday
February
24th,
with
no
opposition
from
the
community.
We
wish
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
I
think
he
done.
AB
F
A
J
A
B
A
B
Forget
about
me,
madam
chef,
following
a
next
cage,
calling
boa
one
zero
three
one:
zero
three,
three
six
ready
Avenue.
This
is
to
extend
an
existing
dormer
and
conform
in
living,
space
and
third
level.
The
violations
article
sixty
nine
section
I
on
the
side
yard,
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
I'm
gonna
read
it
into
the
record
again
sorry
case:
boa
one
zero:
three
one:
zero
three:
three:
six
ready
Avenue!
This
is
a
purpose
to
extend
an
existing
dormer
for
access
to
conform
to
a
living
space.
In
the
third
level,
the
violation
is
article
69,
section,
nine.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
A
A
AE
A
J
V
E
B
Call
your
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero:
five,
six
six,
two
seven
one
79
Ruskin
deal
Road.
This
is
aligning
a
new
to
family
dwelling
to
an
existing
building.
The
violations,
article
69
section,
9,
a
flirty.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69,
section
I
in
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
AF
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Laden.
Nora
I
am
the
owner
of
macedon
Roslindale
Road.
We
have
received
approval
for
construction
at
ERT,
nine
to
eight
735.
We
found
an
amendment
that
refers
to
article
69
and
one
second
here:
30-1,
which
will
allow
us
to
align
with
the
existing
structure
on
the
street.
I
also
adjust
the
property
one.
AF
AF
A
AF
A
K
K
AG
A
AC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
morning,
board
members,
we
hadn't
proved
this
back
under
the
original,
the
original
design,
and
it
is
stated
in
our
recommendation
as
such,
and
it
was
discussed
with
the
the
applicant
debt.
If
you
look
at
Ruskin
deal,
it
just
made
sense
to
bring
this
to
bring
the
building
out
that
five
feet.
V
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Brian
flew
at
the
mayor's
office
and
Neighborhood
Services
represent
Hyde
Park
and
about
his
being
was
held
on
Thursday
February
20th,
and
there
was
no
opposition
from
the
community.
Since
then,
our
office
has
received
no
emails
phone
calls
with
any
type
of
opposition,
so
I
wish
to
fully
support
this
proposal.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
A
Thank
you,
mr.
fortune,
is
anybody
just
here
to
speak
in
opposition.
AH
B
Calling
a
minute
case
calling
boa
one
zero
one:
two,
nine
three,
three:
ninety
one
Green
Street.
This
is
a
construct,
an
addition
on
the
rear
of
an
existing
house
to
create
an
additional
dwelling
unit
and
garage
the
violations.
Article
80
section
80
to
an
application
of
the
small
project
review
article
55,
section
9,
additional
Lodi
area
is
insufficient.
Article
55
section
9
the
floor.
Near
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
B
AI
AI
The
owners
are
looking
to
construct
a
small
apartment
for
Colleen's
parents
to
live
with
them,
they're
aging
and
eats
him
assistance.
The
addition
has
been
located
to
the
rear
of
the
house
to
minimize
any
change
to
the
appearance
from
the
street.
We
did
meet
with
the
abutters
on
December
4th
of
last
year
and
had
no
opposition,
also
On
January
13th,
with
a
Sumner
Hill
neighborhood
association
and
on
February
5th,
with
JP
Neighborhood
Council,
which
both
of
those
groups
also
supported
us.
AI
A
AI
A
AI
It's
a
4,500
square
foot
law,
the
allowable
fer
is
point
six
and
we
are
requesting
a
point:
seven
one
fer
yeah
as
part
of
the
design.
There
are
some
there's
a
room
that
is
designed
to
be
for
the
two
families
to
socialize,
together
in
which
could
be
considered
part
of
the
apartment.
That
would
push
the
apartment
size
up
to
closer
to
850
square
feet,
but.
AI
J
J
T
Chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Lukas
and
snarks.
Neighborhood
Services
yeah
wicked,
has
worked
closely
and
has
received
support
from
their
mediator.
Butters
I
have
people
who
seek
support
from
the
Jamaican
neighborhood
council
and
also
from
the
summer
Thunderhill
Association
from
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
project.
Thank.
U
B
You
very
much
calling
you
the
next
case
calling
VOA
one
zero.
Four,
seven,
seven,
four
nine
three
large
place.
This
is
seeking
to
erect
the
rare
addition
also
to
renovate
the
property.
The
violations,
article
55,
section
12,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient
required
20
feet
proposed
15,
foot,
four
inches
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
E
So
the
owners
they
currently
live
on
the
second
floor
of
this
to
family
existing
dwelling.
The
first
floor
is
occupied
by
the
mother
and
father
of
the
woman
who
lives
on
the
second
floor,
knowns
it
so
it's
a
fully
occupied
for
their
family.
They
have
two
daughters
as
well,
and
what
they're
looking
to
do
is
to
expand
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
into
the
rear
yard,
to
increase
their
total
living
space,
to
provide
additional
bedrooms
for
their
two
daughters
and
to
just
be
able
to
stay
in
this
house
as
their
family
is
grown.
Okay,.
E
So
the
zoning
requires
I
believe
the
zoning
requires
25
feet
at
the
rear
yard.
We
are
proposing,
at
its
nearest
point,
20
feet,
4
and
3/4
of
an
inch
from
the
rear
of
the
addition
to
the
rear
yard
line,
and
what
we've
done
is:
we've
looked
to
the
existing
home.
That's
a
right
next
door,
which
completed
a
similar
addition
recently
and
set
the
extent
of
the
proposed
addition
to
be
went
in
the
extent
of
where
the
other
abutting
home
was
extended
to
try
to
keep
and
saying
keeping
with.
What's
happened
in
the
neighborhood
there.
AJ
AJ
J
J
J
E
AJ
Just
a
rhetoric
of
that
Thank
You
mr.
Hanson,
again
attorney
John
house,
but
we're
going
to
scout
out
at
this
time.
Our
client
is
committed
to
replanting
additional
trees
along
the
property
line
to
replace
what
would
potentially
be
taken
down.
In
addition,
it's
important
to
note
that,
even
with
a
smaller
addition,
the
tree
would
have
to
come
down
or
this
family
to
increase
living
space
via
rare
addition
and.
A
AJ
E
I'd
also,
this
is
Peter
bar
attached.
The
architect
for
the
project.
I'd,
also
like
to
note
that
the
existing
tree
is
currently
in
the
shadow
line
of
the
existing
home
and
also
well
below
the
height
of
the
existing
tree.
Canopy
that
sits
along
the
rear
property
line.
We
haven't
had
an
arborist
go
out
and
expect
the
health
of
the
tree
or
look
at
it
more
closely,
but
the
tree
does
appear
to
be
instead
of
average
condition
and.
A
A
AK
A
B
B
B
Calling
a
next
case
calling
Bo
a
one:
zero
three,
seven
one:
five,
seven
84
South
Warren
Road.
This
is
a
small
single
level
edition
added
to
the
rare
of
a
single-family
home,
all
new
construction
to
a
house
of
a
Newton
new
kitchen,
the
violations,
article
55,
section
9.
The
lot
width
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please,
yes,.
AH
Where
my
wife
and
I
just
purchased
the
home
last
year
and
are
with
the
small
nature
of
the
home,
only
about
800
and
under
800
square
feet
over
three
levels
and
we
are
proposing
adding
another
180
square
feet
off
the
back.
So
now,
we've
modified
the
plans
a
little
not
to
house
a
kitchen,
but
just
for
additional
living
space.
For
us,
since
the
nature
of
the
house
itself
is
okay.
A
J
A
J
A
AH
Is
an
odd
shape
lot
it.
It
was
not
becoming
the
first
place.
The
reason
for
our
hearing
so
we're
a
very
small
community
of
two
houses
that
bought
each
other
and
so
most
of
this,
because
this
small
nature
of
the
house-
it's
it's
a
it's
not
in
any
home,
but
800
square
feet
over
three
levels.
So
it's
about
300
square
feet
that
that
existing
footprint.
X
T
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Lucy
Santana
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
received
general
support
from
their
their
abutters
and
they
received
the
support
from
the
wood
Barona
Association
and
Jamaica
Jamaica
Plain
Neighborhood
Council
members
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
project.
Thank.
A
B
B
B
F
A
A
X
A
AM
This
has
been
a
derelict
property
for
about
20
years,
I
moved
in
ten
years
ago
and
and
thrilled
that
these
folks
bought
the
property
and
are
trying
to
fix
it
up
and
improve
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
the
addition
is
also
very
respectful
to
the
historic
integrity
of
the
neighborhood
and
it's
appropriately
sized
and
located
on
the
law.
Thank.
A
Q
A
AN
My
partner,
Stuart,
walk
and
I
are
co-owners
at
63,
born
Street,
director
butters
284
South
Warren,
and
we
are
in
support
of
the
addition,
because
mr.
Davis
and
we
have
agree
to
having
a
foundation
that
would
be
the
least
intrusive
and
not
damage
a
mature
sugar
maple,
that
is
on
the
boundary
between
the
two
properties
and
mr.
Davis,
has
agreed
to
are
not
putting
in
a
full
or
partial
basement,
and
therefore
we
feel
we
can
support
this
addition.
Thank.
AO
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero:
four,
nine
three,
six,
three
six
crosstown
Avenue:
this
is
an
existing
single-family
erected,
a
one-story
addition.
Fourteen
foot
by
nine
feet
at
the
front
entry
door
and
install
a
six
foot
by
five
foot
and
closed
three-season
porch.
The
violation
is
article
18
section,
one.
The
front
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AP
AQ
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
I,
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
We
had
in
the
butters
meeting
back
in
February,
none
of
the
neighbors
showed
up
into
the
Neighborhood
Council
in
February
as
well,
and
receive
unanimous
support.
So
just
like
to
reiterate
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AR
A
A
F
A
A
Well
mask
motion:
please.
K
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
Bo
a
1
0
4
7
0
7
8
47
LaSalle
Street.
This
is
create
a
second
floor
addition
by
raising
a
portion
of
the
existing
roof.
Minor
changes
are
to
be
constructed.
On
the
first
floor
in
preparation
for
a
stair
between
the
first
and
new
second
floor,
the
building
footprint
will
not
change
the
violations.
Article
56
section
8,
the
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
56,
section
8,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AS
My
name
is
Derrick
Reuben
off
of
Derrick
Rubinoff,
architect,
82
Spring
Street
in
West
Roxbury,
and
we
do
have
mr.
Cohen
Ciara
available
as
well.
In
this
meeting
he's
the
owner,
along
with
his
wife,
Ruby
out
I'm.
Also
a
I
also
live
on
the
south
street
I
live
at
101,
LaSalle
Street,
so
I'm
literally
the
next
block
down
from
the
house,
and
so
it's
really
a
pleasure
to
work
on
Ruby
and
Shawn's
house
hearing
and
neighbor
down
the
street.
AS
So
the
the
existing
house
is
fairly
typical
of
some
of
the
bungalows
around
the
area
on
the
south
street
and
some
of
the
neighborhood's
neighboring
streets.
It's
rather
small
and
the
rooms
inside
are
quite
small
and
it's
one
of
the
smaller
houses
on
these.
These
logs,
which
are
quite
typical,
most
of
the
houses,
are
two
and
a
half
stories.
This
one
is
one
and
a
half
and
they
have
a
growing
family,
the
planning
of
growing
slightly
and
they
would
like
to
have
more
rooms.
AS
AS
So
if
you
look
at
the
top
left
at
the
drawing
on
this
sheet,
you
can
see
that
the
second
floor
addition
would
have
a
cascading
gable,
a
sort
of
child
gable
and
sign
of
carrot,
cable
that
would
be
further
recessed
back
another
13
feet
or
so
from
the
front
of
the
existing
house.
So
the
design
of
the
addition
would
attempt
to
work
within
the
architectural
language
of
the
existing
house,
and
I
mean
we
carry
the
the
roofline
or
of
the
first
floor,
the
eave
line
around
the
sides
in
the
back
of
the
houses.
A
AS
The
addition,
it
would
be
eight
feet
and
then
most
of
the
in
the
bathroom
in
the
proposed
master
bathroom,
the
rest
of
the
master
master
closet.
The
rest
of
the
proposed
a
master
bedroom
suite
would
be
a
cathedral
ceiling
above
eight
feet
are
some
yes
you're
approaching
3d
views
here,
which
would
be
very
helpful
for
you
to
understand
what
we're
proposing
and
so
yeah
the
site.
I'm,
sorry
I'm
sure.
J
AQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
and
record
support.
Yeah
we
had
an
abundance
meeting
back
in
February.
There
was
no
one
sheets
there
and
also
went
before
the
West
Roxbury
Neighborhood
Council
last
week,
June
16th
and
received
their
support
as
well.
Thank
you
thank.
A
W
AR
F
F
R
B
R
AT
J
AQ
A
AR
B
You
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero
five,
three
three
seven
one
one
sixty
Russett
Road,
this
enclosed
the
first
floor,
porch
and
add
a
sunroom
to
the
second
floor.
Above
it,
the
violation
is
article
56,
section
8,
the
fluidity
and
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
56,
section
8,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
56,
section
8,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AU
AU
Basically,
the
building's
footprint
will
be
exactly
the
same,
and
on
the
top
of
that
of
the
new
entry,
we
would
like
to
add
another
room
on
the
second
floor
which
gonna
create
our
office
for
my
wife,
which
you
know
she
found
out
that
she's
gonna
permanently
work
at
home,
so
that
would
be
a
really
nice
office
for
her.
This.
AI
J
AQ
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
We
had
in
the
butters
meeting
in
April,
none
of
the
neighbors
showed
up
and
it
went
before
the
West
Roxbury
Council
last
week
on
June
16th
and
received
their
support
as
well.
Thank
you.
AR
J
R
B
A
next
case
calling
do
a
one:
zero,
two,
six,
six,
six,
six
thirty
Sturgis
Road.
This
is
to
expand
the
living
space
in
the
back
of
the
house
where
a
screen
porch
currently
exists
and
expand
and
renovate
the
kitchen
add
a
bedroom.
On
a
second
level
of
addition,
the
violations,
article
9
section
1
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
56
section
8,
Vilonia
ratio
is
excessive.
An
article
56
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AG
The
morning
this
is
Kalia
for
heart:
I
am
the
architect
on
this
project
here
on
behalf
of
the
home
owners
and
residents,
Jessica
and
David
party.
So
what
we
are
looking
for
here
is
to
get
a
variance
on
the
fer,
the
the
side
yard
violation
is
existing,
so
there
was
no
change
to
that.
The
current,
if
ALR,
will
be
allowable
if
they
are
when
this
bubble
points
the
worst.
AG
The
existing
is
one
four
six,
and
with
this
proposed
renovation,
it
would
be
one
point:
five,
four
we're
adding
three
hundred
ninety
seven
square
feet,
and
that
would
be
over
two
levels,
so
the
addition
would
be
would
extend
the
kitchen
on
the
back
of
the
house.
There
is
an
existing
swing
towards.
We
would
keep
that
footprint
from
that
footprint.
The
fourteenth
it
would
stay.
The
same
would
widen
that
towards
the
existing
bulkhead
to
create
an
entry
porch
in
a
small
mudroom
and
then
above
that
would
be
a
new
bedroom
and.
J
AQ
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
jeff
duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
We
are
the
butters
meeting
back
in
january.
A
couple
neighbors
showed
up.
They
were
all
support
and
went
before
the
west,
roger
Neighborhood
Council
on
January
21st
and
received
their
support
as
well.
Thank
you.
A
B
B
B
So
the
first
case
bo
a
1
0
to
9
3
4
456
Green
Street,
was
to
a
dirĂa
dormer
and
rebuild
an
existing
second
floor
deck.
It
was
approved
case
bo,
a
1
0
to
9
3
4
to
16
Hill
Street
was
touching
exterior
roof
line
through
a
large
front
and
rear
door.
Mazzanti
remodel
a
first-floor
kitchen,
a
third
floor;
master
bedroom,
suite
structural
header,
the
third
floor
to
remove
existing
chimney.
B
It
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case
bo
a
one,
zero
three
four
six,
two
six,
thirty
seventh
white
street
was
to
construct
a
roof
deck
with
roof,
hatches
and
construct
a
red
deck,
both
exclusive
to
the
unit.
It
was
approved
pending
the
Sultan
Lea
max
decision
of
approval
case
bo
a
one,
zero
three,
four,
six,
two
five,
thirty
seven
Dwight
Street.
It
was
denied
case
bo
a
one,
zero.
B
Four,
eight,
two,
two
seven
four,
forty
four
West
4th
Street
was
the
frame
a
shared
dormer
and
in
the
front
of
the
house
it
was
approved
case
boa
one:
zero:
five,
zero;
five;
six
to
thirteen
mill
street.
It
was
install
a
deck
on
the
top
of
the
roof
and
deck
on
top
of
the
garage
installed,
one
one
sliding
door.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
one
zero.
Four,
three,
two
one
858
Rockne
Avenue.
It
was
obstructing
one-story
bathroom
addition.
B
It
was
approved
with
the
proviso
that
a
bedroom
that
the
bathroom
included
a
window
case
boa
one
zero.
Three
six,
seven,
three
337
Melville
Avenue
was
in
addition
of
the
kitchen
one-story
remodel
three
bathrooms,
two
kitchens,
two
staircases.
It
was
approved
case,
boa
one
zero,
four,
three,
four,
three,
two,
twenty
eight
Rosalyn
Street
was
the
use
of
premises
for
two
parking
spaces.
It
was
denied
without
prejudice
case,
boa
one,
zero.
Four,
six,
five,
seven
to
eleven
to
thirteen
Halifax
Street
was
the
employed,
a
ratio,
sorry
interior
and
exterior
renovation
of
attic.
B
With
dormice
and
new
exterior
windows.
It
was
approved
at
BPD
a
case
boa
one:
zero,
two,
seven,
six:
zero,
eight
twenty
two:
twenty
two
Bradfield
Avenue
with
adding
two-car
parking
space
in
the
front
and
removing
the
existing
landscape.
It
was
approved
with
P
PDA
and
to
reduce
the
curb
cut
to
a
12-foot
case.
Boa
one:
zero
to
nine
one:
nine
seven.
Ninety
six
cheeseburger
road
was
constructed
new
mudroom
front,
porch
and
second-story
addition
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling.
B
It
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case,
boa
one,
zero,
two,
seven,
two
three
three
thirty
eight
Lynette
Street
it
was
an
attic
conversion
and
a
master
bedroom
and
bath.
It
was
approved
with
BPD
a
case
boa
one:
zero
to
nine
to
zero
to
150.
Sanborn
Avenue
was
a
demo,
an
existing
right
side,
mudroom,
reconstructed,
larger
and
construct
a
new
red
deck,
the
renovate
basement.
First,
in
the
second
floor,
it
was
approved
in
the
last
case
case,
boa
one,
zero,
two
three
three
five,
seven
fourteen
Thurlow
Street.
B
A
Motion
carries
can
all
board
members
stay
on
the
line
just
for
one
minute
and
isd
stop,
so
that
we
can
see
what
worked
and
what
didn't
work
so
that
we
can
tighten
it
up
for
next
week.
Ok,
so
the
meeting
is
now
a
judge,
a
quick
question:
what
do
you
think
didn't
work
because
I
know
ed
and
and
Carrie-
and
this
is
the
first
time
for
you
around.